YALE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY mclmmtital f^tetorg gotitty. estafclfe&rii for tf)t pufclfcatfon antr wjraMfcatfon of €Wvtf) It'storwsi, &t* 1847. ECCLESIASTICAL HISTORY SOCIETY STRYPE'S MEMORIALS OF ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. IN THREE VOLUMES. VOL. II. OXFORD: PRINTED BY T. COMBE, PRINTER TO THE UNIVEBSITY, FOB THE ECCLESIASTICAL HISTORY SOCIETY. M.DCCC.XLVIII. C-y MEMORIALS MOST REVEREND FATHER IN GOD THOMAS CRANMER, SOMBTHIB LORD ARCHBISHOP OF CANTERBURY, THE HISTORY OF THE CHURCH, THE REFORMATION OF IT, DURING THE PRIMACY OF THE SAID ARCH BISHOP, ARE GREATLY ILLUSTRATED ; AND MANY SINGULAR MATTERS RELATING THEREUNTO, NOW FIRST PUBLISHED (1694) IN THREE BOOKS. COLLECTED CHIEFLY FROM RECORDS, REGISTERS, AUTHENTIC LETTERS, AND OTHER ORIGINAL MANUSCRIPTS. BY JOHN STRYPE, M.A. VOL. II. OXFORD: PRINTED BY T. COMBE, PRINTER TO THE UNIVEBSITY, FOB THE ECCLESIASTICAL HISTORY SOCIETY. 1848. ADVERTISEMENT TO THE READER. A MONG those to whom the Editor has been -^*- most indebted in the preparation of this volume, he is bound especially to name his grace, the most reverend the archbishop of Canterbury, patron of the Ecclesiastical History Society, who has liberally permitted him to have free access to the Registers and other MSS. preserved in the archiepiscopal library at Lambeth ; to whom he would most respectfully beg to be allowed to tender his most grateful thanks. His especial thanks are also due to J. B. Lennard, esq., Privy Council Office, Whitehall, for the facilities kindly afforded by him for the collation of the MSS. Council Books under his care. He would also thankfully acknowledge his obligations to the Rev. J. Thomas, M.A., librarian to his grace the archbishop of Canterbury; the Rev. A. Hackman, M.A. Christ Church, Oxford; the Rev. H. Christ mas, M.A., F.R.S., F.S. A., librarian of Sion College; and Felix Knyvett, esq., the Palace, Lambeth. Ecclesiastical History Society's Office, Strand, London, July 13, 1848. CONTENTS OF BOOK II. MEMORIALS OF ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. CHAPTER I. He crowns king Edward. Conceives great hopes of king Edward. The archbishop takes Anno 1546. a commission to execute his office. King Edward crowned by the archbishop. The manner of the coronation. The archbishop's speech at the coronation 1—9. CHAPTER II. A royal visitation. A royal visitation on foot. The visitors. The method of this Anno 1547. visitation. The Homilies, and Erasmus' Paraphrase. 10 — 16. CHAPTER III. Homilies, and Erasmus' Paraphrase. The archbishop to Winchester concerning the Homilies. The Anno 1547. Archbishop, &c. compose homilies. Winchester in the Fleet. The bishop of Winchester's censure of the homily of Sal- x THE CONTENTS. vation : and of the archbishop for it. Winchester's censure of Erasmus' Paraphrase. His account of his commitment. Erasmus vindicated. Winchester's letter to Somerset con cerning these things. The archbishop appoints a thanksgiv ing for a victory. The archbishop to the bishop of Lon don 17 — 35- CHAPTER IV. A convocation. Anno 1547. A convocation in the first year of the king. Dr. Redman's judgment of priests' marriage. The archbishop's influence on the parliament. The communion in both kinds esta blished. The archbishop's queries concerning the mass. The archbishop assists at the funeral of the French king. The marquis of Northampton's divorce committed to the archbishop. Processions forbid by his means. Examines the offices of the church 36 — 45. CHAPTER V. The archbishop's Catechism. Anno 1547. The archbishop puts forth a catechism, and a book against Unwritten Verities. His care of Canterbury 46 — 52. CHAPTER VI. The archbishop's care of the university. Anno 1547. The archbishop's influence upon the university. Some of St. John's college apply to him upon the apprehension of a dan ger. Offended with some of this college, and why. The ill condition and low estate of the university. An address of the university to the archbishop. The sum thereof. The success of the university's address to him and others. An other address to him against the townsmen. Roger As- cham's application to him for a dispensation for eating flesh. Favourably granted by the archbishop. The archbishop's THE CONTENTS. xi opinion concerning Lent. Ascham acquaints him with the present state of the university, as to their studies. Sir John Cheke, the archbishop's dear friend, the prime instrument of politer studies there. The impediments of the univer sity's flourishing state laid before him 53 — 76. CHAPTER VII. Dr. Smith and others recant. Dr. Smith recants at Paul's Cross. His books. Gardiner of- Anno 1547. fended with this recantation. Other university-men recant. Smith affronts the archbishop, His inconstancy. The archbishop's admonition to the vicar of Stepney. The archbishop licenseth an eminent preacher. Who preacheth against the errors and superstitions of the church. Is bound to answer for his sermon at the assizes. How far the re formation had proceeded. Ridley consecrated bishop. 77 — 88. CHAPTER VIII. The church's goods embezzled. New opinions broached. Churches profaned. Church ornaments embezzled. The Anno 1548. council's letter to the archbishop thereupon. A form of prayer sent to the archbishop ; with the council's letter. New opinions broached. Champneys revokes six articles ; and abjures. Other heresies vented. Assheton's recantation. Other errors still. Joan Bocher's heresy. Latimer's cen sure of her. George van Paris 89 — 101. CHAPTER IX. The archbishop visits. The archbishop visits his diocese. His articles for the clergy ; Anno 1548. and for the laity. An exchange made between the arch bishop and the lord Windsor. Farrar bishop of St. David's consecrated. Some account of this bishop. The archbishop swayed by Farrar's enemies 102 — 11 1. xii THE CONTENTS. CHAPTER X. The archbishop answers the rebels' articles. Anno 1549. Rebellion in Devon. The archbishop answers the rebels' ar ticles. Some account thereof. Crispin, Moreman, Car dinal Pole. The archbishop procures sermons to be made against the rebellion. Peter Martyr's sermon upon this oc casion. The French take occasion at this rebellion. Bucer's discourse against the sedition. The archbishop's prayer, com posed for this occasion 112 — 122. CHAPTER XI. Bishop Boner deprived. Anno 1 549. The archbishop deprives Boner. Discourse between the arch bishop and him concerning his book ; and concerning the sa crament. Chargeth the archbishop concerning the preachers he allowed. The archbishop's answer to Boner's declaration. Papists insist upon the invalidity of the laws made in the king's minority. An ordination of priests and deacons. The office of ordination reformed. The archbishop visits some vacant churches ; St. David's, Glocester, Norwich, London. A new dean of the arches 1 23 — 134. CHAPTER XII. Duke of Somersefs troubles. — The Common Prayer ratified. Anno 1 549. The archbishop writes to the lords at Ely-house. Their an swer. The archbishop gets the Common Prayer-book con fined 135— J39- CHAPTER XIII. The archbishop entertains learned foreigners. Anno 1549. The archbishop harbours learned strangers. Bucer writes in the archbishop's family. The archbishop's guests. Martyr dedi cates his lectures at Oxon to the archbishop. The archbishop writes to Bucer to come over. Bucer and Fagius professors THE CONTENTS. xiii at Cambridge. Fagius dies. The archbishop sends money to Fagius' widow. Bucer laments his loss 140 — lji. CHAPTER XIV. Peter Martyr disputes in Oxford, being challenged thereunto. Peter Martyr challenged pubhcly to a disputation. His answer Anno 1549. hereunto. Declines it at present ; and why. They agree upon the conditions of a disputation. They dispute. Martyr sends the sum of the disputation to the archbishop. The dis putation published by Martyr : and by Tresham. Smith writes to the archbishop from Scotland. Disputations at Cambridge before the commissioners. Bucer disputes. His judgment of the sacrament 152 — 174. CHAPTER XV. Matters of the church, and its state now. Relics of popery remaining. The council gives orders to the Anno 1549. justices : and writes to the bishops. Neglect in London. Adulteries frequent. Books dispersed by protestants. [Letter to the lord protector.] Preaching against Lent. Gardiner's judgment of a rhyme against Lent. Latimer counsels the king about marriage. Foreign protestants, their offer to king Edward 1 75 — 193. CHAPTER XVI. Ridley made bishop of London. — The Communion-Book reviewed. Ridley made bishop of London. [Ridley's letter.] Rochester Anno 1550. vacant. Bucer writes to Dorset not to spoil the church. The Common Prayer-Book reviewed. Bucer and Martyr employed in it 194—204. CHAPTER XVII. Hoper 's troubles. Hoper nominated for bishop of Gloucester. He and Ridley con- Anno 1550, fer about the habits. The archbishop writes to Bucer for his XIV THE CONTENTS. judgment in this matter. The questions. Martyr writes to Hoper. Hoper's two objections considered. Another ob jection of Hoper considered. Other things urged by him. Hoper confined to his house, and silenced. Committed to the archbishop's custody. Sent to the Fleet. Hoper conforms. Martyr to Gaulter concerning Hoper's conformity. 20J — 219. CHAPTER XVIII. Bishop Hoper visits his diocese. Anno 1550. Hoper visits his diocese. His articles of religion. His injunc tions and interrogatories. Holds Worcester "in commen- dam : " and visits that church and see. Goes over both his dioceses again. The council's order concerning the two canons. License for the bishop of Glocester to attend upon the duchess of Somerset in the Tower. Other matters relating to this bishop 220 — 227. CHAPTER XIX. Troubles of bishop Gardiner. Anno 1550. Divers great lords repair to Gardiner. The council's proceed ings with him. Articles propounded to him to subscribe. Winchester sequestered for three months. The sequestration expires. The commissioners sit to examine him. A letter of some noblemen, whom he had belied. Gardiner offers his book against Cranmer to the commissioners. He is deprived. The council's order for his strait confinement. Poynet made bishop of Winton 228 — 244. CHAPTER XX. Bishop Hethe and bishop Day, their deprivations. Anno 1550. Other popish bishops dealt with. Bishop Hethe's troubles. Sent for before the council. Day, bishop of Chichester, his trou bles. Bishop Day will not pull down altars. Appears before the council. The archbishop and bishop of Ely reason with him. The council give him time to confer. Before the council THE CONTENTS. xv again. Before the council the third time. And the fourth time, when he was sent to the Fleet. Commissioners ap pointed for Worcester and Chichester. They are deprived. Placed, the one with the lord chancellor, and the other with the bishop of London. Day writes to King's college for leav ing off masses. His unnatural carriage towards his brother. Preaches against transubstantiation. His change charged on him 245 — 262. CHAPTER XXI. Papists grow bold. — Loose professors restrained. The papists write libels. Several papists now taken up. Ched- Anno 1550. sey, Morgan, sir Anthony Brown, White. Other professors restrained 263 — 268. CHAPTER XXII. Foreigners allowed churches. A Lasco. The archbishop's care of the souls of strangers residing here. Anno 1550. The Dutch congregation under John & Lasco. The occasion of his coming into England. His business here. From Embden he wrote to the archbishop ; and to Cecyl. The sad condition of the protestants there. Latimer mentions a Lasco to the king. Contest among a Lasco's people. The care of A Lasco over his church, and its privileges. Favourably received by the lord chancellor Goodrich. La bours with the secretary to procure letters from the council in behalf of his church. The extent of his superintendency. Melancthon thought to shelter himself under him. His great abilities for government. Erasmus' praise of him. Purchased Erasmus' library. A Lasco a married man. His influence in the reformation under queen Elizabeth. Blamed for meddling in our controversies. A church of Italians con stituted in London. Michael Angelo their minister. The service the archbishop did for this church : and for the minister. Divers of this church fall out with their minister, and go to mass again. A conjecture at the cause thereof. xvi THE CONTENTS. Their minister sends their names to the secretary, and accuses them. The morals of this man tainted. Writes a penitent letter to the secretary. A French church also in London 269 — 285. CHAPTER XXIII. The church at Glastenbury. Anno 1550. Another church of strangers at Glastenbury. Their trade weaving. Valerandus PoUanus their preacher and superin tendent. How they come to fix here. Conditions of trade between Somerset and them. Their trade obstructed by the troubles of Somerset. Apply themselves again to the council, and to the secretary Cecyl. The council become their patrons, and assist them. Orders from the lords to set this manufac ture forwards. PoUanus very serviceable to them. An apology for the largeness of the former relation. After the king's death they remove to Frankfort. [Troubles at Frankfort.] Prove friends to the English exUes there. A Spanish church. Cassiodorus and Corranus their preachers. Many of king Philip's Spaniards become protestants. Great numbers of protestants in Spain and Italy 286 — 296. CHAPTER XXIV. The archbishop's care of the revenues of the church. — Bucer dies. Anno 1550. The archbishop labours to preserve the revenues of the church The detaining the church revenues a scandal to the reforma tion. Calvin to the archbishop upon this matter : and to the duke of Somerset. Bucer publicly disputeth at Cambridge. Dieth. The university wrote up concerning his death. Bucer's library. His widow retires to Germany. The correspondence between him and Martyr. A plot of the papists at Oxon against Martyr, at an Act. Martyr's judgment of the Com munion-Book. Bucer's great dangers. Poynet consecrated, and Hoper ¦ 297 — 31 1 THE CONTENTS. xvii CHAPTER XXV. The archbishop publisheth his book against Gardiner. Cranmer publisheth his book of the sacrament. His first book Anno 1551, of that subject. Wrote against by Gardiner and Smith. Vindicated in another book by the archbishop. The method of the archbishop's reply. The judgments made of this book. How the archbishop came off from the opinion of the cor poral presence. The archbishop's great skill in controversy. Peter Martyr enlightened by Cranmer. Foxe's conjecture of the archbishop. A second book of Gardiner against the archbishop. The archbishop begins a third book, [but fives not to finish it.] Martyr takes up the quarrel. Cranmer puts out his book of the sacrament in Latin. Printed again at Embden. Cranmer's second book intended to be put into Latin. Some notes of Cranmer concerning the sacrament. Martyr succeeds Cranmer in this province. Writes against Gardiner and Smith 31 2 — 339. CHAPTER XXVI. The duke of Somerset's death. — New bishops. The duke of Somerset's death. Winchester supposed to be in Anno 1551. the plot. Articles against the duke. What he is blamed for. The new "book of Common Prayer established. [Troubles at Frankfort.] Coverdale made bishop of Exon. Scory, bishop elect of Rochester. The archbishop appoints a guardian of the spiritualties of Lincoln; and of Wigorn ; and of Chichester; and of Hereford ; and of Bangor. Hoper visits his diocese. Two disputations concerning the sacrament. Dr. Redman dies. [The sweating sickness.] The archbishop and others appoint ed to reform ecclesiastical laws. The method they observed. Scory, Coverdale, consecrated 340 — 363. CHAPTER XXVII. The Articles of Religion. The Articles of Religion framed and published. The archbishop's Anno 1552. diligence in them. The archbishop retires to Ford. 364 — 368. CRANMER, VOL. II. b xviii THE CONTENTS. CHAPTER XXVIII. Persons nominated for Irish bishoprics. Anno 1552, Consulted with for fit persons to fiU the Irish sees. Some account of the four divines nominated by him for the archbishopric of Armagh. Mr. Whitehead; Mr. Turner; Thomas Rosse, or Rose ; Robert Wisdom. The character the archbishop gave of the two former. Turner designed for Armagh : but declines it. Goodacre made archbishop of Armagh. Letters from the council to Ireland, recommending the Irish bishops 369 — 382. CHAPTER XXIX. The archbishop charged with covetousness. Anno 1552. A rumour given out of the archbishop's covetousness and wealth : which Cecyl sends him word of. The archbishop's answer for himself and the other bishops. This very slander raised upon him to king Henry. King Henry promised him lands. This promise performed by king Edward. His purchases. The archbishopric fleeced by king Henry. Lands passed away to the crown by exchange. Lands made over to the archbishop. The archbishop parted also with Knoll and Otford to the king. What moved him to make these exchanges. His cares and fears for the king .... 383 — 390. CHAPTER XXX. His care for the vacancies. — Falls sick. Anno 1352. His care for filling the vacancies of the church. Laboured under an ague this autumn. The great mortality of agues about this time. That which most concerned him in his sickness. The secretary sends the archbishop the copy of the emperor's pacification 391 — 393. CHAPTER XXXI. His kindness for Germany. Anno 155a. His kindness for Germany. His correspondence with Germany ; THE CONTENTS. xix and with Herman archbishop of Cologne. The suitableness of both these archbishops' dispositions. Their diligence in reforming 396 — 402 CHAPTER XXXII. Troubles of bishop Tonstal. The troubles of bishop Tonstal. The cause of this bishop's Anno 1552. punishment. A bill in parliament to attaint Tonstal. The care of the diocese committed to the dean 403 — 40J. CHAPTER XXXIII. The new Common Prayer. — The archbishop in Kent. The new Common Prayer began to be used. This book put Anno 15^2. into French for the king's French subjects. The age stiU vicious. A new sect in Kent. The archbishop's business in Kent. A letter for installing bishop Hoper. The vicar of Beden. Sampson and Knox. The councU favour Knox. John Taylor consecrated 406 — 413. CHAPTER XXXIV. A Catechism. The archbishop opposeth the exclusion of the lady Mary Great use made of the archbishop at council. The Articles of Anno 1553. religion enjoined by the king's authority. The catechism for schools. A catechism set forth by the synod. The archbishop opposeth the new settlement of the crown. Denieth before the councU to subscribe to the exclusion of the lady Mary. Sets his hand. The archbishop ungrate- fuUy dealt with. The councU subscribe and swear to the limited succession 414 — 423- CHAPTER XXXV. The king dies. The king dies. His character. The archbishop delights in Anno 1553. this prince's proficiency. King Edward's writings. The b2 xx THE CONTENTS. king's memorial for religion. The archbishop frequent at council. His presence in the council in the year 1550. In the year 1551. In the year 1552. And 1553. John Harley consecrated bishop 24 — 440. Places THE APPENDIX TO BOOK II. whence transcribed. WUkins' XXXIV *. Injunctions given by the most exceUent prince, Ed ward the Sixth, by the grace of God, king of England, France, and Ireland, defender of the faith, and in earth under Christ, of the church of England and of Ireland, the supreme head : to all and singular his loving subjects, as weU of the clergy as of the laity 443. Foxii MSS. XXXV. The bishop of Winchester to archbishop Cranmer : relating to the reformation of religion 460. Vespas. XXXVI. Gardiner, bishop of Winton, to the duke of Somerset, D 18 ¦ concerning the book of Homilies and Erasmus' Paraphrase, Englished 467 . StiUingfleet XXXVI *. Questions put concerning some abuses of the mass, with the answers that were made by many bishops and di vines to them 475. Sir W. XXXVII. Roger Ascham to Mr. Cecyl, giving him an account MSS^ of a disPutation m St. John's College whether the mass and the Lord's supper be all one 479. Aschami XXXVIII. The university of Cambridge to the archbishop. 482. Ep.Becon's XXXIX. Richard Smith's, D. D. recantation of his books.. . 483. Reports. Cranm. XXXIX*. The sentence against Joan of Kent, with the certi ficate made upon it 488. Concilia. XXXIX **• Articles to be inquired of in the visitations to be had within the diocese of Canterbury, in the second year of the reign of our dread sovereign lord, Edward the Sixth, by the grace of God, king of England, France, and Ireland, THE CONTENTS. xxi defender of the faith, and in earth of the church of England, and also of Ireland, the supreme head 492. XL. Archbishop Cranmer's answers to the fifteen articles ofMSS. the rebels, Devon, anno 1549 502. C-C,c-C' XLI. The archbishop's notes for an Homily against the Re- Ibid. beUion 562. XLH. The lady Mary to the council, justifying herself for Sir W. using the mass in king Edward's minority 565. S!??6'9-' XLH *. Letters from the lords of the council at Windsor to Stow's the lords of the councU in London, with answers, &c. 567. Anllals' &0- XLII **. The king's order, and the mandate of the archbishop Wilkins' of Canterbury, for bringing in popish rituals 577. Loncl ia- XLIII. The archbishop's letter to Martin Bucer, inviting himBuceri over into England ^8l Script. Ang. XL1V. A catalogue of books published by Paulus Fagius. . . 582. XLIV*. To Martin Bucer 586. MSS.C.C C.C. [XLIV.] Dr. Cox, the chancellor of the university of Oxford, P. Mart. his oration at the conclusion of Peter Martyr's disputa- uPera- tion 5^8- XLV. Dr. Tresham's epistle to his relation of the disputation Foxii MSS. between himself and Peter Martyr at Oxford 392. XLVI. The sententious sayings of master Martin Bucer upon Ibid. the Lord's supper 597- XLVI*. Injunctions &c. given to Boner by the council . . 6n.Foxe's Acts and Mon. XLVI**. R. V. Domino Joanni Hoppero, episcopo Glocestriensi. P. Martyr. Videtur huic inscripta, quamvis in avroypd.-\guidem omnis juris dicendi autoritas, atque etiam jurisdictio omnimodo, tarn ilia quae ecclesiastica dicitur, quam secularis, a regia potestate, velut a supremo capite, ac omnium ma- gistratuum infra regnum nostrum fonte et scaturigine, pri- mitus emanaverit," &c. That is, " Since all authority of 142 exercising jurisdiction, and also all kind of jurisdiction, as well that which is called ecclesiastical, as secular, origi nally hath flowed from the king's power, as from the supreme head, and the fountain and source of all ma gistracy within our kingdom : we therefore in this part yielding to your humble supplications, and consulting for the good of our subjects, have determined to commit our place to you, under the manner and form hereunder de scribed." And the king then licenseth him to ordain within his diocese, and to promote and present to eccle siastical benefices; and to institute and invest; and, if occasion required, to deprive; to prove testaments, and the rest of the business of his courts. And so all the rest of his offices were reckoned. This was dated Feb. 7, 1546. But yet all these things were committed to him, with a power of revocation of the exercise of this authority re served in the king, " et durante beneplacito." Thus a formal Hist. Ref. commission was made to him ; I do not transcribe it, be- I546-] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 3 cause the bishop of Sarum hath saved me that pains", p. u. Coll. And hence I find, that the archbishop in some of hisp-9°" writings is styled, "The commissary of our dread sovereign lord king Edward." One of the first exercises of his episcopal power was the King Ed- coronation of young king Edward ; which was celebrated crowned by February the 20th, at the abbey of Westminster, the arch- ^rch- bishop assisting now at his coronation, as he had done about nine years before at his christening, when he stood his godfather. The form and solemnity of it, and wherein C. C. C. C. the archbishop bore so great a part, was in this manner, Misceuan. as I collect and transcribe out of a manuscript in BenetB- Collegeb. First, there was a goodly stage, richly hanged with cloth The man- of gold and cloth of arras ; and the steps from the choir coronation. contained two and twenty steps of height; and down to the high altar but fifteen steps, goodly carpeted, where the king's grace should tread on withc his nobles. Secondly, The high altar richly garnished with divers and costly jewels and ornaments of much estimation and value. And also the tombs on each side the high altar richly hanged with fine gold arras. Thirdly, In the midst of the stage was a goodly thing made of seven steps of height, all round, where the king's majesty's chair-royal stood ; and he sat therein, after he was crowned, all the mass-while. Fourthly, At nine of the clock all Westminster choir was in their copes, and three goodly crosses before them : and after them other three goodly rich crosses, and the king's chapel with his children, following all in scarlet, « [See Burnet's History of b [MSS. C.C.C.C. No. cv. p. Reformation, vol. ii. pt. ii. B. i. 235-240; from which the text No. 2. pp. 131-133- ed. Oxon. has been corrected.] i82q.] c [" Should tread with. "Strype.] b2 4 MEMORIALS OF [II. 1. with surplices and copes on their backs. And after them ten bishops in scarlet with their rochets, and rich copes on their backs, and their mitres on their heads, did set forth at the west door of Westminster towards the king's palace, there to receive his grace; and my lord of Canterbury with his cross before him alone, and his mitre on his head. And so passed forthc in order, as before is said. And within a certain space after were certam blue cloths laid abroad in the church-floor against the king's coming, and so all the palace, even to York-place. 143 Then is described the setting forward to Westminster church to his coronation, unction, and confirmation. After all the lords in order had kneeled down and kissed his grace's right foot, and after held their hands between his grace's hands, and kissed his grace's left cheek, and so did their homage ; then began a mass of the Holy Ghost by my lord of Canterbury, with good singing in the choir, and organs playing. There at offering-time his grace offered to the altar a pound of gold, a loaf of bread, and a chalice of wine. Then, after the elevation of the mass, there was read by my lord chancellor d, in presence of all the nobles, a general pardon granted by king Henry the Eighth, father to our liege lord the king, that all shall be pardoned that have offended before the 28th day of January last past. When the king's majesty, with his nobles, came to the place of the coronation, within a while after, his grace was removed into a chair of crimson velvet, and borne in the chair between two noblemen unto the north side of the stage, and shewed to the people ; and these words spoken to the people by my lord of Canterbury, in this manner, 0 [" And so past forth." Strype.] the coronation of Edward VI. See d [Thomas Wriothesley, earl of Burnet's Hist, of Reformat, vol. Southampton, who was removed ii. p. 31. ed. Oxon. 1829.] from his office immediately after 1546-] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 5 saying : " Sirs, here I present unto you king Edward, the rightful inheritor to the crown of this realm ; [whose coro nation, unction, and confirmation is this day appointed by the nobles of this realme] . Wherefore all ye, that be come this day to do your homage, service, and bounden duty, be ye willing to do the same ?" To the which all the people cried with a loud voice, and said, "Yea, Yea, Yea ;" and cried, "King Edward;" and prayed, "God save king Edward." And so to the south side in Hke manner, and to the east side, and to the west side. After this, his grace was borne again to the high altar in his chair, and there sat bareheaded : and all the nobles f and peers of the realm were about his grace, and my lord of Canterbury prmcipal. And there said certain prayers s and godly psalms over his grace ; and the choir answered with goodly singing, the organs playing, and trumpets blowing. Then, after a certam unction, blessing, and singing of his grace, he was borne into a place by the high altar, where the kings use always to kneel at the elevation of the parlia ment-mass. And there his grace was made ready of new garments ; and after a certain space brought forth between two noblemen, and sat before the high altar bareheaded. Then after a while his grace was anointed in the breast, his soles of his feet, his elbows, his wrists of his hands, and his crown of his head, with virtuous prayer said by the bishop of Canterbury, and sung by the choir. Then anon after this, a goodly fair cloth of red tinsel gold was holden over his headh : and my lord of Canterbury, e [This paragraph is entirely ers." Id.] omitted by Strype.] h [" Was hung over his head." f[" All his nobles." Strype.J Id.] e ["There made certain pray- 6 MEMORIALS OF [II. I. Hist. Ref. vol. ii. Collect. P- 93- The arch bishop's speech at the coro nation. kneeling on his knees, and his grace lying prostrate' afore the altar, anointedk his back. Then, after this, my lord of Canterbury arose and stood up, and the fair cloth taken away. Then my lord pro tector, duke of Somerset, held the crown in his hand a certain space ; and immediately after began " Te Deum," with the organs going, the choir singing, and the trumpets playing in the battlements of the church. Then, imme diately after that, was the crown set on the king's ma- 144jesty's head by them two, [viz. Somerset, and the arch bishop of Canterbury.] And after that another crown; and so his grace was crowned with three crowns. The relation breaks off here abruptly. But what is wanting may be supplied by the order of the coronation, as bishop Burnet hath taken it out of the council-book, and given it us in his history1. At this coronation there was no sermon, as I can find ; but that was supphed by an excellent speech which was made by the archbishop. It was found among the in estimable collections of archbishop Usher™ ; and though 1 [" Laid prostrate." C. C. C . MSS.] k ["Altar and anointed." Id.] 1 [See Burnet's Hist, of Re format, vol. ii. pt. ii. B. i. No. 4. PP- !35-i39- ed. Oxon. 1829.] m [Search has been made from time to time for the original copy of this speech, but hitherto with out success. See Jenkyns' Re mains of Archbishop Cranmer, vol. ii. p. 118, note a. Works of Abp. Cranmer, vol. ii. p. 126. Park. Soc. ed. It has been col lated for this edition with the second part of " Foxes and Fire brands," (from which Strype has transcribed it, which was pub lished at Dublin, A. D. 1682, by Robert Warre,) who says ; " The collections in this second part are most of them either out of the memorials of that great minister of state, the lord Cecil, or from the testimonies of persons that are still living." Part i. To the reader, A. 4. — The inaccuracies of Strype are corrected in the text, and referred to in the fol lowing notes.] lS46-] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 7 pubhshed of late years, yet I cannot but insert it here. Foxes and tending so much to illustrate the memory of this great partii. and good archbishop. edPbublin 1682.] "Most dread and royal sovereign: the promises your highness hath made here at your coronation, to forsake the devil and all his works, are not to be taken in the bishop of Rome's sense, when you commit any thing dis tasteful to that see, to hit your majesty in the teeth, as pope Paul the Third, late bishop of Rome, sent to your royal father, saying, ' Didst thou not promise, at our per mission of thy coronation, to forsake the devil and all his works, and dost thou turn to heresy" ? For the breach of this thy promise, knowest thou not, that it is in our power to dispose of the sword0 and sceptre to whom we please ?' We, your majesty's clergy, do humbly conceive that this promise reacheth not at your highness' sword, spiritual or temporal, or in the least at your highness' swaying the sceptre of this your dominion, as you and your predecessors have had them from God. Neither could your ancestors lawfully resign up their crowns to the bishop of Rome or to his legates p, according to their ancient oaths then taken upon that ceremony. "The bishops of Canterbury, for the most part, have crowned your predecessors, and anointed them kings of this land : yet it was not in their power to receive or re ject them, neither did it give them authority to prescribe them conditions to take or to leave their crowns; although the bishops of Rome would encroach upon your prede cessors by his bishops' act and oil and not by any precept of God's word ; as in that they should be bound by reason of any vow, which, in as far as my conscience is, priests in this church of England do not make : I think that it standeth well with God's word, that a man which hath been, and is but once married, being otherwise accordingly qualified, may be made a priest. And I think that forasmuch as canons and rules made in this behalf be neither universal nor everlasting, but upon considerations may be altered and changed : therefore the king's majesty, and the higher powers of the church, may, upon such reasons as shall move them, take away the clog of perpetual continency from the priests ; and grant that it may be lawful to such as cannot, or will not, contain, to marry one wife. And if she die, then the said priest to marry no more, remaining still in his ministration." p [John Redman, S.T.P. was ap- and died a.d. 1551. SeeLeNeve's pointed the first master of Trinity Fasti, p. 436.] college, Cambridge, a. d. 1546, 40 MEMORIALS OF [II. 4. Some larger account of this memorable convocation, Irenic. especially as to some of these matters then under their ' ' ' hands, may be read in bishop Stillingfleet's Irenicum, pubhshed by him from a manuscript volume once belong ing to archbishop Cranmer 9. The arch- In this convocation the archbishop bore the great sway ; fluenceVn" an(l what things were agitated herein were chiefly by his the parlia- motion and direction : some whereof were turned into laws ment. by the parliament, that was now sitting, through his ac- tiveness and influence. As particularly that repeal of the statute of the Six Articles, and of some other severe laws, decreeing divers things treason and felony, made in the former king's reign. For when the archbishop in the convocation had made a speech to the clergy, exhorting them to give themselves to the study of the Scriptures, and to consider what things in the church needed refor mation, that so the church might be discharged of ah popish trash, not yet thrown out ; some told him, that, as Hist. Ref. long as the Six Articles remained, it was not safe for them vol. ii. p. . 4o r. to dehver their opmions. This he reported to the council : upon which they ordered this act of repeal. The com- By his means also another great thing, moved in the mumon in 00, both kinds convocation, was now ratified, and made a law by this parhament : which was, for the administration of the com munion under both kinds throughout the kingdom of 158 England and Ireland. And upon this the king appointed Foxe. certain grave and learned bishops, and others, to assemble at Windsor Castle, there to treat and confer together; and to conclude upon and set forth one perfect and uniform order of communion, according to the rules of Scripture, and the use of the primitive church. And this being framed, it was enjoined to be used throughout the realm 1 [See Stillingfleet's Irenicum, pp. 387, 393. ed. Lond. 1660.] r [See Burnet's Hist, of Reformat, vol. ii. p. 83. ed. Oxon. 1829.] I547-J ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 41 by a proclamation, and all required to receive it with due reverence'. s [" Moreover in the same ses sion, (i. e. of parliament, i° Ed. vi. a. d. 1547, 8), his majes ty with the lords spiritual and temporal, and the commons in the same parliament assembled, throughly understanding by the judgment of the best learned, that it was more agreeable unto the first institution of the sacrament of the most precious body and blood of our Saviour Christ, and also more conformable to the common use and practice both of the apostles and of the primitive church, by the space of five hun dred years and more after Christ's ascension, that the said holy sa crament should be ministered unto all Christian people under both the kinds of bread and wine, than under the form of bread only, and also that it was more agreeable unto the said first institution of Christ, and the usage of the apo stles, and primitive church, that the people being present should receive the same with the priest than that the priest should receive it alone, did by their authority moreover enact, that the said holy sacrament should be from thence forth commonly dehvered and mi nistered unto the people through out the churches of England and Ireland, and other the king's do minions under both the kinds of bread and wine, except necessity otherwise required ; and also, that the priest that should minister the same, should at the least one day before, exhort all persons, which should be present, likewise to re sort and prepare themselves to receive the same. And at the day prefixed, after some godly ex hortation made by the minister, (wherein should be further ex pressed the benefit and comfort promised to them, which worthily receive this holy sacrament, and the danger and indignation of God threatened to them, which presume to receive the same un worthily, to the end that every man might try and examine, his own conscience before he should come thereunto), the said mi nister should not without a lawful cause deny the same to any per son, that would devoutly and humbly desire it: any law, sta tute, ordinance, or custom, con trary thereunto in any wise not withstanding. "After which most godly consent of the parliament, the king, being no less desirous to have the form of administration of the sacrament truly reduced to the right rule of the Scriptures, and first use of the primitive church, than he was to establish the same by the autho rity of his own regal laws, ap pointed certain of the most grave and best learned bishops and others of his realm, to assemble together, at his castle of Windsor, there to argue and intreat upon this matter, and conclude upon 42 MEMORIALS OF [H. The arch- I meet with a writing of the archbishop, without date, Series'3 consisting of queries concerning the mass, in order to the concerning ab0]ish.ing it, and changing it into a communion. Which the mass. n - , , I know not where so well to place as here, now the convo cation was employed upon this matter: for it seems to have been drawn up by the archbishop on purpose to be laid before the consideration of this house. The queries were these' : "What or wherein John, fasting, giving alms, being baptized, or receiving the sacrament of the altar" in England, doth profit and avail Thomas, dwelhng in Italy, and not knowing what John in England doth ? "Whether it profit themv that be in heaven, and wherein ? " Whether it lieth in the faster, giver of alms, receiver of the sacrament, him that is baptized, to defraudw any member of Christ's body of the benefit of fasting*, alms- deeds, baptism, or receiving of the sacrament ; and to ap ply the same benefit to one person more than to another ? " What thing is the presentation of the body and blood of Christ in the mass, which you call the oblation and sacrifice of Christ ? And wherein standeth it, in act, ges ture, or wordy; and in what act, gesture, or wordy? and set forth one perfect and uni- Chichesterf, and Hereford!, and form order according to the rule by many other bishops and di- and use aforesaid." Foxe's Acts vines.] and Monuments, p. 1299. ed. ¦* [" Sacrament of thanks." Lond. 1583.] Still. MSS.] * [Stillingfleet MSS. Lambeth T [" Whether the said acts of library, 1108. fol. 40. Original. John do profit them." Id.] These and the following questions w [" Whether it lieth in the said will also be found in the Appendix John to defraud." Id.] with the answers made to them x [" Of his fasting." ' Id.] by the bishops of Worcester*, 7 [" Gesture or words." Id.] * Nicholas Heath. f George Day. J John Skyp. J547-J ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 43 "Is there any rite or prayer, and expressed2 in the Scripture, which Christ used or commanded at the first institution of the mass, which we be now bound to use ; and what the same be ? "Whether in the primitive church there were any priests that lived by saying of mass, matins, and even-song, and praying for souls, only? And where any such state* of priesthood be allowed in the Scriptures b, or be meet to be allowed now ? " For what cause were it not expedient nor convenient to have the whole mass in the Enghsh tonguec ? " d Wherein consisteth the mass by Christ's institution ? "What time the accustomed order began first in the church, that the priests alone e should receive the sacra ment? "Whether it be convenient that the same custom con tinue still within this realm ? "Whether it be convenient that masses satisfactory should continue ; that is to say, priests hired to sing for souls departed ? " Whether the gospel ought to be taught at the time of the mass to the understanding of the people being present ? " Whether in the mass it were convenient to use such speech as the people may understand ?" To proceed to some other things wherein our archbishop The arch- was this year concerned. In June the church of St. Paul's sis9ts°at the was hanged with black, and a sumptuous hearse set up in 159 the choir, and a "Dirige" there sung for the French king, {^French z[" Prayer not expressed." Id.] * [Stillingfleet MSS. Lambeth mg- a ["And whether any such library 1108. fol. 6. Origi- state." Id.] nal.] b [" In the Scripture." Id.] e [" The priest alone." Still. c ["Whole mass in English." MSS.] Id.] 44 MEMORIALS OF [II. 4. who deceased the March precedent. And on the next day the archbishop, assisted with eight bishops more, all in rich mitres, and their other pontificals, did sing a mass stow. of requiem ; and the bishop of Rochester preached a fune ral sermon f. The mar- A nice matter was now put by the council to the arch- NrthLm - msh°P; having some other bishops and learned men joined ton's di- -with him, to the number of ten. The case was, "Whether ™tedT' a man divorced from his wife for her adultery might not Wshop*' lawfully marry again?" This was propounded upon the account of a great man in those times, namely, the brother of queen Katherine Par, marquis of Northampton, who had gotten a divorce from his wife, the daughter of Bouchier, earl of Essex, for adultery. The canon law would not allow marrying again upon a divorce, making divorce to be only a separation from bed and board, and not a dissolving the knot of marriage. This was a great question depending among the civilians. And it being ^committed to the determination of our archbishop, and f ["On the same 19. of June rige' was there sung, and on the was a ' Dirige' sung in every pa- next morrow, the archbishop of rish church in London, for the Canterbury, assisted of eight bi- French king late deceased, (to shops, all in rich mitres, and other wit, on the 22d of March last be- their pontificals, did sing a mass fore passed)*, also the church of of 'Requiem,' and the bishop of St. Paul in London, being hang- Rochesterf preached there a learn ed with black, and a sumptuous ed sermon." Stow's Chronicle, hearse set up in the quire, a ' Di- p. 594. ed. Lond. 1631.] * " II (i.e. Francis I.) mourut au chateau de Raimbouillet, le dernier jour de Mars 1547, age' de cinquante-deux ans, apres en avoir regne' trente-deux.'' Biograph. Univer. torn. xv. p. 347. ed. Paris. 1811-47. t Henry Holbeach was then bishop of Rochester, not having been elected to Lincoln till August 9th, 1547; it was not Holbeach, however, but Ridley, who preached this sermon, and he was not at that time even bishop elect of Rochester, as the conge, d'elire was not issued till the 1st of August follow ing. Stow is in error in this particular. See Gloucester Ridley's Life of bp. Ridley, pp. 184, 210, 211. 1547 J ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 45 some other delegates, (though the marquis staid not for their resolution, but in this interval married Ehzabeth, daughter of the lord Brooke, [lord Cobham]), he searched so diligently into the Scriptures first, and then into the opinions of fathers and doctors, that his col lection swelled into a volume, yet remaining in the hands Bp. of of a learned bishop of this realm ; the sum whereof is Hist. Ref. < digested by the bishop of Sarums. Cranmer seemed tovol'11-p'56' allow of marriage in the innocent person. He was a means also to the council of forbidding Processions forbid by processions : wherein the people carried candles on Can- his means. dlemas-day, ashes on Ash- Wednesday, palms on Palm- Sunday; because he saw they were used so much to superstition, and looked like festivals to the heathen gods. So that this year on Candlemas-day, the old cus tom of bearing candles in the church, and on Ash- Wed- stow. nesday following, giving ashes in the church, was left off through the whole city of London". He was a member of a committee this winter, appointed Examines to examine all the offices of the church, and to consider the church. where they needed reformation, and accordingly to reform them. Of this commission were most of the bishops, and several others of the most learned divines in the nation. And a new office for the communion was by them pre pared, and by authority set forth, as was observed before', and received all over England. e [See Burnet's Hist, of Re- of London."— "The Wednesday 'format, vol. ii. pp. 115-120. ed. following, [viz. Shrove-Sunday, Oxon. 1829.] Feb. 12, Monday, and Tues- h["And on the 2. of Febru- day,] commonly called Ash- Wed- ary, being the feast of the purifi- nesday, the use of giving ashes cation of our lady, commonly in the church was also left." — called Candlemas-day, the bear- Stow's Chronicle, p. 595.] ing of candles in the church was l [See above, p. 40.] left off throughout the whole city 46 MEMORIALS OF [H-5- CHAPTER V. THE ARCHBISHOP'S CATECHISM. The arch- This year the archbishop put forth a very useful cate- forth°PaPUtSchism, intituled, "A short instruction to Christian re- catechism, jjgjo^ for tke singular profit of children and young people)." This catechism went not by way of question and answer, but contained an easy exposition of the Ten Commandments, the Creed, the Lord's Prayer, and the 160 two Sacraments. The first and second commandments were put together as one, and the whole recital of the second omitted, according to the use in those times. But that commandment is explained under the first. The substance of this book is grave, serious, and sound doe- trine. It is said in the title-page, "to be overseen and corrected by the archbishop." Indeed it was a catechism wrote originally in the German language, for the use of the younger sort in Nuremburg; translated into Latin by Justus Jonas junior, who now was entertained by the archbishop in his family; and thence turned into our vulgar tongue by the said archbishop, or his special order. But it is certain, so great a hand he had therein, that in the archbishop's first book of the sacrament, he said, that it was " translated by himself, and set forthV Bi shop Gardiner, in his book against the archbishop, takes i [The catechism here referred diner. — See Works of abp. Cran- to was that set forth a.d. 1548, mer, vol. i. p. 190. Park. Soc. ed. translated from the Latin of Jus- — " And in a catechism by me tus Jonas, who had made this translated and set forth, I used version from the original German, like manner of speech, saying that in which he had written it,]. with our bodily mouths we receive k [" And as for ' the catechism the body and blood of Christ." — of Germany' by me translated Id. p. 226.] into English," &c. Answer to Gar- I547-] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 47 advantage of two things in this catechism against him, as though he himself, when he put it forth, was of the opinion of the corporal presence. The one was a picture that stood before the book, where was an altar with can dles lighted, and the priest apparelled after the old sort, putting the wafer into the communicant's mouth1. The other is an expression or two used somewhere in the book, " That with our bodily mouths we receive the body and blood of Christ :" and, "that in the sacrament we receive truly the body and blood of Christ:" and, "this we must beheve, if we will be counted Christian men." But to both, Cranmer in his next book against Gardiner made answer, "That as for the picture, it was that was set before the Dutch edition of the book, and so none of his doing; but that he afterwards caused the popish picture to be altered into a picture representing Christ eating his last supper with his disciples. As for the expressions," he said, " he taught, that we in the sacrament do receive the body and blood of Christ spiritually; and that the words really and substantially were not used, but truly"1." 1 [" But with such matter he a matter as clear contrary to the filleth his leaves, and forgetting matter of this book, as is light himself, maketh mention of the and darkness, which now this au- catechism by him translate, the thor would colour with speeches original whereof confuteth these of authors in a book written to two parts of this book in few instruct rude children; which words, being printed in Germany, is as slender an excuse as ever wherein, besides the matter writ- was heard, and none at all, when. ten, is set forth in picture the the original is looked on." — Gar- manner of the ministering of this diner's Explication, &c. touching sacrament; where is the altar, the Sacrament of the altar. — Id. with candle-light set forth, the pp. 226, 7.] priest apparelled after the old m ["And as concerning the sort, and the man to receive catechism, I have sufficiently an- kneeling, bare head, and holding- swered in my former book. But up his hands, whiles the priest in this place may appear to them ministereth the host to his mouth, that have any judgment, what 48 MEMORIALS OF [II. 5. And in his answer to Dr. Richard Smith's" preface, wrote against the said archbishop, who it seems had twitted him also with this catechism, he spake largely of these his expressions in his own vindication". And a book There was another book of the archbishop's against written UD" Unwritten verities, which I do by conjecture place here, as put forth under this year, or near this time0. Which verities. pithy arguments you make, and what dexterity you have in ga thering of author's minds, that would gather my mind, and make an argument here of a picture, neither put in my book, nor by me devised, but invented by some fond painter or carver, which paint and grave whatsoever their idle heads can fancy. You should rather have gathered your argument upon the other side, that I mislike the matter be cause I left out of my book the picture that was in the original before. And I marvel you be not ashamed to allege so vain a matter against me, which in deed is not in my book, and if it were, yet were it nothing to the purpose. And in that cate chism I teach not, as you do, that the body and blood of Christ is contained in the sacrament, being reserved, but that in the ministration thereof we receive the body and blood of Christ; whereunto if it may please you to add or understand this word, ' spiritually,' then is the doctrine of my catechism sound and good in all men's ears, which trow the true doctrine of the sacraments." Id. p. 227. — Facsimiles of the engravings prefixed to the exposi tion of the Lord's Supper in the original Latin catechism of Justus Jonas, and of that which was substituted in the English trans lation may be seen in Jenkyns' Remains of abp. Cranmer, vol. iii. P- 345-] n[See vol. i. p. 178. n. z.] 0 ["And if D. Smith under stood him (i. e. Peter Martyr) otherwise in his lectures at the beginning, it was for lack of knowledge, for that then D. Smith understood not the mat ter, nor yet doth not, as it ap- peareth by this foolish and un learned book, which he hath now set out ; no more than he under stood my book of the catechism, and therefore reporteth untruly of me, that I in that book did set forth the real presence of Christ's body in the sacrament." — The Answer to Smith's Preface. — See abp. Cranmer's Works, vol. i. p. 374. Park. Soc. ed.] 0 [" It is stated in the title-page that this ' Confutation of Unwritten verities,' was 'made by Thomas Cranmer, late archbishop of Can terbury,' and 'translated and set I547-J ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 49 I suppose Dr. Smith nibbled at in his book of traditions, which this year he recanted. The book was in Latin, and consisted only of allegations out of the Bible and ancient forth by E. P.' Strype goes far ther, and supposes that it was not only 'made' by the archbishop, but published by him in Latin in 1547. Yet it certainly was not ' made' by Cranmer in its present form : for the Preface and some other parts were avowedly written by the translator. And it may be doubted, whether it was ever pre pared by him for pubhcation at all; no complete copy of it in Latin, either printed or in manu script, having been yet discovered. The citations however, of which the work chiefly consists, are for the most part to be found in one of the archbishop's common place books in the British Mu seum, arranged under the same heads as in the 'Confutation.' And hence, perhaps, it may be conjectured, that, according to his usual practice, he formed a collection of authorities on the subject for his private use; that this collection fell after his death into the hands of the per son designated by the letters E. P. ; and that it was moulded by him, by addition, omission, and transposition, into the shape in which it now appears. Under these circumstances it cannot safely be quoted as evidence of Cranmer's tenets, and perhaps it scarcely ought to be admitted into a collection of his works. — Strype has ascribed to Cranmer another tract on Unwritten veri ties, published anonymously in 1548. But he does not bring forward any evidence in support of his opinion; and as he has manifestly fallen into much con fusion on this matter, his judg ment is of no great weight. And it is clear that the ' Confutation' . . is the only work on this sub ject by the archbishop, which was known to his contemporary Bale." — Jenkyns' Remains of abp. Cran mer, vol. iv. p. 144. — "The proba bility is, that Strype confounded this short tract with a larger book bearing a similar title, which was put forth in 1557 by an exile, de signating himself by the initials E. P., and which professed to be a translation from the Latin of the archbishop. But neither is this larger book free from all suspicion. Notwithstanding the statement in its title-page, bishop Tanner* has remarked, that though written, it seems never to have been printed in Latin : and it is indeed not unlikely, that it was com- * " The following is his remark : ' Confutation of Unwritten verities, written against Rich. Smith's book, De veritatibus non scriptis; qui liber Latine scriptus, nunquam ut mihi quidem videtur, in ea lingua impressus fuit.' — Tanner, Bibliotheca." CRANMER, VOL. II. E 50 MEMORIALS OF [II. 5. writers. In queen Mary's days the book was again pub hshed by an Enghsh exile, naming himself E. P. The title it now bore was, " A Confutation of Unwritten veri ties, by divers authorities, diligently and truly gathered out of the Holy Scripture, and ancient fathers, by Thomas Cranmer, late Archbishop, and burned at Oxford, for the defence of the true doctrine of our Saviour. Translated and set forth by E. P." Before it is a preface of the translator to his countrymen and brethren in England. In it he lamented the woful state of things in England, by the restoring of popery, and the persecution of pro testants there ; and shewed what a kind of man the chief bishop then in England, viz. cardinal Pole, was, who in 161 the last king's reign went from prince to prince, to excite them to make war against his own prince and country. This treatise is but a bare collection of places of holy Scripture, and ancient fathers, to prove, " That the canon of the Bible is a true, and sound, and perfect doctrine, containing all things necessary to salvation : that neither the writing of the old fathers, without the word of God, nor general councils, nor the oracles of angels, nor appa ritions from the dead, nor customs, can be sufficient in rehgion to estabhsh doctrine, or maintain new articles of faith." Then reasons are given against unwritten verities, and the places of holy Scripture, and other writers, which piled by E. P. out of some manu- matter which was put together by script notes by the archbishop, Cranmer, though probably with- still preserved in the British Mu- out any design of publication, seum. It is at least certain, that Dr. Jenkyns reprinted it in vol. the preface and the conclusion, iv. pp. 145-244. The other tract, together with some parts of the being thought tobe altogether spu- body of the work, must be rious, was placed by him in the ascribed entirely to the transla- Appendix (vol. iv. p. 358) to the tor."— Id. Preface, vol. i. p. lvi. Remains of abp. Cranmer.] — As it, however, contained much 1 547-] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 51 the papists bring to maintain unwritten verities, are answered. At last the objections of the papists are con futed, in a concluding chapter. Which last part was not writ by the archbishop, but by the translator. For re lating here the story of the holy maid of Kent, he saith, she was examined by Thomas Cranmer, archbishop of CanterburyP. And at last he saith, " I have plainly and fully answered to all that I remember the papists do, or can allege by writing, preaching, or reasoning, for the defence of their unwritten verities ; on which they build so many detestable idolatries and heresies. But yet, if any be able to answer so plainly and truly to the Scriptures, authorities, and reasons rehearsed by me as I have done to theirs, and to prove their doctrines by as plain testi monies and reasons as I have done mine, I shall not only acknowledge my ignorance and error, but I shall gladly return into England, recant my heresies," &cq. Hence it is plain, that the conclusion of the book, as well as the preface, was writ by the translator. I will add one passage taken out of this book, about the middle, whereby it may be seen what a clergy was now in England. Having quoted the canons of the apostles, " Let Can. 3. not a bishop or deacon put away his wife," &c, r he makes a heavy complaint against the frequent practice of beastly sins in the priests, adultery, &c. and that they never were punished. " And in my memory, (as he proceeds), which is above thirty years, and also by the information of others, that be twenty years elder than I, I could never learn that one priest was punished s." P [See abp. Cranmer's Works, \aPeias'eav8eeKJ3dK\T],d(popi£eo-8a' vol. ii. p. 65. Park. Soc. ed.] empevav 8e, Ka0aipeicrda>. Can. 1 [Id. p. 67.] Apost. Can. 5. Bruns. p. 2. ed. r [Id. p. 37. 'E7TIO-K07TOS, tj TTpC- BerOl. 1839.] o-fivrepos, r) 8uiKovos ttjv iavrov s [See abp. Cranmer's Works, yvva'iKa pfj do-et ev- vol. ii. pp. 37, 8.] E 2 52 MEMORIALS OF [II. 5- His care of This is some account of the care he took for the church bury"" in general as metropolitan. But he had a particular care of his own diocese, now his power was not checked, as it was in the former reign, especially of the city of Canter bury ; which had been formerly the backwardest in religion of any other place of his diocese. He supphed this city with store of excellent learned preachers, Turner, the two Ridleys, Becon, Besely, and John Joseph, who this year went along with the king's visitors as one of then- preachers t. These converted not a few to sincere rehgion ; as may appear by those numbers of Canterbury that in queen Mary's reign suffered the torment of fire for then- profession of the gospel. But in that reign all the preachers fled, so that there was scarce one remaining in the city: which was looked upon as a particular sign of God's dis pleasure against that place, because the professors there, and others, reformed not themselves according to those 162 opportunities of grace, which God had put into then- hands. And so I find in a letter to them, wrote by some Foxe's eminent person in prison in queen Mary's reign : " Alas ! how few faithful servants hath the Lord of life in these troublesome days within Canterbury, to whom above all other people, in comparison of multitude, he hath sent most plenteously his word, in the mouths of most excellent preachers. But even as the people were negli gent, hard-hearted, nothing willing to take the hvely word unto their defence against the world, the devil, and the flesh even so hath he permitted the same preachers to be dispersed, that not one of them should be a comfort able example to such an unkind people11." ' [See above, pp. 13, 14.] therein : it is probable that either " [" A letter from a prisoner Strype was incorrect in his refer- for the gospel in queen Mary's ence, or that some portion of this time" is preserved in the Harl. document may have been de- MSS. 416. Plut. lxv. E. fol. 159. stroyed.] but the above passage is not found I547-J ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 53 CHAPTER VI. THE ARCHBISHOP'S CARE OF THE UNIVERSITY. The archbishop was a great patron of all sohd learning, The arch- • i . -, bishop's in- bemg a very learned man himself. And knowing very well fluence up- how much the "hbertas philosophandi," and the know- ™r*ity unl" ledge of tongues, and the other parts of human learning, tended to the preparing men's minds for the reception of true rehgion, and for the detecting of the gross errors and frauds of popery, which could subsist only in the thick darkness of ignorance ; these things made him always cast a favourable aspect upon the universities, and especially that of Cambridge, whereof he himself was once a mem ber: which the governors and the rest of the gremials very well knew, and therefore did frequently apply to him, as often as they had need of the favour of the court or parhament. Roger Ascham, fellow of St. John's Col lege, and one of the floridest wits of this university, and who succeeded sir John Cheke in reading the Greek lec ture, said of him in a letter he sent him, (wherein he styled him " hterarum decus et ornamentum"), " That he was the man, who was accustomed to express great joy at the good progress of learning, such was his singular good will towards it; and when it went otherwise than well with it, he alone could apply a remedy; such was his sway and authority." And so much was he t le known Mecaenas of learning, that according to the pubhc encou- w [" Quoniam tu is es, qui li- potes, propter summam tuam au- teris progredientibus plurimum thoritatem. Unde literarum decus gaudere soles, propter singularem et ornamentum." — Epist. Rog. tuam erga illas voluntatem: et Aschami, p. 200. ed. Lond. eisdem laborantibus unice mederi 1590.] 54 MEMORIALS OF [II. 6. ragement or prejudice it received, so the vulgar accounted the praise or dispraise thereof to redound upon Cranmer. So that if learning were discountenanced, it was esteemed to cast some disparagement upon him ; if it flourished, it was a sign that Cranmer prevailed at court. For to that purpose do those words of the said Ascham to the arch bishop, in another letter, seem to tend : " Nulla hoc tem pore literis vel insperata clades, vel expectata commoditas accidere potest, cujus tu non aut author, ad magnam com- mendationem, aut particeps ad aliquam reprehensionem, voce ac sermone omnium jactatus erisx." Some of St. In this year 1547, and in the month of October, there le°nap jy'fell out an accident in St. John's College in Cambridge, to him up- which made those of that college that favoured learning on the ap- ° ° J 63 and religion, (as that house was the chief nursery thereof prehension m that university), judge it highly necessary to apply themselves to the archbishop to divert a storm from them. The case was this ; a French lad of this coUege, sizer, to one Mr. Stafford there, had one night, in hatred to the mass, secretly cut the string whereby the pix hung above the altar in the chapel. The like to which was indeed done in other places of the nation by some zealous persons, who began this year, without any warrant, to pull down crucifixes and images out of the churches : as was particularly done in St. Martins, Ironmonger-lane, Londony. This affront to the popish service made a great noise in the college; and the sober party among them feared the ill effect it might have upon the whole college, either to its disparagement or prejudice, when the news of it should come to court ; especially by the means of such, who stomached much the decay and downfall of super stition, and endeavoured what in them lay to obscure and x [Epist. Rog. Aschami, p. 315.] * [See Burnet's Hist, of Reformat, vol. ii. p. 17. ed. Oxon. 1829.] I.547-] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 55 echpse the rising light of the gospel. Therefore, after the matter had been taken into examination by themselves, quietly and without tumult, they thought fit, by consent, to acquamt the archbishop with it in a letter ; which one of their members, Thomas Lever, a learned and grave man, carried ; who likewise should inform him of all cir cumstances : and so committed both the cause and person to his grace's judgment and censure. But withal letting him know, that the youth was well learned, and before this had carried himself quietly and modestly ; and that Mr. Stafford, who was a great student, could not tell how to be without him : but however, such was his prudence, that he was willing to leave his scholar and his fault to the archbishop's discretion. By which message, they warily avoided the odium of this action, as though they had countenanced any violent or illegal methods for the removal of superstition, before it were done by pubhc au thority; and likewise rescued their scholar from expul sion, or too rigorous punishment, which some in the college would have been apt to inflict upon him, had not the matter been thus prudently removed from them. Let me here insert another matter that happened the year offended after in the same college; whereat divers took occasi°nofhis8cdU so to represent it to our archbishop, as to create in him, lege> and ..why. as much as they could, an ill opinion of the better sort of the members thereof. About November or December, in the year 1548, some of the college got this question to be disputed in the chapel concerning the mass, " Ipsane ccena dominica fuerit, necne ? " It was handled with great learn ing by two learned fellows of the house, Thomas Lever and Roger Hutchinson. The noise of this soon spread in the university, and many were much displeased at it. At last Ascham, being a very fit person to undertake it, was prevailed with by the rest to bring this question out of 56 MEMORIALS OF [II. 6. the private walls of the college, into the pubhc schools : yet, as was pretended, with this mind and meaning, not dogmatically to assert any thing, but modestly and freely to learn from learned men what could be fetched out of the holy Scriptures to defend the mass, which had taken up, not only the chiefest place in rehgion, and men's con sciences, but took away in effect all the use and benefit of 164 the faithful ministry of the word and sacraments from Christians. This business they set about with quietness; they conferred their common studies together, propounded to themselves the canonical Scriptures, by the authority whereof they wished the whole might be decided : they took also along with them, concerning this matter, the ancient canons of the early church, the councils of fathers, the decrees of popes, the judgments of doctors, the great plenty of questionists, all the modern authors, both German and Roman. But this design of theirs was not only the subject of talk in the university, but noted in the public sermons; and such labour there was among some in opposition to it, that Dr. Madew, then vice-chan cellor, was prevailed with by his letters to forbid the dis putation. They obeyed, but took it hardly that they might not as well dispute in favour of the question, as others might preach as much as they would against it. But it ended not here ; for their adversaries industriously carried the report hereof to our prelate, and did so blacken the business by their slanders, and loud and tragical cla mours, that he became somewhat offended with the under takers. These on the other hand, no question, apphed themselves to him with their just defence : and not only to him, but to others, and particularly to Mr. Cecyl, one formerly their colleague, who was now master of requests to the protector, letting him know the whole matter ; that he might upon occasion represent the cause I547-J ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 57 the more favourably to the archbishop. And Ascham himself was their scribe; whose epistle, penned in a handsome Latin style, being not extant among his printed epistles, and being subservient to the history of the uni versity in those times, I have thought worthy to be in serted among the originals. In this letter he charged Number XXXVII the other party as well with mahce as ignorance : for this their question was very agreeable to Thomas Aquinas, who proved that the mass exceeded the Lord's supper in many prerogatives, and much differed from it by many notes ; as, women, children, bastards, maimed persons, were not allowed to partake of the mass, but they were received to the holy supper. So that should any say, (as he proceeds in his letter), that the mass and the supper were the same, they might exclaim against them much more. Their adversaries had charged them with being too rash, in not staying for what reformation the state should make : but he said that all Cambridge wanted rather spurs to put them forward, than a bridle to keep them back. But though their dispute were prohibited, yet their studies upon the same argument had in a manner increased ; having now written a just treatise of the mass, which they intended shortly to present to the protector ; and waited only for Cecyl's and Cheke's advice therein. But I must beg pardon of the reader for this excursion. And as I have given an instance or two of the private The ill con- address of a particular college to him in a particular lowTstate case, so I will subjoin another more public of the univer- of *e uni_ " x versity. sity in general. In the year abovesaid, being the first year of the king, the university laboured under the fears of the encroachments of the town upon their privileges, and hkewise under great suspicions of being spoiled of its revenues, or at least of having them much diminished ; she having observed how those of her sister, the church, 58 MEMORIALS OF [II. 6. 165 were daily invaded by secular hands. These fears put Cambridge now in a decaying state, and the studies of good literature began to be but little minded. Add also hereunto, that ecclesiastical preferments, which formerly were the peculiar rewards of academics, were now or- Hist. Ref. dinarily enjoyed by mere unlearned laymen. So the earl partii.p. 8. Qf jjartford held a deanery, a treasurership of a cathedral church, and four of the best prebends ; and his son three hundred pounds a year out of the bishopric2. And learned men were seldom taken notice of, or had honours z [" There was a clause in the king's (Henry vm.) will, requiring his executors to make good all that he had promised in any man ner of ways. Whereupon sir William Paget, sir Anthony Denny, and sir William Herbert, were required to declare what they knew of the king's intentions and promises ; the former being the secretary whom he had trusted most, and the other two, those that attended on him in his bed chamber during his sickness. — Paget declared, that, when the evi dence appeared against the duke of Norfolk, and his son the earl of Surrey, the king, who used to talk oft in private with him alone, told him, that he intended to be stow their lands liberally : and since by attainders, and other ways, the nobility were much de cayed, he intended to create some peers; and ordered him to write a book of such as he thought meetest : who thereupon proposed the earl of Hartford to be a duke : so, after many consultations, he ordered the book to be thus filled up: 'The earl of Hartford to be earl marshall, and lord trea surer, and to be duke of Somer set, Exeter, or Hartford, and his son to be earl of Wiltshire, with £8oo a year of land, and £ 300 a year out of the next bishop's land that fell void ;' And having, at the suit of sir Edward North, promised to give the earl of Hartford six of the best prebends that should fall in any cathedral, except deaneries and treasurer- ships ; at his suit he agreed, that a deanery and treasurership should be instead of two of the six pre bendaries. It may perhaps seem strange, that the earl of Hartford had six good prebends promised him ; two of these being afterwards converted into a deanery and treasurership. But it was ordinary at that time. The lord Crumwel had been dean of Wells ; and many other secular men had these ecclesiastical benefices with out cure conferred on them." — Burnet's Hist, of Reformat, vol. ii. pp. 11 -14, 16. ed. Oxon. 1829.] I547-] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 59 conferred on them; and if they obtained any rewards, they were but small. Nor were scholars now in any repute or value : so that neither poor nor rich abode long at their studies in the university, to attain to any con siderable degrees of learning. The poor could not, because the encouragements there were scarce capable to maintain them ; and the richer sort would not, choosing rather to follow some other course, because of the obscure and neg lected condition learning then lay under. The grammar schools also became disused, parents choosing any other calling for their children, rather than to bring them up to letters : as Roger Ascham, a man that well knew the state of the university, complains in a letter to the marquis of Northampton. This was the cause that the said Ascham pensively thus writ unto our archbishop not long after : "That the university was then in so de pressed and drooping a condition, that very few had hope of coming thither at all, and fewer had any comfort to make long tarrying when they were there : and that abroad it retained not so much as the shadow of its ancient dignitya." At this low ebb the university now was, when king An address Edward the Sixth came to the sceptre. But there being versity to a parhament this year in the month of November, the,heh^ch" chief officers thereof thought it advisable however to pre vent it, if they could, from sinking lower, and to keep at least what they had, by getting their ancient privileges a [" Hoc omnes scimus, Aca- nitatis et loci tueri queat, intus demiam nostram, quomodo nunc autem et domi vincula nervique est, per se satis depositam et incli- salutis ejus concidantur, quid reg- natam esse, quo veniendi paucis- num, quid religio, quid regia ma- simis spes, et hie diu manendi jestas ab hac Academia sperare paucioribus alacritas est. Itaque, amplius possit, non videmus." si Academia extrinsecus et foris, Epist. Rog. Aschami, p. 312. ed. ne umbram quidem veteris dig- Lond. 1590.] 60 MEMORIALS OF [II. 6. confirmed by that parhament. And for this purpose they writ their earnest letters to the archbishop : John Madew The sum their vice-chancellor, the bearer, urging to him, "not only that it was a thing usual at the beginning of princes' reigns, to shew that favour to the university to have then- privileges renewed by parliament; but chiefly, that the favour his grace should do to it would be a true piece of service to the religion which he had such a tender care of. That every one knew how much it concerned the commonwealth that account should be made of learning; but how much it concerned the pure religion, (as they styled that of the Reformation), he alone did consider above all others. That he knew how that about five hundred years past, or more, the knowledge of letters, by the fault of kings, who ought to have cherished it, began to withdraw itself from men, and to hide itself in darkness. In which dark times, so involved in ignorance, that notable wild boar out of the wood spoiled the vine yard of Christ above measure : not only treading down the kings of the earth, and conferring upon himself the empire of the world, but so invaded and broke into the holy seat and temple of conscience, that now there were scarce any manners of men, any course of life, any rite 166 of ceremonies, any sacrament of the church, any footstep of Christ, which were not either laid waste by his thun der, or defiled by his breath : or, to speak in milder, but more significant terms with St. Paul, which were not most foully corrupted and adulterated by the wisdom of human will- worship. That it was this night of discipline, and want of knowledge, which robbed us of God's word, and advanced the empire of man's doctrine to that arbi trary height, that, instead of the true worship of God, the right using of things divine, a holy and pure course of life; hypocrisy, idolatry, and adultery were most cun- 1 547 J ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 61 ningly conveyed and brought in. That they did the more willingly mention this pest of ignorance, conceiving great hope that the honour of learning would be restored anew, now when all things tended in a wonderful manner to the illustrating of true religion, which good learning did ne cessarily accompany. And that since God had now raised him up on purpose for the restoring of the gospel, and had so long reserved him for that end, they doubted not but he would give all his pains and authority to preserve the welfare of learning. And that somewhat for this reason, because at that time there could happen no calamity or advantage thereunto, but every man would be apt either to charge him with the blame of the one, or attribute to him the praise of the other." This eloquent letter in dited by the pen of Ascham, then the university orator, having some remarkable passages of the state of the uni versity at that time, and of the great sway the archbishop then carried in the pubhc, and the marvellous good will he was esteemed to bear towards learning, I have therefore placed in the Appendix, though printed before. xxxvih This favour of having their privileges confirmed, sued for The success in the forementioned letter, the university then got, partly "erjitJ1"1" by the means of their cordial patron, the archbishop, and address t0 partly by the intercession and friendship of queen Ka- others. therine Par, a great favourer of learning and pure reli gion, of Wriothesly, lord chancellor, the earl of Warwick, the marquis of Northampton, the earl of Arundel, and sir William Paget ; to all whom at that time they addressed their letters : whether it were out of fear of the difficulty of getting the thing done, or to take this opportunity to obtain the countenance of the great men of the court. Some time after, upon another occasion, the heads of Another the university made another application to their patron, mmr against the archbishop; which was, to befriend them at court thetowns_ 62 MEMORIALS OF [II. 6. against the townsmen, their old enemies, who were now wresting from them one of their ancient undoubted pri vileges ; namely, the use of the prisons of the tollbooth and castle. The occasion was this : in the time of Stur- bridge fair, the proctors, upon great complaints made to them, going their rounds one night, had taken certain evil persons in houses of sin, and had brought them to the toUbooth, in order to the commitment of them there. But having sent to the mayor for the keys, he absolutely refused to part with them. So they were fain to carry their prisoners to the castle, where they left them in custody. But the mayor's son, after an hour or two, let 167 them all out, to return, if they pleased, to their former lewdness; to the breach of law, and affront of the magistrate. Upon this the university sent their letters to the archbishop, making certain of their grave members the bearers, to relate the matter more fully; earnestly requiring that such insolence might be punished: and that the king and his council would make such men feel what it was to violate laws, and to cherish impunity, and to break their oaths, which they had taken to maintain the university privileges1'. They urged to him, "how ser- b ["Great was the alteration privileges of scholars should be which followed in Cambridge, abolished, under the notion of upon king Edward's coming to superstition. Ungratefully, there- the crown. Stephen Gardiner, fore, they began their pranks ; I chancellor of the university, was say, ungratefully. For, although put out of his office, and into the particular scholars might owe mo- Tower. Edward Seymour, lord ney to particular townsmen, yet protector, and duke of Somerset, the whole town owes its well be- vvas chosen in his room. The ing to the university. Amongst townsmen of Cambridge began their many insolencies, two were now to hope their time come to most remarkable : First, one Max- cast off the yoke (as they counted well, by profession once a jail- it) of the university ; as if, on the keeper, then a bear-ward, pro- alteration of religion, the ancient moted at last purveyor to provide I547-] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 63 viceable and ready their university had been to him in his pious labours and counsels, in establishing the true doctrine in the church ; and what fit and worthy men they had sent him for his assistance in that good work. In like manner they required and expected of him, that their dignity might be maintained and preserved by his aid and authority. That the university was then but in a low condition, and that abroad it scarcely retained the shadow of its former glory. But if at home, and within itself, the bonds and sinews of its safety should thus be cut, as not to have a power to restrain vice by imprisonment, what could the kingdom, rehgion, and the king's majesty hope for any more from that university ? They inculcated, how learning and the true rehgion rise and fall together ; carriages for the king's fish, (which commonly came from Cambridge)j seized on an am bling nag of the master of Peter House, [i.e. Ralph Aynsworth] (which the old and infirm doc tor kept for his health), merely that his man might thereon ride after the king's carriages. This horse, I may say, had a long reach ; the injury seeming small and personal, concerned the whole university, both in present and posterity. Secondly, when the proctors, at Sturbridge fair, had, according to their office and an cient custom, fetched out many dissolute persons, out of vicious places, at unseasonable hours, the mayor refused to give them the keys of the toll-booth, or town-prison, to secure such of fenders therein. Yea, when they had carried such malefactors to the castle, within an hour or two comes the mayor's son, sets open the jail, and lets loose those lewd persons, to the great injury of the university, and encouragement of all viciousness. It was now high time for Dr. Madew, the vice- chancellor, and master Roger Ascham, the university-orator, to bestir themselves. The latter be- lettered all the lords of the privy- council, and amongst the rest, sir Thomas Wriothesly, the lord chancellor of England, (' whom,' saith he, 'the university partly commandeth, as once a member, partly requesteth, as now a patron thereof), with some gentlemen of the king's bed-chamber ; and by them procured the confirmation of the university privileges in the following parliament. However, these oppidane animosities, in some degree, continued all this king's reign." — Fuller's Hist, of Cambridge, p. 179. Lond. 1840.] 64 MEMORIALS OF [II. 6. and that if it went otherwise than well with the one, the other would feel the smart of it. And truly, (say they), no remarkable damage can light upon the studies of learning, which by the same motion draws not along with it the true rehgion into the same catastrophe0." And these considerations they made use of, to excite his grace to assist them in vindicating their privileges, and in having that gross infringement of them punished. Upon the same occasion they wrote their letters also to sir William Paget, a great friend of theirs, and eminent patron of good c [" Quantas quotidie curas la- boresque exhauris, reverendissime pater, in repurgandis fsecibus illis, quaa per sentinam papisticam in ecclesiam Anglicanam derivatae influxerunt, universi nos cum summa et laude tua, et congra- tulatione nostra accepimus. Et cum tibi sedulo imprimis incum- benti ad hanc puram tradendam constituendamque doctrinam, haec nostra Academia, singularem opem, paratissimum studium, in- structissimos semper viros praes- titeret : vicessim ilia a te postulat et expectat, ut mutua ope autho- ritateque tua, ejus dignitas atque salus conservetur. Hoc omnes scimus, Academiam nostram, quo- modo nunc est, per se satis depo- sitam et inclinatam esse, quo veniendi paucissimis spes, et hie diu manendi paucioribus alacritas est. Itaque, si Academia extrin- secus et foris, ne umbram qui- dem veteris dignitatis et loci tueri queat, intus autem et domi vin- cula nervique salutis ejus conci- dantur, quid regnum, quid reli- gio, quid regia majestas ab hac Academia sperare amplius possit, non videmus. Et profecto li- terarum studiis, nulla insignis pernicies importari potest, quae non veram etiam religionem, eodem motu, in eundem occasum et interitum trahat. Quamobrem, in hanc spem ducimur, nullam noctem et tenebras literarum stu diis offundi posse, in his potissi- mum temporibus, quae ad splen- dorem verse germanaeque religionis mirifice illucescunt. Et cum has duae res sic inter se cohaerent im- plicitaeque sunt, ut si haec fluat, ilia consistere non possit : non dubitamus, quin, quam curam in vera doctrina illustranda suscep- isti, eandem ipsam in Academiae nostras dignitate constituenda col- locaturus sis. Nos autem per- petuo laborabimus, ut nostra in studiis diligentia, in moribus mo- destia, in religione sinceritas, hoc beneficio tuo nos non indignos sit demonstratura." — Epist. Rog. Aschami, pp. 311, 12. ed. Lond. 159°-] 1547-J ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 65 learning. What the issue of these applications was, I find not ; but may conclude, they received a success propor tionable to the good will and authority of those to whom they were made. And as the whole body of the university knew what Roger favour our prelate bore to it, so every single ingenious application member confided in him, and apphed to him in their needs, a0^™^*. Roger Ascham, the university orator, whom I had occa- tion for . . eatingflesh. sion to mention before", was a man of a weak constitution, and had contracted more frailty by reason of a long ague that then hung about him, and his complexion became melancholy by the rehcs of that stubborn distemper. He had also in his nature a great averseness to the fish-diet. Upon these reasons he addressed his letters to the arch bishop with an humble suit, very handsomely penned, that he might be dispensed with as to abstinence from flesh-meats, Lent and fish-days being then strictly ob served in the colleges. And this license he desired might be not only temporary, but perpetual, as long as he hved ; which was somewhat extraordinary. But to- incline the archbishop to yield to his suit, he told him, " That it was not to pamper his flesh, nor out of an affectation of doing that which was unusual, or against common custom, but only for the preserving his health, and that he might the more freely pursue his studies." He added, "That the air of Cambridge was naturally cold and moist, and so the 168 fish-diet the more unwholesome. He desired therefore, that by his authority he might no longer be tied by that tradition, which forbad the use of certam meats at cer tain times." He said, "That those who granted this hberty to none but such as laboured under a desperate disease, did hke them who never repaired their houses but when d [See above, p. S3-] CRANMER, VOL. II. P QQ MEMORIALS OF [II. 6. they were just ready to fall down by age. Thrifty house keepers did otherwise : so did skilful physicians, who did not use to prescribe their physic when it was too late, but always put a stop to beginnings. That they who never would impart the using of this hberty, (of eating flesh), to any, but when all health was despaired of, knew not what good a prudent foresight did in all commonwealths, and did too insolently abuse a good thing bestowed upon us by God, when httle or no use at all could be made of it. Nay, that such a good was no good at all, being external, but in that respect only, as there might some use be made of it. That we ought not therefore unprofitably to abuse food to diseases that are desperate, but to accommodate it to the preservation of health. And so did St. Paul com mand, 'Therefore I exhort you to take some food, for this is for your health.' " Then he subjoins a passage of Herodotus in his Euterpe, concerning the Egyptian priests, from whom issued originally all kinds of learning and arts, and who were always conversant in learned studies. These, saith that author, religiously tied themselves ever to abstain from all eating of fish. "No doubt for this only cause," saith Ascham, " ' Ne ignea vis ingenii atque praestantia, ullo frigido succo, quern esus piscium ingene- raret, extingueretur.' fThat the wits of men, that have a noble fiery quality in them, might not be quenched by some cold juice, which the eating of fish might engender.' And that it was somewhat unjust," he adds, " that when so many kinds of superstition flowed in such a plentiful measure from the Egyptians, as might easily be proved, and thence derived themselves, first to the Greeks, then to the Romans, and afterwards to our times, through that sink of popery, that that single worthy counsel and re medy of those most learned men, enjoined for the enlarg ing and spreading of learning, should be debarred us to I547-] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 67 follow ; and that by such as were either unlearned them selves, or superstitious men: whereby the best wits re ceived so great prejudice and damage. That none knew better than his lordship whence this custom arose, by whom cherished, and by what kind of men brought down to us. And, lastly, how unwholesome and unfit all eating of fish was in the spring-time. And that he might ob tain this favour, he would use it without giving offence, or making any common speech of it, with quietness and silence, with abstinence and thanksgiving e." e [" Sed quorsum haec perti nent ? dicis : ut scias, cum Dei imprimis proviso, amicorum ali- quid cura, nonnihil mea me vo luntas, omnem ut aetatem meam in literarum studio contererem, commovisset, atque in ipsam stu- diorum viam, non infaeliciter in- gressus fuissem : ecce tibi partim otiosum hoc literarum studium, et vitae institutum quod sequor : partim situs loci, et coeli intempe- ries, in qua vivo: partim imbe- cillitas naturae, et febris quartanae vis, qua non paucos menses gra- vissime jactabar, ita omnes salutis meae, et salubrioris sanitatis ra- tiones, vel urgent haec singula, vel opprimunt universa, ut eum cur- sum, quern in literarum studio conficere instituerim, nee con- stanter ad laudem, nee dihgenter ad usum, diu tenere potuero. Ita- que, cum nee meae me fortunae sinant, hoc solum, sedis muta- tione vertere: nee mea voluntas, et animi inductio gestiant vitae in stitutum relinquere : nee curatio ulla possit naturae imbecillitatem corrigere : nee tempus adhuc va- luit amissas vires restituere: vel colluviem illam faecemque melan- chohae et rehquias quartanae febris ejicere : et cum me contra, ab Op timo remedio victusque ratione excludunt, partim constitutiones humanae, in quas impetum facere nefas esse duco : partim supersti- tiosae aliquot hominum consci- entiae, quarum nullam ducere ra- tionem iniquum esse scio : cum inquam, fortunarum angustia, loci intemperies, studiorum rationes, naturae imbecillitas, melancholiae vis lex dura, hominum sive im- peritia, sive superstitio, gravi im- petu in salutem corporis facto, immensum in modum cursum studiorum meorum impediunt : rogo dominationem tuam per hanc Academia? sedem, quam incolo : per vitae studiorumque rationem, quam sequor: per naturae vale- tudinieque imbecillitatem, qua gra- viter implicatus premor : ut ego, authoritate tua non amplius te- near, ea traditione, qua certus ciborum delectus, certis tempori- f2 68 MEMORIALS OF [II. 6. Favourably granted by the arch bishop. This letter he got his friend Poinet, the archbishop's chaplain, (the same I suppose who after was bishop of bus praecipitur. Quam meam pe- titionem, nee cura carnis ad con- cupiscentiam finxit : nee licentia ulla ad insolentiam subornavit : sed salutis meae ratio tantum, ad expeditiorem studiorum meorum progressum excogitavit: cujus si compos fuero, vulgi, nee in offen- sam, nee in sermonem efFerendo sed tacite, considerate, quiete, ab- stinenter cum gratiarum actione usurpabo. Qui nemini, nisi des perate morbo laboranti, hanc li- bertatem concedunt, perinde faci- unt, ac hi homines solent, qui nunquam aedes suas, nisi vetustare ruinosas, et jamjam collapsuras reparant. Frugi patres familias aliter faciunt, aliter periti medici, qui non sero medicinam parant, at principiis semper obstare so- lent. Itaque, qui nunquam nisi desperata salute, hujus divini be- neficii usum hominibus imparti- unt, et imperiti sunt, quid prudens in omnibus respublicis proviso facit, et nimis insolenter abutentes sunt divinitus nobis dato bono, quo tempore usus ejus aut nullus, aut exiguus esse potest, cum ta- men hujusmodi bonum, bonum non est, quia externum est, nisi ex ea parte tantum, quatenus usus aliquis ejus consequatur. Cibo ergo non ad desperates morbos inutiliter abuti, sed ad salutem vitae nostras retinendam accomo- dare debemus, jubente ipso Paulo, ubl ait, 8tb wapatcaka fyiar rrpoo-- Aa/3«i/ Tpo ' Cranm. crosses of silver, bells, and other ornaments of the church, Regist. , . [fol. 55 b.] which were not given for that purpose, to be ahenated at their pleasure ; but either to be used to the intent [that] they were first given, or to some other necessary and con venient service of the church. Therefore this is to will and require you immediately, upon the sight hereof, to give strait charge and commandment, on the king's ma jesty's behalf, to every parish-church within your diocese, that they do in no wise sell, give, or otherwise ahenate any bells, or other ornament, or jewel, belonging unto your parish-church, upon pain of his highness' displeasure, as they will answer to the contrary at their peril. Thus fare you well. From Westminster, the last day of April 1548. " Your loving friends, "E. Somerset. Will. Seint-John. J. Russel. " H. Arundel. Thomas Cheyney. William Paget. "Thomas Smith. A.Denny. W.Herbert. "John Baker." 1548-] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 91 It is not an improbable conjecture, that the archbishop procured this letter to arm church-wardens with an an swer to such greedy courtiers and gentlemen, as used often to resort to them ; and in their own, or the council's name, required these goods of their churches to be yielded up to them ; and threatened them if they did not. The next month the council sent the archbishop a form A form of of prayer, to be used by himself and those of his diocese : to the wherein God was implored to grant the nation peace andar ' p- victory over her enemies : for now all things round about appeared in a posture of war; and preparation of arms was making, which caused the king also to raise forces. And, for a blessing upon them, the privy-council sent to the archbishop, together with the form, an order for the speedy using of it. The tenor of the letter follows : " Ajter our hearty commendations to your good lord- 178 ship. Hearing tell of great preparation made of foreign a^Jl>^ princes, and otherwise being enforced, for the procurement letter. and continuance of peace, to make preparation for war : Regist. forsomuch as all power and aid vailable cometh of God, '•°'ss '-' the which he granteth, as he hath promised by his holy word, by nothing so much as by hearty prayer of good men : the which is also of more efficacy, made of an holy congregation together gathered in his holy name : there fore this is to will and require you to give advertisement and commandment to all the curates in your diocese, that every Sunday and holy-day, in their common-prayer, they make devout and hearty intercession to Almighty God for victory and peace. And to the intent that you should not be in doubt what sort and manner thereof we do like, we have sent unto you one, [the] which we would that you and they should follow, and read it instead of one of the collects of the king's majesty's procession. Thus we 92 MEMORIALS OF [II. 8. New opinionsbroached. Cranm. Regist. [fol. 72.] pray you not fail to do with all speed, and bid you fare well. From Westminster, the 6th of May, 1548. " Your loving friends, "E. Somerset. R. Rich, cane. W. Seint-John. "J. Russel. Thomas Cheyney2." [To our very good lord, the archbishop of Canterbury.] Now that the hberty of the gospel began to be allowed, divers false opinions and unsound doctrines began to be vented with it ; of which public cognizance began now to be taken. As, " that the elect sinned not, and that they could not sin. That they that be regenerate never fall away from godly love. That the elect have a right to take so much of the things of the world as may supply their necessities." And there were some that openly preached these doctrines, and set forth and pubhshed books to the same tenor. Several of these heretics, in the month of April, were convented before the archbishop of Canterbury ; sir Thomas Smith ; Richard Cox, Hugh Latimer, doctors of divinity ; William May, dean of St. Paul's ; Wilham Cook, Richard Lyel, doctors of law ; and others the king's commissioners. Then did one John Champneys, of Stratford on the Bow, abjure. He taught, and wrote, and defended ; " 1 . That a man, after he is regenerate in Christ, cannot sin. 2. That the outward man might sin, but the inward man could not. 3. That the gospel hath been so much persecuted and hated ever since the apostles' times, that no man might be suffered openly to follow it. 4. That godly love falleth never away from them which be regenerate in Christ : wherefore they cannot do contrary to the com mandments of Christ. 5. That that was the most prin- [See also Wilkins' Concilia, vol. iv. p. 26.] 1548-] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 93 cipal of our marked men's doctrine, to make the people beheve that there was no such spirit given unto man, whereby he should remain righteous, and always in Christ. Which is, [as he wrote and asserted], a most devilish error. 6. That God doth permit to all his elect people their bodily necessities of all worldly things." All these he revoked, granting or confessing now, "1.179 That a man, after he is regenerate in Christ, may sin, be- CnamPne7s ' ° ' •> > revokes six ing destitute of his spirit. 2. That the inward man doth articles. sin, when that the outward man sinneth actually with the consent of the mind. 3. That divers times, since the apostles' times, hath been suffered to follow openly the gospel of Christ. 4. That godly love falleth from them that be regenerate in Christ, being destitute of his spirit : and that then they may do contrary to the commandments of Christ. 5. That it is no erroneous doctrine, the which he affirmed in his book to be a devilish error, and our marked men's doctrine, viz. To make the people to beheve that there was no such spirit given unto man, whereby he should remain righteous always in Christ. But I confess, [saith the abjurer], that a man, having the spirit, may afterwards fall, and not be righteous. 6. That God doth not permit to all his elect people their bodily necessities of all worldly things to be taken, but by a law and order ap proved by the civil pohcy : in which words by me now spoken I mean, nor understand any other sense than hath been here opened;" to use again his very words in his ab juration. And so, touching the holy gospel with his hand, before the king's commissioners, he abjured, promising, "That he should never hold, teach, beheve [write, print, or cause to be written or printed] the said errors, heresies, or damned opinions above rehearsed." And so subscribed his name. Then the archbishop in his own name, and in the name And ab jures. 94 MEMORIALS OF [II. 8. of the other commissioners, gave him his oath. " 1. That he should not by any means hereafter teach or preach to the people, nor set forth any kind of books, in print or otherwise, nor cause to be printed or set forth any such books, that should contain any manner of doctrine, with out a special hcense thereunto of the king's majesty, or some of his grace's privy council first had and obtained, 2. That the said Champneys, with all speed convenient, and with all his diligence, procure as many of his books, as are passed forth in his name, to be called in again, and utterly destroyed, as much as in him should he. 3. That he should the Sunday following attend at Paul's Cross upon the preacher, all the time of the sermon, and there penitently stand before the said preacher with a faggot on his shoulder." And then he had two sureties bound in five hundred pounds, that he should perform his penance". This was done April 27. Other here- There were other heresies also now vented abroad, as sies vented. the ^^ Qf ^ rp^^ and Qf the deity of fae Hoiy Ghost, and the assertion, " That Jesus Christ was a mere man, and not true God, because he had the accidents of human nature ; such as hungering and thirsting, and be ing visible : and that the benefit men receive by Jesus Christ was the bringing them to the true knowledge of God." There was one John Assheton, a priest, that preach ed these doctrines, who on the 28th of December was Cranm. summoned to Lambeth, to appear there before the arch- [fof 73.] hishop. Where John Whitwel, the archbishop's almoner, and Thomas Langley, both priests, and his grace's chap lains, exhibited a schedule of divers heresies and damned opinions against the said Assheton ; which are recited in a [The above and the following this edition from the Cranmer extracts have been corrected for Register.] 1548-] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 95 the abjuration which he made. The tenor whereof is as followeth : " In the name of God, Amen. Before you, most learned 1 80 father in God, lord Thomas, archbishop of Canterbury, Assheton\< primate, and metropohtan of all England, commissary of tion. our most dread sovereign lord, and excellent prince, Edward VI. by the grace of God, &c. I, John Assheton, priest, of my pure heart, free-will, voluntary and sincere knowledge, confess and openly recognize, that in times past I thought, beheved, said, held, and [presumptuously] affirmed [by subscription of my proper hand writing] these errors, heresies, and damnable opinions following; that is to say, 1. That the Trinity of Persons was established by the confession of Athanasius, declared by a psalm, "Qui- cunque vult," &c. and that the Holy Ghost is not God, but only a certain power of the Father. 2. That Jesus Christ, that was conceived of the Virgin Mary, was a holy pro phet, and especially beloved of God the Father ; but that he was not the true and living God; forasmuch as he was seen, and lived, hungered and thirsted. 3. That this only is the fruit of Jesus Christ's passion; that whereas we were strangers from God, and had no know ledge of his testament, it pleased God by Christ to bring us to the acknowledging of his holy power by the testament. Wherefore I, the said John Assheton, detesting and abhorring all and every my said errors, heresies, and damned opinions, willingly, and with all my power, affect ing hereafter firmly to beheve in the true and perfect faith of Christ and his holy church, purposing to follow the true and sincere doctrine of holy church with a pure and free heart, voluntary mind, will, and intent, utterly to forsake, relinquish, renounce, and despise the said de testable errors, heresies, and abominable opinions : grant- 96 MEMORIALS OF [II. 8. ing and confessing now, 1. That the blessed Trinity con- sisteth in three distinct Persons, and one Godhead; as God the Father, God the Son, and God the Holy Ghost, coequal in power and might. 2. That Jesus Christ is both God and man, after his godly nature eternally begotten of his Father, of his own substance; in his humanity was conceived by the Holy Ghost incarnate, and for our redemption, being very God, became man. 3. That by the death of Jesus Christ we be not only made partakers of his testament, and so deduced to the knowledge of his godly will and power, but also that we have full redemp tion and remission of our sins in his blood." Then he subscribed his hand to this confession before the arch bishop, exhibiting it for his act ; and, lifting up his hand, beseeched his grace to deal mercifully and graciously with him ; and touching the gospel, gave his faith that he would faithfully and humbly obey the commands of the holy mother-church, and whatsoever penance the said most reverend father should lay upon him. Other er- To these erroneous doctrines we must add others, that rors still. ' now also spread themselves : as, that Christ took not flesh of the Virgin : that the baptism of infants was not profit able. Of which error one Michael Thombe of London, butcher, recanted the year following, viz. 1549, May 11, having been then convented before the archbishop at Lambeth. 181 "I Michael Thombe of London, butcher, of my pure [Cranm. neart and free-will, voluntarily and sincerely acknow- foi. 74.] ledge, confess, and openly recognise, that in times past I thought, believed, said, held, and affirmed these er rors, heresies, and damnable opinions following : that is to say, that [whether] Christ took no flesh of our Lady; and [that whether I beheve that I have said] that the baptism of infants is not profitable, because it goeth 1548.] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 97 without faith. Wherefore I, the said Michael Thombe, de testing and abhorring all and every such my said errors, heresies, and damned opinions ; [willing] and with all my power affecting hereafter firmly to beheve in the true and perfect faith of Christ, and of his holy church, purposing to follow the true and sincere doctrine of holy church with a pure and free heart, voluntary mind, will, and intent, utterly to forsake, relinquish, renounce, and despise the said detestable errors, heresies, and abominable opinions ; granting and confessing now, that Christ took flesh of the Virgin Mary, and that the baptism of infants is pro fitable and necessary." And by this submission and penance doing, Thombe escaped. But another of the same opinion, more obstinate, came Joan to a sadder end, and was burnt ; namely, Joan Bocher, or heresy. Joan of Kenta. Her opinion is in the instrument drawn [Cranm. * Regist. fol. 75-] » ["Much undeserved odium not incapable, of defence. They has been thrown upon archbishop have mostly contented themselves Cranmer in connection with this with alleging that it was contrary case of Joan Bocher, in conse- to the general tenor of his life, quence of an erroneous statement and with bringing forward the of Foxe, the martyrologist*, re- entry in the privy-council book specting the importunity with to prove that he was not present which he urged, if not forced, the when her fate was finally deter- young king into the signature of mined, and may therefore be pre- the death warrant upon which she sumed to have exhibited but httle suffered. All classes of objectors of the eager spirit of a persecutor. to the Reformation have availed The last writer of the history of themselves of this presumed fact, the Reformation J has gone a little to magnify the clemency of the further, and has ventured to im- king by way of contrast to the pugn the authority of this par- primate's 'importunity for bloodf.' ticular passage in Foxe, on the Cranmer's advocates have ap- ground of the silence not merely parently felt this passage in his of the king's journal, but also of life to be one extremely difficult, if the Romanist libellers of the pri- * [Foxe's Acts and Monuments, vol. v. p. 699. ed. Lond. 1843-48.] t [Hayward's Ed. vi. p. 16. ed. 1636.] J [Soames, vol. iii. p. 544.] CRANMER, VOL. II. H 98 MEMORIALS OF [II. 8. up against her in the archbishop's register : which ran thus; "That you beheve that the Word was made flesh mate, respecting the alleged inter view. Nothing is more likely than that if the king's feeling had been such as Foxe represents, the entry in his journal would have been different from the one we find there § ; whilst, if such an inter view had really taken place, San ders, and other writers of that class, would have been delighted to avail themselves of it against Cranmer; but it is unfortunate that Cranmer's defenders have not produced the whole entry in the privy-council book, instead of merely referring to it, in proof of the single fact of Cranmer's ab sence. Had that been done, it would long ago have occurred to some one, that it contained evi dence that Foxe's story, for which he does not assign any authority, could not be true. Amongst the minutes of the business transact ed by the council, (who, be it re membered, under the will of Henry viii. were the actual governors of the kingdom during the mino rity of Edward vi.), on the 27th of April 1550, is the following entry : — ' A warrant to the lord chaunceUor to make out a writt to the shireff of London for the exe- cucon of Johan of Kent, con- dempned to be burned for certein detestable opinions of heresie.' — It appears from these words, that, in conformity with the ordinary legal practice of the period, Joan Bocher was executed upon a writ de haretico comburendo, addressed to the sheriff of London, and is sued out of chancery, upon the authority of a warrant signed, not by the king, but by the council. It would have been contrary to constitutional custom for the king to have signed any such docu ment; it is quite clear, from the entry quoted, that, in point of fact, he did not sign it ; and the narrative, which the worthy mar- tyrologist was misled into insert ing, and Cranmer's difficulty to cause the king to ' put to his hand,' and the tears, by which subse quent writers have declared that his submission to the stern plead- § ["Joan Bocher, otherwise called Joan of Kent, was burnt for holding, ' that Christ was not incarnate of the Virgin Mary :' being condemned the year before, but kept in hope of conversion ; and the 30th of April, the bishop of London, (Ridley), and the bishop of Ely, (Goodrich), were to persuade her ; but she withstood them, and reviled the preacher that preached at her death." The preacher was Dr. Scory, afterwards bishop of Rochester, and she was burnt May 2nd. See Burnet's Hist, of Reformat, vol. ii. p. 230. pt. ii. p. 18. ed. Oxon. 1829. Collier's Eccl. Hist. vol. v. p. 386. ed. Lond. 1840, 1. Fuller's Church Hist. vol. iv. pp. 52, 3. ed. Lond. 1845. Wilkins' Concilia, vol. iv. pp. 43-45. Stov/s Chronicle, p. 596. ed. Lond. 1631. Fabyan's Chronicles, p. 710. ed. Lond. 181 1.] 1548.J ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 99 in the Virgin's belly; but that Christ took flesh of the Virgin you beheve not, because the flesh of the Virgin, being the outward man, was sinfully gotten, and born in sin. But the Word, by the consent of the inward man of the Virgin, was made flesh." This she stood perversely in. So the archbishop himself excommunicated her judici ally; the sentence being read by him, April [12] 1549, in St. Mary's chapel, within the cathedral church of Paul's, sir Thomas Smith, William Cook, dean of the arches, Hugh Latimer, Richard Lyell, LL. D. the king's com missioners, assistingb. She was committed afterwards to the secular arm ; and certified so to be by an instrument made by the commissioners to the king. After she was condemned, she was a sevennight in the lord chancellor Rich's house ; and every day the archbishop and bishop Ridley came and reasoned with her, that, if possible, they might save her from the fire : but nothing would do. I will here produce Latimer's censure of her, who well knew Latimer's her case, being one of the commissioners that sat upon ner ing of his spiritual father were hi. That the persons present on accompanied, all vanish. — That no the day referred to were, 'The doubt may remain upon the sub- Lorde ChaunceUor, the L. High ject I will add, i. That it was not Threasorer, the L. P. Seale, the customary for the king to attend L. Great Chamberlaine, the L. the meetings of the council, ii. Chamberlaine, the L. Pagett, the That whenever the council desired Busshopp of Ely, Mr. Threasorer, that the king should be consulted, Mr. Comptroller, Mr. of the or communicated with, an entry Horse, Mr. Vicechamberlaine, was made upon the council-book Sir Rauf Sadler, Sir Edward similar to the following, which Northe.' " — Preface to Hutchin- occurs on the same day as the son's Works, pp. iii-v. Park. Soc. preceding : ' It was agreed by the ed. See also Todd's Life of abp. whole counsaill, that the king's Cranmer, vol. ii. pp. 147-153.] majestie should be moved for the b [The sentence against Joan restitution of the duke of So- Bocher will be found in the Ap- mersett unto all his goods, his pendix.] debtes, and his leases yet ungiven.' h2 100 MEMORIALS OF [II. 8. George van Paris. her. " She would say," saith he in his sermon on St. John Evangelist's day, "that our Saviour was not very manj nor had received flesh of his mother Mary : and yet she could shew no reason why she should beheve so. Her opinion was this; The Son of God, said she, penetrated through her as through a glass, taking no substance of her. This foolish woman denied the common creed, ' Natus ex Maria Virgine,' and said that our Saviour had a fantastical bodyc." A Dutchman, an Arian, named George van Paris, deny ing Christ to be true God, came to a like end with Joan, namely, that of burning to death, being condemned for heresy; that was in the year 1551 d. But though I make c [" I told you, the last time, of one Joan of Kent, which was in this foolish opinion, that she should say our Saviour was not very man, and had not received flesh of his mother Mary : and yet she could shew no reason why she should beheve so. Her opinion was this, as I told you before. The Son of God, said she, penetrated through her, as through a glass, taking no sub stance of her. But our creed teacheth us contrariwise ; for we say, ' Natus ex Maria Virgine,' ' Born of the Virgin Mary :' so this foolish woman denied the common creed; and said that our Saviour had a phantastical body ; which is most untrue, as it appeareth evidently in the Epistle to the Hebrews, where St. Paul plainly saith, that Christ was made of the woman, that he took his flesh from the woman." — Latimer's Works, vol. ii. p. 1 14. Park. Soc. ed.] d [" After this, (i. e. the sen tence against Joan of Kent, Cranm. Reg. fol. 78), followeth the pro cess, and sentence of condemna tion of one George van Parre, a Dutchman, for obstinately main taining the like opinions ; together with a petition imploring the exe cution thereof, and the assistance of the secular power, conform to the tenour of that above- written, bearing date the 6th of April, anno Dom. 1551. " The judges and commission ers of this process were, Thomas archbishop of Canterbury, Nicho las (Ridley) bishop of London, WiUiam May, Griffin Leyson, John Oliver, Miles Coverdale, Richard LyeU, John Gosnold, and Christopher Nevison. "His heresy 'thathebeUeveth,' is, 'That God the Father is only God : and that Christ is not very God, is non-heresy.' And being asked, by an interpreter, 'Whether 1548.J ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 101 some anticipation in my history, yet I do it that I may lay these heresies here together, that started up, or rather shewed themselves more visibly, in this reign. he would abjure the said opinion,' Oxon. 1829. — See also Foxe's he answered, 'No.'" Burnet's Acts and Monuments, p. 1297, ed. Hist, of Reformat, vol. ii. pt. ii. Lond. 1383. Todd's Life of abp. B. 1. No. 35. pp. 238, 9. ed. Cranmer, vol. ii. p. 155.] 102 MEMORIALS OF [II. 9. 182 CHAPTER IX. THE ARCHBISHOP VISITS. The arch- The archbishop in this year held a visitation in divers visits his places throughout his diocese : wherein inquiry was to be diocese. made concerning the behaviour both of the priests and the people, in eighty-six articles e. Whereby may be seen the archbishop's conscientious care and solicitude for the abrogating of superstition, and the promoting of true religion ; that he might reduce the clergy to learning, so briety, and diligence in their vocation ; and the people to loyalty and obedience to the king, and the sincere wor shipping of God. His articles Concerning the priests, he ordered inquiry to be made; TOP TllP clergy. "Whether they preached four times a year against the usurped power of the bishop of Rome, and in behalf of the king's power and authority within his own realms. Whether, in their common prayers, they used not the col lects made for the king, and mentioned not his majesty's name in the same. Whether they had destroyed and taken away out of the churches all images and shrines, tables, candlesticks, trindals, or rolls of wax, and all other monuments of feigned miracles, idolatry, and superstition; and moved their parishioners to do the same in their own houses. Inquiries were made concerning their due ad ministration of the sacraments ; concerning their preach ing God's word once at least in a quarter; and then exhorting their parishioners to works commanded by Scripture, and not to works devised by men's fancies, as wearing and praying upon beads, and such like. Concern- e [These "articles to be inquired of," &c. will be found in the Appendix to this volume.] 1548-] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 103 ing the plain reciting the Lord's Prayer, the Creed, and Ten Commandments in Enghsh, immediately after the Gospel, as often as there were no sermon. Concerning the examining of every one that came to confession in Lent, whether they were able to say the Creed, the Lord's Prayer, and Ten Commandments, in English. Concern ing the having learned curates, to be procured by such as were absent from their benefices. Concerning having the whole Bible of the largest volume in every church, and Erasmus' Paraphrase in Enghsh. Concerning teaching the people of the nature of the fast of Lent, and other days in the year, that it was but a mere positive law. Con cerning residence upon benefices, and keeping hospitality. Concerning finding a scholar in the universities, or some grammar-school, incumbent on such priests as had an hundred pounds a year. Concerning moving the parish ioners to pray rather in Enghsh than in a tongue unknown, and not to put their trust in saying over a number of beads. Concerning having the New Testa ment in Latin and Enghsh, and Erasmus' Paraphrase, which all priests under the degree of bachelors in divinity were examined about. Concerning putting out of the church-books the name of Papa, and the name and ser vice of Thomas Becket, and the prayers that had rubrics, containing pardons and indulgences." And many the hke articles: which may be seen by him that will have 183 recourse to them, as they are printed in bishop Sparrow's Collections*. Those articles that related to the laity were, " Concern- And for ing the letters or hinderers of the Word of God read in English, or preached sincerely. Concerning such as went out of the church in the time of the Litany, or common- f [See Sparrow's Collection of Articles, &c. pp. 25-33. ed- Lond. I67S-] 104 MEMORIALS OF [II. 9. prayer, or sermon. Concerning ringing bells at the same time. Concerning such as abused the ceremonies, as casting holy-water upon their beds, bearing about them holy-bread, St. John's Gospel; keeping of private holy- days, as tailors, bakers, brewers, smiths, shoemakers, &c. did. Concerning the misbestowing of money arising from cattle, or other moveable stocks of the church, as for finding of lights, torches, tapers, or lamps, and not em ployed to the poor man's chest. Concerning abusing priests and ministers. Concerning praying upon the Enghsh Primer set forth by the king, and not the Latin, for such as understand not Latin. Concerning keeping the church-holy- day, and the dedication-day, any other wise, or at any other time, than was appointed. Con cerning commoning and jangling in the church at the time of reading the common-prayer or homilies, or when there was preaching. Concerning maintenance of error and heresy. Concerning common swearers, drunkards, blasphemers, adulterers, bawds. Inquiries were also to be made after such as were common brawlers, slanderers ; such as used charms, sorceries, inchantments, and witch craft; such as contemned their own parish-church, and went elsewhere. Concerning marrying within the de grees prohibited, and without asking the banns. Con cerning the honest discharge of wills and testaments, in such as were executors or administrators. Concerning such as contemned married priests, and refused to receive the communion and other sacraments at their hands. Concerning such as kept in their own houses images, tables, pictures, painting, or monuments of feigned miracles undefaced, &c. An ex- ln this year also the archbishop, with the dean and made be- chapter of Canterbury, granted the patronage, rectory, archbishop &c- 0I" Riceborough Monachorum, in the county of 154S.J ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 105 Bucks?, to the lord Windsor, for fourscore and nineteen and the years : and, in exchange, the said lord granted to the arch- sor, bishop the advowson, patronage, and nomination of Midley in Kent, for the same duration of years". September the ninth, being Sunday, Robert Farrar, Bishop of D.D. was consecrated bishop of St. David's, by Thomas conse- archbishop of Canterbury, endued with his pontificals, and"^m' assisted by Henry bishop of Lincoln', and Nicholas bishop Regist. of Rochester k, at Chertsey in the diocese of Winton, in the archbishop's house there. Then certain hymns, psalms, and prayers being recited, together with a portion of Scripture read in the vulgar tongue out of St. Paul's Epistles, and the Gospel of St. Matthew, the archbishop celebrated the sacrament of the body and blood of Christ. There communicated the reverend fathers, Thomas bishop of Ely1, Thomas bishop of Westminster™1, Henry bishop of Lincoln, Nicholas bishop of Rochester, and Farrar the new bishop; together with William May, dean of St. Paul's, Simon Hains, dean of Exon, Thomas Robertson 184 and John Redman, professors of divinity, and others. The archbishop then distributed the communion in Enghsh B [i. e. Monks Risborough, in son and patronage of this church the Hundred of Aylesbury, which with Thomas, archbishop of Can- " the see of Canterbury continued terbury, for that of Riceborough to possess from the time of Dun- Monachorum, in the county of stan, a.d. 959, to that of abp. Bucks, for the term of ninety -nine Cranmer." See Lipscomb's Hist, years. Which exchange was with of Bucks, vol. ii. pp. 410. et sqq. the consent of the dean and chap- ed. Lond. 1847.] ter of Canterbury." Hasted's h ["This church (Midley), was Hist, of Kent, vol. iii. pp. 503, 4. formerly appurtenant to the manor ed. Canter. 1778-99.] of Midley above mentioned, and * [Henry Holbeach.] continued so in king Edward k [Nicholas Ridley.] vith's reign, in the third year of ' [Thomas Goodrich.] which, anno 1548, William, lord m [Thomas Thirlby.] Windsor, exchanged the advow- 106 MEMORIALS OF [II. 9. words. The bishop, (as it is writ in the margin of the register), was the first that was consecrated upon the bare nomination of the king, according to the statute that for that purpose was published in the first year of his reign". n ["Towards the close of 1547, Cranmer was principally con cerned in the formation of an act*, which withdrew from deans and chapters the election of bishops, and admitted the prelates to their sees by the letters patent of the crown, and which declared 'all ju risdiction both spiritual and tem poral to be derived from the king, in whose name therefore aU epi scopal citations and processes should now run, and with whose arms, instead of their own, their official documents should be sealed. Under their own names and seals the prelates againf acted in the reign of Mary, and have since continued so to do. The admission however to their sees by the letters patent has been shewn to be J no innovation, but a recovery to the crown of its an cient right. The renewal of it in England has been the wish of one of our most learned divines. §' It would be much easier,' he ob serves, ' if, instead of the mock elections of bishops by conge' d'e'lire, and the operose way of suing out so many instruments, and going through so many offices, and there paying so many fees for them, in order to their fuU settle ments in their preferments, bishops were made here in the same man ner as they are [in] Ireland, by the king's letters patent j in which case there would be nothing fur ther necessary than those letters presenting them to the benefice, as in the case of all other ecclesi astical benefices in the king's gift, and his mandate to the archbishop * [10. Edward vi. cap. 2. intituled "An act for the election of bishops, and what seals and style they and other spiritual persons exercising jurisdic tion ecclesiastical shall use ;" (see Statutes of the Realm, vol. iv. pp 3, 4.) which was repealed by 10. Mary, cap. 1. (Id. p. 202.) By 1°. Elizabeth, cap. 1. (Id. pp. 350-355.) the statute "restraining the payment of annates &c. 250. Henry vni. cap. 20. (Id. vol. iii. pp. 463-464.) was revived, which provided for the election of archbishops and bishops by deans and chapters, &c. under the king's license and letters missive, (viz. by congi d'elire, but in default of such election, by the king's letters patent,) instead of the act 1°. Edward vi. cap. z, which had in fact repealed the 25°. Henry vm. cap. 20. It is upon this statute that the elections of archbishops and bishops have proceeded from that time to the present.] t [Heylin's Hist. Of Reformat, p. 51. ed. Lond. 1674.] J [Ibid. p. 53.] § [Life of dean Prideaux, p. 1 13.] 1548.] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 107 The form of the king's letters patents, whereby he con stituted Farrar bishop, is extant in the register, dated from Leghes, August 1, in the second year of his reign0. At this bishop of St. David's I will stay a httle : proving Some ac- unhappy by his preferment unto a church, whose corrup- t^a bishop. tions while he endeavoured to correct, he sunk under his commendable endeavours p. He was an active man, and made much use of in pubhc affairs in king Henry and king Edward's days; having been first a canon of St. Mary's in Oxon. He was with bishop Barlowq when he was by king Henry sent ambassador to Scotland, anno 1535. Another time employed in carrying old books of great value from St. Oswald's, a dissolved monastery, as it seems, unto the archbishop of York. And in the royal visitation in the beginning of king Edward, he was one of the king's visitors, being appointed one of the preachers, for his great ability in that faculty : and being chaplain to the duke of Somerset, was by his means advanced to be bishop; and upon his fall he fell into great troubles. to consecrate, institute, and instal David's in Wales," see Foxe's Acts them. By these means a great and Monuments, pp. 1544 et sqq. deal of trouble and expense would ed. Lond. 1583. See also Harl. be saved, and deans and chapters MSS. 420. Plut. lxv. E. art. 17- delivered from the great danger 27. fol. 80-178. British Museum, of a praemunire, to which they are Originals, from which and Foxe's liable in all such elections, if they narrative Strype most probably do not within twenty days return drew the above statement respect- elected the person, whom the king ing the bishop of St. David's.] in his letters missive nominates 1 [Successively bishop of St. A- to them.' " Todd's Life of abp. saph, St. David's, Bath and Wells, Cranmer, pp. 31-33. See also (of which he was deprived a. d. Burnet's Hist, of Reformat, vol. 1553.) and Chichester, (to which i. pp. 300, 1. vol. ii. pp. 88-92. see he succeeded upon the death ed. Oxon. 1829.] of John Christopherson, who was 0 [Cranm.Reg. fol. 327 b, 328.] deprived in the first year of p [For "the history of Dr. Elizabeth.) See Le Neve's Fasti, Robert Farrar, bishop of St. pp. 22, 33, 58, 514.] 108 MEMORIALS OF [II. 9. This bishop, not long after his first entrance upon his bishopric, resolved to visit his diocese, like a careful pastor, hearing of very great corruptions in it, and par ticularly among those that belonged to the chapter of the church of Carmarthen ; and chiefly Thomas Young, chaunter, after archbishop of Yorkr, (who pulled down the great hall in the palace there for lucre of the lead), and Rowland Merrick, one of the canons, after bishop of the said see of St. David'ss, and father to sir Gilly Merrick, that came to an untimely death by being in the business of the earl of Essex4. These two, having been before com missaries of the diocese, had spoiled the cathedral church of crosses, chalices, and censers : with other plate, jewels, and ornaments, to the value of five hundred marks or more ; and converted them to their own private benefit : and had sealed many blanks, " sede vacante," without the king's hcense or knowledge. Whereupon the bishop issued out his commission to his chancellor" for visiting the chapter, as well as the rest of the diocese. But the com mission was, it seems, drawn up amiss by the said chan- r [Precentor of St. David's, Dec. 21, a. d. 1559. See Le a. d. 1542, which office he re- Neve's Fasti, p. 27.] signed, a. d. 1553; Dec. 6, a. d. * [Sir GUlie Merrick was stew- I5S9> ne was elected bishop of St. ard to Robert Devereux, earl of David's, and was translated to Essex, and one of the accomplices York, Feb. 2g, a. d. 1560. See in his treason ; he was brought to Le Neve's Fasti, pp. 311, 514, trial with sir Christopher Blunt, 5X5'] sir Charles Danvers, sir John s [See above, p. 37. Rowland Davis, and Henry Cuff, March Merrick was appointed commis- 5, and was executed with Cuff, at saryofthe see of Bangor with Grif- Tyburn, March 13, a.d. 1601. fin Leyson, and Geoffrey Glynn, See Rapin's Hist, of England, a. d. 1551, (see below cap. xxvi.) vol. ii. pp. 151, 154. ed. Lond. and was consecrated bishop of 1732-51.] Bangor, (not of St. David's, as is " [Rowland Merrick.] erroneously stated by Strype), 1548.] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 109 cellor, to whom the bishop left the forming the draught : for it ran in the old popish form, and so the king's supre macy not sufficiently acknowledged therein ; though he professed to visit in the king's name and authority. This these two, in combination with his own ungrateful register, George Constantine, whom he had preferred, took their advantage of; not only to disobey the said commission, but to accuse the poor bishop of a " praBmunire :" for which he was fain to go down from London, whither they had before brought him up, to answer at the assizes of Car marthen. And when, by reason of the molestations they gave him, and their detaining him in London, he could not be so exact in paying in the tenths, and first-fruits, and subsidies, due from the clergy of his diocese ; they took hold of this as another crime to lay to his charge. 185 And hereupon, in fine, he was kept in prison a long time, and so remained when queen Mary entered upon the government" : upon which occasion he fell into the hands of the pope's butchers ; who at last, for maintaining the x [" Briefly, in few words to under sureties, in the reign of conclude this process, bishop king Edward, not for any just Farrar, partly upon the importu- cause of his part deserved, but by nate suit of his adversaries, partly reason that he had been promoted upon the sinister and unfortunate by the duke of Somerset, and now faU of the good duke of Somerset, after his fall he found fewer friends by whom he had been before pro- to support him against such as moted and maintained, having but hunted after his bishopric, at smaU favour shewed, was detained length after the decease of king in prison, tiU the death of king Edward, by the coming in of ' Edward, and the coming in of queen Mary, the state of religion queen Mary, and popish rehgion, began to be changed and altered. whereby a new trouble rose upon Whereby a new trouble rose upon him, being now accused and ex- him, being now accused and ex amined for his faith and doc- amined, not for any matter of trine. After that the foresaid praemunire, but for his faith and M. Farrar, bishop of St. David's, doctrine. Whereupon he was had been long detained in custody called before the bishop of Win- 110 MEMORIALS OF [II. 9. truth, sent him into his diocese, and burnt him at a stakey. And thus these men became the instruments of his death. The arch- In their vexatious suits against this good bishop, un swayed by dertaken the better to conceal their own faults, our arch- Farrar's bishop seemed to be engaged, giving too much credit to Enemies. - the ill reports that Farrar's enemies raised against him, in a great heap of frivolous and malicious articles, exhi bited to the king's council. Who appointed sir John Mason and Dr. Wotton to examine them2 : though, I sup pose, our pious archbishop afterwards saw through this malice, and forbore any further to give influence to those that prosecuted this honest man : understanding by letters, which that afflicted man sent, both to him and bishop Goodrich, lord chancellor, his unjust vexations Chester, (Stephen Gardiner), with pronounced as " a heretic excom- M. Hooper, M. Rogers. M. Brad- municate," was condemned to de- ford, M. Saunders, and others gradation and death by his suc- aforesaid, the 4th of February*. cessor, Henry Morgan, Wednes- On the which day he should also day March 13, 1555, an^ g'ven with them have been condemned, over to the secular power, viz. but because leisure or list did not to Master Leyson, the then sheriff so well then serve the bishop, his of Caermarthen, and was burned condemnation was deferred, and "in the market-place on the south he sent to prison again, where he side of the market-cross, the continued till the 14th day of the Saturday before Passion Sunday, said month of February." Foxe's March 30th." — See Foxe's Acts Acts and Monuments, p. 1553. an^ Monuments, p. 1555.] ed. Lond. 1583.] z [Id. p. 1546. See vol. i. p. y [Bishop Farrar, having been 159.] * [This date is probably inaccurate, as Foxe also states (p. 1483.) that Farrar was brought before the bishop of Winchester and other bishops on Wednesday, Jan. 30. with doctor Taylor, Crome, Bradford and Saunders, who were excommunicated, condemned, and committed to the sheriffs.— Hooper, Rogers, Taylor, and Bradford, he also says, (ibid.) were excommuni cated. In the previous day, Jan. 29, ecclesiastical judgment was passed by Gardiner on the two former, the condemnation of the two latter being deferred till the next day.] 1548.] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. Ill wrought by his adversaries. One whereof, I mean his register", remained register to that very popish bishop that succeeded himb, nay, and was assistant at his trial and condemnation. In short, hear what one writes that lived nearer those times, and might therefore be pre sumed to know more of these matters. " This was a conspiracy of his enemies against him, and Sutclif's of wicked fellows who had robbed the church, kept con- parsons' cubines, falsified records, and committed many other Qon^r°g gross abuses0." To conclude, I find, by a private letter of England. written to John Foxe, that these men, knowing how they had wronged the good bishop, came to him before his death and asked him forgiveness; and he hke a good Christian forgave them, and was reconciled to themd. a [George Constantine.] January, a. d. 1560, desiring b ["Henry Morgan, who was that the controversy that was deprived of his bishopric about formerly between Mr. Farrar and Midsummer, a.d. 1559, and died Mr. Young, (designed to be made Dec. 23 foUowing." See Le archbishop of York), and Mr. Neve's Fasti, p. 514.] Constantine, might not be men- e [See Sutclif's Threefold An- turned in his English Martyr- swer unto the third part of a ology; and is sorry that Mr. certaine Triobolar treatise of three Constantine was mentioned in supposed conversions of England, his Latin book, they having been &c. p. 41. ed. Lond. 1606.] reconcUed to one another." — d[i. e. "An original letter of Harl. MSS. 416. Plut. lxv. E. Mr. Richard Pratt to Mr. John fol. 170.] Foxe, dated from London, 29 112 MEMORIALS OF [II. 10. CHAPTER X. Ann.1549. THE ARCHBISHOP ANSWERS THE REBELS' ARTICLES. Rebellion in Devon. The commons this year brake out into a dangerous rebelhon ; and though they were once or twice appeased and scattered in some places, yet they made insurrections in others : and chiefly in Devon, where they were very formidable for their numbers. The reason they pre tended was double : the one was, the oppression of the gentry in enclosing of their commons from them. The other, the laying aside the old rehgion ; which, because it was old, and the way their forefathers worhipped God, they were very fond of. The lord Russel, lord privy-seal, who was sent against theme, offering to receive their com plaints, the rebels sent them to him, drawn up under fifteen e [" Against this seditious com pany of rebels was appointed and sent by the king, and his council, sir John Russell, knight, lord privy-seal, as lieutenant-general of the king's army, of whom chiefly depended the charge, and achievance of that voyage in the west parts. To him also were adjoined as in part of ordinary council in those affairs under him, sir William Herbert, sir John Paulet, sir Thomas Specke, with lord Gray, and others besides. Thus the said lord privy-seal, ac companied with the lord Gray, advancing his power against the rebels, although in number of soldiers not equaUy furnished like to the other, yet through the gracious assistance of the Lord's help fighting in his cause, and giving the adventure against the enemy, about the latter end of July, anno 1549, gave them the repulse. Who, notwithstanding, recovering themselves again with such stomachs as they had, en countered the second time with the foresaid lord privy-seal, about the beginning of August follow ing, of whom, through the Lord's mighty power, they with their whole cause of false rehgion were utterly vanquished and over thrown." — Foxe's Acts and Mo numents, p. 1307. ed. Lond. 1583. See Burnet's Hist, of Re format, vol. ii. pp. 237-242. ed. Oxon. 1829. FuUer's Church Hist. vol. iv. pp. 40-50. ed. Oxon. 1845. Holinshed's Chro nicles, vol. ii. part ii. pp. 1002, et sqq. ed Lond. 1586, 7.] I549-J ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 113 articles'. As before they had sent their demands in seven articles s, and a protestation that they were the f [These " fifteen articles " will be found in the Appendix, No. xl., with the answer to them by abp. Cranmer.] B [The foUowing are " the arti cles of the commons of Devon shire and Cornwall sent to the king :— " First, forasmuch as man ' ex cept he be born of water and the Holy Ghost cannot enter into the kingdom of God,' and forasmuch as the gates of heaven be not opened without this blessed sa crament of baptism, therefore we will that our curates shaU minis ter this sacrament at aU times of need, as weU in the week days, as on the holy days. " Item, We wiU have our chUd ren confirmed of the bishop, whensoever we shaU within the diocese resort unto him. " Item, Forasmuch as we con stantly beheve that after the priest hath spoken the words of consecration, being at mass, there celebrating and consecrating the same, there is very really the body and blood of our Saviour Jesu Christ, God and man, and that no substance of bread and wine remaineth after, but the very self same body that was born of the Virgin Mary, and was given upon the cross for our redemption; therefore we wUl have mass cele brated as it hath been in times past, without any man communi cating with the priests, foras- CRANMER, VOL. II. much as many rudely presuming unworthily to receive the same, put no difference between the Lord's body and other kind of meat, some saying that it is bread before and after, some say ing that it is profitable to no man except he receive it, with many other abused terms. " Item, We will have in our churches reservation. " Item, We wiU have holy bread and holy water in the re membrance of Christ's precious body and blood. " Item, We wiU that our priests shaU sing or say with an audible voice, God's service in the quire of the parish churches, and not God's service to be set forth Hke a Christmas play. " Item, Forasmuch as priests be men dedicated to God, for ministering and celebrating the blessed sacraments, and preach ing of God's word, we will that they shall live chaste without marriage, as St. Paul did, being the elect and chosen vessel of God, saying unto aU honest priests, ' Be ye foUowers of me.' " Item, We wUl have the Six Articles, which our sovereign lord king Henry vui. set forth in his latter days, shaU be used and so taken as they were at that time. " Item, We pray God save king Edward, for we be his, both body and goods." — Foxe's Acts and Mo numents, p. 1305. ed. Lond. 1583.] I 114 MEMORIALS OF [II. 10. king's, body and goods. In answer to which the king sent a message to them, that may be seen in Poxeh. They sent also a supplication to the king : to the which an answer was made by the king's learned counsel'. The arch- I shall take notice only of the fifteen articles, unto swerethe" wnich our archbishop drew up an excellent answer at 186 good length: for no man was thought so fit as he to tides! ar" °Pei1 an' king's majesty himself commandeth me so to do, then I will do it, not afore. This is a wicked saying, and dam- f [i. e. Tuesday, Oct. i, a. d. 1549.J e [See Foxe's Acts and Monuments, p. 1307. ed. Lond. 1583.] 128 MEMORIALS OF [II. II. nable : for we may not so be excused. Scripture is plain in it, and sheweth us that we ought to obey his officers, having authority from the king, as well as unto the king himself. Therefore this excuse will not, nor cannot serve afore God. Yet let the magistrates take heed to their office and duty1." An ordina- This year the archbishop celebrated a great ordination, prieste and consisting of such chiefly as shewed themselves favourers deacons. 0f ^ icmg>s proceedings, to be sent abroad to preach the gospel, and to serve in the ministry of the church. At this ordination bishop Ridley also assisted the archbishop. The old popish order of conferring of holy orders was yet in force, the new office as yet not being prepared and established : but this ordination nevertheless was cele brated after that order that was soon after estabhshed. At this ordination great favour was shewn, and conni vance to such who, otherwise being well qualified for piety and learning, scrupled wearing the habits used by the popish priests. I meet with two famous men now or dained : the one was Robert Drakes, who was deacon to Dr. Taylor, parson of Hadley, at the commandment of archbishop Cranmer, afterwards parson of Thundersley in Essex, and in the year 1556 burnt to death in Smithfield 192 for his constant profession of Christ's rehgion k. The other 1 [See Latimer's Works, vol. i. deacon by Dr. Taylor of Hadley*, p. 118. Park. Soc. ed.] at the commandment of Dr. k [" About the fourth day of Cranmer, late archbishop of Can- March next after Robert Drakes terbury ; and within one year also was examined, who was after, which was the third of the parson of Thundersley in Essex, reign of king Edward, he was by and had there remained the space the said archbishop, and doctor of three years. He was first made Ridley, bishop of London, admit- * [i. e. Dr. Rowland Taylor, chaplain to archbishop Cranmer, " who suf fered for the truth of God's word," at Hadley, of which he was parson, Feb. 9, a.d. 1555. — See Foxe's Acts and Monuments, pp. 1518—1527. ed. Lond. ¦583.] 1549-J ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 129 was Thomas Sampson, parson of Bread Street, London, and successively dean of Chichester and Christ Church, Oxon1 : who in a letter of his, written to secretary Cecyl ted minister of God's holy word, and sacraments, not after the or der then in force, but after such order as was after established, and was presented unto the said bene fice of Thundersley by the lord Rich, at the suit of Master Caus- ton, and Master Treheron, and now notwithstanding was sent up by the said lord Rich — to Stephen Gardiner, bishop of Winchester, then the lord chanceUor of Eng land, about the 22nd day of March, 1555." Robert Drake was " burned in Smithfield at one fire," with WiUiam Tyms, Richard and Thomas Spurge, John CaveU, and George Ambrose Fuller, "about the 23rd day of April, a. d. 1556," or " the 14th day of" that month. — Foxe's Acts and Monuments, pp. 1895, 1898.] 1 [Thomas Sampson was born at Playford in the county of Suf folk, and was afterwards a feUow of Pembroke CoUege, Cambridge, and parson of AUhaUows Church, Bread Street, London. In the year 1552, he was appointed to the deanery of Chichester. He fled to the continent, with many others, at the beginning of queen Mary's reign, and resided at Frankfort, where he took an active part in the contentions respecting the use ofthe English Service Book. Atthe accession of queen EUzabeth, a. d. 1558, he returned and preached CRANMER, VOL. II. the Spital Sermon, at St. Paul's Cross, on Low Sunday, April 2, and was named amongst those who were deemed worthy of preferment. Upon the removal of George Carew to the deanery of Windsor, Sampson " was installed dean of Christ Church, Oxford, in Mi chaelmas term, a. d. 1561." In the year 1564, he was deprived of this deanery for his refusal to wear the ecclesiastical vestments, to which he had previously offered no objection, inasmuch as in the first year of his absence from England, a. d. 1554, he had writ ten a letter from Strasburgh to his parishioners, in which he re commended them to conform to the ceremonies, that had been set tled in the reign of Edward VI. During his absence from England he changed his opinions on this subject, which was attributed to his converse with John Calvin, and other reformers. Although "some of the common lawyers dis puted the legahty of Sampson's deprivation, and would have brought a praemunire upon the commissioners," he was not re stored tothis preferment. Upon his deprivation, which was executed by archbishop Parker, and other ecclesiastical commissioners, " he was restrained of his liberty at London by the queen's special commandment, that he might be K 130 MEMORIALS OF [II. II. The office of ordina tion re formed. in queen Elizabeth's reign, said, " That at his ordination he excepted against the apparel ; and by the archbishop, and bishop Ridley, he was nevertheless permitted and admitted." All the divine offices were now reformed, but only that for ordination of ministers. Therefore, for the doing of this, the council appointed twelve learned men, consisting half of bishops, and half of other inferior divines ; whose names I do not meet with, excepting Heathe, bishop of Worcester; who, because he would not assist in this an example of her displeasure to the rest," who held the same opinions. Through the interces sion of archbishop Parker with the dean and chapter of Christ Church, and sir William CecU, secretary of state, afterwards lord Burleigh, and lord high treasurer, he was released from confinement, althoughhestiU persisted in his re fusal to wear the vestments, which the latter by letter urged upon him. Afterwards, a.d. 1567, not withstanding he had been '• put out of the deanery of Christ Church" for this very reason, he was allowed to preach in London without wearing the habits; and a. d. 1573, was "found master of" the hospital, caUed " Whittington CoUege, London, where he read a lecture every term, for the an nual stipend of £10 given by the company of cloth workers." " In the latter end of the year 1573, he was taken with a numb palsy on one side, which deprived him of half the use of his limbs." After his lameness "he retired to the hospital at Leicester," to which " he twice did good service for its good estate, and the pre servation of its revenues." He " died April 9th, 1589, astat. 72, and was buried in the chapel of Whittington CoUege, London." See Strype's Eccl. Memor. vol. ii, pt. i. p. 403. pt. ii. pp. 72, 276. vol. iii. pt. i. pp. 231, 234, 404, 591. pt. ii. pp. 227-241. ed. Oxon. 1822. Strype's Annals of the Re format, vol. i. pt. i. pp. 60, 151, 229. pt. ii. pp. 132, 133, 143,146, I47-T53- vol. ii. pt. i. pp. 396, 5°S, 5<56. ed. Oxon. 1824. Strype's Life of abp. Parker, vol. i. pp. 368, 371-373, 445. vol. ii. p. 377. ed. Oxon. 1821. Strype's Life of abp. Grindal, p. 171. ed. Oxon. 1821. Cranmeri Defens. de sacr. (Embd.) p. 9. printed in abp. Cranmer's Works, vol. i, Park. Soc. ed. FuUer's Church Hist. vol. iv. p. 331. ed. Oxon. 1845. Collier's Church Hist. vol. vi. pp. 402, 403, 407, 408, 415, 417. ed. Lond. 1840,41.] 1 549. J ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 131 work, was sent to prison. The chief of them no doubt was the archbishop. After mature deliberation, this office was agreed upon, and finished" : and Ponet0 was the n ["To return to the parha ment, in which an act passed for drawing up an ordinal. The act being short, and not printed ex cept in the statutes at large, I shaU transcribe it for the reader. ' An act to empower a committee of bishops, &c. to draw up an ordinal,' (or for the ordering of ec clesiastical ministers) ' Foras much as concord and unity to be had within the king's majesty's do minions, it is requisite to have one uniform fashion and manner, for making and consecrating of bi shops, priests, deacons, or minis ters of the church. Be it therefore enacted by the king's highness, with the assent of the lords spiri- tural and temporal, and the com mons in this present parhament assembled, and by the authority of the same, that such form and manner of making and con secrating of archbishops, bishops, priests, deacons, and other mi nisters of the church, as by six prelates, and six other men of this realm, learned in God's law, by the king's majesty to be ap pointed and assigned, or by the most number of them shaU be de vised for that purpose, and set forth under the great seal of England, before the first day of April next coming, shaU by virtue of this present act be lawfuUy ex ercised and used, and none other ; any statute, or law, or usage to the contrary in any wise notwith standing*.' When this act passed the house of lords, the bishops of Durham f, Carlisle J, Worcester §, Westminster IT, and Chichester ||, protested against it. Heathe, bi shop of Worcester, was one of the six prelates appointed by the king ; but refusing to consent to the alterations proposed, he was called before the councU, on the 8th of February, and on the 8th of March, committed to the Fleet for persisting in his incompliance. This usage looked hke a strain of justice ; but Heathe, having been observed to dissent from aU the bills which promoted the refor mation, he was probably on this score more rigorously treated." Collier's Eccl. Hist. vol. v. pp. 375, 6. etsqq. ed. Lond. 1840, 41. See Burnet's Hist, of Reformat. vol. u. pp. 289, 292, 294. et sqq. ed. Oxon. 1829. Todd's Life of abp. Cranmer, vol. ii. p. 170.J 0 [John Poinet, or Poynet, whose name is also sometimes written Ponet, and Ponnet, was a Kentish man, and educated at *[3° and 40 Edward VI. cap. 12. Statutes of the Realm, vol. iv. p. 112.] t [Cuthbert Tnnstal.] + [Robert Aldrich.] § [Nicholas Heathe.] 1f [Thomas Thirlby.] || [George Day.] K2 132 MEMORIALS OF [II. n. first bishop consecrated after this new form. And that I suppose may be the reason, that it is set down at length in the archbishop's register in that manner as it is there to be seen : as we shall see under the next year. The arch- Upon the vacancy of cathedral churches the archbishop visits some used to visit. So now the church of St. David's being churches vacant, upon the removal of Barlow to Bath and WehV, S. David's, the archbishop issued out a commission to Ehseus Price? Glocester. to visit that church. And upon the vacancy of Glocester by the death of Wakeman1", there was a commission to J. Williams, LL. Ds. and prebendary there, to be his commissary, and to visit that church, and to be keeper of the spiritualties of the city and diocese of Glocester in this third year of the king. This year also the church of Norwich. Norwich being become vacant by the resignation of Queen's College, Cambridge. He above, p. 105.) In the year 1553, was one of Cranmer's chaplains, he resigned his preferment, and and was consecrated bishop of fled to Germany ; returning to Rochester, June 29,1550, upon England on queen Elizabeth's ac- the elevation of Nicholas Ridley cession he was made bishop of to the see of London; he was Chichester, Dec. 20th, 1559, and translated to Winchester, March died Aug. 13th, 1568. See vol. i. 23, i55x> O" the deprivation of p. 78. Le Neve's Fasti, pp. 22, Stephen Gardiner ; but when 33, 58, 514. Strype's Eccl. Mem. queen Mary came to the crown, vol. u. pt. ii. p. 168. vol. iii. pt. i. he left the kingdom, and died at p. 431. ed. Oxon. 1822. Strype's Strasburgh, in Germany, April Life of abp. Grindal, p. 41. ed. nth, 1556. See book iii. cap. 28, Oxon. 182 1. Strype's Life of abp. and Le Neve's Fasti, pp. 251, Parker, vol. i. 537. vol. hi. p. 283. 287. See also Todd's Life of ed. Oxon. 1821.] abp. Cranmer, vol. ii. pp. 171, 2.] 1 [See above, p. 37.] p [William Barlow was elected r [see Vol. i. p. 217. " He died bishop of St. Asaph, Jan. 1 6, 1 53J, at Worthington, in the county of and was translated to St. David's, in the beginning of AprU 10th, 1536; and to Bath Dec. 1549." Le Neve's Fasti, and WeUs, Feb. 3rd, 1547. He p. 10i.] was succeeded by Robert Farrar, in s [gee above, p. 37.] the bishopric of St. David's, (see I549-] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 133 Repps (, the archbishop granted a commission to John, bishop suffragan of Thetfordu, and dean of the church of the Holy Trinity, Norwich, to be his deputy and com missary for visitation and jurisdiction. But, somewhat before this, he constituted Roland Taylor, LL.D. and William Wakefeld, D.D. to be keepers of the spiritualties of Norwich: from whose jurisdiction he protested not to derogate by those his commissional letters to the suf fragan, nor to withdraw from them any authority of juris diction. This was dated February 15. Also the church of London being vacant by the deprivation and destitution London. of Bonerw, the archbishop consecrated Gabriel Donne, residentiary of St. Paul's, to be his official, and keeper of the spiritualties, to exercise all manner of episcopal juris diction in the said city and diocese. r [See vol. i. p. 105. " He re signed in January, a.d. 1549, and died Sept. 2 1st, 1550." Le Neve's Fasti, p. 211.] " ["John SaUsbury, suffragan bishop of Thetford, was made dean (of Norwich) on the resignation of WiUiam Castleton, in 1539. He was deprived in the beginning of queen Mary's reign, March 1. 1555." He was " again restored in 1560, and in 1571 was made bishop of the Isle of Man (i. e. Sodor and Man); but held this deanery in commendam with it to his death, which happened in the latter end of September, 1573, and was buried in Norwich Cathedral." Id. pp. 213, 214, 358. See vol. i. p. 80.] w [See vol. i. p. 196. Boner "was deprived by two several commissions, dated the 8th and the 17th of September, 1549. The defi nitive sentence was pronounced October 1st," by archbishop Cranmer, who "openly read and pubhshed it with the whole con sent of the other commissioners." " By a sentence promulged Sept. 5th, 1553, Boner was restored to his bishopric, but was again dis placed by authority of parliament, May 30th, 1559. He died a pri soner in the Marshalseain South- wark, Sept. 5th, 1569," to which he had been committed, April 20th, 1560. Le Neve's Fasti, p. 180. See also Foxe's Acts and Monu ments, pp. 1312, 1322, 1329. ed. Lond. 1583. Strype's Annals of the Reformat, vol. i. pt. i. pp. 86, 205, 210, 214, 220 ; pt. u. p. 298. ed. Oxon. 1824. Strype's Eccl. Mem. vol. ii. pt. ii. p. 165. ed. Oxon. 1822.] 134 MEMORIALS OF [II. ii. A new dean of the Arches. Archesx This year he made Griffin Leyson, LL.D. dean of the x [i. e. Griffith Leyson, a civilian, was one of the judges and com missioners in the case of George van Paris ; — (seeabove, p. ioo. nA) he was also appointed a commis sioner with archbishop Cranmer, bishop Ridley, (London) Goodrich, (Ely) and Holbeach, (Lincoln) sir WiUiam Petre, judge Hales, and others, for the examination, and deprivation, of Stephen Gardiner, bishop of Winchester; he was also one of the commission appointed by the king to examine and re port upon the proceedings of the former commissioners against Boner, by whom he had been de prived of his bishopric and im prisoned ; he was also Cranmer's "principal chanceUor and offi cial," as weU as dean of the Arches Court. See Foxe's Acts and Monuments, p. 776. 1st ed. 1563. pp. 1330, 1358. ed. Lond, 1583. Burnet's Hist, of Reformat. vol. ii. p. 340. pt. u. p. 239. ed. Oxon. 1829. Strype's Eccl. Mem. vol. hi. pt. i. pp. 37, 8. ed. Oxon. 1822.] I549-] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 135 CHAPTER XII. duke of Somerset's TuotJBLEsy. the common PRAYEE RATIFIED. When most of the council had combined together, inThearch- i t ¦ , bishop the month of October, against the protector ot the kmg s^tes to person, the duke of Somerset, and had withdrawn them- ^°^a selves to Ely-house, the king then being at Hampton Court, house. and suddenly conveyed by the said duke to Windsor2, upon the fear of tumult; then I find the archbishop, 1 93 and but two privy-counsellors a more, with the king and the protector there. Being here, the good archbishop, though he would not forsake his friend the duke, nor the king his master, yet he did what lay in him to appease and pacify these heats. And so he, with the lord Paget0 y [For an account of the history of the troubles of the duke of Somerset, see Foxe's Acts and Monuments, pp. 1367. et sqq. ed. Lond. 1583. Burnet's Hist. of Reformat, vol. u. pp. 269 et sqq. ed. Oxon. 1829. CoUier's Eccl. Hist. vol. v. pp. 362, et sqq. ed. Lond. 1840, 41. FuUer's Church Hist. vol. iv. pp. 76, et sqq. ed. Oxon. 1845.] z [See king Edward's Journal, Cotton MSS. Nero. C. x. fol. 13. b. British Museum. Original and holograph, and Burnet's Hist, of Reformat, vol. n. pt. ii. p. 12. ed. Oxon. 1829.] a [i. e. lord Paget, and sir Tho mas Smith.] b [Sir WiUiam, afterwards lord Paget, who had been employed in several foreign embassies, was se cretary of state, and one of Henry VHIth's executors and governors to his son, Edward VI. ; of whose council he was a member. For his adherence to the falling fortunes of the duke of Somerset he was committed to the Tower. He was afterwards degraded from being a knight of the garter ; upon the death of Edward VI., he was sent with the earl of Arundel by the council to acknowledge queen Mary; he was also restored to the order of the garter, and de puted with lord Hastings to bring over cardinal Pole to Eng land ; he received the appoint ment of lord privy-seal, and was one of the select committee appointed for the regulation of affairs during the absence from England of Philip, the husband 136 MEMORIALS OF [II. I a. and secretary Smithc, in their own and the king's name, wrote an earnest letter to the separating counsellors, and sent it by sir Philip Hobyd: wherein, as appears by their answer, "they were charged by the archbishop with creating much care and sorrow to the king, and that he thought they had not that care that beseemed them of pacifying the present uproars, and for the preservation of the state from danger : that they forgat the benefits they had received from the king's father, nor were mindful of their duty of allegiance : that their doings bespake wilfulness ; and that the protector meant nothing but the safety and protection of the king in what he had done ; and that he had that consideration of his duty to God, that the promise and oath he made required." They were ad, vised to do as they would be done unto : and mention was made of "cruelty" more than once, charging them obliquely. therewith. And in fine he wrote, that he, and those with him, knew more than they did, to whom they writ. Pro bably he meant, that he knew that this anger against the duke arose from the private mahce of some of them, or their hatred of the reformation, notwithstanding all the fair pretences of their care of the king, and the protector's misgovernment . of queen Mary. In queen Eliza- Annals of the Reformat, vol. iii. beth's reign he was laid aside pt. i. p. 87. ed. Oxon. 1824.] from the privy council, and " died c [See above, p. 123.] at his house in Drayton, a. d. d [Sir Philip Hobey, or Hob- I5(>3-" — See v°l- i- PP- 21, 22, bey, was a favourer of the refor- 321. Burnet's Hist, of Refor- mation and one of Edward Vlth's mat. vol. ii. pp. 6, 36, 213, 271, councU. He was also a friend of 304, 369, 425, 479, 584, 621. the lord protector, and employed vol. iii. pp. 181, 297, 455, 490. in several embassies during this ed. Oxon. 1829. Strype's Eccl. reign.— See Burnet's Hist, of Mem. vol. ii. pt. i. pp. 17, 19, Reformat, vol. i. pp. 652, 653, 242-249, 497. vol. iii. pt. i. pp. 655. vol. ii. pp. 179, 288, 4g1.pt. 28, 248, 323, 455,469, 489. pt.ii. ii. pp. 12, 37, 39, 68, 122. vol. p. 160. ed. Oxon. 1822. Strype's iii. pp. 355, 367, 368.] 1 549.] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 137 This letter the lords from Ely-house answered, charging Their an- and commanding the archbishop, and those with him, to have a continual earnest watch of the king's person, and that he be not removed from Windsor castle, as they would answer the same at their utmost perils. They wondered much, they said, that they would suffer the king's royal person to remain in the guard of the duke's men, and that strangers should be armed with the king's armour, and be nearest about his person. For, it seems, many of the king's servants, in this fear, were removed away. They advised the archbishop, and the lord Paget, to come over to their side, and to leave the poor duke alone. Upon this the archbishop and the others wrote a second letter, dated October the 10th: wherem they assured the lords, that they could, whensoever they pleased to require it, give such very good reasons for their so often mentioning cruelty in their other letter, as, they questioned not, they would be well satisfied with. And so, upon the lords propounding a meeting with the king and them, they accorded thereunto, in great pru dence willing, for peace and quietness in that dangerous time, so to do. These letters are recorded in the History vol. ii. Col- of the Reformation^. lecct- P- 107, 100. The Common Prayer-book, and administration of the The arch- sacraments, by the great care and study of the arch- tng conf-*" bishop, was now finished, and settled by act of parlia-™on*'rayer- ment f : which would not down with a great many. But firmed. upon the taking up of the duke of Somerset in the month e [See Burnet's Hist of Refor- cap. 1. intituled, " An act for the mat. vol. ii. pt. ii. B. i. Nos. 43, uniformity of service and admi- 44- PP- 263-268. Abp. Cranmer's nistration of the Sacraments Works, vol. n. pp. 520-522. Park, throughout the realm." — See Soc. ed. and the Appendix to this Statutes of the Realm, vol. iv. volume.] pp. 37-39.] 1 [i.e. 2°. and 3°. Edw. VI. 138 MEMORIALS OF [II. la. of October, and laying him in the Tower, it was generally said that now the old Latin service should come in again, the common opinion being, that the Common Prayer was I94 peculiarly of his procuring. And that there were such designs among Somerset's enemies, who were generally favourers of the old religion, it is not improbable. The good archbishop thought it now time to interpose in this thing, and to obtain from the privy-council somewhat to confirm the book of Common Prayer. So there was in December 25 a general letter drawn up to all the bishops of England : letting them understand, that there was no intention of bringing in again Latin service, conjured bread and water, nor any such abrogated ceremonies: and that the abolishing of these, and the setting forth of the book of Common Prayer, was done by the whole state of the realm. That the book was grounded upon the holy Scripture, and was agreeable to the order of the primitive church, and much to the edifying of the sub ject. And therefore that the changing of that for the old Latin service would be a preferring of ignorance to knowledge, darkness to light, and a preparation to bring in papistry and superstition again. The bishops there fore were bid with all speed to command their deans and prebendaries, and all parsons, vicars, and curates, to bring to such places as the bishops should appoint, all antiphoners, missals, &c. and all other books of service: and that they be defaced and abolished, that they be no let to that godly and uniform order set forth. And to commit to ward any stubborn and disobedient persons that brought not the said books, and to certify the coun cil of their misbehaviour. That they should make search, if any of these superstitious books were withdrawn or hid. That, whereas there were some persons, who refused to contribute to the buying of bread and wine for the com- I549-] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 139 munion, according to the order of the book, whereby many times the holy communion was fain to be omitted, to convent such persons before them, and admonish them ; and if they refused to do accordingly, to punish them by suspension, excommunication, or other censure. This was signed by the archbishop and the lord chancellor Rich, and four mores. b [See the Appendix to this volume, in which this letter -is printed entire.] 140 MEMORIALS OF [II. 13. CHAPTER XIII. THE ARCHBISHOP ENTERTAINS LEARNED FOREIGNERS. The arch- The archbishop had now in his family several learned hishop har- hours men. Some he sent for from beyond sea, and some in strangers V^J ne entertained, being exiles for rehgion. Among the former sort was Martin Bucer", a man of great learning and moderation, and who bore a great part in the reforma tion of Germany. While he and the rest abode under his roof, the archbishop still employed them, sometimes in learned conferences and consultations held with them, sometimes in writing their judgment upon some subjects in divinity. Here Bucer wrote to the lady Elizabeth a letter, bearing date the 6th of the calends of September, commending her study in piety and learning, and exciting her to proceed therein ; incited so to do, I make no doubt, by the archbishop, whom Bucer in that letter makes men- 195 tion of, and styleth "Patrem suum, et benignissimum hospitem'." Hence also he wrote another letter to the marquis of Northamptoni (who was a patron of learning, h [" Martin Bucer was one of England ; and, at Cranmer's so- the first reformers at Strasburgh; licitation, he came to England in he was born in Alcace in 1491. 1549, and taught divinity at Cam- At seven years old he took the ha- bridge, where he died in 1551." bit of St. Dominic. He read Lu- [Feb. 27.]— Foxe's Acts and Mo ther's works, and conferred with numents, vol. v. p. 704. n. 2. ed. him in person at Heidelberg, in Lond. 1843-48.] 1521: but although he agreed with i [MSS. C.C.C.C. No. cxiii. him in many of his opinions, yet p. 4.] in the foUowing year he gave the 3 [i. e. WiUiam Par, earl of Es- preference to those of Zuinglius. sex, marquis of Northampton, He was at the Interim at Augs- who was appointed an assistant burg in 1548, from whence the to the executors of Henry news of his piety, and sentiments VHIth's wiU; he was a privy- upon matters of faith reached councillor, and was sent against 1 549-3 ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 141 and a professor of rehgion), in the behalf of Sleidan, who was promised a pension by the king, to enable him to write the history of the progress of rehgion, beginning at Luther. A part of the letter, translated into English, ran thus : — "Therefore if we should not take care that this so great act of divine goodness towards us, [viz. the refor mation began in the year 1517], should be most diligently written and consecrated to posterity, we should lie under the crime of the neglect of God's glory, and most foul ingratitude. Therefore John Sleidan, a very learned and eloquent man, five years ago began to compile an history of this nature, as the work he had pubhshed did witness. But after he was much encouraged in this undertaking, and well furnished with matter, the calamities that befel Germany, for our own deserts, intercepted the pious at tempts of this man, so very useful to the church. Nor doth it appear now from whence, besides the king's ma jesty, we may hope that some small benignity may be obtained for Sleidan ; since the salaries, which he received for this purpose from the German princes, failed ; and he was poor. That John Alasco, Dr. Peter Martyr, and he, considering these things, and weighing how the truly Christian king Edward was even born with a desire of illustrating the glory of Christ, and what need there was to set Sleidan again upon finishing the History of the Gospel restored to us; they had therefore presumed to the Norfolk rebels, but was un- but escaped, and was one of successful: he took part against queen Elizabeth's first privy- the lord protector, and upon his councU. See above, p. 44. Bur- removal was appointed one of the net's Hist, of Reformat, vol. ii. six governors of the king's per- pp. 7, 30, 36, 243, 246, 280, 286, son. He was brought to trial for 396, 471, 486, 487, 752. ed. taking part against queen Mary Oxon. 1829.] 142 MEMORIALS OF [II. 13. supplicate the king in his behalf, and intreated the mar quis to promote and forward their supphcation, and to vouchsafe to contribute his help also." We shall hear more of this hereafter. Bucer I find also annotations writ by the said Bucer upon St. the areh- Matthew, reaching as far as the eighth chapter, and there fenu°P'S en(nng> in this method : There is the Latin translation, MSS. with large notes added in the margin ; and at the end of Miscellan. each chapter common places collected from thence in the nature of inferences and observations : which I conclude the archbishop put him upon doing while he was now with him. The work was looked over and examined by the archbishop, notes and corrections of his own hand being here and there inserted. Also the gospel of St. Mark is handled in the same method, by another of the archbishop's guests : which writing hath this inscription by Cranmer's hand ; " Petrus Alexander in Marcum." The arch- At; this time therefore there were at the archbishop's bishop's guests. house, (besides Bucer), Alascom, Peter Martyr11, Paulus 1 [MSS.C.C.C.C.No. civ. p. 1.] the Interim into Friesland accele- m [John a Lasco, a nobleman rated his departure from that of Poland, the nephew of an country, which he quitted in Oc- archbishop of that name, who tober, and having resided for had formerly lived and boarded some time at Bremen and Ham- with Erasmus, by whose conver- burgh, he embarked from the sation and writings he was led last named town, and reached into the reformed systems. Hav- England in the spring of 1550, ing embraced the Reformation, where on July 24th he was ap- he forsook his country and be- pointed the superintendant of the came preacher to a protestant foreign protestant congregation congregation at Embden. In established in London." His September 1548 he visited Eng- ministry was suppressed at the land " upon the invitation of accession of queen Mary, and he Cranmer, with whom he resided himself, with most of the foreign at Lambeth six months. He re- protestants, upon orders to that turned to Embden in the spring effect, left the kingdom. He of 1549; but the introduction of stood very high in the estimation ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 143 1549-J Phagius0, Peter AlexanderP, Bernardine Ochinn, Mat. Negelinus, after a minister of Strasburgh, who accom- of Cranmer, and interfered inju diciously, as some have thought, in the controversies of our own church. — See Todd's Life of abp. Cranmer, vol. ii. pp. 203, 4. Burnet's Hist, of Reformat, vol. n. pp. 318, 319, 4°5> 5QI- voL hi. p. 398. ed. Oxon. 1829. Ori ginal Letters of the Reformat. p. 187. n. 2. and abp. Cranmer's Works, vol. ii. pp. 420. et sqq. Park. Soc. eds.] n [" Peter Martyr was born at Florence in 1500. He studied at Padua and Bononia, and was a monk of the Augustine order in the monastery of FiezoU. He preached the doctrines of Zuing- lius and Bucer, privately at Rome; being impeached there, he fled to Naples, and thence to Lucca. Having been sent for by king Edward, he was made professor of divinity at Oxford, in 1549, but retired to Strasburgh on the accession of queen Mary, and died in 1562." — Foxe's Acts and Monuments, vol. v. p. 704. n. '. ed. Lond. 1843-48.] 0 [Paulus Phagius accompa nied Martin Bucer into England to propagate the doctrines of the reformation, upon the invitation of archbishop Cranmer. He was profoundly skiUed in the eastern languages, and was appointed to the professorship of Hebrew at Cambridge, where he died No vember 15, 1549. His bones with those of Bucer were taken up and burnt in 1557. — See Todd's Life of abp. Cranmer, vol. ii. pp. 194-197. Foxe's Acts and Monuments, vol. v. p. 704. n. 3. ed. Lond. 1843-48. Burnet's Hist, of Reformat, vol. ii. pp. 182, 694. Works of abp. Cran mer, vol. u. p. 426. n. !.] p [Peter Alexander, whom the archbishop employed as his se cretary. Like Bucer and Pha gius, he appears to have written expositions of Scripture at Lam beth. — Todd's Life of abp. Cran mer, vol. u. p. 201.] 1 [Bernardine Ochin, an Ita lian, who had been highly dis tinguished at Naples as the chief director of the capuchin friars and at Venice as a preacher. Having embraced the principles of the reformation he fled to Switzerland, and thence to Stras burgh ; he came to England upon the invitation of archbishop Cran mer, who obtained a prebend of Canterbury for him almost im mediately from the crown, to which he was presented May 9, 1548. He departed from Eng land at the accession of queen Mary, at which time he was de prived of his prebend and pro nounced contumacious. — See Todd's Life of abp. Cranmer, vol. ii. p. 188-190. Burnet's Hist, of Reformat, vol. ii. p. 109. Le Neve's Fasti, p. 18.] 144 MEMORIALS OF [II. I3. panied Bucer and Phagius into England, and others whose names do not occur. Three of these were soon after pre ferred to pubhc places of reading in the universities. Peter Alexander was of Artois, and lived with the arch bishop before Bucer came into England. He was a learned man, but had different sentiments in the matter of the Eucharist, inclining to the belief of a corporeal pre sence with the Lutherans. Though some years after he 196 came over to a righter judgment, as his companion Peter Calvin. Ep. Martyr signified to Calvin, in a letter wrote from Stras burgh1'. Martyr Peter Martyr coming about the beginning of the year hhled^es 1549 nnto the university of Oxford, his first readings at Oxon. were up011 the eleventh chapter of the first epistle to the to the r archbishop. Corinthians ; in which chapter is some discourse of the Lord's supper. The professor, when he came so far, took occasion to expatiate more largely upon that argument ; and the rather, that he might state it aright in the midst of those hot contests that were then about it among learned men. These lectures on the sacrament he soon after printed at London, for the benefit of the world, (as they were two years after done at Zurich), and dedicated them to his patron the archbishop. And that partly to give a pubhc testimony of his sense of the archbishop's great humanity and benefits towards him : "which were so large, that he must do nothing else but tell of them, to be sufficiently thankful for them. And known it was to r [" Petrus Alexander, ut ad atque potest ecclesiae nonnihil me scribit, est brevi te invisurus : prodesse. Rursus vale, ac me qusso ilium aequo ac libenti ani- precibus apud Deum juvato. Ar- mo videas. Nam licet hactenus gentinae, 24 Septembris." [a.d. de re sacramentaria sit nobis ad- 1554.] — P. Martyr. Calvino.-Cal- versatus, attamen in prassentia vin. Epist. p. 91. ed. Amstel. Deo monstrante totus est noster, 1667.] 1 1549- ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 145 all," as he said, "how obligingly he received, and how liberally he entertained, both himself, and many other strangers of his rank and condition. And partly that by his authority he would protect and defend what he should find in his book to be consonant to the holy Scriptures, and agreeable to the king's laws. For he had," he said, "skill and industry enough to do it; who had himself often, both in pubhc and private, conflicted with the adversaries, and with admirable learning, accuracy of wit, and dexterity, vindicated the truth from the spinous and confused cavils of sophisters. Nor did he want will to stand up for sound and Christian doctrines, as all good men knew : who saw how earnest he was in his labours of restoring rehgion; that for that cause he drew upon himself many enmities and threatening dangers s." s [" Quamobrem non opus fuit, ut meum hunc libeUum eo con- sUio tibi exhiberem, ut ex eo ali- quid novi cognosceres, (cum ego potius majorem doctrina? partem ex tuis laboribus hauserim), sed tantum ob id ad tuam celsitu- dinem hoc meum scriptum desti- navi, quo tua censura, (cum jure et merito sis primas totius Angliae), de iUo statueres, notaresque in eo, quicqciid a recto et orthodoxo sen- su visum fuerit dissentire : utque authoritate tua, (quae veluti est, ita summo loco haberi debet), ea pro- tegeres, tuereris, atque defenderes, qua? judicaveris divinis Uteris con- sona, et cum regiae m ajestatis edictis pulchre convenire. Taceopraeterea multa, propter quae in ita causa, non minori, (quam tuum sit), patro- cinio nihil opus fuerit. Negotium itaque, (ut dixi), probe tenes. Ars CRANMER, VOL. II. etiam, ratio et industria tuendi quae amplecteris, nequaquam tuam cel- situdinem deficit. Quod inde pos- sumus edoceri, quia saepius cum adversariis et pubUce et privatim es conflictatus, et mira ut doc- trinae, ingenii acrimonia, et agendi dexteritate, quas vera esse cogno- veras, a sopbistarum spinosis et imricatiscavilhs,asseruisti. Quam vero non desit voluntas, imo prce- sentissimum animum habeas ad tuenda sana et Christiana dog mata, omnes pii satis intelligunt, qui tanto studio religionis instau- randae te flagrare viderunt, ut hac una de causa gravissimas inimi- citias susceperis, multa commoda hujus vitae neglexeris, et horri- bilia pericula subieres. — Ea vero est benignitas tua et humanitas, merita et beneficia quibus me af- fecisti, pro quibus si velim juste L 146 MEMORIALS OF [II. 13. The arch- The first occasion of Bucer's call into England was thus. writes to He had wrote to John Hales1, (a learned Englishman, his Bucer to acquaintance), the sad estate of Germany, and that he could scarce stay any longer in the place where he was. This Hales acquainted the archbishop with ; which made a great impression upon his compassionate soul, and he brake out into those words of the Psalmist, " Mirifica misericordias tuas, qui salvos facis sperantes in te a resis- tentibus dexterae tuas." And forthwith writ to Bucer a letter in October 1548, to come over to this realm, which should be a most safe harbour for him, urging him to become a labourer in the Lord's harvest here begun; and using other arguments with him to move him hereunto, in the most obliging style possible, calling him, "My Bucer." And that he might come over the safer from harms and enemies, the archbishop recommended him to one Hills, an Enghsh merchant, to provide for his passage. No.xliii. The archbishop's letter maybe found in the Appendix, To this letter Bucer wrote an answer, seeming upon some considerations to decline the archbishop's invitation11. This letter coming to the archbishop's hands, he shewed gratias agere, eaque ut merentur * [John Hales was a learned ornare, et mihi nil praeterea dicen- and good man, and clerk of the dum erit, et quantumvis ista hanaper to Edward VI. and queen praedicavero, magnitudine rei Elizabeth. In queen Mary's time semper vincetur oratio. Idcirco he was an exUe at Frankfort. de his potius nihU, quam indigne He died a.d. 1572. — See Strype's ac tenuiter dicere, statui. Notum Eccl. Mem. vol. ii. pt. i. p. 47- est jam omnibus, non solum me, vol. hi. pt. i. p. 405. ed. Oxon. verum permultos alios mei ordi- 1822. Annals of the Reformat. nis peregrinos, quam humaniter vol. i. pt. i. p. 74. pt.ii.p. 117. vol. exceperis, et exceptos quam be- ii. pt. i. p. 352. ed. Oxon. 1824, nigne tractaveris, ideo haec, ut Bp. Keith's Affairs of Church and probe cognita, ulterius prosequi State in Scotland, vol. ii. pp. 226, desino."— P. Martyr. Tractat. de 7. Spottiswode Soc. ed.] sacr. Euchar. Epist. nuncupat. u [See Original Letters of theRe- fol. i. b. 2. ed. Lond. 1549.] format, pp. 533, 4. Park. Soc. ed.] I549-] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 147 to Peter Alexander; who, by the archbishop's order, wrote back to Bucer, in the said archbishop's and the protector's name, to call him again over ; which letter was dated March 24, from Lambeth ; telling him withal, that the good old man Latimer saluted himv. Letters, I sup pose, of the same import, were also dispatched to the 197 learned Fagius*. Bucer and Fagius, who were thus honourably invited Bucer and into England by repeated letters of the lord protector and fesaors at archbishop Cranmer, were by them also nominated for Cambridge. pubhc professors in the university of Cambridge, the one of divinity, the other of the Hebrew tongue. This was looked on by their friends as a notable piece of God's good providence, that when these two eminent champions of the true rehgion were in so much present danger in Germany, so seasonable a refuge was provided for them else where. They both arrived safe in England in the end of Vit. P. Fag. April, and abode with the archbishop above a quarter of aakquosEc- year, until towards the end of the long vacation, the arch- ^j^" T [See Buceri Script. AngUc. iterum serio vocarentur : nimirum pp. 191, 2. ed. Basil, 1577.] ut earn nationem fermento evan- x [See Original Letters of the geUi magis conspergerent. Dimisi Reformat, p. 329. Park. Soc. ed.] itaque a suis magistratibus, licet y ["Caeterum tot atque tanta, invitis, et temporum necessitatibus quae piis Christi ministris, omni- quasi adactis, per terras et maria um vero maxime antesignanis, in paulo ante calendas Maii (rin- Germania imminebant pericula, gentibus interea, atque frementi- nationes etiam exteras latere diu- bus plurimis quos habuerunt tius haud poterant : unde factum hostibus, iisque impiissimis) in est, ut et Bucerus et Fagius, prop- Angliam salvi et incolumes per- ter veritatis inconcussam profes- venerunt. Hac divina in hos sionem, extremis periculis quasi benedictione considerata, haud expositi, divina providentia sic praeter rem quis cogitet, Germa- disponente, ab archiepiscopo Can- niam jam permultum mutatam tuariensi, et regni Anglicani pro- ab Ula, tantis civibus ulterius fu- tectore in AngUam, quasi in locum isse indignam. Haec tamen est refugii tutissimum, semel atque fortuna non insolens fidissimis l2 148 MEMORIALS OF [II. 13. bishop intending they should be at Cambridge when the term should begin, in order to their reading. During this interval, while they continued at Lambeth, they were not idle ; being every day busied in some study and exercise agreeable to their function, as was hinted before. But the main of their thoughts were taken up in preparing for quibusque doctis atque ecclesi- asticis viris, in hujus tristissimo incolatu sasculi: donee aliquando laetissimum illud, euge serve bone ac fidelis &c. a summo pastore Christo suo audire contingat. In archiepiscopi hujus aula novi et diu expetiti hospites Germani, ho- norificentissime excipiebantur per- multisque diebus ibi non absque pietatis incremento detinebantur. Sub id vero tempus subingressi sunt dies, quos vocant, vacanti- arum, quibus in academiis istius regionis anni fere quartam partem a praelectionibus professores feri- antur. Haec sane fuit causa, quod Bucerus et Fagius, quamvis id valde optabant, certis suis mini- steriis tempestivius non sint de- stinati. Quanquam autem nul lum diem absque linea ducta abire paterentur : tamen praeter reliquas lectiones atque meditationes, in maxime praeclarum et universae ecclesiae Christi utilissimum opus, praecipue erant intenti : nimirum, ut integra Biblia non solum pro- prietate sermonis, sed etiam suc- cincta, clara tamen, certa atque perspicua interpretatione, loco- rumque difficilium aut pugnanti- um euodatione ac conciliatione illustrata in lucem ederentur. Ha- buit hie ipsorum conatus lauda- tissimus autborem archiepiscopo- rum Cantuarien. qui ipsos ad alios labores paratos, ad hunc praacipue turn vocabat, atque invitabat. Cu jus voluntati libenter morem ge- rentes, ipsum opus pari studio et alacritate aggrediuntur : ita tamen, ut ipsius operas facerent aliquam distributionem, videlicet, ut D. Bucerus in explicatione et illus- tratione Novi Testamenti : alter vero Paul. Fagius in interpre tatione et elucidatione Veteris Tes tamenti, consideratis fontibus lin- guarum, elaboraret. Habuit qui- dem iste labor pulcherrimum initium : sed tamen illius progres- sum morbus utriusque valde peri- culosus mox intercepit : cujus eti am effectum mors Fagii insperata, maxime tamen luctuosa, ut paulo post dicetur, prorsus tandem ever- tit. Dedit nihilominus uterque specimen alicujus praeclari monu- menti, si Deus vitam ipsis proro- gasset. D. enim Bucerus evan- gelium Joannis auspicatus: Fagius vero Esaiam aggressus, aliquot capita uterque in suo opere ab- solvit." Hist, vera de vita, &c. D. Martini Buceri et Paul! Fagii. ed. Argent. 1562.] 1 549.] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 149 their university lectures : which, of what subject-matter they should be, the archbishop himself directed. As it had been a great while his pious and most earnest desire, that the holy Bible should come abroad in the greatest exactness, and true agreement with the original text : so he laid this work upon these two learned men. First, that they should give a clear, plain, and succinct interpretation of the Scripture, according to the propriety of the lan guage. And, secondly, illustrate difficult and obscure places, and reconcile those that seemed repugnant to one another. And it was his will and his advice, that to this end and purpose their pubhc readings should tend. This pious and good work, by the archbishop assigned to them, they most gladly and readily undertook. For their more regular carrying on this business, they allotted to each other, by consent, their distinct tasks. Fagius, because his talent lay in the Hebrew learning, was to undertake the Old Testament, and Bucer the New. The leisure they now enjoyed with the archbishop, they spent in pre paring their respective lectures. Fagius entered upon the evangelical prophet Esaias, and Bucer upon the gospel of the evangelist John : and some chapters in each book were dispatched by them. But it was not long, but both of them fell sick, which gave a very unhappy stop to their studies. Fagius' distemper proved mortal ; who was seized at Fagius dies. first with a very acute fever. And notwithstanding physic and attendance, remaining very ill, he had a great desire to remove to Cambridge to his charge appointed him, hoping the change of air might help him. He made a shift to travel thither, leaving his dear colleague sick be hind him. But Fagius still declining in his health, ar dently desired Bucer's company, who on the fifth of No vember came to Cambridge. And ten days after Fagius The arch bishop sendsmoney to Fagius'widow. 150 MEMORIALS OF [II. 13. deceased, aged about forty-five years, to the extraor dinary loss of that university, and the grief of all pious men that wished well to rehgion; and, which was most to be lamented, before he had given any specimen of his learning and abilities in England; though he had already given many to the world, all shewing what a master he 198 was in Hebrew and Rabbinical learning. His pubhshed labours of this nature, (all within the space of six years), No XLIV. may be seen in the Appendix : which I have placed there for the preserving the memory of that learned professor, which our university of Cambridge was once honoured with. The good archbishop, troubled at the sudden death of this learned man, from whom he had promised himself some great good to accrue to the university, sent a letter, November the last, unto his sorrowful companion Bucer, desiring him, among other things, as from him, to comfort Fagius' widow, and to let her know, that he had sent her by the carrier seven and twenty pounds, which was part of the stipend due out of the exchequer to her husband: which although it were not yet paid into Cranmer's hands, yet he thought good to send her the money so soon, that it might be some alleviation of her present sorrow. There were fifty pounds due for his readings, reckoning from Lady-day last, when his pension began ; but three pounds were disbursed for charges in taking out the patent, and twenty pounds the archbishop had sent him before2. Bucer above all lamented the loss of his mate, and wrote a sorrowful letter " ad fratres et symmystas," to his brethren and fellow-ministers in Germany upon this subject. And in a letter to P. Martyr, then at Oxon, he not only com plained of this heavy loss, but, as if himself were like to z [The letter of archbishop found in the Appendix to this Cranmer to Martin Bucer will be volume.] Bucer la ments his loss. !549-] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 151 follow him, of several things that made him uneasy at Cambridge, where he was now placed ; as, of the want of a convenient house, of a body impatient of cold, which the time of the year made him begin to feel, need of necessa ries : that the letters patents were not yet signed, [for his salary], and the slow and uncertain payment of his pen sion. But Cranmer, out of that high respect he had for him, was not wanting in his dihgence in due time to make all easy to him ; and to have so useful and grave a man well provided for. But the next year, the last day of February, he followed his companion to the other world : but not before he had made himself and his learn ing known to the university; which, to qualify him to moderate at' the pubhc disputations at the Commence ment, had given him the degree of doctor, as a peculiar honour done him, without the common rites and forms ordinarily used in those cases. Yet he chose to do his exercises, responding the first day of the Commencement, and opposing the second, with great learning, and no less satisfaction to the university. 152 MEMORIALS OF [II. 14. CHAPTER XIV. PETER MARTYR DISPUTES IN OXFORD, BEING CHALLENGED THEREUNTO. The papists in both universities were resolved to try the metal and learning of their new professors; being ex ceedingly nettled at their coming, and offended at then- readings. p. Martyr Those of P. Martyr at Oxon highly provoked many in publidy to that university, that could not endure to hear the old error tionSpUta" °f tne corporeal presence opposed. And of such there were 199 not a few, and especially the heads of the colleges; the elder sort being more stiff and prejudiced to their old ways and opinions. This doctrine of the sacrament was first obscured, and afterwards depraved : and so this error be ing entertained, became a door for the letting in a flood Vit. Mart, of superstition and idolatry into the church. This Martyr ' well knew, and therefore with wonderful pains endeavoured to vindicate the truth of the eucharist from error and cor ruption1. And this procured him many enemies here. For they could not endure him : and first raised up among the people slanders against him ; as though he impugned the doctrine of the ancients, and shook the laudable cere monies of the church, and profaned the sacrament of the altar, and in effect trampled it under his feet. And this noise being a httle stilled, not long after, the day before he was to read pubhcly, they set up bills in Enghsh upon all the doors of the churches, that on such a day there should be a pubhc disputation about the presence of Christ a [See Collier's Eccl. Hist. vol. vol. ii. pp. 217-220. ed. Oxon. v- PP- 334-341- ed. Lond. 1840, 1829.] 4 . Burnet's Hist, of Reformat. 1549-] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 153 in the sacrament, Martyr knowing nothing of it, though he was designed to be the disputant. The day being come, the schools were filled with great numbers of such who favoured the papists : and these were instructed to be ready to make loud clamours and tumults, and to proceed to blows, if need were. The students also and the towns men flocked together at the noise of this dispute, to see the event, and to make a party, according as they stood affected. When the day was come, notwithstanding his friends persuaded him not to adventure himself to read that day, lest he might incur some danger, he went and did his duty. For he said, " he would not be wanting to his office, nor neglect the place the king had intrusted him with ; and that there were many, that came question less to hear his lectures, whom he would not disappoint." As he, with his friends accompanying him, went to his reading, a servant of Richard Smith, D.D. whom we have before spoke of b, the chief in this plot, met him, and de hvered him a letter from his master, wherein he chal lenged him to a dispute that dayc. b [See vol. i. p. 178, n. z, and tiplicia capita quas ad nostrorum above, p. 77. et sqq.] temporum controversias faciunt, 0 [" Itaque sub exitum Novem- sic ut hujus epistolae doctrina si bris anni 1547, permissu senatus commode dextreque adhibita fue- Argentina, ubi jam quinquennium rit, omnibus vitiis quibus eccle- docuerat, in Angliam discessit, co- siae sinceritas corrupta est, mederi mitante eum Bernardino Ochino, possit : et omnes abusus atque qui et ipse quoque ab eodem ar- superstitiones papisticas convin- chiepiscopo vocatus fuerat. Cum cere. Pontificii quorum adhuc autem aliquandiu eos archiepisco- Oxonii magnus erat numerus, pus secum detinuisset, et omnibus initio quidem utcunque patienter humanitatis officiis prosecutus es- ferebant Martyrem docentem, et set, Martyr jussu regis sacris lite- quidam etiam lectiones ejus fre- ris interpretandis Oxonii praefectus quentabant, et se illius eruditionem est. In ea Academia primum admirari pras se ferebant : alii vero enarravit epistolam D. Pauli ad ac praecipue collegiorum prsesides, Corinthios priorem, eo quod suos arcebant a lectionibus, nihil in ea tractentur varia et mul- tamen movebant ulterius. Verum 154 MEMORIALS OF [II. I4. His answer Being come to the chair, he gently told his adversaries, in a modest speech to them, " that he refused not to dis pute, but that at that time he came to read, and not posteaquam damnatis jam ante ipsorum votis, deinceps occasione verborum Apostoli de coena Do mini tractare incaepit, existima- runt sibi non ulterius esse quies- cendum. Etenim cum majores ipsorum obscurata primum, de- inde depravata doctrina hujus dogmatis, in ecclesiam hac janua erroris patefacta omnem supersti- tionem et idololatriam invexerint, non poterant ferre Martyrem, qui mirifico studio veritatem eucha- ristias ab eorum erroribus et cor- ruptelis vindicabat. Quo vero non modo invidiam, sed grave etiam periculum iUi crearent eum apud vulgus primum usitatis cri- minationibus traducebant, quod majorum doctrinam impugnaret, ceremonias optime constitutas convelleret, sacrosanctum altaris sacramentum prophanaret, et tan tum non pedibus conculcaret. Deinde omnibus rebus compositis, ipso ignorante, omnibus templis schedas Anglico sermone conscrip- tas affigunt, postridie publice dis- putandum esse contra praesentiam Christi in sacra coena. Die ergo sequenti hi auditorium occupant, operas suas idoneis locis dispo- nunt, easque ad clamores et tu- multum, et ad pugnam prasterea si usus postulet paratas esse ju- bent. Concurrunt praeterea au- diendi causa, non tantum studiosi ex omnibus collegiis, verum etiam pars non exigua concitati populi, partim ut eventum rei spectarent, partim etiam ut alterutri parti adessent, si forte tumultus aliquis exoriretur. Martyr interea horum omnium ignarus sese domi para- bat, ut hora constituta more solito lectionem faceret, eum interea amici permoti insolita concursa- tione populi, domum ad eum ve- niunt, ac illi omnem rem expo- nunt, hortanturque, ut se domi contineat, neque aliquod pericu lum sibi conciliet, quandoquidem adversarii ita parati sint, ut po- tius videantur armis quam ar- gumentis concertare veUe. Re- spondet Ule, se non posse officio suo deesse, et munus a rege de- mandatum sibi, negligere, se nul- Uus tumultus auctorem unquam fuisse, cujus rei ipsi optimi testes esse possint : nunc quoque se nolle adversariis tumultuandi occasio- nem dare, sed more solito legere veUe, esse haud dubie multos in hoc coetu qui lectiones consuetas expetant, quos non possit negli gere. Pergebat jam ad auditorium comitantibus Ulum amicorum fi- delissimis, cum Uli in via obvius fit puer Smithaei, qui in hac tra- gcedia primas partes agebat, ac literas ei porrigit quibus ipsum herus suus ad disputandum pro- vocabat." — Simler. Orat. de vita et obitu P. Martyr., pp. 13, 14- ed. Tigur. 1563.J 1 549-] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 155 to dispute." And so themselves yielding to it, he pro ceeded to his lecture, which he performed with much constancy and undauntedness, without the least disturb ance of mind, or change of countenance or colour, or hesitation in his speech, notwithstanding the murmur and noise of the adversaries. Which got him much credit and applause. As soon as he had done his reading, the adversaries Dedmesjt began to make loud cries that he should dispute, andandwhy. ' especially Smith the champion. But he modestly refused it, and said, " he would do it at another time, and that he was not then prepared, because they had so studiously concealed the propositions to be disputed of, and had not propounded them pubhcly, according to the accustomed manner; and that he knew nothing of them till that very day." But they told him, "he could not be unpre pared, who had read so much of the Lord's supper, what soever arguments they propounded in this matter." They still rudely urging him; he said, "he would do nothing 200 in such a matter without the king were first made privy to it, especially when the thing tended to sedition. More over, for a lawful disputation, it was requisite," he said, "that certain questions be propounded, judges and mo derators constituted ; and pubhc notaries be present, that might impartially and faithfully write down the argu ments and speeches on both sides d." d [" Ibi turn amici rursus mo- sed nunc non disputandi, sed nere, rogare, hortari ut domum legendi causa hue venisse, atque redeat, commemorare pericula ita Ulis concedentibus lectionem qua? ipsum maneant, perstat ta- more soUto habet, magna omnium men ille in sententia, pergit in admiratione. Quippe qui ante auditorium ac provocantes adver- singularem doctrinam et eloquen- sarios modesta oratione compe- tiam admirati, nunc quoque in- scens quantum poterat, respondet, credibilem constantiam et forti- se disputationem non recusare, tudinem in ipso suspicerent. In 156 MEMORIALS OF [II. I4. They agree In fine, the matter came to that pass, that, fearing a conditions tumult, the vice-chancellor e decided the controversy after ofadispu- tms maimer, "That both P. Martyr and Smith, with some friends, should meet in his house, and should appoint the propositions to be disputed of, the time, the order, and the manner of disputation." And so the vice-chancellor, tation. tanto enim murmure popuU et fremitu adversariorum, ita lecti- onem absolvit, ut nuUa rnutatio vultus et coloris in eo esset, non hassitatio aliqua vocis, non linguae titubatio,. non denique tremor membrorum aut pallor aliquam opinionem timoris praebuit. Fi- nita lectione acrius instant ad- versarii, et eum magnis clamori- bus ad disputandum provocant, neque modestissimam ejus excu- sationem recipiunt, quod se dice- ret disputaturum esse sed alio tempore, nunc se non esse para- tum, cum propositiones dispu- tandas ita studiose occultarint, neque more solito publice propo- suerint, ut eas ad hunc usque diem ignoret : aiebant enim eum, qui nuper causam ccenae Domini, tam multis lectionibus tractasset, non posse imparatum esse quse- cunque tandem in hac materia quasstiones praeponerentur. Turn iUe cum eum urgere persevera- rent, denuo respondit, se primum nolle inconsulta regia majestate tantam rem aggredi, praesertim cum res ad seditionem spectare videatur. Deinde ad legitimam disputationem requiri, ut propo- nantur certae qusestiones, consti- tuantur judices et moderatores, quorum judicio atque arbitrio tota res gubernetur, denique re quiri notarios qui utriusque partis argumenta et orationes, bona fide justaque diligentia conscribant : cum autem horum nihil nunc pa- ratum et constitutum sit, se nee veUe nee posse disputare, prae- sertim cum non satis temporis supersit, die jam in meridiem vergente, ad tantam rem excu- tiendam." — Simler. Orat. de vita et obitu P. Martyr, p. 14.] e [i. e. Walter Wright, vice- chancellor of the university of Oxford from a.d. 1547, to 1550; he was governor of Durham col lege, and the last archdeacon of Oxford whilst that dignity was part of the diocese of Lincoln, and the first at Oxford after its separation, having received the appointment in the beginning of a. d. 1543. Upon the accession of queen Mary he complied and was appointed one of the visitors of Magdalen CoUege, but "was the most moderate, seeking to qualify the cruelty of the rest, as far as he could or durst appear." Upon " the crowning of queen Elizabeth he confessed his errors, and with a weak voice but strong arguments in his sermon preached ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 151 T.549-] the beadle making him way, went to the pulpit where the professor was, and took him by the hand, and led him down through the crowds to his own house, his friends going along with him; and among the rest Sidalf and Curtop s, then vigorous defenders of the truth ; but after, in queen Mary's days, revolting. Smith also, and his friends Coleh at AUhallows, solidly confuted the main of popish opinions." He died May 10, a. d. 1561, and was buried in St. Mary's Church, Oxford. — See Le Neve's Fasti, pp. 166, 232, 457, and Fuller's Church Hist. vol. iv. p. 153. ed. Oxon. 1845.J f [Henry Sidal, or Sydel, (see above, p. 14), canon of Christ Church, Oxford, and vicar of Walthamstow, Essex, was one of the principal managers of the aUurements and threats, by which Cranmer was induced to sign the recantations attributed to him, which he and the Spanish friar, John de VUla Garcina, subscribed as witnesses. Notwithstanding the part that he had taken against the archbishop, and his persecut ing spirit during the reign of queen Mary, he was amongst the first who conformed upon the ac cession of queen Elizabeth. He died May 2, a.d. 1572. — See Todd's Life of abp. Cranmer, vol. ii. pp. 470-480. Works of abp. Cranmer, vol. n. pp. 567, 8. Park. Soc. ed. Strype's Eccl. Mem. vol. iii. pt. i. p. 394. ed. Oxon. 1822. Strype's Life of abp. Parker, vol. i. p. 154. ed. Oxon. 182 1. Le Neve's Fasti, p. 235.] s [James Curtop, or Curthop, M.A., was appointed the first canon of Christ Church, Oxford, in the sixth staU by the charter of the new foundation, a.d. 1546 ; his name also occurs as dean of Peterborough, May 3, a. d. 1550 ; he originally favoured the reformation, but recanted in queen Mary's reign, and was sworn as a witness against Cran mer at his trial. He died July 19, a. d. 1557. — See Works of abp. Cranmer, vol. ii. pp. 546, 550. Park. Soc. ed. Le Neve's Fasti, pp. 236, 240.] h [Henry Cole, D.D. and LL.D., archdeacon of Ely, a.d. 1540, was elected warden of New CoUege, Ox ford, " October 4, 1542," which "he resigned April 16, 1551." In 1554 he succeeded sir Thomas Smith as provost of Eton, and December 11, 1556, became dean of St. Paul's, of which he was deprived in the first year of queen Elizabeth's reign. He preached the sermon at Cran mer's execution, and was one of the popish disputants at West minster, March 31, 1559 : for the part he took on this occa sion, he was fined, together with Ralph Bayne, bishop of Lichfield 158 MEMORIALS OF [II. 14. Oglethorpe1, and three more, repaired to the vice-chancel lor ; where it was agreed, after some jangling, that Mar tyr should observe the same order in confutmg as he did in teaching ; and abstaining from strange, barbarous, and ambiguous words, wont to be used in the schools : he said, he would use only "carnaliter" and " corporaliter," "re- and Coventry, Cuthbert Scot, bishop of Chester, Owen Ogle thorpe, bishop of Carlisle, John Harpsfield, and William Chedsey; he was sent to the Tower and afterwards imprisoned in the Fleet by order of the queen's commissioners. — See Le Neve's Fasti, pp. 74, 185, 362, 489. Fuller's Ch. Hist. vol. ii. pp. 367, 454, vol. iv. p. 274. ed. Oxon. 1845. Collier's Eccl. Hist. vol. vi. pp. 140, 1. ed. Lond. 1840,41. Foxe's Acts and Monuments, pp. 1885, 6. ed. Lond. 1583. Strype's Life of sir Thos. Smith, p. 46. ed. Oxon. 1822. Strype's Annals of the Reformat, vol. i. pt. i. pp. 129, 139, 140, 220, vol. ii. pt. ii. p. 660. ed. Oxon. 1824.] 1 [See above, p. 79. Owen Oglethorpe, S.T. P., who was concerned in the disputation at Oxford upon the sacra ment against Cranmer, Latimer, and Ridley, a. d. 1554, was elected president of Magdalen College, Oxford, February 21, '535' which he resigned, Sep tember 27, 1552. He was a se cond time elected to the headship of this house, October 31, 1553, upon the resignation of Walter Haddon, on the 5th of April, 1555- On the 14th October, 1540, he was also instaUed canon of Windsor, and "from a canonry was instaUed dean in 1553; ne was the first dean " of Windsor " that enjoyed the office of regis- trary of the most noble order of the garter, which before that time had always been enjoyed by one of the canons." He "was consecrated bishop of Carlisle, Aug. 15, 1557, and was present at the Westminster disputation." Notwithstanding that he had crowned queen Elizabeth, "an office which aU other bishops then stiffly denied to perform," he refused to take the oath of supremacy. He was deprived of his bishopric " about Midsummer (June 21,) 1559;" he "died of apoplexy, and was privately buried, January 4, 1560, at St. Dunstan's in the West London." — See Foxe's Acts and Monu ments, p. 1428. ed. Lond. 1583. Le Neve's Fasti, pp. 335, 376, 382, 493. FuUer's Ch. Hist. vol. ii. pp. 466, 7. vol. iv. p. 193. ed. Oxon. 1845. Burnet's Hist, of Reformat, vol. ii. pp. 564, 776, 792. ed. Oxon. 1829. Strype's Annals of the Reformat, vol. i. pt. i. pp. 139, 204, 210, 214. ed. Oxon. 1824.] *549-] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 159 aliter" and " substantiahter," because the Scripture useth only the words "flesh" and "body," "res" or " substantia." And so it was agreed ; and the day set was the fourth of May ensuing. And it was agreed also on both sides, that all this whole matter should be signified to the council, that they might have cognizance of the thing. And by them the day of the disputation was appointed, when some from the king, as judges and keepers of peace, would be pre sent at it. The papists reported falsely, " that he, having appointed the time of the disputation to be ten days hence; in the mean time got the magistrates acquainted with this affair, that they might stop and forbid it, (which they did indeed, proroguing it till some months after the first chal lenge.) And that afterwards, when the professor saw his opportunity, he provoked to a pubhc disputation, offering to dispute of his questions formerly propounded, and thought there would be none to take him up. For Smith, they say, smelt out some crafty device taken against him, and so appeared not at the dispute. And then indeed few thought convenient to be there, their plot of making a rout and confusion being spoiled. Indeed Smith, conscious to himself of making this tumult, fled before the day came, and went into Scotland. But Dr. Treshami, a zealous man, that this cause might not fall, was desirous to un dertake the disputation; and did so, with Dr. Chedseyk, J [WUliam Tresham, S.T.P., against Cranmer at his trial. — canon of Christ Church, Oxford, See vol. i. p. 174. Le Neve's he was appointed a commissioner Fasti, p. 233. Burnet's Hist, of for the discussion of certain ques- Reformat, vol. ii. p. 565. ed. tions in rehgion, a. d. 1540, and Oxon. 1829. Foxe's Acts and took part in the disputation at Monuments, pp. 1428, 1879. eo<- Oxford against Cranmer, Lati- Lond. 1583.] mer, and Ridley, as weU as in k [William Chedsey, or Chadsey, that above mentioned with P. "was by the protestants accounted Martyr. He was also a witness a very mutable andunconstantman 160 MEMORIALS OF [II. I4. and Mr. Morgan1, before the king's visitors: who were Henry bishop of Lincoln m. Dr. Cox", chancellor of that university, Dr. Simon Haines, dean of in his religion, but by the Roman catholics not, but rather a great stickler for their religion, and the chief prop in his time in the university for the cause, as it appeared not only in his opposi tion of P. Martyr, but of the three bishops that were burnt at Oxon." He succeeded John Sampson as parson of AUhal- lows, Bread Street, June 14, 1554, and was chaplain to bishop Boner, and canon of Windsor; he was collated October 10, 1556, to the archdeaconry of Mid dlesex, and was instaUed in the room of James Curthop deceased, as canon of Christ Church, Oxon, the latter end of July, 1557. He was also concerned in the dispu tation against Cranmer at Oxford; upon queen Elizabeth's accession he took part in the disputation at Westminster, was fined, aud sent to the Tower, and after wards imprisoned in the Fleet for recusancy, by order of the commissioners. — See above, p. 79. Wood's Athenae Oxon. vol. i. fol. 323, ed. Bliss. 1818-20. Le Neve's Fasti, pp. 194, 236, 382. Burnet's Hist, of Reformat, vol. ii. pp. 564, 776. ed. Oxon. 1829. Foxe's Acts and Monuments, pp. 1428, et sqq. ed. Lond. 1583. Strype's Eccl. Mem. vol. iii. pt. i. PP- 329> 591- Pt- h. pp. 125, 127, ed. Oxon. 1822. Strype's Annals of Reformat, vol. i. pt. i. pp. 129, 139, 140, 220, 417. ed. Oxon. 1824.J 1 [Henry Morgan was conse crated bishop of St. David's in the room of Robert Farrar, April 15, 1553, he pronounced the de finitive sentence against his pre decessor, and was present at the trial of bishop Hooper. — See above, p. 111. n. b. Foxe's Acts and Monuments, p. 1555. ed. Lond. 1583. Strype's Eccl. Mem. vol. iii. pt. i. p. 286. ed. Oxon. 1822.] m [Henry Holbeach.] " [Richard Cox, S.T.P. was one of those who went from Cambridge to Christ Church, Ox ford, at its foundation; he was tutor and almoner to Edward VI. and held the offices of prebendary and archdeacon of Ely, dean of Christ Church, chancellor of the university of Oxford, and dean of Westminster. In the time of queen Mary he fled abroad, and was instrumental in quieting the troubles at Frankfort. Upon queen Elizabeth's accession he returned home, and took part in the important ecclesiastical trans actions of her reign. " In 1559 he was nominated and elected bishop of Norwich, but before consecration he was removed to the see of Ely ;" he died in July (either the 13th or 22nd), 1581. — See vol. i. p. 4. Le Neve's Fasti, pp. 70, 74, 212, 230, 364, 443. Burnet's Hist, of Reformat. 1 549-] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 161 Exeter0, Richard Morison, esq.P, Christopher Nevison, doctor of civil lawi. Before these honourable umpires, (who came with the king's letters patents), the disputation concerning transubstantiation, and the carnal presence in the sacrament, lasted four days ; wherein P. Martyr the respondent did acquit himself very sufficiently, both from Scripture and Fathers r. The sum of which may be seen in vol. u. p. 2. vol. ui. pp. 376, 681. ed. Oxon. 1829. Strype's An nals of the Reformat, vol. iii. pt. i. pp. 37, 8. ed. Oxon. 1824.] 0 [Simon Haines, or Heins, S.T.P., one of the early professors of the gospel in Cambridge, was master of Queen's coUege in that university, and instaUed canon of Windsor, Dec. 24, 15 35; upon his return from a foreign embassy he was elected and confirmed dean of Exeter, July 23, and 28, 1537 ; he " was made the first prebendary " of the first stall at Westminster, "when king Henry VIII. con verted this church into an epi scopal see. a.d. 1540, he assisted in the compilation of the Enghsh liturgy; but at the time of the prosecutions upon the act of the Six Articles, he was imprisoned for favouring the reformation. He died, October, a. d. 1552." — See Le Neve's Fasti, pp. 86, 365, 382,429. Strype's Life of abp. Par ker, vol. i. p. 13. ed. Oxon. 1821. Strype's Eccl. Mem. vol. i. pt. i. PP- 355. 543- vol. ii. pt. i. pp. 134. pt. n. p. 52. ed. Oxon. 1822. FuUer's Ch. Hist. vol. iv. p. 27. ed. Oxon. 1845. Burnet's Hist. of Reformat, vol. i. pp. 653, 736. ed. Oxon. 1829.] CRANMER, VOL. II. p [Sir Richard Morison was one of the royal visitors appoint ed a. d. 1547 ; he was employed in several embassies during this reign, and fled to Strasburgh on the accession of queen Mary, where he died. — See above, p. 14. Strype's Eccl. Mem. vol. ii. pt. i. PP- 576> 577> P4- «¦ P- 78- vo1- iii. pt. i. pref. vi. pp. 7, 232. ed. Oxon. 1822. Strype's Life of abp. Parker, vol. ii. p. 446. ed. Oxon. 1821. Strype's Life of abp. Grindal, p. 12. ed. Oxon. 1821.] 1 [Sir Christopher Nevinson, who had sat as one of the judges and commissioners in the trial of George Van Paris, and was one of the royal commissioners, a. d. 1547. — See above, pp. 14, 100. n.d. Burnet's Hist, of Reformat, vol. ii. pt. ii. p. 239. ed. Oxon. 1829.J r [" Posteaquam vero his rati- onibus quamvis aequissimis ad- versariis non satisfiebat, et jam res ad pugnam et conflictum spectare videretur, interponit se universitatis Oxoniensis vice-can- cellarius, (liceat enim mihi usitata nomina retinere), et his condi- tionibus pugnam dirimit, ut uter que, Martyr et Smithaeus cum aliquot sociis in ipsius aedibus conveniant, propositiones dispu- M 162 MEMORIALS OF [II. I4. tandas, tempus, ordinem, et mo- dum disputandi communi con- sUio constituant. Jubet deinde apparitores suos, pedeUos* no- minant, turbam summovere, et ipse ad suggestum accedens Mar- tyrem manu iUi porrecta e turba populi abducit, et domum usque comitatur, ac pro sua auctoritate tumultuantes compescit. Martyr liberatus ex hoc praesenti peri- culo, ne ideo quod causae diflnde- ret disputationem renuisse vide- retur, hora constituta ad domum vice-canceUarii venit, comitanti- bus ipsum cum ahis amicis, turn praesertim SidaUo, et Curtopo, qui illo tempore eximii veritatis defensores erant, postea tamen Marianis temporibus eandem con- stantiam non retinuerant. Facit idem adversarius, et secum ad- ducit Colum, Oglethorpum, et tres alios theologiae doctores. Diu inter eos de disputation e constituenda disceptatum est, Martyr enim aequum esse aiebat, ipsos in confutando eum servare ordinem quem ipse tenuisset in docendo, idque tandem obtinuit. Abhorrebat prasterea a vocibus pe- regrinis, barbaris, et ambiguis, quae tamen in scholis receptee sunt, itaque duabus tantum usus est carnaliter, et corporaliter, quo- niam scriptura in coena descri- benda tantum carnis et corporis, non rei et substantias meminit, attamen ne ambiguitate aliqua ludere ipsum existimarent, se Ulas accipere dixit, atque si dictum esset realiter, et substantiaUter. Fuerunt etiam aliis de rebus dis- sensiones aliquae inter ipsos, atta men cum demum de universa ra- tione disputandi inter ipsos con- venisset, omnia quae turn consti tuta fuerunt, partium consensu ad regiae majestatis consiharios relata sunt, ut UU de tota contro- versia cognoscerent : ab his dis- putationis dies constitutus est quarto nonas Maii, ad quem diem affuturi sint legati regii, qui dis- putationi prasint. Verum Smith- aeus conscius sibi tumultus ex- citati, non expectata die consti tuta, fuga se subducit, et in Sco- tiam primum, deinde Lovanium in Brabantiam abut. Posteaquam vero praescripta dies admit, vene- runt Oxonium regu legati, R. D. Henricus, episcopus Lincolnien- sis, D. Richardus Coxus, univer- sitatis Oxoniensis cancellarius, D. Simon Haydesf, decanus Ox oniensis X, M. Richardus Mo- risinus, armiger, D. Christopho- rus Neuynsonus, Ju. C. doctor. His prsesentibus disputavit Mar tyr per quatriduum cum tribus pontificiae religionis theologis, Treshamo, et Cheadzeo, doctori- bus, et Morgano, artium magistro. Quanta autem eruditione hos con- futarit non necesse est a me com- memorari, quandoquidemacta hu jus disputationis in omnium ma- nibus habentur. Nam Martyr quia adversarii multa falsa et con- ficta de hac disputatione in vulgus spargebant, eorum improbitate et prasterea amicorum precibus, qui hoc assidue flagitabant, coac- tus, disputationem hanc in pub licum edidit : qua autem fide ac [Sic] t [Sic.] [Sic] 1 549. J ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 163 Foxe's Monumentss, and the whole in Martyr's works in 201 that part thereof intituled, " De Eucharistia Disputatio'." The first day of the disputation was May the 28th : They dis- it was managed between Martyr and Tresham. Dr. Cox, pu the chancellor, began with a speech. Then Martyr made his proemial oration and prayer. Then Tresham suc ceeded with another oration, bestowing some praises upon Martyr; which he replying upon, and briefly and modestly declining, began his argument. The next disputation, on May 29, was between Martyr and Chedsey, after Martyr had made a short speech and prayer, and Chedsey his preface. The third action was between Morgan, Tresham, and Martyr. The disputation of the fourth day, June 1, was again between Chedsey and Martyr. And then all was concluded by another speech uttered by the said chancellor. Wherein he had these words : " Peter, (and a Peter indeed for his steady constancy), Martyr, (and rightly called Martyr, for the numberless testimonies by him produced in the behalf of truth), must needs obtain much favour and respect from us, and all good men ; First, that he hath taken such vast pains in standing under even a burden of disputations. For if ' not Hercules himself against two,' what shall we think of Peter alone against all ? Secondly, that he hath undertook the challenge of a disputation : and so stopped the vain speeches of vain men, who dispersed envious and odious insinuations concerning him ; as that either he would not, or dared not, to main tain his own tenets. And, lastly, that he hath so ex cellently well answered the expectation of the chief ma- dUigentia hoc fecerit, ostendit tes- tation, see Foxe's Acts and Monu- timonium regiorum legatorum li- ments, pp. 1373, et sqq. ed. bro ab ipsis additum." — Simler. Lond. 1583.] Orat. de vita et obitu. P. Martyr. * [P. Martyr, disput. de Eucha- PP- J4» t5-] ristia, a.d. 1549. ed. Lond.] s [For an account of this dispu- M 2 164 MEMORIALS OF [II. 14. gistrates, and so of the king himself; while he hath not only recommended to the university the doctrine of Christ from God's lively fountains, but also hath not permitted any, (as much as lay in him), to muddy or obstruct them." [Number But I refer the reader for the rest to Dr. Cox's own XLIV.] oration. Martyr The professor drew up the whole four days' disputation sum of the aoon after, and sent it by his constant friend and corn- disputation paiu0ix Juhus, to his patron the archbishop. And with bishop. the same messenger he conveyed a letter, dated June 15, to Bucer, then at the archbishop's house, concerning his said disputation. Therein he signified the obstinacy and boldness of his opponents ; and that he feared, " That his doctrines he then maintained might not altogether square with Bucer's judgment. But he said in his own justifi cation, that he granted the body of Christ was present to us by faith, and that we are incorporated into him by communication. He confessed here, that we do partake of the matter of the sacrament, namely, the body and blood of Christ ; but he meant it in mind and faith. And in the mean time he granted, that the Holy Ghost is efficacious in the sacraments, by virtue of the Lord's in stitution. But that which he especially endeavoured to assert, was, that they mixed not the body and blood of Christ carnally with the bread and wine, by any corporeal presence. Nor yet would he have the sacrament to be symbols without honour and reverence. Another thing he asserted, which he thought might offend Bucer, was, That it was not agreeable to the body of Christ, however glorified, to be in many places at once. But for this, he 202 wrote Bucer, as he urged in the disputation, that the Scripture obhged to no such belief; how the reason of an human body reclaimed against it ; and the Fathers afiirmed that such a quality was granted to no creature, but be- '549-] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 165 longed to God alone." And so, inviting him, and Fagius" and Alexander", to Oxford, concluded his letter. But when the papists dispersed vain stories and many The dispu- falsehoods concerning this business, he was forced, his j^^ {,y friends also urging him thereunto, to publish an account Martyr- hereof. And with what fidehty and dihgence he drew up his book, the testimonies of two of the king's councillors, ear-witnesses, added thereto, sufficiently confirmed. In the preface to his relation of these disputes, he assigned two reasons that made him publish them. The one was, the calumnies of evil men ; the other, the desires of his friends. Under the former he complained, " how he was by his adversaries bespattered among all sorts of people, princes, nobles, commons, citizens, clowns : and that all corners, streets, houses, shops, taverns, sounded their triumphs over him : and he doubted not, that it was dis persed by them into other nations. Upon these conside rations, his great patron, the archbishop of Canterbury, (to whom he dared to deny nothing), and the king's visit ors, besides others of his friends, had advised and desired him to put forth these his disputations in his own vindica- Quid enim tion, and in the vindication of the truth. These he pro- ^Jf^ever." fessed to write with all fidehty : and, that he might be thearcWePi" •" _ scopo Cant. more exact, he had compared his own collections with cui plane the relations that were drawn up by the adversaries ; and debeo ? that, having read theirs, what he could recall that he had**} frsefat. before omitted, which was of any moment, he restored out of their writingsy." a [See above, p. 143.] cipes, nobiles, plebeios, cives, et x [See above, p. 143.] rusticos me traduxerint, non di- y [" Quae vero sparserit non- cam : quod nihil ab eis obscure nuUorum impudentia, de dispu- factum sit, sed omnes anguli, tatione a me habita Oxonii jam plateae, domus, officinae, et a?no- elapsa aestate, et quomodo apud polia adhuc eorum mentitos tri- cujuslibet generis homines, prin- umphos de me, et imvUta reso- 166 MEMORIALS OF [II. I4. And by Tresham. But Tresham, the chief disputant, pretending himself aggrieved with this book, as though Martyr had therein misrepresented him, and expressed some indignation against him, and added some things that were not spoken, wrote himself another account of this disputation, in justification of himself against the professor ; and set a preface before it, by way of epistle, to the king's privy-council. "Wherein he most angrily bespattered this reverend man, calling him " Pseudo-Martyr, a doting old man, subverted, impu dent, and the famous master of errors : and that he fled into Germany to obtain the more hcense for his lust, and that he might enjoy his adultery," meaning his wife. The disputation itself is too long to be transcribed ; it is ex- nent: nee dubito istorum male- dicta, caeteras quoque nationes pervasisse. Quare una causarum quae me ad haec aedenda compulit, haec fuit. Altera vero, (ut ab in itio dixi), amicorum postulata, quibus profecto hue usque pro- viriU obstiti, turn quod hac de re satis librorum extare inteUigerem, quibus abunde pius quisque posset institui, turn quod nemo melius ac ego ipse, mea novit, quae hac- tenus tanti feci, ut noluerim te, candide lector, per ea remorari a meliorum librorum lectione. Nunc vero hi, et quidem nonnihil im- proborum criminationibus com- moti, me adeo urserunt, ut ali- quorum precibus victus, aliorum vero authoritate compulsus, tan dem cesserim, quid enim negare ausim reverendissimo archiepi- scopo Cantuariensi, cui plane omnia debeo ? quidve regiis visi- tatoribus, qui hisce disputationi- bus non solum interfuerunt, sed praefuerunt? Damus itaque tibi hanc disputationem, cui ad ma- jorem evidentiam, tractationem de eadem re, adjecimus, qua; om nia simplici quidem, (ne dixerim), absque ullo stilo, conscripsi, at- tamen fideUter. Nam quod atti- net ad disputationem, mea contuli cum exempUs adversariorum : quibus diligenter perlectis quae animadvertere potui me preeteri- isse, quod ahcujus esset momenti, quantum rei Veritas patiebatur, ex eorum scriptis non detrectavi restituere : et ubi eos deprehendi quandoque suas rationes fusius explicasse, et artificiosius scri- bendo tractasse, quam tunc dum agebatur, prolatae fuerint, ego quoque salva sentential veritate, rem paulo latius exposui, quod tamen raro admodum contigit." — Epist. ad. lector. Petr. Mar tyr. Disput. de Eucharist, a.d. I549-] X549-J ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 167 tant among the Foxian manuscripts2. But the epistle dedicatory, or preface before it, I will not omit, that the reader may there observe the malicious spirit of Martyr's adversaries, and collect some further account of this dis- No. xlv. putation. But the reader must remember, that it was an angry antagonist that wrote it. Dr. Smith, who had done his best to cause a riot in the Smith university, and thereby to endanger the king's professor, thearch- and was therefore got away into Scotland; conscious hke-oisnoPfrom . . Scotland. wise to himself of calumnies and wrongs done by him against the archbishop ; some time after wrote to the arch bishop a submissive letter, praying him " to forgive all the 203 injuries he had done his grace, and to obtain the king's pardon for him, that he might return home again. And he promised to write a book for the marriage of priests, as he had done before against it. That he was the more desirous to come home into England, because otherwise he should be put upon writing against his grace's book of the sacrament, and all Ms proceedings in rehgion, being then harboured," as he would make it believed, " by such as required it at his hands"." But in queen Mary's days z [Harl. MSS. 422. Plut. lxv. eth), upon no firm conscience of E. fol. 4-30. British Museum. doctrine, as both by his articles Original.] by him recanted may appear, and *¦ [" The next day foUowing also by his own letter, sent a Uttle which was the 17th April, (a. d. before in king Edward's days to T554)> was brought before Dr. the archbishop of Canterbury Ridley to dispute, against whom from Scotland. Which letter I was set Dr. Smith to be principal thought here to exhibit as a cer- opponent. Touching which Dr. tain preface before his own ar- Smitb, forsomuch as mention here guments, or rather as a testi- happeneth of his name, first the mony against himself, whereby reader is to be advertised what is the reader may understand how to be attributed to his judgment devoutly he magnified them, and in rehgion, which so oftentimes their doctrine a little before, a- before hath turned and returned gainst whom he now disputeth so to and fro, grounded, (as it seem- busily. Read, I beseech thee, his 168 MEMORIALS OF [II. I4. he revolted again, and was a most zealous papist, and then did that indeed, which he gave some hints of before; for he wrote vehemently against Cranmer's bookb. Disputa- But from Oxford, let us look over to Cambridge : where Cambridge disputations likewisec were held in the month of June, before the Defore the king's commissioners, who were Ridley bi- sioners. shop of Rochester, Thomas bishop of Elyd, Mr. Chekee, epistle, and judge : — ' The true copy of a certain epistle of Dr. Rich. Smith, declaring his affec tion to the setting forth of God's sincere word. Most honour able, I commend me unto your lordship, doing the same to un derstand, that I wrote letters to your grace in January last, and the 10th day of February, declar ing the causes of my sudden and unadvised departing from your grace over the sea, and desiring your good lordship of your cha rity toward them that repent of their iU acts, to forgive me your self aU that wrong I did towards your grace, and to obtain in writ ing the king's majesty's pardon for me in aU points concerning his laws : upon the receipt where of I would return again home, and within half a year, (at the utter most), afterward write, De sa- cerdotum connubiis, &c, a Latin book, that should be a just satis faction for anything that I have written against the same. Reli- quaque omnia dogmata vestra, turn demum libenter amplexurum, ubi Deus mentem meam, ut ea citra conscientia? laesionem ag- noscam, doceamque. I wrote not this that I want any good living here, but because mine absence out of the realm, is dishonour to the king's highness and realm, and because I must needs, (if I tarry here a quarter of a. year longer), write an answer to your grace's book of the sacrament, and also a book of common places against all the doctrine set forth by the king's majesty, which I cannot do with good conscience. Wherefore I beseech your grace help me home, as soon as you may conveniently for God's sake, and you shaU never, I trust in God, repent that fact. Ex urbe divi Andrea?, 14 Feb. Richardus Smith.eus.' " — Foxe's Acts and Monuments, p. 1441. ed. Lond. T583-] b [See vol. i. p. 178, n. z, and above, pp. 48, 77.J c [For an account of the " Dis putations holden at Cambridge, the 20th day of June, a.d. i549>" see Foxe's Acts and Monuments, pp. 1376, et sqq. ed. Lond. 1383.] d [Thomas Goodrich.] e [Sir John Cheke, sometime professor of Greek in the univer sity of Cambridge, was, with Richard Cox, (see above, p. 160. I549-] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 169 Dr. May, and Dr. Wendy1, the king's physician. The questions were, "That transubstantiation could not be proved by Scripture, nor be confirmed by the consent of ancient Fathers for a thousand years past. And that the -Lord's Supper is no oblation or sacrifice, otherwise than a remembrance of Christ's deaths." There were three solemn disputations. In the first, Dr. Madew" was n. n.) tutor to Edward VI., and one of his privy-chamber ; he was one of the commissioners ap pointed to revise the ecclesiastical laws, and a visitor of the univer sity of Cambridge. He signed Edward VI.'s limitation of the crown, as weU as the letter of the councU to the princess Mary to acquaint her that the lady Jane Grey was queen. He was sent to the Tower for opposing queen Mary's title to the crown, but escaped abroad. Upon the as surance of pardon he surrendered himself, and being brought home, was sent to the Tower, from which he was discharged; "but, upon some new offence, he was taken again in Flanders, in May, 1556, and was prevailed upon to re nounce his rehgion, and then he was set at liberty; but was so sadly affected at the unworthiness of that action," that he soon after died. — See Strype's Life of sir John Cheke, ed. Oxon. 1821 ; Burnet's Hist, of Reformat, vol. ii. pp. 2, 50, 471,480,548. pt.ii. PP- 53. 68- vo1- iu- PP- 398. 409- pt. ii. pp. 281, 546. ed. Oxon. 1829.] 1 ["Dr. May, civilian, and Thomas Wendy, the king's phy sician." — Foxe's Acts and Monu ments, p. 1376. ed. Lond. 1583.] ? [" The first disputation hol- den at Cambridge the 20. day of June, a. d. 1549, before the king's majesty's commissioners by Dr. Madew respondent, whose first conclusion was this : ' Tran substantiation cannot be proved by the plain and manifest words of Scripture, nor can thereof be necessarily collected, nor yet con firmed by the consents of the an cient Fathers, for these thousand years past.' The second matter to be disputed of is this : ' That in the Lord's Supper is none other oblation or sacrifice, than one only remembrance of Christ's death, and of thanksgiving.' " — Id. pp. 1376, 7. For the Latin of the first disputation, see Harl. MSS. 422. Plut. lxiv. E. fol. 35- 37 ; and of the second and third, fol. 31-35, where they are dated June 24th and 25th. British Museum. Originals.! h [John Madew, S.T. P., master of Clare Hall, and vice-chancellor of the university of Cambridge, in the years 1546, 1550. — See above, p. 56 ; and Le Neve's Fasti, pp. 394. 395. 422-1 170 MEMORIALS OF [II. 14. respondent; and Glyn', Langdalek, Sedgwick1, and Youngm, 1 [Geoffrey Glyn, L.L.D., who was present at Poinet's consecra tion, a.d. 1550, was also one of the commissaries for the vacant see of Bangor, a.d. 1551 ; he was also one of the disputants at Cam bridge "about the sacrament of the Eucharist," and also against Cranmer, Latimer, and Ridley at Oxford. — See below, cap. xxiv. and xxvi.; and Foxe's Acts and Monuments, pp. 1376, 1378, 1381, 1428. ed. Lond. 1583.] k [Alban Langdale, D. D., be sides being engaged on the popish side in this disputation at Cam bridge, was one of those who were sent from this university to dis pute with Cranmer, Latimer, and Ridley at Oxford : he was instaUed archdeacon of Chichester, April 16, 1555. In the year 1556, he set forth a book to confute the determination of Ridley, bishop of Rochester, and martyr, at the Cambridge disputation, " entitled, Albani Langdal. Confutatio deter- minationis Nic. Ridlei," which was printed at Paris. He also took part on the papists' side at the disputation at Westminster, a.d. 1559. — See Foxe's Acts and Monuments, pp. 1376, 1379, Le Neve's Fasti, p. 65; Strype's Eccl. Mem. vol. ii. pt. i. p. 328 ; vol. iii. pt. i. p. 538. ed. Oxon. 1822 ; Strype's Annals of Refor mat, vol.i. pt. i. p. 129. ed. Oxon. 1824; Burnet's Hist, of Refor mat, vol.ii. p. 776. ed.Oxon. 1829.J 1 [Thomas Sedgwick, S.T.P., succeeded Bucer as divinity pro fessor in Cambridge, where hetook part in the disputation " about the sacrament of the Eucharist;" he was also one of the disputants sent from that university to disputewith Cranmer, Ridley, and Latimer at Oxford. — See Le Neve's Fasti, p. 411; Foxe's Acts and Monuments, pp. 1376, 1380, 1381, 1428.] m [John Young, S.T. P., who had formerly recanted, and been opposed to Bucer, was one of the disputants at Cambridge, who also went from that university to Oxford to contend against Cranmer, Latimer, and Ridley. He was elected .master of Pem broke-hall, Cambridge, in 1553, when the mastership became void by the deprivation of Ridley. Upon the deprivation of Matthew Parker, afterwards archbishop of Canterbury, he " had a grant of the second stall, as prebend of Ely, April 12, 1554." He served the office of vice-chanceUor in I553- In 1559, ne " was Put out from the mastership of Pembroke- haU, for refusal of the oath of su premacy," (or rather went out by an unwilling resignation), and was succeeded by Edmund Grin dal ; he was imprisoned for recu sancy in 1562, and sought his li berty by letters to lord Burleigh, iii June 1574, when he was " sixty years of age," which favour. " though promised, was not per formed." — See above, p. 79 > Foxe's Acts and Monuments, pp- I549-] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 171 opponents. In the second, Dr. Glyn was respondent on the popish side; opponents, Perne", Grindal", 137°. J38i, I385. i386> M»8 ; Le Neve's Fasti, pp. 7s, 395, 424 ; Strype's Life of abp. Parker, vol. i. p. 65. ed. Oxon. 1821; Strype's Life of abp. Grindal, pp. 38, 459. ed. Oxon. 1821 ; Strype's Annals of the Reformat, vol. i. pt. i. p. 417 ; vol.n. pt. i. p. 489, pt. ii. p. 661. ed. Oxon. 1824.] » [Andrew Perne, S. T. P., "was born at Bilney," in Norfolk, " bred in Peter-house, whereof he was feUow, and master ;" he was appointed to the latter office, Feb. 7th, 1553, and held it to the time of his death, April 26th, 1589. He served the office of proctor of his university, in 1546 ; and that of vice-chancellor five times ; he also was instaUed prebend of Westminster in the room of Simon Haynes, Nov. 8, 1552. In 1557, he succeeded to the deanery of Ely : he was also one of Edward vith's six chaplains. Fuller says of him, " I know he is much taxed for alter ing his religion four times in twelve years, (from the last of king Henry VIII. to the first of queen Eliza beth); a papist, a protestant, a papist, a protestant, but stUl Andrew Perne. However be it known, that though he was a bending willow, he was no smart ing wiUow, guilty of compUance, not cruelty, yea, preserving many, who otherwise had been perse cuted." He died April 26, 1589. —See Fuller's Worthies of Eng land, vol. ii. p. 464. ed. Lond. 1840; Le Neve's Fasti, pp. 72, 365> 394, 395. 397. 421 ; Burnet's Hist, of Reformat, vol. ii. p. 694. ed. Oxon. 1829 ; Strype's Life of abp. Parker, vol. i. p. 349. ed. Oxon. 1821; Strype's Eccl. Mem. vol. ii. pt. i. pp. 521, 524 ; pt. ii. pp. 52, 273. ed. Oxon. 1822 ; Strype's Life of abp. Whitgift, vol. i. pp. 9, 618. ed. Oxon. 1822.] ° [Edmund Grindal, S.T. P., was born at St. Bees, in Cumber land; he was first of Magdalen coUege, and then of Christ's col leges, and was afterwards fellow, and master of Pembroke-hall, Cambridge, to which latter ap pointment he succeeded in 1559, upon the deprivation of John Young; he was chaplain to Rid ley, bishop of Rochester, and prebendary of Westminster, and served the office of proctor in this university in 1548. Upon the death of Edward VI. he fled abroad to Strasburgh, and was sent to Frankfort to dissuade the English exiles from departing from the English service book. Upon queen Elizabeth's acces sion he was called home, and was made successively bishop of London, archbishop of York, and Canterbury. He died in his sixty- third year, at Croydon, July 6th, 1583, and was there buried. — See FuUer's Worthies of England, vol. i. pp. 342, 3 ; Le Neve's Fasti, pp. 8, 180, 311, 368, 394, 424 ; Strype's Life of abp. Grin- 172 MEMORIALS OF [II. 14. Guest P, Pilkingtonq. In the third, Dr. Perne was re- dal, pp. 9, 10, 12, 14, 15, 33, 38, 41, 239, 282-286, 429. ed. Oxon. 1821.] p [Edmund Guest, or Gheast, S. T. P., was born at Afferton in Yorkshire, and was a fellow of King's college, Cambridge, and chaplain to abp. Parker. During the reign of queen Mary he con cealed himself, and upon the acces sion of queen Elizabeth, had her nomination to the archdeaconry of Canterbury, Oct. 13, 1559, in the room of Nicholas Harpsfield, deprived, which dignity he was allowed to hold " in commendam" with the bishopric of Rochester, to which he was elected Jan. 29, in the same year ; he also held the office of queen's almoner. He took part on the protestant side at the Westminster disputation in this year, viz. 1559, and was employed in 1563, by abp. Parker, to revise the book of Psalms for the bishops' Bible. In Decem ber, 15 7 1, he was translated from Rochester to Salisbury, where he died, Feb. 21st or 28th, 1576. — See Fuller's Worthies of England, vol. iii. p. 411 ; Le Neve's Fasti, pp. 13, 251, 260; Strype's Life of abp. Parker, vol. i. pp. 114, 127, 257.416; vol. ii. pp. 80, 459; vol. iii. pp. 383. 296. ed. Oxon. 1821 ; Strype's Annals of the Reformat, vol. i. pt. i. pp. 129, 199, 230, 232 ; vol. iv. p. 600. ed. Oxon. 1824; Burnet's Hist. of Reformat, vol. ii. pp. 776, 806. ed. Oxon. 1829.] 1 ["James Pilkington, S.T.B., was born at Rivington, in Lanca shire, a. d. 1520." At the age of sixteen " he was admitted a mem ber of St. John's coUege, Cam bridge, where he proceeded to the degree of A. B., a. d. 1539, an(i was elected fellow, March 26, in the same year." He afterwards took the degrees of A. M. and B. D., but never appears to have taken the higher degree of D. D. He was zealous in forwarding the reformation; and while re siding on his feUowship, read theological lectures gratuitously; " in December, 1550, he was ap pointed by Edward vi. to the vicarage of Kendal, in Westmore land, which he resigned in the foUowing year." Upon the ac cession of queen Mary, he retired to the continent, and lived at Zurich, Basle, and Geneva. Upon the death of queen Mary, a. d. 1558, he was at Frankfort, and signed, if he did not write, the answer of that church to the church at Geneva. " On his re turn to England, he was asso ciated with BiU, Parker, Grindal, Cox, Guest, Whitehead, and May as commissioners to revise the Book of Common Prayer. In 1559, July 20th, he was admitted master of St. John's coUege, which he held till October, 1661, though he had been consecrated the first protestant bishop of Durham, March 2, in that year, at the age of forty : he died at Bishop's Auck- '549-J ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 173 putes. spondent; Parker1, Pollard5, Vavasor1, Young, opponents. After these disputations were ended, the bishop of Roches ter determined the truth of these questions "ad placitum suumu," as a papist wrote, out of whose notes I transcribe the names of these disputants. Besides these disputations, when Bucer came to Cam- Bucer dis- bridge, he was engaged in another with Sedgwick, Perne, and Young, upon these questions: " I. That the canonical books of Scripture alone do teach sufficiently all things necessary to salvation. II. That there is no church in earth that erreth not, as well in faith as manners. III. That we are so freely justified of God, that, before our justification, whatsoever good works we seem to do have the nature of sinv." Concerning this last, he and Young land, Jan. 23, 1575, aged fifty- five. — See Biog. Notice of life ; bp. Pilkington's Works. Park. Soc. ed. ; Le Neve's Fasti, pp. 349, 433 ; FuUer's Worthies of England, vol. ii. pp. 196, 7.] ' [Matthew Parker, S. T. P., afterwards archbishop of Canter bury. — See Strype's Life of abp. Parker, ed. Oxon. 1821 ; Le Neve's Fasti, p. 8.] s [Probably the same person who, Nov. 6, 1553, " preached at St. Michael's, Cambridge, and in his sermon spake for purgatory." — See Strype's Eccl. Mem. vol. iii. pt.i. p. 81. ed. Oxon. 1822.] * [See Strype's life of abp. Parker, vol.ii. p. 167, and of abp. Grindal, pp. 273, 535. ed. Oxon. 1821.] u [For the determination of Dr. Nicholas Ridley, bishop of Rochester, upon these disputa tions, see Foxe's Acts and Monu ments, pp. 1387, 8. ed. Lond. 1583, and works of bp. Ridley, pp. 171-179. Park. Soc. ed.] v [" Over and beside these dis putations above mentioned, other disputations also were holden at Cambridge shortly after by Martin Bucer, upon these conclusions foUowing : ' Conclusions to be disputed. ' 1. The canonical books of holy Scripture alone do sufficiently teach the regenerated all things necessarily belonging unto sal vation. ' 2. There is no church in earth which erreth not, as weU in faith as in manners. ' 3. We are so justified freely of God, that before our justifica tion it is sin, and provoketh God's wrath against us, whatso ever good works we seem to do. Then being justified, we do good works.' In these three propositions 174 MEMORIALS OF [II. 1 4. had several combats : which are set down in his Enghsh works. His judg- As to Bucer's opinion of the presence in the sacrament, sacrament16 tne great controversy of this time, it may not be amiss to consider what so great a professor thought herein; and especially by what we saw before, that Martyr and he did somewhat differ in this point : for as he would not admit those words "carnally" and "naturally," so neither didhe like "realiter" and "substantialiter." Bucer's judgment, drawn up by himself sententiously in fifty-four aphorisms, may be No. XLVI. seen in the Appendix, as I meet with it among Foxe's pa pers. It is extant in Latin among his " Scripta Anghcana," and entitled, "Confessio D. M. Buc. de Sancta Eucharistia, in Anglia Aphoristicos scripta, anno 1550w." And so we take our leave of Bucer for this year. We shall hear of him again in the next. against Bucer, disputed M. Sege- confessio D. Mart. Buceri de S. wicke, Young, and Perne."— Eucharistia in AngUa Aphoristi. Foxe's Acts and Monuments, p. cos scripta, anno 1550."— Bucer. 1388. ed. Lond. 1583.] Script. Anglican, pp. 538-543. ed. w [i. e. " Exomologesis, sive Basil. 1577.] IJJ49-] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 175 CHAPTER XV. 204 MATTERS OF THE CHURCH, AND ITS STATE NOW. Let me now crave a httle room to set down some mat ters that relate to the church, coming within the compass of this year, which will shew what mean advances rehgion as yet had made in the nation. Divers rehcs of popery still continued in the nation, Relics of P0D61TV Y&— by means partly of the bishops, partly of the justices of maimng. peace, popishly affected. In London bishop Boner drove on but heavily in the king's proceedings, though he out wardly complied. In his cathedral church there remained still the apostles' mass, and our lady's mass, and other masses under the defence and nomination of our lady's communion, used in the private chapels, and other remote places of the same church, though not in the chancel ; contrary to the king's proceedings. Therefore the lord protector, and others of the council, wrote to the bishop, June 24, complaining of this, and ordering that no such Foxe's masses should be used in St. Paul's church any longer ; and that the holy communion, according to the act of par hament, should be ministered at the high altar of the church, and in no other place of the same, and only at such times as the high masses were wont to be used ; ex cept some number of people, for their necessary business, desired to have a communion in the morning ; and yet the same to be exercised in the chancel at the high altar, as was appointed in the book of Pubhc Service". Accord- * [The foUowing is the " letter mass, within the church of St. directed from the king's council Paul, used under the name of to Edmund Boner, bishop of Lon- the apostles' communion. 'After don, for abrogating of private hearty commendation : having masses, namely, the apostles' very credible notice that within 176 MEMORIALS OF [II. 15. ingly Boner directed his letters to the dean and chapter of Paul's, to call together those that were resident, and to declare these matters y. that your cathedral church, there be as yet the apostles' mass, and our lady's mass, and other masses of such peculiar name, under the defence and nomination of our lady's communion, and the apo stles' communion, used in pri vate chapels and other remote places of the same, and not in the chancel, contrary unto the king's majesty's proceedings, the same being, for the misuse, displeasing to God; for the place of Paul's, in example not tolerable ; for the fondness of the name, a scorn to the reverence of the communion of the Lord's body and blood; we, for the augmentation of God's glory and honour, and the conso nance of his majesty's laws, and the avoiding of murmur, have thought good to wiU and com mand you, that, from henceforth, no such masses in this manner be in your church any longer used, but that the holy blessed communion, according to the act of parliament, be ministered at the high altar of the church, and in no other places of the same, and only at such time as your high masses were wont to be used, except some number of people desire for their necessary busi ness to have a communion in the morning, and yet the same to be executed in the chancel at the high altar, as it is appointed in the book of the pubhc service, without cautel or digression from the common order. And herein you shah not only satisfy our ex pectation of your conformity in aU lawful things, but also avoid the murmur of sundry that be therewith justly offended. And so we bid your lordship heartily fareweU. From Richmond, the 24th of June, an. 1549. Your loving friends, E. Somerset. W. Saint John. Ed. Montague. R. Rich. Chan. Fra. Shrewsbury. W. Cecil." Foxe's Acts and Monuments, p. 1302. ed. Lond. 1583 ; see Hey- Un's Hist, of Reformat, p. 74. ed. Lond. 1674.] y [The foUowing is the letter of Edmund Boner to the dean and chapter of St. Paul's, sent with the order in councU. " To my right worshipful friends and most loving good brethren, Mr. dean of St. Paul's,* with all the canons, residentiaries, prebenda ries, sub-deans and ministers of the same, and every of them, with speed. ' Right worshipful, with most hearty commendations. So it is this Wednesday, the 26th of June, going to dinner, I received William May. 1549O ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 177 As it was thus in London, so in the countries, too many The council of the justices were slack in seeing to the execution of the foThe^us-8 king's laws, relating not only to rehgion, but to other tlces- affairs. And in some shires that were further distant, the people had never so much as heard of the king's procla mation, by the default of the justices, who winked at the people's neglect thereof. For the quickening of the justices of peace at this time, when a foreign invasion was daily expected, and foreign power was come into Scotland to aid that nation against England, the lord protector and the privy-council assembled at the Star-chamber, and called before them all the justices, (which was a thing accustomed sometimes to be done, for the justices to appear before the king and council, there to have admonitions and warnings given them for the discharge of their duty). And then the lord chancellor Rich made a speech to them, " That they should repair down into their several countries with speed; and give warning to other gentlemen to go down to their houses, and there to see good order and rule kept, that their sessions of gaol-delivery, and quarter-sessions be well observed, that vagabonds and seditious talebearers of the king or his council, and such as preached without hcense, be repressed and punished. That if there should be any uproars, or routs, and riots of lewd fellows, or privy trai tors, they should appease them. And that if any enemy 205 should chance to arise in any place of England, they letters from the king's councU by company together of the church, a pursuivant, and the same I do and make declaration hereof unto send now herewith unto you, to them : thus committing you to the intent you may peruse them God, right well to fare. Written well, and proceed accordingly : with speed this 26th of June, at praying you in case all be not one of the clock. Your loving bro- present, yet those that be now re- ther, Ed. London.' " — Foxe's sident, and supplying the places, Acts and Monuments, p. 1302. may, in their absence, call the ed. Lond. 1583.] CRANMER, VOL. II. N 178 MEMORIALS OF [II. I5- should fire the beacons, as had been wrote to them before, and repulse the same in as good array as they could. And that for that purpose they should see diligently that men have horse, harness, and other furniture of weapon ready2." And writes And to the bishops the council now sent letters again bishops, for redress of the contempt and neglect of the Book of Common-Prayer, which to this time, long after the pub lishing thereof, was either not known at all to many, or very irreverently used ; occasioned especially by the wink ing of the bishops, and the stubborn disobedience of old popish curates. The letter is dated the 23d of July, and is extant in Eoxe\ z [For the " exhortation or ad monition" addressed by the lord chancellor Rich "unto the justices of peace," see Foxe's Acts and Mo numents, pp. 1302, 3. ed. Lond. 1583-] a ["What zealous care was in this young king, and in the lord protector his uncle, concerning reformation of Christ's church, and sincere religion, by these in junctions, letters, precepts, and exhortations, as well to the bi shops as to the justices of the realm above premised, it may right well appear. Whereby we have to note, not so much the careful diligence of the king and his learned council as the lin gering slackness and drawing back, on the other side, of divers, the said justices, and lawyers, but especiaUy of bishops, and old popish curates, by whose cloak ed contempt, wilful winking, and stubborn disobedience, the book of Common-prayer was, long after the publishing thereof, either not known at all, or else very irreverently used, through out many places of this realm; which, when the king by com plaint of divers, perfectly under stood, being not a little aggrieved, to see the godly agreement of the learned, the wUling consent of the parliament, and his grace's own zealous desire, to take so small effect among his subjects, [he] decreed presently, with the advice of his whole council, again to write unto aU the bishops of his realm, for speedy and diligent re dress therein; willing and com manding them thereby, that as well they themselves should, thence forth, have a more special regard to the due execution of the pre mises, as also that aU others, within their several precincts and jurisdiction should, by their good instructions and willing example, be the more oftener and with better devotion, moved I549-J ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 179 In London, by the connivance and remissness of the Neglect in London. bishop, many neglected the divine service then estabhshed: to use and frequent the same : as further appeareth by the contents of his letter here en suing. " Another letter directed by the king and his council, to Boner, bishop of London, partly rebuk ing him of negligence, partly charging him to see to the better setting out of the Service-book within his diocese. 'Right re verend father in God : right trusty and weU beloved, we greet you well: and whereas after great and serious debating and long confer ence of the bishops, and other grave and weU learned men in the holy Scriptures, one uniform or der for common-prayers and ad ministration of the sacraments, hath been, and is, most godly set forth, not only by the common agreement and full assent of the nobUity and commons of the late session of our late parliament, but, also by the hke assent of the bi shops in the same parhament, and of aU others, the learned men of this our realm in their synods, and convocations provincial : like as it was much to our comfort, to understand the godly travail then dUigently and willingly taken for the true opening of things men tioned in the said book, whereby the true service and honour of almighty God, and the right mi nistration of the sacraments being weU and sincerely set forth, ac cording to the Scriptures and use of the primitive church, much idolatry, vain superstition, and great and slanderous abuses be taken away : so it is no smaU oc casion of sorrow unto us, to un derstand, by the complaints of many, that our said book, so much travaUed for, and also sin cerely set forth, (as is aforesaid), remaineth, in many places of this our realm, either not known at aU, or not used ; or, at the least, if it be used, very seldom, and that in such light and irreverent sort, as the people, in many places either have heard nothing, or, if they hear, they neither under stand, nor have that spiritual de lectation in the same, that to good Christians appertaineth. The fault whereof, like as we must of rea son impute to you, and other of your vocation, caUed by God through our appointment to have due respect to this and such hke matters : so, considering that by these and such like occasions, our loving subjects remain yet still in their old blindness, and super stitious errors, and, in some places, in an irreligious forget- fulness of God, whereby His wrath may be provoked upon us and them: and remembering withal, that amongst other cures committed to our princely charge, we think this the greatest, to see the glory and true service of Him maintained and extoUed, by whose clemency we knowledge n2 180 MEMORIALS OF [II. 15. and others did in secret places of the diocese often fre quent the popish mass, and other superstitious rites, not ourselves to have all that we have ; we could not but by ad vice and consent of our dearest uncle, Edward, duke of Somerset, governor of our person, and pro tector of our realm, dominions, and subjects, and the rest of our privy council, admonish you of the premises. Wherein, as it bad been your office to have used an earnest diligence, and to have preferred the same * in all places within your diocese, as the case required: so have we thought good to pray and require you, and nevertheless straightly to charge and command you, that from henceforth ye have an earnest and special regard to the reduce (redress) f of these things, so as the curates may do their duties more often, and in more reverent sort, and the people be occasioned, by the good advices, and examples of yourself, your chancellor J, archdeacons ||, and other inferior ministers, to come with oftener, and more devotion to their said common prayers, to give thanks to God, and to be partakers of the most holy com munion. Wherein shewing your self diUgent, and giving good example in your own person, you shaU-both discharge your duty to the great pastor, to whom we all have to account, and also do us good service, and, on the other side, if we shall hereafter, (these our letters, and commandment notwithstanding), have eftsoons complaint, and find the like faults in your diocese, we shall have just cause to impute the fault thereof, and all that ensue thereof unto you, and, consequently, be occa sioned thereby to see otherwise to the redress of these things; whereof we should be sorry. And, therefore, we do eftsoons charge and command you, upon your allegiance, to look weU upon your duty herein, as ye tender our pleasure. Given under our signet, at our manor of Rich mond, the 23d of July, the third * [" To have reformed the same." Boner. Reg. fol. 112. See Foxe's Acts and Monuments, vol. v. p. 844. ed Lond. 1843-48.] f [Id. ibid.] J ["Thomas Baghe, alias Williams, S. T. B. was collated Feb. 22, 1529: void by the resignation of [John] Edmunds : he died in 1557." — Le Neve's Fasti, p. 206.] || [John Wymmesley, or Wymmisley LLB. was collated to the archdea conry of London, Oct. 29, 1543, and resigned in 1554; Edward Mowlewas collated to the archdeaconry of Essex, Oct. 29, 1543, and died in 1558) Richard Eden was collated to the archdeaconry of Middlesex, Aug. 11, 15 16, and died before April 9, 1551; Anthony Bellasis, LLD. succeeded to the archdeaconry of Colchester, April 27, 1543, and died in 1553 See Le Neve's Fasti, pp. 188, 191, 194, 197.] 1549-] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 181 allowed by the laws of England. The sins of adultery greatly increased. The churches, and particularly the mother-church of St. Paul's, ran into dilapidations ; the glass was broken, and the ornaments and other buildings belonging to churches neglected. Many refused to pay tithes to their curates, probably of both sorts ; such as were papists to those curates as more diligently preached reformation, and obeyed the king's laws : and such as were not so, to such curates as were more backward there unto. Bishop Boner also himself now seldom came to year of our reign, 1549.' The bishop of London, among the rest of the bishops, receiving these letters, did, (as always be fore), in outward shew willingly accept the same ; and, therefore, immediately, with the said letters, directed this his precept unto the dean and chapter of his cathedral church of Paul's, commanding them to look to the due accom plishing thereof accordingly. ' A letter of Boner to the dean and chapter of Paul's. Edmund, by the grace of God, &c. To my well beloved brethren, the dean and chapter of the cathedral chuTch of St. Paul, in London, and to the other ministers there, and every of them, do send greet ing. And whereas it is so, that of late I have received the said sovereign lord, the king's ma jesty's letter, of such tenor as is hereunto annexed, and, according to my most bounden duty, am right weU willing and desiring, that the said letters should be in aU points duly executed and ob served, according to the tenor and purport of the same, as appertain- eth: these, therefore, are to re quire, and also straightly to charge you, and every of you, on his majesty's behalf, &c. that you do admonish and command, or cause to be admonished, or com manded, all and singular parsons, vicars, and curates of your juris diction to observe and accomplish the same from time to time ac cordingly : furthermore requiring and likewise charging you, and every of you, to make certificate herein to me, my chancellor, or other, my officers in this behalf, with such convenient celerity as appertaineth, both of your pro ceedings in the execution hereof, and also the persons and names of all such, as, from henceforth, shall be found neghgent in doing their duties in the premises, or any of them. Given at my house at Fulham, the 26th of July, in the year of our Lord, 1549, and in the third year of our said sovereign lord, the king's majesty's reign.' " — Foxe's Acts and Monuments, pp. 1303, 4. ed. Lond. 1583.] 182 MEMORIALS OF [II. ij. church, seldomer preached and celebrated the Enghsh communion. Wherefore the council sent certain private injunctions to Boner for the redress of these things: " That he should preach in his own person at Paul's Cross, and declare certain articles, relating to the before-men tioned neglects, which the council now sent to him to redress. That he should preach once in a quarter, and exhort the people to obedience; and that he should be present at every sermon at Paul's Cross; that he should on the principal feasts celebrate the communion, and at all times that his predecessors used to celebrate and sing high mass. That he should call before him all such as did not frequent the church and common-prayer, and the holy com munion, and punish them, as also adulterers : and that he should look to the reparation of St. Paul's and other churches, and that the people pay their tithes b." Adulteries The adulteries before hinted, which the council thought fit to recommend to the bishop to take particular cogni zance of, makes me add, that about this time the nation grew infamous for this crime. It began among the no bihty, and so spread at length among the inferior sort. Noblemen would very frequently put away their wives, and marry others, if they liked another woman better, or were like to obtain wealth by her. And they would sometimes pretend their former wives to be false to then- beds, and so be divorced, and marry again such whom they fancied. The first occasion of this seemed to be in the earl of Northampton, divorcing himself from his first wife Anne, daughter to the earl of Essex, and after marry ing Elizabeth, daughter to the lord Cobhamc. In hke manner Henryd, son of William earl of Pembrokee, put b [For " the certain private in- = [See above, pp. 44, 140.] junctions, and articles given to a [Afterwards second earl of Boner by the council," see the Pembroke.] Appendix to this volume.] e [§ir William Herbert, earl of frequent. I549-J ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 183 away Katharine, daughter to Henry the duke of Suffolk', 206 and married Mary, the daughter of sir Henry Sidney*. Pembroke, who was a privy councUlor, an executor of the wUl of Henry VIII., and governor to Edward VI., and the kingdom. He was employed to put down an insurrection in WUtshire, and against the Devonshire rebels ; he also signed Edward Vlth's li mitation of the crown, as weU as the letter of the councU to the princess Mary, acquainting her that the lady Jane Grey was queen; but afterwards declared himself for queen Mary, and was her general against Wyat's rebel hon, and was appointed one of the select committee for the regu lation of affairs during the ab sence of PhUip I. from England. He commanded the English forces at the battle of St. Quintin, a. d. 1557, and became a member of queen Elizabeth's first privy coun cU on queen Mary's death. — See Burnet's Hist, of Reformat, vol. ii. pp. 6, 36, 236, 471, 478, 707, 752. pt. u. pp. 8, 10. vol. iii. p. 490; pt. n. p. 281. ed Oxon. 1829. Strype's Eccl. Mem. vol. ii. pt. i. p. 19 ; pt. ii. pp. 422- 424. vol. in. pt. i. pp. 21, 135. ed. Oxon. 1822. Strype's An nals of the Reformat, vol. i. pt. i. p. 8. pt. ii. p. 390. ed. Oxon. 1824.] f [Henry Grey, marquis of Dorset, duke of Suffolk, the fa ther of the lady Jane Grey, and a privy councillor, was one of the peers, who sat as judges on the duke of Somerset's trial ; he signed Edward Vlth's limitation of the crown, and with the duke of Northumberland waited upon his daughter to acquaint her she was queen on the death of Ed ward VI. ; and signed the letter of councU to the princess Mary acquainting her of it; he, how ever, dehvered up the Tower to queen Mary, to which he was immediately sent as a prisoner, but was speedily liberated through the earnest intercession of his duchess. He afterwards entered into Wyat's conspiracy, in con sequence of the queen's intended marriage with PhiUp of Spain, and being betrayed, was again sent to the Tower ; he was " tried by his peers and condemned, Feb. 17, 1554," and executed on the 23d. — See Burnet's Hist, of Refor mat, vol. ii. pp. 369, 468, 469, 471, 479, 480, 538, 540, 547. pt. ii. pp. 61, 122. Strype's Eccl. Mem. vol. iii. pt. i. pp. 24. 133, 136, 144, 146. Foxe's Acts and Mo numents, pp. 1467, 8. ed. Lond. IS83-] s [Sir Henry Sydney, one of the gentlemen of Edward Vlth's privy chamber, in whose arms the young king died. He be came afterwards lord president of Wales, a knight of the garter, and lord deputy of Ireland. He was also a privy councUlor in queen Elizabeth's reign, and one of her great friends. — See Burnet's 184 MEMORIALS OF [II. I5. These adulteries and divorces increased much; yea, and marrying again without divorce; which became a great scandal to the realm, and to the rehgion professed in it, and gave much sorrow and trouble in good men to see it. Insomuch that they thought it necessary to move for an act of parhament to punish adultery with death. This Latimer, in a sermon preached in the year 1550, signified to the king : " For the love of God," saith he, " take an order for marriage here in England"." Books dis- This is some account of the retardation of rehgion. On persed by protestants. the other hand, the endeavours of those that wished well to it were not wanting. Now the protestants began more freely to put forth books, and to disperse such as were formerly printed beyond sea, in the behalf of rehgion against popery, and concerning such as had suffered under Hist, of Reformat, vol. ii. p. 460. pt. ii. pp. 16, 46. Strype's Eccl. Mem. vol. ii. pt. ii. pp. 164, 245. Strype's Annals of the Reformat. vol. i. pt. ii. p. 23. vol. i. pt. ii. pp. 116,204, 211, vol. ii.pt.ii.317, 707,708. ed. Oxon. 1824. Strype's Life of abp. Parker, vol. i. p. 140. ed. Oxon. 1821.] h [" I have not long to live, so that I think I shall never come here into this place again ; and therefore I will ask a petition of your high ness. For the love of God, take an order for marriages here in Eng land. For here is marriage for pleasure and voluptuousness, and for goods ; and so that they may join land to land, and possessions to possessions ; they care for no more here in England. And that is the cause of so much adultery, and so much breach of wedlock in the noblemen, and gentlemen, and so much divorcing. And it is not now in the noblemen only, but it is come now to the inferior sort. Every man, if he have but a smaU cause, wiU cast off his old wife, and take a new, and will marry again at his pleasure ; and there be many that have so done. I would therefore wish that there were a law provided in this be half for adulterers, and that adul tery should be punished with death; and that might be a re medy for aU this matter. There would not be then so much adul tery ... in England as there is. For the love of God, take heed to it, and see a remedy pro vided for it." — Latimer's Works, vol. i. pp. 243, 4. Park. Soc. ed.] I549-J ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 185 the cruelties of the church of Rome. Bale about these days dispersed his books. One was, " The Image of both Churches," applying the divine prophecy of the Revelations to the apostate church of Rome'. Another was, a vindi cation of the lady Anne Askew, who suffered the cruel death of burning about the end of king Henry's reign ; whose cause the papists studiously had rendered bad. This book he entitled, The " Elucidation of Anne Askew's Martyrdom," which was this year exposed pubhcly to sale at Winchester, and the parts thereabouts, as a re proach to the bishop of Winchester, who was the great cause of her death. Four of these books came to that bishop's own eyes, being then at Winchester ; they had leaves put in as additions to the book, some glued and some unglued; which probably contained some further intelligences that the author had gathered since his first writing of the book. And herein some reflections were made freely, according to Bale's talent, upon some of the court, not sparing Pagetk himself, though then secretary of state. Another of Bale's books, that went now about, was touching the death of Luther1. Therein was a prayer 1 [i. e. " The image of both your marvel, how I know sooner churches, after the most wonder- things from thence, than your ml and heavenly revelation of St. grace doth there, which ariseth John, containing a very fruitful not upon any desire of know- exposition or paraphrase upon ledge on my behalf, (for evil things the same, wherem it is conferred be over soon known), nor upon with the other scriptures and any slackness of your grace's be- most authorised histories. Com- half there, who is, and is noted piled by John Bale, an exUe also very vigUant, as your grace's in this life for the faithful testi- charge requireth. But thus it is, mony of Jesu." — Imprinted by even as it was when I was in John Day, b. 1. without date.] some little authority ; they that k [See above, p. 135. n. >>.] were the evil doers in such mat- 1 [" One thing necessary to ters, would hide them from me. answer your grace, in touching So, now they have handled it 186 MEMORIALS OF [II. ij. of the duke of Saxony™ mentioned, which the bishop of Winchester gladly took hold on ; wherein that duke, as to the justness of his cause, remitted " himself to God's judgment to be shewed on him here in this world, if the cause he undertook were not just concerning rehgion; and desired God, if it were not good, to order him to be taken and spoiled of his honours and possessions." Since which the duke was taken prisoner : and, at the very time of his taking, the papists made an observation, that the sun appeared so strangely in England, as the hke had not been seen before. So apt are men to interpret events ac cording to their own preconceived opinions. But at this Letter to Winchester took much advantage". Whereas indeed the otherwise ; for as for Jack of to whom it was, (as I remember Lent's Testament, [it] was openly he told me), given at London for sold in Winchester market, before news ; and [he] had it a good I wrote unto your grace of it. And while 'eer I wrote to your grace. as for Bale's books, caUed the Elu- I had not then received the in- cidation of Anne Askew's Martyr- hibition for preaching, whereof dom*, they were in these parts men spake otherwise than they common, some with leaves un- knew." Another letter of W. [in- glued, where master Paget was Chester] to the l[ord] protector, spoken of; and some with leaves dated June 6, [a.d. 1547.]— glued. And I caU them com- Foxe's Acts and Monuments, pp. mon, because I saw at the least 1346, 7, ed. Lond. 1583.] four of them. As for Bale's book, m p. e. john Frederic, duke of touching the death of Luther, Saxony, to whom Cranmer was wherein was the duke of Sax- sent as ambassador by Henry on[y]'sprayer,(whereof I wrote)t, VIII.— See vol. i. p. 18, n. p.] [it] was brought down into this " ["Bale hath set forth a country by an honest gentleman, prayer for the duke J[ohn] of * [" Bale's book called ' Elucidation, &c. touching Luther.' ' The true historie of the christen departynge of Martyne Luther, translated by Johan Bale, 8vo. 1546 ; and the examinacion of Anne Askew, latelye martyred in Smithfelde; imprented at Marpurg, 1546,' (7), appears in Herbert's Account of Printing, vol. iii. pp. 1560, 61. "—Foxe's Acts and Monuments, vol. vi. p. 39) "• (0 ed. Lond. 1843-48.] t [See below, n. n,] I549-] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 187 issues of God's providence in this world are not favour- the lord able always even to the best causes. pro eo or' The keeping of Lent was now called into controversy ; Preaching and asserted, that it was not to be observed upon a reh- Jf^"8 gious account. And this was done the rather, because the papists placed so much rehgion in the bare fast. In the pulpit it began to be cried down. Tongue" and JosephP, two great preachers in London, said, " That Lent Saxe (Saxony), wherein the duke remitteth to God's judgment to be shewed here in this world the justness of his cause concerning rehgion, and desireth God, if his cause be not good, to order him to be taken, and to be spoUed of his honour, and possessions, with many such gay words, whereby to tempt God ; since which prayer the duke is indeed taken, as all the world saith ; and at the time of his taking, as the account is made, such strangeness in the sun, as we saw it here, as hath not been seen. They happened both together, this we know, and be both marvellous ; but whether the one were a token ordered to concur with the other, God knoweth, and man cannot de fine." Another letter of S.[te- phen] Winchester] to the lord protector, from Winchester, May 21, [a.d. 1547.] — Foxe's Acts and Monuments, p. 1343. ed. Lond. 1583.] 0 [Tong, or Tongue, chaplain to Edward VI., and one of the learned men at Cambridge, who attended sir Thomas Smith's Greek lectures. — See Strype's •Eccl. Mem. vol. ii. pt. i. p. 16. ed. Oxon. 1822, and Life of sir Thomas Smith, p. 14. ed. Oxon. 1820.] p [John Joseph, once a friar at Canterbury, and one of the preach ers that attended the king's visi tors to different dioceses, a. d. 1547. " Holinshed, at the end of Edward Vlth's reign, mentions among others, who died about that time, ' doctor Joseph, an ex cellent preacher.' (Chronicles, vol. n. pt. ii. p. 1087. ed. Lond. 1586-87.) John Joseph, S.T.B., is mentioned by Newcourt, (Re- pertorium, vol. i. p. 439. ed. Lond. 1708-10), as becoming rec tor of St. Mary-le-Bow, per mort. Cockys, October 20th, 1546, put in of course by Cranmer ; this is probably the same individual, but Newcourt does not mention the time of his death." He was pre sented to a prebend of Canter bury, July 18, 1550, and was succeeded by Richard Faucet, March 23, 1553. Strype states that he was cited, March 7, 1553, and deprived of his church of St. Mary-le-Bow, London, for being a married man, and of his pre- 188 MEMORIALS OF [II. 15. was one of Christ's miracles, which God ordained not 207 men to imitate or follow : 1 and that it was an insup portable burden." There was a set of rhymes now made about the burial of Lent, which was called, Jack of Lent's Testament, and publicly sold in Winchester market: therein Stephen Gardiner the bishop was touched, who was a great man for keeping it. For in the ballad Stephen Stockfish was bequeathed in this will to Stephen Gardiner. Of this he made a long complaint to the protectory But bend soon after, and that he was also an exile for his religion. — See vol. i. p. 228, and above, p 14, also vol. iii. B. iii. caps, iii and viii. Le Neve's Fasti, p. 19 Foxe's Acts and Monuments, vol vi. p. 745. ed. Lond. 1843-48 Rymer's Fcedera, vol. xv. p 237-l 1 " I hear say that Lent is thus spoken of by Joseph and Tongue, with other new, (whom I know not), as being one of Christ's miracles, which God ordained not man to imitate and follow ; at which teaching aU the world wiU laugh." Another letter of S.[te- phen] Winchester to the lord protector] from Winchester, May 21, [a.d. 1547]. — Foxe's Acts and Monuments, p. 1343.] r ["If any man had either fondly or indiscreetly spoken of Lent to engreive it to be an im portable burden, I would wish his reformation; for I have not learned that all men are bound to keep the Lent in the form received. But this I reckon, that no Chris tian man may contemn the form received, being such a devout and profitable imitation of Christ to celebrate his fast; and in that time such as have been in the rest of the year worldly, to prepare themselves to come, as they should come, to the feast of Easter, whereof St. Chrysostome speaketh expressly. And for avoiding contempt, a license truly obtained of the superior serveth. And so I heard the king's ma jesty, our sovereign lord, declare, when your grace was present; and therefore he himself was very scrupulous in granting of licences. And to declare that himself con temned not the fast, he was at charge to have, (as your grace knoweth), the Lent diet daily prepared, as [if] it had been for himself; and the like hereof I hear say your grace hath ordered for the king's majesty that now is ; which agreeth not with certain preaching in this matter, nor the rhymes set abroad. Lent is, among Christian men, a godly feast [fast] to exercise men to forbear, and in England both godly and politic, such as with out confusion we cannot forbear, I549-] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 189 yet this neglect of Lent was not encouraged by the supe riors : for it was kept at court, and preparations for the king's diet were made accordingly this Lent by the protector. The protestants indeed were for keeping it, and an order was issued out for that purpose ; though not upon a rehgious but politic account. But the greater part of the ordinary people would not be brought to it by this distinction: so that the preachers were fain to be em ployed. Latimer preached, " That those that regard not laws and statutes, were despisers of magistrates. There be laws made of diet," he said, " what meats we shall eat at all times. And this law is made in policy, as I suppose, for victual's sake, that fish might be uttered as well as other meat. Now as long as it goeth so pohticly, we ought to keep it. Therefore all, except those that be dis pensed withal, as sick, impotent persons, women with child, old folk, &c. ought to hve in an ordinary obedience to those laws, and not to do against the same in any wises. as the experience shaU show, if it to consider, how much we be be ever attempted, which God bounden unto God, that he open- forbid. And yet Lent is buried eth unto us his word so plainly, in rhyme, and Stephen Stockfish and teacheth us so truly how we bequeathed, not to me, though should behave ourselves towards my name be noted; wherewith the magistrates and their laws; for mine own part I cannot be but for all that, I fear there be angry, for that is mitigated by some of us which httle regard their fondness. But I would de- their laws and statutes. Such sire of God to have the strength despisers of magistrates, when of this realm increased with re- they pray they pray against them- port of concord, which doth selves. There be laws made of quench many vain devices and diet*, how we shaU feed our imaginations." — Id. p. 1344.] bodies, what meat we shall eat 8 [" And here we have occasion at all times ; and this law is * [i. e. 2° and 30 Edw. VI. cap. 19:5° and 6° Edw. VI. cap. 3. See Sta tutes of the Realm, vol. iv. pp. 65, 66, 132, 3.] 190 MEMORIALS OF [II. 15. Gardiner's Gardiner urged the great inconvenience these rhymes ofdaSrhe me against Lent might occasion : " That they could serve for against nothing but to learn the people to rail, and to make others forbear to make their usual provisions of fish against the ensuing year, fearing Lent to be sick, as the rhyme pur ported, and like to die'." Latimer About these times there arose much talk of the king's the Mne matching. The protestants were much afraid of his about mar- marrying with some foreign princess abroad, that might turn his heart from religion. But the popishly affected did their endeavours to persuade him to please himself with some lady abroad, as best agreeable with pohtic ends, as the enlarging of his dominions, and the surety and de fence of his countries. Some therefore put Latimer upon giving the king counsel in this matter from the pulpit. So he advised the king, " to chose him one that is of God, that is, which is of the household of faith ; and such an one as the king can find in his heart to love, and lead his life in pure and chaste espousage with. Let him choose a wife that fears God. Let him not choose a proud made in policy, as I suppose, for fond, (saving your grace's honor), victual's sake, that fish might be and foolish! and yet the people uttered as well as other meat. pay money for them, and they Now as long as it goeth so in can serve for nothing, but to policy, we ought to keep it. learn the people to rail, and to Therefore all except those that be cause such as used to make pro- dispensed withal, as sick, impo- vision for fish against Lent, fear- tent persons, women with child, ing now [in] Lent to be so sick as or old folks, or licensed persons, the rhyme purporteth, and like to aU the rest to live in an ordinary die indeed, to forbear to make obedience to those laws, and not their accustomed provision for do against the same in anywise." the next year." Another letter of (Fourth Serm. on the Lord's S.[tephen] Winchester], dated Prayer); Latimer's Works, vol. i. Winchester, May 21, [a.d, p. 372. Park. Soc. ed.] 1547.]— Foxe's Acts and Monu- * [" What rhymes be set forth ments, p. 1543. ed- Lond- '583-] to deprave the Lent, and how 1 549-J ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 191 wanton, and one full only of rich treasures and worldly pompu." The sentiments of the protestant foreigners concerning Foreign the present Enghsh state deserve a particular remark, their offer ' They took such great joy and satisfaction in this good^kins king, and his estabhshment of rehgion, that the heads of them, Bullinger, Calvin, and others, in a letter to him, offered to make him their defender, and to have bishops in their churches as there were in England, with the tender of their service to assist and unite together. This nettled the learned at the council of Trent, who came to the knowledge of it by some of their private intelligencers; and they verily thought, that all the heretics, as they called them, would now unite among themselves, and be come one body, receiving the same discipline exercised in 208 England. Which if it should happen, and that they should have heretical bishops near them in those parts, n ["It is a very hard thing for full of rich treasures, and worldly a man to rule weU one woman, pomp." — First Serm. preached Therefore let our king, what time before Edward VI. "And here I his grace shaU be so minded to would say a thing to your ma- take a wife, choose him one, jesty: I shall speak it of good which is of God ; that is, which will to your highness : I would I is of the household of faith. — And were able to do your grace good that she be such one as the king service in any thing, ye should be can find in his heart to love, and sure to have it. But I wiU say lead his life in pure and chaste this : for God's love beware where eBpousage; and then he shaU be you marry: choose your wife in the more prone and ready to ad- a faithful stock. Beware of this vance God's glory;— let the king worldly policy: marry in God; therefore choose unto him a godly marry not for the great respect wife whereby he shah the better of alliance, for thereof cometh all hve chaste; and in so living, aU these evUs of breaking of wed- godhness shaU increase, and righ- lock, which is amongst princes teousness be maintained.— Let the and noblemen."— First and last king therefore choose a wife, Serm. preached before Edward VI. which feareth God; let him not Latimer's Works, vol. i. pp. 94,' seek a proud wanton, and one 93.97.243- Park. Soc. ed.] 192 MEMORIALS OF [II. Ij. they concluded that Rome and her clergy would utterly fall. Whereupon were sent two of their emissaries from Rotterdam into England, who were to pretend themselves Anabaptists, and preach against baptizing infants, and preach up rebaptizing, and a fifth monarchy upon earth. And besides this, one D. G. authorized by these learned men, dispatched a letter written in May 1549, from Delf in Holland, to two bishops, whereof Winchester was one, signifying the coming of these pretended Anabaptists, and that they should receive them and cherish them, and take their parts if they should chance to receive any checks : tilling them, that it was left to them to assist in this cause, and to some others whom they knew to be well affected to the mother church. This letter is lately put in print. Sir Henry Sydney first met with it in queen Foxes and Elizabeth's closet, among some papers of queen Mary's. Firebrands, part ii. He transcribed it into a book of bis, called, " The Romish Policies." It came afterwards into the hands of archbishop Usher; and was transcribed thence by sir James Ware v. v [Memorandum taken out of crafty and politic councU hath sir Henry Sidney's book, called absolutely brought in heresy, the Romish Pollicies, numb. 6, which if not by art or other en- pag. 37, in fol. a manuscript, with deavours speedily overthrown, and archbishop Usher. made infamous, all other foreign " Her royal highness giving me heretics wUl unite with your new the freedom to search the affairs heresies now amongst your- of state ever since her royal fa- selves lately planted, and so have ther's denying the jurisdiction of bishops as you have ; and it is the see of Rome, amongst others the opinion of our learned men of this sort, I found a letter di- now at Trent that the schisms in rected to the bishops of Winches- England by Edward's council ter and Rochester; part of the established, will reclaim aU the contents being for my purpose, foreign sects unto their discipline, be these, as they were translated and thereby be one body united. out of the Low-Dutch. For Calvin, Bullinger, and others " Edward, (son of Henry the have wrote unto Edward to offer heretic king of England), by his their service to assist and unite, I549-J ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 193 Let it be remembered here, and noted, that about this time Winchester was appointed, with Ridley bishop of Rochester, to examine certain anabaptists in Kent. I find no bishops consecrated this year. also to make Edward and his heirs their chief defender, and so have bishops as weU as Eng land; which if it come to pass, that heretic bishops be so near, and spread abroad, Rome and the clergy utterly faUs. You must therefore make these offer- tures of theirs odious to Edward and his council. Receive N. S. and E. L. from Rotterdam, their lessons are taught them, take you their parts, if checked by the other heretics ; for these be for rebap- tizing, and not for infant bap tism : their doctrine is for a future monarchy upon earth after death, which wiU please the or dinary kind weU, and dash the other that rageth now amongst you. Reverend fathers, it is left to you to assist, and to those you know are sure to the mother- church. From Delph, the 4th ide of May, anno Christi, 1549. D. G." — Foxes and Firebrands, by Rob. Ware, pt.u. p. 11. ed. Dubl. 1682. Strype attributes this part of "Foxes and Firebrands" to sir James Ware, which is an error. See Watts' Bibl. Brit. vol. ii. (authors) col. 949. s. ed. Edin. 1824.] CKANMER, VOL. II, 194 MEMORIALS O* [II. 16. Ann.isso Ridley made bi shop of London. Ridley's letter, among the Letters of the Mar tyrs x. CHAPTER XVI. RIDLEY MADE BISHOP OF LONDON. THE COMMUNION- BOOK REVIEWED. Ridley bishop of Rochester was designed to succeed Boner, lately deprived, in the bishopric of London; and April 3, took his oath, an half year being almost spent before he entered upon the care of that see, after Boner's deprivation. At his entrance, he was exceeding wary not to do his predecessor the least injury in goods that be longed to him. He had not one pennyworth of his move able goods ; for if any were found and known to be his, he had license to convey them away, otherwise they were x [" To the Uueen's Majesty. — It may please your majesty, for Christ our Saviour's sake, in a matter of conscience, (and now not for myself, but for other poor men), to vouchsafe to hear and understand this mine humble supplication. It is so, (honour able princess), that in the time while I was in the ministry of the see of London, divers poor men, tenants thereof, have taken new leases of their tenantries and holdings, and some have renewed and changed their hold, and therefore have paid fines and sums of money, both to me, and also to the chapter of Paul's, for the confirmation of the same. Now I hear say, that the bishop which occupieth the same room now will not aUow the aforesaid leases, which must redound to many poor men's utter ruin and decay; wherefore, this is mine humble supplication unto your ho nourable grace, that it may please the same, for Christ's sake, to be unto the aforesaid poor men their gracious patron* and defender, either that they may enjoy their aforesaid leases, and years re newed, (as, whenf their matter shall be heard with conscience, both justice, conscience, and equity shaU require; for that their leases shall be found, (I trust), made without fraud or coven X, either of their part or of mine; and also the old rents always reserved § to the see, with out any kind of damage thereof); * [" Patronus."— Foxe.] f [" As (I suppose) when."— Foxe.] J [" Collusion."] § [" And always also the old rents reserved."— Foxe.] '55°- J ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 195 safely preserved for him. There was some quantity of lead lay in the house, which he used about it and the or if this will not be granted, then that it may please your gra cious highness to command that the poor men may be restored to their former leases and years, and may have rendered* to them again, such sums of money, as they paid to me and to the chap ter f for their leases and years so now taken from them; which thing concerning the fines paid to me, may be easUy done, if it shaU please your majesty to com mand some portion of those goods which I left in my house, to be given unto them J. I suppose that half of the value of the plate § which I left in mine offices, and especiaUy in an iron chest in my bed-chamber, wiU go nigh to re store all such fines received ; the true sums and parcels whereof are not set in their leases, and therefore, (if that way shall please your highness,) they must be known by such ways and means as your majesty by the advice of men of wisdom and conscience shaU appoint. But yet for Christ's sake I crave and most humbly beseech your majesty, of your most gracious pity and mercy, that the former way may take place. I have also a poor sister, that came to me out of the north with three fatherless children for her rehef, whom I married after to a servant of mine own house ; she is put out of that which I did provide for them. I beseech your honourable grace, that her case may be mercifuUy consi dered : and that the rather, in contemplation that I never had of him which suffered indurance || at my entrance to the see of Lon don, one penny IF of his moveable goods, for it was almost half-a- year after his deposition, afore I did enter in that place** ; yea, and also if any were left known to be his, he had Ucence to carry it away, or there for his use it did lie safe ; and his officers do know, that I paid for the lead ft which I found there when I occupied any of it to the behoof of the church or of the house. And moreover, I had not only no part of his moveable goods, but also as his old receiver and then mine, called master Staunton, can tes tify, I paid for him, towards his servants' common liveries and wages, after his deposition, fifty- three li. or fifty-five pounds, I can- * ["And to have rendered." — Foxe.] f [" That chapter house.'' —Foxe.] % [" When I fled in hope of pardon for my trespass towards your grace, which goods, (as I have heard,) be yet reserved in the same house." — Foxe.] § [" Of my plate." — Foxe and Park. Soc. ed. || [" Hardship."] If [" Not one penny." — Foxe.] ** [" Into that place."— Foxe.] ft [" Did lie safe, as his officers do know. I paid for the lead." — Foxe.] o2 196 MEMORIALS OF [II. 16. church ; but Ridley paid for it, as Boner's own officers knew. He continued Boner's receiver, one Staunton, in his place. He paid fifty-three or fifty-five pounds for Boner's own servants' common hveries and wages, which was Boner's own debt, remaining unpaid after his deposi tion. He frequently sent for old Mrs. Boner, his prede cessor's mother, calling her " his mother," and caused her to sit in the uppermost seat at his own table, as also for his sister, one Mrs. Mungey. It was observed, how Rid ley welcomed the old gentlewoman, and made as much of her as though she had been his own mother. And though sometimes the lords of the council dined with him, he would not let her be displaced, but would say, " By your lordships' favour, this place of right and custom is for my mother Boner." But to see the base ingratitude of Boner ; when he was restored again in queen Mary's reign, 209 he used Ridley far otherwise than Ridley had used him : for he would not allow the leases which Ridley had made; which was in danger to redound to the utter ruin and decay of many poor men. He had a sister with three children, whom he married to one Shipside a servant of his, and provided for them. This sister Boner turned out of all, and endeavoured the destruction of Shipside, had not tell whether. In all these mat- whose succour and some relief, ters I beseech your honourablema- now unto your highness I make jesty to hear the advice of men of most humble suit. conscience, and especiaUy* the Thei6thday of October, 1555. archbishop now of York t which, N. R." for that he was continually in my — Letters of the Martyrs, pp. 27- house a year and more before 29. ed. Lond. 1844. See also mine imprisonment, I suppose he Foxe's Acts and Monuments, is not altogether ignorant of some p. 1768. ed. Lond. 1583. Works part of these things ; and also his of Bp. Ridley, pp. 427-429. Park. grace doth know my sister, for Soc. ed.] * ["And in especially."— Foxe.] f [" Archbishop of York."— Foxe.] 55o.] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 197 not bishop Hethe dehvered himy. Ridley, in his offices, and in an iron chest in his bed-chamber, had much plate, y [" Now remaineth a word or two to be declared of his (Rid ley's) gentle nature, and kindly pity in the usage of an old wo man called Mrs. Boner, mother to Dr. Boner, sometime bishop of London; which I thought good to touch, as weU for the rare clemency of Dr. Ridley, as the unworthy inhumanity and ungrateful disposition again of Dr. Boner. Bishop Ridley, be ing at his manor of Fulham, al ways sent for this said Mrs. Boner, dwelling in an house ad joining to his house, to dinner and supper, with one Mrs. Mun- gey, Boner's sister, saying, ' Go for my mother Boner ;' who, coming, was ever placed in the chair at the table's end, being so gently entreated, welcomed, and taken, as though he had been born of her own body, being never displaced of her seat, al though the king's councU had been present; saying, when any of them were there, (as divers times they were), ' By your lord ship's favour, this place of right and custom is for my mother Boner.' But how well he was recompensed for this, his singu lar gentleness and pitiful piety after, at the hands of the said Dr. Boner, almost the least child that goeth by the ground can declare. For who afterward was more enemy to Ridley than Boner and his ? Who more went about to seek his destruction than he? recompensing his gentleness with extreme cruelty ; as well appeared by the strait handling of Ridley's own natural sister, and George Shipside her husband from time to time : whereas the gentleness of the other did suffer Boner's mother, sister, and other his kindred, not only quietly to enjoy aU that which they had of Boner, but also entertained them in his house, shewing much courtesy and friendship daUy unto them : whereas on the other side, bishop Boner, being restored again, would not suffer the brother and natural sister of bishop Ridley, and other his friends, not only not to enjoy that which they had by the said their brother, bishop Ridley, but also currishly without aU order of law or honesty, by extort power wrested from them aU the livings they had. And yet, being not therewith satisfied, he sought all the means he could to work the death of the foresaid Shipside, saying, that he would make twelve godfathers to go upon him; which had been brought to pass indeed, at what time he was prisoner at Oxford, had not God otherwise wrought his deliverance by means of Dr. Heath, bishop then of Worcester. Teste George Shipside. Whereby all good indifferent readers noto riously have to understand, what great diversity was in the dispo- 198 MEMORIALS OF [II. 1 6. and considerable quantities of other goods; all which Boner seized upon. Insomuch that Ridley, but a httle before his burning, wrote a supplicatory letter to the queen to take this into her consideration, " That the poor men might enjoy their leases, and years renewed, for that they were made without fraud or covin, either for then- parts, or his ; and the old rents always reserved to the see, without any kind of damage thereof : or at least that they might be restored to their former leases and years, and might have rendered to them again such sums of money as they paid him and the chapter, as fines for their leases and years taken from them. Which fines he desired the queen would command might be made good out of the plate and other things he left in his house ; half whereof would disburse those fines." This did so much run in the good man's mind, that at the time of his burning, he desired the lord Williams 7-, then present, to remember this his suit to the queen3. Which he promised him he would do. But what effect it had I cannot tell. sition of these two natures ;- where- released from the Tower, she was of as the one excelled in mercy placed in his custody, who waited and pity, so the other again as on her to Woodstock, and treated much or more excelled in churlish her with great civility, and all the ingratitude, and despiteful dis- respect due to her quality: but dain." — Foxe's Acts and Monu- this not being so acceptable to ments, pp. 1717, 18. ed. Lond. those who governed she was put 1583. See also Wordsworth's under the charge of sir Henry Eccl. Biogr. vol. iii. pp. 7, 8, n. 7. Beddingfield by whom she was ed. Lond. 1839.] more roughly handled." — See z [" Sir John Williams, created Burnet's Hist, of Reformat. lord WiUiams for proclaiming the vol. ii. pp. 284, 503, 573, 640, princess Mary queen in Oxford- 729. vol. iii. p. 435. ed. Oxon. shire, was appointed to escort 1829.J Cranmer, Ridley, and Latimer to a [" In the meantime Dr. Rid- Oxford, and by the queen to see ley spake unto my lord Williams, the execution of the two latter. and said, ' My lord, I must be a When the princess Elizabeth was suitor unto your lordship in the 1 55°-J ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 199 In the vacancy of the church of Rochester, by the Rochester remove of Ridley, the archbishop committed the spi ritualities to William Cook, LL.D.b April 18. The nobility and gentry this year flying so much upon Bucer the spoil of the church, Bucer, by the archbishop's in- Dorset, not stigation, as well as his own inclinations, wrote to thec£us^ e marquis of Dorset0 to forbear, dissuading him from spoil ing the church of her maintenance. In which letter he hath these expressions : " Antiquum dictum est, neminem MSS. posse vere ditari furtis aut rapinis, quibus invaduntur res MigCeUari. ahenae ; multo minus peculatu, quo defraudatur respublica. A- d Quem igitur habeat sensum Dei, qui dubitet, minime omnium posse cujusquam opes augeri salutariter sacri- legiis, quibus acciduntur res ecclesiastical ? Sunt nimium amphe hse opes, addictse ecclesiis; et in luxum permulti eas diripiunt. Homines plane otiosi; nee ullam reipu- blicse conferentes utihtatem. Submoveantur igitur hi fuci ab ecclesiae alvearibus, nee depasci permittantur apum labores. Deinde procurentur, ut restitutis passim schohs behalf of divers poor men, and wUl not allow my grants unto especially in the cause of my poor them made, but contrary unto all sister: I have made a suppUcation law and conscience, hath taken to the queen's majesty in their from them their hvings, and wiU behalfs. I beseech your lordship not suffer them to enjoy the same. for Christ's sake, to be a mean I beseech you, my lord, be a to her grace for them. My bro- mean for them ; you shall do a ther here hath the suppUcation, good deed and God will reward and will resort to your lordship you." — Foxe's Acts and Monu- to certify you hereof. There is ments, p. 1770. ed. Lond. 1583.] nothing in aU the world that b [Dean of the arches, com- troubleth my conscience, (I praise missary of the prerogative court God), this only excepted. Whilst of Canterbury, and judge of the I was in the see of London, di- admiralty. See above, pp. 92, 99.] vers poor men took leases of me, c [See above, p. 183. n. '.] and agreed with me for the same. d [MSS. C.C.C.C. No. CXIII. Now I hear say, the bishop that p. 3.] now occupieth the same room. 200 MEMORIALS OF [II. 1 6. The Common Prayer- Book re viewed. nusquam desint ecclesiarum frugi ministri," &c. That is, " It is an old saying, nobody can grow rich by the steal ing and taking away of private people's possessions ; much less by robbing of the public. What sense therefore hath he of God, that doubts not that his riches shall increase to good purpose that commits sacrilege, and robs the church of what belongs to it ? But it is objected, the church hath too much, and many spend it in luxury: the churchmen are idle, and bring no profit to the commonwealth. Let these drones therefore be removed from the hives of the church, but let not the pains of the bees be eaten up. And then, having schools of good literature every where restored, let not the church want sober ministers," &c. 210 A review was made of the book of Common Prayer, about the latter end of the year, by archbishop Cranmer and the bishops. Divers things, that savoured too much of superstition, were endeavoured to be changed or a- mended : but there were among them some that made what opposition they could. The archbishop had now by Wilks, master of Christ's Collegee, desired Bucer, (that great divine then at Cambridge), that he would take an impartial view of the whole book, having procured him a translation of it into Latin, done by Aless f, the learned e [Richard Wilks, S.T.P., master of Christ's CoUege Cam bridge from A.D. 1549 to 1553. See Le Neve's Fasti, p. 432.] f [" Alexander Aless was a native of Edinburgh, and one of the canons of St. Andrews, who, having at first opposed the pro testants, became afterwards a con vert to their doctrines, and took refuge in Germany. Soon after the advancement of Cranmer to the see of Canterbury, Aless, who had lived much with the German divines, especiaUy Melancthon, was invited into England from Antwerp, as he himself informs us, 'by the right noble lord Crumwell, and the archbishop of Canterbury,' and after being 'lov ingly received ' not only by them, but also by the king himself, he was sent down to read a theo logical lecture at Cambridge; but meeting with opposition there, he returned to London, studied me- I55°-J ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 201 Scotch divine, for his understanding of it; and that he should judge, if he thought any thing in the book might be more explained agreeable with God's word, and for better edification of faith. Bucer in answer sent the archbishop word, first, what his judgment was of the book, and then what course he intended to use in the examination of it that he was now to make. He said, that when he first came into England, and by the help of an interpreter took some knowledge of the rites and doctrines of this church, that he might see whether he could join his ministry with it, he thanked God " that had inclined the officers of the church to reform the ceremonies to that degree of purity ; and that he found nothing in them that was not taken out of the word of God, or at least was not repugnant to it, being fitly taken s. For some few things there were," added he, " that, unless they were candidly interpreted, might seem not so sufficiently agreeable with the word of God." As for what he was now to do in order to the fulfilling what the archbishop required of him, he intended in short notes, at every chapter of the book, to observe what he thought to be according to God's word, and to be re tained and vindicated ; what to be taken away or mended, and what to be more plainly explained and allowed. After dicine under Dr. Nicholas, an professor of Divinity, which post eminent physician, and was now he retained until his death in practising in that art, when met in 1565." Wordsworth's Eccl. the manner described by the lord Biogr. vol. ii. pp. 247, 8. n. 2. CrumweU. After the fall of Crum- See also p. 604. n. 3. ed. Lond. well he returned to Germany, and 1839.] was made professor of divinity at b Nee enim quicquam in illis Francfort on the Oder, which deprehendi quod non sit ex verbo place he soon left, in consequence Dei desumptum, aut saltern ei non of giving offence to the elector of adversetur, commode acceptum. Brandenburgh. He retired to Buceri Scripta Anglican, [p. 456. Leipzig, and was there also chosen ed. Basil. 1577. J 202 MEMORIALS OF [II. 16. his perusal of the book, he gave this judgment in general : "That in the description of the communion and daily prayers, he saw nothing enjoined in the book but what was agreeable to the word of God, either in word, as the psalms and lessons; or in sense, as the collects11. Also h [" Benevolentia atque benefi- interpretetur, videri queant, non centia Domini nostri Jesu Christi augeatur R. P. T. perpetuo. Sig- nificavitmihi, reverendissime pater ac domine, eximius vir, magister N. praefectus collegii Christi, re- verendissimam P. T. petere, ut expensis qua? insunt in libro sa- crorum hujus regni, judicem, si quae existimem in eo libro posse explicari amplius, et cum verbo Dei consentanee, et ad fidei a?di- ficationem apposite*. Memor ergo quid reverendissimse P. T. et ec clesiis Anglicanis cum primis de- beam, quod datum mihi est hac in re videre, id studeam subscri- bere. Reverendissima P. T., alii- que tui ordinis, de his judicabunt. Equidem cum primum in hoc regnum venissem, quae publice dogmata quique ritus in ecclesia essent recepti : videremque eo, num meum possem ministerium his solido consensu adjungere, librum istum sacrorum per inter- pretem, quantum potui, cognovi diligenter : quo facto, egi gratias Deo, qui dedisset vos has cere- monias eo puritatis reformare, nee enim quicquam in illis deprehendi, quod non sit ex verbo Dei de- sumptum, aut saltern ei non ad- versetur, commode acceptum. Nam non desunt paucula qua?- dam, qua; si quis non candide satis cum verbo Dei congruere. Quo vero officium, quod reveren dissima P. T. a me petit, prastem fidelius, annotabo paucis ad sin gula libri capita, quid midi vide- atur juxta verbum Dei retinendum esse et vindicandum, quid tollen- dum, aut emendandum ; denique qui etiam plannis explicandum et perficiendum, ordinem sequar in eo libro, cujus haec sunt pra- cipua capita : 1 . descriptio pre- cum, quae quotidie in templis haberi debeant cum suis lectioni- bus et psalmis. 2. descriptio S. communionis. 3. consecrationis S. connubii. 4. visitationis se- grotorum. 5. exequiarum fune- brium. 6. purificationis puerpu- rarum. 7. pubhea? supplicationis pro venia peccatorum. Porro de aliis casremoniis ac riti- bus, qua? in se verbo Dei non repugnant, ut loca religionibus sacra, purae preces, lectiones, psalmi, et alia? hujus generis, ac- curandum erit, ut ha?c religionum instrumenta atque ritus ita exhi- beantur et observentur, ut requirit regula Spiritus S. in libro probe proposita : ut scilicet nihil loci relinquatur ulli veteri vitio : nihil insit obscuri, et non intellectum, nihil non grave et fidei in Christum fedificationi, decorique cruris Chri- [Sic] 1 55°-J ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 203 that the manner of their lessons and prayers, and the times of using them, were constituted very agreeable both with God's word, and the observation of the ancient churches : and therefore that that book ought to be re tained and vindicated with the greatest strictness'." What particular animadversions the said learned man made upon the book, may be seen in his " Scripta An- glicana," and in the bishop of Sarum's History, as he hath there abridged themi. And such a deference was given to his judgment, that most of the things that he excepted against were corrected accordingly. And, that the book might be the more exact, and perhaps be the more agreeable to the doctrine and practice of foreign churches, the archbishop recommended the diligent ex- mination of it unto another great divine, Peter Martyr k, who was now at Lambeth; the archbishop desiring him to note what he thought good concerning the book, and, because he knew not the language, the version of sir John Cheke1, (who had also translated it into Latin), was given him. He was also requested to set down in writing what he thought deserved correction. And he accordingly made his annotations. Martyr agreed clearly in judgment with Bucer about 211 the book, as he wrote to him in a letter sent him to Bucer and Cambridge, extant among archbishop Parker's manu-pioyedinit. sti accomodatum." Censur. in Religione igitur summa retinenda ordinat. Eccl. Bucer. Script. An- erit, et vindicanda ha?c ceremonia. glic. pp. 456, 495. Ed. Basil. Censura, inter Scripta Anglican. I577-] [P; 456, 7-] ' Modus quoque harum lee- J [Burnet's Hist, of Reformat., tionum ac precum, et tempora, vol. ii. pp. 319-321. ed. Oxon. sunt admodum congruenter, et 1829.] cum verbo Dei, et observatione k [See above, p. 143. n. n.] priscarum ecclesiarum constituta. 1 [See above, p. 168. n. e.] 204 MEMORIALS OF [II. 16. MSS. scripts. On the back-side of which letter is written, by c c c c vol. intit'. that archbishop's own hand, "Censura hbri communium viror' II- precuin." In this letter Martyr told Bucer, that the same lustr. et things that he disapproved of, the same likewise had he German m. ° Ai [Peter Martyr] done : and that atterward he drew them up into articles, and shewed them to the archbishop of Canterbury. That to all that Bucer judged ought to be amended, he had subscribed; and that he thanked God, that had given occasion to admonish the bishops of these things. From this letter it appears, that the archbishop had told Martyr, that, in the conference among the di vines concerning the correction of these pubhc prayers, it was concluded to make many alterations. But what those things were, as the archbishop told him not, so neither, as he wrote, did he dare to ask him. But what Cheke told him did not a little refresh him; viz. "That if they themselves would not change what ought to be changed, the king would do it of himself; and, when they came to a parliament, the king would interpose his majesty's own authority." m [MSS. C.C. C.C. No. cxix. p. 39. For this document, see Appen dix, No. lxi, to this vol.] i55°J ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 205 CHAPTER XVII. hoper's troubles. In the month of July John Hoper, who had hved long Hoper no- o • i i minated for abroad in Germany and in Switzerland, and conversed bishop of much with Bullinger and Gualter, the chief reformers cester" there, but returned into England in king Edward's reign, and retained by the duke of Somerset, and a famous preacher in the city, was nominated by the king to the bishopric of Gloucester n. But by reason of certain scruples of conscience he made to the wearing of the old n [" John Hoper was born in Somersetshire, about the close of the fifteenth century; he studied at Oxford, probably at Merton coUege, and subsequently em braced the monastic life. After the dissolution of the monasteries, and when the act of the Six Ar ticles was in force, he withdrew to the continent, where he was kindly received at Zurich by Bullinger. He remained abroad till the ac cession of Edward vi. ; he re turned to England in 1548, and residing in London, preached continuaUy to large congregations, taking also an active part in the proceedings of that period. In May (15th) 1550, he was nomi nated to the bishopric of Glou cester, but was not consecrated till the next year, March 8, 1551. This delay was owing to his ob jections to an oath by the saints, and to some of the vestments formerly worn by the popish pre lates, and then retained. The former point was conceded, but the dispute respecting the habits went so far, that Hoper was for a short time confined in the Fleet. This matter being at last arranged by his yielding in a great measure to what was required, he entered upon his diocese, to which that of Worcester was afterwards added, (in commendam on the depriva tion of Heathe in 1552)." On the accession of queen Mary he was deprived of his bishoprics, condemned January 1555, and burned near his own cathedral in Gloucester, February 9, 1555. See biogr. notice, works of bp. Hooper, vol. i. pp. 3, 4. Park, Soc. ed. Le Neve's Fasti, pp. 101. 299. Foxe's Acts and Monuments, pp. 1502 et sqq. ed. Lond. 1583. Wordsworth's Eccl. Biogr. vol. ii. PP- 3S5-402- ed. Lond. 1839.] 206 MEMORIALS OF [II. I7. pontifical habits, as the chimere and rochet, and such like, and disliking the oath customarily taken, he was not consecrated till eight months after, and endured not a little trouble in the mean season. Soon after his nomi nation he repaired to the archbishop, desiring him in these things to dispense with him : but the archbishop, for certain reasons, refused it. Then was the archbishop solicited by great men. The earl of Warwick, afterwards the great duke of Northumberland0, wrote to him a letter, dated July 23 v, the bearer whereof was Hoper himself, 0 [John Dudley, viscount Lisle, earl of Warwick, and duke of Northumberland, was one of Henry VIII. 's executors, being then lord high admiral, a go vernor to Edward VI. and to the kingdom, a privy councillor, lord great chamberlain, and lord pro tector of the north during the protector Somerset's expedition into Scotland. Upon Somerset's fall, whom he had opposed, he became one of the governors of the king's person, and absolute at court. He persuaded Edward VI. to leave the crown to the lady Jane Grey, whom his own son, lord Guilford Dudley, had married; and waited upon her with the duke of Suffolk to acquaint her that she was queen, but failing in his projects, he declared^for queen Mary; being taken prisoner he was sent to the Tower, condemned, and executed as a traitor, August 22> '553) notwithstanding he pro fessed to be a papist to save his life.— See Burnet's Hist, of Re format, vol. ii. pp. 6, 36, 66, 276, 279, 286, 384, 455, 456, 469, 478- 480, 487, 488. pt. ii, p. 4. ed. Oxon. 1829. Strype's Eccl. Mem. vol. ii. pt. i. pp. 19, 535, 537, 585, 586 ; pt. ii. p. 13. vol. iii. pt. i. pp. 8, 16, 21, 33. ed. Oxon. 1822.] p [" Besides this letter of the king" (for which see p. 207. n. r.), " also the earl of Warwick, (who was afterwards duke of Northumberland), adjoined his letter to the aforesaid archbishop of Canterbury, to this purpose and effect ; that Mr. Hoper might not be burdened with the oath used then commonly in the con secration of bishops, which was against his conscience ; as by the purport of the letter here is to be seen, as followeth : — ' After most hearty commendations to your grace, these may be to desire the same, that in such reasonable things, wherein this bearer, my lord elect of Gloucester, craveth to be borne withal at your hands, you would vouchsafe to shew him your grace's favour, the rather at this my instance : which thing !55°-] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 207 that the rather at his instance he would not charge the bishop elect of Gloucester with an oath burdenous to his conscience. Which was, I suppose, the oath of canonical obedience 1. And when Hoper had sued to the king, either to discharge him of the bishopric, or that he might be dispensed with in the ceremonies used in consecration, (which he knew the archbishop could not do, no more than to dispense with the laws of the land, whereby he should run into a pr.] 26th of this present, to certify unto n [" At Westminster, the 23rd the council what was to be done day of November, an0. 1550.— duly by the order of the law in This day the bishop of Winches- this case."— MSS. CouncU Book, ter's matter was renewed, and a. d. 1550-1553. fol. 167. Harl. thereupon, considering the time MSS. 352. Plut. Ux. I. fol. 118.] of his intimation was long since ° [MSS. Council Book, a.d. expired, it was agreed that the 1550-1553. fol. 185. Harl. bishop of Ely, Mr. Secretary MSS. 352. Plut. lix. I. 125, b., Petre, Dr. May, and Dr. Glyn, 126.] 238 MEMORIALS OF [II. I9. against the bishop, who then made a speech. Where in, first, he protested against these his judges, and ex cepted against their commission; and required this his protestation to be entered into the acts of the court. Then desiring a copy of the commission, it was granted him, together with that of the articles too, to make his answers to. Next, the archbishop gave him his oath to make true answer : which he took still with his protesta tion. Then the bishop desiring counsel, the archbishop and the rest not only granted his request, but aUowed him whomsoever he should name : which was the next day allowed also by an order of council. Certain honour able persons were deposed and sworn for ¦witnesses, as sir Anthony Wingfield, controller of the household?; sir William Cecyl, secretary*] ; sir Rafe Sadlierr ; sir Edward P [Sir Anthony Wingfield, a privy councillor, comptroller of the king's household, a knight of the garter, lord-lieutenant of Suffolk, and one of the chamber lains of the exchequer, was one of the privy-council appointed by Henry VHIth's will to assist his executors; he took part against the lord protector, besides being a witness against bishop Gardiner, he was also one of the commis sioners to hear bishop Boner's appeal against his trial: he died at Bethnal Green, Aug. 15, 1552, and was buried at Stepney. — See Burnet's Hist, of Reformat. vol. ii. pp. 7. 36, 282. ed. Oxon. 1829. Strype's Eccl. Mem. vol. i. pt. i. p. 565. vol. ii. pt. i. pp. 465, 587, 588. pt. ii. pp. 63, 160, 162, 163, 202, 228. vol. iii. pt. i. p. 38. ed. Oxon. 1822.] 1 [Sir WUliam Cecil, after wards lord Burleigh, secretary of etate and lord treasurer, who takes a prominent position in the history of this and the two suc ceeding reigns.] r [Sir Ralph Sadler, or Sadlier, was one of the privy-council ap pointed by the will of Henry VIII. to assist his executors; he took part against the lord protector, became one of queen Elizabeth's privy-councillors, and chancellor of the duchy of Lancaster, and of the exchequer. — See Burnet's Hist, of Reformat, vol. ii. pp. 7> 36, 280. ed. Oxon. 1829. Strype's Eccl. Mem. vol. ii. pt. ii. p. 161. ed. Oxon. 1822. Strype's Annals of the Reformat, vol. ii. pt. i. p- 500. pt. ii. pp. 317, 707, 709. ed. Oxon. 1824.] l550-] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 239 Norths; Dr. Cox, almonert; and others. The bishop also protested against them, and the swearing of them. At this first sessions he had also said, in the hearing of a 224 great multitude present, concerning the duke of Somerset and some other privy-counsellors, sent to him in the Tower, "That they had made an end with him before for all the matters for which he was committed : insomuch that he verily thought he should never have heard any more of it"." This, coming soon to the ears of these nobles, highly A letter of offended them, as reporting falsely of them. So that, meilj whom to justify themselves in as pubhc a manner, the next ses- |?*dhad be" sions they sent their letter, dated December 17, signed by the duke of Somerset, the earls of Wiltshire and Bedford, and sir Edward North : wherein they denied any such matter ; saying, " That the bishop defended his cause with untruths, and that, upon their fidelities and honours, his tale was false and untrue ; for that their coming to him in the Tower was to do their endeavour to reclaim him. And they prayed the commissioners, that, for their vindi cation, they would cause this their letter to be publicly read." Which was accordingly done ; though the bishop, thinking how this would reflect upon him under his for mer protestation, laboured hard that he might first be s [Sir Edward, afterwards lord pointed to attend queen Eliza- North, was chanceUor of the beth upon her coming to London. court of augmentations, one of —See Burnet's Hist, of Refor- Henry Vlllth's executors, and mat. vol. i. p. 679. vol. ii. pp. 6, governor to Edward VI. and the 36, 279, 471. ed. Oxon. 1829'. kingdom : he was also a privy- Strype's Annals of Reformat, vol. councillor, and was one of the i. pt.ii.p. 391. ed. Oxon. 1824.] opponents of the lord protector : t. [See above, p. 160. n. ».] he signed the letter to the prin- « [See Foxe's Acts and Monu- cess Mary, acquainting her that ments, pp. 776, 778. ist ed. 1563. the lady Jane Grey was queen, and vol. vi. pp. 93, 97. ed. Lond. and was one of the peers ap- 1843-48.] 240 MEMORIALS OF [II. 19. heard, and that he had something to propose why it should not be read. Which notwithstanding they would not grant x. January 19. The council sitting at Greenwich, the bishop's servants came and desired, that certain of them might be sworn upon certain articles for witness on his behalf. And if they might not be sworn, that upon their honours, as they would answer before God, they would witness truly according to their conscience, and as effectu ally as if they were sworn upon a booky. And they were allowed. Gardiner The bishop, to make his cause the more plausible, as b0ok S though he were the public defender of the Roman cathohc against church m England at this time, laboured to make it be- Cranmer to ° the com- lieved, that he fell into all this trouble for the defence of ' the real presence in the sacrament, and for maintaining the cathohc doctrine in a sermon before the king2; and that he made his book to vindicate himself therein. And therefore, in one of his appearances before the commis sioners, openly in the court delivered them his book against archbishop Cranmer, printed in Erance : and to make it suit the better, he had altered some lines in the beginning of his book, so as to make it to relate to his present case. But in truth Gardiner had wrote and finished his book before. This Cranmer unveiled in his Page 2. answer to this book of Gardiner's : saying there, " That he made his book before he was called before the com- x [Foxe's Acts and Monuments, 121, 2. ed. Lond. 1843-48.] pp. 778, 9. 1st ed. 1563, and vol. z [This sermon preached before vi. pp. 97, 8. ed. Lond. 1843-48.] the king on St. Peter's day, 1548, y [MSS. Council Book, a.d. will be found in Foxe's Acts and J55°-l553- fol- 202. Harl. MSS. Monuments, vol. vi. pp. 87-93. 352. Plut. lix. 1. fol. 129. b. See ed. Lond. 1843-48, where it is also.Foxe's Acts and Monuments, reprinted from the 1st ed. 1563; p. 792. 1st ed. 1563. vol. vi. pp. pp. 771-776.] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 241 missioners, as he could prove by a book under his own handwriting; and that he was called before the com missioners by his own suit and procurement, and as it were enforcing the matter. But indeed the true cause was, that he was called to justice for his manifest con tempt and continual disobedience from time to time, or rather rebelhon against the king's majesty ; and was de prived of his state for the same*." a ["The first entry of your your own importune suit and procurement, and as it were en forcing the matter, you were caUed to justice for your mani fest contempt and continual dis obedience from time to time, or rather rebellion against the king's majesty, and were justly deprived of your estate for the same, you would turn it now to a matter of the sacrament, that the world should think your trouble rose for your faith in the sacrament, which was no matter nor occa sion thereof, nor no such matter was objected against you, where fore you need to make any such defence. And where you would make that matter the occasion of your worthy deprivation and pun ishment, (which was no cause thereof), and cloak your wilful obstinacy and disobedience, (which was the only cause thereof), aU men of judgment may well per ceive, that you could mean no goodness thereby, neither to the king's majesty nor to his realm." — Answer to Stephen Gardiner upon the Sacrament of the Lord's Supper. Works of abp. Cranmer, book sheweth to them that be wise, what they may look for in the rest of the same, except the beginning vary from aU that fol- loweth. Now the beginning is framed with such sleight and subtlety that it may deceive the reader notably in two things : the one, that he should think you were caUed into judgment before the king's majesty's commission ers * at Lambeth for your cathohc faith in the sacrament ; the other, that you made your book for your defence therein; which be both utterly untrue. For your book was made or ever ye were caUed before tbe said commissioners ; and after you were called, then you altered only two lines in the beginning of your book, and made that beginning which it hath now. This am I able to prove, as well otherwise, as by a book which I have of your own handwriting, wherein appeareth plainly the al teration of the beginning. "And as concerning the cause wherefore ye were caUed before the commissioners, whereas by . * [" See the definitive sentence of these commissioners in Foxe's Acts and Monuments, pp. 1359,60. ed. Lond. 1583. It was passed on the 18th of April, 1551, Burnet, Hist, of Reformat. voL ii. p. 341. ed. Oxon. 1829."] CRANMER, VOL. II. R 242 MEMORIALS OF [II. I9. He is de prived. 225 In short, after a great deal of pains and patience, the bishop was by the archbishop and the rest of the commis sioners deprived, after no less than two and twenty ses sions, held at divers places, that is, from the 15th of December to the 14th of February : though Stow falsely nameth but seven0. The bishop, when he saw the sen tence definitive ready to be pronounced, made an appeal from them to the king : for his doing which he produced these reasons. For that these his pretended judges were not indifferent, but prejudiced against him. That my lord of Canterbury had caused him to be sent to prison, (whereas the archbishop was only present at the council when he was by them ordered to the Tower) : and so had Halesc, Goodrickd, and Gosnolde counselled to send him vol. i. p. 10. Park. Soc. ed. Jen kyns' Remains of abp. Cranmer, vol. iii. pp. 35, 36.] b [" Stephen Gardiner, bishop of Winchester, having been divers times conveyed from the Tower of London to Lambeth, (to wit, on the 15. and the 18. of Decem ber; the 8., the 12., and the 16. of January; the 13. and 14. of February), and at every the said times, examined by the archbi shop of "Canterbury, and other the king's high commissioners, he was now on the said 14. of February deprived of his bishop ric, and committed again to the Tower : into his place was trans lated Dr. Poynet, late bishop of Rochester ; and master John Scorie was made bishop of Ro chester." — Stow's Annals, p. 605. ed. Lond. 1631.] c [" Sir James Hales, knight, a pious and good man, and a just and able judge under king Henry and king Edward," who was the only person that refused to sign the letters patent of Edward VI. settling the crown upon lady Jane Grey. In the reign of queen Mary he fell into trouble, and was imprisoned for his religious sen timents. He was prevailed upon to recant by Day, bishop of Chi chester, and Portman, a judge; .... but the trouble that arose in his conscience filled him with great terror, and overwhelmed him with sorrow, so that he attempted to kill himself. Having recanted, and being " dismissed home into his own country and habitation, conquered with grief and despair, he drowned himself in a shallow pond near his own house," " about the beginning of the month of February, or the month of January before, a.d. I555-" — See Strype's Eccl. Mem. vol. iii, pt. i. pp. 274-276. ed. Oxon. 1822; Burnet's Hist, of Refor- 155°.] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 243 thither. Also, that the archbishop, and the bishops of Londonf and Lincolns, did contrary to the laws ecclesias tical, and taught and set forth manifest condemned errors against the presence in the sacrament. And because the bishop, as well in his writings as otherwise, did set forth the cathohc faith of the very presence of Christ's body and blood : therefore they shewed themselves unduly affected towards him. That sir Wilham Petre h decreed the fruits of his bishopric to be sequestered "de facto, sed non de jure," and now was judge in his own cause. But notwithstanding this appeal, the archbishop with the rest of the commissioners pronounced him deprived, and his bishopric void. After this was done, the bishop ap pealed again to the king, instantly, more instantly, most instantly, from their sentence as injust, and of no effect in law; and asked of them letters dimissory to be granted to him, and a copy of the judgment. But the judges de clared they would first know the pleasure of the king and his council therein. And so this last session brake up1. The day after, being the 15th of February, the council The coun cil's order mat. vol. ii. pp. 457,8. ed. Oxon. duke of Northumberland and the ^. -t 1829; Foxe's Acts and Monu- earl of Shrewsbury, he consented finement. ments. pp. 1410, 1467, 1532,3. and signed Edward Vlth's limita- ed. Lond. 1583.] tion thereof in her behalf. — See d [Richard Goodrick, or Good- Burnet's Hist, of Reformat. vol.ii. rich, an eminent civUian, who was pp. 340, 457, 8 ; pt. ii. pp.76, lawyer to Edward VI., and en- 123; vol. iii. pt. ii. p. 281. ed. gaged in most of the remarkable Oxon. 1829.] trials of this reign.] ' [Nicholas Ridley.] e [John Gosnold, or Gosnald, s [Henry Holbeach.] was a privy-councUlor, and soli- n [See vol. i. p. 1 18. n. u. and citor to the court of augmenta- above, p. 11.] tions : he was also made solicitor- » [See Foxe's Acts and Monu- general, and at first objected, with ments, pp. 865-867. 1st ed. 1563, sir James Hales, to the settlement and vol. vi. pp. 261-266. ed. of the crown upon the lady Jane Lond. 1843-48.] Grey, but being threatened by the r2 244 MEMORIALS OF [II. 1 9. sitting at Westminster, " upon debating [of] the bishop CouncU- 0f Winton's case ; Forasmuch as it appeared he had at all times, before the judges of his cause, used himself unre- verently to the king's majesty, and [very] slanderfully to wards his council; and especially yesterday, being the day of his judgment given against him, he called his judges heretics and sacramentaries, they being there the king's commissioners, and of his highness' council ; it was therefore concluded by the whole board, that he should be removed from the lodging he hath now in the Tower to a meaner lodging, and none to wait upon him but one, by the lieutenant's appointment, in such sort as by the resort of any man to him, he have not the libertyi to send out to any man, or to hear from any man. And likewise that his books and papers be taken from him, and seen ; and that from henceforth he have neither pen, ink, nor paper to write his detestable purposesk, but be sequestered from all conference, and from all means that may serve him to practise any way1." Poynet March 8, at Westminster. " This day, by the king's shop6 of" majesty's own appointment, Dr. Poynet, bishop of Ro- Winton. chester, was appointed and admitted111 bishop of Winches ter." And the archbishop of Canterbury had given him 2661. 13s. 4e?. (i. e. 400 marks) for his pains and charges about the bishop of Winchestern. And thus I have, from 226 very authentic authority, gathered together these memo rials of this turbulent haughty man ; who was now so seasonably laid aside in this king's reign, till we hear of him loudly in the next ; when he sufficiently wreaked his revenge against our good archbishop and the true rehgion. i [" He have the means." MSS. 352. Plut. lix. fol. 136 b.] Council Book.] m [" Was chosen bishop." k [" His determinable purpo- Strype.] ses." Harl. MSS.] n [MSS. CouncU Book, a. d. 1 [MSS. Council Book, a. d. 1550-1553. fol. 240, 1.] ^o-^SS- fob 222. Harl. MSS. I550-] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 245 CHAPTER XX. BISHOP HETHE AND BISHOP DAY, THEIR DEPRIVATIONS. While the aforesaid bishop lay under sequestration in other po- the Tower, two other bishops, that were wayward to the ^0„s 'dealt king's proceedings in the reformation of the church, (viz. Wlth- of Worcester and Chichester), came under the hands of the privy- council, resolving to make them comply, or de prive them : that others, more willing and better affected to reformation, might succeed and do service in the church ; and that the archbishop might go forward with less stop and impediment in the good work he had dedi cated himself unto. Both of them were of the archbi shop's raising, and seemed very compliant with the archbi shop during king Henry's reign. But now both hung off from him, seeming much offended with him for his re linquishing the doctrine of the corporeal presence, and for writing a book against it : whereof they made men tion, with dislike, in their depositions in the bishop of Winchester's trial before the commissioners0. ° [The articles, to which bi- "That in the months November shops Heathe and Day were and December, in the second year sworn, were the IVth and Vlth of the king's majesty's reign, of these, which Gardiner, in ad- the bishops of Durham, Carlisle, dition to those he had previously London, Chichester, Worcester, presented, exhibited at the ninth Norwich, Hereford, and West- session upon his cause, held in minster, (being of the most an- the house of Cuthbert Tonstal, cient bishops, and best learned in bishop of Durham, before Tho- this realm), did openly, in the mas Goodrich, and Henry Hoi- parUament then kept at West- beach, bishops of Ely and Lincoln, minster, defend the very and true with the other commissioners, presence of Christ's body and judicaUy sitting, Wednesday, blood to be in the sacrament of January 21st, 1551; they were the altar." (VI.) "That the truth to the following effect : (IV.) of Christ's most precious body 246 MEMORIALS OF [II. 20. BishopHethe's troubles. In the last year, the year 1549, twelve learned divines, bishops and others, were appointed by the council to pre pare a new book for the ordination of ministers, purged of the superstitions of the old ordinal. Hethe bishop of Worcester was nominated for one of these : but he, not liking the thing, would not agree to what the others did, and blood in the sacrament of the altar, hath not been, nor was im pugned, by any famous clerk, or yet by any named learned man in any part of all Christendom, either in the Greek, or in the Latin church, by our time; spe- ciaUy at the time of the letters sent by the same duke of Somer set to the said bishop, mentioned in this matter aforesaid ; but only by CEcolampadius, ZuingUus, Vadianus, and Carolostadius, the impugning whereof was most ma nifest error ; and, in England, no learned man named had, or yet did, openly defend or favour that error. And this is true, public, notorious, manifest, and famous." "Nicholas, bishop of Wor cester, of the age of forty-nine, or thereabout; sworn and examined upon the IVth and Vlth articles of the positions, deposeth as fol- loweth : To the said IVth article, he deposeth the contents of this article to be true, saving that where he himself is named among the ancient and best learned bi shops, he referreth that to the judgment of others. To the Vlth article, to that part ' Carolosta dius,' etc., he saith, that the arti cle is true, saving, as he thinketh, that there were divers other sacra mentaries, which, besides these that be named in the article par ticularly, did impugn the said truth. And to the next part ofthe article, this deponent saith, that the impugning thereof is manifest error. And to the last, so begin ning, ' And in England,' etc., this deponent saith, that he hath been in prison a long season; and what hath been defended or main tained since his coming to prison, he is not able to declare, but he judgeth, that whosoever defendeth that error, he is not sufficiently in that matter learned. And other wise he cannot depose." " George, bishop of Chichester, of the age of forty-nine, or there about ; sworn and examined upon the IVth and Vlth articles of the positions additional. To the IVth he saith, that the contents of the article are true: saving, (he saith), that himseU is none of the most ancient bishops of the realm, nor taketh himself to be one of the best learned bishops. To the Vlth article, unto this place, 'And Carolostadius,' he saith, that in foreign realms and countries, he knoweth not that any famous clerk, or named i55°0 ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 247 nor subscribe the book when made0. For which, in March, he was committed to the Fleet; where he lay under easy confinement all the next year, the year 1550 ; during which time 1 find him once produced as a witness on bishop Gardiner's behalf P. But in the year 1551, the court being at Chelsey, and Sent for the council sitting September 22, by virtue " of the king's council. express commandment, Nicolas bishop of Worcester was Coundl- sent for, and came before the lords and others : to whom was repeated the cause of his imprisonment to be, for that he refused to subscribe the book devised for the form of making archbishops, bishops, priests, and deacons, being authorized by parhament. At the time of which refusal, being not only gently and reasonably required to sub scribe it, but also being manifestly taught by divers other learned men, that all things contained in that book were learned man in our time, hath impugned the truth of Christ's most precious body and blood in the sacrament of the altar, but such as be named in the said arti cle ; saving that he knoweth that BuUingerus and Musculus have written against the truth of Christ's body and blood in the sacrament : and though he taketh these for learned men, yet he doth not asssent to their doctrine in this matter of the sacrament. And to this part of the article, * The impugning whereof is manifest error,' he saith, it is true. And to the last part, he saith, that at the time the bishop of Winton preached on St. Peter's day, he knoweth not any learned man, within this realm, did impugn the verity of Christ's body and blood in the sacrament. And since that time, my lord of Canterbury hath made a book against the verity of Christ's body and blood in the sacrament; and that the bishop now of London, did openly im pugn the verity of Christ's body and blood in the sacrament in the parliament at Westminster : from both whose learning and judg ments in this matter, this depo nent doth dissent, although he taketh them for learned men. And otherwise he cannot depose." — Foxe's Acts and Monuments, pp. 794,5. 854. isted. 1563; and vol. vi. pp. 126, 240. ed. Lond. 1843-48.] 0 [See above, p. 130.] p [See above, p. 246. n, «.] 248 MEMORIALS OF [II. 20. good and true, and that the book was expedient and al lowable, the said bishop declared himself to be a very ob stinate man. And for that his doing, it was now shewed to him, that he deserved longer imprisonment. Never theless the king's majesty's clemency was such, that now if he had, or would reconcile himself, and obey his majesty in this former commandment, he should recover the king's 227 majesty's favour. For which cause it was told to him, that he was then presently sent for, and willed now to subscribe the same. Whereunto he answered, [confess ing] that he took the cause of his imprisonment to be as was alleged, and that also he was very gently used, rather hke a son than a subject. Nevertheless, he said, he remained in the same mind, not willing to subscribe it, although he would not disobey it. And although he was reasoned withal by every of the said council in dis proving his manner of answer, that he would not sub scribe it, being every thing in the said book, true and good ; and being devised by eleven other learned men, to [the] which he was joined as the twelfth, and received of all the whole estate of the realm, agreeing also that he would obey it, but not subscribe it, which contained a contradiction in reason : yet he still, as a man not remove- able from his own conceit, refused to subscribe it. Where upon, to prove all manner of ways for the winning of him to his duty, he was offered to have conference with learned men, and to have time to consider the matter better. Whereunto he said, that he could have no bet ter conference than he had heretofore : and well might he have time, but of other mind he thought never to be : adding, that there be many other things whereunto he would not consent, if he were demanded, as to take down altars and set up tables. And in this sort, seeing him ob stinately settled in mind (not) to be conformable, he was l550'] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 249 in the king's majesty's name expressly commanded and charged to subscribe the same [book] before Thursday next following, being the 24th hereof, upon pain of deprivation of his bishopric, to all and singular effects which might follow thereof. And hearing that commandment, he re solutely answered, he could not find in his conscience to do it, and should be well content to abide such end, either by deprivation or otherwise, as pleased the king's majesty. And so, as a man incorrigible, he was returned to the Fleet P." This order was subscribed by these of the privy-council ; W. Wiltshr, J. Warwick, W. Herbert, W. Cecyl, Jo. Masone. That which gave the council the first occasion against Bp. of Chi- Day bishop of Chichester was, partly his refusal of comply- his trail ing with the order of changing the altars in his diocese bles- into tables ; and partly going down into his diocese, and Council- there preaching against it, and other matters of that nature then in agitation, to the raising of dangerous tu mults and discontents among the people. This came to the council's ears ; and October 7, this year, Dr. Cox'', the king's almoner, was ordered " to repair into Sussex to ap pease the people by his good doctrine, which were now troubled through the seditious preaching of the bishop of Chichester and others r." November 8. The said bishop "appeared before the council to answer" such "things as should be objected against him for preaching. And because he denied the words of his accusations, therefore he was commanded within two days to bring in writing what he preacheds." p [MSS. CouncU Book, a. d. ¦" [MSS. Council Book, a. d. ¦iSS<>-ISS3-fo1- 39°. r- Harl.MSS. 1550-1553. fol. 140. Harl. MSS. 352. Plut. lix. I. fol. 183 b- 352. Plut. lix. fol. 113.] 185.] s [MSS. CouncU Book, a. d. 1 [See above, p. 160. n. n.] 1550-1553. fol. 158.] 250 MEMORIALS OF [II. 20. Bishop Day November 31. " This day the duke of Somerset declared dtwnaitars1!*0 the council, that the bishop of Chichester came [to him]" within "two days past, and shewed to him, that he received letters from the king's majesty, signed with his majesty's hand, and subscribed with the hands of divers 228 lords of the council. The tenor of which letter here en- sueth ; " Bight reverend father in God," &c. [It is the same letter as is printed in Foxe's Acts, about pulling down altars4] ; " according to which letter" the said bi- * ["Furthermore in the next year following, (1550), other let ters Ukewise were sent for the taking down of altars in churches, and setting up the table instead of the same, unto Nicholas Rid ley, who, being bishop of Roches ter before, was then made bishop of London, in Boner's place. The copy and contents of the king's letters are these, as follow: 'Right reverend father in God, right trusty and well beloved, we greet you well. And whereas it is come to our knowledge, that being the altars within the more part of the churches of this our realm [are] already upon good and godly considerations taken down, there doth yet remain al tars standing in divers other churches, by occasion whereof much variance and contention ariseth amongst sundry of our subjects, which if good foresight were not had, might perchance engender great hurt and incon venience; we let you wit, that, minding to have aU occasions of contention taken away, which many times grow by these, and such Uke diversities, and consi dering that amongst other things belonging to our royal office and cure, we do account the greatest to be, to maintain the common quiet of our realm, we have thought good, by the advice of our council, to require you, and nevertheless specially to charge and command you, for the avoid ing of aU matters of further con tention, and strife about the standing or taking away of the said altars, to give substantial order throughout aU your dio cese, that with aU dihgence, all the altars in every church or chapel, as well in places ex empted as not exempted, within your said diocese, be taken down; and in lieu of them a table set up in some convenient part of the chancel, within every such church or chapel to serve for the mi nistration of the blessed com munion. And, to the intent the same may be done without the offence of such our loving sub jects as be not yet so well per suaded in that behalf as we would wish, we send unto you herewith I55°-] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 251 shop "said, he could not conform his conscience to do that he was by the said letter commanded ; and therefore prayed the said duke he might be excused. Whereunto the said duke, for answer, used divers reasons moving the said bishop to do his duty, and in such things to make no conscience, where no need is. Nevertheless the said bishop would not be removed from his former opinion, [and] therefore the said duke said, he would make report to the rest of the council. And so in the end he prayed the lords of the council this day, that the bishop might be sent for, and shew his mind touching this cause. Which was agreed, and commandment given for the bishop to be" at the council the next dayu. December 1. " [This day] the bishop [of Chichester] Appears came before the council ; and being asked what he said COuncil. to the letters sent to him from the king's majesty, he an- certain considerations gathered and collected, that make for the purpose ; to the which, and such others as you shaU think meet to be set forth to persuade the weak to embrace our proceed ings in this part, we pray you cause to be declared to the peo ple by some discreet preachers, in such places as you shall think meet before the taking down of the said altars; so as both the weak consciences of others may be instructed and satisfied as much as may be, and this our pleasure the more quietly exe cuted. For the better doing whereof we require you to open the foresaid considerations in that our cathedral church in your own person, if you conveniently may, or otherwise by your chan cellor, or some other grave preacher, both there, and in such other market towns, and most notable places of your diocese, as you may think most requisite. Given under our signet, at our palace at Westminster, the 23rd day of November, the fourth year of our reign. E. Somerset. T. Cant. W. Wiltshire. J. Warwick. John Bedford. W. North. E. Clinton. H. Wentworth. T. Ely." u [MSS. Council Book, a. d. I550-I553- fol- 175. 6. Harl. MSS. 352. Plut. lix. I. fol. 120, 121 b.] 252 MEMORIALS OF [II. 20. swered, that he could not conform his conscience to take down the altars in the churches, and in heu of them to set up tables, as the letter appointed. For that he seemed for his opinion (to have) the Scripture, and consent of the doctors and fathers of the church ; and contrariwise did not perceive any strength in the six reasons, which were set forth by the bishop of London" to persuade the taking down altars and erection of [the] tables. And then, being Es. xix. 19. demanded what Scripture he had, he alleged a saying in Esay : which place, being considered by the archbishop of Canterbury, the bishop of London, and other lords of the council, was found of no purpose to maintain his opinion. The arch- And thereupon, by the said archbishop and [the] bi- bishop and . bishop of shop of Elyw, divers good reasons were given to prove" withhim11 that it was convenient to take down the altars, as things abused; and in liou of them to set up tables, as things most meet for the supper of the Lord, and most agreeable to the first constitution. And besides that, his other reasons were then fully answered. The council Wherefore the council commanded him expressly, in time to the king's [majesty's] name, to proceed to the execution confer. 0f njg majesty's commandment in the said letter expressed. Whereunto he made request, that he might not be com manded to offend his conscience : saying, if his conscience might be instructed to the contrary, he would not thus molest the council with his refusal7. Which his saying, considered by the council, moved them to shew thus much favour unto him ; that they willed him to resort unto the archbishop of Canterbury, the bishops of Ely, or London, and to confer with them in this matter, so as he might be instructed by them to accept the just command of the v [Nicholas Ridley.] w [Thomas Goodrich.] * [" Made to prove."— MSS. Council Book.] y ["Any refusal."— Id.] l55°'] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 253 king's majesty with a safe conscience". And for his second answer, day was given him until the 4th of this month. At which day he was commanded to return again b." December 4. " This day the bishop of Chichester came Before the before the council ; and was demanded. Whether he had again been with the archbishop of Canterbury and the other bishops, according to [the] former order given him ; who answered, that he was one afternoon at Lambeth, to have waited on the archbishop, but he was answered, that he 229 was at the court : and upon a demand what time his grace would come home, one of the chamberlains, as he saith, answered, that he doubted it would be late ere his grace come home, because he so used ; [and] there fore he tarried notc. And to any other bishops he made no repair : saying further, he had not been well in health ; for the which cause he took some physic yesterday. The archbishop hereunto said, that the same afternoon when the bishop of Chichester had been there, he came home very early on purpose to have conferred with the said bishop: for the which cause he had leave of the king's majesty the same day to depart [home] sooner than for other business he might conveniently. To the matter he was asked, what mind he was of, touching the executing the king's command4 ; and what he could say, why the same should not be obeyed ? who answered as he did be fore6, that his conscience would not permit him to do the same ; for that the same was against the Scripture a ["And to confer with them H. fol. 16, 17.] to accept the just commandment c ["And therefore, (said the of the king's majesty with his safe bishop of Chichester), he tarried conscience." — Id.] not." — MSS. CouncU Book.J b ["MSS. CouncU Book, a.d. d [" Touching the execution I550_I553- fol- 176, 7- Harl. of the king's commandment." — MSS. fol. 352. Plut. lix. I. fol. Id.] 121 b., 122 b. and 6195. Plut. lix. e [" As before."— Harl. MSS.] 254 MEMORIALS OF [II. 20. and the doctors. And being asked of the first, he alleged a place in the last [of Paul] to the Hebrews, mentionmg Heb. xiii. the word altar : which place being considered1, was mani festly by the archbishop of Canterbury and the bishop of Ely declared to be meant of Christ : as by the very con text s of the same most manifestly appeared to every reader. Next to this he alleged the former place of Esay, which also was most evident to be meant otherwise than he alleged, and so proved. [And] as to the use of the pri mitive church, besides the texts of the New Testament, it was most clearly by Origen contra Celsum proved, that in his time Christian men had no altars, by direct negative propositions". Besides this, the abuse of the altars was shewed unto him, and reasons declared how necessary it was to reform the same. [And] touching the naming [of] the table an altar, it was left indifferent to him, [so to name it,] because ancient writers sometimes call that table an altar. But yet, notwithstanding that his own reasons were fully [soluted] solved, and divers good and weighty reasons made, he persevered in the pertinacy of his own singular opinion. Whereupon the council, re hearsing to him the evil (that) should come of this his disobedience, if he should be suffered ', commanded him, in the king's majesty's name, upon his allegiance expressly to become an obedient subject, and so to execute the king's commandment^. And for that it should appear [un]to him, that there was as much favour meant as might be, not offending the king's majesty, on his ma jesty's behalf they would be so bold as to appoint him f [" This word altar, which 1733-59.] place considered."— MSS. Coun- l [" If it should be suffered." cil Book.] —MSS. Council Book.] b ["As the very context." — Id.] k ["And to execute the king's h [Origen. contr. Celsum. lib. majesty'scommandment."— Harl. viii. vol.i. pp. 754-756. ed. Paris, MSS.] 155°-1 ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 255 Sunday next to make his final answer ; and in the mean time he might advise himself, and weigh the cause as it ought to be. And so the day was given him" [for ap pearance1.] December 7. " [This day] the bishop of Chichester" Before the , , „ , ., „ t i • i , council the agam "appeared before the council; and bemg asked third time. touching the execution of his majesty's commandment in the letter1", he answered plainly, he could not do it, saving his conscience: for the altars seemed [un]to him a thing anciently established by the agreement of the holy fathers, and confirmed by ancient doctors, with the custom also of a number of years, and, as he thought, according to the Scriptures. Wherefore he could not in conscience assent to the abohshing of them, and determmed rather 230 to lose all that ever he had, than to condemn his own conscience; with many other circumstances to that ef fect. Finally, the matter being well debated, it was thought good, yet to give him two days respite further to be advised, in hope he might reconcile himself : which if he did not upon his next answer, appointed to be on Tuesday next, the council agreed to proceed ordinarily against him, as against a contemptuous person, by way of sequestration"." December 11. "This day the bishop of Chichester" ap- And the peared before the council : and being "demanded0 whether ^henhe"6' he would obey the king's" commandment in uulhne down was sent to J & ±-8 the Fleet. 1 [MSS. Council Book, a. d. highness' letters."— MSS. Coun- I550-I553- fol- 179. l8°- Harl. cil Book.] MSS. 352. Plut. lix. I. fol. 122, » [MSS. CouncU Book, a. d. b.-i24 and 6195. Plut. lxi. H. 1550-1553. fol. 183 b. Harl. fol- J7. 18.] MSS. 352. Plut. lix. I. fol. 124b. m ["Where being demanded 125.] of a direct answer touching the ° [" Was caUed before the coun- execution of the king's majesty's cil and once again demanded." proceedings mentioned in his MSS. Council Book.] 256 MEMORIALS OF [II. 20. the altars p, "as is before rehearsed; he answered, that he thanked both the king's highness h, and his council, of their great clemency used towards him : but he said he could not by any means persuade himself to do that thing that was against his conscience. Wherefore he prayed them to do with him what they thought requisite ; for he would never obey to do this thing r that his conscience would not bear. Whereupon for his contempt he was, by the order of the whole council, committed to ward in the Fleet, till further order should be taken for hims." Commis- We hear no more of him and his fellow, the bishop of pointed for Worcester, till nine months hence. And so we leave them ^"cht" both in the Fleet till September 27, 1551. When we find Chester. su- Roger Cholmely, Kt.* lord chief baron of the ex chequer, sir Richard Readw, Richard Groodrickx, John Grosnoldy, John Oliver2, and Richard Ryel, being "com- P [" The king's majesty's com mandment touching the pulling down of the altars." MSS. Coun cil Book.] i [" King's majesty." Harl. MSS.] r [" For he would never obey to do this thing, thinking it a less evil to suffer the body to perish, than to corrupt the soul with that thing that his conscience would not bear." MSS. Council Book.] s [MSS. Council Book, a. d. i55°-i553-fol- i84,5- Harl.MSS. 352. Plut. lix. I. fol. 125 b.] * [Sir Roger Cholmely, lord lieutenant of Middlesex, chief baron of the exchequer, and lord chief justice, was sent to the Tower for opposing queen Mary's title to the crown, but being dis charged, was afterwards (a. d. 1538) in a commission in her reign against the Lollards, and was "a turncoat and a covetous man." — See Burnet's Hist, of Reformat, vol. ii. p. 480. pt. ii. p. 76. ed. Oxon. 1829. Strype's Eccl. Mem. vol. u. pt. i. p. 465. pt. ii. pp. 63, 226. vol. iii. pt. i. PP- 24, 34. 35- ed. Oxon. 1829. Strype's Annals of the Reformat. vol. i. pt. i. p. 57. ed. Oxon. 1824.] w [Sir Richard Read, or Rede, a judge, who besides being in a commission for the trial of bishops Heathe and Day, was engaged in others of a similar nature, as in the cases of bishops Tonstal and Boner.] x [See above, p. 243. n. d.] y [See above, p. 243. n. e.] z [See vol. i. p. 33.] 1550.] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 257 missioners appointed by the king's majesty for the pro ceeding in the causes laid against" these two bishops, were commanded, by letter from the council, " to call the said bishops before them at Whitehall; and beginning with the bishop of Worcester's cause, to proceed also with Chichester -. for as the judgment of the one might succeed the other, without any delay of time more than needed. And when the acts of the council proceeded in those causes should be requisite, the same, upon knowledge given thi ther, should be sent them : and in the mean time to use for their instruction the acts that were passed upon Worces ter's cause, and those that Mr. Read had already concern ing Chichester ; with admonition, seeing their contempts so evident, not to give them any long delay, by granting any learned counsel, or otherwise by such pretexts3." September 28, the council sent a letter to the lord They are chancellor, "with the commission directed to the above- named persons, for the examination and determining of the bishops of Worcester and Chichester's causes : praying him to send the same to such of the council as are at or near London, whose hands be not thereto, that they might sign it; and then to seal it, and send it with a letter from the said lords, enclosed within his, to the said com missioners1'." According to these orders, within less than a month, these two bishops were at last deprived, after the expectation of their compliances a long while. And October 24, 1551, the council sent " a letter to the chancellor of the augmentations, to take immediate order for [the] seizure into the king's majesty's hands of the tem- poralties of" their bishoprics, "lately given to his highness 231 a [MSS. CouncU Book, a. d. b [MSS. CouncU Book, a. d. I550-I553- fol- 379- Harl. MSS. 1550-1553- fol. 397. Harl. MSS. 352. Plut. lix. I. fol. 186.] 352. Plut. Ux. I. fol. 186. b.] CRANMER, VOL. II. S 258 MEMORIALS OF [II. 20. by the judgment passedc by the commissioners, [lately] appointed for the hearing of those bishops' causesd." Placed the These bishops remained prisoners in the Fleet, after the lord1 thei? deprivation, till the next summer. When, as it chancellor, seems, for their healths-sake, they desired to be removed the other . with the to some place of better air, and more hberty. Where- London. upon, June 15, 1552, Dr. Day was sent to the bishop of Ely, lord chancellor, and Dr. Hethe to the bishop of Lon don, by the appointment of his majesty. And they were directed to use them as to Christian charity should be most seemly. At whose hands the king doubted not but they should receive such Christian advice, as would tend to the glory of God. July 17, upon the motion of the bishop of London, the lords of the council were content that he should send Dr. Hethe unto the bishop's own house at London [from Fulham] to recover his health, and then to have him again. So far more kindly were these popish bishops dealt withal in this reign, than the protestant bishops were in the next. Hoper, bishop of Gloucester, succeeded in the see of Worcester15 ; and Scory, bishop of Rochester, in that of Chichester . I will here crave the reader's leave to insert two or three words concerning bishop Day ; thereby to judge the better of him. Day writes About the year 1547, saying of masses was laid aside to King's Tr. , 1n _^ college for m ^mg s college in Cambridge, the members of which c [" Judgment given." MSS. Winchester, at Croyden, Aug. 30, Council Book.] 1^1) an(j was translated to Chi- d [MSS. Council Book, a. d. Chester, upon the deprivation of I550-I553- fol- 420. Harl. MSS. George Day, May 23, 1552. He 352. Plut. lix. I. fol. 195.] was himself deprived in the fol- e [See above, p. 205. n. ».] lowing year, and Day was re- f [John Scory was consecrated stored.— See Le Neve's Fasti, pp. bishop of Rochester, upon the 58, 251.] translation of John Poynet to i55°-J ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 259 college generally favoured the Gospel. Day, the provost leaving off thereof, (which place he held " in commendam " with his bishopric s), hearing of this, wrote an angry letter to the vice-provost, and in him to the whole college, for divers things which they had done relating to reformation ; and particularly for leaving off saying masses. In which, he said, "They departed from the institution of the house, and that they did it rashly, and besides the law ; there being as yet no law for so doing. He charged them with the breach of statute ; and so would involve them in the sin of perjury. And whereas in their pubhc disputations they gave questions against popish doctrines, he charged them with disputing wickedly and turbulently, to the wounding of tender consciences, and the infamy of the house. And finally required that things should be put in the same posture they were before." To which the college, by Dr. Haddon's elegant penh, wrote an answer : " That as to Haddoni ° r Ep. p. 169. B [George Day, S.T.P. was ad mitted master of St. John's col lege, Cambridge, void by the ces sion of Nicholas Metcalf, July 27, 1537. He was elected provost of King's coUege, June 5, 1538, and bishop of Ely, AprU 24, 1543. — See Le Neve's Fasti, pp. 58, 428, 433. Fuller's Hist, of Cam bridge, p. 168. ed. Lond. 1840.] h [Walter Haddon, feUow of King's coUege, Cambridge, was one of those learned men who were invited to join the founda tion of cardinal Wolsey at Ox ford, which he declined ; he afterwards became regius pro fessor of civil law, in the univer sity of Cambridge, and succeeded to the mastership of Trinity haU about the year 1549, which he held tiU he was appointed master of Magdalen coUege, Oxford, Sept. 30, 1552, upon the resigna tion of Owen Oglethorpe. This headship he also resigned, Octo ber 30th, 1533, when bishop Gardiner visited that coUege. During the reign of queen Mary he escaped the persecution of the times, which was attributed to his having written congratulatory verses on her accession. He wrote a simUar poem on the ac cession of queen Elizabeth, to whom he became master of re quests ; he was also made judge of the prerogative court by the appointment of Matthew Parker, archbishop of Canterbury. He s2 260 MEMORIALS OF [II. 20. His unna tural car riage to wards his brother. 232 Hatcher's MS. Catal. of Provosts &c. of King's coll, their abohshing masses, they said, they were private masses ; and the statutes of the college did seem to en join only masses, wherein was a communion of the body and blood of Christ. That that was not perjury, when by the common consent of the college, some minuter matters of the statutes were changed. That had he himself been there, he would have done as they did, considering the re ports that came from the court, brought by witnesses worthy of credit. And that as for their disputations they urged, that it was free for them to dispute matters con troverted, for better inquiry into the truth : and that it was done with lenity, without any perverseness of speech'." He had a younger brother named Wilham, (who was above forty years after bishop of Wintoni.) This man was a scholar of the college while his brother was provost and bishop : to whom he sent once a request, to supply him with a httle money to buy him some books and other necessaries he stood in need of at that time. His brother answered him, knowing him to be well affected to the Gospel, "That for his part he held it not fit to reheve those that were not of the true church, and therefore he died, a.d. 1572, "in the fifty- sixth year of his age, and was buried at Christ's Church, Lon don." — See Le Neve's Fasti, pp. 411, 426, 493. FuUer's Ch. Hist. vol. ii. pp. 466, 7, n. f. vol. iv. p. 152. ed. Oxon. 1845. Burnet's Hist, of Reformat, vol. iii. pt. ii. p. 539. ed. Oxon. 1829. Strype's Life of abp. Parker, vol. i. pp. 11, 60, 210. vol. ii. p. 145. ed. Oxon. 1821. Strype's Eccl. Mem. vol. ii. pt. i. p. 369. pt, n. p. 268. vol. iii. pt. i. pp. 23, 82. ed. Oxon. 1822. Strype's Annals of Refor mat, vol. i. pt. i. pp. 8, 125, 165. ed. Oxon. 1824.] 1 [The letter of G. Haddon to Day, bishop of Chichester, will be found in the Appendix to this volume.] J [WiUiam Day, S. T. P., was elected bishop of Winchester Nov. 3, 1595, confirmed January 22, and consecrated at Lambeth the 25th of the same month 159$. He died Sept. 20. 1596, — Ls Neve's Fasti, p. 287.] I55°-] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 261 would not in any wise relieve him." Thus had his reh gion destroyed in him the very principles of nature. This bishop had been a vehement asserter of transub- Preaches stantiation: yet in April 1550 he preached against it attransuD. Westminster; which king Edward thought fit to take stantiation. notice of in his journal k : and he comphed, and went along with all the steps of the reformation till the declining of this year 1550; when the matter of taking down altars was set on foot. For then it seems either there was a prospect that the reformation, carrying on, would have a stop, or it was secretly agreed, among the popishly affected, now to fall off. In queen Mary's days he was a mighty busy man, and His change one of the commissioners for the examination and con- nmi- demning to death the professors of rehgion. When in conference with Bradford, that holy man had charged him for departing from the reformed church, as it was in king Edward's days ; he told him, " That he was but a young man, (and yet in the first year of that king he was five or six and forty years of age) ; and that, coming from the university, he went with the world: but it was always against his conscience1." He could, it seems, dispense k ["April 4. The bishop of you did weU to depart from the Chichester, before a vehement Romish church, so I think you affirmer of transubstantiation, did have done wickedly to couple preach against [it] at Westminster yourselves to it again, for you in the preaching place." — Cotton can never prove it, which you MSS. Nero. C. x.fol. 15. b. Brit- caU the mother church, to be ish Museum. Original and holo- Christ's church.' graph. Burnet's Hist, of Refor- " ' Chichest. Ah ! master Brad- mat, vol. u. pt. ii. p. 14. ed. Oxon. ford, you were but a chUd when 1829.] this matter began. I was a young 1 ["Here, after much talk of man, and then coming from the excommunication, at length Brad- university, I went with the world, ford said: but I teU you it was always '"Brad. Assuredly, as I think against my conscience.'" — Con- 262 MEMORIALS OF [II. 20. with his conscience upon occasion : and yet what a man of conscience was he when altars were to be pulled down ! He sat a commissioner upon Hoper, together with Win chester"1, London11, Durham0, and Landaff?: and how ever gently he had been used in his trouble, that was for got; and he treated that reverend man most rudely, in decently falling upon him with foul words, and with a scornful countenance calling him " hypocrite^ ." ference between Bradford and P [Anthony Kitchen, alias the abp. of York, (Nicholas Dunstan.] Heathe), and Chichester, (George 1 [" The bishop of Chichester, Day.) Foxe's Acts and Monu- Dr. Day, caUed master Hooper ments, p. 1616. ed. Lond. 1583.] 'hypocrite,' with vehement words, m [Stephen Gardiner.] and scornful countenance." — " [Edmund Boner.] Foxe's Acts and Monuments, p. 0 [Cuthbert Tonstal.] 1506. ed. Lond. 1583.] 1550.] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 263 CHAPTER XXI. PAPISTS GROW BOLD. LOOSE PROFESSORS RESTRAINED. Thus indeed, when the papists found they could not The papists prevail by outward force, which they had tried to the utmost the last year, they now used other arts. One among the rest was to hbel the government, and disperse scurrilous rhymes and ballads upon the preachers. One of these was this year fastened upon the pulpit of some eminent church, probably of St. Paul's ; which neverthe less soon had an answer to it. And not long after a more witty ballad was put abroad, glancing, as it seems, at the archbishop, upon occasion of the hberty of reading the Bible, and of the English service, and the publishing the Homily-book, and other good books : whipping the go vernment under the person of one John Nobody, because that, notwithstanding all these rehgious pretences, there was so much sin, lechery, adultery, bribery, and want of charity. A taste of this their poetry I have put into the 233 Appendix : because some probably may be so curious as to peruse the fancy of that age. No. XLIX. The papists were at this juncture very bold, whether it Several pa- were that they had taken up a conceit that the old reh- takenTpT gion would be again restored upon the disgrace of the duke of Somerset, or upon some other reasons. To stay these men, the council, as they had proceeded before against some popish bishops, so they thought fit to use some rigours towards others, noted to be the forwardest men. One of these was Dr. Chedsey r, who was one of the Coundl disputants against Peter Martyr, the king's professor. He chedsey. took now upon him to preach openly at Oxford against r [See above, p. 159. n. k.] 264 MEMORIALS OF [II. 21. Morgan. Brown. White. the steps of the reformation that were made, and making. Wherefore, March 16, he was committed to the Marshal- sea for seditious preaching : where he lay till November the 11th, 1551 : and then he was ordered to be brought to the bishop of Ely's, where he enjoyed his table, and an easier restraint8. March 19, serjeant Morgan1 was com mitted to the Fleet for hearing mass in the lady Mary's chapel. March 22, sir Anthony Brown u was committed to the Fleet for the same offence. And three days after viz. March 25, Mr. "White, warden of Winchester1", ap- s [MSS. Council Book, a. d. 1550-1553- fol- 246, 435.] ' [Morgan was a serjeant at law, and afterwards a judge : he was present at bishop Hooper's examination before the bishops of Winchester, Durham, Chichester, and Llandaff, at whom he railed " a long time, with many oppro brious and foul words of his doing at Gloucester, in punishing of men, and said, there was never such a tyrant as he was." He pronounced the sentence of death upon the lady Jane Grey, which had " so violent an operation" upon him, that he "fell into a frenzy and madness, and died of the same," and was buried in Northamptonshire, Sept. 6, 1558. — See Burnet's Hist, of Reformat. vol. ii. p. 546. ed. Oxon. 1829 ; Strype's Eccl. Mem. vol. iii. pt. i. p. 94; pt. ii. p. 117. ed. Oxon. 1822 ; Strype's Annals of the Reformat, vol. i. pt. i. p. 378. ed. Oxon. 1824; Strype's Life of abp. Parker, vol. i. p. 317. ed. Oxon. 1821 ; Foxe's Acts and Monu ments, p. 1506. ed. Lond. 1583 ; MSS. Council Book, a.d. 1550- 1553. fol. 248.] u [Sir Anthony Brown, master of the horse, and knight of the garter, afterwards created viscount Montague, was one of Henry Vlllth's executors and governors to Edward VI., and the kingdom, and joined the council against the lord protector j he was sent as ambassador to Rome in queen Mary's reign, of whose privy- councU he was a member; he was one of the noblemen ap pointed to attend queen Elizabeth upon her first going to London, but dissented from the biU in par hament for restoring the queen's supremacy. — See Burnet's Hist. of Reformat, vol. u. pp. 6, 36, 282, 601, 771; pt. ii. pp. 145,573- ed- Oxon. 1829; Strype's Eccl. Mem. vol.ii. pt.i. pp. 18, 19; vol. iii. pt.i. PP- 333. 35°. 359 ; P*- «• PP- 75, 159, i6o.ed. Oxon. 1822 ; Strype's Annals of the Reformat, vol. i. pt. i. pp. 84, 87. ed. Oxon. 1824 j MSS. CouncU Book, a.d. 1550- 1553. fol. 249.] w [John White, chaplain to 155°-] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 265 peared before the council, and confessed that he had divers books and letters from beyond sea, and namely, from one Martyn, a scholar there, who repugneth the king's ma jesty's proceedings utterly. And (it) being manifest that he [lately] (had) consented to things of that sort in such wise, that greater practices were thought to be in him that ways, he was committed to the Tower :" where lying for some months, he shewed better conformity in matters of rehgion. So that in June 14, 1551, the council wrote a letter to the archbishop, that he should send to the lieu tenant of the Tower for Mr. White to be brought to him, and with him to remain, till such time as he should re claim him. Which being done, he was to be sent back again to the Tower, until the king's majesty's further pleasure upon his lordship's certificate of his proceedings with him. This White, however he comphed now, was in queen Mary's reign made bishop successively of Lincoln bishop Gardiner, was consecrated Watson, his successor in the see bishop of Lincoln, April i, 1554, of Lincoln, "had the presumption and translated from thence to to threaten to excommunicate the Winchester, May 16, 1556; he queen. He died of ague, January assisted at the trials of bishop 12, 1559, at sir Thomas White's Hooper, and Dr. Taylor, and was place in Hampshire ; and the present at the consecration of 15th was carried, and buried at cardinal Pole as archbishop of Winchester." — See Le Neve's Canterbury; he was also one of Fasti, pp. 141, 287; Burnet's the commissioners for judging Hist, of Reformat, vol. u. pp. 552, bishops Latimer and Ridley. He 638, 682, 693, 757, 758, 771, 776, dissented in the first parhament 782, 783, 792. ed. Oxon. 1829 ; of queen Elizabeth from the biU Strype's Eccl. Mem. vol. ii. pt. i. for restoring the supremacy to p. 374; vol. iii. pt.i. pp. 180, 286, the crown; and took part on the 290, 473, 487. ed. Oxon. 1822 ; popish side in the disputation at Strype's Annals of Reformat, vol.i. Westminster, for which he was pt. i. pp. 82, 84, 128, 130, 133, summoned before the queen, de- 138-140, 206, 210, 211, 220, 213. prived, and sent to the Tower; he ed. Oxon. 1824; MSS. Council persisted in his refusal to take Book, a.d. 1550-1553. fol. 252, the oath of supremacy, and with 327.] 266 MEMORIALS OF [II. 21. and Winchester, and preached that queen's funeral ser mon : and was deprived by the next queen for refusing conformity to the rehgion then established. Other pro- And while the papists on one hand were so busy in strained?" promoting their ends, there were a looser sort of pro fessors of religion disgraced the reformation on the other. For some there were that took the hberty of meeting together in certain places, and there to propound odd questions, and vent dangerous doctrines and opinions. Of these also the council having notice, they thought it very fit to discountenance and restrain them. January 27, a number of persons, a sort of anabaptists, about sixty, met in a house on a Sunday, in the parish of Bocking in Essex ; where arose among them a great dispute, " Whether it were necessary to stand or kneel, barehead or covered, at prayers ? and they concluded the ceremony not to be material; but that the heart before God was required, and nothing else." Such other -like warm dis putes there were about Scripture. There were likewise 234 such assembhes now in Kent. These were looked upon as dangerous to church and state : and two of the com pany were therefore taken and committed to the Marshal- sea ; and orders were sent to apprehend the rest, viz. to sir George Norton, sheriff of Essex, to apprehend and send up to the council those persons that were assembled for Scripture-matters in Bocking : nine of them were named, being cowherds, clothiers, and such-like mean people. The hke order was sent to sir Edward Wotton*, and to sir Thomas Wyat?, to apprehend others of them, x [Sir Edward Wotton, trea- with those who separated from surer of Calais, was one of Henry the lord protector. — See Burnet's Vlllth's executors and governors Hist, of Reformat, vol. ii. pp. 6, to his son, and the kingdom, and 36, 279. ed. Oxon. 1829.] a privy-councillor. He took part y [Sir Thomas Wyat was a *55°-J ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 267 seven whereof are named, hving in Kent. February 3, those that were apprehended for the meeting at Bocking appeared before the council, and confessed the cause of their assembly to be, " For to talk of Scriptures ; [not denying but] they had refused the communion above two years," and that, as was judged, " upon very superstitious and erroneous purposes : with divers other evil opinions, worthy of great punishment." Whereupon five of them were committed : and seven of them were bound in re cognizance to the king in forty pound each man. " The condition, to appear when they should be called upon, and to resort to their ordinaries for resolution of their opinions, in case they had any doubt in rehgion2." kinsman of the duke of Northum berland, but nevertheless he took part with the princess Mary in opposition to that nobleman's de sign of placing the lady Jane Grey upon the throne; he proclaimed queen Mary, but in consequence of her intended marriage with Philip of Spain, he entered into a conspiracy, and headed a rebel hon, in which he was defeated, and taken prisoner. At his trial, " he begged his life in most abject terms, and offered to promote the queen's marriage," if his life were spared; "but for aU that he was beheaded."— See Burnet's Hist. of Reformat, vol. ii. pp. 538, 540, 543> 547; vol. in. p. 431. ed. Oxon. 1829.] 2 [" At Greenwich the 27th day of January, an0. 155$. — Upchard of Bocking, was brought before the councU, touching a certain as sembly that had been made in his house in Christmas last, who con fessed that (there) were (some) cer tain Kentish men to the town to have lodged with good man Cooke, and because Cooke's wife was in chUdbed, they came to this Up- chard's house, where Cooke was then at dinner, and by Cooke's intreaty there they were lodged; and upon the morrow, which was Sunday, divers of the town about twelve of the clock came in, and there they feU in argument of things of the Scripture, specially whether it were necessary to stand or kneel, bareheaded or covered at prayer, which at length was concluded in ceremony not to be material ; but the hearts before God was it that imported, and nothing else. And because it seemed such an assembly, being of sixty persons or more, should mean some great matter, therefore both the said Upchard and one Simpson, of the same sort, was committed to the Marshalsea till 268 MEMORIALS OF further trial were had, and order taken that letters should be sent both into Essex and Kent for the apprehension of those that are accounted chief of that practice. A letter to sir George Norton, knight, sherifF of Essex, to ap prehend certain persons, whose names were sent enclosed in a [II. 21. schedule, and to send them hither, that none of them have conference with other. — A like letter to sir Edward Wotton, and sir Thomas Wyat, to apprehend and send up these persons," &c. — MSS. Coun cU Book, a. d. 1550-1553. fol. 206, 207, 215. Harl. MSS. 352. Plut. Ux. I. fol. 130, 1.] 1550.] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 269 CHAPTER XXII. FOREIGNERS ALLOWED CHURCHES. A LASCO. We shall now shew a remarkable instance of the arch- The archbi- bishop's episcopal piety, in the care he took of the souls of^souTs of foreigners, as well as of the native Enghsh. For in kingof strangers D . residing Edward's reign there were great numbers of strangers inhere. the realm ; French, Dutch, Italians, Spaniards, who abode here upon divers occasions : some for trade and com merce, and some, no doubt, to be secret spies, and pro moters of the pope's affairs, and to hinder the propaga tion of the rehgion : but the most were such as fled over hither to escape the persecutions that were in those times very violently set on foot in their respective countries, and to enjoy the hberty of their consciences, and the free profession of their rehgion. Our prelate had a chief hand in forming these strangers into distinct congre gations for the worship of God, and in procuring them convenient churches to meet in, and setting preachers of their own over them, to instruct them in the true reh gion; Cecyl and Cheke joining with him in this pious design, and furthering it at court with the king and duke of Somerset. And this they did both out of Christian charity and Christian policy too; this being a probable means to disperse the reformed rehgion into foreign parts ; that when any of these strangers, or their children, should return into their own country, they might carry the tincture of rehgion along with them, and sow the seeds of it in the hearts of their countrymen. This year the German or Dutch congregation began The Dutch under Johannes a Lasco, a nobleman of Poland, styled 1°^^ their superintendent : and this by the favour and in- 235 fluence of our archbishop, who had entertained him in his J^^01"1 270 MEMORIALS OF [II. 22. family with respect due to his quality and great piety. This person had forsaken his country and honours for the sake of the gospel, and became a preacher to a protestant The occa- congregation at Embden in East Friezland. But seeing sion of his aij tijmgS \00\ black and stormy round about him, and coming into ° England, tending to a persecution, he took an opportunity to em bark for England : where, being a person not only of honour, but of great learning and piety, and withal an exile for the sake of Christ, and voluntarily taking up the ministry out of zeal to promote the gospel, he met with a very honourable and friendly reception ; and soon became acquainted with many eminent persons here : as with Dr. Turner, the duke of Somerset's physician, and dean of Wells a ; sir John Cheke, sir Wilham Cecyl, and our arch bishop ; and, by their means, with the duke of Somerset His busi- himself. His chief busmess here seemed to be, to make some provision for himself and his congregation, in case of persecution. For this purpose he got a conference with the said duke, a way, as it seems, being made there unto by the archbishop ; requesting that he and his con gregation might have leave to transplant themselves to London, that they might have a church here, and certain privileges hkewise : moving the protector thereunto by arguments as well taken from charity as policy, namely, that hereby a trade and gainful manufacture would be in troduced into England. He desired therefore that they might be incorporated by the king's letters patents, and a [William Turner, a native of the continent : he was restored to Northumberland, was educated at his deanery a.d. 1560, and "died Pembroke- hall, Cambridge, and July 7, 1568." — Strype's Life of early favoured the gospel there: abp. Grindal, p. 7. ed. Oxon. 1821; he succeeded to the deanery of Strype's Life of abp. Parker, vol. i. WeUs, a. d. 1550, and was de- pp. 13, 93. ed. Oxon. 1821 ; Le prived a. d. 1553, when he fled to Neve's Fasti, p. 37.] ness here. 1550.] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 271 that some old dissolved church or monastery might be granted to them, to worship and serve God in. When he had done this, he desired a certain Italian friend of his to acquamt Cecyl with the sum of his discourse with the protector : and so, taking an opportunity on a sudden of passing again to Embden along with some ambassador that was going into those parts, he took his leave of Eng land; leaving the archbishop and Cecyl to second his busmess with the duke as occasion should serve. Being at Yarmouth, before his going abroad, he wrote to Cecyl his full mind, in case he and his congregation should be driven away. He desired him, " that if he should under stand any thing concerning his call into England, or would be informed by him of any other matters, that he would convey his letters unto one Robert Legat, an Eng lishman, hving at Embden, who would communicate them unto him." Being arrived at Embden, he writ to the archbishop, From Emb- relating all passages that he knew concerning the state of w™te t0 the affairs, and particularly of rehgion in those parts : desiring archbishop, him to impart them to the protector. He writ also unto and to Cecyl, his letter bearing date in April 1549, referring him ecy " to the protector's letters : and withal acquainting him in what a tickhsh and dangerous condition they were. " That The sad they certainly expected the cross ; that they did mutually 0f"the pro- exhort one another to bear it, with invocation upon God's *f>tanta holy name : that by patience and faith they might over come all whatsoever God should permit to be done against them, to the glory of his name, or for their trial. They were sure he had a care of them, and that he was so powerful, that he could in a moment, by a word of his 236 mouth, dash in pieces all the forces of their enemies whatsoever they were. And that he was so good, that he would not suffer so much as an hair, without cause, to fall 272 MEMORIALS OF [II. %%. from their head, although the whole world should make an assault upon them. And that he could no more wish them harm, than a mother could her own infant, or any one the apple of his own eye ; yea, no more than he him self could not be God. Who was to be praised in all things whatsoever happened to them, since he permitted nothing to fall out to them, but for their good ; and so, for their welfare. And that therefore they committed themselves wholly to him, and did expect with all tolera tion whatsoever he should allow to be done to them." In this pious manner did a Lasco write to Cecyl; and no doubt in the same tenour to the archbishop. This made a very great impression upon the godly hearts of them both, and caused them vigorously to use their interest with the protector to provide a safe retreat for him and his congregation : which was obtained for them soon after. His whole letter, in a handsome Latin style, as some me- No. L. morial of him, I have reposited in the Appendix. Latimer Latimer also made way for his reception : who, in one A Lasco to °f his sermons before king Edward, made honourable the king, mention 0f him ; using an argument proper for that audi ence, namely, how much it would tend to the bringing down God's blessing on the realm, to receive him, and such pious exiles as he. " Johannes a Lasco was here, a great learned man, and, as they say, a nobleman in his country ; and is gone his way again. If it be for lack of entertainment, the more pity. I would wish such men as he to be in the realm : for the realm should prosper in Third ser- receiving [of] them : [' qui vos recipit, me recipit.'] ' He the king, *na^ receiveth you receiveth me,' saith Christ. And it anno 1549. gnom(j De for the king's honour to receive them and keep themV b [Latimer's Works, vol. i. p. 141. Park. Soc. ed.] 1550.] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 273 It was but a httle after the king had received this con gregation of foreigners into England, and had granted them a church, viz. St. Augustin's, but great contest Contest happened among them about their church, yielded them^^,8 for their rehgious worship. This P. Martyr took notice pe°Ple- of with grief to Bucer : and addeth, " that their minds Benet were so implacable to one another, that the difference was fain to be referred to the privy-council to make an end ofc." But not to leave our superintendent yet. A Lasco with his strangers being settled at London, The care of and incorporated by the king s patents, bemg their chief over his pastor, and a stirring man, was very industrious to pro- ^^^ cure and maintain the liberties and benefits of his church, ^ges. The members thereof had planted themselves chiefly in St. Katharine's, and in great and httle Southwark. Here they were now and then called iipon by the church- war dens of their respective parishes to resort to their parish churches, though the ministers themselves did not appear in it. In the month of November, anno 1552, some of these strangers, inhabiting the parts of Southwark, were again troubled by their church-wardens, and threatened with imprisonment, unless they would come to church. Whereupon their superintendent a Lasco apphed himself to the lord chancellor, who then was Goodrich, bishop of 237 Ely. By the way one might inquire, why he resorted not rather to his friend and patron the archbishop of Canter bury. But the reason may soon be guessed : namely, that after the fall of Somerset, the archbishop's good friend, he came not so often to court, or transacted busi ness there, unless sent for : knowing his interest likewise to be but httle with the duke of Northumberland, who c [See Peter Martyr's letter to M. Bucer, 10 Jan. 1551 ; Appendix, No. lxi.] CRANMER, VOL. II. X chancellor Goodrich. 274 MEMORIALS OF [II. 22. now bare all the sway, and who had a jealous eye of him, as he had of all Somerset's friends. And so the arch bishop might have rather hindered than forwarded a Lasco's business, if he had appeared in it. But this " en Favourably passant." The chancellor gently received a Lasco, and, thTiord r dismissing him, sent him to secretary Cecyl with this message, to get him to propound the business the next day in the afternoon at the council-board, when himself should be there : promising him likewise, that he would be assistant to him in procuring him a warrant in writing to be directed to all ministers and church-wardens of the parishes of Southwark and St. Katharine's, that for the time to come the strangers of this congregation should Labours receive no molestation in that regard any more. Accord- with the ingiy & Lasco the next morning sent one of the elders of secretary to ° •> ° procure hig church to Cecyl with his letter, excusing himself that letters from . . .... the council he came not, being grievously afflicted with a pam m his Ms church° hea(l. Therein he acquainted him with the sum of his conference with the lord chancellor, adding, that the obtaining such a warrant would be necessary for them to produce and shew to such as at that present did annoy them, and to be hereafter kept by the church; that they might not be forced at other times, upon the hke occa sions, to create new trouble to the king's council, or him self, in suing for new warrants of that nature. Meaning hereby to put the secretary upon drawing this up the more formally and substantially. And so, entreating him to hear what the elder had to say, and to dispatch him, he took his leave. This letter also is inserted in the No. li. Appendix. The extent The superintendency of a. Lasco seemed to extend not intendency! omy to tms particular congregation of Germans, but over all the other churches of foreigners set up in London, as also over their schools of learning and education. They 1550.] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 275 were all subject to his inspection, and within his juris diction. And Melancthon, in an epistle to him in theMelanc- x , thons month of September, 1551, speaks of the purity of doc- Epistles, trine "in his churches." His condition now, as to worldly Leyden," circumstances, began to be so good, that he was able tol647- reheve and succour such learned foreigners as should retire hither. For when one Nicolas Forst, a learned and grave man, who had hved long in the university of Louvain, and had spent some time with Melancthon, was minded, for the sake of rehgion, to convey himself into England; he recommended him earnestly to the super intendent, as a person fit to teach in his churches and schools : and that he would friendly entertain him as an exile for the same cause himself was, and find him some httle nest to remain in. Nay, and the said Melancthon Melanc- bimself had some thoughts of sheltering himself under a thought to Lasco here, as appears by the forementioned letter, where- f^elteff in he styles him his patron. For the superscription of under his letter is thus, "Ulustri, magnifico, ac reverendo viro, nobihtate generis, virtute et sapientia praestanti Dn. 238 Johanni a Lasco, patrono suo colendo." So much of deference and honour did learned and pious men then use to give him. In this letter Melancthon told him, that the calamities of the churches were great, and that he himself expected banishment, and might probably in a short time arrive where he was. And in respect of his hospitable reception of strangers, he told him, that he believed he did often remember that saying of the exiled queen, "Non ignara mali, miseris succurrere disco." d ["Ulustri, magnifico, et re- lendo. S. D. Scripsit apud nos verendo viro, nobihtate generis, orationem de fratre tuo homo in- virtute et sapientia prsestanti Dn. geniosus, et valde amans familial Johanni a Lasco, patrono suo co- tua?, qua tot jam sseculis prae- t2 276 MEMORIALS of [II. 22. ment. Erasmus' praise of him. His great Nor yyas a. Lasco any ways unfurnished for this spi- abilities for . , . * „ it- t « govern- ritual government, being a man of good learning, and of great piety, strictness, and gravity from his younger age : and of whom the great Erasmus himself acknowledged that he learned much. For in his epistle to Johannes a Lasco, the archbishop of Gnesne, who was namesake and Ep. 3. Lib. y^gjg £0 our superintendent, he speaks thus of his nephew: "That he was but young, yet grave beyond his years; and that he himself accounted it none of the least parts of his happiness, that he happened to have his converse and society for some months :" praising the endowments that God had given him; and particularly, concerning the benefits he received by him, he could not but confess, stantes, et duces et senatores reg no Polonico genuit. Etsi autem scriptum est, ut videbis, juvenile, tamen propter argumentum, ac vero etiam propter autorem li- benter edidi. Ego si mihi fratris historia magis nota fuisset, retexu- issem, quamquam et mea oratio squalidior est. Te scio habere iUas dotes, qua? in scriptore pos- tulantur, o-ivecnv ttoXitiktjv, Kal 8ivapiv ipp-qvevriKTjv, ' prudentiam civilem, et interpretandi facul- tatem.' Quare optarim te ipsum aliquid de fratre edere, aut certe commentarium nobis mittere. Ex- empla orationis exhibebit tibi hie Nicolaus Forstius natus in Bra- bantia, vir eruditus et gravis, qui propter doctrinae puritatem in ec clesiis vestris mavult vivere quam- alibi. Diu in Academia Lovani- ensi fuit, postea hie amplius anno commoratus est, et comperimus ejus integritatem nobis ab Alberto Hardenbergio vere praedicatum esse. Poterit istic in docendis Belgicis ecclesiis usui esse. Po terit et in scholis docere. Quare te valde oro, ut hospitem tecum exulantem in eadem causa amanter excipias, et ei nidulum alicubi quaeras. Credo tibi saepe in men- tem venire dictum exulantis re- ginae, ' non ignara mali miseris succurrere disco.' Eadem oratione fortassis brevi apud te coram utar. Expectamus enim nos quo que exUia. Tantae cum sint ca- lamitates ecclesiae, Prutenicus Gorgias Tapdaro-ct to KefydkaiaraTOV pfpos rrjs 8i8ao-Ka\las' iript Sotai- ocrvvr)s, xai rrep\ dproXarpelas, ' turbat maxime capitalem partem doctrinae de justitia et adoratione panis.' Sed oremus fihum Dei, ut ipse tot magnis vulneribus ec clesiae medeatur. Bene vale, Die nova Septembris, 1551." — Epist. P. Melancthon. pp. 321-323. ed. Lugd. Bat. 1647.] I550,J ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 277 "Senex juvenis convictu factus sum mehor, ac sobrie- tatem, temperantiam, verecundiam, linguae moderationem, modestiam, pudicitiam, integritatem, quam juvenis a sene discere debuerat, a juvene senex didici8." "That by the conversation of that young man, he, an old man, became better : and that sobriety, temperance, awfulness, govern ment of the tongue, modesty, chastity, integrity, which the young ought to learn of the old, he, an old man, had learned of a young." This he wrote in August 1527, soon after a Lasco was gone from him. And in June Lib. 19. the same year, while he resided with him, in another p' letter to Leonard Cox, a learned Englishman, he signified the great complacency he took in his company. " Johan- nis a Lasco tale sum expertus ingenium, [quotidieque ex- perior], ut vel hoc uno amico mihi videar sat beatusf." " That he had found a Lasco's parts to be such, that he seemed happy enough in his single friendship." And this good understanding continued between them Purchased as long as Erasmus hved. For a Lasco seems to have^*™"3 been with him in his last sickness; when, as the last token of Erasmus' esteem of him, he made a purchase to Abe' R"di- viv. e ["Ut autem tarn insignem depingebat imprudens. Hunc ecclesis doctorem tui nominis au- mihi convictorem pauculos licet spicio potissimum veluti renatum menses contigisse, non in pos- in lucem prodire veUem, cum trema felicitatis parte pono. Uti- pnmis in causa fuit Joannes a nam mihi liceret per adulationis Lasco, te patruum non minus invidiam praedicare Dei doteB, morum ornamentis quam nomine quas in Ulo et amavi, et veneratus referens : nam juvenis senem sic sum. IUud non possum non fa- exprimit, ut in eo veluti renatus teri, senex juvenis &c." (ut supra). videriqueas. Is tui simulachrum Erasmi. Epist. dccclxxviii. quoties mihi depingebat oratione, torn. i. col. 991. ed. Lugd. Bat. toties agnoscebam in narrante 1706.] imaginisexpressaeantitypon.Adeo f [Id. p. 982.] dum patruum depingit, seipsum 278 MEMORIALS OF [II. 22. him of his own hbrary, (that incomparable treasure), if we may believe the author of his life in English?. i Lasco a a Lasco thought not the clergy obhged to celibacy, or man. single life, for he himself was a married man. Who his wife was, I know not ; but as for her quahties, she was in all probability a pious and discreet woman, whereby she gained a great share in his affections. He styled her "the other part of himself." But in August 1552, God deprived him of her. Which stroke put him for some time under much sadness and indisposition both of mind and body, as appears by one of his letters. His influ- He was ahve at the accession of queen Elizabeth to the ence in the -,- i ,n -in reformation Enghsh throne; and though he came not back then to queen Eli- England again, whence he departed upon king Edward's 2abeth. death, yet, according to that great interest he had here 23Q . . v with the most eminent persons, and even the queen her self, he neglected not by his letters to promote the reform ation, and to give his grave counsel in order thereunto. And Zanchy, public professor at Strasburgh, knowing the sway he bare here, in a letter to him in the year 1558, or 59, excited him in these words ; " Non dubito, quin T. P. jamdudum scripserit ad reginam, eique consuluerit, quae b [" His library he sold upon seen in the Appendix to Dr. his death bed to Johannes a Samuel Knight's life of Erasmus. Lasco." FuUer's Abel Redevivus ; Append, p. ex. ed. Camb. 1726. (life of Erasmus) ; p. 77. ed. Lond. The words referring to the trans- 165 1. The words " upon his death action with a. Lasco are these: bed" must be understood in a wide " Bibliothecam meam jam quidem sense. Erasmus was confined to vendidi D. Joanni a Lasco Polono, his bed nearly a month before he juxta syngrapham super hoc con- died, which event took place, July tractu inter nos confectam : non 12th, 1536. His wUl bears date tradentur tamen libri, nisi hseredi Feb. 12th, in the same year. A numeravit ducentos florenos.""! copy of the original wiU may be 1550.] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 279 pro ilhus regni conservatione, et regni Christi instauratione facienda judicarit," &c. " That he doubted not he had before now written to the queen, and given her his advice, what he judged fit to be done for the preservation of her kingdom, and for the restoring of the kingdom of Christ. Yet he would not omit to pray him to do it again and again by his repeated letters. For I know," said he, "how great your authority is with the Enghsh, and with the queen herself. Now certainly is the time that you, and such as you be, should by your counsels help so pious a queen, and consult for the safety of so great a kingdom, yea, and succour the whole Christian church, every where afflicted and vexed. For we know that if Christ's king dom be happily introduced into the kingdom of England, no small aid will thence come to all the other churches dispersed through Germany, Poland, and other countries0." There is one thing that is wont to be urged against Blamed for him, and which makes him to this day to be somewhat ill our con. thought of; which was, that he opposed himself so openly, troversies- by writing against the habits prescribed the clergy, and the posture of kneeling at the reception of the holy sacra ment: whereby he incurred the censure of a meddling h [" Non dubito, quin T. P. tanti regni, imo vero toti Ecclesiae jam dndum scripserit ad reginam, Christiana?, ubique terrarum af- eique consuluerit, quae pro ilhus flictse et vexatae, succurratis. regni conservatione, et regni Scimus non parum adjumenti Christi instauratione facienda accessurum reliquis omnibus per judicarit: non oinittam tamen, Germaniam, Poloniam, et alias quin T. P. rogem, ut idem sae- regiones dispersis ecclesiis, si penumero, et multiplicatis Uteris regnum Christi in regnum Angliae faciat. Scio enim, quanta sit tua feliciter introducatur. Ergo vi- apud Anglos, atque apud ipsam demus, in cujus rei studium sit reginam autoritas. Nunc certe diligenter incumbendum." — Zan- tempus est, ut tu tuique similes, chii Op. torn. viii. col. 360. ed. vestris consiliis adjuvetis tam [Heidelberg] 1613.] piam reginam, consulatis saluti 280 MEMORIALS OF • [II. 22. temper, and of ingratitude to that nation that so kindly had entertained him. Concerning the habits, Bucer and he had some controversy. The sum of which, on both parts, archbishop Parker drew up, (upon the desire, I suppose, of sir Wilham Cecyl), about the year 1565, when that controversy was hotly renewed again by Humfrey1 and Sampson J. This sum whosoever is minded to see, may probably hereafter find it in the memorials of that archbishop, if God grant life and opportunity to me to write themk A church About this time, viz. in' the year 1550, or 1551, there constituted was also a church of Itahans constituted in London, by m London. ^g mfluence an(j care 0f our archbishop and sir Wilham Cecyl, under a Lasco's superintendency. This church consisted of divers Italian nations, as Florentines, Genoese, Milanois, Venetians, and others : though several of them 1 [Laurence Humfrey, Hum phrey, or Humphreys, S. T. P., president of Magdalen college, Oxford, and regius professor of divinity in that university, was an exile during the reign of queen Mary, and dwelt at Zurich : he and Sampson were the leaders of the nonconformists in the suc ceeding reign, and were brought into much trouble for refusing to wear the ecclesiastical vestments ; through the interest of lord Bur leigh, who induced him to wear these habits, he was made dean of Gloucester, March 13, 1570, upon the preferment of Thomas Cowper to the see of Lincoln, and October 14, 1580 he was removed to the deanery of Winchester. " He died Feb. 1, 1589, jetat. 63, and was buried in Magdalen coUege Chapel, Oxford." See Le Neve's Fasti, pp. 103, 289, 471, 493. Burnet's Hist, of Reformat, vol. iii. p. 590. ed. Oxon. 1829. Strype's Eccl. Mem. vol. iii. pt. i, pp. 232, 409. ed. Oxon. 1822. Strype's Annals of the Reformat. vol. i. pt. ii. pp. 132, 144, 518. pt. ii. p. 65. ed. Oxon. 1824. Strype's Life of abp. Parker, vol. i. pp. 222, 223, 322-328, 367. ed. Oxon. 1821. FuUer's Ch. Hist. vol. ii. p. 466. vol. iv. pp. 153, 207, 329. vol. v. p. 232. ed. Oxon. I845-] J [See above, p. 129. n. l.~) k [See Strype's life of abp. Parker, vol. i. pp. 340-343. ed. Oxon. 182 1.] 155°\\ ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 281 joined themselves with this congregation more out of worldly ends than conscience, as will appear afterward. For they had a kindness for the mass, and could not endure to hear the pope's supremacy called in question, and inveighed against. One Michael Angelo Florio, a Michael Florentine by birth, was appointed their preacher; pro- 1^^„ bably brother, or kinsman, unto Simon Florio, preacher lster- at the city of Clavenna among the Rhaetii, an eminent professor of the gospel in those parts, who wrote a letter to Gratalorius, an Italian physician, concerning two whole towns in Calabria, utterly destroyed by reason of the rigor of persecution exercised there : and about eight hundred or a thousand of the inhabitants put to death, because they professed the gospel. Which letter is ex- 240 tant in Foxe, in his table of the Italian martyrs1. 1 ["The end of a certain letter of master Simon FloreUus, written in Italian, concerning a lament able slaughter of eighty-eight Christian saints, in the parts of Calabria. — News out of Italy, a. d. 1560. — As concerning news, I have nothing to write, but only that I send you a copy of certain letters imprinted either at Rome or at Venice, concerning the mar tyrdom or persecution in two several towns of Calabria, eight Italian rmles from the borders of Consentia; the one caUed St. Sixtus within two mUes of Mont- alto, under the seigniory of the duke of Montalto : the other caUed Guardia, situate upon the sea coast, and twelve mUes from St. Sixtus : the which two towns are utterly destroyed, and eight hun dred of the inhabitants there, (or, as some write from the city of Rome), no less than a full thou sand. He that wrote the letter was servant to Ascanius Carac- ciolus. The country and people there I weU knew, to take the first original of their good doc trine and honest life from the Waldenses. For before my de parture from Geneva, at their re quest, I sent them two school masters and two preachers. The last year the two preachers were martyred : the one at Rome, named Joannes Aloysius Paschalis, a citizen of Cunium : the other, at Messina, named James Bovell, both of Piedmont : this year the residue of that godly fellowship were martyred in the same place. I trust this good seed sown in Italy, wiU bring forth good and plentiful fruit." Foxe's Acts and Monuments, p. 942. ed. Lond. 1583-] 282 MEMORIALS OF [II. 22. The service For the encouragement of this congregation, the arch- Hshopdid bishop procured the members of it to be free denizens, to for this nve anfj traffic here with as much freedom as natural church; , Enghsh subjects, which they were admitted to by swear ing fidehty and allegiance. For their more easy and con venient dwelhng here, they often petitioned the king for new privileges and immunities, as they saw they needed them ; and such favour and countenance was shewn them, and for the that they seldom failed of their suits. The archbishop also, that their preacher might be provided for, dealt with the congregation, and made them oblige themselves to provide him with all necessaries; as a dwelling, and a Ann.1552. competent yearly salary. In the year 1552, Michael Angelo sued again to our archbishop for some favour to be obtained from the king ; whether it were for the better estabhshment of his church, or for some further immu nities to be granted to the members thereof, it doth not appear. But this the most reverend man readily furthered, by writing in that behalf to the duke of Northumberland from his house at Ford, near Canterbury, the duke being, I suppose, with the king in progress at this time. He likewise dispatched another, dated November 20, ra the year abovesaid, to the secretary, entreating him to for ward that cause as much as lay in him. Divers of But however serviceable this their minister had been this church T fall out unto these Italians, in preaching the gospel to them, and minister" soliciting the archbishop for their benefit; yet many of and go to them carried themselves but little obliging to him. Whe- mass again. . . ther it were some misbehaviour or imprudences in him, which he was not altogether void of, or his too violent declaiming against the pope and popish doctrines, which they were not yet enough ripened in evangelical knowledge to receive, or that he too roughly charged them with the m [See the Appendix to the 3rd volume of this edition, No. cvii.] I55°0 ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 283 hardness of their hearts, and backwardness to receive gospel-truths, as he did use to do : but many of them wholly withdrew from him, and went to mass again. His contribution also fell very low, not having received above five pounds in a considerable time from them. Hereupon he resorted to the secretary, "making heavy complaints of his own poverty, that many of his people had forsaken his assembly, spake very slanderously against him and his ministry, and the gospel which he preached, after they saw and heard him in an open manner preaching against the pope's doctrines, his tyranny and hypocrisy, and re proving them for their unbelief, and the hardness of their hearts." The too much vehemency and passion of this A con- man, and his neglect of informing the judgments of these tne ^gg Itahans in milder and more leisurely methods, I suspect thereof- to have been a great cause of this apostasy. But, upon this complaint, the secretary bade the pastor Their min- send bim a list of the names of those that had thus be- their names haved themselves, and that he himself would call them to *he se" , ' cretary, and before him, and discourse with them. Accordingly he accuses sent the names of fourteen in a letter to the said secretary, withal aggravating to bim their misbehaviour, and inform ing of their daily going to mass, and adding, that there fore they, being free denizens, and so subjects to the 241 Enghsh laws, ought to be punished as any Englishman would be, if he heard mass. He quoted a place or two in Deuteronomy, where those that rebelled against God, the laws, and the judges, should be slain without mercy. He subjoined, that Elisha, by God's command, anointed Jehu to be king for this very purpose, that he should wholly root out the house of Ahab, and kill all the priests of Baal ; and thence makes his uncharitable conclusion, (more agreeable to the rehgion that he was so hot a- gainst), that therefore these Itahans should be so served, 284 MEMORIALS OF [II. 22. The morals of this man tainted. Writes a penitent letter to the secre tary. No. LII. LIII. A French church also in London. since they opposed the gospel and the king's pious pro ceedings. But it might make one apt not to think over- favourably of this man ; a pastor, thus to turn accuser of his flock ; a professor of the reformed religion to require the utmost rigor of punishment for differing in rehgion. I also find the morals of this man tainted, having once made a very foul slip, being guilty of an act of unclean- ness ; for which sir William Cecyl, secretary of state, who had been his good friend, was exceedingly displeased with him, and withdrew all favour and countenance from him, calhng him " wicked man," and intending to inflict some severe punishment upon him, which seemed to be banish ment out of the nation, or at least turning him out of his family, where he seems to have been entertained. Angelo wrote him a very penitent letter, minding him of the frailty of human nature, and of the mercy of God to Moses, Aaron, David, Jonas, Peter, after their falls : and that if he were forced to depart the kingdom, he must either be compelled to renounce the truth of the Gospel, or have his blood shed by the enemies thereof. This was, as I suppose, in the year 1551. In fine, he got over this brunt, and recovered mild Cecyl's favour : for I find, a year after, our archbishop wrote to him to further a cer tain busmess of Michael Angelo at court, as much as he could". This is all I have to say of that Italian congregation, and the minister thereof. For further memory of which, I have added in the Appendix two letters of this Michael Angelo to secretary Cecyl, whence many of the matters next above mentioned were collected. As there was thus a German and Itahan church in London, so also there was a third of Frenchmen, under n [See the Appendix to the 3rd volume of this edition, No. cvii.] I550-] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 285 a Lasco's supermtendency. One member of which, a very honest man, and of sound rehgion, by the general testimony of that church, had desired to set up a print ing-house for his livelihood, chiefly for printing the Litur gy, and other books of the church of England, in French, for the use of the French islands under the English sub jection. In whose behalf the superintendent readily in terceded by a letter with the secretary to procure the king's letters patents, for his hcense and authority so to do. The issue of which will be seen in the progress of this history. The letter I have transcribed to accompany two others of a Lasco in the Appendix. No. liv. 286 MEMORIALS OF [II- 23- 242 CHAPTER XXIII. THE CHURCH AT GLASTENBURY. Another In the same year, viz. 1550, another church of strangers, strTngerfat and they mostwhat French and Walloons, began to settle burSteTheir at Glastenbury in Somersetshire. They were weavers, trade weav- and followed the manufacture of kersies, and cloth of that nature, as I conjecture. Their great patrons were the duke of Somerset and sir Wilham Cecyl ; I add, and our archbishop, though I do not find his name mentioned in the papers I make use of, relating to this church : for there is no question but that his counsel and aid concurred in the settlement of this church, as well as those in Lon don : and particularly as to the preacher ; whom I suspect to have been one of those learned foreign divines whom he Valerandus harboured in his own house. His name was Valerandus their PoUanus, a man of great worth both for learning and preacher integrity, who had the title of " Superintendent of the and super- ° J ' c intendent. strangers' church at Glastenbury," as John a Lasco had of that at London; given to each to fix a character of honour and esteem upon their persons, and perhaps to exempt them and their churches from the jurisdiction of the bishops of those respective dioceses. This Pollanus turned into Latin, and printed, the disputations held in the beginning of queen Mary's reign between the pro testants and papists at the convocation, anno 1553. If any desire to know the particular state and condition of the estabhshment of these strangers, as to their trade, it stood thus : How they Pollanus, in behalf of the rest, had preferred a petition here. to the duke of Somerset, and the rest of the lords of the council, to this effect ; " That they might be permitted to form themselves into a church for the free exercise of 155°] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 287 rehgion, and to follow peaceably their calling of weaving ; declaring, as an argument to persuade them to allow the same, the considerable benefit that would accrue thence to the realm ; and that for shops and working-houses, and for reception of them and their faniilies, they might enjoy some old dissolved religious house." Their petition was condescended to : and the duke, being a great cherisher of those of the rehgion, resolved to be their patron, and to take the managing of this whole cause upon himself. The duke, in the month of June0 this year, had made an exchange of certain lands with the king, and that proba bly for the better accommodating of these strangers. He had parted with the castle and lordship of Sleaford, and other lands and tenements in the county of Lincoln, to the king : and the king had granted him, in lieu thereof, all and singular his messuages, lands, tenements, and hereditaments, with their appurtenances, in the town of Glastenbury, (namely, what had belonged to the abbey), and other lands and tenements in Kingston-upon-Hull, to the value of 214/. 14*. 5d. obq. as I find in a manu script book, mentioning the several sales that king made. Having obtained such conveniences in Glastenbury, he ° ["I have yet met with no- merset, in consideration of his thing of this abbey from the time petition and the advice of his it was pulled down, to king Ed- council, to support his dignity. ward Vlth's days ; and so I pre- But he enjoyed it only one year, sume it laid near a dozen years seven months, and twenty days, waste and desolate. But in Ful- being beheaded on Tower-hill, ler's* history of abbeys I find, the 24th of January, 155^. So that it was granted by king Ed- httle did this and his other sacri- ward, on the fourth of June, in the leges thrive with him." — Hearne's fourth year of bis reign, (that is to Hist, of Glastonbury, p. 52. ed. say, in the year of Christ 1550.), Oxon. 1722.] to Edward Seymour, duke of So- * [Fuller's Abbeys, p. 368.] 288 MEMORIALS OF [II. 23. resolved to plant this manufacture here ; which he thought 243 would tend so much to the benefit of the country, himself, and these poor strangers too. Conditions were mutually entered into. Conditions Tne conditions on Somerset's part were, " That he should of trade be- . . -, tween So- provide them houses convenient for their occupations, and merset and tQ contain themselves and famihes : that five acres of pas ture land, or as much as would serve for the feeding of two cows throughout the year, should be allotted to each of them : and until land were so allotted, they should en joy the park in common for the said use, with some part also of the gardens. They were also to be supphed with monies from the duke to buy wool, and to defray other charges necessary to set them on work. They were also empowered to employ both Enghsh men and women, as they should have occasion, in spinning and other works belonging to their trade." And so accordingly they went down to Glastenbury, and fell to work. Their trade But upon the troubles and fall of Somerset, which hap- by the trou.pened about fourteen or fifteen months after, their affairs bles of So- were mucj1 obstructed. His servants neglected to furnish merset. ° them with money according to contract : nor was he at leisure now to regard them. The people, among whom they hved, took this opportunity to express what httle kindness they had for them : it being the temper of the common sort to be jealous of strangers, and rude to them. So that they were not without their discontents and dis couragements : for they wanted those conveniences of room for work-houses and habitations, that were pro mised them. They ran in debt, and were forced to lay to pawn the clothes they had wove, to supply their wants. Cornish, one of the chief of their procurators, appointed to oversee them, and further their trade, proved very de ceitful and false to them ; who came to them, pretending I55°-J ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 289 letters from the council, and treating them at first with fair words, and after with threatenings : and so compelled them to dehver the clothes that they had made to him, though they had by mere necessity been forced before to pawn them. He had also, by his importunity and fraud, got the grant of the park from them, though he knew the duke had fully purposed and intended it for their use, for the necessary maintenance of themselves and families. Things being in this ill condition with them, and Somer- Apply tin 'i nsclvcs set no longer able to befriend them, they were glad to agam to the apply again to those above. Pollanus therefore, in their council» behalf, petitioned the lords of the council to take their declining state into their consideration, and to carry on that good work the duke of Somerset had begun. He did also ply the secretary to further their petition, (who was and to the indeed of his own accord their most hearty friend) ; and cecyl. laboured particularly with all earnestness imaginable, both by word of mouth and by divers letters, to get the factory discharged of Cornish, urging that the weavers had never found the least grain of integrity, justice, or candour in him. This man was now very industrious and busy at court to get himself continued in his office; which the strangers understanding, were as dihgent to get them selves dehvered of him. The superintendent had but a httle before dispatched to the secretary one Peter Wolf, 244 a good man, and a great sufferer, a Brabanter by nation, to relate the evil deeds of this man : and now again he dispatched Stephen Le Provost, a deacon of his church, with another message to the same import to the said se cretary. Telling him, "That those who were to be set over others ought themselves in the first place to be honest and just ; but especially they ought to be so in the highest degree that were to be placed over such good men, and who were exiles only for the sake of Christ ; unless any CRANMER, VOL. II. U 290 MEMORIALS OF [II. 23. could be willing that such upright men should be undone, and that those very considerable advantages that were hkely to accrue to the commonwealth by them should be diverted to some other place or country. That they could not enough wonder with what forehead this man should attempt this thing, after he had so plainly betrayed his base treachery and ill-will towards them : and could not but know, how very hardly they could away with him, and who were going to sue to the duke for that which they now desired. That himself was solicited by the prayers of those good men to write this to him, that he would be their advocate with the lords in this behalf." The council The result was, that the lords consented to uphold and their pa- encourage them, and sent down their letters to the over- trons, and seers 0f tbis manufacture, and to the chief officers of the assist them. town, Powis, one of the king's servants, and Hyet, the chief magistrate, and others, to examine into the present state of these strangers, and to give them in writing an account thereof. These letters the superintendent de hvered to them; and one Clark, a justice of peace, was then present, who being a gentleman and a scholar, that understood both French and Latin, did, out of his good will to them, interpret to the rest Pollanus' petition to the lords of the council, and the contents of their contract with the duke of Somerset, and other matters relating to this business ; that so they might be the better acquainted with their affairs, and it might appear there were no neglects or breaches of covenants on the strangers' parts. And so letters were dispatched back to the lords from the overseers, signifying how they had examined the affairs of these strangers, and had found all things fair and just on their side; mentioning likewise what considerable com modity they hoped for by them, and likewise from the chief of the town to the same import. 155°-] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 291 Speedily upon this, orders came down from the lords to Orders certain gentlemen ofthe town and neighbourhood, where- f^*eset of one Dyer was one, a person of good religion, and their this manu- J .... facturefor- cordial friend, commissionmg them to set this manufac- wards. ture forward, and to take care the undertakers might be reheved in what they needed, according to their former contract with the duke. So they obtained the use of the park for the running of threescore head of kine, till other pasture were provided them. Thirty houses were ordered to be forthwith repaired and fitted up for them: and money was paid sufficient for the clearing them of their debts. These gentlemen had also assigned them a stated provision of money for the future, but it was too scanty ; 245 the allowance that they had proportioned them for two months would scarcely hold out for five weeks. Nor was any wool at all bought for their use, though their stock was almost at an end ; and then their work must stand still for want thereof, having no money themselves to pur chase more : and to take it upon credit would enhance the price thereof. For one Crouch had demanded of them thirty-two shillings for wool, when they could buy it of their neighbours for four and twenty, had they money. Their only hope was in Dyer, who promised them wool at a far more reasonable rate, and kindly offered them a long day of payment for it, without consideration for forbear ance : their doubt only was, whether his wool was proper for their use. But the interest of Cornish was such, that he was continued by the lords in his office over these tradesmen, and enjoyed a part of the park to himself. These things were transacted in the month of November, anno 1551, which was the month after the duke's com mitment. In all this affair Pollanus was very much employed. PoUaim» .. 'veryser- taking a great deal of pams m settling this trade : for he viceable to u 2 tW 292 MEMORIALS OF [II. 23. took many journeys between Glastenbury and the court, and was, as himself wrote, at mcredible expences ; and in fifteen months' space received not an halfpenny, though he had a large family to maintain. The office also of sur veying the reparation of the houses lay upon him : and, fearing the lords of the council might be displeased at the greatness of the charge they had been at already in the repairs, and the httle profit that as yet arose to quit the cost, he entreated the secretary that he would bear up their reputation with the lords; telhng him, "That he doubted not that the project would hereafter redound much to their own praise, by reason of the very great emolument that all men should perceive would come to the realm thereby within three years, God prospering them, as he had begun to do. And for himself, all he desired was, that for all his charge and trouble he might obtain a stipend of fifty pounds to be settled upon him." The letters of Valerandus Pollanus, being three in num- lvi lvii ^er> ¦"¦ nave inserted in the Appendix. An apology I acknowledge, that many of these things I have related largeness of concerning this business may seem too little and minute the former for an historian to take notice of. But I was loth any relation. particulars of so remarkable a design should be lost, which in probability would have turned so much to the benefit of our nation. It being also an instance of the pious care and good pohcy that was then taken by the court for the relief and sustentation of poor fugitives, fly ing hither from their native country, friends, and liveli hood, for Christ's sake ; and yet that the pubhc might be as httle burdened by them as might be. After the Queen Mary's access to the crown spoiled this good de- king's death gj^ jior avi strangers being then commanded suddenly move to to depart the realm, this congregation accordingly brake Frankfort. . up, and removed themselves to Frankfort in Germany; 1550.J ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 293 where the magistrates kindly entertained them, and al- Troubles at lowed them a church. And when afterwards, viz. 1554, divers of the Enghsh nation fled thither for their rehgion, the governors of the town, upon their petition, received 246 them also, and all other such Enghsh as should resort thither upon the same account, as many did. And two members of this French congregation, mindful undoubt- Prove edly of the former kindness themselves or their country- tne English men had received in England, assisted them much ; exilesthere. namely, Morellio a minister, and Castaho an elder. The Enghsh here made use of the same church the French did ; these one day, and the Enghsh another : and upon Sundays the use of it respectively, as themselves could agree. And as there were settled here congregations of French, Itahans, and Dutch strangers, so I am very apt to beheve there was also a church of Spaniards too. Indeed I do A Spanish not find express mention of any such till the beginning of queen Elizabeth's reign; when Cassiodorus and Antho- Cassiodorus nius Corranus Hispalensis [of Seville], (a member of the*"nug°kejj. Italian congregation), were their preachers, of whom I preachers. shall have occasion to say something in my memorials of archbishop GrindalP. It is certam, that in queen Mary's Many of days many of those Spaniards, who came over in thePnif >s retinue of Philip, the Spanish prince, or after, forsook Spaniards become popery, and became professors of the reformed rehgion : protestants. which one cannot well tell how it should come to pass, unless it were by the hearing of the Gospel preached in their own language here. And it is observable, that among these many had been sent for over, in that queen's time, to convert our nation from heresy, as they termed it, and to reduce it to the Boman church. This notable p [See Strype's Life of abp. Grindal, pp. 69-71. ed. Oxon. 1821.] 294 memorials of [II. 23. success and power, which the clear evidence of truth had upon these men, was in those times taken much notice of, as it might well be. James Pilkington, the master of St. John's college in Cambridge, and who was afterwards bishop of Durham 1, makes a note of it to the university, in the sermon which he preached at the re stitution of Bucer and Fagius, in the beginning of queen Ehzabeth's reign, after the barbarous indignities that had been offered them in the former queen's reign, in raking their dead bodies out of their graves, and burn ing them. " It is much more notable," said he, " that we have seen to come to pass in our days, that the Span iards, sent for into the realm on purpose to suppress the Gospel, as soon as they were returned home, re plenished many parts of their country with the same truth of rehgion, to the which before they were utter enemies'"." Great num- 'Naj, and not long after this, such earnest professors of testants the true rehgion were found in Spain, that many of them and Italy, endured the fiery trial, and offered up their bodies to the flames, for Christ's sake ; and more were cast into prisons : and yet the Gospel got ground there to admira tion, as Zanchy gave a relation thereof to a Lasco in one of his letters ; wherem he spake of the great numbers of true professors in Italy also. The place being so much to our present purpose, I will take leave to lay before the ZanchiiEp. reader. "In Calabrise duobus castellis," &c. "In two lib, 2. « [See above, p. 172. n. 1.] eadem religionis veritate, cujus r ["Sed multo tamen celebrius hostes erant, replevisse." — Cone. esse, quod his nostris temporibus de J. Pylkinton. in restitut. D. contigisse vidimus. Hispanos M. Buceri et P. Fagii. — Bucer. opprimendi Evangehi causa in Script. Anglic, p. 942. ed. Basil. hoc regnum accersitos, reversus 1577.] domum multas sua; patriae partes 1550.] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 295 castles of Calabria, one belonging to the duke of Mont- alto, the other to a nobleman of Naples, were found four thousand brethren, being the remainders of those brethren called Waldenses. They were for many years unknown, and hved safely in their ancestors' possessions. For though they approved not of masses, yet they thought the faithful might go to them with a safe conscience. 247 But being untaught this bad doctrine, they did wholly and universally abstain going any more. And so it came to pass, that they could not be concealed any longer: therefore a persecution was raised up against them. They writ to the brethren at Geneva to assist them by their prayers, their counsel, and also by human aid. We see also in Italy, where the seat of Antichrist is, there is a great harvest; but very few to gather it. O God, have mercy upon Italy ! In Spain very many were burnt, more cast into prison. Nevertheless, in the mean time, the Gospel goes forward, as we hear, wonderfullys." And in another letter he writes thus ; " There is a very s [" In Calabria? castellis duo- est excitata. Scripserunt ad fra- bus, quorum unum est sub di- tres Genevam, ut turn precibus, done ducis Montis aid, alteram turn consilio, turn etiam humana est cujusdam nobilis Neapolitan!, ope se adjuvent. Videmus etiam reperta sunt 4000 fratrum, e reh- in Italia, ubi sedes est Antichristi, quuis illorum fratrum, qui Wal- multam tamen esse segetem : sed denses appellantur. Ii annos per qui earn colligant, perpaucos. O multos incogniti : tuto in pater- Deus miserere Italise 1 In Hispa- nis aadibus vixerunt. Etsi enim nia permulti fuerunt combusti, missas non probabant, sentie- multo plures in carcerem conjecti: bant tamen posse eas a fidelibus, interim tamen Evangelium mira- salvis conscientiis adiri. At biliter, ut audimus, serpit. Totus ubi hanc malam doctrinam de- terrarum orbis parturit Christum, docti fuerunt, omnes simul ab eis adsit igitur parturienti optimus abstinuerunt. Itaque factum est, Pater caelestis." — Zanchii Op. ut non potuerint amplius latere, torn. viii. col. 360. ed. [Heidel- Persecutio igitur adversus illos berg.] 1613.] 296 MEMORIALS OF [II. 2,3. great persecution in Italy, nor a less in Spain : a sign there be many faithful there that dare confess Christ V * ["In Italia maxima persecu- les, qui audent Christum confi- tio, nee minor in Hispania. Ar- teri." — Zanchii Op. torn. viii. col. gumento est, multos ibi esse fide- 359.] ^O-] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 297 CHAPTER XXIV. THE ARCHBISHOP'S CARE OF THE REVENUES OF THE CHURCH. BUCER DIES. I return now to our prelate again, to take a further The arch- view of him, acting in his high function in the Enghsh boured to church. It must not be omitted to be ranked among his preserve good services towards it, that he did what in him lay to nues of the „..,.. , ., church. preserve the revenues of it m his time, when there were so many hungry courtiers gaping after them. These were again in a new danger after the duke of Northumberland, and his party had removed Somerset, and made them selves the great controllers of pubhc affairs. It was indeed the scandal of the reformation, that the The detain- demeans, that had been settled long before by our pious church re- ancestors for the maintenance of God's ministers, as they venues a ' •" scandal to had been formerly wrongfully appropriated to monasteries, the refor- and swallowed up by lazy monks, so they had not now recurred and been restored to their true owners ; but be came possessed by laymen: so that in many scores of parishes there remained not sufficient to buy bread for the incumbents and their families. And it was more than suspicious that many patrons did render the condition of the church still worse in these days by retaining and reserving to themselves, whether by contract or power, the tithes of the benefices they presented to : and by these means pluralities and nonresidences, the old mis chief of the church, were not redressed, but rather made necessary. This abuse grieved good men, and lovers of the reformation, both at home and abroad; because they saw how the preaching of the Gospel was obstructed hereby. Concerning this, Bucer from Cambridge wrote privately 298 MEMORIALS OF [II. 34- Calvin to to Calvin in the year 1550. And this made Calvin ad- the arch- fce&s a letter to our archbishop, telling him, that, for the this matte™ flourishing state of rehgion, he thought it highly needful to have fit pastors, that might seriously set themselves to perform the office of preaching. One great obstacle Ep. 127. whereof he makes very truly to be, " Quod praedae expositi sunt ecclesia; reditus ;" " That the rents of the church were exposed to be a prey :" which he calls " malum sane 248intolerabileu." And of the same thing, and not long And to the after, viz. July 1551, he admonished the duke of Somerset Somerset, m a French letter, all of his own handwriting : which because of the antiquity of it, and the matter it treats of, referring to our church, and not being among his printed No. LVIII. epistles, I have added in the Appendix. In which letter he excites the duke to take care that there might be fit and able ministers fixed in parishes to teach the people : the want whereof he attibuted to two causes. The one whereof he made to lie in the universities ; and the other in the matter that we are speaking of. " That the reve nue of the cures was withdrawn and dispersed away ; so that there was nothing to maintain good men, who were fit to perform the office of true pastors. And hence it came to pass, that ignorant priests were put in, which made great confusion; for the quahty of the persons begat great contempt of God's word. Advising the duke to endeavour to bring those that had these spiritual pos sessions, to be willing to part with them, inasmuch as they could not prosper in defrauding God's people of their spiritual food, which they did by hindering the churches of good pastors." Bucer pub- Bucer, the king's divinity professor at Cambridge, was licly dis- . . . puteth at this year engaged m a pubhc disputation ; as his col- u [See Calvini Epist. p. 62. ed. Amstelod. 1667.] 155°-~] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 299 league, Peter Martyr, the king's professor at Oxon, had Cambridge. been there the last w. Before this disputation happened, Bucer communicated his purpose to his said colleague and friend ; who, having sufficient experience of the vain glorious ends of the papists in these kinds of disputations, and of their unfair dealings, advised him in a letter not to engage in it, but to decline it. On which letter arch bishop Parker, into whose hands it fell, wrote this inscrip- MSS. tion ; " Ad Bucerum, prudens Martyris consilium, ut non det se in disputatione cum gloriosuhs Thrasonibusx." But it seems he was too far engaged to avoid it with reputation, nor thought he fit to do it for the vindication and sake of truth. The questions disputed of, and his antagonists, were before mentionedy. It seems he came off with great credit ; for his friend Martyr, in a letter to bim soon after it was over, professed a great deal of gladness that his disputations had that good success : and that it so well happened was by God's providence: which, he said, he could scarce have beheved to have been a thing possible, without visitors, or other grave judges ; since the papists reckoned it enough for their busmess only to dispute, afterwards studiously dispersing their lies, to their own advantage, and the disparagement of those that disputed against them. And therefore, Martyr said, he wondered not that Christ in the beginning confirmed the disputa tions of his apostles with miracles. November 9, Bucer began a learned reading of the power and use of the ministry, but hved not to finish it ; for the latter end of this year put an end to this learned Dieth. man's hfe ; of whose counsel and advice our archbishop made great use in the steps he made for reformation of w [See above, pp. 152, et sqq.] * [C.C.C.C.MSS. No. cxix. p. 105.] y [See above, pp. 168, et sqq.] 300 MEMORIALS OF [11.24- rehgion. He made his will before he left Strasburgh : but the codicil to that will he added, February 22, a few days before his death2. Wherein he left to his wife to take the advice of Mr. Bradford1, and the minister of All-hallows, for ordering of his burial, and constituted two 249 eminent men of that university his executors, namely, Dr. Matthew Parker, who was afterwards archbishop of Canterbury, and Dr. Walter Haddon, after master of re quests to queen Ehzabeth : and both of them adorned his funeral, the one with an English sermon before the uni versity, and the other with a Latin oration, being univer sity orator : both which are extant in print. He died but poor; and seemed to be in some want of necessaries in his last sickness : for there is a short letter, in a scrawl ing hand, which I have seen, wrote by him to the afore said Parker, then master of Benet college, and his great friend, to lend him ten crowns ; which because it was the last letter, I beheve, he ever wrote, and but short, I shall here insert. z [The original will was made pied the same apartment with at Strasburgh Jan. 23, 1548, and Cranmer, Ridley, and Latimer, the codicil added at Cambridge with whom he studied the New Feb. 22, 1551. — C.C. C.C. MSS. Testament: having been excom- No. cxix. p. 69.] municated and condemned, he a [i.e. "John Bradford, who was burnt in Smithfield, July, was of Pembroke Hall, Cam- a. d. 1555." — See Strype's Life bridge, and there tutor to arch- of abp. Parker, vol. i. pp. 10,421. bishop Whitgift : he was ordained ed. Oxon. 1821. Strype's Life priest by bishop Ridley, and be- of abp. Whitgift, vol. i. p. 8. ed. came his chaplain, and preben- Oxon. 1822. Strype's Eccl. Mem. dary of St. Paul's ; he was also vol. ii. pt. i. pp. 383, 384, 403, appointed one of Edward Vlth's 522, 524. vol. iii. pt. i. pp. 77, chaplains for itinerant preaching, 166, 331. ed. Oxon. 1822. Foxe's but was omitted when the num- Acts and Monuments, pp. 1603 ber was reduced to four. He was et sqq. ed. Lond. 1583. Collier's deprived and imprisoned in the Eccl. Hist. vol. vi. pp. 11, 106. reign of queen Mary, and occu- ed. Lond. 1840, 41.] 155°-J ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 301 " S. D. Oro D. T. Clarissime D. Doctor, ut des mihi X coronatos mutuo, uno tantum mense. Reddam bona fide. Opt. vale. D. T. deditiss. in Dno. Martinus Bucerus manu persegre propria." Under which is writ by Dr. Parker, out of the honour he had for his memory, "Scriptum novissimum omnium quod scripsit D. Bucerus, paulo ante mortem ejusb." Bucer's friends, after they had taken care for giving The uni- him an honourable funeral, consulted the supply of his™"/up widow, Wibrand Bucerin, that she might be weU grati- ™n^hns fied, and presented with some gratuities, that might shew the respect the nation had for her learned husband. So the university wrote a letter to the king and council con cerning Bucer's death, and their respectful interment of him, with the signification of their desire, that his majesty would send them another able professor in his roomc. With this university-letter, Dr. Parker wrote another to sir John Cheke; entreating him to present their letter, and that he would particularly speak to the council, and to the archbishop of Canterbury, to remember the widow. Sir John Cheke, March 9, wrote a letter in answer to Dr. ParkerV ; which I have placed in the Appendix. He Number T TIC therein lamented the loss of this man : commended him for his depth of knowledge, earnestness in rehgion, father- liness in life, and authority in knowledge. He added, that the king would provide some grave learned man to maintain God's true learning in that university ; though he thought in all points they would not meet with Bucer's hke. He desired Parker, that all Bucer's books and writ ings might be sent up and saved for the king's majesty, b [C.C.C.C. MSS. No. cxix. p. 68.] <= [Id. No. cvi. p. 461.] d [Id. No. cxix. p. 79.] 302 MEMORIALS OF [II. 24. except Mrs. Bucer might turn them to better account some other waye. e [The following letter was also addressed by abp. Cranmer to Bucer's widow, in answer to one from her to him dated April 20, 1552, for a translation of which, see Orig. Letters of Engl. Re format, pp. 363, 4. Park. Soc. ed. — " S. P. Benevolentia singularis qua virum tuum cum adhuc vi- veret sum prosecutus, post mortem ej us nequaquam est imminuta. Si- quidem egregia ejus pietas et in- signis doctrina non momentaneos, verum a?ternos, fructus ecclesiae attulit ; quibus non tantum omnes pios, verum et me omnium maxime in perpetuam sibi devinxit. Quare a scribendo ad me ne ulla ratione patiaris te deterreri, si quid erit quod tibi aut rebus tuis adjumento esse possim. Nam literis tuis ex- citatus, et amici carissimi jucun- dam memoriam non absque vo- luptate mecum repetam, et tibi ejus viduse propenso animo ilia caritatis officia praestabo, quae verbum Dei suadet impendenda, et pietati tu» pro re nata exhi- benda fuerint. Atque de eo quod mihi nuper significasti negotiis tuis expediendis opus esse, ut ali- quo scripto certum ac testatum fieret, summam illam centum marcarum quam dono accepisti a majestate regia, cum hinc dis- cederes, ad te ipsam proprie ac singulariter pertinere, literas ad tutores * liberorum Buceri dedi ; * [i. e. Conrad Hubert, Quinter Andernach, and Huldric Chelius, to whom the following letter was also addressed by Cranmer. " S. P. Quum nuper in- tellexerim ex literis quas vidua D. Buceri pise memorise hue scripserat, ad facultates viri ejus jam defuncti partienda inter liberos, opus esse certa notitia seu fide quoad summam pecunise centum marcarum quse donata est a regia majestate an ad viduam pertineat an ad liberos ; ideo ut res liquida fiat, et ambiguitas prorsus tollatur, affirmo ac testor summam illam centum mar carum a serenissimo rege nostro post obitum D. Buceri viduss peculiariter fuisse donatam, ut ad ipsam proprie pertineret : ut ex literis quas Domini consiliarii ad qusestorem scripserunt manifeste liquet, quarum exemplar ad viduam D. Buceri misi. Deus Spiritu Sancto suo vos gubernet, et successum in laboribus vocationis vestrse vobis donet ! Valete. Lambethi xxmo Aprilis, 1552. Vester ex animo, T. Cantuabjen. Viris eruditione et pietate prsestantibus D. Conrado Huberto, verbi Dei ministro, D. Quintero Ander- naco, et D. HuMco Cheho, medicinse doctoribus, et ceteris tutoribus liberorum D. Buceri, dentur hse literse.""' T55O.] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 303 These books and papers were apprized at one hundred Bucer's li- pounds. But she received but fourscore pounds of those iary" that bought them. Which she desired Parker and Haddon, the executors here in England, to testify under their hands ; that she might shew it to vindicate her truth and honesty, not to have wronged the heirs. The hbrary was divided into three parts. The king had the manuscripts, which was one part ; the duchess [of Somerset, I suppose,] had the greater part of the books, and the archbishop of Canterbury had the remainder; for which he, for his share, paid her forty pounds. The university gave her an hundred crowns: the king an hundred marks more, 250 besides her husband's half year's pension, though he died before Lady-day, when it came due. He also allowed for such reasonable repairs as Bucer had bestowed about the house wherein he hved. And, March 31, 1551, she had His widow a passage by sea granted her with eight persons in her Germany. company. She returned unto Strasburgh, whither she retired, by Mr. Bichard Hills, merchant, the sum of two hundred twenty-six pounds two shillings. From Stras burgh, in February the next year, she wrote a letter to ex quibus apertis cognoscere po- Deus qui fons est et pater uni- terunt, quamam fuerit ea de re versse consolationis te consolari serenissimi regis nostri voluntas. dignetur, et in utroque nomine Mitto ad te exemplar literarum a cum tota familia servet ! — Vale. dominisconsuiariisadD.Joannem Lambeti xxmo Aprilis, a° 1552. Hales quaestorem regiae majestatis, Tuus quantum potest, (qui nunc opinorest Argentorati), T. Cantuarien." — aut eo absente ad ejus vicarium, The letter of Matthew Parker and Anglice scriptarum, qua? clare Walter Haddon to the guardians testantur tibi a regia majestate of Bucer's children, dated at centum marcas dono datas, idque Cambridge, 1551, with their ac- post obitum mariti tui, quod literae count of his property, may be ilia? ultimo Martii fuerunt scriptae, seen in Orig. Letters of the Engl. quum maritus tuus praecipitato Reformat, pp. 361, 2. Park. Soc. Februario ex hac vita decesserit. ed.] 304 MEMORIALS OF [II. 24. the executors, wherem she acknowledged their kindness to her, praying God for them, in respect of their singular humanity and benefits which they had shewed to her husband and herself, and especially when he was dead. " Miseram me," said she in that letter, " omnique solatio destitutam non deseruistis, sed in vestram me tutelam benigne suscepistis ; omnia denique Christianas charitatis officia demonstratisf." Bucer left a son named Nathaniel, and a daughter named Elizabeth, behind him, at Stras burgh, when he came into England: which, I suppose, were all the children he left surviving him, whom he had by a former wife that died of the plague there. By her he had many more, but they died before him. The corre- As long as Bucer hved, there was a dear correspondence spondence between between him and P. Martyr, while they were the one at Martyr Cambridge, and the other at Oxford. In the private J*^s- _ library at Benet college there be still remaining divers letters from Martyr to him : one whereof was writ upon occasion of Bucer's communicating to him his judgment of the habits; which he had composed for the use of Hopers. Which letter began thus : " S. P. Perlegi, Vir Dei, quas de vestium discrimine docte pieque scripsisti, ac ex illis non mediocrem volup- tatem cepi, turn quia vera quae prsedicas intelhgebam, turn quod per omnia consentiebant cum his, quas ego Londinum ad Hopperum ipsum, pridie ejus diei, qua tuse mihi red- derentur miseram." So that hence it appears they were both unanimous for wearing of the habits enjoined; and so had given their judgments to Hoper. In the same letter he answered a case put to him by Bucer, " Quamdiu fidem in Christo generalem, confusam aut imphcitam satis- fuisse ad hominum salutem." And the resolution of this f [C.C.C.C. MSS. No. cxix. p. 81.] e [Id. ibid. p. 105.] J55°-l ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 305 question being the chief matter of this letter, archbishop Parker, (into whose hands it fell), entitled it thus, " Quamdiu fides implicita licuerit." And on the margin of the same letter, where he entered upon another argument, is written by the same hand, " De concordi confessione in re sacramentaria." For k Lasco had lately wrote to Martyr his desire, that some confession about the sacrament might be drawn up ; to which he and Bucer, and Bernardine, and Martyr, might set their hands, to testify the foreign protestants' consent. Another letter, wrote by Martyr to Bucer, bore this title, set to it by the same hand with the former, "Quibus artibus instituerint disputationem theologicam in comitiis Oxoniensibus." And on the side of this letter, "Gaudet disputationem non esse factam, et astutia papistica in disputatione." In a third letter he gave Bucer advice, "that he should 251 not engage in any disputation with the vain-glorious papists." There is yet a fourth letter, wherein Martyr commu nicated to him how he had been employed by the arch bishop of Canterbury in taking into examination the Eng hsh book of Common Prayer, with his judgment thereon. This letter hath this title put to it by Parker, " Censura hbri communium precum." The contents of the second and fourth letter, having A plot of some things very remarkable for the illustration of oura/0PxonS 9 history, I shall here set down more largely. In the for-?fa"18t mer, having congratulated Bucer's coming off so well in an Act. his disputation with Young, the papist, he took notice of the unfair ways the papists used in their disputes : and then proceeded to tell what happened to himself the last Act at Oxford this year, by a party there, that did what CRANMER, VOL. II. X 306 MEMORIALS OF [II. 24. they could to affront him, and the evangelical truth, which he taught. Certam that then went out bachelors of di vinity made this combination among themselves. One of them they set up to be respondent. The opponents, who were of the same strain, and the question to be disputed, they suppressed, and kept under great silence ; on purpose that Peter Martyr, the king's professor, should not know : and when some had urged to them, that it belonged to the professor to know the question, they answered, that it did not ; and that it was enough for them to know it that were to dispute on it. The day before the disputation was to be undertaken, about two of the clock in the after noon, they set up the question upon the church-doors : and then it appeared to be in behalf of transubstantiation. And, to exclude the professor, they chose to themselves a great papist, Dr. Chedsey, for their father. And here the opponents were to have taken and managed all Martyr's arguments ; and the respondent was to have assoiled them as he thought good. And then the opponents were to acknowledge, they were satisfied with the answers given thereunto. And their father, who was to occupy the pro fessor's place, was by a speech highly to approve and ap plaud all that had been done. And things were so to be ordered that day, that the professor should not have any opportunity of speaking. For these disputations were to have been performed but a httle before night, after the civilians had finished their parts ; which used to be the last exercises. Or if, after this divinity-disputation were done, the professor had been minded to say any thing, he must do it when it was night, and when the tired au ditors would be all going home : and then these disputants and their party were every where to cry " victory," and carry away the glory. There was now observed a greater confluence of people at this Act than could have been be- l55°m~\ ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 307 heved : for they had sent about their letters to invite such hither as were for their own turn : and all to increase the triumph. Among the rest there were present the chap lains of Winchester and Durham. But all this elaborate and fine-spun plot was by a providence broken on a sud den; the vice-chancellor, whether he feared any riot, or for what other cause, it was uncertain, forbidding the 252 divinity-disputations that day, without the privity of the professor. The matter of Martyr's other letter, wrote to Bucer in Martyr's January, (as the former was in September before), related 0fthe'com- to the book of Common Prayer. For the correction of mumon- Book. which the archbishop, the bishop of Elys, and the other bishops were, by the king's command, met together in consultation. And that this work might be the more ef fectually performed, the archbishop thought good to have the judgment herein of both the pubhc professors, Bucer and Martyr. Accordingly Bucer wrote his "Censure," and Martyr his "Annotations," as was said before": apag. 210. copy of which "Censure" Bucer had communicated to Mar tyr, who in this letter declared his consent and approba tion thereunto. As to his own annotations, Cheke's Latin version, which he used, was so brief and defective, that for that reason many things were omitted by him, which he would have noted, had he seen the book complete. But after he had sent in those his annotations to the arch bishop, who earnestly required them, he saw Bucer's "Censure," whereby he perceived divers other things called for correction, than he had taken notice of. So he re duced whatsoever was wanting in his annotations into certain brief articles, and acquainted the archbishop there with ; and that in them all he did freely agree with Bucer, that it were fit they should be altered. But Martyr's an- * [Thomas Goodrich.] n [See above, p. 200 — 204.] x2 308 MEMORIALS OF [II. 24. notations did fully accord with Bucer's animadversions, though they were at a distance, and consulted not at all with one another before they wrote their judgments. But one thing was passed over by Bucer, which Martyr won dered at : it was in the office for the communion of the sick. Where it was ordered, " That if this private com munion happened to be on the same Sunday when there should be a public one, then the priest was to take along with him some of the consecrated elements, and with them to administer the sacrament in the house of the sick'. Wherein this offended Martyr," as he said, " that the office that belonged to the communion should not be repeated before the sick man, and the rest that communicated with him, since the words of the supper do rather belong to the men, than to the bread and wine. And his advice was, that all that was necessarily required to the Lord's supper should be said and done whensoever it was pri vately, as well as publicly, celebrated." He subscribed to Bucer's " Censure" in every thing ; and he thanked God, that had administered an occasion, that the bishops should by them be admonished of those matters. So that it was concluded by the bishops, at their conference about the communion-book, that much should be changed therein, as the archbishop told Martyr, then at his house : and if they would not do it, the king was resolved to do it by himself and his parliament, without them. In this letter he speaks something concerning Hoper, whose behaviour he disliked; and concerning Dr. Smith, who had lately written against the archbishop's book of the sacrament, and against himself concerning monastic vows. Both these letters, as well worthy the sight and perusal of the No. LX. reader, I have reposited in the Appendix. LXI. 253 Thus this reverend and learned foreigner, after many 1 [See Liturgies of Edward VI., p. 141. Park. Soc. ed.] ^O'l ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 309 great difficulties passed through for the cause of rehgion, Bucer's flying from one place to another, came at last to a natural|™s. death and a quiet end in this land. For his fame and wis dom he was called by the electors Palatine and of Bran- denburgh, with the emperor's permission, to temper the emperor's rescript about rehgion, which was to be pub hshed, that so it might please both parties. But he thought he could not do it with any honesty ; and, rather than meddle with it, he fled to Strasburgh with his wife and children : hereby he fell under the displeasure of those princes, as well as before he had done under that of the emperor for the reformation of Cologne; the envy of which Melancthon escaped, but it fell on poor Bucer. Being at Strasburgh, he also contracted much ill-will by means of the anabaptists and others, whom he opposed, and who, by their pretended sanctimony, had a great party there. His friends apprehended him on these accounts in great danger ; but he thought of no removal to any other place, patron, or church, trusting himself in God's hands, till Sturmius •> and some others advised him by all means to depart into England. Which he at length yielding to, the said Sturmius admonished him, for his safer travel, to take a more uncommon way, through Lorraine and Rheims, and some other parts of France, to Calais, and there to cross over the sea. Which he did, and was very hospitably here entertained, as was said before. Bishops Consecrated. June 29, John Ponet, or Poynet, D.D. chaplain to theponet. archbishop, was consecrated bishop of Bochester at Lam- J [i. e. John Sturmius, whose academy at Strasburgh, which the learning acquired him the name emperor Maximilian II. raised to of the "German Cicero," was an university in 1566, of which born a. d. 1507 at Sleidan, near Sturmius became the first rector; Cologne. In 1537 he formed an he died a.d. 1589.] 310 MEMORIALS OF [II. 24. beth chapel by the archbishop of Canterbury, assisted by Nicolas, bishop of London, and Arthur, bishop of Bangor. This consecration was performed with all the usual cere monies and habits, probably for this reason, to give as little occasion of offence to papists as might be, and to keep close to the old usages, avoiding superstition : there fore it was set down in the register at large in what for- Cranm. malities all was now done. The archbishop is described, Regist. . [fol. 330. b. " Usitatis insigniis redemitus, et uno epitogio, sive capa — 33 *'¦* indutus, oratorium suum prsedictum honeste et decenter ornatum ingressus," &c. " Having on his mitre and cope, usual in such cases, went into his chapel, handsomely and decently adorned, to celebrate the Lord's supper accord ing to the custom, and by prescript of the book, intituled, 'The Book of Common Service.' Before the people there assembled, the holy suffrages first began, and were pub hcly recited, and the Epistle and Gospel read in the vul gar tongue, Nicolas, bishop of London i, and Arthur, bishop of Bangor k, assisting; and having their surplices and copes on, and their pastoral staves in their hands, led Dr. John Ponet, endued with the like habits, in the middle of them, unto the most reverend father, and presented him unto him, sitting in a decent chair, and used these words; ' Most reverend father in God, we present unto you this godly and well-learned man to be consecrated bishop.' The bishop elect forthwith produced the king's letters patents before the archbishop : which, by command of 254 the said archbishop, being read by Dr. Glyn1, the said Ponet took the oath of renouncing the bishop of Borne, and then the oath of canonical obedience to the arch bishop. These things being thus dispatched, the arch bishop exhorted the people to prayer and supplication to i [Nicholas Ridley.] k [Arthur Bulkeley.] 1 [See p. 170. n. l.~\ I55°'J ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 311 the Most High, according to the order prescribed in the Book of Ordination, set forth in the month of March, 1549. According to which order he was elected and con secrated, and endued with the episcopal ornaments, the bishop of London first having read the third chapter of the first Epistle of Paul to Timothy, in manner of a ser mon. These things being done, and the sacrament of the Lord's supper celebrated upon a table, covered with a white linen cloth by the archbishop and the two assisting bishops, the same archbishop decreed to write to the arch deacon of Canterbury™ for the investiture, installation, and inthronization of the said bishop of Rochester, as it was customary. Present, Anthony Huse, principal re gister of the archbishop; Peter Lilly, John Lewis, John Lucent, pubhc notaries ; and many others, as well clerks as laics." March 8, John Hoper was consecrated bishop of Glo- Hoper. i.i ii-i [Cranm. cester, just after the same manner, by the archbishop ; Reg, f0i. Nicolas, bishop of London, and John, bishop of Rochester, 33z-^ assisting, clothed, (say the words of the register), in linen surplices and copes, and John, elect of Glocester in the like habit. m [Edmund Cranmer, who was was deprived in 1554. See Le collated to the archdeaconry of Neve's Fasti, p. 13.] Canterbury March 9, 1553, and book. 312 MEMORIALS OF [II. 2j. CHAPTER XXV. THE ARCHBISHOP PUBLISHETH HIS BOOK AGAINST GARDINER. Ann.i55i. This year our archbishop published his elaborate book Cranmer of the sacrament, confuting the gross and carnal presence publisheth „ . . his book of of Christ there, in vindication of a former book of his, ment?0™ wrote against by bishop Gardiner and Dr. Smith. For, to give the reader some distinct account of this matter, in the year 1550, Cranmer printed a book in English in His first quarto with this title ; " A defence of the true and ca tholic doctrine of the sacrament of the body and blood of our Saviour Christ ; with a confutation of sundry errors concerning the same : grounded and estabhshed upon God's Holy Word, and approved by the consent of the most ancient doctors of the church." The great rea son that moved him to write this book was, that he might the more effectually purge the church of popery ; esteem ing transubstantiation, and the mass, to be the very roots of it. " The taking away of beads, pilgrimages, pardons, and such-hke popery, was," (as he wrote in his preface), " but the lopping off a few branches, which would soon spring up again, unless the roots of the tree, which were transubstantiation, and the sacrifice of the mass, were pulled up. Therefore out of a sincere zeal to the honour of God, he would labour," he said, " in his vineyard, to cut down that tree of error root and branchs." By this book b [" But what availeth it to tion of his flock. The rest is but take away beads, pardons, pil- branches and leaves, the cutting grimages, and such other hke away whereof is but like topping popery, so long as two chief roots and lopping of a tree, or cutting remain unpulled up ? whereof, so down of weeds, leaving the body long as they remain, will spring standing, and the roots in the again all former impediments of ground ; but the very body of the the Lord's harvest, and corrup- tree, or rather the roots of the 155 1. J ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 313 very many were enhghtened to perceive the errors of the popish doctrines of the sacrament. This treatise he di vided into five books or points. I. Of the true and catho- 255 lie doctrine and use of the sacrament of the body and blood of [our Saviour] Christ. II. Against the error of transubstantiation. III. The manner how Christ is pre sent in the sacrament11. IAr. Of the eating and drinking of the body and blood of [our Saviour] Christ. V. Of the oblation and sacrifice of our Saviour Christ. In the third part he made mention of the bishop of Winchester', in these words: "As many of them [i. e. of the papist writers] as I have read," (the bishop of Winchester only excepted), do say, that Christ called not the bread his weeds, is the popish doctrine of transubstantiation, of the real pre sence of Christ's flesh and blood in the sacrament of the altar, (as they call it), and of the sacrifice and oblation of Christ made by the priest, for the salvation of the quick and the dead. 'Which roots, if they be suffered to grow in the Lord's vineyard, they will over spread all the ground again with the old errors and superstitions. "These injuries to Christ be so intolerable, that no Christian heart can willingly bear them. Wherefore seeing that many have set to their hands and whetted their tools, to pluck up the weeds, and to cut down the tree of error, I, not knowing otherwise how to excuse myself at the last day, have in this book set to my hand and axe with the rest, to cut down this tree, and to pluck up the weeds and plants by the roots, which our heavenly Father never planted, but were grafted and sown in his vineyard by his ad versary the devil, and antichrist his minister. The Lord grant, that this my travail and labour in his vineyard be not in vain, but that it may prosper, and bring forth good fruits to his honour and glory. For when I see his vineyard overgrown with thorns, brambles, and weeds, I know that everlasting woe appertaineth unto me, if I hold my peace, and put not to my hands and tongue to la bour in purging his vineyard." — Preface to the Reader, prefixed to the orig. ed. of the " Defence of the true and catholic doctrine of the sacrament, 1550." Works of abp. Cranmer, vol. i. p. 6. Park. Soc. ed. Jenkyns' Remains of abp. Cranmer, vol. ii. p. 289.] h[" In his supper." — Ed. 1550.] 1 [Stephen Gardiner.] 314 MEMORIALS OF [II. 25. bodyi." This bishop was much offended that he was named in the book, and pretended this to be one reason why he did write against it, to vindicate himself, as well as the papal church, hereby so dangerously struck atk. This book of Cranmer's was turned into Latin by John 5 ["Now let the papists shew some authority for their opinion, either of Scripture, or of some an cient author. And let them not constrain all men to follow their fond devices, only because they say it is so, without any other ground or authority but their own bare words. For in such wise credit is to be given to God's word only, and not to the word of any man. " As many of them as I have read, (the bishop of Winchester only excepted), do say, that Christ called not bread his body, nor wine his blood, when he said, 'This is my body, this is my blood.' And yet in expounding these words they vary among themselves ; which is a token that they be uncertain of their own doctrine." — Works of abp. Cranmer, vol. i. p. 105. Park. Soc. ed. Jenkyns' Remains of abp. Cranmer, vol. ii. p. 376.] k [" Forasmuch as among other mine allegations for defence of myself in this matter, moved against me by occasion of my sermon made before the king's most excellent majesty, touching partly the catholic faith of the most precious sacrament of the altar, which I see now impugned, by a book set forth under the name of my lord of Canterbury's grace; I have thought expedient for the better opening of the mat ter, and considering I am by name touched in the said book, the rather to utter partly that I have to say by confutation of that book ; wherein I think neverthe less not requisite to direct any speech by special name to the person of him that is entitled author, because it may possibly be that his name is abused, wherewith to set forth the mat ter, being himself of such dignity and authority in the common wealth, as for that respect should be inviolable. For which con sideration, I shall in my speech of such reproof as the untruth of the matter necessarily requir- eth, omitting the special title of the author of the book, speak only of the author in general, being a thing to me greatly to be marvelled at, that such matter should now be published out of my lord of Canterbury's pen; but because he is a man, I will not wonder, and because he is such a man, I will reverently use him, and forbearing further to name him, talk only of the author by that general name." — Works of abp. Cranmer, vol. i. p. 10. Park. Soc. ed. Jenkyns' Remains of abp. Cranmer, vol. iii. pp. 34, 35.] 155 1 -J ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 315 Young1 ; who comphed afterwards with the old rehgion under queen Mary, and was master of Pembroke Hall, Cambridge. At this book the defenders of popery were so nettled. Wrote that, in the same year 1550, Winchester then in the Gardiner Tower, and fickle Dr. Smith then at Louvain, printed and Smith- answers™. Of Smith's book I shall only note by the way, that, March 8, 1550, there was an order of council to examine the bringer over of his book against Cranmer" : such a countenance did the state give to the archbishop and his book. Gardiner's book made the greatest noise : which was printed in France, and intituled, "An ex plication and assertion of the true cathohc faith touching the most blessed sacrament of the altar, with the con futation of a book written against the same °." In the beginning of his book he wrote, " that his sermon before the king, [on St. Peter's day], touching the sacrament of the altar, gave occasion to the archbishop's book against it ; and that he was called before the king's commissioners at Lambeth for his cathohc faith in the sacrament P." 1 [See vol. i. pp. 151, 152, and sent special letters, which Sethe above, p. 170. n.m; see also Works dehvered. Being thought a matter of abp. Cranmer, vol. i. Defensio necessary to be examined, it was vers et cath. doct. &c. p. 2, resolved that Dr. Poynet now note.] named bishop of Winchester, Mr. m [The title of Smith's book Gosnall, and John Throgmorton was, " A Confutation of the true should have the examination of and cathohc doctrine."] the same matter." MSS. Council n [" At Westminster the 8th Book, a. d. 1550-1553. fol. 240. day of March, an° 1550.— Upon Harl. MSS. 352. Plut. lix. I. fol. knowledge that one Sethe had 157.] brought over certain evil books ° [" Made by Stephen, bishop made by Dr. Smith in France of Winchester, — and exhibited by against the bishop of Canterbury his own hand for his defence to and Peter Martyr's book; foras- the king's majesty's commis- much as he directed his said books sioners at Lambeth."] to divers persons byname, and also P [See above, p. 314. n. k.] 316 MEMORIALS OF [II. 25. Whereas indeed this was not the cause of his troubles; nor had some former copies of his book these words : but, after the commission was issued forth against him, to make his cause appear the more specious, as if it were the cause of the church, he thought fit to make an alteration in the beginning of his book in the manner abovesaid: and, to carry on the scene, he in open court offered his book before the king's commissioners. Vindicated To this book of Gardiner's our archbishop studied and in another 11n. i ¦ i p i book by the composed an answer ; holding himself bound, for the °P- vindication of the evangehcal truth, as well as of his own writing, and for the satisfaction of the people, not to suffer it to he untaken notice of. When it was known the archbishop was preparing an answer against Gardiner, the people were in very great expectation, and conceived an earnest desire to see and read it : having therefore dis patched his copy, and sent it to Rainold Wolf, his printer, it was printed off in the month of September 1551. But there was some stop put to the publishing of it, occasioned by a proclamation issued out from the king ; whereby, for some political ends, both the printing and selling of English books, without the allowance of the king's majesty, or six of his privy-council, was forbidden p. The archbishop, being desirous that his book might come abroad the next term, for the contentation of many who 256 had long expected the same, sent to secretary Cecyl and sir John Cheke to procure, either from the king or council, a license to the said Wolf for printing and selling his book; which was obtained, and the book pubhshed accordingly. This letter of the archbishop's, dated Sept. No. lxii. 29, I have thought not amiss to reposit in the Appendix. October 1, a license was granted to Wolf to publish the p [See Wilkins' Concilia, vol. the king's most honorable privy- iv. pp. 1, 2. where it is " four of council.""1 I551-] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 317 book, under the king's privilege, the court then being at Hampton-court, and the archbishop himself present «i. The title this second book of the archbishop's bore was, "An answer by the reverend father in God, Thomas, archbishop of Canterbury, primate of all England, and metropohtan, unto a crafty and sophistical cavillation, devised by Stephen Gardiner, doctor of law, late bishop of Winchester, against the true and godly doctrine of the most holy sacrament of the body and blood of our Saviour Christ. Wherein is also, as occasion serveth, answered such places of the book of Dr. Richard Smith, as may seem any thing worthy the answering. Also a true copy of the book written, and in open court de hvered, by Dr. Stephen Gardiner, not one word added or diniinished, but faithfully in all points agreeing with the original." This book of archbishop Cranmer's was printed again at London, 1580, with his life, and some other things r. His reply to Gardiner was in the most fair and candid Themethod method that could be devised : for he first set down his mshop"C " own treatise, piece by piece ; then Gardiner's reply there- revlJ- 9 ["At Hampton-court the ist he hath beautified Gardiner's of October, an°. 1551. — A letter to doings, with as much diligence Raynard Wolfe, printer, licensing as might be, by applying notes in him to publish and setto sale under the margin, and marks to the the king's majesty's privilege, the doctor's sayings, which before book lately by him imprinted and wanted in the first impression. set out by the archbishop of Canter- Hereunto is prefixed the discourse bury against Dr. Gardiner's book." of the said archbishop's life and MSS. Council Book, a. d. 1550- martyrdom, briefly collected out 1553- fol- 401. Harl. MSS. 352. of his history of the Acts and Plut. lix. I. fol. 203, b.] Monuments, and in the end is r [i, e. by John Day, a. d. added certain notes, wherein 1580 ; " revised and corrected by Gardiner varied both from him- the said archbishop at Oxford self and other papists, gathered before his martyrdom ; wherein by the said archbishop."] 318 MEMORIALS OF [II. 25. unto, word for word, leaving not one paragraph without a full answer. His reply to Smith was only of some things most worthy to be taken notice of, the rest of Smith's book being mere trifles. This reply to Smith he inserted in the body of his answer to Gardiner, as occasion served : only at the end he made a particular reply to Smith's preface s. The judg- It seemed to be a very complete exercitation upon that ortMs™ e subject. The book was stored with so great learning and ln°A ti plenty °f arguments, " Ut ea controversia," saith one of Brit. his successors (, " a nemine unquam contra pontificios accuratius tractata esse videatur;" "That no one con troversy was by any ever handled against the papists more accurately." It may not be amiss to mention here the opinion that Cranmer himself had of his book, in that famous and renowned confession he made of his faith in St. Mary's church, Oxon, immediately before he was led away to his burning. Where he expressed his full ap probation and great confidence of the doctrine contained Foxe' s Acts. therein : saying, "that as for the sacrament, he believed as he had taught in his book against the bishop of Win chester. The which book," he said, "taught so true a doctrine of the sacrament, that it should stand at the last s [See Works of abp. Cranmer, accuratius tractata esse videatur. vol. i. pp. 368-379. Park. Soc. Contra hunc librum Stephanus ed.] Gardinerus, Wintoniensis epis- * [" Cranmerus domi otium copus, Turri Londiniensi inclusus, omne suum sacris literis impar- furtim et prolixe in eo libro in- tivit, scripsitque, contra pontifi- vectus est, quem Marcum Con- ciorum sententiam illam crassam stantium nominavit. Atque hunc atque carnalem in sancta; coena? rursus Cranmero postea mortuo sacramento Christi preesentiam Petrus Martyr docte refelht et re- affirmantium, tanta doctrina et futavit." — Parker, de Antiq. Brit. argumentorum copia refertum Eccl. in Cranmer. p. 400. ed. librum, ut ea controversia a ne- 1572.] mine unquam contra pontificios 155I-] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 319 day before the judgment of God, where the papistical doctrine, contrary thereto, should be ashamed to shew her faceu." The papists spake as much against this book, being much galled by it. Dr. Tresham, in his dis putation with Latimer, said, "there were six hundred errors in the book." Weston, thinking to invalidate the book by the pretended novelty of the doctrine, asked the same father, "how long he had been of that opinion?" He said, "not past seven years;" that is, about the year 1547; "and that archbishop Cranmer's book confirmed his judgment therein :" and added, "that if he could but remember all therein contained, he would not fear to answer any man in this matter w." The archbishop had acknowledged to the queen's com- 257 missioners at Oxford, that Eidley had first begun to en- H°w the hghten him as to the true notion of the presence, as he came off had maintained it in his book". Hereupon one of them o^nion^f took occasion to try to baffle the true doctrine, by making the corporal . presence. the whole stress of it to depend upon the authority of single Eidley. Latimer, said he, leaned upon Cranmer, and Cranmer leaned upon Eidleyy. Whereas the truth ° [See Foxe's Acts and Monu- Gloucester.) Foxe's Acts and Mo ments, p. 1887. ed. Lond. 1583.] numents, p. 1877. ed. Lond. 1583.] w [Id. p. 1456. See also vol. i. y ["Gloucester*. — If you would p. 152. n. k.] once empty your stomach, cap- x [" I grant that then I believed tivate your senses, subdue your otherwise than I do now ; and so reason, and together with us con- I did, until my lord of London, sider what a feeble ground of doctor Ridley, did confer with your religion you have, I do not me, and by sundry persuasions doubt but you might easily be and authorities of doctors drew induced to acknowledge one me quite from my opinion." church with us, to confess one (Exam, before Brokes, bishop of faith with us, and to believe one * [i. e. James Brokes, S.T.P., who was consecrated bishop of Gloucester, after the deprivation and martyrdom of Hooper, April 1, 1554. See Le Neve's Fasti, p. 101.] 320 MEMORIALS OF [II. 25. of this was no more, but that Eidley, reading Bertram's book of the body and blood of Christ2, was sharpened to examine the old opinion more accurately, of the presence of Christ's flesh and blood; and looking into ecclesiastical authors, he found it greatly controverted in the ninth century, and learnedly writ against: which made him begin to conclude it none of the ancient doctrines of the church, but more lately brought into it. These his thoughts he communicated to archbishop Cranmer, which was about the year 1546: whereupon they both set to examine it with more than ordinary care : and all the arguments that Cranmer gathered about it he digested into his book a. Nor was the good archbishop ashamed religion with us. For what a weak and feeble stay in religion is this, I pray you ? Latimer leaneth to Cranmer, Cranmer to Ridley, and Ridley to the singularity of his own wit : so that if you over throw the singularity of Ridley's wit, then must needs the religion of Cranmer and Latimer fall also." (Last Exam, of Ridley before the commissioners.) Foxe's Acts and Monuments, p. 1765.] z ["The celebrated work of Bertramus, or Ratramnus, ' de corpore et sanguine Domini,' is here alluded to. An English translation by William Hugh had shortly before this time, viz. in 1548, been printed, under the title of 'a book of Bertram the priest.' It is supposed that Ridley met with it in the year 1545 or 1546." — Ridley's Works, p. 159. n. 3. Park. Soc. ed.] a [" Now concerning God's vocation, how Dr. Ridley was first called to the savouring and favoring of Christ, and his gospel, partly by his disputation before, and other his treatises, it may appear, that the first occasion of his conversion was by reading of Bertram's book of the Sacrament, whom also the conference with bishop Cranmer and with Peter Martyr did not a little confirm in that behalf." Foxe's Acts and Monuments, p. 1718. ed. Lond. 1583. — " During all this mean time of king Henry aforesaid, until the entering of king Edward, it seemeth that Cranmer was scarcely yet throughly persuaded in the right knowledge of the sacrament, or at least, was not yet fully ripened in the same : wherein shortly after he being more groundly confirmed by con ference with bishop Ridley, in process of time did so profit in i55J-J ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 321 to make a public acknowledgment in print of this, as well as of his other popish errors, in his answer to Smith's Preface, who, it seems, had charged him with inconstancy. "This I confess of myself, that, not long before I wrote the said catechism, I was in that error of the real presence, as I was many years past in many other errors, as of transubstantiation, of the sacrifice propitiatory of the priests in the mass, of pilgrimages, of purgatory, &c. being brought up from my youth in them. For the which, and other the offences of my youth, I do daily pray unto God for pardon and mercy. After it pleased God to shew me, by his holy word, a more perfect know ledge of his Son Jesus Christ, I put away my former ignorance. As God gave me light, so through his grace I opened my eyes to receive it. And I trust in God's mercy for pardon of my former errors'." I set this more riper knowledge that at last he took upon him the defence of that whole doctrine, that is to refute, and throw down, first, the corporal presence; secondly, the fantastical transubstantiation ; thirdly, the idolatrous adoration ; fourthly, the false error of the papists, that wicked men do eat the natural body of Christ; and lastly, the blasphemous sacrifice of the mass. Whereupon in con clusion he wrote five books for the instruction of the church of England, which instruction yet to this day standeth, and is received in this church of England." Id. p. 1870.] 1 [" But this I confess of my self, that not long before I wrote the said catechism, I was in that error of the real presence, as I CRANMER, VOL. II. was many years past in divers other errors : as of transubstan tiation, of the sacrifice propitiatory of the priests in the mass, of pilgrimages, purgatory, pardons, and many other superstitions and errors that came from Rome; being brought up from youth in them, and nousled therein for lack of good instruction from my youth, the outrageous floods of papistical errors at that time over flowing the world. For the which, and other mine offences in youth, I do daily pray unto God for mercy and pardon, saying, ' de- lictajuventutis meae et ignorant ias meas ne memineris, Domine.' ' Good Lord, remember not mine ignorances and offences of my youth.' But after it had pleased God to shew to me, by his holy 322 MEMORIALS OF [II. 25. down the more at large, to shew the great ingenuity as well as piety of this good man. The arch- Peter Martyr, in the year following this, printed a book great skill of the sacrament, which was the sum of what he had read troversy.0"" Defore uPon tnat Pomt m tte university of Oxford ; which book he dedicated to his patron, the archbishop of Canter bury : and, giving the reason why he made the dedication to him, said, " That he knew certainly that Cranmer had so great skill in this controversy, as one could hardly find in any one besides. That there was none of the Fathers which he had not diligently noted ; no ancient or modern book extant, that he [Martyr] had not with his own eyes seen noted by the archbishop's hand. Whatsoever be longed to the whole controversy, he said that the arch bishop had digested into particular chapters; councils, canons, popes' decrees, pertaining hereunto: and that with so great labour, that, unless he had been an eye witness of it and seen it, he could not easily have believed others, if they had told him, in regard of the infinite toil, diligence, and exactness, wherewith the archbishop had done it." He added, "that the archbishop had not be stowed such kind of pains and study in the matter of the 258 sacrament only, but that he had done the same thing as word, a more perfect knowledge norance. And now I may say of of his Son Jesus Christ, from myself, as St. Paul said : 'When I time to time as I grew in know- was like a babe or child in the ledge of him, by little and little I knowledge of Christ, I spake like put away my former ignorance. a child, and understood like a And as God of his mercy gave me child ; but now that I come to light, so through his grace I man's estate, and growing in opened my eyes to receive it, and Christ, through his grace and did not wilfully repugn unto God, mercy, I have put away that child- and remain in darkness. And I ishness.'" — Answer to Smith's trust in God's mercy and pardon Preface, Works of abp. Cranmer, for my former errors, because I vol. i. p. 374. Park. Soc. ed.] erred but of frailness and '8'- I^-J ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. to all other doctrines, in effect, which in that age were especially under controversy. And this, that learned man said, he had made good observation of. Nor," as he went on, "that he wanted skill, a method, and industry in de fending what he held. Which might," he said, " be known by this, because he had so often conflicted with his ad versaries, both pubhcly and privately, and by a marvellous strength of learning, quickness of wit, and dexterity of management, had asserted what he held to be true, from the thorny and intricate cavils of sophisters ; [glancing at his controversies with Winchester, who was commonly then called the sophister;] and that he wanted not a will, yea, a mind ready to defend sound and Christian doctrines. That all men did sufficiently understand, who saw him burn with so great an endeavour of restoring rehgion, that for this cause only he had great and heavy enemies, and neglected many commodities of this life, and underwent horrible dangers i." The great and intimate i ["At controversiae hujus tan- operam, studium, laboremque, tam peritiam habere tuam celsitu- solum in hoc eucharistico negotio dinem, certe scio, quantam in ullo impendisti, verum idem quoque alio difficile quis reperiat. Nullus abs te factum observavi, quo ad profecto est ex patribus, quem omnia fere alia dogmata, quae non diligentissime observaris. Ne- nostra hac astate maxime sunt in que veterum aut recentiorum libri controversia. — Ars etiam, ratio, et ulli extant, in quibus ego hisce industria tuendi quae amplecteris, oculis non viderim tua ipsius nequaquam tuam celsitudinem de- manu adnotatum, quicquid ad ficit. Quod inde possumus edo- universam hanc disputationem ceri, quia saepius cum adversariis pertinet. Concilia, canones, ponti- et publice et privatim es conflic- ficum decreta, quae hue spectant, tatus, et mira ut doctrinae, ingenii ipse tanto labore, quo ad hanc acrimonia, et agendi dexteritate, tractationem, in praecipua capita quae vera esse cognoveras, a so- digessisti, ut hasc nisi testis ocula- phistarum spinosis et intricatis tus deprehendissem, nunquam cavillis, asseruisti. Quam vero aliis narrantibus facile fuissem non desit voluntas, imo praesen- crediturus. Neque hujus generis tissimum animum habeas ad y2 324 MEMORIALS OF [II. 25- converse that P. Martyr had with Cranmer, gave him op portunity to know him very well : and therefore I have chosen to set down this character that he gave of him, and particularly of his ability in this controversy of the eucharist. P. Martyr And I am apt to think that the careful perusal. of these byhCran-ed authorities, collected by the archbishop, and his conver- mer- sation with this learned prelate, being much with him at Lambeth, was a cause of bringing Martyr to the true doctrine : for, at his first coming to Oxon, he was a papist, or a Lutheran, as to the behef of the presence. And so Foxe' sActs. Feckenham k, dean of St. Paul's, told Bartlet Green at his tuenda sana et Christiana dog mata, omnes pii satis intelligunt, qui tanto studio religionis in- staurand* te flagrare viderunt, ut hac una de causa gravissimas inimicitias susceperis, multa com- moda hujus vita; neglexeris, et horribilia pericula subieris." — Epist. nuncup. R.D.T.Cranmero. Tractat. de sacrament, ed. Lond. I549-] k [" Feck.— At last Fecknam * demanded of him, how long he had been of his opinion : ' for master Greene,' said he, 'you confessed once to me, that when you were at Oxford at school, you were called the rankest papist in that house; and being compelled to go to the lecture of Peter Martyr, you were converted from your old doctrine.' Greene. — And Greene confessed the same. Feck. — Then again he said, that Greene told him, that the said Peter Martyr was a papist in his first coming to Oxford. Whereupon he made an exclamation, and prayed the people to consider how vain his doctrine that he professed was, which was grounded upon one man, and that upon so unconstant a man as Peter Martyr, which per ceiving the wicked intent of the council, was content to please them, and forsake the true and catholic faith. Greene. — Greene said that he grounded not his faith upon Martyr, nor any other, nor did believe so because Martyr believed the same, but because that he had heard the Scriptures, and the doctors of the church truly and wholesomly expounded by bim; neither had he any re gard of the man, but of the word which he spake. And further he said, that he heard the said master Peter say often, that he had not as yet, while he was a papist, read * [See above, p. 123. n. b.] 1551O ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 325 examination; and that Martyr, perceiving the king's council, as he uncharitably suggested, to be of another opinion, he, to please them, forsook the true catholic faith. But Mr. Green, who had been a hearer of him at Oxon, rephed, that he had heard Martyr say, " That he had not, while he was a papist, read St. Chrysostom upon the tenth to the Corinthians, nor many other places of the doctors : but when he had read them, and well con sidered them, he was content to yield to them, having first humbled himself in prayer, desiring God to illuminate Chrysostome upon the ioth to the (i) Corinthians, nor many other places of the doctors : but when he had read them, and well con sidered them, he was content to yield to the doctors, having first humbled himself in prayer, desir ing God to illuminate him, and bring him to the true understand ing of the Scripture : ' which thing,' said Greene, 'if you, my lord, would do, I do not doubt but God would open your eyes, and shew you his truth, no more than I do doubt his words to be true, that saith, ' ask, and it shall be given to you; knock, and it shah be opened unto you,' " &c. — Foxe's Acts and Monuments, p. 1854. ed. Lond. 1583. '"Peter Martyr,' saith he, 'at his first com ing to Oxford, when he was but a Lutheran in this matter, taught as Dr. Smith now doth. But when he cameonceto thecourt,and saw that doctrine misliked them that might do him hurt in his living, he anon after turned his tippet, and sang another song.' Of M. Peter Martyr's opinion and judgment in this matter, no man can better testify than I; forasmuch as he lodged within my house long before he came to Oxford, and I had with him many conferences in that matter, and know that he was then of the same mind that he is now, and as he defended after openly in Oxford, and hath written in his book. And if Dr. Smith understood him otherwise in his lectures at the beginning, it was for lack of knowledge, for that then Dr. Smith understood not the matter, nor yet doth not, as it appeareth by this foolish and un learned book, which he hath now set out : no more than he under stood my book of the catechism, and therefore reporteth untruly of me, that I in that book did set forth the real presence of Christ's body in the sacrament." — Answer to Smith's Preface, Works of abp. Cranmer, pp. 373, 4. Park. Soc. ed. See also Strype's Eccl. Mem. vol. ii. pt. i. pp. 190, 1. ed. Oxon. 1822.] 326 MEMORIALS OF [II. 25. him, and bring him to the true understanding of Scrip ture." Foxe's con- As to the authorities the archbishop allegeth in his the arch- book, it was the conjecture of John Foxe, that he made bishop. Qge Qf July's book, which he wrote of the sacrament against More, divers years before; and that from the said. author the archbishop seemed to have collected the testi monies of the doctors, which he produced in his apology against the bishop of Winchester : and that he gathered the principal and chiefest helps thence, that he leaned to1- But although he might peruse Frith, as he did almost all other authors that wrote of this controversy, yet he was too well versed in the ecclesiastical writers, that he needed to go a borrowing to the readings of any others, for sen tences and allegations out of them. A second Cranmer hved to see his book replied again unto by his Gardiner adversary Gardiner, in Latin, under the feigned name of agamst the ]yiarcus Antonius Constantius, a divine of Louvain. His archbishop. 259 D0°k went under this title, " Confutatio cavillationum, quibus sacrosanctum eucharistiEe sacramentum ab im- piis Capharnaitis impeti solet." Printed at Paris, 1552™. In this book he spared the name of the archbishop, but 1 [" And as it were a great much whether the archbishop ever labor, so do I think it not much gave any more credit unto any necessary to repeat all his (Frith's) author of that doctrine, than unto reasons and arguments, or the this aforesaid Frith." — Foxe's testimonies, which he had gathered Acts and Monuments, p. 1033. ed. out of the doctors : specially for- Lond. 1583.] somuch as the archbishop of m [This book was not pubhshed Canterbury, Cranmer, in his at Paris but at Louvain; there apology against the bishop of were two editions also of it, the Winchester, seemeth to have col- first issued a. d. 1552, and the lected them abundantly, gathering second 1554. See Watts' Biblo- the principal and chiefest helps thee. Brit. (Authors) vol. i. col. from thence that he leaned unto 400 v. ed. Edinb. 1824.] against the other : and I doubt I55I,J ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 327 reduceth all the archbishop's book into no less than two hundred and fifty-five objections : to each of which, one by one, the cathohc is brought in making answer. Next, whereas Cranmer had laid down twelve rules for the find ing out the true sense of the Fathers in their writings, the cathohc examines them, and enervates them. Then follows a confutation ofthe solutions, whereby the "sectary," as he is called, (that is, Cranmer), endeavoured to take off the arguments of the cathohcs. And, which is the fourth and last part of the book, he defends cathohc men's sense of the allegations out of the Fathers against the sectaries. Gar diner, when he compiled this book, was in the Tower a pri soner ; but yet he was under so easy restraint, that he was furnished there with workmen and amanuenses. " As they Preface to ~P Msrtvr's of old to the building of the tabernacle, so he to the pre- book in de- paring of his book, a kind of papistical tabernacle, [to use^nce ofr the words of Martyr,] all sorts contributed something. For his book was Pandora's box, to which all the lesser gods brought their presents. For every man, were his learning less or more, that had any arguments for the popish doctrine, brought them all to him, (many whereof were windy and trivial enough), and he out of the heap made his collections as he thought good"." But Watson and Smith were his chief assistants. n ["Taceo enim non ita me in- tumultuarii milites, videantur ali- structum fuisse ab opibus, ut tot quid contulisse. Est enim haec, operas, et amanuenses alere po- ne nescias lector, Pandora? pyxis, tuerim, quibus Gardinerus, etiam in quam omnes etiam Minorum cum in carcere esset, ita abundavit, gentium dii sua munuscula con- ut quemadmodum ohm ad exa?di- gesserunt. Nam, ut olim, quem- ficandum tabernaculum, ita hie ad admodum est in fabulis, Ulyssi ornandum istum librum, ceu ta- navigaturo jGolus ventos omnes bernaculum quoddam papistarum, in utrem contrusos in manum omnes, quicunque tunc essent in dedit, ut ille cum soluisset in illorum castris, etiam rustici, et altum, eis pro suo arbitrio utere- 328 MEMORIALS OF [II. 25. The arch-- The archbishop, though the times now soon after turned, bishop be gins a third and he cast into prison, was very desirous to prepare an- n°ts no't'to other book in confutation of Marcus Antonius, and in vin- finishit. dication of his own writing. He hved long enough to finish three parts : whereof two unhappily perished in Oxford, and the third fell into John Foxe's hands, and for aught I know, that by this time is perished also0. But the great desire he had to finish his answer to that book was the chief cause that, at his last appearance before the queen's commissioners, he made his appeal to a general council : that thereby he might gain some time and leisure to accomplish what he had begun, before his life were taken away, which, he saw, was hkely to be within a very short space. " Otherwise," [as he writ to his lawyer, who was tur : ita isti Gardinero, cum nescio quid contra nos moliretur, omnia sua argumenta, satis ea quidem ventosa et levia tradiderunt, ut ille ex acervo deligeret, quicquid vellet et sibi alieno vento vela faceret." — (Praefat. ad Lect.) Doct. vet. et apost. de Eucharist. Sacrament. P. Martyr, defens. ed. Tigur. 1559.] 0 [" The unquiet spirit of Ste phen Gardiner being not yet con tented, after all this thrusteth out another book in Latin of the like popish argument, but after an other title, named Marcus Anto nius Constantius. Whereunto first the archbishop again intend ing a full confutation, had already absolved three parts of his an swer lying in prison. Of the which parts, two perished in Ox ford : the other yet remaineth in my hands ready to be seen and set forth, as the Lord shall see good. Also bishop Ridley lying likewise the same time in prison, having there the said book of Marcus Antonius, for lack of pen and paper, with a lead of a win dow in the margin of the book wrote annotations, as straightness of time would serve him, in re futation of the same book. And finally, because those worthy mar tyrs had neither liberty nor lei sure to go through with their travail, that which lacked in them for accomphshment of that behalf was supplied shortly after by Peter Martyr, who abundantly and substantially hath over thrown that book in his learned defension of the truth, against the false sophistication of Mar cus Antonius aforesaid." — Foxe's Acts and Monuments, p. 1870. ed. Lond. 1583.] 155 1. J ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 329 to draw up his appeal], "it was much better for him to die in Christ's quarrel, and to reign with him, than to be shut up and kept in that body : unless it were to con tinue yet still awhile in this warfare, for the commodity and profit of his brethren, and to the further advancing of God's gloryP." Peter Martyr, his surviving and learned friend, being Martyr solicited by many Enghshmen by letter and word oftneequiOTel. mouth, undertook the answering this book. But before he had finished it, an Enghsh divine and friend of Mar tyr's, with whom he held correspondence in queen Mary's reign, wrote him word, in the year 1557, that an answer to Antonius, by some other hand, was then in the press, naming the author. Martyr rephed, " That he was rather Mart.Epist. glad of it, than any ways moved or disturbed at it, as a disappointment of what he was doing :" and added, " that he expected nothing from that man but what was very exquisite, acute, and elaborate; but that he feared the260 noise thereof would not hold truei." And so it proved. Whether this learned man withdrew his book, that he might give way to that which P. Martyr was writing, or P["Potissima sane appellationis aliquandiu militare; cui sit omnis mea? causa est, ut, (si ita Deus gloria in aavum. Amen." — Let- voluerit), donetur eousque vivendi ter to a Lawyer, Works of abp. tempus, quousque coeptum con- Cranmer, vol. ii. p. 455. Park. tra Marcum Antoniura Constan- Soc. ed.] tium responsum absolvero. Quod 1 [" De libro D. Cantuariensis si veritatis hostes meae appella- in Antonium, qui, ut scribis, jam tionideferre nolint, (quod existi- est sub praelo, gaudeo, tantum mo), fiat voluntas Dei, susque de- abest ut quicquam ea causa mo- que fero, modo glorificetur Deus, vear. Nihil enim quod non sit sive per vitam, sive per mortem. expolitum, acutum et elaboratum, Melius est enim multo mori pro ex eo viro expecto. Sed vereor Christoetcumilloregnare.quamin ne quod audivisti non sit verum." hoc carnis ergastulo concludi, nisi — Mart. Epist. ad calc. loc. com- in fratrum utilitatem ad majorem mun. p. 11 18. ed. Tigur. 1587.] Dei gloriam propagandam liceat 330 MEMORIALS OF [II. 25. whether it were a flam given out to stop Martyr in his design, it is uncertain. But not long after this learned Italian put forth his answer. He had it under the press P. Martyr at Zurich in December 1558 ; and it came out the next Ep. . year. Wherein, as he wrote to Calvin, he did unravel and confute all the sophisms and tricks of the bishop of Winchester r. And it came forth very seasonably, as Martyr hoped. For hereby the English papahns might see, at this time especially, that that book was not, as they boasted hitherto, invincible. He gave this title to his book, "Defensio doctrinse veteris et Apostolicae de S. S. Eucharistia? sacramento." In the preface to which he shewed, " How this work fell to his lot : not that that most reverend father wanted an assistant, for he could easily have managed Gardiner himself. For he knew how Cranmer, in many and various disputes formerly had with him, came off with victory and great praise; but because the archbishop, when in prison, was forced to leave his answer, which he had begun, unfinished, by rea son of his strait keeping, having scarce paper and ink allowed him, and no books to make use of ; and being cut off so soon by death, before he could bring to perfection what he had writs." Wherein, as Martyr said, he had r [" Nihil praeterea novi habeo, tas mihi fuisse, et veheinentes nisi quod meum librum sub praslo causas. Nam cum doctissimus habeo, quo Stephani Gardineri juxta ac sanctissimus vir, D. olim Vintoniensis episcopi omnia Thomas Cranmerus, archiepisco- sophismata et praestigias de re pus nuper Cantuariensis, earn in se eucharistica retexi et confutavi." provinciam suscepisset, quem sci- — Calvin Epist. et Respons. p. rem isto papistarum Achille in 133. ed. Amstel. 1667.] omni genere literarum longe esse s [" Primum ergo, si forte mi- superiorem, quod ego non adula- raris me ad hoc opus ita tarde tionis causa dico, (quis enim adu- aggressum esse, illudque nunc letur homini mortuo), sed quod tandem ita sero edere, scire debes, ilium sciam ex multis, et variis ejus lam diuturnae dilationis jus- disputationibus, quas habuit ali- 155 ' -J ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 331 harder measure by far from the papists, than Gardiner had from the protestants in king Edward's days, when he wrote his book. Gardiner, in that book of his under the name of M [ar- Cranmer cus] Constantius, had shewn such foul play with Cranmer's book of th* book, mangling it, and taking pieces and scraps of it here sacrament and there, and confounding the method of it, to supply himself with objections to give his own answers to with the most advantage ; that the archbishop thought, that if learned foreigners saw but his first book of the sacrament, as he wrote it, it would be vindication enough against Gardiner's new book against it : and therefore he took order to have it translated into the same language in which Gardiner wrote, that is, Latin, that impartial stran gers might be able to read and judge : and sir John Cheke elegantly performed it for his friend the archbishop'. This book of Cranmer's thus put into Latin, with some additions, came forth 1553. Before it he prefixed an epistle to king Edward VI. dated at Lambeth, idib. Mart. the same year : wherein he said, " It was his care of the Lord's flock committed to him, that put him upon renew ing and restoring the Lord's supper according to the in stitution of Christ. And that that was the reason that, about three years ago, he set forth a book in Enghsh quando cum Vintoniensi, et cum nique constanter tulit, sublatus victoria, et summa cum laude esset, opus, quod jam habebat discessisse, non putavi esse pu- prae manibus, coactus est relin- doris mei, ut illi tam sanctum, quere inchoatum."— (Prafat. ad tamque pium institutum praeri- Lect.) P. Martyr. Defens. doct. perem. At ille, cum in carcere vet. et apost. de eucharist. sacra- arctissima custodia observaretur, ment. ed. Tigur. 1559.] ubi vix charta ad scribendum, t[Seeabove, pp.314,315, where nedum librorum copia suppeteret, this translation is attributed to et postremo cum durissima morte, John Young.] quam in verse fidei confessione de- 332 MEMORIALS OF [II- 25- against the principal abuses of the papistical mass." Which book had great success upon the people's minds, in bringing them to embrace the truth. "Whereby," he said, " he perceived how great the force of truth was, and understood the benefits of the grace of Christ, that even the blind should have their eyes opened, and par take of the light of truth, as soon as it was revealed, and shewed itself clearly to them. But that this gave great offence unto Gardiner, then bishop of Winchester, so that he thought nothing was to be done till he had answered 261 the book, supposing that there would be no helper of so declining and forsaken a cause, unless he put to his handu." And so the archbishop proceeded to shew how u [" Pro cura dominici gregis mihi commissa, in quo salutari pastu verbi divini erudiendo om nem curam cogitationemque me am collocare debeo, illustrissime princeps, ccenam Domini, (quae multis et magnis superstitionibus violata est, et ad quasstum trans- lata), renovandam ad Servatoris Christi instituta et redintegran- dum putavi ; et de vero ejus usu et verbi divini et veteris ac sanctse ecclesias auctoritate commonefaci- endos esse omnes judicavi, quo rum cura et instructio ad officii mei auctoritatem aliqua ex parte pertinet. Itaque ante triennium missa5papisticaeabususpra?cipuos, (quibus non modo ecclesia An- glica, sed etiam totus pene orbis fcedatus atque infectus fuerat), libello quodam Anglo confutavi, et verum atque Christianum ejus usum restituendum docui. Quo libro ita multi sunt ad sanam de ea re opinionem adducti, ut veri- tatis vim, quanta esset, sentirem, et gratiae Servatoris Christi bene- ficia intelligerem, ut ad veritatis lucem patefactam occaecati ho mines splendorem lucis acciperint, et, (ut Paulus prasdicante Anania), oculorum aciem perciperent. Hoc ita aegre Stephanus Gardinerus Wintoniensis turn episcopus tu- lerat, ut nihil sibi prius faciendum putarit, quam ut librum tam uti- lem et plausibilem confutaret, ratus nisi opera sua aliqua im pedimenta objicerentur, nullos de- ploratae jam et derelictae pene sentential adjutores fore. Itaque eadem ipse lingua librum iisdem de rebus conscribit, et firmatam jam de vero caena? usu senten- tiam evertere conatur, et papisti- cam opinionem, superstitionibus undique diffluentem, revocare co natur. Post hunc prodiit M. Antonius Constantius, Stephano Gardinero ita affinis et germanus, ut idem ipse esse videatur ; tanta 155 1. J ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 333 that bishop first put forth his Enghsh book, endeavouring to overthrow the true doctrine, and to restore and bring again into repute the mass, with all its superstitions ; and afterwards his Latin book, under a feigned name. In which Gardiner had so unfairly dealt with the archbishop's argu ments, chopping and changing, defacing and disfiguring them, that he could not know them for his own ; and all that he might make it serve his own turn the better : in somuch that he resolved to have his own book translated out of Enghsh into Latin, that his true opinon and mind in this controversy might the better be apprehendedv. The whole epistle is writ in a pure elegant Latin style, with a good sharpness of wit. The pubhcation of this his Latin book he thought suf ficient for the present to entertain the world, till he should put forth, in Latin also, a full answer to Gardiner, which he intended shortly to do. To this Latin book the arch bishop, occasionally reviewing it while he was in prison, made sundry annotations and additions ; not of any new arguments, but only of more authorities out of the Fathers and ancient writers. This valuable autograph fell into the hands of some of the Enghsh exiles at Embden, it may be by the means of bishop Scory, who was superintendent of the Enghsh church there, or sir John Cheke, who also for some time was in this place; both great friends of theprinted archbishop. In the year 1557, the exiles here printed it Embden. est ingeniorum subtilitas, scrip- sequitur,ut sibi optimum videtur; turae sophistices similitudo. Sed et ut causam juvet, saspe trun- uterque idem tractat, alio tamen cata, saepe inversa, saspe disjecta, modo." — Defens. verae et cathol. sic introducit, ut non magis a doct. de Sacrament. Epist. ad me agnosci potuerint, quam Me- regem. p. io. Works of abp. Cran- deae liberi in multa membra dis- mer, vol. i. Park. Soc. ed.] jecti et deformati, &c." [Id. T "Constantius [enim] libro La- ibid.] tine scripto ita argumenta mea per- 334 MEMORIALS OF [II. 25. with this title, " Defensio, &c. a Thoma Cranmero mar- tyre scripta. Ab authore in vinculis recognita et aucta." Before it is a new preface to the reader, made, as it is thought, by sir John Cheke, relating to the archbishop and this his book, shewing how well-weighed and well- thought on this doctrine of the sacrament was, before he pubhshed it, and that he let it not go abroad till he had diligently compared and pondered all Scriptures and an cient authors, and confirmed it at last by his blood. In the body of the book, the places where any enlargements are, are signified by an hand pointing thereunto. In the margin is often to be found this word " Object." with certain numbers added : which numbers shew those places which Gardiner, under the name of Marcus Antonius, did endeavour to confute. The very original these Enghsh exiles here at Embden kept, as a great treasure, among them, and as a memorial of the holy martyr w. Cranmer's Besides this, the archbishop fully intended to have his book in- vindication of his book, impugned by Gardiner, put into tended to Latin also ; but he lived not to see that done. But care be put into Latin. was taken of this business among the exiles : insomuch M°SS. P ^at both sir John Cheke and John Foxe were busied about it at the same time. But the former surceased, and left the whole work to Foxe, then at Frankfort, after he had finished the first part. In this piece done by Cheke, John a Lasco had an hand : for he put in the Latin school- terms, instead of more pure good Latin, which Cheke had used. And it was judged fit that such words should be used where the archbishop in his Enghsh had used them. And this Cheke and k Lasco themselves wrote to Foxe. w " Autographon ejus in nos tra apud iEmbdanos ecclesia pro thesauro quodam, et clarissimi viri. sanctique Christi martyris mne- mosyno servamus." — In Epist. [pio lectori. Defens. verae et ca- thol. doct. de Sacrament, p. 7. Works of abp. Cranmer, vol. i. Park. Soc. ed.] 1551 •] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 335 Foxe undertook the rest, by the incitation and encourage ment of P. Martyr, and of Grindal and Pilkington, both bishops afterwai-ds: who gave him directions for the 262 translating j and, as doubts occurred concerning the sense of certain matters in the book, as he met with them, he consulted with these men for their judgments therein. Grindal, in one letter, bad him write a catalogue of all passages by him doubted of, and send it to him. Foxe finished his translation in the year 1557, before June : for which he had a congratulatory letter from Grindal, who was his chief assistant and counsellor herein. The work was dispatched to the press, at Basil I suppose ; and, when one part was printed, the censors of the press thought it would be better to defer an argument of that nature to better times, the controversy having been bandied up and down so much already: but Froscover undertook the printing of the whole book. Foxe would do nothing of himself; but, leaving himself to the judg ment of his learned brethren, to commit the work now to Froscover, or no, queen Mary's death, and the return of the exiles, I suppose, stopped further progress in this matter. The original manuscript, under Foxe's own hand, in very cleanly elegant Latin, I have lying by me: it bears this title; "De tota Sacramenti Eucharistise causa Institutionum Libri V. Autore D. Thoma Cbanmero Ar- chiepiscopo Cantuariensi. Quibus et Stephani Garneri Episcopi Wintoniensi, et Smithi Doctoris Theologi, im- pugnationibus respondetur*." And, that I may bring here together all that relates to Some notes Cranmer, as to this matter of the sacrament, I must not conceTnTn^' omit what I saw in the Benet libraryy. There is a thinthe aacra- note-book of this archbishop's with this title, wrote by his Miscellan. x [Harl. MSS. 418 Plut. Ixv. y [C.C.C.C. MSS. No. cii. p. E. British Museum. Original.] 151.] 336 MEMORIALS OF [II. 25. own hand, " De re Sacramentaria ;" which I verily believe are his meditations and conclusions, when he set himself accurately to examine the sacramental controversy, and fell off from the opinion of the carnal presence. The notes consist of nothing but quotations out of ancient ecclesias tical authors about the Lord's supper ; interlined in many places by the archbishop's pen. On the top of some of the pages are these sentences writ by himself, being doc trines proveable out of the sentences there produced, and transcribed. " Panis vocatur corpus Christi, et vinum sanguis. " Panis est corpus meum, et vinum est sanguis meus ; figurativae sunt locutiones. "Quid significet haec figura, edere carnem, et bibere sanguinem. " Mah non edunt et bibunt corpus et sanguinem Domini. " Patres Veteris Testamenti edebant et bibebant Chris tum, sicut et nos. " Sicut in eucharistia, ita in baptismo, prsesens est Christus. " Contra transubstantiationem." After this, follow these writings of the archbishop's own hand, (which archbishop Parker elsewhere transcribed for his own satisfaction.) "Multa affirmant crassi papistse, seu Capernaitse, quae neque Scriptura neque ullus veterum unquam dixerat. Viz. " Quod accidentia maneant sine subjecto. " Quod accidentia panis et vini sunt sacramenta : non panis et vinum. 263 " Quod panis non est figura, sed accidentia panis. " Quod Christus non appellavit panem corpus suum. I55I-J ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 337 " Quod cum Christus dixit, ' Hoc est corpus meum,' pronomen fHoc' non refertur ad panem, sed ad corpus Christi. " Quod tot corpora Christi accipimus, aut toties corpus ejus accipimus, quoties, aut in quot partes, dentibus seca- mus panem." Thus having set down divers assertions of papists, or " Capernaites," as he styled them, which neither Scrip ture nor ancient Fathers knew any thing of; his notes proceed to state wherem papists and protestants dis agree. " Preecipua capita in quibus a papisticis dissentimus. "Christum papistae statuunt in pane, nos in homine comedente. " Uli in comedentis ore, nos in toto homine. "Llli corpus Christi aiunt evolare, masticato vel con- sumpto pane; nos manere in homine dicimus, quamdiu membrum est Christi. " Hh in pane statuunt per annum integrum, et diutius, si duret panis : nos in homine statuimus inhabitare, quam diu templum Dei fuerit. " Hlorum sententia, quod ad realem praesentiam attinet, non amphus edit homo quam bellua, neque magis ei prod- est, quam cuivis animanti." Thus God made use of this archbishop, who was once Martyr suc- one of the most violent asserters of the corporal presence, mer lathis" to be the chiefest instrument of overthrowing it. But Province- this good work required to be carried on after Cranmer's death, for great brags were made of Gardiner's second book; and it was boasted, that none dare to encounter this their Gohath. P. Martyr was thought the fittest man to succeed Cranmer in this province, to maintain CRANMER, VOL. II. Z 338 MEMORIALS OF [II. 25. Writes the truth that began now to shine forth. He, overcome Gardiner, Dy the solicitation of friends, composed a book against Gardiner, as was said before, and printed it at Zurich5. Wherein, 1. He defended the arguments of our men; which had been collected together, and pretended to be confuted, by Gardiner's book. 2. He defended those rules which Cranmer had put forth in his tract of the sacrament. 3. He maintained those answers, whereby the arguments of the adversaries were wont to be re futed. And, 4. He asserted the just and true interpre tation of certain places out of the Fathers, which Gar diner and his companions brought for themselves and their errors. and Smith. After this defence followed another by the same author, printed in the same town of Zurich, against two books of Dr. Richard Smith, concerning the single life of priests, and monastic vows', which he wrote at Louvain against Martyr. For when Martyr had read at Oxford upon 1 Corinthians, chap. vii. where the apostle speaks much of virginity and matrimony, (the notes of which readings Smith had very diligently taken, being constantly present at them) ; from thence he composed two books, not so strong as mahcious, " Of the Celibacy of Priests," and " Of Vowsu :" designing thereby to confute Martyr's ar guments, which he therefore thought fit to vindicate. In this book he not only answered Smith's arguments, but whatever else he could meet with upon that subject. But 264 it was thought to be a very improper undertaking, and s [See above, p. 330.] alterum inscriptum : ' defensio * [i. e. "Defensio P. Martyri, ccelibatus sacerdotum;' alterum, contra R. Smithaei, duos libellos 'confutatio quorumdam articulo- de ccelibatu sacerdotum et votis rum de votis monasticis Petri monasticis." ed. Basil. 1559.] Martyri.' ed. Lovan. 1550." — Io. u [" Ediderat Smithaeus duos Geo. Walchii Bibl. Theol. vol. ii. libellos contra Petrum Martyrem : p. 254.] I551-] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 339 proved cause of mirth, that so filthy a fellow as Smith was known to be, and once taken in the act of adultery, should write a book of priestly chastity. Which occasioned these verses made by Laurence Humphrey ; " Haud satis aflabre tractans fabrilia Smithus, Librum de vita caelibe composuit, &c. Dumque pudicitiam, dum vota monastica laudat, Stuprat, sacra notans fcedera conjugii." z2 340 MEMORIALS OF [II. 26. CHAPTER XXVI. THE DUKE OP SOMERSET'S DEATH. NEW BISHOPS. The duke of The archbishop of Canterbury this year lost the duke death"6 S °^ Somerset, whom he much valued, and who had been a great assistant to him in the reformation of the church, and a true friend to it. His violent death exceedingly grieved the good archbishop, both because he knew it would prove a great let to rehgion, and was brought about by evil men, to the shedding of innocent blood, for the furthering the ends of ambition ; and begat in him fears Inter Foxii and jealousies of the king's life. It is very remarkable what I meet with in one of my manuscripts". There was a woman, somewhat before the last apprehension of the duke, wife of one Woocock of Poole in Dorsetshire, that gave out, that there was a voice that followed her, which sounded these words always in her ears : " He whom the king did best trust should deceive him, and work treason against him." After she had a good while reported this, sir William Barkley, who married the lord treasurer Win- chester'sy daughter, sent her up to London to the council, with two of his servants. She was not long there, but, without acquainting the duke of Somerset, whom it seemed most to concern, (he being the person whom the king most trusted), was sent home again with her purse full of money. And, after her coming home, she was more busy in that talk than before. So that she came to a market-town called Wimborne, four miles from Poole, where she re ported, that the voice continued following her as before. This looked, by the circumstances, like a practice of some x [Harl. MSS. 425. Plut. lxv. E. fol. 127. British Museum. Original] y [See above, p. 11. n. x.] 155 1-] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 841 popish priests, accustomed to deahng in such frauds, to make the world the more inclinable to beheve the guilt of the good duke, which Somerset's enemies were now framing against him. And so some of the wiser sort thereabouts did seem to think ; for there were two mer chants of Poole that heard her, and took a note of her words, and came to the house of Hancock, minister of Poole, who was known to the duke, counselling him to certify my lord of her. Which Hancock accordingly did, and came to Sion, where the duke then was, and told him of the words. He added, " Whom the king doth best trust we do not know, but that all the king's loving subjects did think that his grace was most worthy to be best trusted; and that his grace had been in trouble: and that all the king's loving subjects did pray for his grace 265 to the Almighty to preserve him, that he might never come in the like trouble again." Then the duke asked bim whether he had a note of the words : which when he had received from Hancock, he said to him, suspecting the plot, " Ah ! sirrah, this is strange, that these things should come before the coun cillors, and I not hear of it. I am of the council also." He asked Hancock, before whom of the council this matter was brought? who rephed, he knew not certain, but as he supposed. The duke asked him, whom he sup posed? he answered, before the lord treasurer, because his son-in-law, sir Wplham] Barkley, sent her up. The duke subjoined, " It was hke to be so." This was three weeks before his last apprehension. This I extract out of Mr. Hancock's own narration of himself and his troubles ; to which he added, that, at his first apprehension, the report was, that the duke, what time as he was fetched out of Windsor Castle, having the king by the hand, should say, "It is not I that they shoot at; this is the mark that MEMORIALS OF [II. 26. they shoot at ;" meaning the king. Which by the sequel proved too true. For that good, godly, and virtuous prince hved not long after the death of that good duke. Winchester Indeed it seemed to have been a plot of the papists, and supposed to , be in the the bishop of Winchester at the bottom of it. This is p ° ' certain, when, in October 1549, the duke was brought to the Tower, the bishop was then borne in hand he should be set at hberty; of which he had such confidence, that he prepared himself new apparel against the time he should come out, thinking verily to have come abroad within eight or ten days. But finding himself disappointed, he wrote an expostulatory letter to the lords within a month after, to put them in remembrance, as Stow writes2. The articles, that were drawn up against the duke, Articles duke. upon his second apprehension and trial, were in number z [" Now when the duke of Somerset was first apprehended, Stephen Gardiner, bishop of Winchester, then being a prisoner in the Tower, was borne in hand, he should be set at liberty : in hope whereof he prepared him new apparel for that purpose, thinking verily to have come abroad within eight or ten days : but when he was forgotten, and nothing said unto him by the space of one month after, he thought it good to put the lords in remembrance, by his letters, wherein, (after commendations had unto them), he wrote as followeth : ' I have continued here in this miserable prison now one year, one quarter, and one month, this same day that I write these my letters, with want of air to relieve my body, want of books to relieve my mind, want of good company, the only solace of this world : and finally want of a just cause why I should have come hither at all.' More of this letter came not to my hands, but that the lords took it in good part, and laughed very merrily thereat, saying, he had a pleasant head; for reward whereof they gave him leave to remain still in prison five or six weeks after, without saying or sending any word to him." — Stow's Chronicle, p. 600. ed.Lond. 1 561. Stow, in addition to this extract, inserts a long letter of Gardiner, to the lords of the council, " requiring that he might be heard according to justice," &c] i55 1-] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. twenty, which I shall not repeat here, as I might out of a manuscript thereof3, because they may be seen in Foxeb. But I do observe one of the articles is not « [Harl. MSS. 419. Plut. lxv. E. fol. 130. British Museum. Ori ginal.] b [The following are the " arti cles objected against the lord protector: — " 1. In primis, you took upon you the office of protector and go vernor, upon condition express ly and specially, that you would do nothing in the king's affairs, pubhcly or privately, but by the assent of the late king's executors. " 2. Also, you, contrary to the said condition, of your own authority did stay and let justice, and subverted the laws, as well by your letters, as by your com mandments. " 3. Also, you caused divers per sons being arrested and imprison ed for treason, murder, man slaughter and felony to be dis charged and set at large, against the king's laws, and statutes of this realm. " 4. Also, you have made and ordained lieutenants for the king's armies and other weighty affairs, under you own writing and seal. " 5. Also, you have communed with the ambassadors of other realms, discoursing alone with them the weighty causes of this realm. "6. Also, you have sometime rebuked, checked, and taunted, as well privately as openly, divers of the king's most honourable counsellors, for shewing and de claring their advices and opinions against your purposes in the king's weighty affairs, saying sometimes to them, that you need not to open matters unto them, and would therefore be otherwise ad vised: and that you would, if they were not agreeable to your opinion, put them out, and take other at your pleasure. " 7. Also, you had, and held against the law in your own house, a court of requests, and thereby did enforce divers the king's subjects to answer for their free holds and goods, and determined the same to the subversion of the same laws. "8. Also, you being no officer, without the advice of the council, or the more part of them, did dispose of the offices of the king's gift, for money, and granted leases and wards of the king's, and gave presentations to the king's bene fices and bishoprics, having no authority so to do. And further, you did meddle with the selling of the king's lands. " 9. Also, you commanded mul tiplication and alchymy to be practised, to abuse the king's coin. " 10. Also, you caused a pro clamation to be made concerning enclosures, whereby the common 344 MEMORIALS OF [II. 26. printed in his book, namely, the tenth, which ran thus : "Also, you are charged, that you have divers and many people have made divers insur rections, and levied open war, and distrained and spoiled divers of the king's subjects, which pro clamation went forth against the will of the whole council. "11. Also, you have caused a commission, with certain articles thereunto annexed, to be made out concerning enclosures of com mons, highways, decaying of cottages, and divers other things, giving the commissioners autho rity to hear and determine the same causes, to the subversion of the laws and statutes of this realm : whereby much sedition, insurrec tion, and rebellion, have risen and grown among the king's subjects. " 12. Also, you have suffered the rebels and traitors to assemble, and to he in camp and armour against the king, his nobles and gentlemen, without any speedy subduing or repressing of them. " 13. Also, you did comfort and encourage divers of the said rebels, by giving of them divers sums of your own money, and by promising to divers of them, fees, rewards, and services. " 14. Also, you in favor of the said rebels did, against the laws, cause a proclamation to be made, that none of the said rebels or traitors should be sued, or vexed by any person for any their offences in the said rebellion, to the clear subversion of the same law. " 15. Also, you have said, in the time of the rebelhon, that you liked well the doings and pro ceedings of the said rebels and traitors ; and said, that the covet ousness of the gentlemen gave occasion to the common people to rise; saying also, that better it were for the commons to die, than perish for lack of living. " 16. Also, you said, that the lords of the parliament were loath to incline themselves to reforma tion of enclosures and other things ; therefore the people had good cause to reform the things themselves. "17. Also you, after the report and declaration of the defaults and lacks reported to you by such as did survey Boulogne and the pieces there, would never amend the same defaults. "18. Also, you would not suffer the king's pieces beyond the seas, called Newhaven and Blacknest, to be furnished with men and victuals, although you were ad vertised of the defaults therein by the captains of the same pieces, and others, and were thereto ad vertised by the king's council; whereby the French king, being the king's open enemy, was en couraged and comforted to invade and win the said pieces; to the king's great loss, and dishonour of his realm. "19. Also, you declared and published untruely, as well to the 155 1.] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 345 times, both openly and privately, said and affirmed, ' That the nobles and gentlemen were the only causes of the dearth of things, whereby the people rose, and did reform things themselves0.' " Whence it appears, that one cause of the hatred of the nobihty and gentry against him was, because he spake against their debauches and excesses, covetousness and oppressions. But that which I chiefly observe here is, that the draught of these articles, which I have seen, were made by bishop Gardiner, being his very hand, unless I am much mistaken. So that he, I suppose, was privately dealt with and consulted, (being then a prisoner in the Tower), to be a party in assisting and carrying on this direful plot against the duke, to take away his life, notwithstanding his outward friendship and fair correspondence in letters with the said duke. But Gardiner was looked upon to be a good manager of accusations; and he was ready enough to be employed here, that he might put to his hand in taking off one 266 that was such a great instrument of promoting the reformation. He is generally charged for the great spoil of churches What he is blamed for. king's majesty, and other the unto the king and his realm, did young lords attendant upon his consult at London, to have coin- grace's person, that the lords of muned with you, to the intent to the council at London minded to move you charitably to amend destroy the king; and you re- your doings and misgovernment, quired the king never to forget it, you, hearing of their said as- but to revenge it : and likewise sembly, did cause to be declared, you required the young lords to by letters in divers places, the said put the king in remembrance lords to be high traitors to the thereof, to the intent to make king, to the great disturbance of sedition and discord between the the realm." — Foxe's Acts and king and his lords. Monuments, p. 1370. ed. Lond. " 20. Also, whereas the king's 1583.] majesty's privy council, of their c[Harl. MSS. 419. Plat. lxv. E. love and zeal, that they did bear fol. 130. Brit. Museum. Original.] 346 MEMORIALS OF [II. 26. and chapels; defacing ancient tombs and monuments, and pulling down the bells in parish-churches, and or dering only one bell in a steeple, as sufficient to call the people together. Which set the commonalty almost into a rebellion. The new As the archbishop the last year had procured amend- Common ments and alterations in the book of pubhc prayers, and bushedeShl" kful consulted therein with the two learned foreign di vines, Bucer and Martyrd : so this year, in January, an act was made by the parhament for authorizing the new book, and obliging the subjects to be present at the read ing of ite. In this book the general Confession was added, and the Absolution*. At the beginning of the second service was added the recital of the Ten Commandments, with the short ejaculation to be said between each com mandments. Something was left out in the consecration of the sacrament, that seemed to favour a corporal presenceh. Several rites were laid aside, as that of oil in confirmation, and extreme unction, and prayer for the dead, which was before used in the communion-office, and that of burial : together with the change and abohsh ing of some other things that were offensive or super stitious : as may be seen by those that will take the pains d[See above, pp. 200-204, 3°7-J creatures of bread and wine, that e [i. e. " An act for the uni- they may be unto us the body formity of common prayer, and and blood of thy most dearly be- administration of the sacrament." loved son, Jesus Christ ;" and the See Statutes of the Realm, vol. iv. sentence was thus changed : " and pp. 130, 1.] grant that we receiving these thy ' [See Liturgies of Edward VI. creatures of bread and wine, ac- pp. 218, 19. Park. Soc. ed.] cording to thy Son our Saviour B [Id. pp. 266, 7.] Jesu Christ's holy institution, in n [The following words were remembrance of his death and omitted : " and with thy Holy passion, may be partakers of his Spirit and word vouchsafe to bless most blessed body and blood." and sanctify these thy gifts, and Id. pp. 88, 279.] 155 1-J ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 347 to compare the two books, the one printed in the year 1549, and the other 1552. And this was brought about by the great and long dihgence and care of our pious archbishop, and no question to his great joy and satis faction : so that I look upon that but as an improbable report, that was carried about in Frankfort in those Troubles at unseemly branglings among the Enghsh exiles there, that Bullinger should say, "That Cranmer had drawn up a book of prayers an hundred times more perfect than that which was then in being ; but the same could not take place, for that he was matched with such a wicked clergy and convocation, with other enemies." But as his authority was now very great, so there was undoubtedly a great deference paid to it, as also to his wisdom and learning, by the rest of the divines appointed to that work : so that as nothing was by them inserted into the Liturgy but by his good allowance and approbation, so neither would they reject or oppose what he thought fit should be put in or altered. The learning, piety, and good deserts of Miles Cover- Coverdale dale i, in translating the holy Scriptures into the Enghsh sn0p 0f Exon. 1 [Miles Coverdale was originally again installed. Coverdale fled an Augustine monk, but became abroad to escape the persecutions an early professor of the gospel ; of queen Mary's reign, and was he assisted Tyndal in the transla- appointed preacher to the exiles at tion and circulation of the Scrip- Wezel, and at Bergzaber by the tures, and became one of Edward duke of Bipont : he returned to Vlth's chaplains. Upon John England upon the accession of Voysey's resignation of the see of queen Elizabeth, but was not Exeter, "he was nominated by reinstated in his former bishopric; the king to succeed him," Au- he assisted at the consecration of gusti4, 1551, consecrated the 30th archbishop Parker, and was pre- of the same month, and enthron- sented by Edmund Grindall, ized September nth following, bishop of London, who had re- He was deprived in 1553, 1°. commended him for the see of Maria?, when John Voysey was Llandaff, to the living of St. 348 MEMORIALS OF [II. 2.6. tongue, and in a constant preaching of the gospel, and sticking to the true profession for many a year; and withal, very probably, their ancient acquaintance in Cam bridge, were reasons that made our archbishop a par ticular friend to him. When the lord Russel was sent down against the rebels in the west, he was attended by Coverdale to preach among them. Coverdale afterwards became coadjutor to Voysey, the bishop of Exeter, who seldom resided, and took httle care of his diocese. But this year, whether voluntarily, or by some order, he resigned up his bishopric, having first greatly spoiled it of its revenues. And when some wise and bold person, and excellent preacher, was found extremely needful to be 267 sent thither to inspect the clergy and ecclesiastic matters in those parts, the late rebellion having been raised chiefly by priests in hatred to the religion, heating and disaffecting the minds of the common people, Coverdale was judged a very fit person to succeed in that charge. Being now bishop elect of Exon, he had long attended at court to get his matters dispatched ; namely, the doing of his homage, and the obtaining a suit to be excused the payment of his first fruits, being but a poor man. But such at that time were the great and urgent affairs of the Magnus in the month of February, See vol. i. p. 129. n.f. Strype's 1563; he died, May 20, 1565, "at Eccl. Mem. vol. i. pt. i. pp. 472, the age of eighty-one, and was 568. vol. ii. pt. i. p. 490. pt. ii. p. buried in St. Bartholomew's 169: vol. iii. pt. i. pp. 233, 410. church, behind the Exchange," ed. Oxon. 1822. Strype's Life of London: from which place his abp. Parker, vol. i. pp. 12, 55, body was removed in 1837, upon i°7> iioj 114-116, 121. ed. Oxon. the pulling down of that church 182 1. Strype's Annals ofthe Re- to make room for city improve- format, vol. i. pt. ii. p. 43. ed. ments, to St. Magnus, where it Oxon. 1824. Strype's Life of abp. still rests, and a tablet raised by Grindall, p. 134. ed. Oxon. 1821. the parishioners records his worth. Le Neve's Fasti, p. 83.] '55T-J ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 349 state, or the secret hinderers of the gospel, that he found nothing but delays. So that he was forced to apply himself unto his friend the archbishop, to forward his business : who forthwith sent his letters to secretary Cecyl, making Coverdale himself the bearer, entreating him to use his interest to get this bishop dispatched, and that with speed: urging this for his reason, (becoming his paternal care over his province), that so he might without further delay go down into the western parts, which had great need of him. And also because he was minded, on the 30th of August, to consecrate him and the bishop of Rochester, [Scory], according to the king's mandatek. This Scory1 was at first preferred by the archbishop to Scory bi shop elect of Roches- k [The following is the letter referred to, a copy of which in Strype's handwriting is preserved in the hbrary of Balliol college, Oxford: — "After my very hearty commendations. Whereas the bearer hereof, Mr. Coverdale, bi shop elect of Exeter, is now through in all matters to the consecration, save only in doing his homage and in the dispatch of his first fruits : these shall be heartily to desire, that, in con sideration of his long attendance, and of the great lack that the west parts have of him, you will shew him your accustomable fa vour and help at this present : that by your procurement he may the sooner take his oath, and have your gentle assistance for the ob taining of his suit concerning the first fruits. For I mind, by God's grace, the 30th day of this month to accomplish the king's majesty's mandate concerning the consecra tion of him and of the bishop of Rochester. And thus I bid you most heartily well to fare. From my manor at Croydon, the 23rd of August, 1552. Your loving friend, T. Cant. To the right worshipful and my very good friend, Mr. Wilham Cecil, one of the king's ma jesty's two principal secre taries." — This date 1552 is in Strype's copy, but it is manifestly a mis take for 155 1. See Works of abp. Cranmer, vol. ii. p. 429. Park. Soc. ed. Jenkyns' Remains of abp. Cranmer, vol. i. pp. 342, 3.] 1 [John Scory was appointed one of the six preachers of Can terbury by archbishop Cranmer in the year 1541, and was "an hearty embracer and furtherer of religion ;" he was one of the arch bishop's, and also of bishop Rid ley's chaplains, and was conse- ter. 350 MEMORIALS OF [II. 26. be one of the six preachers at Canterbury, and always contmued firm to the purity of rehgion, and endured trouble for the good and wholesome doctrine that he preached ; having been presented and complained of, both in the spiritual courts, and to the justices at their ses sions, when the Six Articles were in force. He was a married man, and so deprived at the beginning of queen Mary's reign, fled beyond sea, and was superintendent of the Enghsh congregation at Embden in Friezland. There, in the year 1555, he wrote and printed "A Comfortable Epistle unto all the faithful that be in prison, or in any other trouble for the defence of God's truth." Wherein he doth as well by the promises of mercy, as also by the examples of divers holy martyrs, comfort, encourage, and strengthen them patiently, for Christ's sake, to suffer the crated bishop of Rochester, Au gust 30, 1 55 1, from which see he was translated to Chichester, May 23, 1552. "In the next year he was deprived," and George Day, who had been removed Oct. 10, 155 1, was restored. In contradic tion to the statement that " he al ways continued firm to the purity of religion," Strype elsewhere says, " He made some compli ances under queen Mary; but afterwards fled abroad, and was an exile;" during the time of his absence from England he resided first at Wezel, and af terwards became superintendent of a church of English fugitives at Embden. " He returned un der queen Elizabeth, and was placed by her, not in Chichester again,' but over the diocese of Hereford," July 15, 1550. He assisted at the consecration of archbishop Parker, and preached on that occasion : he was also one of the disputants at West minster on the protestant 6ide; he died June 26, 1585. — See vol. i. p. 214. Le Neve's Fasti, pp. 58, 111, 251. Strype's Eccl. Mem. vol. ii. pt. i. pp. 402, 496 ; pt. ii. pp. 171, 269. vol. iii. pt. i. pp. 233, 241. ed. Oxon. 1822. Strype's Life of abp. Grindal, p. 41. ed. Oxon. 1821. Strype's Life of abp. Parker, vol. i. pp. 107, 108, no, 114, 115-117, 119, 121; vol. iii. p. 283. ed. Oxon. 1821. Strype's Annals of Reformat, vol. i. pt.i. pp. 129, 230, 231. vol. iii. pt. i. p. 476. ed. Oxon. 1824. Fuller's Ch. Hist. vol. iv. pp. 51, 205,218,275. vol. v. p. 94. ed. Oxon. 1845. Burnet's Hist, of Reformat, vol. ii. pp. 342, 418, 15.51.] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 351 manifold cruel and most tyrannous persecutions of Anti- christian tormentors." As the book bears title"1. There were divers bishoprics vacant this year : as that The arch- of Lincoln by the death of Holbeach". The archbishop J^aap" deputed the spiritualties to John Pope, LL.B0. and cnan-gJ^^f cellor of that church, [August 19, 1551 .] The church com- aities of mending unto the archbishop this Pope, and two more ; viz. JohnPrinne, LL.DP. subdean of the church, and Christo pher Massingberde, LL.Bi. archdeacon of Stow. So he chose the first : but yet he committed a special trust to Tay- Cranm. lorr, the dean of Lincoln, (whom he knew to be tight to re- ,2i i>, 122'.] ligion), sending a commission fiduciary to him, before Pope entered upon his office, to give the said Pope his oath, "le gally and faithfully to perform his office committed to him by the archbishop, and to answer to the said archbishop for all obventions coming to him by virtue of his jurisdiction and office ; and that he should not, by mahce or wrong, squeeze the subjects of the king, and of that diocese, whether clerks or laics; that he should not knowingly grieve them in their estates or persons : and that he shall abstain from oppressions, extortions, and unlawful exac- 553. 776> 8°5> 806. ed. Oxon. Fasti, pp. 151, 170.] 1829. See Wharton's note upon p [" John Prynn, or Prinne, this place.] LL.D. was installed " subdean of m [See Watts' Bibliotheca Brit. Lincoln " April 17, 1556 ; he died (authors) vol. 2. p. 839. u. ed. April 29, 1558."— Id. p. 155.] Edin. 1824.] q [Christopher Massingberd, n [August 2, 1551.— Le Neve's LL.D. was installed chancellor of Fasti, p. 141 .} the church of Lincoln March 21, 0 [John Pope, LL.B. was col- 1532 ; he resigned this office in Iated to the chancellorship of Lin- 1543, and was succeeded by John coin Aug. 24, 1543. He resigned Pope. On the 24th Aug. 1543 this office in 1544, on the 24th he was installed archdeacon of Aug. of which year he was in- Stow, and died March 8, 1553. stalled archdeacon of Bedford; Id. pp. 151, 173.] he died Nov. 1 1, 1558. — Le Neve's r [See above, p. 36. n . ".] 352 MEMORIALS OF [II. 26. 268 tions ; and that he shall renounce the bishop of Rome his usurped jurisdiction and authority, according to the sta tutes of parhament." And of all this he wrote a letter to the said Pope, signifying that he required such an oath of him to be taken before the dean. The tenor of the arch bishop's letter to the dean went on further, "requiring him by his sound counsel, singular prudence, and by the assistance of his sincere judgment, to be present with him in any hard cases, and of great moment; and that he would not be wanting to him in any matters of that sort, being a person of that knowledge in sacred and profane learning, of that prudence, circumspection, and dexterity in managing business. And so finally joined him with Pope to perform all this piously and cathohcly, according to the rule of evangelic religion, and the exigency of the laws and statutes of this kingdom." And deputed him his vice gerent. This letter was dated at Croydon, the 20th of August. This commission seemed to be somewhat extra ordinary : the occasion whereof might be, because the arch bishop did not confide in this chancellor of the church, suspecting his rehgion, and compliance with the king's proceedings ; therefore he thought good to associate him with Taylor the dean, of whom he was well assured. And of iphe church of Worcester became also vacant by the Wigom. ^ deprivation of Hethe the bishop. The archbishop com mitted the spiritualties thereof to John Barlows, dean of the said church, and Roland Taylor, LL.D1. his domestic Cranm. chaplain. These he constituted his officials to exercise 1; 8b 1 q l a^ epiSC0Pal jurisdiction. This commission was dated at Lambeth, Jan. 10, 1554, by an error of the scribe for 8 [John Barlow, A.M. succeeded "was installed June 20, 1544, Henry Holbeach, afterwards bi- and deprived in February, 1553." shop of Rochester and Lincoln, — Le Neve's Fasti, p. 300.] in the deanery of Worcester, and * [See above, p. 128. n. k.] 155*1 ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 853 1551, as appears by a certificate sent from the church to that archbishop, signifying the vacation of it. Upon the vacancy of the church of Chichester by the And of deprivation of Day, the archbishop made John Worthial u, rcranm!"' archdeacon of Chichester, and Robert Taylor, LL.B. dean Ree- ,foJ- . . I29> D0 of the deanery of South Mailing, his officials. This com mission to them, dated November 3, 1551, was to visit, &c. Upon the vacancy of the church of Hereford by the And of death of Skip, late bishop there, the spiritualties were [Cranm. committed to Hugh Coren*, LL.D. dean of that church, Res- fol- and Richard Cheney, D.Dy. archdeacon of Hereford. Their commission [dated April 3, 1552.] was to visit, &c. Upon the vacancy of the bishopric of Bangor, either by And of the death of Bulkley2, the bishop, or his resignation upon [Cranm. ,- r. . .. .- -Reg- f°l- 79, 156, 174. Strype's Life ofI36] n [John Worthial was collated to the archdeaconry of Chichester, Feb. 2, 1530. — Le Neve's Fasti, p. 65.] x [Hugh Coren or Curwin, LL.D. who had the character of being " a compiler in all reigns," was chaplain to Henry VIII.; and had the spiritualties of the vacant see of Hereford intrusted to him, when a prebendary of that church, upon the death of Edward Fox, a.d. 1538; he was also one of a commission to discuss certain questions of religion in the year 1540. He " was installed dean of Hereford, June 1, 1541. In 1555 he was made archbishop of Dub lin in Ireland; and twelve years after, viz. 1567, was translated, Sept. 26, to the bishopric of Ox ford. He died in the latter end of October 1568, at Swinbroke, near Burford in Oxfordshire, and lies buried there." — See vol. i. pp. CRANMER, VOL. II. abp. Parker, vol. i. p. 508. ed. Oxon. 182 1. Le Neve's Fasti, pp. 114, 228.] y [Richard Cheney, S.T.B. was collated to the archdeaconry of Hereford, Feb. 3, 1551, which preferment he resigned in the year 1557 : he was consecrated bishop of Gloucester April 19, 1562 ; he " had the queen's leave to hold the bishopric of Bristol ' in commendam' by her letters pa tent, dated April 29, 1562, and accordingly he received the ad ministration May 3. following, and held the revenues of them both to the time of his death, which hap pened April 25, 1579." — Le Neve's Fasti, pp.48, 101, 119.] z [Arthur Bulkeley, LL.D. was consecrated bishop of Bangor, Feb. 19, 1541. Strype says, (Eccl. Mem. vol. ii. pt. ii. p. 174. ed. Oxon. 1822), "He sat bishop a a 354 MEMORIALS OF [II. 26. his blindness, the archbishop made his commissaries, Griffin Leyson a, his principal chancellor and official; Rowland Merick", a canon of St. David's; and Geofrey [Cranm. Glynn<=, LL.D. [March 23, 1552.] The church of Ro- 134.] Chester also became this year vacant by the translation of Scoryd to Chichester. In these vacancies the bishop rics were lamentably pilled by hungry courtiers, of the revenues belonging to them. Hopervisits This year bishop Hoper was by the council dispatched ' down, (as was said before), into his diocese e; where things were much out of order, and popery had great footing ; and therefore it wanted such a stirring man as he was. That he might do the more good, he had the authority of the lords of the council to back bim, by a commission granted to him and others. He brought most of the 269 parish-priests and curates from their old superstitions and errors concerning the doctrine of the sacrament of the Lord's supper. The recantation of one of them of more note, named Phelps, the incumbent of Cirencester, which No. LXIII. he made pubhcly and subscribed, may be seen in the Ap pendix. Twodispu- This year there happened two learned conferences in cerning the Latin, privately managed, about the corporeal presence in sacrament, ^ sacrament. The one on the 25th of November, in the house of sir Wilham Cecyl, secretary of state, per- from the year 1541 to the year mini Arthuri Bulkeley ultimi epi- 1555, that is, in three princes' scopi et pastoris ejusdem sedis." reigns. He was blind some time Cranm. Reg. fol. 136. — See Le before his death: being suddenly Neve's Fasti, p. 27.] struck with blindness, as though "¦ [See above, p. 134. n. x.] it had been some judgment upon b [See above, pp. 37, 108. n. s.] him for his sacrilege;" but Le c [See above, p. 170. n. ".] Neve states his death to have d [See above, p. 349. n. ', and taken place March 14, 1552. p. 363.] " Vacatio sedis episcopalis Ban- e [See above, p. 220.] gorien. per mortem naturalem do- I55i-J ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 355 formed by the said Cecyl; sir John Cheke f; Home, dean of Durham g; Whitehead h, and Grindal', on the pro testant side : and Feckenhami and Youngk on the popish. But first, before they began, Cecyl under his solemn pro testation assured them, that every man should have free hberty to speak his mind, and that none should receive any damage or incur any danger. Cheke began by pro pounding this question ; " Quis esset verus et germanus f [See above, p. 168. n. e.] B [Robert Home, S.T.P., suc ceeded Hugh Whitehead, S.T.P., in the deanery of Durham Nov. 20, 155 1 : during the restraint of Cuthbert Tunstal, the diocese of Durham was committed to his care ; upon Tunstal's deprivation the bishopric was granted to him, but he refused to take it " over Tunstal's head;" yet the latter, when restored in queen Mary's reign, "was his great and chief enemy." On her accession he retired beyond sea to avoid the persecution of the times, and re sided at Zurich and Frankfort; where (Frankfort) he lectured in Hebrew. He returned to England on the accession of queen Eliza beth, and took part on the pro testant side in the Westminster disputation; he was consecrated bishop of Winchester Feb. 16, 156^, and died June 1, 1580. — See Lee Neve's Fasti, pp. 287, 351. Strype's Eccl. Mem. vol. ii. pt. ii. pp. 22, 167, 267, 275. vol. iii. pt. i. pref. viii. pp. 231, 404, 4°9> 543- ed. Oxon. 1822. Annals of Reformat, vol. i. pt. i. p. 151. ed. Oxon. 1824. Fuller's Ch. Hist. vol. iv. pp. 207, 219, 405. ed. Oxon. 1845. Burnet's Hist, of Reformat, vol. ii. pp. 502, 503; vol. iii. pp. 776, 779, 806; ed. Oxon. 1829.] h [David Whitehead, "once chaplain to queen Anne Boleyn," was an exile for religion in the time of queen Mary, and pastor of an Enghsh congregation at Frank fort. He returned to England upon the accession of queen E- lizabeth and was employed upon the third edition of the Liturgy, and was one of the divines on the protestant side in the conference at Westminster; but was se questered for nonconforming, a.d. 1564. — See Fuller's Ch. Hist. vol. iv. pp. 27, 219. ed. Oxon. 1845. Strype's Eccl. Mem. vol. iii. pt. i. pp. 231, 404. ed. Oxon. 1824. Strype's Life of abp. Grindal, pp. 35, 145. ed. Oxon. 1821. Strype's Annals of Re format, vol. i. pt. i. pp. 75, 129. ed. Oxon. 1824. Burnet's Hist. of Reformat, vol. ii. pp. 756, 776. ed. Oxon. 1829.] ' [See above, p. 171. n. °.] J [See above, p, 123. n. b.] k [See above, p. 170. n. m.] a a2 356 MEMORIALS OF [II. 26. sensus verborum Coenae, 'Hoc est corpus meum?' Num quem verba sensu grammatico accepta prae se ferebant, an ahud quiddam?" To whom Feckenham answered. There were present, besides those that disputed, these noble and learned persons ; the lord Russel ', sir Anthony Coke m, Mr. Hales n, Mr. Wroth °, Mr. Throgmorton P, Mr. Knollys 1, Mr. Harrington. The second disputation 1 [See above, p. 10. n. w.] m [Sir Anthony Coke, or Cook, a patron at court of religion and learning, was one of Edward Vlth's instructors, and was employed in several commissions during this reign ; he was sent to the Tower as an adherent of the lady Jane Grey, but was enabled to escape to Strasburgh ; he returned home upon the accession of queen E- lizabeth ; he was father-in-law to Cecil, lord Burleigh, and died June 11, 1576. — See Strype's Life of Cheke, pp. 22, 47, 175. ed. Oxon. Strype's Eccl. Mem. vol. ii. pt. i. pp. 74, 385 ; vol. iii. pt. i. pref. vi. pp. 24, 232. ed. Oxon. 1822. Strype's Annals of Re format, vol. i. pt. i. p. 151 ; vol. ii. pt. ii. p. 86. ed. Oxon. 1824. Burnet's Hist, of Reformat, vol. ii. p. 74; pt. ii. p. 68. ed. Oxon. 1829. Fuller's Ch. Hist. vol. iv. p. 228. ed. Oxon. 1845.] n [i. e. Christopher Hales, who was an exile for religion in the time of queen Mary. See Strype's Life of Cheke, pp. 70, 77, 95. ed. Oxon. 1821. Strype's Eccl. Mem. vol. iii. pt. i. p. 405. ed. Oxon. 1822. Strype's Life of abp. Grindal, p. 12. ed. Oxon. 1821. Strype's Annals of Reformat, vol. i. pt. i. p. 151. ed. Oxon. 1824.] 0 [i. e. Sir Thomas Wroth, who was one ofthe principal gentlemen of the privy chamber, with whom Edward VI. used to exercise and play : he was an exile for religion in the time of queen Mary, and resided at Strasburgh, where he was serviceable to his fellow exiles : he returned home on the accession of queen Elizabeth, and was held by her in high estimation. — See Strype's Eccl. Mem. vol. ii. pt. i. pp. 387, 388, 389 ; ii. p. 164; vol. iii. pt. i. pp. 226, 232. ed. Oxon. 1822. Strype's Annals of Reformat, vol. i. pt. i. p. 151. ed. Oxon. 1824.] p [Chamberlain of the ex chequer. — See Strype's Life of Cheke, pp. 70, 77. ed. Oxon. 1821.] 1 [i. e. Sir Francis Knowles, or Knollys, was one of the exiles on account of the rehgious perse cutions of queen Mary's reign, and resident at Frankfort, and Strasburgh ; he returned home on queen Elizabeth's accession, and became treasurer of her household and a privy councillor. See Strype's Life of Cheke, pp. 70, 77, 95. ed. i55T-J ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 357 was December 3. following, in Mr. Morison's r house : where were present the marquis of Northampton8, the earl of Rutland', the lord Russel, and those above named, and Watson u added on the papists' side. Then Cheke Oxon. 1821. Strype's Life of Grindal, p. 112. ed. Oxon. 1821. Strype's Eccl. Mem. vol. hi. pt. i. pp. 231, 404. ed. Oxon. 1822. Strype's Annals of Reformat, vol. i. pt. i. p. 151. ed. Oxon. 1824. Burnet's Hist, of Reformat, vol. ii. p. 752. ed. Oxon. 1829.] r [See above, p. 161. n. p.] s [See above, p. 140. n. i.] * [i. e. Henry Manners, second earl of Rutland, who was im prisoned as an adherent of the lady Jane Grey, a knight of the garter, and lord president of the north. — See Strype's Eccl. Mem. vol. hi. pt. i. p. 25. ed. Oxon. 1822; and Annals of Reformat. vol. ii. pt. ii. p. 709. ed. Oxon. 1824.] * [Thomas Watson, S.T. P., was chaplain to Henry VIII. and to bp. Gardiner, and master of Christ's college, Cambridge, in which university he served the office of vice-chancellor in the years 1518, 1519, 1530, and 1531. He was present at the trials of bp. Hoper,andDr.Taylor,andwasone ofthe disputants at Oxford against Cranmer, Latimer, and Ridley, as also in the commission for burning the bodies of Bucer and Phagius at Cambridge. He received the appointment to the deanery of Durham, Nov. 18, 1553, and "by papal provision, bull dated 9 Cal. Apr. (Mar. 24.) 1556, was con secrated bishop of Lincoln, Aug. 15, 1557." He was one of the popish disputants at the West minster conference, where he con ducted himself with so much in solence that he was sent to the Tower. Having been imprisoned for a short time he was summoned before the queen, and deprived of his bishopric June 25, 1559. With John White, bishop of Win chester " he had the presumption to threaten to excommunicate queen Elizabeth." He was "a sour and morose man, and hved twenty-four years after his de privation, sometime with the bishop of Rochester, and some time with the bishop of Ely. But afterwards, when certain popish emissaries came into the realm and began to disturb the church, he, (being too conversant with them), was committed to Wisbeach castle a close prisoner," where he died Sept. 27, 1584. — See above p. 327. Strype's Eccl. Mem. vol. i. pt. i. p. 488 ; vol. ii. pt. i. p. 109 ; vol. iii. pt. i. pp. 288, 290, 488, 510, 572. ed. Oxon. 1822. Strype's Annals of Reformat, vol. i. pt. i. pp. 128, 131, 133, 138-140, 206, 210, 211, 213, 214, 220. ed. Oxon. 1824. Strype's Life of abp. Parker, vol. i. pp. 177, 178, 279. ed. Oxon. 1 82 1. Burnet's Hist, of Reformat. 358 MEMORIALS OF [II. 26. again propounded the question, "Whether the words of the supper are to be understood in a grammatical or in a figurative sense?" To which Watson responded. Both these disputations are too large for this place, but they Miscellan. are set down in one of the manuscript volumes of the C w Benet library. Dr.Redman In November died Dr. John Redman*, master of Trinity college in Cambridge, and one of the great hghts of that university, for the bringing in sohd learning among the students : a prebendary of the church of Westminster ; Foxe'sActs. and who, in the year 1549, assisted in the compiling the Enghsh book of Common Prayer, and preached a sermon upon the learned Bucer's death the day following his funeral. He was a person of extraordinary reputation among all for his great learning and reading, and profound knowledge in divinity : so that the greatest divines gave a Becon's mighty deference to his judgment. And therefore, when rintiie third ne ^7 s^c^ a* Westminster, many learned men repaired part of his fj0 him, desiring to know his last judgment of several 264 b., 266 points, then so much controverted. And he was very 1563-] °n rea(ty to- give them satisfaction. Among the rest that came, were Richard Wilks y, master of Christ's college, Cambridge ; Alexander Noel z, afterwards dean of Paul's ; vol. ii. pp. 693, 776, 782, 783, z [Alexander Noel, or Nowel, 792; vol. iii. pp. 508, 562. ed. "was born of a knightly family Oxon. 1829. Fuller's Ch. Hist. at Read in Lancashire" in the vol. iv. p. 280. ed. Oxon. 1845. year 1510. At the time of John Foxe's Acts and Monuments, p. Redman's death he was master of 1428. ed. Lond. 1583. Le Neve's Westminster school, and suc- Fasti, pp. 141, 351, 392, 393, 432.] ceeded to the second stall of the w [MSS. C.C.C.C. No. cii. pp. abbey Dec. 5, 1551, in his room ; 253, 259. See also Strype's Life in the first parhament of queen of Cheke, pp. 69-86. ed. Oxon. Mary he was returned for Loo, , 1821.] in Cornwall; but the election was x [See above, p. 39.] declared void on account of his y [See above, p. 200. n. e.] being a dignitary of the church. ^•J ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 359 and Young, a man of fame in Cambridge for his disputing against Bucer about justification. In these conferences with these learned men, he called the see of Rome "sentina malorum," "a sink of evils;" he said, "that purgatory, as the schoolmen taught it, was ungodly ; and that there was no such kind of purgatory as they fancied. That the offering up the sacrament in masses and trentals for the sins of the dead, was ungodly. That the wicked are not partakers of the body of Christ, but receive the outward 270 sacrament only. That it ought not to be carried about in Soon after this he fled to Stras burgh, and resided there and also at Frankfort. He was the first of the exiles that returned after the accession of queen Elizabeth ; upon the deprivation of William Chedsey hewas collated to the arch deaconry of Middlesex January T» I559> md was "constituted in 1560" prebend of the sixth stall in Canterbury cathedral, at which time he was chaplain to abp. Grindal, having preached the sermon at his consecration as bishop of London, Dec. 21, 1559. He was elected to the deanery of St. Paul's, Nov. 17, 1560, which he held forty-two years. He was prolocutor in the convocation of 1562, in which the articles of rehgion were settled ; he pubhshed a "greater" and "lesser" cate chism in Latin, the latter of which was an abridgment of the former. He is also supposed to have written the chief part of the church catechism. Besides founding a free grammar school at Middleton, he endowed thirteen fellowships at Brasenose college, Oxford, into which society he was admitted at thirteen years of age, and studied therein thirteen years, and of which he was also principal from Sept. 6, to Dec. 14, 1595, when he resigned the office. He was confessor to queen Elizabeth, con stantly preaching the first and last Lent sermons before her. He died, being ninety years of age, not decayed in sight, Feb. 13, 1601. — See Fuller's Worthies of England, vol. ii. pp. 204, 5. ed. Lond. 1840. Strype's Eccl. Mem. vol. ii. pt. i. p. 527 ; pt. ii. p. 267 ; vol. iii. pt. i. pp. 232, 404. ed. Oxon. 1822. Strype's Life of abp. Grindal, pp. 49, 56. ed. Oxon. 182 1 . Strype's Life of abp. Parker, vol. i. pp. 144, 240, 241. ed. Oxon. 1821. Strype's Annals of Re format, vol. i. pt. i. pp. 306, 307, 473. ed. Oxon. 1824. Burnet's Hist, of Reformat, vol. ii. p. 506; vol. iii. pp. 578, 583. ed. Oxon. 1829. Fuller's Ch. Hist. vol. ii. p. 509 ; vol. v. p. 256. ed. Oxon. 1845. Le Neve's Fasti, pp. 16, 185. 194. 3^6, 494-] 360 MEMORIALS OF [II. 2,6. procession. That nothing that is seen in the sacrament, or perceived with the outward sense, is to be worshipped. That we receive not Christ's body ' corporaliter,' grossly, like other meats, but so 'spirituahter,' that nevertheless 'vere,' truly. That there was not any good ground in the old doctors for transubstantiation, as ever he could per ceive; nor could he see what could be answered to the objections against it. That priests might by the law of God marry wives. That this proposition, Faith only justifies, so that this faith signify a true hvely faith, rest ing in Christ, and embracing bim, is a true, godly, sweet, and comfortable doctrine. That our works cannot deserve the kingdom of God. And," he said, " that it troubled him that he had so much strove against justification by faith only." A treatise whereof he composed, which was printed at Antwerp, after his death, in the year 1555. He said also to Young, "that 'consensus ecclesiae' was but a weak staff to lean to; and exhorted him to read the Scriptures, for there was that which would comfort him, when he should be in such a case as he was then in." One asked him concerning the doctrine of the school- doctors, that bread remained not after consecration. He rephed, " there was none of the school-doctors knew what ' consecratio' did mean." And, pausing awhile, said, "It was ftota actio,' the whole action in ministering the sacrament, as Christ did institute it." After the conference with bim was ended, Young, retiring into another chamber, said to Wilks, that Dr. Redman so moved him, that whereas he was before in such opinion of certain things, that he would have burned and lost his life for them, now he doubted of them. "But I see," said he, "a man shall know more and more by process of time, and by reading and hearing others. And Mr. Dr. Redman's saying shall cause me to look more diligently for them." Ellis Lomas, 155 1. J ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 361 Redman's servant, said, he knew his master had declared to king Henry, that faith only justifieth, but that he thought that doctrine was not to be taught the people, lest they should be negligent to do good works8. All this I have related of this divine, that I may in some measure preserve the memory of one of the learnedest men of his time ; and lay up the dying words of a papist, signifying so plainly his dislike and disallowance of many of their doctrines. The sweating sickness breaking out this year in great The sweat- violence, (whereby the two sons of the duke of Suffolk ness_ were taken off), "letters" from the council, dated July 18, were sent "to all the bishops, to persuade the people [un]to prayer, and to see God better served b." It being enacted, 1549 c, that the king might, during The arch- three years, appoint sixteen spiritual men and sixteen 0flJ^™_ temporal, to examine the old ecclesiastical laws, and toPointedto . . ' . . reform the compile a body of ecclesiastical laws, to be m force in the ecclesiasti- room of the old : this third year, October 6, a commission aws was issued out to the same number of persons, authoriz ing them to reform the canon laws; that is to say, to eight bishops, eight divines, eight civil lawyers, and eight common. Whose names, as they occur in an original, are as follow : Bishops. 271 The archbishop of Canterbury ; the bishops of London d, Winchester6, Ely f, Exeter s, Gloucester h, Bath', Rochester^ a [See Foxe's Acts and Monu- c [30. and 40. Edward VI. cap. ments, pp. 1360-1364. ed. Lond. n. See Statutes of the Realm, 1583.] vol. iv. p. 111.] b [MSS. Council Book, Privy <• [Nicholas Ridley.] Council Office, a. d. 1550-1553. e [John Poinet.] fol. 346; see also the "letter of f [Thomas Goodrich.] Edward VI. to the bishops, on s [Miles Coverdale.] occasion ofthe sweatingsickness;" h [John Hoper.] Works of abp. Cranmer, vol. ii. > [William Barlow.] p. 531. Park. Soc. ed.] k [John Scory .J 362 MEMORIALS OF [II. %6. *' 1 Divines. Mr. Taylor of Lincoln ; Cox, almoner ; Parker of Cam bridge, Latimer, Cook, [sir Anthony, I suppose], Peter Martyr, Cheke, Johannes a Lasco. Civilians. Mr. Petre, Cecyl, sir Thomas Smith, Taylor of Hadleigh, Dr. May, Mr. Traheron, Dr. Lyel, Mr. Skinner. Lawyers. Justice Hales, justice Bromley, Goodrick, Gosnald, Stam ford, Carell, Lucas, Brook, recorder of London. Themethod It was so ordered, that this number should be divided served. va^° two distinct classes, or companies ; each to consist of two bishops, two divines, two civilians, and two common lawyers. And to each company were assigned their set parts; which when one company had finished, it was transmitted to the other companies, to be by them all well considered and inspected. But out of all the number of two and thirty, eight especially were selected, from each rank two ; viz. out of the bishops, the archbishop and the bishop of Ely ; out of the divines, Cox and Martyr ; out of the civilians, Taylor and May; out of the common- lawyers, Lucas and Goodrick : to whom a new commission was made, November 9, for the first forming of the work, and preparation of the matter1. And the archbishop supervised the whole work. This work they phed close this winter : but, lest they should be straitened for time, the parhament gave the king three years longer for ac complishing this affair"1. So, Feb. 2, "a letter" was sent from the council " [to the lord chancellor] to make [out] a new commission to the archbishop, and to the other bishops and learned men, civilians and lawyers [of the 1 [See Wilkins' Concilia, vol. iv. p. 69.] m [30. and 40. Edw. VI. cap. 1 1 . Statutes of the Realm, vol. iv. p. 1 1 1.] 155 1 •] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 363 realm], for the establishment of [the] ecclesiastical laws, according to the act of parliament made in the last session"." This was a very noble enterprise, and well worthy the thoughts of our excellent archbishop, who with indefatigable pains had been, both in this and the last king's reign, labouring to bring this matter about ; and he did his part, for he brought the work to perfection. But it wanted the king's ratification, which was delayed, partly by busmess, and partly by enemies. Bishops Consecrated. August the 30th, John Scory, Ponet being translated Scory. to Winchester, was consecrated bishop of Rochester, atReg. [f„i. Croydon, by the archbishop of Canterbury, assisted by333'-' Nicholas, bishop of London, and John, suffragan of Bed ford: Miles Coverdale was at the same time and place conse- Coverdale. crated bishop of Exon, all with their surplices and copes, Reg8"^. and Coverdale so habited also. b-3 n [MSS. Council Book. Privy Council Office, 1550-1553. fol. 484.] 364 MEMORIALS OF [II. 37. 272 CHAPTER XXVII. THE ARTICLES OF RELIGION. Ann. 1552. Our archbishop, and certam of the bishops and other The articles divines, but whom by name I find not, were this year framel'and chiefly busied in composing and preparing a book of published, articles of rehgion, which was to contain what should be publicly owned as the sum of the doctrine of the church of England. This the archbishop had long before this bore in his mind, as excellently serviceable for the creating of a concord and quietness among men, and for the putting an end to contentions and disputes in matters of rehgion. These articles the archbishop was the penner, or at least the great director of, with the assistance, as is very probable, of bishop Ridley. And so he pubhcly owned afterwards, in his answers to certain interroga- Foxe. tories put to him by queen Mary's commissioners ; viz. that the catechism, the book of articles, and the book against Winchester, were his doings". These articles were 0 ["As for the catechism," (i. e. soon as I had knowledge thereof, the short catechism added to I did not like it ; therefore when the articles of 1552), "the book I complained thereof to the coun- of articles, with the other book cil, it was answered me by them, against Winchester, he granted that the book was so entitled, be- the same to be his doings." — cause it was set forth in the time Foxe's Acts and Monuments, p. of the convocation." — Id. p. 1440. 1877. ed. Lond. 1583. — " Weston: — " A different explanation of this Also, you have set forth a cate- title was given by Philpot, who chism in the name of the synod in the convocation of the preced- of London, and yet there be fifty ing October, ' stood up, and spake which, witnessing that they were concerning the catechism, that he of the number of the convocation, thought they were deceived in the never heard one word of this titleofthecatechism,inthatitbear- catechisra." eth the title of the synod of Lon- " Cranmer: I was ignorant of don last before this, although many the setting to of that title ; and as of them which were then present J552-J ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 365 in number forty-two, and were agreed to in the convoca tion 1552. And in the year 1553 they were published by the king's authority both in Latin and Enghsh. After they were finished, he laboured to have the clergy subscribe them: but against their wills he compelled none; though afterwards some charged him falsely to do so: which he utterly denied, as he declared before the said queen's commissioners p. But to enter into some par- were never made privy thereof in setting it forth ; for that this house had granted the authority to make ecclesiastical laws unto certain persons to be appointed by the king's majesty; and whatsoever ecclesiastical laws they, or the most part of them, did set forth, according to a statute in that be half provided, it might well be said to be done in the synod of London, although such as be of this house now had no notice thereof before the promulgation.' Foxe, vol. hi. p. 20. (p. 1410. ed. Lond. 1583.) See also Lamb, Hist, of the XXXIX. Articles, p. 8. It is a question who was the author of this catechism. By the Oxford disputants it was attri buted, on the assertion, as they pretended, of Cranmer, to Ridley : but Ridley himself, though he ad mitted that he noted many things for it and consented to it, denied that he was its author. It has been ascribed also to Ponet, bi shop of Winchester, and to Alex. Nowell. Ward, one of the En glish divines sent to the synod of Dort, believed it to be Nowell's ; and Strype, in his later publica tions, expresses the same opinion. But it must be confessed that his reasons are not convincing. — See Burn. Ref. vol. iii. p. 410. (ed. Oxon. 1829.) Strype, Cranm. p. 294. (ed. Oxon. 1840.) Eccl. Me mor. vol. ii. p. 368. (pt. ii. p. 24. ed. Oxon. 1829.) Annals, vol. i. p. 353. (pt.i. pp. 525-527. ed.Oxon. 1840.) Preface to Cranmer's Cate chism, Oxford, 1829." — Jenkyns' Remains of abp. Cranmer, vol. iv. p. 65. n. 1. — " It may be added, that the idea that bishop Ponet was the author of this catechism seems to be the most correct. It is strengthened by the following passage in a letter, obtained from Zurich by the Parker Society, written by sir John Cheke to BuUinger, dated June 7, 1553: 'Nuper etiam J. Wintoniensis Episcopi [Ponet] Catechismum auctoritate sua scholis commen- davit, et articulos synodi Londi- nensis promulgavit, quos tu si cum Tridentina compares, intelli- ges spiritus spiritui quid prae- stet.' "—Abp. Cranmer's Works, vol. i. p. 422. n. 2. Park. Soc. ed.] p [See Foxe's Acts and Monu ments, p. 1877. ed. Lond. 1583.] 366 MEMORIALS OF [II. 27. ticulars concerning so eminent a matter ecclesiastical as this was, The arch- In the year 1551, the king and his privy-council ordered diligence in tne archbishop to frame a book of articles of rehgion for them. ^he preserving and maintaining peace and unity of doc trine in this church, that, being finished, they might be set forth by pubhc authority. The archbishop, in obedience hereunto, drew up a set of articles, which were dehvered to certain other bishops to be inspected and subscribed, I suppose, by them. Before them they lay until this year 1552. Then, May 2, "a letter" was sent from the council to our archbishop, to send the articles that were "dehvered the last year to the bishops, and to signify whether the same were set forth by any pubhc authority, according to the minutes q." The archbishop accordingly sent the articles, and his answer, unto the lords of the council. In September I find the articles were again in his hands. Then he set the book in a better order, and put titles upon each of the articles, and some additions, for the better perfect ing of the work, and supply of that which lacked. And [Number so transmitted the book again from Croydon, September 19, to sir Wilham Cecyl and sir John Cheke, the one the king's principal secretary, and the other his tutor, being the two great patrons of the reformation at the court : desiring them together to take these articles into their serious considerations ; for he well knew them to be both wise and good men, and very well seen in divine learning. And he referred it to their wisdoms, whether they thought best to move the king's majesty therein before his coming to court; as though he conceived the king might make 273 some demur in so weighty an affair, till he should consult i [MSS. Council Book, Privy Council Office, a. d. 1550-1553. fob 543-J I552-] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 367 with the metropohtan, in order to the coming to a resolu tion; or that there were some great persons about the king, that might cast some scruples and objections in his mind concerning it, which he by his presence might pre vent, or be ready at hand to resolve. Cecyl and Cheke thought it more convenient the archbishop should offer them to the king himself. So, coming to court soon after, he dehvered the book to the king, and moved him for their publishing and due observation. And so, leaving them before the king and council, they were then again de hvered unto certain ofthe king's chaplains, who made some alterations. For I find that, October 21, " a letter" was Council directed "to Mr. Harley, Bill, Horn, Grindal, Pern, and Knox, to consider certain articles," (which must be these articles of rehgion), " exhibited to the king's majesty, to be subscribed by all such as shall be admitted to be preachers or ministers in any part of the realm ; and to make report of their opinions touching the same '." The time of the year declined now towards the latter end of November; and the archbishop being retired down from Croydon to his house at Ford near Canterbury, the privy-council s, November 20, dispatched, by a messenger, the articles unto him to be reviewed, and for his last hand, that they might be presented before the convocation, and allowed there ; and so be published by the royal authority. The archbishop received the book and letter from the council, November 23. And, making some notes upon it, enclosed them in a letter to the lords, and sent them, to gether with the book the next day ; beseeching them to prevail with the king, that all bishops should have autho rity to cause their respective clergy to subscribe it : and "then he trusted," (as he wrote), "that such a concord r [MSS. Council Book, Privy Council Office, a. d. 1550-1553. fol. 624.] s [Id. fol. 645.] 368 MEMORIALS OF [II. 27. and quietness in religion would soon follow, as otherwise would not be in many years. And thereby God would be glorified, and the truth advanced, and their lordships re warded by him, as the setters forth of his true word and No. LXIV. gospel." This pious letter may be read in the Appendix'. The arch- The king went a progress this summer ; and the arch bishop re tires to bishop retired to Croydon : where I find him in July, August, and September. And thence, October 11, he went to Ford, to spend some time in his diocese. Now he was absent from the court, and the king abroad at that distance that he could not frequently wait upon him, and be present at the council, his enemies were at work to bring him into trouble, as we shall see by and bye. ' [See Appendix, Nos. lxv, lxvi, lxvii.] I552-] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 369 CHAPTER XXVIII. PERSONS NOMINATED FOR IRISH BISHOPRICS. There were certain bishoprics in Ireland about this Consulted time vacant ; one whereof was that of Armagh : and it waspersong to thought convenient to have them filled by divines out 0ffiUtIieIrisl1 ° •> sees. England. In the month of August the archbishop was consulted with for this ; that so, by the influence of very 274 wise and learned men, and good preachers, the gospel might be the better propagated in that dark region. But because it was foreseen to be difficult to procure any Eng hshmen, so endowed, to go over thither, therefore secre tary Cecyl, being then with the king in his progress, sent a letter to the archbishop at Croydon, to nominate some worthypersons for those preferments, and whom he thought would be willing to undertake them. He returned him the names of four ; viz. Mr. Whitehead of Hadleyr, Mr. Turner of Canterbury, sir Thomas Bosses, and sir Bobert r [See above, p. 355. n. h.] ford, knight, obtained at the arch- s [Sir Thomas Rosse, or Rose, bishop's house to have him thither. was arrested a.d. 1533, by the ser- Howbeit, by means one was placed geant-at-arms, at the instigation in the cure at Hadleigh, he could of Walter and John Clerke, by not enjoy his office again there, whom he was charged with hav- but went to Stratford three miles ing been " privy of the burning off, and there continued in preach- of the rood of Dover court ;" he ing the word three years ; till at was " set at liberty by archbishop length the adversaries procured Cranmer's means ; but yet so, an inhibition from the bishop of that he was bounden not to come Norwich, to put him to silence." within twenty miles of Hadleigh. He endured much persecution in After this he came to London, queen Mary's reign, but escaped. and there preached the Gospel — See Foxe's Acts and Monu- half a year, till Hadleigh men ments, pp. 2083-2086. ed. Lond. hearing thereof, laboured to have 1583. Strype's Eccl. Mem. vol. iii. him to Hadleigh again, and in- pt. i. pp. 329, 401. pt. ii. p. 147. deed by means of sir John Rain- ed. Oxon. 1822.] Bb '370 MEMORIALS OF [II. 28. [No. Wisdom'. He said, "he knew many others in England that would be meet persons for those places, but very few that would gladly be persuaded to go thither :" for it seems the Enghsh were never very fond of hving in Ire land. But he added concerning these four which he had named, " that he thought they, being ordinarily called, for conscience-sake would not refuse to bestow the talent committed unto them, wheresoever it should please the king's majesty to appoint them." He recommended like wise a fifth person for this promotion, one Mr. * Whitacre", a wise and well-learned man, (as he characters him), who was chaplain to the bishop of Winchester [Poinet] . But he doubted whether he would be persuaded to take it upon him. Some ac- It may not be amiss to make some inquiry who and count of the !.,¦./,•,» . four divines what those four before-mentioned persons were. by'hunfor Mr- Whitehead was an exile in queen Mary's reign, and the arch- pastor of the Enghsh congregation at Frankfort. And at bishopric of Armagh, the conference in the beginning of queen Ehzabeth's go- head, "vernment, he was one of the nine disputants on the pro testant side, and one of the appointed eight to revise the * [Robert Wisdom was parson Oxon. 1824. Le Neve's Fasti, of St. Catherine's, Lothbury ; he p. 74.] was imprisoned upon the passing * I suppose this might be a of the Act of the Six Articles, slip of the archbishop's pen or and fled to Frankfort in the time memory, writing " Whitacre " of queen Mary. He "was collated" for "Goodacre," who afterwards to the archdeaconry of Ely, " Jan. was placed in that Irish see, and 1, 1560," and subscribed, as a had been Poinet's chaplain. member of convocation, the ar- u [Hugh Goodacre (Whitacre) tides of 1562 ; "he died in 1568." was vicar of Shalfleet, (Isle of — See Strype's Eccl. Mem. vol. i. Wight), before he succeeded to pt. i. pp. 567, 570. ed. Oxon. the archbishopric of Armagh. — 1822. Strype's Annals of Refor- See Strype's Eccl. Mem. vol. ii, mat. vol. i. pt. i. pp. 489, 491. ed. pt. i. p. 523.] 155 2. J ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 371 Service Book. The writer of the "Troubles at Frank fort" mentions three, viz. Coverdale, Turner, and this Whitehead ; of whom he saith, " that they were the most ancient preachers of the Gospel, and the most ancient fathers of this our country ; and that from their pens, as well as their mouths, most of queen Ehzabeth's divines and bishops first received the light of the Gospel"." Why Cranmer should style him Whitehead of Hadley, I do not apprehend; seeing Dr. Bowland Taylor, his chaplain, was now parson of Hadley, who not long after was there burnt : and one Yeomansy was Taylor's curate there, who also was afterwards burnt at Norwich. But I suppose this was some other Hadley. I find two about this time bearing the name of Turner ; Mr.Tumer. both eminent men, and preachers : the one was named WiUiam Turner z, a doctor in physic, and greatly befriended by sir John Cheke and sir WiUiam Cecyl. This man, a native of Northumberland, was the first Englishman that compiled an herbal; which was the groundwork of that which Gerardea laid the last hand unto. He was a retainer x ["And it maie here also be handling of Richard Yeoman, Dr. noted, that the moste auncientest Taylor's curate at Hadley," see fathers of this oure owne countrie, Foxe's Acts and Monuments, pp. as maister Couerdale, maister D. 2045, 6- ed. Lond. 1583.] Turner, maister Whithead, and z [See above, p.270 . n. B.] many others some dead some a ["John Gerarde, an Enghsh yet liuinge (from whose mouthes botanist and surgeon, born at and pennes the vrgers of theis Nantwich, in Cheshire, in 1545, receiued first the light off the and died in 1607. He was the Gospell) could neuer be brought author of ' Catalogus arborum, to yelde or consent vnto such fructicum, et herbarum,' and the thinges as are now forced with so ' Herbal or general history of greate extremitie." — A Brief dis- plants,' a work which contributed course of the troubles begun at to diffuse a taste for botany; he Frankfort, p. ccxv. ed. (reprint) also became master of the Apothe- 1846.] caries company."] y [For " the history and cruel Bb2 372 MEMORIALS OF [II. 28. to the duke of Somerset in Edward Vlth's time, and was physician in ordinary to his family : and the year be fore this, viz. 1551, I find him dean of Wells. The other was Bichard Turner, a Staffordshire man, in former time curate of Chartham in Kent, and commonly called Turner of Canterbury, hving in the family of Mr. Morice, the archbishop's secretary, (of whom afterwards), who held the impropriation of that parsonage, and had presented 275 this man to the vicarage. For his free and bold preach ing against popish errors, and asserting the king's supre macy, and for the extraordinary success of his ministry in bringing multitudes of people in those parts out of igno rance and superstition, he was put to much trouble and danger. He was first complained of to the king; and being brought up, the archbishop, and other ecclesiastical commissioners, were commanded to examine him upon certain articles. But, by the secret favour of the arch bishop, and his own prudent answers, he was then dis charged. Soon after, upon some false reports told of him, king Henry was so offended, that he sent for the arch bishop, willing him to have him whipt out of the country. But the archbishop pacified the king, and sent him home the second time. Afterwards, a third time, his old ene mies, the popish clergy, got him convented before the privy- council, and committed for doctrines preached by him before he came into Kent. The archbishop being then down in his diocese, Turner was sent back to him with an order to recant; to whom, when his fast friend and patron, Mr. Morice, had apphed himself in his behalf, the archbishop himself, being now under some cloud, dared not to interpose, because, as he then said, it had been put into the king's head that he was the great favourer, and maintainer of all the heretics in the kingdom. Morice, then, that he might prevent this recantation, if possible, 1552- j ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 373 which would have been such a reflection to the doctrine he before had preached, addressed his letters to sir An thony Denny, gentleman of the king's bed-chamber, and sir Wilham Butts, his physician, relating at large Tur ner's case. And by their means the king became better informed of the man, and, in fine, commanded him to be retained as a faithful subject. This story is at large re lated by Foxeb. And this I judge to be that Turner, whom the archbishop nominated for Ireland, having lived long in his diocese, and so well known to him ; and whom he had, I suppose, removed to Canterbury, to a prebend, or some other preferment there. Here he did this re markable and bold piece of service, that when, about three years past, the rebels were up in Kent, he then preached twice in the camp near Canterbury : for which the rebels were going to hang him. But God preserved himc. In b [For " a letter of apology of M . Morice, sent to sir Wilham Butts, and sir Anthony Denny, defend ing the cause of M. Richard Tur ner, preacher against the papists," see Foxe's Acts and Monuments, pp. 1868-1870. ed. Lond. 1583.] c [The following passage re lating to Richard Turner is found in a letter of archbishop Cran mer to sir Wilham Cecil ; " After my very hearty recommendations : now at the last, against his will, Turner is come up unto the court. He preached twice in the camp that was by Canterbury ; for the which the rebels would have hanged him ; and he seemed then more glad to go to hanging, than he doth now to go to Armachane ; he alleged so many excuses, but the chief is this, that he shall preach to the walls and stalls, for the people understand no Enghsh. I bear him in hand, Yes ; and yet I doubt whether they speak Eng hsh in the diocese of Armachane. But if they do not, then I say, that if he will take the pain to learn the Irish tongue, which, with diligence he may do in a year or two, then both his per son and doctrine shall be more acceptable not only unto his dio cese, but also throughout all Ire land. I commit him to your cure, praying you to help him to have as ready a dispatch as may be, for he hath but a little money." — Works of abp. Cranmer, vol. ii. p. 439. Park. Soc. ed. Jenkyns' Remains of abp. Cranmer, vol. i. P- 355- See also the Appendix to this volume, No. lxvi.] 374 MEMORIALS OF [II. a8. Bale'sCent. queen Mary's time he fled to Basil; where he expounded upon St. James, the Hebrews, and the Ephesians, to the exiles there ; when James Pilkington expounded Ecclesi- astes, and both Epistles of Peter, and the Galatians ; and Bentham the Acts of the Apostlesd. Thomas Thomas Rosse, or Bosee, was also as memorable a man; Rose.' very eminent both for his preachings and sufferings. He was a west-country man, but by providence was removed into Suffolk, and at Hadley had preached against purga tory and worshipping images, about the time that Bilney and Latimer did the like in Cambridge, (which was five and twenty or thirty years past) ; whereby he had brought many to the knowledge of the truth in that town. About the year 1532, when certain persons, out of their zeal against idolatry, had stolen by night the rood out of the church at Dover Court in Essex, for which, being found 276 guilty of felony, they were hanged, Bose seemed to have been privy hereunto; for with the rood they conveyed away the slippers, the coat, and the tapers belonging to d [" Sunt adhuc, praster eos, Pilkintonum, Lancastriensem, Ri- quos in hac nona centuria tetigi, cardum Turnerum, quem de pra?clari concionatores, theologi Cantuariavocant, Straffordiensem, ac bonarum artium studiosi, nu- atque Thomam Benthamum, Ebo- mero plures : qui maluerunt racensem, viros venerabiles ac Dei in solitudinem fugere, quam cum spiritu affatim illustratos, libens pseudoprophetis, Samariae aut his adderem. Quorum Jacobus Babylonia? deliciis frui. Ex horum Salomonis Ecclesiasten, utramque numero, in nostro collegio sunt: D. Petri epistolam, ac Paulum ad Jacobus Pilkintonus, eruditus Galatas : Ricardus, epistolam Ja- ac pius theologus, qui utram- cobi, Paulumque ad Hebrseos et que D. Petri epistolam elegan- Ephesios : atque Thomas, Apo- ter exposuit, et nunc in Salomi- stolorum acta, nobis qui adhuc nis Ecclesiastice fideliter laborat. Basilia? sumus piissime ac doc- Ricardus Turnerus, quem Can- tissime exposuerunt." — Id. pt. ii. tuariensem vocant. Thomas Ben- p. 113.] tham." — Bale. Script, illust. catal. e [See above, p. 369. n. s.] p. 741. ed. Basil. 1557. " Jacobum J553-] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 375 it; which coat Rose burnt. Whether for this, or some other thing, he was complained of to the council, and brought before them, and by the bishop of Lincoln1 was committed to prison: where he lay for some days and nights with both his legs in an high pair of stocks, his body lying along on the ground. Thence he was removed to Lambeth, in the year that Cranmer was consecrated, (which was 1533), who set him at hberty. Afterward he was admitted by Crumwel to be his chaplain, that thereby he might get a hcense to preach. After various tossings from place to place, for safety of his life, he fled into Flanders and Germany, and came to Zurich, and remain ed with Bullinger ; and to Basle, where he was entertained by Grinseus. After some time he returned back into England, but was glad to fly beyond sea again. Three years after, in his voyage back to his own country again, he was taken prisoner by some French, and carried into Dieppe, where he was spoiled of all he had. His ran som was soon after paid by a well-disposed person, who also brought him over into England. Then the earl of Sussex? received him, and his wife and child, privately into his house. But when this was known, the earl sent him a secret letter to be gone : and so he lurked in London till the death of King Henry VIII. King Ed ward gave him a hving of West Ham, near London, in Essex. Being deprived upon queen Mary's coming to f [John Longland.] to conclude the marriage between B [i. e. Henry Ratcliffe, second Mary and Philip : he died, accord- earl of Sussex, who was lord lieu- ing to Strype, Feb. 17, 1556, ac- tenant of Norfolk, and supported cording to Burnet, in March, 1557. queen Mary's claims in that coun- — See Strype's Eccl. Mem. voL ii. ty, in behalf of whose title he pt. i. p. 464. vol. iii. pt. i. pp. 134, raised forces, and was of great ser- 196,512. ed. Oxon. 1822. Burnet's vice to her in obtaining the crown ; Hist, of Reformat, vol. iii. p. 503. he was sent toSpain as ambassador ed. Oxon. 1829.] 376 MEMORIALS OF [II. 28. the crown, he was sometime preacher to a congregation in London ; but was taken at one of their meetings in Bow-church-yard. Which, I suppose, was in the year 1555. For then he was in the Tower: and thence, in the month of May, by the council's letters, he was delivered to the sheriff of Norfolk, to be conveyed and dehvered to the bishop of Norwich, and he either to reduce him to recant, or to proceed against him according to lawh. Much imprisonment and many examinations he imderwent, both from the bishops of Winchester1 and Norwichi ; but escaped at last, by a great providence, beyond sea, where he tarried till the death of queen Mary. And after these his harassings up and down in the world, he was at last, in queen Ehzabeth's happy reign, quietly settled at Luton in Bedfordshire, where he was preacher, and lived to a very great age. Robert The fourth was Robert Wisdom k, a man eminent, as the rest, both for his exemplary conversation and for his preaching, together with his sufferings attending thereon. In Henry Vlllth's reign he was a person of fame among the professors of the Gospel in the south parts of the nation : whence, after many painful labours and per secutions he fled into the north; as did divers other preachers of the pure rehgion in those times. There in h [" At Hampton Court, the proceed against him according to 7. of May, an0. 1555. — A letter the order of the laws." — MSS. to the lieutenant of the Tower Council Book. Privy Council to deliver the body of Thomas Office, a.d. 1553-1557. fol. 239. Rosse there to the sheriff of Nor- Original.] folk to be by him ordered as he is * [Stephen Gardiner.] appointed. — A letter to the bishop J [John Hopton, who was con- of Norwich to receive the said secrated Oct. 25, or 28, 1554. He Rosse at the sheriff's hands and died in 1558. — See Le Neve's to travail to reduce him from his Fasti, p. 212.] heresies to the truth; otherwise to k [See above, p. 370. n. *.] 1 552.] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 377 Staffordshire he was one of those that were entertained by John Old1, a pious professor, and harbourer of good men : and Thomas Becon m, was another, who was taken up with Bradford11 in the beginning of queen Mary's reign, and committed to the Tower. Of this Old the said Becon, in a treatise of his, printed in Edward The Jewel Vlth's reign, gives this character : That " he was to ° oy' him and Wisdom, as Jason was to Paul and Silas : he received us joyfully into his house, and hberally, for the 277 Lord's sake, ministered [all good things] to our necessi ties. And as he began, so did he continue, a right hearty friend, and dearly loving brother, so long as we remained in the country0. P While Wisdom was here, "he was ever virtuously occupied, and suffered no hour to pass [away] without (some) good fruit:" employing himself now in writ ing, as he had before in preaching. Besides other books formerly writ by him, he penned here " very godly and fruitful expositions upon certain psalms of David, of the which [also] he translated some into Enghsh metre [very learnedly] ." There is one of them, and I think no more, 1 [John Old, D. D., " a teacher m [For a biog. notice of Thomas of youth, as well as a teacher of the Becon, S. T. P., chaplain to abp. gospel," was the translator, at the Cranmer, see " Early Writings desire of bishop Latimer, of of Thomas Becon," pp. vii. et Erasmus' Paraphrase upon all the sqq. Park. Soc. ed.] canonical epistles, and was con- n [See above, p. 300. n. a.] cerned in the royal visitation of ° [See Becon's Jewel of joy, 1547 ; he became vicar of Cub- Works, (Catechism, &c.) p. 422. bington, Warwickshire, and was Park. Soc. ed.] also appointed to a prebend in the P They were both forced to church of Hereford," a.d. 1552. recant openly at St. Paul's Cross, In the time of queen Mary he was in the year 1544, together with an exile for his religion. — See one Shingleton. And hereupon, above, p. 14; Strype's Eccl. Mem. I suppose, they conveyed them- vol. ii. pt. i. p. 47, pt. ii. p. 273. selves into the north parts for ed. Oxon. 1822.] security. 378 MEMORIALS OF [II. 28. still remaining in our ordinary singing psalms ; namely, the hundred [and] twenty-fifth, which in the title is said to be composed by R. W. There is also a hymn of his pre served, and set usually at the end of our Enghsh singing psalms, in our Bibles, beginning, "Preserve us, Lord, by thy dear word." He writ here "also many godly and learned sermons upon the Epistles and Gospels, [that are] read [in the temples] on Sundays." He "translated a pos- til of Antonius Corvinus," a Lutheran divine, " and divers other learned men's works." And some of his adversaries having laid certain errors to his charge very unjustly, he writ a confutation thereof; a book, it seems, replenished "with all kind of godly learning." These, and several other things, he writ while he was here, but they were not pubhshed. After his abode in this place some time, he was by letters called away again among his former friends and acquaintance 1. And what became of him afterwards, I find not ; until here, in Edward Vlth's reign, he was nominated by our archbishop to be made archbishop of Armagh. But in queen Mary's reign he fled to Frank fort, where he remained one of the members of the Enghsh congregation there. And when an unhappy breach was made there among them, some being for the use of the Geneva discipline and form, and others for the continuance of that form of prayers that had been used in England in king Edward's days ; and the faction grew to that head, that the former separated themselves from the rest, and departed to Geneva: this Wisdom did, in a sermon preached at. Frankfort, vindicate the English book, and somewhat sharply blamed them that went away, calling them mad-heads. As one Thomas Cole wrote 1 [Becon's Jewel of Joy, Works, (Catechism, &c), pp. 422, 3. Park. Soc. ed.] 1552'1 ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 379 from thence to a friend, with this censure on him : "That he so called them, he would not say, unwisely, [alluding to his name Wisdom], but he might well say, uncharitably." I have thought good to give this account of these men, that we may perceive hence the good judgment of our archbishop in propounding them for those Irish prefer ments; so fit and well qualified for them, as in other respects of prudence and learning, so especially for their tried zeal and boldness in preaching the gospel, and their constancy in suffering for it; which were virtues that there would be great occasion for in Ireland. Of all these four, our archbishop judged Mr. Whitehead The cha- the fittest; giving this character of him, That he was archbishop endued with "good knowledge, special honesty, fervent saye of the zeal, and politic wisdom." And the next to him in fitness he judged Turner : of whom he gives this relation : " That [No. he was merry and witty withal, ' Nihil appetit, nihil ardet, '-1 nihil somniat, nisi Jesum Christum/ And, in the hvely preaching of bim and his word, declared such dihgence, 278 faithfulness, and wisdom, as for the same deserveth much commendation." In fine, Turner was the man concluded upon by the Turner de- king for the archbishopric of Armagh, Whitehead either A^1^hfor being not overcome to accept it, or otherwise designed. And the archbishop had order from court to send to Canterbury for him to come up, which accordingly he did. And now, about the middle of September, much against his will, as not liking his designed preferment, Turner waited upon the archbishop, who, urging to him the king's will and pleasure, and his ordinary call unto this place, and such hke arguments, after a great un willingness, prevailed with him to accept it. But the archbishop told the secretary, that Turner seemed more 380 MEMORIALS OF [II. 28. glad to go to hanging, (which the rebels three years be- [No-7 fore were just going to do with him, for his preaching lxvi.] . . against them in their camp), than he was now to go to Armagh. He urged to the archbishop, " That if he went thither, he should have no auditors, but must preach to the walls and stalls ; for the people understood no Enghsh." The archbishop, on the other hand, endeavoured to answer all his objections. He told him, "They did understand Enghsh in Ireland ; though whether they did in the diocese of Armagh, he did indeed doubt. But, to remedy that, he advised him to learn the Irish tongue : which with dih gence," he told him, " he might do in a year or two : and that there would this advantage arise thereby, that both his person and doctrine would be more acceptable, not only unto his diocese, but also throughout all Ireland." And so, by a letter to secretary Cecyl, recommended him to his care ; entreating, " that he might have as ready a dispatch as might be, because he had but little money ' ." But de- This letter of the archbishop is dated Sept. 19th, 1552. So that it must be a mistake in the late excellent historian, when he writes, that Bale and Goodacre were sent over Hist. Ref. into Ireland to be bishops in the month of August s: which 205. cannot agree with this letter of Cranmer, which makes Turner to be in nomination only for that see a month after. And by certain memorials of king Edward's own hand, which I have, it appears, that as Turner at last got himself off from accepting that bishopric, so by the date thereof it is evident, it was vacant in October following : for the king, under that month, put the providing for that place, which Turner refused, among his matters to be re membered. The archbishop's letters concerning this Irish No. LXV, affair are m the Appendix. LXVI. r [See above, p. 373. n. c.] format, vol. ii. p. 422. ed. Oxon. 8 [See Burnet's Hist, of Re- 1829.] 155a.] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 381 So that at last this charge fell upon Hugh Goodacre, Goodacre the last man, as it seems, nominated by the archbishop ; yshop of " whom he termed "a wise and learned man." He andArmash- Bale, as they came together out of bishop Poinet's family unto their preferments, so they were consecrated together by Browne, archbishop of Dublin, February 2 ; assisted by Thomas, bishop of Kildare, and Eugenius, bishop of Down and Connor, which makes me think they were not come over long before. Goodacre died about a quarter of a year after at Dublin, and there buried, not without sus picion of poison, by procurement of certain priests of his diocese, for preaching God's verity, and rebuking their common vices, as Bale writes K He left many writings of 279 great value behind him, as the said Bale, his dear friend, Vocation of relates ; but none, as ever I heard of, pubhshed. As he BalEei was a sober and virtuous man, so he was particularly Centur- u famed for his preaching. He was at first, I suppose, chaplain to the lady Elizabeth; at least to her he had been long known. And for him, about the year 1548, or 1549, she procured a hcense to preach from the protector; as appears by a letter she wrote from Enfield to Mr. Cecyl, who then attended on him, of which Goodacre himself was the bearer ; wherem she gave this testimony of bim ; " That he had been of long time known unto her t [" In the mean time came the like in my diocese of Ossory, sorrowful news unto me that M. which made me peradventure Hugh Goodacre, the archbishop more circumspect than I would of Armach, that godly preacher, have been." — The vocation of and virtuous learned man, was John Bale, &c, fol. 22. ed. Rom. poisoned at Dublin, by procure- 1553.] ment of certain priests of his u " Beats memoriae concionato- diocese, for preaching God's verity rem in Hibernia- vigilantissimum, and rebuking their common vices. ac theologica eloquentia non im- And letters by and by were di- merito commendatum." [Bale. rected unto me, by my special illust. vir. catal. pt. ii. p. 231. ed. friends from thence, to beware of Basil 1557.] 382 MEMORIALS OF [II. 28. to be as well of honest conversation, and sober living, as of sufficient learning and judgment in the Scriptures, to preach the word of God. The advancement whereof," as she said, "she so desired, that she wished there were many such to set forth God's glory. She desired him therefore, that as heretofore, at her request, he had ob tained hcense to preach for divers other honest men, so he would recommend this man's case unto my lord, and therewith procure for him the hke hcense as to the other had been granted." Letters And lastly, that Goodacre, and his colleague Bale might from the ii-ij_t_ council to find the better countenance and authority, when they commend^" sL-oulcL exercise their functions in that country, the privy - ing the council wrote two letters to the lord deputy and council Irish bi- f . shops. of Ireland ; the one, dated October 27 T, " in commendation of Bale, elect bishop of Ossory;" and the other, dated Council November 4, "in commendation of Goodacre, elect bishop Book- of ArmachanV v [MSS. Council Book. Privy Council Office, a.d. 1550 — 1553. fol. 630.] w [Id. fol. 635.] 1552*-] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. CHAPTER XXIX. THE ARCHBISHOP CHARGED WITH COVETOUSNESS. To divert the king after the loss of his uncle, whom he A rumour dearly loved, Northumberland x took him in progress in ofVthe°arch- the summer of this year. While he was in this progress, bishop's co- some about his person, that they might the better make and wealth. way for their sacrilegious designs, and to make the king the more inclinable to lay hands on the episcopal demeans, or at least to chp and pare them, buzzed about the court rumours, how rich the archbishop of Canterbury and the other bishops were; and withal, how niggardly and un suitably they hved to their great incomes, laying up, and scraping together to enrich themselves and their pos terities; whereby hospitality was neglected, which was especially required of them. Hereupon sir Wilham Cecyl Which the secretary, who was now with the king, and took notice himVord S of these discourses, and saw well the mahcious tendency of- thereof, (and moreover thought them perhaps in some measure to be true), laboured to hinder the ill conse quence: for he was ever a very great favourer, as of the reformed clergy, so of their estate and honours. This put him upon writing a private letter from court to the arch bishop, desiring him favourably to take a piece of good counsel at his hands, as he intended it innocently and out of a good mind, acquainting him with the reports at the 280 court of his riches, and of his covetousness ; reminding him withal of that passage of St. Paul, " They that will be rich fall into temptation and a snare ;" meaning probably thereby, the danger that he and the rest of his brethren might expose their revenues to thereby. The archbishop x [See above, p. 206. n. °.] 384 MEMORIALS OF [II. 20, The arch bishop'sanswer for himself and the other bishops. No. LXVII. This very slanderraised upon seemed somewhat nettled, and, perceiving the ill designs, dispatched an answer hereunto, giving a true account of his own condition, and of the other bishops, as to tem poral things, and letting him understand, how much the world was mistaken in him and the rest : " That for him self he feared not that saying of St. Paul half so much as he did stark beggary. That he took not half so much care for his hving, when he was a scholar of Cambridge, as he did at that present : for although he had now much more revenue, yet," he said, "he had much more to do withal. That he had more care now to hve as an arch bishop, than he had at that time to live like a scholar. That he had not now so much as he had within ten years past by an hundred and fifty pounds of certam rent, besides casualties. That he paid double for every thing he bought : and that if a good auditor had this account, he should find no great surplusage to grow rich upon." And then, as for the rest of the bishops, he told him, " that they were all beggars, but only one single y man of them : and yet he dared well say, that he was not very rich. And that if he knew any bishop that were covetous, he would surely admonish him. Intreating the secretary, that, if he could inform him of any such, he would signify him, and himself would advertise him, thinking he could do it better than the other." Who seemed to have hinted his mind to the archbishop, that he intended to do it. This letter will be found among the rest in the Appendix. No doubt the archbishop was thus large and earnest on this subject to supply the secretary with arguments to confute that malicious talk at court concerning the bishops, and to prevent the mischiefs hatching against them. Nor indeed was this the first time this archbishop was thus slandered. For some of his enemies, divers years y He probably was Holgate, archbishop of York. I552.J ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 385 before, had charged him to his loving master, king Henry hjm t0 VIIL, with covetousness and ill housekeeping: and the Henry. chief of these, that raised this report, was sir Thomas Seymour. But the king made him to convince himself, by sending him to Lambeth about dinner time upon some pretended message : where his own eyes saw how the archbishop hved in far other sort than he had told the king, keeping great and noble hospitality. So that, when he returned, he acknowledged to his majesty, that he never saw so honourable a hall set in this realm, besides his majesty's, in all his life, with better order, and so well furnished in each degree. And the king then gave this testimony of him, " Ah, good man ! all that he hath he Foxe. spendeth in housekeeping z." For this reason probably it was, as well as upon the ac- King Henry count of his good service, and also of the exchanges he him lands. was forced to make, that the said king gave him a promise of a grant of some lands, and by a general clause in his will signified as much; which was, "That certam persons 281 should be considered." Accordingly I find in the fore- This pro- mentioned manuscript-book of sales of king's lands, thatfe^^" Thomas archbishop of Canterbury did, in the first year of kins Ed" king Edward VI., partly by purchase, and partly by ex change of other lands, procure divers lands of the king. He obtained the rectory of Whalley, Blackburn, and Bochdale, in the county of Lancaster, lately belonging to the monastery or abbey of Whalley in the same county ; and divers other lands and tenements in the counties of Lancaster, Kent, Surrey, London, Bangor. And this partly in consideration of king Henry VIII' s promise, and in performance of his will, and partly in exchange for the manor and park of Mayfield in the county of Sussex ; z [See Foxe's Acts and Monuments, pp. 1864, 5. ed. Lond. 1583.] CRANMER, VOL. II. C C 386 MEMORIALS OF [II. 29. and divers other lands and tenements in the counties of Middlesex, Hertford, Kent, Buckingham, and York. This purchase he made, I suppose, not for himself, but for his His pur- see. About the same time he also bought of the king, for the sum of five hundred and eighty pounds, eight shillings, and four pence, the manor of Sleaford in the county of Lincoln, and of Middleton-Cheny in the county of Northampton, and divers other lands and tenements in the said counties. He made another purchase of the king the same year, that is, the first of his reign, for four hundred twenty-nine pounds, fourteen shillings, and two pence, and "for the fulfilling the last will of the late king, and in consideration of services," as it is expressed in the said book of sales. This purchase was the priory of Arthington, in the county of York, and divers other lands and tenements in York, Nottingham, and Kent. An extract of which three purchases, exactly taken out of the said book, with the value of the lands, and the rent reserved, and the time of the issues, and the test of the Number patent, I have thought fit to insert in the Appendix, which probably may not be unacceptable to curious persons. The arch- Which purchases when we consider, we might be ready fleeradby *° ma^e a stand, to resolve ourselves how the archbishop kingHenry. could represent his condition so mean as he did in the letter before-mentioned, as though he feared he should die a beggar. But it will unriddle this, if we think how the archbishopric had been fleeced by king Henry VIIL, in ten years before : insomuch that the rents were less by an hundred and fifty pounds per annum, than they were before ; besides the loss of fines, and other accidental benefits, as it is mentioned by the archbishop in his letter. Add those extraordinary expences he was at in the main tenance of divines and scholars, strangers, that were exiles for rehgion, and the salaries, and pensions, and gratuities, 1552.] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 387 sent to learned men abroad, besides his great and hberal housekeeping, and constant table, and large retinue. But, to make appear more particularly in this place how Lands past king Henry pared his revenue, I will give one instance of ^wn by what was passed away at one clap by exchange ; which excnanse- was indeed so considerable, that it was commonly called, "The great exchange." This way of exchanging lands was much used in those times ; wherein the princes com monly made good bargains for themselves, and ill ones for the bishoprics. This exchange, made by Cranmer with the king, was on the first day of December, in the twenty-ninth year of his reign, being the very year of the 282 suppression of the greater abbeys and rehgious convents. They were the ancient demeans belonging to the arch bishopric, consisting of many noble manors, whereof some had palaces annexed to them. I shall name only those that lay in the county of Kent, as I find them dispersed VfflareCan- in Philipott's book of Kent. I. The manor and palace of Maidstone ; which palace, Leland saith, was once a castle a. II. The manor and palace of Charing. III. Wingham. IV. Wingham-Barton, in the parish of Alresford. But in this Philipott is mistaken ; for this was let to sir Edward Bainton for ninety-nine years, by means of the king's own solicitation to the archbishop. V. Wrotham. VI. Saltwood; that had in times past a magnificent castle and park, and many manors held of it by knights' service, which made it called an Honour. VII. Tenham. a ["The castle standeth abowt of Cant." — Leland's Itinerary, the myddes of the town, being vol. vii. p. 101. ed. Oxon. 1710- well maintained by the archbishop 12.] c c2 388 MEMORIALS OF [II. 29. VIII. Bexley. IX. Aldington. Where was a seat for the archbishop, a park, and a chase for deer, called Aldington-Frith. Besides Chve or Cliff ; and Mahngden, a manor appendant there unto : which king Henry took away from this see and bishop, without any satisfaction, as far as I can find. Also Pinner, Hayes, Harrow, Mortlake, &c. were part of this Lands great exchange. In heu of these demeans past over to to the arch- the crown by way of exchange, the king conveyed several bishop. manors to the archbishop, all which had appertained to the lately dissolved rehgious houses. Namely, these among others : I. Pising ; a parcel of the abbey of St. Eadigunds. II. Brandred; another manor belonging to the said abbey. III. The college of Bredgar. IV. Keculver ; another abbey suppressed. V. Dudmanscomb ; belonging to the priory of St. Mar tin's in Dover a. The arch- One author, viz. Kilburnb, that hath wrote of Kent, bishop parted also makes Cranmer also to have made over to the king the an^Otford sumptuous palace of Otford, built by archbishop Warham, to the king, which cost him thirty-three thousand pounds, (a vast sum in those days), as Lambardc tells us. Phihpott, another writer of that county, saith that this was incorporated into the revenue of the crown by the builder himself, arch bishop Warham, about the twelfth year of that king's reign ; together with the magnificent seat of Knoll, near Sevenoaks ; exchanging both with the king for other lands, a [See Philipott's Villare Canti- or Survey of Kent, p. 208. ed. anum, pp.40, 44, 65, 100, 119, Lond. 1659.] 228, 278, 298, 299, 336, 363, 373, c [See Lambard's Perambula- 374. ed. Lond. 1659.] tion of Kent, p/377. ed. Lond. b [See Kilburn's Topography, 1576.] I552-J ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 389 to extinguish the passions of such as looked with regret and desire upon the patrimony of the church d. But it MSS. c c c c appears, by a writing of Cranmer's own secretary, that ¦ • ¦ • this archbishop parted with both Otford and Knoll at once to the king, after he had possessed them some years; and not Warham, as Phihpott mistakes6. The world is apt to blame Cranmer for parting with What mov- these revenues of the see. But surely it was a true apo- make tnese logy that the author before namedf made for the arch- 283 bishop's great exchange; namely, "Because he, finding exc anses- that the spreading demeans of the church were in danger to be torn off by the talons of avarice and rapine, to mor tify the growing appetites of sacrilegious cormorants, ex changed them with the crown." Which may be enough to stop any clamours against this most reverend prelate for this his doing : especially considering what I shall add upon this argument hereafter, from his own secretary. His care and concern for the welfare of the Enghsh His cares church made him ever most earnestly to love the king, fortheking. and to have a very tender regard for the safety of his person. Who in the summer of this year, as was hinted before?, went a progress, accompanied by the duke of Northumberland ; brought about probably by him to get more into the king's affections, and to have his own de signs the better to take effect, and with the less opposi tion and control : and possibly, that the king might be the further off from the archbishop to consult withal. d [See Phihpott's Villare Canti- account ofthe archbishop's bouses anum, pp. 263, 319.] at Maidstone, Otford, and Knoll, e [MSS. C.C.C.C. No. cxxix. will be found in the same author, — The indenture for effecting vol. i. pp. 323, 338, and vol. iii. the exchange bears date Nov. 30, p. 624.] 29 Hen. VIII. i.e. a.d. 1537. f [i. e. Philipott.] Hasted's Hist, of Kent, vol. i. p. S [See above, p. 383.] 322. ed. Cant. 1742-99. — A full 390 MEMORIALS OF [II. 29. But he had now a more especial concern upon him for his majesty at this time, as though his mind had pro phetically presaged some evil to befall the king in that progress ; (and indeed it was the last progress that ever he made) . And so methinks do these expressions of the arch bishop sound, in a letter, dated in July, to Cecyl, then attending the court ; " beseeching Almighty God to pre serve the king's majesty, with all his council and family, and send him well to return from his progress s." And in a letter the next month, " he thanked Cecyl for his news ; but especially," said he, "for that ye advertise me that the king's majesty is in good health : wherein I beseech God long to continue his highness"." And when, in the latter end of the following month, the gests, (that is, the stages of his majesty's progress), were altered, which looked hke some ill design, the archbishop entreated Cecyl to send him the new resolved-upon gests from that time to the end, that he might from time to time know where his ma jesty was; adding his prayer again for him, "that God would preserve and prosper him'." e [See Appendix, No. lxvii. and and Works of abp. Cranmer, Works of abp. Cranmer, vol. ii. vol. ii. p. 438.] pp. 437, 8. Park. Soc. ed.] ! [See Appendix, No. lxv. and h [See Appendix, No. cvi. in Works of abp. Cranmer, vol. ii. the third volume of this edition, p. 438.] I553.J ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 391 CHAPTER XXX. HIS CARE FOR THE VACANCIES. FALLS SICK. While the king was thus abroad, and the archbishop His care for absent, unworthy or disaffected men were in a fairer pro- vacancies of babihty of getting promotions in the church, while he was the church- not at hand for to nominate fit men to the king, and to advise him in the bestowing the vacant dignities and bene fices. The archbishop knew very well how much learning and sobriety contributed towards the bringing the nation out of popery, and that nothing tended so effectually to continue it as the contrary. This matter the archbishop seemed to have discoursed at large with secretary Cecyl at parting; who therefore, by a letter sent to the said archbishop, then at his house at Ford, desired him to send him up a catalogue of learned men, and such as he 284 esteemed fit for places of preferment in the church and university: that so, as any place fell in the king's gift, the said secretary might be ready at the least warning to recommend fitting and worthy men to supply such vacan cies, and to prevent any motion that might be made by any courtiers or simonists for ignorant persons, or cor rupt in rehgion. In answer to which letter, the arch bishop writ him word, that he would send him his mind in that matter with as much expedition as he could J. And undoubtedly we should have seen the good fruits of this afterwards in the church, had not the untimely death of that admirable prince, that followed not long after, pre vented this good design. This year the archbishop laboured under two fits ofLaboured sickness at Croydon. The latter was caused by a severe ^ethis ¦ rcl . .. ,, ... . autumn. 1 [See Appendix, No. cvm. in and Works of abp. Cranmer, the third volume of this edition, vol. ii. p. 441. J 392 MEMORIALS OF [II. 30. ague ; of which his physicians doubted whether it were a quotidian, or a double-tertian; and, seizing him in the dechning of the year, was in danger to stick by him all the winter. But, by the care of his physicians, in the latter end of August, it had left him two days, which made him hope he was quit thereof; yet his water kept an high colour. That second day he wrote to Cecyl, and " desired him to acquaint Cheke how it was with him. And now the most danger was," as he said, "that if it came again that night, it was hke to turn to a quartan, a most stub born ague, and likelier to continue and wear him outk." A disease, indeed, that carried off his successor, cardinal Pole, and was, as Godwin observed1, a disease deadly and mortal unto elder folk. The great The archbishop's friends had reason to fear his distem- agues about Per> ^ we think of the severity of agues in that age ; greater, this time. as ft seems, than in this. Roger Ascham complaineth to his friend John Sturmius, anno 1562; "that, for four years past, he was afflicted with continual agues : that no sooner had one left him, but another presently followed ; and that the state of his health was so impaired and broke by them, that an hectic fever seized his whole body : and the physicians promised him some ease, but no sohd re- stew's medym." And I find, six or seven years before that, men tion made of hot burning fevers, whereof died many old k [See Appendix, No. lxv. and secuta : atque sic rationes salutis Works of abp. Cranmer, vol. ii. meae omnes, istis nexis et jugatis p. 438.] febribus, sunt fractse et convulsae, 1 [Godwin de Prasulibus, vol. i. ut jam corpus meum omne febris p. 151. ed. Cantab. 1743.] ilia hectica occupaverit : cui, me- m [" Hos quatuor proximos dicorum filii, allevamentum ali- superiores annos, ita continenti- quando, remedium solidum nun- bus febribus correptus sum, ut quam pollicentur." — Roger. As- una vix me unquam reliquerit, chami Epist. p. 79. ed. Lond. quin etiam altera statim sit con- 1790.] Chron. I552-J ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 393 persons ; and that there died in the year 1556, seven alder men within the space of ten months. And the next year, about harvest time, the quartan agues continued in like manner, or more vehemently than they had done the year before ; and they were chiefly mortal to old people, and especially priests : so that a great number of parishes be came destitute of curates, and none to be gotten ; and much corn was spoiled for lack of harvest-men". Such was the nature of this disease in these days. But the severity or danger of the archbishop's distem- That which per did not so much trouble him, as certain inconveniences ™rne(j h]m that attended it ; viz. that it put him off from those pious in nis sick- ness. and holy designs that he was in hand with, for God's glory, and the good of the church. For so he expressed his mind to his friend the secretary ; " However the matter chance, the most grief to me is, that I cannot proceed in such matters as I have in hand, according to my will and desire : this ' terrenum domicilium ' is such an obstacle to 285 all good purposes0." So strongly bent was the heart of this excellent prelate to the serving of God and his church. n [" In the last year began the in harvest time, the quartain hot burning fevers whereof died agues continued in like manner, many old persons, so that in or more vehemently, than they London there died seven alder- had done the last year passed, men in the space of ten months, wherethrough died many old peo- whose names were Henry Her- pie, and specially priests, so that dion, who deceased the 22 of a great number of parishes were December, 1555 ; sir Richard unserved, and no curates to be Dobs, late mayor; sir William gotten, and much corn was lost Laxton, late mayor; sir Henry in the field for lack of workmen Hoblethorn, late mayor; sir John and labourers." — Stow's Chro- Champneis, blind, late mayor; nicle, pp. 628, 634. ed. Lond. sir John AylefFe, late sheriff, and 1631.] sir John Gresham, late mayor, ° [See Appendix, No. lxv. and who deceased the 23. of October, Works of Cranmer, vol. ii. p. 438. anno 1556.— This year (i.e. 1558) Park. Soc. ed.] 394 MEMORIALS OF [II. 30. But out of this sickness he escaped ; for God had reserved him for another kind of death to glorify him by. The secre- A httle before this sickness befel him, something fell thefarch-3 out which gave him great joy. Cecyl knew how welcome bishop the g.0od news out of Germany would be to him, and therefore copy of the ° J emperor's in July sent him a copy of the pacification P ; that is, the tion. emperor's declaration of peace throughout the empire, after long and bloody wars; which consisted of such articles as were favourable unto the protestants, after much persecution of them : " as, that a diet of the empire should shortly be summoned, to dehberate about compos ing the differences of rehgion; and that the dissensions about rehgion should be composed by placid, and pious, and easy methods. And that in the mean time all should hve in peace together, and none should be molested for vid. Sleid. religion ; with divers other matters q." And in another lib. 24. letter, soon after, the said Cecyl advised him of a peace concluded between the emperor and Maurice, elector of Saxony, a warhke prince, and who headed the protestant army : which being news of peace among Christians, was highly acceptable to the good father. But he wanted much to know upon what terms, out of the concern he had that it might go well with the protestant interest: and therefore, Cecyl having not mentioned them, the archbishop earnestly, in a letter to him, desired to know whether the peace were according to the articles, meaning those of the pacification, or otherwise r. Which when he understood, (for upon the same articles that peace between p [i. e. of Passau, the date of 1 [Sleidan, de statu relig. et which was July 31, a. d. 1552, reipub. lib. xxiv. pp. 562 et sqq. "upon which a definite arrange- ed. Francof. 1568.] ment was based for the future r [See Appendix, No. cvi. in peace of Germany in matters of the 3rd vol. of this edition, and religion, a.d. 1557." Works of Works of abp. Cranmer, vol. ii. abp. Cranmer, vol. ii. p. 437. n. 3.] p. 439.] I552-] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 395 the emperor and duke Maurice stood), it created a great tranquillity to his pious mind. Thus were his thoughts employed about the matters of Germany, and the cause of rehgion there, which he rejoiced not a httle to see in so fair a way to a good conclusion. 396 MEMORIALS OF [II. 3 1. CHAPTER XXXI. HIS KINONESS FOR GERMANY. His kind- To this country he had a particular kindness ; not only Germany, because he had been formerly there in quahty of am bassador from his master king Henry, and had contracted a great friendship with many eminent learned men there, and a near relation to some of them by marrying Osiander's niece at Nuremburg ; but chiefly, and above all, because here the light of the gospel began first to break forth and display itself, to the spiritual comfort and benefit of other nations. He had many exhibitioners in those parts, to whom he allowed annual salaries : insomuch that some of his officers grumbled at it, as though his housekeeping were abridged by it. For when once in king Henry's reign, one, in discourse with an officer of his grace, had said, " He wondered his lordship kept no better an house ;" 286 (though he kept a very good one) : he answered, " It was no wonder, for my lord," said he, "hath so many exhi bitions in Germany, that all is too httle to scrape and get to send thither." His corre- He held at least a monthly correspondence to and from with Ger- learned Germans : and there was one in Canterbury, many' appointed by him on purpose to receive and convey the letters, which his enemies once, in his troubles, made use of as an article against him. And Gardiner, a prebend of Canterbury, and preferred by the archbishop, of this very thing treacherously, in a secret letter, informed his grand enemy and competitor Gardiner, the bishop of Winton. and with Among the rest of his correspondents in Germany, archbishop Herman, the memorable and ever-famous archbishop and of Cologne, elector of Cologne, was one ; who, by the counsel and di- 1552-] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 397 rection of Bucer and Melancthon, did vigorously labour a reformation of corrupt rehgion within his province and territories. But, finding the opposition against him so great, and lying under the excommunication of the pope for what he had done ; and, being deprived thereupon by the emperor of his lands and function, he resigned his ecclesiastical honour, and betook himself to a retired life : which was done about the year 1547. But no question, in this private capacity, he was not idle in doing what service he could for the good of that cause which he had so generously and pubhcly espoused, and for which he had suffered so much. I find that, in this year 1552, our archbishop had sent a message to secretary Cecyl, who accompanied the king in this summer's progress, desiring him to be mindful of the bishop of Cologne's letters. And in another letter, dated July 21, he thanked the secretary for the good remembrance he had thereof s. What the contents of these letters ofthe archbishop of Cologne were, it appeareth not : but I am very apt to think the purport of them was, that Cranmer would sohcit some certain business in the English court, relating to the affairs of rehgion in Germany, and for the obtaining some favour from the king in that cause. But the king being now abroad, and the archbishop at a distance from him, he procured the secretary, who was ever cordial to the state of rehgion, to sohcit that archbishop's business for him : sending him withal that archbishop's letters for his better instruction. And this, whatever it was, seems to have been the last good office that archbishop Herman did to the cause of rehgion ; for he died, according to Sleidan *, in the month s [See Appendix, No. Ixvii, and * [See Sleidan, de statu relig. et Works of abp. Cranmer, vol. ii. reipub. (a. d. 1552) lib. xxiv. p. P- 437-] 572. ed. Francof. 1568.] 398 MEMORIALS OF [II. 31. of August; and our archbishop's letter, wherem that elector's letters are mentioned, was writ but the month before. The suita- And if one may judge of men's commencing friendship bleness of both these and love according to the suitableness of their tempers and shop's'dis- dispositions, our archbishop of Canterbury, and the arch- positions. kisj,0p 0f Cologne, must have been very intimate friends. It was said of this man, that he often wished, "That either he might be instrumental to the propagating the evangelical doctrine and reformation of the churches under his jurisdiction, or to live a private life." And when his friends had often told him what envy he would draw upon himself by the changing of rehgion, he would answer, hke a true Christian philosopher, " That nothing could happen to him unexpectedly, and that he had long 287 since fortified his mind against every event." These two passages spake the very spirit and soul of Cranmer ; which they may see that are minded to read what Foxe saith of him, as to his undauntedness and constancy in the main taining of the truth, against the many temptations and dangers that he met with during these three reigns suc cessively u. »["' To cleave fast unto the true never, for the most part, shrunk word of doctrine, that he may be from no manner of storm, but was able to exhort with wholesome so many ways tried, that neither learning, and to improve that say favor of his prince, nor fear of the against it :' if he be void, I say, indignation of the same, nor any of these gifts and graces, he is other worldlyrespect could ahenate worthy of no commendation, but or change his purpose, grounded shall seem an idol, and a deceiver upon that infallible doctrine of the of the world. Neither shall he gospel. Notwithstanding his con- deserve the name of a bishop, if stant defence of God's truth was either for bread or meat, affection ever joined with such meekness or favor, he do at any time, or in toward the king, that he never any point, swerve from the truth. took occasion of offence against As in this behalf the worthy con- him." — Foxe's Acts and Monu- stancy of this said archbishop, ments, p. 1865. ed. Lond. 1583-] I552-] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 399 And lastly, as our archbishop devoted himseK wholly Their diii- to the reforming of his church; so admirable was thef^^™_ dihgence, pains, and study this archbishop took in con triving the reformation of his. He procured a book to be writ concerning it, called " Instauratio Ecclesiarum," which contained the form and way to be used for the redressing the errors and corruptions of his church. It was composed by those great German divines, Bucer and Melancthon; which book was put into Enghsh, and pubhshed here, as a good pattern, in the year 1547. This book he intended to issue forth through his jurisdiction, by his authority to be observed. But first he thought fit well and seriously to examine it: and spent five hours in the morning, for five days, to dehberate and con sult thereupon: calling to him, to advise withal in this great affair, his coadjutor count Stolberg, Husman, Jenep, Bucer, and Melancthon. He caused the whole work to be read before him; and, as many places occurred wherein he seemed less satisfied, he caused the matter to be disputed and argued, and then spake his own mind accurately. He would patiently hear the opinions of others for the information of his own judg ment; and so ordered things to be either changed or illustrated. And so dexterously would he decide many controversies arising, that Melancthon thought that those great points of rehgion had been long weighed and considered by him, and that he rightly understood the whole doctrine of the church. He had always lying by him the Bible of Luther's version; and, as testimonies chanced to be alleged thence, he commanded that they should be turned to, that he might consider that which is the fountain of all truth: insomuch that the said Melancthon could not but admire and talk of his learn ing, prudence, piety, and dexterity, to such as he con- 400 MEMORIALS OF [II. 31. Mel. Epist. versed with ; and particularly to John Csesar, to whom Leyden3, in a letter he gave a particular account of this affair. 1647. pag. And it is to be noted by the way, that the said book, according to which the reformation was to be modelled, contained only, as Melancthon in his letter suggested, a necessary instruction for all children, and the sum of the Christian doctrine : and the appointments for the colleges and ecclesiastical hierarchy were very moderate ; the form of the ecclesiastical pohty being to remain as it was, and so were the colleges, with their dignities, wealth, degrees, ornaments thereunto belonging; only great su- « Nee aliam perstitions should be taken away. Which the wise hanc'unam Melancthon aforesaid did so approve of, that he professed utretineantjjg jja(j 0fteil propounded it in diets ofthe German nation, episcopi et x *¦ collegia suae as the best way to peacex. And this I add, that it might x [" Clarissim. et doctissimo viro Joanni Caesareo, S. D. Ut post prselium, ita post conventuum exitus, ha?c civilia certamina me lius narrari possunt. Cum igitur finem conventus adhuc expecte- mus, nondum de eo satis plane scribere possum. Sed narrabo historiam, qua? pracessit, quam scio tibi jucundam lectu fore, mihi certe spectanti fuit jucun- dissima. Priusquam princeps publicavit librum Instaurationis * ecclesiarum, legere et penitus cog nosces eum ipse voluit. Perti- nebat hsec diligentia ad ejus omcium, et laude digna est. Sed multo magis miratus sum ejus in auscultando attentionem et as- siduitatem, et in expendendis ac emendandis locis obscurioribus et horridioribus prudentiam et in disputando eruditionem. Tribuit quinque diebus matutinas horas quinas huic auscultationi, adhi- bitis coadjutore, comiteStolbergio, Husmanno, Jenipio, Buchelo, et me. Attentissime audivit legi in tegrum opus. Quoties occurrit locus in quo aliquid desideravit, re disputata, accurate dixit quid sibi videretur, et auditis aliorum sententiis, vel mutari, vel illus- trari earn partem jussit, qu»dam ipse suo judicio recte emendavit. Multas controversias dogmatum ita dextre dijudicavit, ut anim- adverterem res tantas ei diu cogitatas esse, et integram ec- clesia? doctrinam recte ab eo in- telligi. Scio paucos hac judicii dexteritate prseditos esse, qua; [Hermannus archiepiscopus Coloniensis, comes a Wied.] I552-J ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 401 be observed how archbishop Cranmer went by the same etsuasopes,et recipiant measures in the reformation of the church of England ; doctrinam maintaining the hierarchy, and the revenues, dignities, ^^ quidem et ingenii vim significat, et curam atque intentionem animi quam nemo adhibet, nisi qui vere Deum colere, et invocare cupit. Erat situs liber caelestis doctrinae ad manum, juxta Lutheri ver- sionem, recens editumWitebergae. Ibi sa?pe testimonia citata ipse requirebat, ut fontes consideraret. Ha?c ssepe commoravi aliis, et hodie recitavi, duobus gravissimis comitibus Manderschid, et No- vaeaquilano, cum D. Bucerum et me ad quandam deliberationem vocassent. Cum igitur judicem principem pia voluntate, et bono consilio hanc instaurationem ec clesiarum mohri, et ipsius virtu- tem laudandam esse sentio, et Deum orandum, ut pia consilia adjuvet. Cumque te idem judi- care et optare arbitrer, hanc tibi narrationem gratam fore speravi. Nunc de conventu pauca adjiciam. Brevissimae dehberationes fu- issent, nisi rem extrahere Grop- perus studeret. Comites, ordo equestris, legati civitatum cen- suerunt recipiendam esse formam ecclesiarum restaurandarum. Sed legati collegii Coloniensis refra- gantur. Etsi enim doctrinae genus non improbant, tamen expectari collegii consensum volunt. Nec- tunt moras, negant rem tantam subito constituendam esse. Ad- sunt viri optimi, senex frater principis, Stolbergius, Glichensis, CRANMER, VOL. II. sed habent, ut solet fieri, mandata certa. Suntque adjuncti duo Gropperus et Hieronymus. Sed rrpa>Tayaivio"n)s est Gropperus. Is hactenus variis artificiis pugnavit, ut impediatur ecclesiarum emen- datio. Liber profecto tantum ne- cessariam omnibus pueris ranj- Xno-iv continet et summam Chri stiana; doctrinae. De collegiis et Upapxiq ecclesiastica, ut vocant, moderatissimse sunt sentential, ut maneat forma politic ecclesiastical, maneant collegia et dfyapaxa UpanKa, opes, gradus, ornamenta; sed superstitiones graves tollantur. Saepe in conventibus Germanic* nationis hanc pacis viam proposui. Nee aliam video, nisi hanc unam, ut retineant episcopi et collegia sua d^twfiara, et suas opes, et recipiant doctrinam piam. Quod cogitari aequius potest? Si hanc moderationem Gropperus non probat, sed prius nos interfici cupit, nee ecclesiae nee patriae bene consulit. Sed Deo haec commendo. Habes historiam conventus inchoatam tantum. Nam ante finem plura nunc quidem scribere non poteram. Deum aeternum patrem liberatoris nostri Jesu Christi oro, ut te diu servet incolumem, meque tibi ut parenti commendo. Bene vale, die Ja- cobi 24. Bonnae, anno 1543." — Melancthon. Epist. pp. 34-37. ed. Lugd. Bat. 1647.] Dd 402 MEMORIALS OF [II. 31. and customs of it, against many in those times that were for the utter abolishing them, as rehcs of popery. Such 288 a correspondence there was between our archbishop and the wisest, moderatest, and most learned divines of Ger many. But let us look nearer home. I552-J ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 403 CHAPTER XXXII. TROUBLES OF BISHOP TONSTAL. As the last year we heard of the deprivation of two The trou- blss oi popish bishops, so this year another underwent the hke bishop censure; I mean Tonstal, bishop of Durham: whose Tonsta1' business I shall the rather relate, because our archbishop had some concern in it. September 21, "A commission MS. of an was issued out to the lord chief justice and his colleagues, ^00^ to examine and determine the cause of Tonstal, bishop of Durham, and eight writings touching the same ; which he is willed to consider, and to proceed to the hearing and ordering of the matter, as soon as he may get the rest of his coBeagues to himy." It was not long after, viz. about the midst of October, that this bishop by these commissioners, (whose names, besides the chief justice, do not occur), was deprived, and his estate confiscated. " October ult. sir John Mason was ordered by the council to dehver, to the use of Dr. Tonstal," (so he is now styled), " remaining prisoner in the Tower, such money as should serve for his necessities, until such time as further order shall be taken touching the goods and money, lately appertaining [un]to him z. December 6, "it was agreed" by the council, that Dr. Tonstal, late bishop of Durham, should [henceforth] have the hberty of the Tower, [until the king's majesty's further pleasure shall be therein known]3:" where he continued till the time of queen Mary. But we will look back to learn for what cause this The cause severe punishment was inflicted upon this reverend grave shop's pu nishment. y [MSS. Council Book. Privy 1550-1553. fol. 631.] Council Office, a.d. 1550-1553. a [MSS. Council Book, a.d. fol. 608.] I550-I5S3- fol. 656,] z [MSS. Council Book, a. d. Dd2 404 MEMORIALS OF [H-32. bishop; and the rather, because the bishop of Sarum could not find, as he writes, what the particulars wered. In the year 1550, a conspiracy was hatching in the north, to which the bishop was privy at least, if not an abettor : and he wrote to one Menvile in those parts relating to the same. This Menvilee himself related unto the coun cil, and produced the bishop's letter; which was after wards, by the duke of Somerset, withdrawn and concealed, as it seems out of kindness to Tonstal. But upon the duke's troubles, when his cabinet was searched, this letter was found : upon which they proceeded against Tonstal. This is the sum of what is found in the Council Book : viz. " May 20, 1551, the bishop of Durham is commanded to keep his house f. Aug. 2, he had hcense to walk in the fields s. December 20. "Whereas the bishop of Dur ham, about July [in anno] 1550, was charged by Vivian Menvile to have consented [and been agreeable] to a conspiracy in the north, for the malting a rebellion;" and whereas, "for want of a letter written by the said bishop to the said Menvile, (whereupon depended a great trial of this matter), the" final "determination" of the matter could not be proceeded unto, "and the bishop" (was) " only commanded to keep his house ; the same letter hath of late been "found in a casket ofthe duke of Somer set's after his last apprehension." The said bishop was [now] sent for, and this day "appeared before the council," 289 and was charged with the letter, " which he could not deny but to be [of] his own handwriting:" and, having little to say for himself, he was then sent to the Tower, d [See Burnet's Hist, of Re- f [MSS. Council Book, a. d. format, vol. ii. p. 401. ed. Oxon. 1550-1553. fol. 297.] 1829.] b [MSS. Council Book, a. d. e [See Strype's Eccl. Mem. vol. 1550-1553. fol. 356.] ii.pt. ii. pp. 21,22. ed. Oxon. 1822.] 1552.] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 405 to abide there till he should be delivered by process of lawh." Agreeable to this is that king Edward writes in his Journal : " December 20, the bishop of Durham was, for concealment of treason written to him, and not dis closed [at all till the party did open him committed] to the Tower1. In the latter end of the year 1551, a parhament sitting, a hill in it was thought convenient to bring in a bill into the J™^™™* house of Lords, attainting him for misprision of treason. Tonstal. But archbishop Cranmer spake freely against it, not satis fied, it seems, with the charge laid against him. But it passed, and the archbishop protested. But when it was carried down to the Commons, they would not proceed upon it, not satisfied with the bare depositions of evi dences, but required that the accusers might be brought face to face : and so it went no further i. But when the parhament would not do Tonstal's business, a commis sion was issued out to do it, as is above spoken. In the mean time, that the bishopric might not want a The care of due care taken of it, during the bishop's restraint, Feb. 18, committed 155|, a letter was sent from the council "to the preben-totlie J98> 2l8> 222> 225, 226, 698, 701, 725, 726.] 237* 24°, 241, 242, 249, 250, 253, w [Nicholas Ridley.] 258, 267, 269, 280, 281, 286, 289, x [Robert Aldrich.] 3M. 327. 332>333> 359> 401, 414. 440 MEMORIALS OF ABP. CRANMER. [II. 35. one of the king's six chaplains, Bill, Bradford, Grindal, Pern, and Knoxy, being the other five, that were appointed to be itineraries, to preach sound doctrine in all the re motest parts of the kingdom, for the instruction of the ignorant in right rehgion to God, and obedience to the king. Y [See above, p. 412. n. y.] THE END OF THE SECOND BOOK. THE APPENDIX TO THE MEMORIALS OP ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. APPENDIX TO BOOK II. OF THE MEMORIALS OF ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. [NUMBER XXXIV*. INJUNCTIONS GIVEN BY THE MOST EXCELLENT PRINCE, ED WARD THE SIXTH, BY THE GRACE OF GOD, KING OF ENG LAND, FRANCE, AND IRELAND, DEFENDER OF THE FAITH, AND IN EARTH UNDER CHRIST, OF THE CHURCH OF ENG LAND AND OF IRELAND, THE SUPREME HEAD : TO ALL AND SINGULAR HIS LOVING SUBJECTS, AS WELL OF THE CLERGY AS OF THE LAITY. The king's most royal majesty, by the advice of his 5^^ most dear uncle the duke of Somerset, lord protector ofvol-iv-pp- all his realms, dominions, and subjects, and governor of sparrow's his most royal person, and residue of his most honourable 0f\ecords council, intending the advancement of the true honour of pp-i-etsqq. Almighty God, the suppression of idolatry and superstition throughout all his realms and dominions, and to plant true rehgion, to the extirpation of all hypocrisy, enormi ties, and abuses, as to his. duty appertaineth ; doth minis ter unto his loving subjects these godly Injunctions here- 444 MEMORIALS OF [append. after following ; whereof part were given unto them here tofore, by the authority of his most dear beloved father, king Henry the Eighth, of most famous memory, and part are now ministered and given by his majesty : all which Injunctions his highness willeth and commandeth his said loving subjects, by his supreme authority, obediently to receive, and truly to observe and keep, every man, in their offices, degrees, and states, as they will avoid his displea sure, and the pains in the same Injunctions hereafter ex pressed. I. The first is, That all deans, archdeacons, parsons, vicars, and other ecclesiastical persons, shall faithfully keep and observe, and, as far as in them may he, shall cause to be kept and observed of other, all and singular laws and statutes, made as well for the abohshing and ex tirpation of the bishop of Rome, his pretensed and usurped power and jurisdiction, as for the estabhshment and con firmation of the king's authority, jurisdiction, and supre macy of the church of England and Ireland. And further more, all ecclesiastical persons, having cure of souls, shall, to the uttermost of their wit, knowledge, and learning, purely, sincerely, and without any colour or dissimulation, declare, manifest, and open, four times every year at the least, in their sermons and other collations, that the bishop of Rome's usurped power and jurisdiction, having no estabhshment nor ground by the laws of God, was of most just causes taken away and abolished, and that therefore no manner of obedience or subjection, within his realms and dominions, is due unto him. And that the king's power, within his realms and dominions, is the highest power under God, to whom all men, within the same realms and dominions, by God's laws, owe most loyalty and obedience, afore and above all other powers and potentates in earth. NO. XXXIV*.] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 445 Besides this, to the intent that all superstition and hy pocrisy crept into divers men's hearts may vanish away, they shall not set forth or extol any images, relics, or miracles, for any superstition or lucre, nor allure the peo ple by any enticements to the pilgrimage of any saint or image : but reproving the same, they shall teach, that all goodness, health, and grace, ought to be both asked and looked for only of God, as of the 'very author and giver of the same, and of none other. Item, That they, the persons above rehearsed, shall make or cause to be made in their churches, and every other cure they have, one sermon every quarter of the year at the least, wherein they shall purely and sincerely declare the word of God : and in the same exhort their hearers to the works of faith, mercy, and charity, specially prescribed and commanded in Scripture ; and that works devised by men's fantasies, besides Scripture, as wander ing to pilgrimages, offering of money, candles, or tapers, or rehcs, or images, or kissing and licking of the same, praying upon beads, or such-like superstition, have not only no promise of reward in Scripture for doing of them, but contrariwise, great threats and maledictions of God, for that they be things tending to idolatry and supersti tion, which of all other offences God Almighty doth most detest and abhor, for that the same diminish most his honour and glory. Item, That such images as they know in any of their cures to be or to have been abused with pilgrimage or offering of any thing made thereunto, or shall be here after censed unto, they, (and none other private persons), shall, for the avoiding of that most detestable offence of idolatry, forthwith take down, or cause to be taken down, and destroy the same ; and shall suffer from henceforth no torches nor candles, tapers, or images of wax, to be 446 MEMORIALS OF [append. set afore any image or picture, but only two lights upon the high altar, before the sacrament, which for the signi fication that Christ is the very true light of the world, they shall suffer to remain stiU : admonishing their pa rishioners, that images serve for no other purpose but to be a remembrance, whereby men may be admonished of the holy lives and conversation of them that the said images do represent : which images if they do abuse for any other intent, they commit idolatry in the same, to the great danger of their souls. Item, That every holy day throughout the year, when they have no sermon, they shall, immediately after the gospel, openly and plainly recite to their parishioners, in the pulpit, the Pater Noster, the Credo, and the Ten Commandments in Enghsh, to the intent the people may learn the same by heart : exhorting all parents and house holders to teach their children and servants the same, as they are bound by the law of God and in conscience to do. Item, That they shall charge fathers and mothers, mas ters and governors, to bestow their children and servants, even from their childhood, either to learning or to some honest exercise, occupation, or husbandry : exhorting and counselling, and by all the ways and means they may^as well in their sermons and collations as otherwise, persuad ing the said fathers and mothers, masters and other go vernors, diligently to provide and foresee that the youth be in no manner or wise brought up in idleness, lest at any time afterward, for lack of some craft, occupation, or other honest means to live by, they be driven to fall to begging, stealing, or some other unthriftiness : foras much as we may daily see, through sloth and idleness, divers valiant men fall, some to begging, and some to theft and murder ; which, after brought to calamity and NO. XXXIV*.] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 447 misery, do blame their parents, friends, and governors, which suffered them to be brought up so idly in their youth, where if they had been well brought up in learning some good occupation or craft, they would, (being rulers of their own household), have profited as well themselves, as divers other persons, to the great commodity and orna ment of the commonwealth. Also, That the said parsons, vicars, and other curates, shall diligently provide that the sacraments be duly and reverently ministered in their parishes. And if at any time it happen them, in any of the cases expressed in the statutes of this realm, or of special license given by the king's majesty, to be absent from their bene fices, they shall leave their cure not to a rude and un learned person, but to an honest, well learned, and ex pert curate, that can by his ability teach the rude and unlearned of their pure wholesome doctrine, and reduce them to the right way that do err ; which will also exe cute these injunctions, and do their duty otherwise, as they are bound to do in every behalf, and accordingly may and will profit their cure, no less with good example of hving than with the declaration of the word of God ; or else their lack and default shall be imputed unto them, who shall straitly answer for the same if they do other wise. And always let them see, that neither they nor their curates do seek more their own profit, promotion, or advantage, than the profit of the souls they have under their cure, or the glory of God. Also, That they shall provide within three months next after this visitation, one book of the whole Bible, of the largest volume in Enghsh. And within one twelve months next after the said visitation, the Paraphrasis of Erasmus, also in English, upon the gospels, and the same set up in some convenient place within the said church that they 448 MEMORIALS OF [APPEND. have the cure of, whereas their parishioners may most commodiously resort unto the same, and read the same. The charges of which books shall be rateably borne be tween the parson and approprietary, and parishioners afore said, that is to say, the one half by the parson or proprie tary, and the other half by the parishioners. And they shall discourage no man, authorised and hcensed thereto, from the reading any part of the Bible, either in Latin or in Enghsh ; but shall rather comfort and exhort every person to read the same, as the very lively word of God, and the special food of man's soul, that all Christian persons are bound to embrace, believe, and follow, if they look to be saved : whereby they may the better know their duties to God, to their sovereign lord the king, and their neigh bour; ever gently and charitably exhorting them, and in his majesty's name straitly charging and commanding them, thatin the reading thereof, no man to reason or contend, but quietly to hear the reader. Also, The said ecclesiastical persons shall in no wise, at any unlawful time, nor for any other cause than for their honest necessity, haunt or resort to any taverns or ale houses. And after their dinner or supper, they shall not give themselves to drinking or riot, spending their time idly by day or by night, at dice, cards, or tables, playing, or any other unlawful game; but at all times, as they ¦shall have leisure, they shall hear and read somewhat of holy Scripture, or shall occupy themselves with some other honest exercise ; and that they always do the things which appertain to honesty, with endeavour to profit the commonweal; having always in mind that they ought to excel all other in purity of life, and should be an example to the people to hve well and Christianly. Item, That they shall in confessions every Lent exa mine every person that cometh to confession to them, NO. XXXIV*.] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 449 whether they can recite the Articles of their faith, the " Pater Noster," and the Ten Commandments in Enghsh, and hear them say the same particularly ; wherem if they be not perfect, they shall declare then, that every Chris tian person ought to know the said things before they should receive the blessed sacrament of the altar, and admonish them to learn the said necessary things more perfectly, or else they ought not to presume to come to God's board, without a perfect knowledge and will to ob serve the same ; and if they do, it is to the great peril of their souls, and also to the worldly rebuke that they might incur hereafter by the same. Also, That they shall admit no man to preach within any their cures, but such as shall appear unto them to be sufficiently hcensed thereunto, by the king's majesty, the lord protector's grace, the archbishop of Canterbury, the archbishop of York in his province, or the bishop of the diocese : and such as shall be so hcensed, they shall gladly receive to declare the word of God, without any re sistance or contradiction. Also, If they have heretofore declared to their pa rishioners any thing to the extolling or setting forth of pilgrimages, rehcs, or images, or lighting of candles, kiss ing, kneeling, decking of the same images, or any such superstition, they shall now openly before the same recant and reprove the same; shewing them, as the truth is, that they did the same upon no ground of Scripture, but were led and seduced by a common error and abuse, crept into the church through the sufferance and avarice of such as felt profit by the same. Also, If they do or shall know any man, within their parish or elsewhere, that is a letter of the word of God to be read in Enghsh, or sincerely preached, or of the execu tion of these the king's majesty's Injunctions, or a fautor of CRANMER, VOL. II. G g 450 MEMORIALS OF [append. the bishop of Rome's pretensed power, now by the laws of this realm justly rejected, extirpated, and taken away utterly, they shall detect and present the same to the king or his council, or to the justice of peace next ad joining. Also, That the parson, vicar, or curate, and parishioners of every parish within this realm, shall, in their churches and chapels, keep one book or register, wherein they shall write the day and year of every wedding, christening, and burial, made within their parish for their time, and so every man succeeding them hkewise; and therein shall write every person's name that shall be so wedded, chris tened, or buried. And for the safe keeping of the same book, the parish shall be bound to provide of their com mon charges one sure coffer, with two locks and keys, whereof the one to remain with the parson, vicar, or curate, and the other with the wardens of every parish church or chapel, wherein the said book shall be laid up : which book they shall every Sunday take forth, and in the presence of the said wardens, or one of them, write and record in the same all the weddings, christenings, and burials made the whole week before; and that done, to lay up the book in the said coffer, as afore. And for every time that the same shall be omitted, the party that shall be in the fault thereof, shall forfeit to the said church 3s. 4>d., to be employed to the poor men's box of that parish. Furthermore, Because the goods of the church are called the goods of the poor, and at these days nothing is less seen than the poor to be sustained with the same ; all parsons, vicars, pensioners, prebendaries, and other beneficed men within this deanery, not being resident upon their benefices, which may dispend yearly £20. or above, either within this deanery or elsewhere, shall dis- NO. XXXIV*.] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 451 tribute hereafter among their poor parishioners, or other inhabitants there, in the presence of the churchwardens, or some other honest men of the parish, the fortieth part of the fruits and revenues of their said benefices, lest they be worthily noted of ingratitude, which reserving so many parts to themselves, cannot vouchsafe to impart the forti eth portion thereof among the poor people of that parish, that is so fruitful and profitable unto them. And to the intent that learned men may hereafter spring the more, for the execution of the premises, every parson, vicar, clerk, or beneficed man within this deanery, having yearly to dispend in benefices and other promotions of the church an hundred pounds, shall give competent exhibition to one scholar: and for so many hundred pounds more as he may dispend, to so many scholars more shall he give like exhibition in the university of Oxford or Cambridge, or some grammar school ; which after they have profited in good learning, may be partners of their patron's cure and charge, as well in preaching as otherwise, in the execution of their offices, or may, when need shall be, otherwise profit the commonweal with their counsel and wisdom. Also, That the proprietaries, parsons, vicars, and clerks, having churches, chapels, or mansions within this deanery, shall bestow yearly hereafter upon the same mansions or chancels of their churches being in decay, the fifth part of that their benefices, till they be fully repaired ; and the same so repaired, shall always keep and maintain in good estate. Also, That the said parsons, vicars, and clerks, shall, once every quarter of the year, read these Injunctions given unto them, openly and deliberately before all their parishioners, to the intent that both they may be the better admonished of their duty, and their said parishioners the more moved to follow the same for their part. Gg2 452 MEMORIALS OF [APPEND. Also, Forasmuch as by a law estabhshed, every man is bound to pay his tithes, no man shall, by colour of duty omitted by their curates, detain their tithes, and so redub and requite one wrong with another, or be his own judge ; but shall truly pay the same, as he hath been accustomed, to their parsons, vicars, and curates, without any restraint or diminution. And such lack and default as they can justly find in their parsons and curates, to call for refor mation thereof at their ordinaries and other superiors' hands, who, upon complaint and due proof thereof, shall reform the same accordingly. Also, That no person shall from henceforth alter or change the order or manner of any fasting day that is commanded, or of common-prayer or divine service, otherwise than is specified in these Injunctions, until such time as the same shall be otherwise ordered and transposed by the king's authority. Also, That every parson, vicar, curate, chantry-priest, and stipendiary, being under the degree of a bachelor of divinity, shall provide and have of his own, within three months after this visitation, the New Testament both in Latin and in Enghsh, with the Paraphrase upon the same of Erasmus, and diligently study the same, conferring the one with the other. And the bishops and other ordinaries, by themselves or their officers, in their synods and visita tions, shall examine the said ecclesiastical persons how they have profited in the study of holy Scripture. Also, In the time of high mass, within every church, he that saith or singeth the same, shall read, or cause to be read, the epistle and gospel of that mass in English, and not in Latin, in the pulpit, or in such convenient place as the people may hear the same. And every Sun day and holy day they shall plainly and distinctly read, or cause to be read, one chapter of the New Testament in NO. XXXIV*.] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 453 Enghsh in the said place at matins immediately after the lessons : and at evensong, after " Magnificat," one chapter of the Old Testament. And to the intent the premises may be more conveniently done, the king's majesty's pleasure is, that when nine lessons should be read in the church, three of them shall be omitted and left out, with the re sponds : and at evensong-time the responds, with all the memories, shall be left off for that purpose. Also, Because those persons which be sick and in peril of death be oftentimes put in despair by the craft and subtlety of the devil, who is then most busy, and espe- cally with them that lack the knowledge, sure persuasion, and stedfast behef that they may be made partakers of the great and infinite mercy which Almighty God of his most bountiful goodness and mere hberahty, without our de serving, hath offered freely to all persons that put their full trust and confidence in him : therefore that this damnable vice of despair may be clearly taken away, and firm behef and stedfast hope, surely conceived of all their parishioners, being in any danger, they shall learn and have always in a readiness, such comfortable places and sentences of Scripture as do set forth the mercy, benefits, and goodness of Almighty God towards all penitent and believing persons, that they may at all times, when neces sity shall require, promptly comfort their flock with the lively word of God, which is the only stay of man's conscience. Also, To avoid all contention and strife, which hereto fore hath risen among the king's majesty's subjects in sundry places of his realms and dominions, by reason of fond courtesy, and challenging of places in procession, and also that they may the more quietly hear that which is said or sung to their edifying, they shall not from hence forth, in any parish church at any time, use any procession 454 MEMORIALS OF [APPEND. about the church or church-yard, or other place, but im mediately before high mass, the priests, with other of the quire, shall kneel in the midst of the church, and sing or say plainly and distinctly, the Litany, which is set forth in Enghsh, with all the suffrages following, and none other procession or Litany to be had or used but the said Litany in Enghsh, adding nothing thereto, but as the king's grace shall hereafter appoint; and in cathedral or col legiate churches, the same shall be done in such places as our commissaries in our visitation shall appoint. And in the time of the Litany, of the mass, of the sermon, and when the priest readeth the Scripture to the parishioners, no manner of persons, without a just and urgent cause, shall depart out of the church; and all ringing and knolhng of bells shall be utterly forborne at that time, except one bell in convenient time to be rung or knolled before the sermon. Also, Like as the people be commonly occupied the work day with bodily labour, for their bodily sustenance, so was the holy day at the first beginning godly instituted and ordained, that the people should that day give them selves wholly to God. And whereas in our time God is more offended than pleased, more dishonoured than ho noured upon the holy day, because of idleness, drunken ness, quarrelling, and brawling, which are most used in such days, people nevertheless persuading themselves suf ficiently to honour God on that day if they hear mass and service, though they understand nothing to their edifying : therefore all the king's faithful and loving subjects shall from henceforth celebrate and keep their holy day accord ing to God's holy will and pleasure, that is, in hearing the word of God read and taught, in private and pubhc prayers, in knowledging their offences to God, and amend ment of the same, in reconciling their selves charitably to NO. XXXIV*.] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 455 their neighbours, where displeasure hath been, in often times receiving the communion of the very body and blood of Christ, in visiting of the poor and sick, in using all soberness and godly conversation. Yet notwithstanding all parsons, vicars, and curates, shall teach and declare unto their parishioners, that they may with a safe and quiet conscience, in the time of harvest, labour upon the holy and festival days, and save that thing which God hath sent. And if for any scrupulosity, or grudge of con science, men should superstitiously abstain from working upon those days, that then they should grievously offend and displease God. Also, Forasmuch as variance and contention is a thing which most displeaseth God, and is most contrary to the blessed communion of the body and blood of our Saviour Christ; curates shall in no wise admit to the receiving thereof any of their cure and flock, who hath maliciously and openly contended with his neighbour, unless the same do first charitably and openly reconcile himself again, re mitting all rancour and mahce, whatsoever controversy hath been between them ; and nevertheless their just titles and rights they may charitably prosecute before such as have authority to hear the same. Also, That every dean, archdeacon, master of collegiate church, master of hospital, and prebendary being priest, shall preach by himseK personally twice every year at the least, either in the place where he is intituled, or in some church where he hath jurisdiction, or else which is to the said place appropriate or united. Also, That they shall instruct and teach in their cures, that no man ought obstinately and maliciously to break and violate the laudable ceremonies of the church, by the king commanded to be observed, and as yet not abro gated. And on the other side, that whosoever doth super- 456 MEMORIALS OF [APPEND. stitiously abuse them, doth the same to the great peril and danger of his soul's health : as in casting holy water upon his bed, upon images, and other dead things, or bearing about him holy bread or St. John's Gospel, or making of crosses of wood upon Palm Sunday, in time of reading of the passion, or keeping of private holy days, as bakers, brewers, smiths, shoemakers, and such other do : or ring ing of holy bells, or blessing with the holy candle, to the intent thereby to be discharged of the burden of sin, or to drive away devils, or to put away dreams and fantasies; or in putting trust and confidence of health and salvation in the same ceremonies, when they be only ordained, in stituted, and made, to put us in remembrance of the benefits which we have received by Christ. And if he use them for any other purpose, he grievously offendeth God. Also, That they shall take away, utterly extinct, and destroy, all shrines, covering of shrines, all tables, candle sticks, trindles or rolls of wax, pictures, paintings, and all other monuments of feigned miracles, pilgrimages, idol atry, and superstition: so that there remain no memory of the same in walls, glass windows, or elsewhere within their churches or houses. And they shall exhort all their parishioners to do the like, within their several houses. And that the church-wardens, at the common charge of the parishioners, in every church, shall provide a comely and honest pulpit, to be set in a convenient place within the same, for the preaching of God's word. Also, They shall provide and have, within three months after this visitation, a strong chest, with a hole in the upper part thereof, to be provided at the cost and charge of the parish, having three keys ; whereof one shall remain in the custody of the parson, vicar, or curate, and the other two in the custody of the church-wardens, or any NO. XXXIV*.] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 457 other two honest men, to be appointed by the parish from year to year. Which chest you shall set and fasten near unto the high altar, to the intent the parishioners should put into it their oblation and alms for their poor neigh bours. And the parson, vicar, or curate, shall diligently from time to time, and specially when men make their testaments, call upon, exhort, and move their neighbours, to confer and give, as they may well spare, to the said chest ; declaring unto them, whereas heretofore they have been diligent to bestow much substance otherwise than God commanded, upon pardons, pilgrimages, trentals, decking of images, offering of candles, giving to friars, and upon other like blind devotions, they ought at this time to be much more ready to help the poor and needy, knowing that to reheve the poor is a true worshipping of God, required earnestly upon pain of everlasting damna tion ; and that also, whatsoever is given for their comfort, is given to Christ himself, and so is accepted of him, that he will mercifully reward the same with everlasting hfe : the which alms and devotion of the people the keepers of the keys shall at times convenient take out of the chest, and distribute the same in the presence of their whole parish, or six of them, to be truly and faithfully dehvered to their most needy neighbours : and if they be provided for, then to the reparation of highways next adjoining. And also the money which riseth of fraternities, guilds, and other stocks of the church, (except by the king's ma jesty's authority it be otherwise appointed), shall be put into the said chest, and converted to the said use, and also the rents and lands, the profit of cattle, and money given or bequeathed to the finding of torches, hghts, tapers, and lamps, shall be converted to the said use, saving that it shall be lawful for them to bestow part of the said profits upon the reparation of the church, if great 458 MEMORIALS OF [APPEND. need require, and whereas the parish is very poor, and not able otherwise to repair the same. And forasmuch as priests be pubhc ministers of the church, and upon the holy days ought to apply themselves to the common administration of the whole parish, they shall not be bound to go to women lying in childbed, except in time of dangerous sickness, and not to fetch any corpse before it be brought to the church-yard ; and if the woman be sick, or the corpse brought to the church, the priest shall do his duty accordingly, in visiting the woman, and burying the dead person. Also, To avoid the detestable sin of simony, because buying and selling of benefices is execrable before God; therefore all such persons as buy any benefices, or come to them by fraud or deceit, shall be deprived of such be nefices, and be made unable at any time after to receive any other spiritual promotion. And such as do sell them, or by any colour do bestow them for their own gain and profit, shall lose the right and title of patronage and pre sentment for that time, and the gift thereof for that vaca tion shall appertain to the king's majesty. Also, Because, through lack of preachers in many places of the king's realms and dominions, the people continue in ignorance and blindness, all parsons, vicars, and curates shall read in the churches every Sunday one of the homi hes, which are and shall be set forth for the same purpose by the king's authority, in such sort as they shall be ap pointed to do in the preface of the same. Also, Whereas many indiscreet persons do at this day uncharitably contemn and abuse priests and ministers of the church, because some of them, having small learning, have of long time favoured fancies rather than God's truth; yet, forasmuch as their office and function is ap pointed of God, the king's majesty willeth and chargeth NO. XXXIV*.] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 459 all his loving subjects, that from henceforth they shall use them charitably and reverently, for their office and admi nistration sake, and especially such as labour in the setting forth of God's holy word. Also, That all manner of persons which understand not the Latin tongue, shall pray upon none other Primer, but upon that which was lately set forth in Enghsh by the authority of king Henry the Eighth, of most famous me mory; and that no teachers of youth shall teach any other than the said Primer. And all those which have know ledge of the Latin tongue, shall pray upon none other Latin Primer, but upon that which is hkewise set forth by the said authority. And that all graces to be said at dinner and supper shall be always said in the English tongue. And that none other grammar shall be taught in any school or other place within the king's realms and do minions, but only that which is set forth by the said authority. Item, That all chantry-priests shall exercise themselves in teaching youth to read and write, and bring them up in good manners and other virtuous exercises. Item, When any sermon or homily shall be had, the prime and hours shall be omitted. The form of bidding the Common Prayers. You shall pray for the whole congregation of Christ's church, and especially for this church of England and Ire land; wherein, first, I commend to your devout prayers the king's most excellent majesty, supreme head, imme diately under God, of the spirituality and temporahty of the same church ; and for queen Katharine, dowager ; and also for my lady Mary and my lady Elizabeth, the king's sisters. Secondly, You shall pray for the lord protector's grace, 460 MEMORIALS OF [APPEND. with all the rest of the king's majesty's council ; for all the lords of this realm, and for the clergy and commons of the same; beseeching Almighty God to give every of them, in his degree, grace to use themselves in such wise as may be of God's glory, the king's honour, and the weal of this realm. Thirdly, Ye shall pray for all them that be departed out of this world in the faith of Christ, that they with us, and we with them, at the day of judgment may rest, both body and soul, with Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob in the kingdom of heaven. All which singular Injunctions the king's majesty mi- nistereth unto his clergy and their successors, and to all his loving subjects; straitly charging and commanding them to observe and keep the same, upon pain of depriva tion, sequestration of fruits or benefices, suspension, ex communication, and such other coercion, as to ordinaries, or other having ecclesiastical jurisdiction, whom his ma jesty hath appointed for the due execution of the same, shall be seen convenient ; charging and commanding them to see these Injunctions observed and kept of all persons, being under their jurisdiction, as they will answer to his majesty for the contrary: and his majesty's pleasure is, that every justice of peace, being required, shall assist the ordinaries, and every of them, for the due execution of the said Injunctions.] NUMBER XXXV. THE BISHOP OF WINCHESTER TO ARCHBISHOP CRANMER: RELATING TO THE REFORMATION OF RELIGION". Foxii MSS. After my duty remembered to your grace. Your let- » [Harl. MSS. 417. Plut. lxiv. F. fol. 79-88. British Museum. Original and holograph.] NO. XXXV.] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 461 ters of the third came to my hands the of the same. And, upon the reading, and advised consideration of the matter in them, have thought requisite to answer unto them; and at length to open my mind frankly in some points of them : tempering my words so, as I shall not be seen to have forgotten your place and condition, 74 nor such familiarity, as hath been between your grace and me : the remembrance of which famiharity maketh me speak as freely, as on the other side your estate bridleth me to be more moderate in speech, than 'some matter I shall hereafter speak of, would else suffer and permit. It grieveth me much to read, written from your grace in the beginning of your letters, how the king, our late sovereign, was seduced, and that he knew by whom he was compassed in that I call the "King's Majesty's Book," which is not his book because I call it so, but because it was indeed so acknowledged by the whole parhament, and acknowledged so by your grace then, and all his life ; which, as you afterwards write, ye commanded to be pub hshed and read in your diocese, as his book : against which, by your grace's speech, ye commanded Joseph he should not preach. All which I think -your grace would not have done, if ye had not thought the book to have contained truth. And in the truth can be no seducing to it, as the king's book containeth, but from it. Which if it had been so, I ought to think your grace would not for all the princes christened, being so high a bishop as ye be, have yielded unto. For " obedire oportet Deo, magis quam hominibus." And therefore after your grace hath four years continually hved in agreement of that doctrine under our late sovereign lord, now so suddenly after his death to write to me that his highness was seduced, it is, I assure you, a very strange speech : which if your grace should bring into open contention, as I know your 462 MEMORIALS OF [append. grace of your wisdom will not ; but in that case will I, as an old servant of my late sovereign Much wanting. itself so many calamities besides, whereof I have more leisure to think on than your grace, as my chance is now, which I reckon in this respect very good ; after so many years service, and in such trouble without danger passed over, to arrive in this haven of quietness without loss of any notable tackle, as the mariners say, which is a great matter as the winds hath blown ; and if the present estate in this world were to be considered, I have many times alleged for confirmation of the opinion of some in rehgion. And the protestants take it for a great argu ment to estabhsh their proceedings, that the emperor was ever letted when he went about to enterprise any thing against them, as Bucer declareth at great length in a letter written to the world. And when Sledanus was here in England, he told me the like at Windsor : and then " tanquam prsedixit" of the effect of certam echpse : adding, that I should see " magnas mutationes." And so I have seen, and have heard marvellous changes since that ; but otherwise than Sledanus took it, and to destroy their fancies, if that were to be regarded. But for myself, I have seen my sovereign lord, with whom I consented in opinion, make the honourable conquest of Bolen, and honourably in his life maintain it. And after an honour able peace made, leave this world over soon to us : but that was due by him to be paid to nature, discharged it honourably; buried honourably with sorrow and lamen tation of his servants and subjects ; and myself, his poor 75 servant, with a httle fleabiting of this world, conveyed to an easy estate, without diminution of my reputation. NO. XXXV.] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 463 And therefore when I hear fondly alleged, or read more fondly written, the favour to that is by Bale, Joye, and Joseph, or such like, newly called " The Word of God," to be embraced for preservation of the worldly estate, I see the clear contrary in experience, and conclude with myself that it prove thnought before man; and take it before God to be abomination. Which causeth me to spend some of my leisure to write so long a letter to your grace, who hath less leisure : wishing that our leisure, great or httle, may be spent otherwise than to trouble this realm in the time of our sovereign lord's mi nority, with any novelty in matters of rehgion : being so many other matters, which, for that I was so late a coun sellor, cannot out of my memory: requiring the whole endeavour of such as have charge, and silence in the people, who should serve and obey, without quarreling among themselves for matters in rehgion. Specially con sidering it is agreed our late sovereign is received to God's mercy. And though some would say, he had [his errors] and saw not perfectly God's truth : yet for us, it were better to go to heaven with one eye after him, than to travail here for another eye with danger to lose both. There was good humanity in bim that said, "Malim errare cum Platone, quam cum aliis vera sentire." Which affec tion were to the world plausible touching our sovereign Lord that made us ; but we Christian men may not teach so, but esteem God above all, and his true divinity. In which case nevertheless, when the divinity pretended is so rejected of many, and utterly reproved -. so doubted of many other, as it is suspected and confessed among us, it is not necessary. For our sovereign lord is gone from us to heaven, in his way. It is a marvellous matter what a certain loss of it is afore- hand to enterprize to search, which [it is] among a 464 MEMORIALS OF [append. very few hath the name of divinity, and of all the rest is so named0 as I will not rehearse. And this I write not, be cause your grace intendeth any such thing so far : for I may not, nor will not so think of you. But this I take to be true, that the way of error is let in at a little gap. The vehemence of novelty will flow further than your grace would admit. And when men hear of new gear, every man maketh his request ; some new hose, some new robes, some new caps, some new shirts. Like as in rehgion we have seen attempted, where the people thought they might prevail ; which caused the commotion in Germany " in hello civili rusticorum," and hath made the same stir there now " in bello civili nobihum." It was a notable act of our late sovereign lord, to reform and then moderate rehgion, as he did : which he did not without all trouble. And how safe we be in rehgion, when all quietness is acquired you wisdom can consider. Our late sovereign lord was wont to say, which I never forget, speaking of himself man had not looked to the pacification. He saw men desirous to set forth their own fancies, which he thought to have excluded by his pacification. If your grace would say to me now, that I wasted much speech in vain, and declared thereby I had too much leisure to write so much in this matter, as though I feared that needeth not to be feared: for your grace hath commanded our late sovereign lord's bookc to be 76 read, and mindeth nothing now but only homihes, wherein your grace would I should write; which to do were neither great pain nor hardness to me ; and I might as soon write an homily as these letters. As for the facility of the matter of writing, or writing by b Heresy. c The Erudition of a Christian Man. NO. XXXV.] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 465 not traverse. But then I consider what controversy may arise in writing. As for example, (for seeing I have leisure to write, I will forget what leisure your grace hath to read), if I should make an homily " de vita perfecta," I would note two parts, one of life, another of perfectness. For the ground of the one, I would take St. John, " misit Deus Filium suum, ut vivamus per eum ;" and for the other, " estote perfecti, sicut Pater vester," &c. In decla ration of life, I would take occasion to speak of faith, the gift of entry to life, and of charity, the very gift of life ; which who hath not remaineth in death. And there fore St. James said, "fides sine operibus mortua est." Not expounding that so, as though faith without charity were no faith, as we say a dead man is no man. For I would wish the people in any wise to beware of that fashion of teaching, and such a sophistical understanding of St. James : and, for detection thereof, declare, that death containeth not always a denial of the thing dead not to be, but only where the name of the thing noted now dead contained before in it a signification of life. As the word " man" signifieth a body hving ; and then it is truly said, that a dead man is no man, no more than a painted man. But faith signifieth not always a life in it : for devils have faith without hfe. And when we speak of dead faith, it is like as when ye speak of a body indeed without life, but apt and meet to receive life. As spawn is a body without life, and dead, but meet to receive life with convenient circumstance. And then we say not, that a body dead is no body ; and therefore may we not say, that a dead faith is no faith ; after which understanding, we should make St. James to treat, whether no faith might justify a man, or no : which were a cold matter. And yet so must we say, if we will expound this saying, that a dead faith is no faith. cranmer, vol. II. H h 466 MEMORIALS OF [append. And in this point I would, in my homily " de vita," be very earnest to shew, that in charity is life, whereunto faith is the entry : which faith without charity is not no faith, but dead. And therefore God, that giveth all hfe, giveth with faith charity: whereof I would make the more words in the homily, because the handling of St. James in the other sophistical interpretation is an entry to unwholesome doctrine. And if your grace would say, What of this ? or to what purpose should it be written to you, that mindeth no such matter? surely for nothing but because I have plenty of leisure, and write as though I talked with you; and not all in vain, for that I have heretofore heard of other, whom I have heard much glory in that exposition, to say St. James meaneth that dead faith is no faith, even as a dead man is no man. Which, by my fay, is overfar out of the way: and yet mine homily might in such an homiler, and company of homi hes, encounter with one of the trade I have spoken of, and bring forth matter of contention and altercation, without all fruit or edification. And thus much for ex ample of trouble in homihes, which these five years have rested without any busmess, and the people well done their duties, I trust, to God in heaven, and know well, to their sovereign lord in earth; and our sovereign lord, 77 that governed them without these homilies, gone to. heaven, whither, I trust, we and the people shall go after, although we trouble them with no homilies. Which shall hardly be so accumulate " ex diversis tractatibus," with diverse fashion of writing, divers phrase of speeches, diverse conceits in teachings, diverse ends per case in tended, as some will construe. The rest is wanting. NO. XXXVI.] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 467 NUMBER XXXVI. GARDINER, BISHOP OF WINTON, TO THE DUKE OF SOMERSET, CONCERNING THE BOOK OF HOMILIES AND ERASMUS' PARAPHRASE ENGLISHED. " After my most humble commendations to your good Cotton grace, with hearty thanks that it hath pleased you toyespas.D. be content to hear from me; wherein now I have 'jj-f"1- 139 hberty to write at large to you, I cannot find the like British t u Museum. gentleness m my body to spend so much time as i would : Copy.] and therefore I shall now desire your grace to take in good part, though I gather my matter in brief sentences. The Injunctions in this last visitation contain a com mandment to see taught, and learned, two books. One of Honuhes, that must be taught ; another of Erasmus' Paraphrases, that the priests must leam. These books strive one against another directly. The book of the Homihes teacheth faith to exclude charity in the office of justification. Erasmus' Paraphrases teach eth faith to have charity joined with him in justifica tion. The book of Homilies teacheth how men may swear. The Paraphrasis teacheth the contrary very extremely. The book of Homihes teacheth how subjects owe tribute to their prince, and obedience, very well. The book of Paraphrases in a place upon St. Paul [doth] violently, and against all truth, after it hath spoken of duty to heathen princes, knitteth the matter up untruly, that between the Christian men at Rome, to whom he writeth, which is a lesson for all, there should be no debt, or right, but mutual charityd, which is a marvellous matter. The book d But these are not the words of Erasmus, but St. Paul, Rom. xiii. 8. Hh2 468 MEMORIALS OF [APPEND. of Homihes in another place openeth the gospel one way. The Paraphrases openeth it clearly contrary. The matter is not great, but because there is contrariety. Now to consider each of the foresaid books. The book of Homihes in the sermon of Salvation teacheth the clean contrary to the doctrine established by the act of parhament e; even as contrary as "includeth" is con trary to "excludeth." For these be the words of the doctrine estabhshed by parhament; where in a certain place faith doth not exclude. The doctrine of the par hament speaketh how they be joined in justification. The Homily speaketh the virtues to be present in the man justified, and how faith excludeth them in the office of justification ; which can never be proved, and is in the mean time contrary to the act. 78 The book of Homihes hath in the homily of Salvation, how remission of sin is taken, accepted, and allowed of God for your perfect justification. The doctrine of the parliament teacheth justification, for the fulness and perfection thereof, to have more parts than remission of sin, as in the same appeareth. And although that remission of sin be a justification, yet it is not a full and perfect. The book of Homihes numbereth the hallowing of bread, palms, and candles, among papistical superstitions and abuses. The doctrine of the parhament willeth them to be reverendly used ; and so do the Injunctions now set forth; which made me think the printer might thrust in an homily of his own devise. The book of Homilies hath words of St. Chryso- stom alleged untruly, not after such a sort as might escape by oversight, but of purpose; as, calling that faith which Chrysostom calleth hope; and in place of e In the book of "The Erudition," &c. NO. XXXVI.] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 469 one sentence putteth another, which should better serve the purpose of the maker of the homily. Now if one would reason with me, that Chrysostom meant this, I would deny it him, as I may. But I may affirm, that Chrysostom saith not, it is but a defamation of the truth : and under such a prince's name as your sovereign lord is, whose tongue, in this so pure innocency, hath not been defiled with any untruth; I assure you, I thought there was not so great haste in homilies, but they might have tarried the printing, either for that only cause. Truth is able to maintain itself, and needeth no help of untrue allegation. It serveth only for enemies to take advantage. All which [i. e. enemies] used to be curious to know what they may reprove. And now all the eyes and ears of the world be turned towards us. And as they shall have cause to talk ho nourably of your vahantness in the wars, so [shall] they talk otherwise of that that is done in your absence, if any thing be amiss. Now I shall shew your grace what author Erasmus is, to be, by name and special commandment, had in credit in this realm. If he be to be beheved, the doctrine of only faith justifieth, is a very poison. And he writeth by express terms, and calleth this another poison, to deny punishment in purgatory after this life. And another poison, to deny the invocation of saints, and worshipping of them. And this he calleth a poison, to say, we need no satisfactory works, for that were to mistrust Christ. Erasmus in another place conferring the state of the church in the beginning and now, he concludeth, that if St. Paul were ahve at this day, he would not improve [i. e. disallow] the present state of the church, but cry out of men's faults. This is Erasmus' judgment in his latter days. 470 MEMORIALS OF [APPEND. His work, the Paraphrases, which should be authorized in the realm, which he wrote above twenty-six years ago, when his pen was wanton, [as] the matter is so hauled, as being abroad in this realm, were able to minister occasion to evil men to subvert, with religion, the pohcy and order ofthe realm. These be the general words, the uttering whereof to your grace in the place you occupy were a great fault, unless I would shew ye good ground and true why to say so. And therefore I am glad I do rather write to you, than to have come and speak with you, because my words in number might fly away ; whereas written words remain to be read again. 79 First, as concerning the pohcy and state of the realm, wheresoever Erasmus might take an occasion to speak his pleasure of princes, he payeth home, as roundly as bishops have been of late touched in pleas. And such places of Scripture as we have used to allege for the state of princes, he wresteth and windeth them so, as if the people read him and beheved him, they would after small regard that allegation of them. And if Erasmus did truly, and that the Scripture bound him so to say, it were more tolerable, (for truth must have place), but when it is done in some place untruly, and in some place wantonly, to check that estate, it can be no good doctrine amongst people that should obey. And this book of Paraphrases is not like the other expositions of Scripture, where the author speaketh in his own person. For Erasmus taketh upon him the evangelist's person, and Christ's person, and enterpriseth to fit up Christ's tale and his words. As for example, where the Gospel rehearseth Christ's speech, when he said, " Give to the emperor that is the em peror's ;" (by which speech we gather, and truly gather, that Christ confessed the emperor to have a duty) ; Eras- NO. XXXVI.] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 471 mus writeth it with an "if," after this sort, " If there be any thing due to them." Which condition Christ put not to it, but spake plainly, "Give to Caesar the things which are Caesar's, and unto God the things that are God's." And I write the very words of the Paraphrases, as they be in Enghsh, for I have the book with me : and so shall no man say, that I misreport the book. The words be these. "Render therefore unto Caesar, if any things appertain unto Caesar. But first of all, render unto God the things that appertain unto God. Meaning that it is no hurt to godliness, if a man being dedicate to God do give tribute to a profane prince, although he ought it not." These be the words in the book ordered to be set forth. Wherein what needeth Erasmus to bring in doubt the duty, when God putteth no doubt at all. It were too long to write to your grace every fault. This one I put for example, where Erasmus doth corrupt Christ's words, with a condition which Christ spake not. The other places of railings would encumber your grace overmuch. But as I write, your grace shall find true, that whatsoever might be spoken to defame princes' go vernment, is not left unspoken. Bishops be more gently handled. Erasmus maketh them very kings of the gospel, and calleth the true kings of the world " profane kings." Bishops have the sword, he saith, of God given, that is to say, the gospel. " Profane princes," as he calleth them, " have a sword permitted unto them, and by Homer," he saith, " be called, pastors of the people." This matter is within the compass of the Paraphrases, if it be not left out; with a commendation also of Thomas Becket of Canterbury, in excommunicating the king of the realm, that then was, by implication, for the manor of Oxford, which the king, as he rehearseth, then withheld. It may 472 Memorials of [append. be the translator would have left this out ; but Erasmus' pen in those days (was) very hght. Moreover when, Erasmus teacheth, that between Chris tian men is no debt, or right, but charity, it is a mar vellous matter to the dissolution of laws and duties. And therein Erasmus doth violate God's Scripture, and saith not true. 80 Thus far is the doctrine pernicious for common policy, [wherem] nevertheless if he had said truth, let the truth prevail ; but the truth is not so. As touching rehgion in this work of Paraphrases, it is so wantonly, (I beseech your grace note my words), and therewith untruly handled, as if we should use to read it, there should ensue a marvellous confusion. Some spe cialties I will note, but not all. The sacrament of the altar is so wantonly talked of by him, that as the world is now, the reading of him were the whole subversion. Erasmus in his latter days, hath for the sacrament of the altar spoken as reverently, and said as much for confirmation of it, as may be, and crieth out of them that would take him otherwise. But this is in the end, when age had tempered him. In this Paraphrases, which he wrote in his wanton age, the words and terms were able to subvert, if it were pos sible, as Christ saith, the elect. If the Paraphrases go abroad, people shall be learned to call the sacrament of the altar holy bread, and a symbol. At which new name many will marvel. And they be wanton words spoken of Erasmus without necessity. By the doctrine of the Paraphrases, whosoever had done away his wife for advoutry might marry again. By the Paraphrases all men may marry, bishops and priests. Wherein Erasmus took his pleasure to understand St. Paul, NO. XXXVl.j ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 473 as though he should describe of what quahty priests' wives should be ; wherein he forgat himself. For St. Paul knew, that if a bishop or priest were once married, his wife must pass with all her faults ; and it should be too late to tell what she should be. For otherwise than she is, she will not be, neither for St. Paul nor St. Peter. And if bishops had that privilege, that they might change while they found such one, as Erasmus saith St. Paul would have them, their estate would be wonderfully envied. But St. Paul did not speak there of bishops' wives. And so therein he doth violence to the Scriptures undoubtedly. Wherefore I write somewhat merrily to shew the absurdity of the thing. By the Paraphrases the keeping of a concubine is called but a hght fault. And that were good for Lancashire. And Erasmus bringeth it so prettily, that a ruler of a country, if he be himself the servant of avarice or am bition, should not brook with his brother, because being overcome by weakness of flesh he useth a concubine. Even thus it is Englished in the book that should go forth. And when to have a concubine, it is called a Hght fault, methinketh if the maid can read, it may serve well, lightly to persuade her. And yet if the man doth it, overcome by the weakness of his flesh, as the book term- eth it, is made matter. Wherein Erasmus speaketh over lightly, to call it a light fault. And the translator in Enghsh wanted speech, when he turned it thus : " That a man overcome with the weakness of his flesh should desire a concubine." I am bold with his grace, to join here Erasmus' lightness with the discretion of the translator. If to keep a concubine shall be by authority called a light fault, the multitude of them may make the fault heavy. By the doctrine of the Paraphrases, every man must come to the high prick of virtue, or to be extremely 474 MEMORIALS OF [APPEND. nought. Which differeth far from the teaching of the Homihes, and from the truth also. 81 The Paraphrases teacheth thus truly; "more glorious it is to die for the gospel's sake. Which death, though it shall be violent and sore, yet it shall not come before the day. Whensoever it cometh it shall not come without the providence of God. And by this it cometh to pass, that if ye endeavour to avoid it, ye cannot." This is the doctrine, which if it were taken for true, might engender hke obstinacy in many, as it hath of late in some. Erasmus teacheth here further than he hath warrant by Scripture. The Paraphrases in another place doth clearly violate the text, and untruly handle it, in a matter of tithes, which your grace is desirous, as appeareth by the Injunc tions, to have truly'paid. Wherein if Erasmus had said truth, let truth prevail ; but when he handleth it untruly it is pity it should be suffered. Thus have I here reckoned your grace some special faults, that be Erasmus' own faults, with a great number that I have not spoken of. And further your grace shall understand, that he which hath taken the labours to translate Erasmus into Enghsh, hath offended sometime, as appeareth plainly, by igno rance, and sometime of purpose, to put in, leave out, and change, as he thought best. Wherewith I will not en cumber your grace, but assure you it is so. And therein I will grant to your grace, that for every he, that I make unto your grace, set one hundred pounds fine on my head, and let me hve here hke a beggar, until my revenues pay. My words remain in writing, and be against me matter of record. And so I yield to have me charged, as the bishop of London was with offering the farm of his bishopric. Which matter I do remember, when I wrote this." NO. XXXVI *.] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 475 I remit the reader for the rest of this letter to Winches ter's ninth letter in Foxe's Acts": this former part of the letter, which is now exposed to view, having been by him omitted. [NUMBER XXXVI*. QUESTIONS PUT CONCERNING SOME ABUSES OF THE MASS, WITH THE ANSWERS THAT WERE MADE BY MANY BISHOPS AND DIVINES TO THEM. i. Whbthbr the sacrament of the altar was instituted to be stillingfleet received of one man for another, or to be received of every r^S~'rfm" man for himself ? 1 108. fol. 6. The sacrament of the altar was not instituted to be Burnet's received of one man for another, but to be received bv ?Ht- of ^ J Reformat. every man for himself. vol.ii.App. B. i. No. a. Whether the receiving of the said sacrament of one man doth ^5- PP- 192 avail and profit any other ? Oxon The receiving of the said sacrament by one man doth l829- avail and profit only him that receiveth the same. 3. What is the oblation and sacrifice of Christ in the mass ? The oblation and sacrifice of Christ in the mass is not so called, because Christ indeed is there offered and sacrificed by the priest and the people, (for that was done but once by himself upon the cross) ; but it is so called, because it is a memory and representation of that very true sacrifice and immolation which before was made upon the cross. 4. Wherein consisteth the mass by Christ's institution ? The mass, by Christ's institution, consisteth in those things which be set forth in the evangehsts : Matt. xxvi. Mark xiv. Luke xxii. 1 Cor. x. and xi. * [See Foxe's Acts and Monuments, vol. vi. pp. 42-46. ed. Lond 1843-48.] 476 MEMORIALS OF [APPEND. j. What time the accustomed order began first in the church, that the priest alone should receive the sacrament ? I think the use, that the priest alone did receive the sacrament without the people, began not within six or seven hundred years after Christ. 6. Whether it be convenient that the same custom continue still within this realm ? I think it more agreeable to the Scripture and primi tive church, that the first usage should be restored again, that the people should receive the sacrament with the priest. 7. Whether it be convenient that masses satisfactory should continue, that is to say, priests hired to sing for souls de parted. I think it not convenient that satisfactory masses should continue. 8. Whether the gospel ought to be taught at the time of the mass, to the understanding of the people being present ? I think it very convenient, that the gospel, concerning the death of Christ and our redemption, should be taught to the people in the mass. 9. Whether in the mass it were convenient to use such speech as the people may understand ? I think it convenient to use the vulgar tongue in the mass, except in certain secret mysteries, whereof I doubt. 10. When the reservation of the sacrament and the banging up of the same first began ? The reservation of the sacrament began, I think, six or seven hundred years after Christ : the hanging up, I think, began of late time. SOME QUESTIONS WITH ANSWERS MADE TO THEM BY THE BISHOPS OF WORCESTER, CHICHESTER, AND HEREFORD. Stillingfleet Quest. What or wherein John's fasting:, giving: alms, being: bap- MSS.Lara- . , &• 6 6 • 6 F beth Libr. tized, or receiving the sacrament of thanks in England, doth NO. XXXVI*.] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 477 profit and avail Thomas dwelling in Italy, and not knowing 1 108. fol. what John in England doth ? naj_ Ans. The distance of place doth not let nor hinder the S^tnetf spiritual communion which is between one and another; Reformat. so that John and Thomas, wheresoever they be, far and B° '^^' sundry, or near together, being both lively members of 25- PP-?10 Christ, receive either of other's goodness some com- Oxon. modify ; although to limit what or wherein, is unsearch able, and only pertaineth to the knowledge of God. Quest. Whether the said acts in John do profit them that be in heaven, and wherein ? Ans. "Gaudium est in coelo super uno peccatore poeni- tentiam agente," &c. Quest. Whether it lieth in the said John to defraud any mem- Worcester. ber of Christ's body of the benefit of his fasting, alms-deeds, Hereford *' baptism, or receiving of the sacrament, and to apply the same benefit to one person more than to another ? Ans. Charity defraudeth no man of any such benefit that might come to him ; and it lieth in God only to apply the same, and not in any man, otherwise than by desire and prayer; but the better the man is, the more avail able his prayer is to them for whom he especially prayeth. Quest. What thing is the presentation of the body and blood of Christ in the mass, which you call the oblation and sacrifice of Christ ? and wherein standetb it, in act, gesture, or words ? and in what act, gesture, 0r words ? Ans. The presentation, &c. standeth in such words, prayers, supplications, and actions, as the priest useth at the mass, having the body and blood of Christ there present in the sacrament. Quest. Is there any rite or prayer not expressed in the Scripture which Christ used, or commanded at the first institution of 478 MEMORIALS OF [APPEND. the mass, which we be now bound to use; and what the same be ? Ans. That Christ used rites and prayers at the institution and distribution of the sacrament, the Scripture de- clareth : but what rites and prayers they were, we know not ; but I think that we ought to use such rites and prayers as the cathohc church hath, and doth uni formly observe. Quest. Whether in the primitive church there were any priests that lived by saying of mass, matins, and even-song, and praying for souls only ? And whether any such state of priesthood be allowed in the Scripture, or be meet to be allowed now ? Ans. There were priests in the primitive church which preached not, but exercised themselves in prayer for the quick and the dead, and other spiritual ministrations in the church, and accustomably used common prayers both morning and evening; and such state of priest hood is not against the Scripture. Quest. For what cause it were not expedient nor convenient to have the whole mass in English ? Ans. This question is answered by Dionyse and Basil "De Spiritu Sancto;" and also an uniformity of all churches in that thing is to be kept. FURTHER QUESTIONS IN REPLY TO THE ABOVE ANSWERS. StilUngfleet If you cannot tell what or wherein the acts of John can beth Libr. profit Thomas, being so far distant from him, that he can II Oriei- never hear °f mm ; why do you then affirm that to be nal- true, which you cannot tell how, nor wherein it can be Burnet's ' J ' Hist, of true ? voUirpY. Whether our prayers for all the souls departed do profit ii. App. the apostles, prophets, and martyrs ? NO. XXXVI*.] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 479 Whether they know all the acts of every man here in (strype's „ , -, correc- earth ; and if not, how do they rejoice or those good acts tioaaj pp, which they know not ? ed.9Oxon. Whether our evil deeds do them hurt, as our good 1829. deeds profit them ? Whether the presentation of the body and blood of Christ in the mass do stand in all the words and actions that the priest useth in the mass ? And if not, then in which of them it standeth ? Whether we may change those rites and ceremonies of the mass, which now we do use ? Whereby is it known that in the primitive church were priests which preached not ? Why may we not as well alter the mass into the Enghsh tongue, or alter the ceremonies of the same, as we alter the communion to be under both kinds, which in other churches is uniformly ministered to the people under one kind, seeing that the uniformity of all churches requireth not more the uniformity in one than in the other ?] NUMBER XXXVII. ROGER ASCHAM TO MR. CECYL, GIVING HIM AN ACCOUNT OF A DISPUTATION IN ST. JOHN'S COLLEGE WHETHER THE MASS AND THE LORD'S SUPPER BE ALL ONE. S. P. in Christo Jesu. Omatissime vir. Ante men-MSS. Sr. sem, aut plus eo, disputatum fuit in hoc collegio more nricke's]. nostro de missa, ipsane coena Dominica fuerit, necne. Magna sane eruditione haBc questio tractata fuit a Thoma Jjevero, et Rog. Hutchinsono, quos opinor nosti. Sunt profecto docti viri. Quidam in academia hanc rem aegre tulerunt. Hue tandem res perducta est, vel ego potius 480 MEMORIALS OF [APPEND. pertractus fui hortatu communi multorum in nostro col- legio, ut hanc ipsam quaestionem e domesticis parietibus in pubhcas scholas prseferrem, hoc animo et mstituto, ut disceremus hbenter et sine rubore a doctis viris, quid e fontibus sacrae scripturae hbari potuerit ad defendendam 82 missam ; quae non solum summum locum in rehgione et conscientiis hominum occupat, sed omne fidele propemo- dum ministerium verbi Dei et sacramentorum, ex usu et consuetudine Christianorum, abstulit. Rem quietissime aggressi sumus, communia studia nos inter nos confere- bamus, Scripturam canonicam nobis proposuimus, cujus auctoritate totam hanc rem decidi cupiebamus : veteres canones ineuntis ecclesiae, conciha patrum, decreta pon- tificum, judicia doctorum, qusestionistarum turbam, re- centiores omnes, quos potuimus et Germanos et Romanos, ad hanc rem adhibuimus. Quidam in academia pubhcis concionibus notabant hoc factum nostrum, et tandem laborarunt, ut D. Madeuus vicecancellarius, hteris suis hanc disputationem prohiberet. Nos hbenter paruimus, ut par fuit; sed aegre tuhmus disputandi facultatem nobis intercipi, concionandi vero copiam pro hbidine ahis concedi. Audivimus Cantuariensem nobis iniquiorem fuisse. Nee mirum est, nam adversarii nostri, cogor invitus acerbiori voce uti, prudentissime vir, tragicis clamoribus hanc rem ilh detulerunt. Quod factum illorum majorine mahtia, aut imperitia institutum fuit dubitari potest. Thomas enim Aquinas probat missam Dominicam ccenam multis praerogativis superasse, et longissime ab ea discrepasse multis notis; sexu, missare enim mulieres non debent: a coena tamen non excludantur: aetate, vitio parentum, luxatione membrorum. Nam pueri, nothi et mutilatia a missae dignitate repelluntur, ad coenae humilitatem reci- piuntur: et multis ahis modis. Ut siquis affirmaret NO. XXXVII.] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 481 eandem esse missam et cosnam, multo magis exclama- rent. Sed quid dicam de hiis nostris ? Nihil aliud, nisi quod " Herodes turbatus est, et tota Hierosolyma cum eo." Dicunt nos esse praecipites. Certe nemo tarn praeceps est, quin facile revocari possit; ut calcaribus potius, quam habenis tota Cantabrigia egeat. Sed quod institui tibi narrare, quanquam disputatio nostra fuerit prohibita, studia tamen nostra in eadem re quodammodo aucta sunt. Scripsimus enim fere justum librum de missa, quem brevi oflerre instituimus D. Pro- tectori, nisi tibi et magistro Checo aliter visum fuerit. Quantum ad tractationem rei pertinet, vellem ut judi cium tuum, non sermoni ahorum, sed ipsi rei reservare vehs. Neque hoc dicimus, quia de nobis aliquid polhceri audemus, sed quia veremur, ne certi homines nimis stu- deant illud impedire quovis modo, quod ipsi non probant. Legimus sanctissimas confessiones reginae nostrae cum tua eloquentissima epistola. Utinam aliquid temporis tui ad excolendam Anglicanam linguam impartire velis, ut homines intelhgerent et nostram linguam omnes eloquen- tiae numeros facile admittere. Literae magistri Checi ad collegium nostrum fuerunt omnibus nobis gratissimae, ubi minimis verbis maxima benevolentia, et ejus et tua, comprehensa fuit. D. protectoris literae ad acad. a te scriptae mirifice nos omnes delectarunt. Commune votum est apud nos, ut Cantabrigia ahquando, imo brevissime, sentiat Joannem Checum praepositum regh collegii. Epis- copus ille1 nihil prodest studiis, vellem ut non obesset. Et hoc non dico ad aucupium cujusvis gratiae, sed ad commodum totius academiae. Plurima sunt, quae nos sic sentire cogunt, et plura tua prudentia videt. Nos sic amici inter nos communicamus, fortasse non pruden- " t " Daius Cicestrensis." CRANMER, VOL. II. I i 482 MEMORIALS OF [APPEND. tissime, cautissime tamen : et quod minimum est, valde 83 amanter. Cogita de hac re quid vis, promove tamen earn quantum potes. Nimis molestus sum. Vale kv Xpto-ra. Quinto Januarii, 1548. E Coll. D. Joan. Cant. Dignitatis tuae studiosiss. R. Aschamus. Ornatissimo viro magistro Guhelmo Cicello supplicum hbellorum magistro. NUMBER XXXVIII. THE UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE TO THE ARCHBISHOP. Aschami Aliquid a te suppliciter petere, cum tu omnia nobis lubenter tribuis, doctissime praesul, non inane et superva- caneum negotium, sed gratae voluntatis debitum potius officium esse ducimus. Rogamus igitur te, ut in hoc se- natu vestro, privilegia nostra confirmentur. Quantum Reipu. interest, ut doctrinae ratio haberetur, omnes fere intelhgunt : quantum vero purae rehgionis interest, tu unus plus universis ahis animadvertis : scis enim tu, quod annis abhinc quingentis, aut plus eo, cognitio hterarum, regum vitio, a quibus ah debuerat, e conspectu hominum sese abducere, et in tenebras relabi coepit. In quibus tem- poribus sic cahgine obductis, sic ignorantia involutis, aper ille singularis de sylva, supra modum depopulatus est vi- neam Jesu Christi, non proculcans solum reges terrae, et imperium sibi collocans mundi : sed ita invasit erupitque in sanctam sedem, et templum conscientiae, ut nulli fere nunc sint mores [hominum], nulla institutio vitae, nullus caeremoniarum ritus, nullum ecclesiae sacramentum, nul lum Christi vestigium, quod non sit ejus aut fulmine pros- tratum, aut halitu foedatum : quod non sit, (ut mitius, sed significantius cum Divo Paulo loquamur), prudentia hu- » [Epist. Rog. Aschami. pp. 314, 315. ed. Lond. 1590.] NO. XXXVIII.] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 483 mans f8rjko0pt]o-Kelas fcedissime corruptum, et constupra- tum. Haec nox disciplinarum, et ignoratio vocem Domini nobis abstulit, et humanae doctrinae imperium, in illam hbidinem evexit, ut pro vero cultu Dei, recto divinissima- rum rerum usu, integra et pura vitae consuetudine, hypo- crisis, idololatria, et adulterium cervicibus hominum astu- tissime imponeretur. Hanc inscientiae pestem libentius commemoramus, quod nunc in magnam spem ducimur constituendae de integro dignitatis hterarum, in hhs prae- sertim temporibus, cum omnia ad veram religionem illus trandam, a qua praeclara docrrina abesse certe non potest, nurifice comparata sunt. Et cum prudentia tua ad ver- bum Dei restituendum, divinitus sit et nunc excitata, et diu reservata : non dubitamus, quin omnem operam et au- thoritatem tuam, ad salutem etiam hterarum continendam collaturus sis: commotus aliquid certe vel hac ratione, quod nulla hoc tempore literis vel insperata clades, vel ex- pectata commoditas accidere potest, cujus tu non aut author, ad magnam commendationem : aut particeps ad ahquam reprehensionem voce ac sermone omnium jacta- tus eris. D. Jesus, &c. NUMBER XXXIX. 84 RICHARD SMITH'S, D. D. RECANTATION OF HIS BOOKS. In my book of traditions I said and affirmed, that icon's Christ and his apostles taught and left to the church [ptm.'vol. many things without writing, which we must both beheve gdf£' 2]1" steadfastly, and also fulfil obediently, under pain of dam- XS64] nation ever to endure. Among the which I rehearsed by name a great number to be obeyed, kept, and followed : as, the observation of Lent from flesh or wine ; the keep ing of the sacrament in the pix; the receiving [of] it at the i i2 484 MEMORIALS OF [append. priest's hands ; the hallowing of the water in the font ; the thrice dipping of the child in the water at the chris tening; the putting on of the chrism; the consecration of the oil ; the anointing of the christened child [ren] ; the hallowing of the altars; the praying toward the east; the censing of the altar; the washing of the hands ; the saying of " Confiteor ;" the lifting up of the sacrament at mass; the making of holy water; that the twelve apostles, every man a piece for his portion, made the Creed; and many more beside these. And after hke sort I spake of canons, decrees, and ordinances of bishops and general councils. Now I do confess the said doctrine, as concerning the observing of the said tra ditions [under that pain], to be false, and tyrannical, and unjust, unlawful, and untrue burden of men's consciences not fit to be taught, preached, or defended. There be many things ascribed to the apostles, and called Traditions, deduced from the time of the apostles, and read in the name of old authors, and set forth under the pretensed title of their name, which be both feigned, forged, and nothing true, full of superstition and untruth, feigned by them which would magnify their [own] power and authority; as is the epistles of Clemens, Anacletus, Evaristus, and Fabianus and others, which are set forth by the bishop of Rome and his accomphces, which be forged, feigned, and of none authority, nor to be beheved, but counterfeited by them ; who, with the colour of antiquity, would magnify that usurped power of the bishop of Rome. And now concerning another book which I made of the sacrifice of the mass ; where the most chief and prmcipal article of our faith, and most directly pertaining to the redemption of our sins and to our salvation, is, that our Saviour Christ Jesus, by his most precious death, and effusion of his most precious blood upon the cross, did NO XXXIX.] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 485 redeem mankind, taking away our sins, pacifying the indignation of his Father, and cancelling the obligation that was against us. In which sacrifice-making unto his Father, our said Saviour Jesus Christ, as St. Paul saith plainly to the Hebrews, was not a priest after the order of Aaron, forasmuch as he was of another tribe : and also, that priesthood was imperfect and unprofitable, bringing nothing to perfection. But our Saviour Christ made his sacrifice upon the cross perfectly, absolutely, and with the most highest perfection that could be, so much that after that one oblation and sacrifice for sin, made by him but once only, neither he nor any other creature should at any time after make any more oblations for the same. 85 And for that St. Paul saith, he was called an eternal priest after the order of Melchisedec, and not of Aaron. This faith ought every man and woman undoubtedly to beheve, and openly to profess, upon pain of everlasting damnation ; and also to die in this profession, if case shall so require. The which most wholesome and most neces sary doctrine of our faith I not diligently considering, as many times to right great clerks and learned men in much writing in hke matters it hath chanced to say too far, the infinnity and weakness of men being such, that seldom in many words error hath escaped : so in my book of the sacrifice of the mass, I did incircumspectly and rashly write and set forth to the people, that Christ was not a priest after the order of Melchisedec, when he offered himself upon the cross to his Father for our sins, but was a priest after the order of Aaron. And that when Christ did offer his own body to his Father after the order of Melchisedec, to appease his wrath, it may not be understood of the sacrifice of the cross, but of the sacrfice that Christ made at his maundy in form of bread and wine. To the which indeed St. Paul's doctrine is 486 MEMORIALS OF [append. contrary, both in other places and in the epistle " Ad Hebraeos" very manifestly. Against whom, (who without doubt had the very spirit of God), neither it becometh, nor I will not willingly teach or defend any thing. Wherefore ye shall impute that, good audience, to the frailty of man's nature, and to my negligent marking, having at that time rather a respect to a fantasy that then I had in my mind, than to the true and infallible doctrine of Scripture. And moreover in the same my book I said not only that the sacrifice of the mass is the selfsame substance of Christ, but also the selfsame oblation or offering of our Saviour Christ's very flesh and blood, which himself once offered to his Father on the cross to appease his wrath : and that the priests do continually and daily in the mass offer not only the selfsame body of Christ, but also to the same effect that Christ did offer himself to his Father at his maundy. Of the which words and doctrine, if they be not very warily and circumspectly read, and more favour ably taken than the words as they he may well bear, it might be gathered that priests herein be equal with Christ. Priests of the order of Melchisedec, appeasing the wrath and indignation of the Father of heaven, cruci fying or offering Christ to the same effect that Christ in his own person did upon the cross, is a blasphemy into lerable to be heard of Christian* ears. For Christ, as St. Paul saith, was but once offered, once gave up himseK for the redemption of our sins on Good Friday upon the cross ; nor never before nor after was offered for us, but in a sacrament and as a commemoration of the same. And so of the maundy, or supper of the Lord, Christ him self saith, " Haec quotiescunque feceritis, in meam com- memorationem facietis." Once he died for our sins, and once again he rose for our justification. He dieth no NO. XXXIX.] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 487 more. And his sacrifice was so good, so full, so pleasant, so precious to God, that there needed no more oblations to appease God, not only for the sins past, but also for all the sins to the day of doom. There need no more sacri fices, no more offerers, but as having a respect and a remembrance of that most holy, most perfect, and most entire lamb, then and for ever offered up for us. But these things aforesaid, I cannot deny but they were 86 spoken of me, and written. And as I do not now hke them, so, at the example of St. Austin and other good doctors, I am not ashamed to retract them, and call them again and condemn them. For when I followed mine own invention, not directed by Scripture, I began, as the nature of man is, to wander, and at the last went clean contrary to God's word. Wherefore I heartily exhort every man, as touching matters of faith, to found the same upon God's certain, true, and infallible word; lest by doing the contrary they fall into superstition, idolatry, and other manifold errors, as myself and many other have done. Wherefore these my two books, the one "ofthe sacrifice ofthe mass," and the other "of the traditions unwritten," in those points before rehearsed, and all other wherein they be not full consonant to Scripture, I forsake and renounce as false, erroneous, and against the true word of God; requiring the good Christian reader, whosoever shall read them, to give no further credence to them than I would myself: that is, not to take as undoubted truth all that is therein written, but as written of a man that some time falleth ; to be so far true as they be consonant to Scripture : where they be not against Scripture, to be human persuasion, which may either be so or not so, as the greater reason shall lead ; where they be not conso nant to Scripture, to be erroneous and false ; and that I 488 MEMORIALS OF [append. much lament and am sorry that I wrote them in those points. And I desire every man that hath any of the said books to beware of them, and to give no credence to them in all such things in them written as be not consonant to the Scripture, as they will avoid occasion of error, and tender the truth of God's word and his glory. To whom be laud, praise, and honour. Amen. [NUMBER XXXIX*. THE SENTENCE AGAINST JOAN OF KENT, WITH THE CERTIFI CATE MADE UPON IT. Regist. In Dei nomine, Amen. Nos Thomas, permissione divina 74 b—75 b. Cantuarien. archiepiscopus, totius Anghae primas et me- tropohtanus, Thomas Smyth, miles, Wilhelmus Cooke, de- canus de arcubus, Hugo Latimer, sacrae theologiae professor, et Richardus Lyell, legum doctor, illustrissimi, invictissimi in Christo principis et domini nostri domini Edwardi Sexti, Dei gratia Anghae, Franciae, et Hiberniae regis, fidei defen- soris et in terra ecclesiae Anghcane et Hibernice supremi capitis, cognitores, inquisitores, judices et commissarii, per literas suas regias patentes, dat. duodecimo die mensis Aprihs, anno regni sui felicissimi tertio, sufficienter et legitime deputati in quodam hereticae pravitatis negotio, contra te Joannam Bocher, ahas nuneupatam Joannam de Kente, coram nobis in judicio personaliter compa- rentem, et nobis super haeretica pravitate, juxta et se cundum commissionem dicti domini nostri regis detectam et declaratam, ac in ea parte apud bonos et graves notorie et publice, diffamatam, rite et legitime procedentes, audi- tis, visis, intellectis, cognitis, rimatis, et matura dehbera- tione discussis et ponderatis dicti negotii meritis et cir- cumstantiis, servatisque in omnibus et per omnia in eodem negotio de jure servandis in quomodolibet requisitis, judi- NO. XXXIX*.] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 489 ciahter et pro tribunali sedentes, Christi nomine invocato ac ipsum solum Deum prae ocuhs nostris habentes ; quia per acta inactitata, deducta, probata, confessata, ac per te saepius coram nobis in eodem negotio recognita, comperi- mus et clare invenimus te, turn per confessiones, turn per recognitiones tuas coram nobis judicialiter factas, nefan- dum et intollerabilem errorem, haeresim damnatam et scandalosam opinionem subscriptam, juri divino et catho- hcae fidei obviantem, contrariam et repugnantem; viz. " That you beheve that the Word was made flesh in the Virgin's belly; but that Christ took flesh of the Virgin, you beheve not ; because the flesh of the Virgin, being the outward man, was sinfully gotten and born in sin; but the Word, by the consent of the inward man of the Virgin, was made flesh;" quam quidem errorem, haeresim dam natam et scandalosam opinionem, juri divino et fidei ca- thohcae obviantem, contrariam et repugnantem, coram nobis tam in judicio, quam extra animo obstinato, perti- naci et indurato arroganter, pertinaciter, et obstinate, etiam non sine fastu, asseruisti, tenuisti, affirmasti, et dixisti, atque sic credere, tenere, affirmare, et dicere velle, paribus obstinacia, pertinacia, mahcia, quoque et mira cordis caecitate etiam amrmasti ; idcirco nos Thomas, archiepiscopus, primas et metropolitanus, ac commissarius regius antedictus, tam de ahorum collegatum nostrorum, nobis in hac parte assidentium et assistentium consensu et assensu expressis; quum etiam de et cum consilio et judicio jurisperitorum et sacrarum hterarum professorum, cum quibus convocavimus in hac parte, te Joannam Bo cher, ahas Joannam de Kente praedictam de meritis, culpis, obstinaciis et contumaciis, per tuam nefandam et damnabilem pertinaciam multiphciter contractis, incursis, et aggravatis, de et super hujusmodi destestabili et hor- rendo haereticae privitatis reatu confessam, ad ecclesiae 490 MEMORIALS OF [APPEND. unitatem redire nolentem, haereticamque opinionem cre- dentem, praemissorum praetextu fuisse et esse, cum animi dolore et cordis amaritudine judicamus, teque ex nunc tanquam pertinacem et obstinatam haereticam, judicio sive curiae seculari ad omnem juris effectum, qui exinde sequi debeat, aut poterit, relinquendam fore decernimus et de- claramus, et sic per praesentes de facto rehnquimus ; teque Joannam Bocher, alias Joannam de Kent, memoratam, (uti praefertur), haereticam, pertinacem, et obstinatam in majoris excommunicationis sententiam occasione praemis sorum incidisse, et incurrisse, necnon excommunicatam fuisse et esse, etiam sententiahter et definitive pronun- ciamus et declaramus, per hanc nostram sententiam dif- finitivam, quam ferimus et promulgamus in his scriptis. Lecta fuit hujusmodi suprascripta sententia per praenomi- natum, reverendum, in Christo patrem Thomam Cantuar. archiepiscopum, dieMartis, viz. ultimo die mensis Aprilis, anno Domini millesimo quingentessimo quadragesimo nono, regnique domini nostri regis Edwardi Sixti anno tertio, in capella beatae Marias infra ecclesiam cathedralem divi Pauh, London., assidentibus dicto reverendissimo patri, Thoma Smyth, mihte, Wilhelmo Cooke, decano de arcu- bus, Hugono Latimer, sacrae theologiae professore, et Ri- chardo Lyell, legum doctore, commissariis regiis huic sen tential consentien., presentibus tunc et ibidem, ac pre- missa viden. et audientibus venerabihbus viris, Wilhelmo Yorke et Joanne Cliffe, militibus et vicecomitibus, Lon don., Clemente Smyth, Edwardo Hastings, militibus, Thoma Huse, armigero, Thoma Argall, generoso, Wil helmo Walker, et Joanne Gregory, notariis publicis. Sermo factus domino regi contra Joannam Bocher, alias dictam, Joannam de Kent pro brachio seculari. Illustrissimo et invictissimo in Christo principi, domino NO. XXXIX*.] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 491 nostro domino Edwardo Sexto, Dei gratia Angliae, Franciae, et Hiberniae regi, fidei defensori, et in terra ecclesiae An- glicane et Hibernice supremo capiti, Thomas, permissione divina Cantuarien. archiepiscopus, totius Angliae primas et metropohtanus, Thomas Smyth, miles, Wilhelmus Cooke, decanus de arcubus, Hugo Latimer, theologiae professor, et Richardus Lyell, legum doctor, vestrae cel- situdinis cognitores inquisitores, judices, et commissarii, per hteras vestras regias patentes gerentes, dat. 12° die Aprilis, anno regni vestri felicissimi tertio, sufficienter et legitime deputati honorem et perpetuam fcelicitatem in eo, per quem reges regnant et principes dominantur. Vestrae regiae celsitudini, tenore praesentium significamus, quod nos et adversus quandam Joannam Bocher, alias diet am Jo annam de Kent, subditam vestram de et super nefando crimine haereseos ac detestanda anabaptistarum secta apud bonos et graves enormiter diffamatam, et super reatu ea- rundem nobis detectam, delatam et denunciatam, rite et legitime juxta hterarum vestrarum regiarum commissio- nahum exigentiam, et tenorem procedentes, eandem Joan nam, per nos examinatam, comperimus et invenimus erro- res, haereses, damnatas et scandalosas opiniones cathohcae Christi fidei obviantes, contrarias et repugnantes, non- modo medio juramento suo corporah coram nobis prestito confessam fuisse, affirmasse, defendisse, et eisdem firmiter credidisse; verunetiam easdem sceleratas opiniones, errores, haereses, et damnatas opiniones pertinaciter animo indurato saepenumero manutenuisse, defendisse et in eisdem perman- sisse, et ab eisdem nullo modo resipuisse, nee resipiscere curasse; sed ad sanctae matris ecclesiae gremium redire pe- nitus neglexisse : ideo, cum animi amaritudine et cordis dolore, eandem Joannam, saepius monitam et per nos ad ecclesiae unitatem redire hortatam, salutaribus nostris mo- nitis parere omnino spernentem, de et cum consensu col- 492 MEMORIALS OF [append. legarum nostrorum, tanquam ovem morbidam a grege Domini, (ne alios viros subditos sua contagione inficiat), ejiciendam et eliminandam fore decrevimus, ipsamque Jo annam occasione iniquitatis suae inveteratae, hujusmodi haereticam ac haereticis opinionibus credentem, mediante nostra sententia difiinitiva, pronunciavimus et decrevimus. Cum igitur sancta mater ecclesia non habeat, quod ulte- rius facere et exequi debeat, in hac parte vestrae regiae subhmitati et brachio vestro seculari dictam haereticam et relapsam rehnquimus, condigna animadversione plec- tandam. In cujus rei testimonium, nos Thomas archie piscopus, primas, metropohtanus, ac commissarius vester humilhmus supradictus, de consensu collegarum nostro rum, hie se subscribentium, sigillum nostrum archiepis- copale praesentibus apponi fecimus. Dat. ultimo die mensis Aprihs, anno Domini millesimo quingentessimo quadragesimo nono, et regni vestri fehcissimi anno tertio.J [NUMBER XXXIX**. ARTICLES TO BE INQUIRED OF IN THE VISITATIONS TO BE HAD WITHIN THE DIOCESE OF CANTERBURY, IN THE SECOND YEAR OF THE REIGN OF OUR DREAD SOVEREIGN LORD, ED WARD THE SIXTH, BY THE GRACE OF GOD, KING OF ENG LAND, FRANCE, AND IRELAND, DEFENDER OF THE FAITH, AND IN EARTH OF THE CHURCH OF ENGLAND, AND ALSO OF IRELAND, THE SUPREME HEAD. Wilkins' First, whether parsons, vicars, and curates, and every vol?!"™. °f them, have purely and sincerely, without colour or dis- 23-26. simulation, four times in the year at the least, preached Sparrow s . r Collection against the usurped power, pretended authority and juris- &c. pp^sl diction of the bishop of Rome. £0^684 item; Whether they have preached and declared hke wise four times in the year at the least, that the king's NO. XXXIX**.] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 493 majesty's power, authority, and pre-eminence, within his realms and dominions, is the highest power under God. Item, Whether any person hath by writing, cyphering, preaching or teaching, deed or act, obstinately holden and stand with to extol, set forth, maintain, or defend the au thority, jurisdiction, or power of the bishop of Rome or of his see heretofore claimed and usurped, or by any pretence, obstinately or maliciously invented any thing for the ex tolling of the same, or any part thereof. Item, Whether in their common prayers they use not the collects made for the king, and make not special men tion of his majesty's name in the same. Item, Whether they do not every Sunday and holyday, with the collects of the Enghsh procession, say the prayer set forth by the king's majesty for peace between England and Scotland. Item, Whether they have not removed, taken away, and utterly extincted and destroyed in their churches, chapels, and houses, all images, all shrines, coverings of shrines, all tables, candlesticks, trindals or rolls of wax, pictures, paint ings, and all other monuments of feigned miracles, pilgrim ages, idolatry, and superstition, so that there remain no me mory of the same in walls, glass windows, or elsewhere. Item, Whether they have exhorted, moved, and stirred their parishioners to do the like in every of their houses. Item, Whether they have declared to their parishioners the articles concerning the abrogation of certain superfluous holydays, and done their endeavour to persuade the said parishioners to keep and observe the same articles inviola bly; and whether any of those abrogate days have been kept as holydays, and by whose occasion they were so kept. Item, Whether they have diligently, duly, and reve rently ministered the sacraments in their cures. Item, Whether they have preached, or caused to be preach- 494 MEMORIALS OF [APPEND. ed, purely and sincerely, the word of God, in every of their cures every quarter of the year once at the least, exhort ing their parishioners to works commanded by the Scrip ture, and not to works devised by men's fantasies besides Scripture, as wearing or praying upon beads, or such-like. Item, Whether they suffer any torches, candles, tapers, or any other lights to be in your churches, but only two lights upon the high altar. Item, Whether they have not every holyday, when they have no sermon, immediately after the gospel, openly, plainly, and distinctly, recited to their parishioners in the pulpit, the " Pater Noster," the Creed, and the Ten Com mandments in Enghsh. Item, Whether every Lent they examine such persons as come to confession to them, whether they can recite the "Pater Noster," the Articles of our faith, and the Ten Com mandments in Enghsh. Item, Whether they have charged fathers and mothers, masters and governors of youth, to bring them up in some virtuous study and occupation. Item, Whether such beneficed men, as be lawfully ab sent from their benefices, do leave their cure to a rude and unlearned person, and not an honest, well-learned, and expert curate, which can and will teach you whole some doctrine. Item, Whether in every cure they have, they have pro vided one book of the whole Bible of the largest volume in Enghsh, and the Paraphrasis of Erasmus also in Eng lish upon the Gospels, and set up the same in some con venient place in the church, where their parishioners may most commodiously resort to the same. Item, Whether they have discouraged any person from reading of any part of the Bible, either in Latin or Eng lish, but rather comforted and exhorted every person to NO. XXXIX**.] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 495 read the same, as the very lively word of God, and the special food of man's soul. Item, Whether parsons, vicars, curates, and other priests, be common haunters and resorters to taverns or ale-houses, giving themselves to drinking, rioting, or playing at un lawful games, and do not occupy themselves in the read ing or hearing of some part of holy Scripture, or in some other godly exercise. Item, Whether they have admitted any man to preach in their cures, not being lawfully hcensed thereunto, or have refused or denied such to preach as have been hcensed accordingly. Item, Whether they which have heretofore declared to their parishioners any thing to the extolling or setting forth of pilgrimages, rehcs, or images, or lighting of can dles, kissing, kneeling, decking ofthe same images, or any such superstition, have not openly recanted and reproved the same. Item, Whether they have one book or register safely kept, wherem they write the day of every wedding, chris tening, and burying. Item, Whether they have exhorted the people to obe dience to the king's majesty and his ministers, and to charity and love one to another. Item, Whether they have admonished their parishioners, that they ought not to presume to receive the sacrament of the body and blood of Christ before they can perfectly rehearse the " Pater Noster," the Articles of the faith, and the Ten Commandments in English. Item, Whether they have declared, and to their wits and power have persuaded the people, that the manner and kind of fasting in Lent, and other days in the year, is but a mere positive law, and that therefore all persons, having just cause of sickness, or other necessity, or being 496 MEMORIALS OF [APPEND. licensed by the king's majesty, may moderately eat all kind of meats without grudge or scruple of conscience. Item, Whether they be resident upon their benefices, and keep hospitahty, or no ; and if they be absent, or keep no hospitahty, whether they do make due distributions among the poor parishioners or not. Item, Whether parsons, vicars, clerks, and other bene ficed men, having yearly to dispend an hundred pound, do not find competently one scholar in the university of Cam bridge or Oxford, or some grammar school, and for as many hundred pounds as every of them may dispend, so many scholars likewise to be found by them, and what be their names that they so find. Item, Whether proprietaries, parsons, vicars, and clerks, having churches, chapels, or mansions, do keep their chan cels, rectories, vicarages, and all other houses appertain ing to them in due reparations. Item, Whether they have counselled or moved their parishioners rather to pray in a tongue not known than in English, or to put their trust in a prescribed number of prayers, as in saying over a number of beads, or other like. Item, Whether they have read the king's majesty's In junctions every quarter of the year, the first holyday of the same quarter. Item, whether the parsons, vicars, curates, and other priests, being under the degree of a bachelor of divinity, have of their own the New Testament both in Latin and Enghsh, and the Paraphrase of Erasmus upon the same. Item, Whether within every church he that ministereth hath read or cause to be read the epistle and gospel in Enghsh, and not in Latin, either in the pulpit or some other meet place, so as the people may hear the same. NO. XXXIX**.] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 497 Item, Whether every Sunday and holyday at matins they have read or cause to be read plainly and distinctly in the said place, one chapter of the New Testament in Enghsh, immediately after the lessons, and at even-song after "Mag nificat," one chapter of the Old Testament. Item, Whether they have not at matins omitted three lessons when nine should have been read in the church, and at even-song the responds with all the memories. Item, whether they have declared to their parishioners, that St. Mark's day, and the evens of the abrogate holy- days should not be fasted. Item, Whether they have the procession-book in Eng hsh, and have said or sung the said litany in any other place but upon their knees in the midst of their church ; and whether they use any other procession, or omit the said litany at any time, or say it or sing it in such sort as the people cannot understand the same. Item, Whether they have put out of their church-books this word " Papa," and the name and service of Thomas Becket, and prayers having rubrics containing pardons or indulgences, and all other superstitious legends and prayers. Item, Whether they bid not the beads according to the order appointed by the king's majesty. Item, Whether they have opened and declared unto you the true use of ceremonies, that is to say, that they be no workers nor works of salvation, but only outward signs and tokens to put us in remembrance of things of higher perfection. Item, Whether they have taught and declared to their parishioners, that they may with a safe and quiet con science in the time of harvest, labour upon the holy and festival days, and if super stitiously they abstain from CRANMER, VOL. II. K k 498 MEMORIALS OF [APPEND. working upon those days, that then they do grievously offend and displease God. Item, Whether they have admitted any person to the communion, being openly known to be out of charity with their neighbours. Item, Whether the deans, archdeacons, masters of hospitals, and prebendaries, have preached by themselves personally twice every year at the least. Item, Whether they have provided and have a strong chest for the poor men's box, and set and fastened the same near to their high altar. Item, Whether they have diligently called upon, ex horted, and moved their parishioners, and specially when they make their testaments, to give to the said poor men's box, and to bestow that upon the poor chest, which they were wont to bestow upon pardons, pilgrimages, trentals, masses satisfactory, decking of images, offering of candles, giving to friars, and upon other hke blind devotions. Item, Whether they have denied to visit the sick, or bury the dead, being brought to the church. Item, Whether they have bought their benefices, or come to them by fraud or deceit. Item, Whether they have every Sunday, when the people be most gathered, read one of the homihes in order as they stand in the book set forth by the king's majesty. Item, Whether they do not omit prime and hours, when they have any sermon or homily. Item, Whether they have said or sung any mass, in any oratory, chapel, or any man's house, not being hal lowed. Item, Whether they have given open monition to their parishioners that they should not wear beads, nor pray upon them. NO. XXXIX**.] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 499 Item, Whether they have moved their parishioners, lying upon their death-beds, or at any other time, to bestow any part of their substance upon trentals, masses satisfactory, or any such blind devotions. Item, Whether they take any trentals or other masses satisfactory to say or sing for the quick or the dead. Item, Whether they have given open monition to their parishioners to detect and present to their ordinary all adulterers and fornicators, and such men as have two wives hving, and such women as have two husbands hving within their parishes. Item, Whether they have not monished their parishioners openly, that they should not sell, give, nor otherwise ahenate any of their churches' goods. Item, Whether they, or any of them do keep more benefices, and other ecclesiastical promotions, than they ought to do, not having sufficient hcense and dispensations thereunto, and how many they be, and their names. Item, Whether they minister the communion any other ways than only after such form and manner as is set forth by the king's majesty in the book of the communion. Item, Whether they hallowed and dehvered to the people any candles upon Candlemas-day, and ashes upon Ash- Wednesday, or any palms upon Palm-Sunday last past. Item, Whether they had upon Good-Friday last past, the sepulchres with their lights, having the sacrament therein. Item, Whether they upon Easter-even last past hallowed the font, fire, or paschal, or had any paschal set up, or burning in their churches. Item, Whether your parsons and vicars have admitted any curates to serve their cures, which were not first examined and allowed either by my lord of Canterbury, master archdeacon, or their officers. k k3 500 MEMORIALS OF [APPEND. Item, Whether you know any person within your parish or elsewhere, that is a letter of the word of God to be read in English, or sincerely preached, or of the execution of the king's majesty's Injunctions, or other his majesty's proceedings in matters of rehgion. Item, Whether every parish have provided a chest with two locks, (and keys), for the book of wedding, christening, and burying. Item, Whether in the time of the litany or any other common prayer, in the time of the sermon or homily, and when the priest readeth the Scripture to the parishioners, any person have departed out of the church without a just and necessary cause. Item, Whether any bells have been knolled or rung at the time of the premises. Item, Whether any person hath abused the ceremonies, as in casting holy water upon his bed, or bearing about him holy bread, St. John's Gospel, ringing of holy bells, or keeping of private holydays, as tailors, bakers, brewers, smiths, shoemakers, and such other. Item, Whether the money coming and rising of any cattle, or other moveable stocks of the church, and money given or bequeathed to the finding of torches, hghts, tapers, or lamps, (not paid out of any lands), have not been employed to the poor men's chest. Item, Who hath the said stocks and money in their hands, and what be their names. Item, Whether any undiscreet persons do uncharitably contemn and abuse priests and ministers of the church. Item, Whether they that understand not the Latin do pray upon any primer but the Enghsh primer, set forth by the king's majesty's authority; and whether they that understand Latin, do use any other than the Latin primer, set forth by like authority. NO.XXXIX**.] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 501 Item, Whether there be any other grammar taught in any other school within this diocese, than that which is set forth by the king's majesty. Item, Whether any person keep their church holyday, and the dedication day, any otherwise, or at any other time than is appointed by the king's majesty. Item, Whether the service in the church be done at due and convenient hours. Item, Whether any have used to commune, jangle, and talk in the church in the time of the common prayer, readmg of the homily, preaching, reading or declaring of the Scripture. Item, Whether any have wilfully maintained and de fended any heresies, errors, or false opinions, contrary to the faith of Christ, and holy Scripture. Item, Whether any be common drunkards, swearers, or blasphemers of the name of God. Item, Whether any have committed adultery, forni cation, or incest, or be common bawds, and receivers of such evil persons, or vehemently suspected of any of the premises. Item, Whether any be brawlers, slanderers, chiders, scolders, and sowers of discord between one person and another. Item, Whether you know any that use charms, sorcery, enchantments, witchcraft, soothsaying, or any like craft invented by the devil. Item, Whether the churches, pulpits, and other neces saries appertaining to the same, be sufficiently re paired. Item, Whether you know any, that in contempt of your own parish church do resort to any other church. Item, Whether any inn-holders or ale-house keepers do use commonly to sell meat and drink in the time of 502 MEMORIALS OF [append. common prayer, preaching, or reading of the homihes, or Scripture. Item, Whether you know any to be married within the degrees prohibited by the laws of God, or that be separated or divorced without a just cause, allowed by the law of God, and whether any such have married again. Item, Whether you know any to have made privy con tracts of matrimony, not calling two or more thereunto. Item, Whether they have married solemnly, the banns not first lawfully asked. Item, Whether you know any executors or adminis trators of dead men's goods, which do not bestow such of the said goods as were given and bequeathed, or appointed to be distributed among the poor people, repairing of highways, finding of poor scholars, or marrying of poor maids, or such other like charitable deeds. Item, Whether any do contemn married priests, and for that they be married will not receive the communion 01 other sacraments at their hands. Item, Whether you know any that keep in their houses undefaced any abused or feigned images, any tables, pictures, paintings, or other monuments of feigned mi racles, pilgrimages, idolatry, or superstition.] NUMBER XL. ARCHBISHOP CRANMER S ANSWERS TO THE FIFTEEN ARTI CLES OF THE REBELS, DEVON, ANNO 1549 h. MSS. When I first read your request, O ignorant men of C.C.C.C. cn-pp. 33 7. h [The text follows that of foot. See Foxe's Acts and Mo- Strype, and has been collated with nnments, p. 1305 et seqq. ed. Lond. the C.C.C.C. MS., of which the 1583; Burnet's Hist, of Reformat. different readings are given at the vol. ii. p. 237-243. ed. Oxon. 1829; NO. XL.] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 508 Devonshire and Cornwall, straightways came to my mind 408. Ori- a request, which James and John made unto Christ ; to holograph. whom Christ answered : " You ask you wot not what." Todd's Life of abp. Even so thought I of you, as soon as ever I heard your Cranmer, articles, that you were deceived by some crafty papist >, ^,3^' which devised those articles for you, to make you ask you wist not what. As for the devisers of your articles, if they understand them, I may not call them ignorant persons, but, as they be indeed, most rank papists, and wilful traitors and ad versaries, both to God and to our sovereign lord the king, and to the whole realm. But I cannot be persuaded so to think of you, that in your hearts willingly you be papists and traitors ; but that those that be such have craftily seduced you, being simple and unlearned people, to ask you wot not what. Wherefore, my duty unto God, and the pity that I have of your ignorance, move me now at this time to open plainly and particularly your own articles unto you, that 87 you may understand them, and no longer be deceived. In your first article you require, that all the general councils, and holy decrees of our forefathers, may be observed and kept, and whosoever shall agaihsay them to be holden as heretics. This you all ask, but what you ask, I dare say k, very few or none of you understand. For how many of you, I pray you, do know certainly which be called the general councils !, and holy decrees of the fathers, and what is in Holinshed's Chronicles, vol. iii. p. l [See Speech on the Authority 1002. TheheadingintheC.C.C.C. of the Pope and of General Coun- MS. is "Against the articles of cils; — Works of abp. Cranmer, the Devonshire men."] vol. ii. p. 76. et sqq. Park. Soc. i [" Papists." MS. C.C.C.C] ed. | k ["I dare boldly say." Id.] 504 MEMORIALS OF [APPEND. them contained ? The holy decrees, as they call them, be nothing else but the laws and ordinances of the bishop of Rome : whereof the most part be made for his own ad vancement, glory, and lucre; and to make him and his clergy governors of the whole world, and to be exempted from all princes' laws, and to do what they hst. And would you ask, if you knew what you asked, that we should put away the laws of our own realm, and be governed by the bishop of Rome's laws ? If you mean this, then be you traitors to the king, and enemies to your own realm. And if you mean it not, consider what persons they be, and how they have deceived you, that make you ask you wot not what. And as for the general councils, you say you will have them all kept : but you be not so destitute of all reason, that you would have spoken such words, if you had known what you had said. For a great number of the councils repugn one against another. How should they then be all kept, when one is contrary to another, and the keeping of one is the breaking of another? And among your own articles you say, you will have divers things observed, which be not only contrary to the general councils, but also contrary to the lawm of this realm, and also to God's laws", as it shall be plainly declared when we come to the articles. And all reason is contrary that you should have asked such things, if you had known what you had asked. I have this opinion of the great number of you, that you would fain walk in the right way, if you could find it. And forasmuch as I perceive that wicked and false guides, under pretence to bring you to the high way, m ["Laws of this realm." MS. C.C.C.C] n ["To God's law." Id.] NO. XL.J ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 505 have brought you clean out of it, my good-will shall be, seeing you so far wandering out of the way, and so blind folded with evil persuasions, that you cannot see where you go, to open your eyes that you may see, and to set vou again into the right way. And when your eyes be so opened that you may see, and the right way shewed unto you wherein you should walk, then if you will still wink, and not see, and run headlong in error, and not come to the right way, you may no longer ° be called simple and ignorant people ; but perverse, froward, and wicked papists and traitors, enemies to God and your own realm. But now I will come to your articles particularly, open ing every one of them by himself, that you may see the bowels thereof, and what is contained in the same : that when you shall understand the whole, you may judge whether you knew before what you asked, or you were deceived by subtle and wily papistical traitors. Your first article is this : 88 We will have all the general councils, and holy decrees of our forefathers, observed, kept, and performed .- and who soever shall againsay them, we hold them as heretics. First, to begin with the manner of your phrase. Is this the fashion of subjects to speak unto their prince, "We will have?" Was this manner of speech at any time used of the subjects to their prince since the begin ning of the world? Have not all true subjects ever used to their sovereign lordP this form of speaking, "Most humbly beseecheth your faithful and obedient subjects ? " Although the papists have abused your ignorance in pro- ° [" Then you may no longer." MS. C.C.C.C.] p [" Sovereign lord and king." Id.] 506 MEMORIALS OF [APPEND. pounding such articles, which you understand not, yet you should not have suffered yourselves so much to be led by the nose and bridled by them, that you should clearly forget your duty of allegiance unto your sovereign lord, saying unto him, "This we will have;" and that saying with armour upon your backs and swords in your hands. Would any of you that be householders be con tent that your servants should come upon you with har ness unto i their backs, and swords in their hands, and say unto you, " This we will have ? " If then you would abhor and detest this in your servants towards yourselves, how can you allow your fact ? With what conscience can you, being but subjects, do to your king that thing which you would condemn in your servants towards yourselves ? But answer me this, Be you subjects or no? If you be subjects, then I admonish you, as St. Paul taught Titus, saying: " Warn them to be subject to princes, and rulers, obeying them at a word." But tell me again, Pertaineth this to subjection and obedience to say, "This we will have ? " St. Peter saith, " Be subject unto kings, as unto chief heads r, and to other rulers sent by them. For so is the will of God." God's will is, that you should be ruled by your princes. But whether is this to be ruled by your king, or to rule your king, to say, " Thus we will have the realm governed ? " Your servants be by the Scripture commanded, as they fear God, to be obedient to their masters, whether their masters be good or evil. And can you think it meet and lawful s for you to disobey your undoubted king, being a prince most innocent, most godly, and most careful for your surety * and wealth ? If 1 [" Be contented, that your serv- s [" Meet or lawful." Id.] ants should come unto you, with ' [So MS. C. C C C. Strype harness upon their backs." MS. reads " sorrow ;" evidently an in- C.C.C.C.] correct reading.] r ["As chief heads." Id.] NO. XL.] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 507 any thing can declare disobedience, what can declare it more, than subjects to come with force of arms to their natural king and prince, and say, " This we will have ?" But now leaving your rude and unhandsome manner" of speech to your most sovereign lord, I will come to the point, and join with you in the effect of your first article. You say, you will have all the holy decrees observed and kept. But do you know what they be ? The holy decrees, as I told you before, be called the bishop of Rome's or dinances and laws. Which how holy and godly soever they be called, they be indeed so wicked, so ungodly, so full of tyranny, and so partial, that since the beginning of the world were never devised or invented the hke. I shall rehearse a certain of them, [whereby you may judge of the rest, to the intent]* that yourselves may see how holy they be, and may say your minds, whether you would have them kept or no. And at the hearing of them, if you shall not think them meet to be kept here in this 89 realm, then you may see how they deceived you, that moved you to ask this article. And if you hke them, and would have them kept, after you know what they be, then I say assuredly, that you be not only wicked papists, but also heretics, and most heinous traitors to the king and this his realm. And yet how an absolute papist varieth from an heretic or traitor, I know not : but that a papist is also both a heretic and a traitor withal. One decree saith, " that whosoever doth not acknow ledge himseK y to be under the obedience of the bishop of Rome, is an heretic2." Now answer me to this question, i [" Unseemly manner." — self." MS. C.C.C.C] MS. CC.C.C] z [See Collection of Tenets x [This passage is inserted from from the Canon Law; — Works of the MS. CC.C.C] abp. Cranmer, vol. ii. p. 68, Park. y [" Doth not knowledge him- Soc. ed.] 508 MEMORIALS OF [APPEND. Whether be you under the obedience of the bishop of Rome, Or not ? If you say that you be under his obedience, then be you traitors by the laws of this realm. And if you deny it, then be you heretics by this decree. And shift is there none to save you from treason, but to renounce this de cree, that commandeth you to be under the bishop of Rome : and so to confess, contrary to your own first article, that all decrees are not to be kept. Yet a great many other decrees be as evila, and worse than this. One saith, "That all princes' laws which be against a decree b of the bishop of Rome, be void and of no strength0." Another decree saith, "That all the de crees of the bishop of Rome ought for ever to be kept of all men, as God's word0." Another decree there is, "That whosoever receiveth not the laws of the bishop of Rome, availeth neither d him the catholic faith, nor the four evan gelists. For his sine shall never be forgiven0." Yet is there a worse and more detestable decree, " That all king's and princes that suffer the bishop of Rome's decree to be broken in any point are to be taken as infidels f." An other is there also, " That the bishop of Rome is bound to no manner of decrees, but he may constrain all other per sons, both spiritual and temporal, to receive all his decrees and canons1." Another is yet more devilish than any before rehearsed, "That although the bishop of Rome neither regard his own salvation, nor no man's else, but put down with himseK headlong innumerable people by a [" Be as ill." MS. CC.C.C] CC.C.C] b [" Any decree." Id.] e [« For his sins." Id.] c [See Collection of Tenets f [See Collection of Tenets from from the Canon Law; — Works of the Canon Law ; — Works of abp. abp. Cranmer, vol. ii. p. 68. Park. Cranmer, vol. ii. pp. 69, 70, &c. Soc. ed.] and Letter to Queen Mary, Sept. a ["Neither availeth." — MS. 1555, pp. 447-454. Park. Soc. ed.] NO. XL.] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 509 heaps unto hell, yet may no mortal man presume to re prove him therefore"." But what should I tarry, and make you weary in rehearsing a number'1 ? For a thou sand other hke canons and decrees there be to the ad vancement of the bishop of Rome's usurped power and authority. I cannot think of you, that you be so far from all godli ness, from all wit and discretion, that you would have these decrees observed within this realm, which be so blas phemous to God, so injurious to all princes and realms, and so far from all equity and reason. But here you may easily perceive, what wily foxes you met withal, which persuaded you to arm yourselves, to make sedition in your own country, to stand against your princes, and the laws of your realm, for such articles as you understand not1, and to ask you wist not what. For I dare say for you, that the subtle papists, when they moved you to stand in this article, " That all the holy decrees should be observed," they shewed you nothing of these decrees, that they were taken for holy decrees. For if they had, they knew right well that you would never have consented unto this article, but would have taken them for traitors, that first moved you thereto. For now shall I shew you what miserable case you 90 should bring yourselves unto, i£ the king's majesty should assent unto this first articlek, " That all the decrees should be kept and observed." For among other partial decrees made in the favour of the clergy, this is one : " That none of the clergy shall be called or sued before any temporal judge for any manner of cause, either for debt, suit of e [Id. p. 70.] i ["Understood not." Id.] h [" In rehearsing a number of k [" Would assent unto this laws." MS. C.C.C.C] your first article." Id.] 510 MEMORIALS OF [append. lands, felony, murder, or for any other cause or crime : nor shall have any other judge, but his bishop onlyk." Another is : " That a spiritual man may sue a temporal man before a temporal or spiritual judge1 at his pleasure : but a tem poral man cannot sue a spiritual, but only before his or dinary1'." I cannot deny, but these been good™ and beneficial laws for the liberty of the clergy. But for your own part", I suppose you do not think it any indifferent law", that a priest shall sue ydu where he list, with the hcense of his ordinary; and you shall sue him for no manner of cause, but only before his own ordinary k. Or K a priest had slain one of your sons or brethren, that you should have no remedy against him, but only before the bishopP. What mean thoseq papistical priests, that stirred you to ask and will such decrees and laws to be observed in this realm, but covertly and craftily to bring you under their subjection : and that you yourselves, igno- rantly asking you wist not what, should put your own heads under their girdles ? For surely if you had known these decrees, when you consented to this article, you would have torn the article in pieces, and they that moved your thereto also. For these decrees be not only partial, and against all equity and reason, made only for the favour of the clergy, and the suppression of the laity ; but also they be, and ever have been, clearly contrary to the laws and customs of this realm. And yet by this article you will have the old k [See Collection of Tenets from n [" But for your own parts." the Canon Law ; — Works of abp. Id.] Cranmer, vol. ii. p. 72. Park. Soc. ° [" An indifferent law." Id.] ed.] p ["The bishops." Id.] 1 [" A spiritual or temporal 1 [" What meant then those." judge." MS. C.C.C.C.] Id.] m ["But these be good." r [" And them that moved you." Id.] Id.] NO. XL.] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 511 ancient laws and customs of this realm, (which have ever been used in all kings' times hitherto), to be void and to cease, and these decrees to come in their place, and be observed of all men, and againsaid of no man. For who soever speaketh against them, you will hold them for here tics. And in so saying, look what sentence to give of yourselvess. Although your article say it, yet I am sure you be not so much enemies to your own realm, that you would have the old ancient laws and customs of this realm, (for the defence whereof all the noble kings of this realm have so vahantly and so justly stand against the bishops of Rome), now to be taken away, and give place unto Romish decrees. And then by your own article you hold and con demn yourselves to be heretics. How be you bewitched by these false papists ? Why do you suffer them thus to abuse you by their subtlety, to make you condemn yourselves of heresy ? Why do you not send them unto the king's majesty, hke errant traitors, as indeed they be; saying unto him, " Most mighty prince, and most dread sovereign lord, we present here unto you most heinous traitors against your majesty and realm, and greatest dissemblers and false deceivers of us, your simple and ignorant people, and yet in our own hearts ' your true and faithful subjects. We have erred, we have grievously offended your majesty : but by ignorance, being so seduced and provoked by the crafty persuasions of these most heinous traitors, that we wist not what we did. But par don us, sovereign lord, have pity upon our simphcity and 91 ignorance ; and these abominable traitors punish accord ing to their deservings. Have mercy, most mercKul prince, of us, your poor flock, which were ignorantly led out of s [" You give of yourselves." Id.] 4 [" Yet in our hearts." Id.] 512 MEMORIALS OF [append. the way, and strike with the sword those malicious guides, that purposely would have led us to our utter de struction." If you did thus, then would you do u the parts of true, faithful, and loyal subjects", and should declare to the world, that all that you have hitherto done was done by error and ignorance. And I would nothing doubt of the king's majesty's clemency and mercy towards you. But yet to the intent that you may further know how unreasonable your first article is, I will yet rehearse an other sort of the holy laws and decrees. One is, " That no layman may have a benefice to farmy." Another is : " That none of the clergy may give any thing to the rehef of the commonweal and necessity of their own realm, without the consent of the bishop of Rome2." Another is : " That no layman may meddle with election or any other thing, that pertaineth unto any of the clergy2." Another is: "That none of the clergy ought to give any oath of fidelity to their princes, except they have temporal lands of them3." Another is : " That princes ought to obey the bishops, and the decrees of the church, and to submit their heads unto their bishops, and not to be judges over the bishops0." Another is this : "Whosoever offendeth the hberties of the church, or doth break any interdiction that cometh from Rome, or conspireth against the person or estate of the bishop or see of Rome, or by any ways offendeth, disobeyeth, or rebelleth against the same bishop or see, or that killeth a priest, or offendeth personally against a bishop or other prelate, or invadeth, u [" Should you do." MS. Cranmer, vol. ii. p. 72. Park. Soc. C.C.C.C.] ed.] x [" Loving subjects." Id.] « [Id. ibid.] y [See Collection of Tenets from a [Id. p. 73.] the Canon Law ;— Works of abp. b [Id. ibid.] NO. XL.] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 513 spoileth, withholdeth, or wasteth lands belonging to the church of Rome, or to any other church immediately sub ject unto Rome, or whosoever invadeth any pilgrims that go to Rome, or any suitors to the court of Rome, or that let the devolution of causes unto that court, or that put any new charges or impositions, real or personal, upon a church0, or ecclesiastical person ; and generally, all others that offendd in the cases contained in the bull, which is usually pubhshed by the bishops of Rome upon Maundy Thursday ; all these can be assoiled by no priest, bishop, archbishop, nor by none other, but only by the bishop of Rome, or by his express hcense e." These, with an in finite number of like sort, be the " godly " and " holy " decrees which you long so sore for, and so much desire. Now would I know, whether you think that these de crees were made for the commonwealth of all realms, or only for the private weal of the bishop of Rome, and of his bishops and clergy ? and whether you hke and long for these laws ; or now, at the hearing of them, your long ing is done ? If you like them, well, for my part I would you had them practised among you for a while, (so that the rest of the realm were not troubled, neither with you, nor with your decrees), until you repented yourselves of your foolish demands. I think within a year you would kneel on your knees to the king's majesty, desiring him to take from your necks the yokes and halters which you had made for yourselves. But to conclude the sum of the first article f in few words. It is nothing else but a clear subversion of the c ["Upon any church." MS. Cranmer, vol.ii. p. 74. Park. Soc. C.C.C.C. ed.] a ["All other that offend." Id.] ' [" Of your first article." MS. e [See Collection of Tenets from C C C. C] the Canon Law; — Works of abp. CRANMER, VOL. II. L 1 514 MEMORIALS OF [APPEND. whole state and laws of this realm; and to make this 92 realm to be wholly governed by Romish laws, and to crown the idol and antichrist of Rome king of this realm, and to make our most undoubted and natural king his vile subject and slave. Oh ! what was in your minds to ask such a thing, and so presumptuously to say, that you " will " have it ? I trust there be not in you so much mahce and devihshness, as the article containeth, but that you were craftily subordinate by subtle papists to ask and demand you wist not what. If you had asked, that the word of God might be duly observed and kept every where within this realm, and whosoever would gainsay God's words, to be holden as a heretic ; if you hadh declared yourselves to be godly men ; all that be godly1 would have commended and furthered your request. But forasmuch as you ask Romish canons and decrees to be observed and kept here in England, and whosoever shall againsay them to be holden as heretics, there is neither godly nor truly Enghsh man, that will allow you, or consent to your articles. But clean contrary to your articles, a great number of godly persons within this realm, for the very love that they have to God, that his name may be glorified above all things, be daily hum ble suitors to the king's majesty, that he, following the steps of his father, will study and travail to weed out of this bis realm all popish decrees, laws, and canons, and whatsoever else is contrary to God's word : and that the speakers against God's word may be taken, (as they be indeed), for heretics. And is any of you so far from rea son, that he thinketh the king's majesty ought to hearken to you, that by force and stubbornness J say you will have Romish laws and decrees kept in this realm, and to turn s ["Againsay." MS. CC.C.C] i [" And all that be godly." Id.] h ["Heretic; you had,"&c. Id.] i [" Force and stoutness." Id.] NO. XL.] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 515 his ears from them that with all humility be suitors for God's word ? But now will I come to your other articles, wherein I will be brief, forasmuch as in the first I have been long and tedious. Your second article is this : We will have the law of our sovereign lord king Henry VIII.k concerning the Six Articles1 to be used again, as in his time they were. Letting pass your rude style, nothing becoming sub jects to say, "You will have :" First, I examine you of the cause of your wilful will, wherefore you will have these Six Articles; which never were laws in no region but this ; nor in this realm also, until the thirty-first year of king Henry VIII k : and in some things"1 so enforced by the evil counsel of certain papists, against the truth, and common judgment both of divines and lawyers, that if the king's majesty himseK had not come personally into the parhament house, those laws had never passed. And yet within a year or httle more the same most noble prince was fain to temper his said laws", and moderate them in divers points : so that the statute of Six Articles continued in his force httle above the space of one year. Is this then so great a matter to make these uproars, and to arise against the whole realm? Will you take away 93 the present laws of this realm, (which be and ever have been the laws of all other countries also), and set up new k [" Henry VIIL.themost noble pp.38, 39. ed. Lond. 1840, 1. prince of famous memory." Id.] Strype's Eccl. Mem. vol. i. pt. i. 1 [See vol. i. p. 160. n. s. and pp. 542, 543. ed. Oxon. 1822.] also Burnet's Hist, of Reformat. m [" And then in some things." vol. i. pp. 518-520. ed. Oxon. MS. C.C.C.C.] 1829. Collier's Eccl. Hist. vol. v. n ["The said laws." Id.] L 1 2 516 MEMORIALS OF [APPEND. laws, which never were but in this realm only, and were here in force not fully thirteen months ? And how chanceth it, that you be so earnest in this article, which is directly contrary to your first article, but you know not0 what neither of the articles meaneth, but be persuaded by per verse papists to ask you wot not what ? But now here is the repugnance of the two articles p: by your first you will have all general councils and decrees observed and kept ; and by your second article you will have the Six Articles used again. Then let us compare the general councils and decrees with the Six Articles ; and you shall see them agree as well together as black and white. First, it is contained in the canons of the apostles, that a priest under no pretence of holiness may put away his wife; and, K he do, he shall be excommunicated i. And the Six Articles say, that if a priest put not away his wife, he shah be taken for a felon. If he keep her not stiU, he must be excommunicate by the canon of the apostles : and if he keep her still, he must suffer death by the Six Articles. You be cunning men, K you can set these two together. Also the council of Nice, which was the chief of all the general councils, and was celebrated more than twelve hundred years past, decreed clean directly contrary to the Six Articles. For where the Six Articles command all priests to be separate from their wives, Nicene council determined clean contrary, that they should not be separated, confessing such copulation to be holy and godly. And the council Gangrense, which was 0 ["But that you know not." Trpoaidcret eiXa^eias' MS. CC.C.C] eav 8e iK^aXKr/, dcjiopi^eaBco' «ri- P ["But now hear the repug- plvav 8k, Ka6aipeio-8a>. — Canon. nance of your two articles." Id.] Apostol. et Concil. can. vi. p. 2. 9 [vi. 'Ejrio-KOTror, f) irpeo-j3vTepos, (Bruns.) ed. Berol. 1839.] ^ 8iaKovos, Tr/v airov yvva'ata pfj r ["Ev Se ra wepl tovtov fiov- NO XL.] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 517 about the same time, so much allowed the marriage of priests, that they accursed thems that would abstain from the ministration' of priests, because they were married". These councils vary so far from the Six Articles, that either you must put the general councils out of your book, or else the Six Articles. Likewise concerning private masses, the law of Six Articles far differeth from the canon of the apostles, and from the councils Nicene and Antioch, as shall be de clared in the next article v. Other things there be divers also in the Six Articles, which cannot stand with sundry old canons, decrees, and councils. So that K you will stand to the canons, decrees, and councils, you must of force be constrained utterly to put out of your book your second article, which requireth the usage of the Six Articles. But now for shortness of time I will come to your third article, which is this : The third article. We will have the mass in Latin, as was before, and \evco-0ai, rots pev SKKois i8oKei men. torn. ii. lib.i. cap.xxiii. p. 41. vopovs emio-dyetv, emo-Konovs ko! ed. Cantab, i 720. See Todd's Life irpeo-fivrepovs, hianovovs re (cat of abp. Cranmer, vol. i. p. 267.] viro8iaK6vovs pi; o-vyKa6ei8eiv rats s [" Accursed all them." — yaperdis, as -npiv Updo~6ai rryd- MS. C.C.C.C] yovro. dvao-ras 8e Haxpvoinos 6 t [" From the administration." opd\oyr)TTis, dvrelire' Tipiov 8c tov Id.] yapov arroKaXav' o-axppoo-vvriv re u [i. Ei ns tov ydpov p^pcpoiTo, ttjv rrpos ras Ibias yvvdiKas o~vvov- Ka\ ttjv KaOevSovaav perd tov dv8pbs aiav, o~we$ov\evo-e ttj o-ov68u> prj aiiTTjs, ovotjv mo-rrjv (cai evAa/Si}, toiovtov diaBai vdjiov. xd^errbv $8ikvo-o-oiTO rj peptpoiro, as av pfj yap eivai to npdypa £peivm Icras 8vvapevr]v els (3ao-CXeiav elae\dfiv, 8c icai carrots Kal rals tovtcov yapt- dvddepa «rrc<>. — Canon. Apostol. rats tov pfj o~axppovelv alrlayevrio-e- et Concil. Concil. Gangren.; (a.d. rai errjiveo-e 8e koI f) o-ivo8os &62.){-yi6), pp.I07,3l9.(Bruns.) tt)v fiov\r)v, Kal irtp\ tovtov oiSev ed. Berol. 1839.] ivopoBcrrfo-cv. — Eccl. Hist. Sozo- v [See p. 522. n. m, n.] 518 MEMORIALS OF [APPEND. celebrated by the priest, without any man or woman communicating with him. Forasmuch as there is nothing with you but " will," let your will be conferred with reason and God's word; and then you shall see how far your will differeth from them both. First, as touching the Latin masses, whatsoever the priest saith in the old masses, whether he pray and 94 ask any thing of God, or give thanks to God, or make the true profession of the faith, or whatsoever he doth besides x, all he doth in your persons and in your names ; and you answer unto that which he saith, sometime " Amen," sometime " et cum spiritu tuo," and sometime other things, as the matter serveth. For all the whole that is done should be the act of the people 7 and pertain to the people, as well as to the priest. And standeth it with reason that the priest should speak for you, and in your name, and you answer him again in your own per son ; and yet you understand never a word, neither what he saith nor what you say yourselves ? The priest prayeth to God for you, and you answer " Amen," you wot not whereto. Is there any reason herein? Will you not understand what the priest prayeth for you, what thanks he giveth for you, what he asketh for you? Will you neither understand what he saith, nor let your hearts understand what your own tongues answer ? Then must you needs confess yourselves to be such people as Christ spake of, when he said, "These people honour me with their lips, but their hearts be far from me." Had you rather be hke pies or parrots, that be taught to speak, and yet understand not one word what they say, than be true Christian men, that pray unto God in heart and in x [" He doth beside." MS. C. C. C. C] y [" Action of the people." Id.] XO.XL.J ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 519 faith? The priest is your proctor and attorney, to plead your cause, and to speak for you all ; and had you rather not know than know what he saith for you ? I have heard suitors murmur at the bar, because their attornies have pleaded their cases in the French tongue, which they understood not. Why then be you offended, that the priests, which plead 2 your cause before God, should speak such language as you may understand? If you were before the king's highness, and should choose one to speak for you all, I am sure you would not choose one that should speak Greek or Hebrew, French or Italian; no, nor one that should speak Latin neither. But you would be glad to provide such one as should speak your own language, and speak so loud, that you might both hear him, and understand him; that you might allow or disallow that that he said in your names. Why do you then refuse to do the like unto God ? When the priest desireth any thing of God a for you, or giveth thanks for you, how can you in your heart confirm his sayings, when you know not one word what he saith ? For the heart is not moved with words that be not understand. But if reason will not persuade you, I will prove what God's word will do unto you. St. Paul, in the first epistle to the Corinthians d, saith, that whosoever shall speak to the people in the church to their edification, must speak such language as the people may understand ; or else he willeth him to hold his peace, and speak softly to himself and to God. For he which speaketh ° a strange language which the people understand not, doth not edify them, as >¦ [" Which pleadeth." MS. C.C.C.C] a [" Desireth of God any thing." Id.] " [" To the Corinthes." Id.] c [" For he that speaketh." Id.] 520 MEMORIALS OF [APPEND. St. Paul saith. And he giveth an example of the trumpet in the field, which when it giveth such a sound that the soldier understandeth, it availeth muchd: for every soldier thereby knoweth what to do. But if such a blast be blown as no man understandeth, then the blast is utterly in vain : for no man knoweth thereby, whether the horse men shall make them ready, or leap upon horseback, or go to their standard ; or whether the footmen shall make them ready, or set themselves in array, or set upon the 95 enemy, or retire to the standard. Even so should the priests be God's trump in his church : so that if he blow such a certam blast that the people may understand, they he much edified thereby; but if he give such a sound as is to the people unknown, it is clearly in vain, saith St. Paul : for he speaks to the air e; but no man is the better or edified thereby, nor knoweth what he should do by that he heareth. Furthermore, in the same place St. Paul saith, that if a man giveth thanks to God in a language to the people unknown, how can they say " Amen" to that they understand not ? He doth well in giving thanks to God ; but that nothing availeth or edifieth the people, that know not what he saith. And St. Paul in one brief sentence concludeth his whole disputation of that matter, saying, " I had rather have five words spoken in the church to the instruction and edifying of the people, -than ten thousand in a language unknown, that edifieth not." And for this purpose allegeth f the prophet Esay, who saith, that "God will speak to his people in other tongues, and in other languages ;" meaning thereby, that he would speak to every country in their own language. So d [" That the soldiers under- air." Id.] stand, then it availeth much." f [" This purpose St. Paul al- MS. C.C.C.C.] legeth." Id.] e ["For he speaketh to the NO. XL.] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 521 have the Greeks the mass in the Greek tongue, the Sy rians in the Syry tongue, the Armenians in their tongue, and the Indians in their own tongue. And be you so much addict to the Romish tongue, (which is the Latin tongue), that you will have your mass in none other lan guage but the Romish language? Christ himself used among the Jews the Jews' language, and willed his apostles to do the hke in every country wheresoever they came. And be you such enemies to your own country, that you will not suffer us to laud God, to thank him, and to use his sacraments in our own tongue ; but will enforce us contrary e, as well to all reason, as to the word of God ? So many as be godly h, or have reason, will be satisfied with this; but the mere papist will be satisfied with nothing. Wherefore I will no longer tarry to satisfy them that never will be satisfied, but will proceed to the second part of this article, wherein you say that you will have neither men nor women1 communicate with the priest. Alas, good simple souls ! how be you blinded with the papists ! How contrary be your articles one to" another ! You say in your first article, that you will have all general councils and decrees observed, and now you go from them yourselves. You say, you will have nobody to communicate with the priest. Hear then, what divers canons, decrees, and general councils say clean against you. There is one decree which saith thus : " When the consecration is done, let all the people receive the com munion, except they will be put out of the church k." s ["Will enforce things con- siasticis carere liminibus. Sic enim trary." Id.] et apostoli statuerunt, et sancta h [" As either be godly." Id.] Romana tenet ecclesia." — Corpus ' [" Man nor woman." Id.] Juris Canonici. Decreti pars iii. k ["Peracta consecratione omnes De Consecrat. Dist. ii. can. x. torn . communicent, qui noluerint eccle- i. col. 1150. ed. Lips, 1839.] 522 MEMORIALS OF [APPEND. And in the canons of the apostles, in the eighth chapter, is contained, " That whensoever there is any mass or com munion, if any bishop, priest, deacon, or any other of the clergy, being there present, do not communicate, except he can shew some reasonable cause to the contrary, he shall be put out of the communion, as one that giveth occasion to the people to think evil of the ministers1." And in the ninth chapter of the same canons of the apostles, and in the general council held at Antioch, is thus written : " That all Christian people that come into the church, and hear the holy Scriptures read, and after will not tarry to pray, and to receive the holy communion with the rest of the people, but for some misordering of themselves will abstain therefrom, let them be put out of the church, until 96 by humble knowledging of their fault, and by the fruits of penance, and prayers, they obtain pardon and forgive ness m." And the council Nicene also sheweth the order how men should sit in receiving the communion, and who should receive first n. All these decrees and general coun- 1 [viii. Ei ns iir'io-KOTTOs, rj Trpeo-- Kkr/aiav tov Oeov, (cat to>v lepav fivrepos, 7] BiaKovos, r) etc tov Kara- ypaobav aKovovras, pr) Koivatvovvras \oyov tov lepartKov 7rpocr(popa.s 8e evxrjs dpa tu> Xac3, r) a7rooTpe- yevopevws pr) perdkdfioi, rr)v alrlav (popevovs ttjv /j.eTaKn\jftv Trjs eu^a- oVara' (cat tav evkoyos 77, s aiTtos (3\d{3rjs yevo- o-las, eo)S av e£opo\oyrjo'dpevoi KaX pevos ra> Xao>, (cat vrrovoiav rroir}0~as 8ei£avres Kapwovs peravoias, (cat Kara tov rrpoo-eveyKavros . — Canon. irapaKaXeo-avres, rvxeiv 8vvt)6£>o-i Apostol. et Concil. can. viii. p 2. o~vyyvapr)s.— Id. Concil. Antioch. (Bruns.) ed. Berol. 1839.] I. (a. d. 341.) can. ii. pp. 81,318.] m [ix. Tlavras roiis elo-iovTas m- n [xviii. THXc9ev els ttjv ayiav o-Tois, Ka\ to>v ypav aKovovras, (cm peydXr/v ovvoSov, on ev Wert ro- pr) rrapapevovras 8e rrj rrpoaeixv kols (cat 7rdXecri, rots irpeo-ftvTepois (cat rfi dyla peTaXr)tyei, a>s dra£iav ttjv evxapurriav oi SiaVovot 8186a- epTrotovvras rrj e(C(eXi)crta, depopi- rriv, owep oiSre 6 kcivuw, oirre t) (eo-$ai XP7)- — Id. can. ix. p. 29. pa tov irapa Kavova yap Kal rrapd rdi-iv Xpt'oTou. (caKctvo 8e eyvaplo-dn, tan to yivopevov. el 8e tis pr) on t)8e rives t5>v 8iaKova>v (eat rrpo deXoi ireidapxetv (cat pe rd tovtovs t£>v emo-Kujrav Tr)s evxapurrlas arr- roils opovs, ncwavo-dw tt)s 8iaKo- Tovrai. raira pev ovv arravra irepin- vias. — Id. Concil. Nicwn. (a.d. pr)o-6a>- Kal eppeveTooa-av oi StdxoMu 325.) can. xviii. pp. 19, 319.] tois iSt'oty perpois, elSores on tov ° [" His apostles." MS. C.C. pev imo-K&irov wrqpeTai elo~\, rav C.C] 8e wpeafivTepatv iXdrrovs rvyxd- P ["Beside this." Id.] vovo-i' XapfSaveTacrav 8e Kara rr)v 1 [" Supplices te rogamus, om- rdi-iv tt)v evxapurriav perd toxis nipotens Deus : jube hac perferri Trpeo~l3vTepovs, r) tov emo-K&irov 81- per manus sancti angeli tui in 86vtos avTois, r) tov irpeo-fUvrepov. sublime altare tuum, in conspectu dXXd prj8e Kadr)o-0ai ev pea-a t5>v divinse majestatis tua? : ut quot- npeo-fivTepav e^eo-rto rdis Siukovois' quot, ex hac altaris participatione, 524 MEMORIALS OF [APPEND. self, and " for all that receive the communion with him, that it may be a preparation for them unto everlasting life r." Which prayer were but a very fond prayer, and a very mocking with God, if nobody should communicate with the priest. And the communion concludes with two prayers made in the name of the priest and them that communicate with him, wherein they pray thus : " 0 Lord, that thing which we have taken in our mouth, let us take it also with pure minds s, that this communion may purge us from om- sins, and make us partakers of heavenly remedy1." And beside all this, there be an infinite sort of post-communions in the mass-books ; which all do evidently shew, that in the masses the people did communicate with the priest. And although I would exhort every good Christian man often to receive the holy communion, yet I do not recite all these things to the intent, that I would in this corrupt world, when men live so ungodly as they do, that the old canons should be restored again, which command11 every man present to receive the communion with the priest : which canons, if they were now used, I fear that many would receive it unworthily. But I speak them to con- sacrosanctum Filii tui, corpus, et paratio salutaris, per eundem ip- sanguinem sumpserimus, omni sum Dominum nostrum. Amen." benedictione ccelesti, et gratia re- — Missale Sarisbur. fol. cxxxiv.] pleamur, per eundem Christum « [" With pure mind." MS. Dominum nostrum. Amen." — C C. C C] Canon. Missa?, Missale Sarisbur. * [" Quod ore sumpsimus, Do- fol.cxxxii. ed. 1533; Missale Rom. mine, pura mente capiamus : et de p. 238. ed. Mechlin. 1840.] munere temporalifiat nobis reme- r [" Hwc sacrosancta commixtio dium sempiternum." — Missale corporis et sanguinis Domini no- Sarisbur. fol. cxxxiii. b. Missale. stri Jesu Christi flat mihi omni- Rom. p. 244. ed. Mechlin. 1840.] busque sumentibus salus mentis u [" Which commanded." MS. et corporis, et ad vitam geternam C C C C] promerendam et capescendamprse- NO. XL.] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 525 demn your article, which would have nobody, neither man nor woman, to be communicated with the priest : which your article condemneth the old decrees, canons, and general councils, condemneth all the old primitive church, all the old ancient holy doctors and martyrs, and all the forms and manner of masses that ever were made, both new and old. Therefore eat again this article, if you will not be condemned of the whole world, and of yourselves also by your first article ; wherein you will all decrees and general councils to be observed. But foras much as I have been so tedious x in this article, I will endeavour myself to be shorter in the next. Your fourth article is this : 97 We mil have the sacrament hang over the high altar, and there to be worshipped, as it was wont to be; and they which will not thereto consent, we will have them die like heretics against the holy catholic faith. What say you, O ignorant people in things pertaining to God? Is this the holy cathohc faith, that the sacra ment should be hanged over the altar and worshipped? and be they heretics that will not consent thereto? I pray you, who made this faith ? Any other but the bishops of Rome ? and that more than a thousand years after the faith of Christ y was full and perfect ! Innocent III. about 1215 years after Christ, did ordain that the sacrament and chrism should be kept under lock and keyz. x [" Forasmuch as I have been tis conserventur, ne possit ad ilia too tedious." Id.] temeraria manus extendi, ad ali- y [" After Christ's faith." Id.] qua horribilia, vel nefaria exer- z [" InnocentiusIII.inconcilio cenda." — Corpus Juris Canonici. generali. — Statuimus, et in cunctis Decretal. Gregor. IX. lib. iii. tit. ecclesiis chrisma et eucharistia, xliv. cap. i. torn. ii. col. 624. ed. sub fideli custodiaclavibus adhibi- Lips. 1839.] 526 MEMORIALS OF [APPEND But yet no motion3 is made of hanging the sacra ment over the high altar, nor of the worshipping of it. After him came Honorius III. and he added further, com manding that the sacrament should be devoutly kept in a clean place, and sealed, and that the priest b should often teach the people reverendlyc to bow down to the host, when it was lifted up in the mass time, and when the priest should carry it to the sick folks d. And although this Honorious c added the worshipping of the sacrament, yet he made no mention of the hanging thereof over the high altar, as your article proportethf. Nor how long after, or by what means, that came first up into this realm, I think no man can tell. And in Italy it is not yet used until this day. And in the beginning of the church it was not only not used to be hanged up, but also it was utterly forbid to be kept. And will you have all them that will not consent to your article, to die hke heretics that hold against the cathohc faith ? Were the apostles and evangehsts here tics? Were the martyrs and confessors heretics? Were all the old doctors of the church heretics? Were all Christian people heretics, until within three or four hun dred years last past, that the bishops of Rome taught them a [" No mention. " MS. C.C. am, ut, cum in celebratione missa- C.C.] rum elevatur hostia salutaris, se b [" That the priests." Id.] reverenter inclinet, idem faciens, c [" Reverently." Id.] quum earn defert presbyter ad in- d [" Honorius III. — Ne propter firmura." — Corpus Juris Canonici. incuriam sacerdotum divina indig- Decretal. Gregor. IX. lib. iii. tit. natio gravius exardescat, districte xli. cap. x. torn. ii. col. 617. ed. pracipiendo mandamus, quatenus Lips. 1839.] a sacerdotibus eucharistia in loco e [" This Innocentius." MS. singulari,mundoetsignato semper C.C.C.C. The MS. has evidently honorificecollocata,devoteacfideli- been corrected by Strype.] terconservetur. Sacerdos vero qui- '["Your article purporteth." libet frequenter doceat plebem su- Id.] NO. XL.] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 527 what they should do and beheve ? All they before re hearsed neither hanged the sacrament over the altar, nei ther worshipped it, nor not one of them all spake any one word, either of the hanging up, or worshipping of the sacrament. Marry, they speak very much of the worshipping of Christ himself, sitting in heaven at the right hand of his Father. And no man doth duly receive the sacrament, except he so, after that manner, do wor ship Christ, whom he spiritually receiveth, spiritually feedeth and nourisheth upon, and by whom spiritually he liveth, and continueth that hfe that is towards God. And this the sacrament teacheth us. Now to knit up this article shortly. Here is the issue of this matter : that you must either condemn of heresy the apostles, martyrs, confessors, doctors, and all the holy church of Christ, until the time of Innocentius and Hono rius, because they hanged not the sacrament over the altar to be worshipped ; or else you must be condemned yourselves by your own article, to die like heretics against the holy cathohc fath. Now to your fifth article. Your fifth article is this : 98 We will have the sacrament of the altar but at Easter de livered to the lay-people ; and then but in one kind. Methinks you be like a man that were brought up in a dark dungeon, that never saw hght, nor knew nothing that is abroad in the world. And if a friend of his, pity ing his ignorance and state, would bring him out of his dungeon, that he might see the hght and come to know ledge, he, being from his youth used to darkness, could not abide the hght, but would wilfully shut his eyes, and be offended both with the hght, and with his friend also. A most godly prince of famous memory, king Henry VIII., 528 MEMORIALS OF [append. our late sovereign lord, pitying to see his subjects many years so brought up in darkness and ignorance of God, by the erroneous doctrine and superstitions s of the bishop of Rome, with the counsel of all his nobles and learned men, studied by all means, and that to his no httle dan ger and charges, to bring you out of your said ignorance and darkness unto the true hght and knowledge of God's word. And our most dread sovereign lord that now is, succeeding his father, as well in this godly intent, as in his realms and dominions, hath with no less care and dih gence studied to perform his father's godly intent and purpose. And you, like men that wilfully shuth their own eyes, refuse to receive the hght, saying you will remain' in your darkness. Or rather you be like men that be so far wandered out of the right way, that they can never come to it again without good and expert guides : and yet when the guides would tell them the truth, they would not be ordered by them, but would say unto them, " we will have and follow our own ways." And that you may understand how far you be wandered from the right way in this one article, wherein you will have the sacrament of the altar dehvered to the lay-people but once in the year, and then but under one kind ; be you assured, that there was never such law nor such request made among Christian people until this day. What in jury do you to many godly persons, which would devoutly receive it many times, and you command the priest to dehver it them but at Easter ! All learned men and godlyk have exhorted Christian people, (although they have not commanded them), often to receive the communion. And B [" By the erroneous doctrines remain." Id.] and traditions." MS. C.C.C.C.] k [" All learned and godly h["Thatwilfullyshutteth."Id.] men." Id.] 1 [" Saying that you will still NO. XL.] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 529 in the apostles' time, the people at Jerusalem received it every day, as it appears1 by the manifest word of the Scrip ture1". And after, they received it in some places every day; in some places four times in the week ; in some three times ; some twice ; commonly11 every where at the least once in the week. In the beginning, when men were most godly and most fervent in the Holy Spirit, then they received the communion daily. But when the Spirit of God began to be more cold in men's hearts, and they waxed more worldly than godly, then their desire was not so hot to receive the communion as it was before. And ever from time to time, as the world waxed more wicked, the more the people withdrew themselves from the holy communion. For it is so holy a thing, and the threaten ings of God be so sore against them that come thereto unworthily, that an ungodly man abhorreth it, and not without cause dare in no wise approach thereunto. But 99 to them that hve godly it is the greatest comfort that in this world can be imagined. And the more godly a man is, the more sweetness and spiritual pleasure and desire he shall have often to receive it. And will you be so un godly to command the priest that he shall not dehver it to him but at Easter, and then but only in one kind? when Christ ordained both the kinds, as well for the lay men as for the priests ; and that to be eaten and drunken at all times. What enemies be you to all laymen, and to yourselves also, to refuse0 to drink of Christ's cup, which he com manded all men to drink upon, saying, " Take and divide this among you;" and, "Drink ye allP of it !" But what need any more be brought for the reproving ' ["As it appeareth." Id.] » ["And commonly." Id.] m ["Words ofthe Scripture." ° ["Also that refuse." Id.] Id.] p[" Drink you all." Id.] CRANMER, VOL. II. M m 530 MEMORIALS OF [APPEND. of this article, than your own first article, where you will have kept all decrees and councils ? Now in the decrees, " De Consecrat. di. 2," there is one decree that command eth all men to receive the communion at the least thrice in the year, at Easter, Whitsuntide, and Christmas 9. An other commandeth every man to receive the same upon Shere-Thursdayr. The council Agathense saith, that all laymen which receive not the communion at Christmas, Easter, Whitsuntide, shall not be taken for catholics s: and the decree of Gelasius *, that the receiving under one kind is great sacrilege11. Then by your first article you do not only condemn this your fifth article, but also you shew yourselves not to be catholics, except you receive the com- i ["Etsi non frequentius, sal tern in anno ter laici homines communicent, nisi forte quis ma- joribus quibuslibet criminibus im- pediatur ; in Pascha videlicet, et Pentecoste, et Natali Domino." — Corpus Juris Canonici. Decreti pars. iii. De Consecrat. dist. ii. can. xvi. torn. i. col. 1152. ed. Lips. 1839.] r [" In coena Domini a quibus- dam perceptio eucharistise negli- gitur, quae quoniam in eadem die ab omnibus fidelibus (exceptis iis, quibus pro gravibus criminibus inhibitum est) percipienda sit, ecclesiasticus usus demonstrat, quum etiam poenitentes eadem die ad percipienda corporis et san guinis dominici sacramenta re- concilientur. — Corpus Juris Ca nonici. can. xvii. torn. i. col. 1152. — Shere-Thursday : the Thursday before Easter, formerly so called. — See Todd's Life of abp. Cran mer, vol. ii. p. 105.] s [" Seculares, qui in Natali Do mini, Pascha, et Pentecoste non communicaverint ; catholici non credantur, nee inter catholicos ha- beantur." — Corpus Juris Cano nici, Decreti pars iii. De Con secrat. dist. ii. can. xix. (ex Concil. Agathen. a. d. 506.) torn. i. col. 1 153. See Can. Apost. et Con cil. (Bruns) pars ii. p. 150. ed. Berol. 1839.] 1 ["Decree of Gelasius saith." MS. C. C C. C] 11 [" Comperimus autem, quod quidam sumpta tantummoda cor poris sacri portione a calice sacri cruoris abstineant. Qui procul- dubio, (quoniam nescio qua su- perstitionedocentur obstringi), aut integra sacramenta percipiant, aut ab integris arceantur, quia divisio unius ejusdemque mysterii sine grandi sacrilegio non potest pro- venire." — Corpus Juris Canonici. Decreti pars iii. De Consecrat. dist. ii. can. xii. torn. i. col. 1151.] NO. XL.] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 531 munion at the least three times in the year, and that under both the kinds, which is clean repugnant to this article. And yet I pray God you may receive it worthily once in your life, which you shall never do, except you wonderfully repent this your misbehaviour ; and all your life-time study to amend and redress that you have now offended. Now to your sixth article. Your sixth article is this : We will that our curates shall minister the sacrament of baptism at all times, as well in the week-day as on the holy-day. Who letteth your ministers to baptize your children every day, if any cause of necessity so do require ? But commonly it is more convenient, that baptism should not be ministered but upon the holy day, when the most number of people be together ; as well for that the whole church* there present may rejoice together of the receiving of new members of Christ into the same church, as also, that all men being present may remember, and the better know, what they promised themselves by their godfathers and godmothers in their own baptism; and be the more earnestly stirred in their hearts to perform the same; and also may altogether pray for them that be baptized, that they may have grace to perform their profession. St. Gregory Nazianzene, as great a clerk as ever was in Christ's church, and master to St. Hierome, counselled, that children should not be christened until they came to three years of age or thereabout, except they were in danger of lifey. And it was thought sufficient to our * [" The whole church of yvopnv, rr)v rpieriav dvapeivavres, Christ." MS. C. C. C C] r) pixpbv ivrbs Toirov,r) vrtkp tovto. y [neat, 8e toiv aXXcoi* 8!8s ceytdfttv (cm ijrvxds (cat M m 2 532 MEMORIALS OF [append. forefathers to be done two times in the year, at Easter and Whitsuntide: as it appeareth by divers of their 100 councils and decrees2; which forbid baptism to be aapxvra ra peydXa pvorrjpim tt)s TeXeiwo-cas. — Gregor. Nazianz. Orat. xl. in Sanctum Baptismum. torn. i. p. 714. ed. Paris. 1778- 1840.] z [" Non ratione auctoritatis alicujus, sed sola temeritate pras- sumitur, ut passim, ac libere Na- talitiis Christi, seu Apparitione, necnon et Apostolorum seu mar- tyrum festivitatibus, innumeras, ut asseris, plebes baptismi mys- terium consequantur, quum hoc sibi privilegium et apud nos, et apud omnes ecclesias dominicum specialiter Pascha defendat cum sua Pentecoste." — Corpus Juris Canonici. Decreti pars iii. De Consecrat. dist. iv. can. xi. torn. i. col. 1191. ed. Lips. 1839. — "Duo tempora, id est, Pascha et Pen tecoste, ad baptizandum a Romano pontifice legitime sunt prsefixa. Unde, quia manifestissime patet, baptizandis in ecclesia electis haec duo tempora, de quibus locuti sumus, esse legitima, dilectionem vestram monemus, ut nullos alios dies huic observantiae misceatis." Id. can. xii. ibid.. — " Proprie in morte crucifixi, et in resurrectione ex mortuis potentia baptismi no- vam creaturam condidit, ex veteri : ut in renascentibus et mors Christi operetur, et vita — ut appareret, ex hujus doctrinae spiritu regeneran- dis tiliis hominum, et in Dei filios adoptandis ilium diem esse, et illud tempus electum, in quo per similitudinem formamque mys- terii ea, quae geruntur in membris, his, quae in ipso sunt capite gesta, congruerunt, dum in baptismatis regula et mors intervenit inter- fectione peccati, et sepulturam triduanam imitatur trina demersio, et ab aquis elevatio resurgentis instar est de sepulchro. Ipsa igitur operis qualitas docet, cele- brandae generaliter gratia? eum esse legitimum diem, in quo orta est, et virtus muneris, et species ac- tionis." — § 2. " Additur sane huic observantiae etiam Pentecostes ex adventu Spiritu-sancti sacra so- lennitas, quae de Paschalis festi pendet articulo, et, quum ad alios dies alia festa pertineant, haec semper ad eum diem, qui resur rectione Domini est insignis, occurrit, porrigens quodammodo auxiliantis gratiae manum, et eos, quos a die Pascha? aut molestia infirmitatis, aut longinquitas iti- neris, aut navigations difficultas interclusit, invitat, ut quibuslibet necessitatibus impediti, desiderii sui effectum dono Spiritus sancti consequantur." Id. can. xiii. col. 1 19 1, 2. — " De catechume- nis baptizandis id statutum est, ut in Paschae solennitate, vel Pentecostes, quanto majoris ce- lebritatis major celebritas est, tanto magis ad baptizandum veniant ; ceteris solennitatibus NO. XL.] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. ministered at any other time than Easter and Whitsun tide, except in case of necessity. And there remained lately divers signs and tokens thereof. For every Easter and Whitsun-even, until this time, the fonts were hallowed in every church, and many collects and other prayers were read for them that were baptized. But alas ! in vaina, and as it were a mocking with God : for at those times, except it were by chance, none were baptized, but all were baptized beforeb. For as vigils, otherwise called watchings, remained in the calendars upon certain saints' evens, because in old times the people watched all those nights0; and Vigilantius, because he speaketh against d these watchings, was condemned of heresye; but now these many years those vigils remained in vain in the books, for no man did watch : even so until this day the infirmi tantummodo debeant bap- tizari, quibus quocunque tempore convenit baptismum non negari." Id. can. xv. col. 1193. — " Si qui necessitate mortis, segritudinis, obsidionis, persecutionis, et nau- fragii urgentur, omni tempore debeant baptizari." Id. can. xvi. ibid. — "Venerabilis baptismi sa- cramentum non nisi in festivitate Paschali et Pentecostes tradere praesumat episcopus ; exceptis iis, quibus urgente mortis periculo talibuB oportet, ne in aeternum pereant, remediis subveniri." Id. can. xvii. ibid. — " Baptizandi sibi quispiam passim quocunque tem pore nullam credat inesse fidu- ciam, prater Paschale festum, et Pentecostes venerabile sacramen- tum excepto duntaxat graviesimi languoris incursu, in quo veren- dum est, ne morbi crescente periculo, sine remedio salutari fortassis aegrotans exitio prasven- tus abscedat." Id. can. xviii. col. "93. 4-] a [" But all was in vain." MS. C. C. C. C] b [" For none were baptized at those times, except it were by chance, but all were baptized before." Id.] c [See Bingham's Antiquities of the Christian Church, book xiii. chap. ix. sect. iv. vol. iv. pp. 357-363- ed- Lond- l84°-J d [" He spake against." MS. C C. C. C] e [See Hieron. adv. Vigilant. Epist. Ix. torn. ii. pp. 83-87. ed. Francof. 1684. Bayle's Dic tionary, vol. ix. pp. 713-16, ed. Lond. 1739.] 534 MEMORIALS OF [append. order and form of christening was read and kept every year at Easter and Whitsuntide, but none was then christened. Wherein it appeareth how far we be swerved from our forefathers. And, to conclude this article shortly, if you will needs have baptism ministered no more at one time than another, then must you needs renounce your first article ; which willeth the councils and decrees of the forefathers to be observed and kept. And this briefly sufficeth for the sixth article. Your seventh article is this : We will have holy bread and holy water every Sunday1, palms and ashes at the times accustomed ,- images to be set up again in every church ; and all other ancient old ceremonies used heretofore by our mother holy church. Oh ! superstition and idolatry, how they prevail among you. The very true heavenly bread of hfe, the food ofs everlasting life, offered unto you in the sacrament of the holy communion, you refuse to eat, but only at Easter. And the cup of the most holy blood, wherewith you were redeemed and washed from your sins, you refuse utterly to drink of at any time. And yet in the stead of these you will eat often of the unsavoury and poisoned bread of the bishop of Rome, and drink of his stinking puddles, which he nameth holy bread and holy water. Consider, O ignorant people, the authors and intents of the makers of them both. The water of baptism, and the holy bread and wine of the holy communion, none other person did ordain, but Christ himself. The other that is called holy f[" Holy water made every s [" Heavenly bread, the food," Sunday." MS. C. C C C] &c. Id.] NO. XL.] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 535 bread, holy water, holy ashes, holy palms h, and all other hke ceremonies' ordained the bishops of Rome; adver saries to Christ, and therefore rightly called Antichrist J. And Christ ordained his bread, and his winek, and his water, to our great comfort, to instruct us and teach us what things we have only by him. But Antichrist on the other side hath set up his superstitions, under the name of holiness, to none other intent, but as the devil seeketh all means to draw us from Christ, so doth antichrist advance his holy superstitions, to the intent that we should take bim in the stead of Christ, and beheve that 101 we have by bim such things as we have only by Christ ; that is to say, spiritual food, remission of our sins, and salvation. First, our Saviour Christ ordained the water of baptism to signify unto us, that as that water washeth our bodies outwardly, so be we spiritually within washed by Christ from all our sins. And as the water1 is called water of regeneration, or new birth, so it declareth unto us, that through Christ we be born anew, and begin a new hfe towards God; and that Christ is the beginning of this new life. And as the body that is new born, although it have hfe within it, yet can it not continue in the spiritual hfe towards Godm, except we be continually nourished with spiritual food : and that spiritual food is Christ also. For as he is the first beginning of our spiritual life, so is he the continuance and ending thereof. And for this h [See Cardwell's Documentary k [" His bread, his wine." Id.] Annals, vol. i. pp. 37, 8. n. "the 1 [" As that water." Id.] archbishop's letter." ed. Oxon. m [" Yet can it not continue 1829.] without meat and drink: even so 1 [" And all such other like." can we not continue in the MS. C. C. C. C] spiritual life towards God." Id.] J [" CaUed Antichrists." Id.] 536 MEMORIALS OF [APPEND. cause did Christ ordain in the holy communion to be eaten bread, and drunken wine, that we should surely beheve, that as our bodies be fed with bread and wine in these holy mysteries, so be we out of doubt that our souls be fed spiritually with the hvely food of Christ's body and blood; whereby we have remission of our sins and sal vation". But the bishop of Rome invented new devices of his own making, and by them promised remission of sins and salvation, that he might be set up and honoured for a saviour equal to Christ ; and so to be esteemed above all creatures, and to sit in the temple of God, that is to say, in the church of Christ, as he were God. And to bring this to pass he hath horribly abused holy Scriptures, altering them to his purpose ; in the stead of Christ's most holy blood putting in his holy water : as it appeareth evidently in this sentence of St. Paul written in the ninth chapter of the Hebrews0: "If the blood of oxen and goats," saith St. Paul, "and the ashes of a young cow purified the unclean, as touching the purify ing of the flesh : how much more the blood of Christ, which through the eternal Spirit offered himself without P spot unto God, shall purge your consciences from dead works for to serve the hving God ? And for this cause he is the Mediator of the new covenants." Consider well this sentence of Paul, and you shall find two purify- n["But my meaning is, that 1551- Answer to Winchester; the force, the grace, the virtue, Works of abp. Cranmer, vol. i. p. and benefit of Christ's body that 3. Park. Soc. ed.] was crucified for us, and of his ° ["To the Hebrews." MS. blood that was shed for us, be C C C C] really and effectually present with p [" Himself being without all them that duly receive the spot." Id.] sacraments : but all this I under- 1 [" Of the new testament." stand of his spiritual presence." Id.] — See Preface to the Reader, ed. NO. XL.] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 537 ings, one of the body, and another of the soul or con science. You shall find also two mediators : one was the priest of Moses' law, and the other is Christ. The priests of the old law, with the blood of oxen and goats, and other their sacrifices, purged only the bodies of them that were defiled, but the soul or conscience they could not help. But our Saviour Christ by bis own blood purged both body and soul. And for that cause he, and none other, is the Mediator of the new covenant r. But the bishop of Rome, to make himself also a mediator with Christ, hath taken upon him to purify the soul and con science with holy water, holy salt, and other his holy crea tures of his own devising, to the intolerable injury of Christ's blood, which only hath the effect8. And to bring this to pass, he hath most shamefully changed the words of the Scripture, and wrested them to his purpose ; some words putting out, and also in the stead of Christ's blood putting in his own holy water and salt'. For whereas St. Paul saith, "If the blood of oxen and goats and the ashes of a cow purified the unclean, as touching the purifying of the flesh:" here the bishop of Rome leaveth out these words, "as touching the purifying of the flesh." And 102 where St. Paul, extolling the effects of Christ's blood in comparison of the blood of oxen and goats, saith, " How much more the blood of Christ, which through the eternal Spirit offered himself, being without spot, unto God, shall r["Of the new testament." Id.] que mundabat, (s. a venialibus) ; s ["That effect." Id.] multo magis aqua sale aspersa di- * [" Aquam sale conspersam po- vinisque precibus sacrata, popu- pulis benedicimus, ut ea cuncti lum sanctificat, atque mundat (a aspersi sanctificentur et purificen- venialibus)." — Corpus Juris Cano- tur. Quod et omnibus sacerdo- nici.Decretiparsiii.dist.iii.can.xx. tibus faciendum esse mandamus, tom.i.col.1186. ed.Lips. 1839. See Nam si cinis vitula? sanguine a- also Durandi Rational. Divin.Offic. spersus populum sanctificabat, at- lib. iv. c. 4. p. 63. ed. Venet. 1609.] 538 MEMORIALS OF [append. purge your consciences :" here the bishop of Rome, ex tolling his water and salt, puts outu Christ's blood, and in the place thereof puts hisx holy water and salt; saying, " How much more water, which is sprinkled with salt and hallowed with godly prayers, shall sanctify and purify the people." O intolerable blasphemy against the most precious blood of Christ ! O shameless audacity and boldness, so to corrupt and pervert God's holy word ! If he by his holy water presume to purify our souls, as Christ did by his blood, what is that else but to make himself equal, and another mediator with Christ ? And what is it to tread under foot 7 the Son of God, and to make the blood of the new testament, whereby he was sanctified2, like other common things, and to dishonour the Spirit of grace, if this be not? And yet, not contented with this blaspheming the blood3 of Christ, he preferreth his holy creatures far above the blood of Christ, promising by them many benefits, which by the blood of Christ be not promised. For in the same place he promiseth by his holy ceremonies to take away from us dearth and scarcity of all worldly things, and to multiply and increase us with the same; also to defend us from the assaults of the devil, and all his deceits, and to give us health both of body and soul. But all men see him so shamefully to he in these worldly things, that no man that wise is will trust him in the rest. Nor no man that is godly will desire such things to remain still, which so much have deceived simple people, and dishonoured God, and been contume lious to the blood of Christ. 11 [" Putteth out." MS. C.C. z ["Whereby we be sanctified." C.C] Id.] x [" Putteth his." Id.] a ["Blaspheming ofthe blood." y [" To tread under his foot." Id.] Id.] NO. XL.] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 539 But now to your images, which, you say, you will have set up again in every church. What moved you to re quire this article, but only ignorance? For if you had known the laws of God, and the use of godly rehgion, as weU before the incarnation of Christ, as four or five hun dred years next after, and by whom images were first brought into Christ's church, and how much idolatry was every where committed by the means of the same, it could not have been that ever you would have desired this ar ticle, except you had more affection to idolatry than to true rehgion. For Almighty God, among the Ten Com mandments rehearsed this for the second, as one of the chief: " Thou shalt not make to thyself any graven image, nor the likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or in the earth beneath, or in the water0 under the earth. Thou shalt not bow down to them, nor worship them." This commandment was diligently kept in the Old Testa ment, so long as the people pleased God. For in their tabernacle was not one image, less nor more, that the peo ple might see : although upon the propitiatory were two cherubimsc of gold by the commandment of God ; and that was in such a place as the people never came near, nor sawd. But when the people, forgetting this command ment, began to make them images, and to set them up in the place of adoration, by and bye they provoked God's indignation against them, and were grievously punished therefore. The church of Christ likewise in the New Testament, for the space of four or five hundred years after Christ's ascension, utterly refused to have images in the church, a D [" Nor in the water." Id.] d [" Never came, nor saw them." c [" Were set two cherubims." Id.] Id.] 540 MEMORIALS OF [append. 103 place of adoration; as it may plainly appear e by all the old ancient authors that hved and wrote in that time ; in- somuchf that above four hundred years after Christ, when some superstitious and ignorant people in some places began to bring painted images, not into the church, but to the church-doors, the great clerk Epiphanius, bishop at Cyprus, finding such a painted image of Christ, or some other saint, hanging at the church-door in a town called Anablatha, he cut it in pieces, saying, that " it was against the authority of Scripture that in the church of Christ should hang the image of a man." And the same Epipha nius wrote unto the bishop of Jerusalem, that he should command the priests, that in no wise they should suffer such images to be hanged in the church of Christ, which were contrary to our religions. But peradventure you will marvel, and ask me the ques- e [The word "appear" is in serted by another hand in the C.C.C.C. MS.] f [" In that time'; so much." MS. C. C. C. C] B [" Pra?terea quod audivi quos- dam murmurare contra me, quia quando simul pergebamus ad sanctum locum, qui vocatur Bethel, ut ibi collectam tecum ex more ecclesiastico facerem, et venissem ad villam, qua? dicitur Anablatha, vidissemque ibi pra?- teriens lucernam ardentem, et in- terrogassem, quis locus esset, di- dicissemque esse ecclesiam, et in- trassem ut orarem ; inveni ibi velum pendens in foribus ejus- dem ecclesiae tinctum atque de- pictum, et habens imaginem, quasi Christi, vel sancti cujusdam : non enim satis memini, cujus imago fuerit. Cum ergo hoc vidissem, in ecclesia Christi contra auctori- tatem scripturarum hominis pen- dere imaginem, scidi illud, et ma- gis dedi consilium custodibus ejusdem loci, ut pauperem mor- tuum eo obvolverent et efferrent. Nunc autem nisi quod potui reperire, et precor ut jubeas pres- byteros ejusdem loci deincepspra?- cipere, in ecclesia Christi ejusmo- di vela, qua? contra religionem nostram veniunt, non appendi." — Epiphan. Epist. ad Joan. Episc. Hier. torn. ii. p. 317. ed. Colon. 1682. See Bingham's Antiqui ties of the Christian Church, vol. ii. book viii. ch. viii. sect. vi. pp. 501-8. ed. Lond. 1840.] NO. XL.] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 541 tion, how it was brought to pass that of late years all churches were so full of images, and so much offering and pilgrimages done unto them, if it were against the commandment of God, against the usage of all godly peo ple in the Old Testament, and also against the custom of Christ's church in the New Testament, so long as it was pure and holy, and kept from idolatry ? Who was able to bring this to effect, contrary both to God's express com mandment, and the custom of all godly people from the beginning of the world until four or five hundred years after Christ ? No man surely could have wrought this thing so much contrary to God, but antichrist himself, that is to say, the bishop of Rome ; to whom God hath given great power to work great wonders, to bring into error those that will not beheve ,the truth. But by what means did he compass this matter? By such means as were most meeth for himself, and as he hath commonly practised in all other matters ; that is to say, by sedition and murder, by confederacies and persecutions, by raising the son against the father, the children against their mother, and the subjects against their rulers ; by deposing of em perors and princes, and murdering of learned men, saints and martyrs. For thus he wrought against the emperor1 of the East parties from Gregory IPs time until Gre gory IIIk; who at length, after this condition1 had en dured above five hundred years, in a council held at Lyons, by feigned promises persuaded the emperor of the East to condescend to his purpose, as well to receive images h [" As was most meet." MS. Nov. 27, a.d. 741. — See Mo- C C. C. C] sheim's Eccl. Hist. vol. ii. pt. ii. 1 ["Against the empire." Id.] ch. iii. sect. xi. pp. 154, 155, and k [Gregory II. May 18, a.d. 673. ed. Lond. 1845.] 715, to Feb. 20, a.d. 732. Gre- 1 [« This contention." MS. gory III. March 18, a.d. 732, to C.C.C.C] 542 MEMORIALS OF [append. into the churches, as to other his requests. But never theless the bishop of Rome failed of his purpose. For yet to this day the Christian men in the East do not allow images to stand in their churches; neither the Greeks, nor the Armenians, nor the Indians, nor none"1 other Christian men. And, that more -is, search all the world" throughout, of what rehgion soever they be, whether they be Jews, Turks, Saracens, Tartaries, or Christian people, and you shall not find an image in none of their churches, but that was brought in by the bishop of Rome, and where the bishop of Rome is, or within these forty years was taken for the head of the church, and Christ's vicar in earth. And at the beginning the bishops of Rome, to cloak their idolatry, pretended to have images set up only for a remembrance to laymen, and to be, as it were, laymen's books. But after, they defined plainly that these should be° worshipped. And so it increased at length, that images were kneeled unto, offered unto, prayed unto, 104 sought unto, incensed and pilgrimages done unto them, and all manner of superstition and idolatry that could be devised. Almighty God knoweth our corrupt nature better than we do ourselves. He knoweth well the inclinations of man p, how much he is given to worship creatures and the works of his own hands ; and specially fond women, which commonly follow superstition rather than true rehgion. And therefore he utterly forbad the people the use of graven images, specially in places dedicated to the honour of God, knowing assuredly that of the having would follow the worshipping of them. Now, thanks be to God, in this realm we be clearly m ["Nor nor none." MS. C.C ° [" That they should be." Id.] C.C] p [" Inclination of man." Id.] " [" Search the all world." Id.] NO. XL.] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 543 dehvered from that kind of idolatry, which most highly offended God, and we do according to the council Eleber- tine, which ordained that no images should be in churches (i. And this council is so ancient, that it was about the same year that Nicene council was. What should then move you to ask again your images in the church, being not only against God's commandments, and the use of God's church evermore since the begin ning of the world, when it was pure from idolatry, but also being chargeable to the realm, and great occasion of heinous idolatry, but that some papistical and covetous priests have persuaded you hereto? which care neither for God's honour r, nor your damnation, so that they may have any commodity or profit thereby. I have been very long in this article, and yet the matter is so large that it requireth much more to be spoken therein, which for shortness of time I am constrained to leave until a more occasion ; and to come to your eighth article. Your eighth article is this : We will not receive the new service, because it is but like a Christmas game ; but we will have our old service of matins, mass, even-song, and procession in Latin, as it was before. And so we, the Cornish men, whereof certain of us understand no English, utterly refuse this new English.As concerning the having of the service in the Latin tongue, is sufficiently spoken of in the answer to your third article. But I would gladly know the reason why 4["xxxvi. Placuit, picturas in ec- Concil. (Bruns) pars ii. p. 7. ed. clesia esse non debere, nequodco- Berol. 1839.] litur, et adoratur, in parietibus de- r [" God's dishonour." MS. pingatur."— Concil. Eliberit. a. d. CC.C.C] 305, cap. xxxvi. Can. Apost. et 544 MEMORIALS OF [APPEND. the Cornish mens refuse utterly the new Enghsh, as you call it, because certain of you understand it not ; and yet you will have the service in Latin, which almost none of you understand. If this be a sufficient cause for Cornwall to refuse the Enghsh service, because some of you1 un derstand none English, a much greater cause have they, both of Cornwall and Devonshire, to refuse utterly the late service"; forasmuch as fewer of them know the Latin tongue than they of Cornwall1 the Enghsh tongue. But where you say that you will have the old service, because the new is "like a Christmas game," you declare your selves what spirit you be led withal, or rather what spirit leadeth them that persuaded youy that the word of God is but hke a Christmas game. It is more like a game and a fond play to be laughed at of all men, to hear the priest speak aloud to the people in Latin, and the people listen with their ears2 to hear; and some walking up and down in the church, some saying other a prayers in Latin, 105 and none understandeth other. Neither the priest nor his parishb wot what they say. And many times the thing that the priest saith in Latin is so fond of itself, that it is more like a play than a godly prayer. But in the Enghsh service appointed to be read there isc nothing else but the eternal word of God : the New and the Old Testament is read that hath power d to save your souls ; which as St. Paul saith, "is the power of God to the salvation of all that beheve ;" the clear hght to our s["Why you Cornish men." a [" Some in the church saying MS. C.C.C.C.] other." Id.] * [" Some of them." Id.] >> [" Nor the parish." Id.] u [" The Latin service." Id.] » [" Is there." Id.] *[" Them of Cornwall." Id.] d["The Old Testament, the y [" Persuaded to you." Id.] word that hath." Id.] z [" Listen to some." Id.] NO. XL.] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 545 eyes, without the which we cannot see; and a lantern unto our feete, without which we should stumble in dark ness. It is in itself the wisdom of God, and yet " to the Jews it is a stumblingblock, and to the Gentiles it is but foohshness : but to such as be called of God, whether they be Jews or Gentiles, it is the power of God, and the wisdom of God." Then unto you if it be but foohshness and a Christmas game, you may discern yourselves what miserable state you be in, and how far you be from God. For St. Paul saith plainly, that the word of God is foohsh ness only to them that perish ; but to them that shall be saved it is God's might and power. To some it is a hvely savour unto life, and to some it is a deadly savour unto death. If it be to you but a Christmas game, it is then a savour of death unto death. And surely persuade your selves that you be not led with the Spirit of God, so long as the word of God savoureth no better unto youf, but seemeth unto yous a Christmas pastime, and foohshness. And therefore the old service pleaseth you better, which in many things is so foohsh and so ungodly, that it seems rather11 to be old wives' tales and lies, than to sound to any godliness. The devil is a liar, and the author of lies ; and they may think themselves governed rather of his spirit, than of God, when hes delight more than God's most true word. But this I judge rather of your leaders than of your selves, who by ignorance be carried away by others', you wot not whither. For when the service was in the Latin tongue, which you understood not, they might read to you truth or fablesk, godly or ungodly things, as they e ["To our feet." Id.] h [" Seemeth rather." Id.] f [" No better to you. ' Id.] ' [" By other." Id.] b [" Seemeth to you." Id.] * [" Truths or fables." Id.] CRANMER, VOL. II. N n 546, MEMORIALS OF [APPEND. pleased; but you could not1 judge that you understood not. And what was the cause m why St. Paul would have such languages spoken in the church as that people" might understand ? that they might learn and be edified thereby, and judge of that which should be spoken, whether it were according to God's word or not. But forasmuch as you understand not ° the old Latin service, I shall rehearse some things in Enghsh that were wontP to be read in Latin, that when you understand them, you may judge them whether they seem to be true tales, or fables ; and whether they or God's word seem to be more like plays and Christmas games. "The devil entered into a certain person, in whose mouth St. Martin put his finger ; and because the devil could not get out at his mouth, the man blew bim, or cacked him out be hind." This is one of the tales that was wont to be read in the Latin service, that you will needs have again. As though the devil had a body, and that so crass that he could not pass out by the small pores of the flesh, but must needs have a wide hole to go out at. Is this a grave and godly matter to be read in the church, or rather a foohsh Christmas tale, or an old wives' fable, worthy to be laughed at and scorned of every man that hath either wit or godly judgment ? Yet more foohsh, erroneous, and 106 superstitious things be read in the feasts of St. Blase, St. Valentine, St. Margaret, St. Peter, of the Visitation of our lady, and the Conception, of the Transfiguration of Christ, and in the feast of Corpus Christi, and a great number more : whereof some be most vain fables, some very super stitious, some directly against God's word, and the laws 1 [" For you could not." MS. » [« As the people." Id.] CC.C.C] ° [" You understood not." Id.] m ["And that was the cause." p [" Which were wont." Id.] Id.] NO. XL.] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 547 of this realm, and altogether be full of error and super stition. But as Christ commonly excused the simple people because of their ignorance, and justly condemned the scribes and Pharisees, which by their crafty persua sions led the people out of the right way ; so I think not you so much to be blamed as those Pharisees and papis tical priests, which, abusing your simphcity, caused you to ask you wist not what, desiring rather to drink of the dregs of corrupt error, which you knew not, than of the pure and sweet wine of God's word, which you may and ought to understand. But now have I sufficiently spoke1 of your eighth article : I will go forward unto the ninth. Your ninth article is this : We will have every preacher in his sermon, and every priest at the mass s, pray specially by name for the souls in purgatory, as our forefathers did. To reason with you by learning, which be unlearned, it were but folly : therefore I will convince your article with very reason. First, tell me, I pray, if you can t, whether there be a purgatory or no; and where, or what it is. And if you cannot tell, then I may tell you that you ask you wot not what. The Scripture maketh mention of two places where the dead be received after this life, of heaven and of hell; but of purgatory is not one word spoken. Purgatory was wont to be called a fire as hot as hell, but not so long during. But now the defenders of purgatory within this realm be ashamed so to say: nevertheless they say it is a third place ; but where or what it is, they confess themselves they cannot tell. And of God's word they have nothing to shew, neither where it is, nor what r ["Sufficiently be spoken." Id.] s [« At his mass." Id.] * ["I pray you, if you can." Id.] N n 2 548 MEMORIALS OF [APPEND. it is, nor that it is. But all is feigned of their own brains u, without authority of Scripture. I would ask of them then, wherefore it is, and to what use it serveth ? For if it be to no use, then it is a thing frustrate and in vain. Marry, say they, it is a place of punishment, whereby they be purged from their sins that depart out of this hfe not fully purged before. I cannot tell whether this saying be more foohsh x, or more contu melious to Christ. For what can be more foohsh than to say, that pains can wash sins out of the soul. I do not deny but that corrections and punishments 7 in this life is a calling of men to repentance and amendment, and so to be purged by the blood of Christ. But correction without repentance can nothing avail; and they that be dead be past the time of repentance; and so no cor rection or torments in purgatory can avail them. And what a contumely z and injury is this to Christ, to affirm 107 that all have not a full and perfect purgation by his blood that die in his faith ! Is not all our trust in the blood of Christ, that we be cleansed, purged, and washed thereby ? And will you have us now to forsake our faith in Christ, and bring us to the pope's purgatory to be washed there in; thinking that Christ's blood is an imperfect lee or soap that washeth not clean? If he shall die without mercy that treadeth Christ's blood under his feet, what is treading of his blood under our feet, if this be not ? But if according to the cathohc faith, which the holy Scripture teacheth, and the prophets, apostles, and mar tyrs confirmed with their blood, all the faithful that die u [" Their own brain." MS. z [" And how great a con- CC.C.C] tumely." Id.] x [" Be more foolishness." Id.] a [" All they have not." y [" But correction and punish- Id.] ment." Id.] NO. XL.] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 549 in the Lord be pardoned of all their offences by Christ, and their sins be clearly sponged and washed away by his blood; shall they after be cast into another strong and grievous prison of purgatory, there to be punished again for that which was pardoned before ? God hath promised by his word, that the souls of the just b be in God's hand, and no pain shall touch them : and again he saith, " Blessed be they that die in the Lord. For the Spirit of God saith, that from henceforth they shall rest from their pains." And Christ himself saith : " He that be- lieveth in him that sent me hath everlasting life, and shall not come to judgment, but shall pass from death unto hfe." And is God no truer of his promises c but to punish that which he promiseth to pardon ? Consider the matter by your own cases. If the king's majesty should pardon your offences, and after would cast you into prison, would you think that he had well observed bis promise? For what is to pardon your offences, but to pardon the punishment for the same ? If the king would punish d you, would you take that for a pardon? Would you not allege your pardon, and say that you ought not to be punished ? Who can then, that hath but a crumb of reason in his head, imagine of God that he will after our death punish those things that he pardoned in our life-time ? Truth it is that Scripture maketh mention of paradise and Abraham's bosom after this life ; but those be places of joy and consolation, not of pains and torments. But yet I know what subtle sophisters use to mutter in men's ears to deceive them withal. David, say theye, with b ["Of the Jews;" (Strype), evi- d [" Pardon;" (Strype), evi dently a misprint.] dently a misprint.] c [" Of his promise." MS. e [" David, they say." MS. CC.C.C] C.C.C.C] 550 MEMORIALS OF [APPEND. many other, were pardoned of their offences, and yet were they sore punished after for the same of God ; and some of them so long as they hved. Well, be it it were so. Yet after their lives they were not punished^in purgatory therefore : but the end of their hves was the end of their punishment. And hkewise it is of original sin after bap tism, which although it be pardoned, yet after pains f thereof continue so long as we hve. But this punish ment in this life-time s is not to revenge our original sin, which is pardoned in baptism, but to make us humble, penitent, obedient to God, fearful to offend, to know our selves, and ever to stand in fear and awe ; as, if a father that hath beaten a wilful child for his faults should hang the rod continually at the child's girdle, it should be no small pain and grief to the child, ever hanging by his side : and yet the father doth it not to beat the child for that which is past and forgiven ; but to make bim beware hereafter that he offend not again, and to be gentle, tract able, obedient, and loath to do any thing amiss. But after this life there is no such cause of punishment; where no rod nor whip can force any man to go any faster or farther, 108 being already at the end of his journey. Likewise a master that hath an unthrifty servant, which out of his master's sight doth nothing but riot and disorder himself, if he forgive his servant, and for the love he beareth to him, and the desire he hath to see him corrected and reformed, he will command him never to be out of his sight ; this command h, although indeed it be a great pain to the servant, yet the master doth it not to punish those faults, which before he had pardoned and forgiven, but to keep him in stay, that he fall no more to hke disorder. But f ["Yet certain pains." MS. C.C.C.C.] s [" In our life-time." Id.] h [" This commandment." Id.] NO. XL.] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 551 these examples and cases of punishment here in this life can in no wise be wrested and drawn to the life to come; and so in no wise can serve for purgatory. And furthermore, seeing that the Scriptures so often and so diligently teach us, almost in every place, to reheve all them that be in necessity, to feed the hungry, to clothe the naked, to visit the sick and the prisoner ', to comfort the sorrowful, and so to all others k that have need of our help ; and the same in no place make men tion1 either of such pains in purgatory, or what comfort we may do them ; it is certain that the same is feigned for lucre, and not grounded upon God's word. For else the Scripture in some place would have told us plainly what case they stood in that be in purgatory, and what rehef and help we might do unto them. But as for such m as God's words speaketh not one word of neither of them both, my counsel shall be, that you keep not the bishop of Rome's decrees that you may come to purgatory, but keep God's laws that you may come to heaven : or else I pro mise you assuredly that you shall never escape hell. Now to your next article. Your tenth article is this : We will have the Bible, and all books of Scripture in Eng lish, to be called in again, For we be informed that otherwise the clergy shall not of long time confound the heretics.Alas ! it grieveth me to hear your articles ; and much I rue and lament your ignorance; praying God most earn estly once to hghten your eyes that you may see the truth". What Christian heart would not be grieved ' [" The prisoners." Id.] * [" To all other." Id.] 1 [" In no place maketh mention." Id.] 111 [" But forasmuch." Id.] n [" See his truth." Id]. 552 MEMORIALS OF [append. to see you so ignorant, (for willingly and wilfully, I trust, you do it not), that you refuse Christ, and join yourselves with antichrist ? You refuse the holy Bible and all holy Scriptures so much, that you will have them called in again; and the bishop of Rome's decrees you will have advanced and observed. I may well say to you as Christ said to Peter, " Turn back again, for you savour not godly things." As many of you as understand no Latin cannot know God's word but in Enghsh, except it be the Cornish men, which cannot understand likewise none but their own speech. Then you must be content to have it in Enghsh, which you know, or else you must confess that you refuse utterly the knowledge thereof. And wherefore did the Holy Ghost come down [among the apostles0] in fiery tongues, and gave them knowledge of all languages, but that all nations might hear, speak, and learn God's word in their mother-tongue? And can you name me any 109 Christians in all the worldP, but they have, and ever hadi, God's word in their own tongue ? And the Jews, to whom God gave his Scriptures in the Hebrew tongue, after their long captivity among the Chaldees, so that more of them knew the Chaldee rather than the Hebrew tongue, they caused the Scripture to be turned into the Chaldee tongue, that they might understand it : which until this day is called Targums. And Ptolemy, king of Egypt, caused sixty [seventy] of the greatest clerks that might be gotten to translate the Scripture out of Hebrew into Greek1. o [These words are found in s [See Home's Introduction to C.C.C.C. MS., but they have been the Study of the Scriptures, vol. ii. omitted by Strype.] pp. 33-38. ed. Lond. 1828.] P [" Any Christian nation in all * [Id. pp. 39, 40. See also Pri- the world." MS. C.C.C.C.] deaux's Old and New Testament 1 [" And ever have had." Id.] connected, vol. ii. pp. 26-28. ed. 1 [" The Chaldee than the He- Oxon. 1839.] brew." Id.] NO. XL.] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 553 And until this day the Greeks have it in the Greek tongue, the Latins in the Latin tongue, and all other nations in their own tongue. And will you have God farther from us than from all other countries, that he shall speak to every man in his own language that he understandeth and was born in, and to us shall speak a strange language that we understand not ? And will you that all other realms shall laud God in their own speech, and we shall say to him we know not what ? Although you savour so httle of godliness that you list not to read his word yourselves, you ought not to be so malicious and envious to let them that be more godly, and would gladly read it to their comfort and edification. And if there be an Enghsh heretic, how will you have him confuted but in Enghsh? and whereby else but by God's word ? Then it followeth, that to confute Enghsh heretics we must needs have God's word in Enghsh, as all other nations have it in their own native language. St. Paul to the Ephesians teacheth all men, as well laymen as priests, to arm themselves, and to fight agamst all adversaries with God's word ; without the which we cannot be able to pre vail, neither against subtle heretics, puissant devils, this deceitful world, nor our own sinful flesh. And therefore, until God's word came to hght, the bishop of Rome, un der the prince of darkness, reigned quietly in the world, and his heresies were received and allowed for the true cathohc faith. And it can none otherwise be but that heresies must reign where the hght of God's word driveth not away our darkness. Your eleventh article is this : We will have Dr. Moreman and Dr. Crispin11, which hold our opinions, to be safely sent unto us ,- and to them we u [See above, pp. 115, 116.] 554 MEMORIALS OF [APPEND. require the king's majesty to give some certain livings, to preach among us our catholic faith. If you be of Moreman's and Crispin's faith, I Hke you much the worse. For " hke lettuce, like lips." And to declare you plainly the quahties of Crispin and Moreman, and how unmeet men they be to be your teachers, they be persons very ignorant in God's word, and yet thereto very wilful, crafty, and full of dissimulation. For if they were profoundly learned, and of sincere judgments, as they be not, they might be godly teachers of you. Or if they were not " toto " wilful, and standing wholly in their own conceits, they might learn and be taught of others1. But now they be so wilful that they will not learn, and so ignorant that they cannot teach, and so full of craft and 110 hypocrisy that they be able to deceive you all, and to lead you into error after themselves. So that if you ask them, you ask your own poison. Now if a man were in such a sickness that he longed for poison, (as many diseases de sire things most noyful unto them), yet it were not the part of a good physician to give it unto them. No more is it the office of a most godly prince to give you such teachers, (although you long never so sore for them), as he knoweth would corrupt you, feeding you rather with sour and unwholesome leaven of Romish pharisaical doctrine, than with the sweet, pure, and wholesome bread of God's heavenly word. And where you would have God's word in English destroyed, and Crispin and Moreman dehvered unto you, you do even as the people of the Jews did; which cried out that Christ might be crucified, and that Barabbas, the strong thief, might be dehvered unto them. Your twelfth article is this : We think it very meet, because the lord cardinal Pole is of x[" Of other." CC.C.C. MS.] NO. XL. ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 555 the king's bloody, that he should notz only have his par don, but also be sent for to Rome, and promoted to be of the king's council. In this article I will answer no more but this : if ever any cardinal or legate were beneficial unto this realm, we may have some hope of some other to follow his steps : but if all that ever were in this realm were pernicious and hurtful unto the same, I know not why we should be with child to long for any more. For by the experience of them that have been heretofore, we may conjecture of them that be to come. And I fear me that cardinal Pole would follow rather the whole race of the rest, than to be gin a better of himself. Surely I have read a book of his making1, which whosoever shall read, if he have a true y [" He was of the blood royal, and cousin-germain to the king, (Henry VIII.), by both the houses of York and Lancaster, being by his mother descended from the duke of Clarence, brother to king Edward IV.;" and was " educated with princely munificence by him." — See also Collier's Eccl. Hist. vol. iv. p. 389. ed. Lond. 1840, 41. Burnet's Hist, of Refor mat, vol.i. p. 444. ed. Oxon. 1829, and Anderson's Annals of the Eng lish Bible, vol.i. pp.421, 422. ed. Lond. 1845.] z ["Blood, should not." MS. C.C.C.C.] a [The book is intituled by Strype and Collier, " De Unione Ecclesiastica," by Burnet, " De Unitate Ecclesiastica ; " it was written against Henry's divorce from queen Katherine, and his assuming the supremacy. " His majesty, having literally made him the man he was, became eager to have his opinions in writing, as to himself and his movements; ex pecting, of course, that they would be entirely in his favour. Pole as sented, and all the time living on Henry's bounty, carried on the de lusion. His opinions grew into a volume, which he began in Janu ary of this year, and so late as June he had the profound hypocrisy to give assurances, in writing*, that he meant to serve the king in the cause desired. His book, how ever, such as it was, had been com pleted in March, but it was retain ed for more than twelve months after that, and shewn to select ene mies, just as if intended to produce the more astounding effect on the day of its presentation next year." * [Cotton MSS. Cleop. E. vi. fol. 334. British Museum.] 556 MEMORIALS OF [append. heart to our late sovereign lord king Henry VIII., or to this realm, he will judge cardinal Pole neither worthy to dwell in this realm, nor yet to hve. For he doth extend all his wits and eloquence in that book to persuade the bishop of Rome, the emperor, the French king, and all other princes, to invade this realm by force. And sure I am, that if you have him, you must have the bishop of Rome also. For the cardinal cannot be a subject, but where the other is his head. This sufiiceth briefly to this article. Your thirteenth article is this : We will that no gentleman shall have any more servants than one to wait upon him, except he may dispend one hundred mark land. And for every hundred mark we think it reasonable he should have a man. Yet have you not foreseen one thing, you wise disposers of the commonwealth. For if a gentleman of an hundred mark landb, (who by your order must have but one ser- 111 vant, except he might spend two hundred marks), should send that one servant to London, you have not provided who shall wait upon him until his servant come home again. Nor you have not provided where every gentle man may have one servant that can do all things neces sary for him. I fear me the most part of you that de vised this article, (whom I take to be loiterers and idle unthrifts), if you should serve a gentleman, he should be fain to do all things himself, for any thing that you could or would do for him. But one thing methink very strange : "See an analysis of cardinal Pole's See also above, pp. 116,555, n.y, character and writings, his viru- Burnet ut supra, vol.i. pp. 11-16; lent and treasonable language, in and Todd's Life of abp. Cranmer, Turner's Henry VIII., chap. 28." vol. ii. p. 132.] ¦ — Anderson's Annals of the Eng- b [" Of an hundred pounds lish Bible, vol. i. pp. 421, 422. land." MS. C.C.C.C] NO. XL.] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 557 for where much complaint is made of divers gentlemen, because they keep not houses, you provide by your order that no gentleman shall keep house, but all shall sojourn with other men. For who can keep an household with one servant, or with two servants, after the rate of two hundred marks, or with three, after the rate of three hun dred, and so upward? For here, it seems c, you be very desirous to make gentlemen rich : for after this propor tion every gentleman may lay up clearly in his coffers at the least the one half of his yearly revenue, and much more. But it was not for good mind that you bare to the gen tlemen that you devised this article; but it appeareth plainly that you devised it to diminish their strength, and to take away their friends, that you might command gen tlemen at your pleasures. But you be much deceived in your account. For although by your appointment they lacked household servants, yet shall they not lack tenants and farmers: which, if they do their duties, will be as assured to their lords as their own household servants. For of those lands, which they have or hold of their lords, they have their whole livings for themselves, their wives, children, and servants. And for all these they attend their own business, and wait not upon their lords but when they be called thereto. But the household servant, leaving all his own business, waiteth daily and continually upon his master's service ; and for the same hath no more but meat and drink and apparel for himself only : so that all tenants and farmers, which know their duties, and be kind to their lords, will die and hve with them, no less than their own household servants. Therefore I would wish you to put this fantasy out of your heads, and this article out of your book, as well for the unreasonableness as for the ungodliness thereof. c [" But here it seemeth." Id.] 558 MEMORIALS OF [append. For was it ever seen in any country since the world be gan, that the commons did appoint the nobles and gentle men the number of their servants ? Standeth it with any reason to turn upside downd the good order of the whole world, that is every where, and ever hath been, that is to say, the commoners to be governed by the nobles, and the servants by their masters ? Will you now havee the sub jects to govern their king, the villains to rule the gentle men, and the servants their masters ? If men would suffer this, God will not ; but will take vengeance of all them that will break his order, as he did of Dathan and Abiram; although for a time he be a God of much sufferance, and hideth his indignation under his mercy, that the evil of themselves may repent, and see their own folly. 112 Your fourteenth article is this : We will that the half part of the abbey-lands and chantry lands in every man's possession, however he came by them, be given again to two places, where two of the chief abbeys were within f every county ; where such half part shall be taken out, and there to be established a place for devout per sons, which shall pray for the king and the commonwealth. And to the same we will have all the alms of the church- box given for these seven years. At the beginning you pretended that you meant nothing against the king's majesty, but now you open yourselves plainly to the world that you go about to pluck the crown from his head ; and, against all justice and equity, not only to take from him such lands as be annexed unto his crown, and be parcel of the same, but also against all right and reason to take from all other men such lands as they came i [" To turn upso down." MS. CC.C.C] e [" Will you have now." Id.] f [" Abbeys was within." Id.] NO. XL.] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 559 to by most just title, by gift, by sale, by exchange, or otherwise. There is no respect nor difference had amongst you, whether they came to them by right or by wrong. Be you so blind that you cannot see how justly you pro ceed to take the sword in your hands against your prince, and to dispossess just inheritors without any cause ? Christ would not take upon him to judge the right and title of lands between two brethren ; and you arrogantly presume not only to judge, but unjustly to take away all men's right titles; yea, even from the king himself. And do you not tremble for fear that the vengeance of God shall fall upon you, before you have grace to repent ? And yet you, not contented with this your rebelhon, would have your shameful act celebrated with a perpetual memory, as it were to boast and glory of your iniquity. For, in memory of your fact, you would have stabhshed in every county two places to pray for the king and the commonwealth ; whereby your abominable behaviour at this present may never be forgotten, but be remembered unto the world's end; that when the king's majesty was in wars both with Scotland and France, you, under pretence of the common wealth, rebelled, and made so great sedition against him within his own realm, as never before was heard of. And therefore you must be prayed for for ever, in every county of this realm. It were more fit for yous to make humble supplication upon your knees to the king's majesty, desiring him not only to forgive you this fault, but also that the same may never be put in chronicle nor writing ; and that neither shew nor mention may remain to your posterity, that ever subjects were so unkind to their prince, and so ungracious towards God, that, contrary to God's word, they should B [" More meet for you." Id.] 560 MEMORIALS OF [APPEND. so useh themselves against their sovereign lord and king. And this I assure you of, that if all the whole world should pray for you until doomsday, their prayers should no more avail you than they should avail the devils in hell, if they prayed for them, unless you be so penitent and sorry for your disobedience, that you will ever after, so long as you live, study to redub1 and recompense the same with all true and faithful obedience, not only yourselves, but also 113 procuring all other, so much as heth in you; and so much detesting such uproars and seditions, that if you see any man towards any such things, you will to your power re sist him, and open him unto such governors and rulers as may straightwayk repress the same. As for your last article, thanks be to God, it needeth not to be answered, which is this : Your last article is this : For the particular griefs of our country, we will have them so ordered, as Humphry Arundel and Henry Bray, the king's mayor of Bodman, shall inform the king's majesty, if they may have safe conduct under the king's great seal to pass and repass with an herald ofarms^. Who ever heard such arrogancy in subjects, to require h [" Would so use." MS. C.C. Bray was mayor of Bodmin, in C.C] Cornwall. — " Attempts, it is 1 [ Redub, i. e. to make a- said, were made to exculpate mends for.] the mayor of Bodmin, on the k [" As may straightways." ground of his having been forced MS. C.C.C.C] into the insurrection against his 1 [ Humphry Arundel, the will. As if this defence had been leader of the ten thousand Devon- successful, sir Anthony Kingston, shire rebels, was of good family, provost-marshal of the army, ap- and governor of St. Michael's pointed a day for dining with Mount. He was sent to London him. — Having been ' right hear- after being for some time confined tily welcomed,' he after dinner at Exeter, and there executed, expressed a wish to see a pair of NO. XL.] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 561 and will of their princes, that their own particular causes may be ordered, neither according to reason, nor the laws of this realm, but according to the information of two most heinous traitors? Was it ever heard before this time, that an information should be a judgment, although the informer were of never so great credit ? and will you have suffice the information of two villainous papistical traitors? You will deprive the king of his lands"1 per taining to his crown, and other men of their just posses sions and inheritance, and judge your own causes as you hst yourselves. And what can you be called then but most wicked judges, and most errant traitors? except only ignorance or force may excuse you ; that either you were constrained by your captains11 against your wills, or gallows, which he had desired his host to erect. On coming thither and beholding them, he said to the mayor, 'Think you, master mayor, that they be strong enough?' 'Yea, sir,' quoth he, ' that they are.' ' Well then,' said sir Anthony, 'get you even up unto them, for they are provided for you.' The mayor, greatly abashed herewith, said, 'I trust you mean no such thing to me.' ' Sir,' said he, ' there is no re medy ; ye have been a busy rebel, and therefore this is appointed for your reward.' And so with out respite or stay there was the mayor hanged. But Boyer, and not Bray, is the name given by Holinshed to this victim of King ston's cruel pleasantry. It may therefore be doubted whether he is correctly described as mayor of Bodmin. The story perhaps may CKANMER, VOL. II. apply to another person named Boyer, who is said by Strype to have suffered death among the rebel leaders." — Jenkyns' Re mains of abp. Cranmer, vol.ii. p. 244. See also Holinshed's Chroni cles, vol. iii. pp. 1006, 1026, and Strype's Eccl. Mem. vol. ii. pt. i. p. 281. ed. Oxon. 1822.] m [" Of the lands." MS. C.C. C.C] n [" Of whom the chief gentle men captains were, Humfrey Arundell, esquire, governor of the mount, James Rosogan, John Rosogan, John Payne, Thomas Underhil, John Soleman, William Segar. Of priests, which were principal stirrers, and some of them governors of the camps, and after executed, were to the number of eight, whose names were Robert Bochim, John Tompson, Roger Barret, John Wolcocke, William o 0 562 MEMORIALS OF [APPEND. deceived by blind priests and other crafty persuaders, to ask you wist not what. How much then ought you to detest and abhor such men hereafter, and to beware of all such hke, so long as you hve ; and to give most humble and hearty thanks unto God, who hath made an end of this article, and brought Arundel and Bray to that they have deserved; that is, perpetual shame, confusion, and death ! Yet I beseech God so to extend his grace unto them, that they may die well which have hved ill. Amen. NUMBER XLI. THE ARCHBISHOP'S NOTES FOR AN HOMILY AGAINST THE REBELLION. Sentences of the Scripture against sedition. Ex MS. 1 Cor. hi. Cum sit inter vos zelus et contentio, nonne C C c c Miscellan. carnales estis, et sicut homines ambulatis ? Et D° 1 Cor. vi. Quare non magis injuriam accipitis ? Quare non magis fraudem patimini ? Jac. hi. Si zelum amarum habetis, et contentiones sint in cordibus vestris, &c. non est ista sapientia desur- 114 sum, descendens a Patre luminum, sed terrena, animahs, Asa, James Mourton, John Soleman, Segar, Boyer, Lee, two Barow, Richard Benet ; besides a mayors, Pain, Maunder, Ashridge, multitude of other popish priests, Thompson, Baret, Bocham, Wol- which to the same faction were cock, Alsa, Morton, Welsh, Bar- adjoined. The number of the row, Benet; which last-recited whole rebellion, speaking with the nine were priests." — Strype's least, mounted little less than to Eccl. Mem. vol. ii. pt. I. p. 281. the sum of ten thousand stout ed. Oxon. 1822.] traitors." — Foxe'sActs andMonu- ° [MS. C C. C. C. No. cii. pp. ments, p. 1305. ed. Lond. 1583. 529-534; from which this docu- " Their names were Arundel, ment has been corrected for this Pomeroy, Coffin, Winslade, Roso- edition.] gan, Holmes, Bury, Underhil, NO. XLI.] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 563 diabohca. Ubi enim zelus et contentio, ibi inconstantia, et omne opus pravum, &c. [Quae autem desursum est sa pientia, primum quidem pudica est, deinde pacifica, mo- desta, suadibilis, &c. Fructus autem justitiae in pace seminatur facientibus pacem.] Jac. iv. Unde bella et htes in vobis ? Nonne ex concupiscentiis vestris, quae militant in membris vestris. How God hath plagued sedition in time past. Num. xvii. Dathan and Abiram, for their sedition against Moses and Aaron, did miserably perish by God's just judgment, the earth opening and swallowing them down quick. 2 Reg. [i. e. Samuel] xv. and xviii. Absalom, moving sedition against David, did miserably perish likewise. 2 Reg. [i. e. Samuel] xx. Seba for bis sedition agamst David lost his head. 3 Reg. [i. e. 1 Kings] i. and ii. Adonias also for his sedition against Solomon was slain. Acts viii. Judas and Theudas for their sedition were justly slain. Acts xxi. An Egyptian likewise, which moved the people of Israel to sedition, received that he deserved. Tumults in England. Jack Cade. Jack Straw. In Germany for their sedition was slain almost in one month about two hundred thousand. The sword by God's word pertaineth not to subjects, but only to magistrates. Though the magistrates be evil, and very tyrants against the commonwealth, and enemies to Christ's rehgion, yet the subjects must obey in all worldly things, as the Christians do under the Turk ; and ought so to do as long as he commandeth them not to do against God. oo2 564 MEMORIALS OF [APPEND. How ungodly then it is for our subjects to take the sword, where there reigneth a most Christian prince, most desirous to reform all griefs ! Subjects ought to make humble suit to their prince for reformation of all injuries, and not to come with force. The sword of the subjects at this present cometh not of God, nor for the commonweal of the realm ; but of the devil, and destroyeth the commonweal. First, For that it is against the word of God. Secondly, For that they rise so many hes ; whereof the devil is ever the author. "Quia mendax est, et pater ejus." Thirdly, For that they spoil and rob men, and com mand every man to come to them, and to send to them what they please. Fourthly, For that they let the harvest, which is the chief sustentation of our life, and God of his goodness hath sent it abundantly ; and they by their' folly do cause it to be lost and abandoned. Fifthly, For that they be led by rage and fury, without reason ; having no respect neither of the king's minority ; nor of the papists in the west country ; nor of our affairs in France, nor Scotland; which by their sedition is so much hindered, that there could not be imagined so great a damage to the realm. 115 Sixthly, That they give commandment in the king's name, and in pain of death, having none authority so to do. Ever agamst God the devil hath raised sedition. As appeareth by the sedition of Dathan and Abiram ; and all the murmurations of the children of Israel against Moses and Aaron. Also, of the conspiracies against Zorobabel in the re-edifying of the temple. Also, agamst Christ and his apostles, in sundry parts of the world. Also, in NO. XLI.] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 565 Germany lately, and now among us. For the devil can abide no right reformation in religion. Civil war is the greatest scourge that can be, and most certain argument of God's indignation against us for our ingratitude : that we either will not receive his true word, or that they which receive the same dishonour God in their hving, when they pretend to honour him with their mouths. Which ingratitude and contumely God can in no wise bear at our hands. The remedies to avert God's indignation from us is to receive his word, and to hve according thereunto, re turning unto God with prayer and penance. Or else surely more grievous affliction shall follow, if more grievous may be, than civil wars among ourselves. The chief authors of all these tumults be idle and naughty people, which nothing have, nor nothing or httle will labour to have ; that will riot in expending, but not labour in getting. And these tumults first were excitated by the papists and others which came from the western camp, to the intent, that by sowing division among ourselves we should not be able to impeach them. NUMBER XLII. THE LADY MARY TO THE COUNCIL, JUSTIFYING HERSELF FOR USING THE MASS IN KING EDWARD'S MINORITY. It is no small grief to me to perceive that they, whom Sir. w. the king's majesty my father, (whose soul God pardon), mss*6'"1 made in this world of nothing, in respect of that they be come to now ; and at bis last end put in trust to see his will performed, whereunto they were all sworn upon a book; it grieveth me, I say, for the love I bear to them, 566 MEMORIALS OF [APPEND. to see both how they break his will, and what usurped power they take upon them, in making, (as they call it), laws both clean contrary to bis proceedings and will, and also against the custom of all Christendom, and, (in my conscience), against the law of God and his church ; which passeth all the rest. But though you among you have forgotten the king my father, yet both God's com mandment and nature will not suffer me to do so. Wherefore with God's help I will remain an obedient 116 child to his laws as he left them, till such time as the king's majesty, my brother, shall have perfect years of discretion to order the power that God hath sent him, and to be a judge in these matters himself. And I doubt not but he shall then accept my so doing better than theirs, which have taken a piece of his power upon them in his minority. I do not a httle marvel, that you can find fault with me for observing of that law which was allowed by him that was a king, not only of power, but also of knowledge, how to order his power. To which laws all you consented and seemed at that time to the outward appearance very well to hke the same. And more immediately when the king reasons to have his proceedings observed. Wherefore I do wonder that you can find fault with me, and not all this while with some amongst yourselves, for running half a year before that, which you now call a law: yea, and before the bishops came together. Wherein me thinketh you do me very much wrong, if I should not have as much preeminence to continue in keeping a full authorized law made without partiality, as they had, both to break the law, which at that time yourselves must needs confess was of full power and strength, and to use alterations of their own invention contrary both to that, yea, and to your new law, as you call it. NO. XLII*.! ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 567 [NUMBER XLII*. LETTERS FROM THE LORDS OF THE COUNCIL AT WINDSOR TO THE LORDS OF THE COUNCIL IN LONDON, WITH ANSWERS, &C.P My lords, we commend us most heartily unto you : and Stew's where the king's majesty was informed that you were assem- 59?j g/ ^a. bled in such sort as ye do now remain there, was advised by Lond- l631- us, and such other of his council as were here about his person, to send master secretary Peter unto you with such a message, as whereby might have ensued the surety of his majesty's person, with preservation of his realm and subjects, and the quiet both of us and yourselves, as master secretary can declare unto you : his majesty, and we of his council here, do not a httle marvel that you stay still with you the said master secretary : and have not, (as it were), vouchsafed to send an answer to his majesty, neither by him, nor yet by any other. And for ourselves, we do much more marvel, and are right sorry, as we and you have good cause to be, to see the manner of your doings, bent with force and violence to bring the king's majesty and us to those extremities, which as we do intend, if you will take none other way but violence to defend us, as nature and our allegiance doth bind us, to extremity of death, and put it unto God's hands, who giveth victory as pleaseth him. So if our reasonable P [See Burnet's Hist, of the Re- Turner and Mr. Todd, who af- formation, vol. ii. part ii. B. i. firm that 'it breathes all his spirit No. 41. p. 261, et sqq. ed. Oxon. in its genuine nature.' Strype also 1829. Stow's Annals, pp. 597, 8. seems to have been of the same ed. Lond. 1516. Ellis' Original opinion." See Turner's Modern Letters, ist ser. Letter clxxi. vol. Hist, of England, vol. iii. p. 286. ii. p. 171, &c. "The second of Todd's Life of abp. Cranmer, vol. them has been attributed wholly ii. p. 157. Jenkyns' Remains of to the pen of Cranmer by Mr. abp. Cranmer, vol. iv. p. 369. n.d.] 568 MEMORIALS OF [APPEND. conditions and offers will take no place, as hitherto none hath been signified unto us from you, nor we do not under stand what ye do require or seek, nor what ye do mean, and that ye speak no hurt of the king's majesty's person : as touching all other private matters, to avoid the effusion of Christian blood, and to preserve the king's majesty's person, his realm, and subjects, ye shall find us agreeable to any reasonable conditions that you will require. For we do esteem the king's wealth and tranquillity of the realm more than all other worldly things, yea more than our own hves. Thus praying you to send us determinate answer herein by master secretary Peter, or, if ye will not let him go, by this bearer, we beseech God to give both you and us grace to determine this matter, as may be to God's honour, the preservation of the king, and the quiet of us all, which may be, if the fault be not in you. And so we bid you heartily farewell. From the king's ma jesty's castle of Windsor, the 7th day of October, 1549. Your lordships' loving friends E. Somerset, &c. Stew's After our hearty commendations unto your good lord- Annals,- pp. _ J JO 598, 9. ed. ships : we have received from the same a letter by master Todd's Life Hunnings, dated at London yesterday, whereby you do of Abp. us f.0 understand the causes of your assembly there, and, Cranmer, J J ' ' vol. ii. p. charging the lord protector with the manner of govern- 157. ment, require that he withdraw himself from the king's majesty, disperse the force which he hath levied, and be contented to be ordered according to justice and reason. And so you will gladly commune with us, as touching the surety of the king's majesty's person, and the order of all other things, with such conformity on that behalf as ap- pertaineth, and otherwise you must, (as you write), make other account of us, than you trust to have cause, and burden us, if things come to extremities. NO. XLII*.] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 569 To the first points we verily beheve, that as bruits, rumours, and reports, that your lordships intended the destruction of the lord protector, induced his grace to fly to the defence which he hath assembled, excuse your lordships, hearing that his grace intended the like de struction towards you, have been moved to do as you have done, so as for lack of understanding one of another's right meaning, things be grown to such extremities, as if the saving of the king's majesty's person and the common weal, take not more place in his grace and your lordships, than private respect or affairs, you see, we doubt not, as we do, that both our king, our country, and also our selves shall, as verily as God is God, be utterly destroyed and cast away. Wherefore might it please you, for the ten der passion of Jesus Christ, use your wisdom, and temper your determination in such sort, as no blood be shed, nor cruelty used, neither of his grace's part nor of your lord ships' ; for, if it come to the point, both you and we are hke to see presently with our eyes that which every vein of all our hearts will bleed to behold. Wherefore, as true subjects to the king's majesty, as faithful counsellors, though unworthy counsellors to his majesty and his realm, and as lamentable petitioners, we beseech your lordships most humbly and from the bottom of our hearts, to take pity of the king and the realm, whereof you be principal members, and to set apart " sum mum jus," and to use at this time " turn bonum et aequ- mn;" and think not that this is written for any private fear, or other respect of ourselves, but for that undoubtedly we hear and know more of this point with your favours, than you there do know; yea, and howsoever it shall please you to account of us, we are true men to God, to the king, to the realm, and so will we live and die whereso ever we be; and in respect of them three esteem httle 570 MEMORIALS OF [APPEND. any other person or thing, no, not our own hves : and having clear consciences, as some whatsoever, ill may follow, upon the use of extremity there, that neither now is nor shall be found fault in us, and so quieting our selves we rest. Now to that you would have the lord protector to do, for his part, his grace and we have communed herein, and much to our comforts, and yours also, if it shall like you to weigh the case, who is contented, if you will again for your parts use equity, to put that now in ex ecution, which many times he hath declared by bis words; that is to say, so as the king and the realm may be other wise well served, he passeth httle for the place he now hath. Mary, he doth consider, that by the king's majesty, with all your advices and the consents of the nobles of the realm, he was called to the place, (as appear eth in writing under his majesty's great seal and sign, whereunto your own hands also, and ours, with all others the lords of the upper house in the parhament are sub scribed) : and therefore in violent sort to be thus thrust out against his will, he thinketh it not reasonable. He is here with the king's person, where his place is to be ; and we be here with him, we trust in God, for the good service ofthe king, the weal of the realm, and the good acquitting both of his grace and of your lordships, which we most heartily desire, and see such hope here thereof; as if you be not too sore bent upon the extremities, as is reported, and as equity can take no place, my lord's grace may hve in quiet, and the king's majesty's affairs maintained in such order, as by his majesty's counsellors shall be thought con venient. Mary, to put himself simply into your hands, hav ing heard as both we and he have, without first knowledge upon what conditions, it is not reasonable. Life is sweet, my lords, and they say you seek his blood and his death ; NO. XLII*.] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 571 which if you do, and may have him otherwise conformable to reason, and by extremity drive him to seek extremity again, the blood of him and others that shall die on both sides innocently, shall be by God justly required at your hands. And when peradventure you would have him again, upon occasion of service, you shall forethink to have lost him. Wherefore, good my lords, we beseech you again and again, if you have conceived any such determination, to put it out of your heads, and incline your hearts to kind ness and humanity, remembering that he hath never been cruel to any of you, and why should you be cruel to him ; as we trust you be not, whatsoever hath been said, but will shew yourselves as conformable for your parts, as his grace is contented, for the zeal he beareth to the king and the realm, to be of his part, as this bearer, sir Philip Hobie, will declare unto you; to whom we pray you to give credit, and to return him hither again with answer hereof. And thus beseeching the hving God to direct your hearts to the making of a quiet end of these terrible tumults, we bid your lordships most heartily well to fare. From the king's majesty's castle of Windsor, the eight of October, 1549. Letters of the 9th of October sent from the lords to the MSS. king's majesty. Boo™ a.d. i549> iS5°- Most high and mighty prince, our most gracious sove-fol- 8-10- Privy Coun- reign lord, we have received, by Mr. Hobbey, your ma- di Office. jesty's most gracious letters, of the 8th of this instant, °ngina1' and heard such further matter as it pleased your majesty to will to be declared by him. And sorry we be that your majesty should have these occasions to be troubled, especially in this kind of matter ; the beginning and only occasion whereof, as we be well able to prove to your ma- 572 MEMORIALS OF [APPEND. jesty, hath proceeded of the duke of Somerset. It is much discomfort to us all, to understand that your royal person should be touched with any care of mind ; and most of all it grieveth us, that it should be persuaded your majesty, that we have not that care that beseemeth us of the pacifying of these uproars, and conservation of your majesty's commonwealth and state from danger ; wherein whatsoever is informed your highness, we humbly beseech your majesty to think, we be as careful as any men hving may be ; and do not, nor, (we trust), shall not forget the benefits received of your majesty's most noble father, nor any of our bounden duties of allegiance ; the consideration, and the special care where of, forced us to consult seriously, and to join in this sort : which thing if we had presently followed, not only your most royal person, (whom Almighty God long preserve), but this your whole estate being already much touched, and in great towardness of ruin, was most hke to come, in short time, to most imminent danger and peril; the causes whereof, as we do all well know, and can prove to have proceeded from the said duke. So if we should not earnestly provide for the same, we should not be able to answer to your majesty hereafter for not doing our duties therein ; therefore do we nothing doubt, but your majesty, of your great clemency and good nature, will not think that all and every of us, being the whole state of your privy- council, one or two excepted, should be led in these things by private affections, or would presume to write to your ma jesty that whereof we were not most assured ; and much more we trust that your highness, of your goodness, will, without any jealousy or suspicion, think that most expe dient, both for your own most royal person, and all your subjects, that by the body of your council may be thought expedient ; to whom, and to no one man, your highness NO. XLII*.] ARCHBISHOP CRANMER. 573 most grave father, appointed by his last will and testa ment, the care of your majesty, and all your most weighty affairs. We cannot therefore but think ourselves much wronged, that your said most royal person is in this sort by the duke only detained and shut up from us, to all our great heaviness, and the great fear of all other your ma jesty's true subjects, and wonder of all the world ; sooner may one man intend ill, than a multitude of us, who, we take God to witness, to be a thousand times more careful of your highness surety, than for all our own hves. We trust also, that of your majesty's good nature, you will not think that wilfulness, which your whole council doth, or shall agree upon, for your majesty's surety and benefit; where the more agreeable we be, the better opinion we trust your majesty will conceive of us and our doings. It com- forteth us much to see the great appearance of your ma jesty's natural clemency, even in these your young years ; and the assured hope which we have thereof, encourageth us to be persuaded, that you both do and will conceive good opinion of us and all our doings ; and that your ma jesty is, and so will continue, our gracious good lord, with whom, (as we trust), (we) never deserve willingly to be called in the standing of any judgment with your majesty. For the end of this matter, touching the duke of So merset, if he have that respect to your majesty's surety that he pretendeth; if he have that consideration of his duty to God that his promise and oath requireth ; if he have that remembrance of the performance of your ma jesty's father's will, that to the effect of a good executor appertaineth ; if he have the reverence to your law that a good subject ought to have; let him first quietly suffer us, your majesty's most humble servants, and true coun sellors, to be restored to your majesty's presence ; let him as becometh a true subject, submit himself to your ma- 574 MEMORIALS OF [APPEND. jesty's council, and the order of your highness laws ; let the forces assembled be sent away, and then may we do our duties, in giving our attendance upon your majesty ; and after consult there with your majesty more freely, for such order as may be thought most meet for your grace's surety : by these means your majesty's subjects may be at quiet, and all occasions of stir taken away. And if the said duke refuse to agree hereunto, we must think him to remain in his naughty and detestable determination. The protectorship and governance of your most royal person, was not granted him by your father's will, but only by agreement, first amongst us the executors, and after of others. Those titles and special trust was com mitted to him during your majesty's pleasure ; and upon condition he should do all things by advice of your council, which condition, because he hath so many times broken, and notwithstanding the often speaking to, without all hope of amendment, we think bim most unworthy those honours or trust. Other particular things, too many and too long to be written to your majesty at this time, may at our next access to your royal presence be more particularly opened, consulted upon, and moderated, for the conservation of your majesty's honour, surety, and good quiet of your realms and dominions, (as) may be thought most expedient. MSS. Letters of the 9th of October from the lords, to the arch- Book a. d. bishop of Canterbury and sir William Paget, fyc. fol. ii. My lords, after our most hearty commendations, we dToffice1"" have receive