YALE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY ^JFTVERTgy THE LIBRARY OF THE DIVINITY SCHOOL * THE DAY MISSIONS LIBRARY ie^v 'Ao V ON MISSIONS. ON MISSIONS, A LECTURE DELIVERED IN WESTMINSTER ABBEY, ON DECEMBER 3, 1873. F. MAX MULLER, M. A., PROFESSOR OF COMPARATIVE, PHILOLOGY AT OXFORD. WITH AN INTRODUCTORY SERMON ARTHUR PENRHYN STANLEY, D. D„ DEAN OF WESTMINSTER. NEW YORK: SCRIBNER, ARMSTRONG, AND COMPANY. 1874. RIVERSIDE, OAMBREDGE : PRINTED BY H. u. HOUGHTON AND COMPANY. THE END AND THE MEANS OF CHRIS TIAN MISSIONS. Then Agrippa said unto Paul, Almost thou persuadest me to be a Chris tian. And Paul said, I would to God, that not only thou, but also all that hear me this day, were, both almost and altogether, such as I am, except these bonds. ' 0 ie 'AypOTTraf npbc rbv TlavXov ifyr) • 'Ev bXiyu jit nudeut, ~S.piana.vbv ysvicr&ai. '0 6i IlaiiAof elirev • Ev^aijienv av ra Oeip, nai tv bXiyu xal kv 'KoTJiip oh povov ae, d?iAa nal iravrac Toi)<; anovovrac fxov arjiiepov, ¦yeveoftai toiovtovq, dnoioc nqryu dpi, napenrbc t&v Seapuv tovtov. — Acts xxvi. 28, 29. When I preached on a like occasion last year I spoke at some length of the Prospects of Christian Missions,1 and I ventured to give seven grounds which the peculiar circumstances of our time afforded for greater confidence in the future. First, the better knowledge of the Divine nature acquired ,by the extinction of the once universal belief that all heathens were everlastingly lost ; secondly, the increased acquaintance with the heathen religions them selves ; thirdly, the instruction which Christian missionaries have gained or may gain from their actual experience in foreign parts ; fourthly, the 1 Prospects of Christian Missions, a sermon preached in West minster Abbey, on December 20, 1872. Strahan & Co., London. 6 CHRISTIAN MISSIONS. recognition of the fact that the main hindrance to the success of Christian missions arises from the vices and sins of Christendom ; fifthly, an acknowledgment of the indirect influences of Christianity through legislation and civilization ; sixthly, the recognition of the advantage of ex act, unvarnished, impartial statements of mis sionary labor ; seventhly, the testimony borne by missionary experience to the common ele ments and essential principles of the Christian religion. On these — the peculiar grounds for hope and for exertion in this our generation — I refer to the observations which I then made, and which I will not now repeat. I propose on this occasion to make a few remarks on the End and on the Means of Chris tian Missions ; remarks which must of necessity be general in their import, but which for that reason are the more suitable to be offered by one who cannot speak from personal and spe cial experience. The text is taken from a striking incident in the life of the greatest of apostolic missionaries. It was in the presence of Felix and Agrippa that Paul had poured forth those few burning utterances which to Felix seemed like madness, but which Paul himself declared to be words of truth and soberness. Then it was that the CHRISTIAN MISSIONS. 7 Jewish prince, Agrippa — far better instructed than the heathen Felix, and seeing deeper into Paul's mind than he, yet still unconvinced — broke in upon the conversation with the words which in the English translation have well nigh passed into a proverb, " Almost thou persuadest me to be a Christian." The sense which they thus give would be in itself perfectly suitable to the halting, fickle character of the Herodian family, and would accurately describe the nu merous half-converts throughout the world — " Almost," but not quite, " thou persuadest me to join the good cause." But the sense which, by the nearly universal consent of modern scholars, they really bear in the original is something still more instructive. The only meaning of which the Greek words are capable is an exclamation, half in jest and half in earn est, " It is but a very brief and simple argument that you offer to work so great a change ; " or, if we may venture to bring out the sense more fully, " So few words, and such a vast conclu sion ! " " So slight a foundation, and so gigantic a superstructure ! " " So scanty an outfit, and so perilous an enterprise ! " The speech breathes something of the spirit of Naaman, when he was told to wash in the Jordan — " Are not Abana and Pharpar better than all the waters of Israel?" It is like the complaint of the 8 CHRISTIAN MISSIONS. popular prophets in the time of Hezekiah, whose taste demanded stronger flavor than the noble simplicity of Isaiah, " Line upon line, precept upon precept." It breathes the spirit of the Ephesian Christians who, when they heard St. John's repeated maxim of "Little children, love one another," said, " Is this all that he has to tell us ? " It expresses the spirit of many an one since, who has stumbled at the threshold of the genuine Gospel — " So vague, so simple, so universal. Is this worth the sacrifice that you demand ? Give us a demonstrative argument, a vast ceremonial, a complex system, a uniform government. Nothing else will satisfy us." As Agrippa's objection, so is Paul's answer. It would have indeed borne a good sense had he meant what in our English version he is made to say, " I would that both ' almost and altogether.' Halfness or wholeness — I admire them both. Half a soul is better than none at all. To have come half way is better than never to have started at all ; but half is only good, because it leads towards the whole." Nevertheless, following the real meaning of Agrippa's remark, St. Paul's retort, in fact, bears a yet deeper significance — "I would to God, that whether by little or by much, whether by brief arguments or by long argu ments, somehow and somewhere, the change CHRISTIAN MISSIONS. 9 were wrought. The means to me are compar atively nothing, so long as the end is accom plished." It is the same spirit as that which dictated the noble expression in the Epistle to the Philippians : " Some preach Christ of envy and strife, some also of good will. The one preach Christ of contention, the other of love. What then ? notwithstanding, every way, whether in pretense or in truth, Christ is preached." 1 And then he proceeds to vindicate the end which makes him indifferent as to the means. Agrippa, in his brief taunt, had said, " Such are the arguments by which you would fain make me a Christian." It is one of the few, one of the only three, occasions on which that glorious name is used in the New Testament. It is here charged not with the venerable meaning which we now attach to it, but with the novel and degrading associations which it bore in the mouth of every Jew and every Roman at that time — of Tacitus or Josephus, no less than of Felix or Agrippa. " Is it," so the king meant to say, "is it that you think to make me a Christian, a member of that despised, heretical, innovating sect, of which the very name is a sufficient condemnation ? " It is only by bearing this in mind that we 1 Phil. i. 13-16 10 CHRISTIAN MISSIONS. see the force of St. Paul's answer. He does not insist on the word ; he does not fight even for this sacred title ; he does not take it up as a pugnacious champion might take up the glove which his adversary had thrown down ; he does not say, "I would that thou wast a Christian." In his answer he bears his testimony to one of the gravest, the most fruitful, of all theological truths — that it is not the name but the thing, not the form but the reality, on which stress must be laid ; and he gives the most lucid, heartstirring illustration of what the reality is. " I would that not only thou, but all those who hear me were — what is no am biguous catchword or byword, but — what you see before you ; I would that you all were such as I am — such as I am, upheld by the hopes filled with the affections, that sustain my charmed existence;" and then, with that- ex quisite courtesy which characterizes so many traits of the Apostle's history, glancing at the chains which bound him to the Roman guard — " ' except these bonds.' This, whether you call it Christian or not, is what I desire to see you and all the world." "You see it before you in the life, the character, the spirit, of one who knows what Christianity is, and who wishes that all his fellow-creatures should partake of the happiness that he has gained, repose on the CHRISTIAN MISSIONS. 11 same principles that give him strength." This, then, is the statement of the greatest of mis sionaries, both as to the end which he sought to attain, and the means by which he and we should seek to attain it. I. Let us first take the End : " Such as I am, except these bonds." That is the state to which St. Paul desired to bring all those who heard him. That, according to him, was the description of a Christian. No doubt if he had been pressed yet further, he would have said that he meant, "Such as Jesus Christ, my Lord." But he was satisfied with taking such a living, human, imperfect exemplification as he whom Felix and Agrippa saw in their pres ence. " Such as Paul was ; " where is no am biguous definition, no obsolete form. We know what manner of man he was, even better than Felix or Agrippa knew. Look at him with all his characteristic peculiarities ; a man passion ately devoted to his own faithful friends, and clinging to the reminiscences of his_ race and country, yet with a heart open to embrace all mankind ; a man combining the strongest con victions with an unbounded toleration of differ ences, and an unbounded confidence in turth ; a man penetrated with the freedom of the Spirit, but with a profound appreciation of the value of great existing institutions whether 12 CHRISTIAN MISSIONS. civil or religious — a thorough Roman citizen and a thorough Eastern gentleman ; a career of daring fortitude and endurance, undertaken in the strength of the persuasion that in Jesus Christ of Nazareth he had seen the highest perfection of Divine and human goodness — a Master worth living for and worth dying for, whose Spirit was to be the regenerating power of the whole world. This character, this con dition it "was to which St. Paul desired that his hearers should be brought. One only reserva tion he makes ; " except these bonds," except those limitations, those circumscriptions, those vexations, those irritations, which belonged to the suffering, toil-worn circumstances in which he was at that moment placed. Such is the aim which, following the example of their most illustrious predecessor, all mis sionaries ought to have before their eyes. To create, to preach, to exhibit those traits of character, those apostolical graces, those Divine intuitions, which even the hard Roman magis trate and the superficial Jewish prince recog nized in Paul of Tarsus. Where these are, there is Christianity. In proportion as any of these are attained, in that proportion has a human being become a Christian. Wherever and in proportion as these are not, there "the missionary's labor has failed — there the seed CHRISTIAN MISSIONS. 13 has been sown to no purpose — there the name of Christian may be, but the reality is not. This preeminence of the object of Christian missions, — namely, the formation of heroic, apostolic, and therefore Christian characters, — has a wide practical importance. In these days — when there is so much temptation to dwell on the scaffolding, the apparatus, the or ganization of religion, as though it were religion itself — it is doubly necessary to bear in mind what true Religion is, wherein lies the essential superiority of Christianity to all the other forms of religion on the surface of the earth. It is not merely the baptism of thousands of infants, such as filled a large part of the aspirations even of so great a missionary as Francis Xavier ; nor the adoption of the name of Christ, as was done on so vast a scale by the ferocious rebels of China ; nor the repetition, with ever so much accuracy, of the Christian creed, as was done by the pretended converts from Mo hammedanism or Judaism, under the terrible compulsion of the Catholic sovereigns of Spain. Nor is it the assurance, ever so frequently re peated, that we are saved ; nor is it the absolu tion, ever so solemnly pronounced by a priest ; nor is it the shedding of floods of tears ; nor is it the adoption of voluntary self-degradation or solitary seclusion. All these may be found in 14 CHRISTIAN MISSIONS. other religions in as great, or even greater force, than in Christianity. That which alone3 if anything, stamps Christianity as the supreme religion, is that its essence, its object, is in none of these things, valuable as some of them may be as signs and symptoms of the change which every mission is intended to effect. The change itself, the end itself, Christianity itself, is at once greater and simpler. It is to be such as Paul was ; it is to produce characters, which in truth fulness, in independence, in mercy, in purity, in charity, may recall something of the great Apostle, even as he recalled something of the mind which was in Christ Jesus. It was this clear vision of what he desired to see as the fruits of his teaching that made St. Paul so ready to admire whatsoever things were lovely and of good report wherever he found them. In Gentile or in Jew, in heathen or in Christian, he recognized at once the spirits kindred to his own, and welcomed them accord ingly. He felt that he could raise them yet higher; but he was eager to claim them as his brethren even from the first.1 Even in the legends which surround his history there has been preserved something of this genuine apos- 1 Acts xiv. 16, 17 ; xvii. 23, 28 ; xix. 37; xxi. 26 ; xxii. 28 ; xxv. 11. Rom. ii. 6-15; xiii. 1-7; xiv. 6. 1 Cor. ix. 20-22; xv. 33. Phil. iv. 8. CHRISTIAN MISSIONS. 15 tolic sympathy. It was a fine touch in the ancient Latin hymn which described how, when he landed at Puteoli, he 'turned aside to the hill of Pausilipo to shed a tear over the tomb of Virgil, and thought how much he might have made of that noble soul if he had found him still on earth : — " Ad Maronis mausoleum Ductus, fudit super eum Pise rorem lacrymse — Quantum, dixit, te fecissem Si te vivum invenissem, Poetarum maxime." It was this which made him cling with such affectionate interest to his converts, to his friends, to his sons, as he calls them, in Christ Jesus. All that he sought, all that he looked for in them, was that they should show in their characters the seal of the spirit that animated himself. Whether they derived this character from himself or from Apollos or Cephas he cared not to ask. He was their pupil as much as their master. He disclaimed all dominion over their independent faith ; he claimed only to be a helper in their joy. This reproduction of Paul — this reproduc tion of all that is best in ourselves or better than ourselves — in the minds and hearts of mankind, is the true work of the Christian mis sionary ; and, in order to do this, he must be 16 CHRISTIAN MISSIONS. himself that which he wishes to impress upon them in humility, goodness, courtesy, and holi ness, except only the straitening bonds which cramp or confine each separate character, na tion, and church. No disparager of Christian missions can dispute this — no champion of Christian missions need go beyond this. When, in the last century, the Danish missionary, Schwarz, was pursuing his labors at Tanjore, and the Rajah Hyder Ali desired to treat with the English Government, he said : " Do not send to me any of your agents, for I trust neither their words nor their treaties. But send to me the missionary of whose character I hear so much from every one ; him will I receive and trust." That was the electrifying, vivifying effect of the apparition of such an one as Paul — "a man who had indeed done noth ing worthy of bonds or of death " — a man in whose entire disinterestedness and in whose transparent honor the image and superscription of his Master was written so that no one could mistake it. " In every nation, he that feareth God and worketh righteousness " is the noblest work of God our Creator — the most precious result of human endeavor. If any such by mis sionary efforts, either convert or teacher, either direct or indirect, have been produced, then the prayers uttered, the labors inspired, the hopes CHRISTIAN MISSIONS. 17 expressed in these and like services have not been altogether in vain. One of the most striking facts to which our attention has been called as demanding our thankfulness on this day is the solemn testimony borne by the Gov ernment of India to the fruits of " the blame less lives and self-denying labors of their six hundred Protestant missionaries." And what are those fruits ? Not merely the adoption of this or that outward form of Christianity by this or that section of the Indian community. It is something which is in appearance less, but in reality far greater than this. It is something less like the question of Agrippa, but far more like the answer of Paul. It is that they have " infused new vigor into the stereotyped life of the vast populations placed under English rule ; " it is that they are " preparing those populations to be in every way better men and better citizens of the great Empire under which they dwell." That is a verdict on which we can rest with the assurance that it is not likely to be reversed. Individual conversions may relapse — may be accounted for by special motives ; but long-sustained, wide-reaching changes of the whole tenor and bent of a man or of a na tion are beyond suspicion. When we see the immovable and, as the official document says, u the stereotyped " forms of Indian life reani- 2 18 CHRISTIAN MISSIONS. mated with a vigor unknown to the Oriental races in earlier days, this is a regeneration as surprising as that which, to a famous missionary of the past generation, seemed as impossible as the restoration of a mummy to life — namely, the conversion of a single Brahmin. This, then, is the End of Christian missions, whether to heathens or to Christians, namely, to make better men and better citizens — to raise the whole of society by inspiring it with a higher view of duty, with a stronger sense of truth ; with a more powerful conviction that only by goodness and truth can God be ap proached or Christ be served — that God is goodness and truth, and that Christ is the Image of God, because He is goodness and truth. If this be the legitimate result of Chris tianity, no further arguments are needed to prove that it contains a light which is worth imparting, and which, whenever it is imparted, vindicates its heavenly origin and its heaven ward tendency. II. This is the End ; and now what are the Means ? They are what we might expect in the view of so great an end. Anything (so the Apostle tells us), be it small or great, short or long, scanty or ample ; the manners of a Jew for Jews, the manners of a Gentile for Gentiles, " all things for all men," 2 are worth considering, 1 1 Cor. ix. 20-22. CHRISTIAN MISSIONS. 19 if "by any of these means he might save," that is, elevate, sanctify, purify, any of those to whom he spoke. When we reflect upon the many various efforts to do good in this mani fold world — the multitude of sermons, societies, agencies, excitements, which to some seem as futile and fruitless as to others they seem pre cious and important — it is a true consolation to bear in mind the Apostle's wise and gener ous maxim, " Whether by little or by much, whether in pretense or in truth, whether of strife or of good-will, Christ is preached, and I therein do rejoice, yea, and will rejoice." It may be by a short, sudden, electric shock, or it may be by a long course of civilizing, humanizing tendencies. It may be by a single text, such as that which awoke the conscience of Augus tine ; or a single interview, like Justin's with the unknown philosopher ; or it may be by a long systematic treatise — Butler's "Analogy," or Lardner's " Credibilia," or the " Institutes" of Calvin, or the " Summa Theologise " of Aquinas. It may be by the sudden flush of victory in battle, such as convinced Clovis on the field of Tolbiac ; or the argument of a peaceful conference, such as convinced our own Ethelbert. It may be by teachers steeped in what was by half the Christian world regarded as deadly heresy, such as the Arian Bishop 20 CHRISTIAN MISSIONS. Ulfilas, by whom were converted to the faith those mighty Gothic tribes which formed the first elements of European Christendom, and whose good deeds Augustine regarded, not withstanding their errors, as the glory of the Christian name.1 It may be by teachers as immersed in strange and fanciful superstitions, now repudiated by the civilized world, as was the famous Roman Pontiff who sent the first missionaries to these shores. Sometimes the change has been effected by the sight of a single picture, as when Vladimir of Russia was shown the representation of the Last Judg ment, — sometimes by a dream or a sign, known only to those who were affected by it, such as the vision of the Cross which arrested Constantine on his way to Rome, or changed Colonel Gardiner's dissolute youth to a man hood of strict and sober piety. Sometimes it has been by the earnest preaching of mis sionaries, confessedly ill-educated and ill-pre pared for the work which they had to accom plish ; sometimes by the slow infiltration of Christian literature and Christian civilization ; 1 In the well-known passage where, speaking of their modera tion and humanity in the capture of Rome, he concludes : " Hoc Christi nomini, hoc Christiano tempori tribuendum quisquis non videt, caacus ; quisquis non laudat, ingratus ; quisquis laudanti reluctatur, ingratus est." — De Civitate Dei, i. c. 7. Compare Ibid. c. 1, and Sermon cv., De Ev. S. Luc. CHRISTIAN MISSIONS. 21 the grandeur, in old days, of Rome and Con stantinople ; in our days, the superiority of European genius, the spread of English com merce, the establishment of just laws, pure homes, merciful institutions. We do not say that all these means are equally good or equally efficacious. St. Paul, in his argument with Agrippa, did not mean to say that " almost and altogether," that " much and little," were the same ; he did not mean that it was equally good that Christ should be preached in strife or in good-will ; he did not mean that a good end justified bad means, or that we may do evil that good may come ; he did not mean to justify the falsehoods which are profanely called pious frauds, nor the persecu tions which have been set on foot by those who thought to do God service, or the attempt to stimulate artificial excitement by undermining the moral strength and manly independence of the human spirit. God forbid ! But what he meant, and what we mean with him, is this : In true Christian missions, in the conversion of human souls from dead works, from sin, from folly, from barbarism, from hardness, from self ishness, to goodness and purity, justice and truth, the field is so vast, the diversity of char acter in men and nations is so infinite, the en terprise so arduous, the aspects of Divine truth 22 CHRISTIAN MISSIONS. so various, that it is on the one hand a duty for each one to follow out that particular means of conversion which seems to him most effica cious, and on the other hand to acquiesce in the converging use ofmany means which cannot, by the nature of the case, appear equally efficacious to every one. Such a toleration, such an adop tion of the different modes of carrying on what John Bunyan called the Holy War, the Siege of Man's Soul, must indeed be always con trolled by the determination to keep the high, paramount, universal end always in view; by the vigilant endeavor to repress the exaggera tion, to denounce the follies and the falsehoods which infect even the best attempts of narrow and fallible, though good and faithful, servants of their Lord. But, if once we have this fixed in our minds, it then surely becomes a solace to remember that the soul of man is won by a thousand different approaches — that thus the instruments which often seem most unworthy may yet serve to produce a result far above themselves — that when "we have toiled all night and taken nothing " by keeping close to the shore, or by throwing out our nets always on one side, yet if we have courage " to launch out into the deep, and cast out our nets on the other side of the ship," we shall " inclose a great multitude of fishes, so that the net shall break." CHRISTIAN MISSIONS. 23 He is a traitor to the cause who exalts the means above the end, or who seeks an end alto gether different from that to which his alle giance binds him ; but he is not a traitor, but a faithful soldier, who makes the best use of all the means that are placed in his hands. Long after the imperfect instruments have perished the results will endure, and in forms wholly un like the insufficiency or the meagreness of the first propelling cause. The preaching of Henry Martyn may have been tinged by a zeal often not according to knowledge ; but the savor of his holy and self-denying life has passed like a sweet-smelling incense through the whole frame-work of Indian society. " Even," so he said himself, " if I should never see a native converted, God may design by my patience and continuance in the work to encourage future missionaries." The more profoundly we are impressed with the degradation of the heathen nations, with the corruption of the Christian churches, the more thankful should we be for any attempts, however slight and however various, to quicken the sluggish mass, and enlighten the blackness of the night, provided only that the mass is permanently quickened, and the darkness is in any measure dispelled. " I have lived too long," said Lord Macaulay on his return from India to 24 CHRISTIAN MISSIONS. England, " I have lived too long in a country where people worship cows, to think much of the differences which part Christians from Chris tians." And, in fact, as the official report to which I have referred testifies in strong terms, the presence of the great evils which Indian missionaries have to confront, has often pro duced in them a noble and truly Christian in difference to the trivial divergences between themselves. "Even a one-eyed man," says the proverb, " is a king amongst the blind." Even the shepherd's sling may perchance smite down the Goliath of Gath. The rough sledge-hammer of a rustic preacher may strike home, where the most polished scholar would plead in vain. The calm judgment of the wise and good, or the silent example, or the understanding sym pathy, or the wide survey of the whole field of the religions of mankind, may awaken con victions which all the declamations of all the churches would fail to arouse. The misery of the war on the coast of Africa, the terrible prospect of the Indian famine, may furnish the very opening which we most desire. They may be the very touchstones by which these suffering heathens will test the practical efficiency of a Christian government and a Christian nation, of Christian missionaries and Christian people, and, having so tested it, will judge. CHRISTIAN MISSIONS. 25 When the first Napoleon suddenly found himself among the quicksands of the Red Sea, he ordered his generals to ride out in so many opposite directions, and the first who arrived on firm ground to call on the rest to follow. This is what we may ask of all the various schemes and agencies — all the various in quiries after truth now at work in all the dif ferent branches and classes of Christendom — " Ride out amongst those quicksands ! Ride out in the most opposite directions, and let him that first finds solid ground call out to us ! It may perchance be the very ground in the midst of this quaking morass where we shall be able to stand firm and move the world." There is one special variety of means which I would venture to name in conclusion. Ever since the close of the Apostolic age there have been two separate agencies in the Christian Church by which the work of conversion has been carried on. The chief, the recognized, the ordinary agency has been that of the clergy. Every pastor, every presbyter, every bishop in the Church of the Roman Empire, and again in the beginning of Christian Europe was, in the strict sense of the word, a missionary ; and al though their functions have in these latter days been for the most part best fulfilled by follow ing their stationary, fixed, pastoral charges, yet 26 CHRISTIAN MISSIONS. it is still from their ranks in all the different churches that the noble army of missionaries and martyrs in foreign lands has been, and is, and must be recruited. Most unwise and un worthy would be any word which should under rate the importance of this mighty element in the work of renewing the face of the earth. But there has always been recognized, more or less distinctly, the agency of Christian laymen in this same work of evangelization. Not only in that more general sense in which I have already indicated the effect of the laws, and literature, and influence of Christian Europe — not only in that unquestionable sense in which the best of all missionaries is a high- minded governor, or an upright magistrate,, or a devout and pure-minded soldier, who is al ways " trusting in God and doing his duty ; " not only in these senses do we look for the co operation of laymen, but also in the more direct forms of instruction, of intelligent and far-seeing interest in labors, which, though carried on mainly by the clergy, must, if they are to be good for anything, concern all mankind alike. In the early centuries of Christianity the aid of laymen was freely invoked and freely given in this great cause. Such was Origen, the most learned and the most gifted of the Fathers, who preached as a layman in the presence of pres- CHRISTIAN MISSIONS. 27 byters and bishops. Such was one of the first evangelizers of India, Pantsenus ; such was the hermit Telemachus, whose earnest protest, aided by his heroic death, extinguished at Rome the horrors of the gladiatorial games ; such was Antony, the mighty preacher in the wilds of the Thebaid and the streets of Alexandria; such, in later days, was Francis of Assisi, when first he began his career as the most famous preacher of the Middle Ages ; such, just before the Reformation, was our own Sir Thomas More.1 In these instances, as in many others, the influence, the learning, the zeal of laymen was directly imported into the work of Chris tianizing the nations of Europe. It is for this reason that we, in our age also, so far as the law and order of our churches permit, have fre quently received the assistance of laymen ; who, by the weight of their character or their knowledge, can render a fresh testimony, or throw a fresh light on subjects where we, the clergy, should perhaps be heard less willingly. As their voices have been raised on this sacred subject of missions in many a humbe parish 1 " Sir Thomas More after he was called to the Bar in Lin coln's Inn did, for a considerable time, read a public lecture out of St. Augustine De Civitate Dei, in the Church of St. Law rence in the Old Jewry, to which the learneder sort of the City of London did resort." — Wood's A thence Oxonienses, fol. ed. 1721, pp. 182, 183. 28 CHRISTIAN MISSIONS. church ; as also on other sacred topics, such as Christian art and history, their words have often been heard within the consecrated walls of this and other great abbeys and cathedrals, — so we shall have the privilege of listening this evening in the nave of this church to a scholar renowned throughout the world, whose knowl edge of all heathen religions in connection with the experience of Christian missions probably exceeds that of any other single person in Europe — in the hope that a more systematic form may thus be given to our knowledge, and a more concentrated direction to our zeal. I conclude by once more applying the Apos tle's words to the Means and the End of Chris tian missions. We would to God that whether by little or by much, whether by sudden stroke or by elaborate reasoning, whether in a brief moment or by long process of years, whether by the fervor of active clergy, or by the learn ing of impartial laymen, whether by illiterate simplicity or by wide philosophy — not only those who hear me, but all on whom the ser vices of this day, far and near, have any influ ence, may become, at least in some degree, such as was Paul the Apostle, such as have been the wisest and best of Christian missionaries, except only those bonds which belong to time and place, not to the Eternal Spirit and the CHRISTIAN MISSIONS. 29 Everlasting Gospel of Jesus Christ. We can not wish a better wish or pray a better prayer to God on this day than that amongst the mis sionaries who teach, amongst the heathens who hear, there should be raised up men who should exhibit that type of Christian truth and of Christian life which was seen by Felix and Agrippa in Paul of Tarsus. May the Giver of all good gifts give to us some portion of his cheerful and manly faith, of his fearless energy, of his horror of narrowness and superstition, of his love for God and for mankind, of his ab solute faith in the triumph of his Redeemer's cause. May God our Father waken in us the sense that we are all his children ; may the whole earth become more and more one fold under one Good Shepherd, Jesus Christ his Son ; may the Holy Spirit " Our souls inspire, And lighten with celestial fire." LECTURE ON MISSIONS, DELIVERED IN THE NAVE OF WESTMINSTER ABBEY, ON THE Evening of December 3, 1873, BY PROFESSOR MAX MULLER. LECTURE ON MISSIONS. The number of religions which have attained stability and permanence in the history Number or of the world is very small. If we leave ite%S. out of consideration those vague and varying forms of faith and worship which we find among uncivilized and unsettled races, among races ignorant of reading and writing, who have neither a literature, nor laws, nor even hymns and prayers handed down by oral teaching from father to son, from mother to daughter, we see that the number of the real historical religions of mankind amounts to no more than eight. The Semitic races have produced three : the Jewish, the Christian, the Mohammedan ; the Aryan, or Indo-European races, an equal num ber : the Brahman, the Buddhist, and the Parsi. Add to these the two religious systems of China, that of Confucius and Lao-tse, and you have before you what may be called the eight distinct languages or utterances of the faith of mankind from the beginning of the world to 34 LECTURE ON MISSIONS. the present day ; you have before you in broad outlines the religious map of the whole world. All these religions, however, have a history, comparative a history more deeply interesting than "felons? the history of language, of literature, of art, or politics. Religions are not unchange able ; on the contrary, they are always growing and changing ; and if they cease to grow and cease to change, they cease to live. Some of these religions stand by themselves, totally in dependent of all the rest; others are closely united, or have influenced each other during various stages of their growth and decay. They must therefore be studied together, if we wish to understand their real character, their growth, their decay, and their resuscita tions. Thus, Mohammedanism would be unin telligible without Christianity ; Christianity without Judaism : and there are similar bonds that hold together the great religions of India and Persia — the faith of the Brahman, the Buddhist, and the Parsi. After a careful study of the origin and growth of these religions, and after a critical examination of the sacred books on which all of them profess to be founded, it has become possible to subject them all to a scientific classification, in the same manner as languages, apparently unconnected and mutu ally unintelligible, have been scientifically ar- LECTURE ON MISSIONS. 35 ranged and classified ; and by a comparison of those points which all or some of them share in common, as well as by a determination of those which are peculiar to each, a new science has been called into life, a science which con cerns us all, and in which all who truly care for religion must sooner or later take their part — the Science of Religion. Among the various classifications x which have been applied to the religions of 1 L ° Missionary the world, there is one that interests mitw^iy us more immediately to-night, I mean e'SI0Q8' the division into 'Non-Missionary and Missionary religions. This is by no means, as might be supposed, a classification based on an unim portant or merely accidental characteristic ; on the contrary, it rests on what is the very heart-blood in every system of human faith. Among the six religions of the Aryan and Semitic world, there are three that are op posed to all Missionary enterprise — Judaism, Brahmanism, and Zoroastrianism • and three that have a Missionary character from their very beginning — Buddhism, Mohammedanism, and Christianity. The Jews, particularly in ancient times, never thought of spreading their religion. Judaism. Their religion was to them a treasure, a privi lege, a blessing, something to distinguish them, 36 LECTURE ON MISSIONS. as the chosen people of God, from all the rest of the world. A Jew must be of the seed of Abraham : and when in later times, owing chiefly to political circumstances, the Jews had to admit strangers to some of the privileges of their theocracy, they looked upon them, not as souls that had been gained, saved, born again into a new brotherhood, but as strangers (cna), as Proselytes (t/ooo-jjWoi); which means men who have come to them as aliens, not to be trusted, as their saying was, until the twenty-fourth generation.2 A very similar feeling prevented the Brah- Brahman- mans from ever attempting to prosely- isin' tize those who did not by birth belong to the spiritual aristocracy of their country. Their wish was rather to keep the light to themselves, to repel intruders ; they went so far as to punish those who happened to be near enough to hear even the sound of their prayers, or to witness their sacrifices.3 The Parsi, too, does not wish for converts to his religion ; he is proud of his faith, as of his blood; and though he believes in the final victory of truth and light, though he says to every man, ' Be bright as the sun, pure as the moon,' he himself does very little to drive away spiritual darkness from the face of the earth, by letting the light that is within him shine before the world. Zoroastri- anism. LECTURE ON MISSIONS. 37 But now let us look at the other cluster of religions, at Buddhism, Mohammedanism^ Missiona and Christianity. However they may EeUs'onB- differ from each other in some of their most essential doctrines, this they share in common — they all have faith in themselves, they all have life and vigor, they want to convince, they mean to conquer. Prom the very earliest dawn of their existence these three religions were missionary : their very founders, or their first apostles, recognized the new duty of spreading the truth, of refuting error, of bringing the whole world to acknowledge the paramount, if not the divine, authority of their doctrines. That is what gives to them all a common ex pression, and lifts them high above the level of the other religions of the world. Let us begin with Buddhism. We know, in deed, very little of its origin and ear- Buddhism. nest growth, for the earliest beginnings of all religions withdraw themselves by necessity from the eye of the historian. But we have something like contemporary evidence of the Great Council, held at Pataliputra, 246 b. c, in which the sacred canon of the Buddhist scrip tures was settled, and at the end of which mis sionaries were chosen and sent forth to preach the new doctrine, not only in India, but far be yond the frontiers of that vast country.4 We 38 LECTURE ON MISSIONS. possess inscriptions containing the edicts of the king who was to Buddhism what Constantine was to Christianity, who broke with the tradi tions of the old religion of the Brahmans, and recognized the doctrines of Buddha as the state religion of India. We possess the description of that Buddhist Council, which was to India what the Council of Nicaea, 570 years later, was to Europe ; and we can still read there 5 the simple story, how the chief Elder who had presided over the Council, an old man, too weak to travel by land, and carried from his hermitage to the Council in a boat — how that man, when the Council was over, began to re flect on the future, and found that the time had come to establish the religion of Buddha in foreign countries. He therefore dispatched some of the most eminent priests to Cashmere, Cabul, and farther west, to the colonies founded by the Greeks in Bactria, to Alexandria on the Caucasus, and other cities. He sent others northward to Nepaul, and to the inhabited por tions of the Himalayan mountains. Another mission proceeded to the Dekhan, to the peo ple of Mysore, to the Mahrattas, perhaps to Goa; nay, even Birma and Ceylon are men tioned as among the earliest missionary stations of Buddhist priests. We still possess accounts of their manner of preaching. When threat- LECTURE ON MISSIONS. 39 ened by infuriated crowds, one of those Bud dhist missionaries said calmly, "Even if the gods were united with men, they would not frighten me away." And when he had brought the peo ple to listen, he dismissed them with the simple prayer, " Do not hereafter give way to pride and anger ; care for the happiness of all living beings, and abstain from violence. Extend your good-will to all mankind ; let there be peace among the dwellers on earth." No doubt, the accounts of the successes achieved by those early missionaries are exag gerated, and their fights with snakes and drag ons and evil spirits remind us sometimes of the legendary accounts of the achievements of such men as St. Patrick in Ireland, or St. Boniface in Germany. But the fact that missionaries were sent out to convert the world seems beyond the reach of doubt ; 6 and this fact represents to us at that time a new thought, new, not only in the history of India, but in the history of the whole world. The recognition of a duty to preach the truth to every man, woman, and child, was an idea opposed to the deepest in stincts of Brahmanism ; and when, at the end of the chapter on the first missions, we read the simple words of the old chronicler, " Who would demur, if the salvation of the world is at stake ? " we feel at once that we move in a new 40 LECTURE ON MISSIONS. world, we see the dawn of a new day, the open ing of vaster horizons — we feel, for the first time in the history of the world, the beating of the great heart of humanity. The Koran breathes a different spirit ; it does Mohamme- n°t mvite, it rather compels the world 1 u to come in. Yet there are passages, particularly in the earlier portions, which show that Mohammed, too, had realized the idea of humanity, and of a religion of humanity ; nay, that at first he wished to unite his own relig ion with that of the Jews and Christians, com prehending all under the common name of Islam. Islam meant originally humility or de votion; and all who humbled themselves be fore God, and were filled with real revernece, were called Moslim. " The Islam," says Mo hammed, " is the true worship of God. When men dispute with you, say, ' I am a Moslim.' Ask those who have sacred books, and ask the heathen : ' Are you Moslim ? ' If they are, they are on the right path ; but if they turn away, then you have no other task but to de liver the message, to preach to them the Islam." 6 As to our own religion, its very soul is mis- cnristianity. sionary, progressive, world-embracing ; it would cease to exist if it ceased to be mis sionary — if it disregarded the parting words LECTURE ON MISSIONS. »41 of its Pounder : " Go ye therefore and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost ; teaching them to observe all things I have commanded; and, lo, I am with you alway, even unto the end of the world." It is this missionary character, peculiar to these three religions, Buddhism, Mohammedan ism, and Christianity, which binds them to gether, and lifts them to a higher sphere. Their differences, no doubt, are great ; on some points they are opposed to each other like day and night. But they could not be what they are, they could not have achieved what they have achieved, unless the spirit of truth and the spirit of love had been alive in the hearts of their founders, their first messengers, and missionaries. The spirit of truth is the life-spring of all religion, and where it exists it must The spirit manifest itself, it must plead, it must persuade, it must convince and convert. Mis sionary work, however, in the usual sense of the word, is only one manifestation of that spirit ; for the same spirit which fills the heart of the missionary with daring abroad, gives courage also to the preacher at home, bearing witness to the truth that is within him. The religions which can boast of missionaries who 42 LECTURE ON MISSIONS. left the old home of their childhood, and parted with parents and friends — never to meet again in this life — who went into the wilder ness, willing to spend a life of toil among strangers, ready, if need be, to lay down their life as witnesses to the truth, as martyrs for the glory of God — the same religions are rich also in those honest and intrepid inquirers who, at the bidding of the same spirit of truth, were ready to leave behind them the cherished creed of their childhood, to separate from the friends they loved best, to stand alone among men that shrug their shoulders, and ask " What is truth ? " and to bear in silence a martyrdom more galling often than death itself. There are men who say that, if they held the whole truth in their hand, they would not open one finger. Such men know little of the working of the spirit of truth, of the true missionary spirit. As long as there is doubt and darkness and anxiety in the soul of an inquirer, reti cence may be his natural attitude. But when once doubt has yielded to certainty, darkness to light, anxiety to joy, the rays of truth will burst forth ; and to close our hand or to shut our lips, would be as impossible as for the petals of a flower to shut themselves against the summons of the sun of spring. What is there in this short life that should LECTURE ON MISSIONS. 43 seal our lips ? What should we wait for, if we are not to speak here and now ? There is mis sionary work at home as much as abroad; there are thousands waiting to listen, if one man will but speak the truth, and nothing but the truth ; there are thousands starving, be cause they cannot find that food which is con venient for them. And even if the spirit of truth might be chained down by fear or prudence, the The s Mtof spirit of love would never yield. Once l0Te' recognize the common brotherhood of man kind, not as a name or a theory, but as a real bond, as a bond more binding, more lasting than the bonds of family, caste, and race, and the questions, Why should I open my hand ? Why should I open my heart ? Why should I speak to my brother ? will never be asked again. Is it not far better to speak than to walk through life silent, unknown, unknowing ? Has any one of us ever spoken to his friend, and opened to him his inmost soul, and been answered with harshness or repelled with scorn ? Has any one of us, be he priest or layman, ever listened to the honest question ings of a truth-loving soul, without feeling his own soul filled with love ? aye, without feeling humbled by the very honesty of a brother's confession ? 44 LECTURE ON MISSIONS. If we would but confess, friend to friend, if we would be but honest, man to man, we should not want confessors or confessionals. If our doubts and difficulties are self-made, if they can be removed by wiser and better men, why not give to our brother the oppor tunity of helping us ? But if our difficulties are not self-made, if they are not due either to ignorance or presumption, is it not even then better for us to know that we are all carrying the same burden, the common burden of hu manity, if haply we may find, that for the heavy laden there is but one who can give them rest. There may be times when silence is gold, and speech silver : but there are times also when silence is death, and speech is life — the very life of Pentecost. How can man be afraid of man ? How can we be afraid of those whom we love ? Are the young afraid of the old ? But noth ing delights the older man more than to see that he is trusted by the young, and that they believe he will tell them the truth. Are the old afraid of the young ? But noth ing sustains the young more than to know that they do not stand alone in their troubles, and that in many trials of the soul the father is as helpless as the child. LECTURE ON MISSIONS. 45 Are women afraid of men ? But men are not wiser in the things appertaining to God than -women, and real love of God is theirs far more than ours. Are men afraid of women ? But though women may hide their troubles more carefully, their heart aches as much as ours, when they whisper to themselves, " Lord, I believe, help thou my unbelief." Are the laity afraid of the clergy? But where is the clergyman who would not respect honest doubt more than unquestioning faith ? Are the clergy afraid of the laity ? But surely we know in this place that the clear voice of honesty and humility draws more hearts than the harsh accents of dogmatic as surance or ecclesiastic exclusiveness. A missionary must know no fear ; his heart must overflow with love — love of man, love of truth, love of God ; and in this, the highest and truest sense of the word, every Christian is, or ought to be, a missionary. And now, let us look again at the religions in which the missionary spirit has been at The fate of T . .. non-mission- WOrk, and compare them with those in aryreugions. which any attempt to convince others by argu ment, to save souls, to bear witness to the truth, is treated with pity or scorn. The former are alive, the latter are dying or dead. 46 LECTURE ON MISSIONS. The religion of Zoroaster, — the religion of zoroastri- Cyrus, of Darius and Xerxes, — which, anism' but for the battles of Marathon and of Salamis, might have become the religion of the civilized world, is now professed by only 100,000 souls — that is, by about a ten-thou sandth part of the inhabitants of the world. During the last two centuries their number has steadily decreased from four to one hundred thousand, and another century will probably exhaust what is still left of the worshippers of the Wise Spirit, Ahuramazda. The Jews are about thirty times the number Judaism. of the Parsis, and they therefore rep resent a more appreciable portion of mankind. Though it is not likely that they will ever in crease in number, yet such is their physical vigor and their intellectual tenacity, such also their pride of race and their faith in Jehovah, that we can hardly imagine that their patri archal religion and their ancient customs will soon vanish from the face of the earth. But though the religions of the Parsis and Jews might justly seem to have paid the penalty of their anti-missionary spirit, how, it will be said, can the same be maintained with regard to the religion of the Brahmans ? That religion is still professed by at least 110,000,000 of human souls, and, to Brahman- ism. LECTURE ON MISSIONS. 47 judge from the last census, even that enormous number falls much short of the real truth. And yet I do not shrink from saying that their reli gion is dying or dead. And why ? Because it cannot stand the light of day. The worship of Siva, of Vishnu, and the other popular deities, is of the same, nay, in many cases of a more de graded and savage character than the worship of Jupiter, Apollo, and Minerva ; it belongs to a stratum of thought which is long buried be neath our feet ; it may live on, like the lion and the tiger, but the mere air of free thought and civilized life will extinguish it. A religion may linger on for a long time, it may be ac cepted by the large masses of the people, be cause it is there, and there is nothing better. But when a religion has ceased, to produce de fenders of the faith, prophets, champions, mar tyrs, it has ceased to live ; and in this sense Brahmanism has ceased to live for more than a thousand years. It is true there are millions of children, women, and men in India who fall down before the stone image of Vishnu, with his four arms, riding on a creature half bird, half man, or sleeping on the serpent ; who worship Siva, a monster with three eyes, riding naked on a bull, with a necklace of skulls for his ornament. There are human beings who still believe in a 48 - LECTURE ON MISSIONS. god of war, Kartikeya, with six faces, riding on a peacock, and holding bow and arrow in his hands ; and who invoke a god of success, Gan- esa, with four hands and an elephant's head, sitting on a rat. Nay, it is true that, in the broad daylight of the nineteenth century, the figure of the goddess Kali is carried through the streets of her own city, Calcutta,8 her wild disheveled hair reaching to her feet, with a necklace of human heads, her tongue protruded from her mouth, her girdle stained with blood. All this is true ; but ask any Hindu who can read and write and think, whether these are the gods he believes in, and he will smile at your credulity. How long this living death of national religion in India may last, no one can tell : for our purposes, however, for gaining an idea of the issue of the great religious struggle of the future, that religion too is dead and gone. The three religions which are alive, and be- The three tween which the decisive battle for the HviDg re- . . jugions. dominion of the world will have to be fought, are the three missionary religions, Bud dhism, Mohammedanism, and Christianity. Though religious statistics are perhaps the most uncer tain of all, yet it is well to have a general con ception of the forces of our enemies ; and it is well to know that, though the number of Chris- LECTURE ON MISSIONS. 49 tians is double the number of Mohammedans, the Buddhist religion still occupies the first place in the religious census of mankind.9 Buddhism rules supreme in Central, North ern, Eastern, and Southern Asia, and it grad ually absorbs whatever there is left of aborig inal heathenism in that vast and populous area. Mohammedanism claims as its own Arabia, Persia, great parts of India, Asia Minor, Turkey, and Egypt; and its greatest conquests by mis sionary efforts are made among the heathen population of Africa. Christianity reigns in Europe and America, and it is conquering the native races of Poly nesia and Melanesia, while its missionary out posts are scattered all over the world. Between these three powers, then, the re ligious battle of the future, the Holy War of mankind will have to be fought, and is being fought at the present moment, though appar- ' ently with little effect. To convert a Moham medan is difficult ; to convert a Buddhist, more difficult still; to convert a Christian, let us hope, well nigh impossible. What then, it may be asked, is the use of missionaries ? Why should we spend 01?je?tg of millions on foreign missions, when mM910nB- there are children in our cities who are allowed to grow up in ignorance ? Why should we de- 50 LECTURE ON MISSIONS. prive ourselves of some of the noblest, boldest, most ardent and devoted spirits and send them into the wilderness, while so many laborers are wanted in the vineyard at home ? It is right to ask these questions ; and we ought not to blame those political economists who tell us that every convert costs us £200, and that at the present rate of progress it would take more than 200,000 years to evangelize the world. There is nothing at all startling in these figures. Every child born in Europe is as much a heathen as the child of a Melanesian cannibal; and it costs us more than £200 to turn a child into a Christian man. The other calculation is totally erroneous, for an intellect ual harvest must not be calculated by adding simply grain to grain, but by counting each grain as a living seed, that will bring forth fruit a hundred and a thousand fold. If we want to know what work there is for patemai the missionary to do, what results we may expect from it, we must distin- ish between two kinds of work : the one is parental, the other controversial. Among unciv ilized races the work of the missionary is the work of a parent ; whether his pupils are young in years or old, he has to treat them with a parent's love, to teach them with a parent's au thority ; he has to win them, not to argue with missions. LECTURE ON MISSIONS. 51 them. I know this kind of missionary work is often despised ; it is called mere religious kid napping ; and it is said that missionary success obtained by such means proves nothing for the truth of Christianity; that the child handed over to a Mohammedan would grow up a Mo hammedan, as much as a child taken by a Christian missionary becomes a Christian. All this is true; missionary success obtained by such means proves nothing for the truth of our Creeds : but it proves, what is far more impor tant, it proves Christian love. Read only the "Life of Patteson," the Bishop of Melanesia; follow him in his vessel, sailing from island to island, begging for children, carrying them off as a mother her new-born child, nursing them, washing and combing them, clothing them, feeding them, teaching them in his Episcopal Palace, in which he himself is everything, nurse and -housemaid, and cook, school-master, physi cian, and Bishop — read there, how that man who tore himself away from his aged father from his friends, from his favorite studies arid pursuits, had the most loving of hearts for these children, how indignantly he repelled for them the name of savages, how he trusted them, re spected them, honored them, and when they were formed and established, took them back to their island homes, there to be a leaven for 52 LECTURE ON MISSIONS. future ages. Yes, read the life, the work, the death of that man, a death in very truth, a ran som for the sins of others — and then say whether you would like to suppress a profession that can call forth such self-denial, such heroism, such sanctity, such love. It has been my priv ilege to have known some of the finest and noblest spirits which England has produced during this century, but there is none to whose memory I look up with greater reverence, none by whose friendship I feel more deeply humbled than by that of that true saint, that true mar tyr, that truly parental missionary. The work of the parental missionary is clear, and its success undeniable, not only in Poly nesia and Melanesia, but in many parts of India (think only of the bright light of Tin- nevelly), in Africa, in China, in America, in Syria, in Turkey, aye, in the very heart of Lon don. The case is different with the controversial . , missionary, who has to attack the faith Controversial •/ ' missions. 0£ men bought Up [Q other religions, in religions which contain much truth, though mixed up with much error. Here the difficul ties are immense, the results very discouraging. Nor need we wonder at this. We know, each of us, but too well, how little argument avails in theological discussion ; how often it produces LECTURE ON MISSIONS. 53 the very opposite result of what we expected ; confirming rather than shaking opinions no less erroneous, no less indefensible, than many ar ticles of the Mohammedan or Buddhist faith. And even when argument proves successful, when it forces a verdict from an unwilling judge, how often has the result been disap pointing ; because in tearing up the rotten stem on which the tree rested, its tenderest fibres have been injured, its roots unsettled, its life destroyed. We have little ground to expect that these controversial weapons will carry the day in the struggle between the three great religions of the world. But there is a third kind of missionary ac tivity, which has produced the most indirect in- important results, and through which Christianity. alone, I believe, the final victory will be gained. Whenever two religions are brought into con tact, when members of each live together in peace, abstaining from all direct attempts at conversion, whether by force or by argument, though conscious all the time of the fact that they and their religion are on their trial, that they are being watched, that they are respon sible for all they say and do — the effect has always been the greatest blessing to both. It calls out all the best elements in each, and at 54 LECTURE ON MISSIONS. the same time keeps under all that is felt to be of doubtful value, of uncertain truth. When ever this has happened in the history of the world, it has generally led ^either to the reform of both systems, or to the foundation of a new religion. When after the conquest of India the vio- . lent measures for the conversion of Influence of Smmoned" the Hindus to Mohammedanism had Brahmanism. t i -\t l i it-»i ceased, and Mohammedans and Brah mans lived together in the enjoyment of per fect equality, the result was a purified Moham medanism, and a purified Brahmanism.10 The worshippers of Vishnu, Siva, and other deities became ashamed of these mythological gods ; and were led to admit that there was, either over and above these individual deities, or in stead of them, a higher divine power (the Para-Brahma), the true source of all being, the only and almighty ruler of the world. That religious movement assumed its most important development at the beginning of the twelfth century, when Ramanuga founded the reformed sect of the worshippers of Vishnu ; and again, in the fourteenth century, when his fifth suc cessor, Ramananda, imparted a still more liberal character to that powerful sect. Not only did he abolish many of the restrictions of caste, many of the minute ceremonial observances in LECTURE ON MISSIONS. 55 eating, drinking, and bathing, but he replaced the classical Sanskrit — which was unintelligible to the large masses of the people — by the liv ing vernaculars, in which he preached a purer worship of God. The most remarkable man of that time was a weaver, the pupil of Ramananda, known ¦ Kabir. by the name of Kabir. He indeed deserved the name which the members of the reformed sect claimed for themselves, Avadhuta, which means one who has shaken off the dust of su perstition. He broke entirely with the popular mythology and the customs of the ceremonial law, and addressed himself alike to Hindu and Mohammedan. According to him, there is but one God, the creator of the world, without beginning and end, of inconceivable purity, and irresistible strength. The pure man is the image of God, and after death attains commu nity with God. The commandments of Kabir are few : Not to injure anything that has life, for life is of God ; to speak the truth ; to keep aloof from the world ; to obey the teacher. His poetry is most beautiful, hardly surpassed in any other language. Still more important in the history of India was the reform of Nanak, the founder Nanaki of the Sikh religion. He, too, worked SSa5.rf entirely in the spirit of Kabir. Both 56 LECTURE ON MISSIONS. labored to persuade the Hindus and Moham medans that the truly essential parts of their creeds were the same, that they ought to discard the varieties of practical detail, and the cor ruptions of their teachers, for the worship of the One Only Supreme, whether he was termed Allah or Vishnu. The effect of these religious reforms has been highly beneficial; it has cut into the very roots of idolatry, and has spread throughout India an intelligent and spiritual worship, which may at any time develop into a higher national creed. The same effect which Mohammedanism pro duced on Hinduism is now being pro- influence ° * ity^S- duced in a much higher degree on the religious mind of India by the mere presence of Christianity. That silent influence began to tell many years ago, even at a time when no missionaries were- allowed within the territory of the old East India Corn- Ram Mohun •> the^hma- Pany- ^s first representative was Ram samaj. jy[0hun Roy, born just one hundred years ago, in 1772, who died at Bristol in 1833, the founder of the Brahma-Samaj. A man so highly cultivated and so highly religious as he was, could not but feel humiliated at the spec tacle which the popular religion of his country presented to his English friends. He drew their attention to the fact that there was a LECTURE ON MISSIONS. 57 purer religion to be found in the old sacred writings of his people, the Vedas. He went so far as to claim for the Vedas a divine origin, and to attempt the foundation of a reformed faith on their authority. In this attempt he failed. No doubt the Vedas and other works of the ancient poets and prophets of India T . „. x J- J- Inspiration contain treasures of truth, which ought oftlieTeda8- never to be forgotten, least of all by the sons of India. The late good Bishop Cotton, in his address to the students of a missionary institu tion at Calcutta, advised them to use a certain hymn of the Rig- Veda in their daily prayers.11 Nowhere do we find stronger arguments against idolatry, nowhere has the unity of the Deity been upheld more strenuously against the errors of polytheism than by some of the ancient sages of India. Even in the oldest of their sacred books, the Rig- Veda, composed three or four thousand years 'ago — where we find hymns addressed to the different deities of the sky, the air, the earth, the rivers — the protest of the human heart against many gods, breaks forth from time to time with no uncer tain sound. One poet, after he has asked to whom sacrifice is due, answers, " to Him who is God above all gods." 12 Another poet, after enumerating the names of many deities, affirms, without hesitation, that " these are all but names 58 LECTURE ON MISSIONS. of Him who is One." And even when single deities are invoked, it is not difficult to see that, in the mind of the poet, each one of the names is meant to express the highest conception of deity of which the human mind was then capable. The god of the sky is called Father and Mother and Friend ; he is the Creator, the Upholder of the Universe ; he rewards virtue and punishes sin ; he listens to the prayers of those who love him. But granting all this, we may well understand why an attempt to claim for these books a divine origin, and thus to make them an artifi cial foundation for a new religion, failed. The successor of Ram Mohun Roy, the present head of the Brahma-Samaj, the wise and excellent Debendranath Tagore, was for a time even more decided in holding to the Vedas as the Deben- sole foundation of the new faith. But dranath - Tagore. this could not last. As soon as the true character of the Vedas,13 which but few people in India can understand, became known, partly through the efforts of native, partly of European scholars, the Indian reformers re linquished the claim of divine inspiration in favor of their Vedas, and were satisfied with a selection of passages from the works of the ancient sages of India, to express and embody the creed which the members of the Brahma- Samaj hold in common.14 LECTURE ON MISSIONS. 59 The work which these religious reformers have been doing in India is excellent, and those only who know what it is, in religious matters, to break with the past, to forsake the established custom of a nation, to oppose the rush of public opinion, to brave adverse criticism, to submit to social persecution, can form any idea of what those men have suffered, in bearing wit ness to the truth that was within them. They could not reckon on any sympathy on the part of Christian Missionaries ; nor schism in j . -. -. . - . the Brahma- aia their work attract much attention Sam5j- in Europe till very lately, when a schism broke out in the Brahma-Samaj between the old con servative party and a new party, led by Keshub Chunder Sen. The former, though wil- Keshub t -i -n i t Chunder img to surrender all that was clearly s™. idolatrous in the ancient religion and customs of India, wished to retain all that might safely be retained : it did not wish to see the religion of India denationalized. The other party, in spired and led by Keshub Chunder Sen, went further in their zeal for religious purity. All that smacked of the old leaven was to be sur rendered ; not only caste, but even that sacred cord — the religious riband which makes and marks the Brahman, which is to remind him at every moment of his life, and whatever work he may be engaged in, of his God, of his ancestors, 60 LECTURE ON MISSIONS. and of his children — even that was to be aban doned; and instead of founding their creed exclusively on the utterances of the ancient sages of their own country, all that was best in the sacred books of the whole world, was se lected and formed into a new sacred Code. The schism between these two parties is deeply to be deplored; but it is a sign of life. It augurs success rather than failure for the future. It is the same schism which St. Paul had to heal in the Church of Corinth, and he healed it with the words, so often misunder stood, "Knowledge puffeth up, but charity edifieth." In the eyes of our missionaries this religious Relation reform in India has not found much of Mission- „ _ nil" aries to the tavor : nor need we wonder at this. Brahma-Samaj. Their object is to transplant, if possible, Christianity in its full integrity from England to India, as we might wish to transplant a full- grown tree. They do not deny the moral worth, the noble aspirations, the self-sacrificing zeal of these native reformers ; but they fear that all this will but increase their dangerous influence, and retard the progress of Christian ity, by drawing some of the best minds of India, that might have been gained over to our religion, into a different current. They feel towards Keshub Chunder Sen as Athanasius might have LECTURE ON MISSIONS. 61 felt towards Ulfilas, the Arian Bishop of the Goths : and yet, what would have become of Christianity in Europe but for those Gothic races, but for those Arian heretics, who were considered more dangerous than downright pagans ? If we think of the future of India, and of the influence which that country has al- „ ,. * Brahma- ways exercised on the East, the move- £3^ t0 i t. t • n t . i a new creed. ment ot religious reform which is now going on, appears to my mind the most mo mentous in this momentous century. If our mis sionaries feel constrained to repudiate it as their own work, history will be more just to them than they themselves.15 And if not as the work of Christian missionaries, it will be recognized hereafter as the work of those missionary Chris tians who have lived in India, as examples of a true Christian life, who have approached the na tives in a truly missionary spirit, in the spirit of truth and in the spirit of love ; whose bright presence has thawed the ice, and brought out beneath it the old soil, ready to blossom into new life. These Indian puritans are not against us ; for all the highest purposes of life they are with us, and we, I trust, with them. What would the early Christians have said to men, outside the pale of Christianity^ who spoke of Christ and his doctrine as some of these Indian 62 LECTURE ON MISSIONS. reformers ? Would they have said to them, "Unless you speak our language and think our thoughts, unless you respect our Creed and sign our Articles, we can have nothing in common with you." O that Christians, and particularly missiona- „. . ries, would lay to heart the words of a Missionaries 7 J "* "quletoo missionary Bishop ! 16 "I have for years thought," writes Bishop Patteson, " that we seek in our Missions a great deal too much to make English Christians. . . . Evi dently the heathen man is not treated fairly, if we encumber our message with unnecessary requirements. The ancient Church had its ' selection of fundamentals.' . . . Any one can see what mistakes we have made in India. . . . Few men think themselves into the state of the Eastern mind. . . . We seek to denational ize these races, as far as I can see ; whereas we ought surely to change as little as possible — only what is clearly incompatible with the simplest form of Christian teaching and prac tice. I do not mean that we are to compro mise truth .... but do we not overlay it a good deal with human traditions ! " Bisho Pat- If we had many such missionaries as HtL Bishop Patteson and Bishop Cotton, if Christianity were not only preached, but lived in that spirit, it would then prove LECTURE ON MISSIONS. 63 itself what it is — the religion of humanity at large, large enough itself to take in all shades and diversities of character and race. And more than that — if this true missionary spirit, this spirit of truth and love, of forbear ance, of trust, of toleration, of humility, were once to kindle the hearts of all those chivalrous ambassadors of Christ, the message of the Gos pel which they have to deliver would then become as great a blessing to the giver as to the receiver. Even now, missionary work unites, both at home and abroad, those who are widely separated by the barriers of theological sects.17 It might do so far more still. When we stand before a common enemy, we „. . * ' Missionary soon forget our own small feuds. But l^a'ot why ? Often, I fear, from motives of unl0Z1' prudence only and selfishness. Can we not, then, if we stand in spirit before a common friend — can we not, before the face of God, forget our small feuds, for very shame ? If missionaries admit to their fold converts who can hardly understand the equivocal abstrac tions of our Creeds and formulas, is it necessary to exclude those who understand them but too well to submit the wings of their free spirit to such galling chains ? When we try to think of the majesty of God, what are all those formulas but the stammerings of children, which only a 64 LECTURE ON MISSIONS. loving father can interpret and understand ! The fundamentals of our religion are not in these poor Creeds ; true Christianity lives, not in our belief, but in our love — in our love of God, and in our love of man, founded on our love of God. That is the whole Law and the Prophets, True ch™- that 1S the religion to be preached to tianity- the whole world, that is the Gospel which will conquer all other religions — even Buddhism and Mohammedanism — which will win the hearts of all men. There can never be too much love, though there may be too much faith — particularly when it leads to the requirement of exactly the same measure of faith in others. Let those who wish for the true success of missionary work learn to throw in of the abundance of their faith ; let them learn to demand less from others than from themselves. That is the best offering, the most valuable contribution which they can make to-day to the missionary cause. Let missionaries preach the Gospel again as it was preached when it began the conquest of the Roman Empire and the Gothic nations ; when it had to struggle with powers and princi palities, with time-honored religions and tri umphant philosophies, with pride of civilization and savagery of life — and yet came out vie- LECTURE ON MISSIONS. 65 torious. At that time conversion was not a question to be settled by the acceptance or re jection of certain formulas or articles ; a sim ple prayer was often enough : " God be merci ful to me a sinner." There is one kind of faith that revels in words, there is another that can hardly Two kinda find utterance : the former is like riches of <h' that come to us by inheritance ; the latter is like the daily bread, which each of us has to win in the sweat of his brow. We cannot ex pect the former from new converts ; we ought not to expect it or to exact it, for fear that it might lead to hypocrisy or superstition. The mere believing of miracles, the mere repeat ing of formulas, requires no effort in converts brought up to believe in the Puranas of the Brahmans or the Buddhist Gatakas. They find it much easier to accept a legend than to love God, to repeat a creed than, to forgive their enemies. In this respect they are exactly like ourselves. Let missionaries remember that the Christian faith at home is no longer what it was, and that it is impossible to have one creed to preach abroad, another to preach at home. Much that was formerly considered as essential is now neglected ; much that was formerly neg lected is now considered as essential. I think of the laity more than of the clergy: but what 66 LECTURE ON MISSIONS. would the clergy be without the laity ? There are many of our best men, men of the greatest power and influence in literature, science, art, politics, aye, even in the Church itself, who are no longer Christian in the old sense of the word. Some imagine they have ceased to be Christians altogether, because they feel that they cannot believe as much as others profess to believe. We cannot afford to lose these men, nor shall we lose them if we learn to be satisfied with what satisfied Christ and the Apostles, with what satisfies many a hard-work ing missionary. If Christianity is to retain its hold on Europe and America, if it is to conquer in the Holy War of the future, it must throw off its heavy armor, the helmet of brass, and the coat of mail, and face the world like David, with his staff, his stones, and his sling. We want less of creeds, but more of trust ; less of ceremony, but more of work ; less of solemnity, but more of genial honesty; less of doctrine, but more of love. There is a faith, as small as a grain of mustard-seed, but that grain alone can move mountains, and more than that, it can move hearts. Whatever the world may say of us, of us of little faith, let us remember that there was one who accepted the offering of the poor widow. She threw in but two mites, but that was all she had, even all her living. NOTES. 1 Different systems of classification applied to the re ligions of the world are discussed in my " Introduction to the Science of Religion," pp. 122-143. 2 " Proselyto ne fidas usque ad vigesimam quartam gen- erationem." Jalkut Euth, f. 1 63, d. ; Danz, in Meuschen, "Nov. Test, ex Talm. illustr." p. 651. 3 " India, Progress and Condition," Blue Book presented to Parliament, 1873, p. 99. " It is asserted (but the asser tion must be taken with reserve) that it is a mistake to suppose that the Hindu religion is not proselytizing. Any number of outsiders, so long as they do not interfere with established castes, can form a new caste, and call themselves Hindus, and the Brahmans are always ready to receive all who submit to and pay them." ' Cf. Mahavanso, cap. 5. 5 Cf. Mahavanso, cap. 12. 6 In some of the places mentioned by the " Chronicle " as among the earliest stations of Buddhist missions, relics have been discovered containing the names of the very mis sionaries mentioned by the " Chronicle." See Koeppen, " Die Religion des Buddha," p. 188. 7 " Islam is the verbal noun, and Moslim the participle of the same root which also yields Salam, peace, and salim and salym, whole, honest. Islam means, therefore, to satisfy or pacify by forbearance ; it also means simply subjection." Sprenger, "Mohammad," i. p. 69; iii. 486. 8 Lassen, " Indische Alterthumskunde," vol. iv. p. 635. 68 NOTES. 9 " Chips from a German Workshop," vol. i. ; " Essays on the Science of Religion," pp. 161, 216. 10 Lassen, " Indische Alterthumskunde," vol. iv. p. 606. Wilson, "Asiatic Researches," xvi. p. 21. u See " Brahmic Questions of the Day," 1869, p. 16. 12 " History of Ancient Sanskrit Literature," by M. M. (2d ed.), p. 569. 13 " The Adi Brahma-Samaj, Its Views and Principles," Calcutta, 1870, p. 10. k a j± Brief History of the Calcutta Brahma-Samaj, 1868," p. 15. 15 The "Indian Mirror" (Sept. 10, 1869) constantly treats of missionary efforts of various kinds in a spirit which is not only friendly, but even desirous of reciprocal sympathy ; and hopeful that whatever differences may exist between them (the missionaries) and the Brahmos, the two parties will heartily combine as brethren to exterminate idolatry, and promote true morality in India. Many of our ministers and leading men, says the " Indian Mirror," are recruited from missionary schools, which, by affording religious education, prove more favorable to the growth and spread of Brahmoism than Government schools with Comte and Secularism (" Indian Theism," by S. D. Collet, 1870, p. 22). 16 " Life of John Coleridge Patteson," by C. M. Yonge, ii. p. 167. 17 The large body of European and American mission aries settled in India bring their various moral influences to bear upon the country with the greater force, because they act together with a compactness which is but little un derstood. Though belonging to various denominations of Christians, yet from the nature of their work, their isolated position, and their long experience, they have been led to think rather of the numerous questions on which they agree, than of those on which they differ, and they cooperate NOTES. 69 heartily together. Localities are divided among them by friendly arrangements, and, with a few exceptions, it is a fixed rule among them that they will not interfere with each other's converts and each other's spheres of duty. School books, translations of the Scriptures and religious works, prepared by various missions, are used in common ; and help and improvements secured by one mission are freely placed at the command of all. The large body of mission aries resident in each of the presidency towns form mission ary conferences, hold periodic meetings, and act together on public matters. They have frequently addressed the Indian Government on important social questions involving the welfare of the native community, and have suggested val uable improvements in existing laws. During the past twenty years, on five occasions, general conferences have been held for mutual consultation respecting their mission ary work ; and in January last, at the latest of these gath erings, at Allahabad, 121 missionaries met together, belong ing to twenty different societies, and including several men of long experience who have been twenty years in India ("India, Progress and Condition," 1873, p. 124). The Schism in the Brahma-Samaj.1 The present position of the two parties in the Brahma- Samaj is well described by Rajnarain Bose (the " Adi Brahmo Samaj," Calcutta, 1873, p. 11). " The particular opinions above referred to can be divided into two compre-, hensive classes — conservative and progressive. The con- 1 Brahma-Samaj, the Church of Brahma, is the general title. When the schism took place, the original Samaj was called Adi Brahma-Ssjmaj, i. e. the First Church of Brahma, while the progressive party under Keshub Chunder Sen was distinguished by the name of the Brahma-Samaj of India. The vowels u and o are often the same in Bengali, and are sometimes used for a. 70 NOTES. servative Brahmos are those who are unwilling to push re ligious and social reformation to any great extreme. They are of opinion that reformation should be gradual, the law of gradual progress being universally prevalent in nature. They also say that the principle of Brahmic harmony re quires a harmonious discharge of all our duties, and that, as it is a duty to take a part in reformation, so there are other duties to perform, namely, those towards parents and society, and that we should harmonize all these duties as much as we can. However unsatisfactory such arguments may appear to a progressive Brahmo, they are such as could not be slighted at first sight. They are certainly such as to make the conservative Brahmo think sincerely that he is justified in not pushing religious and social reformation to any great extreme. The progressive Brahmo cannot therefore call him a hypocrite. A union of both the conservative and the progressive elements in the Brahmo church is necessary for its stability. The conservative ele ment will prevent the progressive from spoiling the cause of reformation by taking premature and abortive measures for advancing that cause ; the progressive element will pre vent the conservative from proving a stolid obstruction to it. The conservative element will serve as a link between the progressive element and the orthodox community, and prevent the progressive Brahmo from being completely es tranged from that community, as the native Christians are ; while the progressive element will prevent the conservative from remaining inert and being absorbed by the orthodox community. The common interests of Brahmo Dharma should lead both classes to respect, and be on amicable terms with, each other. It is true the progressive of the present half century will prove the conservative of the next ; but there could never come a time when the two classes would cease to exist in the bosom of the church. She should, like a wise mother, make them live in peace with each other, and work harmoniously together for her benefit. NOTES. 71 " As idolatry is intimately interwoven with our social fabric, conservative Brahmos, though discarding it in other respects, find it very difiicult to do so on the occasion of such very important domestic ceremonies as marriage, shradh (ancestral sacrifices), and upanayana (spiritual ap prenticing) ; but they should consider that Brahmoism is not so imperative on any other point as on the renunciation of idolatry. It can allow conservatism in other respects, but not on the point of idolatry. It can consider a man a Brahmo if he be conservative in other respects than idol atry ; but it can never consider an idolater to be a Brahmo. The conservative Brahmo can do one thing, that is, observe the old ritual, leaving out only the idolatrous portion of it, if he do not choose to follow the positive Brahmo ritual laid down in the Anushthana Paddhati. Liberty should be given by the progressive Brahmo to the conservative Brahmo in judging of the idolatrous character of the por tions of the old ritual rejected by him. If a progressive Brahmo requires a conservative one to reject those portions which the former considers to be idolatrous, but the latter does not, he denies liberty of conscience to a fellow- Brahmo. " The Adi Brahmo-Samaj is the national Hindu Theistic Church, whose principles of church reformation we have been describing above. Its demeanor towards the old re ligion of the country is friendly, but corrective and reform ative. It is this circumstance which preeminently distin guishes it from the Brahmo-Samaj of India, whose attitude to that religion is antagonistic and offensive. The mission of the Adi Samaj is to fulfill the old religion, and not to destroy it. The attitude of the Adi Samaj to the old re ligion is friendly, but it is not at the same time opposed to progress. It is a mistake to call it a conservative church. It is rather a conservative progressive church, or, more cor rectly, simply a church or religious body, leaving matters of 72 NOTES. social reformation to the judgments of individual members or bodies of such members. It contains both progressive and conservative members. As the ultra-progressive Brah mos, who wanted to eliminate the conservative element from it, were obliged to secede from it, so if a high conservative party arise in its bosom which would attempt to do violence to the progressive element and convert the church into a partly conservative one, that party also would be obliged to secede from it. Only men who can be tolerant of each oth er's opinions, and who can respect each other's earnest con victions, progressive and conservative, can remain its mem bers." The strong national feeling of the Indian reformers finds expression in the following passage from " Brahmic Ques tions," p. 9 : — " A Samaj is accessible to all. The minds of the major ity of our countrymen are not deeply saturated with Chris tian sentiments. What would they think of a Brahmo minister who would quote on the Vedi (altar) sayings from the Bible ? Would they not from that time conceive an in tolerable hatred towards Brahmoism and everything Brah mo ? If quoting a sentence from the Bible or Koran offend our countrymen, we shall not do so. Truth is as catholic when taken from the Sastras as from the Koran or the Bible. True liberality consists, not in quoting texts from the religious Scriptures of other nations, but in bringing up, as we advance, the rear who are groveling in ignorance and superstition. We certainly do not act against the dic tates of conscience, if we quote texts from the Hindu Sas tras only, and not from all the religious Scriptures of all the countries on the face of the globe. Moreover, there is not a single saying in the Scriptures of other nations, which has not its counterpart in the Sastras." And again in " The Adi Brahma Samaj, Its Views and Principles," p. 1 : — NOTES. 73 " The members of the Adi Samaj, aiming to diffuse the truths of Theism among their own nation, the Hindus, have naturally adopted a Hindu mode of propagation, just as an Arab Theist would adopt an Arabian mode of propagation, and a Chinese Theist a Chinese one. Such differences in the aspect of Theism in different countries must naturally arise from the usual course of things, but they are adven titious, not essential, national, not sectarian. Although Brahmoism is universal religion, it is impossible to commu nicate a universal form to it. It must wear a particular form in a particular country. A so-called universal form would make it appear grotesque and ridiculous to the nation or religious denomination among whom it is intended to be propagated, and would not command their veneration. In conformity with such views, the Adi Samaj has adopted a Hindu form to propagate Theism among Hindus. It has therefore retained many innocent Hindu usages and cus toms, and has adopted a form of divine service containing passages extracted from the Hindu Sastras only, a book of Theistic texts containing selections from those sacred books only, and a ritual containing as much of the ancient form as could be kept consistently with the dictates of con- Extracts from Keshub Chunder Sen's Lecture on Christ and Christianity, 1870. " Why have I cherished respect and reverence for Christ ? .... Why is it that, though I do not take the name of " Christian," I still persevere in offering my hearty thanks givings to Jesus Christ ? There must be something in the life and death of Christ, — there must be something in his great gospel which tends to bring comfort and light and strength to a heart heavy-laden with iniquity and wickedness- .... I studied Christ ethically, nay, spiritually, — and I 74 NOTES. studied the Bible also in the same spirit, and I must ac knowledge candidly and sincerely that I owe a great deal to Christ and to the gospel of Christ. . . . "My first inquiry was, What is the creed taught in the Bible? . . . Must I go through all the dogmas and doc trines which constitute Christianity in the eye of the various sects, or is there something simple which I can at once grasp and turn to account ? " I found Christ spoke one language and Christianity an other. I went to him prepared to hear what he had to say, and was immensely gratified when he told me : ' Love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, with all thy mind, with all thy soul, and with all thy strength, and love thy neigh bor as thyself ; ' and then he added, ' This is the whole law and the prophets,' in other words, the whole philosophy, theology, and ethics of the law and the prophets are con centrated in these two great doctrines of love to God and love to man ; and then elsewhere he said, ' This do and ye shall inherit everlasting life.' .... If we love God and love man we become Christ-like, and so attain everlasting life. " Christ never demanded from me worship or adoration that is due to God, the Creator of the Universe He places himself before me as the spirit I must imbibe in or der to approach the Divine Father, as the great Teacher and guide who will lead me to God. " There are some persons who believe that if we pass through the ceremony of baptism and sacrament, we shall be accepted by God, but if you accept baptism as an out ward rite, you cannot thereby render your life acceptable to God, for- Christ wants something internal, a complete con version of the heart, a giving up the yoke of mammon and accepting the yoke of religion, and truth, and God. He wants us to baptize our hearts not with cold water, but with the fire of religious and spiritual enthusiasm ; he calls upon NOTES. 75 us not to go through any outward rite, but to make baptism a ceremony of the heart, a spiritual enkindling of all our energies, of all our loftiest and most heavenly aspirations and activities. That is true baptism. So with regard to the doctrine of the Sacrament. There are many who eat the bread and drink the wine at the Sacramental table, and go through the ceremony in the most pious and fervent spirit, but, after all, what does the real Sacrament mean ? If men simply adopt it as a tribute of respect and honor to Christ, shall he be satisfied ? Shall they themselves be sat isfied ? Can we look upon them as Christians simply be cause they have gone through this rite regularly for twenty or fifty years of their lives ? I think not. Christ demands of us absolute sanctification and purification of the heart. In this matter, also, I see Christ on one side, and Christian sects on the other. " What is that bread which Christ asked his disciples to eat ? what that wine which he asked them to taste ? Any man who has simple intelligence in him, would at once come to the conclusion that all this was metaphorical, and highly and eminently spiritual. Now, are you prepared to accept Christ simply as an outward Christ, an outward teacher, an external atonement and propitiation, or will you prove true to Christ by accepting his solemn injunctions in their spiritual importance and weight ? He distinctly says, every follower of his must eat his flesh and drink his blood. If we eat, bread is converted into strength and health, and becomes the means of prolonging our life ; so, spiritually, if we take truth into our heart, if we put Christ into the soul, we assimilate the spirit of Christ to our spiritual being, and then we find Christ incorporated into our existence and converted into spiritual strength, and health, and joy, and blessedness. Christ wants something that will amount to self-sacrifice, a casting away of the old man and a new growth in the heart. I thus draw a line of demarkation 76 NOTES. between the visible and outward Christ and the invisible and inward Christ, between bodily Christ and spiritual Christ, between the Christ of images and pictures, and the Christ that grows in the heart, between dead Christ and living Christ, between Christ that lived and that was, and Christ that does live and that is. . . . " To be a Christian then is to be Christ-like. Chris tianity means becoming like Christ, not acceptance Christ as a proposition or as an outward representation, but spiritual conformity with the life and character of Christ. And what is Christ? By Christ I understand one who said, ' Thy will be done ; ' and when I talk of Christ, I talk of that spirit of loyalty to God, that spirit of absolute determinedness and preparedness to say at all times and in all circumstances, ' Thy will be done, not mine.' . . . " This prayer about forgiving an enemy and loving an enemy, this transcendental doctrine of love of man, is really sweet to me, and when I think of that blessed Man of God, crucified on the cross, and uttering those blessed words, ' Father, forgive them, they know not what they do ; ' oh ! I feel that I must love that being, I feel that there is some thing within me which is touched by these sweet and heav enly utterances, I feel that I must love Christ, let Christians say what they like against me ; that Christ I must love, for he preached love for an enemy. . . . " When every individual man becomes Christian in spirit, — repudiate the name, if you like, — when every individual man becomes as prayerful as Christ was, as loving and for giving towards enemies as Christ was, as self-sacrificing as Christ was, then these little units, these little individual ities, will coalesce and combine together by the natural af finity of their hearts ; and these new creatures, reformed, regenerated, in the child-like and Christ-like spirit of devo tion and faith, will feel drawn towards each other, and they shall constitute a real Christian church, a real Christian na- NOTES. 77 tion. Allow me, friends, to say, England is not yet a Chris tian nation." Extracts from a Catechism issued by a member of the Adi Brahmo-Samaj. Q. Who is the deity of the Brahmos ? A. The One True God, one only without a second, whom all Hindu Sastras proclaim. Q. What is the divine worship of the Brahmos ? A. Loving God, and doing the works He loveth. Q. What is the temple of the Brahmos ? A. The pure heart. Q. What are the ceremonial observances of the Brahmos ? A. Good works. Q. What is the sacrifice of the Brahmos ? A. Renunciation of selfishness. Q. What are the austerities of the Brahmos ? A. Not committing sin. The Mahabharata says, He who does not commit sin in mind, speech, action, or understand ing, performs austerities ; not he who drieth up his body. Q. What is the place of pilgrimage of the Brahmos ? A. The company of the good. Q. What is the Veda of the Brahmos ? A. Divine knowledge. It is superior to all Vedas. The Veda itself says : The inferior knowledge is the Rig Veda, the Yajur Veda, the Sama Veda, the Atharva Veda, etc. ; the superior knowledge is that which treats of God. Q. What is the most sacred formula of the Brahmos ? A. Be good and do good. Q. Who is the true Brahman ? A. He who knows Brahma. The Brihadaranyaka-TJpani- shad says : He who departs from this world knowing God, is a Brahman. (See " Brahmic Questions of the Day,'' 1869). BuDfBURGH REVIEW. -"The BEST History of the Roman Republic." LONDON TIMES. -"BY FAR THE BEST Historv of the Decline and l.iB of the Roman Commonwealth." THE jJSiatott) of Home, FROM THE EARLIEST TIME TO THE PERIOD OF ITS DECLINE. By Dr. THEODOE MOMMSEE Translated, with the author's sanction and additions, by the Rev. W. P. Dickson, Regiui Professor of Biblical Criticism in the University of Glasgow, late Classical Examiner in the University of St. Andrews. With an Introduftion by Dr. Leonhahd Schmitz, aw! a copious Index of the whole four volumes, prepared especially for this edition. REPRINTED FROM THE REVISED LONDON EDITION Four Volumes crown 8vo. Priee per volume, $2.00. Dr. Mommsen has long been known and appreciated through his researches into the languages, laws, and institutions of Ancient Rome and Italy, as the most thoroughly versed scholar now living in these departments of his torical investigation. To a wonderfully exafl and exhaustive knowledge of these subjects, he unites great powers of generalization, a vigorous, spirited, and exceedingly grapliic style and keen analytical powers, which give this history a degree of interest and a permanent value possessed by no other record of the decline and fall of the Roman Commonwealth. " Dr. Mommsen's work," as Dr. Schmitz remarks in the introdu&ion, " though the producTion of a man of most profound and extensive learning and knowledge of the world, is not as much designed for the professional scholar as for intelligent readers of all classes who take an interest in the his tory of by-gone ages, and are inclined there to seek information that may guide them safely through the perplexing mazes of modern history." CRITICAL NOTICES. " A. work of the very highest merit ; its learning is exact and profound ; its narrative full of grains and skill ; its descriptions of men are admirably vivid. We wish to place on record our opinion that Dr. Mommsen's is by far the best history of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Commonwealth." — London Times. " Since the days of Niebuhr, no work on Roman History has appeared that combines so much to attract, instruct, and charm the reader. Its style— a rare quality in a German au thor—is vigorous, spirited, and animated. Professor Mommsen's work can stand a com. parison with the noblest productions of modem history."— Dr. Schmitz. "This is the best history of the Roman Republic, taking the work on the whole- tha Ulthor's complete mastery of his subject, the variety of his gifts and acquirements, hii jraphic power in the delineation of national and individual character, and the vivid interM.1 i/hich he inspires in every portion of his book. He is without an eoual in his own sphere. " -Edinburgh Xevieio. - A book of deepest interest"— Dran Trench. ANOTHER GREAT HISTORICAL WORK. ©|f Ijjisforg of (JpFFtF, By Prof. Dr. ERNST CURTIUS. Translated by ADOLPHUS WILLIAM WARD, M.A., Fellow of St. Peter's College, Cambridge, Prof, of History in Owen's College, Manchester. To be completed in four or five vols., crown 8vo, at $2. SO per volume. Printed upon Tinted Paper, Uniform with Mommsen's History of Rome, and the Library Edition of Froude's History of England. VOLS. I., II., AND III., NOW READY. Curtius* History of Greece is similar in plan and purpose to Mommsen's History of Rome, with which it deserves to rank in every respect as one of the great masterpieces of historical literature. Avoiding the minute details which overburden other similar works, it groups together in a very picturesque manner all the important events in the history of this kingdom, which has exercised such a wonderful influence upon the world's civilization. The narrative of Prof. Curtius' work is flowing and animated, and the generalizations, although bold, are philosophical and sound. CRITICAL NOTICES. " Professor Curtius' eminent scholarship is a sufficent guarantee for the trustworthiness of his history, while the skill with which he groups his facts, and his effective mode of narrating them, combine to render it no less readable than sound. Professor Curtius everywhere main tains the true dignity and impartiality of history, and it is evident his sympathies are on the side of justice, humanity, and progress." — London Athenceum. " We can not express our opinion of Dr. Curtius' book better than by saying that it may be fitly ranked with Theodor Mommsen's great work." — Lo?tdon Spectator. "As ah introduction to the study of Grecian history, no previous work is comparable to the present for vivacity and picturesque beauty, while in sound learning and accuracy of statement it is not inferior to the elaborate productions which enrich the literature of the age." — N. V. Daily Tribune. "The History of Greece is treated by Dr. Curtius so broadly and freely in the spirit of the nineteenth century, that it becomes in his hands one of the worthiest and most instructive branches of study for all who desire something more than a knowledge of isolated facts for their education. This translation ought to become a regular part ol the accepted course of reading for young men at college, and for all who are in training for the free political life of our country." — N. Y. Evening Post. This book sent post-paid, upon receipt of the price, by the Publishers, SCRIBNER, ARMSTRONG & CO., 654 Broadway, New You/..'