FIRST GOVBHSrOR OF MASSACHUSETTS. 'o: O^i^ Froi'n/ tfij; ori^un^ puOir/-, uv possesi-ian^ of IVm,. P. L'ndiaaet .Esq Su^Urn- Mass. ACCOUNT OF THE Ctntennid iiekkatioit IN DANVERS, JUNE 16, 1852, TOGETHER WITH THE PROCEEDINGS OF TIIE TOWN IN RELATION TO TIIE DONATION OF ^forgp Mnhh\, ^!\., OF LONDON, PRI\TED BY ORDER OF THE TOW.X : 185 2. /¦.nffT-ai/^:?. -fbr j< ,.-:.. t. HvL-al -S7at4!/tes or'JMimd/iZ/ir: OF LONDON, THIS BOOK IS INSCRIBED AS AN EXI'RESSION Of THEIK ESTIMATION OF THE HONOR WHICH HE HAS IlEFLId'EL) (!Dn l}ig ^'"atice €cmin, IN THE HIGH POSITION WHICH HE HAS REACHED BY A SAGACIOUS AND DEVOTED .lAPP.LICATION TO HONORABLE PURSUITS, .-• ¦¦«Sfe(fc. ,' AND THE PK0M0TI0N;"0F INTERNATIONAL COUKTESIES, ®£ tj)c lifiecalitg toitj iujicj' Je ai)p):ojj;tate.9 >' GREAT WEALTH TO PURPOSES OF HUMANITY AND SOCIAL IMPROVEMENT, AND AS A TESTIMONY OF GRATITUDE iFotr f^t MnniUtmt donation WHICH HE HAS BESIOWfiD ON DANVERS, /or tIjB itffDBiDii nf ^Htfttl InnmlBigB oraniig its (Citt)piis. f Committee of r PuBl.iCAriu.s. ANDREW NICHOLS, MILTON P. BRA.WAN, SAM'L P. FOWLER, r. POOLE, JOHN W. PROCTOR, CENTENNIAL CELEBRATION, AT DANYERS, MASS, JUNE 16, 1852. "Lives there a raan "with soul so dead, Who never to himself hath said, This is my own, my native land ?" Scott. BOSTON: PRINTED BY DUTTON AND WENTWOETH, No. 37, Congress Stbeet. 1852. Ck ^3, ¥8 3 Aged 83. ADDRESS, BY JOHN W. PROCTOR Welcome, friends of Danvers, to the land of your hirth, and of your choice! It gladdens the heart to meet so many cheerful countenances on this One Hundredth Anniversary of the independent munici pal existence of our town. In behalf of my fellow-citizens, I bid you all a hearty wel come here. Your presence gives assurance that we have not mistaken your sympathies with the occasion of our meeting. Why these thronging crowds in every avenue of the town ? Why has the farm,er left his plough, — ^the tanner his vat, — the currier his beam, — ^the trader his shop, — the shoemaker his bench, and every one his employment ? Why this gathering of thousands of children, — the future men and women, to govern and adorn, — and the interest that beams in every expression of their animated countenances ? Why have our friends from the North, the South, the East, and the West, favored us with their presence ? Is it not to bring to mind the virtues, the toils, the sufferings of our fathers ? " It is a privilege to learn what shall be from what has been, — to turn experience into prophecy, — to view in the mirror of the past, the vision of the future." The settlement of Salem, early known as Naumkeag, was begun by Roger Conant and others, in 1626, and much in creased, in 1628, by the arrival of John Endicott and others, all emigrants from England. I a It then included Salem, Danvers, Beverly, Marblehead, Wen ham, and parts of Topsfield, Manchester, Lynn, and Middleton, bounding northerly by Agawam, southerly by Saugus, westerly by Andover, easterly by the Atlantic ocean. Then Saugus, Salem, Gloucester, Agawam, and Newbury, extended all along the coast of Essex to the Merrimack ; and Andover was the only interior town south of that river. Whoever would do justice to the topics brought to mind by the occasion, should trace the origin of each of the towns that have sprung from Old Naumkeag. Time will not now admit of this. ' My purpose is, to pass over the first century of Naum keag, excepting as to the part included in the act of the Legis lature, passed " Anno Regni Regis Georgii secundi, &c., vices- simor quinto," — or, in plain English, the 25th year of George the 2d, our then Royal Master, — or Anno Domini, 1752. By this, Danvers was set off from Salem, as a distinct municipal district, with all the privileges of a town, except that of choos ing representatives to the General Court, which restrictive con dition was taken off by an act passed June 16th, 1757. Upon a view of these acts, the town determined to date their inde pendent corporate existence in the year 1752, — ^which determi nation we take to be conclusive of the matter. Our then Royal Master did I say ? By the grace of God, and the pleasure of the King, then came all our privileges. I know that the generations which have since arisen have but an imperfect idea of this obligation to the king, but a grievance it was, and so our fathers felt it to be. What do we most desire? Is it not independence? In the language of the most gifted mind* of the age, (I say it with emphasis on this 16th day of June, A. D. 1852,) when the aspirations of millions are turned towards him with anxious solicitude, " Hail, Independence ! Hail, that best gift of God to man, saving life and an immortal spirit !" That Indepen- I dence, which gave us " A Church without a hiahop, A State without a king," * Daniel Wehster, the fanner of Marshfield, Mass. NAME OF DANVERS. Whence came the neime of Danvers ? why applied to this territory ? are inquiries often made, but never, to my knowledge, quite satisfactorily answered. For years before the separation, the name Danvers was occa sionally applied to the middle precinct of Salem. Among the settlers, prior to the separation, were several by the name of Osborne, — a name connected, by marriage, with the Danvers family in England. Earl Danvers was one of the regicides, the fifth who signed the death-warrant of Charles. Sir Henry Danvers, the last of this family, died in 1643, a man of wealth, as is to be presumed from his liberal donation of £5000 and more for the advancement of learning in the University of Ox ford. It is highly probable, the name of the town was derived from this family. This name has one merit, — it is not found anywhere else. Mr. Felt, the careful annalist of Salem, thinks the name was suggested by Lieut. Gov. Phipps, from gratitude to one of his patrons, and refers to a letter that so states the fact. It may have been so. But if the people of Danvers were then so obedient as to adopt a name because a Governor sug gested it, it is a characteristic that has not remained one of -their distinguishing qualifications. Few towns have been less disposed to follow the lead of any master. This example was early set by their file leader. Gov. Endicott. If the noble Earl, for whom the name was probably given, had anticipated the perpetuity to accrue to his name in this humble district of these Western Wilds, and the present wants of its High Schools, now Weltered only in hired tenements of cast-off chapels, he would, without doubt, have contributed of his abundance to the relief of their necessities. This era of separation has not been chosen for celebration because of the severance. Though severed in name, we have ever been united in spirit; and though our good old mother^ Salem, nursed us at her bosom all of one century, she has not failed to feed us with pap of various kinds, ever since. Some times we have given her sauce in ir©.tiiria, but ©ftener the sub- stantials of Ufe. Notwithstanding our fathers thought many inconveniences would be remedied, and many advantages gained, by being a distinct town, as appears by their petition to the General Court, it must be apparent to every reflecting mind that the balance of benefits, consequent upon separation, was against us. True, being a distinct corporation created a few municipal offices, for ¦ the gratification of ambitious aspirants ; but generally speaking, ; a review of the lives of such office holders wUl show, that those who have least, fare best ; and those who strive to do most, ¦instead of receiving benedictions, are usually loaded with the ^opposite. 'The petitioners were a scattered population of about 200 families, containing from twelve to fourteen hundred persons, chiefly occupied in the cultivation of the land. Those from whom they sought to be separated, were mariners, traders, and merchants, densely located, with interests, in some measure, clashing with those on the borders. The busy hum of mechan ical and manufacturing industry had then scarcely begun to be heard in the village of Brooksby, as the region hereabout was then called, where the brooks from the hills united with the waters of the ocean. At first, towns assumed to own all the lands within their limits not specifically granted. Grants were made, by the colonial authority, or by towns through the agency of seven men, or selectm,en, according to the standing of the grantees, or services rendered, — as seats in the church were assigned, first to the Captain, then to the Lieutenant, not omitting the En sign, and the Corporal. Thus the records speak of Captain Samuel Gardner, Lieutenant Thomas Putnam, Ensign Cornelius Tarbell, Corporal Samuel Twist, Deacon Malachi Felton, Daniel Eppes, Esquire, arranged in the order of the consequence of the titles they sev erally mounted. These are referred to as illustrations of the style of the times — as our kind friends from the school districts have shown us cocked hats, hooped petticoats, and high-heeled shoes, as illustra tions of tiress in times gone by.* It was of little consequence what the title was, as Corporal Twist said, on his return home after his election, " if it had the ril to it, — so that when the bell tolled at his funeral it could be said, Corporal Twist is dead." Who will presume to say, that, in the term Corporal, there is not as much body, aye soul to, as in that of General ? " Worth makes the man, the want of it the fellow.'' But three instances of colonial grants are known to have been made on our territory, viz. : — 1. To John Endicott, in 1632 and 1636 ; 2. To Samuel Shelton, in 1634 ; 3. To John Humphrey, in 1635. The grant to Endicott is thus described. " A neck of land Ijring about three myles from Salem, called in the Indian tongue, Wahquameschock," situate between the inlets of the sea, now known as Waters River on the south, and Crane River on the north, bounding "westerly by the maine land." Such was the precision of early grants. * My recollections of the " A^e of Homespun," impresses my mind strongly with the propriety of the following passage in a Centennial discourse by Dr. Bushnell, at Litchfield, Conn., in August last : — " The spinning-wheels of wool and flax, that used to buzz so familiarly in the childish ears of some of us, will be heard no more forever, — seen no more, in fact, save in the halls of the anti quarian society, where the delicate daughters will be asking what these strange machines are, and how they are made to go ? The huge hewn-timber looms, that used to occupy a room by themselves in the fa-m-houses, will be gone, cut up for cord wood perhaps, and their heavy thwack, beating up the woof, will be heard no more by the passer-by. The long strips of linen bleaching on the grass, and tended by a rosy-cheeked maiden sprinkling them each hour from her water can, under a burning sun, thus to prepare linen for her own or her brother's marriage outfit, will have disappeared, save as they return to fill a picture in some novel or ballad of the old time." Who will presume to say, that, in these labors of our mothers, will not be found the hidden power that gave firmness to the muscles and vigor to the constitutions of their de scendants .' I would give more for the lessons learned on 07i« spinning-wheel, or over one milk pail, than those acquired on ten piano fortes. I have often thought that girls would profit more by learning to jump over fences or clamber ledges, than by dancing polkas, or practising other fashionable amusements, — many of which are better calculated to excite the passions, than to improve the health of body or mind. There is much propriety in the admonition, " Lead ug not into temptation." 8 On a beautiful eminence between these rivers. Captain E., who, as acting governor, was chief magistrate of the colony previous to the arrival of Winthrop in 1630, established his residence. The selection of this site speaks favorably of the judgment of the man. It would be difficult to find one more eligible. For two hundred years at least it remained in the Endicott family ; and when the ability of many of those, who still bear the name, is considered, it is matter of surprise that they should have suffered it to pass from the family. How can a man better do honor to himself, than by venerating his ances tors who were worthy of it ? I know, our republican notions cut across the doctrine of entailments ; but still, there is some thing impressive in the contemplation of those venerable abodes, in our fatherland, that have remained in the same family for centuries. The fortunate possessor, thus advised of what his fathers have done, is prompted to endeavor to " go and do likewise." From this position, before roads were laid or bridges con structed, the Governor was accustomed to go, in his own shallop, to and from the seat of government at Boston, while engaged in the government of the colony, either as chief magis trate or as one of the assistants. On this orchard farm (so it was called) in front of the man sion about sixty rods, now stands the celebrated Endicott pear tree, celebrated not so much for the fruit it bears, as for the time it has borne it. It is probably the oldest cultivated fruit- bearing tree in New England, — itself brought from Old Eng land, — thereby constituting a direct connecting link with the mother country. The fruit is called Bon Chretien, — ^whether so called from its own merits, or the merits of its owner, I am not advised. It is of medium size and fair quality, but not quite equal to the Seckel. In 1850, the tree bore one and a half bushels of fruit, as I myself witnessed, and new shoots grew upon it, more than six inches in length. One thing is made certain by this tree, viz., that a pear tree will last two hundred years, — ^liow much longer may be told at the next Centennial. 9 On this same Endicott grant, now stands the Parris house (so called) from which sprung other fruits* not quite as worthy the name of good Christian as the Endicott pear. The grant made to Rev. Samuel Skelton, — the spiritual father of Endicott, and associate pastor with Higginson, at the First Church in Salem, — was situate between Crane and Porter's Rivers, bounding westerly, also, by the " maine land." So at first, these grants to the Captain and the Parson gave them a presumptive title to all the town northerly of Waters River. This section between Crane and Porter's Rivers was long known as Skelton's Neck ; — then as New Mills ; — and recently as Danvers-port. The natural advantages of this part of the town are second to none other. Free communication with the ocean by water,. and with the interior by railroads, its facilities for business are^ first rate. It only needs energy and capital to go ahead. In 1635, a grant was made by the colonial authority to John Humphrey, in the westerly part of the town, — whence came the name of Humphrey's Pond, situate on the line between Danvers and Lynnfield ; a beautiful sheet of water, containing 165 acres, about 100 feet above tide water ;-^in the midst of which is an island of five acres, on which the first settlers had a fortification as a retreat from the Indians. The recent location. of a railroad from Salem to Boston, by this pond, has probably laid the foundation of a thrifty village in this vicinity, — as soon as the lands shall pass from the hands of visionary speculators to the control of men of sound, practical common sense. December 31, 1638. "Agreed and voted, that there should be a village granted to Mr. Phillips and his company, upon such conditions as the seven men appointed for the town affaires should agree on." Hence the origin of Salem Village. This Mr. Phillips was a clergyman. He did not long abide in the place. He removed to Dedham, and thence to England, in 1642. Probably Putnam, Hutchinson, Goodale, Flint, Need- ham, Buxton, Swinnerton, Andrews, Fuller,. Walcott, Pope, * See the story of the Salem Witchcraft, that follows. 2 b 10 Rea, Osborn, Felton, and others, were of the associates in the settlement of the village. Their business was farming. Labor in the field for six days of the week, and going to meeting on the seventh, was their chief employment. Companions of Endicott, the puritan principles they imbibed, even to the third and fourth generations, bound them to their meeting. He that cut the cross from the flag, would not allow his attendants to sail under any other banner than such as he chose to hoist, or any deviation in their voyage. He was one of those lovers of liberty who was not unwilling to engross the largest share of it himself. Sure that he was right, he felt it to be his duty to see that others acted according to his notions of right. He was indulgent to those who were obedient. One of the grievances alleged by the petitioners, as a reason for separation, was, that their children could not conveniently attend school. This was indeed a grievance. Situate four, five, and six miles from the school, how could they attend ? Early taught by Endicott himself the value of these institutions, it is not surprising, when they found the superior advantages enjoyed by the children of their fellow townsmen, in part at their expense, that complaint should have been made. Be it remembered, the first free school in the land, if not in the loorld, was established at Salem. The language of the selectmen's order, by which this was done, is worthy to be inscribed on the same tablet with the Declaration of Independ ence. It reads thus : — " Sept., 1641. Ordered, that a note be published on next Lecture-day, that such as have children to be kept at schoole, would bring iu their names, and what they will give for one whole year ; and also that if anie poor bodie hath children, or a childe, to be put to schoole, and is not able to pay for their schooling, that the toione will pay it by a rate." Here is the seed whence sprung the free schools of Massa chusetts. It contains the germ of freedom itself Here it was planted, on the orchard farm of the Governor, under his own care, as Governor of the Colony, and Chairman of the Select men of Salem. Governors in those days were well employed 11 in looking after the fruits of the field and the childreii of the household; — the oozings of the still did not then trouble them.* In 1634, one of the earliest grants was made to John Putnam and his three sons, Thomas, John, and Nathaniel. They came from Buckinghamshire, England, settled, cultivated, and peopled it. This was situate in the Village Parish, westerly of the grants to Skelton and Porter ; probably along the line of what is now known as Whipple's Brook, extending from Judge Putnam's Mill to the house of Daniel Putnam, — famous as the birth-place of Gen. Israel Putnam, who made his mark on Bunker's Heights, at Charlestown, June 17th, 1775, witnessed by Warren, and many others, and sealed with their blood ; — he who nobly exclaimed, " My sons, scorn to be slaves ! " No name is more prominent in the annals of the town than that of Putnam. Although hundreds have gone out in all directions, still, from the beginning, there has been more of this name than any other. By the kindness of Col. Perley Putnam, — who has taken unwearied pains to ascertain the facts, — I am informed that he has the particulars of between five and six hundred families of the name ; many of Avhom had from ten to seventeen children, — amounting in all to 3500 descendants of John, in 220 years, an increase worthy of the highest com mendation of Adam Smith, who considers numbers the first of all national improvements. If all the settlers had done as well, both in quantity and quality, there would have been no occa sion for further importations. I should be glad to notice the worthy, particularly ; but if all should be thus noticed, the world would scarcely contain the books that would be written. I am happy to see so many present, of age and ability, to speak for themselves ; and from them I hope to hear an account more full than is in my power to give. Another grant, purporting to be 500 acres, (covering, at least, * In Felt's Annals, (Vol. I., p. 253,) it is stated that William Trask ex changed with Governor Endicott 250 acres of land for 500 apple trees, from his nursery ; — a pretty good bargain, if trees grew then as readily as now. It is highly probable that the space between the mansion of the Governor, and the bank of the rivet, in front, was used for the growing of a nursery. I am well assured of this fact by S. P. Fowler, Esq., an intelligent cultivator of fruit, residing on Skelton's Neck. 12 700,) was made in 1635, to Emanuel, a descendant of Sir George Downing, and known as the Downing Estate, (on which it was my lot to be born. ) This extended southwesterly, from the head of Waters River, to what is now known as Proctor's Brook; and in 1701, passed by deed from Charles Downing to Benjamin and Thorndike Proctor, sons of John, (of 1692 notoriety.) This included the tract of tillage land, in times past known as Hog-hill, but recently christened Mount Pleasant, — and with great propriety, if fertility of soil and beauty of prospect are considerations worthy of this appellation. Another grant, of 300 acres, southerly of this, was made to Robert Cole, — extending from Gardener's Bridge to the Downing Estate, — which passed through Jacob Reed to Daniel Eppes, Esq. On this tract sprung the celebrated Eppes Sweet ing, better known as the Danvers Winter Sweet ; a variety of apple more extensively cultivated than any which has originated in Massachusetts, — excepting the Baldwin and the Hubbardston Nonsuch. This tree stood on land now belonging to the Hon. Richard S. Rogers. The original stump is now distinctly to be seen, with a sprout from it ten inches in diameter, yielding the genuine apple ; clearly indicating the fruit to be natural, — not grafted. The tree is thrifty and hardy, the fruit excellent ; as all lovers of apples and milk will cheerfully testify. It would be easy to enumerate many other grants of land to individuals, all of which would be interesting to those of the same name, or to those claiming under them ; but my limits will not admit of anything more than a specimen of the manner of doing the business in olden time. WITCHCRAFT DELUSION. The events of the year 1692, commonly spoken of as Salem Witchcraft, made an impression so deep on this community, that they cannot with propriety be overlooked, in any complete notice of the town. More than twenty citizens, some of the first respectability, were, in the course of a few months, ar raigned charged with capital offences. Half this number suf fered the severest penalty of the law. For this precinct, con- 13 taining at that time probably not more than five hundred souls, to be thus decimated in a few months, was a calamity tremen dously awful. Now-a-days, when one man* is arraigned, tried and executed, for good cause, (if there ever can be a good cause for execution,) the whole state, as well as states adjoining, are agitated to their centre. What could have induced the apathy that endured such things then, it is impossible to conceive. This moral m,ania is said to have originated with children, under twelve years of age, in the family of the Rev. Samuel Parris, of Salem Village. A part of the identical building in which Mr. Parris then lived, it is said, now remains, situate on the easterly side of the Ipswich road, about twenty rods northerly of the Collins house. It then was a part of the par sonage, standing a few rods northwesterly of the village church. It should ever remain a monument with this inscription, "Obsta principiis." Although this delusion may have begun with children, it was not the work of children alone. It is chargeable upon those of an older growth, — upon those whose station in society demand ed from them better things, — clergymen and magistrates. I am sensible that I speak plainly of those in authority ; but nothing less plain Avill meet the case. I use the words of "truth and soberness." When these extravagances in the children were first noticed, the Doctor was consulted, and gave his opinion "that they were under an evil hand." "This," says Cotton Mather, "the neighbors took up and concluded they were bewitched." Whether he was a doctor of medicine, of law, or of divinity, who gave this opinion, I am not advised. Of the name of the doctor, history gives no information, — ^not even the learned Dr. Mather's Magnalia, which tells all that was true and something more. This is certain, the Reverend gentleman, in whose house the malady began, and his associates of the neighbor hood, did very little to suppress the evil ; much less than they should have done. Says Dr. Mather, "Mr. Parris, seeing the condition of his family, desired the presence of some worthy • Prof. J. W. Webster, of Cambridge. 14 gentlemen of Salem, and some neighbor ministers, to consult together at his house ; who when they came, and had inquired diligently into the sufferings of the afflicted, concluded they were preternatural and feared the hand of Satan was in them." I cannot better express my views, than in the terse language of the Rev. Dr. Dwight, President of Yale College, who can never be charged with want of proper respect for the clergy. Says he, "Had Mr. Parris, instead of listening to- the com plaints of the children, and holding days of fasting and prayer, on occasions so preposterous, applied the rod as it should have been ; had the magistrates, instead of receiving the complaints, arrested the complainants as disturbers of the peace ; or had the Judges ofthe Court quashed the indictments, as founded on the baseless fabric of a vision, and discharged the prisoners, the evil might have been arrested, in limine. But unhappily these were efforts of reason, which lay beyond the spirit of the times." Those who conducted these trials were not only deceived themselves, but they were willing to deceive others. They were not simply zealous ; but they were corruptly furious. They introduced testimony, equally at variance with law, with common sense, and with the Scriptures. Children incapable of any comprehension of the topics about which they were inter rogated, were in some cases the only witnesses. A venerable man was found guilty on the testimony of his own grandchild. What is worst of all, the answers desired were put into their mouths by the illegal forms of the questions proposed. Time will not admit of a reference to each of the victims of this delusion, that had a home in Danvers. Among them were the following : — Rev. George Burroughs, (who himself had been a settled minister in the village ;) Giles Corey, and wife ; John Proctor, and wife ; Rebecca Nourse, George Jacobs, Sarah Good, John Willard. Dr. Mather estimates the whole number of arrests, at 100 ; the whole number executed, at 19. I will briefly advert to a few of the cases as samples of the whole ; at the same time must say, that in the examination of the trials as preserved, I have not noticed a single error, in con duct or opinion, in those who were accused. On the contrary, 15 the more prominent were theii' virtues the more likely were they to be accused ; and the less chance had they for escape. In the case of John Proctor, (whose character I feel in duty bound to vindicate from all unjust aspersions,) his only fault was a kind regard for his wife. When she was arrested and about to be carried to prison, (her health being such as to forbid her being imprisoned,) he insisted upon going with her; whereupon, her accusers cried out against him, and he was arraigned also. Dur ing his trial the Rev. C. Mather was in Court, (at the special solicitation of the prisoner, see his admirable letter of July 23d, 1692,^ and fearing there might be some hesitation in the minds of the jury on account of his well-established character for integ rity and piety, volunteered to testify that he himself had seen his Satanic Majesty, the Devil, whispering in the ear of the prisoner, while there in Court. To every intelligent mind the statement of such a fact carries with it its own commentary. The learned Doctor must have had the impulses of his own fears, in the eye of his mind, when he presumed to give such testimony ; not to speak of the wisdom of the judges, who permitted it to be given.* In the case of Rebecca Nourse, a sister of the Church, of fair character, the jury returned a verdict of not guilty ; but the * That injustice may not be done to Dr. Mather, whose greatest defect seems to have been his egregious vanity, I will quote the views of Mr. C. Rob bins, of Boston, who appears to have examined the part acted by Dr. Mather with much kindness and discrimination. "That Cotton Mather was enchanted in the same spell with the other prominent actors in these tragic events ; that he was credulous to a ridiculous extreme ; that he was inordinately fond ofthe marvellous ; that he was too easily imposed upon ; that his intense and undis guised interest in every case of alleged possession, betrayed him into indis cretions, and laid him open to censure ; and that he busied himself unneces sarily with the trials, are facts which rest upon indubitable evidence, — are blemishes which can never be wiped away from his name. That he was under the influence of any bad motives, any sanguinary feelings ; that he did not verily thii.k he was doing God service, and the devil injury ;— the most careful examination has failed to make me believe." Bred as he was of the blood of the Mathers and Cottons for many genera tions ; reverenced as they had been by the people as the elect of God, before whom the people bowed at their nod, as was the custom of the times ; it is not surprising that he assumed to dictate. Humility, in those days, was not an indispensable qualification in the character of a Christian minister ; on the contrary, it was a qualification rarely found in their possession. It is said, " to do all the.good he could to all, was his maxim, his study, his labor, his pleasure. (Hist, of 2d Church, Boston, p. 111.) 16 combined influence of the populace, the church and the clergy, brought about her execution. She was first excommunicated, then hung ; the first instance of the application of Lynch Law, to be found in the annals of New England. Giles Corey and Martha his wife, who lived in the western part of the town, on the estate recently occupied by the Hon. Daniel P. King, were accused and suffered' death. He was eighty years old. His contempt for the entire proceedings was such, that he stood mute and refused to plead to the accusa tions. Because he so refused, they undertook to press or extort an answer from him, and so suffering, he died under the press ure. Thus dying, his body was denied a Christian burial, and it is said was deposited at the crotch of the roads, near Tapley's brook, as was done with the bodies of infamous malefactors. This is the only instance of the application of this kind of tor ture, to my knowledge, in this Commonwealth. The idea is most forbidding. A grey-headed veteran thus treated, in a Christian land, and by those too who professed to have imbibed more than a common share of the spirit of Christ ! If such be a Christian spirit, how shall the opposite be described ? The very thought produces a chill of horror. George Burroughs, who, for several years, was a pastor of the Village Parish, having removed to Portland, where he was re spectably settled in the ministry, was cried out against by his enemies, tried, convicted, and executed with the others, August, 1692, on Gallows Hill. He is entitled to be remembered with high regard, as he had the firmness to resist the infatuations that overcame the minds of so many of his brethren. Says Mr. Willis, the historian of Portland, "there has nothing sur vived Mr. Burroughs, either in his living or dying, that casts any reproach upon his character ; and, although he died a vic tim of a fanaticism as wicked and as stupid as any which has been countenanced in civilized society, and which at the time prejudiced his memory, yet his character stands redeemed in a more enlightened age, from any blemish." I have sought in vain for the part taken in these trials, by the lawyers as such. The trials appear to have been carried on before 17 a special tribunal, organized for this special purpose, partaking of the powers of civil and ecclesiastical tribunals, having little or no regard to the rules of evidence, or any other proprieties ; and thus to have continued, until it broke down under the weight of its own extravagances. Messrs. Stoughton, Salton stall, Richards, Gedney, Sewall, Winthrop and Sargent, were the seven eminent citizens selected for this purpose. They were men of high respectability. A special jury was organized before which all the cases were brought. The depositions and affidavits used, show that rules of law were entirely disregarded in the trials. A species of infatuation seems to have pervaded the minds of all concerned. The entire movement, from begin ning to end, was an anomaly most extraordinary. I am not unmindful, that trials for like offences had been carried on in England, and on the continent of Europe, and that some of the purest jurists of the time, had participated in the trials. But such was not the fact in regard to the witchcraft of New Eng land. These trials bear no marks of wisdom, and very few of honesty of purpose. Perhaps the reason for the appointment of a special tribunal for the trial of those accused of witchcraft was, that the Provincial Charter did not arrive until May, 1692, and no regular court was organized under it, until December following. Here then was an interval in which the regular ad ministration of justice was suspended for the want of a proper Court ; from which a lesson is to be learned, that such experi ments should not often be repeated. But why do we dwell with such abhorrence upon the follies of olden time ? When in our own times, and almost in our own circles, are extravagances, quite as irrational and unintelli gible. That there may be phenomena, from natiual causes, electrical, galvanic, or otherwise, of a character to astonish and confound, I will not presume to deny, though I have not wit nessed any such. Btit that any communications with the spirits of the departed, directly or indirectly, have ever been had; or any revelations from them, through any such agencies, I do not believe. All such pretences, under whatever name they may come, are false and deceptive, and only calculated to 3 c 18 mislead. They are to be classed in the same category with witchcraft of olden time. I am not unmindful that it is said by high authority, (Exodus xxii, 18,) " Thou shah not suffer a witch to live." There are many other things said by the same authority, which, in my opinion, were not intended literally to be regarded as rules for our guidance, without some qualification of circumstances. Suppose this rule to be followed, and the idea of a witch, then prevalent, to be taken, — what would be the consequence ? "A witch" is defined, in the Magnalia of the learned Doctor, to be "a person that, having the free use of reason, doth knowingly .-and. willingly seek and obtain of the Devil, or any other god (beside the true God Jehovah, an ability to do or know strange : things, or things which he cannot by his own human abilities arrive unto." A witch was supposed to have renounced allegi ance to the true God, and to have promised obedience to the Devil. Some of the clergy construed the Scriptures as recog nizing the validity of such contracts. Was it strange, then, to believe, that the persons supposed to be beioitched were I moved ¦ of the Devil ? Were not those who thus taught and misled those whom they taught, justly chargeable with the blood of the innocent sufferers? I have no respect for the agency of the Devil, as he is supposed to have operated in 1692, or as he is now operating in 1852 ; and as to good spirits ope rating through such mediums to instruct and bless mankind, I have no faith in it. These accusations continued to multiply, until they were checked by their own extravagance.* The arraignment of * Dr. Mather says, (Vol. II, 413, § 1 1,) " By these things you may see how ¦ this matter was carried on, viz., chiefly by the complaints and accusations of the afflicted, bewitched^ones, as it was supposed, and then by the confession of the accused, condemning themselves and others. Yet experience shewed, the more there were apprehended, the more were still afflicted by Satan ; and the number of confessors; increasing, did but increase the number of the ac cused; and the executing of some, made way for the apprehending of others: far still the afflicted complained of being tormented by new objects, as the former were removed. At last, it was evidently seen that there must be a stop put, or the generation of liie. children of God would pass under that condemna tion. Henceforth, therefore, the juries generally acquitted such as were tried fearing theyliad gone too far; before .'" " Considering the confusion this mat ter had brought us into, it was thought safer to unckr do than to over do, espe cially, in matter8.'C^pital, where what is once compkated, cannot be reprieved." 19 Mrs. Hale, wife of the minister of Beverly, and of Mrs. Proctor, wife of John Proctor, beforenamed, ladies eminent for their vir tues, opened the eyes of jurors and judges to reflect, that their own tifne might soon come. The jurors before whom the accused were tried, with one accord, acknowledged their error in acting upon such evidence, or rather without any evidence ; and the judges, particularly the excellent Chief J. Sewall,* continued to lament their mistakes while they lived. Whether Justices Hawthorne and Corwin, the magistrates who conducted the preliminary examinations, ever made the amende honorable, does not appear. Perhaps, as they were judges of an inferior court only, a correction of errors was not deemed an essential part of their duty. This is certain, the higher law of common sense gained the ascendency, and false interpretations of the laws of Moses were soon in a measure corrected. The Devil was deposed. I have dwelt long upon this antiquated topic, because justice to the memory of those who died without blemish, together with the unaccountable propensity of the human mind, even at the present time, to give credence to irrational absurdities and visionary fancies, forbid my saying less. I am not insensible that my views of the subject are extremely imperfect. Nothing less than an entire volume would do justice to it. All the facts deserve to be gathered and chronicled, as a warning to future generations. Had not those in high life participated so fully, it would, ere this, have been done. " Dog wont eat dog," is " A maxim true As human wisdom ever drew." revolutionary incidents. Passing over events of a temporary character, let us glance for a moment to the period immediately preceding the Revolu- * The Hon. Samuel Sewall, afterwards Chief Justice of the Court, and a magistrate of sterling integrity, was accustomed annually to ask the prayers of the church and congregation at the Old South Church, where he worshipped, for the pardon of his offence in the part he took in condemning those charged with witchcraft. He was not so meaJly mouthed as some of the present day, who would charge the error entirely to the times, and take no part of it to themselves. Such men would hang witches, or do anything else that expediency might prompt. 20 tion, when trifles light as air were big with the fate of nations. The refusal to use a paper with a government stamp upon it, was interpreted treason. The sale of a little tea, for the use of the ladies, involved loss of caste and imprisonment. The charge of an exorbitant price for a piound of cheese, public posting, by order of the town, as faithless to one's country. The seeds of jealousy planted at the time of the granting of the Act of Incorporation, whereby the right of representation was restricted, were never eradicated. It was not the value of the privilege withheld, but the manner in which it was done, that excited the indignation of the people. His majesty had given special instructions that no more towns should be incor porated, with the privilege of choosing their own representatives. Our fathers were jealous of their rights, especially when in fringed by the power over the water ; and there were those on this side of the water who took good care to keep this jealousy .enkindled. The Adamses, the Otises, the Q,uincys, the Pick erings, were not silent, and did not live in vain in those days. The spirit they infused, pervaded every artery of the body politic. How else could it have happened, that simultaneously, from all parts of the State, came up resolutions of similar import. Doubtless these resolutions expressed the feelings of the people ; but they probably had a common origin. Although messages were not then circulated by lightning, or handbills published through the daily press, still, messengers were not wanting, nor prompters to tell the people what to say. James Otis, John Adams, Joseph Warren, Samuel Adams, Timothy Pickering, and many others, were intent on securing the freedom of the colonies. In 1765, it was deliberately resolved, in town-meeting assem bled, " that the inhabitants were greatly incensed by the burdens attempted to be imposed upon the people, and were ready to resist to the uttermost." In 1768, Dr. Holten, delegate to a convention holden at Faneuil Hall, the cradle of Liberty, in Boston, was specially instructed "to look well to the rights of the people." With 21 such marked ability did he then discharge this duty, that he thereby laid the foundation for a distinction more prominent, and an influence more pervading, than any other citizen ever acquired. While he lived, to hesitate to yield assent to the opinions of Dr. Holten, was by many deemed political heresy. The ardor of his feelings and the purity of his life gave an au thority to his views that could not be resisted.* In 1772, Messrs. Wm. Shillaber and others were appointed a committee of vigilance. The manner in which their duty was dischai-ged shows them to have been a vigilant committee, — regulating not only what men should say and do, but what they should eat aud drink, and what should be paid therefor. If those who would reform the manners of the age, as to diet and regimen, would seek precedents, they may readily find them in the records of those days. Our fathers were a law-abiding people, — provided always, they had a voice in the making of the laws, — not otherwise. They were sensitive and jealous of their rights in the extreme. The spirit of Robinson, of Peters, of Williams, of Endicott, of Bradstreet, and of Winthrop, per vaded their entire nature. They felt that they were born to be free, and they suffered no opportunity for securing this privi lege to escape without improvement. So marked were these characteristics, that, in 1774, a regi ment of royal troops was quartered on yonder plain, in front of the then residence of the Royal Governor Gage, — for, be it remembered, that twice in our history was Danvers the resi dence of the royal governors. So ardent was the patriotism of the citizens at this time, that it is not improbable the first bursting forth of the flame of liberty was here apprehended. So correctly did they augur coming events, that, in February next following, less than two months previous to the battle of Lexington, the first onset by the British was aimed at Danvers. Col. Leslie, with his regiment, came from Boston for the pur pose of destroying cannon and military stores supposed to be deposited at Danvers. Without doubt, such deposits were here. * See remarks following, by Rev. J. Warburton Putnam, for a more com plete view of the life and character of this estimable citizen. 22 In those days, patriots had to have their eyes open in all direc tions. They had to Avatch their enemies at home and abroad. The tories were on the watch, ready at all times to give in formation of every movement. While Col. Leslie was parleying with parson Barnard and others, about crossing the North Bridge in Salem, near the line of Danvers, Mr. Richard Skidmore (familiarly known as Old Skid) took care to trundle off the cannon, upon the carriages he himself had made. So the brave Colonel returned to Boston, with his first lesson distinctly conned, that a yankee was not to be caught napping. This excursion was on the Lord's day, Feb. 26th, 1775. The troops landed at Marblehead, while the people were at church in the afternoon, and it is worthy of special notice, as the resistance here experienced was the first resistance to British arms. As Gov. Kossuth recently happily remarked at our own monument, in allusion to this event, " the men of Danvers were ready to fight, and this is quite as good as fighting. Would the people of the United States just say to the Czar of Russia, what the people of Danvers said to Col. Leslie, I think the Czar of Russia would do as Col. Leslie did, go back again, and thus my own beloved Hungary would be free." Had it not have been for the pacific wisdom exercised on that occasion, by Messrs. Barnard, Pickering and others, Salem would have been the theatre on which the first blood for liberty would have been shed, and thereby she would have plucked the feathers from the caps of Lexington and Concord.* The men of Danvers were there. Messrs. Rev. Clergy, Wadsworth and Holt, were there seen in the ranks of the mili- * Rev. J. W. Hanson, in his History of Danvers, (page 86,) says " This was the first resistance, bloodless indeed, but determined, which was made on the part of the people of this country to the encroachment of foreign aggres sion. In the town of Salem, nearly two months before the battle of Lexington, the people of Danvers, joined by those of Salem, opposed and beat back the foe, and established their title to the quality of determined bravery. But for the calmness and discretion of Leslie the English commander, North Bridge, at Salem, would have gone ahead ofthe North Bridge at Concord, and Salem itself have taken the place of Lexington ; and February 26th would have stood forever memorable in the annals of the Republic. The British under Leslie numbered 140, The Americans under Pickering numbered 50." 23 tia, with their guns ready for battle, under the command of the brave Samuel Eppes. When the alarm was sounded, the ser mon was cut off, and the concluding prayer, with the doxology, were deferred to a more convenient season. Then, men not only slept upon their arms, but carried them to meeting. The best of men were ready to fight. All were soldiers, — none too good for service. Their country's rights, not their own aggran dizement, were the objects for which they watched without ceasing. battle of LEXINGTON. Thus continued the town, in a state of constant preparation and alarm, until the morning of April 19th, 1775, an era most marked in the annals of Danvers. Then, every man capable of bearing arms, from the stripling of sixteen to the veteran of sixty years, was seen trotting at the rate of four miles an hour, to the field of duty and of glory, — with what effect, the return ing wagons on the following day, loaded with the dead and wounded, too plainly told. Seven of the young men of Dan vers, whose names are registered on yonder monument of gran ite, quarried in our own hills, the corner stone of which was laid by Gen. Gideon Foster, their commander, on the sixtieth anniversary, then became entitled to the inscription, " Dulce et decorum est, pro patria mori." As many more received marks of distinction from the enemy, that they carried with them to their graves. Think of it, my friends ! Suppose your father, son, or brpther, one or all,- as was the case with some families at that time, to have been thus exposed, when the distant thunder of conflicting arms came echoing over the hills, and the lightning flash of artillery illumined the western horizon, you will be able to appreciate the price paid by your fathers for the liberties you now enjoy. The impulse given at Lexington was never suspended. The funeral knell of those, whose lives were thus sacrificed, constantly resounded in the ear. As a specimen of the feeling that then pervaded the entire commimity, I beg leave to recite an anec- 24 dote of an event that occurred on that morning, which I had from tlie Colonel himself, and therefore it may not be ques tioned.* BATTLE OF BUNKER HILL. On the 17th of June, next following, (a morning not unlike the present, when the grass was waving in abundance on the plains,) Captains Foster, Flint, Page, Porter, and others of Dan vers, were found in the post of danger, at the bloody ramparts of Bunker Hill, under Gen. Putnam, the commander, — himself of Danvers. There they stood, shoulder to shoulder, side by side, with Warren, Stark and Prescott, the motto of Patrick Henry on their helmets, colors not to be mistaken, " Give us Liberty, or give us Death! " Shall it be said, my friends, that Danvers did nothing towards securing our freedom ? — Danvers, that poured out her best blood in the midst of the fight ? of one, who had rather die than stoop, though cautioned to do so, — one, who, when questioned where he should be on the day of battle, replied, " Where the Ejiemy is there you will find me! " All who know our country's history must be aware that I refer to the brave Captain Samuel Flint, who fell fighting, sword in hand, on the mounds of Bennington, in the prime of life and vigor of manhood ; leaving descendants, whose highest pleasure it should be to imitate the patriotism of their grandfather, and the amiable virtues of their father, — the late Hon. D. P. King. On the 18th of June, 1776, it was voted, in town meeting, "if the Honorable Congress, for the safety of the United States, * When the troops from Salem, under the command of Col. Timothy Pick ering, were on their way to meet the enemy, (the Danvers companies having started ahead by permission,) they halted at the Bell Tavern, now Monument, to arrange their places ; and while thus stopping. Basket Qerby, one of the soldiers, stepped into friend Southwick's, the house opposite, with whom he was acquainted, where Mrs. Southwick said to him. Friend Derby, tliee knows that my principles will not allow me to do anything to encourage war ; but as there is a long and tedious march before thee, and thee and those with thee may be in need of refreshment, this batch of bread, just taken from the oven, thee may take, if thee please,— /or it never can be wrong to feed the hungry. And she put into his knapsack a cheese aiso. The same facts have been affirmed to me by her son Edward, who, with the soldier from Salem, lived to be men of the greatest wealth and influence in their respective towns. 25 declare them independent of the kingdom of Great Britain, — we, the inhabitants of Danvers, do solemnly pledge our lives and fortunes to support them in the measure," — language smelling strongly of the Declaration made at Philadelphia, on the 4th of July next following ; — which Declaration was unan imously approved by vote, and ordered to be entered, at length, in the records of the town. Yes, there it is, my friends, in bold relief, on the page, — for the instruction of future genera tions. This little incident speaks volumes of the feelings that pervaded the minds of the community. This little town, with less than two thousand inhabitants, thus ratifying the doings of a nation, and taking upon itself the responsibility. The spirit of Holten, of Foster, of Hutchinson, of Shillaber, and their compatriots, is apparent in this thing. When such a feel ing prevails, victory or death must follow. No compromise is admissible. No tory spirit was found here. While these men lived, there was no doubt where Danvers would be found.. Her sons have every reason to be proud of the patriotic spirit and determined purpose of their sires. The names of many brave men are conspicuous in her annals. Let their sons, to. the latest generation, see to it, that a reputation so nobly earned shall never be tarnished. REVOLUTIONARY HEROES. On the page of history that shall mark the efforts of Danvers^ in the Revolutionary struggle for Independence, will be found. the names of — Gen. Israel Putnam, Gen. Gideon Foster, Gen. Moses Porter, Col. Jeremiah Page, Col. Israel Hutchinson, Col. Enoch Putnam, Major Caleb Lowe, Major Sylvester Osborn, Capt. Samuel Eppes, Capt. Samuel Flint, 4 d 26 Capt. Jeremiah Putnam, Capt. Samuel Page, Capt. Dennison Wallis, Capt. Levi Preston, Mr. William Shillaber, Dr. Amos Putnam, Dr. Samuel Holten, Capt. Johnson Proctor, (my father,) the last survivor of the revolutionary worthies, who died No vember 11, 1851, aged 86. A class of men worthy of the cause they so ably defended. They were none of your milk- and-water heroes ; salt pork and bean porridge constituted the basis of their diet.* AGE OF SOLDIERS. It is interesting to notice the extraordinary length of lives attained by these patriots. Of those named, their average ages exceeded 80 years. What could have so extended their lives ten years beyond the period ordinarily allotted to man ? This is an inquiry of much interest. It could not have been quiet, and freedom from exposure, — for none were more exposed. The incidents of the soldier's life, under circumstances most favorable, have little to charm or amuse ; but the Revolutionary Soldiers, half clad and half starved, as they often were, must have lived on something not fully appreciated, to hold out as they did. May it not in part be attributed to their energy and activity of movement in early years? to that buoyancy and cheerfulness of spirits that naturally flow from such movements? Who has not witnessed the animation with which the old soldier adverts to the perils of his youth, and " Shoulders his crutch to show how fields are won " ..* Who will presume to say that cheerful spirits do not essentially contribute to the prolongation of life ? * There are many others, " good men and true," who did much service, with equal energy and patriotism, but who were content with being brave, without any proclamation made of it. Those who float readily on the top, have not always the most solidity. LEVI PPvESTO Aged 33. 27 CENTENNARIANS. But two instances, within the limits of the town, of persons living to the age of one hundred years, have come to my knowledge. These were both soldiers, who had seen much service in many wars. The first was Thomas Nelson, a native of Scotland, who died in 1774, at the age of 113 years. The second was Lemuel Winchester, a native of Brookline, Massachusetts, who died in 1844, at the age of 100 years 8 months and 5 days. Of father Nelson, I have heard my grandmother say, (who herself lived to be almost one hundred,) that when he was more than one hundred, he often walked from his residence to Salem, six miles, as upright as any young man. Both of these gentlemen possessed cheerful dispositions and active habits. Both of them were free from those excesses so common to the age in which they lived, though probably not tee-totallers, — a description of beings that were not common in revolutionary times. How important then, to those who would possess health and long life, to imitate their example in the cultivation of habits of activity, temperance and cheerfulness. It was remarked by Lord Mansfield, one of the most sagacious of men, that he never knew an instance of a person living to extreme old age who did not rise early ; and he might have added, who did not live temperate. Temperance and activity are the corner stones of health and usefulness. RELIGIOUS WORSHIP. The first setters of Salem were Puritans. They were men who aimed to be governed by the impulses of their own con sciences, and to keep themselves void of offence.* Such were Endicott and his associates when they came to Salem. I do * In the language of Governor Bradford, when a young man, " To keep a good conscience, and walk in such a way as God hath prescribed in his Word, is a thing which I rauch prefer before you all, and above life itself." 28 not presume to say they were without blemish, — the sun has spots, — but " their faults leaned to virtue's side." They had more of merit in them than many men's virtues. Thus moved by a faith that gives dignity to man. — purity to woman, — and loveliness to the child, — it would have been strange indeed if they had neglected to provide all needful accommodations for the worship of God. As early as 1666, the farmers of the village were incorporated into a society for religious worship. This was the Second Parish in Salem. Parish privileges and rights of citizens were then essentially connected. No man could exercise the rights of a citizen who did not belong to the Church. In the meetings of the Church, matters of business were moulded as much as they now are in caucus assembled. The first thirty years of the Village Parish covers that period when the witch delusion and other controversies were agitated to such extent that little may be said of the religious influences then prevalent, — if regard be paid to the text, "By their fruits shall ye know them." In 1697, Rev. Joseph Green became the pastor of this society, and so continued for a period of eighteen years. He died among his people, universally beloved and respected. He must have been a very good man to have lived and died as he did, at such a time, surrounded with such influences. He was succeeded by Rev. Peter Clark, who continued to minister until all those who settled him had left the stage ; a period of more than fifty years. His funeral discourse was preached June 16, 1768, by Rev. Thomas Barnard, of Salem. Such permanency in the ministry speaks well of pastor and people ; — and is in accordance with our best New England notions. I know that many have grown up of late who think they know more than their fathers did, — btit I have heard it said old Doctor Clark once said to his son Caleb, "Caleb! is -there no nearer way to Heaven than round by Chebacco ? " — -meaning thereby to reprove the new light influences then prevalent. So in modern times, many are not content to pursue the good old way to Heaven, but want to go hy steam ; when they start thus, there is danger of bursting the boiler. 29 Rev. Benjamin Wadsworth succeeded Mr. Clark, and minis tered unto this people for more than flfty years. My first impressions of a model minister were taken from this 'gentleman when a boy at school. Subsequently, when an older boy, myself attempting " to teach the young idea how to shoot," I had the pleasure of a more intimate acquaintance, which con firmed my first impressions. He was a gentleman, in the best sense of the term. He knew what to say, and when to say it. He too lived a long life harmoniously with his people, and died beloved and respected. What Christian minister can ask a better eulogy? Who that remembers the words of wisdom that fell from the lips of these venerable men, will fail to rejoice at their good fortune in being thus instructed? I know of nothing that savors more of Heaven, than lessons of instruc tion from a virtuous, modest, wise old minister. Very few societies can render so good an account of their stewardship. Since the decease of Dr. Wadsworth, the increase of popula tion has been such as to demand a division, and two societies are now sustained on the old foundation. Of the living, I forbear to speak, well knowing that the sound of their own voices will be their highest encomium. They are favorably es teemed wherever learning or piety is regarded. The inhabitants of the southerly part of the town worshiped with the First Church in Salem, until 1710, when a new soci ety was incorporated, under the name of the Middle Precinct Parish. This was the Third Parish in Salem. Their first effort was, to obtain from the town, a grant of "a quarter of an acre of land to set a meeting-house on." This was so located, that, in process of time, it expanded to more than an acre. Whether fortunately, or not, involves too many incidents to admit of discussion on this occasion. In 1713, Rev. Benjamin Prescott was settled as pastor over this parish, and remained such for a period of forty years. His pastoral relations were closed in 1752, (the year of the sep aration from Salem,) in consequence of contentions that had arisen about the collection and payment of his salary. There were, within the parish, duakers and others, who thought they 30 could not conscientiously pay for such preaching. The laws had no regard to scruples of conscience of such a character. After the dissolution of his pastoral relations, Mr. Prescott con tinued to reside in the parish, a worthy citizen and magis trate, dying in good old age, respected for his talents and virtues, and was buried at the foot of the hill bearing his name. A shrewd observer, with much experience in ministerial affairs, remarked, in relation to Mr. Prescott's ministry, " When a minister and people cannot get along without quarrelling about his salary, it is better for both that the connection should be dissolved. God and Mammon cannot peaceably occupy the same tenement." The Rev. Nathan Holt succeeded Mr. Prescott, and minis tered with good fidelity for a period of thirty-four years. He was a peaceable, clever man, — deeply imbued with the patriotic spirit of the times. Of his services in the pulpit, I have heard but little. His labors among his people were highly prized, and productive of a happy influence. " He was an Israelite indeed, in whom there was no guile." Rev. Samuel Mead followed Mr. Holt, and was pastor about ten years. The record of this period is lost ; it is not safe, therefore, to speak, where the best evidence is wanting. I remember him well. His peculiarities were many. In 1805, the Rev. Samuel Walker was settled, and remained the pastor for a period of twenty-one years. His life was termi nated by a painful casualty. He was faithful to his calling, discreet in his movements, and died with a kind remembrance in many a bosom. Since his death, a Unitai'ian, a Methodist, a Baptist, and a Universalist society have grown up in the par ish, and flourished with various degrees of success, leaving the Old South Society still one of the largest and ablest in the county. For a few years they were ministered unto by the Rev. George Cowles, who, while on his way south with his lady, in search of health, was suddenly lost on board the steamer Home, dying with these last words, " He that trusteth in Jesus is safe, even among the perils of the sea." He died deeply lamented. 31 having previously resigned his pastoral care on account of ill health. The Rev. H. G. Park followed for a short time. The Rev. Thomas P. Field succeeded Mr. Park for a period of ten years, laboring successfully to a harmonious and happy people, — which labors were unfortunately interrupted by his being called to a position of more extended usefulness at Troy, N. Y., with the offer of a compensation better proportioned to the worth of his services. When it was too late, the people saw their error. The disappointment experienced in parting with one so highly esteemed, with no appreciable reason as signed therefor, poorly prepared the way to treat with kindness and Christian sympathy his successor, the Rev. James D. Butler, who, after a conditional settlement of one year, was crowded off, without ceremony. May his eminent learning and Christian humility command a position in which they will be duly appre ciated. Several other religious societies have grown up in different parts of the town, and been sustained with varied success. A Baptist society was organized at the New Mills Village, under the pastoral care of Rev. Benj. Foster, sixty-eight years since. The present pastor. Rev. A. W. Chapin. There is also a Uni versalist society in that neighborhood, which was organized thirty-seven years since, now under the pastoral care of the Rev. J. W. Putnam. Within my memory, four valuable churches have been de stroyed by fire, probably caused by incendiaries. One offender only has been brought to justice, and he under his own con fession. Within the last twelve years, there has been expended ih the construction and finish of churches, more than f 50,000. The present annual payments within the town, for the sup port of religious instruction, cannot be estimated at less than $10,000. The predominant faith at the present time, (exclusive of those who have no faith at all,) is a modified version of the notions of the Puritan Fathers of New England ;— how far improved 32 by the modification, must be left to the better judgment of those who have really experienced its purifying influences. That there may be such, I cannot doubt, — but something more than mere profession of religion is wanted, to satisfy my mind. I incline to the belief, that his faith cannot be wrong whose life is right. And where the life does not illustrate and adorn the profession, the profession will be found " a sounding brass and tinkling cymbal." EDUCATION. Popular education, in the broadest sense of the term, has en grossed the attention of the people of Danvers as much as any other topic. From the time of their first meeting, March 4th, 1752, when Daniel Eppes, father and son, were moderator and clerk, each year's record shows more or less of interest in the education of the rising generation. Previous to the separation, but little attention had been given to supporting schools for the children on the borders. In 1783, when revolutionary troubles had subsided, the peo ple began to look after the condition of the schools. In 1793, an interesting report on the reorganization of the schools was made to the town, by Dr. Archelaus Putnam, which appears in full upon the records, — ^a fact worthy of notice, be cause many a report, placed on file only, is not now to be found. Files that are handled by every body, soon become every body's property. In 1794, pursuant to a plan proposed by Gideon Foster, Samuel Page, and John Kettelle, the town was divided into districts. In 1802, the districts were remodelled, at the suggestion of Sylvester Osborn. Thus we find Holten, Foster, Page, Osborn, and others, who were foremost in their efforts to secure our rights, going ahead in their endeavors to educate the children to understand those rights. In 1809, the present system of school districts was estab lished, — then nine, now fourteen ; — then containing 800 chil dren, now more than 2000, of age suitable to attend school. 33 It is not easy to understand how schools were supported as well as they were, with the limited appropriations then made. Masters must have taught for the love of teaching, and children studied for the sake of learning. The days of study, and not the days of vacation, must then have been their seasons of amusement. In 1814, an order was adopted requiring a report of the condition of the schools, for the year next preceding, to be made at the annual meeting in each year. This is worthy of notice, it having become a State regulation since. In 1820, an order was adopted requiring the names and ages of children between four and sixteen years, resident in town on the first day of May, to be returned by the prudential com mittees, and recorded by the clerk. This also was in advance. of the action of the State to the same effect. Both of these regulations have been found highly serviceable. The money appropriated for the support of schools has since been apportioned to the several districts in proportion to the children thus returned, with donations to the districts containing a sparse population, to equalize the advantages of schooling as- far as practicable. High schools have recently been established with good success. The present year, a new plan of superintendence has been ordered and entered upon with high expectation of ben efit. It remains with the person who fills the ofiice whether these expectations shall be realized. The superintendent enters upon the duties this day. I cannot doubt the efiiciency of individual superintendence when regulated- by competent ability, with a single eye to the advancement of the schools. The predominant feeling has long been, that it is the bounden duty of the town to carry out the free-school principle first proposed by Endicott, viz, — to provide for the complete education of all the childreti, at the public charge, in such manner as their condition in society demands. In this way alone can it be explained that Danvers has edu cated so small a proportion of her sons at colleges, according to her wealth and population. On locking over the list of natives S e 34 of the town who have had the benefit of a collegiate education, for one hundred years last past, I find six clergymen, three law yers, two physicians, five farmers, and two others, — in all, twenty ; — a number much less than will be found ¦ in many towns with one half the population.* 1 speak of the fact as presenting considerations worthy of reflection, and not because I deem such an education an essential qualification to good citi zenship. Instance the success of Franklin, of Washington, of our own Bowditch, to the contrary. The truth is, the people of Danvers have been anxious to realize a more speedy income on their investments than is ordinarily found by trimming the mid night lamp. As a general thing, they value objects in possession more than those in expectancy ; their faith is not strong enough to sustain the hope of distinction by means of literary eflbrts. An elaborate attempt to abolish the district system of schools was made in 1850, but the people were not prepared to give up what they deemed a certainty for an uncertainty. * CoiLEGF. Graduates. — Names of natives of Danvers, who have been educated at Collegiate Institutions :— P. *Daniel Putnam, F. *James Putnam, T. *Daniel Eppes, F. *Tarrant Putnam, P. *Archelaus Putnam, L. Samuel Putnam, T. "Israel Andrew, C. William P. Page, C. Israel Warburton Putnam, C. Daniel Poor, L. John W. Proctor, C. Ebenezer Poor, L. *Winiam Oakes, P. John Marsh, F. *Daniel P. King, C. Allen Putnam, P. Samnei P. C. King, C. Ezekiel Marsh, *Augustus E. Daniels, *Thomas Stimpson, 6 of the above became clergymen ; .% lawyers ; 2, physicians ; 2, occupation not yet determined. Ten have deceased ; ten now living. P. Parmer ; C. Clergyman ; P. Physician ; L. Lawyer ; T. Teacher. Several other citizens have engaged in professional employments, without the aid of collegiate instruction. Several are now preparing for such employ ments. Harv. 1717. Harv. 1746. Harv. 1758. Harv. 1763. Harv. 1763. Harv. 1787. Harv. 1789. Harv. 1809. Dart. 1809. Dart. 1811. Harv. 1816. Dart. 1818. Harv. 1820. Harv. 1823. Harv. 1823. Harv. 1825. Amherst . 1831. Yale. 1839. Harv. 1846. Amherst. , 1850. rs; 2, teachers; 5, farmers; 35 SUPPORT OF SCHOOLS. I There is no town in the county where the appropriations for schools are more liberal, in proportion to the number to be educated and the ability to pay. Mr. Webster, in his late speech at Faneuil Hall, says it is the glory of Boston that she applies one quarter part of all the taxes assessed, for the support of public schools, viz., $50,000 out of |20(),000, — there being a population of 140,000. Danvers applies 1 10,000 out of $25,- 000, — there being a population of 8000. Danvers has a valua tion of 13,000,000;— Boston, $300,000,000. Here is a question for boys at school to answer, which of these places does best for the support of public schools, according to its ability ? If the schools of Danvers are not advanced in proportion to their appropriation, the defect is not chargeable to the mass of the inhabitants, — their will is to have flrst rate free schools. SCHOOL FUNDS. The wisdom of the town in applying the surplus revenue, that came to their use in- 1844, as a permanent fund for the benefit of schools, over and above a prescribed sum of not less than three dollars per scholar, to be raised by the town annually for this purpose, must not be overlooked. This fund now amounts to the sum of $10,000, and is invested in the hands of trustees chosen by the town. Considering the many jealousies brought to bear on this topic, the act whereby the investment was made will ever remain most creditable to the town. No man did more to bring this about than the late Elias Putnam, who in this, as in all his other public services, showed himself a vigilant friend of the best interests of the town. Danvers will long mourn his departure in the midst of his usefulness. He was " a man of marked energy and decision of character. Selfish to some extent, — for who is not, — ^but public spirited, far beyond most of those around him. Those who knew him best, valued him highest. It was often my privilege, as on this subject, to cooperate in the objects he had in view. I knew him well. 36 WALLIS FUND. By the generosity of Capt. Dennison Wallis, who died in 1825, a local fund of $2500 was established for the benefit of School District No. 1, in which he then lived. He intended the fund should have been $5000, but the phraseology of the will so far fell short of the intentions of the donor, when tried in the crucible of the Supreme Court, as to reduce the amount otie half. With this fund, the Wallis School, for the education of chil dren between the ages of six and twelve years, has been estab lished, and sustained for twenty years. If the spirit of the donor could look down upon the cheerful countenances of the happy group of children, educated by his bounty, on one of their days of successful exhibition, it would discover abundant reason for rejoicing in the wisdom of the donation. Happy spirit that I which can contemplate a life of toil and perplexity terminated so gloriously. When another century shall have passed away, who will be remembered with more admiration than he who laid the foundation of the Wallis School ? Al though his name may not live in the offspring of his own loins, it shall be immortal in the benefits conferred on thousands. This crowning act of his life will be cherished with gratitude, even when his heroic exposure at Lexington shall be forgotten. SUPPORT OF PAUPERS. As a municipal regulation, next in importance to the educa tion of the young, is the support of the unfortunate poor. By the record of the first meeting, it appears that both these sub jects were provided for. Still, no well-established system of relief to the poor was adopted, until about the year 1800, when the attention of friends E. Southwick and S. Shove, moved by the combined considerations of economy and humanity, were directed to this subject. To the credit of these gentlemen, be it said, notwithstanding they belonged to a class of Christians whose sense of religious duty will not suffer any of their num ber to be a charge upon the public, that they did more to alle- 37 viate the condition of the paupers, as well as to relieve the town from the expense of their support, than has been done by any others. Their shrewd observation discerned, what was not then generally known, that almshouse establishments, with conveniences for industrial employments connected therewith, adapted to the capacities of the inmates, were the true means of benefiting their condition ; — that by thus being employed, they would be saved from many a temptation incident to their humiliated position, and the burden of their support would be greatly diminished. At this time a house, with about a dozen acres of land ap purtenant, was appropriated to this use. But it was soon found that the locality of the establishment was too central, for the convenience of those around ; and that the growing wants of the village demanded its removal. Accordingly, it was transferred to the extensive farm of two hundred acres now occupied, then chiefly covered with wood. The selection of this site, although censured by many at the time, shows the superior discernment of those who chose it. It is airy, healthy, and easy of access, and readily made a secure abode, far removed from evil com munications, and evil spirits also. Whoever would deal with paupers, must prepare to guard against the influence of such spirits with eagle eyes. The rival efforts of these gentlemen, (Messrs. Southwick and Shove,) to see which could out-do the other in saving for the town, and the suggestions made by them, from time to time, in their annual reports, will ever be interesting features for exami nation. They were, in fact, a sort of Q,uaker duel, in which no blood was shed, — although occasionally one would say to the other, " Thee lies, thee knoics thee lies, under a mistake." During their administration of this department, the State allowed twenty-one cents per day for the support of paupers, instead of seven, the present allowance ; which materially aided in bal ancing their accounts. ALMSHOUSE. The present, almshouse, with the farm and its appendages, cost $25,000. It was erected in 1844. The town was moved 38 to its erection, by the admonitions of Miss D. Dix, of Boston, whose generous philanthropy has done so much for suffering humanity. There were those who thought her officious, mis informed as to the facts she stated, and disposed to meddle with that which did not concern her. I know there were such. But even those will now cheerfully acknowledge, that she was actuated by good motives ; and that she did the town a service, for which she ought ever to be held in grateful remembrance. Noble soul ! that looks around and sees how many tears of suffering she has dried up, and how many pangs of distress she has alleviated. Her own reflections are a heavenly reward. May her shadow never be less. There is no town in the Commonwealth where the unfortu nate poor are regarded with more sympathy and kindness. Every rational movement for their benefit has always met a cheerful approval by the town. Care is taken to secure the services of intelligent and humane' overseers, and the establish ment entire is a model worthy of imitation. A careful analysis ofthe concerns of this department fox flfty years last past, will show, that at least three fourths of all those who have received relief at the almshouse, have been brought to this necessity by reason of intemperance, notwithstanding the unremitted efforts of the town to stay the devastations of this debasing vice, — this inexhaustible fountain of suffering and of crime. May God grant a safe deliverance from it, even though it should involve the total annihilation of all that intox icates. TEMPERANCE. In the efforts that have been made to advance the cause of temperance, for the last forty years, Danvers has taken no mean position. During all this period, many of her best citizens have been actively cooperating with the best friends of the cause. As early as 1812, Samuel Holten, Benjamin Wadsworth, EdAvard Southwick, Fitch Poole, Caleb Oakes, and others, were pioneers in this enterprise. They dared to say, even then, when it was almost the universal practice to " take a little for the stomach's sake and often infirmities," that "the use of 39 intoxicating liquors, as a beverage, was an evil, and only evil continually." It is glorious to find these experienced, upright, and keen observers of human nature, putting forth the doctrine that total abstinence, from everything that intoxicates, is " the only sure guide," the only principle that can be depended upon. What the zealous friends of law (Massachusetts law, may I say?) have recently discovered, they seem to have known by instinct. They preached temperance, and they practised what they preached. Without which, on any subject, preaching is " a tinkling cymbal," — an " empty show." Danvers was the first town that took action, in its corporate capacity, against licensing the retail of intoxicating liquors. The motion, (to my certain knowledge,) was drafted in pencil, at the Village Church, and presented at the annual meeting, 1835, by S. P. Fowler, Esq. To the credit of the town, its authorities have constantly adhered to the faith then promul gated. Not so Avith all the authorities in towns around, — and hence has flowed misery and crime. Since 1835, there has annually been appointed a committee,' to watch the progress of the cause, and to advance its success. What Maine now is to other states, Danvers has been to other towns, a beacon light on the eminence of Temperance. May its effulgence be strength ened, until the path of duty shall be, as illuminated hy the noonday sun. BUSINESS. FARMING. Attention to business has ever been a prominent trait in thc character of the people of Danvers. For many years, the cul tivation of the land was their chief employment. Throughout the early records, they are spoken of as the farmers, in contrast with those engaged in commercial pursuits, for which Salem has been eminent from the beginning. Among the farmers best known, will be found the names of Putnam, Preston, Proc tor, Felton, and King. Their fields have exhibited samples of cultivation that will compare with any in the Commonwealth. They have stirred their soil deep, and aimed to understand the reason for so doing. The town affords every variety of soil, 40 from very strong to very shallow. The lands require much labor, and unremitted attention to the application of invigorating substances. As the population has increased, their labors have been concentrated ; and it Avould not be difficult to point out those who raise as much, and live as well, from the products of ten acres, as did those before them frora the products of one hundred acres. I forbear to dilate. The story of their farm ing has often been told, and can be better told elsewhere. TANNING. About one hundred years ago, friend Joseph Southwick com menced the business of tanning, in a few tubs or half hogs heads. This business has since so expanded, that it now occu pies as many thousand vats. It is the staple business of the place. For many years, it was carried on chiefly by Messrs. Southwick, Shove, Wallis, Sutton, Poole, and a few others, who made fortunes in attending to it. The hide and leather business, in all its modifications, has probably done more to advance the wealth and resources of the town, than any other ; especially when the manufactures, of which leather is the prin cipal component part, are taken into view. The annual amount of these manufactures is estimated at not less than $2,000,000.* EARTHEN WARE. A class of coarse ware, known as Danvers crockery, has been coeval with the existence of the town. Forty years since, it was made much more extensively than of late. It is now thrown out of use by articles of more strength and beauty, pro cured at less expense from abroad, — though for many purposes, it still finds favor with those accustomed to its use. The clay cfn the margin of Waters River has been found particularly well adapted to this manufacture. The Osborns and Southwicks have done more at this work than any families within my knowledge.. William Osborn, the first of the name, was spoken of as a. potter. His descendants • See Appendix, for statistics of this business. 41 for four generations certainly, have shown their regard for their ancestor by sticking to his employment. OFFICIAL STATIONS. The right to participate in the making of the laws has ever been esteemed one of the choicest privileges of a citizen of New England. As early as 1634, the settlers here had beeome so numerous, that they felt the necessity of delegating their au thority to representatives of their own choice. It was the jeal ousy of the infringement of this right that moved our fathers to resist the oppressive taxation by the mother country, — and not the amount of tax imposed. It was the interference with this right by Lieut. Gov. Hutchinson, under the special instructions of " Georgius Secundus," at the time of the incorporation of the town, that specially aroused the indignation of the people of Danvers.* Thus early awakened, it would have been extraordinary indeed if the citizens had not, at all times, been careful to be represented by " good men and true," — by those understanding their duty, and ready to discharge it. * Lieut. Gov. Hutchinson entered upon the Records of the Council his pro test against the act, as follows, viz. : — " I protest for the following reasons : " First. Because it is the professed design of the bill to give the inhabitants who now join with the town of Salem in the choice of representatives, a power of choosing by themselves ; and the number of which the house of representa tives may at present consist being full large, the increase must have a tendency to retard the proceedings of the General Court, and to increase the burdens which, by their long session every year, lies upon the people, and must like wise give the house an undue proportion to the board ofthe legislature, where many affairs are determined by a joint ballot of the two houses. " Second. Because there being no governor in the Province, it is most agree able to his Majesty's commissioij to the late governor, to the message of this board to the house at the opening of the session, and in itself is most reasona ble, that all matters of importance should be deferred until there be a governor in the chair. " Third. Because the board, by passing this bill as the second branch ofthe legislature, necessarily bjing it before themselves as the first branch for ass^njt or refusal ; and such members as vote for the bill in one capacity, must give their assent to it in the other, directly against the royal instruction to the gov ernor, when the case is no degree necessary to the public interest ; otherwise, their doings will be inconsistent ajid aheu^j^. Thos. Hutchinson. Council Chamber, June 9, 1757." 6 / 43 JUSTICES. Of the County Courts, Hon. Timothy Pickering, Hon Sam uel Holten, and John W. Proctor, have been Justices. Of the Court of Probate, Hon. Samuel Holten was for many years a Judge. Of the Supreme Judicial Court, Hon. Samuel Putnam was for many years an eminent Judge, as his well-digested legal opinions in the Reports bear testimony. Of Judges Holten and Putnam, it can in truth be said, what rarely is true with men in ofiice, that they were more ready to leave their offices, than to have their offices leave them, — they having both voluntarily resigned, when their services were highly appreciated. Judge Putnam still lives, at the green old age of eighty-five, beloved and respected by all who know him. REPRESENTATIVES IN CONGRESS. In Congress, the voice of Danvers has been heard, through the representatives of the second district of the State, for about one eighth part of the time since the organization of the gov ernment. Hon. Samuel Holten, " Nathan Reed, " Daniel P. King, have occupied this station. Mr. King was the immediate suc cessor of the lamented Saltonstall, of Salem. Few, very few districts in our land can boast of representatives so unexcep tionable in all those qualities that best become a man. They will long be remembered as stars of the first magnitude in the constellation of worthies from Essex South District. MUNICIPAL OFFICES. CLERKS. In the management of the concerns of the town, there is no duty of more responsibility than that which devolves upon the clerk. On the correctness of his record rests the tenure of office, and essentially depends the character and reputation of the town. 44 How else is he who caters for the intellectual part of the centennial entertainments to be advised of facts? What is now learned of time past one hundred years can be come at through the records alone. What those present at the next centennial will be able to present, must be drawn mainly from the clerks' records. Nothing else will have a character to be relied on ; unless perchance some floating leaf of this day's doings shall chance to be preserved by some careful antiquarian. Fortunately the records of Danvers were commenced by Daniel Eppes, Jr., and kept for two years in a form highly exemplary. His chirography was plain, his knowledge of lan guage good, so that he used the right words in the right place, neither more nor less ; — a qualification not sufficiently regarded by many of those who have come after him : — -among these, James Prince, .6 years, Stephen Needham, 11 Gideon Foster, 4 Joseph Osborne, Jr., 6. Nathan Felton, 27 Benjamin Jacobs, 6 Joseph Shed, 17 and others from one to three years. Joseph Shed, Esq., the present clerk, has greatly improved upon the records of his predecessors by his mode of indexing and flling of papers. There still remains much to be done to make the records intel ligible, without the explanation of those who made them. Let any one experience the inconveniences I have met in ascer taining facts that should be readily imderstood, and I will guarantee that he will not come to any other conclusion. A town like this should have their own office for all their papers, and all their papers arranged in systematic order, under the care and keeping of the clerk, — and not otherwise. MEDICAL PROFESSION. No educated physician, to my knowledge, resided in town previous to the separation. Female attendants were at com raand, without doubt, in cases of emergency, which often 45 occurred, as the increase of population fully demonstrates. A Dr. Gregg is mentioned, as early as the year 1692, as being consulted in the diseases that then prevailed ; but where he resided I know not. Drs. Jonathan Prince, Archelaus Putnam, Samuel Holten, and Amos Putnam, are the first named physicians in the North Parish. Drs. Parker Cleveland, Joseph Osgood, and Joseph Torrey, are the first in the South Parish. All of these are believed to have been regularly educated physicians, of the old order. Other names have appeared, at different periods, such as Drs. Chickering, Nutting, Hildreth, Bowers, Carlton, Clapp, Cilley, Little, Peabody, Gould, Southwick, Porter, Bush, Patten,