|i'"!, ',.... Ji'Tii^^ri.i* C/, ^i.rfZ 1915 HISTORY OF PRINCETON, WORCESTER COUNTY, MASSACHUSETTS ; CIVIL AND ECCLESIASTICAL; a Mm its ^M MtlmM in 1730, TO AFBIL 18S2. By JEREMIAH LYPORD HANAEORD. " Those matters which possess a natural interest to a particular neighbor hood, from association with familiar names and places, should be of interest to every one, who seeks, in the experience of the past, for that wisdom which may be derived from a knowledge of what those who lived before us liave done or suffered — wherein they have erred and in what respects they have judged rightly." WORCESTER: BUCKINGHAja WEBB, PRINTER. 1852. PREFACE. In the foUowing pages the author has aimed to present a brief, yet distinct statement, of the prominent events in the history of the town of Princeton. Particular attention has been directed to the various trials, toils, and hardships of the early settlers, — to the spirited resolutions and acts of the citizens in the period of the revolution, — to the difficulties that presented themselves in the organization of our federal government, as far as they had to do with the acts of the people, — to the ecclesiastical history, — and to tracing the progress of the town in its march of prosperity through the period of years which have rolled onward since the first settlement. Throughout the composition, he has confined himself almost exclusively to fotds — having his eye upon the original documents — which, so far as he is capable of judging himself, have been presented with entire impartiality. The work was commenced and prosecuted with an ardent desire to benefit and interest, not only the citizens of this town, but also those of the adjoining towns, and of the State generally. It is true that this is a local history ; yet the reminiscences of events that have transpired in this vicinity, anecdotes of men who have lived here, the record of their manners and habits, all constitute a tributary stream to the general current of our country's histo ry. "All history should be, and American history in particular must be, the history of the people. Not an account of the pro ceedings of a court, of the operations of a government only but of what the people have been doing in villages, and com- munities, and families. Here things lie at the foundation of na tional character and sentiments, and consequently of national events. We are carried by this means behirid the scenes, or rather into the scenes, of private history, and shown what are really the secret springs of public history." The volume we have thus drawn up, makes no pretensions to attractiveness, otherwise than the nature of the subject, and the facts exhibited, may be attractive. Many things worthy to be perpetuated, have, no doubt, for the want of information, been omitted ; accuracy, however, has been the constant aim of the author. Materials have been collected from sources as various as can be readily imagined by individ uals who have not attempted a similar work, — the most of which it will not be thought necessary to specify particularly. The Town Books, Church and Society Records, and various Publi cations, were of course, carefully examined. Many of the facts here presented, were obtained from a History of Princeton, written sorae years since by Charles Theodore Russell, Esq., to whom we would here publicly acknowledge our indebtedness. We are also particularly indebted fo several of the aged peo ple whom we have consulted. That this, our effort has many imperfections, and some slight inaccuracies, is extremely probable ; yet we dismiss it, to those for whom it was compiled, with the hope that it may prove to be interesting and profitable to them. The Author, Princeton, April 1, 1852. CONTENTS. CIVIL AFFAIRS. CHAPTER I. General History— Purchase of the Indians^-Proprietors' Petition— Order of General Court — Division of the Twelve miles' Square of the Indian Pur chase — Rutland East Wiug — Watertown Farms — First Settlement — Loss of Robert Keyes' Daughter — Incorporation of the District — Dr. Harvey — Pirst Town Meeting— First Roads 9 CHAPTER II. Character of the First Settlers — Their Ancestry — Increase of Population — Province Lands — Land granted by the General Court to the First settled Minister — Petition to be Incorporated as a Town — Act of Incorporation — Opposition of the Town to the addition of Territory — First Representa tive—Boundary 34 CHAPTER III. American Revolution — First expression of the town in relation to revolutionary measures — Resolutions^Committee of Correspondence — Alarm — Prepara tions for War — Instructions to Representative — Declaration of Rights — Bounty to the Minute Men — The citizens leave their homes for the Con test — Trouble with Rev. Mr. Fuller^Declaration of Independence — Regu lation of the currency — War terminated 31 CHAPTER IV. Insurrection — Distress of the People— County Convention — Instructions to Col. Sargent — Grievances-^Courts suspended — Capt. Gkile at the Court House — Court of Sessions interrupted— Preparations of Government — Daniel Shays — Forces.of Insurgents— Insurgents occupy the Court House — Consultation of the Insurgents — The Retreat— Gen. Lincoln's Army — Termination of the Rebellion — Henry Gale 53 VI CONTENTS. CHAPTER V. Political History — Adoption of the National Constitution — Funeral Honors to Washinglon— Embargo— Petitions to President Jefferson, and to the Le gislature of Massachusetts — Opposition to the War with England— Reso lutions— First Town House— Benefactions of Mr. Boylston — Adoption of Amendments to the State Constitution — Part of No Town annexed — New Town House — Proposed Division of the County — Incidents in Local History. 67 ECCLESIASTICAL HISTORY. CHAPTER VI. Introductory Remarks— First Preaching in Town— Attempts to erect a Meet ing House — Committee to measure the District — Building of Meeting House — Assignment of Places in Church — Church Music — Church Covenant — Unsuccessful attempt to settle a Minister — Call to Mr Fuller — His Ordina tion — Covenant of Admission — First Deacons and Present to the Church — Complaints against Mr. Fuller — His Reply — Ecclesiastical Council — Mr. Fuller's Dismiasion — Suit against Town— Biographical Notice of Mr. Fuller '81 CHAPTER VII. Unsuccessful efforts for a re-establishment of the Gospel Ministry — Settlement of Mr. Crafts — He requests a Dismission^Letter to hira — Rev. Mr. Good rich — New Meeting House — Mr. Russell's Settlement — Dedication of Meeting House— Mr. Russell's Dismission— Settlement of Mr. Murdock — Pirst General Revival of Religion in Town— Church Covenant— Mr, Mur- dock's Dismission 98 CHAPTER VIII. Religious Divisions — Attempt to settle Rev. Mr. Clarke — Remonstrance of the Church — Church has a right to choose its own Pastor — Mr. Clarice's Re ply to Call — Second effort of the Town to settle Mr. Clarke — His Reply — Petition circulated through the Tow» — Call of Mutual Council — Its Re sult—Protest of the Minority — Mr. Clarke's Covenant — Third Call of the Town to Mr. Clarke — His Reply and Settlement. . . . 113 CHAPTER IX. Call of Council by the Church— Result— Organization of the Presbyterian Church— Ruling Elders — Call to Mr. Bond— Accessions to the Church and Congregation— New Meeting House— Seizure cf Property to pay CONTENTS. VJl Ministerial Rates— Seizure of the body— Mr. John H. Brooks carried to Jail — Suit, Samuel Brooks vs. Town — Mutual Settlement of the Contro versy — Settlement of Mr. Phillips— Origin of Division — Mr. Clarke's Dis mission — Biographical Notice — Proposal for a Union— First Parish, and Mr. Cowles' Settlement and Dismission. ..... 130 CHAPTER X. Farther Measures for a Union— Call of a Council— Result— Proceeding upon it— Objections — Votes of First Parish — Votes of Evangelical Society — Action of Congregational Church — Doings of the Council's Committee — Sooieties unite — Mr. Phillips at the House of the First Parish— His return to his former place of labor — Church Meetings _ 142 CHAPTER XI. Attempts to effect a Reconciliation — Further examination proffered, with a plan therefor — Amendment Proposed — Objections to Amendment — CaU of Exparte Council — Mr. Phillips' letter to the Council — Result of Council — Mr. Phillips' Dismission — Biographical Notice — Meetings suspended at the Meeting House of First Parish — Mr. Demond's settlement over First Par ish — Disaffected ask for a Dismission — Call of Council — Result — Mr. Har ding's Settlement and Dismission — Mr. Goldsmith's Settlement and Dis mission-Call of Mr. Hitchcock 160 CHAPTER XII. METHODIST EPISCOPAL CHURCH. * Introduction of Methodism into Princeton — Messrs. Lewis and Fay join Class at Worcester— First Methodist Preaching by Rev. J ames Porter— Revival of Religion under the Labors of Rev. Mr. Paine — Formation of Classes — Huhbardston and Rutland made Stations — New Meeting House — First Quarterly Conference — Purchase ot Furniture for Parsonage— Present to the Church — Stationed Preachers — Munificence of Mrs. Nabhy Brooks 172 CHAPTER XIII. THE BAPTIST CHURCH. Formation of the Baptist Society— First Baptist in Town— First Preaching- Rev. Mr. Andrews— Organization of the Church — Articles of Faith — Rev. Mr. Walker — Rev. Mr. Johnson — Settlement and Dismission of Mr. Morse —Call and Settlement of Mr. Level- His Dismission— Settlement of Mr. Ball — Settlement of Mr. Cunningham— Accessions to the Church — Dis mission of Mr. Cunningham — Temporary Supply of the Pulpit. . 176 yjli CONTENTS. MISCELLANEOUS MATTERS. CHAPTER XIV. First Public School in Town— Division of the Town into School Districts- Appropriations for Schooling — Select Schools — Munificence of John Brooks, Esq. — Native Ministers 183 CHAPTER XV. Biographical Notices — Physicians — Postmasters — Public Buildings— Accom modations at the Wachusett Hotel — Streams and Ponds— Wachusett Mountain— Hills— Products 189 APPENDIX. List of Officers chosen at Town Meeting, 1761, 197 Location of Roads, 1784, ib. Petition of Rev. Mr. Fuller and Resolve of General Court thereupon,. . . 198 A Document, containing an imperfect account ol the number of men fur. nished in the Revolutionary War, at the expense of the town, . . . 200 List of Votes for Govemor since 1780 201 Municipal Officers from 1760 to 1762, ._. , . ... 209 HISTORY OF PRINCETON. CIVIL AFFAIES. CHAPTER I. General History— Purcliase of the Indians — Proprietors' Petition — Order of General Court — Division of the Twelve miles' Square of the Indian Piir- ciiase — Rutland East Wing — Watertown Farms — Fhn Setllcmcnt— Loss Cif Robert Keyes' Daughter — Incorporation of tlie District — Dr. Harvey— First Town Meeting — First Roads. After the first settlement of Massachusetts, but a few years elapsed before the hand of industry penetrated far and fast into the uncultivated wilderness. In 1G2S, but eight years after the landing of the I'ilgriras, Sakm was settled. In 1629 Lynn was inhabited. Boston rtnd Cambridge and Watertown were founded in 1630. The stream of emigration soon began to flow westward from its fountain. In 1G35 Concord was purchased cf the Indians and a settlement comraenced. In 1638 Sudbury was planted, and Marlborough was incorporated but a few years subsequent to that period. The increasitig population pushed farther onward the frontier of im provement. The fertile region in the vicinity of Wor cester attracted the attention of the early settlers of Massachusetts. The first settlement in the County of Worcester was made in Lancaster, in 1C45. Mendon is a very ancient town, the second in ag.e in the County. Brookfield was incorporated by an Act of the Legisla- 2 10 INDIAN DEED. ture in 1660. Oxford embraces a tract of land wliich was a grant made to certain individuals by government in 1682. On the 22nd of December, 16S6, Joseph Trask, alias Puagastlon, of Pennicook; Job, alias Pompamam.ny ; James Wiser, alias dualipunit; Sassawannow, of Natick, and Simon Pilicom, alias Wananapan, of Wamassick, — five Indians, who claimed to be lords of the soil, gave and executed a deed to Henry Willard, Joseph Eow- landson, Joseph Foster, Benjamin Willard, and Cyprian Stevens, in consideration of twenty-three pounds of the then currency, of a certain tract of land, twelve miles square, going under the general name of Naquag, and bounded as follows ; " The south corner butting upon Muscopague Pond, and running north to Q,uanitick and to Wanchatopick, and so running upon great Watchu- selt, which is the north corner ; so running northwest to Wallamanumpscook, and so to Q,uapuanimawick, a little pond, and so to Asnaconcomick Pond, which is the northwest corner; and so running south and so to Muss- hauge a great, swamp, and so to Sussahatassick wbic'i ';> the south corner; and so running east to Pascut.c!; quage, and so to Ahumpatunshauge, a. little pond, nnd so to Siimpauge Pond, and to Muscopague, which is the east corner." This Indian deed, signed and acknowledged by fhe above named Indians, was re ceived April 14, 1714, and recorded in the Eegislry of Deeds for Middlesex County, Vol. .wi, p. 51!, — Worcester County not having been incorpor.iied until April 2, 1731. That this deed did not give to the grantees an indis putable legal title to the territory it purported to convey is evident. For prior discovery, or occupancy, by the ORDER OF GENERAL COURT. 11 Indians, was not acknowledged by our legislators and courts as creating any fee in the soil ; while discovery by the English was recognized as vesting all lands, me diately or immediately, in the Crown. Consequently, as this tract of land was included in the grant to the colony of Massachusetts, any conveyance of it by the natives must be invalid until sanctioned by the Provin cial legislature. And that the original purchasers, re garded the deed as worthless is also obvious. For a little more than twenty-six years subsequent to its date, we find that the General Court on the 23d of February, 1713, upon the Petition of the sons and grandsons of Major Simon Willard * of Lancaster, deceased, and the other heirs of the grantees, for approbation and confirm ation of their title to the. above tract of land, passed an Order, " That the lands in the Indian deed, and accord ing tb their buts and bounds, be confirmed to the child ren of the said Simon Willard, deceased, or to their legal representatives, and to the other petitioners, or their legal representatives, and associates, provided that with in seven years time there be sixty families settled thereon and sufficient lands reserved for the use of a gospel min istry and schools, except what part thereof the Hon. Sumuel Sewall, Esq. hath already purchased, and that this grant shall not encroach upon ,any former grant or grants, nor exceed the quantity of twelve miles square. The town to be called Rutland, and to liye to the County of Middlesex." The tract of land purchas ed of the Indians, which was thus conditionally con- * This was the famous Major Willard, who marched with 46 men from Lan caster to Brookfield, in 1675, for the relief of tiie little band there surrounded hy more than 300 Indians, and vvtiose memory has been unhappily slandered by tradition. 12 DIVISION OP TERRITORY. firmed, comprised in all 93,160 acres, including 1,000 acres owned by Hon. Mr. Sewall ; and was surveyed by William Ward in October, 1715. This purchase, with the exception of that owned by Mr. Sewall, was dis tributed among the heirs of the original grantees in thirty-three" shares : Joseph Foster had two, and the others had one share each. The proprietors, at a meeting held Dec. 14, 1715, at Boston, voted to survey six miles square of the territory, for the settlement of sixty-two families, in order to the fulfillment of the condition of the grant of 1713. The settlers, on the llth of August, 1720, entered into a written agreement with the proprietors, and bound themselves by certain articles, signed and witnessed. And on the 26th of June, 1721, this six miles square ¦was confirmed to the settlers by the proprietors, and it now composes the town of Rutland, which was incor porated by an Act of the Legislature, May 30, 1722. Of the remainder of the Twelve miles' Square, one portion, known as "Rutland District," was, by an Act of the Legislature, incorporated on the 14lh of June, 1774, and called Barre, as a token of respect to a wor thy friend of America, at that time a member of the British House of Commons ; a second portion, called " the Northeast quarter of Rutland," was iacorporated on the 13th day of June, 1767, and called ITubliardston, to perpetuate the name and memory of the Hon. Thomas Hubbard, Esq. of Boston, who had been sometime Speaker of the House of Representatives, a member of the Corporation of Harvard University in Cambridge, and a large proprietor of lands in Rutland original grant ; a third portion was styled " Rutland West Wing" until the yei,t 1759, when the inhabitants had certain BUTLAND EAST WING. 13 privileges granted thetn, and the place was called the "Precinct of Rutland West Wing" until its incorpora tion by an Act of the Legislature, June 7, 1762, when the name of Oakham was given to it ; a fourth portion, with an equal tract from the town of Leicester, was in corporated on the 12lh of February, 17,65, as the town of Paxton — named after Charles Paxton, a commissioner of the customs J while the remaining portion, known as "Rutland East Wing," and comprising ll.,626 acres, now constitutes the southerly and greater part of Prince ton. The last mentioned tract is the ojjly portion of the original purchase with which we are intimately concerned in this work. Agreeable to a vote of the proprietors, tjais tract was surveyed and laid out into forty-eight farms, of two hundred and thirty-seven acres each and numbered by Jetters, and a strip of two hundred and fifty acres undi vided, which now includes ths "Pout-water''' aind " Let ter M" lots. Rev. Thomas Prince, then ftoileague pastor of the Old South Chiirch, Bo^toUj was by far the largest proprietor of the traet, he owning nearly three thousand acres, the most of which subsequently came into the possession of the late Ward N. Boylston, Esq. The entire tract was botiindfid o» th« north and east by ihe line which separated it from several farms termed " Watertown Farms," and which in the Indian deed is described * as ruaniijg from ¦" Waneiiatopick," now de- * The line relerrod -to orosses tlie Bostnn road tnear the "Great IVlaple," at the foi*t of the " W'hirney -hill,*' a^nd, inn.ni*ig .northu'est, leaving the farms ot the late Jabez G. Head and flarloftv &lcinner a little to the norih, constitutes tiie dividing line between those (i-f :\Ie.^sr^. EH.^ha & Charles A. flliricl< and r«Ir. Uavis. ** After reaclii.n2 Ithe J:eiglit of land near Mr. Enoch Brooks's, it jmrsiies a snutheastGrly direction :uid utee's liIiiiljibaLdaton line on the land of t^zra Brooks."" O* 14 WATERTOWN FARMS. nominated Rutland Pond, to "Great Watchusett;" on the south by Rutland and Holden ; and on the west by Ilubbardston. The original proprietors, at the before mentioned meeting in Boston, Dec. 14, 1715, chose a committee, to which the absolute control of tbe concerns of the proprietary was entrusted, and who made the first conveyance of any portion of said territory, subsequent to the purchase of the Indians in 1686. Antither portion of territory, now comprised in the town of Princeton, was the " Watertown Farms." " This was a tract of about three thousand acres, granted, tradition says, by the General Court to the tovvn of Watertown, to aid in building and unaintaining a bridge. I find, after diligent inquiry, no record existing of the grant, nor any act or clue, by which its date, or specific ipurpose, other than that above stated, can be ascertain ed. It dates, probably, about the year 1745, and was re garded as of little or no value. The line bounding it on the north and east, ran from the north boundary of Rutland East Wing, beginning at a stake and stones in the 'pine woods' on land of" Sewell Richardson,* "near ly due north to a stake and stones, still existing, at the corner of lands owned by Dea. Israel Howe, James Brown, and formerly by Charles Gregory, now by Dan iel Parker. Thence it pursues nearly a westerly direc tion, crossing the county road near the mill-dam of Jaraes Brown, and passing a little to the south of Dea. Howe's dwelling-house, over the top of Pine hill, to the easterly side of Wachusett. Whence it pursues a crook ed southerly course, on the side of the mountain, to the aforesaid line of Rutland Eiiet Wing, which it meets at a stake and stones on .land of Enoch Brooks. This * Formerly owned bj'vtlio lute CiA. Jijm Whitney. FIRST SETTJ^EMEXT. 15 tract was sold by the town of Watertown to sundry prc- prietors. At a meeting of these, soon after the convey ance, a committee, of whom I believe Jonas Harrington, grandfather of the" late Capt. Benjamin Harrington, "was chairman, was chosen to survey the territory, and divide it into farms of equal value. This accounts for the inequality in extent of the lots, some containing nearly double the number of acres of others. After the completion of this survey and division, the lots were numbered and drawn by the original proprietors, some of whom settled on the farms thus obtained, while the greater portion made a second conveyance of them to. settlers."* ., We can find no records which lead us lo conclu(^e that any settlement was made on either of the above- mentioned tracts of land previous to 1739. The soli tude of the wilderness had remained unbroken, unless the occasional report of a huntsman's gun, or the shrill whoop of the Indian, echoing among the hills, aroused the timid deer, or hungry wolf. Tradition says that numbers of both these continued in the vicinity, some time after the first settlers made their homes in the wil derness. Some more than a century had now elapsed, since the Pilgrims disembarked from the Mayflower, upon the shores of New England. It had been a cen tury of great labor, — of hardships, perils and wars,— to the first settlers of the country. During this time, the colonies were continually increa=itig in population and importance. Every year \\itnessed new settlements in the willerness. About this period — Spring of 1739, — Mr. Joshua Wilder removed from Lancaster, and cle.ir- ed a s.nill spot, beside ihe brook, a liuJe east of the dwel- -* RusseU's History of rrinct-ton, pp. 3, 4. 16 FIRST SETTLEMENT. ling house on the farm owned by the late Peabody Houghton, and erected thereon a log house, in which he with his family resided for many years; probably until 1760. " Mr. Wilder was a saddler by trade, and the son of Capt. Nathaniel Wilder of Lancaster, a man somc- ivhat renowned, in the annals of his time and town, for his temerity and facetiousness. He married a daughter of Maj. John Keyes of Shrewsbury, who was also no little famous ' in his day and generation.' During the French war, somewhere about the year 1760 or 61, Mr. Wilder purchased a large number of cattle for the purpose of driving them to Canada, and disposing of them at a profit to the English army. ^ This intended speculation, however, was a total failure. On his arrival at its place of destination, with his stock, the war was so far con cluded that he found no sale for it, or at least none at asy adequate price. He returned, broken in property, and sold his farm to Benjamin Houghton, who owned the adjoining land, and with whom he had some litiga tion as to their respective boundaries. Soon after this he removed to Belchertown, then Cold Spring, where he died in 1762. Miss Sarah Wilder, his fourth child, was ihe first white person born in Princeton. Her birth oc curred in 1739. In 1762 she was married to Thomas Meriam of Westminster, and was the mother of the Meriams* at present residing in that place. She died 1819, at the advanced age of 80 years. The descend ants of Miss Wilder recoUect hearing their mother fre quently speak of gathering blueberries in company with others on the Meeting-house hill, with a file of soldiers to protect them from the Indians."t No other settle- * Grandmother of Mr. dark Meriam, \^ ho resides in tliis t,v\'n. t RuascH's Ili:;tory of Pr'n.Hton, p. 7. 17 ment was probably made, subsequent lo that of Mr. \^"il- der, ])rior to the year 1750, when Mr. Abijah Moore commenced to clear the farm at present owned and oc cupied by Maj. Joseph A. Read. JMr. Moore opened the first public house that was kept in town. The third settlement was made by Mr. Cheever, on what is at the present day called the Cobb farm. And in May, 1751, (the following year) Mr. Robert Keyes with liics family removed from Shrewsbury to this place, and se tied on the farm now owned by Amasa Smith, which is situated at the foot of the Wachusett, east side. On the 14th day of April, 175.5, a daughter of Mr. Keyes, named Lucy, aged foi# years and eight months, attempting, as was supposed, to follow two of her sisters, who had gone to Wachusett Pond, about a mile distant, for some sand, and having nothing but marked trees to guide her, wandered out of the way, and became lost in the forest. The people for nearly thirty miles round immediately collected, and in companies traverse! the woods, day after day, and week after week, searchiii;r for her, but without succe-s. They also repeatedly dragged the neighboring pond. Nothing of the child was discovered. Many jmirneys were taken by the f w ther in consequence of report-;, but all in vain. Tlie conjectures of the people were and have been various as to its fate ; "the most prevalent, and which divers con curring circumstances rend.:-r most probable," was, that it was carried off by the Indians on a visit to the moun- ttiin; and that she soon forgot her native language and became as one of the aborigines. " This was ma-tjo mure probable, by the story of two men, who went some years after this occurrence from Groton, on a trnding ex pedition among the Indians on Canada line. They re- 18 FIRST SETTLEMENT. later', on their return, that they found living among the Indians, a white woman, who knew nothing further of her birth or parentage than that she once lived near ' Chusett MIL' ' Mr. Oliver Davis wis the first settler in the west part, and the fifth iu the town. He settled on what is at the present time called " Clark hill," in 1751. Mr. Davis was industrious and frugal. He did much for the early advancement of the new settlement, by his example of diligence, aiid the introduction of useful, especially me chanical, arts. He purchased a large tract of land, part of which lay in Princeton, and the remainder in Hub- hardston; and erected a%aw-rnill on a branch of the Ware river. This was not only the first application of water power to mechanical purposes in the town, but also the first in the immediate vicinity. He also, a short time subsequent to this, built a grist mill on the above- mentioned river, sorne half a mile below where the " Slab-city" mill now stands.* At a subsequent period this was consumed by fire, and both a saw and grist mill were afterwards built by him on or near' the same site. Some of the first mills in Huhbardston were also built by him. Three of Mr. Davis's sons enlisted in the army, at the commencement of the Revolutionary con test, and one fell on the field of battle. Mr. Davis died on the 25th of January, 1803. From the consultation of ancient records, or inquir ies among the most aged inhabitants, we have not been able to decide upon the precise years when settlements ware made in different parts of the town. During 1752. and the four or five following years, several settlements were commenced in various parts of the town. Among * At present owned by Wm. D. Cheever, Ec-q. FIRST SETTLEIVIENT. 19 the settlers of about this period, were a Mr. Peter Good- now, on the site where the dwelling-house of Charles Russell, Esq. now stands ; a Mr. Norcross commenced the farm at present owned and occupied by Mr. Israel Everett ; Caleb Mirick, on the farms occupied by Messrs. Elisha and Charles A, Mirick ; Samuel Nichols ou Mr. Enoch Brook's farm ; Mr. Mede, on the farm at pres ent occupied by Ephraim Osgood ; Joseph Eveleth, en the farm of the late Capt. Benjamin Harrington ; Sam uel Hastings, on the farm of Mr. George Davis ; James Mirick, on the farm now owned by Mr. Geo. O. Skin ner ; Messrs. Thomas Gleason and Gibbs, on the site where the Wachusett Hotel now stands. A Mr. Stratton also commenced a farm whe»e the " Union'' meeting house now stands. There were also, about this time, several settlements made in the west part of the town. Among this number, subsequent to the settlement of Mr. Davis, were Joseph Rugg, Charles Parmenter, Sadey Mason, Seth Savage, Timothy Keyes, David Parker, Robert Cowdin, Mr. Rosier, — Thomas Mason on the farm now owned by Joseph Mason, — Mr. Wheeler, nnd subsequently Col. Benjamin Holden from Dedham, on the farm now owned by Benjamin Holden, the grandson of the latter, — and Isaac Thompson, on the farm of Isaac Thompson. The first settlers in the town labored under very great difficulties for a time, by reason of a rough, mountain ous and rocky soil and the naturally moist state of the land, for want of passable roads, and frora the prodigi ous quantities of heavy timber with which the ground was covered. The inhabitants were for some years de pendent on the neighboring towns for most of their supplies. They were industrious, however, and in a 20 ACT OF INCORPORATION. few years brought the soil into successful cultivation, when grass, especially, was produced in great abun dance — the soil being rich and fertile. The toils and dangers of original settlement being past, the increasing population and expanding resources required municipal powers for the management of the common interests of the inhabitants. In 1759, the free holders and proprietors presented a Petition to the Leg islature for Incorporation, whereupon the following Act was passed by the General Court: — - " Anno Regni Regis Georgii Secundi TricesiiEO L. S. Tercio. "An Act for erecting the East Wing of Rutland, so called, in the County of Worcester, and sundry farmu con tiguous thereto, lying between Lancaster and Narraganset number two, into a separate District by the name of Prince- Town. " Whereas a number of the Inhabitants and Proprie tors of the East Wing of Rutland, in the County of Worcester, and the proprietors and inhabitants of sun dry Farms contiguous thereto, lying between Lancaster and Narraganset No. 2, have represented to this Court raany difficulties they labour under, and praying that they may be made a separate District. "Therefore, be it enacted by the Governor, Council, and House of Representatives, That the said East Wing of Rutland, so called, and sundry Farms lying contigu ous thereto, contained within the bounds hereafter men tioned, be and hereby is erected into a distinct and separate District by the name of Prince Town : — viz. beginning at the northwest corner of Lancaster second Precinct, being also the southwest corner of Leominster, ACT OF INCORPORATION. 21 from thence running north 54 degrees west seven hun dred and sixty rods to a heap of stones upon the line of Narraganset No. 2, from thence running west thirty- five degrees south seven hundred and eighty-eight Rods to the southern corner of said Narraganset number two, then^turning and running southeast fifty-six Rod to the northeast corner of said Rutland East Wing, then turn ing and running west thirty Degrees south eleven hun dred and sixty Rod, on the northwest line of said Wing to the westerly corner of said Wing, then running south thirty-nine degrees east sixteen hundred and seventy Rod, being the dividing line of the first settlers part of Rutland, and the said Wing to the southerly corner of said East Wing, then turning and running east thirty-five degrees north eleven hundred and fifty rods on Holdin line to the corner of said East Wing, Holdin and Shrewsbury, and from thence running on the same point three hundred and ninety Rod on Shrewsbury line to the River, and from thence bound ing on Lancaster second Precinct to the first mentioned bounds, and that the said District be and hereby is in vested with all the Privileges, Powers, and Immunities that Towns in the Province by Law do or may enjoy, that of sending a Representative to the General Assem bly only excepted, " Provided, nevertheless, and be it further enacted, That the said District shall pay their proportion of all Town, County and Province taxes already sett or grant ed to be raised on the Towns of Rutland and Lancaster as if this act had not been made. " And be if further enacted, That William Richard son, Esq. be and hereby is empowered to issue his warrant to some principal Inhabitant of said District 3 23 FIRST TOWN MEETING. requiring him to notify and warn the inhabitants of said District qualified by Law to vote in Town affairs to meet at such time and place as shall be therein set forth to choose all such officers as shall be necessary to man age the affairs of said District. " October 12th, 1759. This Bill having been*ead three several times in the House of Representatives — Passed to be enacted. S, Wliite, Spk, " October \6th, 1759. This Bill having been read three several times in Council — Passed to be enacted. A. Oliver, Sec'y. " October 20th, 1759. By the Governor. I consent-to the enacting of this Bill. T. Pomnall." / This district thus incorporated, and which comprised jnearly 15,000 acres, constituting the main part of jPrinceton, was called Prince Town, to perpetuate the Iname and memory of Rev. Thomas Prince, then col- leaorue pastor of the Old South Church, Boston, and a large proprietor of this tract of land, as before mention ed, and whose only surviving daughter and child the Hon. Judge Gill subsequently married for his first wife. AT the time of the incorporation there were about thirty- families in the place. The first physician, by the name of Dr. Zackariah Harvey, settled about this time, on the farm now owned and occupied by Deacon Ebenezer Parker. - ) In accordance with the last clause of the act of inr corporation, a' warrant was issued by William Richard son, of Tiancaster, directed to Dr. Zachariah Harvey ; and on the 24th day of December, 1759, the inhabitants convened at the house of Abijah Moore, their first dis- FIRST ROADS. 23 trict meeting. Municipal officers were chosen, and from that day Princeton assumed her place among the regularly organized Districts of the Commonwealth. — Several pages are missing from the first volume of the Town records, consequently the proceedings of the abov.e mentioned meeting are lost. The officers elected at this meeting were only chosen to serve until the March following, when, as at the present time, the reg ular meeting for an election was held. Hence, the first " March meeting" was convened in 1760. The first, however, of which the proceedings are found on record, was held in March, 1761.* It is very evident from the following protest which is transcribed from the records, that there was some difficulty at this meeting : — " We the subscribers, Inhabitants and freeholders of Prince Town District, judging the annual meeting in Prince Town District on the 16th, of March, 1761, to be illegal, by reason of the meeting not being purged from such persons or voters as are unqualified by law for voting, we do therefore hereby enter our dissent against said meeting, it appearing unlawful. Signed, James Thompson, Oliver Davis, Isaac Wheeler, Capt. Eliphelet Howe, Ephm. Allen, Sadey Mason, Wm. Muzzy, Gideon Fisher. Princetown District, Mar. ye 16th, 1761." Previous to the last date, the inhabitants having peti tioned to the General Court, praying said Court to grant them a land tax, to enable them to build roads, and also to erect a house for Public worship, and having had their petition granted, and received the amount of .£337, *See a list of officers chosen at said meeting, transcribed from the records, in the appendix. 24 CHARACTER OP SETTLERS. public roads were laid oiit by the Selectmen in 1762, according to the instructions of the district. Of these, the first completed was " a road from Westminster line thro' Allen's farm, thence on the line between the Wing and Farms so called; thence thro' the land of Mr. Mo ses Gill and Caleb Mirick, to the meeting-house; thence thro' lots Letter B, No. 9 and 12, Letter H G. No. 22, to Holden line." The first settlers must have had ro mantic notions; for it appears that they were in the habit of constructing their roads over the highest hills. The manner of locating their roads also was somewhat peculiar.* And what is still raore remarkable, they " endeavored to locate their meeting-house as near heaven as possible^' — placing it on the summit of the highest point of land, except that of the old Wachusett. After repeated requests preferred to the district by sev eral of the inhabitants, it was granted to them in 1768, to pay their highway taxes, by work on the new roads most needed, and the price was fixed for the labor of man and beast. A short time subsequent to this period, many of the other roads at present existing in the town were built. Great sums have been appropriated for roads from time to time.* See in the appendix. CHAPTER II. Character of the First Settlers— Their Ancestry— Increase of Population- Province Lands — Land granted by the General Court to the First settled Minister— Petition to be Incorporated as a Town — Act of Incorporation — Opposition of the Town to the addition of Territory — First Representa tive — Boundary. In tracing the history of Princeton, we are approach ing the close of that generation of men, who may be CHARACTER OF SETTLERS. 25 called, the the first settlers of the town. Our minds, however, linger around this period with the most in tense interest. The men of that day had difficulties, perplexities and trials, to endure and overcome, such as are in a measure experienced in the settlement of all new colonies ; yet not in the eminent degree, perhaps, that they were by the first settlers of these regions. — The adventurer who at the present day penetrates the distant west, or the regions of California, may carry with him some of the comforts of civilized life, but this could not be obtained at the period of the settlement of Princeton ; for but a few of the luxuries of existence were known in the country. On the other hand, these early settlers were persons of decision, boldness, enterprise and independence. — They left their native town or country, and bid adieu to friends, acquaintance, a father's house, a pleasant home, to take up their abode in a howling wilderness, exposed day and night, whether in the hut or field, to the lurk ing and ravenous bear and wolf, — to cultivate a dreary waste, and this, too, under a thousand difficulties. Yet to clear the forest, erect houses, construct roads, build bridges, maintain schools, and support the gospel minis try, were enterprises most cheerfully undertaken. — Merely to live was not the whole of life with them, it was the height of their ambition to live as honest men, good neighbors, honorable citizens, and accountable to their Creator. They were not inferior to that genera tion of men whose settlement in New England consti tutes so important an epoch in history, and whose fame knows no limits other than the whole civilized world. — ¦ They were men possessing the sentiments of the Pil grims ; men who understood and highly valued both re- 3* 26 INCREASE OF POPULATION. ligious and civil freedom ; who cheerfully suffered for its enjoyments ; who were determined on its maintain- ance and promotion ; and who zealously labored to pre pare their children for its support and perpetuation. — They understood, appreciated and loved the truth. — They prayed and labored for its diffusion. They cul tivated and exhibited the evangelical spirit and faith of the gospel. Such were the men who settled here, and such their character. The charge of excessive vanity has not unfrequently been cast upon the people of New England, for speaking in terms which betray warm ad miration for the character of their ancestors. And yet, those who would reproach us as being judges, there is truth, confessedly, in an artfully expressed sentiment of a writer of antiquity. " The Lord sifted the kingdoms of Europe to obtain good seed wherewith to plant the sterile fields of Neiv England.'' A large proportion of the families first settling in Princeton, could trace their ancestry back to the earlier settlers of New England. Many came from Lancaster, sorae from Concord, some from Weston, some from Sudbury, and others from Dedham, Lexington, Water- town, Medfield and various other towns in different parts of the Province. Some twelve years subsequent to its incorporation as a District, Princeton had increased in numbers and wealth to a considerable extent. In 1759 there were, probably, not more than twenty-five or thirty legal voters, while in 1771 the number had augmented to nearly one hundred ; and when the census was taken in 1791, a still later period, there were oue hundred and forty-four dwelling-houses and 1,016 inhabitants in the place. In addition to the two tracts of land which were TOWN INCORPORATION. 27 incorporated into the District in 1759, there were con tiguous thereto some thousands of acres of Province land, whiqh had never been incorporated into any dis trict ; — with the exception of five hundred acres, mainly lands on the Wachusett mountain, and which at a subse quent period were granted by the General Court to the Rev. Timothy Fuller, in consideration that he was the first minister and settled upon a small salary in the in fancy of the town.* In 1765, the District chose Samuel Woods, Joseph Eveleth and Boaz Moore, a committee, and instructed them " to send," in behalf of said district, " a petition t to the Great and General Court for the province land in this district." " Of the adjoining Province lands, one thousand acres known as the ' Potash farm,' were granted to one Plastid, in case he should teach the people the manufacture of potash. Buildings were erected and the manufacture commenced. For some reason, however, Plastid failed to obtain the land, and it was subsequently granted to Gen. Ruggles, for some military service in the French war. The- re mainder of the Province land was probably settled by adventurers or taken up by speculators." In 1770, it was voted by the District to petition the General Court to be incorporated into a town ; and accordingly, the Selectmen were appointed a commit tee for this purpose. During this year, or early the succeeding one, they forwarded to the General Court the Petition which follows, and which eventuated in the sought for Act of Incorporation, a copy of which Act we also subjoin. ''' See Appendix, for a copy of the Petition and Resolv^ upon which said innd was given to Mr. Fuller. t No copy of this Petition, or of the one for incorporation in 1759, cr of tliat of the town in 1779, is to be found. 28 PETITION FOR INCOUPOKATION. "Province of Massachusetts Bay. "To His Excellency Thomas Hutchinson, Esq., Gov ernor and Commander-in-Chief in and over said Province, The Honorable His Majesty's Council and House of Rep resentatives in General Court assembled at Cambridge. " The Petition of Princetown, in the County of Wor cester, humbly shews, That said place composed of Province Land and other Lands,' and Farms which never before belonged to any Town or District to the Amount of near eight thousand acres, together with a part of the original grant of twelve miles square to the Proprietors of Rutland, which part was never incorporated into the Town of Rutland or any other Town, as many of this Honorable Court are well knowing,was in the year 1760 — 1759 — erected into a District by the name of Prince town, and was not annexed to any Town to join with them in the choice of Representative, and never can join with any, without being subject to greater difficul ties than any District lately made by reason of the dis tance, and badness of the Roads. " Your petitioners therefore humbly pray (seeing saitl District was composed of lands, which never before be longed to any town or District) you would out of your wonted goodness erect said place into a Town, with all the powers and privileges which are enjoyed by other Towns in this Province. "And as in duty bound will ever pray. Ebenezer Jones, "1 Caleb Mirick, J ACT OF INCORPORATION. 29 " Anno Regni Regis Georgii Testii L. S. Undecimo. "An Act to erect the District of Prince Town into a Town by the name of Princeton. " Whereas the Inhabitants of the District of Prince Town have Petitioned this Court to be Incorporated into a Town that they may enjoy the privileges of other Towns in this Province, " Be it therefore enacted by the Governor Council, and House of Representatives, That the District of Prince Town in the County of Worcester, with all the lands adjoining to said District not included in any other Town or District, be and hereby is incorporated into a Town by the name of Princeton, and that the Inhabi tants thereof be and hereby are invested with all the powers, privileges and immunities which the Inhabitants of the several Towns within this Province do enjoy. "April 17th, 1771- This bill having been read three several times in the House of Representatives — Passed to be enacted. Thomas Cushing, Speaker, "April 19th, 1771. This Bill having been read three several times in Council — Passed to be enacted. Thomas Fluckcr, Sec'y, "April 2ith, 1771, By the Governor. I consent to the enactment of this Bill. T, Hutchinson." The inhabitants of Princeton, as appears from the town records, were strongly opposed to the addition of territory to the original district, which was made by the above act of the General Court. Hence they passed, in 30 ADDITION OP TERRITORY. Oct. 1771, the following vote : — " That it is the opinion of the town, that it is a hardship both to this town and the farms lately laid to it, that they should be annexed, inasmuch as they are in no way accommodatfid to it, and that it is impracticable that they should receive privileges that they be not rated." In May following, it was voted, " That a petition be prepared to" be pre sented to the General Court then " setting in Cambridge, praying that the land lately annexed to this town may be taken off;'' and the town also chose a committee consisting of Joseph Eveleth, William Thompson and Joseph Sargent, for this purpose. This petition, as be fore stated in a note, has been lost by some means. — The land alluded to, is probably that which at the present time constitutes the northern part of the town, known by the name of " Notown," which was undoubtedly an nexed at that time, — inasmuch as the above act oj" the General Court embraced " all the lands adjoining said District" not previously incorporated in any district or town ; but which was also, it would seem, on the prayer of this petition " taken off." It was finally annexed again by an act of the Legislature in 1838. The great objection to the annexation of the " farms" was, that roads were to be built through them, at the expense of the town ; which would in their view be " an unrepara- ble and unsupportable burden to the inhabitants." The town after the passage of the above act of incor poration had the right of a representation, but as this must have been at their own expense, it was voted in 1772 and 1773 not to send a representative, on account of the "extraordinary cost" and also "the "great ex pense of making roads." The first representative of the tovvn was Moses Gill, who was chosen in 1774 to BOUNDARY. 31 represent it in the General Court to be held in Salem, Oct. 5. It was the custom of the town, at that early date, to give written instructions to their representa tives.* The manner of calling the early town meetings, was to divide the town into " ranges," usually two, and a constable was appointed for each " range," whose duty it was to give personal notice to each inhabitant. The territory of Princeton at the present time consists of "Rutland East Wing," containing about 11,626 acres ; of the " Watertown Farms,'' about 3,000 acres ; of Province lands, incorporated in 1759, nearly 2000 acres; and of lands annexed, in 1771, about 2500 acres ; and about 500 acres set off from Huhbardston, on petition of the owners in 1810 ; and about 500 acres from "No Town" in 1838. The town is situated some fifty miles from Boston, about due west ; and fourteen miles from Worcester, nearly north ; — and is bounded on the north by Westminster, on the east by Sterling, on the south by Holden and Rutland, and on the west by Huhbardston. * For the instructions given to Mr. Gill m 1774 see succeeding chapter. CHAPTER III. American Revolution— First expre.E&ion of the town in relation to revolutiona ry measures — Reaolutioua — Committee of correspondence— Alarm — Prep- nrations for war— Instructions to representative — Declaration of rights — Bounty to the minute men — ThecitizensleavetheiiJ homes for the contest; Trouble with Rev. Mr. Fuller — Declaration of Independence— Regulation of the currency — War terminated. W^ have now reached an epoch of the deepest interest in our history. '* Tiie middle of the century had scarcely 32 AMERICAN REVOLUTION. past, before the shadows of oppression began to darken the land, and the first tremulous motions of the revolu tion, which finally upheaved the colonial government, were felt. The collision of popular privilege with royal prerogative, maintained during successive years by the representatives, had prepared the people for the investi gation of the principles on which their connection with the mother country rested, and waked their vigilance for the protection of chartered and inherited rights." — The long series of wars* which they had previously en dured, were doubtless useful schools, diffusing military spirit, and imparting knowledge of strength and skill, and confidence for repelling encroachments. When the appeal to arms approached, however, some of the colonists were filled with fear. And this is not to be wondered at, since the match was most unequal. There was on the one side, no organized regiment, no fortified town, no ship of war, no money, no arms nor military stores; while on the other there was a well dis ciplined army, with eminent officers, an extensive and powerful navy, an abundance of money, arms and stores, sustained by a reputation for military bravery that made their name a terror to all Europe. Besides, they had been educated with sentiments of veneration for the Crown 'of England, to which they had sworn fidelity, being indebted to its bounty for the honors and wealth they possessed. Some among them viewed the opposition to the measures of government premature, in its advance to extremities. The times, however, did not admit of a middle course. For the crisis had al. ready arrived. And it was found that the American colonists, gener. • Indian and French Wars, REVOLUTIONARY MEASURES. 33 ally were so inflexible in their adherence, on all occa sions, to truth ; — so elevated, expansive, and practical were their views ; so keen were their sensibilities to what was wrqng and injurious; so steadfast their deter mination to secure what was just; so vigilant their guardianship of their inalienable rights ; and so ardently were they attached to the principles of liberty ; — that, with comparatively few exceptions, there existed but one feeling, sentiment and aim, and that was to secure their just rights; and if this could be effected in no other way, to do it by tlie Declaration of Independence. — However the colonists were divided in other things, they were united in this. However different in their departments of effort, all converged to this one great point. The earliest expression of opinion, on the records of the town of Princeton in relation to revolutionary measures, was entered on the 7th of March, 1768, when the people, at their annual town meeting, manifested their indignation at the promulgation of the act of Par liament imposing duties on paper, glass, painters' colors and tea, imported into the colonies. They did this by concurring with certain resolutions* to encourage do mestic manufactures and refrain from purchasing the taxed articles, which were passed by the inhabitants of Boston, at a meeting held October, 1767. From this period to 1773 no doings of the inhabitants, in their corporate capacity, mark the progress of the spirit of independence. A letter of correspondencet * The Legislature adopted resolves of similar import, Feb. 96. I The letter of correspondence to the town, closes with these words : — t' Let us consider, brethren, we are struggling for our best birth right and in heritance, which being inlringed renders all our blessings precarious in their enjoyment, and consequently trifiing in their value. Let tis disappoint the 4 3/4 RESOLUTIONS-. received from Boston, called the attention of the town, a; a meeting held in January, 1773, to the grievances under which the province labored. A committee was appointed to consider the contents of said letter, who presented the following resolutions at the adjournment, January 25, which exhibits the spirit that animated the bosoms of our fathers in those days which " tried -men's souls." They were unanimously passed by the town : — " Resolved, 1st, That the connection between the mo- tlier country and these colonies is of great consequence to both, if mutually kept up ; but when digressions are raade from established compacts, that connection begins to lessen, and of course,, creates an alienation, the ef fects of which must be attended with bad consequences. For the resolute man, in a just cause, while in a state cf freedom, never will consent to any abridgements or deprivations of his just rights, and disdains threats or any measures of compulsion to submission thereto — not like the dog, the more he is beaten the raore he fawns ; but on the contrary, with a noble mind, defends to the last, and every stripe stimulates his efforts and endeav-, crs, in defence of his own country's cause. "2. — That this town, as a part of their province, whensoever their rights, liberties, and properties, are in-; fringed upon, by what authority soever, that they, in honor to their forefathers, by whose solicitude and indus try, under God, they for many years have enjoyed the fruits of their labors — for the regard they bear to posr terity — as friends to their country, have good right to men, who are raising themselves on the ruin oi this country. Let us convince every invader of our freedom that we will be as tree as the Constitution ou^ fathers recognized willjustify." RESOLUTIONS. 35 complain, and manifest iheir uneasiness at such pro ceedings. *' 3.' — That the repeated attempts to make the people of this province subject to unjust taxation, and absolute ¦dependency upon the crown, together, appear subversive of, and inconsistent with, the constitution of a free people. "4. — That such measures are unconstitutional, and demand the attention of all well disposed people, and a mutual connection and joint adherence in proper means for redress, thsrt thereby the rights and liberties, civil tmd religious, which have been transmitted to us from -our illustrious ancestors, might be kept inviolate by us their posterity, " 5 — That they shall be aWays ready to concur in all just and proper means that this province and the neigh boring colonies raay come into for the common good, -and in conjunction with the friends of liberty., shall bear testimony to all invasions upon our rights and liberties. "6. — That the report (these resolutions) be put on the town record, that posterity may know they had a sense of their invaluable rights and liberties, and were not ¦svilling to -part with them, but by their own consent, and that they are determined to vindicate and support them as time and occasions may call,* Ephraim Woolson, ~\ Boaz Moore, I ,~ ..... „ j-i. T r Committee, Ebenezer Jones, ( Charles Brooks, J At the annual town meeting in March, 1774, it was voted "to choose a committee of correspondence to com- * A copy of the above resolutions- were transmitted to the inhabitants at Boston, by the Cleric. 36 COMMITTEE OF CORRESPONDENCE. raunicate with committees of correspondence in other towns in this province, to give the earliest intelligence to the inhabitants of this town, of any designs that they shall discover, at any subsequent period, against our natural and constitutional rights." Accordingly, Capt. Benjamin Holden, Joseph Everleth, Samuel Woods, Wil liam Thompson, John Jones, Adonijah Howe, and Sadey Mason, were elected a committee of correspondetice, — four of whom were to constitute a quorum. The records of the town of Princeton exhibit the brightest evidence of the devotion of its inhabitants to their country's inalienable rights. They were not only ready to pass resolves which breathed the spirit of pa triotism ; but they were also ready to seal their devo tion to their country's cause, by death on the battle field, if need be. Hence, when the alarm* reached the place, that a band of the King's troops had made an ex cursion by night, up the Mystic river, and carried off a quantity of gunpowder deposited in the arsenal in the northwest part of Charlestown, the effect was electric. And tradition says that a part of the night was speiit by some in changing pewter platters into musket bullets, and in preparation for immediate engagement. As soon as these arrangements could be completed, several of the inhabitants marched, and were on their way, when the return of messengers from Boston assured them their further advance was unnecessary. It has been supposed by some that the occasion had been seized to try the spirit of the inhabitants at large, that they might thereby ascertain the extent and strength of the resolution of resistance. And such was the spirit animating the community, that men who had * The esact date of this alarm we ar* not able to state. 37 never seen the tents of an enemy, left the plough in the furrow, and the sickle in the harvest, and went out to meet the trained foe, without discipline, equipments, or munitions.* It is said by one historian : " There came men without officers, and officers without men, long fowling pieces and short blunderbusses, muskets of all sorts and sizes, some without locks, others without stocks, and -many without lock, stock, or Ijarrel ; car tridge boxes, shot belts, powder horns, swords, hatchets, snic'kersees, crow bars, and broom sticks all mingled together." Ample evidence was afforded of steadfast determination to meet even the dreadful appeal to war, and a sufficient pledge was given of the support every town might hope from its neighbors in extremity. One beneficial result from this excitement, was the admonition of the necessity of a better preparation for the contest which was now evidently approaching. At a meeting held in Princeton, but a short time subse quent to that period, the selectmen were instructed to purchase two barrels of gunpowder, one hundred weight •of lead and three hundred flints, to add to the town stock. This vote evinces both a foresight of conse quences and deterrainateness of action on the part of the town. In October, Moses Gill was elected representative to the General Court tq be held in Salem, and Benjamin Holden delegate to the provincial Congress to be as sembled at Concord. The former was instructed, " ab solutely to refuse to be sworn to represent said town by any unconstitutional officer," and, "In case the General Court is prevented setting constitutionally to repair to Concord, and join the provincial Congress." The in- * GOOD from Worcester County. 4* 38 INSTRUCTIONS. structions to the latter required that he should " use his greatest influence to prevent all arbitrary acts of Parlia ment taking place, evidently tending to destroy the lib erties and privileges of this and the other provinces," and also to " endeavor to make provision for and come into such measures as shall be for the peace and good order of this Province." Gov. Gage was a royalist, and becoming alarmed by the spirit of the instructions that were given to the rep resentatives in most towns, and the stormy aspect of the times, issued his proclamaition, declaring that it was expedient the session of the General Court, summoned to be held the 5th of October, should not be held ; at the same time discharging the members from attend ance ; and announcing his intention not to meet the as sembly. But the current of popular feeling was not thus to be diverted. The representatives elect assem bled at Salem, and, resolving themselves into a provin cial Congress, elected John Hancock President, and Benjamin Lincoln Secretary, and immediately adjourn ed to Concord. Here measures were taken for arming the whole province ; twelve thousand men were to be raised, and to hold themselves ready to march at a mo ment's warning. The patriotic resistance to invasions of liberty was not confined to municipal corporations or general asem- blies of citizens. The fervid enthusiasm, pervading the whole fabric of society, manifested itself in varied forms. The following document is found appended to the sec ond volume of the records of the town, without date. — It appears to be an oath of allegiance or declaration. — It breathes the spirit of the times ; and was probably drawn some time during the year 1774 ; OATH OF ALLEGIANCE. 3Q " I do truly and sincerely acknowledge, profess, tes- tdlfy, and declare, that the Commonwealth of Massachu setts is, and of right ought to be, a free, sovereign, and independent State. And I do swear that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the said Commonwealth, and that I will defend the sam« against all traitorous con spiracies and hostile attempts whatsoever — and that I do renounce and abjure all allegiance, subjection, and obe dience to the King or govopM?ar jealousy and dislike — that the minds of the people be no longer agitated with repeated returns of the refugees."* * Messrs. Moses Gill, Sadey Mason, and Joseph Sargent, were a committee wlio reported said instructions— which were also adopted by the town. CHAPTER IV. Insurrection— Distress of the People— County Convention- Instructions to Col. Sargent— Grievances— Courts suspended— Capt. Gale at the Court House — Court of Sessions Interrupted— Preparations of Government Daniel Shays — Porcesof Insurgents— Insurgents occupy the Court Bouse • Consultation of the Insurgents— The Retreat— Gen. Lincoln's Army- Termination of the Rebellion— Henry Gale. Scarcely were the struggles of the revolution over, and the smoke of its burning lost in a clear sky, before internal dissensions threatened the overthrow of the general government, Difiiculties presented themselves, INSURRECTION. 53 which, in their progress, brought the Commonwealth of Massachusetts to the very verge of ruin. We would refrain from an allusion to the insurrection known in History as the Shays' Rebellion could its ex istence be effaced from memory. But those events cannot be forgotten, since they stand with prominence upon the annals of the State. Neither is the voice of tradition silent upon this subject. " Historical truth, however, not unfrequently checks and properly tempers the fervor of admiration which we sometimes experi ence, when contemplating the patriotic exertions of our ancestors. That there existed circurastanges, which palliated, though they did not justify, the conduct of those who rebelled against the government of their own enactment, is clearly evident.'' " After eight years of war, Massachusetts stood with the splendor of triumph, in republican poverty, bankrupt in resources, with no revenue but of an expiring currency, and no metal in her treasury more precious than the continental copper, bearing the devices of union and freedom. The coun try had been drained by taxation for the support of the army of independence, to the utmost limit of its means ; public credit was extinct, manners had become relaxed, trade decayed, manufactures languishing, paper money depreciated to worthlessness, claims on the nation accu mulated by the commutation of the pay of officers for securities, and a heavy and increasing pressure of debt restetf oiTthe Commonwealth, corporations and citizens. The first reviving efforts of commerce overstocked the markets with foreign luxuries and superfluities, sold to those who trusted to the future to supply the ability of payment. The temporary act of 1782 making property a tender in discharge of pecuniary contracts, instead of 54 COUNTY CONVENTIONS. the designed remedial effect, enhanced the evils of gen eral insolvency, by the postponing collections. The outstanding demands of the royalists' refugees, who had been driven from large estates and extensive business, enforced with no lenient forbearance, came in to in crease the embarrassments of the deferred pay-day. At length a flood of suits broke out. In 1784, more than 2000 actions were entered in the county of Worcester, then having a population less than 50.000, and in 1785, about 1700."* Property of every description was seized and sold at great sacrifice, the general difficulties having driven away purchasers. Amid the great distress of the people, many were ex cited to frenzy by the actual evil of enormous debt, and by the supposed grievances of a defective constitution, a corrupt administration, and unequal and unjust laws. It is not surprising that in such a state of affairs a reme dy should be sought by resort to the most unjustifiable measures. Previous to the close of the revolutionary war, there were some indications of uneasiness mani fested, on the part of the people, in reference to some of the acts of the Legislature, as the operation of laws conflicted with their views of expediency and their in terests. In 1782, however, the complaints of grievan ces were of a more general character. As early as April of that year, a Convention was held at Worcester, composed of delegates from twenty-six towns in the County. This Convention attributed the prevailing dis satisfaction of the people to a want of confidence in the disbursement of the enormous sums of money annually assessed, and recommended instructions to the represen tatives in General Court, to require immediate settle- * See Lincoln's History of Worcester, Chap. VIII. INSTRUCTIONS. 55 ment with all public officers entrusted with the funds of the Commonwealth, to reduce the compensation of the members of the House and the fees of lawyers, to pro cure sessions of the Court of Probate in various places in the County of Worcester, — the revival of confessions of debt, enlargement of the jurisdiction of Ju.stices of Peace to .£20, — contribution to the support of the con tinental army in specific articles instead of money, — and the settlement of accounts between Massachusetts and Congress. At an adjourned session. May 14, the Con vention recommended, that the account of public ex penditures should annually be rendered to the towns ; — that the General Court be removed from Boston, a sepa ration of the business of the Court of Common Pleas and Sessions, and also an inquiry into the grants of lands in the State of Maine in favor of Alexander Shepherd and others. Princeton was represented in this assem blage by Lieut. Charles Brooks. Although these complaints were unnoticed by the Le gislature, the spirit of discontent was hushed and quieted for a season. But the murmurs of the coming storm were again heard here in August, 1786. On receipt of the invitation of a Convention holden at Leicester, June 26, requesting the participation of the town, at an ad journed meeting, to be held in the month of August, at the same place. The inhabitants determined, by a great majority, to comply ; and accordingly elected Col. Sargent a dele gate, with the following instructions : — " As the safety and happiness of a people depend upon the support of Government and good and wholesome Laws are to be enacted by the Legislature for that pur- 56 GRIEVANCES. pose, and that uo people or body of men can be safe without it, — and that justice ought to be administered in a way least expensive to the people — it is therefore the sense of this town at this day of public distress that the number, and salaries of public officers ought to be reduced, — and that in our opinion Government might be supported at a less expense than it is at present, — and that the granting moneys from time to time to per sons employed in the public service, other than amply to reward them for their service, is oppressive, and ought not to be done under any pretence whatever ; that it is the sense of this town that petitions be sent to His Ex cellency the Governor, by the people of this Common wealth, praying him to call the General Assembly to gether as soon as may be, to take under consideration the distresses of the good people of this Commonwealth, that some measures may be taken for their relief, par ticularly that industry and manufactures may be en couraged, and superfluities as much as possible be avoid ed. And it is the sense of this town that the making a paper currency will, instead of granting relief, involve us in confusion, and that it be recommended to the good people, to cultivate a benevolent temper, and disposition towards their fellow mortals at this day of distress, and those that are strong, bear the infirmities of the weak." In addition to the grievances referred to in the previ ous Conventions, the following were enumerated at this in Leicester : — abuses in the practice of the law ; the number and salaries of public offcers ; grants to the At torney General and to Congress while the State accounts remained unpaid, together with some others. To this period the people had sought redress by the COURTS SUSPENDED. 57 constitutional appeal to the Legislature. The first open act of insurrection followed immediately after the close of the Convention last named. The September following, Capt. Adam Wheeler, of Huhbardston, heading a band of eighty armed men, entered Worcester and took pos session of the Court Flouse. Their numbers were soon augmented to more than four hundred ; " half with fire arms, and the remainder furnished with sticks." The Colonels in the brigade were ordered on the part of gov ernment to call out their regiments, and march, without a moment's delay, to sustain the judicial tribunals; but the order was unavailing, for the militia shared in the disaffection, and generally favored those movements of the people directed against civil government, and'tending to the subversion of social order. Hence the Court ¦finding that no reliance could be placed on that right arm, on which the government rested for defence-— it be ing paralyzed, and of consequence entertaining no hope of being permitted to proceed with business, adjourned until December following, continuing all causes to that term. Announcement was made by the sheriff to the people, and a copy of the record communicated. — The Court of Sessions >also considering their deliber ations controlled by the mob, of insurgents— or Regu lators as they styled themselves, — deemed it expedient to imitate the example of the superior tribunal and there fore adjourned to the 21st of November. Before night closed down on the day in which the courts were sus.- pended, the Regulators, elated with their partial success returned home to foment greater commotions ; and thus terminated the first interference of the citizens in arms with the course of justice." The success of the insurgents had an unfavorable JB- 58 CAPT. GALE AT THE COURT HOUSE. fluence on the state of feeling in Princeton. Other por tions of the State also caught the spirit of discontent. As the time approached for the sitting of the Sessions, whose jurisdiction was principally over criminal offences, and its powers exercised for the preservation of social order, no opposition had been anticipated, and conse quently no defensive preparations on the part of the government had been made. In the meantime, however, the disaffected had been active in their preparations to interrupt the Sessions on the 21st of November ; and on that day Capt. Abraham Gale, of this town, entered the north part of Worcester with about sixty armed men. — ' The day following their numbers were augmented to more than two hundred, mostly from Shrewsbury and Huhbardston. A petition was presented to the Court, at the United States Arras' Tavern, by a committee chosen for that purpose, for their adjournment until a new election of representatives to the General Court. — : The petition, however, was not entertained. The men under Capt. Gale then took posession of the ground around the Court House, which they guarded in a martial form ; and sentinels were posted along the front of the building. " When the Justices approached, the armed men made way, and they passed through the opening ranks to the steps. There, triple rows of bayo nets presented to their breasts, opposed further advance. The Sheriff, Col. William Greenleaf, of Lancaster, ad dressed the assembled crowd, stating the danger to them selves and the public from their lawless measures. — Reasoning and warning were ineffectual, and the proc lamation in the riot act was read for their dispersion. — Amid the grave solemnity of the scene, sorae incidents vs'ere interposed of lighter character. Col. Greenleaf PREPARATIONS OF GOVERNMENT. 59 remarked, with great severity, on the conduct of the armed party around him. One of the leaders replied, they sought relief from grievances ; that among the most intolerable of them was the Sheriff himself; and next to his person were his fees, which were exhorbitant and excessive, particularly on criminal executions. 'If you consider fees for executions oppressive,' replied the Sheriff, irritated by the attack, ' you need not wait long for redress ; for I will hang you all, Gentlemen, for noth ing, with the greatest pleasure.' Some hand among the crowd, which pressed close, placed a pine branch on his hat, and the county officer retired, with the Justices, dec orated with the evergreen badge of rebellion. The clerk entered on his records, that the Court was pre vented from being held by an armed force, the only no tice contained on their pages that our soil has ever been dishonored by resistance of the laws." To this period government had resorted only to leni ent measures, hoping that these might have been suffi cient to have induced her revolted subjects to lay down the arms assumed under strong excitement, and that re viving order would rise from the confusion. But the insurgents, animated with their temporary success, and mistaking the mildness of forbearance for weakness, or fear, had extended their purposes from present relief to permanent change. In their early movements they pro fessed to have but one object in view, — to stop the flood of executions which wasted their property and made their homes desolate. Consequently, a large portion of the community, though they condemned the measures resorted to by the actors in the scenes we have describ ed, sympathized in their sufferings, and therefore they 60 . THE INSURGENTS. were disposed to consider the offences venial. But on this renewal of the 21st of November, of opposition to the administration of justice, the sympathizers with the insurgents, were materially lessened. Defiance of the authority of the Commonwealth could no longer be tol erated, without demolishing her institutions. The crisis had fully arrived when government was compelled to appeal to the sword for preservation, even though its destroying edge, turned on the citizen, might be crimsoned with civil slaughter. " Information was communicated to the chief magistrate of the extensive levies of troops for the suppression of the judiciary, and the coercion of the legislature. Great preparations were being made to prevent the session of the Court of Com- monPleas, in Worcester, in December following." The Governor* with the advice and consent of his council, in the meantime had determined to adopt vigorous measures to restrain the Regulators. Orders were dis patched to Maj. General Warren, to call out the militia of division, and^five regiraents were directed to hold themselves in readiness to march without a moment's delay. But in this hour of utmost need, the troops shared in the disaffection, and the Sheriff reported that it was out of his power to muster a sufficient force. The first instructions were therefore revoked. And it was resolved to make a desperate effort to raise an army whose power might effectually crush all resistance. At the same time, the Judges were instructed to adjourn the Court until the 23rd of January following, at which time it was confidently expected that the contemplated arrangements, could be matured to terminate the unhap py agitation, and disturbances. * Gov. Bowdoin. DANIEL SlIAYS. 61 "The insurgents, unapprised of the change of oper ations, began to concentrate their whole strength to in terrupt the Courts at Worcester and Concord. They had fixed on Shrewsbury as the place of rendezvous. — On the 29th of November, a party of forty from Barre, Spencer, and Leicester, joined Capt. Wheeler, who had established his head quarters in that town during the preceding week and succeeded in enlisting about thirty men. Daniel Shays, the reputed commander-in-chief, and nominal head of the rebellion, made his first public appearance in the County* soon after, with troops from Hampshire. Reinforcements came in, till the number at the post exceeded four hundred. Sentinels stopped and examined travelers, and patrols were sent out to wards Concord, Cambridge, and Worcester. On Thursday, Nov. 30, information was received that the Light Horse, under Col. Hitchborn, had captured Shat- tuck, Parker and Paige, and that a detachment of cavalry was marching against themselves. This intelligence disconcerted their arrangements for an expedition into Middlesex, and they retreated, in great alarm to Hid den." As the Light Horse retired, it was discovered that they did not exceed twenty. Learning this fact, nearly one hundred of Shay's men rallied, and pursued their foe whose velocity of moveraent was such that it left no cause to fear they could be brought in conflict. On arriving at Shrewsbury consultation was held as to the expediency of marching to Worcester, and take possession of the ground around the Court House for an encampraent. It was however considered, in view of their being destitute of clothing, food, and money, impracticable to maintain themselves there, and on Sat- * Worcester County. 6* 62 INSURGENTS OCCUPY THE COURT HOUSE. urday they marched to one of the neighboring towns, and went into quarters with some that sympathized with them in their movements. Shays himself, with his men, retired to the barracks in Rutland, leaving orders for the different detachments to assemble in Worcester on Monday following. On Sunday evening, a body of troops entered Wor cester, under the command of Captains Abraham Gale of this town, and Wheeler of Huhbardston, and others. Halting before the Court House, they placed a strong guard around the building, and posted sentinels on all the streets and avenues of the town. Those who were not on duty, having obtained the keyes by some means, entered the Court House, and rolling themselves in their blankets, rested on their arras on the floor of the Court room. The day following the military strength of Wor cester rallied under Capt. Joel Howe to the support of government. Fortunately, however, the insurgents were not prepared to stain their cause by civil war. " As the evening closed in, one of the most furious snow storms of a severe winter commenced. One division of the in surgents occupied the Court House; another sought shelter at the Hancock Arms. The sentinels, chilled by the tempest, and imagining themselves secured by its violence from attack, joined their comrades around the fire of the guard room." The increasing fury of the storm, and the almost impassable condition of the road did not prevent the arrival of many from different towns in the vicinity of Worcester, on Tuesday, augmenting the numerical force of the discontented subjects of gov ernment to about five hundred. The Court of Common Pleas was opened according to adjournment at the Sun Tavern. But in conformity with the instructions of CONSULTATION OF THE INSURGENTS. 63 Gov. Bowdoin and the Council, it adjourned, without at tempting to transact business, to the 23rd of January, 1787. " On Tuesday evening, a council of war was convened, and it was seriously determined to march to Boston, and effect the liberation of the State prisoners, as soon as sufficient strength could be collected. In anticipation of attack, the Governor gathered the means of defence around the metropolis. Guards were mounted at the prison and at the entrances of the city ; alarm posts were assigned, and Major General Brooks held the militia of Middlesex contiguous to the road in readiness for action, and watched the force at Worcester." On Wednesday, Dec. 6, Shays and his aid, mounted on white horses entered Worcester. About 800 troops formed the army of the insurgents. In this force were several soldiers from Princeton, The following day, Thursday, was spent by committees from several towns in the county, with Shays and his officers, in consulting as to their future operations. Their deliberations were exceedingly perplexing and contradictory. The weather had been so inclement, that large parties that were ex pected from Berkshire and Hampshire were prevented from arriving. It was finally resolved in view of the im possibility of retaining the soldiers who had assembled without subsistence or stores, to abandon the contempla ted attack on Boston, and more pacific measures were adopted. A petition was prepared for circulation, re monstrating against the suspension of the habeas cor pus ; requesting the pardon and release of the prison ers — anew act of amnesty ; and the adjournment of courts until the session of the new Legislature in May ; and expressing their willingness to lay down their arras 64 CONSULTATION OP THE INSURGENTS. on compliance with these demands'. The following day was also spent in consultation. Being apprised that pub lic sentiment was setting against them with strong reac tion, letters were communicated to each town of Worces ter County, soliciting the citizens to unite in their peti tions. On Saturday, about 12 o'clock M., the insurgents in Worcester were dismissed, and as another snow storm had commenced early in the raorning, they were com pelled to wade through the drifting snows on their home ward march. " The condition," says Lincoln, in his Flistory of Worcester, " of these deluded raen during their stay here, was such as to excite compassion rather than fear. Destitute of almost every necessary of life, in an incleraent season, without money to purchase the food which their friends could not supply, unwelcome guests in the quarters they occupied, pride restrained the exposure of their wants. Many must have endured the gnawingsof hunger in our streets ; yet standing with arms in their hands, enduring privations in the midst of plenty, they took nothing by force, and they passed on no man's rights by violence ; some declared they had not tasted bread for twenty four hours ; all who made known their situation, were relieved by our citizens with liberal charity. The forlorn condition of the insurgents was deepened by the distresses of their retreat. Their course was amid the wildest revelry of storm and wind, in a night of intense cold. Some were frozen to death by the way ; — others exhausted with struggling through the deep and drifted snow, sank down, and would have perished but for the aid of their stouter comrades ; when relief was sought among the farm houses, every door was opened RETREAT OF THE INSURGENTS. 65 at the call of misery, and the wrongs done by the rebel were forgotten in the sufferings of him who claimed hos pitality as a stranger." Shays conducted the remnant of his forces to Spring field, and on the 26th of December interrupted the Court of Common Pleas in that town. Intelligence being re ceived of active exertions to prevent the session at Wor cester on the 23d of January, vigorous measures were adopted to sustain the judiciary. The Governor called upon the militia of Boston and vicinity to march under the coraraand of General Benjamin Lincoln, and to force the insurgents to surrender. An army of more than 5000 men was raised for thirty days. On the 21st of January, Gen. Lincoln with his force took up their line of march from Roxbury, and arrived at Worcester the following day. Detachments of in surgents were collected in Princeton and some of the neighboring towns, but, intimidated by the military, did not attempt to enter Worcester, and the courts proceed ed, without being resisted. On the 25th of January, Gen. Lincoln hastened to Springfield for the relief of Shepard and of the arsenal at that place, invested by Shays and his force. Major General Warner being left at Worcester in command, with a regiment of infantry and a corps of artillery. " Information having been given that a body of about two hundred insurgents had assembled at New Brain tree, intercepting travelers and insulting the friends of government, twenty horsemen, supported by about 150 infantry in sleighs, were sent out, on the night of the 2d of February, to capture or disperse the disaffected. Up on approaching the place of theii: destination, the caval ry were ordered to advance at full speed to surprise the 66 TEMINATION OP THE REBELLION. enemy. The insurgents, apprised of the expedition, had abandoned their quarters, at the house of Micah Hamil ton, and taken post behind the walls of the roadside, and having fired a volley of musketry upon the detatchment, fled to the woods ; Mr. Jonathan Rice of Worcester, a Deputy Sheriff, was shot through the arm and hand ; Doot. David Young was severely wounded in the knee ; the bridle rein of Theopilus Wheeler, Esq., was cut by a ball. Without halting, the soldiers rapidly pursued their way to the deserted head quarters, where they liberated Messrs. Samuel Flagg, and John Stanton, of Worcester, who had been seized the day previous while transacting private business at Leicester. Having dispersed those who occupied the barracks at Rutland the next day, the companies returned with four prisoners." Shays retired to Petersham, where he expected to con centrate the forces of expiring rebellion and make his final stand. But the spirit animating the first movements had grown cold, and Shays with his soldiers were doubt less sensible that the cause had become gloomy and hope less. The insurgents dispersed and were never again collected in force. How many of the citizens of Prince ton, bore arms with Shays, we are unable to say. At one time during the insurrection, Princeton assumed the appearance of a garrison town. The citizens answered to the frequent challengesof military guards ; the travel er was admonished to slay his steps by the voice and bayonet of the soldier. Once a funeral procession was opposed en its way to the burial ground. Sentinels were posted near the house of Col. Sargent.* The rebellion having terminated, the infliction of some punishment for the highest political crime was * Where Major Joseph A. Reed now residee. HENKY GALE. 67 deemed advisable. Several of those who had been in arms against the government, were brought to trial and convicted of treason, and sentenced to death. Among that number was Henry Gale* of Princeton, who was sentenced to be executed on the 23rd of June, 1787, — The day having arrived he was accordingly led out to the gallows, erected on the Common at Worcester, with all the solemn ceremony of such exhibitions. A re prieve was however read to him while on the gallows, and subsequently a full pardon was given. The clem ency of government was ultimately extended to all who had been involved in the disaffection, upon taking the oath of allegiance to the Commonwealth, after some temporary civil disqualifications. Peace was again re stored to the Commonwealth. t * The Court assigned as Mr. Gale's counsel, Levi Lincoln, sen. and Jaraes Sullivan. t Free use has been made of Lincoln's History of Worcester in the notice ofShay's Rebellion. CHAPTER, V. Political History — Adoption of the National Constitution— Funeral Honors to Washinglon — Embargo — Petitions to President Jetferson, and to the Ler gislature of Massachusetts — Opposition to the War with England — Reso lutions — First Town House — Benefactions of Mr. Boylston — Adoption of Amendments to the State Constitution— Part of No Town annexed— New Town House— Proposed Division of the County — Incidents in Local History. W^e have arrived to that period, in the progress of our narrative, in which the events of the past are very close ly connected with the feelings of the present. Some particulars of the history of the last sixty years, insula^ ted from dissensions which have long' been quieted and 68 POLITICAL HISTORY. which it is not desirable now to recall to recollection, are scattered through the space remaining to be travers ed. During the political controversies which for many years divided public opinion in the United States, a de cided majority of the inhabitants of Princeton were firm supporters of the Federalists, when the name marked well-defined distinctions of principles. The leading men of the town were ardent politicians, and there were periods of excitement when diversity of sentiment im paired the harmony of social intercourse, separated those closely allied by the ties of kindred, and dissolved the bonds of friendship.* A majority of the inhabitants were early in favor of a protective tariff. This is evi dent from the following instructions given to Hon. Moses Gill, representative to the General Court in 1787.t " That you use your influence, that the Produce and Manufactures of this Commonwealth, may be more ef fectually encouraged by laying duties on those of for eign countries, and granting premiums on our own, — and that foreign superfluities may be prohibited, and also the exportation of wool and flax." Timothy Fuller was chosen to represent the town in a Convention holden in Boston, in 1787, when the pres ent National Constitution was proposed for adoption.— He however voted against it, notwithstanding a majority of the town were in favor of its adoption. The citizens of Princeton joined in the national hon ors paid tq the memory of Washington, Feb. 22, 1800, the anniversary of the birth of the father of his country. A great concurse of inhabitants assembled in the church, * Tradition says that one man ordered his son to leave his house, for refus ing to vote the Whig ticket. t The state of political sentiment will he sufficiently indicated by the list of yoles for executive officers in successive years, placed in the appendix. EMBARGO. 69 which was hung with black and with emblems of mourn ing. An appropriate eulogy was delivered by the Rev, Joseph Russell on the virtues of the departed soldier, statesman and patriot. In August, 1808, the Selectmen of Boston, transmit ted a petition, adopted by the inhabitants of that place, addressed to the President of the United States, praying the suspension of the Embargo laws ; or, if doubt ex isted of the competency of the Executive for affording relief from measures that pressed heavily on comraerce, requesting that Congress might be convened for the pur. pose of taking the subject into consideration. The com munication was accompanied with an invitation to call a town meeting to obtain concurrence in the sentiment expressed in the petition, from the capital. The muni cipal officers complied with the proposition ; and, at a meeting of the citizens on the 5th of September, a com mittee consisting of three persons* was chosen, and in structed to prepare and submit to the town a petition in conformity to the sentiments expressed by the citizens of Boston. At an adjournment of the meeting said committee presented the following petition, which was unanimously adopted : " To the President of the United States ;" "The inhabitants of the town of Princeton, in the county of Worcester and Commonwealth of Massachu setts, in town meeting legally assembled, upon the fifth day of September, 1808, beg leave, respectfully to rep resent that they feel themselves deeply interested in whatever tends to proraote and secure the general pros perity of the United States ; and could they believe that * William Dodd, Dea. Parker, Capt. Stratton. 70 PETITION TO THE PRESIDENT. the existing Jaws recently enacted restraining the com mercial enterprize of our country were inevitably neces sary to affect this desirable object, they would cheerful ly submit to the unparalleled losses and inconveniences which result from the enforcement of them ; but we would humbly suggest, that however flattering in expec tation the effects of their restraints may have been, yet such has been our distresses, such our embarrassments, and so great and unexpected has been the change in Europe, that nothing salutary can be expected frora their longer continuance — coiisidering the present crisis tbe most favorable opportunity for obtaining a remuneration for the losses we have already sustained, and if properly improved, for rescuing us from further distress and em barrassment. We do respectfully pray that the Embargo in whole or in part may be suspended according to the powers vested in the President by the Congress of the United States, — and if any doubt should exist of the com petency ofthose powers, we would humbly request that Congress may be convened as early as possible for the purpose of taking the subject into their consideration." This petition was signed by the Selectmen of the town, and forwarded to President Jefierson. In Febru ary, 1809, a committe* was elected by the town to dra/t a petition, on the sarae subject, to ' be presented to the Legislature of Massachusetts at its forthcoming session. They reported the following, which expressed the unaiii- imous sentiments of the town at that time : " To the Senate and the Hon. House of Representatives of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts now in session. " We the inhabitants of the town of Princeton, in le- * Ebenezer Parker, Joseph Sargent, Samuel Stratton, Artemas Stow, Eph raim WUson. PETITION TO THE LEGISLATURE. 71 gal town meeting assembled beg leave to represent : — That being ardently attached to the civil constitution under which an indulgent Providence has placed us, and feeling alive to the interests and prosperity of our be loved country, we have viewed with painful anxiety and alarm, some of the recent measures of our national Gov ernment. The several acts passed the last session of Congress laying an unlimited embargo upon all com merce both foreign and domestic, appears to your me morialists fraught with ruin to our country and not jus tified or required by the state of our foreign relations, so far as they have been raade known to the public. We did indulge the hope that at the commencement of the present session, Coagress would have heard the nu merous petitions respectfully addressed to them, — and also finding that it would require a great part of the mil itary force of the country to enforce those oppressive laws and therefore would have unanimously repealed them. But with extreme regret we have beheld the ma jority in both Houses of Congress, in opposition to the most powerful arguments and remonstrances of old Rev olutionary Patriots and experienced Statesraen, and in deed of several who had been inwardly led to favor their system at tbe last session not only persisting in their for mer measures, but enacting laws to enforce them, which have a still more alarming aspect, — particularly the law passed on the 9th day of January last to enforce the for mer embargo laws, appears to us contrary to the spirit if not the letter of the Constitution, inconsistent with the principles of a Republican Government, and calculated to provoke riot and insurrection to the jeopardy of Na tional existence. Under these impressions we cannot look forward without the most painful anxiety, Appre- 72 WAR with ENGLAND. hending from the past that our feeble voice would be disregarded in the general government, and reposing confidence in your wisdom and zeal for the public good, and it is with pleasure we hear the resolves of the Sen ate of this state, stating ' that a suitable remonstrance (will) be prepared and immediately forwarded to the Congress of the United States expressing their opinion, &c.,' Such proceedings will receive the sanction and approbation of your memorialists, or any other measure your prudence and patriotism may dictate for securing to our common country its Constitution, its Liberty, and its Prosperity ; and we hereby pledge ourselves to sup port with our lives and property all such constitutional and prudent measures for the attainment of these im portant objects, as your wisdom may approve." On the Declaration of War with England, in 1812, an Act of Congress authorized the President to require the Executives of the several States and Territories, to take effectual measures to arm, organize, and hold in readiness to march at a minute's warning, their respect ive proportions of 100,000 militia. Massachusetts was called on to furnish men for the fortresses on the mari time frontier. The Governor, however, declined com plying with the requisitions, on the ground of constitu tional objections ; and the troops of the State were not called to the field of battle. The town assembled on the 16th of August and referred the subject to a com mittee,* who presented an elaborate report at the ad journment. After commenting on the violation of rights and the numerous insults and injuries this country had sustained, for a series of years, from the United King- * The Committee were Rev. James Murdoch, Capt. Artemas How, Capt, Samuel Stratton, Dr. Wilson, Mr. Bulloch RESOLUTIONS ON THE WAR. 73 doms of Great Britain, and Ireland, and its dependen cies, they sta;te their objections to the War, and the sup posed insufficiency of the reasons alleged. At the same time the town unanimously adopted the following Preamble and Resolutions, which contain the sentiments expressed in the Report of the Committee : — " The inhabitants of the town ©f Princeton legally assembled in town meeting, deeply and sensibly feeling the effects of the existing and pending calamities of the present crisis, of our National and Foreign relations have with every other class of citizens of a free Republic, on this as well as on all iraportant occasions, a right to as semble and express, without fear or restraint, our opinions of the measures of the General as well as State Govern ment, — and the present momentous and alarming situa tion of our Country, demands a firm, energetic and une quivocal expression of our feelings : " Resolved, That we view with the most painful ap prehensions, the late Act of Congress, declaring war against the United Kingdoms of Great Britain, Ireland and .their dependencies ; and the threatening prospect of an alliance with that belligerent whose agressions have been so enormous, and whose depredations were first and far more axtensively committed on our neutral rights. " Resolved, That we feel deeply sensible of our ob ligations to maintain and support with patriotic fidelity, the laws enacted by a Government elected by the peo ple, but from any disclosures which our government have made, the present crisis does not in- our opinion, sanction an expedient of such distressing tendency. " Resolved, That we have viewed with deep regret and concern, the ruinuous situation of our commerce, so 7* 74 RESOLUTIONS ON THE ^WAR. inseparably connected with our agricultural and mechan ical interests ; and as the anticipation of some speedy alleviation has been the ground of our acquiescence for years, in the many restrictions to which this vital interest of the Nation has been subject, we feel compelled, while we view the fatal blow now struck, to express our entire disapprobation and abhorrence of the measure. " Resolved, That we sympathise with that portion of our fellow citizens who are suffering under the acts of our own government, prohibiting them from collecting and rescuing their property from foreign ports, where it is now liable to confiscation, and abhor that fatal policy, which led the governraent, notwithstanding repeated and humble supplications from the suffering citizens, perti naciously to continue their restrictions, regardless of the destructive tendency of such measures not only to the unhappy individuals, but to the commercial interests of the Country and the subversion of the future confidence of commercial men in the government. " Resolved, That the measures which have been adopted by our administratitDn, are repugnant to our feelings, injurious to our interests, and hopeless in re sult to our country, and that we will use all honorable means afforded by our elective franchise to produce a change of rulers, as the only means to produce a radical change of measures. " Resolved, That we admire and reverence that wise and excellent Constitution of our country, purchased and established with so much suffering and blood, — and with every thing dear to us, as men and citizens we will de fend our Constitution and country against every hostile attempt to invade the principles of the one, or the rights and territories of the other. BENEFACTIONS OF MR. BOYLSTON. 75 " Resolved, That we highly approve of the wise, dig nified and patriotic conduct of the Governor and House of Representatives of this Commonwealth, relative to the present alarming crisis of our National affairs, and that we will use our exertions to give effect to their recom mendations, and to obtain for such statesmen and patriots the universal confidence and support of our countrymen." These Resolves were directed to be signed by the Moderator and attested by the Town Clerk, entered on record, and a copy furnished for publication, in some of the public journals. Previous to 1816 there was no Town House in Prince ton. On the 13th day of August of that year, it was vo ted to call the Central School House, Town House. — During the long period intervening between 1759, when Princeton was incorporated as a District, and 1816, the citizens met to transact their municipal business, first in a dwelling house, then in a schoolhouse, and subsequent ly in the meeting house. In 1818, Ward Nicholas Boylston, Esq., devised to the town of Princeton, two lots of land as a parsonage estate, on the condition that " the same doctrines and principles of faith and practice be preached as are now preached and taught by their present Pastor."* In case they were destitute of a settled ministry for six months, the rents or produce of said estate was to go to the wid ow and children of the deceased Pastor, if there were any ; if the pulpit was vacated a year the same to be paid to the Selectmen of the town of West Boylston, In addition to this, §500 were given to thera to lie as an accumulating fund, under certain conditions, until it * Kev, Samuel Clark, Unitarian in sentiment. 76 AMENDMENTS TO THE CONSTITUTION. should be sufficient to build " a handsome and suitable Hall, of one story high for the use of the inhabitants to transact the municipal concerns of the town in their cor porate capacity, or for the accommodation of the Con gregational Church, when the severity of the season may make it raore convenient for them." By his last will he also left them at his death, $500, the interest of which, after a certain amount is accumulated, is to be applied to the support of Congregational preaching. Also $500 after a certain time, is to be applied to the support of poor widows and orphans. All of the above benefactions were accepted by the town.* Ward Nicholas Boylston, Esq., was elected Oct. 6, 1820, Delegate to the Convention which was convened at Boston in November, of that year, for the amendraent of the State Constitution. Of the articles adopted by this body, Nov. 15, and submitted to the -people, nine were approved and adopted April 9, 1821. The inhabi tants of Princeton concurred in the adoption of the Con stitution as amended. The Amendment numbered as the 10th in the Re vised Statutes, changing the commencement of the po litical year from the last Wednesday of May, to the first Wednesday of January, adopted by the Legislature of 1829-30 and 1830-31, was accepted by the people. May 11, 1831. The vote of Princeton stood 54 for, 23 against. The Amendment numbered eleven in the volume re ferred to, modifying and altering the third articles of the Bill of Rights, having passed the Legislatures of 1832 and 1833, was accepted by the citizens Nov. 11, 1833 Eighty-five votes were given by the inhabitants of Prince ton in the affirmative, only one in the negative. • These benefactions are now supposed, however, to have heen forfeited By filie Xown. ANNEXATION OF A PART OF NO TOWN. 77 Between Princeton, Westminster, the south west cor ner of Leominster, and the northwest corner of Sterling, a tract of land intervened, called No Town, beyond the jurisdiction of either municipality. The owners and inhabitants of this territory, or a part of it, petitioned to be annexed to Princeton. The petitioners and their estates were united to this town in 1838, by the following Act of the General Court : — "An act to annex a part of No Town to the town of Princeton. " Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Repre sentatives in General Court assembled, and by the au thority of the same as follows : " Sec. 1. All that part of the unincorporated lands of No Town, in the County of Worcester, which is inclu ded within the following bounds, viz : beginning at a stake and stones, on the line between No Town and Leominster, it being the northeast corner of a lot of land in No Town, belonging to John Whitney, runniug on said line south thirty-three degrees west, two hundred and ninety-seven rods, to a stone monument, it being the southeast corner of No Town, the southwest corner of Leominster, the northwest corner of Sterling, and the northeast corner of Princeton ; thence^ north, fifty-two degrees and thirty minutes west, on the line between No Town and Princeton, eight hundred and thirty rodsj to a stone monument in the line of the town of West minster, it being the southwest corner of No Town, and the northwest corner of Princeton ; thence north, fifty- two degrees and thirty minutes east, on the line between No Town and Westminster, two hundred and twenty- four rods, to a large rock, in an angle ia the last men- 78 NEW TOWN HOUSE. tioned line ; thence south sixty-eight degrees and twelve minutes east forty-four rods, to a stake and stones, by land of Mr. Osgood ; thence north, fifty-four degrees and fifteen minutes east, on the line of said Osgoods' land, eighty-eight rods to a stake and stones, at the northwest corner of Mr. Hadley's land ; thence south, seventy de grees and twenty-five minutes east, on the north line of said Hadley's land, one hundred and twenty-six rods, to a stake and stones on land of Charles Grout ; thence South seventeen degrees and twenty minutes east, on the line between said Hadley's and Grout's land, seventy rods and a half, to a stake and stones on an angle in said line ; thence south fifty degrees and thirty minutes east, through land of said Hadley and others five hundred rods, to the place of beginning, — is hereby annexed to and made a part of the town of Princeton, in said County. " Sec. 2. This act shall take effect from and after its passage. " Approved by the Governor, April 4, 1838." The town voted at their annual meeting in March, 1842, to erect a new Town House during the en suing summer and autumn ; and that the donation of of the late Ward Nicholas Boylston, Esq., be appropria ted for the Building of said house; and that it be one story high, 64 feet long, and 40 feet wide. After the completion of said house it was unanimous ly voted to call it Boylston Hall, to perpetuate the name and memory of the late Ward Nicholas Boylston, Esq., iu consideration of the liberal donation he made to the town. A prayer was offered, and an appropriate address delivered at the dedication, Feb. 13, 1843, by Rev. Wil lard M. Harding. The most ancient records of the DIVISION OF THE COUNTY. 79 town were then exhibited by the Town Clerk, after which the inhabitants proceeded to the transaction of their mu nicipal business. At three several times since the incorporation of Princeton, the division of Worcester County has been submitted for the action of the towns proposed to be set off for a new County. A memorial, of the delegates of Templeton, Barre, Pe tersham, Athol, Winchendon, Huhbardston, Adams, Gerry, Gardner, Royalston, and Warwick, at the Janu ary session of the Legislature in 1798, prayed for the incorporation of those towns into a new county. The people in Princeton voted in February unaniraously, that it was inexpedient to divide Worcester into two distinct counties. At the annual meetings in April, 1828, the question was submitted, by tbe Legislature, to the people of Wor cester and Middlesex, of a new County to be formed of the towns of Royalston, Winchendon, Athol, Temple- ton, Gardner, Westrainster, Ashburuhara, Fitchburg, Leominster, Lunenburg, Princeton, Huhbardston, Phil- lipston, Lancaster, Bolton, and Harvard, from the Coun ty of Worcester, and Groton, Shirley, Pepperell, Ashby, and Townsend, from the County of Middlesex, as prayed for in a Petition bearing the name of Ivers Jewett at the head. The decision in Princeton was in the negative by a great majority of the voters. In 1851, a petition of Alva Crocker and others was presented to the General Court, praying for the erection of a new County. Templeton, Gardner, Phillipston, Athol, Petersham, Royalston, Huhbardston, Westmin ster, Princeton, Ashburnharn, Fitchburg, Leominster, Sterling, Lunenburg, Bolton, Harvard, Lancaster, Win- 80 INCIDENTS IN LOCAL HISTORY. chendon, were to be separated from the County of Worcester, and Ashby, Townsend, Pepperell, Groton, and Shirley, from Middlesex. Orders of notice were issued, but the proposition shared the fate of similar pro jects to diminish the integrity of our territory. Sixty- nine votes were given by the inhabitants of Princeton in the negative , and eleven in the affirmative, when the question was submitted to the town. The faithful review of the incidents of local history from the adoption of the Federal Constitution, embracing the struggles of the two great parties dividing the com munity, executed without partiality and in the spirit of independence, would doubtless be both useful and inter esting. But the period has not yet arrived when the de tails of the contest, agitating every village, town and city of the country, and kindling strife, in the relations of social life, can be recorded with freedom and frank ness. The embers of political controversy, long since covered over, have not been so extinguished, that the historian may tread with safety over the spot where they once glowed. The sons may not hope to render unbi ased judgment of the measures of the fathers, in these scenes of intense excitement. When the present gene ration shall have passed away, and the heated passions and irritation of the actors shall exist only in memory, the history may be narrated with fidelity, without fear that inherited partiality or prejudice may lend undue col oring to the picture delineated. Now the feuds and animosities of the past have sub sided it excites surprise, that the surface which at the present is so tranquil, should have been agitated by commotions so angry as were those which once disturbed its tranquil repose, ECCLESIASTICAL HISTOEY. CHAPTER VI. Introductory Remarks— First Preaching in Town— Attempts to erect a Meet ing House — Committee to measure the District — Building of Meeting House — Assignment of Places in Church — Church Music — Church Covenant — Unsuccessful attempt to settle a Minister— Call to Mr Puller— His Ordina tion — Covenant of Admission — First Deacons and Present to the Church — Complaints against Mr. Fuller— Bis Reply — Ecclesiastical Council— Mr. Fuller's .Dismission — Suit against Town — Biographical Notice of Mr. Fuller. The Ecclesiastical History of Princeton is of peculiar interest, and remarkable for striking incidents. Could the existence of religious difficulties, which have occa sioned fixed differences of sentiment, diversity of taste and discordant and conflicting opinions, interposing in superable obstacles to union, be effaced from memory, it would be wanton outrage to recall from oblivion the tale of misfortune and dishonor. But those events can not be forgotten ; they have floated down in tradition ; they are recounted by the domestic fireside ; they are inscribed on roll and record of the archives of the Church and Town. There is no discretion entrusted to the his torian to select among the events of the past. It is his task to relate with fidelity the events of the times he re views. By changing even slight features, the resem blance of the picture would be destroyed. The annals would be worthless, which impaired confidence by the suppression of truth, even though unpleasant and un welcome. History, the mirror of the past, reflects with 8 82 FIRST PREACHING. painful fidelity, the dark as well as the bright objects from departed years, and although we may wish to contem plate only the glowing picture of prosperity, the gloomy image of ecclesiastical commotion is still full in our sight, shadowing tbe background with its solemn admo nition. No records ot the Church in Princeton previons to 1761, some more than twenty years subsequent to the first settlement, have descended to our times. Subse quent to that period, some information of the prominent events in Ecclesiastical History, may be collected from the votes of the inhabitants concurrent with the acts of the Church ; for it was the ancient usage of all our towns, before they had been divided into parishes, to manage their parochial concerns in the general meetings. Meetings for worship were held at the dwelling houses most convenient in regard to central situation. " The first sermon ever preached in town was probably at the house of Abijah Moore, to an audience, vfhich materi ally increased at a later day, a small room and bed-room held quite comfortably. An old lady still living* at the age of eighty-four, recollects hearing a sermon at Mr, Moore's preached by the Rev. Mr. Harrington of Lan caster, in October, 1759, on the occasion of the district's incorporation. ' There were then,' says the old lady, ' but a handfol of us, who found our way to church by marked trees.'t At this date it was the custom of the inhabitants to have preaching usually eight Sabbaths in the year. A short time subsequent, they had preaching' four or five months, in the pleasant seasons of each year. The first expression of opinion on the records of the *In 1838. ¦f Russell's History of Princeton, p. 5^, MEETING HOUSE ATTEMPTS. 83 town, in relation to ecclesiastical matters, dates the 9th of Feb. 1761, when the following article is found in the warrant for a District meeting :* " To see if the dis trict will vote to build a meeting house for the public worship of God, and choose a committee for the same or act anything relative thereunto, as the district shall think proper."t This article, as appears from the records, " was not voted," although it would seem from the war rant for the district meeting in March of the same year that the question of erecting a house for public worship had not only been agitated, previous to this period, but that the place ot its location had been determined. The following articles, somewhat peculiar in their orthogra phy and phraseology, are found in said warrant. " To see if the Destrict will vote to build the meeting house, to wit the house for the publick worship of God in some other place than that which it is already Voted to be built on and vote aneything Relating thereunto that the Destrict shall think proper, or otherwise to vote were the said meeting house shall be built." " To see if the Destrict will vote to build a meeting-house as soon as can be convenantly and choose a committee for the same and Report unto the Destrict upon what terms they can git it built and when, or act anything as the Destrict shall think proper." It was voted to pass'over the last article, and the follow ing vote was passed relative to the first. " Voted, Col. John Whiteomb of Bolton, Dea. Samuel Pierce, of Hol- * The town records for two years subsequent to the incorporation of the dis trict in 1759, are lost. f ¦ In 1760, at the meeting jn March, as I learn from other sources, than the records, it was voted to petition the General Court to grant a land tax, to ena ble the distrietto bitild a homae of worship, settle aminister, and lay out roadsf and Dr. Harvey was chosen an agent to present this petition." — See RusseU'^ History of Princeton, chap. 4. 84 COMMITTEE OF MEASUREMENT. den, and Dea. Joseph Miller of Westminster, be a com mittee to measure the said District of Princetown, and find the centre thereof, and afix or order the place for building the meeting-house on, to wit, the house for the public worship of God, and if the centre be not suitable ground to build the said house on, then on the nearest place to the centre that is suitable according to the best judgment of the Committee, and they are desired to make return thereof at the adjournment of this meeting, and it is also voted that Mr. Thos. Harmon of Rutland, and Dea. Jonathan Livermore of Westborough, be sur veyors for the purpose above said and that all the said committee and surveyors be under oath for the trust committed to them as above said. Also voted that the vote for building the said meeting-house within two rods of the most southerly corner of Mr. Caleb Myrick's Land be and hereby is revoked and discontinued." The above named committee attended to the " trust committed to them" with fidelity, and reported at the ad journment of the meeting, June 29, but their report is not on record. A majority of the town being dissatis fied therewith, it was voted, after paying them a consid erable sum for services, " not to accept their report, and locate the house themselves." Consequently, at a meet ing on the 22d of July, the following vote was passed : " Voted, that the meeting-house for the public worship of God be built on the highest part of the land given by Mr. John and Caleb Mirick, to the District for their public use, near three pine trees marked on the norther ly side, being near a large flat rock." The site thus de termined upon, and on which the house was ultimately erected, is some few rods northeast from the old town house. FIRST MEETING HOUSE. 85 The question relative to the place of location, which had agitated the inhabitants several months, being thus finally settled, the first measures for the erection cf the house were taken in October, when it was "Voted to build a meeting-house for the public worship of God, and that said house shall be fifty foots long and forty foots wide. And also voted that Capt. Eliphelet How, Robert Keyes, Caleb Mirick, James Thompson and Boaz Moore be a Comraittee to see on what terms they can get the timber for said meeting-house, and get said house fraraed." The coramittee were subsequently directed to purchase boards, clapboards, and shingles, to be de» iivered at the site of said house. The frame of the house was set up on the 30th of June, 1762. The cost of the frame was .£71, 13s, id, which was paid to Abijah Moore, who appears to have procured said frame; and in addi tion to the above, .£28 was also drawn from the treasu ry, as the expense of raising *. The glass windows were not supplied until after a lapse of more than three years, when the glass was donated to the town by the Hon. Mo ses Gill. When the first preaching was had in this church we have not been able to ascertain. It was not entirely completed until as late as the year 1770. For years the people met in the house for worship, without any floor, excepting some loose boards. Their seats were blocks, boards, and movable benches. June 4, 1767, it was voted " to lay the gallery floors and build a breast work and set up the pillars in their proper places and also build four seats round the galleries." It was also allowed individuals who felt disposed to occupy ei ther side of the house with pews, if they would make * Another draft also made on the treasury, by P. Goodnow, to the amount of £7, 2s, 2if, was fur rum purchased by him for workmen on said meeting-house. 8* 86 FIRST MEETING HOUSE. them at their own expense. The manner of disposing of the pew ground, as it was called, was as follows : The individual who paid the highest land tax was to have the first choice, by paying a certain sum fixed by the district. Dr, Harvey obtained the first and Oliver Davis the second, the former paying £S, Is, id, the second £3. In March, 1770, it was voted " to paint the meeting house, jjrouicfet^ iifr. Moses Gill finds paint." Whether Mr. Gill's generosity again developed itself, so as to in fluence him to comply with this vote of the town we are not able to say. In October of the same year another advance was made towards the completion of the house by voting to plaster the walls. In November succeed ing it was also voted that " y^ plaistering under y^ Galle ries be made crowning and y* plaistering whitewashed and y^ Seats in y'' side Galleries be finished." The en tire cost of this house which was so long in the process of building we are not able to state. The assignment of places in church was formerly a matter of grave importance, and not unfrequently claimed the attention of the town. In 1768, a committee of four was chosen and instructed to seat the meeting-house, taking as a general rule the invoice taken in the year 1766, saving liberty to have due regard to age as they shall see cause. For many years those who joined in singing the devotional poetry of religious exercises, were dispersed through the congregation, having no place as signed them as a distinct body, and no privileges sepa rate from other worshippers. After the clergyman had read the whole psalm, one of the deacons repeated the first line, which was sung by those who were able to aid in the pious melody, and thus the exercises of singing and reading went on alternately. CHURCH COVENANT. 87 The people continued to employ preaching several months each year.* Still it appears that there was no organized church until the 12th of August, 1764, twen. ty-five years after the first settlement, when the following covenant was adopted and subscribed by eighteen male persons, who constituted the church at that time. "A Covenant entered into Aug, 12th, 1764. "We whose names are hereunto subscribed, apprehendinef ourselves called of God into a church state of the Gospel — Do first of all confess ourselves to be so highly favored of the Lord and admire his free and rich grace which calls ua hereunto ; and then with humble reliance and dependence on the assis tance of his grace and Holy Spirit therein promised for them, that in a sense of their own inability to do any good thing, do humbly wait upon him for all, we do thankfully lay hold on his covenant, and solemnly enter into covenant with God and with one another according to Godliness. We declare our serious belief of the Christian Religion aa contained in the sacred Scriptures, acknowledging them to contain the whole revealed will of God concerning our faith and practice, heartily resolving to conform our lives to the rules of that Religion so long as we live. We give up ourselves to the Lord Jehovah, the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost, the only true and living God, and avouch him this day to be our God and portion forever. We give up ourselves to the blessed Jesus, who is the Lord Jehovah and ad here to him as the head of his people in the covenant of Grace, and rely upon him as our Prophet, Priest and King, to bring us to eternal blessedness. We acknowledge our everlasting and indispensable obligation to glorify God in all the duties of a sober and goodly life, and particularly in the duties of a church state and a body of people associated for an obedience to him in all the ordinances of the Gospel, and whereupon depend upon his gracious assistance for our faithful discharge of the Duties thus incumbent upon us. We engage with dependence on his promised grace and spirit to walk together as a church of the Lord Jesus Christ in the faith and order of the gospel, so far as we shall have the same revealed- unto us, conscientiously attend ing the worship of God in his house in praying to him, singing to him, and giving reverend attention to ifis word, read and preached according to his institution, the sacraments of the New * The preaching was paid out of the land tax. 88 CHURCH COVENANT. Testament, the discipline of his kingdom, and all his holy insti tutions in communion one with another and watchfully avoiding all sinful stumbling blocks nnd contentions, as become God's people in covenant with him. At the same time we do present our offspring with ourselves unto the Lord, purposing with his help to do and keep in the methods of a religious education that they may be the Lord's. All this we do ileeing to the blood of the everlasting covenant for the pardon of our many Errors, and praying that the glorious Lord Jesus who is the great Shepherd would prepare and strengthen us for every good work to do his will, workmg in us that which is well pleasing in his sight to whom be glory forever. Amen."* Signed by the following persons ; — Tilly Litllejohns, James J'^orcross, .Elisha ffilder, Timothy Moseman, Ebenezer Jones, Peter Goodnow, Mel Pray, James Gibbs, Samuel Hastings, Abijah Moore, Samuel Bixby, Caleb Mirick, Abner Howe, Timothy Keyes, Samuel Moseman, JVoah JVorcross, James Haynes, , Stephen Brigham,j Frora the date of this covenant, no record is preserved on the church book, of any transactions until May 17, 1767. We learn, however from the records of the town, that they continued to be favored with the preaching of the Gospel, at least a portion of each year. About this tirae, (1764,) Rev. William Crawford supplied the pul pit. It was voted on the 4th of March, 1765, to have " six months preaching beginning in April," The first moveraent of the inhabitants of Princeton to wards the settlement of a minister was in 1765. In the warrant for a district meeting in December of that year, the following article was inserted : — " To see if the Dis trict will vote hoij soon they will settle a minister, and * This covenant was not entered on the church records until-several yei.rs after its adoption, t Church records, vol. 1, p. I. FIRST CALL OF A MINISTER. 89 also whether they will hear any one or more of the can didates for the ministry which they have already heard in order for settling, or any other or others which they have not heard, or act anything relating to that affair." On this article it was " voted to hear Mr. Baker, Mr. Fuller, and Mr. Moore, each of them six sabbaths on probation, in order for settling." Whether these Rev. gentleraen complied with the above vote of the district it does not appear. Neither of them, however, received a call to settle in the district at that time. The first in vitation extended to any individual to become their min ister, was the call to the Rev. Sewall Goodrich, in 1766. On the 21st of August of this year, the district voted to concur with the church in their selection of Mr. Good rich to settle with them in the Gospel ministry. At the same time there was also voted him as a settlement, .£133, 65, 8d, one half payable in eight months from the time of his ordination, and the remainder in one year from the time of the first-mentioned payment. As an annual sal ary there was also voted him .£53, 6s, 8d, Mr. Goodrich declined the invitation ; and on the 5th of September it was voted to make an addition to the salary of £13, 6s, 8d, to be paid as follows : " One half at the expiration of five years from his ordination, thenceforth to be paid as part of his salary ; the remainder to be paid in ten years from his ordination as pastor with the like condition." Mr. Goodrich still declined the invitation to settle.. Nothing further was done towards the settlement of a pastor until the 30th of March, 1767, when the district voted, 22 to 4, to concur with the church in their choice of the Rev. Timothy Fuller to settle with them in the work of the gospel ministry. The same pecuniary encourage ment was voted Mr. Fuller, as a settlement, which had 90 MR. fuller's ORDINATION. been previously offered Mr. Goodrich. They also voted him an annual salary of .£53, 6s, 8d, ; and an addition of £6, 13s id, to be paid to his wife at the expiration of five years from his ordination, thenceforth to be contin ued yearly; and the same amount additional in ten years, thenceforth to be paid yearly so long as Mr. Fuller shall continue to be their minister and fulfil the work of the ministry. A committee was appointed to wait on the Rev. Mr. Fuller, with the above invitation, to which he returned an affiirmative answer. On the 9th of Septeraber, 1767, Mr. Fuller was or dained as pastor of the religious society. There were present on this occasion to assist in the solemnities of the ordination, pastors and delegates from the First Church in Danvers, the second Church in Shrewsbury the second in Lancaster, and the Churches in Wilmington, Rutland, Holden, Weston, Westminster and Middleton. As a substitute for the old covenant, the following was adopted hy the church, on the 9th of November, to be used in the admission of members : " A Covenant for admission into the Church, "You declare your firm belief of one Infinite and Eternal God, Fiither Son and Holy Ghost, that the Sacred Scriptures are of Divine origin, and comprehend our whole duty as it re lates to faith and practice ; — You resolve to conform your lives to the rules of God's word till death, — giving up yourselves to God the Father as your portion, to God the Son as your Re deemer, and to God the Holy Ghost as your sanctifier guide and comforter : — You acknowledge your indispensable obligation to serve and glorify God in a holy, sober and godly life, and prom ise to live in obedience to him walking in all his ordinances blameless : — You promise also by the help of God to walk with the Church in the faith and oider of the gospel, attending the public worship of God, the Sacrament of the New Testament, the duties of his kingdom and all his holy institutions, so long as you continue in the place : — you proraise to devote your off spring to God, and to instruct thera in the principles and prac- COMPLAINTS AGAINST MR. FULLER. 91 tice of religion ; carefully avoiding every cause of contention and every source of sin, as becomes God's people in covenant with him ; and this you do flying to the blood ot the everlasting covenant for the pardon of your sins, praying that the Lord Je sus who is the great Shepherd would prepare and strengthen you for every good work to do his will, working in you that which is well pleasing in his sight, to whom be glory forever and ever. Ainen." After the adoption of the above covenant and at the same meeting, the first Deacons of the church were elect ed. These were Timothy Keyes and Adonijah Howe. It was also voted " that the sacrament be administered once in two months ; but may be omitted at particular times as the pastor may judge expedient." On the 10th of April the year following, the Hon. Moses Gill pre sented to the Church a flagon, tankard, cup and dish for the coraraunion table, and also a baptismal basin. Mr Fuller continued to exercise his ministerial func tions to the general satisfaction of his parishioners for nearly eight years, when, during the opening struggles of the revolutionary war and amid the viojence of party contention, he was suspected of entertaining unfavorable views in regard to the rights and liberties of the Colo nies. In view of the alarming state of affairs, the Gene ral Court, at its session in 1774, were desirous to have Gov. Gage appoint a fast. He refused to comply with their wishes, whereupon they recommerided a day for public fast and prayer, in imitation of their pious ances tors, " who on all occasions of common danger and dis tress devoutly looked to God for direction and favor." The people of Princeton desired Mr. Fuller, in accord ance with the recommendatiQn of the General Court, to hold a fast, but he declined. Many took offence at this course ; and from this period the disaffection commepced 92 COMPLAINTS AGAINST MR. FULLER. which seemed to produce in the minds of the people an indomitable determination to dissolve their existing con nection. This .however was not the only complaint brought by the people against their pastor. Many things that had passed unnoticed for years, were construed into grievances. The following letter, from a comraittee of the church, contains a summary of these allegations : — " To the Rev. Timothy Fuller. •' Sir, We are dissatisfied with your conduct in the pastoral office in the following particulars. 1. Your not catechising and instructing the children more frequently. 2. Your neglect of pastoral visits and of conversation on spiritual things. 3. An unchristian backwardness to instruct and enlighten your flock, which we fear proceeds from a disregard to their spiritual welfare. 4. Your nt^ec\mg\ectuxesiohen first settled among us. 5. Your refusing to appoint a Fast when motioned by the Gene ral Court on account of the fearful apprehension of losing liberties of country, through the arbitrary proceedings of the British Parliament. 6. Your treatment of the Church, when seeking for satisfaction in the articles of charge. Timothy Keyes, Stephen Brigham, Stephen Harrington, Ichabod Fisher, Thos. Gleason. Princeton, March 26, 1776." Mr. Fuller returned an answer to this bill of charges by letter, " which stands on record," say the church re cords, " in the Old Church Book." This book, unfor tunately, has been lost ; consequently the reply is not accessible to the writer. From April, 1776, to May, ME. fuller's REPLY. 93 1786, no record is preserved on the church book of any transactions, " Sometime subsequent however," says Mr. Russell in his History of Princeton, " to the trial of the suit at Salem, which he commenced against the town for the recovery of his salary, Mr. Fuller published a vindication* of his conduct, in which is incorporated, probably, the substance of his reply to the church." With respect to the charge of toryism he says, — " What my people believed, I am unable to determine ; but I persuade myself they did not believe me opposed to the measures of my country, because there was nothing in my conduct or conversation to justify such a faith, con sidered as a rational principle. My principles did not forbid my offering the petitions of the people for relief; but I readily joined with my people on all days set apart by any Court or Congress, for public devotion, and led them in their addresses to heaven for aid and deliver- ance."t In regard to the chargesof neglect of lectures, catechising, and pastoral visits, he says, — " To these I at that time answered, that I had rarely omitted a lecture previous to the communion, except for a period some what exceeding a year after my settlement, when lec tures "were not so statedly appointed as afterwards, by reason of necessary avocations. That I had made it a rule to catechise their children twice a year, from which I had seldom deviated. That I had visited thera all generally once a year ; and never neglected to- visit per- * " This is a smaH pamphlet of twenty-three pages, entitled ' Eemarks, Sec' nnd purports to be written in reply to some strictures upon a pamphlet published by the Eev. Mr. Thatcher. It is without date or signature, and but few copies probably exist. For the one in my possession I am indebted to the politeness ofCharles Miricfc, Esq." fThe charge of toryism, against Mr. Fuller, we have narrated in the Chap ter on the Revolutionary War. 94 MR. fuller's REPLY. sons in sickness, upon their offering a note for public prayers, or upon particular application, and on such visits had endeavored to adapt my addresses to their cir cumstances." The charge of levity, in presiding at the church meetings, is explained by supposing " the mode rator laid down his head on the seat before him, shiver ing with the cold, which the people might fondly pon- strue into a shake of laughter." " It may be impossi ble," somewhsd satincdWy contmues the writer, "some times in such debates and altercations to suppress a re luctant smile. And there may be such a concurrence of circumstances, as to protect a man from censure, in such a case, on any occasion whatever, except an immediate ad dress to the Deity." Mr. Russell proceeds, " The t)-- ranny in church government, another subject of com plaint, seems to have been charged upon Mr. Fuller in two instances in particular; in one of which, he refused to put a vote whereby the church would go into an im mediate investigation of the charges, then for the first time brought against him. On his refusal, the church were on the point of voting in a new moderator, when he dissolved the meeting. In the other instance, he over ruled a motion to choose a committee to collect articles of charge against him, remarking that if any one had anything against him, he had full liberty to offer it, and in due tirae, it should be laid before the church, but that he would not be active in choosing a committee to hunt up articles against him. In vindication of Mr. Fuller's conduct, in this respect, I should remark that, up to this time, the ministers clairaed the right of negativing any vote of the church which they disliked."* Such was the character of the charges against Mr. Fu|t See ' History of Princeton' pp. 41, 42. ECCLESIASTICAL COUNCIL. 95 ler, and such his reply to them. During several months, continued but ineffectual efforts were made to secure equitable adjustment. Meeting after meeting was held. It was finally decided, on the part of the church and town, to submit the determination of the whole matter to an Ecclesiastical Council. Consequently a Council convened March 11, 1776, at the house of Caleb Mi rick, from the churches in Worcester, Westminster, and the first in Shrewsbury. After the organization of said council, notice was given to Mr. Fuller and his presence solicited ; who, on receiving said notice, communicated through them a letter to the town and church commit tee, proposing a mutual Ecclesiastical Council, on the following terms : — " 1st. To consist of nine churches, four to be chosen by each party, the ninth mutually, and to be selected from this county, in consequence of the almost universal adoption in Worcester county, of the ' Bolton plan.'* 2d. Each church to be represented by its pastor and two delegates. 3d. That all articles of grievance be subraitted to them. 4th. That each party be served with a copy of these articles at least fourteen days before the sitting of the Council. 5th. That the Council regulate their own proceedings. 6th. That the number of persons sitting in Council frora each church be equal. 7th. That each party choose several churches extraordinary, out of which they may supply, if any of the first choice should happen to fail." These proposals were assented to on the part of the committee, with the substitution of seven churches instead of nine. Mr. Ful ler consented, and accordingly the committee, in con- * Previous to the year 1776 it had been the unanimous practice of the minis ters to negative any vote of the church which they disapproved. This right, however, the church in Bolton disputed, and their views were finally sanc tioned by an Ecclesiastical Council. Hence the " Bolton plan." 96 ECCLESIASTICAL COUNCIL. nection with Mr. F., proceeded to the selection of church es. A disagreement, however, arose between the par ties, in choosing the " extraordinary churches," which defeated the whole plan. Hence the former council, with the addition of the first church in Dedham and the church in Weston, convened on the 16th of April, and Mr. Fuller was requested to appear before said Council, by a letter from the Rev. Mr. Maccarty, who had been elected moderator. This he refused to do, stating as an objection, that he considered that they were an exparte Council, and of consequence were devoted to the inter ests of his opponents. The Council then proceeded to make the following proposition, — that they would name twelve churches, from which each party should select Jhree, mutually con senting to the church in Weston, (which was then pre sent) as the seventh, which should be a council for the final settlement of all grievances. With this, again, Mr. Fuller refused to comply, stating as an objection, that it 'Would be, in effect, exparte, as the whole twelve from which the mutual council was to be chosen, were selected by the sitting council. Says Mr. Fuller in his reply to the proposal of the council, — "If my brethren had pro posed to choose my judges, I should not have thought it strange, but that you, gentlemen, should propose that they should do the same thing by proxy, is a little wonder ful." At the same time he renewed his proposal for a mutual council, on ibje same conditions as before men tioned. This was declined by the council, on" account of the embarrassments thrown'in the way" at the first at tempt, in the selection of the " extraordinary churches." The council now proceeded to advise Mr. Fuller to re quest a dismission. He however declined, but waited BIOGRAPHICAL NOTICE. 97 ¦on them, proposing a mutual council on one of the two following conditions : — 1st. He would " set aside six of the churches which the brethren had chosen," the six that remained, in connection with the seventh which should be mutually selected, to constitute the council. 2d. "I will set aside," says Mr. Fuller, " twenty church es, and the brethren as many more, and then we will each choose three congregational churches, of good standing, any where in the province, no objection on either side; who, together with one mutually agreed upon, shall be a mutual council." Neither of these propositions were acceded to; and the council on the 19th, again proceeded to advise, fi nally, Mr. Fuller's dismission. He was accordingly dis missed. Subsequently Mr. Fuller called an exparte council, consisting of Rev.- Mr. Howard's church, Bos ton, Payson's of Chelsea, Whitney's of Shirley, Adams' of Lunenburg, and Barnard's of Salem. The result of this was favorable to Rev. Mr. Fuller. Being dissatis fied with the result of the first council, and also believing it to have been illegal, Mr. Fuller commenced a suit against the town in 1782, for the recovery of his salary from 1775. The case was argued at Salem in Novem ber, by Judge Parsons in behalf of the plaintiff, and Messrs. Sullivan and Lincoln for the defendants. Mr. Fuller, however, lost his case — a verdict being found in favor of the town, and thus ended this unhappy and pro tracted controversy. The Rev. Timothy Fuller, a graduate of Cambridge University, in 1760, was born in Middleton, in this State, in 1738, and descended from an ancient family, who em igrated from England to this country in 1628. After Lis dismission from Princeton, Mr. Fuller reraoved to 9* 88 REV. DANIEL ADAMS. Martha's Vineyard, and preached in Chilraark until the dose of the revolutionary war. In 1782 he removed to Middleton, his native place, and in a short time subse quent to that period, he returned to Princeton, where he devoted his tirae to agricultural pursuits. In 1788, he represented the town in the convention which approved and adopted the present Federal Constitution. In 1796, Mr. Fuller removed to Merrimac, N. H., where he was employed in cultivating the soil, until July, 1805, when he died, at the age of sixty-five.* * For the materials of the biographical sketch of Mr. Fuller, as well as of several other clergymen, I ara indebted to the History of Princeton by Russell. CHAPTER VII. Unsuccessful efforts for a re-establishment of the Gospel Ministry — Settlement of Mr. Crafts — He requests a Dismission — Letter to him — Rev. Mr. Good rich — New Meeting House — Mr. Russell's Settlement — Dedication of Meeting House — Mr. Russell's Dismission — Settlement of Mr. Murdock — First General Revival of Eeligion in Town — Church Covenant — Mr. Mur- dock's Dismission. In the period of little more than ten years subsequent to the disrassion of Mr. Fuller, several candidates were heard, and thre^ unsuccessful attempts were made for the re-establishment of the Gospel ministry.* The first of these was on the 26th of January, 1778, when the town " voted to concur with the church in their choice of Mr. Daniel Adams of Medway for their Pastor," at the same tirae offering him £400 as a settlement. At a sub sequent meeting the inhabitants voted a salary of i£70, * January 7, 177P, was set apart by a vote of the church and town, for humil- ation, prayer, and supplication of the divine assistance, for the re-establish ment of the Gospel ministry. REV. MESSRS, LITCHFIELD AND HUBBARD. 99 to be paid him annually, so long as he should continue in the ministry with them, as follows : One half at the Rate of Indian Corn a.t four shillings jier bushel, and the remainder in- cash, from the fluctuating currency of the times. Mr. Adams declined this invitation. In October, an invitation was given to Rev. Paul Litchfield to settle in the place, and a settlement of £600, with the same pecuniary encouragement as an annual salary, which had been previously offered Mr. Adams, was tendered to him. At a subsequent meet ing, however, the town so far reconsidered this as to vote, — "that there be paid to Mr. Paul Litchfield each and every year during his continuance in the ministry among us seventy pounds as followeth ; — twenty-three pounds, six shillings, eight pence, at the Rate of Indian Corn at three shillings per bushel, .£23, 6s, 8d, at the Rate of Beef at twenty shillings per hundred ; and £23, 6s, 8d, in cash of the present currency." Mr. Litchfield declined this invitation. It was renewed in May, 1779, by a vote of the town, 46 to 22, with the settlement augmented to £1200, with the same salary, only £17, 10s, however, being payable in the then currency. This invitation he also declined. In January, 1781, Rev. Ebenezer Hubbard was invi ted to settle, and a settlement of .£200 lawful money, of fered, payable " at the rate of Indian Corn at 3s, Rye at four shillings a bushel, beef at 20 shillings per hun dred, and pork at three-and-a-half pence per pound." A salary also of £73, 6s, 8d, of lawful money payable at the rates of Indian Corn, Beef and Pork, as above.* It was also voted subsequent to this period, that thirty * This was a necessary expedient to avoid the depreciation of the paper cur rency of the times. 100 RET. THOMAS DRAFTS. cords of wood annually, be added to this salary. Mr. Hubbard however declined the invitation. No further atterapts were made for the re-establish ment of the Gospel ministry until January, 1786, when Rev. Thomas Crafts received an invitation from the in habitants to become their pastor. It was voted that " the sura of .£200 be paid him in six months after his or dination, as his settlement, and that the sum of i&80 be paid him as his annual salary, and that twenty cords of wood be delivered him every Fall so long as he shall continue our minister.'' Mr. Crafts accepted the call, and was ordained on the 28th of June, 1786.* On this occasion letters missive, inviting their presence by pas tor and delegate, were sent to the fourth church in Bridgewater, the church in Brattle-street, Boston, — in Roxbury, Brookiine, Shrewsbury, Rutland, Holden and Sterling, all of which were present. Mr. Crafts continued to discharge the duties of the * "No little display would seem to have been made on this occasion, if we may judge from the following account, which I accidentally came across among a mass of loose papers in the Town Clerk's office, and which speaks loud for the multitude present or the poverty of the town. The people of Princeton would be the last to let such an occasion pass wanting in a single one of the * good things of this life' which usually load the groaning tables of the ordination day." * To the Town of Princeton, to me Debtor. For going to Hardwick, to carry Mr. Crafts — Ihe call of the town, 09 00 Also for fetching cider, plates and dishes from Shrews bury and carrying them back again 06 00 For going to Westminster for knives and forks, and for a liorse to carry one of the cooks home, 07 60 For nine dozen eggs for the Council, 06 00 18 60 Princeton, June 30, 1786.' ADONIJAH HOWE. I also find about this time — * The Town of Princeton, To Samuel Dadman, Dr. For one leg of bacon 163^ lbs., 0 13 11 2.' which it is not unfounded conjecture to suppose, went the way of the * nine dozen eggs for the Council.' "—Russell's Hist, of Princeton, Chop. v. LETTER TO ME. CRAFTS. 101 ministry with fidelity, for about three years, until his health failed. For nearly two years he was unable to preach, when all hope of recovery, so as to be able to carry on the work of the sacred office, being cut off, he requested and received, a dismission frora the pastoral re lation. That Rev. Mr. Crafts was very highly respected and beloved by the people of his charge, is evident from the following letter, sent him on the occasion of his dismis sion : — "Reverend Sir : — The Church and Congregation in Princeton having this day, according to your request, voted your dismission frora your Pastoral Relation sole ly on the account of your ill state of health and little prospect of your future usefulness in that work ; We the Church and Congregation in this place declare that it is with reluctance that we are constrained to part with you under these considerations ; that it has been with pleasure and much satisfaction that we have sat under your ministry ; that we sincerely sympathize with you under these (your)afflictions ; that we ardently wish Al mighty God would take you and your family under His Gracious Protection, and if it be his pleasure, to give you a confirmed state of health, and make you yet use ful in your public character, and long continue you a blessing to the world. "We ask an interest in your prayers, and subscribe "Your affectionate Friends and Brethren, Moses Gill, Moderator." " Signed at the request of the town in town meeting assembly. To the Rev. Mr. Thos. Crafts." 102 REV. MR. GOODRICH. Rev. Thomas Crafts was a native of Newton, son of Dr. John S. Crafts, who removed to Norlh-Bridgewater when his son was quite young. The latter graduated at Cambridge University in 1783. After his removal from Princeton he returned to Bridgewater, in which place and Weymouth he resided until 1802, when, having re gained his health, he settled over a church and society in Middleborough, where he continued his labors until his demise, January 19, 1819, at the age of 60. For several months after the dismission of Rev. Mr. Crafts, the pulpit was supplied by Rev. Hezekiah Good rich, who was subsequently settled over the church and society in Rutland. On the 5th of December, 1791, it was " voted unanimously that Mr. Flezekiah Goodrich's late preaching has been acceptable to the town, and that the committee be instructed to apply to him to preach six Sabbaths on probation — after the term which he is engaged has expired." Whether Mr. Goodrich com plied with this vote we are not able to say. He how ever received no call from the church or town to settle over them in the ministry. No attempt was made, front 1791 until 1795, for the re^establishment of the Gospel ministry in Princeton. ' The first Meeting House exhibiting signs of decay, the question was discussed in Town Meeting, March 9, 1795, " shall a new raeeting-house be built." It was the opinion of the town to build a new house. A com mittee, consisting of Dea. Howe, William Whittaker, Capt. Sarauel Hastings, His Honor Moses Gill, and Lieut. A, Merriam, was appointed to draft a plan and estimate the probable cost. Subsequently this comrait tee reported the probable expense of said house as fol lows : .£1039, 8s for materials, £60 for extra expenses. NEW MEETING HOUSE. 103 .£700 for carpenters' work ; and the probable amount which would accrue from sale of pews, and the old houSe at £1875. The coramittee also reported the following plan : — Dimensions, 70 by 55 feet ; to contain 75 ground and 26 gallery Pews. Their report was accepted by the town, whereupon a building comraittee, consisting of Hon. Moses Gill, Capt. Samuel Hastings, Lieut. Amos Merriam, David Brooks and William Whittaker, was chosen. This comraittee was instructed to erect the " New Meeting House on the ground where the old meeting-house stands, or as nigh it as shall in the judgment of the committee be most eligible." The pews in said house were disposed of May 6, 1795, some months previous to its erection.* The whole amount of receipts frora the sale of the same was £1728, 3s, Id, and the whole cost of said house (exclusive of the bell, which was purchased some years subsequent for #470, and the painting, for which $320 was paid afterwards,) £2273, 3s, Id, consequently there was a deficiency of £545, id, which was raised at a subsequent period by a general tax. Previous to the erection of this house, the Rev. Jo seph Russell received an invitation from the church and town to settle over them as a pastor. December 7, 1795, the town voted unanimously to concur with the church in their " invitation'' made on the 20th of Nov. to Mr. Russell. At the same time it was " voted that the usual mode of giving a settlement be dispensed with, and that the sum of four hundred thirty-three dollars and one third of a dollar be paid him yearly during his continuance in the ministry." It was also voted, on the * Michsl Gill, Esq., paid £36 for No. 66 Few in said house, which was the highest sum obtained for any one. 104 MR. Russell's settlement. 8th of February, 1796, to "furnish Mr. Russell with twenty-five cords of good merchantable wood annually, delivered to him at his dwelling-house, so long as he shall continue our minister and the price of staple com modities remain as they now are ; but when the capital articles of consumption shall revert back to their former standard, that is to say, when the price of beef shall be reduced from thirty-six to twenty-four shillings per hun dred ; Pork from six to four pence per pound ; Rye from six to four-shillings per bushel ; Indian Corn from four-and-six-pence to three shillings per bushel ; the whole expense of the wood, be it more or less, shall be deducted from the salary already voted by the town, and so in a less proportion as the price of those commodities shall gradually decrease." Mr. Russell having accepted the invitation, March ]6, 1796, was fixed for his ordination, and a committee charged with the proper preparations. The time ap pointed for the ceremony having arrived, the Rev. Dr. Morse, of Charlestown, introduced the solemnities with prayer; Rev, Mr, Backus of Somers, delivered a sermon from Matthew, xvi, 26, "For what is a man profited, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul ? or what shall a man give in exchange for his soul?" — Rev. Dr. Thacher, of Boston, made the ordaining pray er ; Rev. Mr. Jackson, of Brookiine, gave the charge ; Rev. Mr. Hubbard, of Sterling, bestowed the right hand of fellowship ; Rev. Dr. Sumner, of Shrewsbury, offers ed the concluding prayer ; and the exercises were closed with an Anthem.* * " Voted that the committee to provide for the ordaining counsel keep the crockery ware, knives and forks, &c., until the new meeting house is raised, then to dispose of them and pay the money into the town treasury." Tovrr^ Records, Vol. 2. call to MR. MURDOCK. 105 The church and society continued to worship in the old meeting house until April, 1797, when, the new house being completed, it was dedicated. An appropriate dis course was preached by the pastor on the occasion. About the sarae time, the Hon. Moses Gill presented to the church, a flagon, tankard, two pewter and two sil ver cups, for the communion table. It was also voted to " introduce Dr. Watts' Psalms and Hymns" as a sub stitute for the Psalms before used. Mr. Ebenezer, Par ker was, on the 28th of November, 1800, elected to the office of Deacon, vice Deacon Howe, deceased. Mr. Russell continued to perform the duties of his office, to the general acceptance of his people, until Sep tember 12, 1801, when he requested a dismission, alleg ing as a reason, that he' was unable, on the account of the precarious state of his health, to apply himself to study with that assiduity, which his engagements indis pensably required. After some unwillingness and delay on the part of the town to grant the request of their pas tor, he was finally dismissed. A short time subsequent to his dismission from Prince ton, Mr. Russell removed to Troy, and has since been engaged in mercantile pursuits. The Rev. James Murdock, was engaged to preach to the church and society in Princeton after the dismission of Mr. Russell; and on the 18th of March, 1802 the church unanimously requested his permanent settlement as their pastor. The concurrence of the town was given to this call on the 5th of April following, with only a single dissenting voice. The stated salary was $366, 67, the improvement of a farm previously purchased by the town as a parsonage,* and twenty cords of wood an- * The present residence and farm of IMr. David H. Gregory. 10 106 ORDINATION OF REV. MR. MURDOCK. nually. To this invitation Mr. Murdock returned an af firmative answer. The ordination services took place June 23d, 1802. The introductory prayer was offered by Rev. Hezekiah Goodrich of Rutland ; sermon by Rev. Jonathan Mur dock of Bozrah, Conn., from 1 Peter, i : xvii, — " Which things the angels desire to look into'' ; ordaining prayer by Rev. Joseph Sumner, D. D., of Shrewsbury ; the charge by Rev. Asaph Rice of Westminster ; the right hand of fellowship by Rev. Joseph Avery of Holden; and the concluding prayer by Rev. Reuben Holccmb, of Sterling., The Rev. William Nash of Boylston with the church under his charge, were also present on this occa sion. During Mr. Murdock's ministry in Princeton, the church was greatly strengthened by accessions to its numbers and graces ; especially in the year 1810, when, through the blessing of God on his preaching, a revival of religion was experienced among the people, and near ly fifty were made subjects of converting grace. Of that number several are still living, who remember the pe riod with joyful emotions. This was the first general re vival after the settlement of the town. As a substitute for the old church covenant, the follow ing articles of faith and covenant were, after due delib eration, adopted by the church' with great unanimity,* Nov. 1, 1810. 1. " You believe that there is one God, the creator and propri etor of all worlds, a being of infinite power, wisdom', justice, *" Those who voted in the negative" say the church records, •* declared, that they fully approved bolh the Articles and Confession, except that they could not see fit to require any acknowledgements of particular sins, as in the parenthesis in the first section of the Covenant, though they wore willing that all candidates for admission who felt disposed should mali;e, such acknowledge. ments." CHURCH COVENANT. 107 goodness and truth ; the self-existent, independent and un changeable fountain of all good. " 2. You believe that the scriptures of the Old and New Tes tament were written by inspiration of God ; and that they con tain a complete and harmonious system of religious truths and precepts, by which we ought to form our doctrinal belief, and regulate our religious practice. 3. " You believe, according to the scriptures, that in the unity of the Godhead there exists a trinity of persons, Father, Son, and Holy Ghost; and thesfl three persons are one in essence, and equal-in all divine attributes. 4. " You believe that God hath made all things for himself ; that he exercises a particular providence over all worlds, and regulates and governs all things, according to the holy and un changeable counsels of his own wisdom and goodness. 5. " You believe that the law of God, the principles and whole administration of the divine government, are perfectly holy, just and good. 6. " You believe that our first parents were originally holy and happy in the enjoyment of God's favor, till by voluntarily trans- ^essing in the garden, they fell from their original state, lost the image and favor of God, and became proper subjects of everlasting condemnation. 7. " You believe that the apostacy of our first parents in volved all their offspring in its dreadfiil consequences, so that till renewed by the power of God, all the sons and daughters of Adam are dead in trespasses and sins — have carnal minda, which are at emnity against God — and do live in the habitual violation of all his commands ; for which reason they are proper subjects of everlasting condemnation. 8. " You believe that God, out of his mere good pleasure, and to manifest the riches of his mercy, has devised a plan of re demption ; that in fulfilment of this gracious plan, the Son of God became incarnate, lived a life of holy obedience on eaith, suffered and died on the cross, (as is stated in the scriptures) and thus made infinite atonement for sin, and laid a foundation for the free pardon and complete salvation of every penitent believer in bim. 9. " You believe that all who hear the gospel are invited to come and share in the salvation which is by Jesus Christ, and that whosoever will, may come and take of this water of life freely ; yet such is the perversity and opposition of the carnal heart to God and to the gospel, that none will come to Christ, till the Father, by the special regenerating influence of his Ho ly Spirit, draw them. 10. " You believe that those who embrace the gospel were 108 CHURCH COVENANT. chosen in Christ before the foundation of the world, unto salva tion through sanctification of the Spirit and belief of the truth ; and that the Holy Spirit, the third person in the trinity, whose office it is, does regenerate and afterwards dwell in all the heirs of salvation, working in them both to will and to do, according to the good pleasure of God. 11. " You believe that there is no condemnation to them who have believed in Christ Jesus ; but notwithstanding their weak ness and inability of themselves to stand, they are kept by the mighty power of God, through faith, unto salvation. 12. " You believe that Christ has a visible church on earth, into which all his real disciples and they only, ought to be ad mitted ; that the members of a particular church are required to watch over, counsel and assist each other as brethren ; and that if any walk disorderly and will not be reclaimed, they ought to be cut off from the church. 13. " You believe that the Sacraments of the New Testament are Baptism and the Lord's Supper ; that believers of regular church standing only, consistently partake of the sacred Sup per ; and that believers, together with their households, and they only, can be consistently admitted to the ordinance of Baptism. 14. " You believe that at the second coming of Christ there will be a general resurrection of the bodies both of the just and of the unjust; that the whole human race will then stand be fore the judgment-seat of Christ, to receive sentence according to the deeds done in the body ; and that from the judgment- seat the wicked will go away into everlasting punishment, but the righteous into life eternal. " Do you without reserve, avow this to he your real belief f The following covenant was subscribed : '' You, in obedience to the gracious invitations of the gospel, do now, with religious fear, approach the living God, in tlie name of Jesus Christ, to take upon you his everlasting Covenant. And in the first place, you come and lay yourself at the feet of God, as a guilty rebel, begging for mercy. Before God, angels, and men, you confess with grief and self abasement that you were conceived in sin, and shapen in iniquity ; that you have been an enemy to God and to his holy government, and have abused his long suffering, and slighted his gracious offers of pardon and eternal life. You come before him, from your very soul ashamed of yourself. You blush and are ashamed to lift up your face unto God, yea, even confounded at the remembrance of your innumerable sins and immense criminality. Particular ly you come moumingforyour open and scandalous violations 13HDRCH COVENANT. 109 of the 1st 2d 3d &c., commandments, or for your (here mention 1st Atheism, infidelity, opposition to the cross of Christ. 3d. Neglect or profanation of God's worship and ordinances. 3d. Piofanity, and irreverence for things sacred. 4th. Profanation and violation of the Sabbath. 5th. Disobedience to parents, disrespect aad undutiful carriage towards superiors, pride, and overbearing or unkind behavior towards inferiors. 6th. Indul- g'ence of angry, malicious, revengeful passions, or of a quarrel- same, contentious, unmerciful and unforgiving temper. 7th. Unchaste, filthy conversation and behaviour, whoredom, adulte ry, revilings, drunkenness. 8th. Theft, robbery, extortion, cheating, oppressions of the poor, the widow or fatherless ; dis honesty, prodigality. 9th. Perjury, lying, backbiting, talebear ing. iOth. Covetousness, envy, avarice, selfishness; or any other sin which may be thought proper.) And you do now, as you humbly hope and trust, with unfeigned sorrow, approach the heart searching God, and cast yourself down before the throne as a guilty helpless sinner, supplicating for pardon and eternal life through tbe atoning blood of the Lamb. And you moreover call Heaven and Earth to witness, that you this day avouch the Lord Jehovah, Father, Son and Holy Ghost, to be your God and por tion, and give up yourself, soul and body, to him in everlasting covenant; that ycu consecrate all your powers and faculties, and all your worldly possessions, to his service and glory ; and sol emnly promise, in dependence on divine grace and assistance, (without which you can do nothing) that henceforth, renouncing all other Lords and forsaking every sinful way, you will love and serve and cleave to the Lord your God, as your chief good and your everlasting portion ; that you will walk humbly and peni tently before him, in all tilings seeking the honor of his name and the interest of his kingdom; that you will submit yourself unreservedly to his government.' and labor to keep all his holy commandments ; that yoa will daily seek commnnion with hira in private, and will regularly attend family and public worship, and all divine ordinances, so far as you shall have opportunity; that you will give diligent heed to tbe suggestions and influ ences of his Holy Spirit, and study not to grieve that blessed Comforter to depart from you ; that yoa will continually look unto Jesus Christ as your example, your Lord, your strength and^ your Redeemer ; and that denying all ungodliness and every worldly lust, you will henceforth make it your great and con stant care to live soberly, righteoasly and godly in this present evil world, till it shall please God, in his infinite mercy to take you to himself. And you do here publicly before God, and with a desire to serve him, join yourself to this as a true church. You promise to walk with this church in the faith and order of the 110 MR. murdock's dismission. gospel, engaging, unreservedly, to submit yourself to its disci pline, so far as conformable to the rules of the gospel. You promise to attend all the ordinances of the gospel, and tbe sac raments of tbe New Testament with us ; and to strive as much as in you lies to promote the peace, the edification and the pu rity of this church, to which you now make these solera covenant engagements." Dr. Murdock continued minister of the town for twelve years. The connection of pastor and parish had been one of uninterrupted harmony. The intimation of his intention to remove, upon being appointed Professor of the Learned Languages in the University of Vermont, at Burlington, was received with regret that circumstances had led to this result. The church, however, unani mously complied with the following request of their pas tor : — " My beloved brethren — The University of Vermont having elected me to the office of Professor of the Learned Languages in their College at Burlington; and the sala ry which the town has been pleased to afford me having become quite inadequate to the support of my family, I ura induced to request that you would unite with the town and myself in calling a mutual ecclesiastical Coun cil to which we may refer the very interesting question of my dismission, and which shall have power to dissolve the connexion between us if they shall judge a separa tion lo be expedient and proper. " I am Dear Brethren, Your affectionate friend and Pastor. JAMES MURDOCK. Princeton, Oct. 2d, 1815." The town having declined to unite with the church and pastor Mr. Murdock solicited the church to unite with him in calling a council according to one of the Ill stipulations made at his settlement. With this request the church complied, one only declining to vote. Con sequently the council convened at the house of the Rev. Mr. Murdock Oct. 11, 1815, and, after considering the reason offered in the above coraraunication which relates to salary, decided that this was not a sufficient reason why a dissolution should take place — as the town in all probability would increase their pastor's salary if applied to. "But in consideration of the vast importance," says the Result of Council, " of those institutions in which young men are educated for the ministry and for all the higher offices in society, the uniform practice in New England since its settlement to dismiss Pastors to fill the office of President and Professors in our Colleges, when called to it, the great want of ministers at the pre sent day, the deep interest which the Church in particu lar must feel in the infant University of Vermont, the pe culiar and eminent qualifications of the Rev. Mr. Mur dock for the office to which he is elected, and the pros pect of his being more extensively useful by a reraoval, we do think he is called in the providence of God to leave the people to whom he is justly so dear ; we do there fore judge it expedient that he be dismissed from his pas toral relations to this church and he is hereby dismissed. While we sympathise with this Churph and People under the removal of a Pastor they so highly esteem, we are no less happy in being able to express our unqualified ap probation of the conduct of the church on this tender subject. The respect and kindness which both the Church and People have shown to their minister, and the pleasing union and harmony, which subsist among them, excite a pleasing hope and confident expectation, that they will make speedy and successful exertions for the 112 BIOGRAPHICAL NOTICE. re-settlement of the gospel ministry, and know from long and happy experience how good and how pleasant it is for brethren to dwell together in unity. We affection ately commend this Church and people and their late Pastor with his family to the mercy and grace of God and devoutly implore for them the benediction of Heaven." In complying with the "Result" of the Ecclesiastical Council which dissolved the connection of their Pastor, the church and town strongly expressed affection for his person, respect for his character, and gratitude for his services. The Rev. James Murdock, D. D., was born at Say- brook, Conn., Feb. 16, 1776. He graduated at Yale College, 1797. During the three or four years follow ing he was engaged as a preceptor, " first in the public grammar-school at New Haven, and afterward in Hamil ton Oneida Academy." After leaving his official station in Princeton, he entered immediately on his new sphere of duty in the University of Vermont. In 1819 he was elected to the Brown Professorship of Sacred Rhetoric and Ecclesiastical History in the Theological Seminary at Andover, where he remained until October, 1828, when he removed to New Haven, where he has since re sided, devoting himsplf to the pursuit of ecclesiastical history.* * Some of the publications of Dr. Murdock, are the following ; 3 . Sermon on the nature of the Atonement, delivered at Andover, 1823. 2. Elements of Dogmatic History, translated from the German of Professor Wm. Muenschcr of Marpurg, 1 vol. 12 mo.. New Haven, 1830. 3. Translation of Dr. Moschiin's Institute of Ecclesiastical History, 3 vols. 6 vo, New Haven, 1832. ATTEMPTS TO SETTLE MR. CLARKE. 113 CHAPTER VIII. Religious Divisions — Attempt to settle Rev. Mr. Clarke — Remonstrance of the Church — Church has a right to choose its own Pastor — Mr. Clarke's Re ply to Call — Second effort of the Town to settle Mr. Clarke — His Reply — Petition circulated through theTowi— Call of Mutual Council — Its Re sult — Protest of the Minority — Mr. Clarke's Covenant — Third Call of the Town to Mr. Clarke — His Reply and Settlement. After the dismission of Rev. Dr. Murdock, but a short time elapsed, before the comraittee of the Town, appoint ed to supply the pulpit, invited Rev. Sarauel Clarke to preach as a candidate for settlement. From that period, differences of opinion on religious doctrine, comraenced development, which, in their progress, produced division in the parent parish, and extended their distracting influ ence over civil, municipal, social, and private affairs. It was soon ascertained that Mr. Clarke preached a dif ferent doctrine from his predecessor, and from that pro fessed by the church ; yet it appears that it was congenial with the sentiments and feelings of a majority of the citizens, but not of the church. A meeting was convened on the 25th of June, 1816, when, in accordance with an article inserted in the war rant, the committee* to supply the pulpit were instructed, 48 to 44, " to request Mr. Samuel Clarke to return and preach farther with them in order for a settlement." At the request of Mr. Clarke's friends, a meeting of the inhabitants was warned to be held on the 26th of August following, to give him a call to settle with them in the work of the ministry, when the vote stood — for the can- * We have been credibly informed (hat it was stated in open town meeting by one of the leading friends of Mr. Clarke, that it was their design, in select ing a committee to supply the pulpit, to elect such as they knew would not employ a CalrinisL ] 14 ATTEMPTS TO SETTLE MR. CLARKE. didate 102, against 44. At the same time, a comraittee* was also appointed to request the Deacons of the church to call a church raeeting, to see if they would concur in this invitation. Accordingly the church, as a distinct body, respectable in point of numbers,t met on the 2d of September, and by a large majority, 19 to 8, refused to unite in this call to Mr. Clarke. The town, not satisfied with the action of the church, subsequently made the second ineffectual attempt to pro cure their concurrence, when the vote stood — for con currence 8, against 21. From this time, it appears that the town resolved to proceed independent of the church, and, disregarding their rights and privileges, to impose upon the.Tn a pastor whose sentiments they greatly disap proved and whose ministry they could never conscientious ly attend. Accordingly, they communicated their inten tions to Mr. Clarke, requesting him to settle with them in the gospel ministry, and at the same time proposing to give him an annual salary of $600. The church, on the other hand, forwarded the following strong, but re spectful remonstrance to Mr. Clarke, against his accept ing the call of the town : " To Mri Samuel Clarke, candidate Jor the Gospel Ministry. " Dear Sir : — Tbe Church of Christ in Princeton, being appri sed of the call you have received from the town of Princ^on to settle with them in the work of the gospel ministry, take the liberty to address you on the subject, to which we invite your serious and candid attention. However much we may need a minister of the gospel to reside among us ; and however desirous we may be to obtain one who shall preach to us and to our children the unsearchable riches of Christ, yet we cannot con sent to receive one under such circumstances and with such prospects as are now presented to our view. We are brought to this conclusion not through disaffection to your person, nor * Abijah Harrington. \ Thirty-four mal* members. REMONSTRANCE OP CHURCH. IIS any deficiency in your abilities, or any fault we find in your moral character ; but especially for the following reasons, which are with us of primary consideration, and which we presume you cannot view with indifference. We present them to you distinctly. The flrst is, because we cannot consent to give up our rights and privileges, and sanction the irregularity of receiv ing a minister in whose call and settlement we have not a prima ry and distinct choice. " We understand it to have been the invariable custom of the New-England churches, in their earlier and better days, and wliich has not till of late been disregarded, in the fi.st place to make choice of their own minister, and then to invite the town or parish to concur in their election and call, and to aid in the settlement. This is the practice to which we have ever been accustomed, and which we view as our natural, inherent right, founded in reason and the sacred principles of Christianity, and which we are, at present by no means prepared to surrender. We hold it as an unquestionable truth, that every church of Christ has an inalienable rigbt to choose its own pastor and teacher; and that the exercise of this right is conducive to tbe prosperity of religion and the welfare of civil society, while the denial or suspension of it is of the most inauspicious tendency. We cannot therefore view with indifference the introduction of a different practice among our churcehs, nor without the deep est concern the attempt to introduce it in this place, by the circumstances of the call with which you have been presented. "Tbe other reason why we cannot consent to receive you as our minister, is because we are not satisfied with the doctrines which you have preached and which it is presumed you will continue to preach, should you be settled here. However cor rect you may view yourself, and however many good things you may say, yet we are constrained to think that your scheme of doctrine is not fundamentally that which is revealed in the Holy Scriptures. Without any impeachment of your honesty we must view tho gospel which you preach to be radically a different thing from that preached by Christ and his apostles, and which the primitive and reformed churches received. It is with no small concern we have viewed the attempt recently made incur own country to alter and mutilate the sacred rec ords of our faith ; to lower down the character of our divine and adorable Saviour to that of a mere man or of a mere crea ture; and to subvert the foundation of our heavenly hope?, laid in the sacrifice of atonement offered on the cross. We wish not to have a scheme of religion, of whi;h these are some of the leading principles, preached in this place. However many apparently good things may be mixed with it, we are fully per- 116 REMONSTRANCE OF CHURCH. Euaded that it will not conduce to our own edification, to the good of our children, nor to the spiritaal welfare of the people in this town. " For these reasons, sir, we are constrained to dissent firom the call you have received from the Town, and respectfully to re monstrate against your settlement in this place in the character of a gospel minister. We hope you will take these things into serious and prayerful consideration, and act, in the view of them, as wisdom and prudence may direct. We entertain a good degree of confidence that you will not, by an acceptance of the call, sanction the irregularity under which it has been obtained and presented, and thus aid in depriving us of our rights, and in breaking down the walls which separate the church of Christ from the world; and that you will not suffer yourself to be obtruded upon us not only without, but against our consent. Should you be settled here under existing cir cumstances, you must it seems, be sensible of the critical sit uation in which you will be placed, and be destitute of that prospect of harmony and usefulness which ought to have a weighty and governing influence with those who engage in the arduous and highly responsible work of the gospel ministry. Our hope and request is, that you will speedily negative tlie call you have received from the town of Princeton." Such were the objections presented to Mr. Clarke by a very large majority of the church. Of the validity of the first, it is due to that majority to state that the set tlers of New England adopted the congregational sys tem as their ecclesiastical constitution, and early intro duced the " Cambridge Platform." In that Platform the following declarations are found : " Officers are to be called by such churches whereunto they are to minis ter. Of such raoment is the preservation of this power, that the churches exercised it in the presence of the apostles. The power granted by Christ unto the body of the church and brotherhood, is a prerogative or priv ilege which the church does exercise, in choosing their own officers, whether elders or deacons."* Cotton Ma ther who wrote the early ecclesiastical history of the * Chap. viiL Sec. 5, and Chap. i. Sec. 5. RIGHT TO CHOOSE PASTORS. 117 congregationalists, quotes the following conclusions ex pressive of the sentiments of an Assembly of Congre gational ministers who were convened at Cambridge, in the early days of our country . "A body of Christians associated for all the ordinances of the gospel, are a church of our glorious Lord which have among other precious privileges, a right from Him to choose their own pastors. The churches which have recovered this right from the oppression of man, under which many churches of the reformation are to this day groaning, ought to keep the precepts and the favors of the Lord, and not easily part with what he has given them. To introduce a practice in the choice of a pastor which being followed, may soon bring a pastor to be chosen for a church, which few yea wojteofthe church have voted for, would be to betray and even destroy a most valuable right that such a society has a claim unto; and many evil consequences are to be ex pected from it." To these quotations Mr. Mather adds, this pertinent remark, — " 'Tis very certain, that the right of a church to choose its own pastor was recognized and exercised in all the times of primitive Christianity ; yea 'twas one of the last things that the man of sin ravished from the people of God. The taking away of this privilege from the people, is by Calvin justly called impia spoliatio, a spoil impiously committed on the church of God."* We add one extract more from the Result of an Ec« clesiastical Council at Sandwich, relative to the usages of the early New-England Churches ; — '' It is a truth of sufficient importance to be repeated, and too clear to be contested, that the church is a distinct body, independent of the parish for its existence and for the exercise of its Ratio Discipline, pp. 16, 17, 26. 11 118 RIGHT OP THE CHURCH. rights. Churches are of divine institution, and subject to the laws of Christ ; parishes are of human establish ment, and subject to human laws. Among the inherent and essential rights of a church, the right of electing its own pastor is one of the last to be surrendered. By the same divine authority by which churches are instituted, it is ordained that they should have pastors. The sa cred pastoral office is not of man, but of God. There is evidence most authentic and abundant, that in the primi tive times, the right of churches to elect their own pas tors was universally exercised and held most saered ; and as emphatically said by one of the fathers of New- England, ' it was one of the last things that the Man of Sin, ravished frora the people of God.' This right is distinctly asserted by tbe Platform of our churches, which for a long course of years has had the sanction of our legislative and judicial authorities; and from the earliest periods of our history it has been exercised throughout New-England, with very few exceptions and very little interruption."* It is true that the usages of the church varied some what at different periods. Under the Colonial govern ment the election of a gospel minister was exclusively with the church, and none, but members were permitted to exercise " the right of suffrage in any important con cern." Under the Provincial government, the congre-> gation were admitted to a concurrent vote in the settle ment of a minister, — the right of the church to proceed and elect their own pastor being preserved inviolate. Under the constitution and laws of the commonwealth of Massachusetts, the rights of the town or congregation were enlarged and those of the church somewhat im-i * Panoplist, vo!, iiii. pp. 277,278. MR. Clarke's reply. 119 oaired ; but still the right of the church to elecl its own linister was not taken away. " The mode of settling ministers," said the venerable Judge Sedgwick, " has continued in every respect the same, since the establish ment of the constitution as it was before." The law indeed gave a town or parish a civil right to elect their own minister; but when chosen, he was a mere civil officer or teacher, and not a minister of the gospel. Concerning the second objection in the remonstrance .if the church to the settlement of Mr. Clarke, we need not remark. The fact that he preached a doctrine, es- 'cntially differing frora that which, in their view, was revealed in the Holy Scriptures, was sufficient toauthor- ze thera in their refusal to receive him as their pastor.* As might be expected from a candidate, for the im portant work of the gospel ministi^, on receiving such a remonstrance from the church, Mr. Clarke negatived the call of the town, on the 30th of September. The follow ing is an extract frora his letter declining said invitation ; — " The first reason I have to offer for not coraplying with your invitation is that there appears to be that want of unaniraity and harmony in your proceedings which are desirable and necessary in the settlement of a minister, I do not feel willing to settle under so great an opposition when corapared with the number in my favor. Hat! I any reason to suppose that in case I should settle with you, most ofthose who are now opposed to me would attend upon my religious instructions, treat me with friendship and christian love and strive to pro raote the union and welfare of the Town, this objection * By a vote of the church Thursday, the 20th day of December was set apart as a day of public fasting and prayer. Rev. E. Brackwood of Westborough preached on the occasion. 120 MB. Clarke's reply. would be done away ; but from conversation I had with some of them, before leaving Princeton and from a re monstrance which has been handed to me from the church, I have reason to suppose that most ofthose who are opposed are determined not to receive me as minis ter of the the town or Pastor of the church, and conse quently ray life would be rendered unhappy, my useful ness be diminished and the peace of the town in a great measure destroyed. This reason, therefore, has with me considerable weight. Another reason for my not complying with your invitation is because there are so many who appear to be indifferent towards me, who do not vote at all. I have understood that there are more than two hundred voters in town. It appears that only one hundred and forty-seven have voted in this case, forty-four of whom are opposed; so that not more than one half of the town are really my friends. I have always considered that those who did not vote should be counted on the side of opposition. It was my request and con stant prayer while I was with you, and it was my hope, that every person would act either for or against me, so that I should be left in no doubt respectingthe minds of all; and could I now be satisfied that,as some have suggested, those who did not vote are my friends and really wish to have me for their minister, ray first objection would in a great measure cease ; but so long as so many are opposed and so many indifferent I shall feel unwilling to settle with you. But my principal objection against complying with your invitation is that I conceive the en couragement you offer rae is not sufficient. From what I can learn respecting the expenses of living the salary you offer me without any ssettlement or any - perquisites, is not sufficient to support a minister and raise him above SECOND CALL AND REPLY. 121 pecuniary embarrassment. Should I ever be settled I shall wish for a competency and nothing more ; so that I may be enabled to pursue my studies and attend to my parish duties with profit to myself and people, which cannot be done by those who are obliged to attend to other employments besides their profession in order to live above erabarrassment. I have thus stated my rea sons to you fairly and candidly, and they are of such weight with me that I have felt it my duty to answer your call in the negative."* The friends of Mr. Clarke, not satisfied with what had transpired, a town meeting was warned, to be held on the 14th day of October, to take into consideration his reply. At this meeting a committee was chosen, " to see what further encouragement it would be proper to offer Mr. Clarke as an inducement to settle in the work of the ministry." This comraittee reported in addition to the before stated salary the sum of four hundred dol lars as a " settlement." A t the adjournment, on the 16th of the same month, after a protracted debate, the report was accepted, and the call renewed, when the vote stood — yeas 66, nays 59. Mr. Clarke finding the opposition inflexible, answered the town negatively a second time, on the 10th of No vember. We subjoin an extract from his second reply. " For this renewed mark of your respect and attach ment be assured I feel the highest gratitude. But my friends I cannot express to you the anxiety I have expe rienced since you renewed your invitation. It having been represented to rae by many that should I settle with you, those who did not vote either for or against me, would undoubtedly unite under my instructions, and * Town Records. u* 122 PETITION CIRCULATED. that most if not all the opposition would cease, I felt it my duty both to you and myself to return into town and satisfy myself on the subject. I have therefore taken such measures for the purpose, as wisdom and prudence appeared to dictate, and have obtained sufficient knowl edge of the state of the town as to enable me to come to a result. Be assured that this result has not been a hasty one. In the presence of God lean say that duty and conscience have dictated it. I have again concluded to answer you in the negative. I have been brought to this conclusion from the conviction that I can neither be useful or happy as your minister. If the word ofthose who profess to be Christians can be relied on, I ara con vinced that the greater part of those who are opposed to me are deterrained not to unite in my settlement or at tend on ray religious instructions. I am satisfied too that the greater part of those who have not voted, al though they cannot be said to be opposed, are yet indif ferent ; that they cannot be considered as my real friends and would for choice rather not have me for their teacher. I am satisfied also that some who are my real friends wish me not to stay under the present gloomy prospects."* On the termination of the second attempt, it seems that Mr. Clarke's friends were still dissatisfied. A person was appointed to circulate a petition throughout the town for another meeting, to see if the town would renew their invitation. One hundred and five signatures were obtained. We subjoin the conclusion of this peti tion, — " Fearing the most alarming consequences if we do not succeed in inviting and encouraging him to settle with us in the Christian ministry, we do earnestly en treat you, once more, as soon as may be, to call a town * Town Records. CALL OF COUNCIL. 123 meeting, to see if the town will renew their invitation to Mr. Sarauel Clarke, to become their Christian minister." The petition was addressed to the selectraen, and con sequently a meeting was warned, which convened on the llth of February, 1817. A renewal of the invitation with a request for concurrence on the part of the church, resulted — yeas 81, nays 44; but no further pecuniary encouragement was offered to the candidate. The church, however, by a vote of twenty to six refused con currence, and at the same tirae requested the town to dismiss the idea of settling Mr. Clarke, and to give di rections to their committee to engage some other can didate, in whom it was possible they might all be united and live in harmony. To these solicitations of the church, the town in turn refused to give heed ; hut at the adjournment of their meeting, on the 21st of February, they voted to refer their troubles to an Ecclesiastical Council. With this vote the church concurred, doutless in hope of obtaining relief. Letters missive, in the name of the church and town, were accordingly addressed to the church m Wor cester under the charge of Rev. Dr. Bancroft, the church in Shrewsbury under the charge of Rev. Dr. Sumnet, that in Lancaster under the charge of Rev. Nathaniel Thayer, that in Rindge, N. H. under the charge ofDr. Payson, and that in Millbury under the charge of Rev. Joseph Goffe, — each of which were represented by their pastor and delegate. The Council asserabled at Prince ton, March 6, 1817, and after taking into consideration various communications from the coraraittees of the church and town relating to the business on which they were asserabled, came to the following conclusion : — " That by reason of existing difficulties in this church 124 ECCLESIASTICAL COUNCIL. and town ; and as there is opened by Providence a pros pect of the re-settleraent of the Christian ministry, if a spirit of mutual condescension and forbearance is in ex ercise ; this Council do, after due deliberation, and iu the persuasion that it will be more conducive to the restora tion of union than any other means they can devise, of fer for the consideration of this church the following ad vice : That on the seventeenth day of the present month, the brethren of this church be regularly notified to as semble in church meeting; that when assembled, the the original covenant* of this church, a copy of which accompanies the result of this council, and in which an alteration will be found, toconform it to the language of scripture, be submitted to their consideration. We as sure the merabers who shall adopt this covenant that we will recognize thera as the church of Chrish in Prince ton. After taking this step, we recommend to them as soon as may be, to submit to their body the question of concurrence with the town in the election, of Mr. Samuel Clarke, to be their minister. In case they shall concur, and he shall accept their invitation, we recom mend that a joint comraittee of the church and town be authorized to issue letters missive for the purpose of in viting an ordaining council to consummate the proposed union." Only six of the ten individuals comprising the mutual council supported the " result," while the remaining four entered the following " Protest" to the proceedings: "We the undersigned, members of the aforesaid coun cil, materially differing in our views and convictions from the above Result, and believing the same repug- * A new church covenant was substituted during the ministry of Rev. Dr. Mutdock, fur the oM covenant, as narrated in a previous chapter. PROTEST OF THE MINORITY. 125 nant to what duty requires, feel ourselves bound in the fear of God, to enter our soleran Protest against said Result, for the following reason, viz : " 1. Because it recoraraends an unnecessary and un authorized subversion of the confession of faith and form of covenant adopted by this church in circumstan ces peculiarly solemn,* and which appear to us happily calculated to maintain the purity of the church in faith and practice. " 2. Because said Result appears to us inconsistent with the character given by inspiration of the church as a pillar and ground of the truth ; and as an unwar rantable attack on the rights and usages of the New England churches, which have been unifiirmly recog nized from the infancy of the country to the present day. "3. Because said Result exhibits an alarming stretch of ecclesiastical power, which threatens the liberties and privileges, and even existence of Congregational church es, by depriving them of the right of choosing their own pastors, breaking down their sacred enclosures, and subjecting thera to the unenlightened guidance of the world. "4. Because, in our view, said Result tends to perpet uate and increase unhappy divisions which exist in this church and society, and which might probably be heal ed by such temperate raeasures as wisdom and duty ap pear to dictate. " With these views and impressions, we would fondly cherish the hope, that the good sense of the town of Princeton will lead them to make a solemn pause, before they adopt and pursue a course so apparently fraught with evils to themselves and their children after them ; * in time of a special revival of religion in Princeton i" 1810. 126 PROTEST OF THE MINORITY. and that the rainority of the church will seriously re flect, and humbly bring the subject to the throne of grace, before they depart frora their solemn covenant engageraents to God and their brethren, abandon the faith which they professed before raany witnesses, and surrender theraselves into the hands of those who have never naraed the narae of Christ. " We cannot but deeply sympathize with this precious section of the kingdom of our Lord in their present op pressed and gloomy situation, in which we view thera as suffering in the cause of truth and holiness. We advise and exhort thera to stand fast in the liberty wherewith Christ has raade them free ; to bear with patience their present trials, and to be much in prayer that God, in his mercy, vt'ould be pleased to turn their capitvity, and cause light to arise upon them in the midst of obscurity. " At the same tirae we recognize them as a true church of Christ, and tender them our best wishes and friendly counsel and assistance in all matters and things conducive to their spiritual prosperity. " With most fervent wishes for the harmony, peace and religious welfare of the church and people of Princeton, we close this our solemn Protest, which we found ourselves in duty bound to offer, and humbly comraend thera to the favor and guidance of the great Head of the church."* The original covenant referred to in the Result of the Mutual Council, is one that was adopted by the church' on the 9th day of November, 1767, termed "covenant for the admission of raerabers." Rev. Tiraothy Fuller was the pastor of the church in Princeton, at that tirae, • Signed by Rev. Seth Payson, D. D , Eev. Joshph Goffe, Elder Oliver Bond and E. Brown. MR. Clarke's covenant. 127 and the covenant was used until 1810. That the proposed alteration of phraseology, in order to make the covenant conformable " to the language of scripture," would essentially change the character of the instru ment, and make it as dissimilar to the original cove nant of the church as Unitarianism is unlike Trinita- rianism, was the opinion of raany at the tirae. That the reader may have the opportunity of comparing the two for hiraself we transcribe the covenant as altered, term ed Mr. Clarke's covenant, and refer him to page 90 for the original : — "You declare your firm belief in one infinite and eternal God, tbe Father, of whom are all things, and we in him, and in one Lord Jesus Christ, by whom are all things, and we by him. You believe that the sacred scriptures are of divine original, and contain our whole duty as it relates to practicp. " You resolve to conform your life to the rules of God's word till death, and give up yourself to God the Father as your por tion, to the Lord Jesus Christ, the Son of God, as your Re deemer, and to the Holy Ghost as your sanctifier, guide and comforter. "You acknowledge your indispensable obligation to serve and glorify God in a sober, holy life, and promise to live in obedience to him, walking in all his ordinances blameless. "You promise, by divine aid to walk with the church in the faith and order of the gospel, attending the public worship of God, the sacraments of the New Testament, the discipline of the church, and all bis holy institutions, so long as you may be continued in the place. " You promise to devote your offspring to God, and to in struct them in the principles and practice of religion ; carefully avoiding evefy appearance of evil and every temptation to sin. "This you engage, flying to the blood of tbe everlasting covenant for the pardon of all your sins, and praying that the God of Peace, wfio brought again from the dead our Lord Jesas, that great Shepherd of the sheep would prepare and strengthen you to every good work, to do his wdl, working in you that which is well pleasing in his eight, through Jesus Christ, to whom be glory forever and forever. Amen." On the 17th day of March, 1817, the day appointed.by 128 MR. Clarke's reply. the council, the church met at the Town House, and, af ter a" candid deliberation," voted, to reject the recom mendation of said council, as an unauthorized and arbi trary infringement upon their privileges and rights. On this occasion, 20 voted non-concurrence, 8 to concur, and 2 were neuter. On the sarae day, the town held an adjourned raeeting, at which they ordered that a copy of the result of said council be presented to a coraraittee, and that said committee notify Mr. Samuel Clarke of his third call to settle with them in gospel ministry, as soon as may be. Our limits do not permit us to transcribe the third let ter of Mr. Clarke, accepting the invitation of a majority of those who voted in the town. We however give an extract. Under date of April 6, 1817, he writes : " My Brethren, I come to you with the deepest humility, sensible of my own insufficiency for so great an undertaking ; yet relying on the mercy and assistance of that great and good Being, who has hitherto directed my steps, and praying that in this trying and important hour he would not forsake, but still continue to prosper and bless me, I come breathing nothing but love and peace. It is from the conviction that your harmony and happiness is to be promoted by having me as your minister, that I have concluded to accept your call. I have been satisfied, frora the disposition you discovered towards me after I gave my last answer, and from your recent conduct and zeal, that you are really and firmly attached to me, and that this attachment and affection will be continued so long as I shall be in any de gree worthy of them. It is my desire, therefore, to come to you in the fulness of the Gospel of peace, ardently praying that I may be made an instrument of promoting your peace and joy m Heaven. " Yet, my brethren, while I rejoice in the belief that I shall be happy and useful among you, I do most sincerely lament that I have not been so fortunate as to effect a greater degree of unanimity than exists in the church and town. It is an unpleas ant thing forme to settle with you contrary to the wishes of any individual in this place. Nevertheless, from the acquaintance I have with those opposed to my settlement, from the civilty and MR. Clarke's reply. 129 respect with which I have ever been personally treated by them, 1 am fully satisfied that although they cannot at present regard me with favor as a preacher, yet they will ever regard rae with that friendship and charity which are due from man to man, and from Christian to Christian, and that they will never do any thing designedly to injure ray character, or my feelings. I believe that I can say from the heart, that 1 feel towards them the love and affection of a Christian ; that they have, and always will have my prayers and beet wishes, and that I shall at all times be ready to extend to them the hand of fellowship, of consolation and of Christian love. " From your past expressions of kindness and affection I feel assured, my Christian friends, that they will be continued to rae ; that in all seasons of want, of distress, of affliction and trial, you will be ready to assist, advise, and comfort me ; that I shall always have your prayers, that I may be faithful to you and myself, and that you will do all in your power to strengthen my hands, and encourage my heart You will I trust always find me ready to do every thing in your behalf which belongs to me as a Christian minister and a man. Let it then be our united prayer to the throne of grace, that should our contemplated union be consummated, it may be productive of the happiest consequences both as it regards our present and eternal peace, that we may be enabled to walk together in the exercise of all the mild and peaceful graces of our holy religion. Let us be much in prayer to God for light and direction. And O, may it be our happiness to be mutual sources of improvement and com ¦ fort in this life and of joy and rejoicing in the day of the Lord Jesus.'' Mr. Clarke was ordained at Princeton, June 18, 1817. The sermon on this occasion was preached by Rev. Dr. Pierce of Brookiine^ 12 130 COUNCIL CALLED. CHAPTER IX. Call of Council by the Church— Result— Organization of the Presbyterian Church — Ruling Elders — Call to Mr. Bond — Accessions to the Church and Congregation — New Meeting House — Seizure of Property to pay Ministerial Rates — Seizure of the body — Mr. John H. Brooks carried to Jail — Suit, Samuel Brooks vs. Town— Mutual Settlement of the contro versy — Settlement of Mr. Phillips— Origin of Division — Mr. Clarke's dis mission — Biographical Notice — Proposal for a Union — First Parish, and Mr. Cowles' settlement and dismission. * The opposition manifested to the call of Mr. Clarke grew stronger after his ordination, and many left the usual place of worship. Previous to that event however, the church determined to call an Ecclesiastical Council to give them advice at this important crisis. Letters missive, in the name of the church, were accordingly addressed to five churches to advise in the case, by vir tue of which the Council assembled at Princeton on the 29th of April, 1817, at the house of Caleb Mirick, Esq. It consisted of Rev. Dr. Payson of Rindge, N. H., Rev. Dr. Crane of Northbridge, Rev. Dr. Snell of Brookfield, Rev. Joseph Goffe of Millbury and Rev. Gains Conant of Paxton, — each clergyman being also accompanied by a delegate. After the organization of said Council the subscribers to the covenant which was recommended by the former Ecclesiastical Council, who formed the mi nority of the church, together with others, were inform ed that the council was proceeding to business ; and that they were ready to receive any communications they were disposed to make. Their doings will be best ascertained from the accorapanying result. " Received several communications from the committee of the church, relating to the repeated invitations given by the town to Mr. Samuel Clarke to be Iheir minister,.^the doings of an Ecclesiastical council lately convened for the purpose of giving their advice upon the subject of their future proceedings ; and RESULT OF COUNCIL. 131 the conscientious scruples of the church in complying with their advice, and in setting under the ministry of Mr. Clarke in case he should be established as a teacher in the town, on ac count of bis religious opinions, in some essential particulars so diverse from their own, so opposite to the covenant thoy had adopted and the gospel of Jesus Christ. Having also had a friendly interview with Mr. Clarke, in which he frankly avowed his religious opinions, on which the church founded their objec tions to him as their pastor and teacher, and of which they ap pear to have formed correct conceptions. Whereupon we would express our sympathetic feelings for the church in Princeton, with them deeply deplore their unhappy state, and lament the assuraed power of the late Ecclesiastical Council, so unprecedented in our country and so unauthorized by the Gospel — a power that threatens the liberties, the privileges and tbe very existence of our churches which are founded upon the pillars of truth ; by depriving them of their inalienable rights, subverting their confessions of faith and their forms of cove nant We commend our brethren for the firm stand they have made in the defence of the truth once delivered to the saints ; so honorable to them as professed Christians. Under all the severe trials this measure may occasion them, a conscious love to the Gospel, the aj)prabation of their own minds and their Christian brethren, and above all the approbation and gracious presence of God will be an ample support — a rich reward. In these trying circumstances we would give them the following advice : " 1. That they give themselves unto prayer for the direction and holy keeping of the great Head of the church, that they may be guided into the paths of wisdom and Christian prudence, that they may meekly and patiently endure every trial to which, in Providence, they are subjected, as the friends of truth, and re main united together in love as tbe humble ftdlowers of the Lord Jesus Christ. " 2. That they take all legal and proper measures to form themselves together with such inhabitants of the town as may choose to unite with them into a distinct and separate religious society, for the quiet enjoyment of Christian ordinances, and the instructions of an evangelical ministry, cleaving to their ar ticles of faith and the holy covenant into which they have moat solemnly entered, and from which their brethren so unwarranta bly departed. " And now, brethren, we aclinowledge you as the Church of Christ in Princeton, cordially recommend you to the fellowship of all Christian Churches in our connection, and pledge our af fectionate counsel, influence and co-operation for your support 132 PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH. and encouragement, and for your furtherance in the faith of the Gospel. Walk in the meekness of wisdom toward those that are otherwise rainded and convince them by a " uniform" Chris tian deportment that conscience, not prejudice, a zeal for the truth and not unyielding perverseness, that the fear of God, and love to our Lord Jesus Christ, and not a spirit of discord, have prevented you from a coalescence with your brethren. Above all, brethren, we commend you to God and to the word of his grace, that he would take you into his merciful keeping, shed npon you the dew of his grace, and enable you to keep the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace. Behold, O God, look down and visit this vine."* Agreeable to the advice of the Council, the Church proceeded forthwith to take the appropriate steps to form themselves into a society for the enjoyment of Christian ordinances, and the in^ruction of an evangelical minis try. A committeet was chosen on the 6th of June to confer with Rev. Mr. Merriam, a Presbyterian minister, to ascertain what measures were necessary to be taken to become united with, and also to come under the regu lations and government of the Presbyterian Church in the United States. On the 18th day of September, 1818, it was unaniraously voted by the Church, to adopt the Presbyterian Articles of Faith and discipline, and become connected with the Newburyport Presbyte ry. This course of the Church was considered a bold innovation, conflicting with the prejudices, and also violating the usages of the times. The erection of a poll parish, bringing together those of similar opinions, without regard to local habitation, alraost unprecedented beyond the metropolis, was strenuously resisted. The founders of the society grasped firmly, and thereby se cured those rights which, after the lapse of time, have been accorded as common privileges. Their meetings * Unanimously adopted by the Council. tDea. Parker,— substitute, Jonas Brooks, Esq. ACCESSION OF MEMBERS. 133 ¦were held for some tirae in one of the schoolhouses, the Selectmen refusing them the use of the Town House. Dea. Ebenezer Parker, Dea. Samuel Stratton, Dea. Israel Howe, Jonas Brooks, Esq., Caleb Mirick, and Thomas Wilder, were elected Ruling Elders, and were ordained on the 25th of October by Dr. Dana frora New buryport. The society being thus organized on the 25th of December invited Rev. Alvan Bond, of Andover, to settle with them in the work of the gospel ministry. • To this invitation, Mr. Bond gave a negative reply, alleging. that he came to this result in view of the state of his health, and also of his intentions to engage in the work of the ministry, in a foreign mission. Though destitute of a settled minister, the Church continued to meet every Sabbath for religious worship. They were supplied with preaching generally by sorae of the clergyraen frora the neighboring towns ; and in the space of little more than two years the Lord so great ly blessed their efforts, that upwards of forty individuals became identified with the church. At length they found themselves straightened for room on account of the great accessions to their congregation, until, in 1819, necessity compelled the erection of a house of worship. This house was located near the old burying ground, a little north-west from the old town-house. The dedica- cation sermon was prea«hed by Dr. Dana of Newbury port. The boundaries of the first parish, co-extensive with those of the town, embraced fhe estates of tbe member-s of the Presbyterian society, and while they contributed to the support of the institutions of their own church and teachers, they were also compelled to pay ministerial ra'tes in the same manner as before the separation. This 12* 134 MINISTERIAL RATES. double taxation was peculiarly onerous. Hence, at a town meeting held Oct.l6, 1818, they made an appeal to the justice of their fellow townsmen, for relief from a lax inconsistent with their religious privileges ; but without avail. On their refusal to pay the ministerial rates assessed against them, for the support of Rev. Mr.C larke, their cattle and other property was seized and sacrificed under the hammer of the auctioneer. A second ineffectual ap peal to the town for relief from this taxation, was made. Upon refusing to pay their ministerial rates, subsequently, their persons were seized by the constable, who, agree able to his instructions, made his way with them towards the County jail. With one exception, however, they came to the conclusion before arriving at the place of destination, to pay their ministerial assessments. Mr. John H. Brooks was lodged in the jail at Worcester, who, after " resting quietly" for a time paid his rates and returned to his family in Princeton; The history of these transactions has become matter of judicial record; a suit having been commenced in 1819 by Capt. Samuel Brooks, in behalf of the Presby terian society to recover the amount of taxes paid by them for the support of the ministry and for parochial purposes in the town subsequent to the formation of said society. This matter, however, was finally taken out of court, and amicably adjusted by the adoption of the report of a committee appointed to adjust the matter, as follows : " The committee appointed to adjust and compro mise the present litigation between the town, by a suit commenced by Capt. Samuel Brooks against the asses sors of said town, and to examine all matters in contro versy between the said town and the Presbyterian so- LITIGATION — MUTUAL SETTLEMENT. 135 ciety or act any thing relative thereto, now respectfully report : " That having fully and faithfully considered the sub ject of the unfortunate controversy growing out of the assessment of taxes for the support of the ministry and for parochial purposes in the town of Princeton, since the formation of the Presbyterian Society, by a I'oluntary association of individuals for that purpose in said town — they are of opinion ; that as the assessment of taxes upon the merabers of said Presbyterian Society for the year 1818 is of doubtful legality, and it is desirable that the controversy to which the said assessment has, and raay hereafter give rise, should be amicably and speedily settled ; the town should direct, that the assessors give their orders of abatement in favor of all those members of said Presbyterian Society who were assessed in the tax of 1818 for the amount of the ministerial tax of that year, to which they were respectively assessed ; and that the Selectmen of said town of Princeton draw their orders upon the Treasury to be paid out of the monies raised for the support of the ministry in favor of all the members of said society, who were assessed for the year aforesaid to the amount of said assessments together,with the amount of cost to which they were subjected in the' collection thereof, all agreeably to the schedule and ex hibit herewith reported, and that the said members of said Presbyterian Society thereupon release and dis charge all claim and demand of action, or right of action against said town, the assessors and collector of taxes therein, for the year 1818, by reason of all such assess ments and any collections thereof as aforesaid. That the comraittee do also recommend to said town and So ciety mutually to pass votes that in consideration of the 136 REV. ALONZO PHILLIPS. foregoing terms, and upon acceptance thereof, all de mands, claims and controversies, which have arisen or might arise between the said town and its officers, on the one hand, and the Society and its members, on the other, in any wise resulting from the assessments of mon ies for ministerial or parochial purposes, and the appro priation of monies thereto previous to this tirae be re leased and wholly discharged." [Here comes in the names of sixty one different individuals, with the enume ration of rainisterial rates assessed for 1818, araounting, in the aggregate, to $131 00.] " To these sums are to be added the amount of surplus monies arising from the sales of property exceeding the suras of taxes respective ly, for the collection of which property was sold, with interest thereon, together with the tax and the cost in the action of Capt. Brooks, and the fees of the collector when paid."* On the 20th day of March, 1820, the Presbyterian Church voted unanimously to give Rev. Alonzo Phillips, who had been for some time previous supplying their pulpit, an invitation to settle with them as their pastor. To this call Mr. Phillips returned the following reply, which is found recorded in the church records, without address or signature : " The office 'of the Christian Minister is doubtless the most important and the most responsible with which man can be in vested. He receives his commission from God, and is account able to him for the manner in which he discharges it. His business lies with immortal beings ; its design is to persuade them to become good ; if it fails of this, its design is lost and worse than lost Obviously then, he who thinks of taking this office upon himself ought not to assume it, till he has made it * Signed by Jonas Hartwell, David Rice, and Charles Mirick, town's com mittee, and Samuel Brooks, Azer Maynard, and Jonas Brooks, Esq., committee joS the FresbytCTian Socie^. MR. PHILLIPS' REPLY. 137 the subject of the most serious contemplation and fervent pray er. This remark is applicable to his decision concerning the particular part of his Lord's vineyard, in which it his duty to labor. The first, and indeed the only question, which ought to govern his decision is — where can I do the most good .' In deciding this question, several things must be taken into con sideration ; such as the ability and willingness of a people to give him support, which will enable him to devote ' himself wholly to the work peculiar to his office; the part of the world or particular place in which, at a time like the present, he ia most needed ; his ability to sustain the labors and perform the duties which will devolve upon liim in a particular place ; the feelings and unanimity of the people, who invite him to settle with them. These considerations I have endeavored to examine with impartiality in forming the decision now to be made pub lic. " In regard to the first of these, the support, I can only say, that on the part of the society there is certainly at present a very pleas- .ing willingness; as to the ability they are the only proper judges. Whether tbe sum proposed be adequate to a support in my case, tirae must determine ; for on this subject I am at present wholly inexperienced. All 1 wish for is a support which with prudence and economy, will enable me to live in a manner which you brethren, would call respectable ; which will enable me to unite with my brethren in the ministry in aiding the religious and benevolent plans which distinguish the present period of the church. In regard to the second thing to be considered — the particular place to which duty calls, thia a much more difficult question to decide. When I have looked at the smallness of this society, and at their ability to live a while longer without a settled minister, I have thought it my duty to go to some other place. But when I have contemplated the stand they have ta ken, and its bearings, the everlasting importance of the truths they wish to support, the connexion of those truths with vital religion and the salvation of men, I cannot doubt. When I look at this church, consider what it has sustained and how it has been blessed, I am fully satisfied, that it is a real branch of the kingdom of Christ, and a branch too, which is as precious to hira as any other branch of his kingdom. Why then should it not be as precious to his ministers .' Of the next thing to be considered — the ability of a man to sustain the labors and dis charge the duties of a particular place, in the present case others are judges ; if they have erred time will rectify the mistake. In regard to the last thing to be considered — the feelings and una nimity of the people, they are all any man could wish for, to afford him happiness and give him influence. 138 ORIGIN OF DIVISION. " With these things before me, what could I do, but resolve to engage in the same cause with you — cast my lot with yours, to live or die with you ? What could I do but answer your in vitation in the affirmative ? With these things before me / dp answer in the affirmative. May the Head of the church approve the answer, and to his name be glory forever. Amen." Mr. Phillips' ordination took place on the 7th of June, 1820. The exercises were, — Introductory prayer, by Rev. Mr. Easton ; Sermon by Rev. Dr. Leonard Woods, of Andover; ordaining prayer by Rev. Mr. Gregor; right hand of fellowship, by Rev. Alvan Bond; charge by Rev. Dr. Dana of Newburyport; concluding prayer by Rev. Mr. Parker. We have now narrated the plain facts in the case, which led to the religious division in the parent parish. That the church in Princeton was a regular Congrega tional church, founded upon the common faith and prac tice of the New-England churchs in general, none can dispute. And, as it appears from its history, its mem bers had lived in peace for many years, and had been blessed and prospered. No uncommon symptoms of disaffection appeared in reference to the doctrines of said church, either in the church or congregation, until the pulpit became vacant by the dismission of Rev. Dr. Mur dock, and other doctrines than the people had been ac customed to hear, were preached among them. At that period divisions and controversies began to manifest themselves. From what source they originated is plain to be seen ; and that the divisions consequent upon the settlement of Rev. Mr. Clarke, have not been remedied by the lapse of years, we shall see in the sequel. The town was now for the first time divided into two religious societies, each having a minister of their own choice.* * Previous to this tirae there were several individuals of the Baptist denomi nation but no orgnnized society existed in town until subsequent to this period. BIOGRAPHICAL NOTICE. 139 That under Mr. Clarke was in full Cellowship with the Unitarian Congregational Societies. The one under Mr. Phillips maintained the confession of faith and dis cipline of the Presbyterian Church until 1830, when, on account of the great inconvenience and expense, par ticularly in attending the meetings of the Presbytery, they were at their request dismissed frora that body, and it was unaniraously voted to adopt the Congregational forra of governraent. At the sarae tirae they also adopt ed the covenant and articles of faith, used by the church at the tirae of Mr. Murdock's diisraission.* Rev. Mr. Clarke continued to preach in Princeton until 1832, when, owing to ill healtht he requested his society to unite with hira in the call of a mutual council to advise as to the dissolution of his ministerial relation. The society coraplying with this request, a council was convened at Larab's Hotel, in Princeton, on the 5th day of June, 1832. And, agreeably to the advice of said council, Mr. Clarke was disraissed on the 18th of the sarae raonth. Rev. Sarauel Clarke is a native of New Boston, N. H. He graduated at Dartraouth College, in 1812, at the age of 21 years, and subsequently pursued his theological studies under the tuition of Rev. Dr. Channing of Bos ton. After leaving his official station in Princeton, he accepted an invitation to becorae pastor of the First Congregational Society! '" Uxbridge, and was installed January 9th, 1833. He still resides in Uxbridge. At the raeeting for the dismissal of Mr. Clarke, on the 21st of May, 1832, either from fear that they would be * See chap. VII, in this work. ¦f It appears that Mr. Clarke soon recovered his health which had been for ff fouryears on the decline" and he settled in Uxbridge, Jan. 1833. f Said society is professedly Unitarian. 140 FKOPOSAI, FOR UNION. unable to sustain their Society as a distinct body without assistance, or from some other cause, the Congregation al Society passed the following vote : — "On motion, voted that the comraittee to supply the pulpit be authorized and instructed to wait on the stand ing or prudential committee of the Evangelical Orthodox Society, and request the coramittee of that society to call a meeting of said society, as soon as may be, to as certain whether said society feel disposed to unite with the Congregational Society in settling a minister, and if so to choose a comraittee consisting of an equal number chosen by the Congregational Society, to co-operate with them in inviting a candidate lo preach to both so cieties, or take such other measures as said coramittee and the coraraittee of said Evangelical Orthodox Society may deem expedient to effect a union of said societies." This vote was comraunicated to the Evangelical Or thodox Society, and it led to the following action ; — "At a meeting of the Evangelical Congregational Society held at their meeting-house, on Monday, the 4th day of June inst., to take into consideration the request of the Congregational Society, by their comraittee ; to see if the Evangelical Congregational Society will unite with that society in settling a minister over both socie ties, after due deliberation passed the following vote, to wit ; — " On motion, voted, that we cannot comply with said request for two reasons ; first we have a minister whom we respect and under whose ministry we are united and happy. Second, we do not feel authorized to act on the subject as proposed, because we feel that it is proper and right that the church should have the first move in all measures preparatory to the settlement of a pastor," FIRST PARISH. 141 At this time, it is doubtless true that a large portion of the Congregational Society were not Orthodox in sentiment, and that there was a majority who were op posed to the settlement of a Calvinistic pastor. Indeed, this very question was submitted to the society, where upon it was ascertained that there were seventeen in fa vor of Calvinistic preaching, ten in favor of Universal- ist, six in favor of Unitarian, and but two in favor of Orthodox.* After the secession of some thirty individ uals, however, which took place about this time, who were organized into a Universalist Society.t, a majority of the merabers that then reraained invited a Calvinistic preacher, in the person of Rev. John P. Cowles, to become their pastor. A salary of $500 was offered. Mr. Cowles having accepted this invitation, the ordination took place July 19, 1833. The introductory prayer was by the Rev. H. Winsjow of Boston ; sermon by Rev. Mr. Litis- ley, of Park-street church, Boston; consecrating prayer by Rev. Dr. James Murdock of New Haven, Conn. ; charge by Rev. Mr. Mann, of Westminster ; exhortation to the church and people by Rev. Mr. Clark of Rutland ; address and right hand of fellowship by Rev. A. E, Phelps of Boston ; concluding prayer by Rev. Mr. Allen of Shrewsbury. December 23, 1833, the Congregationalist society was organized as the first parish in Princeton. From this time it commenced its legal existence, distinct from the municipal corporation, and the support of worship ceased to be provided for by the inhabitants in ' their general meetings. * See Town Records, vol. iv. ¦j- The Universalists had preaching at the "Town House," one third of the ^^bbaths, for some time, but finally disbanded. 13 142 MR. cowles' DISMISSION. Mr. Cowles continued pastor of the church until Oct. 5, 1834, when at the instance of the following letter, he was dismissed. " To the Church and Society of the First Parish in Princeton. " Brethren and Friends, — I have to request your consent to the dissolution of my relation to yon as your Pastor and Min ister. It is very plain that either my preaching or my conduct, or both, have given sufficient dissatisfaction to render this step desirable, both for me and you, and sooner or later, indispensa ble. My fixed choice is, not to have it delayed, for I am per fectly satisfied that no change in me, or in my conduct, or in my preaching, which my principles would allow me to make, will materially alter the present aspect of things. You will be only doing me justice if you think of my principles in these respects as entirely immutable. It is therefore proper and desirable, that our relation as pastor and people should cease. Your consent to this step I have to request Your minister's constant prayer is and will be that God would so order his Providence towards you and so guide and control your own feelings and cyndael&j\& those of others, as to secure to you still, in some way, a gospel faithfully and successfuUy preached. John P. Cowles. Princeton, Oct 5, 1834." CHAPTER X. Farther Measures for a Union — Call of a Council — Result — Proceeding upon it — Objections — Votes of Fiist Parish — Votes of Evangelical Society — Action of Congregational Church — Doings of the Council's Committee — Societies unite — Mr. Phillips at the House of the first Parish — His return to his former place of labor— Church Meetings. After the dismission of Rev. Mr. Cowles, the Con gregational Society renewed their proposals for a union with the Evangelical Congregational Society. This was done by the following communication : " To the Evangelical Congregational Church in Prince ton, under the pastoral care of Rev. Mr. Phillips. " Rev. and Beloved, — The undersigned, having been appointed MEASURES FOR UNION. 143 a Committee by the Congregational Church, [for the purpose of making a communication to your Church, would respectfully lay before you the doings of the said Congregational Church, and the advice of an Ecclesiastical Council, lately convened in this place. " At a meeting of the Congregational Church, Oct 26, 1834, a Committee was appointed to ask the advice of the Ecclesias tical Council, which was then to be convened on the 38th of said month, for the dismission of Rev. John P. Cowles, in relation to what course it was the duty of saidf Church to pursue, and what measures to adopt, under the existing circumstances of the religious affairs of this place. " The said Committee attended to the duty of the appoint ment and received from said Council the following result : — ' The advice of this Council having been asked by the Con gregational Church, in regard to tbe course they should take, provided Mr. Cowles be dismissed, the Council advise to the foUowing measure : that said Church propose to the Evangeli cal Congregational Church to unite in choosing a Mutual Or thodox Council to settle the following points : ' 1st. Shall a union be effected between the two Churches ? '2J. On what ground shall such union be effected ? Samuel Gat, Moderator. Cyrus Mann, Scribe.^ "At a meeting of the Church, Oct 29th, the foregoing result and advice of Council was laid before the said Church, and Gccepted ; and Deacon Charles Russell and Caleb Dana, and Brother Charles B. Temple, were appointed a Committee to present to tbe Evangelical Church a copy of the advice of said Council, and to adopt measures to carry the same into effect " Agreeably to the advice of s^id Council, and in full accord ance with our own views and feelings, we do now, in behalf of the Congregational Church, proprose to unite with your Church in inviting a Mutual Orthodox Council for the purposes men tioned in the result of said Council. " In making this request, we wish to add, that we, in common, doubtiesB witfi you, regard it as exceedingly desirable, for the interests of religion in this place, that all those in these two Churches, who coincide in their views of the doctrines and du ties of the Gospel, and give credible evidence of their being the children of God, should be united in one Church, and under one pastor. We do not regsnd a union as desirable except on such conditions, and on such grounds, as shall ensure to you and to us a prospect of purity as well as peace and harmony. Under such conditions we do desire it, for the sake of that cause which we equally profess to love. We deeply lament the division 144 CALL OF COUNCIL. which has long existed in this town, and our prayer to God is that it may soon be terminated in that way and in thay way only which will be for his glory and for the spiritual benefit of his chosen people. And that this desirable end may be effec ted, we desire on our part, to remove every reasonable objection. We propose to unite with you in calling a Mutual Couniil, be cause we do believe that there are questions arising out of tbe character and relations of these churches, which affect so vitally the best interests of the people of this place, aa well as the Church of Christ, that neither ot these Churches is at liberty to disregard them. " Should your Church accede to this proposition and request, we trust there would be no disagreement in selecting a Mutual Council, of approved Orthodox Ministers in this Commonwealth, which would be entirely satisfactory to both Churches. We wish to be distinctly understood that we are willing to submit the whole case, in all its parts, to the decision of such a Council. " And now Christian Brethren, we respectfully ask you to give this subject, as we trust you will, your serious and prayer ful consideration. And may tbe great Head of the Chuich, vouchsafe to you and to us his grace, guidance and direction, and lead us in the path of duty, to the exercise of those Chris tian feelings and to the adoption of such measures as shall re dound to his glory and the spiritual and everlasting good of his people. Yours, with Christian affection, Charles Russell, p Caleb Dana, > Committee. Charles B. Temple.") At a meeting of the Evangelical Congregational Church, Nov. 11, to hear the above communication, and to act thereon, after a protracted discussion, it was voted to appoint a committee, whose duty it should be, in the first place, to endeavor to convince the comraittee, who presented said communication, that such a Council as proposed was entirely unnecessary, as the church were ready to receive all such persons as coincided with them in their " views of the doctrines and duties of the Gos pel," and that " gave credible evidence of piety," with out the advice of a council ; and secondly, if they should not succeed in convincing them, then, as a matter of pa- RESULT OP COUNCIL. 145 cification, to agree with them to call a Council. After attending to the duty assigned them, said committee re ported that nothing but a Council would be satisfactory. Accordingly the measure was agreed to, and a Council called, consisting of the Church of Christ in North Brook field, under the charge of Rev. Dr. Snell; the Congrega tional church in Templeton, under Rev. Samuel P. Bates ; the church in Westminster, under Rev. Cyrus Mann ; the church in Harvard, under Rev. George Fisher ; the church in Bolton, under Rev. John W. Chickering; the Calvanist church in Worcester, under Rev, John S. C, Abbott, and the church in Holden, under Rev. Willard P. Paine, — each of these churches being represented by pastor and delegate. The Council convened at the house of John Brooks, Esq., Dec. 17, 1834. After receiving various commu nications frora the committees of the two '¦.hurches, rela ting to the subject, and desirableness of a union of said churches, they came to the following result -. "The Council deems the union of the two churches exceed ingly desirable, both as it regards the peace of the town, and the prosperity of religion. The Council is also very much grat ified with tbe truly Christian spirit, manifested in the communi cation made by the Committee of the Church lately under the care of the Rev. Mr. Cowles, and with their candor and mode ration ; and have full confidence in the purity of the motives which led thera to make an effort for a reconciliation. Anima ted by these feelings we sincerely hope that the suggestions which may be made by the Council, and the terms proposed, win be acceptable to both parties, and promotive of mutual edificatioii. The Council are aware of difficulties in the way, but do not feel that they are insurmountable. Christians are often called upon to make sacrifices, but if they are sacrifices of feeling and not of principle, they ought to be made. " The Council is of opinion, that the whole subject is involved in two questions. " 1. The first question respects the possibility of a union of 13* 146 RESULT OF COUNCIL. the two Churches which shall promote the cause of truth, purity and peace. " The Council is of the opinion that the Orthodox portion of the Church lately under the pastoral care of Rev. Mr. Cowles, and of the Church under the pastoral care of Rev. Mr; Phillips, may become one united and happy Church. And the plan of union the Council would recommend is this, viz : that the Rev. Messrs. Bates of Templeton, Mann of Westminster, and Paine of Holden, be a Committee to satisfy theraselves, at a proper time and duly notified, of the personal piety of such members of the first named Church as desire the union, and recommend them to the other Church by letter; and that by virtue of this letter of recommendation, they become embodied with the Church now under the pastoral care of Rev. Mr. Phillips. " 2. The second question has suggested itself to our minds in a form like the following : Is there a sufficient degree of har mony in the views of those two parties, to authorize the hope that they may unite in listening to, and supporting, sound Evan gelical ministrations .' " This question we hope we are not mistaken in answering likewise in the affirmative. As to the mode of union, we would recommend that the Society connected with Mr. Phillip's Church, should unite with the other, and in one united Church and Society, sustain and enjoy the ordinances and privileges of the Gospel. " 3. The third and only remaining question respects the pas toral and ministerial relationa of the proposed united Church and Society. The only difficulty on this point, arises from the fact that the two Churches and Societies, as they now exist, are not on equal ground in this respect. "The one have a pastor whom they respect and love, who has been with them in times of anxiety and trial, and between whom and themselves there exist ties of too sacred and tender a nature to be sundered, ex cept by the voluntary motion and action of the parties concern ed. The other has no pastor, nor has it from the nature of the case, that attachment to the pastor of the other Church which would doubtless have existed, had he been for as many years their pastor. To the removal of this difficulty this Council are constrained to feel themselves inadequate, since they cannot control the affections of the one body, nor, unrequested and un authorized, touch the pastoral relations of the other. We are not prepared, on the one hand, to say that all tbe prejudices and preferences can or should be given up by Mr. Cowle's late peo ple ; nor on the other hand require either the Rev. Mr. Phillips or his Church, to make a sacrifice, of the duty and expediency of which, they must be the judges. However, then, in view of RESULT OF COUNCIL. 147 all the facts which have come to our knowledge, our private opinions respecting duty and expediency in this matter, may differ from that of Rev. Mr. Phillips' Church as expressed by him as the organ of their Committee, we feel obliged to leave the matter to the consideration and decision of themselves and their pastor. " This Council cannot refrain from expressing our belief, from what we have witnessed, that there ia, in all the parties concerned, a sufficient desire for union — a sufficient sense of the importance of the best economy in ministerial labor, in these days of destitution, and sufficient readiness to make any need ful sacrifices for the sake of Christ and his cause, to render such a.disposition as has now heen raade of this whole subject, the best we could make even if it were not, as we think it is, the only in our power. " This Council cannot refrain from pressing it upon the minds of all Christians, in both Churches, that for the sake of union on the ground of Gospel truth, and for the advancement of the cause of Christ, it is their incumbent duty, while they contend earnestly for the faith once delivered to the saints, to make great sacrifices of personal feeling and private interest "We do most earnestly and affectiouately entreat the mem bers of both Churches to live as brethren. We cannot doubt that the cause of Christ is equally dear to botli churches, and we do believe that if the spirit of conciliation and kindness, which has been manifested during the session of the Council is continued, the troubled waters will grow more and more calm, till all is tranquility and peace. Wo hope, beloved brethren, that you will endeavor to cherish a childlike, a lowly, and a con tented spirit, and if things are not in all respects as many of you could wish, wait quietly till He who orders all things wisely, shall bring all things right " The Council beg leave to assure the merabers of both Churches of their kind feelings and Christian regards. We have found ourselves called to settle questions of the utmost difficulty and delicacy. Circumstances of past occurrence, cause us to feel a deep sympathy with the members of tbe Church un der the pastoral care of Rev. Mr. Phillips. Circumatancea of a more recent date conatrain us to look with much affection upon the members of the Church under the late care of Rev. Mr. Cowles. But we beg them both to be aasured, that we have earnestly sought guidance from above, that we might come to such a result, as would be mutually acceptable, and promote the social and spiritual happiness of all the friends of the Saviour, in this place. Thomas Sifs.1.1,, Moderator. John S. C. Abbott, Scribe,^' 148 OBJECTIONS TO RESULT. On the 8th of January, 1835, the church under the the Charge of Rev. Mr. Phillips, met to hear the result of the Council, and to take such order upon it as they deemed proper. To its acceptance there was in the minds of many, very weighty and serious objections. One of these was the "private opinion of the Council" in reference to the dismission of Mr. Phillips. They, with their pastor, had supposed that the union was to be formed under the ministry of Mr. Phillips. " One of the Committee" of his church, " that difficulty raight not arise, in relation to this matter, in the midst of the busi ness of forming a union, sought to have adefinite under- Btanding with them respecting it, and supposed that such an understanding existed ; and more, thatthe committee of the Congregational Church had given him a pledge, that they shouldisay and do nothing respecting the pas tor. But the fact turned out to be, some three or four days before the meeting of the Council, when it was too late to have the day of their meeting deferred, that the committee of the Congregational Church were deter mined the Council should take up and aqt on the sub ject of the pastor's dismission."* The main objection, however, was the appointment of three ministers to come and satisfy themselves of the personal piety of those members of the Congregational Church who desired a union, and recommend them by letter to the Evangelical Congregational Church, by vir tue of which they should become identified with that church. This right they felt that they ought not to be required to resign into the hands of those who were en tire strangers to the persons they were to recommend. Some of these persons had been professors of religion * Mr. Phillips' Appeal, p. 3. RESULT ADOPTED. 149 for fifteen, some twenty and others thirty years, a suffi cient time to have established a character of some kind among those to whom they were well known. " But how were a comraittee of strangers to know whether all the persons who should offer themselves to be trans lated from the then late Unitarian church to the Ortho dox, had established and sustained a Christian charac ter."* There were many of the church that thought that it would be preposterous to entrust the matter en tirely to their hands. In view of these and some minor objections, the church, at their meeting, voted, to appoint a committeet of seven, to confer with an equal num ber of the other church, to ascertain their views or un derstanding of the result of Council, and to report at a future meeting. After several weeks had elapsed, said raeeting con vened, when the following vote was passed by a majority of those voting A majority of the whole number of vo ters in the church, it was said, however, were never suffi ciently satisfied with the result, and did not vote at all. " To the Clerk of the church, lately under the pastoral care of the Rev. J. P. Cowles ; — The following is a copy of a vote passed by our church, at a regular meeting, Feb. 5, 1835. " Feb. 5. The church met agreeably to appointment ; after hearing the report of the committee, which seemed favorable, voted to accede to the first part of " tho result," viz., that which relates to the union of the Orthodox members of the other Con gregational church with this. " A true copy — Attest, A. Phillips." The following is the vote of The Congregational church, on the acceptance of the result of Council. " February 28, 1835. Tbe church of Christ under the late pastoral care of the Rev. John P. Cowles, held a raeeting at the * Mr. Phillip's Appeal, p. 6. „ , a,..,.™ t The committee were I. Thompson, John H. Brooks, Dea. Samuel Stratton, J. Cutting, J. Brooks, Jr., E. Beaman. 150 VOTES OF THE FIRST PARISH. hall of Dea. Charles Russell, Feb. 28, to consider and act on the result of the Mutual Ecclesiastical Council, lately convened in this place. The meeting was opened by the Moderator, Dea. Charles Russell, who led the church in address to the throne of Divine grace, for light and direction in the important business before them. " The church then proceeded to a consideration of the sub ject before them, and after a full and harmonious interchange of feelings, — " Voted unanimously to accept the result of said Council. "Voted, That the Clerk of the church be directed to transmit a copy of the doings of this meeting to the church under the pastoral care of the Rev. Mr. Phillips. C. Dana, Clerk. " Copy from the records — Attest. C. Dana, late Clerk of said Church." On the 4th of March following, at a legal meeting of the First Parish in Princeton, convened at the " Town House,'' the following votes were passed : " Voted unanimously, That we accept of the Result of the Mutual Ecclesiastical Council lately convened In this place, by the request of the church under the late pastoral care of the Rev. Mr. Cowles and of the church under the pastoral care of the Rev. Mr. Phillips, and that we can cheerfully, and do most heartily respond to the sentiments expressed in the Result of said Council, that there is a sufficient degree of harmony in the views of this, and the Evangelical Society, to authorize the be lief that they may unite in listening to, and supporting sound Evangelical ministrations. " Voted unanimously. That this Society invite, and we do hereby affectionately and respectfully, fhe said Evangelical So • ciety to unite with us, agreeably to the recommendation con tained in the Result of said Council. "Voted unanimously. That we are, and have been, for a con siderable time past, desirous of a union with the Evangelical Society, and that we highly approve of the course taken by the church connected with us, and of the measures they have adopt ed to effect a union of the two churches. "Voted unanimously. That a union of the two societies ap pears to us to be very desirable, and would tend 'as we fully be lieve to piomote tbe peace. Christian harmony, and spiritual welfare of the people in this place ; and we can see no reason why the division which has for a long time unhappily existed here should be longer continued, or why we should transmit such a state of things to posterity. VOTES OF THE FIRST PARISH, 151 " Voted unanimously, That should a union take place, we sincerely desire that it may be extensive, permanent and last ing ; that it raay be such an one aa shall promote the social and spiritual happiness of both societies ; and that in our own en deavor to effect a union we disclaim having any other motive than that of advancing the Redeemer's kingdom and promoting the best interests of the people in this town. Our cause we firmly believe is a righteous cause ; one for which, we raay invoke the blessing of Heaven, and one on which we may humbly trust the smiles and blessings of God will rest. " Voted unanimously. That we believe there ia no relation raore aacred and important than that which exists between a minister and his people — the peaceable and useful continuance of which depends on the mutual affection existing between them ; therefore we cannot refrain frora expressing our serious and solemn conviction, that a union under the Rev. Mr. Phil lips, would not be such an one as would be the best calculated to promote the happineaa, the harraony, and the highest interest of the united society — inasmuch aa we believe there is a want of that cordiality of feeling, both in him and in us, which it is so desirable should exist between a minister and people — and the attitude in which he has stood to us has been such as to render it impossible, in our view, for him to associate with a portion of the united people, with that freedom and cordiality which are so absolutely necessary in order that a people may derive from their minister, and he communicate to them, that re ligious instmction which ia ao important for their highest good. " Voted unanimoualy. That we are aware that there ia, as there always should be between a minister and his people, a mutual attachment existing between Mr. Phillips and the peo ple under his pastoral care ; and we have no desire to do any thing to weaken or destroy this attachment : still we cannot re frain frora expressing it as our opinion, that should duty dictate to the Rev. Mr. Phillips to leave the field, as we cannot but be lieve under the guidance of Divine Providence it may, thehar- veat would ke rauch greater under some other peraon than it- possibly can or would be under his ministrations. " Voted unanimously. That if the Rev. Mr. Phillips should determine to ask his diamiaaion from his paatoral charge, we will contribute our share of any reasonable sum which shall be thought Juat and right as an indemnity for any losa he may sus tain in consequence of such dismission. " Voted unanimously. That we hope and confidently believe that after viewing and deliberating upon all the circumstances connected with a uniop, that neither the Rev. Mr. Phillips nor 152 VOTES OF EVANGELICAL SOCIETY. his people, will insist upon his being the minister of the united church and society. " A true copy of the records of said Pariah meeting. " Attest : Joseph A. Reed, Clerk." It was voted, that the Clerk transmit to the Pruden tial Committee of the Evangelical Society, an attested copy of the doings of said Parish. At a legal meeting of the Evangelical Congregational Society in Princeton, convened in their Meeting House, on Monday, the 23d day of March, A. D. 1835, the fol lowing votes were passed, viz : — " Voted, — That we accept of the Result of the Mutual Ec clesiastical Council, lately convened in this place, by tbe re quest of the church under the late pastoral care of the Rev. Mr, Cowlea, and of the church under the care of the Rev. Alonzo Phillips, relative to the union of the said societies. " Voted, — That the Clerk of said Evangelical Congregation al Society transmit to the Pirst Parish in Priiiceton, an attested copy of the doings of said Society. " A true copy of the record of said Parish meeting. "Attest: Erasmus D. Goodnow, Clerk." This vote was also passed, it has been stated, not by a majority of the whole number of voters in the Evan gelical Congregational Society, — for there were raany, (as in the church) that never voted for the Result at all, not being sufficiently satisfied with it to do so. The Congregational Church, having been informed of the doings of the Evangelical Congregational Society, at their meeting on the 23d of March, met subsequent thereto, on the 27th day of April, when the following vote was passed : — "Voted unanimously, to carry into effect the result of coun cil; and Dea. Charles Russell and Caleb Dana and Br. Charles B. Temple, were appointed a committee to call a meeting of the church, when they raay deem it expedient, and to invite the committee, consisting of the Rev. Messrs. Bates of Templeton, Mann of Westminster, and Paine of Holden, to be present at DOINGS OF COMMITTEE. 153 the said raeeting of the church, to discharge the important du ties assigned them in the Result of said council." In accordance with the above vote, this comraittee ap- pointed the 16th of May following, for the clergyraen mentioned in the Result of the Council, to meet for the transaction of its business or duties assigned them. The annexed document will show the result : — " May 16, 1835. The brethren and sisters of the church under the late pastoral care of the Rev. Mr. Cowles, met this day at the Town House, at half past ten of the clock, A. M., agreeably to notice given by tbe committee of the church ap pointed foraaid purpoae, to carry into effect the result of coun cil, said result having been adopted by the church under the pastoral care of the Rev. Mr. Phillips. " The committee appointed by the council, consisting of the Rev. Messra. Bates of Templeton, Mann of Weatminater, and Paine of Holden, were there preaent agreeably to tbe invitation of tbe church, given by the committee appointed for the pur poae, to attend to the important duties assigned to them in the result of said council. " The Rev. Mr. Mann addressed the Throne of Grace for light and asaistance on the solemn and interesting occaaion.-^ Important remarks were then offered by the Rev. gentlemen composing the committee. The articles of faith and covenant of the church under the pastoral care of the Rev. Mr. Phillips, were then read by the Rev. Mr. Mann, and aaaented to by all the brethren and sistera of the church preaent, " The Brethren of the church adjourned to the Meeting house ; and after having had an interview with the committee of the council. Voted to adjourn, to meet at half past five of the clock, P. M., at the Town House. " Adjourned meeting. The brethren met at the town house agreeably to adjournment. The meeting was opened with pray er by Br. Charles B. Temple. The committee of the church, consisting of brothers Russell, Dana and Temple, informed the brethren, by their chairman, that the committee of the council, having attended to the duties assigned them, had put into their hands the following communication as the result of their do ings, viz : — " 'To the church of Christ in Piincelon, under ihe pastoral charge of Rev. Mr, Phillips. " ' Rev. and Beloved, — The committee appointed by a council mutually chosen by you and the church under the late care of 14 154 ACTION OF SOCIETIES. Rev. Mr. Cowles to unite said churches, having satisfied them selves of the personal piety of tbe foHowing individuals, raera bers of the last named church, recommend them to your fellow ship; and they are hereby embodied in one church in accord ance with your vote in accepting the result of said council. [Here follow tbe names of forty-six individuals.] " ' Wishing you grace, mercy and peace, we are yours, dear brethren, with christian affection. Lemuel P. Bates, 5 Ctrus Mann, > Commiltet.^ May 16, 1835. William P. Paine, > " Voted, to accept and sanction the doings of the committee of council. " Tbe deacons of the church, viz. David Brooks, Joshua Ev eleth, Charles Russell, and Caleb Dana, having severally ten dered their resignations of said office, in consequence of the union about to be consummated with the church under the pas toral care of the Rev. Mr. Phillips, — Therefore, Voted, to accept their resignation, and that they are, at their own request, here by discharged from the duties appertaining to said office. " Whereas several of our brethren and sisters have not seen fit to comply with the advice contained in the result of council, and to appear with the church this day before fhe committee appointed for the purpose mentioned in said result — Therefore, Voted, that tbe clerk of the church be authorized, when re quested, to give certificates to such persona as did not conform to the result of said council ; certifying: that they were mem bers in regular standing previous to the union, said certificate to bear date of this day. May 16, 1835. "Voted, That brothers Cbarles Rusaell and Caleb Dana be directed to present to tbe Rev. Mr. Phillips' church, the letter of recommendation, that the union of the churches may be con summated, agreeably to tbe result of the Ecclesiaslical council convened in this place December last, at the request of said churches, and in accordance with the subsequent votes and transactions of said churches, in adopting the result of said council. " Voted to dissolve the meeting. " Copy and record of the proceedings. Caleb Dana, Late Clerk of the Church under the pastoral care of Rev. Mr. Cowles." On the 18th of the same month, the two societies — the First Parish and the Evangelical Congregational So-. NEW OBSTACLE TO UNION. 155 ciety — held each of them a meeting. The raeeting of the latter was to ascertain whether its members were willing, accordingto the recommendation of the result, to dissolve their own Society and join the First Parish. The members of this Society, or alarge portion of thera at least, were merabers of the church, and they felt un willing to have a union effected under such circumstances. Consequently, after a " most vigorous" effort by those favorable to the measure, only twelve of the entire socie ty were induced to vote in favor of joining said parish. The remainder, with the exception of nine who voted in the negative, did not see fit to act at all. The informal manner in which the Council's Commit tee " satisfied themselves of the personal piety" of the for ty-six individuals which they recommended to the fellow ship of the Phillips' church, had now become an obstacle to the proposed union. " The coraraittee came on the last day of the week — on Saturday; and in the short space of three hours, read" the articles of faith and covenant of the Evangelical Congregational Church, "and took an assent to them, and satisfied themselves ' of the per sonal piety' of forty-six individuals. Now how, accord ing to the obvious meaning of the language of the result, were the comraittee, being strangers, to satisfy them selves of the personal piety of the persons who should offer themselves ? Can any sensible and candid man give any other answer to this question than ' by personal examination' ; examination in the sense in which the term is generally understood in orthodox churches? Such was the understanding of the original* church. Had they not supposed there would have been an exam ination in the usual sense of the term, not more than * The Evangelical Congregational Church. 156 NEW OBSTACLE TO UNION. three in the entire church would ever have voted to ac cept the result. But was there an examination in the sense in which the term is generally understood by-ortho dox people 1 Forty-six individuals in three hours ! You have perhaps, reader, been present at the examina tion of persons in relation to their religious experience and doctrinal views and the evidence of their having passed from death unto life. How much tirae do churches, or the committees, as the case raay be, occupy in the examination of each individual, when there are several to be examined ? Ten minutes in all cases, undoubted ly ; probably in most cases more. But take the least, ten minutes. Six persons then, may be examined in an hour, and eighteen in three hours. But in the instance before us, we have forty-six in three hours. In the sense then in which the term is generally understood, could there have been an examination. The majority of the original church have felt, that there conld not have been, and that there was not such an examination. Some per sons present, too, have made statements which show, what the want of time evinces, that the forty-six persons who presented themselves, were not in the usual Ortho dox sense of the term examined. It is a very delicate and disagreeable thing to add, but justice demands it, that the standing, as to a good name, of some of the per sons recommended, and the character of several as to piety, is such as evinces that the committee, being sensi ble men, could net have examined them. They never would have been satisfied of their piety, had they done so. Here then, reader, we have the reason, though not the only, yet the main and great reason, why the majori ty of the original church could not feel willing that the union should go into effect. Ought they to have felt UNION OF SOCIETIES. 157 willing, that it should? What if most of those who vo ted at all — nearly half of the church — had once voted to accept the result 1* They voted thus, most of them cer tainly, on the supposition, that the persons to be recom mended to them and embodied in the church would first be examined. Under these circumstances, were the church bound by the above vote ? Every candid and pi ous mind, it is believed, must answer this question in the negative. In deep anxiety and distress, in many tears and prayers, a majority of thera came to the conclusion,, that they were not, and could not be bound by it."t The twelve persons in the society who were in favor of the union, being a majority of those who voted, pro ceeded still further, however, and carried a motion to dissolve their society, and to join the First Parish. Ac cordingly they " went over forthwith to the meeting of the First Parish,'"' and presented their names and also the names of all the other members of the Evangelical Congregational society, for the reception of said parish. f The First Parish, in their meeting, accepted said list of names, voting them in individually. At the same time, also, a coramittee |1 was chosen to request the Rev. Alonzo Phillips to supply their pulpit for " the present.''' Mr. Phillips, as desired, agreed to supply their pulpit for " the present," and for the present only ; which ¦supply, for five sabbaths, he accordingly rendered ; — when a majority of the Evangelical Congregational Church, after having pondered and prayed over the sub- * The Result of the Ecclesiastical Council. t Phillips' "Appeal," pp. 6, 7, 8. X Several protested at the tirae, we have been informed, against their names being presented for admission into the First Parish. 11 The committee were Messrs. Caleb Dana, Jonas Brooks, Jr., Charles B. Temple, Joseph Mason, and Charles Russell. 14* 158 MB. PHILLIPS' SUPPLY. ject apart and together, and conferred upon it, came to the deliberate and solemn conclusion that they could not conscientiously go forward in a union, under circum stances which seemed to them adapted to the corruption of vital piety. In accordance with this conclusion, they addressed the following note to their pastor : — " Whereas it has become quite manifest to us, the subscribers, that the way is not yet prepared to carry the union, respecting which so much has been said and done, into practical effect ; and whereas, neither we ourselves, nor our families, seem in a situation to derive much benefit from our rainister's labours under present circumstances, we regard it as our right and our duty to request, and we do hereby request him to return to his former place of labour." Mr. Phillips read this communication to the congre gation of the First Parish, and stated that, as he was the Pastor of those who were the authors of the communi cation, and was in the place he then occupied only for a temporary supply, it was obviously his duty to comply with their request. He therefore gave notice that he should discontinue supplying for "the present" the pul pit of the First Parish, and return to his former place of labor. From this event, two separate congregations of public worship were again sustained. A difference of opinion having arisen in the church under Mr. Phillips, as we have seen, as to the propriety of the proposed union going into effect, (many main taining that it was inexpedient, on account of the " un satisfactory standing of several of the persons the coun cil's committee" had seen fit to recommend, while others were unwilling that a division in public worship should CHURCH MEETINGS. 159 take place,) a portion of the church returned to their usual place of worship with their pastor, and the others remained at the house of the First Parish. Forthwith thereafter, the other party held a meeting and resolved to continue their worship at the old Congregational house. On the same day, a meeting of the united church was also held, and a committee appointed to wait on Mr. Phillips and request him to call a meeting of the church, to ascertain " why they were not willing, that the union should go into effect." This resulted in a meeting of said church in July following; " at which, but for the opposition of those who were determined the union should go as matters then stood, the persons recommend ed* would have been informed where the difficulty was, and a course adopted, there is good reason to believe, which would have saved the church from much of the evil they have since experienced. Near the close of this meeting, when half the raerabers had gone and the rest were on their feet, beginning to go, a resolutiont was offered by one of the union-men-as-matters-were, the purport of which was that the church, in order to a har monious union, wished for some opportunity to obtain a knowledge of the doctrinal views and religious experi ence of the persons recommended. This resolution was retained by the mover, but the substance of it was event ually forwarded by the committee appointed for the pur pose to the persons whom it concerned."! * The persons recommended by the Council's Committee. f A copy of this resolution will appear in the succeeding chapter. } Phillips' Appeal, p. 11. I0- 3; Ephraim Mirick 1820-'o; Charles Mirick 1824; Amos Mer iam 1825-9; Ephraim Mirick, 2d 1827; John Whitney 18-37-9, 32-5, 7-9, 44, 5; Jacob W.Watsnn 1838,9 ; Moses G. Clieev- er 1830,1,6; R'lfus D.ivis 1830-2, 48, 50; Israel Everett 1833, 3. 7-9. 44, 50 ; Harlow Skinner 1833, 4 ; Joshua T. Eve rett 1834, 5; Nathan Meriam 1835 ; Hamilton Wilson, 1836-9; Williams. Evprett 1836; John Biooks 1840, 1, 50; Joseph Meriam 1840-3 ; Caleb Dana 1840 ; Charles B. Temple 1841-4; Joseph Hartwell 1812,3; Asa H. Goddard 1845-7; Mirshall Meriam 1845 ; Cileb S. Mirick 1846, 8 ; Gaorg.; O. Skinner 2iM APPENDIX. 1646,7; Ephraim Beaman 1847; Phineas E. Gregory 1848; Jonas Brooks, Jr. 1849; Prederick Parker 1849,51,2; Win. D. Cheever 1849, 51, 2 ; Henry Boyles 1851 ; Joseph Whit eomb 1852. Town Treasurers. — Peter Goodnow 1761 ; James Mirick 1762, 3 ; Timothy Keyes 1764, 5 ; Sadey Mason 1766 ; Joseph Sargent 1767, 70, 1 ; Abner Howe 1768, 9 ; Joseph Eveleth 1772,3; Robert Cowden 1774-7; Charles Brooks 1778; Jo seph Haynes 1779; Enoch Brooks 1780-1812, 14-16; David Rice 1813; Benjamin Harrington 1817-21; Thomas Wilder 1822; Jacob W. Watson 1823.4; Jonas Brooks 1825-33; Charles Mirick 1826, 32; Moses G. Cheever 1827-30, 42; John Brooks 1831 : Jacob W. Watson 1834-6 ; Joseph Mason 1837-41; Daniel Howe 1843,4; Alphonso Brooks 1845-8; Warren Patridgt? 1849 ; Joseph A. Read 1850-2. Representatives. — Moses Gill 1780,4-95 ; Asa Whiteomb 1783; Ebenezer Parker 1797.8, 1800; David Rice 1801, 2, 13-18, 21; John Dana 1804, 5, 12; William Dodds, 1806, 8- 11; Ephraim Mirick, Jr. 1823; Charles Russell 1826-33 ; Josh ua T. Everett 1833, 5 ; Jonathan Whitney 1834 ; John Brooks 1835,6; John Whitney 1836; Alphonso Brooks 1838; Sewall Mirick 1839, 45; Ebenezer Parker 1840-2; Israel Everett 1843, 44; Caleb S. Mirick 1847 ; Henry Boyles, 1848 ; Eben ezer Smith 1849 ; Ephraim Beaman 1850 ; Luther Crawford 185L YALE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY Tlie present town bouse, ol stone, was •, ,.- built in 1830, the corner stone being lai^l &^'v - Aug. 21. Ward N. Boylston, heir of j Thomas Boylston, some time ot Boston, ' but wlio (lied iu England, gave £iO, to be put out at compound interest till ir, \m- came large enough for some public bnild- I ing here, sucli as he should direct. In I his visit here in lfc20 ho found this fund had increased to $1000. Dying iho uext January, he added $300 more by will, di recting the whole to be used toward a svtbstaiitial structure ol stone, like what is here. This was done, and a historical ! slietch embodying these facts was prepared : by Bev. Ward Cotton, and placed under I tbe corner stone. Ward Nicholas Boylston ot I'rinceton, 1 the towik's benefactor, was son of Benjamin Hallowell of Boston, who married, iu 1746, i Mary Boylstoii,si.ster of Thomas Boylston, a rich merchant of London, and benefactor 1 of the city of Boston, and tha nephew, in heriting great wealth fro mhis itncle, after wards assumed the name of Ward iSTicho- las Boylston, by which he wi^i alterwarda known. He had an uuch', Nicholas Boyl ston, in Boston, who endowetla profes.soi- ship in Harvard College, and who directed his executors after bis decease, iu 1771, to purchase the ancient bomestead in Brook- line which had belongsd to his grand father, Dr. Thomas Boylston, and to con vey tlie same to Brookiine Churcli. The remains o£ this Ward Nicholas Boylston, and ot his son of tbe same uaine, who siicceedeil to liis estate, lie in a magnificent tomb erected by the junior Ward N. Boylston in their cemet^ety in Princeton. Rebecca Boylston, sister ot the senior Ward Nicholas Boylston's mother, was wife of Hon. Moses Gill of Princeton, lieutenant governor of Massa chusetts, and Eebecea's cousin, Susanna Boylston, was mother of John Adams, president of the United Stales, Many of the present generation will remember the latter of these two Ward N. Boylstons of Princeton, both benefactors of the old town of Boylston. ^-^ ITiW ''^T". '^' 'fmm i - :l/ -;¦¦ ¦".~V"f''!K!Ktv,v.-!iMiaajt-.y-|i:';j