YALE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY THE LIBRARY OF THE DIVINITY SCHOOL THE KENNETH SCOTT LATOURETTE LIBRARY THE INTERPRETATION OF THE CHARACTER OF CHRIST TO NON-CHRISTIAN RACES Works by Canon C. H. Robinson. STUDIES IN THE RESURRECTION OF CHRIST. An Argument. Revised and enlarged edition. Crown 8vo, 3s. 6d. net. (Longmans.) STUDIES IN THE CHARACTER OF CHRIST. An Argument for the Truth of Christi anity. Tenth thousand. Crown 8vo, 3s. 6d. net ; Popular edition, paper covers, 6d. net. (Longmans.) THE INTERPRETATION OF THE CHARACTER OF CHRIST TO NON-CHRIS TIAN RACES : An Apology for Christian Missions. Crown 8vo, 3s. 6d. net. (Longmans.) HUMAN NATURE A REVELATION OF THE DIVINE. An Argument for the Inspiration of the Old Testament. Second impression. Crown 8vo, 3s. 6d. net; Popular edition, paper covers, 6d. net. (Longmans.) STUDIES IN CHRISTIAN WORSHIP. Second edition. Crown 8vo, paper covers, 6d. net ; cloth, is. net. (Longmans.) NIGERIA, OUR LATEST PROTECTOR ATE. Illustrated. Crown 8vo, 5s. (Horace Marshall.) THE INTERPRETATION OF THE CHARACTER OF CHRIST TO NON-CHRISTIAN RACES AN APOLOGY FOR CHRISTIAN MISSIONS CHARLES H. ROBINSON, M.A. HON. CANON OF RIPON ; EDITORIAL SECRETARY OP THE S.F.G., AND EDITOR OF "THE EAST AND THE WEST " " Whosoever is a good and a true Christian, let him understand that truth belongs to his Lord, wherever he may find it." — Augustine. LONGMANS, GREEN, AND CO. 39 PATERNOSTER ROW, LONDON, NEW YORK, BOMBAY, AND CALCUTTA iglO Yale Divinity Library PREFACE. A Japanese Christian, speaking at a college in North India, referred to the benefits which Asia had conferred upon Europe. " We (Asiatics)," he said, "gave them (the Europeans) their re ligion, but in giving Christ, unfortunately, we have lost Him." In the following pages we have attempted to answer the question, How may those whose hopes have been transformed by the great gift which has come to them from the East hope to interpret to the peoples of the East the life and character of Christ, so as to beget within them the desire to reclaim their true heritage ? There are some who possess a superficial ac quaintance with the chief non-Christian religions and whose attitude towards them is one of ig norant sympathy, to whom, moreover, all re ligions appear of equal value, because their life would not be different from what it now is if all were proved to be equally false. There are others to whom Jesus Christ is the one supreme reality VI PREFACE and whose loyalty to Him makes it difficult for them to discern, amidst the low ideals and lower achievements of non-Christian peoples, the mea sure of truth which is embodied in the great re ligions of the East. We have tried to show that our prospect of appealing to the adherents of these religions depends upon our ability to combine a loyal acceptance of the faith of Christ with an intelligent and sympathetic appreciation of what is best and highest in non-Christian religions. The limits imposed by the size of the present volume have prevented any attempt to describe the ideals of more than the four chief religions of the East and no reference has been made either to Taoism or Shintoism. Neither of these, how ever, is a religion in the same sense as are the other four, and Taoism is now hardly more than an elaborate system of witchcraft and necro mancy. The final chapter on Christian Missions and the interpretation of natural beauty, whilst it forms an integral part of the argument that we have tried to develop, suggests how far-reaching is the aim which inspires the Christian mission ary, and how great will be our eventual gain, in the realm of art as well as in that of morals and religion, when Christian races in the Far East are in a position to re-interpret to us the knowledge which we are now trying to share with them. PREFACE vii The chapters on the ideals of the four chief non-Christian religions will suggest to some of their readers the criticism that the writer has failed to point out how greatly the adherents of these religions fall short of their own ideals. This failure is not the result of ignorance. He has seen fakirs and other "holy" men in India whom he would not dare to compare in holiness or in spiritual discernment with the cannibals whom he has met in Central Africa ; he has stayed with Mohammedan slave raiders whose religion was unworthy to rank with that of their pagan slaves ; lastly, he has met nominal Chris tians in West Africa and elsewhere whose ideals of life and conduct would compare unfavourably not only with those of the adherents of non- Christian religions but with those of many hea then. But although, even within the limits of his own experience, the profession and practice of religion, whether Christian or non-Christian, have proved to be widely separated, he feels that to attain a true conception of any religion we must judge it not by its unfaithful and inconsis tent, but by its faithful and consistent followers. Moreover, he feels that the work of the Chris tian missionary, if it is to follow the lines laid down by the founder of Christianity, must be constructive and not destructive. Christ is, we Vltt PREFACE believe, the Sun of Righteousness, but in order to prepare for His complete manifestation we have not got to extinguish the stars which have helped to illumine the darkness of the non-Chris tian world and to guide seekers after truth in their search for God. One chief reason why the noble ideals of the great Eastern religions do not ennoble the lives of more of their adherents is that these ideals are themselves so high that they tend to create a spirit of despair or even of cynicism in those who accept them. These have found by bitter ex perience that they cannot live up to the ideals of their own religions and in too many cases they have ceased to aspire to do so. Our message to them is that freedom from sin and selfishness can be obtained through Jesus Christ whose life, re produced and lived over again by the power of the Divine Spirit in their own experience, may render it possible for them to attain to the utmost heights to which their own great teachers aspired. The belief which lies behind this message forms the basis of our apology for Christian Missions. Charles H. Robinson. February, 1910. SYNOPSIS OF CONTENTS. I. THE INTERPRETATION OF THE CHARACTER OF CHRIST. The need of an apology for Christian Missions (i). The goals of Hinduism (2), Buddhism (3), Confucianism and Islam (4). The goal of Christianity is the attainment of character (7). Dr. Lecky on the influence of an ideal character (9). The features of Christ's character which appeal to English men (10), and to Hindus (n). Hinduism and moral responsibility (14). Christian evidences which fail to appeal to Hindus (16). The character of Christ needs to be interpreted to India (18). The reflection of His character in the West and in the East (20). Lack of historical perspective in the East (22). The appeal which Christian history makes to the Western student (23). Is Christianity justified in interfering with the religions of the East ? (24). We must practise the Christ-like virtues of the East if we are to commend to the East the Christ-like virtues of the West (27). The Church of Christ a focus and centre of attraction (28). X SYNOPSIS OF CONTENTS II. THE IDEALS OF HINDUISM. The difficulty of defining Hinduism (29). The Bhagavad-gita — the Hindu Bible (31). Brief summary of its teaching (32). The Ramayana poem by Tulsi Das (34). The doctrines of bhakti (faith) (36), and of love (40). The teaching of Kabir (41), of Nanak (42), and of Tukaram (43)- A Christian liturgy for India (44). The Hindu doctrine of oneness with God (45), and of incarnation (46). Do Hindus believe in personal immortality ? (48). The teaching of Ramanuja and Sankara (50). Failure of the Bhagavad-gita to uplift India (52). Our hope of appealing to Hindus (54). III. THE IDEALS OF BUDDHISM. Where is true Buddhism to be found? (56). The Buddhism of Burma largely consists of animism (57). Theistic sects in Burma (59). Buddhism in Ceylon (59). The place of women in Buddha's Order (61). Buddhism in China : the number of Buddhists in the world (62). Buddhism in Japan : the doctrine of faith in Amida (63) ; the connection of this doctrine with Christianity (65). Sir Edwin Arnold's poem (66). SYNOPSIS OF CONTENTS xi The ideals of Buddhism : self-conquest and benevolence (67). An example of Buddhist self-conquest (69). Buddhist teaching in regard to benevolence compared with the Christian doctrine of love (70). The failure of Buddhists to attain their ideals (72). The Christian faith supplies a motive force which may render possible the realisation of the ideals of Buddhism (74). IV. THE IDEALS OF CONFUCIANISM. The belief of Confucianists in a future life and a Supreme God (7 7). The highest ideals of Confucius — the solidarity of the human race and the dignity and potential worth of human nature His teaching concerning love (79), and concerning the potential development of human nature (80). The need of righteousness (82). His teaching concerning suffering, sin and truth (84). The doctrine of "propriety" (85). The prayers offered by the Emperor (86). Confucius' teaching concerning the ideal man found its only explanation in the life and character of Christ (87). The final results of Christian Missions to the Chinese (88). V. THE IDEALS OF ISLAM. The teaching of Mohammed compared with that of Moses (90- The teaching of both on slavery (92), and polygamy (94). xii SYNOPSIS OF CONTENTS Mohammed's description of paradise compared with that in the N. T. (96). Ignorance concerning Mohammed in England (98). An early apology for Islam (99). Mohammed's teaching in regard to — the reality of God's existence (100), the nature of God (102), a divine reve lation (104), the efficacy of prayer (105), the brotherhood of believers (105). Sufiism the result of contact of Islam with the Aryan race (106), its teaching in regard to absorption into God, and divine and human love (107) ; Babiism (109). Has Islam been a blessing to the world? (109); compare Islam with Abyssinian Christianity (no). Sufiism a preparation for the Christian doctrine of the Love of God (in). The ranks of Islam contain many followers of Christ (112). VI. ARE CHRISTIAN MISSIONS TO MOHAMMEDANS JUSTIFIABLE? In view of the high ideals of Islam can Missions to Moslem lands be justified? (113). The condition of Greece and Italy in the first century a.d. parallel to that of Moslem lands to-day (115). The religious teaching of Epictetus (117), and Seneca (119). S. Paul's work in Greece and Italy (120). Are Missions to Moslems of any use (123), or productive of result? (126). Ought Christian Missions to be encouraged in the Soudan ? (128). One thousand three hundred years of Islam in Arabia and the result (130). Summary of conclusions (131). SYNOPSIS OF CONTENTS xiii VII. SEVEN OBJECTIONS TO CHRISTIAN MISSIONS. The subject of foreign Missions distasteful to many earnest and intelligent persons (133). Seven common objections — 1. Why neglect heathen at home ? (1 34) ; 2. Why interfere with other religious faiths ? (135); 3. The missionary work done is not satisfactory (136); 4. and will not last (137); 5. Christians cannot agree amongst themselves (138) ; 6. The Christian creed is too dogmatic (138); 7. Missions cause political dis turbances (139). A scene at Jerusalem a.d. 60 — seven parallel objections raised (140). Had these objections then prevailed, we should not now be Christians (148). It was a dogmatic faith which conquered the world (148). The need of a truer appreciation of the final aim of Christian Missions (151). VIII. "HEATHEN LONDON." Could any more Christ-like missionaries be found, than those working in London? (152). If London can still be called "heathen," what hope is there for the success of foreign missionary work? (153). Four questions raised by Mr. Booth— 1. The attitude of people of London towards Christianity? (154) ; 2. How far do they possess a knowledge of the Christian, faith ? (1S6) > 3- To w^at extent does Christianity influence in dividuals ? (157) ; How far is church attendance a religious test? (158). xiv SYNOPSIS OF CONTENTS If England is "half-full of home-heathen," why send missionaries abroad ? (160). The meaning of the words " I pray not for the world " (162). Thousands were "perishing" while Christ was devoting time to individuals (163). Influence of example, story of a London deaconess (164). Peking and Calcutta a thousand years hence (166). The work of Christian Missions affects the whole universe (167). IX. CHRISTIAN MISSIONS AND THE INTERPRETATION OF NATURAL BEAUTY. The ultimate object of Christian Missions (169). How far have Christian Missions tended to develop an appreciation of beauty of landscape and of flowers ? (1 70). The appreciation of natural scenery in Greek and Latin literature (170). The distinction between the beautiful and the sublime (171). Failure of ancient and mediaeval writers to appreciate Swiss scenery (173). The lack of appreciation of scenery in Hebrew literature (i7S)- The mediaeval interpretation of " Love not the world " (176). The development of landscape painting (177). Rousseau, Goethe and Wordsworth, their respective stand points (178). References to the beauty of nature in the Rig Veda (180). Japanese appreciation of beauty of landscapes and of flowers (181). Buddhism and the art of painting in the East (182). Landscape painting in Japan (183). The appreciation of colour and form in Burma (184). SYNOPSIS OF CONTENTS XV Lack of appreciation of flowers in the ancient world (186); its literature contains no parallel to Christ's words, " Con sider the lilies of the field " (187). The attitude of the Japanese towards flowers (188). Christian Missions should prepare the way for a deeper communion with nature (189). The significance of the divine revelation in Christ will only be fully grasped when God's revelation of Himself in nature is perfectly understood (191). APPENDICES. I. The Zodi Buddhists in Burma (192). II. Prayers of the Chinese Emperor (194). Index (196). I. THE INTERPRETATION OF THE CHARACTER OF CHRIST. The increasing recognition of the measure of truth which is common to Christianity and to all other great religions of the world accentuates the importance of the question, What is there in the teaching of the Christian faith which is of so distinctive and vital a character as to justify the professors of Christianity in their attempt to claim a hearing from the adherents of the great Eastern religions ? After a visit to the principal centres of missionary work in India, the writer felt that those of the noble band of civilians who at present govern India, whose attitude towards Christian Missions is one of indifference if not hostility, have something to say in their defence ; for, unless it can be shown that the distinctive truth which missionaries have to teach is of vital importance to the well-being of the non-Chris tian races, it is impossible to justify the action of those who are endeavouring to substitute another 2 AN APOLOGY FOR CHRISTIAN MISSIONS faith for the great religions of the East, such as Hinduism, Buddhism, Islam, or Confucianism. We shall appreciate better the message of the Christian Church to the non-Christian races if we try to answer the question, What in the case of the chief religions of the East is the goal, and what are the means adopted in order to reach the goal, which the adherents of these religions set before themselves? We may, then, compare these with the goal of the Christian faith and the means whereby Christians hope eventually to at tain their goal. Let us try to suggest in the fewest words the goal and the means whereby the goal is sought to be attained by Hindus, Buddhists, Moslems and Confucianists.1 We need not emphasise the fact that the character istics to be suggested merely represent salient features of these religions and are not to be re garded as summaries of their teaching. i. The goal which the orthodox Hindu sets before himself is absorption, or rather re-absorp tion, into impersonal divinity. The means where by he strives to attain this goal is intellectual 1 The goals of the non-Christian religions here given are not intended to represent the ideals of the founders of these reli gions or of their truest disciples. These are discussed in the four following chapters. They represent rather the goals of the majority of the uneducated and less spiritual adherents of these religions. INTERPRETING THE CHARACTER OF CHRIST 3 self-control, which, to be effective, must be com bined with the performance of an elaborate series of caste regulations and with abstention from every act of ceremonial pollution. To the Hindu the visible world is the thought of an imper sonal God veiled in illusory forms, and every thing material is a hindrance to the acquisition of divine knowledge. To him the supreme soul of the universe is idealised intelligence, and it is by attaining self-knowledge that he hopes to be come like his divine ideal. By abstracting him self from all the concerns and duties of life the fakir or sadhu hopes to attain that direct and in tuitive knowledge of the divine being which he regards as unattainable by people engaged in the ordinary pursuits of life. 2. Turning from the Hindu to the Buddhist, we may say that the goal which the Buddhist sets before himself is perfect enlightenment. To him personality and divinity are terms which are even more incompatible than they are to the Hindu. To obtain divine enlightenment is to lose all desire for individual action or individual aspiration. Absence of desire is to him a char acteristic sign of divinity. The means whereby he hopes to attain the extinction of desire, which is the necessary prelude to perfect enlighten ment, is the recognition of the fact that all that 4 AN APOLOGY FOR CHRISTIAN MISSIONS he sees around him is illusion. Dr. Copleston, in his book on " Buddhism in Ceylon," is in clined to regard Hinduism as more inspiring and as holding out higher ideals than Buddhism. " For," as he says, "with all its proud claims and assertions of attainment, Buddhism does in effect deny the high capacities of man. The Brahman ideal of absorption into the One Supreme Being was nobler and nearer truth. That Buddhism knows nothing of such absorption, if only because it admits no Supreme Being, is now at last be ginning to be understood. The Buddhist theory makes the fatal mistake of supposing that it is grand to have nothing and no one to look up to. The monk, if he has attained the further stages of his course, can look down, it is pretended, on deities and all that is divine. But this does not exalt the monk, it takes away from him the opportunity of being great. . . . Buddhism de grades man by denying that there is any being above him." Later on he quotes from the " Buddhist Catechism," which has been written at the instigation of European Buddhists, and is being circulated by them in Ceylon : "a personal God Buddhists regard as only a gigantic shadow thrown upon the void of space by the imagina tion of ignorant men ".1 1 " Buddhism," pp. 152, 282 sq. INTERPRETING THE CHARACTER OF CHRIST 5 3. The goal of Confucianism may be described as a contented materialism. The means where by this goal is sought to be attained is the culti vation of practical wisdom which consists to a large extent in the observance of the series of maxims which are ascribed to its founder. In reply to the statement, "Without Confucius China had been without a native religion," Dr. Gibson, in his book, " Mission Problems in South China," writes : "it would be truer to say, ' But for Confucius China had been a religious country ' ". He says that in the " Book of Docu ments " and the " Book of Odes," both of which are older than the time of Confucius, the one great spirit, " Shangti," is described as " Creator, Preserver, and Lord of all". "Confucius," he writes, "did much to undermine the realisation of the personality of God in the minds of his countrymen. With a keen interest in practical ethics ... he had no anxiety to give his ethics any theological basis. The result has been to leave his countrymen without any spiritual at mosphere, and so to vitiate in practice his ethical theories." 4. Lastly, the goal of Islam, if by goal we mean the reward or prize which the average un educated Musulman J strives to keep in view, and 1 For a sketch of the higher ideals of Islam see chap. v. 6 AN APOLOGY FOR CHRISTIAN MISSIONS the thought of which nerved and inspired his ancestors in their struggles to spread the know ledge of Islam, is in a single word, Heaven. Heaven is regarded by him as a place in which will be reproduced the material joys of earth, and the enjoyment of which will be enhanced by the knowledge, if not by the actual sight, of the torments which unbelievers will suffer. The means whereby the Musulman hopes to attain to his goal is complete resignation to the will of God, who is regarded as an almighty and arbitrary Creator, and, secondly, the preservation of rigid orthodoxy, enshrined for him in the sacred book which he believes to have existed in Heaven before the creation of the world. It would be possible to show how the respective ideals of the religions to which we have alluded are included in the higher, wider, and more in spiring ideal which is set before the follower of Christ, and which it is our object to set before the non-Christian world. With the Hindu the Christian anticipates an absorption into God, in which his will will become indistinguishable from God's will, but in which his identity will be conserved in order that as a free agent he may bring the greater glory to God. With the Buddhist the Christian anticipates a INTERPRETING THE CHARACTER OF CHRIST 7 condition of perfect enlightenment and the ex tinction of all tormenting, unsatisfied desires, but the means by which he seeks to attain this en lightenment is not by cultivating a belief in uni versal illusion, but by the appropriation of that eternal life which he regards, not as a state to be enjoyed in the distant future, but as a possession which the knowledge of God revealed in Christ secures to him here and now. With the Musulman he anticipates compen sation for all the sorrows and sacrifices of this present life, but the compensation to which he looks forward is not of a material but of a spirit ual order. The Christian can sympathise, too, at least to some extent, with the common-sense materialism of the Confucianist, inasmuch as the realisation of his own ideal includes an unlimited increase in the physical well-being of the community here on earth. If we turn now to ask what, in briefest language, we may describe as the goal of Christians, and what the means whereby they hope to attain their goal, our answer is that the goal of Chris tianity is the attainment of character. Heaven, as a Christian writer has well said, is character. Comparing the goal of Christianity as thus de fined with the goals and ideals which we have 8 AN APOLOGY FOR CHRISTIAN MISSIONS already mentioned, we realise how arduous is the task which confronts the Christian missionary. If Christian missionaries could be content with the profession of orthodox opinions, or with the performance of correct ceremonial, their task would be comparatively easy. Orthodoxy may be obtained in a day, the performance of rites and ceremonies may be taught in a week, but for the formation of character, decades of years, if not centuries, are required. We realise, too, how unreasonable it is to be in a hurry, and how im possible it is to gauge progress by statistics. There is no material or arithmetical test by which we can estimate the development of the Christ like character in an individual, still less in a com munity. If, then, it be admitted that the goal of Chris tianity is the formation of character, how may we describe the means whereby this goal is to be attained ? We may say that the means where by Christians hope to produce character is the manifestation or presentation of character. They believe that God's final and complete revelation to the world is not theological or metaphysical knowledge, such as Hindus and Buddhists eagerly desire, nor has it been a code of laws, or maxims such as the Mohammedans believe that they pos sess in their Koran, and the Confucianists believe INTERPRETING THE CHARACTER OF CHRIST 9 that they have received from their great teacher, but it has been a revelation of His own character which He has made to us in the incarnate life of His Son. "It was reserved for Christianity," said Dr. Lecky,1 "to present to the world an ideal char acter which, through all the changes of eighteen centuries, has inspired the hearts of men with an impassioned love, has shown itself capable of act ing on all ages, nations, temperaments, and con ditions, has been not only the highest pattern of virtue, but the strongest incentive to its practice, and has exercised so deep an influence that it may be truly said that the simple record of three short years of active life has done more to re generate and soften mankind than all the disquisi tions of philosophers and all the exhortations of moralists. This has indeed been the well-spring of whatever is best and purest in the Christian life. Among all the sins and failings, amid all the priestcraft and persecution and fanaticism that have defaced the Church, it has preserved, in the character of its Founder, an enduring principle of regeneration." When we go on to ask, How may this reve lation be made effective, or, in other words, what is the message which those who have received 1 " History of Morals," vol. ii., p. 9. IO AN APOLOGY FOR CHRISTIAN MISSIONS and understood it have to give to the non-Chris tian races ? our answer is that we have to bring to bear upon their lives the influence of this char acter. To do this the Christian missionary must not only be able to describe it to them, he must be able to reflect it. There is a world of differ ence between the description of a face which we might read in a book and the direct reflection of the same on which we might gaze in a looking- glass. There is as real a difference between the influence which the character of Christ will exert upon non-Christians who may read of it in the Gospels and the influence which will be exerted by the same character when reflected in the Christ-like life of a Christian. St. Paul, in writing to the Corinthians, could venture to speak of him self as "reflecting as a mirror the glory of the Lord".1 It is hardly necessary to suggest that if the influence of Christ's character is to become effec tive, His followers must not be content with try ing to present one or two aspects or features of that character. The features which appeal with special force to Englishmen are His courage, His sympathy, and His strenuous activity. They will not, however, succeed in commending to non-Christians a character which possessed these 19 Cor. iii. 18, R.V. INTERPRETING THE CHARACTER OF CHRIST II traits unless they can also reflect the meekness and the patience which were traits of the same character. It is the passive and non-resisting features of Christ's character, His meekness and gentleness, His patient endurance of insult and outrage, and the unruffled calm which character ised His whole life, which appeal to the Eastern mind, and our presentation of His character will remain ineffective unless we can convince those to whom we desire to appeal, that we ourselves are striving to imitate these special traits. This thought, viz., that he who would reflect Christ's character to any purpose must reflect it as a whole, has been well expressed by Dr. J. P. Jones, who has spent the greater part of a life time in close touch with Indians. He writes : " I am inclined to believe that we of the West have few things of greater importance and of deeper religious significance to learn from the East than the appreciation of such graces of life as patience and endurance under evil. We stand always prepared to fight manfully for our convic tions, and to obtrude them at all points upon friend and foe alike. It is not in the nature of the East to do this. We say that he has no stamina. We call him, in opprobrium, 'the mild Hindu'. But let us not forget that he will reveal tenfold more patience than we under very trying circum- 12 AN APOLOGY FOR CHRISTIAN MISSIONS stances, and will turn the other cheek to the enemy when we rush into gross sin by our haste and ire. He is one of the hemispheres of a full-orbed character. Ours of the West is the other. Let us not flatter ourselves too positively that our assertive, aggressive part is the more beautiful or the more important. Yea, more, I question whether ours is the stronger and more masculine part of life and character ; for is it not, to most of us, an easier thing to fling ourselves in vehemence against an evil in others than it is to sit calmly and patiently under a false accusa tion as our Lord Himself did ? At least, it must be felt an open question as to whether the impulsive and domineering vigour of the West is preferable to the 'mildness' of the East. What I wish to emphasise is the dissimilarity between our Western type of life and the Eastern, and to warn the Christian worker from the West against the danger of assuming that Christian life must be adorned with only those Western traits and excellences of character which are foreign, if not unpalatable to the East — the very fault which characterises the Hindu on his side, and which makes him feel so superior at times and so inaccessible to Christian influ ence. For let it not be forgotten that the Hindu regards what we call our foibles of petulance, INTERPRETING THE CHARACTER OF CHRIST 1 3 arrogance, and intolerance with the same disap probation and disgust as we do their more fre quent violation of the seventh, eighth, and ninth commands of the Decalogue. And who is to decide as to which catalogue is the worse and the more heinous in the sight of God ? " * Mr. C. F. Andrews (of Delhi) writes : " I was teaching the Sermon on the Mount to a Hindu student and friend. When we came to the words ' Blessed are the meek, for they shall inherit the earth,' he said to me, ' Sir, the Englishman may inherit the earth, but if you call him " meek " he would be insulted '. " Mr. Andrews adds : ' ' There, in one singularly true criticism, in the form of an epigram, lies the difference between conventional Christianity and the Christianity of Christ ! " Again, Mr. Holland (of Allahabad) writes : " I speak to an Englishman of some acquaintance as a ' really good man, though he has a hot temper,' and the description suits a familiar type ; but speak to an Indian of a good man who loses his temper, and a look of sheer bewilderment comes over his face. ' What is goodness,' he asks, ' but calm and patience and unruffled benign serenity ? ' After centuries of Christianity we have still not accom plished the most elementary of all tasks, that of mastering our temper." '"The East and the West," vol. iii., p. 13. 14 AN APOLOGY FOR CHRISTIAN MISSIONS A doctrine which must form part of the Church's message to the non-Christian world, the presenta tion of which to the Eastern mind, and especially to Hindus, is attended with exceptional difficulty, is that of human responsibility and its correla tive human sinfulness. Orthodox Hinduism is so largely pantheistic that the missionary finds it hard to convince those to whom he appeals that moral responsibility can attach to them for any thing that they can do. If, as they are ready to assert, God is in them and they are in God, and they have no identity apart from the being of God, their deduction seems not unnatural that whatever they do is done by God, to whom must belong all responsibility. In dealing with peoples to whom this belief has come down as a heritage of faith from a pre historic past, the wisest plan must obviously be to begin by laying emphasis upon the great truth which underlies Hinduism and pantheism, that is the truth of the divine immanence and of man's affinity with God, and to claim it as part of the Christian faith. We can then go on to urge that sin may be defined not as a breach of ceremonial law nor as the commission of any particular act, but as an inward rending of the unity of life. The tragedy of sin will be realised when it is un derstood that by acquiring a selfish and unloving INTERPRETING THE CHARACTER OF CHRIST 1 5 character a man renders nugatory the advantage which should accrue to him as a result of the divine immanence and separates himself from God. We can point out how in the early revela tion given to the Jews the doctrine of human responsibility was directly based upon the doctrine of man's affinity with God. Thus we read in Genesis ix. : " At the hand of every man's brother will I require the life of man ... for in the image of God made He man". The Christian believes and, in a modified sense, the Hindu believes that God completes Himself through man, and that man completes himself in God. Sin is that which interferes with this completion and with man's self- realisation. Man sins when he asserts himself against the Divine order. One of the writers of the Book of Proverbs (viii. 36) said, " He that sinneth wrongeth his own soul ". The true inter pretation, therefore, of the great truth of the Divine immanence which underlies Hinduism and much of the thought of the East should act as a pre paration for the appreciation of the Christian doctrine of human responsibility and human sin fulness. It is hardly necessary to point out that until the consciousness of human responsibility and of sin has been created, the Christian doctrine of an atonement can have no meaning to the Eastern 1 6 AN APOLOGY FOR CHRISTIAN MISSIONS mind. It is the contemplation of Christ's char acter which will most surely raise the ideals of non-Christians and, by revealing to them how far short they have fallen of these ideals, will create a consciousness of sin, and thus prepare the way for the preaching of the Christian doctrine of an atonement. In endeavouring to commend to the Eastern mind the truth of the Christian revelation we need to remember that much of the evidence in its support which appeals to us does not appeal to the natives of the East at all. An Indian who was at Cambridge with the writer, and who took Paley's evidences for the truth of Christianity as one of the subjects for his first University ex amination, was asked by a friend what he thought of the argument which the book contained and on which he had passed a successful examination. He explained that though he had nothing to say against Paley's arguments, in which he could detect no flaw, they had quite failed to convince him or to modify in any way his own belief. Even when we turn from the arguments sug gested by Paley to the argument which now appears to many as the strongest that can be alleged for the truth of our faith, and which is based upon the existence of the Gospel portrait of Christ, and the miracle which is implied by INTERPRETING THE CHARACTER OF CHRIST I J the present existence of this portrait, the case is not altogether different. To the Eastern mind this argument does not appeal in at all the same way as it does to us. The Hindu who believes in the repeated incarnations of Vishnu, which have no moral purpose, and some of which are associated with acts of open immorality, is in no way impelled to believe in the Divine nature or heavenly origin of Christ, because of the moral excellence of the character which is attributed to Him. This inability to feel the force of the appeal which the moral excellence of Christ's character makes to us, and which for many of us constitutes the strongest argument for the truth of our religion, greatly enhances the difficulties of the Christian missionary who is in contact with non-Christian peoples. Hence before the character of Christ can ex ert its proper influence in the East it will have to be interpreted. John Bunyan said that for the unbelieving world the Bible was written in an unknown tongue and that the lives of Chris tians were its only interpreters. As we come into contact with the peoples of the East we realise that the character of Christ as portrayed in the Gospels is written in a language which no mere translation of the Bible can render in telligible. If the love of God revealed in Christ 1 8 AN APOLOGY FOR CHRISTIAN MISSIONS is to exert its potential influence, it must be inter preted, or rather reflected, in the lives and char acters of Christians. An Indian, for example, who has never been accustomed to attribute love or sympathy to the Divinity may read of the loving sympathy of Christ and remain entirely unmoved. The orthodox Hindu finds it im possible to assign any meaning to the state ment that "God is Love". He finds it equally impossible to understand the existence of an ob ligation to love God. A recent writer on the religions of India says : " The first great com mandment of Christianity is 'Thou shalt love the Lord thy God* . . . Christ setting Himself before us the concrete object of this affection, says : ' If ye love Me ye will keep My command ments '. But from the Eastern point of view, there is little place for this love in the religious system. Knowledge, esoteric knowledge of the Infinite, excludes it, and excludes it logically ; for if I am God and my apparent separateness is the snare that hinders me from realising my identity of substance with the Infinite, love to God, which presupposes my separate individual ity, is but tightening the bands that keep me apart from God, retarding that release which can be hastened only by ignoring the personal distinctions involved in love, and plunging be- INTERPRETING THE CHARACTER OF CHRIST 1 9 neath them into the abysmal blessedness of un differentiated knowledge."1 There is no line of intellectual argument by which we can hope to convince the Indian of the falsity of this reasoning. When, however, the love and sym pathy of Christ are presented to him in an in carnate form, the interpretation of His character which is thus afforded will prepare the way for the appreciation of His teaching and of His re velation of the character of God. We do not believe that missionaries who have not them selves a profound conviction of the Divinity of Jesus Christ will contribute much towards win ning India to Christ, but this will not be the first truth that they will emphasise. For while the average Indian will readily admit the Divinity of Christ, the admission will mean little and will but serve to place Him on the same level as himself. It is only when India comes to realise that what it needs is not a sage but a Saviour, and when its peoples learn to know not so much the Christ of history as a Christ who appeals to their immediate consciousness that they will come at last to take their stand beneath the Cross of Calvary and be constrained to say "truly this man was the Son of God". A belief in the 1