MA. OF TUSCANY NORA DUFF H JS. Til, D£l DEI siilill D "Igmtfe£e Booh ,_ for. the founding ef a College in Aftf Colony" DIVINITY SCHOOL TROWBRIDGE LIBRARY MATILDA OF TUSCANY ' Chronicles tell of deeds : Time alone reveals the individual. Cosi '1 crin ti corono, e bramo intanto Tromba, da cui rimbombi in Vaticano Encomio eterno di tua larga mano. Non piu lodi Elicona Con favoloso canto L'Ariannea corona ; Ma di questa ch'io t'offro innalzi il vanto. Ben merta, che si stime, Che di bellezza e in grando piu sublime Quanto nel ciel piu belle Delle dipinte son le vere stelle.' From the Ode in lode della Contessa Matilda Cardinal Barberini (Urban viii.). PORTRAIT OF MATILDA (from A fresco at verona) MATILDA OF TUSCANY LA GRAN DONNA D'lTALIA BY NORA DUFF WITH SIXTEEN ILLUSTRATIONS NEW YORK E. P. DUTTON AND COMPANY 31 WEST TWENTY-THIRD STREET I9IO NOTE MY grateful thanks are due to Mr. Philip Wicksteed for most helpful criticism and advice in the earlier stages of the manuscript of Matilda, to my cousin Miss Henrietta Tayler at a later period, and to Mrs. Robert Goff for valuable assistance in the correction of proofs. It is to the kind courtesy of the Marchese Lodovico di Canossa that I am indebted for permission to reproduce the photograph from the fresco portrait of Matilda in his possession, and to Professor Bellodi of Mantua for a similar permission, with regard to the photograph of Matilda's tomb at S. Benedetto Polirone. I wish also to acknowledge my debt of gratitude to Father Ehrle, Prefect of the Vatican Library, and to the various librarians in the public libraries of Italy who have rendered easy the work of research, and finally to all those kindly people who have sped Matilda on her way. N. D. Florence May 1909 Introduction, CONTENTS CHAPTER I CHAPTER II PAGE I The foundation of the house of Canossa — Siegfried — Azzo or Atto— The story of Adelaide — Her reception at Canossa — Canossa's triumph — Azzo's successor Tedaldo — Boniface's rule — His greatness and his tyranny— Jealousy of Henry in.— Death of Boniface— His wife Beatrice— Hildegarde and Guilla, wives of Atto and Tedaldo, . ... . . . 10 CHAPTER III Birth of Matilda probably at Lucca in 1046 — Marriage of Beatrice with Godfrey of Lorraine — Matilda's Betrothal by proxy to Godfrey's Son in 1053 — Anger of Henry in. who detained Beatrice as Prisoner — Reconciliation of Henry and Godfrey— Death of Henry in. and return of Beatrice and Godfrey to Italy in 1057, .... 31 CHAPTER IV A Short Summary of the Papacy with regard to the Question of Investitures — The Part played by the Emperors — Charlemagne — Otto the Great — Charter of Henry n. — Hildebrand the Monk — Education in Rome and sub sequent History — Attaches himself to Gregory VI. and accompanies him into Exile — Journey to Rome with Leo ix. — Councils at Rome, Pavia, Rheims and Mainz, 1048, . . ... .... 37 CHAPTER V Rise of the Norman Power in the South of Italy — Character of the Norman adventurers who landed there in the early part of the eleventh century, and their conflicts with the various races already in possession — At first Leo ix. adopts a friendly attitude towards them, but soon changes, and determines to check their aggressions — Battle of Civitate and captivity of Leo— Embassy of Frederick of Lorraine to Constantinople — Robert Guiscard — Death of Leo ix. in T054 — Gerbhard of Eichstadt elected Pope as Victor II. — Henry in. fears the increasing power of Duke Godfrey and is suspicious of his brother Frederick — The latter retires to Monte Cassino — Death of Henry in. — Minority of Henry iv. and regency of the Empress Agnes — Death of Victor 11., 1057 — Stephen ix. — The Antipope Benedict X. — Appointment of Nicholas 11. in place of the Antipope 57 CHAPTER VI Matilda's early upbringing — Her training under Arduino della Palude — Her mother's part in her education — Her appearance— The portraits of her extant, 76 viii MATILDA OF TUSCANY CHAPTER VII PAGE Lateran Council held by Nicholas II., 1059 — Alliance with the Normans — Hildebrand as Archdeacon and Abbot of St. Paul's — The Pataria at Milan — Death of Nicholas, io6r, in Rome — Anselm, Bishop of Lucca, is elected Pope as Alexander XI. — Lombard Prelates cause Cadalous of Parma to be Pope with the approval of the Empress Agnes — These rival Popes are the means of producing a widespread schism in the Church : it is agreed to refer the whole question of the schism to a Council— The Council held at Mantua in 1064, when Alexander is unanimously declared the lawful successor to Peter — Cadalous and his friend Guibert retire to Parma, to conspire once more against the Pope, 83 CHAPTER VIII Cadalous and Guibert induce the Normans to invade the Papal Territory — The Normans march on Rome — Beatrice attempts to entrap Cadalous — Cadalous, however, reaches Rome, and takes the Leonine quarter — Duke Godfrey's forces drive off the schismatics and enter Rome — Cadalous remains in St. Angelo — Holds the fortress for two years— Finally driven out and flees from Rome — Godfrey is held by some to have been privy to his escape — Alexander appoints his nephew Anselm as Matilda's spiritual adviser — Renewed conflict with the Normans— Their rout at Aquino, . . .98 CHAPTER IX Confusion existing regarding the date of Matilda's marriage with Godfrey of Lorraine — Vedriani's account — Most probably the marriage took place be tween 1069 and 1071 — Differences between husband and wife — Matilda's journey into Lorraine — Return to Italy — Godfrey in Italy in 1073 — Gregory elected Pope — Evil conduct of the young Emperor — Gregory's Council in 1074, . . . 104 CHAPTER X The Abbot of St. Hubert determines to journey to Rome in company with the Bishop of Metz, and lay his cause before the Pope — They are entertained in Pisa by Beatrice and Matilda, and Abbot Dietrich is given letters to the Pope — Gregory receives him and sends him away with power to act against Duke Godfrey — Godfrey attempts a reconciliation with Matilda — The plot against the Pope's life in Santa Maria Maggiore is unsuccessful — Gregory is made prisoner, but is released on the following day — Death of Godfrey in February 1076, and of Beatrice in April 1076 — Matilda has henceforth to stand alone — Henry iv. is reproved by the Pope for his evil conduct — Re taliates by commanding the Pope to vacate the Chair of Peter, and sends an envoy to Rome with an insolent letter to Gregory — Gregory excommunicates him and many German bishops — Effect of this on Henry's subjects, who declare he must have the sentence of excommunication removed, or lose his kingdom — The excommunicated bishops hasten across the Alps to ask for absolution— Henry departs from Spires, halts at Besancon for Christmas, and finally, with great difficulty, crosses the Alps in the winter of 1076-1077, 131 CHAPTER XI Gregory leaves Rome and is escorted by Matilda and her troops through Lombardy — On hearing Henry is in Italy he turns aside to Canossa — Arrival of excommunicated bishops and laymen — They receive pardon — Gregory at Canossa — Henry's arrival — Penitence and reconciliation with the Pope — Henry's plot to entrap Gregory frustrated by Matilda's man-at-arms — Gregory remains in Matilda's strongholds throughout the summer, . . 149 CONTENTS ix CHAPTER XII /-..., . „ , , PAGE Civil war in Germany and the campaign against Rudolf of Suabia— Gregory still hesitates to excommunicate Henry again — Rebellion of Lucchese against Matilda — Gregory pronounces anathema on Henry once more and sends Rudolf the imperial crown ; Henry has Guibert elected Pope at Brixen— Rout of Matilda's troops at Volta and death of Rudolf— Henry and Guibert encamp on the meadows of Nero outside Rome, and for three years Rome is invested during the winter — Anselm's letter to Guibert in defence of Matilda — Matilda forced to send Canossa's treasure to the help of Rome — Triumph of the schismatics — Henry's coronation in Rome— The Normans in Rome — Flight of Henry— Sack of the city, 166 CHAPTER XIII Gregory's last Lateran Council— Matilda's letter to the faithful in Germany — Gregory's retreat to Salerno — Extract from his letter to the faithful abroad — Matilda's victory at Sobara — Death of Gregory, 25th May 1085, at Salerno, 177 CHAPTER XIV Pestilence and famine visit Italy in 1085 — Death of Anselm of Lucca — Desiderius of Cassino elected Pope — Refuses the Papacy at first — At length gives his consent and is installed in Rome as Pope, 1087 — Matilda entertains Robert of Normandy, but rejects his suit — Matilda learns bad news from Rome and hastens to take the field once more — Arrives in Rome and confers with Pope Victor, June 1087 — They agree to attack the schismatics, but are discomfited — Death of Pope Victor, Sept. 1087, . . . 183 CHAPTER XV Election of Urban 11. — Arranges for Matilda's second marriage — Matilda persuaded to consent to it for political reasons — Henry, furious at the marriage, besieges Mantua, which capitulates — Domnizo's lament over Mantua, . igo CHAPTER XVI Henry assaults Ferrara, which opens its gates at once to him — Matilda's troops betrayed by Ugo di Manso and defeated at Tre Contadi — Henry besieges Montebello, which holds out for a considerable time — Makes over tures of peace — Matilda consents to consider them — Calls a council of war — Carpineta — Speeches of the Bishop of Reggio and the abbot of Canossa, . 198 CHAPTER XVII Henry raises the siege of Montebello and marches upon Canossa — His dis comfiture and flight — His standard captured and brought to Canossa, where it is placed in the Church of St. Apollonio— Flight of Adelaide, Henry's wife — Takes refuge with Matilda— Rebellion of Conrad, who is offered the crown of Italy — He accepts — Journey of Pope Urban to Lombardy — Welcomed by Matilda — Council of Piacenza — Separation of Guelf and Matilda in 1095 — Reasons for the separation not absolutely known, though there are many plausible ones to be found — Henry's last hostility against Matilda at Nogara unsuccessful 209 CHAPTER XVIII The beginnings of the Crusades — Aspirations of Gregory vn. — His letters to Henry in 1074 — Forced to abandon the idea — Development under Pope Urban n. at Councils of Piacenza and Claremont — Urban appeals to all true warriors to fight for the Holy Sepulchre — Departure from Lucca of the Crusaders in 1095 — Halt in Rome and disillusionment of many who turn back — Capture of Jerusalem — Death of Urban, 1099, 220 x MATILDA OF TUSCANY CHAPTER XIX PAGE Election of Paschal II. — Death of Antipope Guibert in noo — Matilda pro motes the founding of the School of Jurisprudence at Bologna, and appoints Irnerius to codify the Laws of Justinian — Restores and beautifies S. Apol- lonio at Canossa — The story of the spurs— Cardinal Bernard is made her director and vicar of the Pope in Lombardy — Matilda renews her donation to the Roman Church in 1102 — Visit of Anselm of Canterbury to Matilda's court — Revolt of Ferrara and Parma — The translation of the body of San Geminiano in Modena — Two miniature portraits of Matilda in the MS. which gives an account of this ceremony, . 227 CHAPTER XX Henry's last years, and the conspiracies of his son against his sovereignty — His piteous letter to the King of France — His death in 1106 at Liege — Council of Guastalla — Pope Paschal's reception in France of the envoys of Henry v. , and his message to the young King — Matilda's last visit to Rome — Her reception of the petition of the inhabitants of Massa Finalese — Struggles between the cities and the growth of their power — Matilda's attitude of neutrality in n 10, when Henry v. visits Italy — Henry's arrival in Rome and abduction of the Pope — He frees Matilda's two vassal bishops on the arrival of her envoy, Arduino della Palude — Matilda receives Henry v. at Bianello and entertains him for three days, 242 CHAPTER XXI Matilda at the baths of Pisa in n 12 — Her failing health and much suffering — She still insists on keeping all the fasts and vigils of the Church — Her frequent visits to San Benedetto Polirone — Alarming illness at Monte Baranzone in n 14 — Revolt of Mantua — Matilda recovers and resolves to punish Mantua — Raises troops and descends to Bondeno, where a rendez vous is given — Council of the citizens of Mantua — Resolve to throw them selves upon Matilda's mercy — She refuses at first to pardon them — But yields finally at the instance of the Bishop and other members of the court, . . 258 CHAPTER XXII Matilda's last donation to San Benedetto, and the grand ceremonial at the abbey — Returns to Bondeno in December, but visits S. Benedetto again at the feast of the Epiphany — Is carried back to Bondeno in great suffering — Visit of the abbot of Cluny — Matilda's last Lent — Her final donations to Canossa's church — She has a chapel built near the rooms where she lies and dedicates it to St. James — Her last words and death — Domnizo's lament — No account given us of her funeral by the ancient writers — Burial at San Benedetto — Changes in the position of the sarcophagus — Finally in 1630 the remains are transferred to Rome . 267 Appendices, . . . . . ... . 282 Bibliography 298 Index, ... . . ... 302 LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS Portrait of Matilda Frontispiece From a Fresco at Verona FACING PAGE Ruins of Canossa 2 From a Photograph by Ferrari, Reggio Emilia Boniface 20 From the MS. of Domnizo Beatrice ... .... .76 From the MS. of Domnizo Matilda 80 From the MS. of Domnizo Gregory VII ... 120 From an old Engraving Tomb of Beatrice at Pisa 138 From a Photograph by Alinari BlANELLO AND QUATTRO CaSTELLA 1 54 From a Photograph by Ferrari, Reggio Emilia Matilda, Henry IV. and Hugo of Cluny . . . 155 From MS. of Domnizo Ruins of Carpineta 202 From a Photograph by Stab. Arti Grafiche, Reggio Portrait of Matilda 224 From the Fresco above her Tomb at S. Benedetto Polirone Matilda at Modena 240 From a MS. in the Chapter Archives Cloister of S. Simeon at S. Benedetto Polirone . 260 From a Photograph by Ferrari, Reggio Emilia Tomb of Matilda at S. Benedetto Polirone . . 274 From a Photograph by Professor R. Bellodi Monument to Matilda in S. Peter's .... 280 From a Photograph by Alinari Seal of Beatrice, and Crosses on the Document quoted on p. 283 . 284 MATILDA OF TUSCANY CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION THE beautiful young girl who appeared to Dante as guardian of the Earthly Paradise, who sing ing gathered flowers by Lethe's stream, has puzzled many a student of the great poet, and all sorts of conjectures have been made as to her identity. Yet to the earlier commentators and to those who have studied carefully the history of Italy before Dante's day this difficulty could not exist. For to Dante, a Tuscan of the Tuscans, there could have been only one Matilda — the great Countess of Tuscany,1 whose name was still a household word in his days, and who remains for ever a grand immortal figure in the world's history. Most fittingly was she placed as guardian of the Earthly Paradise, she, who to a saintly life added noble deeds, she, who ruled her people wisely and well, and who in an age of lawlessness and barbarity stood for law and order in a most remarkable degree. Although the barest shell of Canossa remains to tell 1 Benvenuto da Imola, ' L'Anonimo,' a. Florentine of the fourteenth century, Jacopo della Lana, ' L'Ottimo,' Francesco da Buti, Pietro Alighieri, ' Pseudo-Boccaccio,' — all these make no suggestion that she could be other than the great Countess. A 2 MATILDA OF TUSCANY of its former greatness, a visit to it to-day must serve to strengthen the conviction that Matilda of Tuscany and Matilda of the Earthly Paradise are one and the same person. Canossa uprears its rugged outlines on a height at the outskirts of the Reggian Apennines, a huge mass of rock superimposed upon a hill. Frequent landslips and ill-treatment at the hands of man have left but a remnant of the castle ; even that remnant is of a building raised there some centuries after Matilda's time. As the traveller approaches from the Ciano d'Enza side, through a region bare and terrible, along the narrow track with gloomy depths beneath it, suggestive of the ' baize ' of the Inferno, he too has a vision of a sunlit hill. The massive rock with the ruins of fortified, encircling walls grows clearer before his eyes, and with each step forward, the similarity between this hill and the mount of Purgatory emphasises itself to his mind, the old walls seeming to mount upwards in circles, as do the terraces in Purgatory. And his imagination at once reverts to the lady who dwelt at the summit, even as Matilda in the Earthly Paradise. He feels that Dante may have travelled along this very track in visiting Canossa. What more likely, since the poet seems to know so well the Pietra Bismantova only some few miles away ? More of Matilda's citadel doubtless remained in Dante's day, more traditions were current of her — traditions handed down by word of mouth from generation to generation, containing, nevertheless, the germs of truth, since spoken words were more carefully cherished in the old times, and memories more tenacious before the know ledge of a written language grew common. To this day there are old people in the mountains who will tell you legends of the * Contessa Matilde ' ! but alas ! she has RUINS OF CANOSSA INTRODUCTION 3 become a very shadowy figure, or else has been meta morphosed into a witch ! In trying to realise something of that Italy of long ago, we perceive that in Dante's time a more intimate knowledge of her life existed — that Matilda was then more than a traditionary name. To the ' divine ' poet, moreover, she was a living embodiment of some of his most cherished ideals ; his love and admiration for her would have been quickened by the knowledge of the part she played in the history of the city he loved so well. Never had Florence been so wisely ruled as in Matilda's days, never had the city been so well protected as when it rested under the shadow of her great name. Within the gates in her time factions did not exist, and law and order prevailed. The surrounding country districts, however, were overrun by the lesser nobility, whose castles, built on the hilltops, dominated the river plain.1 These barons of Teutonic origin had in the old days been fiercely jealous of the great Boniface, Matilda's father ; now in Matilda's time they declared themselves adherents of the Emperor, an assertion which lent them a pretext for swooping down on the citizens, plundering their merchandise when they issued forth to the north or to the south, and hemming them in so that no outlet for their commerce was passible. It was Matilda alone who was able to hold these marauders in check, and punish their deeds of violence ; again and again the Florentines appealed to her for protection, and, so long as her forces were available, they never appealed in vain. So that 1 Dal Pozzo inclines to think that the Tuscan Lombards were amongst Boniface's assailants at the battle of Coviolo. See Dal Pozzo, p. 185. He says further that they hated the idea of Boniface's increasing power, and were most anxious to work his downfall. 4 MATILDA OF TUSCANY when through stress of war the power of the great Countess was weakened, and her fortunes at a low ebb, the citizens of Florence loyally repaid her. They withstood the Emperor in her name, they built a strong circle of walls around their city, and defended it with such spirit that the Emperor had finally to abandon the siege and con tinue his way to Rome, as we shall see hereafter. To Florence Matilda granted various privileges, and instituted a system of government which answered so admirably that, even after her death, the city went on quietly governing itself under the same conditions, and was practically autonomous long before it declared itself a commune. All this may have come back to Dante in thinking of the great Countess, the one woman who in Italy had made her name synonymous with that of a worthy ruler. If we wish to find another point of resemblance between Dante's Matilda and her prototype, may we not see it in the frank laughter and love that Matilda of the Earthly Paradise flung across the stream to the poet ? For the real Matilda was, above all things, a friend and lover of mankind. In reading the history of her life we are struck by the number of notable characters who paid homage to this remarkable woman, and who evinced the warmest admiration and regard for her. From her earliest years she Was brought into close association with the Popes, and fought, according to tradition, for Nicholas 11. and Alexander h. before the walls of Rome. Later we meet with a long array of famous names — Gregory vn. and Urban H. amongst the Popes ; Peter Damian, Anselm of Lucca, our own Anselm of Canterbury, Bernard of Parma, amongst the famous ecclesiastics ; Arduino della Palude, who instructed her in the art of war, Domnizo, the priest INTRODUCTION 5 of Canossa, who wrote lovingly of her deeds, — all these testify to the worth of her friendship, besides many others not mentioned here. Of Matilda the warrior we learn something from con temporary historians, much from Domnizo the faithful chronicler, who describes glowingly many a battle fought and won by his dear mistress. We realise from these records the heroic part she played — how for over thirty years she upheld the cause of the Church against the might of the Empire; how untiringly she fought; how again and again she raised armies to help the Church's need ; how she gave everything, her wealth, her vassals, and her very self, in consenting to two loveless marriages, for what she believed to be right ; and how but for her noble defence of the Church, Italy would have remained an appanage of the Empire and the Pope would have retained only the power he held as Bishop of Rome. In the brief spaces of peace that were vouchsafed to poor unhappy Italy, Matilda saw that the laws should be properly administered, she built and endowed churches, monasteries, and hospitals without number. She had roads and bridges constructed in order to open up hitherto inaccessible parts of her dominions, she founded the baths of Casciano and restored the baths of Pisa. To her public charities were added numerous acts of gracious kindliness. She succoured the needy and the hungry, and Canossa was often a very haven of refuge for the oppressed. The Italian peninsula in the eleventh century presents no pleasing spectacle. In the south the long-drawn-out struggle between the last remnants of the Longobard race and the survivors of the Byzantine rule on the one hand, against the rival Saracen and Norman invaders on 6 MATILDA OF TUSCANY the other, devastated the lands of Beneventum, Capua, Salerno, and the island of Sicily. In the north a latent national sentiment, a half-unconscious desire to be free of the German yoke, was continually stifled by the factions and petty jealousies of the nobles. Here a great marquis would gain pre-eminence by strategy and force, or an ecclesiastic would rise to power and unlawfully seize lay and Church lands alike ; then conspiracies would be set on foot by the rest against the one successful man, and there would be no respite until he was overthrown. The Emperor would be appealed to, and would cross the Alps to subdue his rebellious vassals, and there would be more bloodshed, cities would be laid in ashes as examples to the rest ; and the nobles, ecclesiastic and secular, would vie with one another in seeking imperial favour, only to quarrel the more violently or plot against the Emperor, once he had set his face northwards again. Into such an atmosphere of conspiracies and wars was Matilda born. Her father, Boniface, one of the greatest lords of his day, had certainly devoted himself to amass ing riches and acquiring territories, but with this saving grace, that he also encouraged the spread of learning and protected its source, — the monasteries, in a manner unequalled by his compeers ; Beatrice of Lorraine, his wife, possessed rare gifts of graciousness and tact, was both gentle and strong. The daughter of these two inherited the best side of both her parents, the strength of purpose, valour and vigour of her father, and the softer graces of her mother. In spite of the stormy and troubled times Matilda's education was extraordinarily diversified. She could converse fluently in four different languages, and could correspond in Latin with the great men her contemporaries ; she wrote her letters herself INTRODUCTION 7 without the aid of a clerk. She helped to foster and develop the love of learning ; she herself was well versed in jurisprudence, and one of her greatest pleasures was in collecting manuscripts and mastering their contents. When we think of these barbarous days and how little education the sons and daughters of the nobles received, we are still more astonished at Matilda's attainments. For in the great feudal castles the boys were taught merely the rough arts of war, and the girls in the nunneries acquired a few Latin prayers and the art of executing rude tapestries. Many of the early German emperors could only affix a cross to their diplomas. Matilda therefore seems some centuries in advance of her times, enjoying almost the knowledge and accomplishments of the great Renaissance ladies, retaining, however, the severer simplicity of her own days. And in a way — the way of perfect liberty of action, since there was no male relative left her, after the age of thirty, under whom she could remain in tutelage, as was the custom of those times — she is curiously akin to the women of our own century. That the history of her life and the work she accom plished should have been so strangely neglected in this country is a matter of surprise. Historians of the Middle Ages, of the Popes, and of the struggle between the Papacy and Empire, have but mentioned her in passing, in connection with the Canossa incident, or they have laid stress on the fact that she possessed large tracts of territory, which after her death became the property of the Church. Yet of the part she played in the history of Italy, of her magnificent efforts to uphold the Church against the Empire, of her friendship with Gregory vn. and their unformulated ideal of a united Italy — the dream of many a ruler, statesman, and warrior, in after 8 MATILDA OF TUSCANY years — modern historians are mostly silent. In Italy certainly, the work of Matilda's life is a recognised factor in history ; from the early chroniclers down to the present day, writers have not been wanting to testify to her fame. Of Matilda the warrior maid of Holy Church, the heroine of many a battlefield, the prototype of Tasso's ' Clorinda,' of Matilda the ruler and judge — the friend of great men and lowly — the gracious chatelaine of Canossa — we catch glimpses in all these varying accounts, but of Matilda the woman, of her personal joys and sorrows, we know so little. Most of the records have perished ; two only of her letters have come down to us. The times in which she lived are so far removed from our own, the happenings of so many intervening centuries have blurred their outline for us, that it is as if a mist hid her from us, or a thick veil shrouded her face — a veil we are unable to draw aside. Those who have been fortunate enough to gain access to the Vatican MS. of Domnizo's chronicle, or who have seen the excellent reproductions of the miniatures in Muratori's version published by Bethmann, or by Pertz, must be conscious at once of a keen sense of disappoint ment if they had hoped to glean from them an idea of Matilda's personal appearance. These miniatures are in no sense portraits of men and women ; they are rude symbols meant to represent the people whose names are written beside them. Yet they were painted probably in Matilda's day — at latest a few years after her death. The later portraits — the fresco at Bianello, the one preserved in the Canossa Palace at Verona, the one in the Sacristy of Mantua Cathedral, represent a beautiful woman. Yet these were all painted a century or more after Matilda INTRODUCTION 9 had been laid to rest in her tomb at San Benedetto. It is even so with the written records. Contemporary history gives us rude outlines, but still nothing that can satisfy our desire for the fuller understanding of the woman we would know. Later history fills in the details, but we have to accept its statements with caution, lest here imagination may have been given too free a rein. The following pages are the outcome of some few years' study of a most engrossing subject, and represent an effort to piece together the all too fragmentary know ledge of Matilda which has been handed down to us. If they serve to kindle a wider interest in a woman whose name once resounded throughout the length and breadth of Europe, if they help in any measure to give an idea of what Matilda's life and deeds have meant to Italy, they will not have been written in vain. io MATILDA OF TUSCANY CHAPTER II The foundation of the house of Canossa — Siegfried — Azzo or Atto — The story of Adelaide— Her reception at Canossa — Canossa's triumph — Azzo's successor Tedaldo — Boniface's rule — His great ness and his tyranny — Jealousy of Henry in. — Death of Boniface — His wife Beatrice — Hildegarde and Guilla, wives of Atto and Tedaldo. THE most interesting document concerning Matilda, inasmuch as it was written while she was still alive, is the chronicle in rude Latin verse by Domnizo, a monk of Canossa. In many respects, however, it gives us only tantalising glimpses of Matilda, and is mainly occupied at first with recounting the greatness of Canossa. In fact, the grim old fortress is supposed to be telling its own story, and the first part is devoted to the history and doings of Matilda's ancestors. Siegfried is the first mentioned by Domnizo. A native of Tuscany and of Lucchese origin, he gained some fame in warring in the Marches of Lombardy. He left behind him three sons, two of whom settled in Parma, and became the progenitors of the families of Guiberti and Barata. ' Both of them were great and resplendent in honour,' says Domnizo. But it is to the third son, Azzo or Atto, that the glory of the house of Canozza belongs. ' Azzo was as astute as a serpent. In the same way that on the high Alps the pine tree overtops the oak, in like manner Azzo surpassed by great lengths his brothers, THE HOUSE OF CANOSSA n growing in power, lifting himself on high, abounding in many things.' x Azzo attached himself as mercenary to Alard, Bishop of Reggio, and received from him instead of pay the rock of Canossa on feudal tenure. This is how Domnizo makes Canossa tell Azzo's story.2 ' The wise Lothaire, King of the Lombards, the suzerain of my master Azzo, had for wife Adelaide, the illustrious Queen. But all too soon died Lothaire, and contrary to the wishes of Adelaide, Berengar, a cruel man, was elected King. He, overcome with anger, made her prisoner, because she did not please to approve of his election as King, and as he had her in his power, he shut her up finally in the fortress of Garda with only a waiting-maid as companion, and a good priest named Martin. Here they lay for a long time, imprisoned in the dungeon of a tower ; but finally the priest suc ceeded with an iron bar in secretly breaking through a part of the wall, and releasing the Queen and her damsel ; they escaped safely in men's clothes, which he had procured for them. ' From there they came to the lake which keeps Mantua alive, and they adventured themselves in a boat kept by a good fisherman. The priest invited him to take him and his companions and row them across. And when the fisher asked what pay he would receive, the priest replied : "If you knew who we were, you would hasten with the greatest joy to ferry us, without asking for payment " — at which the fisher said : " Tell me then who you are, if you desire that I should take you over." And the priest answered him : "If you will swear to keep it secret, we will reveal to you the entire mystery, which should satisfy you wholly." They had 1 Dom., lib. i. cap. i. 2 Ibid., lib. I. cap. i. 12 MATILDA OF TUSCANY not the codex of the evangelist, but immediately the rough boatman laid on the ground two sticks in the form of a cross, and erring in nothing, he swore upon it, as if it had been a beautiful cross. Then the priest, Don Martin, said to him : " Now, good man, I feel myself drawn to tell thee more safely everything. This is the Queen whom some time ago King Berengar made prisoner in wrath. We are fleeing. Be a faithful friend to us ! " Therefore, praising God, he took them quickly across to the other side ; offered them a big fish, and said to the Queen : " If by chance the omnipotent Lord God restore you to honour, I hope you will remember me." The boatman deposited them in the vicinity of a wood that borders on the lake, and the Queen remained there a whole week, adoring Christ faithfully, whilst the priest as her host, went secretly in search of bread. At last the Queen said, sighing : " How can I enjoy being here, if the continual thought of being recaptured agonises me ? Oh, good priest, the Bishop of Reggio, Adelardo, always remained good friends with us, and now you might tell him how great is our distress, and perhaps he will find the means of removing us from here." Then the exiled priest, though wearied, set forth to Reggio, and when the Bishop knew who he was, he asked after the Queen, saying : " Tell me, I pray thee, what has hap pened to her, which I hope much to learn from thee " ; and the priest replied : " She died in her dark prison." At the sad news the Bishop broke into exclamations of grief, and weeping said : " O great disaster ! And the crime of it is most manifest ! " The priest perceiving that the Bishop was horrified at the death of the Queen, and that he would rejoice greatly to know her still alive, suddenly told him that she still lived, and desired him to THE HOUSE OF CANOSSA 13 offer her refuge. " I rejoice greatly that she lives," said the Bishop, but I do not know that I have under me any strong castle where she would be safe. However, there is Azzo, my soldier,1 who has one called Canossa, in which, if he wills it, the Queen could hold out many years against the anger of the King." To-morrow, therefore, thou shalt take our horses and shalt go to Azzo, as I will show thee, and warmly begging him, thou shalt perhaps obtain that which thou desirest." At the dawn of the following day the priest was put on the road to Canossa, and, arrived there, Prince Azzo interrogated him closely as to what had happened to the Queen. And the priest replied that she had died in prison. Azzo with a full heart broke into bitter tears and lamentations. Then the other, seeing manifestly that he cried, said to him aside : " Ah ! she lives, and desires to flee to thee, and to be by thee sheltered from danger." Hearing this, the Prince had his own horses taken out and galloped to where she was. It was the third hour of the day, fine and warm weather. . . . And when the sixth hour of the day arrived, high Canossa honoured itself as host of the illustrious Queen, together with her damsel. Afterwards, moved by all that had happened, Azzo sent a secret messenger to the Pope in Rome, supplicating him, and requesting him for advice in this matter, inasmuch as he wished to give the Queen as wife to Otto, whom the people of Alemannia obeyed. Pope John,2 1 The Latin word miles means also 'vassal' according to Leibnitz and Muratori. See Don Davoli's notes on Domnizo, p. 277. 2 Domnizo's history is at fault here, and it must have been to Pope Agapetus II., who was Pope from 946 to 955, that Azzo sent his messenger, since the events just narrated took place in the year 951, and Otto's marriage was celebrated on Christmas Day of that same year at Pavia, not at Verona. Agapetus's successor was Pope John XII. 14 MATILDA OF TUSCANY a man of great probity, wrote commending his actions, and counselling him to carry his designs into effect. ' After all these things a nuncio of Azzo's, followed by a small escort, went to the King in Verona, in which city Otto had already arrived. Azzo then came to him bringing with him the Queen, who was there united to the King in wedlock, and then taking her with him, he returned immediately to his own land, promising Azzo that he would do great things for him hereafter. The Lombard King had not yet heard of the doings of the Queen, nor could he find out where she had taken refuge, but he heard at last that King Otto had been in Verona, and that this had happened by Azzo's help. Therefore, raging and storming, be collected soldiers, and came to Canossa, thinking to carry all before him. . . . But I am of stone, not wood. Azzo remained at my summit and with him prudent and wise men. Smite ! O Berengar ! Smite as you will with the darts ! that death may gather in, the sooner, those that you have brought to break our fortress.' A long Homeric struggle ensued around Canossa. Besieged for years she emerged at length triumphant. Otto was instated with honours, first as King at Milan, and finally confirmed in the title of Emperor by Pope John xii. in 962. He did not forget his friends, and Azzo, chief amongst them, was created Count, then Marquis, with sovereignty over Modena, Reggio, and a great part of Lombardy. ' And Azzo multiplied my Towers, and lifted up my walls to the heavens.1 But was it not through me he became rich, through me that all came to him ? It was 1 Dom., lib. I. cap. ii. THE HOUSE OF CANOSSA 15 therefore natural that all he had obtained that was beautiful and precious, helmets, shields, armour, swords and hatchets, should serve to adorn my vast halls.' Thus chants Canossa in her glory. But it was not only for future warlike purposes, or in memory of his past victories that Azzo embellished and enlarged Canossa. He took care that it should also be celebrated for the beauty and sanctity of its church. Relics of many saints were conveyed there — those of St. Victor, Santa Corona, and above all, Sant Apollonio, to whom the church was dedicated, are specially men tioned. Rich and costly robes for the priests, chased vessels for the sacred offices were also bestowed upon the church, and with great pride Domnizo tells us of twenty crowns of gold and silver and the various chalices and sculptured tablets, with which the church was enriched. This was the foundation of the famous treasure of Canossa, which, more than a century later Matilda, her private re sources being at an end, was obliged to melt down, in order to send the precious metal to Pope Gregory, who was in sore need of money to pay his troops. Domnizo tells us, moreover, that Azzo further insti tuted at Canossa a college of monks to chant the Divine Office, and that this might be done more effectively ' he caused an organ to be constructed to accompany the voices of the singers.' It is interesting to note in passing that this is the first precise mention of any organ being built and placed in a church in Italy. The organ was probably conveyed to Canossa and placed in position between the years 970-976.1 Azzo's eldest son Rodolf died in the flower of his youth, the second Godfrey entered the Church and became 1 See Don Davoli's notes to Domnizo, note 67, pp. 297-98. 16 MATILDA OF TUSCANY Bishop of Brescia. Tedaldo, the youngest, succeeded his father, and right well did he maintain the family tradi tions in remaining faithful to the German kings, and add ing to the territorial domains of the family. ' He was most renowned and dear to kings, and the Roman pontiffs who loved him much, and most sincerely, conceded to him the domain of Ferrara. He loved the Castle of Canossa no less than his faith ; and it was he that had built near the Po, and in the neighbourhood of the waters of the Larione, the monastery of S. Benedetto, worthy of the Lord, desiring that a family of monks should be established there ; and this is a most happy spot, since here true religion flourishes.' 1 Tedaldo left three sons ; the eldest one, his namesake, Bishop of Arezzo, is mentioned by the chroniclers as being a friend of Guido of Arezzo the musician, who dedicated to him a celebrated necrology. Conrad the youngest remained associated with his second brother Boniface, the successor to the marquisate ; unfortunately he received a mortal wound at the battle of Coviolo, in 1030, and died shortly after from the effects of it. Boniface pursued the family vocation of acquiring terri tory, power and riches, content however to remain first among the princes of Italy rather than seek for any regal crown. It would appear that before the death of Tedaldo, Boniface was associated with him in the government of his domains. Tedaldo is said to have called together his vassals and the counts over whom he had lordship, and made them pay homage to Boniface as their feudal lord. Boniface was in many ways a typical mediaeval lord. His early training under his father had fitted him for the 1 Dom., lib. 1. cap. iii. BONIFACE OF TUSCANY 17 position he had inherited, while his own personal char acter, which was dominated by a large and never satiated ambition, made him the most remarkable ' Grand Seigneur ' of his time. He was a singular man, with that strange blending of vice and piety characteristic of the Middle Ages. In some respects he was more enlightened than his contemporaries, for, far from despising learning and culture as did most warriors of that age, scornfully declaring that to write and read was only the employment of clerks, he encouraged the pur suit of the gentle arts in every way he could, and took delight in assembling under his roof all the light and the learning of Italy. In fact the court that he and his wife held at Mantua has been compared to that of Florence under the princes of the house of Medici : ' With so many magnificent spectacles and feasts that all posterity and all their contemporaries marvelled thereat.' x Yet while he showered money for pious oblations on churches and monasteries, he was not above stooping to various artifices to wrest lands and castles from the bishops, and heads of monastic institutions. He would offer a few miserable farms in exchange for a tract of territory or castle, declaring his intention of paying yearly rental for the same. But the rent was never paid and the lands remained in Boniface's hands, while the clerical party was too weak to enforce its claims. Muratori cites how many churches, castles, and monasteries were thus obtained from the Bishop of Reggio alone. One incident may be given illustrating to what depths of ferocity Boniface could descend, were his anger aroused. In the year 1039 he had been as far north 1 From a review on the Corografia Mantovana, by Giacomo Ottali. 18 MATILDA OF TUSCANY as the Castle of Miroalto 1 to render help to the Emperor Henry in. against Odo, Count of Champagne, and after a successful campaign was returning to Italy. The corn lay ripe in the Burgundian fields, and he permitted his cavalry to damage the crops ruthlessly, and even to pas ture in their midst. The people of the district, greatly resenting this wanton destruction, caught some of the stragglers of the mounted troops, and deprived them of their horses. In fury Boniface turned back, vowing vengeance. He planned an attack against a neighbour ing castle, laying an ambush when the lord and his retainers sallied forth, and succeeded in making a large number of captives. He then ordered that all their nostrils and ears should be cut off. ' Three military shields were piled with these severed members,' says Fiorentini. Amongst the prisoners was the only son of a noble matron, who, half distraught with fear lest he should suffer such indignity, threw herself in front of Boniface, offering him her son's weight in silver if he might be spared. Boniface thrust her aside, brutally remarking that he was ' no merchant but a soldier,' and the deed was done. And Fiorentini adds, quoting from an earlier chronicle : ' She obtained further the bellicose response, " Absit ut hostes ferro capti redimantur argento " — " Far be it that what was captured by steel should be redeemed with silver." ' (Fiorentini, lib. i. P- 36.) In his later years Boniface devoted himself more than ever to Holy Church, surrounding himself with monks and clerics who continually sang psalms in the chapel 1 Miroalto, to-day Morat or Miirten, situated in that part of ancient Burgundy which now constitutes the canton of Friburg in Switzerland, and not far from Neuch&tel. See Don Davoli, p. 320. to) O > n w o H C Facsimile of Boniface's signature, A.D. 1038 (reduced in size). fyj From a document preserved in the State Archives at Lucca. ^ ^B°N£f ^civ_5HKp-cHl° &£P^ VO 20 MATILDA OF TUSCANY of Canossa. He confessed his deeds of violence and all his sins, and for his acts of simony he even submitted to a pious flagellation at the hands of the Abbot Guido of Pomposa. On this account, mayhap, his evil deeds were covered with a cloak of Christian charity by many a monkish chronicler, while his upholding of the Church is glowingly described by Don Luchino da Mantova : x ' Boniface most illustrious Marquis of Mantua and Ferrara did not fall away or degenerate from his father Tedaldo, but conformed to him in all clemency and piety, and united in himself all those Qualities which go to form a rare and accomplished prince. . . . This gener ous prince had always a soul inclined to the Christian religion.' Boniface's exalted position, and the high esteem in which he was held by the German Emperor, did not fail to bring him many enemies,2 especially among the princes of Lombardy, who never let an opportunity pass of plotting his ruin. (Whatever his faults may have been, his loyalty to the Empire was unquestionable, though during the last years of his life this loyalty received a grievous shock.) Such an opportunity offered itself to Boniface's jealous fellow-countrymen at the death of Henry n., when Conrad was elected Emperor and King of Italy. Most of the Italian nobles refused to receive another German, and offered the crown else where — to Robert of France, to his son Hugo, to William Duke of Aquitaine. Boniface remained faithful to Conrad, and in consequence the other princes of the 1 Luchino, p. 12. 2 ' The dukes [Boniface and Conrad] showing themselves strong and great against their enemies like true giants, many people rose up against them.' Dom. , lib. I. cap. vi. VI. CL uctopUcoai cururo rrccrcvmm3C5cvmc tiivuxbo BONIFACE FROM THE MS. OF DOMNIZO BONIFACE OF TUSCANY 21 realm, after having in vain tried to draw away Conrad (Boniface's brother) from his allegiance, descended upon the lords of Canossa and offered them battle at Coviolo, a mile and a half from Reggio. Although Boniface1 issued forth victorious from this combat it was at a heavy price, since his brother died shortly afterwards from the effects of a wound received on the battlefield. The historian Muratori 2 tells us that when the Emperor Conrad descended into Italy in 1027 to have his election to the Italian throne ratified by Pope John xx., Lucca, the Tuscan capital, defied him, whereupon he subdued it, and Rainieri, the reigning Marquis of Tuscany, who had been active in the rebellion against the German allegiance, was despoiled of his possessions. These, together with the title of Marquis, it is supposed, were conferred upon Boniface by the Emperor, in return for the services he had rendered him. There are some divergences of opinion as to the exact date of Boniface's accession to the Lordship of Tuscany, and there is no documentary evidence to prove that he assumed the government of this state in 1027. The first time Boniface calls himself Duke and Marquis of Tuscany is in 103 1, in a document quoted by Sigonio ; and Jacopo, Bishop of Fiesole, in writing in 1032 of the founding of the canonicate at Fiesole, refers to Boniface as ' Most Serene Duke and Marquis of Tuscany.' 3 It is certain that 1 'The audacious lance of Boniface appeared almost a thousand cubits long to all his enemies, and the sword of Conrad a hundred cubits broad.' — Dom., lib. I. cap. viii. There is a tradition current that the family of Canossa, to this day residing in Verona, is descended from Conrad. 2 Annali d' Italia, anno 1027. 8 This letter is given in Ughelli's Ital. Sac, torn iii. ; also Rena, vol. ii. p. 60 et sea. 22 MATILDA OF TUSCANY Boniface x took an active part in establishing Conrad on the throne of Italy, and quelled several rebellious towns, amongst others Pavia and Parma ; the lands of Tuscany may therefore have been bestowed on him as a reward for these services. As a further mark of his esteem, Conrad honoured Boniface by concluding an alliance with him, no longer regarding him as a vassal of the Empire but as an independent prince. The relations between Conrad and Boniface seem to have been always of a most friendly nature, Conrad deeming it wise to do everything possible to conciliate so powerful an Italian ally, and Boniface upholding him loyally. 1 It is somewhat difficult to ascertain exactly what the tities of Duke, Marquis, or Count implied at this period, but Muratori in his Dissertazioni suite Antichita Italiane throws some light on the subject. Counts, he tells us, were originally the governors of one city only, but their jurisdiction often extended outside the city, and the tract of country they governed was called 'Comitatus' or 'Contado.' But there were exceptions to this rule, since we know that Tedaldo was Count of Modena and Reggio ; and, on the other hand, in the year 994 Verona had two Counts. About the title of Duke there is some confusion. They were superior to Counts and could create them, but sometimes they too were rulers of only one city, and sometimes they had large territories. The title of Marquis was taken from those provinces called ' Marches,' that is provinces on the confines of empires or kingdoms which had inde pendent rulers, these tracts being conceded to certain vassals by Emperor or King on condition that they were to defend them against the neighbouring enemies. In time the superior Counts who had lands and cities to rule and who were first called ' conti provinciali ' — provincial counts — took the title of Marquis to distinguish them from the lower order of counts (governors of cities). Then some Marquises had as well the title of Count to indicate that they were special rulers of some cities. Tedaldo is cited as: Thedaldus Marchio et Comes Comitatu Motinense. These titles were not hereditary at first but became so gradually. In an account of a Council of Charlemagne it is written that after the Emperor the Counts were the first persons of the Empire. Therefore Counts were often called Princes. Counts, Marquises, and Dukes assisted at the election of the Emperors. They also had their special chambers of jurisdiction for certain offences, and these powers were subject to the Emperor alone, and they only yielded prerogative to special legates of the Emperor who were occasionally despatched to render justice on extraordinary occasions. See also Muratori, Delle Antichita estensi, vol. i. chap. V. BONIFACE OF TUSCANY 23 Conrad's successor, Henry in., however, did not pursue the same policy. When in 1046 he, together with his wife Agnes, descended into Italy for the Imperial corona tion at Rome, they stayed on their way in Piacenza, where Boniface received and entertained them right royally. In course of a familiar conversation Henry expressed pleasure at the taste of a particularly powerful vinegar prepared at Canossa. Overjoyed at such an opportunity of proving his devotion and affection to his sovereign lord, Boniface hastened back to Canossa, where he ordered a flagon to be delicately wrought in silver, together with a silver car and a yoke of oxen, and filling the flagon with the choicest vinegar, he had all these placed in a real cart further ornamented with most costly draperies, and drawn by two white oxen. He despatched this princely gift to Henry, accompanied by a numerous band of pages and esquires. The following year, as the royal couple were on their way back from Rome, they were received in Mantua by the governor of that city, Boniface's deputy, who presented them with a hundred magnificent horses, and two hundred falcons equipped for the chase. The Empress Agnes expressed surprise at such a magnifi cent present, and Henry remarked that Boniface alone of all Italian, or German princes, could have vassals under him capable of bestowing such rich gifts. But these incidents aroused the Emperor's fears and excited his jealousy, and from this time forth Boniface was looked upon with suspicion, and Henry proceeded by fair means or foul to undermine his power — nay, more than this, to try to make away with him altogether. He began by endeavouring to lure him out of Italy, promising him unbounded power, wealth, and estates in Germany, would he but return there with him. But 24 MATILDA OF TUSCANY Boniface could not be tempted to leave his native land. Henceforth all sorts of means were used to entrap him. Upon one occasion Henry demanded his immediate attendance at a Council, intending that Boniface should be conducted to a remote room in the castle, and there kept prisoner. Henry was anxious to effect his capture as rapidly and as secretly as possible, for Boniface was too popular with his own vassals to risk raising a hue and cry about him. Boniface went, but attended by such a retinue that Henry was disconcerted, for some chance words that the Empress Agnes had let fall the day before had put the Duke upon his guard. When he reached the palace gates he was told that he alone could be admitted, but in a haughty way he thrust the guard aside, and his followers entered with him. He was then conducted from room to room, and at last admitted to the presence of Henry, who was not in Council, but alone. Henry terrified at seeing Boniface attended by such a retinue, feared that his plot had been discovered, and that Boniface's men had slain his guard, and had now come to take vengeance upon the Emperor himself. But when he saw the Duke's soldiers attempted nothing and paid him the usual obeisance, he pretended that he had only summoned Boniface for a very important and private Council. Boniface replied with similar artifice, regretting that as he only came to serve his Majesty, he should have entered his presence in such a manner, but the guard had refused to admit his retinue inside the palace at all, and having heard that his Majesty meditated a sudden departure from Italy, he feared these extraordinary orders had been the result of some court machinations to exclude his faithful followers and himself from the Royal Presence for some sinister reason. BONIFACE OF TUSCANY 25 He had therefore forced his way in thus, to assure his Majesty of his own fidelity and promptitude, together with that of his followers. Henry accepted the explana tion with as good a grace as possible, and proceeded to offer some plausible reasons for the sudden summons he had given Boniface, concluding by recommending him in all things to be vigilant concerning the interests of the Empire. This incident only served to increase Henry's dislike, jealousy, and distrust of Boniface's enormous power and personal sagacity, and the following morning he made a further attempt to secure his person, begging him to come and form part of the bodyguard for that night, thinking in this way he would come very slightly attended, and that, having posted a number of mercenaries about the town, it would be easy in the darkness to take him prisoner. Boniface rode forth, with fewer followers it is true, but these were armed to the teeth, and each bore a lighted torch attached to his lance, making the small company appear larger than it was, and the mercenaries evidently feared to attack it, for Boniface rode home in safety again when the night was over. After the failure of these plots Henry was unwillingly obliged to leave Italy to attend to his rebellious subjects at home,1 leaving Boniface in full possession of his wealth, territories, and immense power. Boniface 1 The German historian Giesebrecht casts some doubt upon these stories of the Emperor's faithlessness to Boniface. Giesebrecht says further that somewhere about 1047 Boniface seems to have deserted the Emperor's cause, and to have entered into a secret alliance with the Tusculan barons, and probably also with Gisulf of Salerno. See notes to Giesebrecht's History, and also vol. ii. p. 436. Frizzi (Memorie per la Storia di Ferrara, vol. ii.) says these attempts against Boniface took place 'about 1047.' It is possible therefore that Boniface's devotion to Germany had received some great check. 26 MATILDA OF TUSCANY ultimately perished at the hands of assassins, during a hunting expedition in 1052, — it was said out of revenge for some of his tyrannical acts, but a certain suspicion lurks in one's mind that Henry may have been privy to Boniface's violent death. Domnizo, perhaps out of respect to Matilda, only remarks that ' Boniface aban doned this world,' and then describes his place of sepulture in Mantua.1 The historian Vedriani gives the following account of Boniface's death : 2 'In Modena in the year 1051 there was occasion for great grief in the unhappy news of the death of the Marquis Boniface. Seven years previously in Brescia he had escaped from a plot against his life and against the State. The conspirators fled to Verona, which city for having offered them a refuge was taken and sacked, and many of their adherents were also banished from Mantua. Amongst these was one Scarpetti Canevari. ' The Marquis, already an old man, and no longer thinking of anything but the affairs of his soul, had a galley built to go to the Church of the Holy Sepulchre in Syria — not so much out of devotion as for a penitence for his sins, which, according to Hermannus Contractus, had gained for him the name of " tyrant." Now while this galley was being constructed he went one day a- hunting towards the river Oglio in a domain called Spineta, not far distant from Martino dall' Argine, a castle belonging at that time to the Prince of Bozzolo. ' In following a wild beast, he separated himself so far from his retainers that the barking of the dogs or the huntsman's horn was hardly to be heard. Dismounting 1 Dom., lib. I. cap. xvi. 2 Ved., vol i. p. 497 et seq. BONIFACE OF TUSCANY 27 from his horse to rest beneath the shade of a tree, he happened to be near a bush, where Scarpetta, who knew him, was lying hid, and he, moved by wickedness, and thinking to do a deed which would be pleasing to the enemies of the Marquis, put a poisoned arrow to his bow, and shot it straight at the heart of the un happy Prince, who, hit in the left breast, expired at once. This unfortunate death was written in characters of blood and bewailed with many tears, not only by the Marchesa but by all his people. He was buried in the beautiful mausoleum with this epitaph : 1 '"Hie jacet egregius Dominus Boni- facius Marchio et Pater Serenis- issimae Dominae Comittissae Matildae Qui obit MLII. Die VI. Ma. II. INDCV. ' " Here lieth the excellent Lord Boniface Marquis and Father of the Most Serene Lady Countess Matilda, who died on the 6th day of May 1052."' From the day that Henry turned against Boniface,2 ' the love of the lords of Canossa was tempered,' remarks Don Tosti,3 ' and the whole of Boniface's lordship, which had been as a citadel of the Empire on the neck of Italy, 1 Of the ' beautiful mausoleum ' nothing remains to this day but an insignificant black stone let into the wall of the west side of the Lady Chapel of the Cathedral at Mantua. It was only after a long search that this tablet was found and identified by the present writer ; the sacristan being positive that the Marquis Boniface was not buried there ! The stone bears the Latin inscription given above. 2 Besides being Duke of Tuscany Boniface is sometimes called Duke of Lucca, and Marquis of Tuscany, Lord of Ferrara, Verona, Mantua, Reggio, Parma, Lucca, Pisa, Florence, Pistoia, Modena, Count of Canossa, Duke of Spoleto, and Camerino. It is certain that at the death of Boniface no other Italian Prince could be found his equal in riches and power. The whole of Tuscany, the greater part of Liguria, Umbria, and Piceno, from the Cremona Alps to Viterbo, was under his sway. 3 Tosti, lib. 1. p. 37. 28 MATILDA OF TUSCANY was converted into a refuge and defence, not only for the destinies of Italy but for those of the Church of Christendom as well.' This was indeed the turning- point in the policy of the house of Canossa. Up till now, its interests and that of the Empire had been one, and since the days of Atto and Otto the friendship and good feeling between Emperor and vassal lord had been main tained. Now through the Emperor's jealousy and treachery the situation was changed, and henceforth all its interests became purely Italian, entirely bound up with that of the Papacy. At first it looked to the Papacy for help and support, and in return the Papacy began to count upon this great feudal house as its strongest ally. Boniface was twice married. Of his first wife Richilda 1 very little is narrated beyond the fact that she was the daughter of ' Guilberto Conte del Palazzo in Rogeneto,' 2 who was Vicar Imperial of Reggio in 1021, and another authority says Vicar Imperial in Verona. Very soon after her death,3 Boniface set forth on a second 1 Rena gives two documents concerning Boniface's first wife of the years 1016 and 1017 respectively. The first is a grant of Henry u. of certain lands in the Ferrarese country to Richilda. The second is the deed in which Richilda, together with her husband, bestows those lands on the abbey of Nonantula. In the first Richilda is only styled 'Countess,' and at the foot there is a cross with ' signum manus pro Richilde Comitissa.' In the second parchment Boniface simply calls himself ' Boniface Marquis,' and does not say of what territory. Muratori (Ant. It., vol. i. p. 71) says that in the year 1004 Boniface made a donation to the abbey of Polirone in which deed he is entitled ' Marquis,' and mentions two other documents of the same year where he is called ' Bonifacius gloriosus Marchio.' As Tedaldo only died in 1007 those documents seem to imply that Boniface assumed the title of Marquis before the death of his father. 2 Mellini, p. 12., quotes from Sigonio as to Guilbert's position at Verona. Mellini says further that Richilda died after 1034, and Boniface's second marriage took place in 1037. 3 ' Our liege Lady Richelida ended her days without leaving any child, an only daughter having died before her, and when she left us the poor lost in BONIFACE OF TUSCANY 29 wooing. His choice fell on Beatrice,1 daughter of the Duke of Lorraine, and Domnizo takes delight in describing Boniface's magnificent following, and the splendid home coming of the bride. For three months they kept open house at Marengo, one of Boniface's castles. Precious perfumes were dispersed like water during the banquets, and by some mechanical means wine was made to run from the wells into rich vessels of silver, while delicate viands were served at the meals, and troupes of jongleurs and troubadours entertained the guests.2 Beatrice appears to have been a remarkable woman in all respects. During her husband's lifetime she evi dently took but small part in public affairs, yet governed her household with wisdom, and is mentioned by one historian as a ' sapient, brilliant and learned princess.' The court at Mantua was a centre of light and learning, and Canossa was far famed for its brilliance and culture during the whole of Beatrice's reign there. Later, when called to govern, first in her son's name, and then during Matilda's long minority, she displayed the greatest sagacity and prudence. The women of the house of Canossa appear to have been most fitting mates for their lords. Of Atto's wife, Hildegarde, it is written : 3 ' She was a princess adorned with every grace and of great worth, with a cultivated mind and pious spirit. A princess gifted with the art her a great helper, as Domnizo testifies. She was buried with great pomp at Nogara, in the Veronese country, in a church endowed by her . . . where vestiges of her sepulchre are to be seen unto this day (a.d. 1666).' — Ved., vol. i. p. 494. 1 Beatrice was a niece of the Empress Gisela, wife of Conrad 11. She and her sister Sophie had been educated at the Imperial Court, and were looked upon by Gisela as her adopted daughters. See Giesebrecht, vol. ii. pp. 276, 318. 2 Dom., lib. I. cap. x. J See here Dal Pozzo, p. 149. 30 MATILDA OF TUSCANY of governing wisely. Prudent and good, a wise adviser, exhorting her husband to good works, a lady of sound judgment and singular prudence in governing, inclined to works of piety.' Guilla, the wife of Tedaldo, is thus described by Dal Pozzo : 1 ' Born of the Counts of the Rhine, a most pious princess, appreciated by every rank of people ' ; and Domnizo says : 2 ' The Duchess Guilla, who, for her works of piety, was dear alike to great and small.' 1 Dal Pozzo, p. 179. 2 Dom., lib. I. cap. v. BIRTH OF MATILDA 31 CHAPTER III Birth of Matilda probably at Lucca in 1046— Marriage of Beatrice with Godfrey of Lorraine — Matilda's Betrothal by proxy to Godfrey's Son in 1053 — Anger of Henry in. who detained Beatrice as Prisoner — Reconciliation of Henry and Godfrey — Death of Henry III. and return of Beatrice and Godfrey to Italy in 1057. FN ROM this illustrious house, founded by Siegfried, noted for its noble women and warlike men, sprang Matilda, who played so great a part in the history of her day. Although the fact J has not been absolutely proved, it is almost certain she was born in Lucca, or at the Castle of Porcari a few miles distant. Beatrice purchased the Castle of Porcari in 1044,2 and in 1047 it is known that Boniface was in Lucca adjudging various difficulties amongst his subjects. Boniface left three children, Frederick or Boniface, Matilda, and ' Beatrice ' or ' Beatricio.' It is a curious fact that about the sex of the last-named child there appears some doubt ; in some genealogies it is called Beatrice and referred to as a girl, in others, where Boni- 1 Historians are greatly divided as to which city should be accredited with the honour of being Matilda's birthplace. Mantua and Modena, Cremona and Verona are mentioned, and many others. (See Don Davoli, p. 352.) ' She was born in Mantua and was given the name of Matilda in baptism to renew the glorious memory of Saint Matilda, Empress, daughter of Theodoric, Duke of Saxony,' writes Vedriani (vol. i. p. 496). In speaking of the meeting between Henry v. and Matilda in the year mi Dean Milman says : ' He conversed with her in German, with which, as born in Lorraine, she was familiar' (Latin Christianity, book viii. chap. ii.). 2 Fiorentini, lib. 1. p. 35. 32 MATILDA OF TUSCANY face is said to have left two sons, the name is written Beatricio.1 Beatrice was left sole guardian of her children, and although she appears to have governed wisely and ably, she was fully alive to the dangers of her position as a defenceless widow with vast wealth and territory, a ready prey for unscrupulous freebooters. As a matter of policy therefore, she contracted a second marriage with Godfrey of Lorraine in 1053. It is said that the Sovereign Pontiff Leo ix., being in Mantua on his way from Germany, per formed the marriage ceremony in that city in the church of San Pietro; at the same time Matilda, then a child of seven, was solemnly affianced to Godfrey's son by a previous marriage, generally known as Godfrey the Hunchback. This alliance aroused a storm of anger on the part of Henry, and he declared it ought not to have taken place without his permission. Godfrey of Lorraine was in open revolt against Germany, and Beatrice had com mitted the sin of lese-majesty in marrying the enemy of her sovereign. She was a widow and only a woman, and could not command in Tuscany, and it belonged to 1 In the history of Riccobaldo, a Ferrarese of the thirteenth century, mention is made (p. 347) of three children, Rudolf, Frederick, and Matilda, and the ' two first died during one of Boniface's absences from Italy. ' Mario Equicola (p. 26) says Boniface had two sons and one daughter. Don Luchino (p. 13) mentions Beatricio a boy; this child Beatricio, or Beatrice, evidently died at an early age. There seems a great uncertainty, however, about these children, the boy is sometimes called Frederick, sometimes Boniface ; is it probable that there were two sons ? In 1053 Beatrice made a donation to the abbey of Fenonica for the souls 'of my son and of my daughter' (see Overman, p. 123). Yet we are told that the only son did not die till 1055 (pp. 123-124). On the other hand, this is not conclusive evidence since Rena who gives the whole document (vol. ii.) remarks that Frederick, the son referred to in the deed of gift, died in the following year, as if it were not unusual to make a donation for the souls of the living. The words used are ' pro remedio animae quondam Bonefacii Marchionis et animae filii et filiae meae.' SECOND MARRIAGE OF BEATRICE 33 the Emperor to give the investiture to the male child. For Henry insisted that the Duchy of Tuscany and all Boniface's vast possessions in Italy were only held under feudal tenure from himself. Godfrey was a man of great force of character and quite capable of stirring up the whole of Italy against the Emperor, so that Henry's objections were not groundless; but the means he took to protect himself were of questionable integrity. He descended into Italy the following spring, 1055, was in Verona in April and celebrated Easter at Mantua. Possibly both Godfrey and Beatrice thought it would be well to attempt a reconciliation, and they first of all sent ambassadors with protestations of their good faith, and bearers of the following message : — ' That he, Godfrey, had espoused the Marchesa Beatrice, Henry's " sister," with the fullest concurrence of Pope Leo, and with all those honours which were due to a princess of her rank. This he had done, not to plot against "the majesty of Caesar," nor to be created King of Italy, but in order to establish himself far away from those States where he knew he was in little favour, and also to do away with the suspicion that Germany bore him of attempting to reobtain the greater and better part of his dukedom, which his ancestors and his fathers before him had possessed for long series of years in feudo nobile.' The ambassadors added : ' That he would be entirely content with the dowry of his wife, and as he was a relation, he would be a faithful subject — nor did it behove a prince to live and die in a minor condition than that of a prince.' 1 1 Vedriani, vol. ii. p. 10. Frederick, Duke of Upper Lorraine, father of Beatrice, died without leaving a son. His dukedom was then bestowed on Gozelo of Lower Lorraine, Godfrey's father. ' Thus were the two duchies united under one ruler.' See Giesebrecht, vol. ii. p. 276. C 34 MATILDA OF TUSCANY Then after having obtained a safe-conduct, Beatrice, taking with her her little son, and accompanied by her mother,1 went down to Mantua in the hopes of melting the Emperor's heart. But Henry remained implacable, and at first refused to see her. Vedriani2 says that Beatrice ' dissimulating her fears ' met the Emperor at Trent, and with great difficulty obtained an audience. When in his presence she said ' with all submission ' — That she had dared to present herself thus before his Majesty, knowing within herself that she had done nothing, which for reasons of State, she was not permitted to do. That, while she was hardly thinking of it, the Holy Pontiff had, in his own person, arranged the mar riage with the Duke, and concluded and celebrated it with his own hands. She herself had consented to it, in order to be provided with a defender for her States who would not be obliged to live on the other side of the Alps — a noble and free princess, uniting herself thus to a prince noble and free, without any ulterior designs. — She supplicated his Majesty, therefore, to remember that it was not a just thing to impute to her as a crime that which she had done through necessity ; — that which in the Roman Empire ladies of high rank were always permitted to do.' This spirited address had no effect on the Emperor, for without regard to the safe-conduct he had given, he kept her a close prisoner in her own city of Mantua, and treated her with the utmost rigour. Henry was only too glad to keep these two as hostages, above all to have Frederick in his hands, so as to deprive Godfrey of every excuse for administering the affairs of 1 Matilda, mother of Beatrice, was daughter of the Duke Herman II. of Suabia and sister to the Empress Gisela. 2 See here also Lambert of Hersfeld, ann. 1055, p. 174 ( Ckron. rer. Germ.). REBELLION OF DUKE GODFREY 35 his step-son. The Emperor was careful, however, not to subject the little boy to the same rough treatment that his mother underwent. In spite of these precautions the boy died,1 and Matilda therefore was left sole heiress, and Mura tori 2 says : ' She assured herself against all violence by retiring to the impregnable rock of Canossa.' Probably her step-father thought it advisable to secure her safety thus. On the other hand Fiorentini seems to think that Matilda was often at Lucca during the years of her mother's imprisonment, so that it is possible that she passed her time between the two. Godfrey, ill-pleased that his wife and mother-in-law should remain in the hands of Henry, departed into Germany, to stir up rebellion against him there, and Henry was forced to leave Italy, taking his illustrious prisoners with him. In a very interesting passage the historian Vedriani s tells us, that Beatrice went willingly in order to see again Germany 'where she was born,' and she did not grieve at parting from Matilda, knowing that she was high-spirited, and that she was looked upon as sovereign Lady by both the Godfreys — father and son — and ' respected.' Godfrey, together with Baldwin, Count of Flanders, was able to create considerable disturbance in Germany, but about the middle of the following year (1056) Godfrey became reconciled to the Emperor. The details of this pacification are wanting, but it is evident that Henry restored him to full favour and liberated Beatrice. From 1 A story was circulated that the Emperor had made away with Matilda's brother and sister. This seems entirely incredible. See Arnulf of Milan (lib. IV. p. 118). 2 Annali oV Italia, anno 1055 ; also Don Tosti, lib. I. p. 56. 3 Vedriani, vol. ii. p. 16. 36 MATILDA OF TUSCANY documentary evidence 1 it is known that Godfrey was at the Imperial Court at Treves on the 30th June 1056. A few months later, after the death of Henry in., when a council was assembled at Cologne, Victor 11. presiding in the name of the young King Henry, the rebel vassals Godfrey and Baldwin of Flanders were formally restored to royal favour. Godfrey's right to govern the Italian States in conjunction with his wife during Matilda's minority was recognised, and shortly afterwards the two Tuscan rulers left the North and returned to Italy. 1 See Giesebrecht, vol. ii. p. 527. THE EARLY PAPACY 37 CHAPTER IV A Short Summary of the Papacy with regard to the Question of Investitures — The Part played by the Emperors — Charlemagne — Otto the Great — Charter of Henry 11. — Hildebrand the Monk — Education in Rome and subsequent History — Attaches him self to Gregory VI. and accompanies him into Exile — Journey to Rome with Leo ix. — Councils at Rome, Pavia, Rheims and Mainz, 1048. FOR the better understanding of the events which immediately followed the return of Godfrey and his wife into Italy in 1057, ft is necessary to take a slight survey of what was occurring elsewhere in the peninsula during the years in which Matilda was growing from childhood to womanhood. Indeed to trace events to their sources we must go back some considerable way, since we have here to consider, if only in a very superficial degree, the history of the Papacy, and what events conspired to bring about that struggle for temporal and spiritual supremacy in which Pope and Emperor were engaged for so many generations. Some two and a half centuries earlier, the Pope had been only Bishop of Rome with very limited civil author ity over the city, but owing to the rivalries of the many contending factions, he had often been called to fill a position of supreme temporal power for the time being, and from this fact his powers and position were gradually strengthened. From the North, however, came a common foe, against 38 MATILDA OF TUSCANY which Pope and Romans, people and clergy united. Various hordes of barbarians descended into Italy, some of them absolutely hostile, some, since they were pro fessing Christians, with ideas of conciliating the Bishop of Rome, and of thereby acquiring for themselves more power and territory. For the sake of expelling the for mer, the help of the latter was solicited, and again there were cases when foreign aid was called in to quell the rebellious Roman nobles and restore some order. Then as reward for services rendered, the Bishop of Rome, later called Pope, would bestow the kingdom of Italy, or the crown of the Holy Roman Empire, upon Frankish or German conqueror, little right as he had to do so. At the same time, the more orderly amongst the Roman princes and people were rendered willing to receive as King or Emperor the foreigner who succeeded in removing the oppression under which they were labouring at the time. Rome, remembering her past glories of Empire, still dreamed that an Emperor might restore them,1 while to the barbarian invader the name of ' Csesar ' had magic in its sound, and Italy proved an allurement so strong that Frankish monarchs and German kings were drawn thither, neglecting their home ties, their home responsibilities, on the chance of establishing a firm foothold on ' this side of the mountains,' as the Italian phrase has it. History repeated itself over and over again — in the case of French Pepin first called ' Patricius ' of Rome and Pope Stephen in. in 754, of the mighty Charlemagne and Popes Adrian 1. and Leo in. in 774 and 800, and of Otto the Great and Pope John xn. in 962. 1 ' Ce titre d'empereur qui, donne dans Rome par le pape, semblait aux imaginations confuses du moyen age, l'investiture de Dieu transmettant l'heritage des Cesars.' — Villemain, vol. i. p. 160. THE PAPACY, CHARLEMAGNE, AND OTTO 39 Each succeeding king or emperor bestowed gifts on the Roman See. Charlemagne left immense treasure at the Vatican, and acquired for the Pope the towns of Capua, Sora, and Arpi, several small Tuscan towns, and amongst others Viterbo and Soano, reserving, however, for the citizens the rights of municipal government. Charlemagne at his coronation promised by a solemn oath to protect and defend the Holy Roman Church, and the election of the Pope was henceforth supposed to be confirmed by the Emperor. Before Otto the Great was crowned Emperor (he who married that Adelaide, whose fortunes we have followed for a brief space in Chapter 1.), he took the following oath : x 'To thee, Lord Pope John, I, Otto, promise and swear, by the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost, and by the wood of the cross that gives life, and by the relics of the saints, that if, by the permission of God, I enter into Rome, I will exalt, according to my power, the Holy Roman Church, and thee its head, and that never shall thy life be taken away by my will or advice, by my avowal or orders, that I will hold no court, nor render any justice without thy advice on such things as concern thee, within the city of Rome.' Otto hereafter made magnificent presents to the Pope, confirmed the donations of Charlemagne, granted further privileges to the Papacy, and distributed largesse to the barons, the clergy, and the people of Rome.2 Some fifty years after, the relations between the Emperor Henry 11. and Pope Benedict viii. appear to have been of the friendliest, the Pope meeting the 1 See Villemain, vol. i. p. 166, also Bonitho (ed. Jane), p. 588 et seq., for various versions of the oath of Otto. 2 Richter, p. 89. For the document of Otto's privileges to the Church see Mon. Germ. Hist., vol. i. p. 322. 40 MATILDA OF TUSCANY Emperor in January 1014 at Ravenna, where they held a great synod together, and vital matters, both ecclesi astical and lay, were discussed and amicably settled. Later, in 1020, the year of the Emperor's coronation, a similar friendly synod was held in Rome, where both the great rulers of Church and State presided. In that self-same year the Pope paid a visit of state to Germany and consecrated the Church of St. Stephen at Bamberg, when the Bishopric of Bamberg was assured by the Emperor to the See of St. Peter, and great rejoicings were held throughout the land. It would seem almost as if the ideal of Dante's De Monarchia were realised, and the Church and State were exercising each its special function. ' Wherefore man had need of a twofold directive power according to his twofold end, to wit, the supreme pontiff to lead the human race, in accordance with things re vealed, to eternal life ; and the Emperor to direct the human race to temporal felicity in accordance with the teachings of philosophy. And since none, or few (and they with extremest difficulty) could reach this port, were not the waves of seductive greed assuaged and the human race left free to rest in the tranquillity of peace, this is that mark on which he who has charge of the world and is called the Roman prince should chiefly fix his mind, to wit, that on this threshing-floor of immortality life should be lived in freedom and peace.' 1 A contemporary writer (Bebo of Bamberg 2) speaks glowingly of those days. ' The peasant rejoices in the 1 De Monarchia, book in. pp. 277-278 ; translated by P. H. Wicksteed, Temple Classics. 2 ' Agricolae namque laetantur in campo, clericalis virtus gaudet in choro, pro distributis divinae gratiae donis unusquisque concessis instruitur studiis et per virtutis tuae defensiones optatas dives sibi videtur ipsa paupertas.' — From Giesebrecht, vol. ii. p. 173. For original see Epistolae Bambergenses, 6 (ed. Jaffe, vol. v.). CHARTER OF HENRY II. 41 field, the cleric in the choir, every one can improve the gifts bestowed on him by Heaven undisturbed, and under the protection of Imperial power, even poverty seems rich.' Yet in spite of friendly relations between individual Popes and Emperors, in spite of the occasional cessation of hostilities, and their concerted action now and then in putting a stop to abuses, and amicably discussing affairs of Church and State, it is undeniable that there was an undercurrent of caution — that the one power strove to safeguard itself against the other, that on the whole they grew to look upon each other as deadly rivals. For there is a charter extant of this very time, of the days of Henry n., which although it renews the privileges of Otto the Great and confirms the Church in many of her possessions, yet it sets forth clearly the relative position of Pope and Emperor. The Popes' claims to several towns in Tuscany, and their dependencies, to the exarchate of Ravenna, to the Sabine territory and its dependencies, to the isle of Corsica, and a crowd of domains in Lombardy, to several towns in Apulia, Naples, and to Sicily ' when God should deliver it over into the hands of the Emperor ' ! x are confirmed. And in return for these concessions the Emperor reserves to himself an important part in the Pope's election, in making the clergy and people of Rome take a solemn oath, that no freshly elected Pontiff should be consecrated until he had sworn in the presence of the Imperial envoys and the people, to uphold and maintain the rights of the Empire. Fur ther, that every year the Pope's envoys should report to the Emperor in what manner the governors and judges 1 See Mon. Germ. Hist., vol. iii. p. 554 5 ' Necnon patrimonium Sicilie, si deus nostris illud tradiderit manibus. ' 42 MATILDA OF TUSCANY were administering justice in the lands of the Church, and, on the other hand, that imperial commissioners were to inform the Pope of all complaints they had heard, so that a remedy could be sent immediately, either by the Pope, or by fresh envoys of the Emperor.1 Thus it will be seen that each power was jealous of the other, and each tried to gain the ascendency. It will readily be understood how factions were hereby developed, and how unscrupulous men would side now with this party, now with that, whichever might happen to be momentarily the stronger. As the riches and territories of the Holy See increased, so did her authority, and in the case of the German emperors, who finally superseded all others, as rulers of the Holy Roman Empire, the Popes gradually took upon themselves to say that, as the Emperor's election could only be ratified by their sanction, they had the right to object to and annul that election,2 and the Emperor declared that, since the Pope could only be Pope by virtue of the protection of the Emperor's power, he had an equal right to object to the choice of the bishops and clergy. In many cases the Emperor seemed justified in objecting, when, for instance, men of notori ously bad morals were raised to the Pontificate, or when 1 This charter is believed to have been given in 1020 at Bamberg or Fulda after the Emperor's return from Rome, and the Pope's visit to Germany. 2 See Bryce on the subject of Charlemagne and Leo in., chaps, iv. and v. Also the letter of Archbishop Siegfried of Mainz to Pope Alexander II. in the spring of 1066 : ' As the crown of our kingdom and the diadem of the whole Roman Empire has been given to St. Peter into thy hands.' And Peter Damian's threat at the Council of Frankfort, 1069, that if Henry IV. should put away his wife Bertha, the Pope would withhold from him the Imperial Crown. Siegfried's letter is quoted by Giesebrecht (vol. iii. p. 130) who says further that Siegfried addressed a second letter to the Pope in the autumn of 1066, couched in the same terms. For an account of the Council of Frankfort see Giesebrecht, vol. iii. pp. 149, 150. 'INVESTITURES' 43 there came the great outcries against simony, and even the Holy See itself was bought and sold. Besides these difficulties about the supreme Head of the Church and Empire, a further note of discord was added to the turmoil by the emperors occasionally arrogating to themselves the right of appointing bishops to the various ecclesiastical sees contrary to the Pope's wish. In many cases, it is true, the bishops were feudal lords and held vast estates, so it behoved the Emperor to have some say in their election ; but that the whole matter should be taken out of the hands of the Church was a direct usurpation of a part of her express function. So, as a small cloud on the horizon destined to grow into a mighty storm, came the struggle over the ' investitures,' which lasted for centuries, producing heroes and fanatics, involving the fate of nations, and causing Italy to become one vast battlefield for the rival parties of Guelf and Ghibelline. ' These times of terrible confusion, and centuries of unhappy memory,' writes Muratori, ' in which one witnesses the sad spectacle of sons fighting against fathers, subjects against their lawful princes and em perors, advocates of the Church against the Church itself, and the sacred pastors, in their divisions, forgetting entirely the character they had to uphold, forgetting alike sacred laws and ecclesiastical discipline. The sovereign Pontiff willed that he should no longer have to depend on the approbation of the Emperor for his election or consecration, and that the election of bishops should be left to conventions of the same, and that it should not be lawful for emperors or the princes to give the investitures to bishops and abbots with the ring and the pastoral staff ; the which had really opened the door 44 MATILDA OF TUSCANY to a thousand scandalous acts of simony. The emperors, on the other hand, sustained their pretensions by quoting ancient usages, founded on several pontifical decrees, and on the rights of the Regalia, of which a donation had been made by antecedent " Augusti " to the Church, with the obligation, they said, to recognise imperial authority ... so a most lamentable schism was caused, with other disorders of which the historians speak at length. In this confusion, the princes, the bishops, and the people, no less of Germany than of Italy, followed that party which seemed to them the more just, or the more useful, and those people may not be wrong who think that many again listened to, or followed, the secret persuasion of their own interests, which ought certainly to be the last, but is often the first motive, and the most efficacious counsellor in our resolutions.' 1 The question whether the Pope's election should rest entirely in the hands of the clergy was the chief point in that part of the conflict which raged during the eleventh and twelfth centuries, aggravated, no doubt, in several acute crises by the characters of the Emperors Henry iv. and v. Although Henry n. was called ' saint,' and was capable of acting in concert with a Pope for the general weal of Christendom, as we have already seen, his allegiance to the Church was not entirely undivided, for he was jealous of ecclesiastical authority and kept the bishoprics and abbeys of his realm subordinate to himself. He granted these high offices to men likely to favour his interests — if the abbots resisted his will, he would change them, at the same time insisting that severe discipline should be maintained amongst the monks, and that they should 1 Muratori, Antichita Estensi ed Italiane, vol. i. p. 14. LATERAN SYNOD OF 1027 45 yield full obedience to whichever abbot it was his sovereign pleasure to place over them. His successor, Conrad the Salic, was of a different stamp. It is true that after his coronation in Rome a great synod J was held on the 6th of April 1027 at the Lateran, and here again both Pope and Emperor presided, and after some ecclesiastical disputes had been settled, matters of a more secular and personal nature, as well as political affairs, were dis cussed. The close union of Church and State exhibited here is worthy of notice. Yet on the whole Conrad had no strong feelings towards Church reform ; he was too much occupied with the safeguarding and developing of his own power within his own realm to bestow much attention on the affairs of the Roman Church, so that for a time under the house of Tusculum — that house which gave to Rome so many worthless Popes — the hold of the Papacy over matters temporal was weakened. It was to the influence of Conrad's son, Henry in., in reforming the Papacy from without, to the 1 To students of English history it may be of value to note that King Canute was present at this synod, and the extract that Giesebrecht gives (vol. ii. p. 249) from Canute's letter to the English bishops is extremely interesting : ' Pope John and the Emperor Conrad convened a great assembly of Princes at the Easter festival in Rome ; all the Princes from Monte Gargano, as far as the shores of the sea near Rome, were present. They received me with much consideration, and honoured me with beautiful presents, the Emperor especially paid me much honour, with many costly gifts and magnificent mantles and raiment. I treated with the Emperor, the Pope and other Princes who were present, for the needs of my people, the English as well as the Danes, especially so that better conditions and safe conduct should be granted to them on the road to Rome, and that henceforth so many of the passes should not be denied to them, nor should they be burdened with heavy tolls on the way. The Emperor considered my demands very just, and King Rudolf (of Burgundy), in whose hands those passes rest especially, and the other Princes received commands to allow henceforth all my subjects — merchants as well as Pilgrims — to proceed over the passes unmolested and free of tolls under safe conduct to Rome, and in like manner to return home.' 46 MATILDA OF TUSCANY influence of a greater mind than Henry's, that the Church once more lifted up her head, and renewed her twofold struggle — the struggle for temporal supremacy, in order to have the material power to strengthen herself in the deadlier struggle against the vices of the day. But in the days of Henry in. there was a moment of respite in the conflict, since Pope and Emperor were at unison over matters of reform. For the spiritual supremacy of Rome first and above all things, for her right on earth to bind and loose, Hildebrand, afterwards Gregory vn., lived and died. Before he rose to power, there were not wanting Popes who felt that if Rome were to prove herself worthy of resisting the might of the Emperor she must first set her own house in order. But it was the monk Hildebrand, ' that ardent flagellator of the Church,' who actually brought about the crusade against simony and the concubinage of the priests, who stimulated, advised and encouraged Pope after Pope to untiring efforts in the way of reform. For Hildebrand's was a master-mind with that happy combination of strength and imagina tion capable of achieving great things. He saw what a terrible position it was for the Church, which hitherto had been the supreme court of appeal against sin, dis order, and oppression, to have its dignitaries called into court as criminals, and what retrogression it would mean if, in future, moral force were to count as nothing, and brute force were to have the pre-eminence. As a writer on those times remarks : 1 ' It was not enough to preach to the people " Believe in Christ," the Redeemer of every injustice, since the ministers of Christ were com mitting fornication with the workers of iniquity.' 1 Don Tosti, lib. i. p. 49 (ed. 1859). HILDEBRAND 47 Hildebrand stands out from the background of history as one whose singleness of purpose was complete, whose whole life was given undividedly to one object, in whom there was no swerving from the path he had chosen, no compromise, and no sign of weakness. Calumny has been unsuccessful against him ; even those who would detract from the greatness of his fame by laying stress on his ambition, can hardly say there was anything base about it, since it was never his own glory or his own advancement that he sought, but always that of the Master he served. Like that of many another great man, his life was of humble beginning. Born of obscure parents about 1013, at the little village of Rovaco near Soana, a few miles from Orbitello, he was sent at an early age to the monas tery of Santa Maria sulT Aventino in Rome, to be edu cated by his uncle the abbot, so that from his childhood he was, as he himself says,1 ' brought up in the house of St. Peter.' Later on he went to the celebrated monastery of Cluny,2 at that time renowned for the austerity of its rule ; it is not known whether he com pleted his novitiate there or at Santa Maria, but the years 1 ' Debito amore apostolorum principis, qui me ab infantia mea sub alis suis singulari quadam pietate nutrivit et in gremio suae clementiae fovit' (Reg., i. 39). 'Sanctus Petrus a puero me domo sua dulciter nutrierat' (vii. 23). ' Audi me servum tuum, quern ab infantia nutristi ' (iii. 10, A). 2 Cluny, a Benedictine abbey situated in the ancient kingdom of Burgundy, lying to the north-west of the town of Macon, was founded in 909 and became later the mother-house of thousands of abbeys scattered over Europe. Its founder, William the Pious, Duke of Aquitaine, in endowing it, freed it from all submission to civil powers, and from the very first, the election of the Abbot rested with the monks themselves. Cluny was able therefore to take up and maintain an independent position in the great struggle between ecclesi astical and temporal power, and the whole of its traditions rested on the idea that the Church should be absolutely free and unhampered, with regard to the election of her bishops and pastors. 48 MATILDA OF TUSCANY passed at Cluny amid the good Benedictines must have had great influence upon his character. From there he is said to have visited the German court, where he preached so eloquently that Henry in. remarked he had never before heard the Word of God expounded with such conviction. Returning to Rome in 1044, he witnessed the Church of Rome at one of its most degraded periods. After the Tusculan barons had disgracefully caused to be elected to the Papal See a boy of twelve, Benedict ix.,1 after a misrule of ten years, this feeble and depraved Pope (whom the Romans had twice before driven out, and who had been twice reinstated, it is said, by Imperial favour) roused the anger of the citizens to such a pitch by his excesses, that once more they cast him out from their midst and appointed John, Bishop of Sabina, who assumed the name of Sylvester in. and is said to have paid Benedict for this privilege. But this new Pope had not sufficient strength of character to make himself master of Rome, and at the beginning of the year 1045, Benedict, by the aid of his relatives and their ill-gotten gains, was able once more to resume the tiara, Sylvester retiring to his erstwhile bishopric. Benedict's position, however, was untenable, and now there appeared a third claimant for the Papacy in the person of John Gratian the arch-presbyter, of the Church of Saint John of the Latin Gate. He was one of the most religious 1 This account of the years 1044-45 is given mainly from Giesebrecht, vol. ii. p. 410, etc., and from the Chron. Mon. Cass, of Desiderius in the appendix to the Sacred Dialogues. There are many confusing versions of what occurred in Rome at this period. Some historians, Stephens for instance, say that the three Popes were in possession of Rome simultaneously ; others, Villemain, Sismondi, Cantii, and Lanziani, mention yet another claimant, 'John xx.,' and say that John Gratian assumed the Pontificate only after the other three were deposed. ANARCHY IN ROME 49 amongst the clergy, a man greatly respected by the more order-loving amongst the citizens, and to his Church many offerings were made. With the large sums of money in his possession, he proceeded to buy out Benedict, this time successfully, and in May 1045 was consecrated in Rome under the name of Gregory vi. To a man imbued with a sense of what the. Church of God should mean, the state of anarchy prevailing in her midst during these years must have been a most appalling spectacle, and have served to engrave more deeply in Hildebrand's heart the resolve that in the future these things should cease. For throughout Italy the most frightful disorder existed. The high-roads, which were nothing better than ill-kept tracks, were infested by brigands who respected no man. Pilgrims to Rome itself were frequently plundered and murdered. In the neighbourhood of Rome the nobles, often no better than robbers themselves, pillaged the country under the pretence of punishing the followers of one or other of the antipopes, while she possessed within her walls hardly one cleric untainted with the sin of simony. The city itself presented a scene of murder and bloodshed ; even the altars of the churches were not held sacred, for the offerings deposited thereon were carried off immediately by evil men, who spent the proceeds in rioting and debauch. Yet about this time, on the other hand, many a monk and many a hermit was uplifting his voice against the vices of the priesthood, and endeavouring by preaching and by example to turn men from their evil ways to lead better lives. Here and there they were successful in winning over some disciples, or in effecting a real reform in the life of some great feudal lord. Amongst So MATILDA OF TUSCANY these isolated teachers we may notice in passing Peter Damian, the hermit monk of Avellana near Gubbio, Romuald at Camaldoli, John Gualberto at Vallombrosa, and the far-famed Abbot Guido of Pomposa. The new Pope, however, was eager for reform, and proceeded at once to administer justice with a firm hand.1 He had murderers tried by court of law, and condemned to death ; he levied troops, and when sentence of ex communication failed, he retook by force the Church lands, which had been seized unlawfully by the Roman nobles. Years before on the Aventine he had known Hildebrand, and had been struck by the boy's abilities. He now appointed him one of his chaplains and showed him great favour. Gregory's rule, however, was a short one. Although the question of the Papacy appeared to have been satisfactorily settled, there still lingered an element of discontent in Rome, for the two antipopes had not been entirely disposed of, and counted some adherents, and there was a strong feeling of dissatisfaction amongst the strictest of the clergy and laity, owing to the fact that Gregory had purchased the Papacy. Appeals were made to the Emperor, then on his way to Rome to be crowned, that he should come and settle the matter once and for all. A council was held at Sutri, in the presence of the Emperor and many princes of the Church, where the Bishop of Sabina's claims were first disposed of. He was judged guilty of simony and condemned to pass the rest of his days in a monastery. Then Gregory's cause was tried. He defended himself well by saying that having amassed riches, he thought he could not 1 See Vitae Rom. Pont. (Mur., Rer. It. Script., vol. iii. pt. n. p. 343). HENRY III. AND POPE CLEMENT II. 51 employ them better than by taking the pontifical power into his own hands and using it honestly and for the general good of the Church. He frankly avowed his bargain with Benedict, and was convinced at length that he had done wrong in this matter. Thereupon he himself acknowledged his guilt, descended from the pontifical throne, and laid aside his episcopal garb. Benedict was not present at this synod, and no conclusion was arrived at as to his claims. However, a few days later in Rome, at another great synod convened by the Emperor, Benedict was formally deposed. Henry had acted with great determination and decision. He was not averse to keeping the bishoprics and livings of his own dominions within his own hands, nor to appointing German bishops to Italian sees, but his opinions as to simony were most pronounced, and the scandal in the Roman Church had to be put down with a strong hand. It now remained for him to appoint a new Pope, and for once the Romans were willing to abide by his decision, and they accepted unquestioned the Emperor's nominee. No fitting Italian cleric was to be found, and Henry's choice lighted upon Suidiger, Bishop of Bamberg, who was forthwith declared Pope under the title of Clement 11. Suidiger had lived a most blameless life, and in his own bishopric was much beloved. He accepted with great hesitation the honours thrust upon him, and shortly before his death, he wrote with yearning of his beloved church at Bamberg, calling her his ' friend,' his ' sister,' his ' bride,' his ' pure white dove,' expressing the grief with which he had renounced her, and the joy with which, had God willed it, he would have led there a quiet retired life. Here in Rome all was changed. On Christmas Day 52 MATILDA OF TUSCANY 1046 Suidiger was consecrated Pope, and on the self same day Henry and his wife Agnes received from him the Imperial Crowns. It was indeed a great day for the German domination in Italy. A German Pope to be crowning the German Emperor and Empress, a German army encamping round the walls of Rome, and received everywhere within the city with signs of joy and satis faction. Hildebrand accompanied the deposed Gregory into exile in Germany, and, the latter dying shortly after, Hilde brand returned to Cluny where he was made prior. Clement n. only survived his predecessor a short while, and in 1048 another German subject of Henry's was elected Pope, Damasus n., who enjoyed his dignity for twenty days :— killed by poison, said the Germans ; by the judgment of God, said the Italians. However this may have been, the Romans were for the moment singularly submissive to the Emperor, for they sent a deputation to him, asking him to nominate a fresh Pope. Henry complied by choosing Bruno, Bishop of Toul, a distant cousin, ' a man of great piety and of an imposing exterior,' says one historian. At an assembly of bishops and nobles at Worms the Emperor's choice was fully ratified. Bruno, however, protested vehemently against his own election, and after fasting and praying for three days, declared himself unworthy of the honour done to him. His scruples finally overcome by the persuasion of the Emperor, he yielded and took upon himself the burden of the Pontificate, beginning at once to look about for suitable men who would help him in the great task he had undertaken. Now it happened that at this time Hildebrand was in Worms, having been despatched there by the Abbot HILDEBRAND AND POPE LEO IX. 53 of Cluny with an important message to the Emperor.1 The ex-chaplain of Gregory vi. was known at least by name to Bishop Bruno, who forthwith summoned him to his presence, and offered him a place in his entourage if he would accompany him to Rome. ' I cannot,' replied Hildebrand. ' And why not ? ' questioned the new Pope. ' Because, without any canonical investiture and by the royal and secular power alone, you are going to take possession of the Roman Church.' This remark made such an impression on Bruno, that he announced before the Worms Council and the Roman deputies, that he would only accept the Pontificate if, upon arriving in Rome, the Roman clergy and people freely confirmed his election. Finding his scruples satisfied, Hildebrand consented to accompany the Bishop and his suite to Rome. There seems to have been a strong bond of sympathy between this Pope-elect and the young prior of Cluny. Possibly in the long journey southwards, which lasted two months, they discussed those reforms, which Hildebrand so ardently desired, and which Bruno, should his election be confirmed, proposed to effect. The Roman barons, people, and clergy welcomed Bruno heartily, his election was fully approved, and he took up his position without further hesitation, assuming the title of Leo ix. Grateful for the advice given him by Hildebrand, the Pope conferred on him the post of cardinal sub-deacon of the Roman Church. In this capacity he took part in the administration of civic government, and the care 1 According to Villemain ; but Voigt, Giesebrecht, and others say that Leo, before departing for Rome, paid a visit to Toul and from thence to Cluny, and it was at the great Burgundian abbey that this memorable conversation took place. 54 MATILDA OF TUSCANY of the Papal exchequer was also entrusted to him. He showed extraordinary ability in dealing with these mundane matters, and by making friends with some of the Jews of the Trasteverine quarter, two in particular, Benedict, a convert to Christianity, and his son Leo, he learnt many a valuable lesson of finance. This meagre little cardinal, undersized and of insignificant exterior, must soon have been well known in every part of Rome, and his influence widely felt. Now also his talent for making friends became manifest, for not only did he number many amongst the Trasteverines, but he managed to keep on good terms with the Roman nobility, and thus to strengthen Leo's position within the city walls. Yet, in the midst of all his activities over secular affairs, he never lost sight of the one great object of his life, the reform of the Church he loved so dearly. Many a great man was stirred by his influence to strenuous effort in this direction, and the reforms he so ardently desired were those that Leo ix., Victor n., Stephen x., and Alexander n., preceding him in the Pontificate, one and all attempted in the Church at large. As we have already seen, Henry in. was in favour of Church reform, and so long as it did not encroach on his own political power, he was willing to give his support to the Church by his presence at councils, and even by his own exhortations. At Pavia (1046) and earlier still he had manifested the greatest indignation at the traffic in livings. A short while before the election of Gregory vi. he had thus expressed himself to the clergy at a Council1 he had assembled, probably at Constance: 1 An account of this synod is given by a contemporary writer, Rudolfus Glaber, a monk of Cluny, but he does not mention the year or place of assembly. Giesebrecht points out that it must have been held either prior COUNCILS HELD BY POPE LEO IX. 55 ' You, who ought to spread blessings everywhere, you are losing yourselves in lust and avarice ; be it in buying holy things, or in selling them, you are equally worthy of malediction. Even my father, for the peril of whose soul I suffer daily, gave himself over too much to this damnable vice. But in future he amongst you who sullies himself thus, shall be cut off from the service of God. For it is by these degraded practices that we draw down upon ourselves famine, pestilence, and war.' In the first year of his Pontificate Leo ix. held four councils with the object of putting down simony: at Rome, Pavia, Rheims, and Mainz. The most im portant of these was at Rheims, where he examined especially the charges of simony brought against the bishops and clergy, and deposed and excommunicated many of them. The Archbishop of Galicia was excom municated for arrogating to himself the title of ' apos tolic,' which the Popes alone reserved exclusively for themselves. The sitting of the council was terminated by a declaration of the Church against many abuses both secular and ecclesiastical. It was forbidden that a man should be raised to the dignity of bishop without the election of clergy and people, that any should buy or sell Holy Orders, and that any lay person should usurp the functions of the priesthood. Priests were prohibited from demanding any fee for burial, baptism, or the visitation of the sick, to practise usury or to carry arms. to, or in, 1045, as Rudolf's chronicle concludes with events happening in that year. See Giesebrecht, vol. ii. pp. 381-382. It would seem likely that the synod may have been held at Constance as Villemain says (vol. i. p. 288), since Rudolfus Glaber speaks especially of German and Burgundian bishops being present, and the city of Constance was not far from the Burgundian border. See Raoul Glaber, Les Cinq Livres de son Histoire (ed. Prou., Paris, 1886), lib. V. cap. v. Voigt (vol. i. p. 8) also gives Constance as the meeting-place for this synod. 56 MATILDA OF TUSCANY Rapine, violence to the poor, incest, and bigamy were denounced in the strongest terms, and some great seigneurs were excommunicated for having committed these crimes. At the Mainz Council, Henry with his court and a great number of nobles was present. Here simony and the marriage of priests were again rigorously for bidden. On his return to Rome Leo, aided and sustained by Hildebrand, continued his work of reforming the Church. In spite of all the councils, the actual work of reform progressed but slowly. Leo ix. was not a strong enough man in himself, nor was the Papacy at that time in a position to enforce effectually the measures recommended. For a new menace to its power presented itself in the south of Italy, where an alien race had succeeded in establishing itself and was growing so formidable, that as ally or foe it had to be counted with, by Pope and Emperor alike. Very briefly indeed, we must see how this people affected the history of the peninsula, at the period with which we are concerned. SOUTH ITALY IN ELEVENTH CENTURY 57 CHAPTER V Rise of the Norman Power in the South of Italy— Character of the Norman adventurers who landed there in the early part of the eleventh century, and their conflicts with the various races already in possession— At first Leo ix. adopts a friendly attitude towards them, but soon changes, and determines to check their aggressions— Battle of Civitate and captivity of Leo— Embassy of Frederick of Lorraine to Constantinople — Robert Guiscard — Death of Leo IX. in 1054— Gerbhard of Eichstadt elected Pope as Victor n. — Henry in. fears the increasing power of Duke Godfrey and is suspicious of his brother Frederick — The latter retires to Monte Cassino — Death of Henry in. — Minority of Henry IV. and regency of the Empress Agnes — Death of Victor 11. , 1057— Stephen ix. — The Antipope Benedict x. — Appointment of Nicholas 11. in place of the Antipope. THE Eastern Empire which had once held complete sway in Sicily and the south of Italy had been ousted from Sicily by the Mussulmans, and almost entirely from its rule on the mainland by the Longobards. At the beginning of the eleventh century, however, the south of the peninsula was divided into a number of petty states, which may be described roughly as follows : — The territories once held by the Longobards in the extreme south, the provinces of Apulia and Calabria, had been reconquered, and were governed by catapans, representatives of the Eastern Emperor sent there from Constantinople to administer the affairs of state. Amain, Naples, and Gaeta on the coast from south to north formed for the time being 58 MATILDA OF TUSCANY three small separate republics, while Salerno, Capua, and Beneventum were the respective capitals of Longo bard principahties, governed by the last rulers of that once mighty race. These principalities bordered on the north with the pontifical State and the Duchy of Spoleto, and this proximity to the Popes' possessions gave rise to many a dispute, and many a small fight. Byzantium still held nominal sway over the whole of this country, and in no way acknowledged the independence of the Longobard princes or the autonomy of the republics. It is true that the former were in a somewhat anomalous position ; in theory they held their lands as fiefs of the Eastern Empire, yet occasionally they would do homage to the Western Emperors, when one of these appeared with an army in the south. The Duchy of Beneventum was often looked upon as a Western Imperial fief, and that the Papacy had some shadowy rights to lands in Calabria and the Duchy of Beneventum is shown by allusions to them in various documents. The Byzantine rulers were not in a position to protect effectually their South Italian possessions, and the paucity of their troops in occupation made rebellion amongst the inhabitants an easy matter, while it left the coasts open to Saracenic invaders, who now owning the entire islands of Sicily were ever ready to swoop down on the mainland for piratical purposes. Such an attack took place in Salerno in 1016, and the inhabitants made an appeal to some Norman pilgrims who had landed by chance in Italy on their way home from Jerusalem. These latter, fired by their love of adventure, and filled with pious horror of the infidels, as true sons of the Church at once espoused the cause NORMANS IN SOUTHERN ITALY 59 of the Salernitans against their enemies, and succeeded in driving off the invaders. The Normans were rewarded with much gratitude, and costly gifts were pressed upon them. The presents they sternly refused, and continued their homeward journey. They were accompanied by envoys from the Salernitans to their country-folk at home, to beg that more warriors would come and take service with them against the infidel, and bearing with them spices, fruit, and precious mantles of silk, as proof of the riches of the land of the south, and of what was to be gained by serving its rulers. This embassy was not without effect, and from that time onward, hosts of Norman warriors made their way into the southern parts of Italy. Here indeed was a great field for enterprising mercen aries, and the Normans were exactly the right people to take advantage of the existing state of affairs in this new land of adventure. Robust to an astonishing degree, valiant and undaunted by reverses, they possessed all the sturdier qualities of manhood which were lacking in these Southern people, for even the original Longobard strain was waxing feeble, and there was no force left to resist the steady onslaught of a more vigorous race. So taking advantage, now of this rebellion, now of that, amongst Longobards or Greeks, allying themselves occasionally with the East or West, later with the pontifical power itself, the Normans gained for them selves a foothold in the south and in Sicily, and their domination gradually spread over all those lands held by Greek, Lombard, and Saracen. At first the Popes and the German Emperors were inclined to look with favour upon the Normans in the south of Italy, thinking that their rising power would 60 MATILDA OF TUSCANY act as a counterbalance to that of Byzantium. The influence of the East was always dreaded at this time. In fact, an expedition taken by Henry n. in 1022, into the south, where the Byzantines were again gaining ground, had resulted in the submission of Salerno and Capua to the German overlordship, and in 1027 the Emperor Conrad appears to have conceded to the Normans the right to settle in the countries of the south of Italy, in order to fight the Greeks,, and again in 1038 he is said to have settled disputes between the Normans and the local inhabitants. In 1047 Henry in. invested several Norman lords with the lands they had already conquered, and because Beneventum refused to receive him, he authorised the Normans to attack the city, and in a measure he encouraged these acts of aggression within the principality itself. But some years later there ensued a revulsion of feeling ; outcries against the Norman cruelties were heard on all sides, and came to the ears of the Pope Leo. ' From being welcomed as deliverers they soon became the oppressors,' and that petition from our ancient Litany, ' From the fury of the Northman, good Lord deliver us,' may have been voiced even in southern Italy. These outrages, together with a wish to limit the power of this new people and to reserve to the Papacy its rights in the south, must have actuated Leo in the course he eventually took. At first he was merely desirous of maintaining order, forcing the Normans to restore to the Church those lands and properties they had pillaged. In a visit he paid to the south in 1049 he appears to have been partially successful in his undertakings, and acting in the name of the Emperor as well as in that of the Church, his actions were invested with a great measure of POPE LEO IX. AND THE NORMANS 61 authority and made an impression even on the Normans. In the year 1051, after having driven Landulf and Pandulf, its ruling princes, into exile, Beneventum offered to submit itself to the Pope, and in July of the same year Leo made his way to that city, and afterwards visited other towns in the south, for the purpose of restoring peace and order amongst Longobard princes, Norman warriors and vassals of the Emperor. At first two of the Norman chiefs had gained his con fidence, and they had rendered him help at Beneventum, but a tumult breaking out between the citizens and the Normans, aroused Leo's anger and suspicions (wrongly, as it was afterwards proved, for the outbreak had been instigated by the Greeks). From this time forth, how ever, Leo's attitude towards the Normans completely changed, and he resolved to try and expel them at least from Beneventan territory. He was supported in his views by his own immediate followers. The cardinals and the young chancellor of the Pope, Frederick of Lorraine, Leo's special protege, evinced great hatred and contempt of the Normans ; Frederick was wont to say that with a hundred warriors he would drive them out of Italy. Leo himself was not so sanguine, however, and employed more cautious measures to attain his end. During a visit to Germany in 1051-52, he exchanged his rights over the bishopric of Bamberg and the abbey of Fulda for Beneventum — and then tried to raise an army wherewith to attack the Normans. A motley crowd of Germans flocked to his standard, and in the south, Frederick the chancellor had managed to collect together a small army of Italian malcontents, and received also a certain amount of support from the lesser Italian lords — those who had suffered much at the hands of the Normans. 62 MATILDA OF TUSCANY He even went so far as to negotiate with the Greeks to gain their help in this undertaking. Near Civitate, in the valley of the Fortore, which marks the boundary between the Beneventan territory and Apulia, the Pope encamped with his army, and here the Normans met him. At first their commander tried pacific negotiations, for their own position was not a very secure one. Their chief ally, Guaimar, Prince of Salerno, had been assassinated shortly after the disturbance at Beneventum, and they knew the Greeks to be inimically disposed towards them : also they were sorely pressed for provisions. Moreover, they had started their career in Italy as defenders of the Church and wished to remain on good terms with its head. So they proposed to disband their troops if the Pope would only confirm them in their possessions as vassals of the Church, and release them from the ban under which he had placed them when his anger had been kindled at Beneventum. But these overtures were ill received by the Papal party, and a battle ensued. The Normans were entirely victorious, and the Pope in Civitate awaited the issue with dismay. But the victors acted generously. With a curious volte-face, more characteristic of southern than of northern blood, they assumed the humble position of the vanquished, craved pardon of Leo for what they had done, begged for absolution with every show of reverence, conducted the Pope to Beneventum, some twelve miles distant, and offered to escort him to Capua, when he should wish to return to Rome.1 In spite of this generosity on the part of the conquerors, there is no 1 The historian Chalandon has called in question this submission of the Normans and the mildness of the Pope (Chal., vol. i. p. 139-140). But Giesebrecht (vol. ii. p. 503) gives it full credence. IMPRISONMENT OF POPE LEO IX. 63 doubt that Leo was more or less forced to remain at Beneventum until some sort of an agreement had been made with the Normans, and it is to be presumed that the Pope consented to invest them with the lands they had conquered. Villemain (vol. i. p. 308) says further that the Pope paid a large sum of ransom money. The Pope employed his time in Beneventum in study ing the Greek language and in addressing various letters to East and West. To Constantinople he made the warmest overtures, expressing a desire that the two Churches might be reunited in the faith, and also his hopes that the Normans might yet be expelled from the peninsula ! An embassy headed by Frederick of Lorraine was despatched with this letter to Constantinople. The result of the battle of Civitate was a severe blow to the authority of the Papacy in the south, and a great help to the prestige of the Normans. In a measure they legitimised their position, and from henceforth they became a power to be reckoned with in the internecine politics of Italy. The commanders at this memorable battle had been Richard, Count of Aversa,1 and the two brothers, Humphrey and Robert Guiscard. These two young warriors were the sons of the Sieur de Hauteville, a poor Norman seigneur whose patrimony was not ample enough for the needs of his numerous family, so that one member after another had left home and made their way to other lands. Their history can be read elsewhere. The one who most concerns us here is Robert Guiscard, who had arrived in Italy some six 1 This countship of Aversa had been founded in 1030 by a Norman knight, Rainulf. It was the first territory acquired by the Normans in Italy. Giesebrecht, vol. ii, p. 332. 64 MATILDA OF TUSCANY years before the battle of Civitate and, already making his name famous in warfare, was destined to become the most celebrated of his numerous brethren. Starting in such poverty that he knew not where to turn for subsistence, he pushed his way upwards ; often unscrupulous in his methods, ready to avail himself of every opportunity for advancement, and gathering round him a crowd of adventurers, he took service under one ruler after another as it suited his ends, and suc ceeded in winning for himself fame, riches, and territory beyond all dreams. He was treated as of royal birth, and his children were sought in marriage by many a princely house of East and West. Undaunted by mis chance — on the contrary, spurred on by it to more vigorous efforts, he was in truth a splendid fighter, a great man and brave, with flashing blue eyes, clear-cut features, ruddy complexion, and of a height that towered head and shoulders above his hosts of armed warriors. Yet it was not only on account of his military talents that Guiscard shone supreme amongst his compatriots. Well did he deserve his nickname Guiscard (Wiscard, i.e. Wizzard, or Wiseacre). His powers of organising the government of his states, his extraordinary political abilities, which enabled him to look beyond the issue of the moment, made him in many respects the equal of Gregory vn. Although at first Guiscard and Gregory were at issue, a strong feeling of friendship grew up between them, and even if the former's allegiance to the Papacy were not undivided, there is no doubt that it was to his better nature that the exiled Pope appealed, when finally the grim old warrior offered him a refuge in Salerno. At times the Normans proved a thorn in the side of DEATH OF POPE LEO IX. 65 the Papacy, at other times a staunch support to its weakness. Though they counted themselves faithful sons of Holy Church, and were pious, as warriors went in those days, they were too easily swayed by the love of gain to be reckoned upon as allies with any degree of security, and it was only when there was hope of plunder, or promise of rich reward, that their help was to be obtained as a certainty. At one moment, when all the rest of the powerful lords in Italy had abandoned his cause, Gregory vn. stood with Matilda and Guiscard as his only two supporters — yet Guiscard did not stay the sack of Rome, and was too full of ambitious plans of empire to employ his whole might in defence of the Church. But in spite of all the drawbacks to the Normans as allies, it is undeniable that their power was a great factor in the development of the Papal supremacy, and a restraining influence on the might of the German emperors. Leo ix. lived only one month after his return from captivity. He expired in Rome in April 1054, deeply regretted by the Roman people, who regarded him as a saint.1 He had won the hearts of all men by his broad human sympathies, and even in enforcing canonical laws and denouncing the vices of the day he never failed to show love and pity towards the individual offender, whilst many an act of mercy tempered his sternest judgments. He was sincerely mourned by Hildebrand, and years afterwards, when the latter was Pope, he was in the habit of speaking of Leo ix. with the greatest rever ence and affection, and enjoined upon the bishops not to let sink in oblivion the precious memories they retained of him, but to commit them to writing : ' the which,' 1 See Giesebrecht, vol. ii. pp. 465-466. E 66 MATILDA OF TUSCANY remarks Villemain,1 ' he would no doubt have undertaken himself, had he not been more fully engaged in surpassing him than in depicting him ' ! Many months elapsed before a worthy successor to Leo could be found, and it was owing to Hildebrand's representations that the Emperor was prevailed upon to nominate Gerbhard, Bishop of Eichstadt, to the Holy See. Hildebrand had been sent to Germany at the head of an embassy to consult the Emperor upon this important question, and it required considerable diplomacy to secure the man most fitted, in his opinion, to become the supreme head of the Church. Henry was loth to part with his favourite bishop, a man of great astuteness, devoted to the Emperor, and enjoying his entire con fidence, yet in nowise likely to forget his duties and position as a churchman. Gerbhard himself was not anxious to become Pope, refused the honour with great insistence, and even went so far as to send special mes sengers to Rome to try and prejudice the Romans against his election.2 But at length Henry was induced to add his entreaties to those of Hildebrand, whereupon Gerbhard yielded, stipulating, however, that his election should be ratified by the Roman people ; and in the following year this was accomplished, and he was welcomed in Rome as Pope Victor n. In all ways the new Pope confirmed Hildebrand's expectations. He identified him self at once with things Italian, and, whilst zealously devoting his life to the work of reforming the Church upon the principles laid down by his predecessors, he still con tinued a staunch friend and supporter of the Emperor. It was shortly after Victor's accession to the Pontifi- 1 Villemain, vol. i. p. 314. 2 Giesebrecht, vol. ii. p. 511. HENRY III. AND CARDINAL FREDERICK 67 cate that Henry in. paid that memorable visit to Italy, to try and reduce the power of Godfrey of Lorraine, as we have already seen in Chapter in. (1055). The Emperor regarded Godfrey's plots as very far-reaching indeed, and his suspicions at this time included even Godfrey's brother, Cardinal Frederick. The latter, upon his return from the East after the death of Leo ix., had retained his appoint ment as chancellor (at all events till 1055), but now the Emperor seems to have suspected him of greater power than he possessed. Tales of the treasures the legates had brought back with them were freely circulated, while Henry imagined Frederick would be able to further his brother's cause by means of the relations he had estab lished with Constantinople. These fears were groundless, however, for although the embassy had been well received at the Eastern court, and loaded with presents by the Emperor, a rebellion had broken out immediately after its departure, and the Patriarch of Constantinople had pronounced his ban on the legates, even as they had previously excommunicated him. The result was a complete rupture between the two Churches of East and West, and although Frederick and his companions had safely landed in Italy with their treasures, they were shamefully robbed by a certain Count Thrasimund of Teano on their way to Rome, and, naturally enough, for the time being all negotiations with Byzantium were at an end. Henry, unmindful of these occurrences, wrote to the Pope, commanding him to secure the person of this dangerous cardinal and have him conveyed to Germany. Frederick, however, was warned in time to protect him self.1 Taking refuge at Monte Cassino, he divested him- 1 Giesebrecht, vol. ii. p. 516. 68 MATILDA OF TUSCANY self of his ecclesiastical robes, and donned the habit of a monk. Fearing still that the enmity of the Emperor would pursue him, he begged the abbot's permission to retire to the island monastery of Tremiti in the Adriatic, a dependency of Monte Cassino, and there he abode for some months till the hue and cry was over, when he returned once more to Monte Cassino.1 Henry's great trust in Pope Victor was evinced in a very marked manner. No latent jealousy of Papal encroachments seems to have possessed the Emperor's mind. On the contrary, he gave back into Victor's hands the rights over many bishoprics and towns, formerly wrested from the Papacy, invested him with the Duke dom of Spoleto and the March of Camerino, and created him Vicar Imperial in Italy. In his attitude towards the Church Henry seems to have been entirely actuated by a desire for her reform, and a wish to establish a state of lasting concord between the two great powers of Christendom. When, at the moment of the Church's degradation, he had been appealed to for help, he had used the authority given him, wisely and well, and had placed the very ablest man he could find in St. Peter's 1 The famous abbey of Monte Cassino, erected to commemorate the burial-place of St. Benedict, is situated on a high hill midway between Rome and Naples. During the Middle Ages it was renowned for its enormous library of precious manuscripts, for its treasures of gold and silver, and for the learning and science of the brethren. The monks displayed the greatest activity in collecting and transcribing MSS., and the library contained a greater number of profane writings than was to be found elsewhere. Two of its historians are still famous — Amatus and Leo Ostensis. At a very early period the science of medicine was largely cultivated in the monastery. Its abbots were most carefully chosen, and many of them became subsequently Popes, two of whom concern this period — Stephen ix. and Victor in. Monte Cassino was the Mecca not only of the Southern Lombards, but also of the rude Normans. ' They robbed, but they fervently reverenced St. Benedict, and singing psalms they went on pilgrimages to his grave.' — Gregorovius, vol. iv. pp. 163-164. INFLUENCE OF HENRY III. ON PAPACY 69 chair. And at the end of his career, in the appointment of Victor n. he had deprived himself of a proved and trusty counsellor for the greater good of the Church. Relying entirely on this his friend's integrity, he endowed him with powers such as had never before been granted by individual Emperor to individual Pope. Had Henry been spared yet longer to rule his realm, the history of Europe might have been differently written, and it is possible that Papacy and Empire would never have arrived at that extreme point of deadly rivalry they were destined to reach in later years. When we think of the long weary struggle for supremacy, upon which these two were shortly to embark, of the anarchy, the strife, and the agonies endured by Italy, it is pleasant to linger a moment over this page of history, to pay a passing tribute to the memory of a truly great ruler. With Hildebrand as Pope, and Henry in. as Emperor, what might not Christendom have achieved ? But henceforth no peace — a sword, rather — was to be her portion, and many a long year of bitterness was in store. It was not without great anxiety for the safety of his realm that Henry in. passed away (October 1056). He had declared his forgiveness of all his enemies, and made peace with many a rebellious vassal, and in his last moments, in the presence of the Pope (then visiting Germany) and the great lords spiritual and temporal, who had gathered round him, he had caused his little son to be again acknowledged as his successor,1 and commended the Empress to the special care of the Pope. The dying Emperor's fears were not groundless, for 1 Already in his cradle Henry had been recognised as his father's successor Giesebrecht, vol. ii. p. 474. 70 - MATILDA OF TUSCANY who could imagine that the princes of the realm, held in check by a stronger man than themselves, would remain contented under the government of a weak woman and a child ? Of Agnes of Poitiers (daughter of that William of Aquitaine to whom the crown of Italy had once been offered) history would have heard but little, had she died the consort of an emperor. Beautiful, well educated for the period, truly charitable and well intentioned, she possessed on the whole those negative qualities which would fit any woman for a secondary position in a great realm ; but as Empress-regent a task was given her far beyond her powers, and her career was deplorable. With no strength of character or discernment, she was the ready dupe of any ambitious ecclesiastic, who could easily obtain influence over her by making some show of piety. Intrigues arose on all sides and throve the more lustily as the Empress's incapacity to grapple with the situation, and rightly administer the affairs of that enormous kingdom, became more marked. Such a woman was not qualified to train a son to become a worthy ruler, and can we wonder that in the midst of an atmosphere of intrigue, jealousy, and lying on the one hand, and of weakness of purpose, caprice, and want of judgment on the other, a child should grow up into such a man as Henry iv. ? For the moment, however, there was quiet in the land ; the princes, who had been greatly mollified by the Emperor's last acts, were stunned at the news of his death, for he was still a man in the prime of life, and they rallied round the young King and his widowed mother in a more conciliatory way than was their wont. Pope Victor lent the Empress his advice and support, DEATH OF POPE VICTOR II. 71 and was the means of adjusting all the outstanding grievances of Godfrey of Lorraine and Baldwin of Flanders, as we have already seen. After spending Christmas with the Empress and little King at Regens- burg, the Pope attended another Council of State to assist the Empress in her deahngs with the remaining princes of the realm. Church affairs, however, recalled the Pope to Italy, and journeying back with Godfrey and his wife, he waited awhile in Tuscany, arriving in Florence some time in the spring of the year 1057. He kept Easter in Rome, and then returned to Florence to visit Godfrey. Here he was met by Frederick of Lorraine, by this time abbot of Monte Cassino, and Victor raised him to further honour by creating him Cardinal Priest of St. Chrysogonus in Rome. Special privileges were also conceded to Monte Cassino ; its abbots were allowed the use of dalmatics and sandals on feast days, and the highest place amongst abbots at every assembly. A limit was set to Victor's activities, however, for in the course of the summer he was seized with fever at Arezzo, and died there on the 28th of July (1057). With the passing of Victor n. and Henry in. the history of the Papacy enters on a new phase. We have seen how Henry in. had on the whole worked for the Church's welfare, and how zealously he had participated in the work of her reform, so that for the time being, there had been less question of her freeing herself entirely from all submission to temporal power. But the idea was still latent, and as the authority of the Empire weakened during the long minority of Henry iv., and submission to such a faithless Emperor as Henry iv. proved himself to be grew more and more repugnant, whilst the Church 72 MATILDA OF TUSCANY strengthened her position in the process of reform, the idea of an entire separation could not but receive fresh stimulus, and the emancipation of the Church from temporal authority grew to be an absolute necessity, in the minds of such men as Gregory vn. The political circumstances were indeed favourable to the furtherance of this idea. Germany was as a house divided against itself, and it was doubtful if it would ever again be in a position to assert the authority it had once exercised over the Papacy. Very rapidly after Victor's death a new Pope was elected and crowned in Rome. Without consultation with the German court, without, as far as is known, the approval of Hildebrand, Frederick of Lorraine was raised to the Pontifical See as Stephen ix. The Romans doubtless wished to conciliate Godfrey, now one of the most powerful rulers in Italy, and at the same time to gain for themselves an ally against the dreaded Normans, since Frederick's hatred of that people was well known. Stephen's reign, however, was a short one, but he em ployed it to the utmost for the furtherance of those plans which he had at heart. Two most important appoint ments for the future of Italy were made by him. He transported Peter Damian, already a man of note, from his hermitage, and created him Bishop of Ostia, and he gave the bishopric of Lucca to Anselm of Milan.1 He also granted fresh privileges to the abbey of Cluny, and provided another abbot for Monte Cassino, in the person of Desiderius, a young man full of promise. He despatched Hildebrand to Germany to try and justify his election to the Empress Agnes, since she, acting as regent for her son, had still a right to be consulted. 1 Giesebrecht, vol. iii. p. 22. PONTIFICATE OF STEPHEN IX. 73 Hildebrand's diplomatic talents must have been taxed to the utmost, and at first he was but ill received, for the Empress was very dissatisfied with the appointment of the new Pope, and mistrusted him and his family as well as Hildebrand. At length, however, the task was accomplished, and Hildebrand returned to Italy with full credentials for the new Pontiff. Yet this had been, doubtless, a most unwelcome mission for him ; it is not very probable that he approved of Stephen's accession, knowing, as he did, the latter's attitude towards the Normans. In deadly earnest the new Pope set to work to rid Italy of these settlers in the south. The treasures of which he had been robbed by Count Thrasimund had been restored, and handed over to Monte Cassino, and these he now demanded of the abbot, in order to spend the money in raising an army. He also prepared an embassy to start for Constantinople to appeal for help from the Eastern Emperor. After Victor n.'s death Godfrey had seized upon the territories of Camerino and Spoleto, handed over to Victor by Henry in., and no opposition had been offered to these proceedings, though the Roman nobility were beginning to look upon him with a jealous eye. There was a report current at this time that Pope Stephen intended to offer the crown of Empire to his brother Godfrey, and so to break entirely with the German royal house. Italy would have been willing enough to throw off its allegiance to Germany, but whether it would have accepted the adopted Tuscan as its liege lord is open to question. Also if Stephen had intended to make headway against the Normans,1 he could hardly have risked incurring the 1 See here Wattendorf. 74 MATILDA OF TUSCANY enmity of the German court ; and however powerful the Tuscan house had become, it would not have been able to fight North and South at one and the same time. We mention this story in passing as it is given full cred ence by many historians, and it is also referred to by a contemporary writer.1 In the meantime, the Pope, anxious to see his brother Godfrey, decided to journey to Tuscany, but before starting he evidently had some premonition of his approaching end, for he assembled the Roman nobles, bishops, and priests, and adjured them most solemnly not to appoint his successor until Hildebrand's return, should he himself die while absent from Rome. Whatever Pope Stephen's plans for Italy may have been, they were brought to an untimely end. He set out for Florence, and on his way he visited the lately founded abbey of Vallombrosa, where he was seized with mortal illness, and passed away in the arms of the saintly abbot, Giovanni Gualberto (March, 1058), again admonishing the clergy, almost with his last breath, to wait for Hildebrand before nominating a new Pope. However, the Roman nobles immediately elected a creature of their own, Benedict x. He reigned in Rome for a few months, when Hildebrand returning from Germany, and halting in Florence, wrote a most indignant letter to the cardinals, censuring them strongly for not having obeyed the injunctions of Pope Stephen, and awaited his, Hilde brand's, return. A great assembly of bishops was convened in Florence forthwith, and the then Bishop of Florence, Gerhard of 1 Leo Ostensis' Chron., lib. n. cap. 99, mentions the report that spread abroad at this time. See also Chalandon, vol. i. p. 165. Giesebrecht says, however, the report is hardly to be credited (vol. iii. p. 21). ACCESSION OF POPE NICHOLAS II. 75 Burgundy as he was called, was elected Pope. ' He (Hildebrand) set up a legitimate Pope against a false one, an apostolic Pope against Antipope, with the good grace also of Duke Godfrey,' writes one of Hildebrand's warm admirers.1 Godfrey was, in fact, pressed to uphold this election, and assembled troops to support the new Pope. Moreover, Hildebrand, still anxious at 'this time to legitimise the Pope's election according to custom previously laid down,2 was the means of having an embassy despatched to the Imperial court to have Gerhard's election confirmed. It is probable that Gerhard himself had accompanied it, and his nomination was thus confirmed by the Emperor without any difficulty. Benedict, unable to face all the power directed against him by the archdeacon,3 was forced to abdicate after a council held in Sutri in January 1059, an(i his rival entered Rome in triumph, accompanied by Hildebrand, Godfrey, Beatrice, and Matilda, early in the year 1059. Bishop Gerhard was promptly hailed as Pope by the Romans under the name of Nicholas n.4 1 Ved., vol. ii. p. 2. 2 Giesebrecht, vol. iii. p. 25. 3 Chalandon, vol. i. p. 166 ; Giesebrecht, vol. iii. p. 25. Bonitho (Liber ad Amicum, p. 640) refers to Hildebrand as ' the archdeacon ' already in the year 1057. Voigt says, ' Hildebrand— who had recently been made arch deacon of the Roman Church ' — in 1059 (vol. i. p. 73). 4 ' The Romans, as easily moved as are leaves, and ready to make Popes or Antipopes according to the caprice of the moment ' — ' I Romani volubili piu delle frondi, e pronti indifferentemente a far Papi ed Antipapi, secondo il lor capriccio.' Thus does Vedriani describe the Roman people at this time (Ved., vol. ii. p. 20). 76 MATILDA OF TUSCANY CHAPTER VI Matilda's early upbringing — Her training under Arduino della Palude — Her mother's part in her education — Her appearance — The portraits of her extant. JT will be readily understood how the events just narrated, how in fact all the circumstances of Matilda's early years, would help to mould her character in one direction and serve to develop her inherited tendencies. From a very early age she must have heard of her father's devotion to the Emperor, and how ill he had been rewarded. Then her mother's captivity and enforced absence in Germany, while she herself had to be carefully guarded lest the Emperor should attempt to lay hands on her, must have made a deep impression on her childish mind. Added to this the deep piety of Beatrice, the cordial relations entertained by so many Popes with the Tuscan princely house.the fact that one amongst them was her step-father's brother, that his, Pope Stephen's, successors always found a warm wel come in Florence, and that during the whole of her youth the real seat of the Papacy may be said to have been in Florence rather than in Rome, — all these would have proved powerful factors in the building up of the ardent religious character, of that firm ally of Holy Church, who was later to become ' the wonder of Italy.' Yet the daughter of Boniface could not but have some masculine traits of character. At an early age XJ en^Pevsl?v:cLAR.lSC>mfc'l