::!' ¦¦¦¦; Si'iiii wr '1: illlfii Mhf47 A1 5 4 YALE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY Presented by John Petheram, Esq. 1845 puritan ©feuplute Cract& HAY ANY WORKE FOR COOPER A REPLY "ADMONITION TO THE PEOPLE OF ENGLAND." BY MARTIN MAR-PRELATE. XU'priittett front fljc JSIadi better e&itUm. WITH AN INTRODUCTION AND NOTES. LONDON: JOHN PETHERAM, 71, CHANCERY LANE. 1845. INTRODUCTION. "Have you any work for John Cooper" appears to have been one of the cries of London, according to a print in that scarce and curious volume, "Tempesta's Cries of London," folio 1711. There are two or three allusions in the present Tract to its author, wliich, though they afford us no means of judging who he was, will satisfy us that he was the author also of the " Epistle" and the " Epitome." " I haue onely published a Pistle, and a Pitomie, wherein also I graunt that I did reasonably Pistle them," says he at p. GO ; and again atp. 41, " lam alone. No man vnder heauen is priuy, or hath bin priuie vnto my writings against you, I vsed the aduise of non therein. You haue and do suspect diuers, as master Paggett, master Wiggington, master Udali, and master Penri, &c. to make Martin." It has been inferred, with very great probability, that John Penri was the author of the Epistle, and it is remarkable that the author here puts Penri last, against 1V INTRODUCTION. whom and Udall a much stronger suspicion existed than against Eusebius Paget and Giles Wiggington. The " More Work for Cooper," so often referred to, was never wholly printed, for it was during the printing of it that thc press was seized, together with several unfinished pamphlets, and tlie persons engaged on it ; but whether' the whole work exists in any form is very doubtful. The original of the present Tract is in black letter, altogether consisting of 58 pages. It was, without doubt, printed with the same types as those used for the Epistle and the Epitome; and the date of publication may be referred, with some degree of certainty, to the earlier part of the year 1589, because he speaks in the beginning of the pursuivants who were sent about the country to seek for him, which was towards the latter end of the year 1588, and a little further on he says, " I loue not the ayre ofthe Clinke or Gatehouse in this colde time of Winter." J. P. London, February 10, 1845. My anp toorfce Cor Cooper? Or a briefe Pistle directed by Waye of an hublication to the reverende Byshopps, counselling them, if they will needs be barrelled vp, for feare of smelling in the nostrels of her Maiestie and the State, that they would vse the aduise of reuerend Martin, for the prouiding of their Cooper. Because the reuerend T. C. (by which misticall ' letters, is vnderstood, eyther the bounsing Parson of Eastmeane, or Tom Coakes his Chaplaine) [hath shrived himselfe in his late Admo nition to the people of England] to bee an vnskilfull and a beceylfull tubtrimmer. Wherein worthy Martin quits himselfe like a man I warrant you, in the modest defence of his selfe and hia learned Pistles, and makes the Coopers hoopes to flye off, and the Bishops Tubs to leake out of all crye. Penned and compiled by Martin the Metropolitane. Printed in Europe, not far from some of the Bounsing Priestes. A man of Worshipp, to the men of Worship, that is, Martin Marprelate gentleman, Primate, and Metropolitane of all the Martins whersoeuer. To tlie Iohn of al the sir Iohns, and to the rest of the terrible priests : saith have among you once againe my cleargie masters. For O brethren, there is such a deale of loue growne of late I perceiue, betweene you and me, that although I would be negligent in sending my Pistles vnto you : yet I see you cannot forget me. I thought you to bee verye kinde when you sent your Purcivaunts about the coun trie to seeke for me. But now that you your selues haue taken the paines to write, this is out of all crie. Why it passes to thinke what louing and careful] brethren I haue, who although I cannot be gotten, to tell them where I am, because I loue not the ayre of the Clinke or Gatehouse in this colde time of Winter, and by reason of my busincs in Pistlemaking, will not withstanding make it knowne vnto the world, that tliev haue a moneths mind towards me. Now truly brethren, I find you kinde, why ye do not know what a pleasure you haue done me. My worships books were vn- knowne to many, before you allowed T. C. to admo- nishe the people of England to take heed, that if they loued you, they woulde make much oftheir prelates, and the chiefe of the cleargie. Now many seeke after my b 2 THE EPISTLE TO THE bookes, more than euer they did. Againe, some knew not that our brother Iohn of Fulham, was so good vnto the porter of his gate, as to make the poore blinde honest soule, to be a dum minister. Many did not know, eytlicr that Amen, is as much as by my fayth and so that our Sauiour Christe euer swore by his fayth ¦ or that bowling and eating of the Sabboth, are of the same nature : that Bb. may as lawfully make blinde guydes, as Dauid might eate of the Shew bread: or that father Thomas tubtrimmer of Winchester, good old student, is a master of Arts of 45. yeares standing. xMany I say, were ignorant of these thinges, and many other prcttie toy™, vntil you wrote this prcttie booke Besides whatsocuer you ouerpasse in my writings, and did not gainsay, that I hope wilbe iudged to be true. And so Iohn a Bridges his treason out of the 448. page of his booke, you graunt to be true. Your selues you denie not to bee pettie popes. The B. of sir Dauids in Wales, you dcnie not to haue two wiues, with an hun dred other thinges which you do not gainsay: so that the reader may fudge that I am true of my worde, and vse not to lye like Bb. And this hath greatly com mended my worshipps good dealing. But in your con futation of ,ny book, you haue shewed reuerende Martin to be truepenie in deede : For you haue confynned rather then confuted him. So that brethren, the plea sure winch you haue done vnto me, is out of all scotche and notche. And shoulde not I againe be as readie to pleasure you? Naye, then I shoulde be as vngrateful towards my good brethre, as Iohn of Cant, is to Thomas TERRIDLE riUESTS. Cartwright. The which Iohn, although he hath bin greatly fauored by the said Thomas, in that Thomas hath now these many yeares let him alone and said nothing vnto him, for not answering his books, yet is not asliamed to make a secrete comparison, betweene himselfe and Thomas Cartwright. As wlio say, Iohn of Lambehith, were as learned as Thomas Cartwright. What say you old deane Iohn a Bridges, haue not you shewed your selfe thankfull vnto hir Maiestie, in oucr- throwing hir supremacie in the 448. page of your booke. I will lay on load on your skincoat for this geare anon. And I will haue my peny worths of all of you brethre ere I haue done with you, for this pains which your T. C. hath taken with me. This is the puritans craft, in procuring me to be confuted I knowe : He be euen with them to. A craftie whoresons brethren Bb. did you thinke, because ye puritans T. C. did set Iohn of Cant, at a nonplus, and gaue him the ouerthrow, that tlierefore your T. C. alias Thomas Cooper bishop of Winchester, or Thomas Cooke his Chaplaine, coidd set me at a nonplus. Simple fellowes, me thinkes he should not. I gesse your T. C. to be Thomas Cooper (but I do not peremptorily affirme it) because the modest olde student of 52. yeres .standing, setteth Winchester after Lincolne and Rochester in thc contents of his booke, which blasphemy, would not haue bin tollerated by them that saw and allowed the book, vnlesse mistres Coopers husband had bin the author of it. Secondly, because this T. C. the author of this booke b 3 10 THE EPISTLE TO THE is a bishop, and therefore Thomas Cooper, lie is a Bi shop, because he reckoneth him selfe charged amongst others, with those crimes whereof non are accused but bishops alone, pag. 101. Iin. 26. Ka olde Martin yet I see thou hast it in thee, diou wilt enter into the bowels of die cause in hand I perceue. Nay, if you wil commend me, I will giue you more reasons yet. The stile and the phrase is very like her husbands, y' was sometimes woont to write vnto doctor Day of Welles. You see I can do it in deed. Again, non would be so groshead as to gather, because my reue- rence telleth Deane Iohn, that he shall haue twenty fists about his eares more then his owne (whereby I meant in decde, that manye would write against him, by reason of his bomination learning, which otherwise neuer ment to take pen in hand) that I threatned him widi blowes, and to deale by Stafford law: Whereas that was far from my meaning, and could by no means be gathered out of my words, but only by him that pronounced Eulojin for Eulogein in the pulpit : and by him whom a papist made to belecue, that the greek word Eulogein, that is to giue thanks, signifieth to make a crosse in the forhead : py hy by hy . I cannot but laugh, py hy hy hy. I cannot but laugh, to thinke that an olde soaking student in this learned age, is not ashamed to be so impudent as to presume to deale with $ papist, when he hath no grue in his pocked. But I promise you Sir, it is no shame to be a L. bishop if a man could, thogh he were as vnlerned as Iohn of Glocester or William of Liechfeld. And I tel you true, our brother terrible priests. 11 Westchester, had as liuc playe twentie nobles in a night, at Priemeero on the cards, as trouble hiin selfe with any pulpit labor, and yet he thinks him self to be a suffi cient bishop. What a bishop such a cardplaier 1 A bishop play 20. nobles in a night? Whie a round threpence serueth the turn to make good sport 3. or 4. nights amongst honest neighbours. And take heede of it brother Westchester : it is an vnlawfull game if you will beleeue me. Foe, in winter it is no matter to take a litle sport, for an od cast braces of 20. nobles when the wether is foule, that men cannot go abroad to boules, or to shoote? What would you haue men take no recreatio ? Ye but it is an old said saw, inough is as good as a feast. And recreations must not be made a trade and an occupation, ka master Martin Marprelate. I tel you true brother mine, though I haue as good a gift in pisde making, as as you haue at priemeero, and far more delight then you can haue at your cards, for the loue I beare to my brethren, yet I dare not vse this sport, but as a recreation, not making any trade thereof. And cards I tel you though they bee without homes, yet they are parlous beasts. Be they lawful or vnlawful take heed of them for al that. For you cannot vse diem but you must needs say your brother T. C. his Amen, that is, sweare by your faith, many a time in the night, wel I will neuer stande argling the matter any more with you. If you will leaue your card play ing so it is, if you wil not, trust to it it wil be the worse for you. I must go simply and plainly to worke with my 12 THE EPISTLE TO THE brethren, that haue published T. C. 'Whosoeuer haue published that booke, they haue so hooped the bishops tubbs, that they haue made diem to smel far more odious then euer they did, euen in the nostrels of all men. The booke is of 252. pages. The drift thereof is, to confute certaine printed and published libelles. You bestowe not full 50. pages in thc answeare of any thing that euer was published in print. The rest are bestowed to maintaine the belly, and to confute : what think you ? Euen the slanderous inuentions of your owne braines for the most part. As y' it is not lawfull for her Maiestie to allot any lands vnto the mainte- naunce of the minister, or the minister to liue vpo lands for tin's purpose allotted vnto liim, but is to con tent him selfe with a smal pention, and so small, as he haue nothing to leaue for his wife and childre after him (for whom he is not to be careful, but to rest on gods prouidence) and is to require no more but foode and raiment, that in poverty he might be answerable vnto our Sauioul- Christ and his apostles. In the confutation of these points, and thc scriptures corruptly aplied to prone them, there is bestowed aboue an 100. pages of this book, that is, from the 149. vnto the end. Well T. C. whosocuer thou art, and whosoeuer Martin is, neither thou, nor any man or woman in England shal know while you liue, suspect and trouble as many as you wil, and therefore saue your mony in seeking for him, for it may be he is neerer you then you are ware of. But whosocuer thou art I say, thou shewest thyself to be a most notorious wicked slanderer, in fathering TERRIBLE PRIESTS. 13 these things vppon those whome they call puritans, which neuer any enioying common sense would affirnie. And bring me him, or set downe his name and his reasons that holdeth any of the former points confuted in thy book, and I wil proue him to be vttcrly bereaued of his witts, and his confuter to be either stark mad, or a stark enemy to al religion, yea to her Maiestie and thc state, of this kingdome. No no, T. C. puritans hold no such points. It were well for bishops, that their aduersaries were thus sottishe. They might then iustly insence her Maiestie and the state against them, if they were of this minde. These obiections, in the confutation whereof, thou hast bestowed so much time, are so farre from hauing any puritane to be their author, as whosoeuer readeth the book, were he as blockheaded as Thomas of Winchester himselfe, hee may easily knowe them to be obiections onely inuented by the authour of the booke himselfe. For although hee bee an impudent wretch, yet dareth he not set them downe, as writings of any other : for then he woulde haue described thc author and the booke by some adient. The puritans in deede, holde it vnlawfull for a mini ster to haue such temporall reuenews, as whereby tenne ministers might be well maintained, vnlesse the sayd reuenews come vnto him by inheritance. They holde it also vnlawfull, for any state to bestowe the liuings of many ministers vpon one alone, especially when there is such want of ministers liuings. They holde it vnlawfull for anye minister to be Lorde ouer his brethren. And they holde it vnlawfull for 14 THE EPISTLE TO THE anye state to tollerate such vnder their gouernment. Because it is vnlawfull for states, to tollerate men in those places whereinto die word hath forbidden diem to enter. They affirme that our Sauiour Christe, hath forbid den all ministers to be Lords, Luke 22. 25. And the Apostle Peter, sheweth them to be none of Gods ministers, which are Lords ouer Gods heritage, as you Bishopps are, and w oulde bee accounted. These thinges T. C. you should haue confuted, and not troubled your selfe, to execute the fruites of your owne braines, as an enemie to the state. And in these points, I do challenge you T. C. and you Deane Iohn, and you Iohn Wliitgift, and you doctor Coosins, and you doctor Capcase (Copcoat I think your name be) and as many else, as haue or dare write in the defence of the esta blished church gouernment. If you cannot confute my former assertions, you do but in vain thinke to main- taine your selues by slaunders, in fathering vppon the puritanes, the ofspringes of your owne blockheads. And assure your selues, I wil so besoop you if you canot defend your selues in these points, as al the world shal cry shame vppon you, you think pretely to escape die point of your Antichristian calings, by giuing out that puritans hold it vnlawfull for her maiestie to leaue any lands for the vse of the ministers maintenance. I cannot but commend you, for I promise you, you can shift of an haynous accusation very pretily. A true man bringeth vnanswerable witnesses against a robber by the high way side, and desireth the Judge, TERRIBLE PRIESTS. 15 that the lawe may proceede against him. O no my Lo/d saith the thiefe, in any case let not me be dealt with. For these mine accusers haue giuen out, that you are a drunkard or they haue committed treason against the state: therefore I pray you beleeue my slander against the, that they may be executed: so when I come to my trial, I shalbe sure to haue no accusers. A very prety way to escape, if a man could tel howe to bringe the matter about. Now bretheren bishops, your manner of dealing, is euen the very same. The puritans say truly, that al Lord bishops are pety Anti- christes, and therefore that the magistrates ought to thrust you out of the common welth. Nowe of all loues say the bishops, let not our places be called in question, but rather credit our slanders against the puritans, whereby, if men would beleeue vs when we lie, we would beare the world in hand, that diese our accusers are Malcontents and sottish men, holding it vnlawful for the maiestrat to alott any lands for the ministers portion, and vnlawful for the minister to pro- uide for his family. And therefore you must not giue eare to the accusations of any such men against vs. And so we shall be sure to be acquited. But brethren doe you thinke to be thus cleared? why the puritans hold no such points as you lay to their charg. Though they did, as they do not, yet that were no sufficient reason, why you being pettye popes, shoulde be main tained in a christian commonwealth. Answeare the reasons that T brought against you : otherwise, Come off you bishops, leaue your thousandes, and content 16 THE EPISTLE TO THE TERRIBLE PRIESTS. your selues with your hundreds, saith Iohn of London. So that you do plainly see, that your Cooper T. C. is but a deceitful workeman, and if you commit the hooping of your bishopricks vnto him, they wil so leake in a short space, as they shalbe able to keepe neuer a Lord bishop in them. And diis may serue for an aunswere vnto die latter part of your booke, by way of an Interim, vntil more worke for Cooper be published. 2?ap anp toorfce for Cooper* And now reuerend T. C. I am come to your epistle to die reader, but first you and I must gp out alone into the plaine fields, and there we wil try it out, euen by plaine syllogismes, and that I know bishops cannot abide to heare of. The reuerend T. C. to the reader, page 1. I draw great danger vpon my selfe, in defending our bishops and others the chiefe of the clargy of the church of England. Their aduersaries are very eger : the saints in heauen haue felt of their tongs, for when they speake of Paule, Peter, Marye, &c. whome others iustly call saints : they in derision call them sir Peter, sir Paule, sir Marie. Reuerend Martin, Alas poore reuerende T. C. Be not afraid. Heere be non but frends man. I hope thou art a good fellow, and a true subiect, ye but I defend die bishops of die church of England saith he, dien in deed I maruell not though thy conscience accuse thee, and diou art sure to be as wel fauoredly thwacked for thy labour, as euer 18 HAY ANY WORKE FOR COOPER. Aon wast ,„ thy life. Thy conscience I say, must needs make thee feare in defending them. For they «e petty popes, and petty Antichristes as I haue proued, because they are pastor of pastors, Sec. thou "ast not answered my reasons, and therefore swadled thou shalt be for thy paynes, and yet if thou wilt yeeld 1 will spare thee. Thou canst not be a good and a sound subiect and defend the hierarchy of Lorde bi shopps to be lawful, as I will shewe anone. Concerning *ir Paul, I haue him not at all in my writings. And therefore the reader must know, that there is a Canter bury trick once to patch vp an acusation with a lye or two. J Sir Peter was the ouersight of the printer, who omitted diis Marginal note vz. He was not Saint Peter which had a lawfull superiour authority ouer the vni- uersal body of the church. And therfore the priest wherof Deane Iohn speaketh was Sir Peter. And good reuerend T. C. I pray thee tel me, what km was Samt Mary Oueries, to Mary the Virgin. In my book learning, the one was some popish Trull, and the other the blessed virgine. But will you haue all those, who are saints in deed, called saints ? Why then why doe you not call saint Abraham, saint Sara, saint leremie. If Iohn of Canterbury should marie, tell me goodT. C. dost thou not thinke that he would not make choyse of a godly woman. I hope a would. And T. C. though you are learned, yet you go beyond your bookes if you saide the contrary : being a godly woman, then she were a sainte. And so by your rule, her name HAY ANY WORKE FOR COOPER. ] () being Marie, you would haue her called sainte Marie Canterburie. But I promise thee, did his grace what "e could, I would call her sir Man.e Canterburie as ong as he professed himselfe to be a priest, and this T .mght do lawfully. For he being sir Iohn, why should not his wife be sir Marie. And why not sir Marie Oueries, as well as sir Marie Canterburie ? I hope Iohn of Canterburie whom I knowe, (though I know no great good ,n him) to be as honest a man as M. Oueries was, whom I did not know. Neither is there any reason why you T. C. should holde M. Oueries and his Mane, because they are within the diocesse of Win- Chester, to bee more honest then M. Canterburie and his wife. Naye there is more reason, why M. Canter burie and his wife dwelling at Lambehith, should be thought die honester of the two, then Oueries and his wife, because they dwel O the bankes side. But good Tom tubtrimmer, tell me what you meane by the chiefe of the cleargie in the Churche of England ? Iohn Can terburie I am sure. Why good T. C. this speache U either blasphemous or traitorous, or by your owne con fession an euident proofe, that Iohn of Canterburie is Lord ouer his brethren. He that is ehiefe of th, cleargie, is chiefe of God's heritage, and that is Iesus Christ only, and so to make the pope of Canterburie chiefe of Gods heritage, in this sence is blasphemous. L3™,?*116 byclear&ie> M Deane Iohn doedi page 443. rf hls b00ke> both the people and m.n.sters ^ Churche of England: in this sence her Maiestie is chiefe of the cleargie in die Church of England, and so c 2 * 20 HAY ANY WORKE FOR COOPER. your speach is traiterous. Lastly, if by cleargie you mean die ministers of die Churche of England, none in this sense can be chiefe of the cleargie, but a pettie pope. For our Sauiour Christe flatly forbiddeth anye to be chiefe of the cleargie in diis sence, Luke 22. 26. And none euer claimed this vnto him selfe but a pettie pope. Therefore T. C. you are either by your owne speach, a blasphemer or a traitor, or els Iohn of Cant. is a petde pope. Here is good spoonemeat for a Cooper. Take heede of writing against Martin, if you loue your ease. Reuerend T. C. page 2. Epistle. But I Feare them not, while I go about to maintain the dignitie of priests. Reuerend Martin. Well fare a good heart yet, stand to thy tackling, and get the high commission to send abroad the purciuants, and I warrant thee diou wilt do something. Alas good priests, that their dignitie is like to fall to the ground. It is pitie it should be so, they are such notable pulpit men. There is a neighbour of ours, an honest priest, who was sometimes (symple as he nowe standes) a vice in a playe for want of a better, his rame is Gliberie of Hawsteade in Essex, he goes much to the pulpit. On a time, I diink it was the last Maie, he went vp with a full resolution, to do his businesse with greaS commen dations. But see the fortune of it. A boy in the Church, hearing either the sommer Lord with his Maie game, or Robin Hood with his Morrice daunce going HAY ANY WORKE FOR COOPER. 21 by the Church, out goes the boye. Good Gliberie, though he were in the pulpit, yet had a minde to his olde companions abroad (a company of merrie grigs you must think them to be, as merie as a vice on a stage) seeing ye boy going out, finished his matter pre sently with Iohn of Londons Amen, saying, ha, ye faith boie, are they there, then ha w' thee, and so came down and among them heo goes. Were it not then pittic, that the dignitie of such a priest should decaie. And I would gentle T. C. that you would take the paines to write a treatise against the boie with the red cap, which put this Gliberie out of his matter at another time. For Glibery being in the pulpit, so fastened his eyes vpon a boye with a red cap, that he was clcane dasht out of countenaunce, in so much that no note could be hard from him at that time, but this. Take away red cap there, take away red cappe there : it had bene better that he had neuer bin borne, he hath marred suche a sermon this day, as it is woonderfull to thinke. The Queene and the Counsell might well haue heard it for a good sermon, and so came down. An admonition to the people of England, to take heed of boies with red caps, which make diem set light by die dignitie of their priests, would do good in this time, brother T. C. you know well. Reuerend T. C. The cause why wee are so spighted, is be- %°"b mayr cause we doe endeuor to maintaine the lawes ceiue tl,a* which her Maiestie and the whole state of the bishop" " c 3 22 HAY ANY WORKE FOR COOPER. Realme haue allowed, and doe not admit a new plat- forme of gouernment, deuised I know not by whom. Reuerend Martin. Why T. C. saye Eulqjin for Eulogein as often as you will, and I wil neuer spight you, or the Bishop of Win chester eydier for the matter. But doe you thinke our Churche gouernement, to be good and lawfull, because hir Maiestie and die state, who maintaine the reformed religion alloweth the same ? Why the Lorde doth not allow it, dierefore it cannot be lawfull. And it is the fait of such wretches as you bishops are, that her Ma iestie and the state allowedi the same. For you should haue otherwise instructed them. They know you not yet as thorowly as I doe. So that if I can prooue, that the Lord disliketh our Church gouernement, your endeuors to maintaine the same, shew that thereby you cannot chuse, but be traytors to God and his worde, whatsoeuer you are to her Maiestie and the State. Nowe T. C. looke to your selfe, for I will presently make all the hoops of your bishoppricks flie assunder. Therefore Our Churche gouernement, is an vnlawfidl Churche go uernment, and not allowed in the sight of God. Because That church gouernment is an vnlawful church go uernment, tlie offices and officers whereof, the ciuil maiestrate may lawfully abollish out of the church, marke my craft in easoning brother T. C. I say the offices and officers for I grant that the maiestrate may thrust thc officers of a lawful church gouernment out of HAY ANY WORKE FOR COOPER. 23 the church if they be Diotripheses, Mar-elmes, Whit- gifts, Simon Maugustes, Coopers, Pcrnes, Renoldes, or any such like ludases, (though thc most of these must be packing, offices and al) but their offices must stand, that the same may be supplied by honester men. But the offices of Archbishops and bishopps, and therefore die officers much more, may be lawfully abollished out of the church by her Maiestie and our State. And truely this were braue weather to turnc them out : it is pitty to keepe them in any longer. And that would do me good at the hart, to see Iohn of London, and the rest of his brethren so discharged of his busines, as he might freely runn in his cassocke and hose after his bowle, or florish with his 2. hand sword. O tis a sweete trunchfiddle. / But the offices of Archbishops and bishops, may be lawfully abollished out of the church by her Maiestie, and the state. As I hope one day they shalbe. There fore (marke now T. C. and cary me this conclusion to Iohn O Lambehith for his breakefast) our church go- uerment by Arch, and bishops, is an vnlawful church gouerment. You see brother Cooper, that I am very courteous in my minor, for I desire therein no more offices to bee thrust out of the church at one time, but Archb. and Bishops. As for Deanes, Archdeacons and Chancellors, I hope they wilbe so kind vnto my Lords grace, as not to stay, if his worship and the rest of the noble clergie Lords weare turned out to grasse. I wil presendy proue both maior and minor of this sillogisme. And hold my cloake there sombody, that I may go , 24 HAY ANY WORKE FOR COOPER roundly to worke. For ise so bnmfeg the Cooper, as he had bin better to haue hooped halfe the tubbes in Winchester, then write against my worships pistles. No ciuil maiestrat may lawfully either maimc or de- forme die body of Christ, which is the church, but who soeuer doth abollish any lawful church officer, out of the churcli gouernment, he doth either maime or de- forme thc churcli. Tlierefore T. C. no ciuil magistrate, no prince, no state, may without sinn abollishe any law- full officer, together with his office, out of the gouerne ment of the church, and per consequence, the offices of Archbishops and Lord bishops, wliich her Maiestie may without sinn lawfully abollish out of the church, are no lawful church officers, and therefore also, the church gouernment practised by Iohn Whitgift, Iohn Mar- elme, Richard Peterborow, William of Lincolne, Ed mond of Worcester, yea and by diat old stealecounter masse priest, Iohn O Glossester, with the rest of his brethren, is to be presently thrust out of the church. And me thinks this geare cottons in deed my masters. And I tould you T. C. that you should be thumped for defending bishops. Take heed of me while you liue. The minor of my last sillogisme, that whosoeuer doth abollish the office of any lawfull church officer out of the church, ho cither maimeth or deformeth the church, I can prone with a wet finger. Because euery lawful Churche officer, euen by reason of his office, is a mem ber of the bodyc of Christe Iesus, whiche is the church, and being a member of the body, Ifthe maiestrate doth displace him by abollishing his office, and leaueth the HAY ANY WORKE FOR COOPER. 25 place thereof voidc, then the maiestrate maimeth the body. If he put another office vnto an officer in stead thereof, he deformeth the same. Because the maiestrate hath neither tlie skil nor thc commission, to make the members of the body of Christ. Because he cannot tel to what vse, the members of his making may seme in the church. Do you think T. C. that the maiestrat may make an eie for the visible body of the church. (For you must vnderstand, that wee al this wliile speake of the visible body) can he make a foote or a hand for that body? I pray you in what place of the body would you haue them placed ? If our Sauiour Christ hath left behind him a perfect body : surely he hath left therein no place, or no vse for members of the maies- trates making and inuention : if an vnperfect and maimed body, I am wel assured that the maiestrate is not able to perfect that which he left vnfinished. But I hope T. C. that thou wilt not be so mad, and wicked, as to say that our Sauiour Christ, left behind him heere on eardi an vnperfect and maimed body. If not, then where shal these offices, namely these members inuented by the maiestrate be placed therein. Would you" haue the naturall eies put out (as your brethren the bishops haue don in the church of England, euer since Iohn of Canterbury vrged his wretched sub scription) and vnnatural squint gogled eies put in their steede : when the body cannot see with any eies, but with the natural eies thereof, displace them howsoeuer you may seme to help the matter, by putting others in their steed, yet the body shalbe stil blind and maimed. 26 HAY ANY WORKE FOR COOPER. What say you T. C. may the Maiestrate cut of[f] tbe true and natural legges, and handes of the body of Christe, vnder a pretence to put woodden in their steed. I hope you wil not say that he may. How then commeth it to passe T. C. that you hold Iohn of Canterbury his office, and Iohn Mar-elms to be true and natural members of die body, that is true officers of the church, and yet hold it laweful for her Maiestie to displace them out of die church. I cannot tel brother what you hold in this point. Me think I haue disturbed your sences. Do you thinke that the maiestrat may displace the true members of the body of Christ, and place woodden in their steed ? Why this is to hold it lawful for the ma iestrate to massacre the body. Do you thinke he may not ? Then may not her maiestie displace Iohn of Can terburies office out of our church : if shee may not dis place his office, then either he by vertue of his office, is a lawfull Pope aboue all ciuill magistrates, or els the Church gouernment is so prescribed in the word, as it is not lawfull for the magestrat° to alter the same. But Puritans Iohn of Canterburie, as the puritans their Cm™, to" be st'1,les confesse, is no Pope. Then either the no Pope. church gouernment is so prescribed in the word as it may not be altred, or els the magestrat may abolish a lawfid church gouernement, and place another in stead thereof. If the Churcli gouernment be so prescribed in the worde, as it cannot be altered, then either our gouernment is ye same which was therein prescribed, or our Church gouerment is a false Church gouerment. If ours be the same which is mentioned in HAY ANY WORKE FOR COOPER. 27 the word : Then Paule and Peter were either no true Church gouernours, or els Paul and Peter, and the rest of Church gouernors in their time were Lordes, for all our Church gouernours are Lordes. But Paule and Peter, &c. were no Lords, and yet true church gouer nours. Therefore our church gouernment is not that which is prescribed in the word : and therfore a false and vnlawfull church gouernement. If you thinke that the magistrate may displace the lawful offices of the bodie, then as I said before, you hold it lawfull for the magistrate to maime or deforme the bodie. Because whatsoeuer he pulleth in the roome of the true and risht members, must needs be a deformitie, and what place soeuer he leaueth vnfurnished of a member, must needes be a maime. And this is the onely and sole office of Christe onely, to place and displace the mem bers of his bodie : to wit, the officers of his Church, he may lawfully do it, so cannot man. And therefore the sots (of which nomber you T. C. and you Iohn Whitgift, and you Deane Iohn, and you D. Coosins, and you D. Copcot, widi the rest of the ignoraunt and wretched defendors of our corrupt church gouernement are to be accounted) which thinke that the offices of pastors, doctors, elders and deacons, or the most of them, may be as well nowe wanting in the Church, as the offices of Apostles, prophets and Euangelists : do notably bewray dieir vile ignorance, but the cause they doe not hurt. For the beastes do not consider that the offices of Apostles, Euangelists and Prophets, were remoued out of the church, not by man, but by the Lord, because 28 HAY ANY WORKE FOR COOPER. hee in his wisdome did not see any vse of such members Theapos- ,n his body> after the time of the first plant- tltZd i0S ^^ Churche- l s^ ^V ^ere re- of James mooued by the Lord himselfe and not by heat/'a's man: because> Paltly the giftes wherewith thea did h, they were endued, partly the largenesse of steedafju- , . . . ° das, fet. i. tlicu* commission, with certaine other essen- tJu!dhZ ti.!l11 l,r°Pcrt;« ^ them belonging, were by don if the him abrogated and taken away, which no man apostolicall i i 1 « . caiih,,; had coula a°- Againe, the Apostolicall, Euan- manir gcl'Cal and Pr°Pheticall callings, were either lawfully or vnlawfully abolished out of the Churche, if lawfully, then they were abolished by the Lord : and therefore they are neither to be called backe vntill he sheweth it to be his pleasure that it shoulde be so, neitiier can die church be truely said to be maimed for want of them : because he which could best tell, what members were fitte for his Churche did abolishe them. If vnlawfully, then those callings may be law fully called backe againe into the church, and the church without them is maimed, that is, wanteth some members. For if their callings were iniuriously abro gated, they are as iniuriously kept out of the churche : and being members of the church, the church is maimed without, vnlcssc the Lorde hath shewed, that the time of their seruicc in the bodie is expired. But they are not iniuriously kept out (for so her Maiestie shoulde be said to iniurie tlie church, vnlesse she would see Apos tles, prophets and Euangelists, planted therein) neither can the church be saide to be maimed for want of them, HAY ANY WORKE FOR COOPER. 29 because die Lorde by taking them away hath declared, that now there can be no vse of them in tlie bodie : therefore the Lorde abrogated them. Therefore also they may be wanting, and tlie churche neither maimed nor deformed thereby. Whereas the keeping out of eyther of the former offices of pastors, doctors, elders and deacons, is a maiming of die churche, the placing of others in their steed, a deforming. Now reuerend T. C. I beseech you entreat mistris Cooper, to write to M. D. Day, somtimes of magdalins, that he may procure D. Cooper, to know of him that was the last Thomas of Lincolne, whether the now B. of Winchester be not perswaded, that reuerend Martin hath suffi[ci]ently prooued it to be vnlawful, for the ciuill magestrate, to abolishe any lawfull churche officer out of the church. Because it is vnlawfull for him to maime or defomie the bodie of Christe, by displacing die members thereof. But it may be, your Coopers noddle, profane T. C. doubteth, (for I knowe you to be as ignorant in these points, as Iohn Whitgift, or dean Iohn their selues.) Whether a lawfull Church officer, in regard of his office, be a member of the bodie of Christ, which is the Church. Therefore looke Rom. 12. vers. 4. 5. &c. and there you shall see, that whosoeuer hath an office in the bodie, is a member of the bodie. There also you shall see, diat he that teacheth, which is the Doctor : lie y' exhorteth, which is the Pastor : he that ruleth, which is the Elder : he that distributeth, which is the Deacon D 30 HAY ANY WORKE FOR COOPER. (as for him that sheweth mercie that is there spoken off, he is but a church seruant, and no church officer). There I say, you shall also see, diat diese 4. offices, of Pastors, Doctors, Eleders and Deacons, are members of the bodie: and 1. Cor. 12. 8. & 28. you shal see that God hath ordained them. Out of al, which hitherto I haue spoken T. C. I come vpon you, and your bishopprickes, with 4. or 5. (yea halfe a dozen and neede be) suchc drie soopes, as Iohn of London with his two hand sword neuer gaue the like. For they aun- swere your whole profane booke. First, that the plat- forme of gouernment, by Pastors, Doctors, Elders and deacons, wliich you say was deuised you knowe not by whom, is the inuention of our Sauiour Christ. For God ordained diem, saith the apostle, 1. Cor. 12. 8. 28. And therefore vnlesse you will shew your selfe, either to be a blasphemer, by terming Iesus Christ to be you cannot tell whom, or els to be ignorant who is Iesus Christ : you must needs acknowledge the platforme of gouernment, which you say, was inuented by you know not who, to haue Christ Iesus for the author thereof. Secondly, that the word of God teacheth, Cooper ' that of necessitie, the gouernment by Pastors, jSS? doctors, elders, &c. ought to be in euery hisEpisilc. ciiurche, which is neither maimed nor de formed. Because that Church must needs be maimed which wanteth those mebers, which the Lorde hath appointed to be therein: vnlesse the Lord himselfe hath, by taking those members away, shewed that nowe his bodie is to have no vse of diem. But as hath bene HAY ANY WORKE FOR COOPER. 31 sayde, God hath ordained pastors, doctors, elders and deacons to be in his Church, proued out of Rom. 12. 6. 7. 8. 1. Cor. 12. 8. 28. Ephe. 4. 12. And he hath not taken these officers away out of his church, because the Church hath continuall need of them. As of Pastors to feed with the word of wisedome : of the Doctors, to feede with the worde of knowledge, and both to builde vp his bodie in the vnitie of fayth : of Elders, to watch and ouersee mens maners : of Deacons to looke vnto the poore, and church treasurie. Therefore, where these 4. officers are wanting, there the Church is im perfect in her regiment. Thirdly that this gouernement cannot be T.Cooper c y • i -c taith it is, inconuenient for any mate or Kingdom, for pagmSeconti, is it inconuenient for a State or kingdome, to EPut- haue die bodie of Christ perfect therein ? Fourthly that euery christian magestrate is bound to receue this gouernment, by Pastors, Doctors, Elders and deacons into the church, within his dominions, whatso- euer inconuenience may be likely to follow the receuing of it. Because no likelyhood of inconuenience ought to induce the magistrate willingly to permit the church vnder his gouernment, to be maymed or deformed. Fiftly that the gouerment of the church by Lord Archbishops and bishops, is a gouernment of deformed and vnshapen members, seruing for no good vse in the church of God. Because it is not the gouernment by pastors, doctors, elders and deacons, which as I haue shewed are now the only true members, that is the only true officers of the visible body. d 2 32 'SAY ANY WORKE FOR COOPER. Sixtly and lastly. That they who defend this false and bastardly gouernment of Archbishops and bishops, and withstand this true and natural gouernment of die churrli, by Pastors, Doctors, Elders and deacons, are likely in awhile to become, Mar-prince, Mar-state, Mar- lawe, Mar-magestrate, Mar-common wealth. As for Mar-church, and Mar-religion, they haue long since proued them selues to be. These six points doe necessarily follow, of diat which before I haue set downe, namely that it is not lawfull for any to abollish or alter, the true and lawful gouern ment of die church, because it is not lawfull for them to maime or deforme thc body of the church. And I chaleng you T. C. and you Deane Iohn, and and you Iohn Whitgift, and you D. Coosins : and you D. Copcot, and al the rest diat wil or dare defende our established Churche gouernement, to be tried with me in a iudgement of life and death, at any barre in England in this point. Namely, That you must needs be, not onely traytors to God and his word, hut also enemies vnto her Maiestie and the land, in defending the established Church gouernment to be lawfull. You see the accusation which I lay to your charge, and here followeth die proofe of it : They who defend that the prince and state, may bid God to battel against them, they are not only traitors against God and his word, but also enemies to the Prince and state. I thinke Iohn of Glocester himselfe, wil not be so sensles as to deny this. HAY ANY WORKE FOR COOPER. 33 But our Archbishops and bishops, which hold it lawful for her maiestie and the state, to retain this established forme of gouernment, and to keep out the gouernment by pastors, doctors, elders and deacons, wliich was appointed by Christ, whom you profane T. C. cal you know not whome, hold it lawful for her maiestie and the state to bid God to battel against them. Be cause they bid the Lord to battel against them which maime and deforme the body of Christ, vz. the church. And they as was declared maime and deforme the body of the church, which keep out the lawful offices, apointed by the Lord to be members thereof, and in their steed, place other woodden members of the inuenteon of man. Tlierefore you T. C. and you Deane Iohn, and you Iohn Whitgift, and you the rest of the beastly defendors ofthe corrupt church gouernment, are not only traytors to God and his word, but enemies to her maiestie and the state. Like you any of these Nuts Iohn Canter bury. T am not disposed to iest in this serious matter. I am called Martin Marprelat. There be many that greatly dislike of my doinges. I may haue my wants I know. For I am a man. But my course I knowe to be ordinary and lawfull. I sawe die cause of Christs gouernment, and of the Bishops Antichristian dealing to be hidden. The most part of men could not be gotten to read any thing, written in the defence of the on[e] and against the other. I bethought mee therefore, of a way whereby men might be drawne to do both, per- ceiuing the humors of men in these times (especially of those that are in any place) to be giuen to mirth. I d 3 34 HAY ANY WORKE FOR COOPER. tooke that course. I might lawfully do it. I, for iesting is lawful by circumstances, euen in the greatest matters. The circumstances of time, place and persons vrged me thereunto. I neuer profaned the word in any iest. Other mirdi I vsed as a couert, wherin I would bring the truth into light. The Lord being the authour both of mirth and grauitie, is it not lawfull in it selfe for the trueth to vse eyther of these wayes, when the circumstances do make it lawful ? My purpose was and is to do good. I know I haue don no harme howsoeuer some may iudg Martin to mar al. They are very weake on[e]s that so think. In that which I haue written I know vndoubtedly, that I haue done the Lord and the state of this kingdom great seruice. Because I haue in som sort discouered the greatest enemies thereof. And by so much the most pestilent enemies, because they wound Gods relligion, and corrupt the state with Atheism and loosnes, and so cal for Gods vengance vppon vs all, euen vnder the coulor of relligion. I affirm them to be the greatest enemies that now our state hath, for if it were not for them, the trueth should haue more free passage herein, then now it hath. All states thereby would be amended : and so we should not be subiect vnto Gods displeasure, as now we are by reason of them. Nowe let me deale with these that are in authority. I do make it knowne vnto them, that our bishops are the greatest enemies which we haue. For they do not only go about, but they haue long since, fully per swaded our state, that they may lawfully procure the HAY ANY WOPrKE FOR COOPER. 35 Lord, to take the sword in hand against the state : if this be true, haue I not said truly, that they are the gretest enemies which our state hath. The papistes work no such effect, for they are not trusted. The Atheistes haue not infected our whol state, these haue. The attempts of our forraine enemies may be pernicious. But they are men as wee are. But that God, which when our bishops haue, and doe make our prince, and our gouernors to wadge war, who is able to stand against him ? Wel to the point, many haue put her maiestie, the parliament and counsell in minde, that the church officers now among vs, are not such as the Lord aloweth of: because they are not of his owne ordaininge. They haue shewed that this fait is to be amended, or the Lords hand to be looked for. The bishops on the other side, haue cried out vpon them, that haue thus dutifully mooued the state. They with a loud voice gaue out, that the maiestrat may lawfully maintaine that church gouerment, which best fitteth our estate, as liuing in yc time of peace. What do they else herein, but say that the magestrat in time of peace, may maime and deforme the body of Christ his church. That Christ hath left the gouerment of his own house vnperfect, and left the same to the discretion of the magestrate, wheras Moses before whome in this point of gouern ment, the Lord Christ is iusdy preferred, Heb. 3. C. made the gouernment of the legal polide so perfect, as he left not any parte thereof, to the discretion of the magestrate. Can they deny church officers, to be mem- 36 HAY ANY WORKE FOR COOPER. bers of the church. They are refuted by the exprcsse text. 1. Cor. 12. will they affirme Christ to haue left behinde him an vnperfect body of his church, wanting members at the lest wise, hauing such members as were only permanent at the magestrates pleasure. Why Moses the seruant, otherwise gouerned the house in his time. And the sonne is commended in this point for wisdome, and faithfulncs before him. Heb. 3. 6. Either then, that commendation of the sonn before the seruant, is a false testimony, or the sonne ordained a permanent gouernment in his church. If permanent, not to be changed. What then, do they that hold it may be changed at the magestrates pleasure, but aduise the maiestrate by his positiue lawes, to proclaime that it is his will, that if there shalbe a church within his domi nions, he will maime and deforme the same. He wil ordaine therein, what members he thinketh good. He will make it knowne, diat Christ under his gouernment, shalbe made lesse faithfuU then Moses was. That he hath left the placing of members in his body vnto the magestrate. O cursed beastes, that bring this guilt vppon our estate. Repent Caitifes while you haue time. You shal not haue it I feare when you wil. And looke you that arc in authority vnto the equity of the contro- uersie, betwene our wicked bishops, and those who woulde haue the disorders of our Churche amended. Take heed you be not caried away with slaunders. Christs gouerment is neither Mar-prince, Mar-state, Mar- law nor Mar-magistrate. The liuing God whose cause is pleaded for, will bee reuenged of you, if you giue eare HAY ANY WORKE FOR COOPER. 37 vnto this slander, contrary to so many testimonies as are brought out of his word, to prooue die contrary. He denounceth his wrath against all you, that thinke it law- full for you, to maim or deform his church : he ac- counteth his Churche maimed, when those offices are dierein placed, whiche hee hath not appointed to be members thereof: he also testifieth that there be no mebcrs of his appointment in the Churche, but such as lie himselfe hath named in his word, and those that he hath named, man must not displace, for so lie shoulde put the bodie out of ioynt. Nowe our bishops holding the contrary, and bearing you in hande, that you may practize the contrary, do they not driue you to prouoke the Lorde to anger against your owne soules ? And are they not your enemies ? They hold the contrary I say, for they say that her Maiestie may alter this gouernment now established, and thereby they shew either this gouerment to be vnlawfull, or that the magis- trat may presume to place those members in Gods Church, which die Lord neuer mentioned in his word. And I beseech you marke howe the case standeth betweene these wretches, and those whom they call puritans. 1 The puritans (falsely so called) shew it to be vnlawfull for the magistrate, to goe about to make any members for the bodie of Christ. 2 They hold all officers of the Church, to be mem bers of die bodie, Rom. 12. 6. 1. Cor. 12. 8. 28. 3 And therfore they hold the altering, or the abolish- 38 HAY ANY WORKE FOR COOPER. ing of the offices of church government, to be the altering and abolishing of the members of die Church. 4 The altering and abolishing of which members, they holde to be vnlawfull, because it must needs be a maime vnto the bodie. 5 They hold Christ Iesus to haue set downe as exact, and as vnchaungcable a churche gouernement, as euer Moses did. Heb. 3. 6. These and such like are the points they holde, let their cause be tried, and if they hold any other points in effect but these, let them be hanged every man of them. Now I demand, whether they that hold the contrary in these pointes, and cause die State to practize the con trary, be not outragious wicked men, and dangerous enemies of the state, it cannot be denied but they are. Because the contrarie practize of any of the former points, is a way to worke the ruine of the state. Now our Bishopps holde the contrary vnto them al, saue the 3. and 2. points, whereunto it may be they will yeeld, and cause our estate to practize the contrary : whence at the length our destruction is like to proceed. For 1 They denie Christ Iesus to haue set downe as exact, and as vnchangeable a forme of church gouern ment as Moses did. For they say, that the magistrat may change the church gouernment established by Christ, so could he not do that prescribed by Moses. 2 In holding all offices of the Church to be members of the bodie, (for if they be not members, what shoulde HAY ANY WORKE FOR COOPER. 39 they do in the body) they hold it lawful for the magistrat to attempt the making of new members for that bodie. 3 The altering or abollishing of these members by the magistrates, they holde to be lawfull. And there fore the maiming or deforming. '-= | -, Now you wretches (Archb. and L. Bishops I mean) you Mar-state, Mar-law, Mar-prince, Mar-raaiestrat, Mar-commonwealth, Mar-church, and Mar-religion. Are you able' for your Hues, to aunswere any part of the former syllogisme, whereby you are concluded, to be the greatest enemies vnto her Maiestie and the State ? You dare not attempt it I know. For you cannot denie, but they who holde it and defend it lawfull, (yea enforce the magistrate) to maime or deforme the bodie of Christ, are vtter enemies vnto that magistrat, and that state, wherin this disorder is practized. You canot denie your selues to do this, vnto our magistrate and State: because you beare them in hand, that a lawfull church gouernment, may consist of those offices, which die magistrate may abollishe out of the church without sinne : and so, that the magistrate may lawfully cut off the members of Christ from his body, and so may law fully massacre the body. You are then the men by whome our estate is most likely to be ouerthrowne, you are those that shal answere for our blood which the Spaniard, or any other enemies are like to spil, without the Lords great mercy : you are the persecutors of your brethren, (if you- may be accounted brethren) you and your hirelings are not only the wounde, but the very plague and pestilence of our church. You are those 40 HAY ANY WORKE FOR COOPER. who maime, deforme, vex, persecute, greeue, and wound the church. Which keepe the same in captiuity and darknes, defend the blind leaders of the blind, slander, reuile and deforme Christes holy gouernment, that such broken and woodden members as you are, may be still maintayned, to haue the romes of die true and natural members of the body. Tel me I pray, whether the true and natural members of the body may be lawfully cut of[f] by the magestrate. If you should say they may, I knowe no man would abide the spech. What ? May the maiestrat cutt of[f] the true and naturall members, of the body of Christ ? O impudency, not to be tolle- rated. But our magestrate, that is her maiestie, and our state, may lawfully by your owne confession, cut you of[f], that is displace you and your offices out of our church. Deny this if you dare. Then in deed it shal appeare, that Iohn of Canturbury meaneth to be a Pope in decde, and to haue the soueraignty ouer the ciuill magestrate. Then will you shewe your selfe in deed, to be Mar-prince, Mar-law and Mar-state. Now if the magestrate may displace you as he may, then you are not the true members. Then you are (as in deed you ought) to be thrust out, vnlesse the magestrate would incur the wrath of God, for maiming and de- forminge the body of the church, by ioyning vnnatural members thereunto. Answere but this reason of mine, and then hang those that seeke reformation, if euer againe they speke of it, if you doe not, I wil giue you lide quiet. I feare you not. If the magestrate wil be so ouerseene as to beleeue, HAY ANY W0IIKE FOR COOPER. 41 that because you which are the maim of the church are spoken against, therefore they, namely our prince and state, which are Gods lieftenaunts, shal be in like sort, dealt with, this credulity wil be the magestrates sinne. But I know their wisdome to be such as they wil not. For what reason is this, which you profane T. C. haue vsed. pag. 103. The sinful, the vnlawful, the broken, vnnatural, false and bastardly gouernors of the church, to wit archb. and bishops, whicli abuse euen their false offices, are spoken against. Therefore the true, natural and lawful, and iust gouernors of the common welth, shalbe likewise shortly misliked. Ah sencelesse and vndutifull beastes, that dare compare your selues with our true magestrates, which are the ordinaunces of God, with your selues, "that is, with Archbishops and bishops, which as you your selues confesse (I will by and by proue this) are the ordinances of the.Diuell. I knowe I am disliked of many which are your ene mies, that is of many which you cal puritans. It is their weaknes, I am threatened to be hanged by you. What though I were hanged, do you thinke your cause shalbe the better. For the day that you hange Martin, assure your selues, there wd 20. Martins spring in my place. I meane not now you grosse beastes, of any commotion as profane T. C. like a sensles wretch, not able to vnderstand an English phrase, hath giuen out vpon that which he calleth the threatning of fistes. Assure your selues, I wil proue Marprelat ere I haue don with you. I am alone. No man vnder heauen is 42 HAY ANY WORKE FOR COOPER. pnuy, or hath bin priuie vnto my writings against you, I vsed the aduise of non therein. You haue and do suspect diuers, as master Paggett, master Wiggington, master Udall, and master Penri, &c. to make Martin. If they cannot cleare their selues their sillinesse is piti- full, and diey are worthy to beare Martins punishment. Well once againe answere my resons, both of your Antichristian places in my first epistle vnto you, and these nowe vsed against you. Otherwise the wisdome of the magistrate must needs smel what you are. And cal you to a reckoning, for deceauing them soe long, making them to suffer the church of Christ vnder their gouernment to be maimed and deformed. Your reasons for the defence of your hierarchic, and the keeping out of Christs gouernment, vsed by this profame T. C. are already answered. They shew what profane beastes you are. I wil heere repete them. But heere first the reader is to know what answere this T. C. maketh vnto the syllogismes, whereby I prooue all L. bishops to be petty popes, and petty Antichristes. I assure you no other then this, he flattly denieth the conclusion, wheras. he might (if he had any learning in liim, or had read any thing) know, that euery dunstical logician, giueth this for an inuiolable precept, that the conclusion is not to be denied. For that must needs be true, if the maior and minor be true, he in omitting the maior and minor, because he was not able to an swere thereby, granteth the conclusion to be true. His answeare vnto the conclusion is, that al lord Bb. were not pety popes. Because pag. 74. Cranmer, Ridly, HAY ANY WORKE FOR COOPER. 43 Hooper, were not petty Popes. They were not pety popes, because they were not reprobates. As though you block you, euery petty pope and petty Antichrist were a reprobate. Why no man can deny Gregory the great, to be a pettye Pope, and a petty and petty Anti christ. For he was the next immediate pope before Boniface the first, that knowne Antichrist : and yet this Gregory left behind him, vndoubted testimonies of a chosen childe of God : so might they, and yet be petty Popes, in respecte of their office. Profane T. C. his 1. and 2. reason, for ye lawfulnes of our church gouer ment. And what though good men gaue their consent vnto our church gouernement, or writing vnto bishops, gaue them their lordly titles ? Are their offices there fore lawfull, then soe is the popes office. For Erasmus was a good man you cannot deny, and yet he both alowed of the popes office since his calling, and writing vnto him, gaue him his titles. So did Luther, since his calling also, for he dedicated his booke of christian liberty vnto Pope Leo the tenth. The booke and his Epistle vnto the Pope, are both in Englishe. Here I would wish the magistrat, to marke what good reasons you are able to afford for your hierarchie. Thirdly, saith profane T. C. page 75. All Churches haue not the gouernment of Pastors and Doctors : but Saxoni and Denmark, haue L. bishops. You are a great State man vndoubtedly T. C. that vnderstand, tlie state of other Churches so well. But herein the impu- dencie of a proude foole appeareth egregiously. As though the testimonie of a siely Schoolemaster, being also e 2 44 HAY ANY WORKE FOR COOPER. as vnlearned, as a man of diat trade and profession can be, with any honestie, would be belieued against knowne experience. Yea, but Saxonie and Denmarke haue Superintendents, what then? ergo L. Archb. and bishops? I deny it. Though other Churches had L. Archb. and Bb. this prooueth nothing els, but that other Churches are maimed and haue their imperfections. Your reason is this, other good Churches are deformed, therefore ours must needes be so to. The kings sonne is lame, dierefore the children of no subiects must go vpright. And these be all the good reasons which you can bring for the gouerment of Archb. and bishops, against the gouerment of Christ. You reson thus. It must not be admitted into tbis kingdome, because then Ciuillians shal not be able to liue, in that estimation, and welth, wherein they now do. Carnal and sensles beastes, whoe are not ashamed to prefer, the outward estate of men, before the glory of Christs kingdom. Here againe, let the magestrate and other readers consider, whether it be not time, that such brutish men, should be looked vnto. Which reason thus. The body of Christ which is the church, must needes be maimed and deformed in this common welth, because otherwise ciuillians should not be able to lino. Why you enemies to the state, you traytors to God and his worde, you Mar-prince, Mar- law, Mar-magcstrate, Mar-church, and Mar-common welth : do you not know that the worlde should rather go a begging, then that the glory of god by maiming his church, should be defaced ? Who can abide this indignity. The prince and state, must procure god tb HAY ANY WORKE FOR COOPER. 45 wrath against them, by continuing the deformity of his church, and it may not be otherwise, because the ciui- lians els must fall to decay. I wil tel you what, you monstrous and vngodly bishops, though I had no feare of God before mine eies, and had no hope of a better life, yet the loue that I owe, as a natural man, vnto her maiestie and the state would inforce me to write against you: her maiestie and this kingdome, (whome the Lord blesse, with his mighty hand, I vnfainedly beseech) must endanger them selues vnder die peril of Gods heauy wrath, rather then the maime of our church gouernment must be healed, for we had rather it should be so, say our bishops, then wee should be thrust out, for if we should be thrust out, the studie of the ciuil lawe, must needs goe to wrack. Well, if I had liued sometimes a citizen, in that olde and auncient (though heathenish) Rome, and had heard kinge Deiotarus, Cesar, yea or Pompei himself giue out this spech, namely : that the citty and empire of Rome must needes .Jbe brought subject vnto some danger, because otherwise, Catelin, Lentulus, Cethegus, with other of the. nobilitie, could not tell how to liue, but must needs go a begging. I woulde surely, in the loue I ought to the safetie of that state, haue called him that had vsed such a speech, in judicium capitis, whosoeuer he had bin : and I woulde not haue doubted to haue giuen him the ouerthrow. And shal I being a christian English subiect, abide to heare a wicked crue of vngodly bishopps, with their hangones and parasites, affirme that our Queene, and our State, must needs be subiect vnto the greatest E 3 46 "AY ANY WORKE FOR COOPER. hunger diat may be, vz. the wrath of God, for deform ing his Church, and that Gods Church must needes be maimed and deformed among vs, because otherwise, a few Ciuillians shal not be able to liue. Shall I heare and see diese thinges professed and published, and in the loue I owe vnto Gods religion and her Maiesty, say nothing. I cannot, I will not, I may not be silent at this speech : come what will come of it. The loue of a christian Church, prince and state, shal I trust, worke more m me, then die loue of a heathen Empire and state should do. Now iudge good reader, who is more tollerable in a commonwealth, Martin that would haue the enemies of her Maiesty remoued thence, or our bishops which would haue her life, and die whole king- domes prosperitie hazarded, rather then a few Ciuillians shoidd want maintenance. But I praye thee tell me T. C. why should the gouernment of Christ impouerish Ciuillians ? Because saith he, pag. 77. the Canon law by which they liue, must be altered, if that were admit ted. Yea but Ciuillians liue by the court of Amraltie, and other courts as well as by the Arches, vz. also the' probatts of Testaments, the controuersies of tythes, matrimonie, and many other causes, which you bishops Mar-state, do vsurpingly take from the ciuill magistrate, would be a means of Ciuillians maintenance. But are not you ashamed, to professe your whole gouernment, to be a gouernment ruled by the Popes Canon lawes,' which are bannished by statute out of this kingdome ? This notably sheweth that you are Mar-prince and Mar-state. For howe dare you retaine these lawes, HAY ANY WORKE FOR COOPER. 47 vnles by vertue of them, you meane eyther to enforce die supremacie ofthe prince to go again to Rome, or to come to Lambeth. It is treson by Statute, for any sub iect in this land, to proceed doctor of the Cano law, and dare you professe your church gouerment to be ruled by that law. As though one statute might not refer all matters of the Canon law, vnto the temporall and com mon law of this Realme : and this is all you can say, Yes sayth he, the gouernment of Christe, would 2 bring in the iudiciall law of Moses. As much as is morall of that law, or of the equitie of it, would be brought in. And do you gainesay it. But you sodden headed Asse you, the most part of that law is abrogated. Some part thereof is in force among vs, as the punish ment of a murtherer by death, and presumptuous obstinate theft by death, &c. Hir Maiesties prero- 3 gatiue in ecclesiastical causes, should not be a whit diminished, but rather greatly strengthened by Christs gouernment. And no lawe should be altered, but such as were contrary to the lawe of God, and against the profit of the common wealth : and dierefore there can be no danger in altering these. The ministers maintenance by tythe, no puritane 4 denieth to be vnlawfull. For Martin (good M. Par son) you must vnderstand, doth account no Brownist to be a puritane, nor yet a sottish Cooperist. The inconuenience which you shew of the gouer- 5 ment which is, that men would not be ruled by it, is answered afore. And I praye you, why should they 48 HAY ANY WORKE FOR COOPER. not be better obedient vnto Gods law, if the same also were established by the lawe of the lande, then to the Popes lawe and his Canons. You think that all men are like your selues : that is, like bishops, such as can not chuse but breake the laws and good orders of God and her Maiestie. 7 The lawes of England haue bene made, when there was neuer a bishop in the Parliament, as in the first yere of her Maiestie. And diis reason as al the rest, may serue to maintaine poperie, as well as the hierarchie of Bb. 8 The gouerment of the church of Christ, is no popular gouernement, but it is Monarchical!, in re- garde of our head Christ, Aristocraticall in the Elder ship, and Democraticall in the people. Such is the ciuill gouernement of our kingdome : Monarchical! in her Majesties person : Aristocraticall in the higher house of Parliament, ot rather at the Councell table : Demo craticall in the bodie of the commons of the lower house of Parliament. Therefore profane T. C. this gouernment seeketh no popularity to be brought into /the Church : much lesse entendeth the alteration of the ciuill state, that is but your slaunder, of which you make an occupation. And I will surely paye you for it. I must be brief now, but more warke for Cooper shall examine your slaunders. They are nothing else but prooffes, that as by your owne confessions you are bishops of the Diuell, so you are enemies vnto the state. For by these slaunders, you go about to blinde our state, that they may neuer see a perfect regiment of HAY ANY WORKE FOR COOPER. 4 9 the Church in our dayes. I saye, that by your owne confession, you are bishops of the Diuell. I will prooue it thus. You confesse that your Lordly gouernment, were not lawfull and tollerable in this comonwealth, if her Maiesty and the state of the land did disclaime the same. Tell me, doe you not confesse this. Denie it if you dare. For will you say, that you ought law fully to be here in our commonwelth whether her Ma jesty and the Counsell wil or no: Is this the thankes that her Maiestie shall haue, for tollerating you in her kingdome all this while, that nowe you will saye, that you and your places stand not in this kingdome by her curtesie, but you haue as good right vnto your places, as she hath vnto her kingdome. And by this meanes your offices stande not by her good liking, and the good liking of the state, as do the offices of our L. high Chan cellor, high Treasurer, and high Steward of Englande. But your offices ought to stand and to be in force, in spight of her Maiestie, the Parliament, Counsel], and euerie man els, vnles they woulde doe you iniury. Soe that I know, I, you dare not deny but that your offices weare vnlawfull in our common wealth, if her Maiestie, the Parliament, and the Counsell woulde haue them abollished. If you grant this, then you doe not hold your offices as from God, but as from man. Her ma iestie she holdeth hir office, and her kingdome, as from God, and is beholding for the same, vnto no prince nor state vnder heiien. Your case is otherwise, for you hold your offices as from her Maiestie, and not from god. For otherwise, you needed not to be any more 50 HAY ANY WORKE FOR COOrER. beholding vnto her Maiestie for the same in regarde of right, then she is boundc to be beholding vnto other states in regarde of her right : and so you in regarde of your Lordly superioritie, are not the bishops of god, but as Ierom sayth, the bishops of man. And this the most of you confes to be true, and you see how dan gerous it woulde be for you, to affirme the contrary : namely, that you holde your offices as from god. Well sir, if you say that you are thc bishops of man. The tell me whether you like of Dean Iohn his ' ' booke. O yes sayth T. C. For his grace did peruse that book, and we know the sufficiencie of it to be such, as the Puritans are not able to answere it. Well then, whatsoeuer is in this booke is authenticall. It is so, saith T. C. otherwise his grace would not haue alowed it. What say you then to the 140. page of that booke, where he saith (answering the treatise of the bishop of God, the bishop of Man, and the bishop of the Diuell) that there is no bishopp of man at all, but euerie B. must be either the Bishopp of God, or the Bishop of the the Diuel. He also affirmeth, none to be the bishop of god, but he which hath E*,' warrant, bodi inclusiuely and also expresly 310. line!. jn gQlis wor(h Now you Bishops of the Diuell, what say you now, are you spighted of the Puritans, because you like good subiects defend the lawes of her Maiestie, or els because like incarnate Diuells, you are bishops of the Diuells, as you your selues confesse. Here againe, let the Magistrate once more consider, HAY ANY WORKE FOR COOPER. 51 what pestilent and daungcrous beasts these wretches are vnto the ciuill state. For either by their owne con fession, they are thc Bishops of the Diuell (and so by that means will be the vndoing of thc state, if they be continued therin) or else their places ought to be in this commonwealth, whether her Maic3tie and our state wil or no : because they are not (as they say) the bishops of man, that is, they haue not tlieir superioritie, and their Lordly callings ouer their brethren by humane constitution, as my LL. Chancellor, Treasurer, and other honorable personages haue, but by diuine ordinance. Yea, and their callings, they holde (as you haue heard) not onely to be inclusiuely, but also expreslie in the word. What shifte will they vse to auoyde this point ? Are they the Bishopps of men, that is, holde they their iurisdiction as fr5 men. No saith Deane Gridges, no sayth Iohn of Canterburie and the rest of them, (for all of them allowe this booke of Iohn Bridges) for then we are the bishops of the deuill, we cannot auoid it ? Are they then the bishops of God, that is, haue they such a calling as the Apostles, Euangelists, &c. had : that is, such a calling as ought lawfully to be in a christian common wealth (vnlesse the magistrate woulde iniurie the Church, yea maime, deforme, and make a monster of the Church) whether the magistrate will or no. We haue say they. For our callings are not onely inclu siuely, but also expressely in the worde. So that by Deane Bridges his confession, and the approbation of Iohn Canterburie, either our bishops are bishops of the diuel, or their callings cannot be defended lawful, with- 52 HAY ANY WORKE FOR COOPER. out flat and plaine treason, in ouerthrowing her Maies- ties supremacie. And so Deane Bridges hath written, and Iohn Whitgift hath approoued and allowed, flat treason to be published. Is Martin to be blamed for finding out and discouer- ing traitors ? Is he to be blamed for crying out against the Bb. of the Diuel. If he be, then in deed haue I offended in writing against bishops ? If not, whether is the better subiect Martin or our bishops : whether I be fauored or no, I wil not cease, in the loue I owe to her Maiestie, to write against traitors, to write against the Diuels bishops. Our bishops are such by their owne confession. For they protest them selues to be bishopps of the Diuel. If they should holde the preheminence to be from man, If they hold it otherwise then from man, they are traytors. And vntil this beast Docter Gridges wrote this booke, they neuer as yet durst pre sume to claim their Lordships any otherwise lawful then from her maiestie, yea and D. Bridges about the CO. page saith the same. But they care not what con trariety they haue in their writings, what treason they hold, as long as they are~perswaded that no man shalbe tollerated to write against them. I haue once already shewed treason to be in this booke of the Deane of Sarum, page 118. I shew the like now to be pag. 340. Because Deane Bridges durst not answeare me. They haue turned vnto me in his stead, a beast whome Jby the length of his eares, I gesse to be his brother, y' is, an Asse of thc same kinde. But I wil be answered of the Deane him selfe in this and the former point of HAY ANY WORKE FOR COOPER. 53 treason, or else, his cloister shal smoake for it. And thus profane T. C. you perceue what a good subieet you are, in defending the established gouernment. Thus also I haue answered all your booke in the mat ters of the lawfulnes of the gouerment by Pastors, Doctors, Elders and Deacons, and the vnlawfulnes of our bastardly Church gouernment, by archbishops and' bishops, where also the reader may see, that if euer there was a church rightly gouerned, that is a church without maime or deformity, the same was gouerned by Pastors, Doctors, elders and deacons. Whau, whau, but where haue I bin al this while. Ten to one among some of these puritans- Why Mar tin ? Why Martin I say, hast tow forgotten thy selfe ? Where hast ti bene, why man, cha bin a seeking for a Samons nest, and cha vound a whol crue, either of ecclesiasticall traitors, or of bishops of the Diuel, of broken and maimed members of the church : neuer winke on me good fellow, for I will speke the truth, lett the puritans doe what they can. I say then that they are broken members, and I say Iohn of Canter bury if he be a member of the church, I say he is a broken member, and that Thomas .of Winchester is a Cholerick member. Yea and cha vound diat profane T. C. is afraid lest her Maiestie shoulde giue Bishops liuings away from them. And therefore shutteth his booke with this position, vz. That it is not lawful to bestow such liuings vppon lay men, as are appointed by Gods law vppon ministers. But hereof more warke for Cooper shal learnedly dispute. 54 HAY ANY WORKE FOR COOPER. Reuerend T. C. Admonition page 1. 2. 3. We vse die Ministers most vile nowe a dayes. God will punish vs for it, as hee did those which abused his prophets. Reuerend Martin. Look to it T. C. then. For out of thine own mouth shalt thou be iudgcd, diou vnrightcous seruant. Our bishops are they whicli abuse the ministers. Our bi shopps were neuer good ministers as yet, and therefore they are not to be compared with the propliets. Reuerend T. C. Page 4. Some men will say, that I do great iniurie to the propliets and apostles, in comparing our Bishops vnto the. But we may be happie if we may haue tollerable ministers in this perilous age. }¦ Reuerend Martin. I hope T. C. that diou dost not mean to serue the church with worse then we haue : what worse then Iohn of Canterburie ? worse then Tom Tubtrimmcr of Win"- chester? worse then the vickers of Hell, syr Jefferie Jones, the parson of Micklain, &c. I pray thee, rather the we should haue a change from euil to worse, let vs haue the euil stil. But I care not if I abide ye venture of the change. Therfore get Iohn. with his Canterburi- nesse, remooued, &c. (whome thou acknowledgest to be euill) and I doc not doubt, if worse come in their stead, but the diuell wil soon fetch them away, and sd' we shalbe quickly rid, both of euill and worse. But good HAY ANY WORKE FOR COOPER. 55 T. C. is it possible to find worse then we haue. I do not maruel though thou callest me libeller, when thou direst abuse the Prophets farre worse, then in calling the libellers : for I tel thee true, thou couldest not haue anye way so stayned their good names, as thou hast done, in comparing them to our bishopps. Call me Libeller as often as thou wilt, I do not greatly care : but and thou loucst me, neuer liken me to our bishops of the diuell. For I cannot abide to be compared vnto those. For by thine owne comparison, in the 9. page, they are iust Balaams vp and downe. Reuerend T. C. page 8. 9. 10. Though our bishops be as euil as Iudas, the false Apostles, and Balaam, yet because they haue sometimes brought vnto vs Gods message, wee must thinke no otherwise of them, then of Gods messengers. For God will not suffer diuellishe and Antichristian persons, to be the chiefe restorers of his gospell. Reuerend Martin, First T. C. I haue truly gathered diine argument, thogh thou namest neither Iudas nor die false apostles. Prooue it otherwise. Then hast thou reuerend Martin, prooued thy selfe a lyar. Now secondly then seeing it ¦is so, I praye thee good honest T. C. desire, our Iudasses (whc( was also one of the first Apostles) not to sell their master for money, desire our false Apostles (who preached no false doctrine for the most part) not to insult ouer poore Paule, and desire our good Balaams, not to followe the wages of vnrighteousnes. The coun- f 2 HAY ANY WORKE FOR COOrEII. sell is good. For Iudas, thogh one of the first pub lishers of the gospell (so were not our bishops in our time) yet hung himself. The false apostles had their reward, I doubt not. And Balaam, as soon as euer the Israelites tooke him, was iusdy executed for his wick- ednes. The forced blessing wherewith he blessed die saued him not. Reuerend T. C. page 10. 11. 12. 13. Ma[n]y coniecturall speeches flye abroad of bishops, as that they are couetous, giue not to the poore, hinder reformation, Simoniacks, &c. but the chiefe gouernours ought to take heede, that they giue no credit to any suche things. I trust neuer any of them, commited idolatrie as Aharon did. Reuerend Martin. Yea, I beseeche you that are in authoritie in any case, not to beleeue any trueth against our bishops. For these puritans (although the bishops grant them- selues, to bee as euill as Balaam) coulde neuer yet prooue the good fathers, to haue committed idolatrie as Aharon did. And as long as diey bee no worse then Balaam was, there is no reason why they should be disliked. You know this is a troublesome worlde, men cannot come vnto any meare liuing without friendes. And it is no reason why a man should trouble his friende and giue him nothing, a hundred poundes and a gelding, is yet better then nothing. To bowle but seuen dayes in a weeke, is a very tollerable recreation. ^ You must knowe, that Iohn of London, hath sometimes HAY ANY WORKE FOR COOPER. 57 preached (as this profane T. C. hath giuen out to his no small commendations) thrise in a yeare at Paules crosse. A sore labor, it is reason that he should bestowe the rest of the yeare, in maintaining his health by recreation, and prouiding for his family: giue him leaue but to keepe out the gouernment of the Church, to swear like a swag, to persecute, and to take some small ten n, the hundred : and truely he will be loath euer to com mit idolatrie as Aharon did. I hope, though Iudas sold his master, yet that it cannot be prooued since his call ing, that euer he committed idolatrie. Reuerend T. C. page 16. 17. Though bishops should offende as Noah did in drun- kennes, yet good childre should couer their fathers fHts. For naturall children, though they suffer iniunes at their fathers hands, yet they take their griefes verie mddely. Reuerend Martin. Bishop Westphaling. But what then? Parson Graual parson of sir Iohn Pulchres in London (one of dumbe Iohns bousing mates) will be drunke but once a weeke. But what then? good childre sli-mld take l.nkes in a cold morning, and light them at his nose, to see if by that means some part of the fire that hath so flashed his sweete face, might be taken away : this were their dutie, sayth T. C. and not to crie redde nose, redd nose. ' But T. C. what if a man shoulde find him lying in the kenill, whether shoulde he take him vpp (all to be mired like a swine) in the sight ofthe people, and cary him home on his backe, or fling a couerled on liim, and f 3 58 HAY ANY WORKE FOR COOPER. 6 !um there toke his rest, vntill his Ieggs woulde be aduised by him to earie him home. But ine d.inks brother T. C. you defend the bishops but euilfauoredly ™ these pointes. For you doe, as though a thiefe should saye to a true man, I must needs haue thy purse thou must beare with me, it is my nature, I must needes Playe die thiefe. But yet thou dealest vncharitably with me, if thou blasest it abroad : for though I make an occupation of dieft, yet charitie would couer it So ^ye you, though our bishops make a trade of perse cuting and depriuing Gods min.sterS) ^^ a trade of continuing in Antichristian callings, yet cha- nt, wouhle haue their faltes eouered, and^e th 1 nnldely del WIt , As though T Q ^ ^ difference, betwixt those that fall by infirmitie into some one sinne, not making it their trade, and not defending the same to be lawfull, and our bishops which continue in an Antichristian calling and occu pation, and defend diey may do so. But wil they leaue think you, if they be mildly and gently delt with. The good Iohn of Canterbury, I pray thee leaue thy persecuting : good Iohn of Canterbury leaue thy Pope- dome : good father Iohn of London, be no more a bishop ofthe Diuell : he no more a tray tor to God and his worde. And good sweet boyes, all of you, become honest men : maim and deforme 'the church no longer : sweet fathers now, make not a trade of persecuting : gentle fathers keep the people in ignoraunce no longer : good fathers now, maintaine the dumb ministerie no Tbnger. Be the destruction of the Church no longer, HAY ANY WORKE FOR COOPER. 50 good sweete babes nowe: leaue your Nonresidencie, and your. other sinnes, sweete Popes now: and suffer the trueth to haue free passage. Lo T. C. nowe I haue mddely delt with thc good fathers, I will now expecte a while, to see whether they will amende by faire means, if not, let them not say but they haue bin warned. Reuerend T. C. from the 20. to the 30. Though the bishops be faltie, yet they are not to be excused that finde fait with them for synister ends. And the prince and magistrates, is to take heed that by their suggestions, they be not brought to put downe L. bishops, to take away their liuings, and put than to their pensions. For the putting of them to their pensions, would discourage young students from the study of diuinity. Reuerend Martin. I thought you were a fraide to loose your liuings, by the courtier Martins meanes. But brethren feare it not. I woulde not haue any true minister in the land want a sufficient liuing. But good soules, I commend you yet, that are not so bashful, but you will shew your griefes. Is it die treading vnder foote of the glory of God, that you feare good men. No no say they, we could resonably wel bear that losse. But we dy'e if you deminish die alowance of our Kitchin. Lett vs be assured of that, and our Lordly callings, and we do not greatly care, how other matters go. , I will when more worke is published, helpe these young students vnto a 60 HAY ANY WORKE FOR COOPER. means to liue, though they haue none of your Bishop- domes, if they will be ruled by me. Reuerend T. C. page 35. 30. There haue bene within diese fewe weekes 3. or 4. pamphlets published in print, against bishops. The author of them calledi him selfe Martin, &c. R. Martin. But good Tom Tubtrimmer, if tliere haue bin*3.-or 4 published, why doth bishop Cooper name oh[e] only, why doth he not confute all? why doth he inuent obiections of his owne, seeing he had 3. books more to confute, or 2. at least then he hath touched, nay, why doth he not confute one of them thoroughly, seeing there in his Bishopdome was reasonably caperclawed. I haue onely published a Pistle, and a Pitomie, wherein also I graunt that I did reasonably Pistle them. Therefore T. C. you begin widi a lye, in that you say that I haue published either 3. or 4. bookes. Reuerend T. C. page 38. His grace neuer felt blow as yet, &c. What is he past feeling, wilt thou tel me that T. C. he sleepeth belike in the top of ye roust. I would not be so wel thwacked for the popedomc of Canter, as he hath borne poore man. He was neuer able to make good syllogisme sii.ee I am sure. Hee alowed D. Bridges his booke quoth T. C. I pray thee what got he by that, but a testimony against him selfe, that either he hath, allowed treason, or confessed him selfe to be the bishop of the Diuell. HAY ANY WORKE FOR COOPER. 61 T. C. page 38. He that readeth his grace's answere, and M. Cartwrights reply, shal see which is the better lerned of the twoe. So he shal in deed T. C. and he were very simple which could not discerne that. And there is soe much answered already as thou saist, that his grace dare answere no more for shame. And T. C. you your selues grant T. Cartwright to be learned, so did I neuer thinke Iohn Whitgift to bee, what com parison cann you make betwene them ? But Thomas Cartwright, shall I say, that thou madest this booke against me, because T. C. is sett to it, wel take heed of it, if I find it to be thy doing, I will so besoop thee, as thou neuer bangedst Iohn Whitgift better in thy life. I see heere that they haue quarrelled with thee Wa[l]ter Trauerse, Iohn Penri, Thomas Sparke, Giles Wigging ton, Master Dauison, &c. Nay it is no matter, you are een wel serued, this wil teach you I trow to become my chaplaines. For if you were my chaplains once, I trowe Iohn Whitgift, nor any of his, durst not once say blackc to your eies. And if I had thy learning Thomas Cartwright, I would make diem all to smoak. But though I were as verye an Assehead as Iohn Catercap is, yet I coulde deale well inough with cleargie men : yea with olde Winken de word, D. Prime his selfe. And ile bepistle you D. Prime, when I am at more leasure, tiiough in deede I tell you true, that as yet I doe disdaine to deale with a contemptible trencher chaplaine, such as you, D. Bankcroft, and Chaplaine Duport are. But ise be with you all three to bring one day, you shall neuer scape my fingers, if I take you 62 HAY ANY WORKE FOR COOPER. but once in hande. You see how I haue delt with Deane Iohn, your entertainement shalbe alike. But Thomas Cartwright, thou art T. C. so is Tom Cooper too. The distinction dien, betweene you both, shall be this : he shalbe profane T. C. because he calleth Christ Iesus, by whom the gouernment by Pastors, Doctors, Elders and Deacons was commanded, to be he knowes not whom : and diou shalt be simple T. C. Concerning Mistresse Lawson, profane T. C. is it not lawfull for her to go to Lambeth- by water, to accom- Q . . panic a preachers wife, agc 58. Allen the Grocer is paid all saue 10. pound : for the vse of that, thc executors haue Iohn O Londons blessing. And I thinke they are reasonably wel serued. page 50. If the tale oix Benison be not true, why was Iohn of London alotted by the counsel, to pay him (I think) 40. pounds for his false imprisonment. Iohn of London is not dumb, because he prcachcdi somtimes tluise a yeare at Pauls crosse. Then we shall neuer. jageG. make our money of it I see. But I pray thee Gl. G2. 'p q howe canst thou excuse his blaspeemie, of Eli, Eli, lama sahuchthani : there haue bin 2. outra- gious facts amongst others committed in the world, by those that professe true religion, the on[e] was the betraying of our sauiour by Iudas an apostle, the other was the horrible mocking of his agonie and bitter pas sion, by Iohn Ehnar a bishop in this speeche. If he had bene in some reformed Churches, the blaspheemer woulde haue hardly escaped with his life. And is it true sweete boy in deed? Hath Leicestorshiere so embraced thc Gospell without contention, and that by Dumb Iohns mcanes? Litle doest thou know what thou hast done nowe, howe if Martin be a Leycester shicre man, hast not thou then sett out the praise of thine owne banc ? For martin I am sure, hath wroght HAY ANY WORKE FOR COOPER. 73 your Caiphas Chaire more wracke and misery, then all the whole land beside. And therefore thou seest, a man may be so madd somtimes, that he may praise he cannot tel what. The bishop of Rochester in page G3. presenting him selfe to a parsonage, did noe more then lawe allowed him. And do so againe good Iohn of Rochester, and it will be for thy credit. Fo, these puritans woulde findc fault I thinke with Iohn of Cant. (if he beleeuing that Christe in soule went to IlcllJ should holde it vnlawfull for a man to pray vnto Christe being in hell. And sweet Iohn of Cant, if euer thou praiedst in thy life for any bodies souls, now pray for thy brother D. Squire and Tarletons soules. They were honest fellows, though I think dean Iohns cars be longer. For why good sweet Iohn, may not your worship do this, as well as William of j,agc G3. Lincolne might pray, that our soules should 0l- be with the soules of professed traiterous papists. The good B. of Winchester did not protest, that at sir M. Oueries which was laid to his charge, p.lge ] j. but he spake som things that way. Wel bro- u5.0b.&o. ther Winchester, you confesse the most part, and we wil beleeue the rest for your sake without witnes. The B. of Winchester neuer said that it was ^age 71. an heresie, to holde that the preaching of the worde was the only ordinarie means to saluation, but inasmuch as Penri helde that the effect of saluation coulde not be wrought by the word read, he said that was not far from heresie : why brother Cooper, what is this els but open confession. For Iohn Penri as appeareth in his 74 HAY ANY WORKE FOR COOPER. writhes holdeth the word read, to be no ordinary means of saluation at al. This I know you wil accout an heresie, otherwise your case is damnable, that cause the people to content themselues with reading, and hold that they may ordinarily be saued thereby. Yea but page 72. T. of Winchester disputed a M. of Art, 45. '5' yeare ago in diuinitie. Here is an old lad once. I hope that disputation was very cholerickly performed. And he did once as prety a thing as that came to. For once preaching at Canter, he was dis posed to note out T. C. I meane simple T. C. in his sermon, his part he plaid after this sort. He noted 4. great Hidraes of the gospell in his sermon. 1. Carnall security. 2. Heathenish gentility. 3. Obstinat papis- trie. 4. saith he, when I looke in his forehead, I finde T. C. 'Written therein, whicli I cannot otherwise inter pret, then thankles curiositie, thanklesse for the benefits already receiued, and more curious than needs in vain and needles questions. The old studet did not know himselfe to be T. C. when he thus spake, and this is yl thankles curiosity yl hath answered Martin. Yea and he saw martins picture drawn when he was a yong man. I perceiue then he was not blind, as the old porter of Paddington, whom Iohn of London bedeaconed and beminsti elled. Lucian of Winchester himselfe was the painter. Mydas of Cant, the iudge. The one of the 2. wonie caled ignorance, was the goodwife of Bath, D. Culpable warden of new colledge, yc other called ielious suspicion, was ye fox Iohn of Exetor. The came in Winkendcword, alias D. Prime callumniator. This HAY ANY WORKE FOR COOPER. I,) Winken and his L. of Winchester, drew innocencie : to wit, Martin Marprelat gentleman by the hairc of the head. Then followed Dolus fraus insidiee. To wit, D. Perne, D. Renold and D. Cosins. The treader was cankered malice, his eyes were fierie, his face thinn and withered, pined away with melancholi, and this was D. Copcoat. Then followed dolfull repentance, yl is, dean Iohn repenting that euer he had writte in the Bb. behalfe because his grace is not as good as his worde. T. C. consider this picture vntill we meet againe. Now my busines calleth me away, I am trauelling towards Ban bury, for I here say that there hath bin old adoe. For bakers daughters wold haue knights whether they would or no. I wil learne the trueth hereof, and so I will post to Solihill, and visiting som parts of Stafford, Warwick, and Northampton shires, I will make a ioumey backe againe to norfolke and suffolke : I haue a register at Burie, and by that time my visitors will be come out of Cornwall, Deuon and Hampshire. And now fare thee well good profane T. C. 1 cannot now meddle with the long period which thou hast in the 33. 34. pag. of thy book, it is but 38. lines : thou art longer wi[n]ded then Deane Iohn is I see, though he hath longer periods then that which I set downe. Whereas thou dost complaine that the liuings of our bishopps are so small, that some of their children are hke to go a begging. There is a present remedy for that. For to what end els, is Iohn of Cant, vnmaried, but to prouide for the bishops children who shalbe poorly left. Though in deed, I neuer said in my life, that there was euer any great familiantie (though 76 HAY ANY WORKE FOll COOPER. I know there was some acquaintauncc) betwccne mistris Toye and Iohn Whitgift. And ilc befie em, ile befie em that will say so of me. And wherfore is Richard of Peterborowe vnmaried, but to prouide for other mens children. O now I reuienibcr me, he has also a charge to prouide for, his hostesse and cosin of Sibson. The peticoat which he bestowed vpon her, within this six moneths was not the best in England, the token was not vnmeete for hir state. Farewell, farewell, farewell olde Martin, and keepe thee out of dieir handes for all that. For thou art a shrewd fellowe, thou wilt one day ouer- throw them Amen. And then thou swearest by thy faith, quoth Iohn of London. Martin the Metropolitane to Iohn the Metropolitane sayth, Nemo eonfidat nimium secundis. Martin to his troubled sonnes sayth, Nemo desperet meliora lapsus. Anglia Martinis disce favere tuis. NOTES. Title.] Thc words inserted in parenthesis, form, in the original, an erratum at the end. P. 7, 1. 4. sir Iohns.} Sir was a title formerly applied to priests and curates in general. Dominus, the academical title of a bachelor of arts, was, at the Universities, usually rendered by sir in English ; so that a bachelor, who in the books stood Dominus Brown, was in conversation called Sir Brown. In the use of the word by our old dramatists and writers, the Christian name appears to have been generally used, although at the Universities it was omitted. In the " Epistle to the Terrible Priests," Reprint, p. 53, we have the amusing story of sir Iefferie Iones, in which he is also styled sir Iones. Sir Hugh Evans, in the M-rry Wives of Windsor; Sir Topas, Twelfth Night; Sir Oliver, As You Like Tt ; of Shakspeare ; and the Sir Hugh Pancras, in Ben Jonson's Title «f a Tub, will readily occur to most readers. Whether it was from the general prevalence of the Christian name John, that we find so many Sir Johns, I cannot tell ; but it would appear from many instances, that it was applicable to all such as had proceeded to the first degree at the Universities, that of bachelor of arts. The author has in the present instance used the term generically, in which sense the following illustration from Latimer may be quoted : — " Instead of a faithfuU and painefull teacher, they have a Sir John, who bath better skill in playing at tables, or in keeping a garden, than in God's word." — Latimer's Sermons, Dedication. The reader who is curious'in the matter may consult the Notes to Reed's Shakspeare, ed. 1813, v. 7. 229; viii. 117; xiv. 3W0.4S2. 11 78 NOTES. P. 7, 1. 13. out of all eric.] This expression, which is to ho met with in the title also, Is one of a numerous class of expressions, meaning, out of all measure, beyond measure. " Sirrah, Serjeant ami yeoman, I should love these maps out of crie now, if we could see men peep out of door in 'em." — Puritan, iii. 5. '¦ And then I am so stowt, and take It upon me, and stand upon my pantofles to them out of all crie." — Six Old Plays, i. 174. So also in Martin's Month's Mind, " he knew not which way to turn himselfe, and at length [was] clean Marde [marred], the greefe whereof vext him out of all crie." — Sign. E 3, verso. Shak speare has out of all whooping, As You Like It, iii. 2. In Greene's Fryer Bacon, " For he once loved the fair maid of Fresingfield out of all hoe." In Martin Mar-Prelate's Epitome, Reprint, p. 49, 1. 3, "This is put home I tiow, and ouerthroweth the Puritans out of all cesse : and in Shakspeare, I. Hen. IV. " the poor jade is wrung in the withers out of all cesse. In page 8 we have out of all scotche and notehe. P. 7, I. 20. moneths mind.] This expression has nothing to do with the office of the Romish Church for the repose of. the dead, formerly used in England, although it is possible the expression might have originated from it. Here it expresses the meaning of a strong desire, and just in the same sense it is used in the western counties to this day. Shakspeare, in the following quotation, has used it in this sense, although the Commentators have given some most strange illustrations : — " Julia. I see you have a menth's mind to them." Two Gent, of Verona, i. 3. Fuller has the expression, " The king had more than a moneth' s mind to procure the pope to canonize Henry VI. for a saint" — CA. Hist. b. iv. § 23. So Hall, "And sets a month's mind upon smiling Mary." Satires, b. iv. § i. NOTES. 79 And llutlcr, " For if n trumpet sound, or drum beat, Who hath not a month's mind to combat" Hudibras, Part i. Cant. ii. ver. 3. Nares has given, from Croft's Excerpta Antiqua, a different origin to the expression, but which does not on examination appear very tenalilc. P. 8, 1. It. dum minister."} This story is to be found in Martin's Epistle. P. 8, 1. 25. true penie.] Hamlet uses this expression to the Ghost: " Ha, ha, boy I say'stthou so? art thou there true-penny f" It also occurs in the Malcontent, 1604: "Illo, ho, ho, ho; art thou there old True-penny?" See also Forty's Glossary. P. 10, 1. 7. Stafford law."} i. e. club law. P. 10, 1. 20, 1. 22. Eulogein.] Enlogeni in the original, but cor rected by the author in the errata. P. 10, 1. 27. no grue in his poclted.} Nares, in glossing the word grew, says that it "seems to be put for thc Greek term ynv ; i. e. any trifling or very worthless matter." The allusion in the text having evident reference to the moderate knowledge of Greek which Martin's adversary possessed, may therefore mean, when he hath very little or no learning wherewith to answer him. P. 11, 1. 1 and 8. our brother Westchester.] i. e. Winchester. P. 11, 1. 2. Priemeero on the cards.] Primero was a game at cards, very fashionable in the reign of Elizabeth. This unrd occurs in Pap with a Hatchet, in the Note to which, p. 46, 1. 24, I must request the reader to correct an error inadvertently com mitted, for Greene to read Cooke, the latter being the author of the play of "Tu Quoque." P. 11, 1. 15. ka.] i. e. quoth. It is remarkable that the woru does not appear in Nares' Glossary. It is frequently used by this writer in his Epistle. P. 11, 1. 26. argling.] i. e. arguing. H 2 80 NOTES. P. 18, 1. 21. adient.] Adjoint, adjunct It refers to the then general custom of placing in tlie margin, or " margent," suoh notes as were necessary to elucidate tile text, whether in reference to the author or the tide of his book. P. 14, 1. 21. besoop.] To belabour. P. 15, 1. 13. qf all lows.] A tender expression frequently used instead of by all means. Coles renders the phrase by amabo. Shakspeare has some instances : — " But Mrs. Page would desire you to send her your little page of all loves ; her husband has a marvellous infection to the little page." — Merry Wives of Windsor, ii. 2. " For all tlie loves on earth, Hodge let me see it" Gammer Gurton, O. P. ii. 76. ' Alack where are you ? speak an if you hear ; Speak, of all loves ; I swoon almost with fear.' ' Mids. N. D. ii. 3. P. 16, 1. 8. vntil more workefor Cooper be published.] The allu sion to this intended tract, in the printing of 'which some short time afterwards the press was seized, is frequent in the present work. P. 17, 1. 10. haue felt oftheir tongs.] Meaning, I suppose, their tongues covered with felt Shakspeare has the word : — " It were a delicate stratagem, to shoe A troop of horse with/eJ«." — Lear, iv. 6. See Reed's Shakspeare, xvii. 550, ed. 1813, for other instances. P. 23, 1. 15. O tis a sweete trunclifiddle.] Nares has the word Trunchefice, with the following illustration, which, as the running qualifications of Bishop Aylmer are referred to, may not be inap propriate : — " Or say' st thou this same horse shall win the prize, Because his dam was swiftest Trunchefice, Or Runcevall his sire." Hall's Satires, ed. 1753, iv. 3. p. 65. NOTES. 81 P. 24, 1. 1. bumfeg.] i. e. belabour j I see no reference to it in any Glossary: bumbaste, a word of similar meaning, sometimes occurs. " 1 will so codgell and bombaste thee, that thou Bhalt not be able to sturre thyself." — Palace of Pleasure, sign. K 6. " I will bombaste you, you mocking knave." Damon and Pitliias, O. P. i. 209. P. 24, 1. 17. stealecounter.] Counters were small circular pieces of base money used for reckoning ; and, according to Dr. Farmer, were introduced from France towards the latter part of the seven teenth century. A stealecounter, therefore, must be one of the pettiest of thieves. P. 24, 1. 20. this geare cottons.] i. e. succeeds, prospers. " Still mistress Dorothy ! the geer will cotton." Beaumont fy Fletcher, Mons. Tho. iv. 8. " Now Hepheetion, doth not this matter cotton as I would." Lyly's Alex. St Camp., O. P. ii. 122. P. 24, 1. 26. proue with a wet finger.] i. e. great ease. Nares seems to think it is derived from the custom of wetting the finger to turn over the leaves of a book with more ease, and quotes the following : — " I hate brawls with my heart, and can turn over a volume of wrongs with a wet finger." Gabriel Harvey's Pierce's Superer. 21, Reprint. P. 27, 1. 12. pulleth.} Evidently an error for putteth. P. 30, 1. 9. soopes.] i. e. blows. P. 33, 1. 18. Nuts.] The expression "that's nuts," when any thing witty is said, and especially in reply to another, is very common in the West of England. P. 40, last line, so ouersecne.] i. e. guilty of oversight. P. 43, 1. 26. Denmark.] In the original in one copy is Den- make, and in another Denmark, a fact hardly worth noticing but for the purpose of stating that the variation occurs in the same 82 NOTES. edition, nor can I trace but one edition, although it is slated by more than one authority that there were at least two about this time; there was a reprint I believe in 1641. P. 44, last line, procure god to wrath.] The sense requires proooke, unless wrath is used as a verb. P. +5, 1. 28. ought.] i. e. owed. It occurs in tiie Mirror for Magistrates, p. 420 : — " The trust he ought me, made me trust him so." P. 45, 1. 29. hangones.] A word still in use in some counties, frequendy joined to rascal, and probably means a person who deserves hanging. It occurs again at page 69. A friend has, however, suggested that it might only be another form for hangers-on. P. 4C, 1. 20. court qf Amraltie.] i. e. Admiralty. Amral occurs in Paradise Lost P. 47, 1. 26. Brownist.] Robert Brown, from whom the Inde pendents or Congregationalists date their origin, was a gentleman of Butlandshire, who suffered several imprisonments for adherence to his opinions. He was a violent opponent of the Church of England discipline and ceremonies. The Brownists were for a long time the subject of popular satire. " I had as lief be a Brownist as a politician," says Shakspeare in Twelfth Night. P. 48, last line, regiment.] i. e. government It appears to have been in general use amongst our old writers to the time of James I. P. 51, 1. 16. Deane Gridgcs.] i. e. Bridges, probably an error of the printer. It occurs again in the next page. P. 63, 1. 14. tow.] u e. thou ; it occurs again at page 64, line 26. P. 53, 1. 15. Where hast ti bene, 8fc] i. e. thou been, why man I have been seeking for a salmon's nest, and I have found a whole crew. See Note, page 65, line 10. NOTES. 83 P. 5.1, 1. 10. Samons nest.] Ofthe meaning of this expression I must confess my ignorance. P. G3, 1. 25. patch.} i. e. fool. P. 65, 1. 2. harrow Hell.] Harrow; to plunder, spoil, lay waste, subdue. The ban owing of hell is an expression constantly applied to oui- Lord's descent into hell, as related in the Gospel of Nico demus. There were several early Miracle-plays on the subject, one of which, of the age of Edward II., has recently been edited by Mr. Halliwell, from a MS. in the British Museum. Spenser, in one of his Sonnets, addressing Christ, says, " And having harrowed hell didst bring away Captivity thence captive." — Sonnets, 68. P. 65, 1. 8. cog, face and lye, as fast as a dog can trot.] This proverb I do not recollect having seen in any collection, although " to lie as fast as a dog can trot" is still in use in Somersetshire. P. 65, 1. 10. ti nowne, cliwamt tee, ti vorehead zaze hard as horne.] i. e. ill plain English, " thine own, I warrant thee, thy forehead is as hard as horn." Steevens, in his Notes on Lear, says, " When our ancient writers have occasion to introduce a rustick, they commonly allot him the Somersetshire dialect. Mercury, in the second Book of Ovid's Metamorphoses, assumes the appearance of a clown, and our translator Golding has made him speak with the provinciality of Shakspeare's Edgar." See Golding's Ovid, ed. 1603, b. ii. One of these peculiarities is in the various forms which the personal pronoun I is made to assume. Mr. Jennings, in >is Somersetshire Glossary, says, that it is variously pronouneed, Ise, ^fch, Iche, Utchy. Whenever the word occurs in composi tion, the mark of elision should be put before instead of after the eJt ; thus in the text, chwarut should be 'eh want. Without ex tending this note further, it may lie worth while to remark, ihat in the present instance, in Lear, in Gammer Gorton's Needle, and in every instance wliich I have met with, the sense requires this mark of elision before the ch. P. 70, 1. 26. shrine.] Screen 2 §4 NOTES. P. 71, 1. 17. frump.'] i, e. a jest : it sometimes means a con temptuous speech. P. 74, 1. 22. martins picture, ifrc.] The description which fol lows is cvidentiy an allusion to the exhibition of Martin on the stage, some particulars relating to which will be found in the Notes to the Reprint of Pap with a Hatchet P. 76, 1. 16. Richard af Peterborowe.] Bishop Howland held the see of Peterborough at this time. THE END. LONDON : Huou W„.t.A«. Printer, Ashby-street, Northampton-square. 3 9002 03720 3719 gl