YALE UNIVERSITY ART LIBRARY ¦&\<. mti ~~,A*'":'- '.W ""'¦ f<-fT. »J Modelling A GUIDE FOR TEACHERS AND STUDENTS VOLUME I BY ED. LANTERI PROFESSOR OF SCULPTURE AT THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART, SOUTH KENSINGTON WITH PREFACE BY ONSLOW FORD, R.A. WITH 42 FULL-PAGE PLATES AND NUMEROUS ILLUSTRATIONS AND DIAGRAMS FRONTISPIECE .— PORTRAIT OF THE AUTHOR, Br PROF. A. LEGROS second edition London : CHAPMAN & HALL, Ltd. 11 Henrietta Street, W.C.2. 1922 Printed in Great Britain by Richard Clay & Sons, Limited, Bungay, Suffolk. PREFACE It would be difficult to overrate the value and excellence of this work. Had such a book been obtainable when I was in the twenties, I would not have rested a moment until I possessed a copy, and when possessed of it, it would have been my constant companion. Professor Lanteri has put in very comprehensive language everything that is needful for the young sculptor to know. The result of the careful thought and observation of years is here set forth in a manner so clear that it may appear to some readers that after learning Professor Lanteri's book by heart, they will then know how to model. A careful study of this work will show that the author does not hold out any such vain 'hope. The object of this work is to teach the student how to begin. Many things are clearly shown in the illustrations and vi Preface described in the text that would take some people many years to find out for themselves. The young student is plainly told how to begin, the more advanced student will find many doubts here cleared up, and the feelings, after reading the book, of all who make sculpture their life study, will be those of gratitude. E. ONSLOW FORD. CONTENTS PAGE Introduction i PART I Tools ... 7 The Features from the Cast 9 (a) The Mouth 9 (b) The Nose 17 (r) The Ear . 19 (d) The Eye 21 The Head from the Cast 25 (1) The Skull 25 (2) The Muscles 31 PART II The Bust from Life . , 39 Measurements ... .47 Diagram of Construciion of Features 62 (a) Mouth 62 (i) Nose 63 (c) Ear ... 66 (<0Eye .69 Vlll Contents PAGE Treatment of Hair 72 Moustache and Beard 74 Diagram of Face . 76 PART III Figure from Nature 83 Framework ........ ... 83 Scale of Proportions ... 86 Posing the Model 87 Chief Line ... 88 Contrasts of Lines and of Projection of Surfaces ... 90 Building up of Figure ......... 93 Measurements and Osteological Construction of Figure . . 100 Influence of Osteology on Superficial Forms . . . . T.12 Radiation of Lines . . .116 Example of the Ilissus 122 Spaces of Rest betweem Masses 123 Expression in Modelling. . . . . . . . .127 Continuation of Lines . . . . . . . . .131 Comparative Proportions 133 Muscles of the Figure — Photographs from Clay Model and Diagrams x,» The Skeleton in Different Views . . . . . . .146 MODELLING INTRODUCTION I have repeatedly been asked to publish the notes of which I made use for my demonstration-classes at the Royal College of Art. I fancy that by somewhat developing them they will be found useful by those who intend to devote themselves to this art, as well as by those who undertake the task of instructing beginners in the subject. I do not pretend to think that my method is the only right one — there is no such thing as an infallible method. Every intelligent teacher must be free to form his own, on condition that he bases it on true principles. Thus, instead of exclusively setting forth one method, — even if it be the very best, — it is better to state broadly the great essential principles of teaching, in which every method ought to be included, and to allow the teacher a certain latitude. B 2 Introduction It is important that every one should bring to the adopted method such modifications as will allow him to consider it his very own personal method. It is only thus, that he will find the impulse and devotion necessary for the accomplishment of his arduous task. The auxiliary means of teaching have not an absolute value in themselves, — they may prove useful or dangerous, according to the moment and measure of their application. In order to prove efficacious, they must be presented in methodical order. This order can only be settled after precisely ascertaining the object in view, and the principles on which the means for obtaining this object should be based. Art is essentially individual, in fact " Individuality " makes the artist. All teaching, to be true and rational, must aim at preserving, developing and perfecting the individual sentiment of the artist. Therefore the end at which every teacher should aim, whose task it is to teach the Fine Arts, is the development of the artistic aptitude of each pupil. The best means and exercises are those which tend most surely to attain this end. In thoroughly teaching each pupil the craft, not to say trade, of a sculptor, there is no fear of destroying his individu ality ; on the contrary, having conscientiously learnt the craft, he will gain confidence and the necessary power to express truthfully the personal sentiment with which Nature has Introduction 3 endowed him. Whilst, if the teacher wants to go further than this, he risks imposing on the student his own way of looking at things, and destroying the pupil's individuality. This short attempt of mine has no other object than to place before the student some practical h.ints, based entirely on the anatomical construction of the human body, which construction is invariable in its principles. When he has mastered this method, he will come to apply it without thinking of it, — in stinctively as it were, and without effort. The application of this method will have caused him to fix the points of construc tion precisely ; he will have made a complete analysis of the human figure ; all the causes and reasons of its various forms will be clear to him, and he will avoid that groping in the dark, those unreasoning alterations, which are always tried, when this branch of the instruction has been neglected. This book contains in short limits the essence of the subject ; it is, so to speak, the summary of a method, a sort of guide which gives the primary indications of the way. I must insist again and again on this point, that the aim of Art-teaching should be to put within the pupil's grasp all that is necessary to help him to express his thoughts by the simplest, surest and quickest means. It should in particular sharpen his observation, without too much influencing his own judgment ; and when the student's judgment goes astray, he should be corrected by model or example, placed before him without his b 2 4_ Introduction perceiving the intention, — for fear of making him lose his own power of judging. ^ And as Drawing is the principal foundation of Sculpture, and a good sculptural work depends largely on good drawing, "the student should draw as much as, if not more than, a student of painting, — (which unfortunately is not always done). No student ought to be admitted to modelling in a school, unless he has first done some serious drawing ; and on this under standing I begin this guide, — always addressing myself to a student who is capable of seeing a line and executing it properly. Another important point on which I must insist, is the thorough study of Artistic Anatomy. You must begin your work with some knowledge of the form of the bones and muscles, and go on with the study of it while at work. I shall point out to you in the following pages what is necessary for you to study, but I can of course only slightly indicate it to you, leaving you to complete your knowledge from the actual skeleton, the anatomical figure, and the excellent books written on the subject of Artistic Anatomy by the late Professor Marshall, Professor A. Thompson, Mr. J. Sparkes, and others. I beg you to observe that the knowledge of the bones is even more important than that of the muscular system ; and do not lose sight of the fact, that " Anatomy teaches you the general laws of the human form, whilst the living model shows you the same laws applied, and modified by individual characteristics." PART I PART I TOOLS (i) Provide yourself with two turntables, — one for the work, the other for the model, the height from the ground about 3 feet 4 inches to 3 feet 6 inches. See Fig. 1. (2) Provide two wooden boards, about 18 inches square or larger, according to the size of your work. To avoid warping through the moist clay, have the boards clamped at the back with two battens nailed or screwed pn crossways. See Fig. 2. (3) A few wooden tools are enough to begin with, the preference to be given to those of simple form ; avoid tools which are heavy in your hand, as well as the small and thin ones, unless your work is to be in very small proportions. One tool with strong wire curves at the extremities will be found helpful. For shapes see Fig. 3. (4) Provide a pair of large iron compasses or callipers, with their legs slightfy curved, and about 10 to 12 inches long. These are best ordered from a local blacksmith. Fig. 4. 8 Modelling 5-s1 ' |I5"«' ; o « • * I • • • C ! _! Fig. 2. Fig. 3. Fig. 4. Modelling . 9 (5) Have at hand a small sponge to keep your fingers clean during modelling, and some soft old linen to cover up the work after leaving off for the day. Occasionally you will also require a fine syringe or a big brush to splash the clay, when it begins to harden. As we go on, I shall describe whatever tools become necessary ; at first no more than the above-mentioned are required. FIRST STUDIES.— THE FEATURES The Mouth The best models for the details of the face I consider to be those taken from the mask of Michel- Angelo's " David." They are executed with such precision, so much knowledge of form and anatomy, that in copying them the student is seized with the desire to know the reason for these forms, and he is thus urged on to the study of Anatomy, so necessary for sculpture. After having fixed your plaster cast on a board like the one you are going to work on, and having placed it on the turn table, fix both boards at the same angle by means of a wooden support, nailed to the board and turntable, (or by an iron support, screwed on to both), see Fig. 5, so that your work, as -well as the plaster model, is in a vertical position. Then drive IO Modelling Fig. 5. a nail into your board, at about the level of your eyes. To this nail, by means of some wire (galvanised iron-wire will do, though copper-wire is preferable) fix a small wooden cross (" butterfly " in studio parlance — see Fig. 5), which will help to bear the weight of the clay. Then with your sponge wet the board and immediately rub some clay on the wetted part, so as to form a thickish paste to which your clay will adhere.. If you neglect this, your clay will soon get loose from the- board and drop down, but this paste and the butterfly will keep it in its place. Let me just mention by the way, that the more you work the- clay through with your hands, the more pliable and conse quently the better it will be. To begin work, lay a certain quantity of clay on your board,. pressing it well in with the thumb, so as to give about the general shape and mass of your model, always taking care to keep a little below the actual amount, so that there will be no need to scrape off, but rather to add on, in order to arrive at. the true form of the model. Before beginning each study, you must try to understand what you wish to reproduce, and I shall, therefore, introduce each feature by a sketch of its characteristics and its anatomy. Fig. 6. \.lo face page n. Fig. ITo face page n. Fig. 8. [To Jace page Modellin 1 1 The mouth is formed by the Upper and Lower Jaw ; the upper jaw consists of the two Superior Maxillary Bones ; they are two large bones, joined in the middle line and placed almost vertically beneath the Frontal Bone. By means of four processes ¦ — the Malar, Alveolar, Palatine and Nasal Processes, which extend in different directions, these bones are joined to the other bones of the face. The Malar processes connect them with the cheekbones. The Alveolar process forms the Superior Dental Arch, which contains the sockets for the Upper Teeth. The Palatine Process passes inwards to form the anterior part of the hard palate, and the Nasal Process extends upwards to the orbits and the Internal Angular Process of the Frontal Bone ; it forms the sides of the nose and is connected with the Nasal Bone in front, its outer border forming the deep notch which constitutes the anterior opening of the nose. The Lower f aw Bone oi Mandible is originally composed of two halves which very early become a single bone, i.e., the Inferior Maxillary. It consists of a solid, horseshoe-shaped body, and upturned, flattened ends, the Rami or Branches. See Photograph of Skull, Figs. 6, 7 and 8. The posterior border of each ramus expands into ah oblong condyle which fits into the Glenoid Cavity of the Temporal bone and forms the Temporo-maxillary Articulation, a very secure double-hinged joint, which allows backward and forward, as well as lateral movement of the lower jaw. The junction of the ' 1 2 Modelling body of the bone and the Rami forms a rounded angle, which really decides the width and shape of the cheek. Apart from individual varieties, the angle Ts more acute in the fully developed individual than in the child, or again in an old man, where it is obtuse. See Figs. 9, 10 and 1 1. Fig. 9. Fig. 10. Fig. ii. In the same way the Alveolar Processes are not so pro minent in a child as in a full-grown person ; and in old age, when the teeth fall out, these processes become absorbed and disappear. There are various processes and ridges on this bone, which serve as attachment to powerful muscles ; most important for our purpose is the triangular Mental Eminence, or Chin, which is subcutaneous, and therefore of great service for taking measures from, besides its being a very characteristic feature in the human face. Above it is the Symphysis, a vertical line which marks the union of the two Maxillary bones. The transverse line which we specially designate by the name of Mouth is surrounded by the lips, which in their Modelling 1 3 turn are surrounded by the Labial group of muscles. These are : — (a) The Levator of the Upper Lip, which raises it arid draws it forwards ; (b) The Levator of the Angle, which raises the outer part of the Upper Lip ; (c) The Zygomaticus Major, which draws the corner back wards and upwards, and is a laughing muscle ; (d) The Zygomaticus Minor, which draws the outer part of the upper lip in an upward, outward, and backward direction ; (-- ¦ Jmm 1 ^^V '/ WW ^^'-3 L jgfflWIHB. .- i^ ^W^ jk m -^a -r^ mm 1 BWa^. ^~- ^^ ¦* ^™ ^^^^^^* . . *<«.^Ja Fig. 48. ITo/ace page 59. 49- [To face page 59, Fig. 50. I To face page 59. Modelling 59 the extremity of the nostril, will assist the eye to fix the place. For the outer corners, measure similarly, and observe that the outer corner is always higher than the inner corner — a fact to which I have continually to draw the attention of my students ! A smile will further raise these outer corners, whilst a sad expression slightly lowers them. It may assist you to measure their distance from the ear, i.e. the notch between Tragus and Antitragus, from which we have taken our other face measure ments, and from any other point that strikes you as being an assistance, for the outer corners are as important for the true outlines of the cheek as the inner ones. See photographs 48, 49, and 50 of head in clay. Arrived at this stage, the student ought to turn the model and his own study as often as possible, both to afford him always the same point of view. When I say " turn," I do not mean that the throne should be turned far round, but rather a small distance, say two inches at a time, so as to give you not only direct profiles, but three-quarter profiles and profiles seen from the back, &c. If you carefully work round the model in this fashion, by the time you come back to the front view, you will be able to correct by means of your anatomical knowledge, and to give expression and intelligence to the mechanism of your work. You should put the hair on with regard to its principal masses, which ought to be laid on in varied planes, for 60 Modelling the suppleness of hair is never obtained by detail, but by numerous planes or surfaces, which give variety of light and shade. Once these surfaces are put in, a few intelligently made touches with the tool (or the jagged end of a broken piece of wood), and a few small balls of clay put in very decidedly, will give much more life and suppleness to the hair than a number of detailed scratches, which will only impart a hard, metallic air to it. Here I would also advise you to study how the hair grows round the face, and that it is paler in colour at its roots. As a painter mixes a little flesh-colour with the local colour of the hair round the face and on the neck, so you must blend its origin in these places with the fleshy parts, so that it does not look stuck on, but growing on. After having thus indicated the hair, and drawn and re-drawn the bust from every point of view, and modelled the whole together by an intelligent understanding of the anatomical form, and having corrected every possible mistake from different points of view, you ought to put yourself in a lower position than before, and look up to study the section of every feature on the model and correct your work from the same point. This has, of course, to be done all round the head, and afterwards you have to mount on a stool and look down on the model and your work, to study the sections of the head and features, from above, and correct wherever you find the slightest deviation from the Modelling 6 1 right outline. Remember that you must particularly study and work up those parts which are not seen from the front view ; it is those same points which make the face by showing you the projections, which you could not possibly see if you looked at the model from the front only — (a daily occurrence at the art schools, however much the teacher may try to prevent the students from doing it), the face becomes flat, and is naturally without colour and construction. Therefore, I say again : turn and turn, draw and re-draw, from below and above, as well as all round. Neglect not a single point ; — under these conditions only will your bust be well set up and constructed as a work deserving the name of sculpture. To finish, put your model in a side-light : a strong effect of light and shade is the best to show up the direction of form. It is well understood that you try to put your work in the same light, not only as regards outline, but also with regard to the value of light and shade. In working from this point of view, be guided not only by drawing, but also by anatomical form for expression, and by colour for simplifying. If you find a shadow too dark, you may be sure that the space is too hollow ; if, on the other hand, it is too light, you may be sure it is too flat, and so on for the half- tints as well. Do not forget that now you must modify your effects as often as possible, and always have model and work in the same effect of light — side-light, of course — for the light from 62 Modelling the front must serve you only to see the result of your work and re-view it, so to speak ; to work in, it is the most dangerous light, as it shows you very little of form, and leads the pupil to polish and fill up without rhyme or reason, so that the result is a heavy, expressionless piece of work. See photographs 51, 52, and 53 of head in clay. When you are at the finishing stage, it is well to model a little across the form, to obtain a richer substance ; and with very soft clay cover the whole surface with a continuous layer of skin, which will blend the depressions and convexities together. Such details as wrinkles on the forehead, or crow's feet below the eyes, should not be obtained by cutting into the clay, but rather — for the sake of suppleness— by superposing clay which the finger ought to shape into the right form on' the work, and which should be very much effaced again, so as not to show too much. DIAGRAM OF CONSTRUCTION OF THE FEATURES In the elementary part I have already described the divisions in the form of the mouth ; now I wish to draw your attention to the movement of the planes at the corner of the mouth. These movements are produced by the Orbicularis Oris. Example of Study from Life. [ To face page 62. Example of Study from Life. [ To face page 62. Example of Study from Life. [To face page 62, Fig. 51. t To face page 62. Fig. 52. [To face page 62. Fig. 53- I To face page 6a. Modelling 63 You notice on the top of the upper lip a large, slightly curved plane, which, diminishing in size, and twisting as it were, round itself, extends to the corner of the mouth. (Fig- 54-) This effect is produced on both sides of the upper lip, and in the same way on the lower lip. (Fig. 55.) These movements form a radiation, the centres of which are the two corners of the mouth. It is almost like a hinge-joint, Fig. 55. Fig. 56. which suggests the impression that the mouth can open and shut when and as it likes. The upper lip presents three masses, the lower lip two masses, and two other large masses stand well out underneath the lower lip — all of these accounted for by the Orbicularis Oris. (Fig. 56.) Nose The shape of the nose is decided by bone and cartilages. When the drawing of the nose, both from the profile and 64 Modelling front, is pretty well correct, you must first study the shape of the nostrils, looked at well from below, and particularly note the ridge which separates them from each other. (Fig. 57-) If this central ridge (Columna Nasi) is made too thick, the nostrils will be too far from the centre and the lower part of the nose will appear too thick. Try to indicate it correctly, and then draw the nostrils ; by these inner contours you will get the outer contours correct. The nose is often modelled too thin, and will consequently appear too long. I have often noticed that this mistake is Fig. 57. Fig. 58B, Right, owing to a misplacement of the Lacrymal Fossa at the inner corner of the eye. If this is placed too low, and if the line which starts from it forms a too acute angle, the nose is not allowed its proper thickness. Great attention ought therefore to be paid to the correctness of these lines. (Figs. 5 8a and B and 59.) Modellin g 65 The division of forms in the nose is shown in Fig. 60. These forms are always existing there — even in the roundest of noses, where they are only less accentuated than in others. A strong side-light on the model will always show them up. Another plane which is very important in order to obtain sup pleness round the nostrils, starts at the outer, lower part of the nostril, follows its upper outline entirely up to the tip of the nose, where it forms a slightly- curved plane. (Fig. 61.) I often see students make the outline of the nose in profile meet the upper lip at a sharp angle, as shown in Fig. 62. This never happens in Nature. There is always a small plane which If Fig. 59. Fig. 60. Fig. 61. Fig. 62. Fig. 63. separates the two, as seen in Fig. 63 ; and this gives both distinction and mobility to the outline. Of course it is more pronounced in some persons than in others. F 66 Modelling Ear More than any other feature, the ear varies infinitely, its outer framework being entirely cartilaginous. Its drawing is generally vigorous in character. Its position with regard to all the other features is of the greatest importance. In the profile it is the central point from which you ascertain the distance to forehead, nose, mouth, and chin. (Fig. 64.) Fig. 64. Fig. 65. If the ear is placed at too great a distance from the nose, the head will appear too thin from the front-view. (Fig. 65.) And from the side-view the back of the head will appear too small. If the ear is placed too far forward, the opposite will happen, and the head will appear flat from the front-view. (Fig. 66.) Modelling 67 If the ear is placed too high, the lower part of the face will appear too long, and the upper part of the head will seem insufficiently developed. (Fig. 67.) If its place is too low, the opposite effect will appear. As a general rule, the direction of the ear is parallel to the direction of the nose (see Fig. 68), but there are numerous Fig. 66. Fig. 67. exceptions, which the student will observe all the more for knowing the general rule. Another general rule is that the top line of the ear falls horizontally in line with the highest point of the eyebrows, and that its lower border is generally level with a horizontal line drawn from the nostrils. Refer to Fig. 68. The length of the ear varies enormously, but a well-propor- f 2 68 Modelling tioned ear fills about the space between the two horizontal lines indicated on Fig. 68. The outline of the ear, looked at from the front of the head, is a matter which demands all our attention. If the ear were too flat, i.e. not standing out from the head like that of the model, the face will appear too thin. This is a mistake which Fig. 68. Fig. 69. Fig. 70. nine out of ten beginners will commit ; as a rule, they will make the ear almost stick to the skull. It is therefore most essential to study the outline of the ear, not only from the front, but also from the back, and carefully to note the distance which separates the border of the Helix from the skull, as well as the depth and drawing of the Concha, or shell. (Fig. 69.) There is another point to which I must draw special Modelling 69 attention. It is the way in which the Tragus follows the perfectly round opening of 'the Auditory Meatus. Conse quently it should not be made flat. (Fig. 70.) Eye I repeat myself, and remind you that the globe of the eye lies in the socket, called Orbit. (Fig. 71.) The eyebrow forms an elongated mass, starting from the inner and upper border of the orbit, and following it as far as its Fig. 71. Fig. 72. Fig. 73. Fig. 74. external border. Its form is larger at the outer end than near the nose. (Fig. 72.) The upper eyelid starts from the corner of the Lacrymal Fossa, and overlies the eyeball. It is larger in the centre than at its extremities. (Fig. 73.) The lower eyelid starts in the same way from the Lacrymal Fossa, and, closely overlying part of the eyeball, it joins the upper eyelid from below at its outer corner. (Fig. 74.) In beginning the eye, the bony construction must be the first consideration ; having obtained that as correctly as possible, you proceed as the diagrams show — first, by putting in the jo Modelling globe, and trying to make its projection correct by studying the eye of the model from the profile as well as from below. Pro ceed in the same way and at the same time with the other eye. You should never finish one side of the face without having established the construction of the other side, or you will not obtain the effect of unity in the face. The eyeball having been placed in the right projection, the eyebrow must be laid on and studied from the profile for pro jection from the front for drawing, from below for its section. Settle the distance between the Lacrymal Fossae, from the full-face view, and their depth with regard to the nose, well bearing in mind the difficulties I have already indicated in the earlier portion of this guide. (Fig. 75.) Starting from the Lacrymal Fossa, you put Fig. 75. jn ^g Upper eyelid, noting in the same way as for the eyebrow the projection from the profile view, and the section from looking up to it. For the lower eyelid you proceed in the same way. If, instead of beginning the eye with its anatomical con struction, you were to put a lump of clay of any shape and anyhow, and tried to dig in it and scrape it about in order to obtain the drawing of eyeball, brow, and lid, the result would probably be an inert and weak feature that could never suggest the movability of the eye. Modelling 71 Another point to be attended to is, that the black spot of the pupil is in the most projecting part of the eyeball. Thence it follows, that directly above it is the highest point of pro jection of the upper eyelid as seen from below. If the model looks towards the side, the outline ofthe upper eyelid from the Lacrymal Fossa forms more or less a straight line up to the central point of the pupil, and from there makes a rapid curve to the outer corner, i.e., where the upper and lower lids meet (Fig. 76) ; whilst in the other eye you observe the Fig. 76. Fig. 77. contrary — the long straight line starting from the outer corner, and the rapid curve of the lid being from the highest point towards the Lacrymal Fossa. It follows from this, that the two Caruncles, that lie in the Lacrymal Fossae, will present different shapes, when the look is directed to the side : the Caruncle of the eye which looks out ward will be stretched and look longer than the Caruncle of the other eye, which is following the direction of this one and approaching the nose. (Fig. yj.) 72 Modelling I have already mentioned on page 59 that the outer corner must never be placed lower than the inner corner, and a hori zontal line through the corners will assist the student to find its correct place. (See Fig. 78.) If, in impressing these details of observation on you, I have repeated myself, you will readily excuse it when you realise how much they contribute to render the expression and direction of the eye strong and vigorous, and how feeble and even faulty the result is, when Fig. 78. they are neglected. What can be more objectionable in a bust, than the two eyes looking at different points ? Therefore, instead of experimenting and pushing the pupil a little to the right, or a little to the left, use every effort to verify the points I have indicated. Hair I have often been struck, when looking at busts, by the fact that the hair has the appearance of a wig put on the head. This unfortunate effect is the result of ignoring the points from which the hair starts or is attached round the face. Looked at from the front and profile, the attachment of the hair takes place in three masses : one goes round the frontal bone (coming generally to a point above the centre of the face), Modelling 73 the second mass is attached to the temporal bone, and the third, smaller, mass below the temples. (See Fig. 79.) On the top of the head the hair is attached or grows round a central point, the Crown of the Cranium, from which the hair grows in all directions, like rays emanating from a centre. (Fig. 80.) In black hair you accentuate the details, i.e. make deeper cuts to obtain the effect of a dark mass ; in white hair details Fig. 79. Fig. 80. must almost disappear, and they must be massed instead of being broken up. The details should not be treated as orna ment. To avoid ornamental treatment, it is necessary to take first the outer contours, and draw them in straight lines, well observing the angles which they make, for it is these angles and their distance from each other which decide the character of 74 Modelling the hair in individuals. After that, each mass must be divided by drawing it in firm, almost straight lines. Here it is very necessary to observe the variety of proportions in one mass, as com pared to the other. And finally indicate the variety of planes which receive light and shade in various 1 '" directions, and add a few touches here and there — some details, in other words — to indicate the fineness of hair. By these means you will avoid its looking heavy, monotonous, and ornamental. Moustache and Beard The moustache grows on each side of the face in three absolutely distinct masses. The first is attached below the nostrils. ^ The second is attached on the upper lip. >(See Fig. 81.) The third is attached on the cheek. ) The beard is also divided into three large masses, which have their points of origin or attachment in different places. The first mass grows underneath the lower lip. \ The second mass is attached to the chin. > ^ 0 \ The third grows on the cheek. J The treatment of the beard in modelling is pretty much the same as that of the hair, but its execution is extremely difficult, Modelling 75 and it is necessary to make special and frequent studies of it or for it, for the treatment varies according to the effect of colour one wishes to give. Badly executed hair and beard will spoil an otherwise good bust. It needs great taste — I might almost say tact — to know how much de tail to introduce in order to preserve its colour with out detracting from the value of the face. Hair and beard must, so to speak, disappear — that is, they must not be the first thing which strikes an observer of the bust, yet they must be interesting. Modelled tastefully, harmonious in colour and shape, they will complete a head and give character to it. Fig. 82. 76 Modelling DIAGRAM OF FACE This diagram represents the division of the forms of the face. (Fig. 83.) Fig. 83. The masses which are indicated by outline are produced not only by the bones and the groups of muscles of the face, but ,• Modelling 77 also by the skin, which covers them in following their undu lations. They exist, with a certain variety of drawing, and in a more. or less accentuated manner, in the female as well as in the male. In the child they seem to disappear altogether, but know ing that they are there, we find them indicated by extremely delicate planes. In the face of an old person we see them quite clearly. When in a face of very simple appearance the existence of these masses does not strike us, we must work continually with a strong side-light in order to obtain on the face of the model a variety of half-tints which will be produced by the planes or depressions that divide these forms, and which will show them more clearly to us. If you ignore this rule, you will, without any doubt, produce a polished surface with no variety of modelling, and the result will be a face without suppleness or expression. One of the most characteristic points in the works of Michel-Angelo, particularly in the statues of David and The Slave, is the neatness and purity with which each of these forms is drawn without anything being lost of the simplicity of the whole. When these divisions of form have been obtained in their proper drawing by studying each separately, the work may appear a little hard. Then it becomes necessary to work by 78 Modelling colour — that is to say, by the comparative values of the half- tints, in simplifying or accentuating the surfaces or planes which divide these forms. The simplicity of the model may be obtained thus, by leaving under this almost flat surface a mechanism, which not only gives expression to it, but enables the work to be exposed to every light without losing its value. Take, for instance, a cast of the head of Michel- Angelo's David ; let it be placed in any light whatever, — this head' always retains its resemblance, and nothing seems to have been left to chance, the whole remains neat and clear ; the planes retain the required direction, and, modelled well together, they give movement to the whole surface. On the other hand, if a sculptor has merely sought to render the impression of the model by effect of shadows, more or less mysterious, by tricks of texture or of tooling — in fact, simply by means of "seasoning," — these works, to preserve their quality, must be allowed to remain exactly in the same light in which they were done, under penalty of no longer being recognised, or of finding that which was expressive become insignificant, — in fact, all resemblance will be gone, simply because the light has been changed, and the work is thus reduced to a mere piece of plaster, having none of those ideal qualities of which that artist had so fondly dreamt. Beyond the artistic expression of the work, which is the Modelling 79 direct result of our sentiment and individual taste, Sculpture exacts positive knowledge of the laws of Nature. Michel-Angelo has proved this to us better than any other Master, by the numerous studies which he has made of every part of the human body, with a love that is only equalled by his scrupulous conscientiousness. Fig. 84. Fig. 85. Fig. 86. Figs. 84, 85, and 86 show you three proportions which are generally the same. Namely : the measurement from ear to ear is equal to the one from under the chin to the eyebrow, and you will find the distance the same from the ear to the point of the nose. Fig. 87. This diagram shows you that the centre of the face lies on a line drawn though the inner corner of the eye, mid way between a line drawn under the chin and another across the top of the cranium. Fig. 87. PART III PART III FIGURE FROM NATURE Framework We take for our study a figure half life-size — that is, about 32 to 34 inches in height. The framework I am going to describe will serve not only for a figure of this proportion, but also for a larger one, say of 6 to 9 feet high. In figures of these proportions the framework may be erected quite straight — that is; without action ; but for one of larger proportions, the frame must at once represent the action, and must be made from a previous sketch, carefully planned with the help of measurements and plumb-line, else it would not possess the necessary strength to support a large mass of clay ; therefore, in a larger figure the lead pipes for the lower limbs are replaced by irons fastened in such a way that they can be moved at the artist's will without sacrificing strength and bearing power. In a second volume I shall supply a series of drawings G 2 84 Modelling of frameworks for various works, from which you will see that the principle remains the same, and that it is only the proportions of the iron and lead pipes which are different ; they must be strong in proportion to the size of the work, and there must be the possibility of putting in more wooden supports and butterflies. You require a wooden turn-table for your work as well as for your model , further, a wooden i-inch board about 18 inches square with two strong battens underneath to prevent the warping of the board. On this square you fix with screws an iron support, bayonet- shaped, so to say, which is to support the frame and conse quently all the weight of clay. This iron, for the half-life-size figure, should be about 20 x 10x5 inches (Fig. 88) ; so that allowing 3 inches thickness of clay for a plinth, it should enter the figure slightly above the middle of its height and below the posterior processes of the Ilium. If inserted lower, it would have too much weight resting on it, besides there being the danger of the frame being too movable, and thus unable to retain the given pose or action. The horizontal branch had better be too long than too short ; for the vertical portion of your support is liable to get in the way of the legs," for instance, in a walking action. I should advise any length between 9 and 1 2 inches. Modelling 85 The third portion of the iron should not go up too high in the torso, as one has sometimes occasion to change the action F:g. 88a. Fig. 88b. Fig. 89. of one's work, and if the iron went too high, the torso would lose its suppleness. 5 to 6 inches therefore suffice. 86 Modelling iiZi OF He on. There are poses which necessitate the iron to be fixed at the side of the figure and not at the back. The iron being screwed on, you make your framework on it by means of lead pipes, which you secure firmly on to the iron by means of copper wire. I give the preference to copper wire over galvanized iron wire, as it is more pliable, less liable to break, and can be twisted tighter than iron wire round the lead and iron pipes. Fig. 89 will give you a clear idea how to make your frame. The next step is to make a Scale of Proportions. For modelling purposes, Fig. 90. you will find the following plan the surest and quickest, I fancy. (See Fig. 90.) 1. Draw a horizontal line on a board. 2. Take half the total height of the model (you will rarely have callipers big enough to take the total height), and measure it off on the horizontal line as A B, and with the distance A B as radius in your compasses, describe an arc from A through B. Modelling 87 3. Measure half the height of your framework ; place one leg of the compasses on B, and with the other intersect the arc to get point C. 4. Join by a straight line points A and C, and your scale is ready. You have only to apply it to your work, by striking an arc for eyery measurement, with A for a centre on lines A B and A C, and the distance from one point of intersection to the other will give you the proportional measure. It will be well to strike the arc a little beyond the lines, so that you write on the outside whatever measurement it is. You will find this a very correct and rapid scale. The same method is used for enlarging, but not for more than twice the size of the original. Framework and Scale being ready, place the former on your stand, taking care to see that the stand is quite horizontal, and place the board with the scale on an easel close to you. Now the model should be placed and posed on a turning throne, at such a distance from your work, that you get a good view of the entire figure. As it always happens that by slow degrees the model loses the pose, owing to fatigue, it is advisable, that before the sitting you should well impress the pose on your mind and eyes, by trying it yourself. That will make you well acquainted with the points and force of the action, so that you concentrate your 88 Modelling i \ efforts not to deviate from your lines when the model should do so. It will be better to give the model a frequent rest for a few minutes, than to work from a tired model, as an experienced model will often, almost imperceptibly, transfer the weight of the body from one leg to the other ; and to a beginner the pose may appear to be the same, although the spirit of it is completely altered. This difficulty can be overcome by paying careful attention to the pose at the beginning, and by studying it, first on yourself, and then on the model, and think ing of it all along as your work proceeds, so that you have no need to change your work, except by emphasizing it more. Let us now begin our work, and take the action indicated in the diagram. The first thing is to establish the chief line, which is the key to the pose. (Fig. 91.) We therefore stand right in front of the model, and, plumb-line in hand, take a vertical line from the centre of the supra-sternal notch, and watch where it passes the leg which carries the weight of the figure, which, in a pose like ours, will almost always touch the projection of the lower extremity of the tibia — that is, the internal malleolus, or inner ankle-bone. (Fig. 92.) Then press a piece of clay on the k d Fig. 91. Fig. 92. Modelling 89 framework, midway between the shoulders, where you fix a point representing the top of the sternum* stand straight in front with your plumb-line* and adjust on the framework the pipe which represents the leg, so that it touches your line, leaving just enough space for a covering of clay, and allowing the pipe to be in the centre of the limb. From the back view the chief line is in dicated by the spinal column as far as it extends, and lower down by the general direction of the carrying leg. This line coincides in all its bearings or curves with the chief line of the figure, as seen from the front view. (Fig. 93.) In sculpture the posterior chief line is more important than the anterior chief line, for we must consider the vertebral column as the central and fundamental part of the skeleton. The different parts of the bony system are attached to it, either directly or indirectly, and from it depends the movement and the place of the pelvis. As for modellers, after the chief line of the back and of the front are settled, and for draughtsmen, the chief line according to the view they have to copy, they must both occupy themselves with the lines of contrast, presented by the action. Fig. 93. 9° Modelling In this pose the side lines of the figure are parallel in their general direction to the chief or central line. If this central line is not exact, the exterior outlines cannot be so either ; therefore you understand my assertion that the chief line is the key to the pose. (Fig. 94.) Now proceed to place the other leg of the framework into its pose, and observe your model well with regard to the contrasting lines caused by the action, and the contrasts of projection. In a pose like ours you will find the fol lowing general rule : — When the figure bears heavily on one leg, the Ilium on the same side is pushed up, foi the tibia and femur preserve their entire length in the vertical direction and thus push the hip bone up ; whilst on the other side the Ilium is pulled down as both tibia and femur are bent forwards. The upper part of the body, in order to keep the equilibrium, tends to bend over on the side of the leg which carries, and thus the shoulder will on this side be lo.wered as compared to the other. Thus you get two contrasts of line in hips and shoulders, the line from one Ilium to the other going down wards, and the line from one shoulder to the other going upwards. (Fig. 95.) Fig. 94. Modelling 91 Having observed this, you bend the pipes of the frame accordingly. Now you turn your model, and note how these same contrasts obtain for the back. (Fig. 96.) There is not only contrast between the shoulder line and the line of the posterior superior iliac processes, but also with Fig. 95. the line of the gluteus maximus ; and further, in the leg you will find a contrast between the oblique direction of the bulk of the two gastrocnemius muscles and the lower extremities of the Tibia and Fibula — in other words, between the calf-muscles and 92 Modelling the ankle-bones (Fig. 97). Of course the same contrast exists in the front view. Another thing : the head being turned towards the side of the free leg, it results that the face lies more or less in the same direction as the iliac processes, and con sequently contrasts with the plane of the shoulders. Refer to Figs. 95 and 96. There is another opposition or con trast between the shoulder and the hip : the contrast of projection. Bearing on one leg, this leg not only pushes the ilium up, but also forward, whilst the ilium on the free leg goes back ward, and the shoulder, which is already lower in line, moves back with regard to the shoulder above the free leg. Thus you have two contrasts of pro jection, which must be marked on the framework by bending the pipes ac cordingly. As the head turns in the direction of the non-carrying, or free leg, you get another contrast of line and projection with regard to the shoulders, indicated by the line of eyebrows and ears, and having indicated all these important lines and planes of contrast, you must think of the Fig. 97. Modelling 93 action of arms and hands, in order to obtain the spirit of the pose from the beginning. As concerns the leg, I might mention that you can fix a chief line as indicated in diagram, Fig. 98, by following the sar- torius muscle from its origin at the anterior superior process of the Ilium along its whole length to the Tibia, and continue the line along the Tibia to the internal Malleolus. When you have marked this chief line, you will note a marked parallelism between this and the general direction of the ex ternal outline of the leg ; it is therefore an excellent guide to obtain the general shape. I often, or almost always, see advanced studies (I am speaking of modellers) where the hands have been neglected, and some times they are not even indicated. This is a great mistake. It is impossible to enter into the spirit of the pose, or action of a figure, without putting in the position and action of the hands. It is by the place and relation to each other of the extremities, i.e. Fig. -98. — Showing ,,.,,, 111 , r THE Chief Line of the head, the hands, and the legs and feet, THE Leg. I1 94 Modelling that all action is determined, and in the hands particularly you find the intention you want to express. Every study ought from the beginning to be considered as a composition. If we set ourselves the task in our figure studies to express, according to the character and pose of the model, some intention or feeling, this study will to the end command our attention, our enthusiasm and intelligence ; and artistic feeling will grow in the place of mere patience. You must, therefore, at once block in the extremities, whose position will determine the action of the rest of the body. You cannot possibly model an arm properly, without having •carefully modelled the hands in which you find the insertions or terminal points of most of the muscles of the fore-arm. It is therefore the natural continuation of the shape of the arm. The same rule applies to the legs and feet. I insist on this point, because I see it so often neglected. This neglect is just as ridiculous as it would be to cover a drawing with a sheet of paper with a small hole in it, to enable the draughtsman to see nothing but the head, and to stipple away at it with tiny pencil strokes, without having the whole figure before his eyes — in fact, with the figure only outlined. I have seen such things done ! From the profile the chief line is given by the direction of the sternum, the outline of the pelvis, and the general direction of the anterior contour of the carrying leg. (Fig. 99.) Modelling 95 There afe persons, whose vertebral column has a more graceful curve than those of other people ; in such cases the chief line of the profile has more movement than that of a straighter-built person. To find the direction of the pose from the profile view, you must again use your plumb-line, and hold it so that it will cut through the centre of the neck, as seen sideways ; then observe where it will pass with regard to the outer malleolus of the standing leg. (See Fig. 99.) Another matter you must pay attention to is, that the pipes are not crooked, but very straight in the big lines and very neatly bent at the joints, — you might even give them the exact curves of the femur, tibia, humerus, and ulna — that is, if you can ! This would give a certain expression and resemblance to the skeleton already in the framework, and would render the work spirited from the very beginning, and at the same time more tempting and encouraging. When, on the other hand, the framework is FlG- "¦ made carelessly, the pipes loosely joined and crooked, the clay stuck on anyhow, &c, the material difficulties are enormous from the beginning, and the discouragement complete. 96 Modelling Fig. ioo. — Armatuke in Action. Modelling 97 Let me caution you, therefore, to bestow the greatest care and attention on all the preliminaries. When the armature or framework has been put into the pose or movement (Fig. 100), cover it all over with a slight layer of clay, just sufficient to mark the chief lines of contrast and projection, as shown in Figs. 101 and 102. The plinth of clay should now be made, and be at least three inches thick, so that, if it is necessary to lengthen the limbs, one may do it in the downward direction by lowering the plinth, without having to destroy the rest of one's previous work. On this plinth of clay it is well to fix a small piece of wood, well towards the centre, so that it will give a firm point for measuring. Starting now from the supra-sternal notch, we draw on the clay the central line of the figure. This will pass along the centre of the sternum, then con tinue along the linea alba, following the curve which the action of the figure causes, through the umbilicus or navel, and down the internal contour of the leg which bears the weight, to the Malleolus internus. It is best to exaggerate the curves of this line, as one is liable to creep back towards the vertical. 11 98 Modelling Fig. ioi. — Figure showing Chief Line and Lines of Contrast. The line HL is a horizontal line drawn through the anterior superior iliac process of the standing leg. 99 Fig. 102. — Figure showing Chief Line and Lines of Contrast. H 2 ioo Modelling FIGURE MEASUREMENTS You must not take the following measurements before being quite sure of having the pose correct, for the measurements do not assist you to find the pose, but only help you to find the construction. (Fig. 103.) 1. The first measurement to be taken for the figure is the distance from the plinth, i.e. from under the arch of the sole of the standing leg, to the upper border of the Patella. 2. The second from the top of the Patella to the anterior superior process of the ilium of the same standing leg. (Fig. 103.) In order to fix the deviation from the vertical of the anterior superior iliac process, place yourself opposite the model, and take with one hand the plumb-line through the centre of the Patella, whilst with the other you measure the distance from this vertical line to the iliac process. Only when you have found this distance take the measure ment, and fix the point, after observing also very carefully from the profile view the projection of the iliac process in relation to the Patella. 3. The third measurement is the distance across the pelvis from one iliac process to the other. (Fig. 103.) Before you fix this, you take a horizontal line, starting from the anterior superior process of the ilium in the standing leg, to Modelling IOI Fig. 103. — Figure showing the Order of Measurement. I. From Plinth to top of Patella. 2. From top of Patella to Anterior Superior Iliac process. 3. Space between the Anterior Iliac pro cesses. 4. From Anterior Superior Iliac process to top of Patella in free leg. 5. From top of Patella to Heel. 6. From Iliac of standing leg to top of Sternum. 7. From Sternum to Ear, 102 Modelling ascertain how much lower than it the ilium of the free leg is, and having noticed this difference, fix your point. (Fig. ioi.) 4. The fourth measurement is from the iliac process of the free leg to the top of the Patella of the same leg. (Fig. 103.) 5. The fifth measurement is taken from the top of the Patella of the free leg to its heel. (Fig. 103.) 6. The sixth measurement is from the iliac process of the standing leg to the top of the sternum, i.e. the supra-sternal notch. (Fig. 103.) 7. For the seventh measurement take the distance from the supra-sternal notch to the ear, i.e. the notch between Tragus and Antitragus. (Fig. 103.) 8. For the eighth measurement take the distance from the profile of the stand ing leg between the Anterior Superior and the Posterior Superior Iliac Processes. (Fig. 104.) To obtain this correctly, you must again use a horizontal line, starting from the Anterior process, in order to see how much higher the Posterior Process is in relation to the former. This measurement must also be taken on the free leg. Fig. 104. 8. From Anterior Iliac pro cess to Posterior Iliac pro cess. 9. From top of Sternum to Seventh Cervical Vertebra. Modelling 103 Fig. 105. 10. Space between Posterior Iliac processes. 11. From Posterior Iliac process of standing leg to Seventh Cervical Vertebra. 1 2. From Acromion process to head of Ulna. 13. From head of Ulna to first articulation of Finger (index finger). 104 Modelling 9. For the ninth measurement take the distance from the Supra-Sternal Notch to the seventh Cervical Vertebra. (Fig. 104.) Before fixing this measurement, you must, in the same way as for the iliac processes, obtain a horizontal line from the top of the Sternum, to ascertain how much higher the seventh Cervical Vertebra lies than the Supra-Sternal Notch. 10. The tenth measurement concerns the distance between the two Posterior Superior Iliac Processes. (Fig. 105.) To obtain it correctly, you again apply a horizontal line, and note how much lower the process on the free leg may be, than on the standing one. (Fig. 102.) The four points obtained by measuring the Iliac Processes must be fixed and verified with the utmost care, because upon them depends to a great extent the entire construction, not only of the torso, but of the whole figure. They are, architec turally speaking, xh^. plan of it. 11. The eleventh measurement is from the Superior Posterior Iliac Process of the standing leg to the seventh Cervical Vertebra. (Fig. 105.) 12. Take the twelfth measurement from the Acromion Pro cess to the head of the Ulna on both arms. (Fig. 105.) 13. Take the thirteenth measurement from the head of the Ulna to the first articulation of the index on both hands. (Fig. 105.) Modelling 105 It seems almost needless to add that during the course of the work you must constantly verify these measurements, for it happens only too often that in modelling you gradually cover them with clay, until the construction has almost disappeared, and your distances begin to change without reason. As a result, your work becomes disappointing, and the worker tires himself out without obtaining a satisfactory result. I have aimed at sparing the student such a painful dis appointment by introducing into the study of the figure a positive system, based on anatomical construction. I lay stress on the fact that the measurements I have given you, and shown in diagrams, are of the greatest importance. You may, as your work proceeds, take many others which you consider a help to your work, but let me warn you against taking mere flesh-measurements. They are misguiding, and you can only rely on the measures taken section of pelvis from bone points. But I must dwell particularly on the / measurements of the four Iliac processes, \( which give a section of the Pelvic Girdle, anterior~fa.ce and on the correctness of which I cannot FlG- IO<5- insist too strongly. Fig. 106 shows you this section, which is also the plan of the torso. If these four points on the Ilium, which in their relation to each other never vary, are not correct, neither can the con- io6 Modelling struction of the torso be right, nor will the legs come in their proper places. The measurement from the top of the sternum to the seventh Cervical Vertebra gives us the depth from front to back of neck, two points which are placed above the section of the pelvis. (See Fig. 107.) 3 •a s2 c 3 PELVIS Fig. 107. Fig. 108. These four points in their oblique direction, viewed from the front, extend or contract the muscles of the back and of the front of the torso ; the muscles on the side of the standing leg will be contracted, while those on the side of the free leg will be extended. (Fig. 108.) The place of the seventh cervical being fixed, it must be joined through the curve of the vertebral column Modelling 107 (which varies in different persons, as already pointed out) to the pelvic girdle. (Fig. 108.) In observing the movement in the Lumbar region, you will find that the pelvis is at right angles with the Lumbar Vertebrae. As I have already said, the vertebral column must be con sidered as the central and fundamental part of the skeleton. It is composed of twenty-four vertebrae : — 7 Cervical, "i 12 Dorsal, > Vertebrae. and 5 Lumbar J The movement of the column is always found in the Cervical and Lumbar regions. (See Fig. 109.) The Dorsal Vertebrae have little movement, for they have to support the bony cage formed by the ribs — i.e. the Thorax — in an almost rigid state to protect the organs of breathing and circulation lodged within it. The bones of the upper part ofthe column, i.e. the Cervical Vertebrae, support the Cranium. To the lower part of the vertebral column the Pelvic Girdle is attached ; it almost forms part of it, owing to the fusion of the hip-bpne with the Sacrum or Coccyx. It is to the Pelvic Girdle that the bones of the lower ex tremities, the legs, are attached. It follows that the most important points in constructing a figure are, to find the relation between the two Anterior and the io8 Modelling CERVICAL two Posterior Iliac processes, between the Supra-Sternal notch and the seventh Cervical Vertebra. Imagine the sections of these two lying above each other and joined by the vertebral column. The movement of the latter takes place immedi ately above the sacrum in the lumbar region, and again above the seventh Cervical Vertebra; the latter deter- \ mine or guide the direction j of the head. i When you have fixed / these points, you must find from the profile the projec tion of the sternum — that is to say, its oblique direction forwards and downwards — DORSAL LUMBAR Fig. 109. in order to ascertain the depth from the front to the back of the thorax. You then complete the body of the thorax in joining the vertebral column to the sternum by means of the ribs. Refer to Fig. 108. Whatever the pose of your figure may be, remember that the thorax is always equally balanced on both sides of the sternum, and its shape is almost invariably symmetrical. How ever oblique the sternum and the dorsal vertebrae may be, we Modelling 109 must build up the thorax equally on either side to bring it up to the volume of the model. (Fig. 109.) If you draw a line below the costal margin (which is at right angles to the sternum), you will find this symmetry very striking, and you obtain at the same time another con trast with the crest of the ilium. The line of the shoulders is generally parallel to the lower border of the thorax (refer to Fig. 101) ; even in the pose which I have chosen for demonstration, you will find that a line joining the two acromion processes is almost parallel with the border of the ribs (it is the muscles of the shoulder which follow the raised arm, the shoulder itself is hardly raised). The symmetry of the thorax on both sides of the vertebral column and the sternum exists in all the movements of which the human figure is capable, and as the flat muscles attached to the thorax follow its shape (refer to Fig. 1 10), it results naturally that, unless the bony cage is correctly established, there will be Fig. no. no Modelling a want of order and harmony in the position of the muscular forms. There is another section which will assist us greatly in our modelling of the figure : it is the section through the two Clavicles, the Scapulae and the Vertebral column. (Fig. in.) This section, like the one through the Pelvis, will help us to find the volume of the upper part of the torso, the roundness of Fig. nr. its outline, and the right place for the neck, which must be well placed in the centre. In students' work the clavicles are often blocked in like two straight bones, instead of their giving them the shape of the letter S. If they are made too straight, the pectorals appear flat and the shoulder comes too far forward, which gives the appearance of low relief on a round shape. By carefully studying the section of the collar-bone you will avoid this effect. Observe, therefore, intelligently the form and drawing of the Clavicles, as well as their symmetry, and study at the back the position of the Scapulae which follow the action of the arms. Modelling in This will give you the upper plan of the trunk, just as the section of the pelvis gives you the lower plan, and if you have these two plans well in their right place, the limbs will of course find their right place. I have stated before that in beginning a piece of sculpture you must avoid putting on too much clay, and rather keep your study thin so that you can add to it ; but as soon as the pose is settled, you must determine the exact proportions of the bones, their extension in length, and — as far as thorax and pelvis are concerned — also their extension in depth and breadth. For they are not only invariable points, but also determine the action and the division of the forms and masses. They are the landmarks of the torso, they are architecturally-speaking the framework of the house. By fixing all the prominent points of the bones in their proper proportions of length and width, and in their right place as regards the movement, one obtains the foundation of the figure, the points of origin and insertion of the muscles. Our knowledge of Myology and exact drawing will then join the separate parts together into a harmonious ensemble. In laying the clay on in the direction of the planes which the muscular fibres present, and by drawing, we evolve out of 112 Modelling the general form the particular character of the form of the model before us. The influence of the curved form of the bones makes itself felt in all the limbs of the human figure. The muscles, more or less fleshy, always follow the curve, and you might truthfully say that the curves of these bones give the cue to the shape of the leg as well as to the shape of the arm. Fig. 1 1 2 shows you how the form of the Humerus and Ulna influences the form ofthe arm. Fig. 113 proves how the Femur and the Tibia influence the shape of the leg from the profile, as well as from the front view. Figure to yourself a student ignoring the curves of these bones. What will happen to his work ? He will place form upon form without any principle, and his work will be heavy, without charm and clearness : I can only compare it to a piece of ornament which lacks a chief line, where every detail, be it flower or leaf, is placed by chance, re gardless of a definite law of direction, and the result is confusion. Fig. 112. — Showing the Influence of the Humerus and Ulna on the Arm. Modelling H3 A thorough knowledge of Osteology from my point of view is more important than that of Myology, for the skeleton determines the movement, the proportion and construction of the figure, and its careful study is indispens able to the study of external forms. I repeat what I said in Chapter I. : Anatomy teaches us the general law of the human form, whilst the living model shows us the same laws applied and modified by individual characteristics, which we have to express by drawing. But remember that all models, whatever their age and sex, will always have the same bones and muscles, with the same attachments. In the study and knowledge of Ana tomy the student will therefore find a posi tive guide to the general facts, although the anatomy of every model will present some different aspects and individual char acteristics. It is these individual char acteristics in their infinite variety, which the artist must endeavour to express. It should, however, not be imagined that the knowledge Fig. 113. — Showing the influence of the Femur, Tibia, and Patella on the Leg. 114 Modelling of Anatomy would suffice to make a work of art : far from it. It is only the handmaiden of art ; it is the means by which we understand the cause of form and shape, and it helps us to put clearness, strength, and expression into our studies. A figure, therefore, in which one had only applied anatomical knowledge, without observing the particular characteristics of the model, might be a scientific piece of work, but it would never possess any artistic merit. In order to well represent objects such as they appear, it is important that you should know them such as they are. You can only see correctly with your mind's eye, and a form which you may have drawn, without understanding it yourself, you cannot hope to make clear to others. I have seen this very well expressed, although I do not recollect where : "The ignorant look, the intelligent see." To copy Nature, you must observe and understand her. At the beginning of our studies, in drawing as well as in sculpture, we must understand the Geometry of the figure, which is real and permanent, without regard to the visual alteration when seen foreshortened. Take as an example the capital of a column. You see it foreshortened, and yet you know it keeps its positive propor tions, its height, width, and volume — in other words, its geometric construction. If you ignore this geometric construction, you Modelling JI5 will hesitate and be doubtful from the beginning about the choice of the points to be fixed. I now draw your attention to the movement of the muscles of the Abdomen, Le. their contraction on the side of the standing Fig. 114. Fig. 115. leg, their elongation or extension on the side of the free leg. {See Fig. 114.) A similar contraction is evident in the Gluteus muscle of the standing leg, and a similar elongation of the same muscle in the free leg. (Fig. 115.) 1 2 116 Modelling I have tried thus far to impress you with the importance of the chief lines of the figure, as well as with the contrasts of line and projection in the movement of the figure, and how necessary it is, not only in this pose, but in any and every action that we want to represent, to discover these lines and apply ourselves to their study. The next task we have to set ourselves is to study the con trast in the character of form, in the direction of the planes presented by the muscles and their fibres, which cover the skeleton, and which play such an important factor in the exterior form by giving it mechanism and expression. A certain law exists in every object of nature, which, for want of a more expressive term, I might call the law of radiation — that is, the tendency of all lines to converge to one central point, or, if you like it better, the divergence of lines from one central point. Such central points are not only found in the human form, but also in drapery, in leaves, flowers, trees, &c. Let us observe the Deltoid and great Pectoral muscles. We find that these two large muscles are inserted almost at the same place on the upper arm, and that thence the ^muscular fibres separate like rays to their respective attachments or origins, — the Deltoid to the Clavicle, Acromion, Scapula, and spine, the Pectoral to the Clavicle, Sternum, and fifth rib. These two muscles alone, radiating from one point, go a long way towards covering the trunk, and the movement of Modelling 117 their planes and their radiation make a striking contrast with the vertical direction of the parallel fibres of the Biceps muscles. (Fig. 116.) If you observe the general direction of the muscular fibres in the Torso, you will find those of the pectorals attaching them selves to the upper" part of the Torso, to the Clavicle, and that gradually they descend to the Sternum and to the fifth rib. Also that those of the Serratus Magnus and of the External Ob lique follow this downward direc tion, and attach themselves to the lower part of the Torso, on the Ilium. Here there is also radiation, and in direct contrast to it are the muscles of the Abdomen, the fibres of which are vertical in their direction, like those of the Biceps. (Fig. 117.) These contrasts of direction exist in a more or less accen tuated degree in the whole figure, and it is by observing them that one adds to the expression of form. For this very reason, it would be foolish, if, in our studies — whether they be of sculpture, painting, or drawing — we aimed at a smooth texture Fig. 116. — Showing contrast of the Fibres of Biceps with radiation of Pectoral and Deltoid. n8 Modelling more or less agreeable to the eye ; we should, on the contrary, analyze the forms we see, and search for their cause before we represent them. Our study ceases, when by some trick we Fig. 117.— Showing the contrast of the Abdominal Muscle with the radiation of Pectoral, Serratus Magnus, and Oblique. polish the clay, or try to give colour, or in a drawing produce velvety shading. It is lost time, utter waste of time! You Modelling 119 may spend your life in working like this, and you will never make any progress. You must on the contrary, so to speak, Fig. ii8a. Fig. ii8b. Fig. it 8a. — Showing the appearance of the Arm when the Lower Border of the Fibres of the Biceps is at Right Angles to its Axis. Fig. ii8b. — Showing the oblique direction of the Attachment of the Fibres of the Biceps. dissect the form, and penetrate it in order to understand it. A pleasing surface will come in a later stage. • I should like also to mention two matters of minor import- 120 Modelling ance, but still of importance, which I have very frequently seen neglected. I refer Xo the arm and particularly to the Biceps and Triceps. The fibres of the Biceps do not merge into the tendons of insertion all at once in a horizontal line, but join it in an oblique direction from the outer to the inner side, thus making an agreeable contrast with the vertical direction of this muscle. The oblique, flattened plane, caused by the tendon of the Biceps, is still enforced on the inner side of the arm, by the tendon of the Brachialis Anticus, and should be well indicated. If this obliquity is neglected, the effect is very heavy and architectural. (Fig. 118 a and e.) The tendon of insertion of the Triceps does not exactly follow the line of the Humerus, as I frequently see it repre sented, but goes obliquely from inwards to outwards, and thus we have another contrast between its direction and the general direction ofthe arm. (Fig. 119 a and b.) In Drawing as well as in Modelling you must endeavour to give expression to the great variety of character which exists in the different parts of the human body. It is evident that the diversity in hardness and rigidity, which exists between the bones, cartilages, tendons, muscles, and fatty parts, will produce different effects on the surface form covering them. By observing this diversity you will avoid the particularly objectionable effect of a drawing looking as if it had been made after a figure composed of cotton-wool. Modelling 121 In the upper arm you will find that the forms are rounder and fuller than those of the fore-arm, for in the former the Fig. 119.1. Fig. 119B. Fig. 119A. — Showing the appearance of the Arm when the Tendon is in the same direction as the Humerus. Fig. 119B. — Showing the oblique direction of the Tendon of the Triceps. tendons are short in comparison to the fibrous or fleshy part of the muscles, whilst in the latter the tendons are long and extend over a large surface. 122 Modelling The same remark applies to the lower extremities. The thigh shows rounder and fuller forms, whilst in the leg the bones and tendons are visible. In the trunk you observe that the Thorax has greater com plexities in the movement of different forms, and a greater solidity of appearance than the abdominal part, which is not closed in by bony structure, but by vertical muscles. This difference of character gives great force to the Thorax, and makes at the same time a welcome change and rest between the thoracic part and the pelvic girdle. The bony structure re appears on the surface in the crest of the Ilium (in the Iliac furrow) and the lower part of the trunk takes again the aspect of solid construction. These contrasts, i.e. the strong structures of Thorax and Pelvis, separated by the soft and flat muscular mass of the Abdomen, impress on us the fact, that all the movement of the Torso must take place in this soft and flexible middle part, which coincides with the Lumbar Vertebrae, the movable parts of the Vertebral Column. An antique figure which shows to perfection this contrasting character of Thorax and Abdomen is the Ilissus. The move ment is of an incomparable suppleness and accuracy, and the abdomen is rendered in the marble with a knowledge that cannot be too much admired. Its volume is moderated and held back by fibres, which appear neither too loose nor too Modelling 1 2 soft, and yet have a marvellous elasticity. The abdomen forms one great mass, over the flatness of which the vigorous con struction of the thorax predominates. The whole of this admirable fragment has evidently^ been conceived and drawn with one impulse, with one inspiration, so that everything is in harmony with the rest, and although the head is missing, the body is still a marvel of expression. I can affirm, without hesitation, that it is the finest piece of sculpture in existence, and that one cannot find a more perfect model to study from. I shall not further insist on the differences or contrasts in character or style of drawing, feeling certain that, having drawn your attention to a few, you will readily find other parts and points where such contrasts of form and character of drawing exist. I will now draw your attention to a principle which the Old » Masters have sometimes exaggerated, and done so with full intention, for the artistic advantage of their works. I refer to what I might call Spaces of rest between the masses. These neutral spaces give to the whole figure, as well as to the separate parts, suppleness and distinction. Nothing is so hard — and consequently rare in Nature — as two big masses, which, at the point of meeting, form a more or less acute angle. Let us take for an example an arm in profile view. If the 124 Modelling outline of the Deltoid makes an angle where it meets the Biceps, and if the Biceps, lower down, where it meets the mass of the Supinators, makes an angle, it will look heavy and lack spring. (Fig. 1 20.) When, on the other hand, you exaggerate the principle which I mentioned, and separate these large masses by a narrow plane Fig. 120. FiG.»i2i. Fig. 120. — Showing the Arm in the same position without the "Points of Rest." Fig. 121. — Diagram showing the "Points of Rest" in the Arm. of rest, you obtain much more spring and elegance in the form and especially more refinement. (Fig. 121.) You will find this principle, not only in the outline of the arm, but just as much between the muscles of the face, and in all the other parts ofthe body. (Fig. 122.) A large mass is always, in a more or less accentuated way, Modelling 125 separated from another by a line or slightly curved plane which I call a rest. Not only "in the outer contour, but also in the sections, do we find this principle applied. For instance, if we take the section of the chest, we find the flat plane of the sternum separating the large masses of the Pectorals, just as the vertebral column separates the masses of the lumbar muscles. (Fig. 123-) If, instead, the two Pec torals were attached to the centre of the sternum, and the lumbar muscles to the centre of the spinal column, the sec tion would lack elegance and strength. (Fig._ 124.) Wherever the bones appear on the surface, or rather are subcutaneous, there is a certain Fig firm rigidity of drawing which impresses on us the fact, that underneath the muscles there is the solid framework of the bones which support them, and on which they depend completely. These points of rest, on the outline as well as in the sections, are generally caused by the bones or the tendinous 122. — The Torso with the " Points of Rest." 126 Modelling parts, which are more rigid in drawing than the muscles. Therefore, these firm, slightly-curved flatnesses, which the subcutaneous bones cause, form, by their tranquil simplicity of aspect, a contrast to the variable alternative roundness of the muscular fibres, and give an impression of resistance, which at the same time detracts from the monotony which would exist, if an even roundness of form prevailed all over the figure. In the beautiful antiques, especially in the Torso Belvedere of the Vatican, you observe the application of this principle. Fig. 123. — Section of the Thorax with " Points of Rest." Fig. 124. — The same without the "Points of Rest." It is not only in the outlines that this is evident, but these intervals of rest show in a more or less emphasized manner between all the large muscles, so that, notwithstanding the enormous muscular development of this torso, it remains elegant, elastic, and supple. I therefore repeat and impress on you that these intervals of rest, or planes of separation, between the masses occur in every part of the figure ; and I am convinced that, having drawn Modelling 127 your attention to this principle, you will see it and apply it yourselves in all the other parts which I have not mentioned. To model does not merely mean making a model of a statue ; this term applies as well to the product of Painting as to that of Sculpture. We talk of good and vigorous modelling and weak, poor modelling of heads, hands, &c. In Painting, the beautiful modelling depends on drawing and colour : it signifies rendering by means of light and shadow the round or fiat projections of a solid body. In Sculpture, it depends on understanding and drawing with intelligence the often slightly-curved half-planes, an intelligence which can only be acquired by a thorough knowledge of the anatomical mechanism which lies underneath the skin ; for it is the movement of the muscles and their fibres, which in their contrasting directions form the large variety of planes which the skin covers, enveloping and following them in all their undulations. The ignorance of Anatomy in this, as in the construction of the figure, can only produce in the execution a result which is weak and unintelligent, and consequently uninteresting. Besides, he who is ignorant of it, cannot so clearly see these movements of planes on the surface, as he who knows it. Even if he sees them, he will never give them such animation, 128 Modelling strength, and feeling of delicacy, for he does not know the origin of these planes, nor their cause. In order to model a form, it must be drawn first by the shadows or half-tints which surround it. These are formed by the, more or less rapid, action of planes, whose place or point of origin is narrow, but which spread by radiation over the large surface of the form. Let us take the Pectoral for an example. Its modelling cannot be obtained by a mere slightly curved plane which surrounds it and draws its outline. If you stopped at that, the result would look like a lifeless board, or, if you simply rounded it off, it would look like a cushion stuffed with cotton-wool, without the " morbidezza " of nature. On the other hand, with regard to these shadows, if you boldly and wisely indicate in them the starting of the number less planes which surround them, by spreading them and again modelling them together on the larger surface, you will obtain an expressive form and a great variety of movement. When all these movements of planes are blocked in, they must be blended together by the skin which delicately covers them, by simplifying them, by almost making them disappear, and by these means you will obtain an animated simplicity. The opposite proceeding can only result in a dead simplicity. In working out these planes, you should never forget to separately observe from below, or from the side, the section of Modelling 129 each separate form, in order to give them their richness of form. If you worked only from the front, the result would certainly be a poor and flat form. By working across the form you will be obliged to look at it from underneath, and thus give it fulness and richness. In this stage, more than ever, you should compare the relative values of half-tints and shadows, for it frequently happens that, in indicating the planes before-mentioned and their radiations, the half-tints which draw the form are almost of equal value. At this point, when a shadow appears too black, it does not always mean that the depression is too deep, but the cause is rather found in the fact that the angle formed by the light and shade is too acute. Or, if it is not dark enough, that the angle is too obtuse. The study of these angles is very important. You can only arrive at them by the section of the form — that is, by looking at it from underneath. To obtain a strong shadow it is not necessary to make a hole, but to make the angles more or less sharp. The Palette of the sculptor is made up of black and white, and all the different tones are formed by the variety of the angles which give light and shade. K i3° Modelling You should never make the half-tints which surround a form too narrow — that will rob them of breadth ; for the richness v\ v Fig 125. Fig. 126. and breadth of form depends absolutely on the half-tint which surrounds it. Modelling I31 If you must exaggerate, it is preferable to make these half tones rather too large, for that will give not only richness to the form, but will produce separation between the various forms, which will give more life and spring to the whole. In drawing an outline you should mentally continue it to the point which it may meet on the other side of the figure. t I Fig. i2£ Take, for instance, the general direction of the outline on the profile, caused by the Shoulder-blade and the Quadratus Lum- borum, and continue across the figure to observe its relation to the general outline of the leg. (Fig. 125.) k 2 1 3 2 Modelling Do the same for the outline of the Trapezius muscle, to find its relation with regard to the dorsal (Latissimus dorsi). (Fig. 126.) Continue the outline of the thorax from the front view with regard to the internal and external oblique muscles. (Fig. 126.) Continue the anterior outline of the carrying leg along its posterior outline. (Fig. 125.) Observe in the arm the relation of the Deltoid to the pos terior outline of the fore-arm. (Fig. 127.) These lines may be traced or drawn on all the views of the figure — as, for example, on Fig. 128 ; by means of this, the general relation of form to form will be ascertained, and you will get harmony of lines at the same time as their movement , you will avoid a piling-up of forms without any relation between them. It is, so to say, in oblique lines the equivalent of the horizontal and vertical lines, which you employ to find the position of different points on the figure. And you might trace such lines ad infinitum. I only mention a few, feeling certain that, if a student has once grasped this principle, he will find many others by himself. Modelling 133 COMPARATIVE PROPORTIONS I am much averse (in our studies from the living model) to the application of rules of proportion which some books give us, which teach that so many noses, or so many fingers, compose the length of an arm or a leg. If we applied this information to our studies from Nature, it would destroy in our work the character and individuality which every being possesses, and the result would be very common place work ; for it is just the proportions which lend individual character to the head, as well as to every other part of the figure. Nevertheless, I believe that it is useful to know certain comparative proportions, which will enable us, in making a sketch or composition, to avoid gross mistakes. I have indicated a few such in a diagram of comparative proportions. (Fig. 129.) In the following measurements we observe a minimum of variation or difference : — In the Leg — The distance from beneath the arch of the foot to the upper border of the Patella is equal to that from the centre of the Patella to the Crest of the Ilium on the standing leg. But I have also found, in rather long legs, that the 134 Modelling Fig. 129. — General Comparative Proportions. 5- I. ( From Plinth to top of Patella. 2. <. From centre of Patella to Iliac process. 3. I From Pubic line to top of Sternum. -—, These three proportions are generally equal. The Arm. 4. Three heads in length from Acromion to first articulation of index finger. From Acromion to head of Ulna one head and a half. 6. From head of Ulna to first articulation of finger one head and a half. From Plinth to top of Patella two heads. From centre of Patella to Iliac process two heads. Modelling 135 proportion from the ground to the top of the Patella was equal to the distance from the top of the Patella (instead of its centre) to the Anterior Superior process of the Ilium. You will also find that this measurement from under the foot to the top of the Patella equals the distance from the supra-sternal notch to the line of the Pubes. Generally speaking, these three measurements are the same. Further : The length of the leg to the top of the Patella contains two heads, and the distance from the centre of the Patella to the Ilium the same. Arm : — In the outstretched arm, the measurement from the Acromion process to the first articulation of the Index contains three heads. In a long arm the third head comes only to the middle of the first Phalanx. There is, as a rule, one head and a half in the distance from the Acromion process, or Shoulder, to the head of the Ulna (the -Elbow), and one head and a half from the Elbow to the end of the first ot the Phalanges. I think the knowledge of these few comparative propor tions will be sufficient to prevent you from mistakes, when you have no model to guide you. But to use, in your studies from life, other proportions than those presented by the model, would be quite contrary to all 136 Modelling idea of study ; for all your attention must be engrossed by searching for the personal characteristics of your model. That is what artistic study means, and it is only by this kind of study that you will develop your powers of observation and lay in a store of knowledge to draw on for composition and design. Fig. 130. [To face page 136. Fig. 131. {To face page 130. Fig. 132. [To face page 136. Fie. 133. [To face page 136. Fig, 134. [To /ace page 136. Fig. 135. \To face page 136- Fig. 136. [To face page 136. Fig. 137. [To face page 136. Fic. i 3S. I7V fmce page 136. Fig. 139. [To face page 136. S^^H ^^^ gA W£M ^m B: j i/M m im A ¦ Is* 1 \\ L«i Ik L.>' "¦ *i Ik J II ^r^^^ ff V bhsE-^H Fig. 140. [To face page 137. Modelling 137 Fig. 141. "* The numbers and letters refer to the same muscle in all four diagrams. A. Masseter. G. Triceps. B. Sterno-cleido-mastoid. H. Pectoralis Major. Trapezius. J. Latissimus Dorsi. K. Serratus Magnus. L. Rectus Abdominis. M. Tensor-Vaginse-Femoris. Deltoid. C, D, E. F. Brachialis Anticus. i38 Modelling N. 'Gluteus Medius. O. Gluteus Maximus. P. Rectus Femoris. Q. Vastus Externus. R. Vastus Internus. S. Sartorius. FlG. 142. T. U.V. w.X. Y. Iliacus and Psoas. Pectineus. Adductor Longus. External Oblique. TibialisAnticus. Peroneus Longus. Fig. 143. [ To face Page 1 38. Fig. 144. [ To face page 1 39. Modelling 139 I. Gastrocnemius. 2. Soleus. 3. Long Flexor ofthe Toes. 4. Supinator Longus. 5. Extensor-carpi-radialis-longior. 6. Flexor-carpi-radialis. 7. Palmaris Longus. Fig. 145. 8. Flexor-carpi-ulnaris. 9. Extensor-communis Digitorum. 10. Extensor-carpi-ulnaris. II. Semi-tendinosus. iz. Biceps Cruris. 13. Semi-membranosus. 14. Long Flexor of Great Toe. 140 Modelling Fig. 146. 1 5 Peroneus Brevis. 16. Gracilis. 17. Rhqmboideus Major. 18. Infra-spinatus. 19. Teres Minor. 20. Teres Major. 21. Extensor-ossis-metacarpi-pollicis. 22. Extensor-carpi-radialis-brevior. 23. Coraco-brachialis. 24. Long Extensor of the toes. 25. Anterior Annular Ligament. 26. Anconeus. Fig. 147. [To face page 140, Modelling 141 v A. Deltoid. B. Pectoralis Major. C. Biceps. I. Subclavius. 2. Pectoralis Minor. 3 Biceps. Fic. 148. — The Muscles of the Torso, D. Latissimus Dorsi. E. Serratus Magnus. F. Aponeurosis of External Oblique. Deep Portion. 4. Coraco-brachialis. 5. Subscapularis. 6. Rectus Abdominis. G. External Oblique. H. Linea Alba. 7. Obliquus Interims Abdominis. 8. Lineae Transversa. 9. Pyramidalis. 142 Modelling Fig. 149. — Muscles of the Back of the Trunk. T- Trapezius. N. Teres Minor. R. Gluteus Medius. K. Deltoid. O. Rhomboideus Major. S. Gluteus Maximus L. Infra-spinatus. P. Latissimus Dorsi. T. M. Teres Major. Q- External Oblique. Deep Portion. 10. Spleriius. 14. Serratus Magnus. 18. Tn fra-spinatus II. Levator-anguli-scapulse. *5- Serratus Posticus Inferior. IQ. Teres Major. 12. Rhomboideus Minor. 16. Obliquus Internus. 20 Teres Minor. '3- Rhomboideus Major. 17- Supra-spinatus. Modelling H3 /// Fig. 150. Fig. Muscles of the Leg. A A'. Gluteus Medius and T- Soleus. Maximus. K. Extensor-longus Digi B B'. Iliacus and Psoas. torum. C. Pectineus. L. Peroneus Longus. DD'. Adductor Longus and M Extensor-propius-poUicis. Adductor Brevis. M. Peroneus Tertius or E. Adductor Magnus. Anticus. F. Vastus Externus. O. Peroneus Brevis. G. Vastus Internus. P. Flexor-longus Digitorum. H. Tibialis Anticus. Q. Gluteus Minimus. 151- R. Obturator Internus. S. ' Quadratus Femoris. T. Adductor Magnus. U. Vastus Externus. V. Vastus Internus. W. Plantaris. X. Popliteus. Y. Soleus. Z. Tendo Achilles. 144 Modelling Fig. 152. Muscles of the Arm. Fig. 153. J. Extensor-ossis-metacarpi-pollicis. L. Extensor-secundi-internodii-pollicis. M. Extensor-carpi-radialis-longior. N. Spinator-radii-longus. 0. Extensor-carpi-radialis-brevior. P. Coraco-brachialis. Q. Biceps Cubiti. R. Brachialis Anticus. S. T. U. V. Pronator-radir-teres. Flexor-carpi-radialis. Palmaris Longus. W. Flexor-carpi-ulnaris. Modelling H5 Fig. A. Triceps. G. B. Triceps. H C. Triceps. J- D. Anconeus. K. E. Supinator-radii-brevis. L. K. Extensor-communis Digitorum. 154. — Muscles of the Arm. Exterisor-minimi-digiti. Extensor-indicis. Extensor-ossis-metacarpi-pollicis. Extensor-primi-internodii-pollicis. Extensor-secundi-internodii-pollicis. 146 Modelling Fig. 155. — The Bones. The letters refer to the same bones in all these diagrams. A. Skull. C Sternum. B. Hyoid Bone. D. Ribs. D1, first Rib ; D™ twelfth Rib. C. Clavicle. E. Scapula. Modelling 147 F. Humerus. G. Ulna. H. Radius. J. Carpus. K. Metacarpus. Fig. 156. L. Phalanges. M. Innominata. M', Ilium ; M", Pubis ; M'", Ischium. N. Femur. 1 O. Tibia. P. Patella. L 2 148 Modelling Q. Fibula. R. Tarsus. S. Metatarsus. Fig. 157. T. Phalanges. U. 7th Cervical. V. 12th Dorsal. W. 5th Lumbar. X. Sacrum. Y. Coccyx. ATTACHMENTS OF THE MUSCLES muscle A. Masseter. B. Sterno-cleido-mastoid- C. Trapezius. D. Deltoid. E. Biceps. F. Brachialis Anticus. attachments ist. Inferior margin of zygomatic arch. 2nd. External surface of the ramus and the angle of the lower jaw-bone. ist. Mastoid process of temporal bone, and back wards some distance along the superior curved line of the occipital bone. 2nd. By the inner head to the front of top of sternum, and by the clavicular head to inner third of upper border of clavicle. ist. Spines of all dorsal vertebrae and last cervical ; ligamentum nucha?, from last cervical ver tebra to occipital protuberance, and one-third of superior curved line of the occiput. 2nd. Outer third hinder border of the clavicle, inner border of the acromion, upper border of spinous process of the scapula. ist. Spinous process of scapula and outer third of clavicle. 2nd. Deltoid impression on the humerus. ist. By the long head above glenoid cavity, by short head to coracoid process of scapula. 2nd. By a long tendon to back of bicipital tuberosity of radius. ist. Lower half of anterior surface of humerus. 2nd. Below coronoid process of ulna. '5° Modelling MUSCLE G. Triceps. i st. H. Pectoralis Major. I. Latissimus Dorsi. 2nd. I St. 2nd. ist. 2nd. K. Serratus Magnus. 1 St. 2nd. L. Rectus Abdominis. 1 St. 2nd. M. Tensor Vagina 1 St. Femoris. 2nd. N. Gluteus Medius. 1 St. 2nd. 0. Gluteus Maximus. 1 St. 2nd. P. Rectus Femoris. 1 St. 2nd. attachments By the middle head, beneath glenoid cavity on neck of scapula ; by the outer head, to outer side of upper half of humerus ; by the inner head, to inner side and lower half of the humerus. Upper border and sides of the olecranon pro cess of the ulna. Aponeurosis of the external oblique muscle of the abdomen, front of body, to hilt of ster num, and adjacent costal cartilages, to inner half of clavicle. Bicipital groove of humerus. By an aponeurosis to the lower six dorsal spines, to all the lumbar, upper two or three sacral spines ; also to the posterior third of the iliac crest, and lowest three or four ribs. Bicipital groove of the humerus. Upper eight ribs. Base of the scapula. Pubic crest and symphysis. Fifth rib, fifth, sixth, and seventh costal carti lages, and xiphoid cartilage. Anterior superior iliac spine, and a small surface on the outer lip of the crest of the ilium. Fascia-lata. Upper part of outer surface of ilium. Outer surface of trochanter major. Lower border of sacrum and coccyx and adja cent portion of ilium. Over trochanter to fascia and back of femur below trochanter. Anterior inferior iliac spine and above aceta bulum. By common tendon to the patella. Attachments of the Muscles 151 MUSCLE Q. Vastus Externus. ist. 2nd. R. Vastus Internus. ist. 2nd. S. Sartorius. ist. 2nd. T. Iliacus and Psoas. ist. 2nd. U. Pectineus. ist. 2nd, V. Adductor Longus. ist. 2nd. w. External Oblique. ist. X. Tibialis Anticus. 2nd, ist. 2nd. Y. Peroneus Longus. ist. 2nd, i. Gastrocnemius. ist. 2nd, 2. Soleus. ist. 2nd. 3. Long Flexor of the f ist. Toes. 1 2nd, 4. Supinator Longus. ist. 2nd. attachments Outer side of back of femur. Common tendon to the patella. Inner side of back of femur. Common tendon to the patella. Anterior superior iliac spine. Inner side of front of tibia. Iliac fossa and crest, base ofthe sacrum, capsule of hip joint, also twelfth dorsal and the five lumbar vertebra?. Trochanter minor. Spine and crest of Os Pubis. Behind trochanter minor on the shaft of the femur. Os Pubis (by a narrow flat tendon). Middle third of back of femur. By digitations with the Latissimus Dorsi and Serratus Magnus, to lowest eight ribs. To the anterior half of the iliac crest and abdominal aponeurosis. Upper half of outer surface and outer tuberosity of tibia. Inner and under side of cuneiform and first metatarsal bone. Upper half and head of fibula. Under side of metatarsal bone of great toe. By two heads to back of condyles of femur. Back of Os Calcis by the tendo Achilles. Back of head of fibula and part of upper fourth of tibia and fibula. Back of Os Calcis. Back of tibia below soleus. Third phalanx of four outer toes. Upper part of epicondyloid ridge of humerus. Base of styloid process of radius J5* Modelling MUSCLES 5. Extensor carpi radi- f ist. alls longior. \ 2nd, 6. Flexor carpi radialis. ist.2nd 7. Palmaris Longus. ist. 2nd. 8. Flexor carpi ulnaris. 1 st. 2nd 9. Extensor communis 1 ist. digitorum. \ 2nd. 10. Extensor carpi ul- t ist. 1 1 . Semi- Tendinosus \ 2nd. ist. 2nd. 12. Biceps Cruris. 1st. 2nd. 13. Semi-Membranosus. ist. 2nd. 14. Long Flexor op Great ( ist. 7b