-4-1 ,- J
.1*1"* - ... -
"j^^ivt ihr/t JBoaiti
^ff JJetiliindSng if a. CoHtgt. m,t^€etoi^

I »T^ILIE«¥]M]I¥EI^SflW-

From the library of
Louis R. Ehrich, Y'69.
Gift of his son
Walter L. Ehrich, '99S.
1926

IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY

IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY
A STUDY OF THE RELATION OF GOVERNMENT
BY THE PEOPLE, EQUALITY BEFORE THE LAW,
AND OTHER TENETS OF DEMOCRACY, TO THE
DEMANDS OF A VIGOROUS FOREIGN POLICY
AND OTHER DEMANDS OF IMPERIAL DOMINION

BY
DAVID STARR JORDAN
PRESIDENT OF LELAND STANFORD, JR., UNIVERSITY

" They enslave their children's children who
make compromise with sin." Lowell.

NEW YORK
D. APPLETON AND COMPANY
1899

COPYKIGHT, l8g9,
By D. appleton AND COMPANY.

TO
JOHN J. VALENTINE, ESQ.,
OF
Oakland, California,
IN
recognition of his unselfish patriotism
and
unshaken courage.

PREFATORY NOTE.

The present volume contains eight addresses bearing on the
policy of the United States, especially conceming the war with
Spain and its results.
The first address " Lest We Forget," was deUvered May 25th,
1898, on the occasion of the graduation of the Class of 1898, in
the Leland Stanford Junior University. As this address has in a
sense a historical value, being one of the very first of Inany of
its kind, it is here pubUshed exactly as delivered with the change
of a word or two only and the omission of a brief quotation.
The second address, " Colonial Expansion," delivered before
the Congress of Religions at Omaha in October, 1898, is here
modified by the omission of a few passages which were used also
on the previous occasion. The third address, " A BUnd Man's
Holiday," was read on February 14th, 1899, before the Gradu
ate Club of Leland Stanford Junior University, and afterwards
repeated before the congregation of Temple Emanu-El in San
Francisco and the Berkeley Club in Oakland. It was reprinted
for general circulation under the title of " The Question of the
Philippines," by the courtesy of Mr. John J. Valentine, who has
also published a similar edition of " Lest We Forget." The
essay on the " Colonial Lessons of Alaska " was delivered be
fore the University Extension Club of San Jose ; that on the
"Lessons of the Paris Tribunal," before the Congregationalist
Club in San Francisco. The essay on " A Continuing City "
was deUvered before the New Charter Association of San Fran
cisco. The essay on the " Last of the Puritans " is introduced to show
the substantial identity of the arguments for slavery or control
vii

via PREFATORY NOTE.
of man by man, benevolent or otherwise, with those for im
perial dominion or the control of nation by nation, of race by
race, each has industrial and civil good for its avowed purpose,
and each has brute force for its method.
I am indebted to Mr Walter H. Page, editor of the Atlantic
Monthly, for permission to reprint " The Colonial Lessons of
Alaska," to Dr. N. C. Gilman, editor of the New World, for the
privilege of republishing the essay on " Colonial Expansion,"
to Whitaker and Ray of San Francisco for permission to use
" The Last of the Puritans," and to Mr. J. M. Rice, editor of the
Forum, for permission to reprint "The Lessons of the Paris
Tribunal of Arbitration."
DAVID STARR JORDAN,
Leland Stanford Junior University, Palo Alto,
Santa Clara Co., California.

CONTENTS.

1. Lest We Forget  i
2. Colonial Expansion  39
3. A Blind Man's Holiday  6i
4. The Colonial Lessons of Alaska  181
J. The Lessons of the Paris Tribunal of Arbitration  215
6. A Continuing City  241
7. The Captain Sleeps  265
8. The Last of the Puritans  275
ix

I.
¦LEST WE FORGET

r u^AoJwj^^o^ ^„^ ^^^^

IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.

"LEST WK FORGET."*

As educated men and women, in your hands lies the
future of the State. It is for you and such as you to
work out the problems of democracy. This is my justi
fication in speaking to you of the present crisis. For
a great world crisis is on us, and this year of 1898 may
mark one of the three great epochs in our history.
Twice before in our national life have we stood in the
presence of a great crisis. Twice before have we come
to the parting of the ways, and twice has our choice been
controlled by wise counsel.
The first crisis followed the War of the Revolution.
Its question was this : What relation shall the emanci
pated colonies bear to one another? The answer was
the American Constitution, the federation of seU-govern-
ing and United States.
*" An address to the Members of the Graduating Class of 1898.
in Leland Stanford Junior University j deUvered May 2e„ 1898,.
 —  —  ^ "3

4 IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
The second crisis came through the growth of slavery.
The union of the States " could not endure, half slave,
half free." The emancipation proclamation of Abraham
Lincoln marked our decision that the Union should
endure ; and that all that made for division should be
swept away.
The third great crisis is on us now. The war with
Spain is only a part of it. The question is not : Can
we capture Manila, Havana, Porto Rico or the Canaries?
It is not what we can take or what we can hold. The
American navy and the American army can accomplish
all we ask of them with time and patience.
Battles are fought to-day through engineering and
technical skill, not through physical dash. The great
cannon speaks the language of science, and individual
courage is helpless before it. The standing of our naval
officers in matters of engineering is beyond question.
There are a hundred nameless lieutenants in our war
ships who, if opportunity offered, could write their names
beside those of Grenville and Nelson and Farragut and
Dewey. The glory of Manila is not dim beside that of
Mobile or Trafalgar. The cool strength and soberness
of Yankee courage, added to the power of naval en
gineering, could meet any foe on earth on equal terms,
and here the terms are not equal. Personal fearlessness
our adversaries possess, and that is all they have. That
we have, too, in like measure. Everything else is ours.
We train our guns against the empty shell of a medi
aeval monarchy, broken, distracted, corrupt.
The war with Spain marks in itself no crisis. The
end is seen from the beginning. It was known to Spain
as clearly as to us. But her government had no re-

LEST WE FORGET.^

5

course. They had come to the end of diplomacy, and
could only die fighting. " To die game " is an old habit
of the Spaniard. "Whatever else the war may do,"
says the Spanish diplomat, with pathetic honesty, "it
can only bring ruin to Spain."
It is too late for us now to ask how we got into the
war. Was it inevitable? Was it wise? Was it right
eous? We need not ask these questions, because the
answers will not help us. We may have our doubts as
to one or all of these, but all doubts we must keep to
ourselves. We are in the midst of batde, and must fight
to the end. The " rough-riders " are in the saddle.
"What though the soldier knew some one had blun
dered? " The swifter, fiercer, more glorious our attacks,
the sooner and more lasting our peace. There is no
possible justification for the war unless we are strong
enough and swift enough to bring it to a speedy end.
If America is to be the knight-errant of the nations she
must be pure of heart and swift of foot, every inch a
knight. The crisis comes when the war is over. What then?
Our question is not what we shall do with Cuba, Porto
Rico and the Philippines. It is what these prizes will
do to us. Can we let go of them in honor or in safety?
if not, what if we hold them ? What will be the reflex
effect of great victories, suddenly reahzed strength, the
patronizing applause, the ill-concealed envy of great
nations, the conquest of strange territories, the raising
of our flag beyond the seas? All this is new to us. It
is un-American ; it is contrary to our traditions ; it is
deUcious ; it is intoxicating.
For this is the fact before us. We have come to our

6 IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
manhood among the nations of the earth. What shall
we do about it? The war once finished, shall we go
back to our farms and factories, to our squabbles over
tariffs and coinage, our petty trading in peanuts and
postoffices? Or shall our country turn away from these
things and stand forth once for all a great naval power,
our vessels in every sea, our influence felt over all the
earth? Shall we be the plain United States again, or
shall we be another England, fearless even of our own
great mother, second to her only in age and pres
tige? The minor results of war are matters of little moment
in comparison. Let us look at a few of them as we pass.
Most of them are not results at all. The glow of battle
simply shows old facts in new relation.
The war has stirred the fires of patriotism, we say.
Certainly, but they were already there, else they could
not be stirred. I doubt if there is more love of country
with us to-day than there was a year ago. Real love of
country is not easily moved. Its guarantee is its per
manence. Love of adventure, love of fight, these are
soon kindled. It is these to which the battle spirit ap
peals. Love of adventure we may not despise. It is
the precious heritage of new races ; it is the basis of
personal courage ; but it is not patriotism ; it is push.
Love of fight is not in itself unworthy. The race which
cannot fight if need be, is a puny folk destined to be the
prey of tyrants. But one who fights for fight's sake is a
bully, not aThero. The bully is at heart a coward. To
fight only when we are sure of the result, is no proof
of national courage.
Patriotism is the will to serve one's country i to make

" LEST WE FORGET." 7
one's country better worth serving. It is a course of
action rather than a sentiment. It is serious rather than
stirring. The shrilling of the mob is not patriotism. It
is not patriotism to trample on the Spanish flag, to burn
fire-crackers, or to twist the Lion's tail. The shrieking
of war editors is not patriotism. Nowadays, nations
buy newspapers as they buy ship's. Whatever is noisy,
whether in Congress or the pulpit, or on the streets,
cannot be patriotism. It is not in the galleries that we
find brave men. " Patriotism," says Dr. Johnson, " is
the last refuge of the scoundrel." But he was speaking
of counterfeit patriotism. There could not be a coun
terfeit were there not also a reality.
But this I see as I watch the situation : True patri
otism declines as the war spirit rises. Men say they
have no interest in reform until the war is over. There
is no use of talking of better financial methods, of fairer
adjustment of taxes, of wiser administration of affairs,
until the war fever has passed by. The patriotism of the
hour looks to a fight with some other nation, not towards
greater pride in our own.
The war has united at last the North and the South,
we say. So at least it appears. When Fitzhugh Lee is
called a Yankee, and all the haughty Lees seem proud
of the designation, we may be sure that the old lines of
division exist no longer. North and South, East and
West, whatever our blood, birth or rank, we Yankees
stand shoulder to shoulder in 1898. But our present
solidarity shows that the nation was sound already, else
a month could not have welded it together.
It is twenty-eight years ago to-day that a rebel soldier
who says —

8 IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
" I am a Southerner,
I loved the South and dared for her
To fight from Lookout to the sea
With her proud banner over me."
stood before the ranks of the Grand Army and spoke
these words :
" I stand and say that you were right j
I greet you with uncovered head.
Remembering many a thundrous fight.
When whistling death between us sped;
I clasp the hand that made my scars,
I cheer the flag my foemen bore,
I shout for joy to see the stars
All on our common shield once more."
This was more than a quarter of a century ago, and
all this time the great loyal South has patiently and
unflinchingly accepted war's terrible results. It is not
strange, then, that she shows her loyalty to-day. The
" Solid South," the bugaboo of politicians, the cloak of
Northern venality, has passed away forever. The warm
response to American courage, in whatever section or
party, in whatever trade or profession, shows that with
all our surface divisions, we of America are one in heart.
The impartial bitterness of Spanish hatred directed to
ward all classes and conditions of Anglo-Saxons alike
emphasizes the real unity of race and nation.
There are some who justify war for war's sake.
Blood-letting " relieves the pressure on the boundaries."
It whets courage. It keeps the ape and tiger alive in
men. All this is detestable. To waste good blood is
pure murder, if nothing is gained by it. To let blood
for blood's sake is bad in politics as it is in medicine.

" LEST WE FORGET. 9
War is killing, brutal, barbarous killing, aiid- its direct
effects are mostly evil. The glory of war turns our
attention from civic affairs. Neglect invites corruption.
Noble and necessary as was our Civil War, we have not
yet recovered from its degrading influences. Too often
the courage of brave men is an excuse for the depreda
tions of venal politicians. The glorious banner of free
dom becomes the cover for the sutler's tent.
The test of civilization is the substitution of law for
war j statutes for brute strength. No doubt diplomacy,
as one of our Senators has said, is mostly " a pack of
lies," and arbitration, as we have known it, is com
pulsory and arbitrary compromise. But in the long run
truth will out, even in diplomacy. The nations who
suffer through clumsy and blundering tribunals of arbi
tration will learn from this experience. They will find
means, at last, to secure justice as well as peace. As
private war gave way to security under national law, so
must public war give way to the law of civilization.
I hear men say to-day that war is necessary to the)
Republic because we need new heroes for our worship.
The old heroes are getting stale. Those of the Revolu
tion are half mythical. Washington and Greene were
never actually alive in real flesh and blood. Even Grant
and Sherman, Lee and Jackson, Thomas and Farragut
are names only to most of us. Our fathers knew them,
but theirs are not names to conjure with to-day. The
name of Dewey fills a popular want. The heroes of the
newspaper in times of peace are mere tinsel heroes.
Here is one with flesh and blood in him, a man of nerve
and courage and success. —
All this is true, but our heroes were with us alreadyTl

ID IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
In times of peace they were ready for heroism. The
real hero is the man who does his duty. It does not
matter whether his name be on the headlines of the
newspapers or not. His greatness is not enhanced when
a street or a trotting horse is named for him. It is the
business of the Republic to make a nation of heroes.
The making of brave soldiers is only a part of the work
of making men. The glare of battle shows men in false
perspective. To one who stands in its light we give the
glory of a thousand. But we may applaud with the rest
as the great captains pass before us. They have earned
their renown, yet when " the tumult and the shouting
dies," still the crisis remains. What effect must the
war have on us?
Our line of action seems a narrow one. Our policy
has been fully declared. Our armies invade Cuba to
put an end to disorder, brutality and murderous wrong.
In the words of the resolution of Congress :
" The abhorrent conditions which have existed for more than
three years in the island of Cuba, so near our own borders, have
shocked the moral sense of the people of the United States,
have been a disgrace to Christian civilization, and cannot longer
be endured."
And in recording the necessity which forces us to act
we disclaim all selfish intentions. Thus Congress used
these words which are already part of the record of his
tory and which we may not forget :
"The United States hereby disclaims any disposition or inten
tion to exercise sovereignty, jurisdiction or control over said
islands except for the pacification thereof, and asserts its deter
mination when that is accomplished to leave the govemment and
control of the island to its people."

" LEST WE FORGET.' 1 1
The wrongs we would avenge are not new to Spain.
By such cruelties she has always held her possessions.
By such means she has lost most of them. Flanders,
Mexico, Peru, Venezuela, Chih, Cuba, all tell the same
story. Spain still belongs to the seventeenth century.
From the seventeenth century Cuba has escaped. To
her we shall bring order and relief. Her shackles once
broken, then we shall stay our hand. To Cuba Libre,
independent and free, we will leave the choice of her
own future.
But this is easier said than done. Cuba Libre has no
heart or will to choose. Her present nominal govern
ment is not that of a republic. It is a poUtical oligarchy,
which has its seat not in Havana, but in New York.
Cuba is helpless now. As a repubhc she will be helpless
still. Spanish blood and Spanish training ill prepare a
land for freedom. Freedom such as we know it has
never yet been won bypeople of Latin blood. The free
dom of Spanish America is for the most part military
despotism. It is said of the govemment of Russia that
it is " despotism tempered by assassination." That of
most of our sister republics is assassination tempered by
despotism. Mexico, the best of them, is not a republic ;
it is a despotism, the splendid tyranny of a man strong
and wise, who knows Mexico and how to govern her, a
humane and beneficent tyrant.
There are many noble men in Cuba, men of education
and character, with the culture and bearing of gentlemen.
Some of these I know, and one I have been proud to call
my friend, Felipe Poey, during fifty years professor in the
University of Havana. Most good men in Cuba hope
for the success of the insurgents, but they have not much

12 IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
confidence in Cuban democracy. The common run of
the Cuban population is of a very different class.
"The Cuban soldiers at Tampa," says John R.
Rathom, " are very small, excitable, erratic, physically
unfit. They go about the camps brandishing their
machetes and telling our infantrymen who tower above
them like giants, how they are going to cut the Span
iards to pieces. Their whole spirit is one of frothy
boasting."
/^ There are three things inseparable from the life of
the Cuban people to-day, the cigarette, the lottery ticket,
and the machete. These stand for vice, superstition and
revenge. Above these the thoughts of the common man
"in Cuba seldom rise. Most of the people cannot read,
and those who can, read largely the Uterature of vice.^/
From my own visit to Havana, two keen recollections
remain. In the early morning the markets are filled by
a long procession of loaded burros who came down from
the mountain side. These bring everything that is eat
able, with the rest live pigs and sheep. Pigs and sheep
alike are tied in pairs and hung saddle-wise, head down
ward, from the backs of the donkeys. From two until
four in the morning the long procession comes in, the
pigs lustily squeaUng, the sheep helpless and dumb. But
nobody cares for an animal's pain. There is no society
for prevention of cruelty to animals in Cuba. There are
not many who could understand even the purpose of
such a society. In Havana, bull-fights follow the church
services, not fights but slaughter. A horse lame and
bUnd is ripped up by an infuriated bull, who in turn is
done to death by the stab of a skilful butcher.
At Christmas time aU interest centers in the lottery.

"LEST WE FORGET." 1 3
Everybody buys lottery tickets. Charms, fortune-tellers,
astrology and all the machinery of superstition are
brought into play to select the lucky numbers. How
many days old am I ? How many days old is my Dolores ?
How many days old was I on my lucky day when I drew
the prize last year? How can I find my lucky number?
These matters are talked of everywhere on the streets,
in the church, in the wine rooms, in the theaters. One
hears the parrots on their posts at the gate discussing
the very same questions. The birds rattle off the names
and numbers as glibly as their masters, and with as high
a conception of the possibilities of life.
f It seems probable that most of the oppressed people,
crowded from their homes by Weyler's armies, will be
dead before we come to their reUef. In starving out
Havana we shall doubtless starve them first. Those who
survive may become our bitterest enemies before the year
is out. For these people prefer the indolence of Spanish
rule with all its brutalities to the bustling ways of the
Anglo-Saxon. Many of them would take their chances
of being starved or butchered rather than to build roads,
wash their faces, and clean up their towns. To suppress
the lottery and the cock-fight would be to rob them of
most that makes life worth living. The Puritan Sabbath
and the self-control it typifies in their minds would be
worse than the flames of Purgatory. Whether as a free
nation under our protection or whether governed by our
martial law, it will be no easy task to hold the peace in
Cuba Libre. The down-trodden Cuban and the Spanish
oppressor are the same in blood, the same in method. >^
But we may say that American enterprise will change
all this. It wiU flow into Cuba when Cuba is free. It

14 IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
will clean up the cities, stamp out the fevers, build roads
where the trails for mule-sleds are, and railroads where
the current of traffic goes. It will make the pearl of the
Antilles the fairest island on the face of the earth.
No doubt all this will come if we give a stable gov
ernment. Whatever else we say or do we must give such
a government. The nations of the world will hold us
responsible for Cuba through the years to come. A
virtual serfdom under American martial law is the fate of
Cuba, though we may declare her free and independent.
Why then shall we not hold Cuba, if she becomes
ours by right of conquest? Because that would be a
cowardly thing to do. The justification of her capture
is that we do not want her. If we want Cuba, common
decency says that we must let her alone. Ours is a war
of mercy, not of conquest. This we have plainly declared
to all the nations. Perhaps we meant what we said,
though the speeches in Congress do not make this clear.
If we can trust the records, our chief motives were three :
Desire for political capital, desire for revenge, and sym
pathy for humanity.
It was desire for political capital that forced the hand
of the President. "The war," says Dr. Frank Drew,
did not begin as an honorable war. If it is to become
such, it must be made honorable by other men than those
whose votes committed us to it."
If we retire with clean hands, it will be because our
hands are empty. To keep Cuba or the Philippines
would be to follow the example of conquering nations.
Doubtless England would do it in our place. The habit
of domination makes men unscrupulous.
Professor Nicholson of Edinburgh has said : " There

"LEST WE FORGET." 15
can be no question, in the light of history, that the polit
ical instinct of the English people — or to adopt the pop
ular language of the moment, the original sin of the
nation — is to covet everything of its neighbor's worth
coveting, and it is not content until the sin is complete."
No wonder England now pats us on the back. We are
following her lead. We are giving to her methods the
sanction of our respectabiUty. Of all forms of flattery,
imitation is the sincerest.
By a war of conquest fifty years ago we took from
Mexico her fairest provinces. For the good of humanity
we did it, no doubt, and along the Unes of manifest des
tiny. Brave battles our soldiers fought, but for all that,
the war itself was most inglorious. So it reads in history
as we write it to-day. It is iniquitous in history as writ
ten in Mexico.
ShaU then the war for Cuba Libre come to an inglori
ous end? If we make anything by it, it will be most in
glorious. It will be without honor if its two millions a
day are made good by conquered territory. Neither for
conquest nor for revenge have we sent forth the army of
the Republic. " Let us beware," says J. K. H. Burgwin,
" of placing ourselves in the position of doing a noble and
generous act and then demanding that a bankrupt and
humbled enemy shall pay our expenses." If we are going
to hold the prizes of war or to use them. in thrifty trade
we should never have set out on the errands of humanity.
The nations of Europe look with jealousy on our pos
sibilities of strength. " If I only," some king may say —
" if I only had all these men, all this land, all these
resources, I would eclipse the glory of Caesar, of Charle
magne, of Napoleon." If we turned everything into

l6 IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
fighting, what a fight we could make. But we have gone
about our business, a vast nation of common people, care
less of European complications, indifferent to European
glory, unconscious of our power.
For the end of government by the people is to fit the
people to control their own affairs. The basis of our gov
ernment is the town meeting. The people manage their
local business, and send their wisest men as delegates to
look after the interests of the nation. This was the
dream of the fathers. If there has been much change and
some degeneration, yet in substance the thoughts of the
fathers prevail. The liberties of the people are secure
because they are everywhere in the people's hands.
America is not a power among the nations. She is a
nation among the powers. A " power " is a country which
is concerned with affairs not her own and which develops
the machinery to make such concern effective. A nation
minds her own business.
The spirit of our foreign poUcy has been to avoid all
display of power. It was set forth in Washington's fare
well address, in these memorable words :
" The great rule of conduct for us in regard to foreign nations is,
in extending our commercial relations, to have with them as little
poUtical connection as possible. * « • Europe has a set of primary
interests which to us have none or a very remote relation. Hence
she must be engaged in frequent controversies the causes of which
are essentiaUy foreign to our concerns. Hence, therefore, it must
be unwise in us to implicate ourselves by artificial ties in the ordi
nary vicissitudes of her politics or the ordinary combinations and
colUsions of her friendships or enmities. Our detached and dis
tant situation invites and enables us to pursue a different course.
* * * Why forego the advantages of so peculiar a situation ?
Why quit our own to stand upon foreign ground ? Why, by inter
weaving our destiny with that of any part of Europe, entangle our

" LEST WE FORGET." 17
peace and prosperity in the toils of European ambition, rivalship,
interest, humor, or caprice ? It is our true course to steer clear
of permanent alliances with any portion of the foreign world."
The America of which Washington dreamed should
grow strong within herself, should avoid entangling alli
ances with foreign nations, should keep out of all fights
and all friendships that are not her own, should secure
no territory that might not be self-governing, and should
acquire no provinces that might not in time be numbered
among the United States. To this policy his followers
closely adhered. Even gratitude to France never made
us her catspaw in her struggle against England. No out
flow of sympathy has caused us to interfere in behalf of
Ireland or Armenia or Greece.
But the world is smaller than in Washington's day.
Steam and electricity have bound the world together.
The interests of one nation are those of all nations. The
interests of Armenia, Cape Colony and Ceylon are closer
to us to-day than those of France and Germany were to
our fathers. Traditions are worthy of respect only when
they serve the real needs of the present. So it may be
that with changed conditions the wise counsel of the past
may be open to revision. Are times not already ripe for
a change in national policy?
Let us look for a moment at the policy of England.
The United States is great through minding her own busi
ness ; England through minding the business of the world.
In the Norse Mythology the Mitgard-Serpent appears
in the guise of a cat, an animal small and feeble, but in
reality the mightiest and most enduring of all, for its tail
goes around the earth, growing down its own throat, and
by its giant force, it holds the world together. Eng-

1 8 IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
land is the Mitgard-Serpent of the nations, shut in a
petty island; as Benjamin Franklin said, "an island
which compared to America is but a stepping stone in a
brook with scarce enough of it above water to keep one's
shoes dry." Yet, by the force of arms, the force of trade
and the force of law she has become the ruler of the
earth. It is English brain and English muscle which hold
the world together.
No other agency of civilization has been so potent as
England's enlightened selfishness. Her colonies are of
three orders — friendly nations, subject nations and mili
tary posts. The larger colonies are little united states.
They are repubUcs and rule their own affairs. The sub
ject nations and the military posts England rules by a
rod of iron, because no other rule is possible. Every
year England seizes new posts, opens new ports and
widens the stretch of her empire. But of aU this Greater
Britain, England herself is but a little part, the ruling
head of a world-wide organism, "What does he know
of England who only England knows ? " No doubt as
Kipling says, England " thinks her empire still
'Twixt the Strand and Holbom HiU,"
but the Strand would be half empty were it not that it
leads outward to Cathay. The huge business interests
of Greater Britain are the guarantee of her solidarity.
All her parts must hold together.
In similar relation to the Mother Country, America
must stand. Greater England holds over us the obliga
tions of blood and thought and language and character.
Only the Saxon understands the Saxon. Only the Saxon
and the Goth know the meaning of freedom. " A sane-

"LEST WE FORGET." 1 9
tion like that of religion," says John Hay, " enforces our
partnership in all important affairs." Not that we should
enter into formal alliance with Great Britain. We can
get along weU side by side, but never tied together.
When England suggests a union for attack and defense,
let us ask what she expects to gain from us. Never yet
did England offer us the hand in open friendliness, in
pure good faith, not hoping to get the best of the bargain.
This is the EngUsh government, which never acts with
out interested motives. But the English people are our
friends in every real crisis, and that without caring over
much whether we be right or not. War with England
should be forever impossible. The need of the common
race is greater than the need of the nations. The Anglo-
Saxon race must be at peace within itself. Nothing is so
important to civilization as this. A war between Eng
land and America fought to the bitter end might sub
merge civilization. When the war should be over and
the smoke cleared away there would be but one nation
left, and that, Russia.
But though one in blood with England our course of
political activities has not lain parallel with hers. We
were estranged in the beginning, and we have had other
affairs on our hands. We have turned our faces west
ward, and our work has made us strong. We have had
our forests to clear, our prairies to break, our rivers to
harness, our own problem of slavery to adjust. We have
followed the spirit of Washington's address for a hundred
years, until the movement of history has brought us to the
parting of the ways. Federalism or ImperiaUsm — which
shall it be?
In the direction of imperialism we have already taken

20 IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
certain steps. The promulgation of the Monroe Doctrine
is one of these. Its original impulse was a jealous regard
for the liberties of the republics of Latin America. We
made no objection to the present occupation of parts of
America by European powers but we shall prevent by
force any extension of such dominion. The cause of the
Monroe Doctrine was the danger to republicanism
through monarchial aggression. With the republics of
America our interests were supposed to be in unison.
But our real interests lie now in other directions. We
have a thousand ties binding us to Europe for one to Latin
America. Even Japan and China are more to us than
the states of South America. Moreover, the republics we
would guard are really only republics in name. They
have no more of a republican spirit than has Italy or
Spain, and vastly less than England or Germany. The
aggressions of England on Venezuela which our strong
protest prevented were really in the interest of civiliza
tion. These republics hate the United States, her peo
ple and her institutions. They resent our protection and
repel our patronage, and as for us, we are likely to de
spise them rather than to love them. The guardian of the
two Americas must use a strong hand if it would save all
of its wards from barbarism.
So the Monroe Doctrine is not alone a willingness to
protect our sister republics from European aggression.
It must become a means of holding them in order. So
long as the Monroe Doctrine is put forth, so long must we
be in some degree surety for the good behavior of South
America. This necessity has carried us away from our
traditional attention to our own affairs. It will carry
us still further unless the policy be reversed.

" LEST WE FORGET." 21
The purchase of Alaska marks another movement
away from self-government. This vast, wild, resourceful
land, unfit for habitation for the most part, unfit for self-
control, we have made a province of our republic. We
have placed it under our flag, but the flag is all we have
given it. On stretches of coast as long as that of Cali
fornia, dotted with fishing viUages, the United States has
exercised no authority whatever. Over the whole coast
of Alaska, from Sitka to Point Barrow, there have been
only scattering and sporadic efforts at national rule.
With a population so weak and scattered, self-govern
ment is impossible, and we have no other form of govern
ment to offer. The condition of Alaska to-day is simply
a disgrace to us. The host that fare to the Klondike
make their own govemment as they go along. What
little government Alaska had in the past has now been
mostly withdrawn on-account of the war with Spain. We
need the patrol vessels for coast defense. This is as
though we sent San Francisco police to garrison Manila.
In public affairs we can never attend to two things at a
time. Considering our possibilities and our intentions,
we have treated the Aleutian Islands as shabbily as
Spain has treated Cuba, and Russia has almost as good
a right to protest against our ways as we have to protest
against those of Spain.
This difference obtains. The natives of Alaska are
gentle and tractable and away from the eyes of the world.
They have no friends, no element of the picturesque,
and our craelty is not violence but neglect. We have
wantonly allowed the destruction of the sea otter, their
chief means of subsistence. We have wasted the sea-lion
which furnishes their boats. Starvation and death are

22 IMPERIAI. DEMOCRACY.
everywhere imminent in these coast settlements of
Alaska, and the blame for it rests on us. " Reconcen-
trados " between Arctic snows and San Francisco greed,
the Aleuts must starve and freeze. From Prince Wil
liam's Sound to Attn, nearly fifteen hundred miles, not a
village has a sure means of support left to-day.
According to latest reports from Port Etches, all the
people of the village live together in the cellar of an
abandoned warehouse. Wosnessenski was starving last
year. In Belkofski, Morjovi, Atka, Attn, and a half
dozen other villages, the Company's store had been
closed because the people can no longer pay for sup
pUes. Civilization has made flour, sugar, tea and to
bacco necessities of life, and these they can get no
longer. As our government is constituted, men must govern
themselves and send their delegates to Congress. For
others we have no government at all. The great cor
porations in Alaska are still squatters on government
land, and the disputes among their employees must be
settled by blow of fist, or they are not settled at all.
Open warfare with knife and gun has existed more than
once along the salmon rivers. This is not the fault of
the companies. They are law-abiding enough when
there is any law. " But there runs no law of God nor
man to the north of fifty-three." The villages of Aleuts
and Esquimaux are raled by the Company storekeeper
and the Russian priest, each with authority unlimited
and unsupported by law. The stanch laws of prohibi
tion by which liquor is excluded from Alaska cannot en
force themselves, and no other adequate force is provided.
The whole matter is a huge farce, and its necessary

" LEST WE FORGET." 23
result is contempt for law. With a colonial bureau like
that of England, the problems of ruling an inferior and
dependent people would be simple enough. Such a
bureau could take care of Alaska and could give good
government to any territory over which our flag may
float. Such a bureau we must have if Alaska is not to remain
a matter of public embarrassment. Such a bureau could
operate Hawaii as well. Hawaii cannot govern itself
under our federal forms. It is an oligarchy in the nature
of things. Under colonial management it would be
peaceful and prosperous. The more it had to do, the
more effective such a colonial bureau would become.
Every governmental department tends to aggrandize
itself. Colonies would demand more colonies. If we
have Alaska already and are certain to take Hawaii, why
not establish such a colonial bureau and manage them
as England manages Hong Kong and Singapore and
Jamaica? In the same way we may control Cuba, which
faUs as a ripe pear into our hands. And Porto Rico
must go with Cuba. The Philippines are not very far
away. They are nearer to San Francisco than Boston
was to Philadelphia in the times of Washington, and the
transfer of news is a matter of a few hours only. The
Philippines are as large as New England and New York,
with a population greater than aU the Rocky Moun
tain country and the Pacific Slope combined. They
have a hard population to manage, to be sure, a sub
stratum of Malays, lazy and revengeful, over these a
social layer of thrifty Chinese and canny Japanese, then
next a Spanish aristocracy and a surface scum of the
wanderers of all the world. In the unexplored interiors

24 IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
of the great islands live the wild tribes of negritos, un
tamed black imps, as incapable of self-government or of
any other government as so many monkeys. Spain has
stood at the gateway of this rich land and taken toU of
whatever goes out. This is all she has attempted. We
could not do much more, but whatever is possible we
can do as weU as any one else. If we do not keep
the Philippines they will surely fall into worse hands.
And aU these territories are to-day virtually under the
American flag. But why stop here? One great need
of the world's commerce is a canal across the territory
of Nicaragua, and we may seize that turbulent little
republic as a guarantee for the security and neutrality of
the canal. Then Costa Rica has her coffee fields, and
there is a wondrous wealth in Guatemala. In the Caro
line Islands we would find a good coaling station. We
have literary interest in Samoa at least, and in the name
of the Ladrones, the islands of the great thieves, we
ought to find something suggestive. An open port of
our own on the coast of China would give our commerce
its proper level of equaUty. Perhaps Swatow would
suffice for us after Russia, and Germany, and France,
and England has each made its choice.
Then there are the Blue Canaries. From the tall
peak of Teneriffe we can overlook the entrance to the
Mediterranean and keep our watch on the poUtics of
Europe. As England is the assignee of bankmpt Egypt,
shall we not seize the assets of bankmpt Spain? To be
sure we come in late in the game of territorial expansion.
We must take what we can get, and we cannot get much
except by force. Still we must have it. For all this
and more, according to Theodore Roosevelt and a host

" LEST WE FORGET." 2$
of others, is our " manifest destiny." To help along
" manifest destiny," is the purpose of the war with Spain.
The spell is on us, and it is the more irresistible because
it came unawares. Recently in an address in Boston,
Richard Olney, one of the wisest of our public men, who
checked the bold, bad British Lion by a bluff as big as
the lion's own roar, made a vigorous plea for national
expansion. He says :
" But it is even a more pitiful ambition for such a country to
aim to seclude itself from the world at large, and to Uve a life as
isolated and independent as if it were the only country on the
footstool. A nation is as much a member of society as an indi
vidual. * * » Does a foreign question or controversy pre
sent itself, appealing however forcibly to our sympathies or sense
of right — what happens the moment it is suggested that the
United States should seriously participate in its settlement .' A
shiver runs through all the ranks of capital, lest the uninterrupted
course of money-making be interfered with ; the cry of ' Jingo 1 '
comes up in various quarters ; advocates of peace at any price
make themselves heard from innumerable pulpits and rostrums ;
while practical politicians invoke the doctrine of the FareweU
Address as an absolute bar to all positive action. The upshot is
more or less an explosion of sympathy or antipathy at more or
less public meetings, and, if the case is a very strong one, a more
or less tardy tender by the Government of its ' moral support.'
Is that a creditable part for a great nation to play in the affairs
of the world .? * « * This country was once the pioneer, and
is now the millionaire. It behooves it to recognize the changed
conditions, and to realize its great place among the power of the
earth. It behooves it to accept the commanding position be
longing to it with all its advantages on the one hand, and ail its
burdens on the other. It is not enough for it to vaunt its great
ness and superiority, and call upon the rest of the world to ad
mire and be duly impressed. Posing before less favored peoples
as an exemplar of the superiority of American institutions may
be justified and may have its uses ; but posing alone is like an
swering the appeal of a mendicant by bidding him admire your

26 IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
own sleekness, your own fine clothes and handsome house, and
your generally comfortable and prosperous condition. He possibly
should do that and be grateful for the spectacle, but what he really
asks and needs is a helping hand. The mission of this country, if
it has one, and I verily believe it has, is not merely to pose, but to
act — and, while always governing itself by prudence and common
sense and making its own special interests the first and para
mount objects of its care, to forego no fitting opportumty to
further the progress of civUization practically as well as theoreti
cally by timely deeds as well as by eloquent words. There is
such a thing for a nation as a ' splendid isolation ' — ^as when, for
a worthy cause, for its own independence, or dignity, or vital in
terests, it unshrinkingly opposes itself to a hostUe world. But
isolation that is nothing but the shirking of the responsibUity of
high place and great power is simply ignominious."
" The doors to that shining destiny are open wide," says a
late writer in the San Francisco Chronicle. " Shall the Nation
pass them or shall it shrink back into itself and leave to other
and braver hands the prizes of the future. To broaden out in
the field of enterprise and acquisition is the duty of the Republic,
to strengthen itself whenever it safely can, to do its part in re
deeming the victims of ignorance as well as of cruelty, to gather
to itself the riches that will free it from debt, and make its in
fluence paramount in the world's affairs as the greatest part of
the Anglo-Saxon brotherhood ; to plant itself in the midst of
events, and mold them to its mighty purpose."
Such is the dream of American imperialism. Its
prizes lie in our hands unasked. The fates have forced
them upon us. But before we seize them, now let us
ask what it will cost? First, it will cost life and money
in rich measure. Kipling teUs us the cost of British
Admiralty :
"' We have fed our sea for a thousand years.
And she calls us stUl unfed.
Though there's never a wave of all her waves
But marks our English dead.

"LEST WE FORGET." 2")
We've strewed our best to the weeds' unrest,
To the shark and the sheering gull ;
If blood be the price of admiralty
Lord God I we have paid it in full."
If we have a navy that can make history we must pay
for it as England does, not only in blood but in cold,
hard cash. This means more taxes, heavy taxes, more
expenditures, more waste. It means the revision of our
tax laws, a tariff for revenue only with every element of
protection for American industries squeezed out of it.
The government will need all it can get. We must
manage our colonies that they may yield revenue. We
must cherish commerce as we have tried to cherish
manufacture, and we must cherish manufacture and
agriculture through commerce. Much more of a navy
we need to preserve ourselves from imbecility. One
victory like that of Manila may save us from a dozen
insults, and we must have the means to win such victories.
So far this would not be unmixed evil, perhaps no
evil at all. But we must go farther. Imperialism de
mands the maintenance of a standing army large enough
to carry out whatever we undertake. We must wholly
change our pension laws and deal with the veteran on a
basis of business, not of sentiment. ImperiaUsm leaves
no place for sentiment in public affairs. To maintain
strong armies the nations of continental Europe sacrifice
everything else. The people are loaded with armor till
they cannot rise, and they dare not throw it off. Even
to-day Italy is on the verge of a revolution, and the cause
is the cost of the army. The Italian proverb says that
if one throws a stone from a window it wiU hit a soldier
or a priest, and the farmer pays for both.

28 IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
The whole world must become the range of our in
terest. We must make every American's house his
castle from Kamchatka to Kerguelen. We must be
quick to revenge and strong to bluff. We must never
fight when the issue is doubtful, and never fail to fight
if there is a point to be gained. We must give up our
foolish notions that America is big enough to maintain a
separate basis of coinage, a freeman's scale of wages, a
pecuUar repubUcan social order different from that of
the rest of mankind. We must open our own doors as
we would push open the doors of the world. We must
change the character of our diplomacy. We must make
statecraft a profession. Hitherto we have sent out our
ambassadors because to do so is the fashion among na
tions, not because we have anything for them to do.
Hereafter they must go out to spread American influ
ences. The plain, blunt, effective truth-telling of our
present diplomacy must give way to the power to carry
our point. We must not send men to foreign countries
because we do not want them at home. The dull in
competence of our consular service must give way to a
system of trained agents. And this, too, has its com
pensating reactions. As our foreign service is made
efffective it wiU become dignified. This wiU help our
relations abroad because foreign nations judge us by the
quality of our representatives.
Our govemment must be changed for our changing
needs. We must give up the checks and balances in
our constitution. It is said that our great battleship
Oregon can tum about end for end within her own
length. The dominant nation must have the same
power. She must be capable of reversing her action in

"LEST WE FORGET." 29
a minute, of turning around within her own length.
This " our prate of statute and of state " makes impos
sible. We shall receive many hard knocks before we
reach this condition, but we must reach it if we are to
" work mightily " in the affairs of the world. If we are
to deal with crises in foreign affairs we must hold them
with a steadier grasp than that with which we have held
the Cuban question. We cannot move accurately and
quickly under the joint leadership of a conservative and
steady-headed President, a hysterical or venal Senate,
and a House intent upon its own re-election. That
kind of checks and balances we must lay aside forever.
As matters are now, President, Senate and House check
each other's movements and the State falls over its own
feet. The government of the United States is the expres
sion of the transient will of the people, so hemmed in by
checks and balances that positive action is difficult what
ever the will of the majority for the moment may be.
This is the government for peace and self-defense, but
not for aggression. The government of England expresses
the permanent will of the intelligent people with such
checks as shut out ignorance and control incompetence.
The nation and not the individual man is the unit in its
actions. Towards the EngUsh system we must approach more
and more closely if we are to deal with foreign affairs in
large fashion. The town-meeting idea must give way to
centralization of power. We must look away from our
own affairs, neglect them if you please, until the pres
sure of growing expenditure forces us to attend to them
again, and to attend to them more carefully than we ever

30 IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
yet have done. Good government at home must pre
cede good government of dependencies. One reason
England is governed well is tliat misgovemment any
where on any large scale would be fatal to her credit
and fatal to her power. She must call her best men to
her political service, because without them she would
perish. It may be that the choice of imperialism is already
made. If so, we shall leam the lesson of dominion in
the hardest school of experience. That we shall ulti
mately learn it I have no doubt, for ours is a nation of
apt scholars. We shall hold our own in war and diplo
macy, we shall tie tlie hands of turbulent nations and
seize the assets of bankmpt ones, and we shall teach the
art of money-making to the dependent nations who shall
be our wards and slaves.
Some great changes in our system are inevitable, and
belong to the course of natural progress. Against them
I have nothing to say. Whatever our part in the affairs
of the world we should play it manfully. But with all
this I believe that the movement tow^ard broad dominion
so eloquently outlined by Mr. Olney, would be a step
downward. It would be to turn from our highest pur
poses to drift with the current of manifest destiny. It
would be not to do the work of America, but to follow
the ways of the rest of the world. I make no plea for
indifference or self-sufficiency or isolation for isola
tion's sake. To shrink from world movements or to
drift with the current is alike unworthy of our origin and
destiny. Only this I urge ; let our choice be made with
open eyes, not at the dictates of chance disguised as
"Manifest Destiny." Unforgetting, counting all the

" LEST WE FORGET." 31
cost, let us make our decision. Let ours be sober,
fearless, prayerful choice. The federal republic — the
imperial republic — which shall it be ?
There are three main reasons for opposing every step
toward imperialism. First, dominion is brute force;
second, dependent nations are slave nations ; third, the
making of men is greater than the building of empires.
As to the first of these : The extension of dominion
rests on the strength of arms. Men who cannot hold
town meetings must obey through bmte force. In
Alaska, for example, our occupation is a farce and scan
dal. Only force can make it otherwise. Only by force
can the masses of Hawaii or Cuba be held to industry
and order. To furnish such power, we shall need a
colonial bureau, with its force of extra-national police.
A large army and navy must justify itself by doing some
thing. Army and navy we must maintain for our own
defense, but beyond that they can do little that does
not hurt, and they must be used if they would be kept
alive. Even warfare for humanity falls to the level of
other wars, and all wars according to Benjamin Franklin,
are bad, some worse than others. The rescue of the
oppressed is only accomplished by the use of force
against the oppressor. The lofty purposes of humanity
are forgotten in the joy of stmggle and the pride of con
quest. The other reasons concern the integrity of the Repub
lic itself. This was the lesson of slavery, that no re
public can " endure half slave and half free." The re
publics of antiquity fell because they were repubUcs of
the few only, for each citizen rested on the backs of nine
slaves. A republic cannot be an oligarchy as well. The

32 IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
slaves destroy the republic. Wherever we have inferior
and dependent races within our borders to-day, we have
a poUtical problem — " the Negro problem," " the Chinese
problem," " the Indian problem." These problems we
slowly solve. Industrial training and industrial pride
make a man of the Negro. Industrial interests many
even make a man of the Chinaman, and the Indian disap
pears as our civilization touches him.
But in the tropics such problems are perennial and
insoluble, Cuba, Manila, Nicaragua, will be slave terri
tories for centuries to come. These people in such a cli
mate can never have seU-govemment in the Anglo-
Saxon sense. Whatever form of control we adopt, we
shall be in fact slave-drivers, and the business of slave-
driving will react upon us. Slavery itself was a disease
which came to us from the British West Indies. It
breeds in the tropics like yellow fever and leprosy. Can
even an imperial republic last, part slave, part free ?
But England endures, and her control of slave terri
tories is her " doom and pride." What then of British
ImperiaUsm ? From the standpoint of ImperiaUsm Eng
land is an oligarchy, not a republic. Her govemment
is not self-rale, but the direction of commerce. It is
admiralty rather than democracy. Americans govern
themselves. Englishmen are ruled by the government
of their own choosing. Englishmen govern themselves
in municipal affairs, and in ways from which we have
much to learn. In foreign affairs their huge govern
mental machine, backed by the momentum of tradition,
is all-powerful. This rules Ireland, India, Gibraltar,
Egypt, all England's dependencies and wards. The
other colonies are republics in fact. Canada, New Zeal-

"LEST WE FORGET." 33
and, the states of Australia — these are republics bound
to keep the peace with the mother country, but in no
other way controlled by, her. Only ties of sentiment
bind Canada to England. In aU practical matters, she
is one with the United States.
The stronger the governmental machine, and the more
adjustable its powers, the better the government. But
government is not the main business of a republic. If
good government were all, democracy would not deserve
half the effort that is spent upon it. For the function
of democracy is not to make government good. It is
to make men strong. Better govemment than any re
public has yet enjoyed could be had in simpler and
cheaper ways. The automatic scheme of competitive
examination would give us better service at half the pre-""
sent cost. Even an ordinary intelUgence office, or states
man's employment bureau would serve us better than
conventions and elections. Government too good aS
well as too bad may have a baneful influence on men.
The purpose of self-government is to intensify individual
responsibility, to promote attempts at wisdom, through
which true wisdom may come at last. The republic is a
huge laboratory of civics, a laboratory in which strange
experiments are performed, but in which, as in other
laboratories, wisdom may arise from experience, and once
arisen may work itself out into virtue.
It is not true that the government " which is best ad
ministered is best." That is the maxim of tyranny.
That government is best which makes the best men. In
the training of manhood lies the certain pledge of bet
ter govemment in the future. The civic problems of
the future will be greater than those of the past. They

34 IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
will concern not the relations of nation to nation, but of
man to man. The policing of far-off islands, the herd
ing of baboons and elephants, the maintenance of the
machinery of imperialism are petty things beside the
duties which the higher freedom demands. To turn
"to these empty and showy affairs, is to neglect our own
business for the gossip of our neighbors. Such work may
be a matter of necessity ; it should not be a source of
pride. The political greatness of England has never
lain in her navies nor the force of her arms. It has lain
in her struggles for individual freedom. Not Marl
borough nor Nelson nor WeUlngton is its exponent.
Let us say rather Pym and Hampden, and Gladstone
and Bright. The real problems of England have always
been at home. The pomp of imperialism, the display
of naval power, the commercial control of India and
China, — all these are as the " bread and circuses " by
which the Roman emperors held the mob from their
thrones. They keep the people busy and put off the
day of final reckoning. " Gild the dome of the In-
valides," was Napoleon's cynical command, when he
learned that the people of Paris were becoming des
perate. The people of England seek blindly for a higher jus
tice, a loftier freedom, and so the ruling ministry crowns
the good queen as " Empress of India." Meanwhile,
the real problems of civilization develop and ripen.
They care nothing for the greatness of empire nor the
glitter of imperialism. They must be solved by men,
and each man must help solve his own problems. The
development of republican manhood is just now the
most important matter that any nation in the world has

" LEST WE FORGET." 35
on hand. We have been fairly successful thus far, but
perhaps only fairly. Our government is careless, waste
ful and unjust, but our men are growing self-contained
and wise. Despite the annual invasion of foreign illit
eracy, despite the degeneration of congested cities, the
individual inteUigence of men stands higher in America
than any other part of the world. The bearing of the
people at large in these days is a lesson in itself. Com
pare the behavior of the American people, in this and
other trying times, with that of the masses of any
other nation, and we see what democracy has done.
And we shall see more of this as our history goes on.
Free schools, free ballot, free thought, free religion — all
tend to enforce self-reliance, self-respect, and the sense
of duty, which are the surest foundation of national great
ness. An active foreign policy would slowly change much of
this. The nation which deals with war and diplomacy
must be quick to act and quick to change. It must,
like the Oregon, be able to reverse itself within its own
length. To this end, good government is a necessity,
whether it be self-government or not. Democracy
yields before diplomacy. RepubUcanism steps aside
when war is declared. " An army," said Wellington,
" can get along under a poor general. It can do noth
ing under a debating society." In war the strongest
man must lead, and military discipline is the only train
ing for an army. In a militant nation the same rules
hold in peace as in war. We cannot try civic experi
ments with a foe at our gates. A foe is always at the
gates of a nation with a vigorous foreign policy. Experi
ments such as we freely try would wreck the British Em-

36 IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
pire. For one of England's great parties to propose a radi
cal change like that of the free coinage of silver would
produce a panic like that of the swallowing of London by
an earthquake. The British nation is hated and feared
of all nations except our own, and we love her only in
our lucid intervals. Only her etemal vigilance keeps
the vultures from her coasts. Eternal vigilance of this
sort wiU strengthen governments, will build up nations ;
it will not in like degree make men. The day of the
nations as nations is passing. National ambitions, national
__hopes, national aggrandizement — all these may become
public nuisances. Imperialism, Uke feudaUsm, belongs
to the past. The men of the world as men, not as na
tions, are drawing closer and closer together. The needs
of commerce are stronger than the will of nations, and
the final guarantee of peace and good wiU among men
will be not " the parliament of nations," but the self-con
trol of men.
C But whatever the outcome of the present war, what
ever the fateful twentieth century may bring, the primal
duty of Americans is never to forget that men are more
than nations ; that wisdom is more than glory, and vir
tue more than dominion of the sea. The kingdom of
God is within us. The nation exists for its men, never
the men for the nation. " The only government that
I recognize," said Thoreau, " and it matters not how few
are at the head of it or how small its army, is the power
that establishes justice in the land, never that which
establishes injustice." And the will of free men to be
just one toward another, is our best guarantee that " gov
ernment of the people, for the people, and by the people,
I shall not perish from the earth."

"LEST WE FORGET."
" God of our fathers, known of old —
Lord ot our far-flung battle line —
Beneath whose awful Hand we hold
Dominion over palm and pine —
Lord God of Hosts, be with us yet.
Lest we forget — ^lest we forget.
" The tumult and the shouting dies —
The captains and the kings depart —
Still stands Thine ancient Sacrifice,
An humble and a contrite heart.
Lord God of Hosts be with us yet.
Lest we forget, lest we forget I
" Far-called our navies melt away —
On dune and headland sinks the fire
Lo, all our pomp of yesterday
Is one with Nineveh and Tyre I
Judge of the nations spare us yet.
Lest we forget — ^lest we forget I "

IL
COLONIAL EXPANSION

IL
COLONIAL EXPANSION.*
Last May I spoke before my people at home on the
subject of Imperialism. I took my title, as I take now
my text, from Kipling's " Recessional," the noblest hymn
of our century : " Lest we forget." For it seemed to me
then, just after the battle of Manila, that we might forget
who we are and for what we stand. In the sudden intoxi
cation of far-off victory, with the consciousness of power
and courage, with the feeling that aU the world is talking
of us, our great stern mother patting us on the back, and
all the lesser peoples looking on in fear or envy, we
might lose our heads. But greater glory than this has
been ours before. For more than a century our nation
has stood for something higher and nobler than success
in war, something not enhanced by a victory at sea, or a
wild bold charge over a hill lined with masked batteries.
We have stood for civic ideals, and the greatest of these,
that government should make men by giving them free
dom to make themselves. The glory of the American

* Address before the Congress of Religions at Omaha in
October, 1S98, published in the " New World " for December,
1898, under the titje of " Imperial Democracy." 41

42 IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
RepubUc is that it is the embodiment of American man
hood. It was the dream of the fathers that this should
always be so, — that American government and republican
manhood should be co-extensive, that the nation shall
not go where freedom cannot go.
This is the meaning of Washington's Farewell Address :
that America should grow strong within herself, should
keep out of all fights and friendships that are not her
own, should secure no territory in which a free man
cannot live, and should own no possessions that may not
in time be numbered among the United States. In other
words, America should not be a power among the nations,
but a nation among the powers. This view of the func
tion our country rests on is no mere accident of revolu
tion or isolation. It has its base in sound political com
mon-sense, and in the rash of new claims and new pos-
sibiUties we should not forget this old wisdom.
This year 1898 makes one of the three world-crises in
our history. Twice before have we stood at the parting
of the ways. Twice before have wise counsels controlled
our decision. The first crisis followed the war of the
Revolution. Its question was this. What relation shall
the weak, scattered colonies of varying tempers and
various ambitions bear to one another? The answer
wasj the American Constitution, the federation of self-
governing United States.
The second crisis came through the growth of slavery.
The union of the States, we found, could not " per
manently endure half slave, half free." These were the
words of Lincoln at Springfield in 1858, — the words that
made Douglass Senator from Illinois, that made Lincoln
the first President of the re-united States. These are the

COLONIAL EXPANSION. 43
words which, fifty years ago, drove the timid away in
fear, that rallied the strong to brave deeds in face of a
great crisis. And this was our decision : Slavery must
die that the Union shall live.
The third crisis is on us to-day. It is not the con
quest of Spain, not the disposition of the spoils of vic
tory which first concerns us. It is the spirit that lies
behind it. Shall our armies go where our institutions
cannot? Shall territorial expansion take the place of
Democratic freedom? Shall our invasion of the Orient
be merely an incident, an accident of a war of knight-
errantry, temporary and exceptional? Or is it to mark
a new policy, the reversion from America to Europe,
from Democracy to Imperialism?
It is my own belief that the crisis is already passing.
Our choice for the future is made. We have already
lost our stomach for Imperialism, as we come to see
what it means. A century of republicanism has given the
common man common sense, and the tawdry glories of
foreign dominion already cease to dazzle and deceive.
But the responsibilities of our acts are upon us. Hawaii
and Alaska are ours already. Cuba and Porto Rico we
cannot escape, and, most unfortunate of all, the most of
us see no clear way to justice toward the Philippines.
The insistent duties of " Compulsory Imperialism "
already clamor for our attention.
In the face of these tremendous problems, the nation
should at least be serious. It is not enough to swell our
breasts over the glories of national expansion, roll up our
eyes, and prate about the guiding finger of Providence,
while the black swarm of our political vultures swoop
down on our new possessions. To the end that we may

44 IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
understand the serious work of " Compulsory Imperial
ism," let us look briefly at a number of easy propositions
or axioms of poUtical science, pertinent, each in its
degree, to the topic before us.
Colonial expansion is not national growth. By the
spirit of our Constitution our Nation can expand only
with the growth of freedom. It is composed not of land
but of men. It is a self-governing people, gathered in
self-governing United States. There is no objection to
national expansion where honorably brought about. It
there were any mpr^ spare tn hp nc-C.iipipH by Ameriran
citizens, who could take care of themselves, we wnnld
cheertuliy overflow and fill it. But Colonial Aggrandize
ment is not national expansion; slaves are not men.
Wherever degenerate, dependent or alien races are
within our borders to-day, they are not part of the
United States. They constitute a social problem; a
menace to peace and welfare. There is -no solution of
race problem or class problem, until race or class can
solve it for itself. Unless the Negro can make a man of
himself through the agencies of freedom, free ballot, free
schools, free religions, there can be no solutions of the
race problem. Aheady Booker Washington warns us
that this problem unsettled is a national danger greater
than the attack of armies within or without. The race
problems of the tropics are perennial and insoluble, for
free institutions cannot exist where free men cannot
live. The territorial expansion now contemplated would not
extend our institutions, because the proposed colonies
are incapable of civilized self-government. It would not
extend our nation, because these regions are already full

COLONIAL EXPANSION. 45
of alien races, and not habitable by Anglo-Saxon people.
The strength of Anglo-Saxon civilization lies in the mental
and physical activity of men and in the growth of the
home. Where activity is fatal to life, the Anglo-Saxon
decays, mentally, morally, physically. The home cannot
endure in the climate of the tropics. Mr. Ingersoll once
said that if a colony of New England preachers and
Yankee schoolma'ams were established in the West
Indies, the third generation would be seen riding bare
back on Sunday to the cock-fights. Civihzation is, as it
were, suffocated in the tropics. It lives, as Benjamin
Kidd suggests, as though under deficiency of oxygen.
The only American who can live in the tropics without
demoralization is the one who has duties at home and
is not likely to go there.
The advances of civilization are wholly repugnant to
the children of the tropics. To live without care, reck
less and dirty, to have no duties and to be in no hurry,
with the lottery, cock-fight and games of chance for ex
citement, is more to them than rapid transit, telegraphic
communication, literature, art, education, and all the
joys of Saxon civilization. The Latin republics fail for
reasons inherent in the nature of the people. There is
little civic coherence among them ; feelings are mistaken
for realities, words for deeds, and boasting for accomplish
ment. Hence great words, lofty sentiments, fuss and
feathers generally take the place of action.
We are pledged to give self-government to Cuba.
This we cannot do in full without the risk of seeing it
relapse into an anarchy as repulsive, if not as hopeless,
as the tyranny of Spain. Only the splendid apparition
of the man on horseback could bring this to an end.

46 IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
The dictator may bring Law, but not democracy. Its
ultimate fate and ours is Annexation. It is too near us
and our interests for us to leave it to its fate, and to
the schemes of its own politicians. It therefore remains
for us to annex and assimilate Cuba, but not at once.
We must take our time, and do it in decency and order,
as we have taken Alaska and Hawaii. We take Cuba,
Porto Rico and Hawaii, not because we want them, but
because we have no friends who can manage them well
and give us no trouble, and it is possible that in a
century or so they may become part of our nation as
weU as of our territory.
_,.- The Anglo-Saxon nations have certain ideals on which
their political superstructure rests. The great political
service of England is to teach respect for law. TTie
British Empire rests on British law. The great poUtical
service of the United States is to teach respect for the
individual man."' The American republic rests on in
dividual manhood. The chief agency in the develop
ment of free manhood is the recognition of the individual
man as the responsible unit of government. This recog
nition is not confined to local and municipal affairs, as
is practically the case in England, but extends to all
branches of government.
It is the axiom of democracy that " government must
derive its just powers from the consent of the govemed."
No such consent justifies slavery; hence our Union
" could not endure half slave, half free." No such con
sent justifies our hold on Alaska, Hawaii, Cuba, Porto
Rico, the Ladrones or the Philippines. The people do
not want us, our ways, our business, or our government.
Only as we displace them or amuse them with cheap

COLONIAL EXPANSION. 47
shows do we gain their consent. These are slave nations,
and their inhabitants cannot be units in government. In
our hands, as Judge Morrow has pointed out in a recent
decision, they will have no voice in their own affairs, but
must be subject to the sovereign will of Congress alone.
This implies taxation without representation, a matter
of which something was said in Boston one hundred
and thirty years ago. Our Constitution knows no such
thing as permanently dependent colonies, else the ac
quisition of such would have been formally forbidden.
To be subject to the will of Congress, as the history of
Alaska has clearly shown, is to be subject to vaciUation,
corruption, tyranny, parsimony and neglect. The great
est scandals England has known have come from her
neglected colonies. It is not that Americans or Eng
lishmen are incompetent to handle any class of problems.
It is because the public weary of them ; colonial affairs
are trivial, paltry and exasperating. When a colony
ceases to be a new toy, it falls into neglect. The record
of American occupation of our one colony of Alaska is
the same in kind (climate and blood excepted) with that
of Spanish rale in Cuba or the Ladrones. We are blind
to this because we do not care. Alaska is none of our
business ; we have no money invested in it. In a few
years Alaska wiU have no resources left ; then we may
throw it away as we would throw a sucked orange. The
American-Spanish idea of a colony is a place to be ex
ploited, to make its captors rich by its resources and its
trade. We have cured Spain of that idea, by taking all
her colonies away. But we have not attained to the idea
that we must spend our money on our colonies, enrich
ing them with enterprise and law.

48 IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
It is said nowadays that wherever our flag is raised it
must never be hauled down. To haul down an American
flag is an insult to Old Glory. But this patriotism rings
counterfeit. It would touch a truer note to say that
wherever our flag goes it shall bring good government.
It should, as Senator Mason suggests, " never float over
an unwilling people." Whatever land comes under the
American flag should have the best government we know
how to give. It should be better than we give ourselves,
for it lacks the noble advantages of self-rule.
Take the Philippines or leave them ! No half-way
measures can be permanent. To rale at arm's length
is to fail in government. These islands must belong to
the United States, or else they must belong to the people
who inhabit them. If we govern the PhiUppines, so in
their degree must the Philippines govern us.
There are some economists who intelligently favor
colonial extension to-day because to handle colonies suc
cessfully must force on us English forms of govemment.
A dose of Imperialism would stiffen the back of our
Democracy. English forms are better than ours in this,
that they can deal more accurately with outside affairs.
This is because the people of England are never con
sulted by the foreign office, the colonial office or the
Bureau controUing coinage and finance. To remove
these matters from popular control makes for good
government at the expense of training of the people.
As to which is the better there is room for honest differ
ence of opinion. The essence of this argument is that
pressure from without wiU force us to take all difficult
matters out of the people's hands, intrusting them only
to trained representatives. It is true, no doubt, that

COLONIAL EXPANSION. 49
our standing in the world is lowered because our best
statesmen are not in politics to the degree that they are
in England. The rules of the game shut them out.
But I believe that we can change these rales by forces
now at work. Wiser voters will demand better repre
sentatives, but these must keep in touch with the people,
acting with them and through them, never in their stead.
For reasons I shaU give later on, I beUeve that to adopt
British forms, with aU their unquestioned advantages,
would be a step backward and downward.
Leaving political philosophers aside, the noisiest
advocates of colonial expansion are among men least
interested in good government at home. Chief among
these are ministers, ignorant of the difficulties of wise
administration, and politicians contemptuous of them.
If it were not for the petty offices which the Philippines
promise, half the poUtical impulse in favor of their
annexation would evaporate. Half the rest comes from
the desire to dodge the issues of labor and coinage by
setting people to talking of something else.
There are two parties in every free country, and only
two. These are, first, those who strive for good govern
ment, and second, those who hope to gain something —
money, glory, prestige — from bad government. These
two parties are not called republican or democrat, not
whig or tory. They do not present separate tickets —
the first party never presents tickets at all. It is always
in the minority, but it is the glory and the hope of
the democracy that it always comes out victorious after
the election is over.
The chief real argument for the retention of the Phil
ippines rests on the behef that if we do not take them.

so IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
they will fall into worse hands. This may be true, but
it is open to question. It is easy to treat them as Spain
has done; but none of the eloquent voices raised for
annexation have yet suggested anything better. We must
also recognize that the nerve and courage of Dewey and
his associates seem spent to little avail if we cast away
what we have won. To leave the Philippines, after all
this, seems Uke patriotism under false pretenses. But
nothing could have induced us to accept these islands,
if offered for nothing, before the battle of Manila. If
we take the Philippines, the business of bringing peace
through war is scarce begun. The great majority of the
Filipinos have never yet heard of Spain, much less of
the United States. This is especially trae of the Malay
pirates of the Southem Islands and the black negritos
of the unexplored interior. It would not be an easy and
humane task to bring these folk to the extermination
which some of the annexationists placidly claim is the
final doom of negritos. Kanaka, Malays and all inferior
races who get in anybody's way.
This, according to John Morley,* is England's ex
perience in bringing peace to suffering humanity in the
tropics : " First, you push on into territories where you
have no business to be, and where you had promised not
to go ; secondly, your intrusion provokes resentment,
and, in these wild countries, resentment means resist
ance ; thirdly, you instantly cry out that the people are
rebellious and that their act is rebellion (this in spite of
your own assurance that you have no intention of set
ting up a permanent sovereignty over them) ; fourthly,
you send a force to stamp out the rebellion ; and fifthly,
* As quoted in the New York Nation,

COLONIAL EXPANSION. 51
having spread bloodshed, confusion and anarchy, you
declare, with hands uplifted to the heavens, that moral
reasons force you to stay, for if you were to leave, this
territory would be left in a condition which no civilized
power could contemplate with equanimity or with com
posure. These are the five stages in the Forward Rake's
progress." It was of England in Chitral that Moriey said
this, not of America in Luzon. No wonder England
now cheers us on. We are foUowing her lead. We are
giving to her methods the sanction of our respecta
bility. There are many who say, "Take whatever we can
get. Who is afraid ? What is there for the strongest,
richest, bravest, wisest nation on earth to fear ? " But
it is not force we fear. Armies, navies, kings and Kai
sers, so long as we behave ourselves, can never harm our
republic. It is bad government we fear, the dry rot of
official mismanagement, corruption and neglect, the de
cay which the Fates mete out " when the tumult and the
shouting dies " to the nations that forget their ideals.
To come to " our place among the nations " will be to
show that democracy can give good government, govem
ment firm, dignified, economical, just. It does not mean
to have everybody talking about us, to carry our flag into
every sea and to spread rank imbecility over a hundred
scattered islands.
So far as the Philippines are concerned, the only
righteous thing to do would be to recognize the inde
pendence of the PhiUppines under American protection,
and to lend them our army and navy and our wisest
counselors, not our politicians, but our jurists, our teach
ers, with foresters, electricians, manufacturers, mining

52 IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
experts, and experts in the various industries. We should
not get our money back, but we should save our
honor. The only sensible thing to do would be to pull out
some dark night and escape from the great problem of
the Orient as suddenly and as dramatically as we got
into it.
To take a weak nation by the throat is not the righteous
way to win its trade. It is not true that " trade follows
the flag." Trade flies through the open door. To
open the door of the Orient is to open our own doors
to Asia. To do this hurries us on toward the final
" manifest destiny," the leveling of the nations. Where
the barriers are all broken down, and the world becomes
one vast commercial republic, there will be leveling
down of government, character, ideals, as well as level
ing up.
It is the duty of nations with ideals to struggle
against " manifest destiny." In the Norse Mythology
the Fenris-Wolf in the Twilight of the Gods shall at last
devour them aU. So at last in the Twilight of the
Nations shall all of them succumb to " Manifest Des
tiny." The huge armaments of Europe, its invincible
armies, its mighty navies, are but piled up as fagots for
the burning which shall destroy dynasties and nations.
Lowering of national character, of national ideals, of
national pride, follows the path of glory.
" We want," some say, " our hands in oriental affairs
when the great struggle follows the breaking up of
China." Others would have " American freedom upheld
as a torchlight amidst the darkness of oriental despot
ism." We cannot show American civilization where

COLONIAL EXPANSION. 53
American institutions cannot exist. But the spirit of
freedom goes with its deeds.
I do not urge the money cost of holding the Philip
pines as an argument against annexation. No depend
ent colony, honestly administered, ever repaid its cost
to the government, and this colony holds out not the
slightest promise of such a result. In fact, the cost of con
quest and maintenance in life and gold is in grotesque
excess of any possible advantage to trade or to civilization.
Individuals grow rich, but no honest government gets
its money back. But with all this, if annexation is a
duty, it is such regardless of cost.
But America has governmental ideals of the develop
ment of the individual man. England has no care for
the man, only for civic order. This unfits America for
certain tasks for which England is prepared. In Zanzi
bar, when the king dies, the first of the royal family to
reach the throne is made king. Once a king who hated
England was thus chosen. A British man-of-war in the
harbor promptly shelled the royal palace and killed so
many followers of the new king that the mistake was
quickly rectified and the Pax Britannica restored. Our
ideals stand in the way of our doing such things as this.
To govern colonies it is necessary to have an auto
matic non-political civil service. That our navy is
organized on such a basis makes its strength. That the
volunteer army is not, is the reason why the air is full
to-day of charges and counter charges. The colonial
policy must be continuous, hence out of the people's
hands. It must be flexible, hence not limited by con
stitutional checks and balances. An annexationist
lately said to me, " I am just tired of hearing of the

54 IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
Constitution." A labor agitator says that aU our trou
bles come from the fact " every reform needed by the
people is prevented by the Constitution." But to pre
vent foolish acts, inside and outside the country, the
Constitution was devised.
Govemment derives its " just powers from the consent
of the governed." This is the foundation of democracy.
But where such consent is impossible, government may
derive powers in another way. It may justify itself be
cause it is good government. This is the maxim of
Imperialism. This is the justification of Mexico. It is
the justification of Great Britain. The function of
British Imperialism is to carry law and order, the Pax
Britannica, to all parts of the globe. This function has
been worked out in three ways corresponding to Eng
land's three classes of tributary districts or colonies.
The first class of these consists of regions settled by Eng
lishmen imbued with the spirit of the law, and capable
of taking care of themselves. Such colonies rale their
own affairs absolutely. The bond of Imperialism is little
more than a treaty of perpetual friendship. Over the
local affairs of Canada, for example, England claims little
authority and exercises none. When difficulties arise
with Canada, we see British Imperialism cringing be
fore provincial politicians as a weak mother before a
spoiled child. Should Canada or Australia break from
her nominal aUegiance, the whole sham fabric of Im
perialism would faU to pieces.
A second class of colonies consists of military posts,
strategic points of war or commerce, wrested from some
weaker nation in the militant past. In the control of
these outposts " the consent of the governed " plays no

COLONIAL EXPANSION. 55
part. The inhabitants of Gibraltar, for example, count
for no more than so many "camp-followers." They
remain through military suffrance, and the forms of
martial law suffice for all the government they need.
The third class of colonies is made up of conquered
or bankrupt nations, people whose own governmental
forms were so intolerable that England was forced to
take them across her knee. These nations still govern
themselves in one fashion, but each act of their rulers is
subject to the firm veto of the British Colonial Office.
" Said England unto Pharaoh, T will make a man of
you,' " and with Pharaoh, as with other irresponsibles of
the tropics, England has in some degree succeeded. 1
But this success is attained only through the strictesF
discipline of military methods. It is not along the lines
by which we have made a man of "Brother Jonathan.''
England has thus become the guardian of the weak
nations of the earth, the police force of the unruly, the ,
assignee of the bankrupt.
Good government is the justification for British im
perialism. If victories at sea, the needs of humanity,
" manifest destiny," and political dalliance with fate
force foreign dominion on the United States, American
imperialism must have the same justification. What
ever lands or people come under our flag are entitled
to good govemment, the best that we can give them.
This should be better than we give ourselves, for it is not
accompanied by the inestimable advantages of self-
government. There are duties as well as glories inherent
in dominion, and the duties are by far the more insistent.
We have had our own set of problems as important as
those of England and more difficult. It is easier to
5

56 IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
govern others by force than to rale ourselves by intelli
gence. Though one in blood with England, our course of
poUtical activities has not lain parallel with hers. While
England has been making trade we have been making
men. We have no machinery to govern colonies well.
We want no such machinery if we can help it. The habit
of our people and the tendency of our forms of govem
ment are to lead people to mind their own business.
Only the business of individuals or groups of individuals
receives attention. Our representatives in Congress are
our attorneys, retained to look after our interests, the in
terest of the state or district, not of the nation. A colony
has no attorney, and its demands, as matters now stand,
must go by default. This is the reason why we fail in the
govemment of colonies. This is the reason why our con
sular service is weak and inefficient. This is the reason
why our forests are wasted year by year. Nothing is well
done in a republic unless it touches the interest or catches
the attention of the people. Unless a colony knows what
good government is and insists loudly on having it, with
some means to make itself heard, it will be neglected
and abused. This is why every body of people under
the American flag must have a share in the American
govemment. When a colony knows what good govem
ment is, it ceases to be a colony and can take care of
itself. The question is not whether Great Britain or the
United States has the better form of govemment or the
nobler civic mission. There is room in the world for
two types of Anglo-Saxon nations, and nothing has yet
happened to show that civilization would gain if either

COLONIAL EXPANSION. 57
were to take up the function of the other. We may
not belittle the tremendous services of England in the
enforcement of laws amid barbarism. We may not deny
that every aggression of hers on weaker nations results
in some good to the conquered, but we insist that our
own function of turning masses into men, of " knowing
men by name," is as noble as hers. Better for the world
that the whole British Empire should be dissolved, as it
must be late or soon, than that the United States should
forget her own mission in a mad chase of emulation.
He reads history to little purpose who finds in imperial
dominion a result, a cause or even a sign of national
greatness. It is not trae that England's escape from political
corraption is due to the growth of her imperial power.
It is due to the growth of individual inteUigence, the
spread of the spirit of democracy. To this development
Imperialism has been a hindrance only. Sooner or
later Imperialism must be abandoned by England.
The subject peoples must share with England the cost
and the responsibility of rule else the mother country
will be crushed under its burdens. Sooner or later, says
a recent writer :
" England must take all her colonies into political copartner
ship (of taxation and of responsibUity) or else abandon them, or
in the end be crushed by the burden of their care."
We may have a navy and coaling stations to meet our
commercial needs without entering on colonial expansion.
It takes no war to accomplish this honorably. What
ever land we may need in our business we may buy in
the open market as we buy coal. If the owners will

58 IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
accept our price it needs no Imperialism to foot the
biUs. But the question of such need is one for com
mercial experts, not for politicians. Our decision should
be in the interest of commerce, not of sea power. We
need, no doubt, navy enough to protect us from insults,
even though every battleship, Charles Sumner pointed
out fifty years ago, costs as much as Harvard College,
and though schools, not battleships, make the strength
of the United States. We have drawn more strength
from Harvard College than from a thousand men-of-war.
Once Spain owned some battleships, as many and as swift
as ours, but she had no men of science to handle them.
A British fleet bottled up at Santiago or Cavite would
have given a very different account of itself. It is men
not ships which make a navy. It is our moral and
material force, our brains and character and ingenuity
and wealth that make America a power among the
nations, not her battleships. These are only visible
S3Tnptoms designed to impress the ignorant or incredu
lous. The display of force saves us from insults — from
those who do not know our mettle.
Men say that we want nobler political problems than
those we have. We are tired of our tasks " artificial and
transient," " insufferably parochial," and seek some new
pnes worthy of our national bigness. I have no patience
with such talk as this. The greatest political problems
the world has ever known are ours to-day and still un
solved, — the problems of free men in freedom. Be
cause these are hard and trying we would shirk them in
order to meddle with the affairs of our weak-minded
neighbors. So we are tired of the labor problem, the
corporation problem, the race problem, the problem of

COLONIAL EXPANSION. 59
coinage, of municipal government and the greatest pro
blem of all, that of the oppression of the individual man
by the social combinations to which he belongs, by those
to which he does not belong, and by the corporate power
of society which may become the greatest tyrant of all.
Then let us tum to the politics of Guam and Mindanao,
and let our own difficulties settle themselves ! Shame
on our cowardice ! Are the politics of Luzon cleaner
than those of New York? We would give our blood to
our country, would we not? Then let us give her our
brains. More than the blood of heroes she needs the
inteUigence of men.

IIL
A BLIND MAN'S HOLIDAY.
And unregretful, threw us all away
To flaunt it in a BUnd Man's Holiday."
Lowell.

III.
A BLIND MAN'S HOLIDAY.*
I wish to maintain a single proposition. We should
withdraw from the Philippine Islands as soon as in dig
nity we can. It is bad statesmanship to make these ahen
people our partners ; it is a crime to make them our
slaves. If we hold their lands there is no middle course.
Only a moral question brings a crisis to man or nation.
In the presence of a crisis, only righteousness is right
and only justice is safe.
I ask you to consider with me three questions of the
hour. Why do we want the Philippines ? What can we
do with them? What will they do to us?
These questions demand serious consideration, not
one at a time but all together. We should know clearly
our final intentions as a nation, for it is never easy to re
trace false steps. We have made too many of these al
ready. It is time for us to grow serious. Even the
most headlong of our people admit that we stand in the
presence of a real crisis, while, so far as we can see,
there is no hand at the helm. But the problem is vir-
* Read before the Graduate Club of Leland Stanford Junior
University, Feb. 14, 1899 : and afterwards (April 3) pubUshed for
the Club by the courtesy of Mr. John J. Valentine. 63

64 IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
tuaUy solved when we know what our trae interests are.
Half the energy we have spent in getting into trouble
wUl take us honorably out of it. Once convinced that
we do not want the Philippines it will be easy to aban
don them with honor. If we are to take them we can
not get at it too soon. The difficulty is that we do not
yet know what we want, and we are afraid that if we
once let these people go we shall never catch them
again. With our longings after Imperialism we have not
had the nerve to act.
Let us glance for a moment at the actual condition of
affairs. By the fortunes of war the capital of the Philip
pine Islands fell, last May, into the hands of our navy.
The city of Manila we have held, and by dint of bulldog
diplomacy our final treaty of peace has assigned to us the
four hundred or fourteen hundred islands of the whole
archipelago. To these we have as yet no real title. We
can get none till the actual owners have been consulted.
We have a legal title, of course, but no moral title and no
actual possession. We have only purchased Spain's quit
claim deed to property she could not hold, and which she
cannot transfer. For the right to finish the conquest of
the Philippines and to close out the insurrection which
has gone on for almost a century we have agreed, on our
part, to pay $20,000,000 in cash, for the people of the
Islands and the land on which they were born, and
which, in their fashion, they have cultivated. This is a
sum absurdly large, if we consider only the use we are
likely to make of the region and the probable cost of
its reconquest and rule. It seems criminally small if we
consider the possible returns to us or to Spain from ped-
dUng out the islands as old jimk in the open market, or

A BLIND man's HOLIDAY. 65
from leasing them to commercial companies competent
to exploit them to their utmost. The price is high when
we remember that the United States for a century has
felt absolutely no need for such property and would not
have taken any of it, or all of it, or any other like pro
perty as a gift. The price is high, too, when we ob
serve that the failure of Spain placed the islands not in
our hands but in the hands of their own people, a third
party, whose interest we, like Spain, have as yet failed to
consider. Emilio Aguinaldo, the liberator of the Fih-
pinos, the "Washington of the Orient," is the de facto
ruler of most of Luzon. In our hands is the city of
Manila, and not much else, and we cannot extend our
power except by bribery or by force. We may pervert
these fragile patriots as Spain claims to have done ; or,
like Spain, we may redden the swamps of Luzon with
their rebellious blood.
" Who are these Americans ? " Aguinaldo is reported
to ask, " these people who talk so much of freedom and
justice and the rights of man, who crowd into our islands
and who stand as the Spaniards did between us and our
liberties?" What right have we indeed ? The right of purchase
from Spain. We held Spain by the throat and she could
not choose but sell.
If, at the close of our Revolutionary War, the King of
France, coming in at the eleventh hour and driving the
English from our capital, had bought a quit-claim deed to
the colonies, proposing to retain them in the interest of
French commerce, he would have held exactly the posi
tion in which our administration has placed the United
States-

66 IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
In that case George Washington would have insisted,
as Aguinaldo has done, that only the people who own it
have any sovereignty to sell. He would have held his
people's land against all comers, not the least against his
late allies. He might even have led a hope as foolish
and forlorn as that which inspired the late pitiful attack
upon our forces at Manila, if, indeed, there was such an
attack, for there is not the slightest evidence that hos
tilities were begun by Aguinaldo.
The blood shed at Manila wiU rest heavy on those the
people hold responsible for it. There is not the slight
est doubt where this responsibility rests. A little court
esy, a little tact, on the part of those in power, would
have spared us from it all. These men have not led a
forlorn fight against Spain for all these years to be tamely
snubbed and shoved aside as dogs or rebels at the end.
If the President had assured Aguinaldo that his people
would not be absorbed against their wiU, there would
have been peace at Manila. If he had assured the
people of the United States that no vassal lands would
be annexed against their will, there would be peace at
Washington. The President has no right to assume in
speech or in act that the United States proposes to
prove false to her own pledges or false to her own his
tory. Unlike the fighting editor, he is sworn to uphold
the Constitution.
If we may trust the record, Aguinaldo became our ally
in good faith, in the belief that we were working with
him for the freedom of his people. In good faith our
consuls made him promises we have never repudiated,
but which, after six months of silence, by the casting vote
of our Vice-President, we refuse to make good. These

A BLIND MAN'S HOLIDAY. 6^
promises were in line with our pledges to Cuba. The
consuls, like Aguinaldo, supposed that we meant what
we said. When we pledged ourselves to give up the
prisoners he had taken we acknowledged him as our
ally; and our threats to arrest him, for holding his
prisoners, as shown in the published correspondence
brought on the present wanton bloodshed. In any
case, we should have lost nothing through courteous
treatment, and our dignity as a nation would not have
suffered even though a civil hearing had been given to
his envoy, Agoncillo. It may be that Agoncillo is a
coward as our newspapers picture him, but that should
not make him lonesome in Washington.
We know nothing of Philippine matters, save through
cablegrams passed through govemment censorship, and
from the letters and speech of men of the army and navy.
The letters and cablegrams do not always teU the same
story. It is certain, however, that General Otis has been
promoted for gallantry at the slaughter of the fifth of
February and in the subsequent skirmishes which have
left 20,000 natives homeless. This is right, if he acted
under orders, for a soldier must obey. If he acted on his
ovra motion, he should have been cashiered. He should
neither have provoked nor permitted a conflict if any
leniency or diplomacy could have prevented it. Even
taking the most selfish view possible as to our plans, their
success must depend on our retention of the respect and
good will of the subject people.
If the FiUpinos are our subjects, they have the right
to be heard before condemnation. If they are our allies,
they have the right to be heard before repudiation.
Their rights are older than ours. It was their straggle

68 IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
for freedom before most of our people had even heard
of their existence. We may treat these matters as we
will, but, in the light of history, we shall appear with the
tyrant and the coward, and our act be the fit conclusion
of the " century of dishonor." " The wreck of broken
promises," says General Miles, referring to our Indian
treaties, " is strewn across the United States from the
Atlantic to the Pacific." We have broken the record
now for we have extended it to the Orient. " Why is
it," a friend once asked General Crooks, " that you have
such influence with the Indians ? " " Because I always
keep my word," was the reply.
To be sure Aguinaldo may not be much of a Wash
ington, a Washington of the hen-roost type, perhaps, as
the brigand patriots of Spanish colonies have been in
the past. As to this we have not much right to speak.
We have never heard his side of the case, and we have
listened only to Spanish testimony. It is worthy of note
that our returned officers from Manila, who are men com
petent to judge, speak of him in terms of the highest
respect. His government, which we try to destroy, is
the most capable, enlightened and just these islands
have ever known. These germs of civic liberty constitute
the most precious product of the PhiUppines. But what
ever his character or motives, he has one great advant
age which Washington possessed — he is in the right.
By that fact he is changed from an adventurer, a soldier
of fortune, into a hero, an instrament of destiny. If
Aguinaldo betrays his people by seUing out to us, the
heroism of the people remains. When men die for in
dependence there is somewhere a hero. Self-sacrifice
for an idea means some fitness for self-government.

A BLIND MAN'S HOLIDAY. 69
Whatever we may choose to do Aguinaldo is a factor,
and our sovereignty over his islands must be gained
through peaceful concession, if it is gained at all. We
could crash Aguinfildo easily enough, but we dare not.
" Instans tyrannus ! " However feeble he may be while
we run our fires around " his creep-hole " he has only to
" clutch at God's skirts," as in Browning's poem, and it
is we who are afraid. This great, strong, lusty nation is
too brave to do a cowardly deed.* In spite of the orgies
of our newspapers, we are stiU bothered by a national
conscience. We do not like to fight in foreign lands
against women with cropped hair defending their own
homes ; against naked savages with bows and arrows,
nor in battles likened to a Colorado rabbit drive. _
The Filipinos are not rebels against law and order, but
against alien control. As a republic under our protec
tion, or without it, I am informed, they stood apparently
ready to give us any guarantee we might ask as to order
and security.
We may easily destroy the organized army of the
FiUpinos, but that does not bring peace. In the cliffs and
jungles they will defy us for a century as they have defied
Spain. According to Deweyy the FUipinos are " fighters
from away back." Tliese ^.four words from Dewey mean
more than forty would from*' an ordinary warrior. In
Sumatra it has cost the E)utch upwards of 300,000 men
to subdue Achin, a peninsula with a total population es
timated at 328,000, and J its native chieftains are still
defiant. Three hiindrecj thousand men, of whom two-
* I let this stand ks originally written. While we have carried
on relentless war in Luzon peither the American people nor their
congress h^ve been consulted in regard to it.

70 IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
thirds rotted in the swamps, never seeing a foe or a
battle. Our people are ashamed of shame, and their eyes
once opened they cannot be coaxed nor driven.
Let us consider the first of our propositions. Why
do we want the PhUippines? To this I can give no
answer of my own. I can see not one valid reason why
we should want them, nor any why they should want us,
except as strong and friendly advisers. As vassals of the
United States they have no future before them ; as citizens
they have no hope. But even if we could by kind pater
nalism make their lives happier or more effective, I am
sure that we will not. Our philanthropy is less than skin
deep. The syndicates waiting to exploit the islands,
and incidentally to rob their own stockholders, are not
interested in the moral uplifting of negroes and " dagoes."
On the other hand I am sure that their possession can
in no wise help us, not even financially or commercially.
The movement for colonial extension rests on two
things : Persistent forgetfulness of the principles of
democratic government on the one hand ; hopeless
ignorance of the nature of the tropics and its people on
the other.
But while I give no reason of my own, I have listened
carefully to the speech of others, and the voices I have
heard are legion. Their opinions I shall try in a way to
classify, with a word of comment on each. And, first, I
place those which claim some sort of moral validity,
though I acknowledge no basis for such claim. For the
only morality a nation can know is justice. To be fair
as between man and man, to look after mutual interests
and to do those necessary things out of reach of the indiv
idual is the legitimate function of a nation. It cannot

A BLIND man's HOLIDAY. ^t
be generous, because it has no rights of its own of which
it can make sacrifice. Moral obligations belong to its
people as individuals. Legal obligations, financial obli
gations, the pledges of treaties, only these can bind na
tion to nation. A nation cannot be virtuous, for that
is a matter of individual conduct. It must be just. So
far as it fails to be this, it is simply corrapt.
It is said that if we do not annex the Philippines we
shall prove false to our obligations. Obviously there are
two primary pledges which must precede all others;
first the obUgation of our whole history that we shall
never conquer and annex an unwiUing people ; second,
our pledge at the beginning of the war, that the United
States has no disposition to seize territory or to dictate
its government.
" The United States hereby disclaims any disposition or inten
tion to exercise sovereignty, jurisdiction, or control over said
island, except for the pacification thereof, and asserts its deter
mination when that is accomplished to leave the govemment and
control of the island to its people."
The plea that these words were intended for Cuba
only and do not pledge us to like action elsewhere is too
cowardly to permit of discussion.
Several questions arise at once. What are those
obligations? To whom are they held? By what re
sponsibility have they been incurred ?
To the first question we may get this answer : We
are under obligations to see that the PhiUppines are no
longer subject to Spanish tyranny and misrale. In the
words of General Miles, " Twelve miUions of people that
a year ago were suffering under oppression, tyranny, and

72 IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
cruelty are to-day under our protection. It would be
the crime of the nineteenth century to turn them back
again." Very well, then, we shaU not turn them back,
nor could we do it if we would. Spain is helpless and
harmless. She has ceased to be a factor in the world's
affairs. What next? Let us quote further from General
Miles : " If you cannot give them govemment in their
own country, if you cannot establish government for
them, you can, at least, protect them until such time as
they shaU be prepared for self-government. And if they
do not care to come and be part of this country you
can see to it that they have a liberal and free govem
ment such as you enjoy yourselves."
This is, perhaps, an average statement of our supposed
obligations. If we had adopted this view we should
have had no war at Manila and our honor would be un
tarnished. Some would put it more strongly. Our
obligations demand that we take the islands by force,
lest they faU back into the hands of Spain, or, still worse,
lest they become victims of the cruel schemes of the
German Emperor, ever anxious to try his hand on mat
ters of which he knows nothing. For the House of
HohenzoUern, as well as ourselves, is afflicted with a
" manifest destiny."
But this German bugaboo is set up merely as an ex
cuse. No nation on earth would dare set the heel of
oppression on any land our flag has made free. The
idea that every Uttle nation must be subject to some
great one is one of the most contemptible products of
miUtary commercialism. No nation, little or big, is
"derelict" that minds its own business, maintains law
and order, and respects the development of its own

A BLIND MAN'S HOLIDAY. 73
people. If we behave honorably towards the people we
have freed, we shall set a fashion which the powers will
never dare to disregard.
We can be under no obligations under our Constitution
and theory of govemment, to do what cannot be done,
what will not be done, or ought not to be done.
Still others put the case in this way ! " We have
destroyed the only stable government in the Philippines.
It is our duty to establish another." But if this is really
the case we have done very wrong. We were told that
the rale of Spain was not stable, that it was not just, and
that it was far worse than no rule at aU. Our sympathies
were with those who would destroy this government of
Spain, and our armies went out with our sympathies.
Either we were on the wrong side in the whole business,
or else we should now respect the rights of the people we
set forth to help. If, by ill chance, we have overturned
the only stable govemment, we must help the people to
make another. " A government of the people, for the
people, and by the people," would be a good kind to
help them to establish ; one made in their own interest
not in ours, even though we think them a sorry sort of
folk. We should not talk in the same breath of our duty
to humanity and of the demands of American commerce,
not even though both speeches be canting falsehoods.
As a matter of fact, of all the people of the tropics the
inhabitants of Luzon have shown most promise of fairly
wise self-rale. All competent judges speak in the highest
terms of the cabinet and parliament at Malolos and of
their wisdom and self-restraint. At the same time under
whatever rule, these people will not cease to be orientals.
To better define these obligations let us find out to

74 IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
whom they were incurred. Nobody in particular lays
claim to them. Surely we are not bound to Spain, for
she feels outraged and humiliated by the whole transac
tion. The FiUpinos ask for nothing more of us.
Doubtless their ralers would retum our twenty miUions
and give us half a dozen coaling stations if that would
hasten our departure. It is their firm resolve, so their
spokesmen in Hong Kong have declared, that they will
not consent " to be experimented upon by amateur
colonial administrators." Even our " benevolent assimi
lation " is intolerable on the terms which we demand.
It was for freedom, not for law and order, that the
FiUpinos and the Cubans took up arms against Spain.
Good order we are trying to bring to the Filipinos; but
that does not satisfy. The grave is quiet, but it is not
freedom. Perhaps it is wrong for these people to care
for freedom, but we once set them the example, as we
have to many poor people, to strive for a liberty they
have never yet enjoyed.
More likely we owe obligations to the city of Manila.
Her business men look with doubt on Aguinaldo and his
cabinet, with gold bands and whistles and peacock
quills to indicate their rank and titles. Doubtless they
fear the native rabble and the native methods of col
lection of customs. But, again, we have as to this only
prejudiced testimony. According to Lieutenant Calkins,
an honored officer in Dewey's fleet, the life and property
of foreigners has been as safe in Malolos as in San Fran
cisco. Moreover, these peddlers from all the world have
no claims on us. They have long fished in troubled
waters and they have learned the art. The pound of
flesh they have exacted from the FiUpinos, in times of

A BLIND MAN'S HOLIDAY. 75
peace serves as an insurance against all losses in war.
It was not to accommodate a few petty tradesmen, for the
most part Chinese, a few EngUsh, and a dozen Germans
and Japanese, that we entered into this war. If we owe
them protection, they owe something to us. The
shelter of the American flag is the birthright of Ameri
cans. Maybe it is to Germany and France that we owe
obUgations. To keep their rulers from falling out over
the rich spoils of the Philippines, we are under bonds to
take them all ourselves. But these nations are not in
the slightest danger of fighting each other or fighting us
over the Philippines. The PhUippines would be as safe
as an independent republic, with our good will, as they
would be in another planet. The huge bloodless com
mercial trusts are afraid of a nation with a conscience.
Maybe we are under bonds to England alone. Her
advice is " take it," " take it," and those of her pohti
cians hitherto most prone to snub and humiUate us are
now most loud in their encouragements. No doubt
these clever schemers want to see us entangled in the
troubles of the Orient. No doubt England is sincere in
thinking that a few years' experience in the hardest of
schools will teach us something to our advantage as well
as to hers. In our compactness lies a strength which
alarms even England. It means our future financial and
commercial supremacy. It is England's way to play
nation against nation, so that the strong ones wiU keep
the peace, while the weaker ones are helpless in her
hands. The essential spirit of British diplomacy is to rec
ognize neither morality nor justice in relation to an
opponent. This has been explained and defended by

•j6 IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
Chamberlain as a matter of course in questions of party
rivalry or imperial dominion. The only wrong is failure
to carry one's point. This feature of British diplomacy
has been exempUfied a hundred times. The career of
Cecil Rhodes, the straggle with Parnell, the Paris Tri
bunal of Arbitration in 1893, are all cases in point.
This gives the clue to British diplomatic success, and it
explains also the cordial hatred the world over for
"Anglo-Saxon" methods. From beginning to end of
British colonial dealings with lower races there has never
appeared the word nor the thought of justice in the
sense in which our fathers used the word — equahty before
the law. Law and trade constitute her sole interest
in tropical humanity, and law for trade. Paternal
helpfulness there has been in large store, but the thought
of human equality, in any sense of the term, is foreign to
British methods. To emphasize and perpetuate in
equality lies at the basis of British polity.
To give up the idea of " equaUty of aU men before the
law " would be to abandon our sole excuse for being as
a nation. We would then become a mere geographical
expression or police arrangement, and logically might as
weU join Canada as a dependency of Great Britain. The
hope that we may do so is the source of much English
" good-wiU." If we feel edgewise toward Germany,* or if Germany
is unfriendly toward us, we have England to thank for
it. That is her diplomacy. She means nothing wrong
* Doubtless German industrial jealousy is acute and well-
grounded and the loss of many good soldiers each year by emi
gration displeases German militarism. But these matters have
gone on for years and have no relation with the war with Spain.

A BLIND man's HOLIDAY. 'JJ
by it. She is our friend, and in politics no water is
thicker than her blood. We shaU cease twisting the
British Lion's tail when we have parts equaUy vulnerable.
We shall not thwart England when we are dependent
upon her good will. But all this constitutes no obliga
tion. We did not go into the war on England's account,
nor must we settle it to suit her. It is our first duty to
follow our own best interests.
I yield to no one in admiration for the- British people
or the British character. The best thoughts of the
world spring from British brains, and British hands have
wrought earth's noblest deeds. " Let us not forget,"
observes LoweU, " that England is not the England only
of the snobs who dread the democracy they do not com
prehend, but the England of history, of heroes, states
men and poets, whose names are as dear and their
influence as salutary to us as to her." But British ine
quality is not the source of lofty thought or brave deed.
We may emulate England in aU matters of poUtical ad
ministration save the very one in which she now urges
on us her cynical advice. It was in protest against Brit
ish inequality that the United States became a nation.
British politics have changed their form, but the basal
principles remain, and inequahty and injustice are no
more lovely now than in the days of '76.
A London joumal recently pictures America as a rosy-
cheeked, unsophisticated youth who has left parental
boundaries and now " goes out to see the world." We
may accept this " lightly proffered laurel," but we may
note that the youth is gaining this experience under the
convoy of the toughest old pirate of the whole water
front.

78 IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
Moreover, England welcomes our intrasion in the
Orient because she finds in us a necessary ally. We
become a partner in her games. More than this our
new relations must break down our protective tariff,
which is most offensive to her, as, perhaps, it should be
to us. The possession of Asiatic colonies makes non
sense of our Monroe Doctrine. To reaUze this fact wiU
teach us needed caution. We shaU not go at diplomacy
in our shirt-sleeves any more as though it were a game
of poker on a Mississippi flat-boat. Besides to follow in
England's footsteps is the sincerest form of flattery. It
gives her methods the sanction of our respectabiUty. It
takes from the opposition party in ParUament one of its
strongest weapons. But this, again, is no national obli
gation. If any obUgation whatever exists, it is to the
Filipinos. It is met by insuring their freedom frora
Spain. For the rest, their fate is their own.
A higher class of English public men advise us to hold
the PhiUppines because they do not understand the pur
pose or basis of our government. Our machinery of
rule is so constructed that it will not work with unwUling
people, nor with people lacking in the Saxon instinct
for co-operation. England has no scraples and no
ideals. Her only purpose, in the tropics, is to hold the
doors open to trade. In this business she has the lead,
and aU gains of aU trade sweU her wealth. In her cap
ital is the clearing house of aU the world. There aU
prices are fixed and aU biUs are settled. What is good
business for her might be impossible for us, who are
not as a nation in business.
Admitting, however, an obligation to do something to
somebody, by whom was such obligation incurred? To

A BLIND. MAN'S HOLIDAY. 79
whom have we given authority to bind us to change the
whole current of our history? Who is the mighty agent
that brings about such things? The Constitution pre
scribes methods in which our people may incur obliga
tions by concurrent action of Congress and the President.
Have we empowered a commodore or even a rear-ad
miral to change our national purposes ? Did the victory
at Manila bind our people to anything? To say that it
did is simple nonsense. This was an incident of war,
not a decision of peace. Did the action of the Presi
dent in sending eighteen thousand soldiers to Manila
oblige us to keep them there, even if the Constitution
of the United States had to be changed to give this act
justification? If so, where did the President get his
authority? This, too, was an incident of war. More
over, the President is not our raler but our servant. The
people of the United States are subject to no obligations
save those they impose on themselves. Neither the
President nor the Cabinet have the sUghtest right to in
cur national obligations. None have been incurred.
But it may be that efforts have been made to bind
the people to " expansion" in advance of their own de
cision. The victory at Manila was so unexpected, so
heroic, so decisive, that it fired the imagination of our
nation. It set the world to talking of us, and it in
spired our politicians with dreams of empire. Such
dreams are far from the waking thoughts of our people,
though while the spell was on us we made some move
ment toward turning them into action. These steps
taken in folly our nation must retrace. It is not pleas
ant to go backward. For this reason those responsible
for our mistakes insist that we are sworn to go ahead

80 IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
whatever the consequences. Political futures are in
volved in the success of these schemes. And so every
effort has been used to rush us forward in the direction
of conquest. Our volunteer soldiery is held as an army
of invasion to rot in the marshes when summer comes,
as brave men once rotted in Libby and AndersonviUe.
Each step in the series has been planned so as to make
the next seem inevitable. To stop to reconsider our
steps is made to appear as backing down. The Ameri
can people will not back down, and on this fact the
whole movement depends. This movement was not a
conspiracy, because every step was proclaimed from the
housetops and shouted back from the newspapers and
the mobs around the railway stations. No wonder the
fighting editor claims to dictate our national policy. The
current of " manifest destiny " is invoked as the cover
for the movement of Imperialism. At each step, too,
the powers that be assure us that they are not responsi
ble, for the invisible forces of Divine Providence have
taken matters from their hands.
In the one breath we are told that it is the will of
God that we should annex the Philippines and make
civilized American christians of their medley popula
tion. In another, we must crush out the usurper,
Aguinaldo, drive his rebel followers to the swamps and
fastnesses and build up institutions with the coward
remnant that survive.
AU this is in the line of least resistance. Along this
line Spain ruled and plundered her colonies. In such
fashion her colonies impoverished and corrupted Spain.
Because she had no moral force to prevent them, craelty
and corraption became her manifest destiny. It will

A BLIND man's HOLIDAY. 8 1
be ours if we foUow her methods. Toward such a man
ifest destiny, " the tumult and the shouting " of to-day
are hurrying us along. The destiny which is manifest
is never a noble one. The strong currents X)f history
run deep, and the fates never speak through the daily
newspapers. " Hard are the steps, rough-hewn in flint
iest rock. States climb to power by." Providence acts
only through men with strong brain and pure heart.
The hand of Providence is never at the helm when no
hand of man is there. Nations like men must learn to
say No, when Yes is fatal. To have the courage to stop
throwing good money after bad is the way nations keep
out of bankruptcy. To back out now, we are told,
would expose us to the ridicule of aU the nations. But
to go on wiU do the same. It is we who have made
ourselves ridiculous. We have already roused the real
distress of aU genuine friends in Europe, because we
have given the ' lie to our own history and to our own
professions. That a wise, strong, peaceful nation should
rise and fight for the freedom of the oppressed, rescuing
them with one strong blow, touches the imagination of
the world. The admiration fades into disgust in view
of the vulgar scramble for territory and commercial ad
vantage, and the inabihty of those responsible to guide
the course of events in any safe direction.
I know that words of this sort are not welcome. The
newspapers have their jokes about Senator Hoar and
Cassandra, a person who once took a dark view of things
in very gloomy times. But there are occasions when
optimism is treason. Only an accomplice is cheerful in
presence of a crime. The crisis once past we may rejoice
in the future of democracy. It is a hopeful sign to-day

82 IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
that the people have never consented, nor have those
directing affairs dared trust the plain issue of annexation
either to the people or to Congress. Their schemes
must pass through indirection, or not at aU.
We need a cheerful and successful brigand like Cecil
Rhodes to pat us on the back and stiffen our failing
nerves. He is not afraid. Why should we flinch from
the little misdeeds we have in contemplation?
Alfred Russell Wallace, in the London Chronicle, ex
presses the
" Disappointment and sorrow which 1 feel in common, I am
sure, with a large body of English and Americans, at the course
now being pursued by the government of the United States
toward the people of Cuba and the PhUippine Islands.
" The Americans claim the right of sovereignty obtained by
the treaty, and have apparently determined to occupy and ad
minister the whole group of islands against the will and consent
of the people. They claim all the revenues of the country and
all the pubUc means of transport and they have decided to take
all this by mUitary force if the natives do not at once submit.
Yet they say that they come ' not as invaders and conquerorsy
but as friends, to protect the natives in their homes, their em-
; ployments and their personal and civU rights,' and for the pur-
pose of giving them ' a liberal form of government through
representatives of their own race.' But these people who have
been justly struggling for freedom are stUl spoken of as ' insur-
. gents ' or ' rebels,' and they are expected to submit quietly to an
altogether new and unknown foreign rule which, whatever may
be the benevolent intentions of the President, can hardly fail to
be a more or less oppressive despotism.
" It may be asked what can the Americans do ? They cannot
I allow Spain to come back again. . . . They are responsible for
the future of the inhabitants. But surely it is possible to revert
to their first expressed intention of taking a small island only as
a naval and coaUng station and to declare themselves the pro
tectors of the islands against foreign aggression.

A BLIND MAN'S HOLIDAY.
" Having done this they might invite the civiUzed portion of
the natives to form an independent government, offering them
advice and assistance if they wish for it, but otherwise leaving
them completely free. If we express our disappointment (as
Englishmen) that our American kinsfolk are apparently follow
ing our example, it is because, in the matter of the rights of
every people to govern themselves, we had looked up to them as
about to show us the better way by respecting the aspirations
towards freedom, even of less advanced races, and by acting in
accordance with their own noble traditions and repubUcan
principles." From France, M. de Pressens^e voices the same feel
ing in an article in the Contemporary Review :
" In the United States of America we see the intoxication of
the new strong wine of warlike glory carrying a great democracy
off its feet, and raising the threatening specter of mUitarism,
with its fatal attendant, Caesarism, in the background. Under
the pretext of ' manifest destiny,' the great republic of the West
ern Hemisphere is becoming unfaithful to the principles of her
founders, to the precedents of her constitutional Ufe, to the tradi
tions which have made her free, glorious and prosperous. The
seductions of Imperialism are drawing the United States toward
the abyss where all the great democracies of the world have
found their end. The cant of Anglo-Saxon alliance, of the
brotherhood-in-arms of English-speaking people, is serving as a
cloak to the nefarious designs of those who want to cut in two
the grand motto of Great Britain, ' Imperium et Libertas,' and to
make ' imperium ' swallow ' libertas.' In the United Kingdom a
similar tendency is at work. Everybody sees that the -present
England is no longer the England, I do not say of Cobden or
Blight, but of Peel, Russell, Palmerston, Derby, or even Disraeli.
A kind of intoxication of power has seized the people. Mr.
Chamberlain has known how to take the flood in time, and to
ride the crest of the new wave. The Unionist party is disposed
to believe that it is to the interest of the privileged classes to
nurse the pride of empire ; first, because they govern it and pro
fit by it ; secondly, and chiefly, because nothing diverts mora

84 IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
surely the spirit of reform than the imperialist madness. It is a
curious thing, but a fact beyond dispute, that when the masses
are on the verge of rising in their majesty and asking for their
rights, the classes have only to throw into their eyes the powder
of imperialism, and to raise the cry of ' The Fatherland in dan
ger,' in order to bring them once more, meek and submissive, to
their feet."
Do we say that these obligations were entailed by
chance, and that we cannot help ourselves? I hear
many saying, " If only Dewey had sailed out of Manila
harbor, all would have been well." This seems to me
the acme of weakness. Dewey did his duty at Manila ;
he has done his duty ever since. Let us do ours. If
his duty makes it harder for us, so much the more we
must strive. It is pure cowardice to throw the responsi
bility on him. Who are we to " plead the baby act? "
If Dewey captured land we do not want to hold, then let
go of it. It is for us to say, not for him. It is foolish
to say that our victory last May settled once for all our
future as a world power. It is not thus that I read our
history. Chance decides nothing. The Declaration of
Independence, the Constitution, the Emancipation Pro
clamation, were not matters of chance. They belong to
the category of statemanship. A statesman knows no
chance. It is his business to foresee the future and to
control it. Chance is the terror of despotism. A chance
shot along the frontier of Alsace, a chance brawl in Hun
gary, a chance word in Poland, a chance imbecile in the
seat of power, may throw aU Europe into war. In a general
war the nations of Europe, their dynasties, and their
thrones, wUl bum like stubble in the prairie fire. Our
foundation is less combustible. Our Constitution is
something more than a New Year's resolution to be

A BLIND man's HOLIDA.Y. 85
broken at the first chance temptation. The RepubUc is,
indeed, in the gravest peril if chance and passion are to
be factors in her destiny. It was not fear of foreign
powers, nor fear of destiny that led Senator Sewell to
urge, last May " For God's sake, bring Dewey home."
It was fear of the rising tide of our own folly.
One of the ablest of British public men, one known to
all of us as a staunch friend of the United States through
the Civil War, when our aUies in the present British Minis
try could not conceal their hatred and contempt, writes
in a private letter to me these words :
" I could not say this in my public writings," he says,
and so I do not give his name, " but it seems to me that
expansionism has in it a large element of sheer vulgarity,
in the shape of a parvenu desire for admission into the
imperialist and miUtary camp of the Old World."
This is the whole story. Our quasi-aUiance with
Aguinaldo obliges us to see that he and his followers
do not rot in Spanish prisons. Here or about here our
obligation ends, though our interest in freedom might
go further. "Sheer vulgarity" does the rest. The
desire to hold a new toy, to enjoy a new renown, to feel
a new experience, or the baser desire to gain money by
it, is at the bottom of our talk about the new destiny of
the American republic and the new obligations which
this destiny entaUs.
We have set our national heart on the acquisition of
the Philippines to give Old Glory a chance in a distant
sea, to do something unheard of in our past history. We
look on every side for justification of this act, and the
varied excuses we can invent we call our obligations.
We have saved Manila from being looted by the bar-

86 IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
barians. This may be true, though we have not the
slightest evidence that it was ever in such danger. But
we have made it a veritable hell on earth. Its saloons,
gaming halls and dives of vice have to-day few paraUels
in all the iniquitous world.
But we have incurred, some say, the obligation to
civilize and christianize the FiUpinos, and to do this we
must annex them, that our missionaries may be safe in
their work. " The free can conquer but to save." This
is the new maxim for the ensign of the Republic, re
placing the "consent of the governed," and "govern
ment by the people," and the worn out phrases of our
periwigged fathers.
But to christianize our neighbors is no part of the
business of our government. Dr. Worcester says
of the Filipinos that "as a rule the grade of their
morality rises with the square of the distance from
churches and other civiUzing influences." This means
that the churches are not keeping up with our saloons
and gaming houses. If they are not we cannot help
them. Missionary work of Americans as against Mo
hammedanism, Catholicism, or even heathenism, our
government cannot aid. It is our boast, and a righteous
one, that aU religion is equally respected by our state. It
has been the strength of our foreign missionaries
that they never asked the support of armies. "The
force of arms," said Martin Luther, "must be kept far
from matters of the Gospel." The courage of devoted
men and women and the power of the Word, such is the
only force they demand. When the flag and the police
are sent in advance of the Bible, missionaries fall to the
level of ordinary politicians. It is the lesson of all

A BLIND man's HOLIDAY. 87
history that the reUgious forms and aspirations of any
people should be respected by its government. From
Java, the most prosperous of oriental vassal nations, all
missionaries are rigidly excluded. They are disturbers
of industry.
It is the lesson of England's experience that aU forms
of government should be equally respected. In no case
has she changed the form, however much she may have
altered the administration. Success in the control of the
tropical races no nation has yet achieved, for no one has
yet solved the problem of securing industry without force,
of making money without some form of slavery. But
those nations which have come nearest solution have
most respected the reUgions and prejudices and govern
mental forms of the native peoples. Individual men may
straggle as they will against heathenism. A government
must recognize religions as they are.
It is said again that the whole matter does not deserve
half the words given it. We destroyed the government,
such as it was, in Cuba and Manila ; we must stay until
we have repaired the mischief. When we have set things
going again it will be time to decide what to do. The
answer to this is that it is not tme. We are not repairing
the damages anywhere, but are laying our plans for per
manent military occupation, which is imperialism. Those
responsible for these affairs have kept annexation steadily
in view. It is safe to say that there is no intention to
withdraw even from Cuba, or to permit any form of self-
government there, until American influences shall dom
inate. It is not because the govemed have some intangible
right to consent that we object to this, but because the
7

88 IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
machinery of democracy, which is acquiescence in action,
wiU not work without their co-operation.
But we must take the Philippines, some say, because
no other honorable course lies before us. Some civilized
nation must own them ; Spain is out of the question ; so
are the other nations of Europe, whUe Aguinaldo and the
Filipinos themselves, " big children that must be treated
like little ones," are unworthy of trast and incapable of
good government.
But, again, what guarantee is there that we shaU give
good government.? When did it become our duty to
see that anarchy and corruption are expeUed from semi-
barbarous regions? When did we learn how to do it?
We have had six months in which to think about it.
Who has ever suggested a plan? For thirty years we
have misgoverned Alaska * with open eyes and even now

* Recently, according to the Springfield Republican, Senator
Carter asked unanimous consent for the consideration of a code
of laws for Alaska. " Various senators objected. Gallinger and
Bate thought a night session for such a purpose a very bad pre
cedent. Mr. Tillman thought the time should be devoted to the
anti-scalping bill, and Mr. Chandler was anxious to discuss a ticket
brokerage bill." There being no senator from Alaska to enter
into trade or combination there is no hope for legislation to bring
order into the territory.
In a recent address Govemor Roosevelt is reported as saying :
" Have you read in the papers that an Alaskan town (Wrangel)
wants to be transferred to Canada ? It wants to get out from
under our flag merely because no one has thought it worth while
to give Alaska good govemment. If we govern the Philippines,
Cuba, Porto Rico and HawaU as we have governed Alaska, we
shall have the same results."
Mr. Brady, the excellent Govemor of Alaska, says :
" There are sixty men in charge of the government of the ter-

A BLIND MAN'S HOLIDAY. 89
scarcely a visible sign of repentance. We are not sworn
to good government even in our own cities. We give
them self-government and that is aU. The people every
where make their own standards. The standard of
Arizona is different from that of Massachusetts, and South
Carolina has another still. There is no good govern
ment in America except as the people demand it. We
want good government on no other terms.
China, Corea, Siam, Turkey, Tartary, Arabia and the
peoples of Asia generally, " half devil and half child,"
are none of them under good govemment. The ralers
of Central America, of Venezuela, Bolivia, and, worst of
all, the unspeakable Hayti, are no more efficient or more
virtuous than the Filipinos. As men we may care for
these things and work for their improvement. As a na
tion they are none of our business so long as the badness
of government does not harm our national interests.
We have no nearer concern in the govemment of the
PhUippines, nor can we give their people a government
any better than they know how to demand. We might
do so possibly, but we shall not. We are not in
knight-errantry " for our health," and we are in no
mood for trying fancy experiments. Those among us
who might lead child races to higher civilization are
not likely to be called on for advice. ,
Others say with swelUng breasts that the finger of Pro
vidence points the way for us, and we cannot choose but
obey. The God of battles has punished Spain for her
ritory. They have no interests in Alaska except to grab what
they can and get away. They are like a lot of hungry codfish.
Seven of these oflScials, eleven per cent of the entire govemment,
are now under indictment for malfeasance in office."

90 IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
centuries of craelty, corraption, and neglect, and we are
but as the instrament in His hand.
There is a story of a man and his boys who got their
breakfast at a tavern where food was scarce and bills were
high. As they left the place they complained loudly of
the bad treatment they had received. At last one of the
boys spoke up ; " The Lord has punished that man. I
have my pocket full of his spoons."
"The terrible prophecy of Las Casas," says an elo
quent orator, " has come trae for Spain, The count
less treasures of gold from her American bondsmen have
been sunk forever, her empire richer than Rome's has
been inherited by freemen, her proud armada has been
scattered, her arms have been overwhelmed, her glory
has departed. If ever retributive justice overtook an
evil-doer it has overtaken and crashed this arrogant
power. An army of the dead, larger by far than the
whole Spanish nation, stormed the judgment seat of
God demanding justice — stern, retributive justice. God
heard and answered. This republic is now striking the
last blow for liberty in America, an instrument of justice
in the hands of an omnipotent power. In the interest of
civihzation, of imperative humanity, we now go forth to
the rescue of the last victim, strong in the consciousness
of the purity of our purpose, and the justice of our
cause." Again let us say, " The Lord has punished that nation.
We have our pockets fuU of her spoons."
Doubtless Spain was very corrapt and very weak and
very wicked, but that is not for us to judge while we
have our pockets fuU of her spoons.
The plain fact is this : the guiding hand of Providence,

A BLIND MAN'S HOLIDAY. 9 1
in such connection as this, is mere figure of speech, in
tended for our own justification. Doubtless Providence
plays its part in the affairs of men, but not in such
fashion as this. Providence is our expression for the
ultimate inevitable righteousness which rules in human
history. It " hath put down the mighty from their
seats and hath exalted them of low degree ;" but its
voice is not the "sound of popular clamor." "Fame's
trumpet" does not set forth its decrees and it is not in
terested in increasing volume of trade.
The war with Spain was in no sense holy, unless we'
make it so through its results. Our victories indicate no
accession of divine favor. We succeeded because we
were bigger, richer, and far more capable than our
enemy. Our navy was manned with trained engineers,
while that of Spain was not. Our gross wealth made
sure the final success of our army in spite of incompe
tence and favoritism which has risen to the proportions
of a national shame. When we have cast aside all
hopes of booty we shall be fit to sit in judgment on
the sins of Spain. TUl then, to say that we alone are
led by Divine Providence is wanton blasphemy. Four
very different impulses carried us into the war ; the feel
ing of humanity, the love of adventure, the desire for
revenge, and the hope of political capital. Strength
and wealth and our prestige led us to success. The de
cision of history as to the righteousness of the war will
be determined by the motive that finally triumphs.
Again, some say we went to war in the interests of
humanity, civilization, and righteousness. To this end
we have poured out blood and treasure. It is only fair
that we should be paid for our losses. Let us fiU our

92 IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
pockets with the spoons. It ceases to be a war for hu
manity when we have forced a humbled enemy, con
demned without a hearing, to foot all the bills.
But we would plant the institutions of freedom in the
midst of the Orient. Freedom cannot be confined.
Expansion is her manifest destiny. " We are like the
younger sons of England who, finding their own country
inadequate, have gone forth to fill the unoccupied places
of the East, and now the time comes when our children
are beginning to face the conditions that hedged around
our fathers and made us turn our faces toward the West.
The United States on this continent have been pretty
well surveyed, explored, conquered, and policed. Shall
we not see to it that our children shall have as good a
forward outlook as we have ? We have proved our ca
pacity to expand. We have proved our capacity to
compete with any man. It were worse than folly, yea,
criminal, to attempt to set back the onward march of
manifest destiny."
So runs the current of yeUow patriotism. But if the
Anglo-Saxon has a destiny incompatible with morality
and which cannot be carried out in peace, if he is bound
by no pledges and must ride roughshod over the rights
and wiUs of weaker people the sooner he is exterminated
the better for the world. In like strain we are reminded
that the arguments against expansion to-day were used
to oppose the Louisiana purchase in Jefferson's time and
the less glorious acquisition of the provinces of con
quered Mexico. If expansion to Nebraska, Kansas,
Washington, Oregon, Colorado, Dakota, and California
was good national policy, why not stiU further to the
PhUippines? But the differences between the one case

A BLINp man's HOLIDAY. 93
and the others are many and self-evident. The Louisi
ana territory and the territory of CaUfomia were ad
jacent to our States. They were in the temperate zone
with climate in every way favorable to the Anglo-Saxon
race and to the personal activity on which free institutions
depend. They were virtually uninhabited districts,
being peopled chiefly by nomad barbarians who made
no use of the land, and whose rights the Anglo-Saxon
has never cared to consider. The first governments
were established by the free men who entered them.
Finally the growth of railroads and the telegraph brought
these vast regions almost from the first into the closest
touch with the East and with the rest of the world. If it
were not for the development of transportation, unfore
seen by the fathers, the arguments they used against ex
pansionism would have remained valid even as againa*
the Louisiana purchase.
It is said that " Jefferson was a rank expansionist."
But there is no record that he favored expansion for
bigness' sake, the seizure or purchase of all sorts of land
and all sorts of inhabitants, regardless of conditions, re
gardless of rights, and regardless of the interests of our
own people.
The Philippines are not contiguous to any land of free
dom. They lie in the heart of the torrid zone, " Nature's
asylum for degenerates." They are already densely popu
lated — more densely than even the oldest of the United
States. Their population cannot be exterminated on
the one hand, nor made economicaUy potent on the
other, except, through slavery. Finally the conditions
of Iffe are such as to forbid Anglo-Saxon colonization.
Among Eun3rec[s"i^^olonial experiments in Brazil, in

94 IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
India, in Africa, in China, there is not to-day such a
thing as a self-supporting European colony in the tropics.
White men live through officialism alone. There are
military posts, so placed as to appropriate the land and
enslave the people, but there is not one self-dependent,
seff-respecting European or American settlement.
Individual exceptions and special cases to the con
trary, the Anglo-Saxon or any other civilized race de
generates in the tropics mentally, morally, physically.
This statement has been lately denied in some quarters.
As opposed to it has been urged the fact that Thackeray
and Kipling, the most virUe of British men of letters,
were born in India, and many other distinguished men
have first seen the light in tropical Africa or Polynesia.
Several Stanford athletes are natives of Hawaii, and
Cuba has furnished her full share of the men of science
of the blood of Spain. But this argument indicates a con
fusion of ideas. Degeneration may be of any one of three
different kinds : race decline, personal degeneration, and
social decay.
The essential of race degeneration is the continuous
lowering of the mental or physical powers of each success-
ive generation. Such a process is very slow, requiring cen-
turies before it shows itself. It finds its cause in unwhole
some conaitions winch destroy first the bravest, strongest,
and most active, leaving the feeble, indolent and cow
ardly to perpetuate the species. Military selection, or
the seizure of the strong to replenish the armies, has pro
duced race degeneration in many parts of Europe.
Such degeneration has been the curse of Italy and parts
of France and Switzerland and doubtless of Spain and
Germany also. The dull sodden malarial heat of the

A BLIND man's HOLIDAY. 95
tropics spares the indolent longest. In the Song of the
Plague, written by some unknown British soldier, we
find these words as to India : —
" Cut off from the land that bore us.
Betrayed by the land we find.
When the brightest are gone before us.
And the dullest are left behind."
This is the beginning of race degeneration. The
Anglo-Saxon in the tropics deteriorates through the
survival of the indolent and the loss of fecundity ; but
this is met or concealed by a number of other tenden
cies, and is not soon apparent. The birth of a Kipling,
a Thackeray, or a Dole could not in any way affect the
argument. The British child born in India to-day must
be reared in England ; and it is to be remembered that
not all the regions south of the Tropic of Cancer are to
be classed as tropical ; most of Mexico, much of India,
and the whole Andean region belong to the temperate
zone. The equable climate of the Hawaiian Islands is
not in any proper sense torrid.
In the tropics the tendency to personal decay is more
directly evident. The swarm of malarial organisms, the
loss of social restrictions, the reduced value of life, the
lack of moral standards, all tend to promote individual
laxity and recklessness. "Where there are no Ten
Commandments," and " the best is as the worst " there,
life is held cheap and men grow careless. Kipling's
fable of " Duncan Parenness " tells the story of personal
degeneration, and this case is typical of thousands and
thousands. Vice and dissipation are confined to no zone,
but in the tropics few men of northern blood can escape
them.

96 IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
From a personal letter from Manila, Mr. John J.
Valentine publishes these words :
" Moral suicide awaits nine out of every ten young
men, who, lacking the elements of christian training and
influence, visit the far East. The morality of the treaty
ports from Yokohama to Suez presents a darker picture
than the slums of Europe can offer. There temptation
is all but overpowering ; it stalks on the streets, is regis
tered at the hotels, and put-up at the social clubs. Its
representatives are prowling into Manila from Hong
Kong and Singapore. November and December last
witnessed a veritable Klondykan rash to the former
Spanish capital. As a result, Manila is becoming a den
of vice. The Escolta, the leading street, facetiously
referred to as the 'Yankee beer chute,' resembles
somewhat a midway, and is all but literally lined with
saloons. I counted four hundred in a little over a mile.
These are mostly kept by Americans. The largest cafe,
known as the Alhambra, has frequently closed its bar at
four in the afternoon because its stock of liquor was ex
hausted. Do the Filipinos form the larger complement
of their patrons? Not at all, our own boys are their
customers, and many of them boys, who prior to their
arrival at Manila, had not, I venture to say, ever touched
a glass of intoxicating liquor.
" The young man without capital has no business in
these islands. Until order is brought out of chaos, the
situation becomes more stable, the clouds lift, and the
necessity of maintaining a large force to hold in check
the native population is removed, the best place for our
young men is at home, and even under the most favorable
conditions, had I a son, I would feel somewhat as though

A BLIND man's HOLIDAY. 97
I was consigning him to almost certain destruction did
I permit him to take up residence in the Orient, when
necessity did not compel his passing beyond our shores."
With individual deterioration goes social decay. Man
becomes less careful of his dress, his social observances,
his duties to others. Woman loses her regard for con
ventionalities, for her reputation, and for her character.
The little efforts that hold society together are abandoned
one by one. The spread of the " Mother Hubbard,"
crowding out more elaborate forms of dress, indicates a
general faUure of social conventionalities. The decay
of society reacts on the individual. Where it is too
warm or too malarial to be conventional, it is too much
trouble to be decent. Without going into causes, it is
sufficient to say that Anglo-Saxon colonies of self-re
specting, self-governing men and women are practically
confined to the temperate regions.
The annexation of the Phihppines is, therefore, not a
movement of expansion. We cannot expand into space
already full. Our nation cannot expand where freedom
cannot go. Neither the people nor the institutions of
the United States can ever occupy the PhiUppines. The
American home cannot endure there, the town-meeting
cannot exist. There is no room for free laborers, no
welcome for them, and no pay. The sole opening for
Americans in any event wiU be as corporations or agents
of corporations, as Government officials or as members
of some profession requiring higher than native fitness.
There is no chance for the American workman, but for
syndicates they offer great opportunities. Yes, for the
syndicates who handle politics as an incident in business.
But the fewer of such syndicates we shelter under our flag.

98 IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
the better for our people. Let them take their chances
without our help.
If it were possible to exterminate the FUipinos as we
have destroyed the Indians, replacing their institutions
and their people by ours, the political objections to an
nexation would, in the main, disappear, whatever might
be said of the moral ones.
For our extermination of the Indian, there is, in general,
no moral justification. There is a good political excuse
in it — that we could and did use their land in a better
way than was possible to them. We have no such excuse
in Luzon ; we cannot use the land except as we use the
lives of the people.
We cannot plant free institutions in the Orient be
cause once planted they wUl not grow ; if they grow they
will not be free. We cannot exterminate these people,
and if we did we could not use their land for our own
people; we could only fiU it with Asiatic colonists,
Malay, Chinese, or Japanese, more of the same kind,
not of our kind.
" Any attempt to govern the tropical possessions of
the United States on democratic principles, says Pro
fessor W. AUeyne Ireland, one of our wisest authorities,
" is doomed to certain failure. It has been already
shown that without forced labor, or at least some form
of indentured labor, large industries cannot be developed
in tropical colonies." Such forced labor can be con
trolled only by the compulsion of the government as in
Java, or by the activity of great corporations as in
Hawaii and Trinidad.
"It is thought by many," says Mr. Ireland, "that
though it may be unadvisable to grant the (tropical)

A BLIND MAN S HOLIDAY. 99
colonies representative government at present, the time
wiU soon come when the people will show themselves
capable of self-government. Judging from past expe
rience there would seem to be little hope that these
pleasant anticipations will ever be realized. We look in
vain for a single instance within the tropics of a really
well-governed country."
The notion that in these fertUe islands our surplus
working men shall find homes is the height of absurdity.
Our labor leaders understand this well enough, and for
once they stand together on the side of common sense.
Scarcely any part of the United States is so crowded
with people as Luzon or Porto Rico ; in no part is the
demand for labor less or its rewards so meager. Ten
cents a day is not a free man's scale of wages ; and no
change of government can materially alter this relation.
In the tropics the conditions of subsistence are so easy
and the incentives to industry so slight that all races ex
posed to relaxing influences become pauperized. It is the
free-lunch system on a boundless scale, the environment
of Nature too generous to be just, too kind to be exacting.
For the control of dependent nations and slave races
the fair sounding name of Imperialism has lately come
into use. It has been haUed with joy on the one hand,
for it is associated with armorial bearings and more than
royal pomp and splendor. It has been made a term of
reproach on the other, and our newspaper politicians
now hasten to declare that they favor expansion only
when it has no taint of Imperialism. But to our British
friends nothing could be more ridiculous. You must
have an iron hand or you get no profits. To cast aside
ImperiaUsm is to cast away the sole method by which

lOO IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
tropical colonies have ever been made profitable to com
merce or tolerable in politics. On the other hand these
same people tell us that they have not the slightest
thought of making states of Cuba or the Philippines, or
of admitting the FUipinos to citizenship. But ff the
Filipino is not a citizen of his own land, who is.'
We are advised on good patrician authority that all is
well, whatever we do, ff we avoid the fatal mistake of
admitting the brown races to political equality — of letting
them govern us. We must rule them for their own good
— never for our advantage. In other words, lead or
drive the inferior man along, but never recognize his
will, his manhood, his equality ; never let him count one
when he is measured against you.
These maxims should be famiUar ; they are the phil
osophy of slavery, and they only lack the claim of the
right to buy and sell the bodies and souls of men. Our
purchase of the Filipinos from Spain, and our subsequent
treatment of the resultant slave insurrection supplies the
missing element.
"Benevolent Despotism," is Mr. Kidd's expression
for the sole method of control possible in the tropics,
leading to industrial success. " Slavery " is an older term
of similar meaning. " I am for the black man, as against
the alligator," Douglas is reported to have said, " but as
between black man and white man, I am for the white
man every time." This is inequality before the law, the
essence of slavery, the essence of Imperialism which is
slavery as applied to nations. Every argument used in<
defense of it, applies as well to the defense of slavery
and has been worn out in that cause.
One plan or the other we must adopt ; either self-

A BLIND MAN S HOLIDAY. IOI
rale or Imperialism ; there is no middle course, and both
under present conditions are virtually impossible. Let
the friends of annexation develop some plan of govern
ment, any plan whatever, and its folly and ineffectiveness
will speedily appear. To go ahead without a plan means
certain disaster, and that very soon ; whatever we do or
do not do, there is no time to lose.
Conquest of the Orient is not expansion, for there is
no room for free manhood to grow there. It is useless
to disclaim Imperialism when we are red-handed in the
very act. Annexation without Imperialism is sheer
anarchy. Annexation with Imperialism may be much
worse, for so far as it goes it means the abandonment of
democracy. The Union cannot endure " half slave, half
free," half republic, half empire. We may make vassal
tribes of the Filipinos, but never free states in the sense
in which the name " state " applies to Maine, Iowa, or
California. The PhUippines can have no part in the
Federal Union. Their self-government must be of a
wholly different kind, the outgrowth of their own needs
and dispositioiis. What they need is not our freedom,
but some form of paternal despotism or monarchy of
their own choosing which shaU command their loyalty and
yet keep them in peace.
" It is no man's duty to govera any other man."
StUl less is it a nation's duty to govern another nation.
AU that the weak nations ask of the strong is : " Stand
out of my sunlight and let me alone."
We have never adopted the theory that each small
nation must be tributary to some other, and that each
nation of the lazy tropics must have slave drivers from
Europe to make its people work.

102 IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
Under the terms of our Federal Union, the United
States has jurisdiction over Louisiana and Calffornia.
But in like degree California and Louisiana have jurisdic
tion over the United States. If under republican forms we
assert our authority over Luzon and Mindanao we grant
in like degree to Luzon and Mindanao authority over
us. The authority of democracy is equal and reciprocal.
Imperialism means such a control of tropical lands
that they may be economically productive or that their
doors may be thrown open to commerce. It is a defi
nite business, difficult and costly, with few rewards and
many dangers. It is fairly well understood by some of
those engaged in it. It has been successfuUy conducted
along certain very narrow lines by Great Britain and by
Holland, although both countries have the record of
many failures before they learned the art. Germany has
tried it for a little whUe, as have also Japan and Belgium,
none of these with successful results. Spain is out of
the business in utter bankruptcy and her assets are in our
hands for final disposition. France has made failures
only, and this because she has held colonies for her own
ends, regardless of their own interests.
"No sooner," says Lionel Dfecle, "was the island (of
Madagascar) in the hands of these (French colonial
leaders) than they closed it to aU foreign prospectors.
They imposed prohibitive duties on all foreign goods,
keeping the country for the French colonists that never
icame, and that never will come."
Control of the tropics has none of the glories we vul
garly associate with imperial sway. Its detaUs are trivial,
paltry and exasperating in the last degree. The more
successful as to money, the more offensive to freedom.

A BLIND man's HOLIDAY. I03
In some regions, as Guiana, no nation has yet accom
plished anything either in bringing civilization or in mak
ing money, while in Java and Trinidad the results, how
ever great, have been financial or commercial only. In
Jamaica, the abolition of slavery marked the end of in
dustrial prosperity. Every dollar made in Java has been
blood money, red with the blood of Dutch soldiers on
the one side and with that of the Malay people on the
other. Concerning the conditions in Java, Mr. Valentine uses
these words :
" The history of Netherlands India — the Dutch Colonies in
Malaysia — is a light-and-shadow picture. Its bright side depicts
the wealthy plantation owner in Europe siirrounded by every
luxury of his home land, annually in receipt of mUUons of guUders
from his East Indian plantations. The contrast is found in the
humid tropic lands, where some 30,000,000 patient, cowed Malays,
working under the harsh supervision of agents, produce the
wealth that rightfully is theirs, because earned by them on lands
which have been wrested or tricked from them and held by the
foreigners at the expense of thousands of lives annuaUy among
the white troops sent out to maintain a usurped supremacy,
gained gradually over the unsuspecting and friendly natives by
false pledges, broken promises and ultimately by force of arms."
Again he says :
" The language of these people is soft and musical, — the Ita
lian of the tropics — their ideas are poetic and their love of
flowers, perfumes, music, dancing, heroic plays and emotional
art of every description proves them highly aesthetic. Their
reverence for rank and age, coupled with an elaborate etiquette
and punctilious courtesy to one another, marked even in the
common people, when contrasted with their abject crouching
humUity before their despotic Dutch masters, are themes for sad
reflection and arouse just indignation. The sight of quiet, in-
8

104 IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
offensive peddlers, who beseech chiefly with their eyes, being
furiously kicked out of a hotel courtyard or any other public
place, when Mynheer does not choose to buy, causes the casual
looker-on to recoU ; but to see Uttle native chUdren actuaUy lifted
by the ear and hurled away from a humble vantage point on
the curbstone to make way for a pajamaed Dutchman who wishes
to view some troops that may be marching by, makes one sick at
heart. " Said a Dutch official to a visitor : ' I noticed you looked at
the whipping-post in the jaU.' ' Yes j we sometimes flog them
lightly. If a man on parole does not retum to the jail in time a
gendarme generally finds him in his hut and brings him back,
when, as he expects, he gets a few lashes. We don't punish
severely — they would never forget that.' Can they ever forget
the indignity of a single lash, which, though lightly laid on, yet
stifles or destroys the spirit of manhood ?
" It is said that the disposition of the Javanese is now chang
ing. The Dutch have lost confidence in native troops. The
people now come freely into contact with Europeans, the educa
tion given them has had an effect, and communication has been
rendered easy. They do not fear the Europeans as they formerly
did. The time is past when the entire population of a vUlage
could be driven with a stick to a far-off plantation — the pruning
knife and the axe would be quickly turned against the driver in
these latter days. They no longer believe that the European is
interested in their welfare, and are well aware that they are cheated
out of a large proportion of the value of the coffee harvest.
However much the colonist may regret it, the period of darkness
is passing away and the time of coercion in Java giving place to
better conditions, and any attempt to stay the tide of progress
will only call forth the enmity of the natives. The Malay spirit
of revenge has done much, perhaps, to bring about the present
governmental era of comparative kindness, fair-deaUng and jus
tice in Java."
The State committee, on government coffee planta
tions is quoted as saying in its latest reports :
" If the native has not become more progressive and sensible,
he is, at least, wiser in matters about which he should be kept in

A BLIND MAN'S HOLIDAY. 105
the dark, unless the govemment means to remove coercion at
the expense of the exchequer."
Concerning " contract labor " as now developed in
Hawaii, Mabel Craft,* makes the following observation :
" One glaring instance of this political immorality existed in
HawaU for years in the shape of a system of contract labor, with
penal enforcement, which differed little from southem slavery.
They will teU you down there that this labor was necessary for
the development of the island — that sugar could not be produced
without it, and that without sugar the islands would never have
been rich. And what they tell you is perfectly true. For sugar
the contract-bound Chinese and Japanese were necessary, and
for the commercial prosperity of the islands there must be sugar.
I believe that the southern owners of cotton plantations pleaded
a similar necessity for almost a hundred years.
" The contract laborer is a wage-slave. For a long time he
had no name, being known only by a number, like a convict,
until pubUc opinion forced a change. His contract was penally
enforced, and if he ran away he was recaptured and brought back
and forced to serve out his time. The only difference between
this slavery and that of the South is that the Hawaiian slaves
are paid a certain wage, and that the consuls look after the rights
of their countrymen when abuses become too flagrant. There is,
too, a suggestion of free-wiU in the fact that the Orientals are
supposed to bind themselves vrillingly in their own countries.
But there are on the island of HawaU whole villages of fugitive
laborers, hidden in inaccessible places in the mountains — camps
whither other laborers flee, somewhat as they did to the Dismal
swamp. " It is something of a shock to the calloused Westerner to find
a government almost entirely composed of the thin, cool New
England blood — the blood of Phillips and of Garrison — so calmly
determining that the labor of the country needs must be given
it. If the kings had done it there would have been no surprise
— they knew no better ; but these political sons of priestly sires,
who had overturned a govemment because they believed in the
* Hawaii — Nei. p. 30.

I06 IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
equality of men— -how could they reconcUe it with their con
sciences .' It seems almost as though in their anxiety to instmct
the natives, the missionaries had forgotten to teach the Golden
Rule to their own sons."
Since the annexation of Hawaii the importation of
coolie laborers from Asia has been checked, and similar
importation of Portuguese indentured laborers has taken
its place.
The voice of common British opinion seems to be that
it is our tum to take a hand in the control of the tropics.
This idea is assumed in Kipling's appeal, "Take Up
the White Man's Burden," and the real force of his verse
is a warning that there is no easy way to success. The
motive is to be not glory, but the profit to the worldo It
is our duty, with the others, to share the burden of tropi
cal control that we may increase the wealth and com
merce of the nations. There is some reason in this
appeal. It is a business we cannot wholly shirk. I
maintain, however, that so far as we are concerned, this
is a matter purely for individual enterprise. The Ameri
can merchant, missionary, and miner have taken up the
white man's burden cheerfully ; the American Govem
ment cannot.
"A certain class of mind," says Mr. Charles F. Lum-
mis, "froths at the bare suggestion that the United
States cannot 'do anything any other nation can.'
WeU, it cannot — and remain United States. A gentle
man has aU the organs of a blackguard. But a gentle
man cannot Ue, steal, bully nor ravish. A repubhc can
not be a despotism."
I notice that not one of our tried friends in England,
men like Bryce, Moriey, and Goldwin Smith, who under-

A BLIND MAN'S HOLIDAY. 1 07
Stand our spirit and our laws, urge the holding of the
PhUippines. In England, as in America, the call to
hold the Philippines is mainly that of the jingo and the
politician, the reckless and conscienceless elements in
the pubhc Iffe of each nation joining hands with each
other. The white man's burden, in the British sense, is to
force the black man to support himseff and the white
man, too. This is the meaning of "control of the
tropics." The black man cannot be exterminated at
home as the red man can ; therefore, let us make him
carry double. The world needs all that we can get out
of him. This may be all the better for the black man
in need of exercise, but it is the old spirit of slavery,
and its disguise is the thinnest.
Our Monroe Doctrine pledges us to a national interest
in the tropics of the New World. This is because
throughout the New World American citizens have in
terests which our flag must protect. In matters of
legitimate interest no nation has been less isolated than
America; but our influence goes abroad without our
armies. Force of brains is greater than force of arms,
more worthy and more lasting. Of aU the recent phases
of American expansion the most important and most
honorable is that which is called the " peaceful conquest
of Mexico." We hear little of it because it sounds no
trumpets and vaunts not itself. The present stability of
Mexico is largely due to American influences. Every
year American inteUigence and American capital find
better and broader openings there. In time, Mexico
ishall become a republic in fact as well as in name, side
by side in the friendliest relation with her sister repubhc

I08 IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
of broader civilization. It is not necessary that the
same flag should float over both. If one be red, white,
and blue, let the other be green, white, and red — what
matter? The development of Mexico, the "awaking of
a nation," is thus a legitimate form of expansion. It is
not a widening of governmental responsibiUty, but a
widening of American influence and an extension of
republican ideas. The next century wiU see Mexico an
American instead of a Spanish republic, and this without
war, conquest or intrigue.
The purpose of the Monroe Doctrine is not to keep
the European flag from America. Its function is to pre
vent the extension here of European colonial methods,
the domination of weak races by strong, of one race for
the good of another, of the principle of inequality of
right which underlies slavery.
The spread of law and order, respect for manhood,
of industrial wisdom and commercial integrity, this is
the trae "white man's burden," not the conquest and
enslavement of men of other races. Expansion is most
honorable and worthy, if only that which is worthy and
honorable is aUowed to expand. The love of adventure,
a precious heritage of our race, may find its play under
any flag if it cannot honorably take our own to shelter
it. The world of action is just as wide to-day as it ever
was, and if the red, white, and blue floated over every
foot of it, it would be no wider.
If after our conquest of Mexico, while our flag floated
over Chapultepec, we had never hauled it down but had
seized the whole land, we should have gained nothing
for civUization, The splendid natural development of

A BLIND man's HOLIDAY. 109
the country by which, in Diaz's own words, it has be
come "the germ of a great nation," would have been as
impossible under our forms as under the imperial forms
of Napoleon and Maximilian. The modem growth of
Japan would never have taken place had she, like India,
been numbered with England's vassals. A nation must
develop from within by natural processes if it is to be
come great and permanent.
But some urge that we must hold far-off colonies, the
farther the better, for the sake of our own greatness.
Great Britain is built up by her colonies. " What does
he know of England, who only England knows ? "
" Just pride is no mean factor in the state.
The sense of greatness makes a people great."
The grandeur of Rome lay in her colonies, and in her
far and wide extension must be the greatness of the
United States.
But the decline of Rome dates from the same far and
wide extension. Extension for extension's sake is a
relic of barbarous times. An army in civilization must
exist for peace not for war, and it should be as small as
it can safely be made. A standing army means waste,
oppression, and moral decay. Carlyle once said some
thing like this, " It is not your democracy or any other
'ocracy that keeps your people contented. It is the
fact that you have very much land and very few people."
But this is not half the trath. The main reason of oui
prosperity is our freedom from war. Our farmer carries
no soldier on his back. We fear no foreign invader be
cause we invite none. Were the people of the continent
of Europe once freed from the cost of militarism, their

IIO IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
industrial progress would be the wonder of the ages.
As it is they are ground down by worse than medieval
taxation. A French cartoon represents the farmer of
1 780 with a feudal lord on his back. The French farmer
of 1900 is figured as bearing a soldier, then a politician,
and on the back of these a money-lender. Without
these, industry would buy prosperity and prosperity con
tentment ; with contentment would rise new hope. The
hopelessness of militarism is the basis of European
pessimism ; men see no end to the pUing up of engines
of death. Were the continent of Europe freed from
kiUing taxation, England could no longer hold her prim
acy in trade. War has destroyed the life of her rivals.
Could bankrapt Italy disband her armies and sink her
worthless navies the glories of the golden age would come
again. Could France cease to be militant she would no
longer be decadent. If politics in the army is fatal to
military power the army in politics is fatal to the state.
No nation can grow in strength when its bravest and best
are each year devoured by the army. This has gone on
in southem Europe for a thousand years.
" War's great purpose," says Edward Markwick, " is the
fostering of strength, not physical strength alone, but the
combination of moral, inteUectual and physical strength."
But the actual effect of war is exactly the reverse of
this. Its call is ever in KipUng's words, " Send forth the
best ye breed." And the best never retum. With the
selection of the best for exile and destruction the stan
dard of the race at home inevitably declines. This is
the story of the failure of the Latin races. It is at least
a warning to all others. Some one thus apostrophizes
ancient Greece :

A BLIND man's HOLIDAY. Ill
" Of all your thousands grant but three
To make a new Thermopylae."
But this cannot be. The heroes are dead. The sons
of heroes were never born, and the men of old who ever
" with a frolic welcome took the thunder and the sun
shine " have given place to a race of clodhoppers and cow
ards, the lineal descendants of men like themselves whom
the warriors could not use. " 'Tis Greece, but living
Greece no more,"
The most insidious foe to race development is military
selection. The destraction of the brave in the Roman
wars finally, according to Otto Sech, left the Romans a
race of " congenital cowards." In proportion as a na
tion succeeds in war, it must lose its possibihty of future
success in war or peace. The greatest loss to America
in her CivU War rests in the fact that a miUion of her
strongest, bravest, most devoted men have left no de
scendants. More than the men who died we miss the men
who never were. Such loss has gone ou in Europe since
war began. It has grown more destructive since the
individual strength of the warrior ceased to count — lost
in the multitude of battalions. If we cannot stop fight
ing, civilization wUl have nothing left worth fighting for.
The terrible wastes of war are recognized by Great
Britain, These she has tried to minimize by letting alone
everything which does not relate to commerce. She has
ceased to hope for the impossible and has come down
to business principles. The British Empire is a huge
commercial trast. England has no Ulusions. " England
neither fears nor admires any nation under heaven,"
writes an Oxford scholar. She never fights save when
she is sure to win and to throw the costs on her opponent.

112 IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
She has secured aU points of real commercial advantage
and is making the most of the ignorance and folly of
those who strive to emulate her.
Great Britain expands where order and trade extend.
Our expansion demands one thing more, equality of all
men before the law. All expansion of our boundaries
brought about by honorable means and carrying equal
justice to aU men, I, for one, earnestly favor. To that
hmit, and that only, I write myseU down as a " rank ex
pansionist." I see no honor in our seizure of the Phil
ippines, nor prospect of justice in our ultimate rale.
Our British friends speak of the smoothness of their
colonial methods, especially in the Crown colonies, which
Parliament cannot touch. Everything runs as though
newly oiled and the British public hears nothing of it.
Exactly so. It is none of the public's business, and the
less the public has to say the less embarrassment from its
ignorant meddling. The Colonial Bureau* belongs to
the Crown, not to the people. The waste and crime
and bloodshed do not rest on their heads. But we
are not ready for that kind of adjustment. Our Execu
tive is a creature of the public. We have no govern
mental affairs which are sacred from the eyes or the
hand of the people. " Government of the people, fof
the people, and by the people " implies that the people
are to be interested in aU its detaUs ; every one to the
least and the greatest, even at the risk of destroying its
* In the journals, to-day, I see a record of a question addressed
in Parliament to the British Minister of Finance. " This is the
question of govemment with government," said he, in refusing
to answer. In other words, imperial affairs in England are none
of the people's business. If they were, there would be fewer of
them.

A BLIND man's HOLIDAY. II3
smoothness of operation. Hence, colonial rale as un
dertaken by us must be marred by vacUlation, ignorance,
incompetence, parsimony, and neglect. All these defects
appear in our foreign relations as well. For the reason
of the greater inteUigence of our people in public affairs,
our government wiU enter on the control of the tropics
with a great handicap. The people want to know all
about it. The Administration must keep open books
and justffy itself at every step. This will act against
its highest efficiency. The forms of seff-govemment are
not adapted to the government of others. The very
strength of the Republic unfits it for complicated tasks,
because its power can be brought at once into effect
only as the people understand its purposes. Popular
government and good government are two very different
things. Often they are for generations not on speaking
terms with each other.
The advantages of sound nationality over strong govem
ment were the subject of the fullest discussion a hun
dred years ago. The feeble rale of democracy is the
strongest of aU governments when it has the force of the
popular will behind it ; when this faUs it is paralyzed as
all government should be. A monarchy is more effec
tive in foreign affairs and calls out better service thaa
democracy. If that were aU we might revert to mon
archy and close the discussion. But that is not aU, and
every move toward centralization costs on the other side.
TTie essential fact of monarchy is not the presence of the
king, but the absence of the people in all large transactions.
This subject has been ably discussed by Goldwin
Smith, who calls special attention to our want of govern
mental apparatus for the control of dependencies. That

114 IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
we car.not have such apparatus most other British writers
have faUed to note. Imperialism demands the powers
of an emperor.
" The British Crown, for the govemment of the Indian Em
pire, has an imperial service attached to it as a monarchy, and
separate from the services which are under the immediate con
trol of Parliament. British India, in fact, is an empire by itself ;
governed by a Viceroy who is a delegate of the Crown, exempt
as a rule from the influence of home politics and reciprocaUy
exercising little influence over them. Before the Mutiny, which
broke up the army of the East India Company, India was stiU
the dominion of that Company ; and the transfer of it to the
Crown, though inevitable, was not unaccompanied by serious
misgiving as to the political consequences which might follow.
Even for the govemment of other dependencies Great Britain
has men like the late Lord Elgin, detached from home parties
and devoted to the Imperial Service. In her dependencies Great
Britain is, in fact, still a monarchy, though at home she has be
come practically a republic. In the case of the United States it
would seem hardly possible to keep the imperial service free
from political influence, or, reciprocally, to prevent the influence
of the empire on politics at home. Imperial appointments would
almost inevitably be treated as diplomatic appointments are
treated now."
" In what, after aU," continues Goldwin Smith, " does the pro
fit or bliss of imperial sway consist ? The final blow has just
been dealt to the miserable and helpless remnant of that empire
on which, in the day of its grandeur, the sun was said never to
set, and to which Spanish pride has always desperately clung. It
may safely be said that not the expulsion of Moriscos or Jews,
nor even the despotism of the Inquisition, did so much to ruin
Spain as the imperial ambition which perverted the energies of
her people, tuming them from domestic industry and improve
ment to rapacious aggrandizement abroad. The political and
reUgious tyranny was, in fact, largely the consequence of the im
perial position of the monarchy, which, by the enormous extent
of its dominions and its uncontroUed sources of revenue, was
lifted above the nation,"

A BLIND MAN'S HOLIDAY. II 5
In the conduct of the war and the peace negotiations
which followed it we have examples of the conditions of
colonial rale. At no step since the beginning has the
American people been consulted. At no point has con
sultation been possible. In managing affairs like this
there can be no divided councils. The responsible head
must rale, and it matters not a straw what is the wish of
the people who foot the biUs. The only check on the
Executive is the certainty that the people wiU have the
last word. What you think or I think or the people
think of the whole business cuts no figure whatever in
the progress of events, because our opinion can at no
time be asked. After all, we are not so much worried
because we have not asked the consent of the people of
the Philippines. It is because the American people
have not been consulted. In a matter most vital to the
life of the nation they are represented only by the rabble
of the streets. When their consent should be asked
they are told that it is too late to say. No !
But there are many wise economists who would make
permanent just this condition of affairs. The certainty
that success in colonial matters would take them abso
lutely out of the hands of the people is their argument
for imperial expansion as opposed to democracy.
Through' concentration of power in the Executive we
may be able to make of Havana and Manila clean and
orderly cities. ShaU we not by simUar means sooner or
later purify San Francisco and New York? If martial
law is good for Luzon or for Santiago, why not for Wil
mington, or Virden, or even for Boston?
If mUitary methods wUl clean up Havana and Santiago,
why not use them for the slums of aU cities? If it is our

Il6 IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
" white man's burden " to make the black man work in
the tropics, why not make white men work outside of
the tropics? If we furnish public employment in the
tropics, forcing the unemployed to accept it, why not do
the same with the unemployed everywhere? Why not
makes slaves of aU who faU to carry the black man's
burden of toil ?
To be good, it is argued, government must first be
strong, and the difficulties before us wUl demand and at
last secure the strong hand.
Impressed by the weakness and corruption of popular
govemment these economists wish, at any cost, to limit
it. To decide by popular vote scientific questions like
the basis of coinage, the nature of the tariff, the control
of corporations, is to dispose of them in the most unscien
tific way possible. The vote of a majority really settles
nothing, and a decision which the next election may re
verse exposes us to the waste which vaciUation always
entails. It is said that in the ideal of the fathers our govem
ment was not a democracy. It was a representative re
public, and the system of representation was expressly
designed to take the settlement of specific affairs out of
the hands of the people. It was not the part of the
people to decide public questions, but to send " their
wisest men to make the public laws." Nowadays this
ideal condition has been lost. The people no longer
think of choosing their wisest men for any public purpose.
They try to choose those who will do their bidding.
The daily newspaper and the telegraph carry to every
man's hand something of the happenings of every day
the world over. On the basis of such partial information

A BLIND MANS HOLIDAY. I17
I every man forms his own opinion on every subject. These
I opimons for the most part are crude, prejudiced, and in
complete; but they serve as a basis for public action.
The common man's horizon is no longer bounded bythe
affairs of the village, to be settled in town- meeting in ac
cordance with the expectations of the fathers. He knows
something about all the affairs of state, and as local affairs
receive scant notice in the newspapers it is these which
he neglects and forgets. The town-meeting has decayed
through the growth of newspaper information, the intro
duction of the voter to broader interests — interests less
vital no doubt to the average man but more potent to
affect his fancy.
Having opinions of his. own, however crude, on all
pubhc questions, the citizen demands that his represen
tatives should carry out these opinions. If he has, or
thinks he has, a financial interest in any line of policy,
he will vote for men whose interests are the same as his.
In such manner Congress has become not an assembly
of " the wisest men to make the public laws," but a
gathering of attorneys, each pledged to some local or
corporate interest, and each doing his best, or appearing
to do it, to carry out lines of policy dictated by others.
This condition the fathers could not foresee. The tele
graph and the newspaper have brought it about. It has
great disadvantages, but it cannot be helped and it is
with us to stay.
Because of this condition economists of a certain type
welcome all extensions of administrative functions. They
would prescribe a dose of Imperialism to stiffen the back
of our democracy. If we complicate the duties of
government, ff we plunge into delicate and dangerous

Il8 IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
foreign relations, our faUures and humUiation will increase
the demand for skiU. The business of horse-stealing
quickens a man's eye and improves his horsemanship.
In such fashion the business of land-grabbing improves
diplomacy. The old idea of representation by statesmen
unpledged to any line of action wiU arise again. The
choice of attorneys will be limited to local assembUes,
and real leaders of parties wiU come to the front.
Such a change England has seen since her aggressive
foreign policy forced upon her the need of eternal vigi
lance. Such a change makes for better government at
the expense of popular choice. " This may not be re
publicanism," say Lummis, speaking of the work of Diaz
in Mexico, " but it is business." The ruler of England
is not the people's choice nor the choice of the Queen.
He is the cleverest mouthpiece of the dominant oligarchy.
It is currently said that British imperial experiences
have caused the purification of British politics and the
expulsion from them of the spoUs system. For this
statement there is no foundation in fact. It is through
the growth of individual intelligence in a compact homo
geneous nation that higher political ideas have arisen.
It is through the pressure of money that waste of pubUc
funds has been checked. The conquest of tropical
races has accompanied this, but has been in no degree
its cause. As weU claim for colonial dominion that it
has abohshed imprisonment for debt, as that it has
purified the civil service. On this important question
I present the following quotation from a paper of Dr.
George Elliott Howard, on "British Imperialism and
the Reform of the CivU Service."
* Published in the Political Science Quarterly, June, 1899.

A BLIND MAN'S HOLIDAY. II9
" Distinguished teachers of poUtical and social science
are asserting that besides the aUeged economic and other
advantages sure to come from the adoption of a ' colonial '
policy by the United States, there will follow a purifica
tion of our civil service, an elevation and regeneration
of our entire national administrative system. For ' re
sponsibility,' we are assured, ' is a powerful moralizing
influence.' In proof of this doctrine the experience of
Great Britain is appealed to. At first, it is conceded,
there wUl undoubtedly be ' corruption and scandals ' in
our colonial governments ; but, continues Professor Gid
dings, ' so far from despairing of the republic if we enter
into more complicated and more delicate relations to
world politics, we may rather anticipate that the change
will prove to be precisely what was needed, and that our
new responsibilities will operate more surely and more
continuously than any other influences to improve the
morale and the wisdom of American administration. In
this belief we are supported by the experience of British
Colonial govemment. As every student of history knows,
the age of Walpole was marked by corruption greater and
apparently more irremediable than any which we have
yet known in American political life. Who could have
predicted that, after a century of continuous territorial
expansion, with a correspondingly rapid multiplication
of official positions, the administrative side of British
government, instead of becoming hopelessly incapable
under the increasing strain, would have become the purest
and most nearly perfect mechanism thus far known in
political history? Have we, then, any right to despair
of our own experiment, under a similar broadening of
opportunities and responsibUities? If we have, ouresti-
9

I20 IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
mate of American character must be a sorry one.' Yet
compared with the colonial empire of Great Britain, the
territory and the population which we may be called upon
to administer is very small. Therefore, ' ff the republi
can form of government is to be undermined and des
troyed in a nation of 70,000,000 of the most resourceful,
energetic and, all in all, conscientious human beings
that have yet lived upon this planet, under the strain
of devising and administering a workable territorial
govemment for outlying island possessions of such
modest dimensions as these, it would appear that our
estimate of the excellence and stability of republican
institutions must have been a grotesque exaggera
tion.'* " Already the argument of Professor Giddings that
wider responsibility will prove a great moral stimulant in
the regeneration of our domestic civil service, with
appeal to the alleged example of Great Britain, has be
come a favorite one among American expansionists.
Some of them even go the length of declaring that Imper
ialism has been almost the sole cause of the rise of the
admirable civil system of Great Britain. Yet, with sincere
respect for the candor and learning of the scholars who
have set up this theory — ior facts have not been forthcom
ing, — it seems very clear that there has seldom been
committed a more dangerous perversion of history. In
the main, it is a striking illustration of the fallacy oiposi
hoc ergo propter hoc ; though it would indeed be strange
if three centuries of British Imperialism, with its awful
mistakes, its colossal crimes, and its vast " successes,"
* Professor Franklin P. Giddings, American Imperialism.: in
Polit. Science Quarterly, December, 1898, p. 601-603.

A BLIND man's HOLIDAY. 121
should not have afforded to society some useful
lessons. " The fact is the purification of the British administra
tive system has come as one of the results of moral and
social evolution. Whatever throughout the ages has
been the subtle and complex cause of the rise of a loftier
standard of social righteousness among the children of
men has contributed to this result. In other words, the
renovation of the British civU service has come as the
gfft of triumphant democracy. In political history, the
spirit of social righteousness and the democratic spirit
are so closely related that it is not always easy to say
which has been the cause and which the effect. For the
point under consideration, they are practically inter
changeable terms.
" It is quite impossible in this short space even to touch
upon the many details, crowding the pages of English
social, economic, and constitutional history, which estab
lish beyond question the view here presented. Only the
trend which a fuU inquiry would take can here be noted.
In the outset, it may be stated as morally certain, that
the rise of the British empire, beginning with the charter
of the East India Company in 1600 and the settlement
of the first permanent colony in America a few years
later, greatly favored the perpetuity of the ancient spoils
system, which had its source in the so-called ' prero
gative' of the king. That patronage in Church and
State should be determined by favoritism and not by
merit was a matter of course in the Middle Ages. This
doctrine was Uved up to by kings and prelates with
bratal frankness. It was sanctioned by the social
moraUty of the times. It was the morality of despotism.

122 IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
which, though disguised, survived in England for eight
hundred years after the Conquest before it yielded to
the influence of democracy. ' To say that a man is en
titled to an office simply because he is a man of worth
and capacity and not otherwise,' says Eaton, ' is in
principle to say that he is entitled to become a knight,
a baron, a duke, or a king for the same reason — obviously
a principle as utterly repugnant to the theory of all
arbitrary governments as it is essential to the prosperity
of a republic. Therefore the spoils system was the nat
ural outgrowth of despotism and aristocracy. It is in its
very nature a royal and aristocratic and not a republican
agency of government.'*
" The medieval theory of patronage was in full force
at the begiiming of the seventeenth century when the
foundations of the British empire were laid and James
Stuart, with his dogma of the ' divine prerogative,' as
cended the EngUsh throne; foir under the Tudors,
instead of reform, there was a corruption of the public
service, local and central, even deeper than had existed
since before the House of Lancaster came to power.
The rise of the new empire increased the value of the
royal prerogative because it increased the royal patron
age. This is a fact of primary significance in account
ing for the astonishing tenacity of the spoils system.
The new world was parceled out through the royal char
ters ; and it was raled in part and in varying degree by
the king's favorites. By the side of the old hereditary
privileged class arose a new privUeged class, a bourgeoi
sie or mercantUe plutocracy, fattening itself on the spoils
of colonial and imperial trade, which was taking the
* Eaton, Civil Service in Great Britain (N. Y., i88o), p. 40.

A BLIND MAN'S HOLIDAY. 1 23
place of the * monopoUes ' of the Elizabethan age.
This new privUeged order became the ally of the despot
ism which caUed it into being. It is true in fact that
the planting of the American colonies under commercial
charters by the three Stuarts gave a great opportunity to
democracy — ^but not in England. If the spirit of demo
cracy became fierce in America, and the colonists en
joyed the practical benefits of seff-government, these
blessings were the result of their circumstances, of their
isolation, not of the beneficent purposes of the king.
According to the colonial theory, adopted by the Crown
and by Parliament, Englishmen who left the old home
to conquer a new one, to face the dangers and hard
ships of the wilderness, became ipso facto an inferior
class of British subjects. Instead of being generously
treated, they wgre to be exploited for the benefit of
those who stayed at home, partly on the alleged ground
of exemption from imperial burdens. If they flourished,
it was because the king was too indifferent or too busy
to enforce his theory. Perhaps for the moment there
was in this course a positive advantage. The same big
oted and pedantic James, who drove the Separatists to
Holland, was wiUing that they and the Puritans should
go to America and practise their beliefs. It will
scarcely be questioned that the withdrawal of so many
thousand sturdy enemies of prerogative to settle the New
England was a real gain to absolutism and gave a longer
lease of life to prerogative and the spoils system. What
would have been the result had there been no empire
and had the Puritan and the Pilgrim been compeUed to
cast in their lot with CromweU? And a like question
must be asked again and again during the next two cen-

124 IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
turies and a haU as the empire expands and the most
courageous and enlightened children of Britain go forth
to seek their fortunes in every zone of the habitable
globe. Whatever compensations they or the world may
have gained by this process, it is certain that the social
movement at home would have been different had they
there remained. Is it not highly probable that the re
sistance of prerogative to the rising tide of democracy
has been greatly protracted by it?
" It is coolly assumed by the advocates of the theory
under consideration that the bracing and broadening
effects of British expansion soon made themselves felt.
We get the impression that the character of English
domestic administration was affected by it in a reasona
ble time ; as if the British experiment of empire were
something which might well be imitated by us as a
proper and rational means to an important end. Only
" at first," we are led to believe, may we expect to
find corruption in the management of our new empire ;
while at home, we infer, the evils of our present civil
service will presently disappear. Therefore we are ex
pected to marvel that within a hundred years of Robert
Walpole British civil service rose from its lowest level of
corraption and inefficiency to a point of excellence never
anywhere attained in history before. In the first place,
it is well to remember that when the rale of Walpole
closed, England's colonial empire had already been in
existence nearly a century and a half ; and that ff gov
emment under Walpole had actually reached an abyss
of cynical depravity, lower even than that which dis
graced the reign of the Stuarts, the fact, pritna facie,
may weU lead the observer to a very different conclu-

A BLIND MAN'S HOLIDAY. 1 25
sion from that which the expansionists have drawn.
One might be tempted off-hand to infer that, under the
stimulus of colonial empire, the royal prerogative had by
the time of Walpole brought the British civil service to
its nadir of abasement, from which, notwithstanding the
growth of democracy and general social culture, it has
required more than another century to raise it. Indeed
there is abundant evidence of the kind already suggested
to show that such an inference would not come far short
of the truth.
" It is very significant that a thorough reform in the
British civU service, either in India or at home, was not
effected until after the middle of the nineteenth cen
tury : two hundred and fifty years after the beginning of
the empire. Verily the miUs of the gods grind slowly.
The lesson of moral discipline and responsibUity was
slow in learning. Only in 1853 was the system of open
competitive examination of candidates for the India
service resolved upon; although some years earlier a
partial reform had taken place. In 1855 the new plan
was put in force. But the change came too late to pre
vent the horrible Sepoy massacre of 1857, — the last
scene in the tragic history of the India Company whose
charter was surrendered in the foUowing year. It was
in 1853, likewise, that the first step was taken towards
an effective reform in the method of choosing members
of the domestic civil service. A parUamentary commit
tee made an inquiry into the state of the existing serv
ice and recommended a system of open competitive
examinations. No action was taken by parliament ; but
in 185s, by an order in council, a civil service commis
sion was appointed, under whose direction aU candidates

126 IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
for junior positions in the departments were to be exam
ined before they could receive a probationary appoint
ment for six months. The order, however, did nOt
provide for "open" competition as recommended.
Only a limited number of candidates — ^in practise
three or more — could compete for each place ; and
these were " nominated " by the heads of the different
offices. Thus "patronage was still permitted to have
full sway in the nomination of the candidates. Appoint
ments might still be made for political and personal
reasons as freely as before. The only condition imposed
was that the nominee should obtain a certificate of qual
ification from the civil service commission." * Yet the
experiment proved encouraging; and improvements
were made from time to time. But it was not until
1870 that patronage received its death-blow through the
adoption of the system of open competition. From the
faU of Lord North onward many reforms in matters of
detail, both in the imperial and the domestic adminis
tration, had been made. Bribery in particular and var
ious forms of pecuniary corraption had been severely
checked. Still, in 1853, many years after parliamentary
and municipal, as weU as many social and industrial,
reforms had been accomplished, the evils of patronage
were grave indeed. For the Indian service, the incom
petent and the iUiterate were " nominated " to compete
in the restricted examinations then in use. "In the
years 185 1 to 1854, both inclusive, 437 gentlemen
were examined for direct commission in the Indian
army; of this number 132 failed in English, and 234 in
* Graves (E. O.), How it was done in Great Britain : in Scrib-
ner''s Monthly, Vol. XIV, p. 243.

A BLIND man's HOLIDAY. 1 27
Arithmetic. The return requires no comment." * There
was, in short, declares Eaton, " a hotbed of abuses pro
lific of influences which caused the fearful outbreak of
1857."! Even more serious abuses existed in the do
mestic service. I
" The reform of the British civil service beginning in
1853 appears clearly in the discussions of the times as
a democratic movement. It came as the gain of the
plain man at the expense of privilege, although some
members of the privileged classes were among its cham
pions. It was distinctly regarded by its enemies as an
other onslaught on the royal prerogative. A noble privy
councilor, after sneeringly declaring that ' the world we
live in is not . . . haff moralized enough for the acceptance
of a scheme of such stern morality as this,' reveals his
true sentiment by exclaiming, ' why add another to the
many recent sacrifices of the royal prerogative ? ' § It
was a victory for social righteousness, under guidance
of the best thought and the most enlightened conscience
of England. Among its prominent supporters were
members of the universities, philosophers like John
Stuart Mill, and humanitarian scientists like MUl's
friend, the sanitary reformer, Edwin Chadwick, who
had advocated the system of open competitive exami-
; nations as early as 1827. || It is instractive that trial of
this plan in the Indian service, fifteen years before it
' was possible to do so in the home administration, was
« Civil Service Papers, pp. 21-2 : cited by Eaton, p. 178.
t Eaton, Civil Service, 178.
X Civil Service Papers, pp. 21-2 : cited by Eaton, 189.
§ Eaton, Civil Service, 196-7.
II Molesworth, Hist, of England, III., 126-7.

128 IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
largely due to the fact that prerogative had less at stake
whUe Indian offices were stUl nominally under the patron
age of the Directors of the East India Company. The
"government," says Molesworth, "which would proba
bly have strenuously resisted such an attempt to interfere
with its patronage in England, consented, without much
reluctance, to a trial of the experiment in India,*
" In the days of the Missouri Compromise, well-mean
ing proslavery expansionists, while yielding to the clamor
of the South for more territory, soothed their consciences
with the deceitful dream that, were importations of
foreign negroes cut off, the evils of American bondage
would be lessened by spreading it over the new lands of
the west. Even Clay and, in his old age, Jefferson were
beguUed by an illusion which has long since passed into
history as one of the most curious fallacies which politi
cal casuistry has ever conceived. Yet the belief that
the evils of slavery could be mitigated by 'dilution'
bears a remarkable likeness to the theory of the modern
expansionists. We cannot get rid of the spoUs system
by ' dilution ; ' by throwing open to partisan greed rich
and distant fields whose helpless inhabitants may not be
even partially protected from exploitation by the posses
sion of the ballot. It is no doubt true, should we retain
Porto Rico and the PhUippines, that American genius,
energy, and courage will in the end solve the problem
of giving them fairly good government. Nor wiU it be
wise to assume that even in the outset American admin
istration would be marked by the rapacity of a Clive or
a Hastings. But, considering the present state of
American political ethics, new and sinister glimpses of
* Moleswoi-th, Hist, of Eng., IIL, 126 7,

A BLIND MAN S HOLIDAY. 1 29
which have recently been revealed in the war investiga
tion scandals, we are forced to believe that frightful
abuses in the management of our ' Colonies,' would
follow and that a new lease of Iffe would be given to
mal-administration at home.
" Moreover, ff we are to read the lesson of British
Imperialism aright, it is needful to avoid another common
and alluring fallacy. Doubtless all human experience is
in some way profitable to the race. Social crime and
social virtue may each in the end confer a social benefit.
It by no means follows, however, for the sake of the
lesson, that crime and virtue are alike to be imitated.
Doubtless, as Professor Giddings reminds us, aU'.great
national or social changes have come in obedience to
historic forces and are as inevitable as a hurricane or
the change of the seasons. Doubtless vast social move
ments, great national policies, the rise and fall of em
pires, regardless of the sufferings and the crimes which
may attend them, are in harmony with the law of ' social
struggle,' and their ultimate results the ' survival of the
fittest.' It does not follow, however, that 'artificial
selection ' on the part of seff-conscious society should
imitate the methods of cosmic evolution. It may be
that Attila or Jenghiz Khan with their Tartar hordes
taught the Aryan men of Christian Europe some lessons
— especiaUy that of unity — ^which they sorely needed to
learn, StUl, the modern moralist will scarcely prescribe
the ' Scourge of God ' to cure similar ills in existing
society. It may be also, as Bishop Stubbs suggests, that
the Norman Duke ' forced out ' the latent energies of
the English race, stimulated the sense of liberty and
nationality, and by rough discipline whipped the native

I30 IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY,
populations into shape to preserve and develop all that
was good in English institutions ; and it may be that Na
poleon, that ' heaven-sent law-giver from Corsica,' was
just the cosmic force needed to free Europe from the
bondage of feudal privilege and prerogative. Still, a
democratic American will scarcely commend either
WiUiam or Bonaparte as a social missionary. One may
concede that a reactionary George III was needed to
force the American colonists into united action, to mold
the feeble spirit of resistance to administrative abuses
into a national sentiment of independence, in order that
the American republic might be born, StiU, ff here is a
lesson for imitation, it is a lesson for the Filipinos and
not for us. It may be that Canada, New Zealand, and
the other free, seU-governing colonies dominated by men
of English blood, are the splendid product of the im
perial expansion of England, But we must not forget
that the existing liberal colonial policy of Great Britain
came only after she tasted the bitter fruit of the Ameri
can revolution.* It is indeed true, as John Fiske insists,
that the battle of Yorktown was in the end a victory for
democracy on both sides the sea. The old mercantile
or restrictive system was doomed — though it died very
hard. Reforms were set on foot by Pitt and Burke
which might have anticipated the reform bill of 1832 by
half a century, had not the panic caused by the French
revolution drawn away the energy of the nation into the
straggle with Napoleon : thus fostering into renewed
vigor the spirit of mUitarism and the thirst for conquest
¦ — the twin vices of ImperiaUsm — and gaining a respite for
* See especially Sir George Trevelyan, The American Revolu
tion, Part I. (N. J., 1899).

A BLIND MAN'S HOLIDAY. 13I
prerogative in its deadly straggle with democracy. Yet
the effect of the successful revolt of the American colo
nies did not at once lead to the grant of political liberty,
of responsible seff-government, to those which re
mained loyal. On the contrary a strict paternalism was
adopted as a policy. ' PoliticaUy the Colonies were no
longer to be treated "with salutary neglect." They
were to be watched, that the first signs of discontent
might be crashed, and a repetition of the American
disaster prevented.' * Commercially a system was set
up which has been happily caUed a system of ' recip
rocity in advantage.' f A differential tariff actually
gave the Canadian and the other northern colonists an
advantage at the expense of the London consumer;
whUe, on the other hand, England retained a monopoly
of the colonial trade, giving her a theoretical but not a
real advantage for it would naturally have come to
her without governmental interference. Against both
elements of this illogical system the English reformers
arose, and, after more than fifty years ' straggle, gained
a complete victory. Now, it is a remarkable proof of
the view here presented as to the influence of the colonial
empire on the domestic civil service, that these refor
mers resisted the new paternalism, because ' they found
that the patronage which the home government controUed
in the Colonies was one of the principal causes of cor
raption in England. To aboUsh the colonial patronage
was to weaken the government at home ; and the straggle
for colonial constitutional government was a part of the
? Davidson, England and her Colomes, 1783-1897 : in Polit.
Science Quarterly, Marfh, 1899, pp. 42-3.
t By Professor Davidson, Op, cit, p. 51,

132 IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
general straggle for political freedom. From the time
of Fox onwards, there is a continuous protest against the
tyranny of the political system "in the Colonies ; and the
protest was the more vigorous, because the system
seemed to exist solely for the benefit of the place-hun
ters.' * "
" Let us beware how we misread the lesson of British
imperialism, and especially that part of it afforded by the
American revolution ; lest, to our shame in the eyes of
the nations, some dusky Patrick Henry of the tropics
arise to teach us its trae moral." (George Elliott
Howard.) In the British system, the Parliament of the people is
behind the Premier, who can act as freely, as boldly and
as quickly as he dare. In the Federal system, the Con
gress of the people stands first and the President acts
behind them and by their permission. Only in time of
war are these conditions reversed and then only partially.
For this reason the severe blame visited on the President
for failure to declare any tangible policy in regard to the
Philippines is only partially deserved.
A movement toward the British system would require
changes in the Constitution, a movement toward further
centralization and toward greater party responsibUity.
This its advocates usually recognize. " It may not be
republicanism, but it is business." Such a change, it is
maintained, would soon do away with our poisonous and
shameful spoils system. It would insure strong, sound,
and dignified party administration, because anything
short of this would ruin party or country. Under such
conditions no place-hunter could hold a seat in our
* Davidson, Op. Cit., p. 44.

A BLIND MAN'S HOLIDAY. 1 33
cabinets, no weakling could thrast himseff foiward in
our civil service, and our Presidents would be men
who would make public opinion, never supinely wait for
it, StiU less accept its vulgar counterfeit of mob opinion.
With such conditions in the Executive, and an au
tomatic, persistent, competent colonial service, with army
and navy to match, we could dictate to the whole earth.
We could have our hand in the affairs of all nations, and
the diplomacy of all the world would tremble at our
frown. All this in its essence, it is claimed, is to return to the
ideals of the fathers before Jackson's vulgarity corrupted
our civil service, and before Lincoln's "bath of the
people" led the common man to regard himseff as the
main factor in our government. " Of the people, by the
people," were Lincoln's additions. The right word is
" Government for the people," and by those who know
better than the people how the people should be gov
emed. In this vein we are told that the people have been
" debauched by freedom." They have come to fear the
bugaboo of too much govemment, too much army. Be
cause we are "debauched by freedom" we have lost our
respect for authority, our respect for law.
Some of our historians now assure us that govemment
by the consent of the govemed was only a catch-phrase.
We never meant what we said when we took these glit
tering generalities from the philosophers of France. We
I governed our Louisiana territory just as we pleased with
these phrases in our mouths, asking no advice of the
French Creoles. We never sought consent of the Indian.
We override the will of the negro even yet. His vote

134 IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
is only a farce. We have never even asked our women,
half our whole number, whether they consent to our
government or not. All of this is petty quibbling. These
exceptions only prove the rule. The principle holds in
spite of temporary faUures justified by local conditions or
not justified at aU. So far as women are concerned it
is StiU, right or wrong, the theory of most civilized gov
ernments, ours with the rest, that women have no gov
ernmental interests at variance with those of men. They
consent tacitly but constantly to be represented by their
fathers, brothers, or husbands. Doubtless this condition
is not eternal, but it exists at present, and no one can
claim that " consent of the governed " is reached only
by a formal vote.
As to this Lincoln once said : — " The framers of the
Declaration of Independence meant to set up a standard
maxim for free society which should be familiar to all, and
revered by all, constantly looked to, constantly labored for,
even, though never perfectly attained, constantly approxi
mated, and thereby constantly deepening its influence, and
augmenting the happiness and value of life to all peoples
of all colors everywhere." One year later, speaking at
Philadelphia, he said that he would " rather be assassi
nated on the spot than to act in the view, that the coun
try could be saved by giving up the principles of the
Declaration of Independence."
"Our own country," says LoweU, in the name of
Homer Wilbur, " is bounded on the north and the south,
on the east and the west by justice, and where she over
steps these invisible bounds, even so much as by a hair's
breadth, she ceases to be our mother." Inside these
boundaries our flag is the banner of freedom; outside it

A BLIND MANS HOLIDAY. 1 35
is the standard of the pirate. Whether on a stolen
guano Mexican island or on a sugar plantation wrenched
or bought from Spain, its truest friends shall be the first
to haul it down.
Doubtless the imperialists are partly in the right.
It is certain that the formation of a colonial bureau and
a foreign bureau wholly outside of popular control would
make, for the time at least, for better govemment and
stronger administration. Doubtless needs like those of
England will hasten British methods of meeting them.
But government for the people and not of them has its
weakness as well as its strength. The strength of de
mocracy lies not in its apparent force. It lies latent,
to be drawn on in times of great need.
Because of its latent power our great blundering
democracy, slow in war and simple or clumsy in diplo
macy, is strong above all other nations. It can safely
try civic experiments the very thought of which, if,
taken seriously, would throw all Europe into convulsions.
The imperial government is a swift express train which
wiU ran with great speed on a proper track but which
is involved in utter rain by a moment's slip of misman
agement. The repubhc is an array of lumbering farm
wagons, not so swfft nor so strong, but infinitely more
adaptable, the only thing you can use on a farm.
The strength of democratic institutions is that without
the intelligent consent of those affected by them they
wUl not work at aU. All permanent govemment rests on
acquiescence of the people, but democracy demands
more. It insists on their positive action.
The strength of empire, however disguised, lies in
brute force and that alone. That of democracy lies in

136 IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
the seU-control and the seff-respect of its individual citi
zens. The work of Great Britain through the centuries
has been to teach its people and its vassals the lesson of
respect of law. It has been the mission of the United
States to teach respect of manhood, a matter vastly
more difficult as well as more important.
A nation self-governed is the most powerful of all
nations, because she is at peace within herself and being
sound at heart she has taken the first step toward good
government, a step by which the best government pos
sible to men must be reached in time. Even the
blunders and corruptions of democracy make for good
govemment at last. When the people find out what hurts
them, that particular wrong must cease. Even the
spoUs system with all its waste and shame has its educa-
cative value, and tremendous wiU be the educative value
of the process by which it is at last thrown off. The re
action from the conquest of Luzon will save us from Im
perialism for the next fifty years.
Democracy is always wiser than it seems. The com
mon politician knows the weaknesses of the people and
tries to profit by them. The trae statesman knows the
strength of the people and tries to lead it, and the re
sults he attains are the marvel of the world. Such a
leader of the people was Lincoln. He could touch the
noblest springs in our national character. Such leaders
will rise when occasion shall demand them. Mean
while, the men are not wanting, Sound common sense
and devoted patriotism are needed in all walks in
life and are found there. The froth on the waves
may fill our public offices, but the great deep is below
them.

A BLIND MAN S HOLIDAY. 1 37
" Are aU the common ones so grand,
And all the titled ones so mean ? "

was asked in 1 863 of the Army of the Potomac. " The com
mon men so grand," though all the titled ones be mean, is
the experience of aU democracy. It is far better and far
safer than the reverse condition when only titled men
are great and all the common men are mean. Such
nations are like inverted pyramids resting on the strength
of one man.
For a nation to be raled by leaders may be considered
as a survival of primitive conditions, when there was no
politics save war. Then all men were warriors and the
tribes were but an array with a camp-following of women,
children, and civUians.
When militarism gives away to industrialism we have
the rise of the individual man at the expense of
the relative standing of his leaders ; for leadership is
necessary only as collective danger threatens. The
rulers are transformed from leaders to agents. These
are at first under democracy responsible to seff-consti-
tuted managers, demagogues, and bosses who usurp con
trol when no imminence of danger forces the necessity
of strong leadership.
From this transition stage, democracy must pass on
to settled institutions and good service. In the stage
which comes next, the intelUgent citizen shall be the
unit and head of political affairs with servants elected,
appointed, or chosen by competitive examinations to do
his bidding and carry out his wiU. " The citizen is at
the head," says Walt Whitman, and President, Congress
and courts "are but his servants for pay." The de-

138 IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
cay of leadership must accompany the rise of the in
dividual man.
Let us assume by way of illustration a few impossible
things. Let us suppose that the Emperor of Germany
should die suddenly, and with him should disappear the
whole royal family, the army, the judiciary, and all
others in power with all the force over which they have
control. Who can say what would happen next? Can
we even guess at the map of the next new Germany? —
for the German Empire has no strength in itseU. It is
strong in battle because it owns miUions of fighting men.
It has little strength in the hearts of the people. The
failure of the force of arms even for a day might mark
the end of the German Empire.
On even fraUer basis rests the Republic of France.
Could such fortune befall her as the loss of her
army and aU others in power, no one could foretell her
protean changes. If, perchance, the scepter feU into
the hands of the people, the new Republic of France
would be very different from any she has ever yet seen.
If in Great Britain the same change could take place
what should we see? If every official of whatever
grade, all the army, and all the navy were swallowed in
the sea, can we forecast the result?
Evidently in England herself no great change would
arise. Respect for law and respect for tradition are
firmly ingrained in the English character. What had
been would be established again, and the common
wealth of England would lose not a whit of its power or
stabihty. But what of the British Empire? Its
scattered fragments could never be collected again. Ire
land, held by force, would go in her own way, and the

A BLIND man's HOLIDAY. 1 39
different factions would again repel one another. Seff-
government for Ireland means disunion of the Empire,
and this the EngUsh statesmen know too weU. India is
no nearer England to-day than she was a hundred years
ago. There is not one of her vassal nations which would
not escape ff it could. There is not one whose presence
does not weaken the British Empire. Shrewd admin
istration has leamed to count on this and to find out
compensating advantages. A vast business on a small
capital is the type of British dominion. No wonder
England cherishes her relation to Canada and Austraha,
elder chUdren of hers, who give her moral help but who
take care of themselves. England dare not release Ire
land from federal union, because only as a helpless mino
rity can Ireland be controUed. On the other hand, she
dare not admit the rest of the empire to the same feder
ation lest she be thrown into the minority herseff.
Sooner or later both these questions wUl become burn
ing ones. When they are solved Great Britain wiU be
no longer an empire.
"Gladly," says Dr. Woolsey, "would Great Britain
limit her responsibilities if she could ; but it would be
constmed as a sign of weakness, and she fears the conse
quences. She cannot let go." " Imperial expansion,"
says Frederick Harrison, speaking of conditions in Eng
land, "means domestic stagnation. It swallowed the
energies of Liberahsm and bartered progress for glory."
The fabric of Imperialism, whatever its form, is built in
shifting sands. The only solid foundation for any gov
ernment is " the consent of the govemed," and here
lies the strength of the United States, the soundest gov
emment on the face of the earth. Not the wisest, not

I40 IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
the most economical, most dignified, or most just, but
the firmest in its basis, and, therefore, the most endur
ing. At the close of the CivU War, when more than ever
before in its history the nation was dependent on a single
man, and he the wisest, bravest, tenderest of all, Lincoln
was murdered. The land was filled with sorrow and dis
tress, but there was no alarm in our body politic. It was
left to Lincoln, says Brownell,
" Even in death, to give
This token for freedom's strife,
A proof how republics live.
Not by a single life,
But the right divine of man
The miUion trained to be free."
Our government would have endured, even in that
troubled time, had every official of every state fallen with
Lincoln. Should our whole body of officers, our army, our navy,
perish to-morrow, all would go on as before. Some
veteran of the CivU War, or some schoolmaster, perhaps,
would take the chair and caU the people to order. The
machinery of democracy would be started, and, once
started, would proceed in its usual way. We should not
have Cuba nor the PhUippines, but we should retain all
that was worth keeping. This stabUity of administration
would not arise from our respect for law. That feeling
is none too strong in our "fierce democracy." Still
less would it spring from respect for tradition. We don't
care a continental for tradition. We should act on the
common-sense of the common man. To cultivate this
common-sense is the chief mission of democracy. In

A BLIND MAN S HOLIDAY. 14I
this it is effective, and for that reason, our Republic is
the strongest and soundest government under heaven.
" I have yet to learn," * says John Brown, " that God is
a respecter of persons." There is " God in our Constitu
tion," not in name, but in fact, for by it " all men are
equal before the law," which " is no respecter of persons,"
Men are men, whether white or black or brown or yellow.
The British gbvernment rests on a foundation of inequality.
Its rewards are titles of nobility, which imply that the
plain man is ignoble. The word law is written on its
every page ; the word justice occurs only as between
equals. Neither the word nor the idea of justice as
resting on human equality before the law finds place in
England's deaUng with other nations.
" How long wiU the United States endure ? " Guizot
once asked of James RusseU LoweU, " So long as the
ideas of its founders remain dominant," was his answer.
Just so long as her government rests on the intelligent
" consent of the governed." When it rests in part on
force, no matter how wisely applied, in so far wiU it be
unstable. A standing army contains the seeds of decay.
As militarism grows democracy must die. But without
the constant pressure of force of arms, law and order and
* " I think, my friends, you are guilty of a great wrong against
God and humanity, and it would be perfectly right for any one to
interfere with you so far as to set loose those you wUf uUy and
wickedly hold in bondage. I have yet to learn that God is a
respecter of persons.
" I pity the poor in bondage who have none to help them :
that is why I am here. ... It is my sympathy with the oppressed
and the wronged that are as good as you are and as precious in
the sight of God." (John Brown, at Harper's Ferry : speaking
from the floor of the Armory).

142 IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
industry have never in any high degree existed in the
tropics. Mexico to-day is a land of law and order, but
the soldier is everywhere. Every railway train in the Re
public carries at least three rurales, or national guards
men. Every flag station has two or three, and every con
siderable town has its battalion or its regiment. These
soldiers are drawn from the body of the people ; very
many of them are ex-brigands, reformed to the higher use
of the enforcement of law. " This may not be republi
canism, but it is business." The conditions of law and
order in the Philippines are just the same. You may
use native soldiers if you like, but without force order
cannot exist.
The cost of this whole business may be urged as an
argument against annexation. It will appeal to our peo
ple as the discussion of the bill for the enlargement of
the army plainly shows. The financial statements of
Congress have proved the strongest arguments against
persistency in folly. It is clearly evident that the cost
of conquest or even military occupation of the Philip
pines is far in excess of any possible gain to the govem
ment. The whole trade of the islands for five years, if we
get all of it, would not pay for a second-class battle-ship.
People who live in straw houses do not make inter
national trade. We may open the way for individuals
and corporations to grow rich, but the people can never
get their money back.
No possible development of the islands can profit the
people at large. There are no openings in the tropics
for the smaU farmer, none for the American laborer, and
in general none for any of the rank and file of the
American people ; nor can any be made by any act of

A BLIND MAN'S HOLIDAY. I43
ours. We cannot alter the conditions of hfe in the Orient.
The question of flag, other things being equal, affects
neither commerce nor industry. Trade never " foUows
the flag " because it is a flag. Trade " flies through the
open door " because it is a door. Men buy or sell wher
ever they can make money.
The whole argument that the needs of our commerce
demand the occupation of the Philippine archipelago is
both faUacious and immoral. It is untrae in the first
place, and unworthy in the second. The needs of
commerce demand no act of injustice and they excuse
none. The total cost of maintenance of our proposed
government in the Philippines cannot fall short of
^10,000,000 per year, and may be far greater. Our
actual trade with the islands now amounts to less than
^500,000 per year, imports and exports together, and
the whole trade of the PhUippines with all the world is
less than ^30,000,000. No form of government could
increase this much, and, under republican forms it might
faU off. The less compulsion, the less labor. Allowing
a net profit of ten per cent on all transactions, a com
plete monopoly of Philippine trade would leave the
people a debt of seven miUions for every three miUions
our trading companies might gain. In time, perhaps, the
outlook would be less unequal. Trade might increase,
expenses grow less, but in no conceivable event would
the people get their money back. The returns either
in money or civUization would always be below their cost.
The argument for commercial expansion has its roots in
our experience of booming towns and has no value with
careful financiers. The whole trade of all the tropics
will, at the best, be but a trifling part of the commerce

144 IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
of the world. Certain drugs, dyes, and fruits, mainly
natural products, with sugar, tobacco, coffee, and tea
make almost the whole of it.
Yet it is true that commercial imperialism might pay
if we were free to act as England would with her wisdom,
her experience, and her selfishness ; but only on a vast
and generous scale, considering commercial results only,
could we make her policy effective. The function of the
British army and navy in these days is not glory nor
dominion. It is to clear away the barriers to trade.
When England subjugates a nation she lets it alone as
much as she can. Interference means waste of men
and money. She never meddles with the religion nor
the form of government of her vassals. The people
may choose king, or president, or sultan, and each may
conduct his own court in his own way, with aU the gold-
lace and peacock-feathers that his barbaric taste may
demand. England does not care for this. On her coat-
of-arms are these three words only, VOLUME OF
TRADE.
All that England now asks of the nations she caUs
colonies is this, and this she gets, that there shall be
law and order, and all doors wide open to the commerce
of all the world. So long as other nations keep closed
doors at home, England can undersell them in the
marketsof the world. Imperialism, then, as Lord Beres
ford trathfuUy insists, means with England simply this.
Volume of Trade. All the rest is mere fiummery. The
sole purpose of the British navy, accident aside, is to
hold the doors of the world open to British merchant
ships. Except as an adjunct to an open door of com
merce aU foreign possessions are costly and ruinous folly.

A BLIND MAN'S HOLIDAY. I45
The maintenance of Algiers, Madagascar and the Indo-
China as tariff-bound colonies for Frenchmen to exploit
has wrought the financial rain of France. The mUitarism
these follies made necessary has wrought her civic ruin.
But with Great Britain army and navy are but adjuncts
used with marvelous skiU toward one great purpose.
Volume of Trade.
The United States cannot be thus tumed into a vast
machine for helping its manufacturers and merchants.
She has many other interests, and the greatest are educa
tional and moral. To drop all these and plunge into the
promotion of commerce she must cast aside all the checks
and balances of her Constitution and to stand unham
pered, just as England stands.
The British Government acts on the instant. Its only
limitation is the confidence of the people. So long as
it holds this by success there is no restraint on its
achievements. One doubt or failure throws the power
into the hands of the opposing party. This forces to the
front the cleverest and strongest men in all England.
It forbids incompetence in every branch of government.
Our government is not an organism which can think
and act as a unit. It is simply the reflex of the people
themselves ; the mirror of the mass, with all its crudities
and inconsistencies. It exists for the purpose of exalt
ing men, not for developing industry or sweUing the
volume of trade. The British flag extends the trade of
England because it insures local peace and clears away
the rubbish of tariff which obstructs traffic. The Dutch
flag helps the trade of HoUand because it means
enforced industriaUsm, slavery that pays its way. The
American flag, outside of America, as yet means nothing;

146 IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
neither greater industry nOr freer commerce, nor yet in
creased observance of law. To plant it anywhere can
not help our trade.
If we were to follow in England's footsteps, let us see
what we should have done. Let us begin with the war
for Cuban freedom, though with England in our place
there would have been no war. She would have found a
way of saving Cuba for herself without humiliating
Spain. But the war once begun would have been pushed on
business principles. Our navy shows the British method.
Our army suggests the methods of Spain, Great Britain
would have no scandal in her army because she would
have no politicians there. There would have been no
officials not trained to the profession ; no colonels who
had not earned their promotion by success. Severe
training and faithful service give military precedence in
England. Political services or favor of the Minister
do not count. Faithful men find their reward in
titles of nobUity. In England, political scheming in army
or navy or civU service alike stands on the plane of
forgery or counterfeiting. The nation could not endure
it and live.
The war once finished, peace would be made with the
blade of the sword. No civil commission would be sent
to wrangle over the details. They would be settled on
the instant, Spain would be given a day to relinquish
whatever England wanted, and England would speak her
wishes in no uncertain tones. What England would do
with these possessions is evident enough. She would put
down rioting and brigandage, and she would employ the
native soldiery to do it. She would press the strongest

A BLIND man's HOLIDAY, 147
leaders into her service, humoring their vanity with tities
and making her interests their own. She would let the
people form whatever government their fancy chose,
with only this limitation, aU factions must keep the peace.
To show what peace means she might knock down a
fortress or two, or blow a few hundred rebels from her
guns for an object lesson to the rest.
AU this in England's case would have taken place long
ago with the sinking of the navies of her foes, and once
accomplished the door of commerce would be flung open
to all the world. All this has its glories, it raay be its
advantages, and we have raen enough who, with force in
hand, could carry out its every detaU. But it could not
be done under our Constitution, nor under our relation
of parties, nor under the adrainistration now at the head
of our affairs. To pause in its accomplishment would be
fatal. To hesitate is to fail, and our opportunity, such
as it was, as well as our imperial prestige, was lost when
we made the leaders of the FUipinos our enemies.
"If ever," says Dr. William James, "there was a
situation to be handled psychologically, it was this
one. The first thing that any European government
would have done would have been to approach it from
the psychological side : Ascertain the sentiments of
the natives and the ideals they might be led by, get
into touch immediately with Aguinaldo, contract some
partnership, buy his help by giving ours, etc. Had our
officers on the ground been allowed to follow their own
common sense and good feeling, they would probably
have done just this. Meanwhile, as they were forbidden
by orders from Washington no one knows what they would
have done.

148 IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY,
" But it is obvious that for our ralers at Washington'
the Filipinos have not existed as psychological quantities
at all, except so far as they might be moved by President
McKinley's proclamation, * * * When General Miller
cables that they won't let him land at Iloilo, the Presi
dent, we are told, cables back : ' Cannot my proclama
tion be distributed? ' But apart from this fine piece of
sympathetic insight into foreigners' minds there is no
clear sign of its ever having occurred to anyone at
Washington that the Filipinos could have any feeUngs or
insides of their own whatever, that might possibly need
to be considered in our arrangements. It was merely a
big material corporation against a small one, the ' soul '
of the big one consisting in a stock of moral phrases, the
little one owning no soul at all.
" In short we have treated the Filipinos as if they were
a painted picture, an amount of mere matter in our
way. They are too remote from us ever to be realized
as they exist in their inwardness. They are too far
away ; and they will remain too far away to the end of
the chapter. If the first step is such a criminal blunder,
what shall we expect of the last? "
In grim and graphic fashion the clear-sighted editor
of the San Francisco Argonaut sets forth the lines on
which we may succeed in our scheraes of conquest.
" If we persevere in our imperialistic plans, we shaU have to
rely upon native troops, for the reason that we cannot get Amer
icans. It is becoming more and more apparent that the youth
of America wUl not volunteer for regular service in the tropics.
We shall have to adopt the same methods pursued by European
colonial powers, if we continue in our imperialistic groove. We
shall have to lay aside a great many scruples to which we now
cling.

A BLIND MAN'S HOLIDAY. I49
" For example, in the Philippines we may have to adopt Span
ish methods in many ways. We may find it necessary to stir up
one tribe of natives against another. Thus we could arm the
Visayans, driU them, and ship them to Luzon. The Visayans
hate the Tagalos, and we could set the two tribes to fighting to
gether, and with the Visayans we might exterminate the Tagalos.
Then, after the Tagalos were exterminated or subjected, we
could stir up the fierce Moros of Mindanao against the Visayans.
By judiciously fomenting strife we could exterminate the Visay
ans. There would then remain only the Moros, and probably
we could get away with them ourselves.
" Here is another suggestion. The Spaniards have always
found it necessary to use treachery, torture, and bribery in the
PhiUppines. We shall probably have to do the same. The
Anglo-Saxon methods of warfare do not appeal to the Malay. In
pursuance of our imperialistic plans, it would be well to hire
some of the insurgent lieutenants to betray Aguinaldo and other
chieftains into our clutches. A little bribery, a little treachery,
and a little ambuscading, and we could trap Aguinaldo and his
chieftains. Then, instead of putting them to death in the ordi
nary way, it might be well to torture them. The Spaniards have
left behind them some means to that end in the dungeons in
ManUa. The rack, the thumbscrew, the trial by fire, the trial by
molten lead, boUing insurgents alive, crushing their bones in in
genious mechanisms of torture — these are some of the methods
that would impress the Malay mind. It would show them that
we are in eamest. Ordinary, decent, christian, and civUized
methods, such as the United States have always pursued in war
fare, will only lead them to believe that we are weaklings and
cowards, and that we are therefore to be steadily and sturdily
combated. " This may seem to some of the more sentimental of our
readers like grim jesting. It is not. It is grim eamest. We
assure them that the Malay race can be ruled only by terror.
The Dutch can tell us a little about that from their experiences
in Java. If there be a belief throughout the United States that
these mediaeval methods are unfitted for us, than we shall have
to retire from attempting to manage Malays. Malays are more
than mediaeval. They hark back to the old, cruel days of prime-

I50 IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
val man. They are primeval rather than mediaeval, and if we
want to manage Malays, we wUl have to do it in such ways that
mere murder would be kindness."
Others say that China is soon to be looted by the powers
of Europe. We wish to be on hand in the center of the
fight to get a share of her land and trade. " I held the
eneray down," said brave John Phoenix at San Diego,
" with ray nose, which I inserted between his teeth for
that purpose." The vultures are already at the huge
Mongolian carcass. Let the Eagle of Freedom join his
fellow buzzards tUl his beUy is fuU. Too proud to attack
for ourselves, we wiU be close at hand to seize whatever
the others may drop in the scrarable. Why not? If we
do not enter the struggle, they " will forever shut us out
of the trade of China." But is this trae ? Trade
demands custoraers, and China wiU never have a better
customer than the United States. To shut out anybody
shuts out trade, and the wrangling powers will bid for
our markets, even if we leave to thera the cost, the waste
and the sharae of the spoliation of China. To secure
our share of the China trade we have only to be ready
with soraething to exchange and ships to carry it. No
nation can afford to subjugate China or to hold any large
part of it under mihtary force. The sphere of influence
is the open door. We have only to meet the open door
with open door. To hold the Philippines will not make
our commerce. Annex them and we shall be just as far
frora the goal as before. Bind thera with our tariffs
and we shaU leave them practically no commerce at aU.
In any case, beyond the conveniences of a coaling
station they do not enter into the Chinese question to
any visible degree.

A BLIND MAN'S HOLIDAY, 151
The argument that annexation is a violation of our
Constitution does not impress me as conclusive. The
Constitution is an agreement to secure justice and
prudence in our internal affairs. Its validity is between
state and state, and between man and man. The hope
of this country lies in the inteUigence, morality and
viriUty of its people, not in the wisdom of its leaders,
StUl less in the perfections of its Constitution, Consti
tutions are mere paper at best, unless they rest on the
consent of the governed ; unless the principles they rep
resent are ingrained deep in the hearts of the people.
If the United States is a nation, she holds all national
prerogatives. As a nation she may do whatever she
chooses, if no other power prevents. The Constitution
cannot test the wisdom of an action. She may annex
barbarous countries, make war on the universe, or do
any other wicked or foolish thing, ff the decision to do
so keeps within proper forms of law. If, however, the
Constitution offers an effective barrier against foUy we
shall soon find it out. We may be sure that no weapon
against Imperialism will be left unused. Whether the
letter of the Constitution forbids the acquisition of vassal
provinces and rotten boroughs is an open question.
But there is no question that the spirit is opposed to
both. Had such conditions been foreseen, the annex
ation of either would doubtless have been formally for
bidden. I do not myself believe that the annexation of the
Philippines will prove fatal to our Constitution or fatal to
democracy. It will be endlessly raischievous, but it wiU
not kill. The only poison that can kill is personal corrup
tion, the moral rot/enness of our people. The govern-

152 IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
ment by the people has wondrous vitaUty, and it has al
ready survived gigantic crimes. It has outlived the
monstrous blunder of secession and the headless spasms
of " organized labor." It wiU outiive the aftermath of
this war with Spain. " You cannot fool aU the people
aU the time." This epigram of Lincoln's expresses the
final strength of democracy. When the craze of the day
has subsided, and we have counted our loss in blood and
treasure, we shall "walk backward with averted gaze to
hide our sharae." May this sharae be enduring, for it is
our guarantee that we shall not do the like again.
Of late the arguraent of annexation assuraes a differ
ent forra. It is justified because it is inevitable. Let us
enter the raoveraent to rule it. Sorae of our ablest
students of political affairs argue in this fashion. The
treaty with Spain is sure to be ratified. The Philippines
wiU be ceded to the United States. Cession corapels
annexation. We are in the current — not of divine Prov
idence nor of abstract destiny, but of inevitable public
opinion. It is no raore use to struggle against this than
against winds and tides. " The King can do no wrong."
All the prestige of power is with the administration.
The American people are bent upon keeping all the ter
ritory won from Spain. It is all a great joke with thera,
and they will never stop to look at the thing seriously.
The one-sided, freakish and chivalrous war has intensified
the huraor of the situation. As well argue against a
cyclone as against a national movement. The American
people are fearless and determined. They go ahead to
the aim in view, and can take no backward step. They
have solved many difficulties in the past by sheer head
long obstinacy. They wUl solve these difficulties in the

A BLIND man's HOLIDAY. 1 53
same fashion. Let us Join the procession. Let us not
cheapen our influence by mugwumpery, but accept the
inevitable, step to the front as leaders and handle the
movement as best we can. Especially, they tell us, we
must seize the occasion to emphasize the value of wise
methods, and, above all, the vital needs of thorough
civil service reform.
But civil service reform is the special abhorrence of
most of the leaders in the movement for annexation.
The petty offices the PhiUppines promise are the basis
of half their influence. The promises of the raen in
power lavishly scattered before noraination as before elec
tion are still far in excess of their fulfilment. Because
of these outstanding promises our volunteer army has
been cheapened and disgraced. Is there any proraise of
better things when civil rale in the islands shall succeed
raartial law and the natives are turned over to " araateur
experimenters in colonial administration? "
As a matter of fact we know that the pressure of the
spoUsman has been and is greater than most presidents
can resist. The appointment of civil officials in the
Philippines means the carnival of the spoUsmen. The
United States raust prepare itseff for scandal and corrap
tion in greater raeasure than it has ever yet known. Al
ready such scandals are ripening at Manila, if we raay
trust the guarded language of our volunteer soldiers.
The universities of Calffornia have raore than one
hundred raen in the ranks at Manila to-day, raen of
culture and education, volunteers who rashed forward
at the call of their country. Over these men are some
officers brave and raanly, a few of thera even trained
for their business. But the officers placed in authority

154 IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
over our patriotic soldiers are not always gentlemen. Too
many of them are men to whom in civU Iffe these same
volunteers would not entrast their dogs. Had our
volunteers been sent to Cuba or ManUa with only
corporals chosen by theraselves and not an officer of
staff or line, brave as raost of the latter were, they
would have made as good a record as is shown to-day.
Officers competent to lead, wUling to share privations,
could accompUsh anything with these soldiers. The
tinsel sons of politicians were an insult to patriotism.
The feeling of the volunteer army to-day is that of men
insulted on every side. Compare this with the feelings
of the men who came home from Appomattox in 1865 ;
and the difference is not in the soldiers ; it is the work
of the spoilsman.
The Araerican soldier wiU gladly suffer every hardship
necessary in the work on which his country sends hira.
Under real officers, raen whose special training makes
their orders effective, men who are not afraid to live or
die in his company, he will face every danger. But he
wiU not wiUingly endure imposed hardships which serve
no purpose and which he thinks due to carelessness or
greed, nor serve under pasteboard officers who riot in
luxury whUe he rots in the swamps.
Very soon the preacher, the economist, and the poli
tician who now work together for expansion shall part
company. The politician does not enter the PhiUp
pines to convert the heathen — unless, indeed, he can,
convert them into coin. He is there for the same rea
son that the Spaniards were, what he can make out of
it. He has shown no signs of repentance in the raatter
of spoils. He has not joined the economist in devising

A BLIND man's HOLIDAY, 1 55
schemes for a purified automatic colonial civU service.
When he is mustered out frora one place he must be
cared for somewhere else.
Let me give an illustration or two frora past experi
ence. Sorae ten or twelve years ago Congress made an
effort to protect the buffalo herd in the Yellowstone
Park. To this end provision was made for a certain
number of experts to act as keepers of the Park. Pro
fessor Baird, of the Smithsonian Institution, wished to
have these keepers drawn from the ranks of trained nat
uralists, that the Park might be investigated while the an
imals were cared for. He asked me to nominate one of
these and my choice fell on a young man, a person of
eminent fitness, a doctor of philosophy in Zoology and a
man of physical strength and woodcraft. He is now cu
rator in the Field Columbian Museum at Chicago, When
the Congressman from his district in Indiana learned of
this choice he demanded the right to make it himseff.
This the appointing power dared not refuse, and the Con-
gressraan proceeded to redeera his outstanding proraise.
He first chose a man whom I will call C, He could not
accept as he was serving a sentence in the Monroe
County jail for larceny. His second choice, H., received
the notice of his appointment while under arrest for rid
ing a mule into a MartinsvUle saloon on Sunday morning.
The mule was sober and would not go in. H. died
of alcoholism at Mammoth Hot Springs, and the buffaloes
were slaughtered in the Absarokie Hills unprotected
and unavenged.
In 1890 the Census Bureau asked me to send them
an expert in fishery matters, at a low .salary, below that
offered in the classified service, I suggested the name

156 IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
of a young raan from Kansas. At once the representa
tive from Topeka claimed the appointment. He had
proraised the first plum that feU to his district to Major
Somebody, and the Major must have it. So the Census
Bureau was obliged to find in the Post Office Depart
ment a position at the same salary for the Major. This
the Major declined in indignant disgust.
Meanwhile the census of the marine industries went
on in the hands of men grotesquely incompetent. They
were set to doing things that could not be done. They
copied their figures from the magnificent census report
of 1880. They raade statistics at random, which were
changed in the Bureau itself to tally with the records of
1880. The expert wrote me : " However little confi
dence the outside public has in our census figures, it is
vastly greater than the confidence of anyone inside the
Bureau." Finally he resigned in disgust. The resigna
tion was not accepted. Then he brought charges of in
competence and falsification against the chief of the
division and all his clerks and enumerators save one or
two. On investigation all were dismissed and the expert
was directed to compile the census of the fisheries for
1890 frora the report of the Fish Coraraission for 1888.
The sound and thorough work of Willcox and Alexander
was thus utilized, but the whole manuscript of the Cen
sus Bureau on the same subject costing several thousands
of doUars went into the waste basket. The courage of
one clerk saved us frora trusting for our inforraation to a
lot of "amateur experiraenters " in statistics.
The appointraent of dranken idlers to positions of
trast was an every-day affair in all departraents not
many years ago. The civU service regulations have

A BLIND man's HOLIDAY. 1 57
saved the minor positions, but at the sarae tirae they
have mtensified the pressure on those above the classi
fied list. It is a raaxira of our politics that anybody will
do for positions outside the country or where newspa
pers do not send their reporters. All of last year
the parlors of the White House were crowded daily with
friends of politicians, and the Senators forced to stand
as their unwiUing sponsors. Every one farailiar with
the facts knows that the day of appointments for merit
only has not yet come to Washington. I have pur
posely chosen two cases from another administration.
I can paraUel both of these from the present one. I
see in Mexico the President and his advisers using every
effort to select a wise and effective successor to Matias
Romero, their late accomphshed and raanly ambassador
at Washington. They have found, at last, a man
worthy of their country and ours. When we have chosen
Ministers to Mexico, with one exception, Pacheco (him
self a Spanish-Californian), not one of them has under
stood the language of the country to which he was
sent. Fitness does not interest our politicians. The
President at the best is almost helpless in the hands of
the Congressional influence. The administration has
rarely tried to rise above it. In the international com
missions, belated as most of them have been, we yet see
an effort to secure the best service possible. This fact
we must recognize, and I do so with real satisfaction.
We may counsel together, economists and preachers ;
we may discuss in conventions the wise manageraent of
alien colonies ; we may pass our virtuous resolutions ;
we may analyze the successes of the Dutch and the
failures of the French, but our masters care not for our dis-

158 IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
cussions and our resolutions. Even now the rough riders
of our politics do not conceal their contempt of the whole
business of good government. They are not in the
Phihppines " for their health," and our mugwump remon
strances are but as the idle wind which they regard not.
Still the deed is not accomplished. I have tried
to keep up with the progress of events, but I have never
heard that we have constitutionally annexed any territo
ries since we absorbed the little nation of Hawaii.
But if annexation is our final decision, the nation raust
begin at once its Iffe and death grapple with spoilsraen
in high places as well as in low.
We are told that the Philippine question is bringing
our best men forward, and that it therefore furnishes a
needed " stimulus to higher politics." But the higher
politics has not yet been shown in our official action.
It appears only in the earnest protest of all classes of
men who look forward to the inevitable disaster. Their
warning voices are outside of politics.
Admitting, however, that somewhere or other a reason
exists for taking the Philippines; admitting that we
have conquered Aguinaldo somehow by gold or by sword,
what shall we do with them ?
Shall we hold thera as vassal nations, subject to the
sovereign will of Congress? ShaU we raake them territo
ries, seU-governing so far as may be under republican
forras? Shall we devise tariffs and other statutes in
their interest alone or shaU we extend to thera unchanged
our protective tariff, our navigation laws, and our Chinese
Exclusion Act, just as they stand, without modification ?
At this point the annexationists fall apart one from an
other. To hold the Philippines as a vassal nation is

A BLIND man's HOLIDAY, 1 59
ImperiaUsm. It is the method of Great Britain and of
HoUand. Its justification is its success. It teaches
respect for law, which is the first essential in industrial
development. It holds the open door, which is the first
essential to commerce.
In promoting industrial progress in the tropics we
have two successful raethods on record, through enforced
labor and through contract labor. Neither of these is
slavery, as Mr. Ireland has pointed out, but the distinc
tion is not one worth wrangling over. Java, with law
and order, perfect cultivation, fine roads and great in
dustrial activity, the fairest garden in all the world,
furnishes the highest type of industrial success. The
island is one vast plantation, owned by the kingdora of
Holland. The natives have lost the title to the land
and cannot buy or seU it. They pay their taxes to the
government in work; the labor is obligatory and the
obligation is enforced by law. In such manner the peo
ple are rescued from natural indolence. There is pros
perity everywhere. The state derives a large revenue,
the people are relatively contented, though a stranger to
the idea of freedom. With poUtics the native has noth
ing to do. Missionaries are excluded from the island
and the people have only to work as they are told, and
enjoy themselves as they can. " This raay not be republi-
canisra, but it is business."
This is a way to a certain prosperity in the Philippines,
but with us it is not a possible way. Our teraper, our
traditions, our raachinery of govemraent leave no room
for such despotic patemahsm. Even this raethod has
faUed in other Dutch colonies. It faUs with the negroes
in the Dutch colony of Surinara. In the midst of the

l6o IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY,
coffee harvest the people go off to the woods for a month
of devil worship. The speU coraes on them, and off they
go. The only recourse of the plantation owners is to
bring contract labor frora China or Japan, This raethod
has failed in Suraatra, where the natives still hold out
against the civUization' that would make money out of
their work.
Only through coolie contract labor has industrial suc
cess in any of the British West Indies been possible.
The natives will not work continuously unless they are
forced to work as slaves. But contract labor from the
outside means the ultimate extermination of the natives
theraselves. In tropical Mexico the industrial situation is not much
better. The great haciendas in the sugar and coffee re
gion, cheap as labor is (six to ten cents a day), are never
sure of help when needed. Even now Senor WoUheim,
Mexican Minister to Japan, is arranging for Japanese
contract laborers to work the great coffee plantations of
Chiapas and Tabasco, Enforced labor of the natives,
contract labor from the outside — between these we must
choose, if the tropics are made economically profitable.
Both systems are forms of slavery, but slavery is endemic
in the tropics. Freedom in the warm countries means
freedom frora work, but without work there is no wealth
in mines or sugar,
" If the Antilles are ever to thrive," says James An
thony Froude (as quoted by Mr. Ireland), " each of them
should have some trained and skilful man at its head
unembarrassed by local elected assemblies . . . Let us
persist in the other Une, let us use the West Indian govern
ments as asylums for average worthy persons to be pro-

A BLIND man's HOLIDAY. l6l
vided for, and force on them black parliamentary institu
tions as a remedy for such persons ' inefficiency, and
these beautiful countries will become like Hayti, with
Obeah triumphant and children offered to the devil and
salted and eaten, and the conscience of raankind wakes
again and the Americans sweep thera all away."
Conceming Dominica, Mr. Froude says : " Find a
Rajah Brooke if you can, or a Mr. Smith of Scilly . . .
Send him out with no more instractions than the Knight
of La Mancha gave Sancho, — to fear God and do his
duty. Put hira on his raetal. Proraise hira the praise
of aU good men if he does well ; and if he calls to his
help intelligent persons who understand the cultivation
of soils and the manageraent of raen, in half a score of
years Dominica will be the brightest gem of the Antilles
. . . The leading of the wise few, the willing obedience
of the many, is the begirraing and end of all right action.
Secure this and you secure everything. Fail to secure
this and be your liberties as wide as you can make them,
no success is possible."
This ideal of Mr. Froude is not without precedent in
American colonial affairs. The wonderful development
of New Metlakahtla by WiUiara Duncan is the perfection
of wise patemalisra. Single-handed, by the sheer force
of his religion and his personal character, he has changed
these cannibal Indians into intelligent, sober, seff-respect
ing, God-fearing citizens. But the element of failure
!lies in the alraost certain collapse of his work when the
strong hand of the founder is withdrawn. The rale of
the Pribilof Islands is the same in theory, and under
(Competent raen, as it is to-day, it works well in practice.
But government by ralers not responsible to the people

1 62 imperial DEMOCRACY.
they rule is Imperialism. It is contrary to our ways
and traditions, and our newspapers and politicians alike
hasten to repudiate it. It is, in fact, industrial success
at the expense of political development. The alterna
tive is to bring the FiUpinos into politics, to endow
them with the rights of our citizens, to give them the
services of our own politicians and let natives and carpet
baggers work out their own salvation under our forms of
law. I cannot iraagine any govemraent rauch worse
than this might be, but it is safer than Imperiahsm, if
these lands and these people become a part of our
democratic nation. If we must choose, let us stick to
republican forms. A folly is always better than a crirae.
Confusion, bankraptcy and failure probably are better in
the long ran than Imperialism. They are more easUy
cured. America has ideals in civil govemment and to
these she must be loyal. The Union can never endure
" haff slave, haff free," haff democracy, half empire.
We cannot run a republic in the West and a slave plant
ation in the East. We must set our bondsmen free,
however unready they may be for freedom. There is
no doubt that our forms of law, the evolution of ages,
are ill-fitted for the needs of primitive men. Doubtless
it would be better for them to work out their own
destiny as we have worked out ours. But if they join
us, they must take up with our fashions, because we can
not adapt ourselves to theirs.
The Anglo-Saxon is, doubtless, the grandest of races,
pushing, effective, successful. But it is not the most
lovable, the most considerate, nor the most just when
it covets what another possesses. Many Anglo-Saxon
achieveraents are justified only by success. " The efforts

A BLIND MAN'S HOLIDAY. 1 63
of our Anglo-Saxon nations," says Professor Lewis G.
Janes, " to civiUze inferior races by force have always
been tragic failures. Witness New Zealand where about
40,000 Maoris survive out of 700,000 who were there
a century ago ... It is not the testimony of history
that the best survive. The strongest and ablest resist
and are kiUed off. Those lacking in vitality who supinely
submit to the inevitable are the ones who survive . . .
It is the fate of all people on whom conditions of life are
forced in advance of their functional development. Does
the tragedy of the passing of these peoples bring any
adequate compensation to the world ? The sociologist
and ethical teacher is compelled to say no. It brutalizes
and depraves the conqueror. It perpetuates despotic
methods of government. It prolongs the evil reign of
raUitancy. It debases labor and gives rise to class dis
tinctions. "The Maoris, the Hawaiians, the FUipinos, the
Cubans, are aU raore competent to rale themselves than
we are to govern them, judged by any test that implies
their permanent betterment and survival as a people.
We have begun at the wrong end in our efforts to civilize
the world . . . The path of conquest is gory with the
blood of victors and victims alike."
Says Goldwin Smith : " If erapire is to be regarded
as a field for philanthropic effort and the advancement
of civilization, it may safely be said that nothing in that
way equals, or ever has equaUed, the British Empire
in India. For the last three-quarters of a century, at
all events, the empire has steadily administered in the
interest of Hindu. Yet what is the result? Two hun
dred miUions of human sheep, without native leader-

164 IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
ship, without patriotism, without aspirations, without
spur to seff-improvement of any kind ; multiplying, too
many of them, in abject poverty and infantile depend
ence on a govemraent which their nurabers and neces
sities wUl too probably in the end overwhelm. Great
Britain has deserved and won the respect of the Hindu ;
but she has never won, and is now perhaps less likely
than ever to win, his love. Lord Elgin sorrowfully ob
serves that there is more of a bond between man and
dog than between Englishman and Hindu. The natives
generally having been disarraed cannot rise against the
conqueror, and their disaffection is shown only in occa
sional and local outbreaks, chiefly of a religious character ;
or in the impotent utterances of the native press. But
the part of the population which was armed, that is to
say the Sepoys, did break out into what was rather an
insurrection of caste than a mUitary mutiny, and com
mitted atrocities which were fearfuUy avenged by the
panic fears of the dominant race. It is perilous busi
ness aU round, this governing of inferior races. Nor is
it true that the work is done better by the highest race
than by one upon a lower level, on which it is not so im
possible to sympathize or even fuse with the lowest.
' Some of the tribes of the PhiUppines are said to be as
fierce as Apaches. If that is all. Uncle Sam will handle
them in his accustomed style.' Is not a warning con
veyed in such words? Dire experience has shown that
the character of the master suffers as well as the body
of the slave.
" War, the alraost certain concoraitant of erapire, is
alleged to have a raore blessed effect on the intemal
harmony of nations. This we are told not only in the

A BLIND MAN'S HOLIDAY. 165
press, but even from the pulpit ; some going even so far
as to intimate that the restoration of national harmony
was a sufficient object for this war. The moral world
would be strangely out of joint if a nation could cure
itseff of factiousness or of an internal disorder by shed
ding the blood and seizing the possessions of its neigh
bors. War has no such virtue. The victories of the
Plantagenets in France were followed by insurrections
and civil wars at home, largely owing to the spirit of
violence which the raids of France had excited. The
victories of Chatham were followed by disgraceful scenes
of cabal and faction as weU as of corruption, terminating
in the prostration of patriotism and the domination of
George III. and North. Party animosities in the United
States do not seera to have been banished or even allayed
by the Cuban War. Setting party divisions aside, no
restoration of harmony appeared to be needed, so far as
the white population was concerned. Not only peace,
but good-will, between the North and the South had
been restored in a surprising degree. The Blue and the
Gray had fraternized on the field of Gettysburg. It was
to harmonize white and black that some kindly influence
was manifestly and urgently needed. But all through
the war and since the war, American papers have been
alraost daily recording cases of lynching, sometimes of
such a character as to evince the last extremity of hatred
and conterapt. The negro is lyraphatic, apathetic,
patient of degradation and even of insult. But San
Domingo saw that he had a tiger in him ; and when the
tiger broke loose, hell ensued. There has been at least
one instance of the retaliatory lynching of a white man ;
and now we have a bloody battle of races at Virden.

l66 IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
Why should the American Commonwealth want more
negroes? "
It is said that we must conquer Aguinaldo because he
in turn is unable to subdue the rest of the fourteen
hundred islands. We tolerate two republics in Hayti
and five in Central Araerica. What matter if two or
three exist in the vast extent of the Philippine archi
pelago? What business is that of ours? These wide-
scattered islands never constituted one nation and never
will. The most of them were never in the hands of
Spain, except in name. Outside of Luzon there are
thirty-two different tribes, it is said, each a little nation
of itseff, each speaking a different tongue. So far from
being " paralyzed by centuries of Spanish oppression "
as the editor of the " Outlook " describes them, most of
these wild folk have never heard of Spain. What harm
if our " new-caught " vassal the Mohammedan Sultan of
Sulu shaU continue to rule his Mohammedan tribes in
Mohammedan fashion? We must let him do it anyhow.
We cannot do it any better. Why not a republic of
Visayas as well as a republic of Luzon? If separate
autonomy suits the people concerned why should we
fight for unification ? Do we believe that Spanish rule
was better than freedom? These wUd tribes must work
out their own destiny or else go into slavery. Perhaps
the latter is their manifest destiny. There is no reason
why we should make it ours.
As I have said raany tiraes, the function of democracy
is not to secure good government, but to strengthen the
people so that they may be wise enough to make good
government for themselves. The real white man's burden
is not the control of dehnquent and dependent races.

A BLIND man's HOLIDAY. 1 67
the tuming of indolence into gold. It is the develop
ment of what is sound and sane in human nature, the
elimination of war and corraption by the force of healthy
manhood. It is said that the politics of America is " insufferably
parochial," its problems petty and local, and that to hold
a hand in the affairs of the world is essential to the
development of great men in freedom. But " insuffer
ably parochial," the affairs of free men must ever be.
The best government is that which best minds its own
business. Our own affairs are always local and devoid
of world-wide interest. Only through usurpation and
tyranny do govemraental affairs attract the fickle notice
of the world at large.
Annexationists now admit that the seizure of the
Philippines is a " leap in the dark." But this is not the
truth. Every element in the matter is known, and well
known, to every student of political science. Our ex
cellent comraission can bring us no new facts. What
we do not know is which way Congress may decide to
leap. Between military rale and democratic anarchy
there is all the difference in the world, and the degree
of our final disappointraent depends on our policy as to
conciliation, taxation, and the control of the civil service.
Just when shall we begin deraocratic rale in the Philip
pines ? How shall we raake it work with a people alien
and perverse, who have no Anglo-Saxon instincts and no
relation to our history? It wiU take sorae tirae, sorae
say 20 years, sorae 500, of railitary discipline to prepare
thera to do their part as citizens of the United States,
their part in governing us. MUitary rule is offensive and
costly. The longer it endures the less fitted are the

l68 IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
people for civic independence. Are we ready to meet
the expense? Sorae say that we must wait till the
Anglo-Saxon is in the numerical majority. That time
wUl never come. With every rod of Luzon soil marked
by an Anglo-Saxon grave, the living Anglo-Saxons would
be a hopeless minority.
"At Batavia," says Mr. Valentine, the principal city
of Java, which was originally situated in the midst of a
deadly swarap, the raortality was appalling, and the settle
ment in its early years was known as the graveyard of
Europeans. Dutch records show that at Batavia, 1,119,
375 deaths occurred between the years 1730 and 1752,
or in 22 years; and 87,000 soldiers and sailors died in
the government hospitals between the years 17 14 and
1776. "To indicate the small percentage of whites to
Malays, I mention, in passing, that at the present time
the total population of the district known as the Malay
Straits Settlements is probably 550,000 of whom not
4,000 are whites."
If we go further into detaUs of control of the tropics
we shaU see that difficulties accumulate. When we con
sider a tariff policy for the Philippine Islands we find
ourselves at once between the devU and the deep sea.
The " open door " is the price of England's favor, or
rather it is the price of the approval of England's ruling
politicians. It is the price of our own comraerce. A
generous policy as to foreign trade is essential to any
kind of prosperity. But the open door to comraerce
marks the doom of our protective systera. It is left
for IraperiaUsm to give the death-blow to Protectionism.
The open door places the veto on our schemes for

A BLIND MAN'S HOLIDAY. 169
Asiatic exclusion. To open the doors of the Orient is
to open our doors to Asia as well. To do or not to do
is aUke difficult and dangerous. The feeling that unless
we can exploit the islands and ultimately exterminate
their inhabitants, we do not want them at all, is growing,
especially in humanitarian circles. The dead hand of
raonasticism already holds a great part of Luzon. This
we cannot tolerate, for it was the head and front of
Spanish oppression; nor by our Constitution can we
remedy it. We are bound to respect the rights of
property, however acquired. Our sole reraedy for any
iU is freedom. For these problems I see no solution,
nor indeed should we hope for any. If the Adrainistra
tion should forraulate any policy whatever, two- thirds of
the expansionists would repudiate it. There is no scherae
on which we can agree which can be raade to work.
" Soraething between an Araerican territory and a
British colony," we are told, is to be their final condition.
A territory is a waiting state; a colony is land held
under martial law or in any other way for the good of
trade. To work for something between these is to fail
on every hand. As matters are, we shall fall short of
Imperialism. On the other hand, we shall fail to give
justice. The final result will be a hybrid mihtary
imperialistic-democratic occupation, unworthy the name
of government, the laughing-stock of monarchy, the
shame of democracy. Toward such a condition the
movement of events is swiftly rushing us.
I note in the journals that the Secretary of the Treas
ury in his estimates takes no account of the revenue to
be derived frora Cuba and the PhiUppines. For this
the papers justly praise his wisdom. There can be no

170 IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
real revenue from these sources. The only income
which any people can receive from colonies is through
increase of trade. This goes into private hands, but
finally sweUs the wealth of taxables. Since her experi
ence in 1776, England has never taxed her colonies.
The more worthless islands we undertake to conquer and
rule the further are we from a favorable balance of
accounts. We now come to the final question : If we take the
Philippines, what wiU they do to us?
If we fail, they wiU corrapt and weaken us. If we
succeed and continue our success, they wiU destroy our
national ideals. To rale them as a vassal nation is to
abandon our democracy, to introduce into our govemment
machinery which is not in the people's hands. Shall we
handle our vassals through the President, through Con
gress, or through mihtary occupation? Obviously mili
tary occupation, under the direction of the Executive, is
the only possible way. Congress is too busy with other
things. Paternalism degenerates into tyranny, and with
out the artificial stimulus of honor and titles which Eng
land so lavishly uses, tyranny becomes corraption and
neglect. To admit the Filipinos to equality in govem
ment is to degrade our own citizenship with only the
slightest prospect of ever raising theirs. It is to estab
lish rotten boroughs where corruption, shaU be the rule
and true deraocracy irapossible. The relation of our
people to the lower races of raen of whatever kind has
been one which degrades and exasperates. Every alien
race within our borders to-day, is an eleraent of danger.
When the Anglo-Saxon meets the Negro, the Chinaman,
the Indian, the Mexican as feUow-citizens, equal before

A BLIND MAN S HOLIDAY. 171
the law, we have a raw wound in our pohtical organism.
Democracy demands likeness of aims and purposes
among its units. Each citizen must hold his own free
dom in a republic. If men cannot hold their rights
through our methods our machinery rans over them.
The Anglo-Saxon will not mix with the lower races.
Neither will he respect their rights ff they are not strong
enough to maintain them for themselves. If they can
do this they cease to be lower races.
Between Imperialism on the one hand and assimila
tion on the other, are all unwholesome possibilities. An
efficient colonial bureau would be, as in England, an
affair of the Crown, its details out of the people's hands.
An inefficient one would be simply spoils in the hands of
future Tammanies. Unless represented in Congress and
potent in party conventions outlying possessions will be
wholly neglected. When the newspaper correspondents
are called home nobody cares what goes on in Cuba or
ManUa. We have not yet framed a code of laws for
Hawaii or Alaska.
With the war in Luzon a certain class of obligations
have arisen. These should be met in manly fashion.
But the final result should not be a Philippine State,
which shall rale itseff and help rale us. StiU less do we
want an oligarchy of sugar syndicates, or a rule by mili
tary force, or a carpet-bag anarchy like that which once
desolated the South, nor the equal corraption of rale
under agents and pro-consuls sent out from Washington.
These alternatives are aU abhorrent, and we see no other
save that of chronic hopeless guerilla warfare, the con
dition in Luzon to-day, unless we recognize Philippine
independence. This has its embarrassraents, too, but

172 IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
they are honorable ones and can leave no disgrace or
regret. The establishment of a protectorate over the indepen
dent Philippines has many difficulties. It is on the one
hand a scheme for finally seizing the islands, on the other
a device to let them go easily. If we assume unasked re-
sponsibihties for them, they wiU be reckless in making
trouble. A protected republic is the acme of irresponsi-
bihty. Its politicians raay declare war against neutral
nations, solely " to see the wheels go round." As raat
ters now stand, however, we have no other course before
us, and the blunders in dealing with Aguinaldo have
made this course not easy. The protectorate is favored
by the best judgment of the Filipinos themselves. They
ask the help and sympathy of America.
Ramon Reyes Lala, a fuU-blooded Filipino, born in
Luzon, but educated in England, an American citizen,
of standing in New York, is quoted as saying :
"Although I beheve we have a great future, I can
not disguise to myself the fact that we are not yet ready
for independence. More especially because the Fili
pinos have not had the preparation for seff-government
possessed by the founders of the American Republic.
And I apprehend that, intoxicated with their new-found
liberty, the Filipinos might perpetrate excesses that would
prove fatal to the race. I feel this all the more when I
consider that the revolutionary leaders, Aguinaldo and
his corapanions, though fervent patriots, do not represent
the best classes of ray countryraen, who, alraost without
exception, are for a protectorate, or for annexation.
" And it is this that I, too, a Filipino, desire raost
ardently. Give us an Araerican protectorate; a terri-

A BLIND MAN S HOLIDAY. 1 73
torial government ; the judiciary, the customs, and the
executive in the hands of Federal officials ; the interior
and domestic administration in the hands of the Filipi
nos themselves ; and their seff-selected officials wiU rale
understandingly and well without friction, which would
be whoUy impossible for alien functionaries begotten of
a Western civiUzation.
"Of you, Americans, I, a Filipino, therefore, beg to
not leave my countryraen as you found them 1 You can
not, in humanity, give thera back into Spanish bondage.
You cannot, in justice, sell thera to sorae European
power to become subject, most likely, to another tyr
anny. They feel that they have fought for and won
their own freedom, though acknowledging that you have
facUitated it. They would, therefore, oppose such dis
position to the bitter death. And a Filipino knows hovy
to die ! Let a thousand raartyrs attest 1
" You raust help thera, you who have so nobly assisted
in freeing them ; you must make it possible for thera
to attain their destiny — the realization of the national
seff." The following words of Mr. Clay McCauley, are
worthy of careful consideration in this connection :
"As a result of a study of the situation at Manila,
I think there are only three ways open to the United
States for the solution of the Philippines problera.
In the first place the islands raust be annexed by
force or purchase. The use of force raeans that the
United States wiU be plunged into the most disastrous
foreign war in their history, a war that would entail
great loss of life and treasure and the violation of na
tional honor. Purchase means the recognition of the

174 IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
insurgents as allies during the war with Spain, the re
ward of the leaders with high office and salaries, the
eraployraent of insurgents in railitary and civil offices,
with back pay as alUes for sorae months, etc. Such pur
chase would secure a compromising gain of doubtful
tenure. "Generally speaking, the Americans in ManUa are
opposed to annexation in any form. The second way
open is to make a coraplete transfer of the sovereignty
in these islands frora Spain to the Philippine Republic,
the United States retaining for its own use Manila bay
and ports — like Hong Kong by Great Britain. This
solution raeans the defenseless exposure of the Philip
pine Islands to the greed of the world's powers, with a
consequent acute crisis in Europe over its far eastern
question. This way is neither honorable nor wise. The
third is to recognize the autonoray of the Philippines
under an Araerican protectorate. This means inde
pendence for the PhiUppine Republic in the administra
tion of its own internal affairs, the United States taking
charge of the supreme judiciary and the republic's for
eign relations, such as the power to declare war or to
enter into treaties with foreign powers and the control of
the customs. This solution might bring about tutelage
toward absolute independence in the future or voluntary
annexation to the United States. Only by the third way
can there be peace and prosperity for both the United
States and the PhUippines. Immediate action is im
perative." As to our trae policy of to-day I give the fuUest in
dorsement to the sane words of Professor Janes, in sub
stance as follows :

A BLIND MAN S HOLIDAY. 1 75
I. Let us carry out the solemn pledge made to the
world with respect to Cuba, and retain mUitary posses
sion only long enough to enable the Cubans to organize
a government of their own. We have no right to insist
that our own, or any particular form of government,
shall be adopted by the Cubans, or to irapose qualifica
tions of citizenship upon thera.
2. The sarae rule should be adopted in regard to Porto
Rico. 3. This govemraent should acquire no inhabited
country which cannot be made seff-goveming under
our forms and ultiraately received into the faraily of
States. If, in the future, the people of Cuba and Porto
Rico agree with those of the United States that annexa
tion is mutually desirable, the matter can be decided,
and in accordance with the provisions of their constitu
tion and ours.
4. Our pohcy in the Philippines should be exactly the
same. Let the people fit their govemraent to their own
needs with the guarantee of our protection from outside
interference for a time, at least,
5. Under no circurastances should distant territory in
habited by an alien population, not self-goveming under
repubUcan forms, be retained as a perraanent possession
by the United States.
The immediate necessity of the day is set forth in the
petition of the " Anti-Imperialist League : " *
* This petition is signed by the foUowing persons :
George S. BoutweU, of Massachusetts.
George F. Edmunds, of Vermont.
John Sherman, of Ohio.
Donelson Caffery, of Louisiana.

176 IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
" They urge, therefore, aU lovers of freedom, without
regard to "party associations, to co-operate with them to
the following ends :
"First. That our govemment shall take iramediate
isteps towards a suspension of hostilities in the Philip
pines and a conference with the Philippine leaders, with
ia view of preventing further bloodshed upon the basis
(of a recognition of their freedora and independence as
isoon as proper guarantees can be had of order and pro
tection to property.
"Second. That the Congress of the United States
W. Bourke Cockran, of New York.
WUliam H. Fleming, of Georgia.
Henry U. Johnson, of Indiana.
Samuel Gompers, of Washington.
Felix Adler, of New York.
David Starr Jordan, of CaUfomia.
Winslow Warren, of Massachusetts.
Herbert Welsh, of Pennsylvania.
Leonard Woolsey Bacon, of Connecticut.
Charles Francis Adams, of Massachusetts.
Samuel Bowles, of Massachusetts.
I. J. McGinity, of ComeU University.
Edward Atkinson, of Massachusetts.
Carl Schurz, of New York.
Reverdy Johnson, of Maryland.
Herrmann von Hoist, of Chicago Umversity,
Moorfield Storey, of Massachusetts.
Patrick A. CoUins, of Massachusetts.
Theodore L. Cuyler, of New York.
Thomas Wentworth Higginson, of Massachusetts.
Andrew Camegie, of New York.
John G. CarUsle, of Kentucky.
Charles EUot Norton, of Harvard University.
W. G. Sumner, of Yale University.
C. H. Parkhurst, of New York.

A BLIND man's HOLIDAY. 1 77
shall tender an official assurance to the inhabitants of
the PhUippine Islands that they will encourage and assist
in the organization of such a government in the islands
as the people thereof shaU prefer, and that upon its or
ganization in stable manner the United States, in accord
ance with its traditional and prescriptive policy in such
cases, wiU recognize the independence of the PhiUp
pines and its equality among nations, and gradually
withdraw all railitary and naval forces."
There is nothing before us now save to raake peace
with the FUipinos, to get our raoney back if we can, to
get a coaling station ff we must — and get out. These
people must first be free before they can enter a nation of
freemen. As to details, it rests with those who have the power to
act to layout a plan of action. It is -useless for the
plain citizen to urge or suggest anything, for there is no
possible line of conduct not fraught with serious difficul
ties, and none which does not demand the highest order
of statesraanship. The worst possible line of conduct is
to let raatters drift along the current of destiny, in the
hope that some easy solution may develop. To postpone
action on vital questions may be good politics but it
is bad statesraanship. The handling of affairs Uke this
demands indeed the services of "the best ye breed," not
as soldiers but as doers of deeds.
I may quote in this connection the noble words of
Carl Schurz :
" We are told that, having grown so great and strong, we must
at least cast off our childish reverence for the teachings of Wash
ington's farewell address — ' nursery thymes that were sung
around the cradle of-the republic' I apprehend that many of

178 IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
those who now so fUppantly scoff at the heritage the Father of
his Country left us in his last words of admonition, have never
read that venerable document. I challenge those who have to
show me a single sentence of general import in it that would not
as a wise rule of national conduct apply to the circumstances of
to-day. What is it that has given to Washington's farewell ad
dress an authority that was revered by all until our recent vic
tories made so many of us drunk with wild ambitions } Not
alone the prestige of Washington's name, great as that was and
should ever remain. No, it was the fact that under a respect
ful observance of those teachings this Republic has grown
from the most modest beginnings into a Union spanning this
vast continent, our people having multiplied from a handful to
75,000,000; we have risen from poverty to a wealth the sum of
which the imagination can hardly grasp ; this American nation
has become one of the greatest and most powerful on earth, and,
continuing in the same course, will surely become the greatest
and most powerful of all. Not Washington's name alone gave
his teachings their dignity and weight ; it was the practical re
sults of his policy that secured to it, until now, the intelligent
approbation of the American people. And unless we have com
pletely lost our senses, we shall never despise and reject as mere
' nursery rhymes ' the words of wisdom left us by the greatest
of Americans, following which the American people have achieved
a splendor of development without paraUel in the history of man
kind." The grave responsibility we have assumed, that of
bringing freedom to the oppressed, caUs us to act with
conscience and with caution. We are no longer a child
nation, a band of irresponsible huraan colts, but mature
men, capable of wielding the strongest influence humanity
has felt. We must shun folly. We raust despise greed.
We raust turn frora glitter and cant and sham. We must
hate injustice as we have hated intolerance and oppres
sion. We must never forget among the nations we alone
stand for the individual man.

A BLIND MAN'S HOLIDAY. 1 79
The greatness of a nation lies not in its bigness but in
its justice, in the wisdom and virtue of its people, and in
the prosperity of their individual affairs. The nation
exists for its raen, never the men for the nation. At the
end of our Civil War, in 1865, it was feared that by the
comproraise of reconstruction the principle of inequality
before the law would be again engrafted on our polity.
It was then that Lowell put these memorable words into
the mouth of his Yankee patriot, Hosea Biglow :
I seem to hear a whisperin' in the air,
A sighin', like, of unconsoled despair,
Thet comes from nowhere an' from everywhere.
An' seems to say, " Why died we ? wam't it, then.
To settle, once for aU, thet men wuz men ?
Oh, airth's sweet cup snetched from us barely tasted.
The grave's real chill is feelin' life wuz wasted I
Oh, you we lef, long-lingerin' et the door,
Lovin' you best, coz we loved Her the more,
Thet Death, not we, had conquered, we should feel
Ef she upon our memory tumed her heel,
An' unregretful throwed us all away
To flaunt it in a Blind Man's Holiday I "

IV.
COLONIAL LESSONS OF ALASKA

IV.
COLONIAL LESSONS OF ALASKA.*
" And there's never a law of God or man runs north of Fifty-
Three." Kipling.
The United States is about to enter on an experience
which the London Speaker cleverly describes as " com
pulsory iraperialisra," Wisely or not, willingly or not,
we have assuraed duties toward alien races which can be
honorably discharged only by methods foreign to our
past experience. In the interests of humanity, our
armies have entered the mismanaged territories of Spain.
The interests of huraanity demand that our influence
should not be withdrawn and the duties we have hastily
assumed cannot be discharged within a single genera
tion. For an object lesson illustrating raethods to be avoided
in the rule of future colonies we have not far to seek.
Most forras of govemraental pathology are exemplified
in the history of Alaska. From this history it is ray pur
pose to draw certain lessons which raay be useful in our
future colonial experience.
Thirty years ago (1867) the United States purchased
* Printed in the Atlantic Monthly, November, 1898.
183

184 IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
from Russia the vast territory of Alaska, rich in native
resources, furs, fish, luniber, and gold, thinly populated
with half-civilized tribes from whose consent no govern
ment could " derive just powers " nor any other. In the
nature of things, the region as a whole must be incapable
of taking care of itseff, in the ordinary sense in which
states, counties, and cities in the United States look after
their own affairs. The town-meeting idea on which
our democracy is organized could have no application in
Alaska, for Alaska is not a region of homes and house
holders. The widely separated villages and posts have few
interests in coraraon. The settleraents are scattered along
a wild coast, inaccessible one to another ; most of the
natives are subject to an ahen priesthood, the white men
knowing " no law of God nor man." With these elements,
a civic feeling akin to the civic life in the United States
can in no way be buUt up.
It is a comraon saying araong Americans in the north
that " they are not in Alaska for their health." They
are there for the money to be made, and for that only ;
caring no more for the country than a fisherman cares
for a discarded oyster-shell. Of the few thousand who
were eraployed there before the raining exciteraent be
gan, probably raore than haff retumed to San Francisco
in the winter. Their relation to the territory was and is
commercial only, and not civil.
Alaska has an area nearly one fifth as large as the rest
of the United States, and a coast line as long as all the
rest. Outside the gold fields the permanent white pop
ulation is practically confined to the coast, and only in
two vUlages, Juneau and Sitka, can homes in the Ameri
can sense be said to exist. Even these towns, rela-

COLONIAL LESSONS OF ALASKA. 1 85
tively large and near together, are two days' journey
apart, with comraunication, as a rule, once a week.
When Alaska came into our hands, we found there a
native population of about 32,000. Of these, about
12,000 — Thlinkits, Tinnehs, Hydas, etc. — are more or
less properly called Indians. Of the rest, about 1 8,000
— Innuits, or Eskimos, and some 2500 Aleuts — are aUied
rather to the MongoUan races of Asia. There were
about 2000 Russian Creoles and half-breeds living with
the Aleuts and Innuits, and in general constituting a rul
ing class araong thera, besides a few Americans, mostly
traders and miners.
Then, as now, the natives in Alaska were gentle and
childUke ; some of thera with a surface civUization, others
living in squalid fashion in filthy sod houses. They all
supported themselves mainly by hunting and fishing.
Dried salt salraon, or ukl was the chief article of diet,
and the luxuries, which as tirae went on becarae neces
sities of civUization, — flour, tea, sugar, and tobacco, — were
purchased by the sale of valuable furs, especially those
of the sea otter and the blue fox. The Greek Church,
in return for its ministrations, received, as a rale, one
skin in every nine taken by the hunters. The boats of
the natives outside the timbered region of southeastern
Alaska were made of the skin of the gray sea lion, which
had its rookeries at intervals along the coast. With the
advent of Americans the sea lion became rare in southem
Alaska, great numbers being wantonly shot because
they were " big game ; " and the natives in the Aleutian
region were forced to secure sea lion skins by barter
with the tribes living farther to the north. This process
was facilitated by the Alaska Commercial Company,

1 86 IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
which maintained its trading-posts along the coast, ex
changing for furs, walrus tusks, and native baskets the
articles needed or craved by the natives.
Of all articles held by the latter for exchange, the fur
of the sea otter was by far the most important. Since
these aniraals were abundant throughout the Aleutian
region thirty years ago, and the furs were valued at
from ^300 to $1,000 each, their hunters became rela
tively wealthy, and the little Aleut vUlages became
abodes of coraparative corafort. In the settleraent of
Belkofski, on the peninsula of Alaska, nurabering 165
persons all told, I found in the Greek Church a com
munion service of solid gold, and over the altar was a
beautiful painting, — small in size but exquisitely finished,
— ^which had been bought in St. Petersburg for ^8250.
When these articles were purchased, Belkofski was a
center for the sea otter chase. With wise government,
this condition of prosperity might have continued in
definitely. But we have allowed the sea otter herd to be
wasted. The people of Belkofski can now secure noth
ing which the world cares to buy. As they have no
means of buying, the company has closed its trading
post, after a year or two of losses and charity. The
people have become dependent on the dress and food
of civilization. Suffering for want of sugar, flour, to
bacco, and tea, which are now necessities, and having
no way of securing material for boats, they are abjectly
helpless. I was told in 1897 that the people of Wosnes
senski Island were starving to death, and that Belkofski,
the next to starve, had sent them a rehef expedition.
I have no information as to conditions in 1898, but cer
tainly starvation is imminent in all the various settle-

COLONIAL LESSONS OF ALASKA. 1 87
ments dependent on the company's store and on the sea
otter.* Some time ago it was reported that at Port
Etches the native population was already huddled to
gether in the single cellar of an abandoned warehouse,
and that other viUages to the eastward were scarcely
better housed. However this raay be, starvation is in
evitable along the whole line of the southwestern coast.
Frora Prince Williara's Sound to Attn, a distance of
nearly 1,800 mUes, there is not a viUage (except Un
alaska and Unga f) where the people have any sure
means of support. These people, 1,165 in number,
have no present outlook save extermination. Forperrait-
ting them to face such a doora we have not even the
excuse we have had for destroying the Indians. We want
neither the land nor the property of the Aleuts. When
their tribes shall have disappeared, their islands are
likely to remairi desolate forever.
The case of the sea otter raerits further exaraination.
The animal itseff is of the size of a large dog, with long
full gray fur, highly valued especially in Russia, where it
* In 1897, the trading posts of Akutan, Sannak, Morjovi,
Wosnessenski, Belkofski, Chemofski, Kashega, Makushin, and
Bjorka were abandoned by the Alaska Commercial Company,
while the stores at Atka and Attn were turned over to a former
agent. t In Unga the Aleuts find work in the gold mines, at Unalaska
in the lading of vessels. Very lately extensive shipyards have
been established at Unalaska, and natives from the various settle
ments in the Aleutian Islands, from Akutan to Attn, are tempo
rarily employed there. It has been found necessary to buUd
vessels destined for the Yukon river at some port in Bering Sea,
as none of those constructed to the southward have survived the
rough seas of the North Pacific. But this shipbuUding industry
must be of very short duration.

l88 IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
was once an indispensable part of the unfform of the
army officer. The sea otters wander in pairs, or some
times in herds of from twenty to thirty, spending most of
their tirae in the sea. They are shy and swift, and
when their haunts on land are once disturbed they rarely
retum to thera. Any foreign odor — as the smeU of man,
or of fire, or of smoke — is very distasteful to them. Of
late years the sea otters have seldom come on shore
anjrwhere, as the whole coast of Alaska has been raade
offensive to them. The single young is born in the kelp,
and the mother carries it around in her arms like a
babe. In the old days the Indians kiUed the otters with
spears. When one was discovered in the open sea, the
canoes closed upon it, and the hunters made wild noises
and incantations. To the Indian who actually kiUed it
the pri2e was awarded; the others who assisted in
" rounding up " the animal, getting nothing. In case of
several wounds, the hunter whose spear was nearest the
snout was regarded as the kiUer. This was a device of
the priests to lead the Indians to strike for the head, so
as not to tear the skin of the body.
Originally, the sea otter hunt was permitted to natives
only. By their methods there were never enough taken
seriously to check the increase of the species. The Aleut
who had obtained one skin was generally satisfied for the
year. If he found none after a short hunt, the " sick
tum-tum " or " squaw-heart " would lead him to give up
the chase.
Next appeared the " squaw-man " as a factor in the
otter chase. The squaw-man is a white man who marries
into a tribe to secure the native's privUeges. These

COLONIAL LESSONS OF ALASKA. 1 89
squaw-men were more persistent hunters than the natives,
and they brought about the general use of rifles instead
of spears. A larger quantity of skins was taken under
these conditions, but the numbers of sea otters were not
appreciably reduced.
The success of squaw-raen in this and other enter
prises aroused the envy of white men less favorably
placed. A law was passed by Congress depriving native
tribes of aU privUeges not shared by white men. This
opened the sea otter hunt to all men, and thus forced
the commercial companies, against their will, to enter
on a general campaign of destraction.
Schooners were now equipped for the sea otter hunt,
each one carrying about twenty Indian canoes, either
skin canoes or wooden dugouts, with the proper crew.
Arrived at the Aleutian sea otter grounds, a schooner
would scatter the canoes so as to cover about sixty square
miles of sea. It would then come to anchor, and its
canoes would patrol the water, thus securing every sea
otter within the distance covered. Then a station fur
ther on would be taken and the work continued. In
this way, in 1895, i^g6, and 1897, every foot of probable
sea otter ground was exarained. At the end of the season
of 1897 only a few hundred sea otters were left, most of
them about the Sannak Islands, whUe a small number of
wanderers were scattered along remote coasts. Of these,
two were taken off Aiio Nuevo Island, California, and
two were seen at Point Sur. One, caught alive on land,
was allowed to escape, its captor not knowing its value.
One was taken in 1896 on St. Paul, one of the Pribilof
islands, and one in 1897 on St. George, another of the
same group.

IgO IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
The statistics of the sea otter catch have been care
fuUy compUed by Captain Calvin L. Hooper, comraan-
der of the Bering Sea patrol fleet, a man to whom
the people of Alaska owe a lasting debt of gratitude.
These show that in the earliest years of American occupa
tion upwards of 2,500 skins were taken annually by ca
noes going out from the shore, and this without apparent
dirainution of the herd. Later, with the use of schooners,
this nuraber was increased, reaching a maximum of 4,152
in 1885. Although the number of schooners continued
to increase, the total catch feUoffin 1896 to 724, these
being divided among more than 40 schooners, with nearly
800 canoes. Very many of the hunters thus obtained no
skins at all.
At the earnest solicitation of Captain Hooper, this
wanton waste was finally checked in 1898. By an order
of the Secretary of the Treasury, Mr. Gage, aU sea otter
hunting, whether by white men or by natives, was limited
to the original Indian raethods. In this chase, no one
is now allowed " the use of any boat or vessel other than
the ordinary two-hatch skin-covered bidarka or the open
Yakutat canoe."
This siraple regulation wiU prevent any further waste.
Had it been adopted two years ago, it would have saved
$500,000 a year to the resources of Alaska, besides per
haps the lives of a thousand people, who raust now starve
unless fed by the govemraent, — a tardy paternalism
which is the first step toward extermination. The loss
of seff-dependence and of self-respect which govemment
support entails is as surely destructive to the race as
starvation itself.
Our courts have decided that the Aleuts are American

COLONIAL LESSONS OF ALASKA, I9I
citizens, their former nominal status under Russian law
being retained after annexation by the United States.
But citizenship can avail nothing unless their means of
support is guarded by the govemraent. They have no
power to protect theraselves. They can have no repre
sentatives in Congress. A delegate frora Alaska, even if
such an official existed, would represent interests wholly
different from theirs. They cannot repel encroachments
by force of arms, nor indeed have they any clear idea of
the causes of their misery, for they have cheerfully taken
part in their own undoing. In such case, the only good
govemraent possible is an enlightened paternalism. This
will be expensive, for otherwise it will be merely farcical.
If we are not prepared to give such govemraent to our
dependencies, we should cede thera to sorae power that
is ready to raeet the deraands. Nothing can be raore
demoralizing than the forms of democracy, when actual
seff-governraent is irapossible.
In general, the waste and confusion in Alaska arise
frora four sources, — ^lack of centralization of power and
authority, lack of scientific knowledge, lack of personal
and public interest, and the use of offices as political
patronage. In the first place, no sin'gle person or bureau is re
sponsible for Alaska. The Treasury Departraent looks
after the charting and the patrol of its coasts, the care
of its aniraal life, the prohibition of intoxicating liquors,
and the control of the fishing industries. The investi
gation of its fisheries and raarine aniraals is the duty of
the United States Fish Comraission, The army has
certain ill-defined duties, which have been worked out
mainly in a futile and needless rehef expedition, with an

192 IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
opera bouffe accompaniment of dehorned reindeer.
The legal proceedings, within the territory are governed
by the statutes of Oregon, unless otherwise ordered.
The Department of Justice has a few representatives
scattered over the vast territory, whose duty it is to en
force these statutes, chiefly through the farce of jur)'
trials. The land in general is under control of the De
partment of the Interior. The Bureau of Education has
an agent in charge of certain schools, while the President
of the United States finds his representative in his ap
pointee, the govemor of the territory. The office of
governor carries large duties and small powers. There
are many interests under the governor's supervision, but
he can do little raore than to serve as a means of com
munication between some of them and Washington, It
is to be remembered that Alaska is a great domain in
itself, and, considering means of transportation, Sitka,
the capital, is much further from Attn or Point Barrow
than it is frora Washington,
The virtual ruler of Alaska is the Secretary of the
Treasury. But in his hands, however excellent his in
tentions, good government is in large degree unattain
able for lack of power. Important matters must await
the decision of Congress. The wisest plans fail for want
of force to carry them out. The right man to go on
difficult errands is not at hand, or, if he is, there is no
means to send him. In the division of labor which is
necessary in great departments of govemment, the affairs
of Alaska, with those of the customs service elsewhere,
are assigned to one of the assistant secretaries. Of his
duties Alaskan affairs form but a very small part, and this
part is often assigned to one of the subordinate clerks.

COLONIAL LESSONS OF ALASKA. 1 93
One of the assistant secretaries, Mr, Charles Sumner
Hamlin, visited Alaska in 1894, in order to secure a
clear idea of his duties. This visit was a matter of great
moment to the territory, for the knowledge thus obtained
brought wisdom out of confusion, and gave promise of
better raanagement in the future.
To this division of responsibility and confusion of
authority, with the consequent paralysis of effort, raust
be added the lack of trastworthy inforraation at Wash
ington. Sorae most admirable scientific work has been
done in Alaska under the auspices of the national gov
emment, notably by the United States Coast Survey, the
United States Fish Commission, and the United States
Revenue Service. But professional lobbyists often
have posed as authorities in Alaskan affairs. Other
witnesses have been intent on personal or corporation
interests, whUe stUl another class has drawn the long-bow
on general principles. Such testimony has tended to
confuse the minds of officials, who have come to regard
Alaska chiefly as a departmental bugbear.
Important as the fur seal question has become, its
subject matter received no adequate scientific investiga
tion until 1896 and 1897. Vast as are the salraon in
terests, such investigation on hues broad enough to yield
useful results is yet to be raade. The sole good work on
the sea otter is that of a revenue officer whose time was
fully occupied by affairs of a very different kind.
Thus it has come to pass that Alaskan interests have
suffered ahke from official creduUty and official skep
ticism. Matters of real importance have been shelved,
in the fear that in some way or other the great commer
cial companies would profit by them. At other times

194 IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
the word of these same corporations has been law, when
the department raight well have asserted its independ
ence. The interest of these corporations is in general
that of the govemraent, because they cannot wish to
destroy the basis of their own prosperity. To protect
them in their rights is to prevent their encroachments.
These facts have been often obscured by the attacks of
lobbyists and blackmailers. On the other hand, in minor
raatters the interests of the govemraent and the cora-
panies raay be in opposition, and this fact has been often
obscured by prejudiced testimony.
Another source of difficulty is the lack of interest in
distant affairs which have no relation to personal or
partisan politics. The most vital legislation in regard
to Alaska may fail of passage, because no Congressman
concerns himseff in it. Alaska has no vote in any con
vention or election, no delegate to be placated, and can
give no assistance in legislative log-rolling. In a large
degree, our legislation at Washington is a scramble for the
division of public funds among the different congressional
districts. In this Alaska has no part. She is not a
district fiUed with eager constituents who clamor for new
postoffices, custora-offices, or improved channels and
harbors. She is only a colony, or rather a chain of little
colonies ; and a colony, to Araericans as to Spaniards,
has been in this case merely a means of revenue, a region
to be exploited.
Finally, the demands of the spoils system have often
sent unfit men to Alaska. The duties of these officials
are delicate and difficult, requiring special knowledge as
weU as physical endurance. Considerable experience in
the north, also, is necessary for success. When positions

COLONIAL LESSONS OF ALASKA. 1 95
of this kind are given as rewards for partisan service, the
men receiving them feel themselves underpaid. The
political " war-horse," who has borne the brant of the
fray in some great convention, feels himseff " shelved "
if sent to the north to hunt for salmon-traps, or to look
after the interests of haU-civilized people, most of whom
cannot speak a word of Enghsh. A few * of these men
have been utterly unworthy, intemperate and imraoral ,
and occasionally one, in his stay in Alaska, earns that
" perfect right to be hung " which John Brown assigned
to the "border raffian." On the other hand, a goodly
number of these political appointees, in American fashion,
have made the best of circumstances, and by dint of
native sense and energy have made good their lack of
special training. The extension of the classified civil
service has raised the grade of these as of other govern
mental appointments. The principles of civil service
reforra are in the highest degree vital in the management
of colonies.
As an illustration of official ineffectiveness in Alaska, I
raay take the control of the salmon rivers by means of
a body of " inspectors." In a joint letter to the Assist
ant Secretary of the Treasury, in 1897, Captain Hooper
and I used the following language : —
" At present this work is virtually ineffective for the
following reasons : The appointees in general have been
men who know little or nothing of the problems involved,
which demand expert knowledge of salmon, their kinds
and habits, the methods of fishing, and the conditions
* According to Govemor Brady, himself a competent and honest
man, eleven per cent, of the govemment officers in Alaska are
now under indictment for ofiieial malfeasance.

196 IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
and peculiarities of Alaska. For effective work, special
knowledge is requisite, as well as general intelligence
and integrity. These men are largely dependent upon
the courtesy of the packing companies for their knowledge
of the salmon, for their knowledge of fishing methods, for
aU transportation and sustenance (except in southeastern
Alaska), and for all assistance in enforcing the law. The
inspectors cannot go from place to place at need, and so
spend rauch of their tirae in enforced inaction. They
have no authority to remove obstructions or to enforce
the law in case of its violation. For this reason, their
recommendations largely pass unheeded.
"To remedy these conditions, provision should be
made for the appointment only of men of scientific or
practical training, thoroughly faraUiar with fishes or
fishery methods, or both, and capable of finding out the
truth in any matter requiring investigation. For such
purposes, expert service is as necessary as it would be in
bank inspection or in any simUar specialized work.
The department should provide suitable transportation
faculties for its inspectors. It should be possible for
them to visit at wiU any of the canneries or salmon
rivers under their charge. They should be provided
with means to pay for expenses of travel and sustenance,
and should receive no financial courtesies from the pack
ing companies, or be dependent upon thera for assist
ance in carrying on their work. The inspectors should
be instracted to reraove and destroy all obstractions
found in the rivers in violation of law. They should
have large powers of action and discretion, and they
should have at hand such means as is necessary to carry
out their purposes."

COLONIAL LESSONS OF ALASKA. 197
Under present conditions, the newly appointed inspec
tor, knowing nothing of Alaska, and stiU less of the sal
mon industry, is landed at some cannery by a revenue
cutter. He becomes the guest of the superintendent of
the cannery, who treats him with politeness, and meets
his ignorance with ready information. All his move
ments are dependent upon the courtesy of the canners.
He has no boat of his own, no force of assistants, no
power to do anything. He cannot walk from place to
place in the taU, wet rye-grass, and he cannot even cross
the river without a borrowed boat. AU his knowledge
of the business comes from the superintendent. If he
discovers iiffraction of law, it is because he is allowed to
do so, and he receives a valid excuse for it. It is only
by the consent of the law-breaker that the infraction can
be punished. The law-breaker is usually courteous
enough in this regard ; for his own interests would be
subserved by the general enforcement of reasonable laws.
The raost frequent violation of law is the building of a
dam across the salraon river just above the neutral tide
water where the fish gather as if to play, before ascend
ing the stream to spawn. Such a dam, if perraanent,
prevents any fish frora ranning, and thus shuts off aU
future increase. Meanwhile, by raeans of nets, all the
waiting fish can be captured. This is forbidden by law,
which restricts the use of nets to the sea beaches. Yet
dams exist to-day in almost every salmon river in Alaska ;
even in those of that most rigidly law-abiding of com
munities. New Metlakahtla, on Annette Island. The
lawlessness of the few forces lawlessness on aU.
All that the inspector can do in the name of the gov
ernment is to order the destraction of an unlawful dam.

198 IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
He has no power to destroy it ; and if he had, he must
borrow a boat from the company and do it himself.
Then, in the evening, as he sits at the dinner table, the
guest of the offending superintendent, he can tell the
tale of his exploits.
The general relation of the salmon interests to law
deserves a moment's notice. Most of the streams of
southern and southwestem Alaska are short and broad,
coming down frora raountain lakes, swollen in sumraer
by melting snows. The comraon red salraon, which is
the raost abundant of the five species of Alaska, runs up
the streams in thousands to spawn in the lakes in July
and August. One of these rivers, the Karluk, on the
island of Kadiak, is perhaps the finest salmon stream in the
world, having been formerly almost solidly fuU of salmon
in the breeding season. The conditions on Karluk River
may serve as fairly typical. A few salmon are sraoked or
salted, but most of them are put up in one-pound tins or
cans, as usually seen in comraerce. This work of pres
ervation is carried on in large est^lishments called can
neries. One of these factories was early built at Karluk,
on a sand-spit at the mouth of the river. All Alaska is gov
ernment land. The cannery companies are therefore
squatters, practically without claim, without rights and
without responsibilities. The seining-ground on this
sand-spit of Karluk is doubtless the best fishing-ground in
Alaska. The law provided that no fish should be taken on
Saturday, that no dams or traps should be used, that no
nets should be placed in the river, and no net set within
one hundred feet of a net already placed. This last
clause is the sole hold that any cannery has on the fish
ing-ground where it is situated. Soon other factories

COLONIAL LESSONS OF ALASKA. I99
were opened on the beach at Karluk by other persons,
and each newcoraer clairaed the right to use the seine
along the spit. This raade it necessary for the first cora
pany to ran seines day and night, in order to hold the
ground, keeping up the work constantly, whether the fish
could be used or not. At tiraes many fish so taken have
been wasted ; at other times the surplus has been shipped
across to the cannery of Chignik, on the mainland.
Should the nets be withdrawn for an hour, some rival
would secure the fishing-ground, and the first company
would be driven off, because they must not approach
within a hundred feet of the outermost net. With over
fishing of this sort the product of Karluk River feU away
rapidly. Some understanding was necessary. The
stronger companies formed a trust, and bought out or
"froze out " the lesser ones and the canneries at Karluk
fell into the hands of a single association. AU but two of
them were closed, that the others might have full work.
Under present conditions, Alaska has more than twice as
many canneries as can be operated. Some of these were
perhaps buUt only to be sold to competitors, but others
have entaUed losses both on their owners and on their
rivals. Meanwhile, salmon became scarce in other rivers, and
canners at a distance began to cast greedy eyes on Karluk.
In 1897 a stearaer belonging to another great " trust "
invaded Karluk, clairaing equal legal right in its fisheries.
This claim was resisted by the people in possession, —
legally by covering the beach with nets, iUegally by
threats and interference. More than once the heights
above Karluk have been fortified ; for to the " north of
Fifty- three " injunctions are laid with the rifle. On the
14

200 IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
Other hand, " Scar-Faced Charley " of Prince WilUam's
Sound and his reckless associates stood ready to do
battle for their company. In one of the disputes a
small steamer sailed over a net, cast anchor within it,
then steamed ahead, dragged the anchor, and tore the
net to pieces. In another case, a large steamer an
chored within the fishing-grounds. The rival corapany
cast a net around her, and would have wrecked her on
the beach. The claira for daraages to the propeUer frora
the nets, with the more important claim that the fisher-
raen of the corapany were prevented by arraed force
frora casting their nets, brought this case into the United
States courts. Fear of scandal, and consequent injury
to the corapany's interests in the east, is doubtless the
chief reason why these collisions do not lead to open
warfare. The difficulty in general is not due to the
lawlessness of the companies, nor to any desire to de
stroy the industry by which they live. Our government
makes it impossible for them to be law-abiding. It
grants them no rights and no protection, and exacts of
them no duties. In short, it exercises toward thera in
adequate degree none of the norraal functions of gov
emraent. What should be done is plain enough. The
rivers are governraent property, and should be leased on
equitable terras to the canning corapanies, who should
be held to these terras and at the sarae tirae protected
in their rights. But Congress, which cannot attend to
two things at once, is too busy with other affairs to pay
attention to this. The utter ruin of the salraon industry
in Alaska is therefore a matter of a short time. Fortu
nately, however, unlike the sea otter, the salmon cannot
be exterminated, and a few years of salmon-hatching.

COLONIAL LESSONS OF ALASKA. 20I
or even of mere neglect, will bring the industry up
again. It may be urged that much the same condition of law
lessness exists in Oregon at the mouth of Rogue River.
But the real condition is very different. On Kadiak the
sole remedy rests with Congress. The people interested
are helpless. But in Oregon, the remedy rests with the
people and with them alone. If the people of Curry
County or of the State of Oregon as a whole prefer law
and order, the machinery adequate to bring it is in their
own hands.
Of the marine interests of Alaska, the catch of the
fur seal is by far the most important, and its details are
best known to the public. Whenever the fur seal ques
tion promises to lead to international dispute, the public
pricks up its ears ; but this interest dies away when the
blood ceases to " boil " against England. The history
of this industry is more creditable to the United States
than that of the sea otter and the salmon, but it is not
one to be proud of. When the Pribilof Islands came
into our possession, in 1867, we found the fur seal in
dustry already admirably managed. A company had
leased the right to kiU a certain number of superfluous
males every year, under conditions which thoroughly
protected the herd. This arrangement was continued by
us, and is still in operation. If not the best conceivable
disposition of the herd, it was the best possible at the
time ; and to do the best possible is aU that good gov
ernment demands.
We were, however, criminally slow in taking posses
sion of the islands after their purchase from Russia. In
1868, about 250,000 skins of young males (worth per-

202 IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
haps $2,000,000), the property of the govemment, were
openly stolen by enterprising poachers from San Fran
cisco. As only superfluous males were taken, this on
slaught caused no injury to the herd. It was simply the
conversion to private uses of so much public property, or
just plain stealing. After 1868 the Pribilof Islands
yielded a regular annual quota of 100,000 skins for
twenty years, when "pelagic sealing," or the killing of
females at sea, rapidly cut down the breeding herd.
This suicidal " industry " originated in the United States ;
but adverse public opinion and adverse statutes finally
drove it from our ports, and it was centered at Victoria,
where, as this is written, it awaits its coup de grace from
the Quebec comraission of 1898.
During the continuance of this monstrous business,*
the breeding herd of the Pribilof Islands was reduced
frora about 650,000, females (in 1868-84) to 130,000
(in 1897). It is not fair to charge the partial extinction
of this most important of fur-bearing animals to our bad
government of Alaska, inasmuch as it was accomplished
by foreign hands against our constant protest. Yet in a
large sense this was our own fault, for the lack of exact
and unquestioned knowledge has been our raost notable
weakness in dealing with Great Britain in this raatter.
The failure to establish as facts the ordinary details of
the life of the fur seal caused the loss of our case before
the Paris Tribunal of Arbitration. Guesswork, however
* Monstrous in an economic sense, because grossly and need
lessly wasteful ; monstrous in a moral sense because grossly and
needlessly cruel ; withal perfectly legal, because not yet con
demned by any international agreement in which Great Britain
has taken part.

COLONIAL LESSONS IN ALASKA. 203
well intended, was met by the British with impudent
assertion. British diplomacy is disdainful of raere opin
ion, though it has a certain respect for proved fact.
Moreover, it was only after a long straggle that our own
people were prevented (in 1898) frora doing the very
thing which was the basis of our just coraplaint against
Great Britain.
The other interests of Alaska I need not discuss here
in detail. The recent discovery of vast gold fields in
this region has brought new problems, which Congress
has made little effort to meet. If we may trust the news
papers, our colonial postal systera is absurdly inade
quate, and the administration of justice remains local or
casual. The Klondike adventurers raake their own laws
as they go along, with little responsibility to the central
governraent Lynch law raay be fairly good law in a
region whence crirainals can escape only to starve
or to freeze ; but martial law is better, and the best
available when the methods of the comraon-law are out
of the question.
The real criminals of Alaska have been the " wild
cat " transportation companies which sprang up like
mushrooms with the rush for the Klondike. There are
three or four well-established companies running steamers
to Alaska, well-built, well-raanned, and destined to ports
which really exist. But besides the legitimate business
there has been a great amount of wicked fraud. A very
large percentage of the Klondike adventurers know
nothing of mining, nothing of Alaska, little of the sea,
and little of hardship. These people have been gathered
from all parts of the country, and sent through foggy,
rock-bound channels and ferocious seas, in vessels unsea-

204 IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
worthy and with incompetent pilots, their destination
often the foot of some impossible trail leading only to
death. I notice in one circular that a graded railroad
bed is shown on the map, through the tremendous ice-
fiUed gorges of Copper River, a wUd stream of the
mountains, in which few have found gold and frora
whose awful glaciers few have returned alive. In the
height of the Klondike season of 1898, scarcely a day
passed without a shipwreck soraewhere along the coast,
— sorae vessel foundering on a rock of the Alaskan archi
pelago or swamped in the open sea. Doubtless most of
the sufferers in these calaraities had no business in Alaska.
Doubtless they should have known better than to risk
life and equipraent in ships and with men so grossly un
fit. But the public in civilized lands is accustomed to
trust soraething to govemraent inspection. The cora
mon raan has not learned how ships may be sent out to
be wrecked for the insurance. In established com
munities good government would have checked this
whole experience of fraud ; but in this case no one
seeraed to have power or responsibility, and the affair
was allowed to run its own course. The "wild-cat"
lines have now raostly faUed, for the extent of the Klon
dike traffic is far less than was expected, and the Alaska
proraoter pUes his trade of obtaining raoney under false
pretenses in sorae other quarter.
The control of the childlike native tribes of Alaska
offers many anomalies. As citizens of the United States,
living in American territory, they are entitled to the pro
tection of its laws; yet in most parts of Alaska the
natives rarely see an officer of the United States, and
know nothing of our courts or procedures. In most

COLONIAL LESSONS IN ALASKA. 205
villages the people choose their own chief, who has
vaguely defined but not extensive authority. A Greek
priest is furnished to thera by the established church
of Russia, He is possessed of power in spiritual raatters,
and such temporal authority as his own character and
the turn of events may give him. The post trader, rep
resenting the Alaska Comraercial Company, often a
squaw-man of some superior inteUigence, has also large
powers of personal influence, which are in general wisely
used. The fact that the natives are nearly always in
debt to the company * tends to accentuate the corapany's
authority. The control of the Greek priest varies with
the character of the raan. Sorae of the priests are
devoted Christians, whose sole purpose is the good of the
flock. To others, the flock exists raerely to be shorn for the
benefit of the church or the priest. But there are a few
whom to caU brates, if we may believe coraraon report,
would be a needless slur on the bear and the sea lion.
On the Pribilof Islands, an anomalous joint paternalism
under the direction of the United States government and
the lessee companies has existed since 1868. The
lessees furnish houses, coal, physician, and teacher, be
sides caring for the widows and orphans. The govern
ment agent has oversight and control of aU operations
on the islands, and is the official superior of the natives,
having full power in all matters of governraent. This
arrangeraent is not ideal, and is in part a result of early
accident. It has worked fairly in practice, however,
and the natives of these islands are relatively prosperous
and inteUigent. The chief danger has been in the
* The credit system has been almost wholly abandoned recently,
as the future of the sea otter leaves no hope of payment of debts.

206 IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
direction of pampering. With insurance against aU ac
cidents of life, there is little incentive to thrift. Out
side of the seal-kiUing season (June and July) the people
become insufferably lazy. There are records of occa
sional abuses of power in the past,* — abuses of a kind to
be prevented only by the sending of men of honor as
agents. In general, self-interest leads the comraercial
companies to send only sober and decent men to look
after their affairs ; and the govemraent cannot afford to
do less, even for Alaska. Of this the appointing power
at Washington seeras to have a growing appreciation.
Araong the irregular methods of government in Alaska
we must mention one of the raost reraarkable experi-
raents in the civilization of wild tribes yet atterapted
anywhere in the world.f I refer to the work of Williara
* For example, some ten or twelve years ago N. K. was fined
fifty doUars by the government agent in charge of the PribUof
Islands, for " disturbance of the peace." His fault was a too
vehement remonstrance against the violation of his young wife by
American scoundrels temporarily employed on the island. The
case was a most flagrant one, but the weak-minded agent felt
unable to cope with it. With the plea that " boy will be boys "
he excused the culprits, visiting the punishment on the injured
husband. The ill feeling resulting from this action is still a
source of embarrassment on St. Paul Island.
t Rev. William Duncan, a. Scottish clergyman of the Anglican
communion, some thirty or forty years ago, entered the lands of
the Simsian Indians, a fierce tribe of cannibals Uving on the
west coast of British Columbia, south of the Alaskan line. Ey
sheer force of personal courage and with many hairbreadth
escapes, he won the confidence of this people, and proceeded in
his way to civiUze and Christianize them. After a time, under his
direction, they bmlt the pretty viUage of Metlakahtla and became
comfortably self-supporting.
The Church took notice of his work and sent out a bishop to

COLONIAL LESSONS IN ALASKA. 307
Duncan, the pastor and director of a colony of Simsian
Indians at New Metlakahtla. I can only mention Dun
can's work in passing, but his methods and results
deserve careful study, — -far more than they have yet re
ceived. The single will of this strong raan has, in thirty
years, converted a band of cannibals into a sober,
law-abiding, industrious community, living in good
houses, conducting a large salmon cannery, navigating a
stearaer built by their own hands, and in general prov
ing corapetent to take care of theraselves in civihzed
life. direct it. The bishop insisted on the use of wine at communion.
To this Mr. Duncan strenuously objected, as even the taste of
intoxicants had a maddening effect on his people, who were kept
in temperance by the most rigid prohibition of alcoholic drinks.
Moreover the belated presence of the bishop as a director of work
already accomplished and beyond his power to aid, was resented
by the followers of Mr. Duncan.
At last, they arranged with the United States Govemment for
the occupancy of Annette Island, in Alaska, some fifty miles
more or less from their former homes. Hither nearly all the
people migrated, under Mr. Duncan's leadership, leaving the
bishop with the abandoned town.
On Annette Island, a new vUlage, New Metlakahtla, was built,
together with a small steamer and a salmon-cannery, besides their
own church and school-house. It is a village of the most perfect
order, with its own brass-band, church-choir, Sunday-school and
societies for culture. For a long time after their steamer was
built they were not aUowed to use it, because not being citizens,
they could not be licensed as pilots, or engineers, and the duly
licensed pUots would not work for Indians. This absurd embargo
was raised by the order of Assistant Secretary Hamlin.
I am indebted to Mr. Hamlin for a copy of the foUowing in
scription which is placed over the town house of New Metla
kahtla ;
" We leave the King of the Beasts for he is a deceiver ; he

2o8 IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
One of the least fortunate acts of the United States
Congress in regard to Alaska has been the enactment of
a raost rigid prohibitory law as to alcoholic liquors.
This is an iron-clad statute forbidding the importation,
sale, or manufacture of intoxicants of any sort in Alaska.
The primary reason for this act is the desire to protect
the Indians, Aleuts, and Eskimos from a vice to which
they are excessively prone, and which soon ruins them.
But a virtuous statute may be the worst kind of law, as
was noted long ago by Confucius. This statute has not
checked the flow of liquor in Alaska, while it has done
more than any other influence to subvert the respect for
law. Usually, men who " are not in Alaska for their
health " are hard drinkers, and liquor they wiU have. It
is shipped to Alaska as "Florida water," "Jamaica gin
ger," " bay rum." Demijohns are placed in flour barrels,
in sugar barrels, in any package which wUl contain
thera.* With aU this there is a vast araount of outright
smuggling, which the Treasury Department tries in vain
to check. AU southeastern Alaska is one vast harbor,
with thousands of densely wooded islands, mostly unin
habited. Cargoes of liquors can be safely hidden alraost
says no one is slave under his flag. So every year he punishes
us without cause ; he held up his naughty gun to crush our vil
lage. Now I find my good friend, he is King of Birds ; he has
sharp eyes to watch over our village if the enemy surround it. I
bid the Lion farewell."
Independence Day, August 7, 1887.
Over the inscription there is a carved picture of a Lion and an
Eagle. * It is said that when the UmatUla foundered off Port Town-
send, August, i8g6, those who took away her cargo found in each
of the sugar barrels consigned to Alaska only a demijohn of whis
key, the sea having dissolved the sugar.

COLONIAL LESSONS IN ALASKA. 209
anywhere, to be reraoved piece by piece in smaU boats.
Many such cargoes have been seized and destioyed;
but the risk of capture merely serves to raise the price
of liquor. Once on shore the liquor is safe enough.
Upwards of seventy saloons are running openly in Juneau,
and perhaps forty in Sitka. There are dives and grog-
geries wherever a demand exists. Most of the tippling-
houses are the lowest of their kind, because as they are
outlaws to begin with, the ordinary restraints of law and
order have no effect on them.
In 1878, it is said, a schooner loaded with "Florida
water " carae to the island of St. Lawrence, in Bering
Sea, and the people exchanged all their valuables for
drink. The result was that in the winter foUowing the
great majority died of drankenness and starvation, and
in certain villages not a person was left. Sometiraes
the stock in trade of whisky smugglers is seized by the
Treasury officials. But high prices serve as a sort of
insurance against capture, and there are ways of secur
ing a tip in advance when raids are likely to occur. This
traffic demoralizes all in any way connected with it.
But one conviction for illegal sale of liquors has ever
been obtained in Alaska, so far as I know ; and, I be
lieve, that this was a test case for the purpose of deter
mining the constitutionality of the law.* A jury trial in
* The appeal of this case (Endleman et al. vs. the United States)
has proved a matter of the greatest importance in relation to the
govemment of American colonies. It was contended (according
to the New York Evening Post) " that the law on which the pros
ecution was based was unconstitutional, because the govemment
of the United States can exercise only those specific powers con
ferred upon it by the Constitution ; that the Constitution guaran
tees to the citizens the right to own, hold, and acquire property.

2IO IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
any case means an acquittal, for every jury is made up
of law-breakers, or of men in sympathy with the law-
breaking. This fact vitiates all other criminal procedure
in Alaska. It should secure the entire abolition of jury
trials and other forms of procedure adapted only to a
corapact civilization.*
Whatever laws are made for the control of the hquor
traffic in Alaska should be capable of enforcement.
They should be supported, if need be, with the full force
of the United States, To impose upon a colony laws
with which the people have no syrapathy, and then to
leave these people to punish infraction for theraselves, is
to invite anarchy and to tum aU law into a farce.
Whisky is the greatest curse of the people of Alaska,
— ^Araerican, Russian, and native. I have not a word to
say in favor of its use, yet I ara convinced that unre
stricted traffic, that any condition of things, would be
better than the present law, with its failure in enforce
ment. The total absence of any law would not make
and makes no distinction as to the character of the property j that
intoxicating Uquors are property, and are subject to exchange,
barter, and traffic, lUce any other commodity in which a right of
property exists ; that inasmuch as the power to regulate com
merce was committed to Congress to relieve it from all restric
tions. Congress cannot itself impose restriction upon commerce
by prohibiting the sale of a particular commodity j and that if
Congress has the power to regulate the sale of intoxicating liquors
within the territories as a police regulation, it can only enact laws
applicable to all the territories alike."
* These facts were stated in detail a few years ago by a special
agent of the United States Treasury. As a result, this truthful
witness was indicted by the grand jury at Sitka for slander, — a
futile act, but one which was the source of much annoyance.
Judge W. W. Morrow, of the United States Circuit Court of

COLONIAL LESSONS IN ALASKA. 211
matters much worse than they are. In fact, the law
would hardly be raissed. In any case, Alaska gets
along fairly well, — much better than any tropical
region would under like conditions. Cold disinfects
in more ways than one, and Alaska gets the benefit
of it.
We cannot throw blame on the officials at Washington.
Appeals for CaUfomia, declaring the decision of the court upon
these claims, said : —
" The answer to these and 'other Uke objections urged in the
brief of counsel for the defendant is found in the now well-
established doctrine that the territories of the United States are
entirely subject to the legislative authority of Congress. They
are not organized under the Constitution, nor subject to its com
plex distribution of the powers of government as the organic law,
but are the creation exclusively of the legislative department, and
subject to its supervision and control. The United States,
having rightfully acquired the territories, and being the only gov
emment w^hich can impose laws upon them, have the entire do
main and sovereignty, national and municipal, federal and state.
Under this full and comprehensive authority, Congress has un
questionably the power to exclude intoxicating liquors from any
or all of its territories, or limit their sale under such regulations
as it may prescribe. It may legislate in accordance with the
special needs of each locality, and vary its regulations to meet the
circumstances of the people. Whether the subject elsewhere
would be a matter of local police regulations or within the state
control under some other power, it is immaterial to consider ; in
a territory, all the functions of govemment are within the legisla
tive jurisdiction of Congress, and may be exercised through a
local government or directly by such legislation as we have now
under consideration.''
In other words, the colonies are under the absolute control o
Congress, subject to no restrictions of any sort, and free from the
operation of any form of constitutional checks and balances.
Only through such freedom is colonial government under the
United States possible.

212 IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
They do the best they can under the circumstances.
The dishonest men at the capital are not many, and most
of them the people elect to send there. The rainor
officials in general are conscientious and painstaking,
making the best possible of conditions not of their choos
ing. The priraary difficulty is neglect. We try to throw
the burden of self-governraent on people so situated that
self-governraent is impossible. We impose on them
statutes unfitted to their conditions, and then leave to
thera the enforceraent. Above all, what is everybody's
business is nobody's, and what happens in Alaska is
generally nobody's business. No concentration of
power, no adequate legislation, no sufficient appro
priation, — on these forras of neglect our failure chiefly
rests. If we have colonies, even one colony, there must be
some sort of a colonial bureau, some concentrated
power which shall have exact knowledge of its people,
its needs, and its resources. The people must be pro
tected, their needs met, and their resources husbanded.
This fact is weU understood by the authorities of Canada.
While practically no government exists in the gold fields
of Alaska, Canada has chosen for the Klondike within
her borders a competent man, thoroughly famUiar with
the region and its needs, and has granted hira fuU power
of action. The dispatches say that Governor Ogilvie has
entire charge through his appointees of the departraents
of tiraber, land, justice, royalties, and finances. "The
federal government believes that one thoroughly reliable,
tried, and trasted representative of British laws and jus
tice, and of Dominion federal power, can better guide
the destinies of this new country than a number of petty

COLONIAL LESSONS IN ALASKA. 21 3
untried officials with limited powers, and Ogilvie thinks
so himself." *
Under the present conditions, when the sea otters are
destroyed, the fur seal herd exterminated, the native
tribes starved to death, the salmon rivers depopulated,
the timber cut, and the placer gold fields worked out,
Alaska is to be thrown away like a sucked orange.
There is no other possible end, ff we continue as we
have begun. We are " not in Alaska for our health,"
and when we can no longer exploit it we may as well
abandon it.
But it may be argued that it wUl be a very costly
thing to foster all Alaska's widely separated resources,
and to give good government to every one of her scat
tered villages and posts. Furthermore, all this outlay
is repaid only by the enrichraent of private corporations, t
which, with the exception of the fur seal lessees, pay no
tribute to the govemraent.
Doubtless this is trae. Govemraent is a costly thing,
and its benefits are unequally distributed. But the
cost would be less if we should treat other resources as
we have treated the fur seal. To lease the salmon
rivers and to protect the lessees in their rights would
be to insure a steady and large income to the govem
ment, with greater profit to the salmon canneries than
comes with the present confusion and industrial war.
But admitting all this, we should count the cost before
* San Francisco Chronicle, August 15, 1898.
t The interests of Alaska, outside of mining, are now largely in
the hands of four great companies, — the Alaska Commercial
Company, the North American Commercial Company, the Alaska
Packers' Association, and the Pacific Steamer Whaling Company.

214 IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
accepting " colonies." It is too late to do so when they
once have been annexed. If we cannot afford to watch
them, to care for them, to give thera paternal rale when
no other is possible, we do wrong to hoist our flag over
them. Govemment by the people is the ideal to be
reached in all our possessions, but there are races of
men now living under our flag as yet incapable of re
ceiving the town meeting idea. A race of chUdren
must be treated as children, a race of brigands as brig
ands, and whatever authority controls either must have
behind it the force of arms,
Alaska has made individuals rich, though the govern
raent has yet to get its money back. But whether colo
nies pay or not, it is essential to the integrity of the
United States itseff that our control over them should
not be a source of corruption and waste. It may be
that the final loss of her colonies, mismanaged for two
centuries, wiU mark the civil 0.nd raoral awakening of
Spain. Let us hope that the same event wUl not mark a
civil and moral lapse in the nation which receives
Spain's bankrupt assets.

V.
THE LESSONS OF THE
PARIS TRIBUNAL OF ARBITRATION

15

V.
THE LESSONS OF THE PARIS
TRIBUNAL OF ARBITRATION.*
The second administration of President Cleveland was
especiaUy characterized by the effort to promote certain
governmental reforras regarded by the President and his
advisers as vitally important to the weffare of the United
States. Most notable among these was the proposed treaty of
arbitration with Great Britain. It was hoped that by
its peaceful operation all bittemess of feeUng between
the two great Anglo-Saxon nations was to be avoided in
the future. All disputed questions were to be removed
frora the category of war and diplomacy, from the arbit
rament of force and intrigue to be settled on a basis of
simple justice and international law.
In spite of the most strenuous efforts of the President
and the earnest advocacy of the able Secretary of State
the proposed treaty of arbitration failed to receive the
approval of the Senate of the United States. That arbi
tration should rightfully supersede war is doubtless the
almost universal opinion of inteUigent citizens of both
nations, but that the treaty in question would have this
* Published in the Forum, May, 1899. 217

2l8 IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
result many of them were led to doubt. Among the
arguments urged against the proposed treaty of 1896
was the fact of the failure of the Paris Tribunal of Arbi
tration of 1893, to secure justice or equity. Its decision,
inconsistent vrith itself, not only failed to settle the fur
seal dispute, but brought it to an acute phase, for which
no remedy was furnished. This condition of things has
passed by without serious friction solely because more
striking matters have cast it into the shade. The inter
national good feeling which now exists has no relation
to the principle of arbitration, and the question at issue
in 1893 is stUl unsettled.
Setting aside minor claims and side issues, the Paris
Tribunal rendered its decision in favor of the " protec
tion and preservation " of the fur seal in the waters of
the North Pacific and Bering Sea, To insure this " pro
tection and preservation " the sarae tribunal prescribed
regulations, having, by the consent of the nations con
cerned, the vaUdity of international law. These regula
tions have in three years achieved the comraercial de
straction of the valuable animal they were intended to
protect and preserve. In a few years more, unless re
scinded by intemational agreeraent, they raust accora-
plish its actual biological extinction. If these regula
tions had been designed to promote destruction and
extermination instead of " protection and preservation,"
they could hardly have been more effective to that end.
It is not to be supposed that the high Tribunal of inter
national arbitration so stultified itseff as to do this on
purpose. The plain intention of the Tribunal was act
ually to protect and preserve, and it failed in this intent
simply through its neglect or inabihty to master the

THE PARIS TRIBUNAL OF ARBITR.\TION. 219
facts in the natural history of the animal with which it
had to deal.
The acceptance of the principle of arbitration may
be taken for granted. The practical details of its appli
cation are more important than the principle itself.
This fact has been comraonly overlooked by the advo
cates of arbitration. It has been virtually assumed
that the principle would work itseff. But it is evident
that if such a tribunal of arbitration can be deceived or
confused as to plain vital facts, its decision does not
settle the question in dispute. If the question is not
settled some higher tribunal is necessary. This can only
be the force of arms or the force of public opinion, and
neither of these has been found infallible in the establish
ment of justice. If one nation or the other is wronged
or betrayed in arbitration the danger of war is not avoided
by its operation.
The Paris Tribunal of Arbitration is, to be sure, only
one of many in which England and the United States
have been concerned. But it was raore iraportant than
most of the others, because it had to consider not
merely conflicting clairas for raoney-daraages, but facts
and laws of science and their bearing on new principles
of international law. Its business was to ascertain facts
and to make these the basis of new precedents in action.
The question of damages was merely incidental to the
main problem.
In this relation compulsory compromise, the mere abate
ment of extreme claims on both sides, is inadequate and
ineffective. If arbitration is to take the place of war, it
must be operative even in cases where one nation is
wholly in the right or wholly in the wrong in some or aU

220 IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
of its contentions. If its final verdict is to be sound, it
must be based on accuracy of fact, not on a rough
average of contending claims.
It may happen that with conflicting equities and con
fusing testimony the tribunal wiU be tempted to cut the
knot by arbitrary coraproraise. If the sole question is
one of daraages raore or less, this solution is easy, for
obvious reasons. But no tribunal can change a law of
nature nor alter a matter of fact.
In the interest of arbitration in the future we may
examine in some detail the operations of the Paris Tri
bunal, that we may discover the reasons of its failure,
and perchance raake use of the lessons it should
teach. The case at issue was at bottora a very siraple one.
The fur seal herds of the North Pacific breed on islands
situated in Bering Sea belonging to the United States
and Russia. On these islands (PribUof and Koraandor-
ski) they receive all necessary protection. The existence
of the herds deraand such protection, as well as further
protection, when they are feeding or migrating in the open
sea beyond the usual three-mile lirait of territorial juris
diction. The aniraals visit certain islands in the suramer.
They breed on them, and make them their home. The
young remain there until driven away by the storms of
winter. The adults leave the islands in sumraer only to
feed, going to a distance of from lOO to 200 miles for that
purpose. The winter is spent by the entire herd in the
open sea, their migrations extending from 1,000 to 2,500
miles to the southward of their breeding resorts. For
many years, both under Russian and American control,
the females have received absolute protection on land, the

THE PARIS TRIBUNAL OF ARBITRATION, 221
kiUing for skins being restricted to the herds of superfluous
males. As only about one male in thirty is able to main
tain himself on a rookery or to rear a family, about
twenty-nine out of every thirty are necessarily super
fluous. The survival of one male in a hundred is suffi
cient for the actual needs of propagation. The young
males on land are as easily handled and selected as
sheep, and no diminution whatever to the increase of
the herd has arisen from selective land-killing. The
number of females in the herd bearing young each year
was in the earlier days about 650,000 on the American
islands and perhaps half as many on the Russian, The
number of males and of young was in each case about
twice as many more. This gave a total on the American
or Pribilof Islands each year of about 2,000,000 animals
of all classes, while on the Russian islands or Koraandor-
ski, there were about 1,000,000. About 1884, differ
ent persons known as pelagic sealers, chiefly citizens of
Canada, but some of them from the United States, began
to attack the herd in Bering Sea, Here no selective
kiUing was possible. The females were always in the
numerical majority, as the males had become less
numerous on account of the land kiUing and as they left
the islands less frequently in the sumraer. Each female
above two years of age, when taken in the sea died with
her unborn young. Most of the adult feraales taken in
the sea after July ist, had left young seals or pups on the
islands, and these orphan pups invariably starved to
death. Through the agency of pelagic sealing and for no other
cause, the herd rapidly declined in numbers. In 1897,
there were about 130,000 breeding seals on the Ameri-

222 IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
ian islands, or about 400,000 of all classes. On the Rus
sian islands the number of breeders was less than 65,000.
For this great reduction in numbers there was but one
cause, a cause plain, seff-evident and undeniable, — the
slaughter of breeding feraales at a rate largely in excess
of the rate of increase. WhUe other causes have been
assigned for diplomatic purposes none of these alleged
explanations are worthy of the slightest consideration in
explaining the decline.
It was evident even in 1893 to all capable of forming
an opinion that pelagic sealing was the sole known
cause of the dechne of the fur seal herds. It was also
evident that as an industry it must be self-destructive,
since if permitted to exist on any scale, which would
make it profitable, it must destroy the herd on which it
operates. It was equally evident, on the other side, that there
was no existing canon of international law by which it
could be prohibited. International law is simply the
sum of the tacit consents and formal agreements of na
tions one with another. There was no other valuable
animal having habits similar to those of the fur seal.
There could thus be no adequate precedent for its pro
tection. To slaughter animals ferce natura anjnvhere
in the open sea is assumed as a right of any citizen
of any nation, unless prevented by the statutes of that
nation. A "right" in this sense has no sort of sacred-
ness. It is simply a case in which the affair is nobody's
business and therefore not forbidden. The progress of
civiUzation and the growth of intemational law have been
marked by the steady elimination of " rights " of this
kind, that is of rights which are inimical to life or

THE PARIS TRIBUNAL OF ARBITRATION, 223
property of others, Salus populi, suprema lex, the needs
of the people override aU statutes, and it is affirraed that
the needs of the civilized world deraand the preservation
of the world's raost valuable beast of the sea.
In the unquestionable absence of international law
on the subject it lay within the province of the Paris
Tribunal to raake new international law, if the in
terests of civilization would be aided thereby. This
in fact, they did, through their regulation of pelagic
sealuag, though in such an ineffective way that their
action was without value unless as a legal precedent.
The case was complicated in the beginning by ad
ditional claims of the American government; naraely,
(a) the right to exercise exclusive jurisdiction over the
herd wherever found, and {b) over the sea in which it
roaraed and fed, together with (f) the right to use force
in support of such jurisdiction. This right to use force
it had actually put into effect, by the seizure of nuraerous
vessels, under the British flag, found kiUing seals in Ber
ing Sea. The vital claim of the United States, stripped
of verbiage was that the fur seal was of value to civiUzation,
that from the nature and the habits of the animal selec
tive killing of males on land only could be safely allowed,
that such condition had long existed forming an estab
Ushed and valuable industry, that pelagic kilUng was sure
to bring the extinction of the herd, and that such ex
tinction was already far advanced. Hence the interests
of civUization demanded the abolition of pelagic kiUing
and the recognition that the ownership and the pro
tection of the breeding homes must carry with it the
ownership and the protection of the animals themselves,
I assume that the right to protect the fur seal is the

224 IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
essential portion of the Araerican contention, because all
other parts of the contention would be useless without
it. They were valuable chiefly for the purpose of
strengthening the main case. They were of little im
portance in theraselves, but were pretentious in forra and
of such a character as to awaken popular interest which
the real matter at issue might fail to excite. These
further contentions were in brief :
I. That Bering Sea was mare clausum, a closed
sea, being entirely surrounded by the territory of Russia
and the United States, and therefore its waters were
under the control of these governraents as the waters of
a harbor are.
2, That in view of such control, the government of the
United States was justified in forbidding pelagic sealing
in these waters, in warning vessels not to engage in it,
and in seizing those which disregarded such prohibition
and such warning.
3, That inasrauch as the American fur seal herd raade
its horae on the Pribilof Islands, returning there each
season to breed, and landing nowhere else, the herd,
wherever found, belonged to the owners of these islands.
The aniraal has then the animus revertendi, or pur
pose to return on leaving the islands, and this purpose
being based on the instinct of reproduction is the
strongest impulse known in nature, either to man or beast.
The British authorities practically denied all these
contentions and in general all the aUeged facts on
which they seemed to rest. After much diplomatic
correspondence, lasting through nearly two years, it
was finally agreed to subrait all of these claims, and the
coimter-claims for damages through the forcible interrup-

THE PARIS TRIBUNAL OF ARBITRATION. 225
tion of pelagic sealing, to a high tribunal of arbitration;
to meet in Paris in 1893. The Tribunal was composed
of seven judges, two from Great Britain, two from the
United States and one each frora France, Italy and
Norway. As to these contentions it raay be said, —
I. The vital claira to which the others were all subor
dinated seeras to be true and just beyond dispute. The
protection and preservation of the fur seal appeals to the
interest of civUization,
2, The claim to control and ownership of Bering Sea
rests partly on historical evidence, partly on legal pre
cedent. It was put forth as above stated primarily as a
device to justify interference with pelagic sealing. It
was set aside by the Tribunal, apparently with justice.
3. The seizure of the British ships could be justified
only as an act of war. If we were willing to fight in
defense of our action, the act might be justified by the
results of war. To submit it to arbitration was to confess
judgment at the start, leaving us no alternative but to
pay the bill.
4. The claim of the actual ownership of the herd is
one of natural justice, not of prescribed law. It could
become an enforceable claim only through international
agreement, or through the action of a tribunal of arbitra
tion. Neither could be made retroactive, hence we
could have no legal claim against Great Britain for dam
ages through the wanton destraction of the fur seal
herds. It is evident that in a case of arbitration the final
¦verdict must vindicate itseff, otherwise the sole value of
this method of settling disputes is lost. It is therefore

226 IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
vitally important that the arbitration tribunal should
correctly understand the facts at issue. Without a clear
comprehension of aU the relevant facts, a just decision is
impossible. In proportion as error exists in the funda
mental propositions, so must the final result be vitiated.
In international affairs, the judges should be men of
exceptional integrity and of exceptional intelligence,
capable of weighing and valuing the most varied forms
of evidence. Perjury, pettffogging and concealment
would be alike an insult to such a court, and every
device which experience has shown necessary in the
extraction of truth from testimony should be in the hands
of the tribunal.
All this would seem self-evident, but in the organiza
tion of the Paris Tribunal it seems not to have received
due thought. In considering the proceedings of this
court, the following facts are apparent :
It was arranged that aU testimony should be presented
in printed form. It was arranged that all testimony as
to matter of fact should be given in ex parte affidavits.
It was arranged that no witness should be present in
person. It was therefore impossible to cross-question
any one of the hundreds of deponents, to ascertain
the range of his experience or his raental or moral fitness
to give testimony. Neither the members of the
American nor those of the British commission of inves
tigation, who had visited the fur seal islands in person,
and who were supposed to have full knowledge of the
vital facts of seal life, were brought before the Tribunal.
The American comraissioners, who should have been the
very center of the Araerican case, were not even called
to Paris.

THE PARIS TRIBUNAL OF ARBITRATION. 227
The oraission of all safeguards against perjury seems to
indicate :
1. That one party or both had perfect confidence m
the self-evident justice of its case ; or
2. That one party or both had perfect confidence
that the other would not try to manufacture evidence,
or suborn perjury ; or
3. That one party or both intended to take advantage
of the other to confuse the court by the submission of
evidence that would not bear cross-questioning ; or
4. That one party or both, from ignorance of natural
history, failed to recognize the vital iraportance
of exact knowledge of the habits of the animal in ques
tion. It may be observed in passing that diplomacy may be
as effective in the organization of a tribunal of arbitra
tion as in any other sphere of action, and as successful
in defeating justice.
The choice of two representatives from each of the
contending nations iraphed that each was to have two
advocates on the bench. The unquestioned eminence
of the four thus balanced against one another would have
no real weight in determining the final results. This
left the remaining three as the real arbiters and de
stroyed from the first the character of the court as an
irapartial tribunal by dividing it against itseff. As to
the other judges it may be said, that their choice from
; nations not in sympathy with the supposed iraperialistic
tendencies of the United States, shown by its claim of
exclusive jurisdiction over a vast sea, may have left the
' burden of prejudice against the American case. This
: is merely an inference resting on no knowledge of the

228 IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
fact. A raore serious difficulty arose from the fact that
the knowledge of the English language by two of the three
judges, or the majority of the sole final arbiters, was none
too perfect. None of the seven judges had any knowl
edge whatever of natural history, and hence the volume
of testimony tended to confuse rather than enlighten
thera. Probably neither they nor many others since
have ever read through, with a view to seriously weigh
ing its value, the vast mass of guesswork and casual
opinion offered as testimony. That this is trae appears
in the fact that during the sessions of the Tribunal
various unofficial brief summaries of evidence were
printed for the use of the court. These were element
ary stateraents of the claims of one side or the other,
almost puerUe in their simplicity, and the need for them
shows clearly that the more elaborate testimony was not
understood. Furthermore, there is every reason to
beheve that the work of the Tribunal was done in undue
haste. After the first novelty of the situation was over
each person concerned was anxious to make an early
escape from the August heat of Paris, to some cooler
retreat, or raore congenial duties.
The testiraony offered before the Tribunal we raay
here briefly analyze.
On the side of the United States there was :
I. The report of the Araerican Comraissioners.
One of these gentleraen is a noted physicist, the other a
naturalist of high distinction. The two visited the
Pribilof Islands in person, spending sorae ten days in ex
amining the breeding rookeries. They consulted fully
with different persons who had enjoyed large opportuni
ties for observing the herd year by year, and the work of

THE PARIS TRIBUNAL OF ARBITRATION. 229
corapilation of the final report was prosecuted with the
exact raethods of a trained naturalist.
The work of the coraraission can hardly be caUed
a scientific investigation, inasmuch as its stay on the
islands was too short for the critical examination of any
phase of fur seal life. On the other hand the report was
emphatically a work of science. In its preparation the
commissioners showed a masterly knowledge of the value
of evidence. All accessible sources of information were
examined. Not a fact vital to the real question at issue
was overlooked, concealed or misstated. The elaborate
later investigations of 1896, and 1897, under direction
of the present writer have only confirmed the conclusions
of the earlier commission. Additional facts of many
kinds have smce come to light and more exact statistics
as to numbers have been attained, but none of these af
fect the raain contention of the Araerican commission
of 1 89 1, that pelagic sealing, and that alone, was destroy
ing the fur seal herd,
2. In addition to this the case of the United States
was supported by a long array of affidavits. These may
be divided into three classes :
(a) The stateraents of trained observers who had vis
ited the islands for one reason or another and made
scientific observations of the animals.
(b) The statements of governraent officials in Alaska,
especially those of agents in charge of the Pribilof
Islands, Sorae of the testimony was of high value ; most
of it consisted of the conjectures and impressions of
careless minds, more or less biased by the desire to help
on the Araerican contention.
(c) The affidavits of the seal hunters of San Francisco

230 IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
and elsewhere. Most of these statements were in the
form of responses to a set of prepared questions made
by men ignorant of all matters outside of their trade of
shooting and skinning seals. Of the appearance of
the animal raarked for slaughter, they were able to speak
with sorae precision, but on the larger questions of its
habits and condition, their opinions, however honestly
given, and however favorable to the Araerican contention,
were of little value. To this there were naturally occa
sional exceptions. One of the whaling captains for ex
ample was a naturalist of exceptional abUity, the author
of a valuable work on the mamraals of the sea.
(d) Testiraony of London furriers, experts in ques
tions of furs and skins, but only remotely acquainted
with the animals from which they are taken.
3. Besides these sources of evidence on the main
question of the decline of the herd, and its cause, a
large araount of evidence for the subsidiary contentions
was put forward.
This consisted of docuraents, raaps, etc. :
(a) Historical testimony concerning Russian clairas
to ownership of Bering Sea, and
(b) Historical precedents as to clairas of jurisdiction
ever marine animals beyond the three-mile lirait.
In favor of the British contention appears :
I. The report of the British coramissioners, the one a
geologist of repute, the other known as a politician and
member of Parhament. These gentleraen had spent a
summer in Bering Sea, about two weeks of it on the
Pribilof Islands. Neither of them were naturalists and
neither made any pretense of scientific investigation.
Their report was of the nature of a lawyer's brief, in

THE PARIS TRIBUNAL OF ARBITRATION. 23 1
favor of pelagic sealing. It had no scientific value or
validity whatever, and its effectiveness lay chiefly in its
bold denial of raany of the weU established facts in the
natural history of the fur seal,
2, The testimony of the pelagic sealers in Victoria.
Analysis of the many published affidavits show thera to
be virtually the work of one person. Series of leading
questions are asked. These are answered by the sealers,
doubtless honestly enough, but all in such a way as to
favor the British contention. These raen had never vis
ited the Pribilof Islands nor seen the aniraal in question
in its haunts. Most of thera could no raore testify as to
the nature and habits of the fur seal than could so raany
butchers' apprentices could bear witness as to the origin
of breeds of cattle. Of raatters within their own obser
vation they were raore competent to speak, but here it
is evident that their opinions were clouded by their sup
posed interests. This relation of opinion to interest is
well understood by lawyers, and is the basis of Lord
Bowen's epigram, " Truth wiU out, even in an affidavit."
By these affidavits it was sought to prove :
(a) That the nuraber of seals shot at sea and not
recovered was about 3 per cent, (i to 12 per cent,)
(3) That the nuraber of feraales in the pelagic catch
did not usually exceed that of the males.
((t) That a large percentage of these were barren.
{d) That the Russian and American herds freely in
termingled and were indistinguishable.
(e) That not all fur seals visited the islands in sumraer.
(/j That the fur seals were steadily increasing in num
bers under pelagic sealing.
{g) That they mated in the sea as well as on land.
16

232 IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
{h) That they were not confined to the known breed
ing islands but have rookeries on islands as yet unknown.
(i) That they resorted from tirae to time to new breed
ing places.
(J) That the sexes could not be distinguished by the
appearance of the skin.
{k) That the sexes traveled together at sea.
(/) That it was an easy thing to raid the Pribilof
Islands. To these statements all of thera partly false, and raost
of them wholly so, all of them moreover partly matters
of opinion to the deponents, we may add three other
fictions useful to forward the British contention. One
of these is* the assertion that orphaned seal pups
feed on sea-weeds, and are nourished by the milk of
other raothers than their own. This was a pure invention,
without a fact or an analogy to back it.
More iraportant than this and more damaging to the
American cause, because originally of American origin,
were two other falsehoods, unsupported by any facts
whatever, but none the less effective in producing con
fusion in the minds of the judges. These were {a) the
stateraent that the driving of the males on land destroys
the virility of those * tumed back from the kilUng,
and (b) the assertion that the number of males had
been unduly reduced by land kUling, leaving a supposed
class of "barren females," that had faUed of impreg
nation. A final and perhaps decisive element of importance in
* The seals above or below the " killable " age of three years
are mostly released. At three years the skin is at its best for
the uses of the furrier.

THE PARIS TRIBUNAL OF ARBITRATION. 233
the British contention was a piece of testimony secured
frora Russia by sorae kind of diplomatic deal. While
the Americans were contending for the exclusion
of pelagic sealing for a radius of 200 miles from the
islands, or throughout Bering Sea, Russia was induced to
accept a closed zone of thirty railes radius around her fur
seal islands. This agreeraent was of course, not in the
interest of the Russian fur seal herds, and it had no
value as indicating the size of the closed zone necessary
to give the aniraals protection about the Araerican islands.
But it had value as influencing a court already bewil
dered as to the facts. Its dramatic introduction in the
midst of a closing speech after the counsel of both sides
had rested their case, and when no opportunity of show
ing its worthlessness was left, was a piece of sharp
practise which the dignity of the high tribunal of inter
national arbitration might have resented. The testi
mony was, to be sure, vrithdrawn, on the protest of the
opposing counsel, but whether retained or withdrawn, it
served the same purpose.
The sole purpose of the British authorities in the whole
raatter was to win the case for the Canadian sealers, not
to protect the herd, nor to secure justice, nor to estab
lish high precedents in international law.
3, On the British side was also produced a coUection of
historical docuraents bearing on Bering Sea, with counter-
evidences that the precedents clairaed by the Araericans
are not fuU precedents at all. The pertinence of all of
this we raay freely adrait, as the decision of the Paris
Tribunal settled once for aU the questions of interna
tional law, though it could not change the laws of nat
ural history.

234 IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
The purpose of the present paper is not to reargue
the question, still less to award blame or praise. I
wish solely to caU attention to the defective organization
of the court as regards preparation for ascertaining the
truth about disputed questions of fact. As one of the
American comraissioners has cleverly said, the verdict of
the Paris Tribunal would have been different had
there been some one present " who knew how to laugh at
the right place." If some one who knew the real facts
of the case, had had the authority " to laugh at the right
place," the eloquent pathos by which the British counsel
told of the horrors of the seal-drive would have been
laughed out of court. As no one on either side
knew the facts at first hand, its absurdity was not ap
parent. Naturally, the eminent counsel on both sides
devoted most of their attention to questions of law. But
the fundamental question was one of fact. Under what
conditions of protection can these animals live and prop
agate their kind? That the facts of fur seal life were
not understood by the Tribunal accounts for the self-
contradictory regulations laid down in their final verdict.
The final decision of the Tribunal was, in brief, —
I. Denial that the Bering Sea is mare clausum.
2, Denial that the fur seal herds are the property of
the United States when in the open sea,
3, Denial of the right of seizure of sealing vessels on
the open sea, this decision requiring that vessels already
seized should be paid for,
4. Provision for the protection and preservation of the
fur seal in the interests of humanity.
This last object it was sought to accomplish through
a series of regulations, by which pelagic sealing was

THE PARIS TRIBUNAL OF ARBITRATION, 235
recognized as legal, but subjected to the following re
strictions, in brief :
I, No fur seals are to be taken within a closed zone
of 60 mUes distance from the Pribilof Islands,
2, No fur seals are to be taken at sea from May i to
July 31, inclusive,
3, Only sailing vessels with undecked boats or canoes
can be used in sealing.
4. Each sealing vessel shall take out a special license
and shall fly a distinguishing flag.
5, Each master of vessel engaged in fur-seal fishing
shall record in his official log-book the place, number, and
sex of fur seals captured each day.
6. The use of nets, firearms, and explosives in Bering
Sea is forbidden.
7. The two Governments must see that raen engaged
in fur-seal fishing shall be fit to handle the weapons used.
8. These regulations shall not apply to Indians of
either country using undecked boats of the usual sort,
outside of Bering Sea, and not under contract for dehvery
of skins to any particular person.
9, These regulations for " the protection and preser
vation of the fur seals " shall reraain in force until they
have been in whole or in part abolished or raodified by
comraon agreeraent between the United States and
Great Britain, The regulations are to be submitted
every five years to a new examination, and to be modi
fied ff experience shows the need of change.
This award gave a great stimulus to pelagic sealing, by
taking it out of the category of Ulicit adventure or piracy.
I On the contrary it slightly prolonged the process of de-
I struction, by preventing close approach to the rookeries

236 IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
and preventing slaughter in May, June and July of the
American herd. These months were used by the sealers
in operations on the Russian herd, which by the ingen
ious stroke of diplomacy already mentioned had been
deprived of the protection of a close season.
The final result has been, in the language of the Joint
Comraission of Fur Seal Experts of 1897, that "in its
present condition the herd yields an inconsiderable re
turn either to the lessees of the islands or to the owners
of the pelagic fleet."
In other words five years of the " protection and pres
ervation " under the regulations of the Paris Tribunal have
achieved the commercial destraction of one of the two
most valuable and almost the sole remaining herds of this
most important of marine mammals. Its biological ex
termination cannot be far distant, if these regulations are
continued, for it can hardly be supposed that the costly
defense of the breeding islands will be maintained by the
United States if no corresponding return is possible,
I trast that it will not seem unduly presumptuous for
me to express an opinion as to what the verdict of the
Paris Tribunal should legitimately have been. In my
judgment it should have been declared :
I. That Bering Sea is not mare clausum * ; its waters
are not the exclusive property of Russia and the United
States. 2. That the ownership of the fur seal herds while the
aniraals are in the open sea cannot be recognized in ex
isting international law or by existing precedent, as
belonging to the nations owning their breeding homes.
* In this and other matters of purely international law, I assume
the verdict of the tribunal is above question

THE PARIS TRIBUNAL OF ARBITRATION. 237
3. That the United States should therefore pay the
value of British vessels seized for kiUing fur seals in the
open sea.
4. That the value of these vessels and their equipment
should be ascertained by an acceptable jury of experts,
the question of the degree to which, if at all, contingent or
possible profits of future cruises should be considered to
be determined by the Tribunal of Arbitration.
5. That the " protection and preservation of the fur
seal " is a matter of importance to the interests of the
civihzed world,
6. That the question of the regulations necessary to
this end should be left to a jury of natural history ex
perts, famiUar with the habits of marine mararaalia and
corapetent to sift evidence concerning thera,
7. That in case absolute or virtual prohibition be found
necessary to this end, as clairaed by the American cora
raission, such prohibition be ordered by the Tribunal,
this order to have the force of international law, over all
nations consenting to the decision of the Tribunal.
8. In such case Canada should yield the possession of
certain recognized rights, inasmuch as prohibition of
pelagic sealing, with protection on land and sea, is tanta
mount to ownership of the herd by the United States.
9. The legitimate raoney value of such rights, ascer
tained by a proper jury or tribunal, the legal considera
tions governing which to be deterrained and laid down
by the high tribunal itseff, should be paid by the United
States, 10. That such decision should establish the precedent
for an international garae law, whereby all animals, feral
or domesticated, crossing liraits of territorial jurisdic-

238 IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
tion in food-seeking or in annual raigrations would be
protected in the sarae degree as if their habitat were
confined to the territory of a single nation. Such prece
dents would govern the raisraanaged fisheries of the
Great Lakes of Araerica, the salraon fisheries of the
Rhine, the pearl beds of Ceylon, as well as the fur seal
and sea otter herds of Bering Sea. Such an interna
tional agreeraent for the protection of valuable aniraals
would be a natural sequence to those agreeraents or
canons which have striven to abolish the slave-trade,
which have exterrainated piracy and checked privateer
ing, which have made foreign travel possible, and which
are humanizing the terrible art of war. " Salus populi,
suprema lex." The ultimate purpose of aU statutes is
the good of the people, not of one nation alone, but of
all the earth.
Such an ultimate agreement is indeed foreshadowed in
the regulations for " the protection and preservation of
the fur seal " and in the provision for the revision of
these regulations at the end of five years by the nations
directly concerned. This precedent raay indeed prove
valuable in future efforts at arbitration in the interests of
huraanity. If so, it is the sole worthy result of the Paris
Tribunal of Arbitration, and its one contribution to
intemational law.
Such a decision as that above indicated would have
been consistent with itseff. It would have " protected
and preserved " the fur seal herd — the only important
matter at issue from a financial standpoint. It would
have done full justice to the rights of both Canada and
the United States while it would have paved the way for
the development of stiU broader principles. Such a

THE PARIS TRIBUNAL OF ARBITRATION. 239
decision would have given strength and dignity to the
plan of arbitration.
This sumraary of a vast and complicated case is of
necessity a very brief one, too brief to deal justly with
all its varied phases. We may, however, deduce from
it certain lessons, as to the organization of similar tribu
nals in the future.
In case of future international tribunals of arbitration :
I. There must be an agreement as to all facts in
question based on the most thorough investigations of
competent experts in the subject in question, leaving to
the tribunal solely the decision of the legal or interna
tional bearings of these facts with their financial estimate
if necessary ; or else,
2. We must grant to such international tribunal every
safeguard found necessary to the highest courts of law,
including time to mature its deliberations and investiga
tions, power to call for persons and papers wherever
situated, power to cross-examine witnesses, to sift evi
dence and to punish perjury or diplomacy or any other
attempt to deceive the court as to question of fact.
If the principle of arbitration is to win the support of
the two great Anglo-Saxon peoples its operations in prac
tice must be worthy of their respect. It must indeed
be the Supreme Court of Christendom. It must be
composed of judges only, not of warring advocates, and
these judges must be as great in the science of jurispru
dence as the generals they replace have been great in the
art of war. They must never be deceived as to fact or
law and their verdict must be the final word of an en-
Ughtened civUization as to the subject in question.

VL
A CONTINUING CITY

VL
A CONTINUING CITY.*
The ideal of democracy is " govemraent of the people,
by the people and for the people." Such " a governraent
derives its just powers frora the consent of the govemed,"
More than this, it is solely through the inteUigent co-opera
tion of the governed that its powers can be exercised.
The thought and force of each raan is deraanded and
the coraposite wiU of the raajority, when all is sumraed
up, is recognized as the wUl of the people. As to the
theory, all are in accord, but the need of operating
through representatives and civil servants complicates
matters of public administration and brings in many new
problems in addition to those arising frora the development
of democracy.
For democracy brings with it no guarantee of good
government. Excellence of rule is not even its main pur
pose, not good govemraent but good people. There is
in government a higher function than economy, dignity
and effectiveness in public management. These are
important but they are not aU, The function of self-
government is the making of men, A republic is a huge
* Address before the New Charter Club of San Francisco,
AprU, 1898. 243

244 IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
training school in public affairs which will in time bring
better raen, and thus produce the sole effective final
guarantee of good governraent. This is the inteUigent
" consent of the governed." Such a training school
deraands experiraents in bad govemment as well as in
good. It demands experiments in blunders as well as
in successes. It demands the pain and humiliation of
loss and failure as well as the pride of victory or the joy
of gain. The surest way out of folly is to give full play
to its demands. " If you think that a law is unjust,"
said General Grant, " enforce it : the people will do the
rest," Each experiraent must teach its own lesson.
The test of fitness for self-govemraent is found in the
degree to which such lessons are heeded. In the long ran
men are governed as well as they deserve. To deraand
good govemraent is the first essential in securing it,
" Eternal vigilance " is its price, and the results of apathy
are found in corruption and waste.
In one regard our fathers failed to see the line of de-
velopraent of our forms of government. In the early
days the town-meeting was the safeguard of freedom.
In New England each citizen had a primary interest in
local affairs. The constant necessity for local action
kept this interes' alive. People care permanently only
when they can act. Men are indifferent toward that
which they cannot help. The town-meeting was the
local school in public administration. Its graduates were
sent on to farther duties, to the legislature of the state
or to the national congress. There raany of thera raade
worthy naraes in the history of the adrainistration. In
the old days " the people sent their wisest raen to make
the laws." In their scattered villages with slow transpor-

A CONTINUING CITY. 245
tation and few newspapers, the people had but dim ideas
of national affairs. They therefore attended to their own
local affairs and gave their wisdom fuU play in managing
them. But with all this the people found a fascination in
national questions, however vaguely understood. What
ever they could learn of them they used to their advan
tage. The influence of the town-meeting worked its way
out to the state.
This growing interest in national matters was greatly
stimulated by the development of the applied sciences.
The postal service, the railway train, the telegraph and
the daily newspaper have destroyed distances. What
ever of importance happens in the civilized world is cor
rectly known in every American household almost at once.
What happens near home in the town or county is not
thus known. The great events overshadow the lesser.
Local matters are inaccurately or sensationally reported.
They do not attract attention unless spiced with exaggera
tion or distorted by caricature. Especially is this trae of
matters of administration. The great national probleras,
finance, taxation, colonial extension interest us all. The
fact that we are powerless to deal with thera we lose sight
of. We have raade up our rainds in regard to them and
we all watch eagerly every attempt of our representatives
to carry our ideas into action. Once in four years all
manner of questions are or seem to be referred back to
the people, and to each of these public questions each
citizen is ready with some sort of a response. Men who
were never able to pay their own debts have very positive
ideas of national finance. Those who cannot keep their
own chUdren out of the streets know exactly what should
be our policy toward the " silent, sullen peoples, haff devU

246 IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
and haff chUd," who dweU in the antipodes. Men who
never had a bank account are self-constituted authorities as
to the national banking system, in which we are all to be
partners, those with nothing to lose as well as those with
something to gain. We shout for " principles " but in the
original thought of the fathers the common voter was
to select wise men, who should themselves be the judges
of principles. In the multiplicity of public officials we
have no certain knowledge of those who ask our suffrage.
Having no tests of character we judge thera by their ex
pressed opinions.
Thus the public attention is turned away frora the local
affairs which furnished the business of the town-raeeting.
It has degenerated into the caucus and is largely in con
trol of those whose relation to government is personal and
selfish. The men who manage local politics care nothing
for shadows. They have their own end in view. Their
operations do not interest us because we cannot follow
thera and we do not understand thera. They are scan
tily reported in the newspapers, and when favorable ac
counts of evil transactions are desired the newspapers will
furnish thera. The partisan organ is always ready to shield
its own rascals while it blackens irapartially the f arae of its
opponents. Thus it comes about that the details of our
governraent are worse raanaged as they corae nearest to
the people. The general governraent absorbs nearly all
of the public attention. With all its faults, the adminis
tration of affairs at Washington is in general better than
the administration anywhere else. It is in the light of
keener criticism. It is nearer to people's minds than
local adrainistration is.
But it is much farther from their interests. The loss

A CONTINUING CITY. 247
through local waste and corraption affects the individual
man more than anything that Congress can do, or leave
undone. Say what we may, exaggerate as we raay, the
cost of the appreciation of gold, the waste of extravagant
pensions, the loss through an ill-balanced raonetary sys
tera, — none of these nor all of these equal the waste of
municipal corruption. These become disastrous only as
they are added to the cost of local profligacy. The
injuries from defective sewage, from filthy streets, from
badly managed and badly taught schools, from saloon
politics, from bad roads, from the cultivation ot slums,
from adulterated food, from poisoned water, vastly out
weigh in importance to the individual the great questions
of party politics for which we pass them by.
The complaint is made that American political affairs
are "insufferably parochial" and it is urged that the
remedy is to be found in a " vigorous foreign policy " of
which the details shall command the attention of the
people but with which they shall have no power to meddle.
But the affairs of a democracy ought to be " parochial "
and the people must have a hand in every one of them.
The more local and provincial its details, the better for
its administration and therefore the better for the people.
A democracy is a form of government adapted to mind
ing its own business. That attention to foreign affairs
and large problems has smothered our interest in paro
chial details of justice and economy, is the chief cause of
our faUure in municipal government. The new destiny
of the United States with its idle hopes of commercial
greatness, keeps us from watching the tax collector and
the deputy sheriff. The town-meeting was the very es
sence of parochialism. It was the tap root of our de-
17

248 IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
raocracy and a certain faUure in the process of govern
ment by the people has resulted from its decline. In
large public affairs it is, " principles, not men " that first
concern us. In local administration it should be the
choice of men rather than political principles.
The evUs of bad local administration are not peculiar
to our cities. County governraent alraost everywhere is
just .<iS ineffective. The county affairs of alraost every
state are in the hands of party henchmen, who build up
under cover of local administration a huge machinery of
corruption, I make no sweeping charge against county
officers. These men in general are honest enough, and
at the worst they simply foUow the letter of the law.
Law and rightfulness are not the same in this case. They
take nothing which is not legally theirs to take. The
defect is that of irresponsible manageraent. There is no
head in county affairs and no direct responsibility to the
people. No one can be blaraed if things go wrong nor is
one rewarded for faithful public service. No one watches
the actions of county boards save those who gain by
wrong action. We have in all local affairs avoided the
tyranny of centralized power by the substitution of the
worse tyranny of official irresponsibihty. There can be no
good government without direct responsibility to some
power adequate to control ; to some king, or governor,
or party, or the people.
In view of aU this we deserve all the evil we receive,
as weU as aU the good. The govemment of any com
raunity in all its grades is as good as the people are en
titled to have. As we come to earn a better administra
tion of national affairs, we find that we receive it. As
our interest in local affairs has waned so have grown the

A CONTINUING CITY. 249
evils of local corruption. In a democracy, the govem
ment can be good only as the people demand good
government. We ask for good govemment on no other
terms. It may be that bad forms of government are re
sponsible for misrule, rather than the people themselves.
Where this is the case the bad forms wUl be changed ff
the people deserve any better. And the present general
movement for municipal reforra shows that the people
are becoming more alive to the need of attention to
local affairs. If our republic is to be perraanent, if
America is ever to have one "continuing city " we must
learn how to live in cities and in so living to guard our
property and our lives. As raatters are we protect neither
Iffe nor property, and the city is a center of degeneration
and waste.
Araong the causes of ineffective local govemment we
may name the following ;
The lack of seriousness. As a people we have a very
fine sense of humor and it is exercised impartially in all
things. In our journals, corruption and inefficiency ap
pear as a joke. A newspaper cartoon tells us the story,
and with this it ends. As cartoons are easily made and
may be as unjust as any other form of criticism, they cease
at length to be taken in evidence at all. An administra
tive crime has no adequate punishment. We do not know
whether it has taken place or not, and in the hopelessly
good nature of the American people, whether it has taken
place or not, it is equally and speedily forgiven.
The lack of perm.anence in our population is the source
of other evils. Migration diverts attention from local
questions. A man who raoves frora place to place may
be just as good an American as one who stays at home.

250 IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
— often a better, — but he is not so good a Califomian.
He is national rather than parochial in his interests, and
he is not so useful a citizen in his relation to local affairs.
The spoils sys>tem in politics is the greatest foe of de
mocracy. In aU its forms and ramifications, it is fatal
to good government. There can be no wise, economical
or dignified administration of public affairs when places
are given in reward of personal or partisan service. The
spoils system has been to a great degree eradicated in
the minor branches of national affairs, but in state, county,
and municipal politics it is almost everywhere still domi
nant. It is even growing worse in many of our large
cities, because' the purification of national administra
tion has narrowed the sphere of its virulence. The
" puU " and the " push," the " coinbine " and the " solid
dozen " control our cities, and wherever the " boys "
are at "work" there is waste, ineffectiveness, and, cor
ruption. The spoUs system is in general dependent on the
organization of the votes of the unenlightened, the in
different and the discontented. There are many causes
for the prevalence of what is known as social discontent.
Some of these a wise administration could avoid ; others
are inherent in human nature. But the political influence
of discontent is alraost always evU. It is opposed to
law and order. It is opposed to hopefulness and pa
tience. It is opposed to frugality and continuity of
purpose. The predatory poor and the predatory rich feed upon
and propagate each other. Two of the most noxious
elements in our political life are the " friend ol the poor "
and the tool of the rich. Both are parasites who live by

A CONTINUING CITY. 25 1
the greed of those who take what they have not earned.
Very often the two characters are united in the sarae
person. The relation alters as opportunities develop,
just as the right bower of hearts becomes, as the trumps
change, the left bower of diamonds.
The hope of getting something for nothing which
draws thousands of men to our great cities, makes of
these same men the worst of citizens. Nothing worth
having ever goes for nothing except to the thief. Hence
arises great co-operative political associations, repre
sented in the councUs of every party, and whose sole
business is un(Jer party names to work the offices for " all
they are worth." Their interest in public affairs is to see
what can be made out of them, . By the promise of some
thing for nothing they hold together the worst elements
of the community. Their work is done in the dark, and
their motto is, "Addition, division, and sUence."
These associations encourage the public interest in
national affairs to divert it from local ones. They are
famUiar with aU the catch-words of the day. But whUe
people cry out for iraperialisra, expansionism, for sound
money, for free trade, for free silver, for free Cuba, —
whatever they please, the political rings devote them
selves to the picking of pockets. They look after the
matters of street cleaning, police service, railway fran
chises, saloon licenses, school furnishing, — and so long as
these profitable enterprises are in their hands they care
not who has the glory or who put up or down the figure
heads of authority. If in their business they need these
figureheads they know how to own them without the
appearance of doing so.
AUied to the habit of seeking something for nothing is

252 IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY,
the disposition to look to national legislation as a relief
from personal discorafort. The recent raoveraent on
Washington, of the Coxey "Commonweal Army" of
idlers is a visible sign of this disposition. It is not often
that prosperity waits on national legislation. National
blunders have evil consequences, but there is not much to
be gained from any positive action. In general the most
that Congress can do is to repair its own past raistakes.
The real prosperity of a country coraes frora the prosper
ity of the individual citizen and from that alone. If he
is frugal, industrious and sober, he wUl be the type of a
successful comraunity. If each raan should solve or even
try to solve his own labor problem, this problem would dis
appear. If we were all good citizens we would have no
trouble with the management of our cities. But we are not
all good citizens ; and there are many rich and many poor
whose interests are served by bad adrainistration. And
there are those who are weak in raind and weak in will,
who are swayed back and forth by the professional agitator.
An agitator, in general, is one who has nothing to lose,
and who finds his sustenance through the confusion of
others. Honest agitators there are, though such are often
insane, whUe the worst of those who foraent discontent
are neither sane nor honest.
The chief source of failure in local governraent is,
however, due to lack of personal responsibUity in ad
ministration. This difficulty is the result of unwise
poUtical forms. It is therefore a raatter which may be
readily detected, and which admits of reraedy.
Whenever any iraportant work is to be done it should
be done under one authority, controlled by one wUl,
and working to a definite end. In case of good adrain-

A CONTINUING CITY. 253
istration the success will be distinct and unquestionable.
In case of faUure there should be one person to be held
responsible. An individual head is necessary to the
control of an army, of a ship, of a team of horses, of a
railway, of a school. It is equally necessary to a city.
Wellington once said that " an army may get along very
well under a bad general ; it never will succeed under a
debating society," This is the vital principle in good
local administration. The fact that in our state consti
tutions this principle has been neglected is one reason
why people havo lost interest in local affairs. The
blame for failure rests on so many shoulders that practi
cally no one can be held responsible for it.
Municipal governraent is not a branch of national
politics. A city is a business corporation, with business
powers and existing for business purposes. It raust be
treated as such. It is not a confederation of states but
an association of men. In our local elections the people
of the city have to choose frora a long series of names
selected in the dark by those who make such matters
their business. These men are raostly unknown to the
individual citizen. Those he knows he rarely trusts
and so he favors a close liraitation of their authority.
They remain equally unknown at the close of their term
of office, for they have little individual power or respon
sibility. It is impossible to know whether their work is
well done or ill done. In most cases it is not distinctly
either, and in few cases can good services or bad serv
ices materially affect permanence in office.
Political changes in city affairs come from changes in
national politics. A republic is governed by see-saw, a cer
tain number changing their party allegiance as one party

254 IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
or another fails, after four-years' trial, to satisfy their
ideas or interest. The city election goes with the rest.
For this condition the first remedy is to make munici
pal matters iraportant. To separate municipal from
general elections is a step in the right direction. But
it is a short step. To insure good govemment the ex
ecutive head must be responsible for raatters of adrainis
tration. He raust control subordinates if he is held to
answer for them. He must have such freedom of
action that his character may be a matter of public con
cern. A bad mayor of a city must have power to make
his badness felt ; else the people will not bestir them
selves to get a good one. An unfit mayor should be a
distinct calamity. But with full responsibility, really bad
administration would rarely come. A poor driver of an
unraly team is better than no driver ; a weak general is
better than a debating society. A weak man or a bad
man under the public eye with full responsibility for his
actions soraetiraes becoraes surprisingly capable. Re
sponsibihty brings caution. Caution leads raen to seek
good advice, and to follow good advice is not very dif
ferent from capability. But an effective responsibility,
as we shall see, can hardly be secured so long as cities
are raled under federal forms, with constitutional checks
and balances, and a fixed tenure of office for each
official. The desire for responsible government for cities is not,
as raany suppose, a raoveraent toward severity of indi
vidual restriction. It is not a device of the rich for the
oppression of the poor. It is not a movement for a
larger police force, or the abatement of agitators
or other public nuisances. It arises simply from

A CONTINUING CITY. 255
the need to hold some one responsible for adminis
tration. No one can be responsible for action be
yond the limits of his power to act. In the national gov
ernment this principle is recognized to some extent.
The President chooses his own adrainistrative officers
and acts through their action. The governor of a state
has no voice in the choice of his cabinet. The county
has no executive officer at all, and the mayor of a city is
in the main a figurehead, with sometiraes the special
function of police court judge.
In the English system of governraent the use of power
is not limited by constitutional checks and balances, but
by the unwritten will of the people. The Premier has un
limited power, but he dare not use it, except with the
approval of the majority of the representatives of the
people. If he use it recklessly his administration comes
to an end and that at once and without warning. The
only check is the disapproval of the party, and behind
the party, that of the people. Hence in party matters
the best men are put forward. The party leader is its
cleverest mouthpiece, its wisest administrator, or at least
the one whom his associates and the people naturally
rank as such.
In the American system are introduced a number of
checks and balances as preventers of mischief. These
serve as antidotes to tyranny but not to corraption or folly.
The evils which our fathers feared were raainly those of
centrahzed power, the force of arras, the pomp of im
periahsm, the domination of the church, the rule of the
aristocracy, inequality before the law. These were the
ills from which they had fled in England. These evUs
they would forever keep away from the shores of the

256 IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
new republic. They had no experience in industrial
miscalculations nor in financial blunders. The con
gestion of population in cities was unforeseen by them.
They knew nothing of the collective folly of mobs, the
enterprise of corporations, nor the pertinency of those
who live by sucking blood wherever blood is found.
They tried to prevent tyranny by scattering power
among many functionaries, each one to be a check upon
the others. In one state it was decreed that a member
of the state council should always sleep with the governor
to prevent him from developing any scheme of oppres
sion. Such an arrangeraent tended to prevent personal
tyranny but it opened the way to many abuses, and it is
from such governmental methods that the evils of the
" Ring system " arise. If the governor were wicked he
might corrupt the councilor. If he were weak the
councUor might manipulate him. From such begin
nings came the raistake of trying to prevent tyranny by
weakening government rather than by strengthening re
sponsibility. It was thought to make officials harmless
by making them powerless. Thus we succeeded in dis
placing individual tyranny by organized tyranny, official
tyranny, by unofficial tyranny. When a thing has to be
done there must be the power to do it. If the official
is prevented by hampering forms of law, it wiU be infor
mally and iUegally done by his political boss.
England has never tried to prevent abuse of adminis
trative authority, by weakening power or scattering re
sponsibihty. Her ideal has been not limited authority
but "conditional authority." No high efficiency can
exist without a wide range of discretion. Complete and

A CONTINUING CITY. 257
immediate responsibUity is the only condition necessary
for the safe exercise of power. " An English prime min
ister can do anything, — always with this reservation, that
if he doesn't do the right thing he may cease to be prime
minister and that without notice."
The most essential condition of successful govemment
is therefore singleness of purpose. Treat the coUective
interests of a city as you would those of a great corpo
ration. Make the mayor the trasted representative of
the corporation, to be discarded by it ff he prove false
to his trust. This plan has proved everywhere successful
in Great Britain. It should succeed equally well in the
United States. When this is done there is roora for
great extension of coUective action. Let the city have
a political see-saw of its own independent of that arising
from national elections. Let the mayor be personally
responsible for the fitness and honesty of the subordinate
heads of departments. Let hira hold each of them in
turn responsible for those under their direction. In
business places have only those who know their business.
Emphasize men, not principles. Men are tangible and
can be reached ; party principles are vague and decep
tive. Let everything stand in open light ; thus unclean
men who work in darkness only have no interest in it.
In most branches of the civil service of cities technical
training is vitally important. The man who knows how
to do a thing is the only one who wiU do it in the right
way. The authority given must be commensurate with the
service required. One individual must be held respon
sible for the whole of one transaction. A stage coach
on a mountain road would not be rendered safer with

258 IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
four drivers one for each horse, or one for each of the
guiding reins. Doubtless the coach raight not be driven
on the wrong road under such conditions, but it would
stand a good chance to be overturned.
But how shall the driver of the coach be selected and
what shaU be the term of his services ? Obviously those
who ride must choose and he must hold the reins only
50 long as he coraraands the confidence of his passengers.
Accepting the principle of the raajority rule as the only
principle practicable in public affairs the driver should
hold his place as long as his acts are approved by the
raajority of those whom he serves.
It is plain that a fixed tenure of office regardless of
conduct is an unnatural and arbitrary arrangement. It
has the advantage of stability of plan, but it permits the
development of schemes adverse to the good of the peo
ple. In the case of the stage coach the question of con
fidence can be settled in a moment and without for
mality. In the case of a city the method must be
different ; the principle is not. In such cases the people
cannot act as individuals in a mass-meeting. Obviously
they must be represented in some form of a councU or a
congress. That body will be most effective whiclj raost
perfectly reflects the wUl of the people in all its organ
izations, tendencies and ramifications, the stupid and the
evil as well as the wise and good, and each in its degree.
To this end some form of election by proportional rep
resentation is apparently necessary. The British system
recognizes this and its plan has great claira on ray con
fidence because it has shown itself successful. Each
voter in the community selects a certain number of men
according to the details of the plan chosen. He votes

A CONTINUING CITY. 259
for these as his personal representatives m the city
council. Those men having the greatest number of votes
are chosen. The larger the council the more perfectly
representative and the less subject to illegitimate in
fluences. The smaller, the more effective in direct action
which is a matter of minor importance, as the council
should be a regulative rather than an administrative or
even a legislative body. The council once chosen, selects
the mayor, whose power is limited chiefly by the coun
cil's own approval. If the mayor carries the councU with
him he can develop the raost elaborate plans in aU details.
If the raajority come to distrust him his authority is with
drawn and that on the shortest notice.
The majority of the council are likely to put forward
the best man of the number for the sake of their own
prestige. Carefully made minor appointraents usually
follow as a raatter of course. The checks and balances
of charter and constitution are unnecessary, for the
executive will not often dare to oppose the teachings of
common sense. Elaborate rules controUing the civil
service are scarcely necessary because the city business
must be conducted on business principles, wherever full
personal responsibility exists. Fraud or favoritism would
destroy confidence. The loss of confidence would turn
the power over to the minority. Thus such a plan re
sults in England. It would work in the same way with
us. In England this general system holds in parliamentary
matters as well as in local affairs. The whole of Great
Britain and Ireland becomes a unit in matters of admin
istration, the empire being in no sense a federation in its
governmental relations. The federal system with its

26o IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
wheels within wheels raakes the adoption of a similar
system at Washington a matter of doubtful expediency.
In the use of the federal system for non-federal relations
we find the raost serious raistake in Araerican local
governraent. The Union is a federation of sovereign
states, having interests more or less divergent and origi
nally swayed by deep and overmastering jealousies. The
checks and balances of our constitution were intended in
large degree to protect the individual state from the
possible tyranny of the others. The separation of exec
utive, legislative and judicial functions and the estabhsh
ment of the two houses of Congress were all matters as
sociated with the protection of states under federal
relations. Whether the need for these safeguards is past
or whether the higher safeguard of party responsibiUty
should take their place, as in England, or whether some
rainor raodification in that direction would be still better,
are questions I cannot discuss here. They are vitally
iraportant but they do not touch our present problera.
It was, however, beyond a doubt, a serious error to
take the forms of federal union as the type of local
govemment. The Union is a federation of sovereign
states, but the state is not a federation of sovereign coun
ties. The county is an artificial division of the state
raade for convenience of adrainistration. The individual
county stands in no danger from the tyranny of the ma
jority. In like manner we cannot regard the county as
a federation of townships. StiU less is the city a federa
tion of wards. Yet in our choice of aldermen it is
treated as such. By a skifful arrangement of wards and
a suitable manipulation of the caucus it is possible to
partly disfranchise the inhabitants of some of them.

A CONTINUING CITY. 261
Thus the better elements remain in large degree unre
presented in our city councils. To destroy the tyranny
of the ward heeler we lirait his authority. We make the
various officials of the city independent of one another
and all of them responsible to nobody. They are bound
by the iron provisions of the charter perhaps, but these
provisions do not enforce themselves. To reduce power
used in the daylight means its greater exercise in the
dark. The systera of proportional representation destroys, in
a large degree, the illegitiraate power of cliques and
associations. It sets aside the false idea of federation
when no federation exists, and it tends to unify adminis
tration and responsibility of the city as a unit. The city
council thus chosen will have good elements and bad
elements. It is simply an epitome of the people with an
emphasis laid on the greater intelligence, for people
under these conditions are less likely to vote for men
they do not know, or whom they regard as incompetent
or derelict.
The business of such a council is supervision rather
than legislation and its chief function that of fusing the
public opinion into a single indivisible wiU, This will
the raayor represents so long as his course receives its
approval and his wiU is reflected in his subordinates and
heads of departraents.
Exactly this principle applies to the successful control
of affairs of great corporations. The president of a
railroad has the raost extended powers, if he satisfies the
directors, who in turn represent the stockholders. In
proportion as such power and its attendant responsibil
ity are real wUl be the success of the road, other raatters

262 IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY,
being of course equal. If the president abuse his powers
it wiU be when the directors neglect their duties. For
popular ignorance or indifference, no system can offer a
remedy. The control of American universities has been likewise
successful in the degree to which it approaches this
model. The freer the rein given the president, other
things being equal, the more effective the work of the
institution. But this free rein must take with it the
watchful confidence of boards of trustees or of the alumni,
or of the public for which the institution exists. The
majestic work of Dr. Eliot at Harvard well exemplifies
all this. With very definite, very wise and very ad
vanced views of all educational problems, he has taken
full rein in carrying them out. But he has sought at the
same time to carry with him the confidence and co-oper
ation of graduates, faculty and overseers. Without this
confidence, freely given because fully deserved. Harvard
University could never have been made what it is.
In few branches of the public service is the spoils sys
tem so deeply intrenched as in the public schools. In
no other place can it do a tithe of the mischief. It
shows itself on the one hand in the wanton selection
of incompetents or favorites ; on the other, in the provis
ion of life tenures for worthless persons its evil is equally
prominent. No teacher should be chosen save for effi
ciency, no teacher should be retained unless this effi
ciency continues. If appointments are on the basis of
merit only, there is no danger of wanton removals, and
any law protecting a teacher from dismissal works against
the interests of the children, a party whose interests in
some of our great cities have been totally ignored. What

A CONTINUING CITY, 263
with the strife on account of life tenures of teachers
chosen by the trastees in the past, and with the desire
of present trastees to provide simUarly for their own in
digent relatives, the public schools of at least one of our
great cities are worse than no schools at all. To use
positions in the schools for purposes of charity is to use
them for corruption. If relieved frora the great expenses
now incurred better schools would arise under private
control. The remedy for this condition is not to abol
ish public schools. It is not the institution which is
discredited but our manageraent of it ; and this through
our own lack of interest and our bad administrative
methods. The former no doubt, is in part an outgrowth
from the latter. Our duty is to repeal aU statutes which
limit responsibUity, place the schools in the hands of a
corapetent superintendent and adopt such forms as will
hold this superintendent to a real and constant re
sponsibUity. Our varied failures in local administration are there
fore in great part the results of efforts to make federal
forms of government do the impossible and of our at
tempts to hold men to responsibihty without giving
thera power. The affairs of no business corporation
could be conducted in such a fashion without immediate
disaster. If these are necessary methods of " American
ism," they are also methods of bankraptcy. No city,
or county or state can be well governed that does not
associate with exercise of authority, personal responsi
bUity for its results.
The first need in good governraent is to enlist the serv
ices of men who know what ought to be done, and who
have the will and the virtue to do it. Such men are
18

264 IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
caUed forth when the people feel the need of them. As
matters now are we do not need good men because we
have no way of using them. In public office they can
only watch and do nothing. This does not suffice for a
man of action. So he wUl rather go on with his own af
fairs which he can control and for which he is actually
responsible. Thus the public affairs fall into the con
trol of co-operative associations of thieves, for which the
city furnishes a figurehead. All constitutional checks
and balances in administration are of but slight impor
tance compared with the personality of men. Let us
try men in our public affairs, and see if Araericanisra is
not strengthened by the change.

VII.
THE CAPTAIN SLEEPS

VII.
THE CAPTAIN SLEEPS.*
In the Outlook for AprU 22 is an editorial record oi
the " Philippine history " which to me is very pairfful
reading. Its narrative of alleged facts doubtless repre
sents the record of what the authorities of the United
States wished to do, and of what thousands of good people
think has been done. But it is not " PhiUppine history."
Our rulers have shown the most singular misconceptions
of the nature of the tropics and their inhabitants, while
our own people have equally forgotten the nature of our
own government, its strength, its limitations and the
principles on which it rests. As a result we are trying
to hold a large and active population by force, without
visible plan or purpose, or reason for so doing. In the
process we find ourselves in the midst of a war of exter
mination, one of the most horrible in the records of
civilization. These people fight for freedom. This we
understand. We fight for law and order, so we are told,
because without examination of the facts, we assume
that the first republic of Asia would be unable to main
tain order. They fight for freedora because they can
see with their own eyes that the first republic of America
urges on them a military despotisra. If we could under-
* Letter to the editor of the Outlook, AprU 26, 1899.
267

268 IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
Stand each other better, we should each know that the
real purposes of the other are more rational than they
seem. The Outlook passes lightly over the huge blunders
which have brought on this war, raistakes that would
bring on war anywhere whenever raade. Doubtless these
delays and blunders were well intentioned, but the fates
judge men and nations by the results, not the purposes,
of their acts. Good intentions lie at the bottom of the
greatest criraes of history. The present writer has
opposed federal union with the Filipinos, because how
ever just morally, such unequal yoking politically would
help neither them nor us. Against imperial or colonial
dominion he is opposed from principle, knowing that
industrial success in " control of the tropics '' is incon
sistent with " equality before the law." The justification
for slavery and that of the " Crown Colony " is one and the
same, nor is there appreciable difference in the results.
The empire can exist, the republic cannot, with such
dominion accepted as part of its function.
But these theoretical considerations have little part
to-day. It is no longer a question of imperialism or of
expansion. It is one of saving the lives of an innocent
people, of saving the honor and self-respect of our own
republic. We can have no future in these islands save
that which comes through the present.
Does the Outlook know what really takes place in the
Philippines ? Of course it is familiar with official dis
patches and with the text of proclamations. These tell
of a difficult task slowly and unwillingly accomplished,
with deeds of heroism on the part of brave men, and the
loss of precious lives both Saxon and Malay,

THE CAPTAIN SLEEPS, 269
This is trae, but it is not all. We fail to read between
the lines. For the rest, we must take the word of naval
officers and of soldiers, sick or wounded, sent back to
their homes, California was the first to catch the fever
of expansion because it is nearest the glamour of the
Orient, It will be the first to recover, because it first
meets face to face the heroes of Manila,
Does the Outlook know what these men have to say?
Their words contradict the Spanish slander of Aguinaldo
as a bribed soldier of fortune. They show him rather
as a patriot, the ally of our leader, the valued "protdgd "
of men who had authority to ask his help. They tell of
his weary waiting for some indication of purpose on the
part of the Unitea States government, of the Constitu
tional Convention at Malolos, of the adoption after
a long debate of the principle of religious equality in a
country of Cathohcs, of the choice of a President by
a free ballot ; of the Cabinet and Congress containing
educated men, many of them graduates of Universities
of Europe. They tell us that, tUl the fatal Fffth of
February, " hfe and property was as safe in the Malolos
as in San Francisco " and that the sole anarchy and de
straction of property which has taken place in any of these
islands since Manila surrendered has been in the few
square miles occupied by our troops. Except about
Manila and Iloilo, seff-government of the natives is the
sole government existing to-day, apparently the sole which
has ever existed. Except in Luzon apparently no other
is contemplated. The Mohammedan sultan stiU enjoys
undisturbed sway, and I am told that we pay him the
same tribute he exacted from Spain. Even savage races
for the most part are at peace within themselves. They

270 IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
are savage only to the alien invader. A wasp's nest is
a home of peace till an alien force assails it.
What does the man who was on the ground say to the
argument that " we destroyed the only stable govern
ment in the PhiUppines : is it our duty to set up another
like it in its place ? Is mihtary despotisra the only gov
ernraent we know how to set up? Does the Outlook
know what ManUa is becoraing under raUitary rale?
We hear of four hundred saloons on the Escolta, where
two were before : that twenty-one per cent, of our sol
diers are attacked by venereal disease, that according to
the belief of the soldiers, " even the pigs and dogs on
the streets have the syphilis."
Does the Outlook realize that Malabon, a prosperous
suburb of Manila, a town in which the kindly and culti
vated people had shown special courtesies to the officers
and raen of the McCullough, was burned to the ground by
the raen of the Monterey, under orders frora the comman
dant at ManUa. It is easier to hold a city that has no
suburbs ; fOr this reason the town was burned and its
people driven out to starve in the swamps.
Does the Outlook know how it feels for a young man of
culture to set the torch to " two hundred acres of houses "
while the people are kneeling and praying at his feet ?
Does the Outlook reaUze the picture of the " half-
naked savages " driven from Santa Ana, while in one of
their spacious "huts" five pianos were found, one of
which was thrown out of the second story window, to
make more room for something else?
Does the Outlook understand that of 30,000 or more
Filipinos slaughtered thus far, half are estiraated to have
been non-corabatants?

THE CAPTAIN SLEEPS. 27 1
Does the Outlook know that our soldiers say that they
were ordered to fire on white flags ? Does it remember
that since Febraary 6th, when audience was refused to
Aguinaldo, these people have had no chance to be heard?
Does the Outlook know that some regiraents of United
States troops have " taken no prisoners ? "
Does the Outlook know that the general in coramand
is described as a man who rarely leaves his office, where
he conscientiously devotes hiraself to the adding of
accounts, "to the work of a quarterraaster's clerk?"
Does it know that the simple-hearted, loyal hero of
Manila is conscientiously sacrificing his reputation and
his judgment because he serves the United States under
the orders of the military commander?
Does the Outlook know why all the general officers
who can get away, escape from ManUa? Can it be as
the soldiers say that they would avoid responsibUity for
what they cannot help ?
Does the Outlook realize that few of the officers at
Manila have any mUitary training, and that over many
of the bravest troops in the world are placed as com-
raissioned officers men who were lawyers, insurance
agents, printers, elevator boys, bartenders, and drivers
of beer-wagons, a year ago in civil life ?
Does the Outlook re?alize the effect of the promiscuous
looting of towns and the murder of " every man that
sticks his head out of the door " on the men engaged
in it?
Some of them glory in it. " It is like a Colorado
rabbit drive on a grand scale." More loathe the very
idea of war and everything and every man concemed
in it.

272 IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
Does the Outlook realize the effect on the country
when both these classes return home ?
One soldier says, " If the United States were on fire
from end to end, I would never raise my hand to put it
out." Another would " toss in a blanket the officials at
Washington, as we toss a cheating corporal." Another
says in print, referring to the abuse of the soldiers by
their superiors in pay :
" Yes, I knew that war would be hell before I got into it. But
I did not know that war would be Hell deliberately and fanati
cally inflicted. I expected to sleep in mud puddles with my head
on a stone for a pillow, and go hungry for days on forced marches
and away from a base of supplies. But I never dreamed that I
would have to sleep in leaky and exposed sheds when there was
plenty of good shelter elsewhere, and when thirty ofiicers had fine
apartments in which there was room for five hundred men ;
neither did I expect to be fed on coffee grounds and foul canned
meat for weeks when we were right next to a base of supplies,
and when our officers lived on the choice of the commissary's de
partment. Now any young man whose ire wUl not arouse at
such deliberate deviltry is not worthy to live under despotic
Russia. Does the Outlook believe that a country as large as
California and with about as many people as Mexico,
and quite as capable and civilized on the average, can
be subdued by any army the American people wiU main
tain? Can it be held when once subdued? Why must
it be subdued ? Why ought it to be ?
It is true enough that not all these people are in arms
against us. But all with whom we have come in contact
are. If we try to bring " Law and order " to Mindanao,
do we not know that the whole island will be in flames?
Has the Outlook heard from one high in authority, that
we have " to kiU off half the population " of these islands

THE CAPTAIN SLEEPS. 273
in order " to give good government to the rest.? " Does
the Outlook realize " what is the character of that calm
when the law and the slaveholder prevaU?" Has it
heard from high authority that " we must hold up the
American flag even if we shoot down ten miUions of
niggers, dagoes and missing links? " It may be that
its staff wiU become so bloody that no free raan wiU
grasp it.
Does the Outlook believe that the coramanding general
with 30,000 troops, mostly volunteers held over time,
will conquer the Filipinos in a thousand years? Has
the Outlook read the history of the Straits Settlements?
Does the Outlook believe that with 100,000 men, a
brave Indian fighter can conquer these people in five
years? Does the C2^//(7^/4 know the story of Achin? Is
it trae that our Consul at ManUa declares that he does
not expect to live to see the end of this war?
Has the Outlook read the story of Mexico? Does it
know how a feeble people cast off an alien yoke and
spurned foreign help, developing at last into a peaceful,
strong and orderly nation solely through forces within
itseff? Now it may be that soldiers exaggerate the things they
have seen. Perhaps so. I may be deceived by them,
and the nightmare I have conjured up may be my own
and theirs. But the men I have trusted had learned to
see clearly when they left California. Their words are
not so raild as those I have chosen. If the Outlook knew
all that has come to those of us in California who have
sought for the truth, it would set up no plea of mitigation.
The magazines are full of stories of " What I did in
Cuba " from officers who took part in that campaign.

274 IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
But no one prints " What I saw in Luzon." Not glory
but the court-martial awaits the man who saw. If it
were seen by the country, the country would bum with
wrath hotter than the flames that consumed Malabon,
In such case, what is the duty of the President? What
is the duty of Congress? What of Christian citizens?
What of the editor of the Christian journal ?
Do what you wUl with the Philippines, ff you can do
it in peace — but stop this war.
It is our fault and ours alone that this war began. It
is our crirae that it continues.
We make no criticism of tlie kindly and popular
President of the United States, save, this one : He does
not realize the wild fury of the forces he has unwillingly
and unwittingly brought into action. These must be
kept instantly and constantly in hand. The authority to
do rests with him alone, and if ever " strenuous life "
was needed in the nation, it is in the guiding hand of
to-day. The ship is on fire. The Captain sleeps. The
saUors storm in vain at his door. When he shaU rise,
we doff our hats in respectful obeisance. If we have
brought a false alarra, on our heads rests the penalty.

VIII.
THE LAST OF THE PURITANS

VIII.
THE LAST OF THE PURITANS.*
I HAVE a word to say of Thoreau, and of an episode
which brought his character into bold relief, and which
has fairly earned for him a place in American history, as
well as in our literature.
I do not wish now to give any account of the life of
Thoreau. In the preface to his volume called " Excur
sions " you will find a biographical sketch, written by
the loving hand of Mr. Emerson, his neighbor and friend.
Neither shall I enter into any justification of Thoreau's
peculiar mode of life, nor shaU I describe the famous
cabin in the pine woods by Waldon Pond, already be
coming the Mecca of the Order of Saunterers, whose
great prophet was Thoreau. His profession of land-
surveyor was one naturally adopted by him ; for to him
every hill and forest was a being, each with its own in
dividuality. This profession kept him in the fields and
woods, with the sky over his head and the mold under
] his feet. It paid him the money needed for his daily
' wants, and he cared for no more.
He seldom went far away frora Concord, and, in a
*Address before the California State Normal School, at San
Jose, 1892. 277

278 IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
haff-playful way, he used to view everything in the world
from a Concord standpoint. All the grandest trees grew
there and all the rarest flowers and nearly all the phe-
noraena of nature could be observed at Concord.
" Nothing can be hoped of you," he said, " if this bit
of mold under your feet is not sweeter to you than any
other in this world — in any world."
Although one of the most acute of observers, Thoreau
was never reckoned among the scientific men of his time.
He was never a member of any Natural History Society,
nor of any Academy of Sciences, bodies which, in a gen
eral way, he held in not altogether unmerited contempt.
When men band together for the study of nature, they
first draft a long constitution, with its attendant by-laws,
and then proceed to the election of officers, and, by and
by, the study of nature becomes subordinate to the
maintenance of the organization.
In technical scientific work, Thoreau took little pleas
ure. It is often pedantic, often bloodless, and often it
is a source of inspiration only to him by whom the work
is done. Animals and plants were interesting to him, not
in their structure and genealogical affinities, but in their re
lations to his mind. He loved wild things, not alone for
themselves, but for the tonic effect of their savagery upon
him. " I wish to speak a word for nature," he said, "for
absolute freedom and wildness, as contrasted with a
freedom and culture merely civU, to regard raan as an
inhabitant, a part and parcel of nature, rather than as a
member of society. I wish to make an extrerae state
raent ; if so, I may make an emphatic one, for there are
enough champions of civilization. The minister and the

THE LAST OF THE PURITANS. 279
school committees, and every one of you, will take care
of that."
To Thoreau's admirers, he is the prophet of the fields
and woods, the interpreter of nature, and his every word
has to them the deepest significance. He is the raan who
" Lives aU alone, close to the bone.
And where life is sweetest, constantly eatest."
They resent all criticisra of his life or his words. They
are irapatient of aU analysis of his raethods or of his
raotives, and a word of praise of hira is the surest pass
port to their good graces.
But the critics soraetiraes raiss the inner harmony
which Thoreau's admirers see, and discern only queer
paradoxes and extravagances of stateraent where the
others hear the voice of nature's oracle. With raost lit
erary raen, the power of disposition of those who know
or understand their writings is in some degree a matter
of literary culture. It is hardly so in the case of Tho
reau. The most iUiterate man I know who had ever heard of
Thoreau, Mr, Barney Mulhns, of Freedom Center, Outa
gamie County, Wisconsin, was a most ardent admirer of
Thoreau, while the most eminent critic in America, James
Russell Lowell, does him scant justice. To Lowell, the
finest thoughts of Thoreau are but strawberries from
Emerson's garden, and other critics have followed back
these sarae strawberries through Emerson's to stiU older
gardens, among them to that of Sir Thomas Browne.
But, setting the critics aside, let me tell you about
Bamey Mullins. Twenty years ago, I lived for a year in
the northern part of Wisconsin. The snow is very deep
19

28o IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
in the winter there, and once I rode into town through
the snowbanks on a sled drawn by two oxen and driven
by Barney Mullins. Barney was born on the banks of
KiUarney, and he could scarcely be said to speak the
English language. He told me that before he came to
Freedom Centre he had lived in a town caUed Concord,
in Massachusetts. I asked him if he had happened to
know a man there by the name of Henry Thoreau. He
at once grew enthusiastic and he said, among other
things : " Mr. Thoreau was a land-surveyor in Concord.
I knew hira well. He had a way of his own, and he
didn't care much about money ; but ff there ever was a
gentleman alive, he was one."
Barney seemed rauch saddened when I told him that
Mr. Thoreau had been dead a dozen years. On part
ing, he asked me to come out sometirae to Freedom
Centre, and to spend a night with him. He hadn't
rauch of a roora to offer rae, but there was always a place
in his house for a friend of Mr. Thoreau. Such is the
feeling of this guild of lovers of Thoreau, and some of
you may come to belong to it.
Here is a test for you. Thoreau says : " I long ago
lost a hound, a bay horse, and a turtle-dove, and am
still on their traU. Many are the travelers I have spoken
to regarding them, describing their tracks, and what
calls they answered to. I have met one or two who
have heard the hound and the tramp of the horse, and
even seen the dove disappear behind the cloud, and
they seemed as anxious to recover them as if they had
lost them themselves."
Now, ff any of you, in your dreams, have heard the
horse, or seen the sunshine on the dove's wings, you may

THE LAST OF THE PURITANS. 281
join in the search. If not, you may close the book, for
Thoreau has not written for you.
This Thoreau guild is composed, as he himself says,
" of knights of a new, or, rather, an old order, not eques
trians or chevaliers, not Ritters, or riders, but walkers, a
StiU more ancient and honorable class, I trast."
" I have raet," he says, " but one or two persons who
understand the art of walking; who had a genius for
sauntering, which word is beautifully derived from idle
people who roved about the country in the Middle Ages
and asked charity, under pretense of going * a la Sainte
Terre ' — a Sainte-terrer, a Holy- Lander. They who
never go to the Holy Land in their walks, as they pre
tend, are indeed mere idlers and vagabonds ; but they
who go there are saunterers, in the good sense. Every
walk is a kind of crusade preached by sorae Peter the
Herrait within us, to go forth and reconquer this Holy
Land frora the hands of the Infidels.
" It is trae that we are but faint-hearted crusaders,
who undertake no persevering, never-ending enterprises.
Our expeditions are but tours, and corae round again at
evening to the old hearth-side frora which we set out.
Haff the walk is but retracing our steps. We should go
forth on the shortest walk, perchance, in the spirit of
undying adventure, never to return, prepared to send
back our embalraed hearts only as relics to our desolate
kingdoras. If you are ready to leave father and raother,
and brother and sister, and wffe and child, and friends ;
if you have paid your debts, and raade your will, and
settled all your affairs, and are a free raan, you are ready
for a walk."
Though a severe critic of conventional follies, Thoreau

282 IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
was always a hopeful man ; and no finer rebuke to the
philosophy of Pessimism was ever given than in these
words of his : " I know of no more encouraging fact
than the unquestionable ability of a man to elevate his
life by a conscious endeavor. It is something to be able
to paint a particular picture, or to carve a statue, and so
make a few objects beautiful ; but it is far more glorious
to carve and paint the very atmosphere and medium
through which we look. This, morally, we can do."
But it is not of Thoreau as a saunterer, or as nat
uralist, or as an essayist, that I wish to speak, but as
a moralist, and this in relation to American politics.
Thoreau lived in a dark day of our political history. At
one time he made a declaration of independence in a
small way, and refused allegiance and poll-tax to a Govem
ment built on a comer-stone of huraan slavery. Be
cause of this he was put into jail, where he reraained one
night, and where he raade sorae curious observations on
his townspeople as viewed frora the inside of the bars.
Emerson came along in the morning, and asked him what
he was there for. " Why are you not in here, Mr. Emer
son? " was his reply; for it seeraed to him that no raan
had the right to be free in a country where some men
were slaves.
"Voting for the right," Thoreau said, "is doing noth
ing for it ; it is only expressing feebly your desire that
right should prevail." He would not for an instant
recognize that political organization as his government
which was the slave's government also. " In fact," he
said, " I will quietly, after my fashion, declare war with
the State. Under a govemment which imprisons any
unjustly, the trae place for a just man is also a prison.

THE LAST OF THE PURITANS. 283
I know this well, that ff one thousand, ff one hundred, or
ff one honest man in this State of Massachusetts, ceas
ing to remain in this copartnership, should be locked
up in the county jail therefor, it would be the abolition
of slavery in America. It matters not how smaU the
beginning may seem to be, what is once well done is
done forever."
Thoreau's friends paid his taxes for him, and he was
set free, so that the whole affair seemed like a joke.
Yet, as Robert Lewis Stevenson says, " If his example
had been followed by a hundred, or by thirty of his
followers, it would have greatly precipitated the era of
freedom and justice. We feel the misdeeds of our
country with so little fervor, for we are not witnesses to
the suffering they cause. But when we see them awake
an active horror in our feUow-men; when we see a
neighbor prefer to lie in prison than be so much as
passively implicated in their perpetration, even the
duUest of us will begin to realize them with a quicker
pulse." In the feeling that a wrong, no matter how great, must
fall before the determined assault of a man, no matter
how weak, Thoreau found the reason for his action.
The operation of the laws of God is like an incontrol-
lable torrent. Nothing can stand before them ; but
the work of a single man raay set the torrent in motion
which will sweep away the accumulations of centuries of
wrong. There is a long chapter in our national history which
is not a glorious record. Most of us are too young to
reraeraber much of pohtics under the Fugitive Slave
Law, or to understand the deference which politicians

284 IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY,
of every grade then paid to the peculiar institution. It
was in those days in the Middle West that Kentucky
blackguards, backed by the laws of the United States,
and aided not by Northern blackguards alone, but
by many of the best citizens of those States, chased
runaway slaves through the streets of our Northern
capitals. And not the politicians alone, but the teachers and
preachers, took their turn in paying tribute to Csesar,
We were told that the Bible itself was a champion of
slavery. Two of our greatest theologians in the North
declared at Princeton and at Bowdoin in the narae of
the Higher Law, that slavery was a holy thing, which
the Lord, who cursed Canaan, would ever uphold.
For these raen believed sincerely that the poor and
the weak should serve the strong and the wise for their
own good as well as for material prosperity. The Un
known God of the nations, they know not how to wor
ship cares for manhood, not order nor prosperity. For
every drop of blood drawn by the lash in their despotic
benevolence. He drew " another by the sword."
In those days there came a man from the West — a
tall, gaunt, grizzly, shaggy-haired. God-fearing raan, a
son of the Puritans, whose ancestors came over on the
Mayflower. A dangerous fanatic or lunatic, he was caUed,
and, with the aid of a few poor negroes whom he had
stolen frora slavery, he defied the power of this whole
slave-catching United States. A little square brick build
ing, once a sort of car-shop, stands near the railway
station in the town of Harper's Ferry, with the moun
tain waU not far behind it, and the Potomac River ran
ning below. And from this buiWing was fired the shot

THE LAST OF THE PURITANS, 285
which pierced the heart of slavery. And the Governor
of Virginia captured this raan, and took hira out and
hung hira, and laid his body in the grave, where it stUl
lies raoldering. But there was part of him not in the
jurisdiction of Virginia, a part which they could neither
hang noi bury ; and, to the infinite surprise of the Gov
ernor of Virginia, his soul went marching on.
When they heard in Concord that John Brown had
been captured, and was soon to be hung, Thoreau sent
notice through the city that he would speak in the public
haU on the condition and character of John Brown, on
Simday evening, and invited all to be present
The Repubhcan Coraraittee and the Committee of the
Abolitionists sent word to him that this was no time to
speak ; to discuss such raatters then was premature and
inadvisable. He replied : " I did not send to you for
advice, but to tell you that I am going to speak." The
selectmen of Concord dared neither grant nor refuse hira
the hall. At last they ventured to lose the key in a
place where they thought he could find it.
This address of Thoreau, " A Plea for Captain John
Brown," should be a classic in Araerican history. We
do not always realize that the tirae of American history
is now. The dates of the settlement of Jamestown, and
Plymouth, and St, Augustine do not constitute our his
tory, Columbus did not discover us. In a high sense,
the true America is barely thirty years old, and its first
President was Abraham Lincoln,
We in the North are a little irapatient at tiraes, and
our pohticians, who are not always our best citizens,
mutter terrible oaths, especially in the month of October,
because the South is not yet wholly regenerate, because

286 IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
not all which sprang from the ashes of the slave-pen
were angels of light.
But let us be patient while the world moves on. Forty
years ago not only the banks of the Yazoo and the
Chattahoochee, but those of the Hudson, and the Charles,
and the Wabash, were under the lash. On the eve of
John Brown's hanging not haff a dozen men in the city
of Concord, the most inteUectual town in New England,
the horae of Emerson, and Hawthorne, and Alcott, dared
say that they felt any respect for the raan or syrapathy
for the cause for which he died.
I wish to quote a few passages from this " Plea for
Captain John Brown." To fully realize its power, you
should read it all for yourselves. You must put your
selves back into history, now already seeming almost
ancient history to us, to the period when Buchanan was
President — the terrible sultry luff just before the great
storm. You raust picture the audience of the best peo
ple in Massachusetts, haff-sympathizing with Captain
Brown, haff afraid of being guilty of treason in so doing.
You must picture the speaker, with his clear-cut, earnest
features and penetrating voice. No preacher, no politi
cian, no professional reformer, no Republican, no Demo
crat ; a man who never voted ; a naturalist whose cora
panions were the flowers and the birds, the trees and
the squirrels. It was the voice of Nature in protest
against slavery and in plea for Captain Brown.
" My respect for my fellow-men," said Thoreau, " is
not being increased these days. I have noticed the
cold-blooded way in which men speak of this event, as
U an ordinary malefactor, though one of unusual pluck,

THE LAST OF THE PURITANS. 287
' the gamest man I ever saw,' the Govemor of Virginia
said, had been caught and was about to be hung. He
was not thinking of his foes when the Govemor of
Virginia thought he looked so brave.
" It tums what sweetness I have to gaff to hear the
remarks of some of my neighbors. When we heard at
first that he was dead, one of my townsmen observed
that ' he dieth as the fool dieth,' which, for an instant,
suggested a likeness in him dying to my neighbor living.
Others, craven-hearted, said, disparagingly, that he threw
his life away because he resisted the Govemment.
Which way have they thrown their lives, pray?
" I hear another ask, Yankee-like, ' What will he gain
by it?' as ff he expected to fiU his pockets by the en
terprise. If it does not lead to a surprise party, ff he
does not get a new pair of boots or a vote of thanks, it
must be a failure. But he won't get anything. Well,
no ; I don't suppose he could get four-and-sixpence a
day for being hung, take the year around, but be stands
a chance to save his soul — ^and such a soul ! — which you
do not. You can get more in your market for a quart
of milk than a quart of blood, but yours is not the market
heroes carry their blood to.
" Such do not know that like the seed is the fruit, and
that in the moral world, when good seed is planted,
good frait is inevitable ; that when you plant or bury a
hero in his field, a crop of heroes is sure to spring up.
This is a seed of such force and vitality, it does not ask
our leave to germinate.
" A man does a brave and humane deed, and on all
sides we hear people and parties declaring, ' I didn't do
it, nor countenance him to do it in any conceivable way.

288 IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
It can't fairly be inferred from my past career,' Ye
needn't take so much pains, my friends, to wash your
skirts of him. No one will ever be convinced that he
was any creature of yours. He went and came, as he
himseff irfforras us, under the auspices of John Brown,
and nobody else.
" ' All is quiet in Harper's Ferry,' say the journals.
What is the character of that calm which follows when
the law and the slaveholder prevaU ? I regard this event
as a touchstone designed to bring out with glaring dis
tinctness the character of this Governraent. We needed
to be thus assisted to see it by the light of history. It
needed to see itseff. When a government puts forth its
strength on the side of injustice, as ours, to maintain
slavery and kill the liberators of the slave, it reveals itseff
simply as brute force. It is more manifest than ever that
tyranny rales. I see this Government to be effectually
aUied with France and Austria in oppressing raankind,
" The only governraent that I recognize — and it raat
ters not how few are at the head of it, or how sraaU its
array, — is the power that establishes justice in the land,
never that which establishes injustice, 'What shaU we
think of a government to which all the traly brave and
just men in the land are enemies, standing between it
and those whom it oppresses ?
"Treason! Where does such treason take its rise?
I cannot help thinking of you as ye deserve, ye govern
ments ! Can you dry up the fountain of thought? High
treason, when it is resistance to tyranny here below, has
its origin in the power that makes and forever re-creates
man. When you have caught and hung aU its huraan
rebels, you have accoraplished nothing but your own

THE LAST OF THE PURITANS, 289
guUt, You have not struck at the fountain-head. The
same indignation which cleared the teraple once wiU
clear it again.
" I hear many condemn these men because they were
so few. When were the good and the brave ever in the
raajority? Would you have had him wait tiU that time
came? Till you and I came over to hira? The very
fact that he had no rabble or troop of hirelings about
hira, would alone distinguish him from ordinary heroes.
His company was small, indeed, because few could be
found worthy to pass muster. Each one who there laid
down his life for the poor and oppressed was a picked
man, called out of raany thousands, ff not millions. A
man of principle, of rare courage and devoted humanity,
ready to sacrifice his Iffe at any moment for the benefit
of his fellow-man ; it may be doubted if there were as
many more their equals in the country ; for their leader,
do doubt, had scoured the land far and wide, seeking to
swell his troop. These alone were ready to step between
the oppressor and the oppressed. Surely they were the
very best men you could select to be hung ! That was
the greatest compliraent their country could pay them.
They were ripe for her gaUows. She has tried a long
time ; she has hung a good many, but never found the
right one before.
" 'When I think of him and his six sons and his son-in-
law enlisted for this fight, proceeding coolly, reverently,
humanely to work, for months, if not years, sumraering and
wintering the thought, without expecting any reward but
a good conscience, while alraost aU Araerica stood ranked
on the other side, I say again that it affects me as a sub
lime spectacle.

290 IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
" If he had had any journal advocating his cause, any
organ monotonously and wearisomely playing the same
old tune and then passing around the hat, it would have
been fatal to his efficiency. If he had acted in such a
way as to be let alone by the Governraent, he might have
been suspected. It was the fact that the tyrant must give
place to him, or he to the tyrant, that distinguished him
from all the reformers of the day that I know.
" This event advertises rae that there is such a fact as
death, the possibility of a raan's dying. It seeras as ff
no raan had ever died in Araerica before. If this man's
acts iind words do not create a revival, it wiU be the
severest possible satire on words and acts that do,
" It is the best news that America has ever heard. It
has already quickened the feeble pulse of the North, and
infused more generous blood in her veins than any num
ber of years of what is called political and comraercial
prosperity. How raany a raan who was lately con tera-
plating suicide has now soraething to live for !
" I ara here to plead his cause with you. I plead not
for his life, but for his character, his iramortal life, and
so it becoraes your cause wholly, and it is not his in the
least. " Some eighteen hundred years ago Christ was craci
fied ; this morning, perchance. Captain Brown was hung.
These are the two ends of the chain which is not without
its links. He is not Old Brown any longer ; he is an
angel of light, I see now that it was necessary that the
bravest and humanest raan in aU the country should be
hung. Perhaps he saw it hiraself. I almost fear that I
may yet hear of his deliverance, doubting if a prolonged
Iffe, if any Iffe, can do as much good as his death.

THE LAST OF THE PURITANS. 29 1
" ' Misguided ! Garrulous ! Insane ! Vindictive ! '
So you write in your easy-chairs, and thus he, wounded,
responds from the floor of tiie Arraory — clear as a cloud
less sky, true as the voice of Nature is ! ' No man sent
me here. It was my own promptings and that of my
Maker. I acknowledge no master in human form.'
" And in what a sweet and noble strain he proceeds,
addressing his captors, who stand over hira,
" ' I think, ray friends, you are guUty of a great wrong
against God and humanity, and it would be perfectly
right for any one to interfere with you so far as to free
those you wiffuUy and wickedly hold in bondage, I
have yet to learn that God is any respecter of persons,
" ' I pity the poor in bondage, who have none to help
them ; that is why I am here, not to gratify personal
animosity, revenge, or vindictive spirit. It is ray syra
pathy with the oppressed and the wronged that are as
good as you are, and as precious in the sight of God.
" ' I wish to say, furtherraore, that you had better, all
of you people at the South, prepare yourselves for a
settiement of that question, that must come up for settle
ment sooner than you are prepared for it. The sooner
you are prepared the better. You may dispose of me
now very easily — I am nearly disposed of already, — but
this question is stiU to be settled, this negro question, I
mean; the end of that is not yet.' "
" I foresee the time," said Thoreau, " when the painter
wUl paint that scene, no longer going to Rome for his
subject. The poet will sing it ; the historian record it ;
and, with the Landing of the Pilgrims and the Declaration
of Independence, it will be the ornament of some future
national gaUer)', when at least the present form of slavery

292 IMPERIAL DEMOCRACY.
shall be no more here. We shall then be at liberty to
weep for Captain Brown. Then, and not tiU then, we will
take our revenge."
A few years ago, while on a tramp through the North
Woods, I came out through the forests of North Elba, to
the old " John Brown Farm." Here John Brown lived
for raany years, and here he tried to establish a colony
of freed slaves in the pure air of the mountains. Here,
too, his family remained through the stirring tiraes when
he took part in the bloody straggles that made and kept
Kansas free.
The little old brown farmhouse stands on the edge of
the great woods, a few mUes to the north of the highest
peaks of the Adirondacks. There is nothing unusual
about the house. You will find a dozen such in a few
hours' walk almost anywhere in the mountain parts of
New England or New York. It stands on a little hill,
" in a sightly place," as they say in that region, with no
shelter of trees around it.
At the foot of the hiU in a broad curve flows the River
Au Sable, sraall and clear and cold, and fuU of trout.
It is not far above that the streara takes its rise in the
dark Indian Pass, the only place in these raountains where
the ice of winter lasts all suraraer long. The sarae ice
on the one side sends forth the Au Sable, and on the
other feeds the fountain-head of the infant Hudson
River, In the little dooryard in front of the farmhouse is the
historic spot where John Brown's body stiU hes raolder
ing. There is not even a grave of his own. His bones
lie with those of his father, and the short record of his

THE LAST OF THE PURITANS. 293
Iffe and death is crowded on the foot of his father's tomb
stone. Near by, in the little yard, lies a huge, wander
ing boulder, torn off years ago by the glaciers from the
granite hills that hera in Indian Pass. The boulder is
ten feet or more in diameter, large enough to raake the
farrahouse behind it seera small in coraparison. On its
upper surface, in letters two feet long, which can be read
plainly for a raile away, is cut the siraple narae —
JOHN BROWN,
This is John Brown's grave, and the place, the boul
der, and the inscription are alike fitting to the man he
was. Dust to dust ; ashes to ashes ; granite to granite ; the
last of the Puritans ! THE END.

D. APPLETON & CO.'S PUBLICATIONS.
JJ/'EALTH AND PROGRESS. A Critical Exam-
'^ ' ination of the Labor Problem. The Natural Basis for Indus
trial Reform, or How to Increase Wages without Reducing
Profits or Lowering Rents : the Economic Philosophy of the
Eight-Hour Movement. By George Gunton. i2mo. Paper,
50 cents ; cloth, $1.00.
" The reader will find a statement of the labor problem as founded upon the etemal
principles that underlie and the laws which govern human progress, not only through
the wages system, where eight hours are practicable and feasible, but the laws which
govern social evolution in all its stages, from savagery to the highest phases of civiliza
tion. ' — Christian at Work.

s

N

PEECHES AND ADDRESSES OF WILLIAM
McKINLE V. From his Election to Congress to the Present
Time. Compiled by Joseph P. Smith. With Portraits on
Steel of the Author and Others. 8vo, 650 pages. Cloth, $2.00.
These selections, sixty-five in number, embrace a wide range of topics of absorbing
public interest, and include twenty-five speeches devoted to the tariff question in all its
aspects, and others on silver. Federal elections, pensions, and the public debt, civil-
service reform, the Treasury surplus and the purchase of bonds, me direct tax bill,
etc. The orator whose views are thus presented is the best authority of his party on
most of the matters considered. An elaborate analytical Index gives the volume an
encyclopedic character, which will be especially appreciated at the present time by the
student of whatever political faith.
ATURAL RESOURCES OF THE UNITED
STA TES. By Jacob Harris Patton, A. M., Ph. D., au
thor of '* Four Hundred Years of American History,'' etc. Re
vised, with Additions. 8vo. Cloth, gilt top, $3.00.
" Covers everything, from the rarest minerals to seedless oranges. ... A most
comprehensive volume." — Philadelphia Press.
'* A valuable summary of our native wealth. It treats not only of the precious
metals, coal, iron, and petroleum, but of natural gas, building stones, fire clay, kaolin,
abrasive materials, mineral springs, salt deposits, grasses, orchard fruits, deposits of
gypsum, marl and phosphate, wild game, and fur-bearing animals. There are chapters
on irrigation, health resorts, resources in water power and in lands. T he section on
our fisheries is deeply interesting, and contributes fresh scenes to the general panorama
of our national prosperity. . , . No reader of this work can consistently despair of the
future of the great republic." — Philadelphia Ledger.
C TUDIES IN MODERN SOCIALISM AND LA-
^ BOR PROBLEMS. By T. Edwin Brown, D. D. i2mo.
Cloth, $1.25.
" This volume by Dr. Brown is one of the best books on the subject. It should be
studied by all, in order that any discussion of it, whether in the pulpit or in private con
versation, should be intelligent." — Cincinnati Christian Advocate.

New York : D. APPLETON & CO., 72 Fifth Avenue.

D. APPLETON & CO.'S PUBLICATIONS.
CHAPTERS IN POLITICAL ECONOMY. By
Albert S. Bolles, Lecturer on Political Economy in the Bos
ton University. Square l2mo. Cloth, $1.50.
Contents. — The Field and Importance of Political Economy ; The Pay
ment of Labor ; On the Increase of Wages ; Effect of Machinery on Labor ;
On the Meaning and Causes of Value ; A Measure of Value ; Money and its
Uses ; Decline in the Value of Gold and Silver ; The Money of the Future ;
The Good and Evil of Banking ; The Financial Panic of 1873 ; Relation of
Banks to Speculators ; Influence of Credit on Prices ; On Legal Interference
with the Loan of Money, Payment of Labor, 2ind Contracts of Corporations ;
Advantages of Exchange j Taxation.
PROTECTION VERSUS FREE TRADE. The
-* Scientific Validity and Economic Operation of Defensive Duties
in the United States. By Henry M. Hoyt. i2mo. Cloth,
$2.00 ; paper, 50 cents.
The author of this work is well known as formerly Govemor of Pennsyl
vania. He appears in this volume as a defender of protection, discussing the
subject in a judicial spirit, with great fullness.
PROTECTION TO HOME INDUSTRY. Four
-* Lectures delivered in Harvard University, January, 1885. By
R. E. Thompson, A. M., Professor in the University of Penn
sylvania. 8vo. Cloth, $1.00.
" In these lectures Professor Thompson has stated the essential arguments for pro
tection so clearly and compactly that it is not strange that they have produced a deep
impression. . . . The lectures as printed form a neat volume, which all fairly informed
students may read with mt'ix^^t." —Philadelphia Item.

T

ALKS ABO UT LABOR, and concerning the Evolu
tion of fustice between Laborers and Capitalists. By J. N.
Earned. i2mo. Cloth, $1.50.
The author's aim has been to find the direction in which one may hope
fully look for some more harmonious and more satisfactory conjunction of
capital with labor than prevails in our present social state, by finding in what
direction the rules of ethics and the laws of political economy tend together.

H

ANDBOOK OF SOCIAL ECONOMY ; or. The
Worker's ABC. By Edmond About. i2mo. Cloth, $2.00.
Contents. — ^Man's Wants ; Useful Things ; Production ; Parasites ;
Exchange ; Liberty ; Money ; Wages ; Savings and Capital ; Strikes ; Co
operation ; Assurance, and some other Desirable Novelties.

New York : D. APPLETON & CO., 72 Fifth Avenue.

D. APPLETON & CO.'S PUBLICATIONS.
(SOCIALISM NEW AND OLD. By Professor
^ William Graham. i2mo. Cloth, $1.75.
*' Prof. Graham's book may be confidently recommended to all who are interested
in the study of socialism, and not so intoxicated with its promises of a new heaven and
a new earth as to be impatient of temperate and reasoned criticism." — London Times.
** Altogether Mr. Graham has given us a useful discussion, and one that deserves to
be read by all who are interested in the subject." — Science.
*' Prof. Graham presents an outline of the successive schemes of three writers who
have chiefly influenced the development of socialism, and dwells at length upon the
system of Rousseau, that of St. Simon, and on that of Karl Marx, the founder of the
new socialism, * which has gained favor with the working classes in all civilized coun
tries,' which agrees with Rousseau's plan in being democratic, and with St. Simon's in
aiming at collective ownership. . . . The professor is an independent thinker, whose
endeavor to be clear has resulted in the statement of definite conclusions. The book
is a remarkably fair digest of the subject under consideration." — Philadelphia Ledger.
T\YNAMIC SOCIOLOGY ; or, Applied Social Science,
¦*— ^ as based upon Statical Sociology and the less Complex Sciences.
By Lester F. Ward, A. M. In 2 vols. i2mo. Cloth, $5.00.
"A book that will amply repay perusal. . . . Recognizing the danger in which
sociology is, of falling into the class of dead sciences or polite amusements, Mr. Ward
has undertaken to * point out a method by which the breath of life can be breathed into
its nostrils.' " — Rochester Posi Express.
" Mr. Ward has evidently put great labor and thought into his two volumes, and
has produced a work of interest and importance. He does not limit his effort to a con
tribution to the science of sociology. . . . He believes that sociology has already
reached ihe point at which it can be and ought to be applied, treated as an art, and he
urges that * the State ' or Government now has a new, legitimate, and peculiar field for
the exercise of intelligence to promote the welfare of men." — Nem York Times.
" A fundamental discussion of many of the most important questions of science and
philosophy in their bearings upon social economy and human affairs in general. It
does not treat directly these current questions in any department, and yet it furnishes
the basis in science and in logic for the correct solution of nearly all of them. It is
therefore exceedingly opportune, as there has never been a period in which greater ac
tivity existed in the direction of thoroughly working out and scientifically setding the
problems of social, national, and individual life." — Washington Star,

F

REELAND : A Social Anticipation. By Dr. Theo-
DOR Hertzka. i2mo. Cloth, $1.00.
"A treatise on social economics somewhat on the plan of Bellamy's 'Looking
Backward.* Dr. Hertzka has actually founded a socialist colony in Aftica, upon the
lines laid down in this book, and ' Freeiand' is the imaginary history of the future of
the colony. It will doubtless be the cause of much comment and discussion." — San
Francisco Evening Post.
"A politico-economic romance in which is elaborated a comprehensive and philo
sophic scheme of social reorganization. Its author is a Viennese economist of emi
nence. . . . Dr. Hertzka's conception of an ideal social state, his 'Anticipation' is well
worth careful and sympathetic reading." — Detroit Tribune.
"In the end Freeiand reaches a state of universal prosperity and contentment now
unheard of. Dr. Hertzka assures the reader that he has drawn no Utopia, buta prac
ticable community, such as a sufficient number of vigorous men can establish in other
eligible parts of the world as well as in the highlands of Xincdi.,"— Cincinnati Times
Star. 
New York : D. APPLETON & CO.. 72 Fifth Avenue.

D. APPLETON & CO.S PUBLICATIONS.

7 HE SCIENCE OF LA W. By Professor Sheldon
Amos, M.A. i2mo. Cloth, $1.75.
CONTENTS.— -Chapter I. Recent History and Present Condition of the Science
of Law; II. Province and Limits of the Science of Law; III. Law and Morality;
IV. The Growth of Law; V. The Growth of Law (continued) ; VL Elementary Con
ceptions and Terms; VII. Law in Relation to (x) the State, (2) the Family, (3) the
other Constituent Elements of the Race; VIII. Laws of Ownership of Property; IX.
Law of Contract ; X. Criminal Law and Procedure ; XI. The Law of Civil Procedure ;
XII. International Law ; XIII. Codification; XIV. Law and Govemment
" Professor Amos has certainly done much to clear the science of law from the tech
nical obscurities which darken it to minds which have had no legal training, and to make
clear to his * lay * readers in how true and high a sense it can assert its right to be con
sidered a science, and not a mere practice." — Christian Register.

T

HE SCIENCE OF POLITICS. By Professor
Sheldon Amos, M. A., author of "The Science of Law,"
etc, i2mo. Cloth, $1.75.
CONTENTS.— Chapter L Nature and Limits of the Science of Politics ; IL Po
litical Terms; III. Political Reasoning ; IV. The Geographical Area of Modem Poli
tics; V. The Primary Elements of PoUtical Life and Action; VI. Constitutions; VII.
Local Govemment ; VIII. The Government of Dependencies; IX. Foreign Relations ;
X. The Province of Govemment ; XL Revolutions in States ; XIL Right and Wrong
in Politics. ** The author traces the subject from Plato and Aristotle in Greece, and Cicero in
Rome, to the modern schools in the English field, not slighting the teachings of the
American Revolution or the lessons of the French Revolution of 1793. Forms of gov
ernment, political terms, the relation of Law, written and unwritten, to the subject, a
codification from Justinian to Napoleon in France and Field in America, are treated as
parts of the subject in hand. Necessarily the subjects of executive and legislative au
thority, police, liquor, and land laws are considered, and tbe question ever growing in
importance in all countries, the relations of corporations to the state." — N. Y. Observer.
r\IGEST OF THE LAWS, CUSTOMS, MAN-
•LJ NERS, AND INSTITUTIONS OF ANCIENT AND
MODERN NA TIONS. By Thomas Dew, late President of
the College of William and Mary. 8vo. Cloth, $2.00.
No pains have been spared by the author to secure accuracy in facts and figures ; and
Ul doubtful cases references are given in parentheses, so that the student can readily
satisfy himself by going to original sources. The department of Modem History, too
often neglected in works of this kind, has received special care and attention.

R

OMAN LA W ; Its History and System of Private
Law. In Twelve Academical Lectures. By Professor James
Hadley. i2mo. Cloth, $1.25.
"The most valuable short account of the nature and importance of the body of Ro
man law. The lectures are free from embarrassing technical details, while at tfie tame
time they are sufficiently elaborate to f^ve a definite idea of tke nature and the great-
nesBofUie subject."— .ZPn C K. Adams's Manual 0/ Historical Literature.

New York; D. APPLETON & CO., 72 Fifth Avenue.

D. APPLETON & CO.'S PUBLICATIONS.
^  .  '-
'DECENT ECONOMIC CHANGES, and their Ef-
^ »- feet on the Production and Distribution of Wealth and ihe
Well-being of Society, By David A. Wells, LL.D., D.C.L.,
Membre Correspondant de 1' Institut de France ; Correspond
dente Regia Accademia dei Lincei, Italia ; Honorary Fellow
Royal Statistical Society, G. B. ; late United States Special
Commissioner of Revenue ; President American Social Science
Association, etc. i2mo. Cloth, $2.00.
" A wonderfully wide and full collection of facts and figures bearing on the question.
It would be well if that part of the volume which specially relates to the fluctuation of
{>rices in recent years could be put in the hands of every man whose political action is
ikcly to be influenced by the heresy that gold is becoming scarce and inadequate in
amount for the circulating medium, and that the scarcity is causing a decline in prices
measured in gold." — Chicago Econo^nist.
*'The book is the best contribution Mr. Wells has ever made to economical and
statistical and social science, and one of the best that is to be found in any country or
.anguage." — N. Y. Evening Posi.
"Mr. Wells deals with the subject of recent economic changes in a manner alto
gether superior to anything which this country can now show. For masterly and
dispassionate treatment of economic facts and tendencies, no less than for grasp of
principle, we must go to Americans like Mr. Wells and Mr. Atkinson, or to French
economists Uke M. 'L,^roy-^^^\^\^\3.."—Macmillan's Magazine ^ London.

A

STUD Y OF MEXICO. Ey David A. Wells.
Reprinted, with Additions, from " The Popular Science
Monthly." l2mo. Cloth, $i.oo ; paper, 50 cents.
" Several efforts have been made to satisfy the growing desire for information re
lating to Mexico since that country has become connected by railways with the United
States, but we have seen no book upon the subject hy an American writer which is so
satisfactory on the score of knowledge and trustwonhuiess as is this one."—Nsw York
Sun. *' . . . Mr. Wells is the first traveler who brings to bear upon the subject a mind
thoroughly trained in the observation and discussion of finance, manufactures, agri
culture the question of labor and wages, and other practical issues, which are of great
importance and interest in estimating the present and future of Mexican mstitutions.
—New York yoitrnal 0/ Commerce.

T

'HINGS NOT GENERALLY KNOWN; A
Popular Hand-Book of Facts not readily accessible in Literature,
History, and Science. Edited hy David A. Wells. i2mo.
Cloth, $1.75-
" The general idea of the work will be readily gathered from its title and fironi a
glance at its contents. It contains many little items of information, gathered from die
troad fields of literature, history, and science, which are not cont^ned in cydopeedias
mod ordinary hand-books, and which are not readily found when sought

New York : D. APPLETON & CO., 72 Fifth Avenue.

A

D. APPLETON & CO.'S PUBLICATIONS.
A FLEA FOR LIBERTY. An Argument against
•^* Socialism and Socialistic Legislation : Consisting of Essays by
various writers, with an Introduction by Herbert Spencer.
Edited by Thomas Mackay, author of "The English Poor.''
8vo. Cloth, $2.25.
*' This book is a raost eloquent and comprehensive argument against governmental
aid to private enterprises, and the consequent and rapidly increasing habit of looking
to the Government for help." — Boston Times.
POLICY OF FREE EXCHANGE. Essays by
Various Writers, on the Economical and Social Aspects of Free
Exchange and Kindred Subjects. Edited by Thomas Mackay,
editor of " A Plea for Liberty." 8vo. Cloth, $4.00.
" Taken as a whole, these essays constitute a powerful argument in favor of the
doctrine, once very generally admitted, but now often ignored even by lawmakers,
that, for laborers as well as for all other members of the community, free exchange, and
not coercive combination, is the safest rule of guidance." — New York Journal 0/
Commerce.
PRINCIPLES OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, with
* some of their Applications to Social Philosophy. By John Stu-
ART Mill. 2 vols. 8vo. Cloth, I4.00 ; half calf, extra, $8.oa
The ** Principles of Political Economy " is an orderly, symmetrical, and lucid expo
sition of the science in its present advanced state. In extent of information, breadth of
treatment, pertinence of &esh illustration, and accommodation to the present wants of
the statesman, the merchant, and the social philosopher, this work is unrivaled. It is
written in a luminous and smooth yet clear-cut style ; and there is diffused over it a
soft atmosphere of feeling, derived &om the author's unaffected humanity and enlight
ened interest m the welfare of the masses.
jrjILL'S PRINCIPLES OF POLITICAL ECON-
IV A OMY, Abridged, with Critical, Bibliographical, and Explan
atory Notes, and a Sketch of the History of Political Economy.
By J. Laurence Laughlin, Ph. D., Assistant Professor of
Political Economy in Harvard University. With 24 Maps and
Charts. A Text-Book for Colleges. Svo. Cloth, $3.50,
"An experience of five years with Mr. Mill's treatise in the classroom not only
convinced me of the great usefulness of what still remains one of the most lucid and
systematic books yet published, but I have also been convinced of the need of such
additions as should give the results of later thinking without militating against the
general tenor of Mr. Mill's system; of such illustrations as should fit it better for
American students ; of a bibliography which should make it easier to get at the writers
of other schools, who o£fer opposing views on controverted qu^tions; and of some
attempts to lighten those parts of his work in which Mr, Mill frightened away the
reader by an appearance of too great abstractness, and to render them, if possible, more
easy of comprehension to the student who first approaches political economy through
this author." — From the Preface,

New York : D. APPLETON & CO.. 72 Fifth Avenue,

D. APPLETON & CO.'S PUBLICATIONS.
n^HE HISTORY OF BIMETALLISM IN THE
J- UNITED STATES. By J. Laurence Laughlin, Ph.D..
Assistant Professor of Political Economy in Harvard Universi
ty ; author of "The Study of Political Economy," etc. With
Sixteen Charts and numerous Tables. Svo. Cloth, $2.25.
•* Prof. Ldughlin's excellent work is timely and valuable. It re-enforces the sugges
tions of political sagacity and business prudence by the warnings of scientific investiga
tion and foresight," — New York Times.
" The book is not a treatise on the theory of bimetallism, but is a history of bimetal
lism, the theory being discussed only so far as the hard facts in the country's experience
have directly borne upon some part of the theory." — Chicago Evening Jourtial,
INANCIAL HISTORY OF THE UNITED
STA TES, FROM I^74 TO lySg, embracing the Period of the
American Revolution. New edition, thoroughly revised. By
Albert S. Bolles, Professor in the Wharton School of Finance,
University of Pennsylvania ; Editor of ' ' The Banker's Maga
zine." Svo. Cloth, $2.50.
INANCIAL HISTORY OF THE UNITED
STA TES, FROM lySg TO i860. By Albert S. Bolles.
Svo. Cloth, $3.50.
INANCIAL HISTORY OF THE UNITED
STA TES, FROM 1861 TO iSSj. By Albert S. Bolles.
Svo. Cloth, $3.50.
" The difficulties, dangers, and triumphs of the Government's fiscal operations early
in the war are well portrayed, and the wonderful course of die deht-paying outlined.
The inception and progress of the national hanks are described; also the system (A
intemal taxation, the tariff, the whisky frauds, etc. The book is the best financial his
tory the country has thus far." — Chicago Tribune.
*' These volumes have been accepted as standard authorities on the subject-matter
treated, both in this country and in Europe. We are thus put in possession of the
entire facts in the fiscal policies of the latest bom among the nations of the earth. It is
manifest that they must embrace a mass of events which in their relations and sequence
are of the highest interest and value to the student of human society." — Philadelphia
Times.

F

FF

A

CRITICAL EXAMINATION OF OUR FI-^
NANCIAL POLICY DURING THE SOUTHERN RE
BELLION. By Simon Newcomb. i6mo. Cloth, $i.oo.
" The objects of the essay are to trace our present financial system to its effects on
ihe power of our Govemment, the permanence of our institutions, the future well-bcine
of society, and other great national interests; to show how certain principles of sociu
science are illustrated in its workings ; and incidentally to inquire in what ways it may
be improved." — From the Pre/ace.
New York: D. APPLETON & CO.. 72 Fifth Avenue.

D. APPLBTON & CO.'S PUBLICATIONS.
pUBLIC DEBTS : An Essay in ihe Science of Finance,
-*¦ By Henry C. Adams, Ph. D., of the University of Michigan,
and Cornell University. Svo. Cloth, $2.50.
CONTENTS.— VBxt I. Public Borrowing as a Financial Policy. Modem '
Public Debts; Political Tendencies of Public Debts; Social Tendencies of Public
Debts; Industrial Effects of Public Borrowing; When may States Borrow Moiiey?—
Part II. National Deficit Financieking. Financial Management of a War; Clas
sification of Public Debts; Liquidation of War Accounts; Peace Management of a
Public Debt; Payment of Public Debt-^. — Part IIL Local Deficit Financiering.
Comparison of Local with National Debts; State Indebtedness between 1830 and
1850; Municipal Indebtedness; Policy of Restricting Governmental Duties.
" Dr. Adams has rendered an important service in this painstaking treatise, both to
financial science in general and to American financial history in particular. The social,
political, and industrial effects of public borrowing and of interest paying are methodi
cally unfolded. The mysteries and sophisms that have grown up like weeds about public
debts are cleared away in language addressed to scholars, but not too recondite to be
understood by any reader of fair education." — New York Evening Post.
" Thoroughly admirable in its care and detail, and altogether the worthiest of recent
publications on economics." — Boston Comjnercial Bulletin.

M'

ONEY AND THE MECHANISM OF EX
CHANGE. By W. Stanley Jevons, Professor of Logic and
Political Economy in Owens College, Manchester. i2mo.
Cloth, $1.75.
" Prof. Jevons writes in a sprightly but colorless style, widiout trace of either preju
dice or mannerism, and shows no commitment to any theory. The time is not vwy far
distant, we hope, when legislators will cease attempting to legislate upon money before
they know what money is ; and, as a possible help toward such a change, Prof. Jevons
deserves the credit of having made a usefiil contribution." — Neiv York Financier.
**The author offers us what a clear-sighted^ cool-headed, scientific student has to
say on the nature, properties, and natural laws of money, without regard to local in
terests or national bias. His work is popularly written, and every page is replete with
solid instruction of a kind that is just now lamentably needed by multitudes of our
people who are victimized by the grossest fallacies." — Popular Science Monthly.
piEMENTS OF ECONOMICS. By Henry Dun-
J—^ ning Macleod, M. a., Barrister-at-Law, selected by the Royal
Commissioners for the Digest of the Law to prepare the Digest"
of the Law of Bills of Exchange, Bank Notes, etc. Lecturer
on Political Economy in the University of Cambridge. In two
vols. i2mo. Cloth, $1.75 each.
** The author attempts to establish an exact science of economics on a mathematical
basis — to establish *anew inductive science'; and he presents what he calls *a new
body ofphenomena brought under the dominion of mathematics.' " — New York World.
"A work which is destined to be of inestimable value to publicists and students,
Mr. Macleod treats of the relation between value and quantity of labor and cost of
production, holding that the relation between supply and demand is the sole regulator
of value, and that value is the inducement to ^e production of profits." — St. Lotm
Republican. New York: D. APPLETON & CO., 72 Fifth Avenue.