^EEM'^JtC'^.'-^'' i^'^^C,, il. 1 Ui^Vi iJ- PJll' i'lSijSi? t^tl; C^l^i; Sa^ * J^'dw- ¦Tk.S- ¦" J4^ J^.r^n'i. ifiM*?! WS Mil ruVSSfT '^-.Sj! n *"%¦ M,f '» .!.¦•: ..KES ...111 i^int •* ' I tX^.ii 'i'm^U: m to: l» ^j«al^ral 7 ? £. - irV r «' > •-¦' it !*"!!¦¦ • | •, I • I UJJi,dU a, ;i„'-.i'.', F ..•¦»,¦-.!• '?;jit.!rr.:r: mrl.: ij^-mn.r'Ji .^ ¦fflSlpiVi-- •¦ * ht ¦ s.|.r,0»*i.i YALE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY THK LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION OF ROBERT BANKS, ECOND EARL OF LIVERPOOL, K.G LATE FIR.ST LORD OF THE TREASURY. COMPILED FROM ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS. CHARLES DUKE YONGE, REGIUS PROFESSOR OF HISTORY AND ENGLISH LITERATURE IN THE QUEEn's COLLHGH, EELFA'^T : AN'D AUTHOR OF "THE HISTORY OF THE BRITISH NAVY," "THE HISTORY OF FRANCE UNDER THE BOURBONS," ETC. IN THREE VOLUMES.— VOL. I. ymtboiT : MACMILLAN AND CO. 1868. [The right of Trandation and Reprodiidioti is reserved-l ADVERTISEMENT. The following ¦work is founded almost entirely on the correspondence and copies of correspondence left behind him by Lord Liverpool, and now in the possession of Colonel and Lady Catharine Harcourt, of Buxted Park, Sussex, who have done me the honour of entrusting the documents to me for the purpose of compiling an account ¦ of his most eventful career. From the suddenness of the calamity which terminated his Administration his papers were not found to be so completely arranged but that some letters have been lost ; arjd for some of those which he wrote to Mr. 'Vansittart (afterwards Lord Bexley), and to Mr. C^qnii^g, I have been indebted to the kindness of their representatives, Mr. John Thornton and Lord Canning Burke, to whom I take this oppor tunity of acknowledging the great obligations under which their courtesy has thus laid me. C. D. Y. CONTENTS TO VOL. L CHAPTER I. Importance of the period at v^fhich Lord Liverpool became minister — Early history of his father — His care of his son's education — Mr. Jenkinson at Oxford — His friendship with Canning and others — He travels on the Continent — Opening of the French Revolution — Mr. Jenkinson is returned for Appleby — His maiden speech — He visits the allied armies on the Rhine — Letters to his father from Coblentz — Proceedings of the French emigrants — Feelings of the Austrians and Prussians — He supports the -war -with France — He opposes Mr. Grey's motion for Reform — He becomes a. member of the Indian Board CHAPTER II. He recommends a march upon Paris — His father is made Earl of Liverpool — He (no-w Lord Hawkesbury) is serving -with his regiment of militia in Scotland — His view of the progress of the war in Germany and of our own position — Approves of the negotiations foi^ peace — Pitt's failing health in 1798 — Seditious associations in England — Irish Rebellion and Union — Lord Hawkesbury's dissatisfaction with our campaign in- Holland — The Catholic question — Scruples of George III. — Pitt's resignation — Character of Mr. Addington — Lord Hawkesbury becomes Foreign Secretary — Derangement ofthe King^ Negotiations for peace — Lord Cornwallis is sent to Amiens — His interview -with the First Consul — Conclusion of the Treaty of Amiens — Lord Hawkesbury's speech on it 33 CONTENTS. CHAPTER III. Buonaparte becomes Consul for life— His discontent with England- Lord Hawkesbury's reply to his remonstrances — Mr. Hookham Frere's description of parties in Spain — Bu6naparte's encroachments — His preparations for war — He annexes Piedmont to France — Switzer land implores the aid of Britain — Lord 'Whitworth is sent to Paris — Negotiations with Austria and Russia — Meeting and character of the new Parliament — Eagerness of the French for the maintenance of peace — Buonaparte's intrigues in Russia — Sebastiani's mission to Egypt — Buonaparte's overtures to Louis XVIII. — Corruption of Buonaparte's family — Lord ¦Whitworth's interview with Talleyrand — He leaves Paris . . .... 77 CHAPTER IV. Renewal of the secret negotiations — Debate on the renewal of the war — Pitt's disapproval of the ministers' policy — Great division in their favour — Col. Crawford's proposal to fortify London — Lord Hawkes bury is removed to the House of Lords — His opinion of the weakness of the German and Russian Governments — Buonaparte's measures towards Spain and Portugal — Portugal applies to us for aid — Plans for the partition of Turkey — Peculiarities of the constitution of Turkey — Buonaparte's colonial losses, and plans for the invasion of Great Britain- — Death of the Due d'Enghien — Louis XVIII. applies to Britain for an asylum — Renewed illness of George III. — General discontent with Addington — Pitt writes to the King — The Volun teer Bill — Pitt writes again to the King — Addington resigns, and Pitt becomes Prime Minister — Lord Hawkesbury becomes Home Secretai-y Ii CHAPTER V. Lord Liverpool's accoUht of the formation of Pitt's second Administra tion — Canning's attack on Lord Hawkesbury — They are reconciled— The Additional Force Bill — A new Corn Bill — Lord Hawkesbuiy's views of Free-trade — Disputes in the royal family — Trades Unions — Rise of Mr. O'Connell — Lord Hawkesbury's advice to the Roman Catholics— Reconciliation of Pitt and Addington— The attack on the Spanish treasure-ships— Napoleon's letter to George III.— Alliance with Austria and Russia . . . . 1,5 CONTENTS. ix CHAPTER VI. PAGE Lord Hawkesbury's speech on the Catholic question — Impeachment of Lord Melville — Resignation of Lord Sidmouth — The King's sight becomes affected — Sir Robert Calder's action — Pitt fails in negotia tions with Prussia, and with the Opposition — Battle of Trafalgar — Indignation of the King of Prussia at the violation of his territory — Battle of Austerlitz — Death of Pitt — The King offers the Treasury to Lord Hawkesbury — Gives him the 'Wardenship of the Cinque Ports — Resignation of the Ministry — Lord Grenville becomes First Lord of the Treasury — Lord Hawkesbury as leader of the Opposition — Lord Hawkesbury's speech on the admission of Lord EUenborough into the Cabinet— Comparison of the two Ministers — Death of Fox — Lord Hawkesbury's conduct to Lord Grenville's Ministry — Dissolution of Parliament — Conduct of the Ministiy on the Catholic question — Duke of Portland's letter to the King — Resignation of the Ministry ... 185 CHAPTER VII. The King sends for Lord Hawkesbury — The Duke of Portland becomes Prime Minister — Lord Hawkesbury the most prominent member of the new Administration — Debate on the change — Lord Hawkesbury's speech — Maiden speech of Lord Aberdeen — Dissolution of Parlia ment — Treaty of Tilsit — The expedition to Denraark — The Orders in Council, and dissatisfaction of the United States — Quarrels between the Prince and Princess of Wales — Arrival of Louis XVIII. as Comte de L'Isle in England — His letters to the King and Lord Hawkesbury — Plans of the Portuguese royal family — Debate and speech of Lord Hawkesbury on the Danish expedition — Seditious conspiracies in • Ireland — Lord Hawkesbury's policy in Ireland — Proposal for a com mutation of tithes in Ireland — Lord Grenville moves for a Committee on the Catholic question — Arrangements in Scotland, and Lord Hawkesbury's rules for the distribution of his patronage . . . 227 CHAPTER VIII. Napoleon's invasion of the Peninsula — Sir A. 'Wellesley is sent to Portugal — Commencement of the Peninsular 'War — Lord Grenville's attack on our policy in engaging in that war — Death of the first Lord Liverpool — Lord Liverpool's defence of the Ministry — Conduct of the French princes — Lord Liverpool's memorandum on the 'Walcheren expedition — Quarrel between Lord Castlereagh and Canning — Resig nation of the Duke of Portland — Letter from Mr. Perceval — He becomes Prime Minister — Lord Liverpool becomes Secretary of State for 'War and the Colonies — He recommends the evacuation of 'Wal cheren — Contest for the Chancellorship of Oxford — Lord Liverpool's views as to the^maintenance of the Peninsular 'War, and his letter to Lord WeUington 267 CONTENTS. CHAPTER IX. Lord Liverpool's labours as Secretary for the Colonies— State of Canada —Lord Liverpool's estimate of the difficulties of the Ministry, and of Lord Wellington in Spain— Lord GrenviUe's censure of the conduct of the war— Lord Liverpool's defence— His panegyric on the spirit of the Portuguese and Spaniards— Lord Grey's motion on Pariiamentary Reform— Lord Liverpool's speech— The recent Reform Bill— Opinion of Castanos on the war— Difficulties of providing specie— The loss of Ciudad Rodrigo— Irritabihty of Wellington— Letter of Lord Liverpool to Wellington 309 CHAPTER X. Illness of the King — Violence of the Opposition — Discussions on the Regency — Characteristics of Lord Liverpool's eloquence — Lord Holland's opposition — The Prince of Wales becomes Regent ... 338 CHAPTER XL Mr. Perceval continues minister — Increased strength of the Ministry — Expectations of the Spaniards — New measures respecting the militia — A Committee of the House of Commons recommends a retum to cash payments — Lord Liverpool predicts a war between Russia and France — Birth of the King of Rome — Operations in Sicily and in India — Debate on the Catholic question — Resignation of Lord Wellesley — Expiration of restrictions on the Regency — Lord Castlereagh becomes Foreign Secretary — The Regent's cordiality towards the ministeis — He makes overtures to Lord Grenville and Lord Grey to join the Cabinet — The Catholic question — Lord Liverpool's predictions of some of the results of emancipation verified in 1868 — Murder of Mr. Perceval — Negotiations for fresh ministerial arrangements — Mr. Stuart Wortley's address to the Regent for a strong Ministry — Discussions in Pariia ment on the negotiations — Lord Wellesley's proposals to Lord Grenville — Negotiations with Lord Moira — The old Administration is replaced under Lord Liverpool .... . ... 359 CHAPTER Xn. Pecuhar qualifications of Lord Liverpool for the lead in the Government — The Cathohc question is made an open question — The policy or impohcy of such an arrangement — Debate on it — Negotiations with Canning — The lead of the House of Commons — Lord Chatham in 1766— Labours which fell to Lord Castlereagh's share, and his per formance of them— Mr. Peel is made Secretary for Ireland— Original difficulties and eventual triumphs of the Liverpool Administration . . 396 CONTENTS. CHAPTER XIIL PAGE The United States declare war — The Orders in Council — The right of search — Concihatory conduct of Mr. Perceval on this subject — Mr. Brougham's motion on the subject — Toleration Bill — Lord Liverpool's feelings towards Dissenters — Riots of the Luddites — Fresh proposals of Napoleon for negotiation — Lord Liverpool's language on Napoleon's title — The battle of Salamanca — The battle of Borodino — Lord Liverpool's comments on the state of affairs — Shght influence of the Government on elections — The new House of Commons favorable to the ministers — Mr. Peel's view of the state of Ireland . . . 428 CHAPTER XIV. Tranquillity of the session of 1813 — Fresh disputes of the Prince and Princess of Wales — Advice of the Council to the Prince — Some of the Opposition take up the cause of the Princess — Discussions on the American war — Renewal of the East India Company's charter — Establishment of the bishopric of Calcutta — Appearance of Warren Hastings in the House of Commons — Opinions delivered by him and Sir John Malcolm on India — The charter is renewed with slight modi fications — The battle of Vittoria — Wellington's invasion of France . 45 1 CHAPTER XV. Necessity for new arrangements cai^sed by the fall of Napoleon — Unreasonableness of our allies — General confidence in the Govern ment — The allies offer to treat — Stubbornness of Napoleon — The Comte d'Artois crosses over to Holland — The Duke of Clarence is present with the allies in the Netherlands — Opening of the Congress at Chatillon — Character of Alexander — Ambitious views of Bemadotte — Lord Liverpool's views on the end most desirable, and on the line to be adopted by Ae r^egotiator's — Differences among the allies — Dis solution of the Congress — Wellington takes Bordeaux — The citizens at Bordeaux acknowledge Louis XVIII. — Lord Liverpool's letter to Wellington — The ^rfnch Senate dethrone Napoleon — Elba is assigned to him — Lord Liverpool's language respecting the peace — Moderation of England — The Slave-trade — Erection of the kingdom of the Netherlands . . ' 476 THE LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION LORD LIVERPOOL. CHAPTER L Importance of the period at which Lord Liverpool became minister — Early history of his father — His care of his son's education — Mr. Jenkinson at Oxford — His friendship with Canning and others — He travels on the Continent — Opening of the French Revolution — Mr. Jenkinson is returned for Appleby — His maiden speech — He visits the allied armies on the Rhine — Letters to his father from Coblentz — Proceedings of the French emigrants — Feelings of the Austrians and Prussians — He supports the war with France — He opposes Mr. Grey's motion for Reform — He becomes a member of the India Board. The statesman whose memoirs I have undertaken to present to his countrymen, having been a Secretary of State for above ten years, governed this nation as Prime Minister for fifteen more. Since the time of Lord Burleigh no one, except the second Pitt, ever enjoyed so long a tenure of power; with the same exception, no one ever held office at so critical a time ; for the period at which he was suddenly called on to wield the supreme authority -was that at which the most momentous and arduous war in which Britain had ever been engaged was assuming new features, through the brilliant successes of 'Wellington in Spain, and the gigantic invasion of Russia by Napoleon ; ,, VOL. I. B 2 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1811 both events calling for increased and extended exertions, differing in character and in the capacity which they required, but similar in the vast influence which, if well directed, they were calculated to exert on the present and future fortunes, not only of this nation, but of the whole of Christendom. Our own warlike triumphs imposed on us the necessity of redoubling the efforts by which they had been gained, and of so strengthening the resources of our invincible general as to enable him to reap and secure the full fruit of his great achievements. The fresh and insane aggressions of the French Emperor, turning into enemies those who had previously been the most enthusiastic and firm of his friends, no less re-opened to us the field of diplomatic labour to confirm them in their hostility to him, and thus to regain them to our side, and to reinforce them with others who were not only still his allies, and were at that moment furnishing one division of his invad ing army, but who were also bound to him by family connexions of the closest kind, which, but a few months before, had seemed, as he clearly intended and expected them to prove, indissoluble. Nor when the generals, lavishly but judiciously supported, and the diplomatists, sagaciously directed and carrying out their instructions with consummate ability, had brought the war to a termination of glory unequalled even in the proudest days of Edward or of Anne, were the toils and anxieties of the minister at an end. The return of peace, glorious as it was, only brought with it cares and labours of a different kind, not less burthensome than those of war, and at least equally involving the reputation of the statesman and the welfare of the people. So protracted and vital a struggle as that through which the nation had passed could not be suddenly brought to a close without its cessa tion producing a perilous reaction. It was necessary to revise the whole financial system of the kingdom ; and a return to old principles and methods, however indispensable, could not be effected without causing a great shock to i827] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 3 interests and habits which had grown up during the long period of their interruption. There was therefore inevitably, as is now generally admitted, severe distress ; the distress was, by an equally inevitable consequence, the parent of fierce discontent (bordering on sedition) ; which could only be allayed by a judicious mixture of firmness and con ciliation, guided by a sagacious appreciation of the existing influences which swayed the popular feelings, and by a penetrating foresight of the future requirements of the country, in order, by a timely and progressive development of its resources, gradually to heal the wounds inflicted on it by a war of unexampled length ; and to place it in a position to secure its full share of that general prosperity 'which the re-establishment of peace was sure eventually to open to the whole world. During the twelve years which followed the restoration of peace all these ends were secured. After more than one most perilous crisis distress was extinguished ; discontent was appeased. Our financiers, aided by our diplomatists, were active and successful in opening fresh channels for our commerce ; and the beginning of 1827 saw the kingdom in the enjoy ment of a degree of present prosperity and renown which had never been surpassed, and resting with a well- grounded confidence on the hopes of a steady augmen tation of even that felicity. The chief means by which these great objects were accomplished I shall attempt to describe in the following pages. And one other preliminary remark will not be out of place, that the minister who advised them is, with his colleagues, fully and solely entitled to the credit of all those measures, and all their fruits. He, does not divide it with his opponents, nor with any party but his own. He is the very last minister who has been able fully to carry out his own political views ; who has been so strong that in matters of general policy the Opposition could extort no concessions from him which were not sanctioned by his own deliberate judgment; the very last who, in B 2 4 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [i770 the strict sense of the word, can be said to have governed England. On that most brilliant statesman who succeeded him, death laid his hand too speedily to allow any of the designs which he may have formed for the internal govern ment of the kingdom to be developed ; and the measure for which Wellington's administration is now chiefly re membered was forced upon him by events, sorely against his -will -and convictions. Similar compulsion exacted Lord Grey's assent to many of the details of the Reform Bill, -which he was as far from approving as from having premeditated ; and the Reform Bill, to the carrying of which he devoted all his energies, and on which he staked all his reputation, however well judged and fortunate in many respects its results may have been, has unquestion ably had the effect, which the Duke of 'Wellington seems to have been the only statesman who foresaw at the time, of rendering the Government permaiiently and incurably weak ; so that since his day there has been no prime minister who has not found himself compelled to consent to, and even at times to adopt and promote measures inconsistent with his previous professions, adverse to his notions of general policy, and condemned, or at least dreaded, by his dehberate judgment. ROBERT BANKS JENKINSON, the eldest son of the first Earl of Liverpool, was born on the 7th of June, 1770. His father was not yet a peer, but was steadily making his way to that promotion. During the administration of Lord Bute he had been that nobleman's private secretary, and, in the political struggles which followed on the resignation of the favourite earl, he became an active member of the small party known as the King's friends. The Duke of Grafton made him a Lord of the Admiralty, and in 177^' under Lord North, he rose to the more important and laborious office of Secretary at 'War, undertaking his new duties at the very moment -when the refusal of the Ame rican Congress to treat for peace on any other conditions 1784] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 5 but those of a formal recognition of the independence of the United States rendered it certain that the war would shortly assume a sterner character ; while the surrender of Burgoyne in the preceding year had greatly strengthened the opponents of the ministry in Parliament, by the proof which it supplied that, at so great a distance from home, it was difficult to follow up success, while defeat must lead to further and more ignominious disaster. 'When, three years afterwards, it was at length acknowledged that any further prosecution of the attempt to subdue the colonists was hopeless, no one attributed our failure to any want of energy on Mr. Jenkinson's part, who had been unwearied in his efforts to furnish the army with reinforcements and supplies, and as successful in his exer tions as the distance to which they were to be sent permitted. But the duties of this office were not those most to his taste ; matters connected with finance and commerce were his favourite study ; and it was greatly to his satisfaction that, on the dissolution of the Coalition Ministry, Mr. Pitt proposed to him to join his government as a member of the Board of Trade. In framing the commercial treaty which shortly afterwards was concluded between Great Britain and the United States, he was the minister's principal assistant ; and with his own fondness for those subjects, and with the enlightened and liberal ideas upon them which he shared with Mr. Pitt, he early imbued his son, who, in more than one of his latest measures, showed that he had not forgotten his teaching. In 1786 he was raised to the peerage as Baron Hawkes bury, and ten years later he received the further promo tion of the earldom of Liverpool ; the title of Hawkesbury descending by courtesy to his heir, who was known by it during the earlier part of his official life. Proud of the position to which he had raised himself by his political exertions and abilities, he from the first seems to have destined his eldest son to a similar career, esti mating with a parental, but not exaggerated, partiality 6 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1784 the talents of which he flattered himself that he saw the promise, and being led by the expectations which he thus formed of him to urge upon him with especial earnestness the necessity of cultivating his abilities by the most diligent study. When his son was old enough for a public school, he placed him at the Charterhouse, and a letter which is preserved from him to the boy when he was but little more than fourteen is creditable to both of them : to the father from the soundness of the judgment with which he suggests to him both the benefits of general application and the particular branches of study which he recom mends ; to the son, because the tone of the letter, the manner in which the father explains his different recom mendations, fortifying them by appeals to his son's reason and filial affection, shows that he conceived him to be already imbued with no little sobriety of mind and stea diness of principle ; and, if he follows up his advice on grave matters with admonitions almost equally earnest on the general appearance and manners which he desires his pupil to cultivate, none but the most pedantic critics will think such topics beneath the notice of a judicious parent Nor will any one deny that these precepts also produced beneficial fruit, who considers the personal difficulties which beset his son when prime minister, and which were only overcome, as they only could have been overcome,, by the unvarying exercise of the most perfect tact and courtesy. Addiscombe Place, November 4th, 1784. My DEAR Bob, I send you the enclosed letter, which I received from Sir Banks Jenkinson ^ a few days ago, as you will see by the latter part of it how much we are all of us interested in your welfare ; and I hope it will serve as an inducement to you to pursue your ' Sir Banks Jenkinson was the head of the family ; an old Gloucester shire baronet, whom Mr. Jenkinson himself succeeded five years after wards in the baronetcy, which now belongs to the present Sir George Jenkinson. 1784] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 7 studies with great industry, as you will thereby secure to your self the affection and support of every part of your family. You are so far advanced in your Latin and Greek that I have no doubt that by the time you leave the Charterhouse you will be pro perly master of those two languages ; but I wish you at present to pay great attention to your exercises, in which you are not very forward, and I have on this head but one piece of advice to give you, which is, that you should not be satisfied in doing your exercises just so as to pass without censure, but always aim at perfection ; and be assured that in doing so you will by degrees approach to it. I hope also that you will avail yourself of every leisure moment to apply yourself to algebra and the mathematics : you will thereby attain not only a knowledge of those sciences, but by an early acquaintance with them you will acquire a habit of reasoning closely and correctly on every subject, which will on all occasions be of infinite use to you. The hours which are not employed in the manner before men tioned you will give to the reading of history and books of criticism, and here the knowledge you have of the French language will furnish you with many excellent books. I would wish you for the present not to read any novels, as they will only waste your time, which you will find not more than suf ficient for the pursuit of more useful and important studies. 'What I have just pointed out to you are the principal objects you should have in view ; but believe me, in addition to all these it will be necessary that you should pay proper attention to your person. Every failing in this respect creates disgust, or exposes a man to ridicule in such a manner as to defeat the advantages he would otherwise derive from his parts and learn ing, or other accomplishments of greater importance. You will recollect the advice I have of late repeatedly given you on this subject, and I am sure you will attend to it, for you are just at the age when improper manners and tastes are acquired, which will become habitual if they are not now corrected. My letter is a long one : I am persuaded, however, that you will impute all I have written to the affection I bear you. Believe me, that the principal happiness I shall expect to enjoy in the decline of life is that which I shall derive from your prosperity and eminence. If I mistake not, there are others of our family 8 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1786 who, like me, look forward with anxiety to the figure you will hereafter make in the world, and feel themselves 'interested in the character you will bear. It is my earnest wish and fimi persuasion that we shall not be disappointed. Lady Cope and your cousins desire their love to you. I am, with great troth, dear Bob Your affectionate Father, C. Jenkinson. From the Charterhouse in 1786 he went to Christchurch, where, as his letters to his father show, he was far from considering himself emancipated from the necessity of following the advice which had been given him two years before. On the contrary, he was a hard worker, and dwells with actual pleasure, and comments with shrewd discernment, on the different characteristics of the great classic writers ; especially of those whose works elucidate the histories of the Greeks and Romans, and the ideas of government and policy entertained by them. Livy seems to have been his especial favourite, since he speaks of taking it up " as a lounging book" as a relaxation from the severer efforts required fully to appreciate the conflict between Demosthenes and his rival ; though his warmest encomiums of all are reserved for Plato, whose beauty of expression he esteems so greatly, that to call the language of any of his treatises "the language of Plato" is so to exhaust eulogy "that nothing more can be said in praise of it ;" while his philosophy he rates even more highly, affirming, with an enthusiasm which requires some de duction, that " his tenets are the same that were afterwards maintained by our Saviour, and such as were perfectly unknown both to the Jews and heathens." He was careful also to adhere to that admonition of his father which many would have found harder to follow than any which inculcate study and industry, and to keep a watch over and break himself of any bad habits into which he had fallen, or to which he was inclined. In one of his Oxford letters he writes : " Though I had contracted a habit of disputing in company during the two or three first terms 1788] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 9 I was here, I have been long since convinced of the bad effects arising from that habit, and I have prevented these bad effects in the most particular manner by avoiding as much as possible all mixed companies, and living princi pally with a few particular people My tutor has frequently thought that I have been too much run away with by general ideas, and that I do not weigh and con sider a book sufficiently. This I endeavour to correct." A youth who at eighteen was thus patient of admonition, thus candid and even severe in his judgment of himself, had already made some progress in fitting himself for an official career. And how steadily he was already training himself for political life is shown still more plainly by others of his letters, in which he proves himself a careful and shrewd observer of public affairs both at home and abroad. He was, as might have been expected, a warm partisan of the ministry ; though, on topics on which his father disagreed with Pitt, naturally preferring him for his guide. In one of his letters he ventures even " to lament the madness and folly of which Mr. Pitt had been guilty," in supporting Wilberforce's measures for the abolition of the slave-trade ; for his father was vehemently opposed to the introduction of any new law on the subject, from a belief that the trade was necessary for the welfare both' of our West Indian colonies, and of our navigation trade at home ; and he himself advocated the same view in one of the earliest speeches he addressed to the House of Commons. On this subject, however, the young politician grew wiser as he grew older ; and, by the time that his opinion had risen to be one of influence and authority, the cause of freedom, so inseparably connected with the glory of the British constitution, had no more resolute advocate. The letter which has been quoted speaks of his living principally with " a few particular people ;" and two of those so • chosen by him now continued to be united to him, both by the closest ties of personal regard and also of IO LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1789 political connexion, to the end of his life. One was Lord Granville Leveson, whom, on another occasion, he extols to his father as " equally conspicuous for the soundness of his understanding, the excellence of his heart, and, above all, for an industry not usual with people of his situation;" and to whom he himself, in after life, afforded an oppor tunity of justifying his early partiality by his discretion as our ambassador at Paris in more than one trying crisis. For his admiration of the other, so far as his abilities were concerned, he can find no language sufficiently powerful ; the readiness of his scholarship, the acuteness of his argumentative powers, and his ceaseless flow of high spirits and love of fun, seem, by turns, to have struck him as his peculiar characteristic ; if he could discover, or suspect, any fault in this friend, it was when he fancied him somewhat prone to sacrifice graver considerations to the wish to point a jest more keenly, or to show his wit at the expense of his associates. Once, in later years, when he himself was a Secretary of State, with his early friend for one of his colleagues, he looked upon himself as having been most unprovokedly singled out for the butt of his sarcastic depreciation, and, for a time, keenly re sented the unfriendhness of the aspersions cast upon him. But both men were of too generous a nature to mis construe one another for any lengthened period ; for the other was George Canning. Judicious friends reconciled them ; they continued colleagues, and, in subsequent years, Canning had no warmer admirer than Lord Liverpool of his oratory, which all admitted to be unequalled among his contemporaries ; nor had Lord Liverpool any coadjutor who more constantly and gratefully proclaimed his sense of the support and assistance which the Prime Minister afforded to every member of his administration. In the summer of 1789 Mr. Jenkinson left Oxford, spend ing the remainder of that, and a greater portion of the next three years, in travelling abroad. The chief object which influenced his father in adopting this plan for him was, as 1789] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 11 we see from the correspondence of both, that he might extend his general political knowledge by informing himself on the spot of the characteristics and resources of the dif ferent countries which he was to visit, and by cultivating an acquaintance with their leading men. And he himself, fully coinciding in this view, showed his further inclination for work, by taking with him a small but well chosen library, and, even among the fascinations of Florence and Naples, finding time not only for an extensive study of the language of the country, but for a reperusal of Blackstone's Commentaries, and a renewed dalliance with the more grace ful attractions of Virgil and Horace. His classical recollec tions did not, however, lead him to share the enthusiasm which his favourite poets expressed for the beauties of the country in which they sang. On the contrary, he tells his father that " with respect to the country nothing can be so disagreeable as the country about Rome. If I had never been in Holland, I should say it was the ugliest country I ever beheld ; indeed it is difficult to believe that the Romans, who had the whole world to choose out of, should have continued long to reside in a country so unhealthy and so disgusting.'' The unattractiveness of the country about Rome, however, only made him the more keenly alive to the change of scenery which was presented to his eyes by the Neapolitan territory. That he describes as "the most beautiful country I ever beheld ; the richest cultiva tion, the greatest variety of hill and vale, the most striking points of view ; here I should say Saturn must have resided during the golden age," forgetting, apparently, that his favourite Virgil assured him that the chosen abode of the old deity was that very district' which he had just con- ' " Haec nemora indigenas Fauni Nymphasque tenebant, Gensque viriim truncis et duro robore nata : Quis neque mos neque cultus erat ; nee jungere tauros, Aut componere opes norant, aut parcere parto : Sed rami atque asper victu venatus alebat. Primus ab setherio venit Saturnus Olympo, Arma Jovis fugiens, et regnis exul ademtis. [Is 12 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1789 demned as unworthy of even the mortals who worshipped him. In other respects he took him for his guide. "I have travelled," he adds, " with ^neas through the grotto of the Sybil and the lake of Avernus; I have passed with him from Tartarus to Cocytus, and from Cocytus to Elysium. I have drunk Falernian wine in the villa of Hortensius, contemplating from the same spot the Temple of Venus, the houses of Cicero and Caesar, and the reputed (though falsely so) tomb of Agrippina. I have visited the baths of Marius and the famous ruin of the Temple of Jupiter. Virgil has been my constant companion; I have found him not inferior in geography to poetry, and I shall in a few days pay my homage at the tomb of the divine poet, remembering with a grateful heart the luxurious moments his verses have so lately afforded me.'' But, if Saturn had civilized the inhabitants of Latium in the days of old, he found that either that civilization had not extended into the adjacent province, or that it was sadly worn out Nothing can be more dreary than the picture which he draws of the universal indolence and filth of the lower orders. On these points, indeed, he only coincides with other travellers, but I do not know that any traveller has given so terrible an idea of the propensity of the Neapolitans to the most atrocious crimes as is conveyed in the following passage of a letter written after a month's sojourn in that outwardly beautiful city : " Nothing is more common than assassinations in Naples: the week does not pass without your hearing of four or five, and in cases of murder little redress is to be found. The judges are so poor that they are mostly liable to be bribed, so that, if the criminal has any money, he is almost sure of escaping. I was told by a gentleman of some consideration in this place that it was computed that the king lost in the town of Naples above Is genus indocile ac dispersum montibus altis Composuit, legesque dedit, Latiumque vocari Maluit, his quoniam latuisset tutus in oris." JEn.vm. 314. 1789] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 13 4,000 subjects every year by assassination, and that murder was considered as a crime much inferior to theft." Of the higher classes his picture, if less formidable, is not much more attractive. " Among the higher rank of people there are very few that are worth knowing ; they are not only ignorant, but in general they despise every kind of know ledge. The women are gallant, without being, for the most part, either amiable or pleasing." In the autumn of 1789 he was in Paris just after the Night of Dupes,^ as Maury called the fatal sitting of the 4th of August ; when the politicians and financiers of the city were agitated by the consideration of Necker's new income-tax of 25 per cent, and the loan of 30 millions which he had demanded avowedly as a temporary expedient to give him time to mature a scheme to place the whole revenue of the State on a better footing. For this most narrow-minded though well-meaning statesman was so im bued with the idea of the superior importance of finance to all other matters, that he believed that all the discontent of the nation at large, and all the appetite for change which was manifestly the dominant passion of the Assembly, would be at once allayed if he could only point out a sure mode for the extinction of the pecuniary embarrassments of the kingdom. But Mr. Jenkinson's report to his father of the feeling of that body, and of the citizens in general on the subject, was not calculated to inspire him with much confidence in the minister's success. He wrote that though "the Assembly had accepted Necker's system of finance, they had only done so, de confiance en M. Necker, without the least deliberation on. any subject, meaning by that phrase, if it should not succeed, to' throw the whole blame upon him. I have conversed," he continues, " with a variety of people on this plan, and I find all who under stand the subject condemn it. It appears almost impossible ' In his speech on Lord Lansdowne's motion on the state of the country, November 30th, i8ig, he mentions that he "was present at the capture of the Bastile." 14 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1789 to conceive that the provinces will consent to part with so considerable a portion of their income, particularly as the payment is required in eighteen months. France is at pre sent in such a situation that I can easily suppose that the nobility and men of property would readily consent to pay part of their fortune for the positive security of the rest. But for the sacrifice they are to make, according to the plan of M. Necker, a temporary relief only is to be procured, and, for what they know, they may be in as bad a situation a twelvemonth hence as they are at present. M. Necker says in his discourse to the Assemblie, Lemprunt remplit lentelnent. I heard it yesterday asserted with great con fidence by a person who pretended to be informed, that if M. Necker could not procure a certain sum, which he almost despaired of, before the 8th of this month,i the bankruptcy would be declared on that day. This fact I will not answer for. There have been great confusions in Paris in the course of the last week. On Monday night the milice bourgeoise, attempting to interfere in the Palais Royal, were repelled. How this matter will end it seems more and more difficult every day to determine. The next fortnight is considered as important, but so has been every fortnight since I have been here.'' The information contained in the above extract was closely verified by subsequent events. But what is most remarkable in them, considering that the writer was only a youth of nineteen, is the care which it displays in the collection of important facts, and the sober-minded caution in forming an opinion on them. And his judgment was equally acute and correct on home politics ; for the next year, on the removal of Mr. Grenville to the House of Lords, he writes : " I was very much surprised at the promotion of Mr. Grenville ; it was what never entered my head, nor that of any other person's, I believe, except Mr, Pitt's and his own, who, I am convinced, have long had ' The date of the letter is October ist. The attack on 'Versailles was already fixed for October 5th. 179°] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. IS the scheme of bringing the business of the House of Lords, as well as that of the Commons, entirely into their own hands." The conclusion to which his conjectures led him is the very same that is expressed by Pitt's biographer ; and which, as we learn by the same authority, was also formed at the time by the experienced Duke of Richniond.i Still more important, as a proof of the innateness of those principles of unswerving integrity and honour which were the especial characteristics of his own administration, are the sentiments which, a month or two afterwards, he expressed on the subject of his father's continuance in office. Among the objections to Grenville's promotion which the Diike of Richmond had urged to the Prime Minister, one, and that not the weakest, was that "he did not imagine that Lord Hawkesbury would feel much dis posed to act under him," and it would seem that such a feeling was actually entertained by Lord Hawkesbury him self, and that, with a view to allay it, Pitt proposed some other arrangement bearing the appearance of favour and promotion, which, however, was never carried out. Lord Hawkesbury related to his son the fact of the negotiation, its nature, and his own disinclination to agree to the pro posals made to him ; and the young man's reply is to the last degree positive and uncompromising. "You know I always thought you entitled to that favour, so much so that I do not think you should accept it on any conditions whatever. The quitting your present situation for the office that I conclude they offered to you would have been highly disgraceful, and I agree with you entirely in think ing it would be better to resign altogether than to acquiesce on such conditions. However agreeable the profits of office may be, they never are to be sought at the price of reputa tion and honour ; and I would rather not inherit a fortune at all than inherit one which in the course of honour and integrity I never could have succeeded to." It was not in those days unusual .for persons to be ' Stanhope's Life of Pitt, ii. 73, jj. i6 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1791 returned by constituencies before they were of age to take their seats in Parliament, though Fox is probably the only instance of a minor venturing to take the oaths and raise his voice in debate. And, in accordance with this certainly unconstitutional practice, in the course of the year 1790 the authority of Sir James Lowther over the borough of Appleby (the same which had the honour of giving Pitt himself the first opportunity of displaying his precocious genius to the Parliament of his country) was exerted to procure the election of Mr. Jenkinson. He was not, however, as im patient to hear his own voice as the great Whig statesman had shown himself ; on the contrary, he did not rise in the House till he had been for above a year a member of it, though it is no slight proof how great was the ex pectation which was already formed of him that, on the occasion of Mr. Whitbread moving a censure on the Government on the question known as that of the Russian armament,! Pitt selected him to open the debate on his side. Nor was the minister deceived in his judgment of him. In what, for a maiden speech, might have been called a most ambitious if it had not been a most successful display, the young orator justified the measures which had been taken by an extensive survey of the condition of all the principal nations of Europe. He was mistaken, indeed, when, adopting the views of Burke, who had predicted that the language of future historians would be Gallos quoque in ' bellis foruisse audivimus, he pronounced "the strength and influence of France at an end, so that we had no further danger to apprehend from that once formidable rival." But he was only proclaiming, for the first time, the conviction which since that day has often prompted our ' Russia had lately gone to war with Turkey, and had taken the strong and important towns of Ismail and Oczakov ; and Pitt, unahle by negotiation to procure favourable terms for Turkey, suddenly aug mented the navy, and brought down a message from the King to the House of Commons that this additional armament was caused by the possibility of open resistance to the encroachments of Russia becoming necessary. I79i] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 17 .foreign policy, when he added that "a Power had succeeded to F"rance no less deserving of attention from its restless politics and ambitious views, namely, Russia ; of which the conduct proved her deep-laid designs on the territories and independence of her potent neighbours. Her plans of conquest against the Turks are notorious. Were she to accomplish them, the balance of Europe would be totally destroyed, to the manifest injury of every state in this quarter of the globe." He justified Turkey for having begun the present contest by a reference to " the manner in which Russia had made herself mistress of the Crimea, to her intrigues in Egypt, and to the haughty and unjust claims which she had put forth to some of the fairest provinces of the Sultan's dominions ;" and reminded his hearers that Britain had once already mediated successfully between those who were now at war. When he proceeded to point out that " the sovereign whose position would best enable him to stem the torrent of Russian aggression was the King of Prussia, and that therefore it was the highest wisdom in our Government to draw closer the bonds of alliance with that potentate," he was taking a line of argu ment which must have been especially acceptable to Pitt, as being an indirect approval of his own father's policy at the time of the Seven Years' War. And though, as he drew towards the conclusion of his speech, he ventured on one more assertion which was falsified by the subsequent triumphs of the French armies, " that the present era was not calculated for invasion or conquests ;" he carried the whole House with him when he affirmed that "Great Britain was constitutionally the foe of all wars of ambition and wanton aggression, and that a stable peace was equally her interest and inclination." Our Parliamentary annals have recorded no maiden speech which made so great an impression. Pitt himself began his own harangue by pronouncing it " not only a more able first speech than had ever been heard from a young member, but one so full of philosophy and science, VOL. I. C i8 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1792 Strong and perspicuous language, and sound and convincing arguments, that it would have done credit to the most practised debater and most experienced statesman that ever existed." And for the next two or three days his father was almost overwhelmed with letters of congratu lation from the most eminent personages in the kingdom: from Dundas and Burke, who had themselves heard the speech; from the Primate, Lord Dover, Lord Bathurst, and other peers, who could only judge from the report of others, but who bore their unanimous testimony to the fact that they had never heard a maiden speech so univer sally extolled as one of the very highest promise. In the summer of 1792 he resumed his travels, this time taking his course through the Netherlands towards the Rhine, and transmitting to his father a great deal of infor mation, which was both curious and valuable, respecting the conduct and objects. of the French emigrants, and the light in which they beheld the course of events in Paris. It is impossible to exaggerate the folly or the mischief of their behaviour. He reached Brussels in the middle of July, just at the moment when the unhappy and bewil dered Louis was venturing on the only act of his career which, if known, would have justified his enemies in the imputations of bad faith with which they were unceasingly assailing him : putting himself in communication with the sovereigns whose armies were known to be preparing for an immediate invasion of his kingdom. It was of the most vital consequence to his interests that such a step, and also the existence in his breast of the feelings which had prompted it, should be kept most carefully secret Yet at that very moment the Baron de Breteuil,! who was universally known to enjoy the king's perfect confidence, had the inexcusable imprudence to declare "that he had authority to say that the sentiments of the king and queen had never varied, and that the king only waited for the entrance of the [Prussian] army into France and ^ He had only just ceased to be Ministre de la Maison du Roi. 1792] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 19 a proper opportunity to declare himself in its favour." The Duke of Brunswick, the Prussian commander-in-chief, though he did not show himself skilful in the field, seems, from Mr. Jenkinson's account, to have displayed more address in his saloon. " He treated the emigrants on every occasion with marked civility and attention, but at the same time uniformly resisted whatever they proposed." From Brussels Mr. Jenkinson proceeded to Coblentz, which was at that moment the head-quarters of the main body of the emigrants. The French princes themselves 'were there, and with them M. de Calonne, the minister whose rashness had very mainly contributed to bring affairs in Paris into their existing condition, but who never theless was still the chief adviser of the king's brothers, the Comte de Provence and the Comte d'Artois. It was also the point of rendezvous for the Austrian and Prussian armies, so that Mr. Jenkinson had an opportunity of gain ing much information as to the condition of the German armies, with the character and views of the German leaders ; and one or two of his letters to his father, who was his principal correspondent during his travels, are worth preserving, from the light which they throw on these points, and also because it is interesting to see the manner in which the different occurrences as they took place struck so acute and impartial an observer. It is singular to find him approving of the tone of the Duke of Brunswick's manifesto, which is believed to have been issued by him against his own judgment, in com pliance with the authoritative demands of the king and emperor, and which dealt out threats such as neither the law of nations nor the customs of war had ever been supposed to ju.stify. But, on other points, while his infor mation was accurate, his judgment was sound ; and his estimate of the relative strength of the Austrian and Prussian monarchies, in spite of the superior discipline which the great Frederick had introduced into the Prussian army, and which, a."? will be seen, he appreciated at its full C 2 20 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1792 value, was abundantly verified by the long stand which Austria made against the might and genius of Napoleon, while Prussia was struck down in a single campaign. Nor is the light unimportant which he throws on the progress of affairs in Paris itself For nothing can show more clearly the extent to which the wrong-headed perverseness of the emigrants enhanced the difficulties of the unhappy king, and tended to destroy the last chance of his escaping from the evils which surrounded him. _ _ Coblentz, July 22d, 1792. Dear Father, I arrived at this place the day before yesterday, and found no difficulty in procuring a lodging. There are at present very few French here, as they were most of them obliged to leave the to-wn on the arrival of the Prussians. The Comt€ d'Artois and M. de Calonne will return here to-day ; the King of Prussia and the Duke of Brunswick are likewise expected from Mayence, where they had an interview with the emperor. The last regiment will arrive to-morrow. I have not yet seen the camp, which is situated at about a league from this town, but I propose riding there this evening. It is expected that there will be a grand review of the army on the 27th, and that on the 28th or 29th they will proceed to the frontier of France,^ Frora my last letter you will easily judge that there is no direct communication between the King and Queen of France and the emigrant princes. Their confidence is completely placed in the Baron de Breteuil. The king was very much displeased that the projects which he had formed were abandoned by the emigrants. His wish was to separate the princes, that the Comte d'Artois should go to Madrid, Monsieur to Turin, and the Prince de Condd should remain in this country.^ This system, as we know, is directly the reverse of what has been ^ The invasion took place on the 30th. (Alison, x. § 15.) ^ Louis's reason for this suggestion was to be found in the quarrels which divided his brothers, who had established rival courts, with a mistress at the head of each, who agitated the whole society of the emigrants with their wranglings ; while Calonne was jealous of De Breteuil, and did his best to disparage him to the German princes, 1792] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 21 pursued. There is a complaint that the money which had been procured from the different courts of Europe has been extremely misapplied. Russia, Prussia, and Spain contributed very con siderable sums. The intention certainly was that the whole of the money should be made use of for the support of the emigrants. Instead of this, however, a great part of it has been employed, by the advice of M. de Calonne, in an attempt to excite com motions in some of the frontier towns of France It is not easy to conceive the sovereign contempt with which the Prussians of every description, soldiers as well as officers, treat the French. If they are satisfied that you are not a French man, they behave to you with the greatest civility ; to convince them of this, however, requires considerable pains. The French army consists of about 16,000 men. In this number there are about 500 soldiers; all the rest are officers. There are several persons who have been taken up as emissaries from the National Assembly ; one of them, whose name I forget, offered his services to the Princes for the purpose of raising a body of men. The offer was accepted, but it was afterwards discovered that he had been employed by the clubs of Paris to raise these very men to fight against the emigrants. About fifty Frenchmen were sent away from Mayence a few days ago on suspicion of being democrats, I remain, dear Father, Your affectionate Son, R. B. J. Coblentz, July 25th, 1792. Dear Father, I send you enclosed a copy of the manifesto^ which the Duke of Brunswick has thought fit to publish previous to the commence- though he knew him to be Louis's authorised agent. (See " Louis XVI." " Marie Antoinette," &c., the collection of letters lately published by M. Feuillet de Conches, Nos. 299, 594.) Louis's real wish, with which, indeed, his interest coincided, was that his brothers should return to France, and he had lately written to entreat them to do so ; but they refused, replying that he was writing under coercion, and not expressing his real sentiments. (Ib. 593, 598, 603, &c.) ' It was dated on the 25th, the day on which this letter was written. 22 LIFE AND ADMINISTRA TION [1792 ment of the campaign, and wliich he pubhcly circulated in the course of a day or two. Though I own it has been my opinion that it would have been better to take no step of this kind, as any manifesto must be in some degree a compromise, and as any compromise under the present circumstances, when the force is on their side, appears to me to be premature ; yet, if it was determined to adopt a measure of this sort, a more unobjectionable paper could not have been imagined. It is moderate, and yet at the same time calculated to inspire terror.^ Indeed it is said that many of the emigrants consider it too moderate. The King of Prussia arrived on Sunday night, and this moming reviewed the right wing of his camp. I was present at the review, and I was surprised, as indeed every foreigner must be, at the operations of the army. I had heard much of the dis cipline of the Prussian troops, and of their coolness and com posure even a few days before they know they are to be in action. This therefore I could conceive : but the celerity and precision with which all their movements are performed are inconceivable to those who have not seen them. Every opera tion they go through is mechanical. All other armies, for instance, when music is played to them, are ordered to march in time to that music. On the contrary, the Prussian soldiers are obliged to march seventy-five steps in a minute, whatever may be the time of the music. By this means their march becomes a matter of exact calculation Dear Father, Your affectionate Son, R. B. Jenkinson. 1 Among other things it declared that the inhabitants of towns, boroughs, and villages who should dare to defend themselves against his troops, should be punished on the spot, and their houses burnt and demolished ; and that, if the least violence or outrage should be com mitted on the King, Queen, or Royal family, and if provision were not immediately made for their safety, preservation, and liberty, the Duke would inflict a signal, rare, and memorable vengeance by delivering up the city of Paris to military execution and total destruction. It is strange that any degree of sympathy for the unhappy sovereigns, who were now little better than prisoners in Paris, could have led an English gentleman to regard these threats as moderate. 1792] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 23 Coblentz, July 26th, 1792. Dear Father, have at length had an opportunity of fully gratifying my curiosity with the sight of the Prussian army. I should be at a loss to decide whether this great body was most deserving of attention from the choice of the individuals who compose it, from the discipline and subordination that reign in every part of it, or from the celerity and precision with which every military opera tion is performed. It is a subject of astonishment even to those most versed in military affairs that, after a march of nearly seven weeks, the different regiments that have arrived here, instead of being exhausted and fatigued, appear in the fullest vigour and spirits, and in every respect prepared for the labours of the campaign. I have had an opportunity of conversing with several military men on the comparative state of this army with that of the Austrians, and I find it universally agreed that (except for the light troops) the Prussian army is indubitably the superior. One reflection, however, necessarily occurs on this subject. The population of the King of Prussia's dominions is so small (scarcely exceeding five millions) that if, from any relaxation of discipline or any unforeseen accident, his army should decline, it would require such exertions to re-establish it as under a prince of moderate capacity could scarcely be expected ; and Prussia, from being the first military Power in Europe, would in that case be reduced at best to the state of a secondary Power. The population of the dominions of the House of Austria is, on the contrary, so extensive, and the people in much the greater part of these dominions are so calculated by nature to form excellent soldiers, that, though the Austrian army may be inferior at one period to what it has proved itself at others, there is little danger of any considerable alteration for the worse in that army ; and, if any such altera tion should take place, so great are the resources of the country that it might easily be re-estabhshed. The artillery of the Prussian army is moderate. It is, I believe, however, better than the Austrian. The French artillery was, before the Revolution in that country, without comparison the best in Europe. Since that period the greater part of the engineers 24 LIFE AND ADMINISTRA TION [1792 have quitted France, and most of them are now in this neigh bourhood. At present, therefore, the preference is given to the Prussian artillery. I dined yesterday vrith the Duke of Brunswick. I found him particularly civil, and not uncommunicative ; but, from the con versation I had Avith him, I could easily judge how impossible it would be to push him on any subject on which he was desirous of remaining silent. You will have seen by the copy of the manifesto which I have sent you that he disclaims, in the names of the Eraperor and King of Prassia, all idea of disraembering France. His conversation with rae was to the same purport, and he added that it was the determination of those sovereigns to receive nothing in compensation for the expense they would be obliged to incur. This conduct must be admitted by all pardes to reflect the greatest honour on these two courts. In the course of the conversation I ridiculed the idea of the Jacobins debauching the French army with assignats of fifty sous. In reply to this he gave a most enter taining account of a Prussian army. As to assignats, he said, he coramanded men who were too stupid to comprehend how it was possible that paper should have a value annexed to it ; and as to women, he would defy all the beauty in the world to make any impression on Prussian soldiers. He concluded with observing, Ik sont grandes betes, mais pourtant ils savent bim leur affaire. I endeavoured to sound hira on the affairs of Poland, but I could get no opinion from him on that subject His silence, however, may be considered as a confirmation of what has been generally believed in this place, that that unfor tunate country is devoted to destmction.^ The King of Prassia is here with his two sons. The Prince Royal is well-informed, modest, and uncommonly well-disposed. His appearance, how- 1 Stanislaus Augustus, the King of Poland, had just granted a new Constitution to his subjects, preserving the elective disposition of the crown, but combining with that principle a regulation which confined the election to the Royal family. The arrangement, according to Lacretelle, excited anew the jealousy of Catherine of Russia, and by a treaty concluded between her, the Emperor, and the King of Prussia at Pilnitz, a fresh partition of Poland was arranged, which was finally accomplished when in the autumn of 1794 Suvarof captured 'Warsaw, and made prisoners of Kosciusko and of Stanislaus himself. 1792] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 25 ever, is rather against him. Prince Louis, the second son, has the advantage of an agreeable person in addition to all the good qualities of his brother I can perceive that the Prussians are excessively dissatisfied with the conduct of Great Britain respecting Russia. I have done all in my power to convince them that, under the peculiar circumstances of the case, it was impossible for our Government to have acted in any other manner ; but to persons who live under an arbitrary government, who are unacquainted with the variety of interests that must be consulted in a government constituted like ours, all the reasoning that can be used is unintelligible. The agreement between the Emperor and the King of Prussia, that no volunteers should be accepted, has been most rigidly adhered to.'- Prince Henry was very desirous of serving the campaign, but was refused. He is so incensed at the conduct of the King of Prussia, that he is determined to have no further concern with military affairs. The hereditary Prince of Orange has likewise been refused, and several of the generals of the army have not been permitted to take their sons as aides-de-camp. My dear Father, Your affectionate Son, R. B. Jenkinson. .„ Coblentz, August 8th, 1792. Dear Father, I quitted this place the day after writing my last letter, and set out for Mayence. From Mayence I went to Manheim. I found the Austrians had passed the Rhine. I determined, however, to follow them, and, understanding that they had marched towards Spires, I immediately set out for that place. I found them encamped not far from Spires, and discovered, from one . of their officers, that they were to quit their camp at 1 2 o'clock that night, and march to the frontier. I left Spires between 10 and II o'clock, and went to a village at the distance of about a league from it; and I had there the satisfaction of 1 In a former letter he had told his father, " The French, whose empressement you are well acquainted with, made several propositions to him (the Duke of Brunswick) ; and among others, that they might be allowed to serve in the Avant-Garde of the army. To this request a very polite refusal was all they met with." 26 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1792 seeing five-and-twenty thousand Austrians within twelve miles of the frontier, marching under the command of Prince Hohenlohe. I never saw a more striking scene. They ap peared elated with joy at the thoughts of attacking the French the next morning The Austrian army is apparently very inferior to the Prussian. One of the striking features of the Prussian army is, that amongst several thousand men you will scarcely see one who is inferior to the rest, with such extraordinary care are they chosen. I cannot say as much of the Austrian array ; sorae of the troops are beautiful, but there is a great difference distinguishable in every part of the army. The Austrians hate the French at least as much as the Prussians. I happened to say to one of their officers, " You ex pect sorae of the French to join you in a few days?" His answer was, "Nous n'en avons pas besoin, nous ferons bien notre affaire sans eux." It is singular that the Powers of Germany should be so particularly active in support of the aristocrats, when, so far as I can judge, this is the country which had the least to dread from the propagation of the new doctrines. I have found in every place where I have been the most marked contempt for French of all descriptions, both aristocrats and democrats. There exists the greatest animosity between the Austrian and Prussian army. It is scarcely possible to conceive how they hate each other. I have taken particular pains to ascertain this fact, and you may depend upon the truth of it. I under stand that the King of Prussia's expedition is very unpopular in his own country ; the wish of his subjects was to assist the Poles against the Emperor of Russia. It has been reported here, but I will not answer for the tmth of it, that the Poles are so offended with the conduct of the King of Prussia, who, they say, has deceived them, that they are determined to throw themselves, without any further resistance, into the arms of Russia. Dear Father, Your affectionate Son, R. B. J. Mr. Jenkinson had, as we have seen, accepted with implicit and indeed unavoidable belief the Duke of 1792] OF LORD LIVERPOOL, 27 Brunswick's assurances of the disinterested spirit which prompted the German sovereigns to exert themselves for the relief of their distressed brother the King of France. But he had scarcely left Coblentz on his way back to England when he found that he had been deceived ; and he was forced to give his father a very different account of their intentions : Bruxelles, August 23d, 1792. Dear Father, .... You will remember that, in a letter which I wrote to you from Coblentz, I irfformed you that, from the tenor of the Duke of Brunswick's conversation to me, I was led to sup pose that the Court of Berlin, in their interference in the affairs of France, had not only renounced every idea of con quest and aggrandizement, but that it was their determination not to accept of even a pecuniary compensation. This was the tenor of the Duke of Brunswick's conversation to me and to several of the persons at Coblentz. Since my arrival at this place, however, I have come to the truth of the trans action. A correspondence has passed on this subject between the Comte de Schulemberg and the Baron de Breteuil. The Comte de Schulemberg, in a letter to the Baron de Breteuil, informed him that his master the King of Prussia would expect to be reimbursed. The Baron de Breteuil, in his answer, requested a particular explanation of the term " re imbursed." To this it was replied that all the King of Prussia desired was that the extraordinary expenses of the campaign might be defrayed : but that his master expected some declaration from the King of France on that subject. The Baron de Breteuil then declared that, possessing full powers from the King, he could promise a complete reimbursement of all the expenses of the campaign, and that, if this were not sufficient, he would engage to procure a declaration to this purport in the King's handwriting. This answer of the baron's was considered as satisfactory. It will most probably appear extraordinary to you that the Austrians should never have commenced their operations till the entrance of the Prussians into France was fully ascer tained. The mystery of the whole business is now, however. 28 LIFE AND ADMINISTRA TION [1792 unravelled. The Austrians were determined from the begin ning to engage the Prussians as principals in the war. The intrigues that were employed to accomplish this object would be too numerous to state at present. One of their projects is, if possible, to drain Prussia of her treasure. A campaign of this kind is certainly not to be considered as a campaign in Silesia, where the greatest part of the money expended would return again into the coffers of the Government If Prussia is fully reimbursed, according to the promise that has been made, the projects of Austria will be defeated; but it is impossible to place any certain reliance on a promise made under the present circumstances, which perhaps it may not even be in the power of the parties to fulfil. The account that I gave you in a former letter of the animosity subsisting between the Austrians and Prussians I have found confirmed in every place I have passed through. An account was re ceived last night of the capture of Longwy by the Prussians. It is said that, on the entrance of the emigrant army into France, Monsieur is to be declared Regent of the country.' A report has been circulated to-day of a quarrel having arisen between Monsieur and the Comte d'Artois Dear Father, Your affectionate Son, R. B. Jenkinson. You will, of course, be cautious of disclosing the contents of my letters from this place. Four days later he writes in high praise of the judicious and conciliatory conduct of the Duke, giving also a plan of the operations of the invaders, which, as in the beginning it was very accurately carried out, shows how correct was his information : Bruxelles, August 27th. My dear Father, . . . The plan of the operations of the different arraies is supposed to be arranged in the following manner. M. de 1 He actually did assume this title of Regent, and in that character issued commands to the emigrants, accompanied with threats if they should disobey them, which amounted to a complete ignoring of his brother's rights as actual king. 1792] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 29 Clairfait, after having taken Longwy, was to proceed to attack Monmedi ; the Prince Hohenlohe was to attack Thion ville, and the Duke of Brunswick was to march on the 27th towards Verdun, and, after having taken that place, was to proceed with all possible expedition to Paris. The conduct of the king and the Duke of Brunswick since their entrance into France has been particularly well judged. They have released all the National Guards, on pretence that, not being taken under arms, they did not come within the meaning of the manifesto. They have done all in their power to concihate them, and, to all appearance, with complete effect. The king, however, has at the same time declared that, if he should find any of them either dressed in the national uni form or with the national cockade,^ he shall immediately make an example of them. The Prussian army on its first entrance into the country was disposed to plunder, and to behave with the greatest severity towards the inhabitants. Several villages had suffered considerably from the enormities which had been exercised. The King of Prussia went him self into the villages, gave the people money as a compen sation for their sufferings, and ordered two of his soldiers who were principally concerned in these atrocities to be executed. If he continues to pursue this line of conduct, behaving with gentleness to those who are willing to submit, and with severity to those who are disposed to resist, the success of his operations will be extremely facilitated. You probably know that the Baron de Breteuil received an invita tion from the Duke of Brunswick some time ago to come to him. I was in company with the baron last night, and it was his intention to set out this day Dear Father, Your affectionate Son, R. B. Jenkinson. It is evident that the habit which the writer had thus acquired in his foreign travels, of procuring correct infor mation by his own personal inquiries, and of balancing ' Perhaps this was the ground on which he detained Lafayette as a prisoner. 3° LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1792 different reports, sifting them, and carefully reflecting and commenting on those which he adopted as correct, was good training for a politician, and especially for one who would form a correct notion of the views and modes of acting of foreign statesmen. And it was, therefore, cal culated to be of special use to Mr. Jenkinson in the first important office which he was called upon to fill. The course which he took in the next session of Par liament showed that the general result of his travels had been to imbue him with a strong tincture of the feelings with which, as he had reported, the Austrians and Prus sians regarded the French. Parliament met on the 13th of December, 1792 ; and when Fox moved an amendment to the address, recommending the employment of "every species of honourable negotiation" in order to save the nation from embarking in a war with France, Mr. Jen kinson took a prominent part in opposing it, advocating immediate war in the plainest terms, on the ground that a comparison of our financial position with that of France proved us to be in a position to attack her at greater advantage than at any recent period: and deprecating with indignation the proposal to send an ambassador to the French Republic at the very moment when " the band of sanguinary ruffians " who were in the exercise of the chief authority in that country were bringing their king to trial, and sentencing him to death, and perhaps already murdering him.^ He reiterated these opinions in the great debate which took place in February, when, after the death of the unhappy Louis, Fox renewed his efforts to avert war, on the grounds that " the complaints which had been stated against the French Government were not of a nature to justify war in the first instance, without our first attempting to obtain redress by negotiation; ' This speech was delivered December 15th. Louis had been brought before the Convention on the i ith ; but after a day or two of discussion the hearing of his counsel was postponed to the 26th. He was put to death January 21st, 1793. 1793] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 31 that in the negotiations which had taken place the minis ters had not taken the proper measures to obtain redress without a rupture ; and that it was not for the honour nor for the interest of Great Britain to make war upon France on account of the internal circumstances of that country." And in May, on a motion made by Mr. Grey in favour of Parliamentary Reform, he made the raost elaborate speech which he had as yet delivered, defending the existing composition of the House of Commons on general principles, as maintaining that variety among the representatives of the people that was indispensable to secure a proper advocacy of all the varied interests of the nation. He affirmed that it worked well, fully an swering the end for which it had been originally designed ; and while he admitted that the House of Commons, which he described as " the democratic part of the con stitution," ought to be in a certain degree affected by public opinion, yet he reminded his hearers that " its first quality was that of a deliberative assembly, and that, if public opinion was necessarily to affect its decisions on every occasion, it would cease to be a deliberative assembly, and the members would soon be degraded into the position of mere delegates." Mr. Grey had asserted that the national debt had originated from the corruption of the House. Mr. Jenkinson replied (and even in the vehemence of the debates which took place on the subject after his death, the correctness of his assertion was admitted by many of the chief Reformers) that this was so far from being the case that the wars which had caused the origin and increase of the debt, the Spanish War, the Seven Years' War, the American War, had all been agreeable to public opinion; that the Spanish War in particular had been "entered upon in compliance with the express requisition of the people, and contrary to the avowed opinion of the Government of the day." He insisted that the present administration had not the confidence of the House of Commons more 32 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1793 completely than it had also the confidence of the people at large ; and that, in short, constituted as the House already was, public opinion had its due weight in the deliberations of Parliament on every important question. Of these two questions, the war with France and the advisableness or danger of Parliamentary Reform, the first continued for more than twenty years to be the chief care and labour of every cabinet ; the second, though not entirely allowed to slumber during the war, only began to assume formidable proportions during the last years of his own administration. On the first he so far modified his opinions as, when the establishment of a settled govern ment in France had in a great degree removed the danger to be apprehended from the spread of revolutionary prin ciples, to make himself a party to the conclusion of peace, to which indeed, as we shall presently see, he had been willing to consent some years earlier. On the second he never materially altered his sentiments, but adhered to the last to the opinion which he had now expressed, though, as will be seen hereafter, he was not unwilling in cases of cor ruption to substitute some other borough for that whose guilt in that respect had been proved. On both points his feel ings were in entire conformity with those of the Govern ment ; and he had already so completely gained the ear of the House, and established his reputation as a speaker and debater of the first class, that Pitt became anxious to enlist him in the administration, and offered him a seat at the India Board, which he accepted, and thus began that official career which, except during the few months of Whig Government which ensued on the death of the Great Minister, he never relinquished. ^ See the debates on the disfranchisement of Grampound in 1824, infra, chap. 28. 1794] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 33 CHAPTER IL He recommends a march upon Paris— His father is made Earl of Liverpool — He (now Lord Hawkesbury) is serving with his regiment of militia in Scotland — His view of the progress of the war in Germany and of our own position — Approves o£ the negotiations for peace — Pitt's faihng health in 1798 — Seditious associations in England — Irish Rebellion and Union — Lord Hawkesbury's dis satisfaction with our campaign in Holland — The Catholic ques tion — Scruples of George III.— Pitt's resignation— Character of Mr. Addington — Lord Plawkesbury becomes Foreign .Secretary- Derangement of the King — Negotiations for peace — Lord Corn wallis is sent to Amiens — His interview with the First Consul — Conclusion of the Treaty of Amiens — Lord Hawkesbury's speech on it. During the next few years Mr. Jenkinson took no very prominent part in Parliament. He had become Colonel of the Kentish Militia, and, as the employment of a large portion of our regular army on the Continent threw a good deal of garrison duty on that force, he was but little in London. He came up for some of the debates in which the Opposition from time to time renewed their remon strances against the further prosecution of the war, and in these he took a prominent part, adhering to the views which he had before expressed ; in one instance provoking the ridicule of Sheridan and his followers by the expression of an opinion that the soundest military policy would be to strike at the heart of the enemy, and march upon Paris itself Even now it may be questioned whether such an enterprise would have been beyond the means of the allies ; the ablest soldiers look upon it as certain that two years earlier it would not have been so, and that the Duke VOL. I. D 34 LIFE AND ADMINISTRA TION [1796 of Brunswick would have found no force able to resist him if he had pressed on without hesitation after his first successes on the frontier, and the capture of Longwy and Verdun. But whether practicable or not in 1794, when Mr. Jenkinson advanced the suggestion, it was too bold a step for the contemplation of the somewhat pedantic commanders of the allied army ; and, as the balance of success soon began to incline to the side of the French, it never was possible after 179S till it was adopted in the last campaign of the war. It is a mistake in young speakers to put themselves forward too frequently ; and it may have been partly the very rarity of his speeches which was gradually but steadily raising his reputation in the House, and teaching him to feel himself of some importance to his colleagues. Lord Hawkesbury had- been very averse to Pitt's measure of admitting American ships into the ports of our West Indian Islands, and Mr. Jenkinson urged him strongly to let his opinion be generally known, since he was deeply "pledged to the public on that subject; if his father should in consequence resolve on quitting the Government, he had," he said, " made up his mind to resign also," but, he added, " he did not think that Pitt would dare to part with them." And, even should he do so, he himself should think any loss of office " a slighter evil than a sacrifice of opinion on such a subject." There proved, however, to be no necessity for so strong a step as a resignation of their offices. Pitt, who was unrivalled in his management of refractory or discontented colleagues whenever he thought them worth propitiating, succeeded in entirely appeasing any dissatisfaction the father may have felt, and in 1796 the agreement of both father and son with his policy on all important subjects was shown by the promotion of the first to the Earldom of Liverpool, and of the second, now become Lord Hawkesbury, to the more lucrative office of Master of the Mint, which, many years before, his father had filled under Lord North. 1 796] OF L ORD LI VERPO OL. 35 In the autumn of 1796 the Kentish Militia were quartered at Dumfries, and one of Lord Hawkesbury's letters from that town presents a not very attractive picture of the Scotch fashions of that day, though nothing could exceed the intended friendliness of their reception of the regiment. Their invitations to dinner were as numerous as the days of the week, but, he adds, " the style of living here is rather gross, though very hospitable. The servants are few, and very dirty ; but there is a great quantity of meat put upon the table, and after dinner the bottle passes rather quicker than I like." From the same letter (its date is August 28) we learn that Pitt was already thinking of peace ; in Lord Liverpool's opinion he was beginning to be dispi rited at the results of the war. The news of the defeat of the Austrians at Lonato had just reached England ; Moreau had crossed the Rhine, and was pressing forward towards Vienna, and it was not yet known how successful a stand the Archduke Charles was making on the Maine. Still Lord Hawkesbury himself " saw no cause, even under those circumstances, for dejection. We are still," he continues, " fortunate enough to possess the empire of the sea, and the commerce of the world ; and, if that can be preserved, I do not even now despair of the issue of the contest." Any appearance of discouragement, " he was convinced, would procrastinate peace rather than hasten it." From this manly spirit he never swerved, but in later years, even when the French successes seemed most unalloyed and their progress most irresistible, when Alexander had become the humble servant of Napoleon, and his brother emperor, Francis of Austria, had even given a daughter to his arms, he was as resolute an advocate for continuing the struggle, and as hopeful of ultimate victory, as when, while the Revolution was still in its agony, he had recommended a march upon Paris. Nevertheless he was now, with Pitt, willing to make peace, if it could be procured on terms as honourable and advan tageous as Great Britain had a right to expect. But, if the D 2 36 LIBE AND ADMINISTRATION [1798 country were, as some indications seemed to show, " deter mined for peace on any terms," he was clear that "Mr. Pitt should risk his Government on the question, and not allow himself to be the instrument of carrying on measures which he disapproved." He drew, with sound discrimina tion, the line at which a minister may without self-abase ment consent to guide his conduct by the judgment or momentary bias of the nation. On questions of inferior magnitude it may " be very well for a minister to give up his private opinion to the opinion of the public, but on questions of this nature a man should stand or fall by his own judgment. If this is not the case, how," he asks, " can we ever expect the Government to be carried on upon any one system of action ? We shall be liable at every moment to be tossed about in consequence of the caprices of a few foolish, weak-minded people." With these feelings he approved of the attempts made by Pitt both in 1796 and 1798 to terminate the war. And when Lord Malmesbury's diplomatic address was foiled by the insincerity and arrogance of the different French Governments, he cordially supported and spoke with great effect in defence of the minister's financial measures, espe cially of the suspension of cash payments, and the bill for the sale of the land-tax, which some of its opponents, with a singularly perverse ingenuity, did not forbear to charac terise, firstly as an " atrocious fraud," and secondly as a measure wholly unconstitutional, since its object was to perpetuate a standing army. " As if a standing army had not been kept on foot for above a century, or as if any danger to the liberties ofthe nation had ever arisen from it In every debate in which the Opposition ventured to go to a division they were beaten by large majorities; but already the long continuance and violence of the parlia mentary conflict was beginning to tell upon Pitt's constitu tion. Lord Hawkesbury's letters of the autumn of 1798 are full of expressions of alarm at his manifestly failing strength ; and, though he expresses a hope that perhaps a 1799] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 37 fit of the gout might relieve him, he, evidently speaking from the information of Pitt's medical adviser, intimates a fear that the disease may be more deeply seated. The attention of Parliament during this and the following year was occupied more by our domestic affairs than by the progress of the war. As far as we were concerned, it had ceased to have that kind of interest that arises from suspense and anxiety. We had withdrawn our army from the Continent, and by sea Lord Howe, Lord St. Vincent, Lord Duncan, and Lord Nelson, had so completely established our supremacy that it was acknowledged even by the French themselves, who took care to risk no general action after the destruction of their finest fleet at the mouth of the Nile. But at home our affairs were in a position that could not be regarded without the most painful uneasiness. In England seditious societies and seditious publications were more rife and more audacious than ever, and were producing a dangerous spirit of disaffection among the lower classes. A year or two before, the carriage of the king himself was pelted in the streets, and fired at as he went to open Parliament ; and this year a regularly organized rebellion broke out in Ireland, which the French endeavoured to support by an invasion of that country. The rebels were routed, the whole force of the invaders was captured, and the peril in which the whole kingdom had been placed pointed out to Pitt the indispensable necessity of uniting Ireland with Great Britain by a measure similar to that which at the beginning of the century had been passed with regard to Scotland. It is unnecessary in this place to describe how warmly it was opposed, or by what energetic and varied ability it was at last carried. It was an achievement of itself sufficient to immortalize the name of the minister who accomplished it ; yet it led, as will presently be seen, to his retirement from office, and opened a wider field than might otherwise have presented itself for some time to the abilities of the subject of this narrative. 38 LIFE AND ADMINISTRA TION [1799 Lord Hawkesbury at that moment was not altogether satisfied with his leader. The same year, 1799, had beheld the dispatch of a fresh British army to Holland, under the Duke of York, to co-operate with a Russian force ; the object of the combined army being to quell the revolu tionary party in that country, and to re-establish the Stadtholder in his ancient authority. The naval part of the expedition, for the British army was accompanied by an adequate fleet, succeeded completely; the Dutch sailors, who were for the most part partisans of the old Government, mutinied in our favour, and their Admiral, Story, had no alternative but to surrender his whole fleet, which Lord Duncan carried off to England, But the army was less fortunate. The British soldiers, indeed, displayed their usual indomitable valour, and on one occasion repulsed the French General Vandamme with heavy loss ; but the Russians, when they arrived, were less successful. In the first general battle which took place after their junction with our forces, their division was repulsed with heavy loss, and its defeat compelled our regiments also to retreat. Another action was attended with nearly the same result ; and at last the Duke of York, finding that his utmost efforts could only enable him to hold his ground against his present enemies, and that heavy reinforcements were on the point of joining them from France, while he himself had no further succour to expect, concluded a con vention with the French general, by which he agreed to evacuate the country. Lord Hawkesbury, as will be seen from the following extracts from his letters, was disposed to be extremely indignant, and to blame not the general who had failed, but the minister who had planned or sanctioned the expedition ; and that not because it had failed, but because, according to the information which he could collect, it was impossible that it should have succeeded. Thus he writes : 1799] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 39 October 17th, 1799. Dear Father, .... I have for some time looked to the expedition as not likely to be ultimately successful, though I did not think its termination would take place so soon. The day before I left London, I met Colonel Twiss. . . . He told me he looked upon the expedition as impracticable, if the French were able to collect a tolerable army in the country : that, in the last century, the Spaniards, with the best troops in Europe, had con tended for nearly forty years for this very country, and were uniformly baffled in their attempts to get possession of it ; that they were successful in the countries which now compose Belgium and French Flanders, but that they were unable to make any impression on Holland. He regretted that the best appointed British army^ that ever was collected should be employed on a service so little likely to be profitable to the country. I have heard that the Dutch who are here are of the same opinion with respect to the part of the country where the attack was made ; and that even Abercromby did not very much like the expedition. I agree with you that our Govern ment is completely disgraced ; for what can be more disgraceful to a minister than to fail in an expedition, when your troops have been uniformly victorious, in consequence of the impracti cability of the country which you have chosen for your scene of action. The consequence of it all has been, that we have ruined the Orange cause, perhaps for ever ; that we have given confidence to the French, and that we have already sacrificed about 15,000" British and Prussian troops. If, however, success would have led us to embark on a continental war, as principals, to the extent you mention, I am inclined to think it is very fortunate we never reached Amsterdam. The next week he writes in something of the same spirit, or indeed blaming the arrangements of the ministers rather more, in proportion as the latest information received led him to be less severe on the general. " If the account ' It did not, however, exceed 18,000 or 19,000 men, 2 This proved to be a great exaggeration. 40 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1799 in the papers of last night is true, the Duke of York's convention is rather less disgraceful than was at first imagined. I agree with you, however, that the whole business is in the greatest degree discreditable. I am curious to know on whom the public principally throw the blame. The Duke of York is certainly not a fortunate nor a popular commander. Will he ever be trusted again with the command of a large army ? " This last question events prevented the necessity of ever answering. Before England again sent forth an army of any magnitude to the Continent an employment had been found for the Duke, for which it was soon seen that nature had most admirably qualified him. And though his repeated failures in Holland render it probable that he would never have become a skilful general in the field, as Commander-in-Chief of the whole army at the Horse Guards he displayed a great capacity for organization, united with an industry and energy which earned for him an honorable fame and unsurpassed popularity in that office. But at the moment we learn from another letter that the Cabinet itself was divided in opinion on the subject: November 12th. Dear Father, .... I am not surprised that there should exist some difference of opinion among your brethren on the late events ; yet their mutual interest will probably keep them together. The friends of the .Duke of York will, I have no doubt, make a common cause of the whole business ; and Pitt (whatever his private feelings may be) will certainly support them. I have seen several officers who have come from Holland within these few days, and I can perceive that there is a difference of opinion in the army respecting the Duke's conduct. Some blame him, others very strongly defend him. Most of the Guards are warm in his praise. The officers I have seen speak highly of Aber- crombyi and Dundas,^ and likewise of Moore ;^ but, though ^ Sir R. Abercromby, who fell at Alexandria. ^ Sir David Dundas, who in 1809 became Commander-in-Chief. ' Afterwards Sir John Moore, who fell at Corunna. 1799] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 41 the other general officers showed great courage, they give them very little credit for knowledge of their profession. They all agree in abusing the Dutch, who, they say, behaved as ill as possible, and showed the most decided partiality to the French. It is singular that for the first time, I believe, since the German war, a sort of intercourse was kept up between our officers and the French officers at the advanced posts of the two armies. Some of the F'rench officers sent a present to ours of two sheep, with orange ribbons in their ears. The point which remains unexplained is the Duke of York's convention.! It is agreed on all hands that the retreat of our army might have been secured by inundating the country. When Nelson was sent to Teneriffe, and the object was found unattainable, in consequence of the unexpected force of the Spaniards, he sent word to the governor that he would burn the town, and cut his way through their army to his ships, if he was not suffered to re-embark unmolested. This had the desired effect. If he had been at the Helder, I have no doubt that, instead of purchasing a disgraceful capitulation, he would have made the French and Dutch restore him a proportion of English and Russian prisoners as the price of his not destroy ing the country. But all commanders are not Nelsons : would they were ! It has been mentioned that Pitt's success in carrying the Irish union, all-important as the measure was to the best interests of both England and Ireland, proved the cause of his retirement from office, which was never more honor ably relinquished. He had not conceived it possible that that measure should singly prove a panacea for the mani fold evils which impeded the tranquillity and prosperity of Ireland. In his eyes it was but a preliminary to ' On the 6th of October the Duke gained a decided advantage over the French under Brune in the neighbourhood of Haarlem. But feel ing the necessity of reinforcements and supplies, and the small proba bihty that existed of obtaining them from any quarter before the end of the next week, he concluded a convention by which he agreed to evacuate Holland before the end of November, and to restore his prisoners. As he had still 20,000 men under his command, sUch a step certainly appears whoUy inexcusable. 42 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1799 other enactments, among which those stood foremost which should deprive the Roman Catholics, then, as now, by far the more numerous portion of the population, of what was at least a plausible ground of complaint, by removing the political disabilities under which they laboured, and by also extinguishing, or at least abating, their discontent at the Protestant Church Establishment through a State endow ment of the Roman Catholic clergy. It is quite certain that at that time, and for many years afterwards, both measures would have been received with unanimous gra titude by the professors of the Roman Catholic religion throughout the whole island. Unhappily, the first was postponed till it lost all its gracefulness through the circum stances under which it was carried, circumstances which gave it the appearance of being extorted from the fears of England rather than cheerfully conceded by a sense of justice ; while the resolution which, on the only occasion on which the second was ever deliberately submitted to the judgment of the House of Commons, that body by a large majority recorded in its favour, even its advocates never attempted to ratify by any formal enactment.^ But for this postponement Pitt was in no degree to be blamed. The justice and reasonableness of both measures was in his eyes undeniable. It was notorious that the disabilities of the Roman Catholics had been imposed on them not from religious, but from political reasons ; because those who held their doctrines were also desirous of replacing their^ co-religionists, the princes of the House of Stuart, on the throne; and now that that race was practically extinct," and the House of Brunswick had no rival claimants of its authority, it seemed reasonable that the disabilities should. not survive the circumstances which had caused their imposition. The equity, as well as the policy, of endowing the Roman Catholic priesthood in Ireland seemed to the ' See infra, chap. xxix. "^ The Cardinal York was the only descendant of James II. stilliving. 1799] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 43 minister to be equally maintainable by the soundest argu ment. The Reformation in Ireland, if what had taken place in that country could be called a reformation at all, had been wholly different from the movement which had almost extinguished Popery in England. The bulk of the nation had never ceased to adhere to the Romish forms, and the Reformation there had been simply a transfer of the property of the Church to the Protestants, unaccom panied by any corresponding change of belief in the people. The wealthier classes had in most instances gradually gone over to the dominant religion ; and the Scotch and English settlers, who at different times had obtained grants or made purchases in the different provinces, and especially in Ulster, were all Protestants of one denomination or another. So that the Roman Catholic priests, whom the transfer of the Church property had reduced to a depen dence on their flocks for support, drew their maintenance chiefly from the poorest class in the island, the tenant- farmers, agricultural labourers, and the tradesmen of the small towns. It is needless to dilate on the evils to which such a state of things must inevitably lead. They had been painfully experienced in the rebellion which had just been put down ; and in all his negotiations with the leaders of the Roman Catholic party, which resulted in the most influential members of that body supporting the Union, the minister had taken care that his inchnation to follow up thaf measure by others for the relief of the Roman Catholics should be clearly seen. If positive assurances of his intention were withheld, it was only because it was thought that the meditated concessions would be more efficacious in conciliating and tranquillising those who were to be affected by them if they appeared to flow from a spontaneous liberality of policy, than if they were granted only as the fulfilment of a stipulated condition.^ More 1 See a letter from Lord Castlereagh to Mr. Pitt (Castlereagh Cor respondence, iv. 8), and a paper drawn up by Lord Castlereagh on Mr. Pitt's retirement from office (Ib. p. 34). 44 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1799 than one of Mr. Pitt's speeches on the details connected with the Union gave, and was meant to give, an indication of his views and intentions ; and, when the Union had become the law of the land, he felt that, without being guilty of some breach of faith, he could not delay to press forward the other parts of his scheme which he had thus allowed the Roman Catholics to see that he contemplated. He was from the first aware that he should find diffi culties in carrying the measures that he desired ; that some of his colleagues were averse to them, and that the king himself entertained, or at least had entertained, scruples as to the propriety of his consenting to them. This last difficulty, however, he had a right to conceive to be not insuperable ; for he was aware that a year or two before George III. had consulted the Chief Justice, Lord Kenyon, and the Attorney-General, Sir John Scott, on the subject, putting his perplexities before them in the form of a legal question, whether he were not absolutely pre cluded by the terms of the Coronation Oath from consenting to any relaxation of the laws affecting the Roman Catholics. Both of these great lawyers were, as politicians, strongly averse to any relaxation, but they combined a sound knowledge of their profession with uncompromising hon esty, and unhesitatingly replied to the sovereign that his oath did not forbid, and never could have been intended to forbid, his giving his royal sanction to any law approved and passed by Parliament. Indeed, a knowledge of law was hardly required to establish that proposition ; for, unless that principle were admitted, it would follow that the Parliament which framed the Coronation Oath must have had power to bind the whole Legislature for ever on one point ; and, if on one, on all on which it desired to bind it Pitt, therefore, might naturally have thought, and probably did think, that the assurances of two men of such eminence in their profession, for both of whom George III. had a personal esteem and regard, must have diminished, if not have removed, the king's reluctance 1799] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 45 to adopt such measures as his Government might deem necessary for the welfare of the State, and for the pre servation of their own honour. But unfortunately another lawyer, Lord Loughborough, the Chancellor, had since that time found an opportunity of discussing the matter with his Majesty. He was a native of Scotland, in which country feelings of animosity towards the Roman Catho lics have always been particularly vehement ; and as he, therefore, entertained the same opinions on the subject of the disabilities as the king, he easily convinced him, who was willing to be convinced, of the soundness of his former scruples ; and, when he found that Pitt was occupied in framing a measure of concession, he deter mined to baffle him, hoping to secure from the royal gratitude his own continuance in office in the event, which he foresaw to be probable, of a general change in the administration. Both Pitt and he had learnt the best method of carrying a point with the king. To gain the royal consent the minister would have proceeded cautiously and gently, giving his Majesty abundant leisure to contemplate the question in all its bearings, and secur ing for himself time, by repeated discussions of details, gradually to soften and overcome his objections. To secure his dissent, the Chancellor knew the best way to be to take him by surprise, and hurry him into a de cision. Accordingly, before Pitt had mentioned the sub ject to the king at all. Lord Loughborough showed him a letter which he himself had just received from Pitt, written in confidence as to a member of the Cabinet ; and, skilfully adapting his law to the royal prejudices, easily persuaded the king to prefer his exposition of the law to that of Kenyon and Scott, and to believe that he could not, without perjury, sanction a single con cession of any kind to the Roman Catholics. The king became greatly agitated. Nearly four months had still to elapse before the meeting of Parliament when Lough borough first disclosed to him the policy which was under 46 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1799 consideration, so that he had time to brood over it from one point of view exclusively. He could talk of nothing else ; he discussed the matter with his wife and daughters, with his equerries, and even with casual strangers; he would read over his Coronation Oath, and declare with vehemence that no power could absolve him from the due observance of every sentence of it, and that, if he should violate it, he should from that moment cease to be a lawful king. His crown, he said, would pass to the House of Savoy. And, as the opening of Parliament drew nearer, his anxiety grew so uncontrollable that he could no longer wait for Pitt to broach the subject to him, but opened it himself at a levee, putting a direct question on the subject to Mr. Dundas, the President of the Board of Control, and declaring that he should reckon any one who proposed any relief of the Roman Catholics his personal enemy. Dundas contented himself with assuring his Majesty that he would find many people favorable to such a policy who, he was well aware, were not his enemies ; but so public a declaration of the king's views had rendered any further delay on Pitt's part impossible, and accordingly he at once wrote to the king, giving an outline of the concessions which he thought desirable, of their object, and their character. The details of the bill by which they were to be carried out he had not yet been able to mature. But he laid be fore his Majesty arguments to prove the intended measure to be as safe as it was necessary with a perspicuity and brevity absolutely unparalleled in State papers ; and, while abstaining from pressing his royal master for any im mediate decision, expressed his conviction that, if the repugnance which the king had already expressed were insurmountable, it would be better that he himself should retire from office. It was insurmountable. The king offered indeed to content himself with Pitt's waiving the question for the future during the remainder of his reign; but when he found that the minister looked on a retention 'fOl 1799] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 47 of office, if purchased by such a silence, as incompatible with his public duty, he acquiesced in his decision, and accepted his resignation. No minister had ever fallen so gloriously. It was not easy to replace him, though Pitt magnanimously did everything in his power to facilitate the new arrangements. The royal choice fell on the Speaker, Mr. Addington, whom the king had for some time admitted to a degree of inti macy and political confidence, and whom, indeed, before he received Pitt's letter, he had employed to dissuade the minister from formally making the proposal of which he had been warned. It was a singular selection, for Mr. Addington had no official experience. Though he had been extremely intimate with Pitt from his first entrance into Parliament, his friend had evidently not considered his talents such as would add strength to his ministry. And though, as Speaker at a time when party spirit gave rise to some scenes of unusual violence, he had raised his reputa tion by the tact and temper with which he had maintained the dignity of the House and the Chair, yet the qualifica tions for that office were very different from those required of him who was to preside over the councils of the country at a most critical period ; when it was not only engaged in a war of almost unprecedented magnitude, but when the very circumstances under which the new minister, whoever he might be, was to take office, increased the disarrange ment of affairs, and added one more element of discussion to those which already divided the different parties in the State. As there was to be no change in any part of the policy that had hitherto been pursued, Pitt exerted himself with his colleagues to persuade them to retain their offices, pressing on them earnestly that they were in no respect bound to follow him in his resignation, and even in some instances making it a matter of personal favour to himself that they should not do so. Those who had not been friendly to the intended concessions naturally saw no reason why they should retire, and among them was Lord Hawkes- 48 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1800 bury, who, however, does not appear as yet to have considered the question as one of any great importance. He willingly consented to remain under Addington, and, in the redistribution of offices which necessarily took place, became a Cabinet minister, by a change which was deci dedly for the benefit of the public service. The seals of the Foreign Office had hitherto been held by Lord Gren ville, a cousin of Pitt, but a man of more industry than natural talent, of a style of oratory in which positiveness and assertion were unusually more conspicuous than power of argument, of unbounded vanity, of immoveable obstinacy, and of a most unconciliatory and arrogant demeanour, which he took no pains to soften even towards the king himself They were now transferred to Lord Hawkesbury, and the peace which followed almost immediately was the direct fruit of the change in the department. The changes, indeed, which had been arranged were not immediately completed, and for a moment there appeared a possibility that they might be avoided. The agitation into which the whole transaction had thrown George III. had brought back that derangement of intellect from which he had before suffered, and which, on this occa sion, was accompanied with greater danger to his life also than had previously been the case. When he began to recover he enjoined his physician to tell Pitt that he alone was the cause of his illness ; and Pitt, greatly shocked, and assured by Dr. Willis that it was of the most vital conse quence to tranquillise the king's mind on a matter which he identified with the preservation of the Church of England, authorised the doctor to assure him that, whether in or out of office, he could never revive the question. It subsequently appeared that the same knowledge of the impossibility of changing the king's mind on the subject, and of mooting it at all without imperilling his understand ing, and perhaps his life, led Fox, when invested with the same responsibility of office, to form the same resolution. And many of Pitt's adherents and personal friends, deeply i8oi] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 49 feeling how immeasurable was the distance between his capacity and that of Addington, and how indispensable it was, now that France was under the government of Buona parte, that England also should have the ablest possible guidance, pressed upon Pitt the propriety of recalling his resignation. But, though he would probably have been willing to consent to do so if invited, he felt that the pro posal could not with decency come from himself And on the 17th of March, 1801, the new appointments were gazetted ; the only one, besides that of Lord Hawkesbury, that could be looked on as an improvement relating to the Great Seal, which, to the dismay of Lord Loughborough, who must have wished he could recall his act of treachery to his chief, and to the great amusement of every one else, was taken from him and delivered to the Chief Justice of Common Pleas, Lord Eldon.^ The negotiations for peace which were at once com menced rendered Lord Hawkesbury's department the most important in the whole administration. It is not impossible that Pitt himself may have had some share in placing him in it. For of all the new appointments it was the one of which he pronounced the most marked approval in one of the debates which necessarily arose on the subject of the recent changes. He challenged those who would depreciate the new ministry to point out a single member superior to Lord Hawkesbury. "The transcendent talents" of Fox he admitted indeed " to make him an exception to almost any rule in everything which required uncommon powers. But with that exception he knew no one superior to his noble friend in capacity for business." And that capacity for business was at once tested in the most arduous manner. Addington had never taken an active part in politics, and with finance he was especially unacquainted, though he had succeeded Pitt as Chancellor of the Exchequer as well as at the head of the Treasury. It was plain, even to himself, that the only chance which he could have of discharging ^ Previously Sir John Scott, Attorney-General. VOL. I. E 50 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1800 his new duties with credit lay in terminating the war ; and though Buonaparte had succeeded in forming the combina tion known as the Northern Confederacy to resist our inter pretation of the maritime law of Europe, it was believed that he too was desirous of peace.^ The chance, indeed, of the Northern Confederacy long continuing to support his views was more than problematical, since a fleet with Nelson on board had already sailed for the Baltic, and there could be little doubt of the issue of any action in which he was to take a principal part. But the confident anticipation of success in that expedition, which was reasonably entertained, did not make any change in the eagerness of the new administration for peace ; and accordingly, only four days after he had entered on office. Lord Hawkesbury was directed to intimate to the French Government " the dis position of his Majesty to enter into immediate negotia tions." Pitt had entertained the same idea in the previous year ; and, intending once more to entrust the discussion of terms to Lord Malmesbury, had submitted his plan to the Cabinet, and had embodied the conditions on which he hoped to conclude a treaty in the following Cabinet minute : Sketch of a Plan of Peace settled at the Cabinet in 1800. I. That the possession of the Cape, Ceylon, and Cochin, is to be invariably insisted on as the sine qua non condition of any treaty of peace, and that no modification is to be listened to on this subject, nor any condition inconsistent with it to be even made matter of negotiation. 2. That whatever places are restored to France or Holland on the Continent of India are to be held as commercial factories only, exercising power of internal jurisdiction, but so as not to interfere with the general government of the British posses sions, nor to be in any case nor under any pretence fortified. 3. That a free commerce to the British possessions in India may be granted by treaty both to France and Holland, together ' The note conveying this intimation, dated March 21st, 1801, was sent through M. Otto, at that time in England as Commissioner for French prisoners. i8oo] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 51 with such particular regulations about saltpetre and other articles, as upon discussion shall be found just and practicable. 4. That all the other conquests made by this country may be made matter of negotiation, and that, subject to the following instructions, the restitution of such part of them may be stipu lated for as shall be fairly compensated by the advantages to result to this country from the Continental peace. With this view it is to be observed that there are but two points in which such compensation can be made to England. These are — I. The evacuation of Egypt, should the French army not have quitted that country either in consequence of the treaty signed by General Kleber, or of the attacks now meditated by the Turkish forces. 2. Such an arrangement of affairs in Holland and the Nether lands as may rescue those countries from their present depend ence on France, and afford to Europe some security for their future independence. In return for these points, and in proportion as they shall be more or less satisfactorily arranged, we are enabled to treat respecting the following objects, which comprise the whole of what we have conquered during the war, except what is specified in the first article of this paper. We have taken from France, — Martinique, Ste. Lucie, Tobago, Goree, St Pierre, and Miquelon, and the French factories in the East Indies. From Spain, — Minorca and Trinidad. From Holland (besides what is above mentioned), — Surinam, Berbice, Demerary, Essequibo, and the Spice Islands. The extent of our cessions out of this list is to depend, as already stated, on what we obtain on the two points above mentioned. With respect to Egypt, the evacuation is all we have to ask, and we are bound by the treaty of defensive alhance with Turkey not to make peace without it. With respect to Holland, it does not appear probable that any sacrifice we could make would induce France to restore the Stadtholder, and to place the government decidedly in his hands ; nor would even that arrangement be secure or per manent unless the independence of the Netherlands were satisfactorily provided for. • E 2 52 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1800 On the other hand, France can have no attachment to the actual Directory or Constitution in Holland. Some middle line raay therefore easily be found in this respect, the real value of which will depend on the nature of the arrangement respecting the Netherlands. Four different arrangements raay possibly come in question in this respect, supposing France to abandon the claim of retain ing these provinces. These are the following, stated in the order of preference as they affect our interests : I. The connecting the settiement of the Netherlands with the exchange of Bavaria, or giving those provinces to the Elector, in addition to as considerable a portion of German territory as can be secured for hira in any general arrangement on that subject that may take place. 2. The giving them to the Grand Duke of Tuscany in exchange for that country, which might either be given to Austria, or made by other arrangements the means of making a satisfactory settlement of affairs in Italy. 3. The giving them to some less considerable prince, to hold as a separate sovereignty under the guaranty of the Great Powers, and possibly as annexed to the Germanic body. 4. The forming them into a separate and independent repubhc, under a government formed as nearly as possible on the grounds of their ancient constitution. These are the different objects to be aimed at, and in this order. With respect to our conquests, we consider the restoration of the Spice Islands and of the two settlements of Demerary and Surinam to Holland as the least disadvantageous of all the cessions we may have to make ; and, although those possessions are of immense value and importance to Holland, yet the king's Governraent does not think that, in consenting to their restitution, even as the price only of the evacuation of Egypt (but certainly if, with that, we obtain only the fourth of the arrangements respecting the Netherlands), any considerable sacrifice of the interests of this country would be made. The negotiation raay more probably turn on the comparative value of the arrangements to be made respecting our other l8oi] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 53 conquests, and respecting the Netherlands according to one of the three first plans above mentioned. If Martinique and Ste. Lucie can both be retained in the West Indies, and Minorca in Europe, and Trinidad, Tobago, the small Newfoundland Islands, and Goree, with the Indian factories, restored in return for the third plan, this would be considered as a very advantageous peace to England. If we obtain either of the two former, we might consent to substitute Trinidad and Tobago for Martinique and Ste. Lucie, or we might ultimately accept one of these three islands (considering, however, Tobago always as necessarily annexed to Trinidad if we retain that island) together with Minorca, if by so doing we can secure the first of the plans respecting the Netherlands, or any other arrangement of those provinces equally satisfactory to us with that. In all other points our negotiator is to second the views of Austria, and he is to stipulate for peace for Naples and Portugal on the status ante bellum, no conquests having been made by France from them.'^ Pitt's desire for peace was not diminished by his own change of position. He at once communicated the minute to Addington, and it served as a guide to the new Cabinet in the proposals they made and in the concessions to which they consented. The French Government, or, it may save trouble to say, Buonaparte the First Consul (for the other two consuls were from the first mere cyphers, meant in some degree to disguise from the French for a time the fact of their subjection to a single master), em powered M. Otto to conduct the preliminary discussions, and throughout the summer a brisk correspondence passed between him and the British Secretary of State. But the very first step taken by the French was calculated to raise a suspicion of their insincerity. Otto proposed an armistice, evidently with the hope that it might be in time ' The precise date of this document does not appear ; but the fact that Malta is not mentioned in it proves the time at which it was drawn up to be anterior to September 15th, 1800, when that island was surrendered to Nelson's squadron. 54 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1801 to save the allies of France in the Baltic from the attack of our fleet. The request came too late, for it was subse quently learnt that on the 2d of April, the very day on which it was made, Nelson had annihilated the Danish defences at Copenhagen. But Lord Hawkesbury could not forget the treacherous use which the First Consul had made of the armistice into which he cajoled the Austrian commander in the middle of the battle of Rivoli,^ and declined falling into a similar snare. On particular subjects M. Otto admitted that he was waiting for precise instruc tions, but the two plenipotentiaries began at once to discuss the general principles of the intended treaty, and the Frenchman explained that " the point on which the nego tiation would be likely to turn would be Egypt, and the question for discussion would be whether France should relinquish Egypt, Great Britain relinquishing the whole or some part of her conquests, or whether France should retain Egypt, Great Britain preserving her conquests. M. Otto also stated that he was authorized to assure Lord Hawkesbury, in consequence of what had passed at their former interview, that the British Government could not be more hostile to the principles of Jacobinism than the First Consul" ^ ' A part of the French army was defeated, and the whole was sur rounded, with its retreat completely cut off, when Buonaparte sent a flag of truce to Alvinzi, requesting an armistige for half an hour, as he had some propositions to make in consequence of the sudden arrival of a courier with fresh despatches from Paris. There was no such courier ; but, as Alvinzi was weak enough to suspend his operations for the time required, Buonaparte employed it to extricate his troops from their difficulties, and to prepare an attack which proved fatal to his dupe and the Austrian army. (Alison, xx. § 144.) ^ The passage within inverted commas is taken from a minute of a conversation between Lord Hawkesbury and M. Otto, held April 2d The minute exists in the Liverpool Papers. And whenever a passage is given in a similar manner (unless some particular statement respect ing it is made), it is a quotation from some document preserved among those Papers. Buonaparte was sincere in his denunciations of Jacobinism, believing that all the plots against his life, of which more than one had been i8oi] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 55 The retention of Egypt by the French, as well as the permanence of the Northern Confederacy, had in fact been already decided by events, though the news detected, originated with the Jacobin party, till Fouchd convinced him that the infernal machine conspiracy had been concocted by some of the Royalists. But George III. had no idea that Jacobinism could be extinguished except by means which Buonaparte was not inclined to employ. I subjoin a brief but characteristic note written by him to Lord Hawkesbury a day or two after the murder of the Czar Paul had become known : — "Kew, 1st May, 1801, 50m. p.m. " I am infinitely pleased with Lord Hawkesbury's attention in so speedily transmitting the despatch from Lord Carysfort, which con firms the good news from Egypt transmitted yesterday. I am anxious to hear from Russia as to the line of conduct embraced by the new emperor with regard to the royal cause in France ; for I own I think there is no destruction of Jacobinism unless royalty is re-established in that country, though I may have my doubts as to the person who may best answer that purpose. " GEORGE R." • I may add, since both in Lord Malmesbury's diary and in that of Mr. Rose the king is represented as speaking slightingly of Lord Hawkesbury's talents for business, &c. (though Mr. Rose admits that on this point his Majesty subsequently changed his opinion), that though no man was less in the habit of paying compliments than the king, unless he fully meant what he said, his early letters to Lord Hawkesbury are full of expressions of the warmest approval. On the 29th of April he writes to him, " I have signed the two warrants he (Lord Liverpool) forwarded through my excellent Northern Secretary of State," using the same form of description to which he had been accustomed in the earlier part of his reign, before the duties of the two chief secretaries were defined as they were afterwards. And a few days later his sentiments are still more unmistakeable, when he writes ; "Kew, May 9th, 1801, 20m. p. 7 A.M. " The King is extremely pleased with the information he has received from Lord Hawkesbury of the intention of sending Count Bernstoff to settle the differences between this Court and that of Denmark ; the more so as it cannot but place in the most advantageous light to the public the conduct of the new administration, and more particularly of Lord Hawkesbury, as he will have the treating with the Count, who is a very warm man, and it will require the good temper of the Northern Secretary of State to keep him in bounds. And it would seem that a little stiffness and restraint is more likely to end the business with credit than at first too much , appearance of desire of ending the business. " George R." S6 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1801 had not yet reached Europe. On the 21st of March Sir Ralph Abercromby had given Menou, who, on the murder of Kleber, had succeeded that general as com mander-in-chief of the army which Buonaparte had left behind him, a decisive defeat at Alexandria ; and the only real question with regard to France and Egypt was whether the relics of the French army should be permitted to return home with their arms in their hands, or should be detained by the English general as prisoners of war Two months before the preliminaries were signed, Menou himself con fessed this to be the state of affairs, and was glad by any sacrifice to purchase the permission of his conquerors to rejoin his old commander as a free man. The French occupation, therefore, of Egypt soon ceased to furnish a topic for discussion; but it is probable, though the news of Abercromby's victory had not yet reached England, that Buonaparte had heard of it when, on the i6th of April, he ordered Otto to interrupt the negotiation, with a state ment that the instigators of the attempt, which in the previous December had been made to assassinate him, were living in England, and in the pay of the English Government. He avowed his conviction that the English ministry was incapable of having hired or encouraged the assassins, but by a declaration that, if such an attempt had been made in London and instigated by men who were seeking shelter in Paris, he should at once arrest them, and deliver them up to the British Government, he evidently indicated a demand that the English minister would sur render those whom he named. It was plain that, even while disavowing any idea of imputing the least complicity in the plot to the British Government, the First Consul did in fact insinuate it ; and Lord Hawkesbury in his reply showed that he felt such to be his intention, and reproved it with "the warmest indignation." But, at the same time, after reminding M. Otto that no proof beyond his mere assertion had been furnished that any one implicated in any attempt on the First Consul's life was to be found in England, he i8oi] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 57 did not shrink from avowing his willingness, if proof suffi cient to fix any one residing in this country with the guilt of such a crime should be afforded, to take the strongest steps which our laws could permit to bring the criminals to punishment. But it would seem that Buonaparte's sole design in instructing Otto to make this complaint was to create a sort of diversion. Delay was his real object, that he might have time to try whether the events of the summer would place him in a more favourable position for treating. He was ostentatiously parading preparations for an invasion of England, though it may be doubtful whether he as yet ever seriously intended to undertake such an enterprise. He had also excited the Spanish Government to make an attack on Portugal, which at the end of June he seconded by an invasion of that country with a French army, under the command of his own brother-in-law. General Leclerc ; and, now that Egypt was wrested from him, he hoped to be able to set off acquisitions made at the expense of our an cient ally against our own conquests in the East and West Indies. If, however, he had formed any real design to at tempt an invasion of this country. Nelson soon compelled him to lay it aside ; and the corruption^ of his own generals reduced the advantages he had hoped to extort from Portugal to a very insignificant amount; so that he was forced, after a brief delay, to continue the negotiation on its original footing, with indeed a certain lowering of his tone with respect to Egypt, his chance of retaining which country by force of arms could no longer be pretended to have any existence. At the same time, he tried to alarm Lord Hawkesbury by the threat that, if peace were not at once concluded, France and all her allies were ready to concentrate their forces against England.^ But in the same 1 Alison (cxxxiv. 62) affirms that the French generals took large bribes from the Portuguese Government, and that Leclerc himself in this way obtained 200,000/. * " La cour de Londres, si elle veut sincferement la paix, peut-elle, S8 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1801 despatch in which this menace was insinuated M. Otto admitted that the acquisitions made by France on the Continent justified some of the demands made by Great Britain, though not the retention by her of Trinidad, Mar tinique, Malta, Ceylon, and all the territories conquered from Tippo Sahib. Perhaps Buonaparte's feeling of the extent to which his position was altered by the defeats of his army in Egypt was most clearly shown by the final suggestion, that he might acquiesce in our preserving all our acquisitions in India and restore Portugal to the status ante bellum, if we, on our parts, would agree to the same status ante bellum being re-established in the Mediterranean and America. Of the menace. Lord Hawkesbury in his reply very properly disdained to take any notice. The status ante bellum. for America he altogether rejected, pointing out that this would involve not only a restitution of those islands in the West Indies which we had wrested from France, but of those which we had also taken from Spain aujourd'hui que les allies sont en mesure de concentrer tous leurs moyens contre elle, prdtendre k conserver des conquetes qu'elle doit en grande partie aux ddsordres de la Revolution Fran9aise et aux efforts de la coalition?" (Extract from a despatch of M. Otto, June i8th, 1801.) But in fact France had as yet no ally bound to co-operate with her against England but Spain and Holland ; and the result of St. Vincent and the capture of most of the West India Islands showed how little was to be apprehended from Spain. Otto's despatch proceeds, " Cepen- dant on reconnait que les grands ^vdnemens survenus en Europe, et les changemens arrives dans les limites des grands Etats du Continent, peuvent autoriser une partie des demandes du Gouvernement Britan- nique ; mais comment ce Gouvernement pourrait-il exiger la conser vation de Malthe, de Ceylon, de tous les Etats conquis sur Tippo Saib, de la Trinity et de la Martinique ? Le soussignd est autoris^ ^ demander de my Lord Hawkesbury si dans le cas ou le Gouvernement Frangais acc^derait aux arrangemens proposes pour les Grandes Indes par I'Angleterre, et adopterait Vante bellum pour le Portugal, sa M. B. consentirait elle-mtoe k ce que le status ante helium fut r^tabli dans la M^diterran^e et en Amdrique ? " " America" through out this negotiation includes the West Indian Islands, nearly the whole of which we had made ourselves masters of. i8oi] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 59 and Holland. He offered, however, as a recompense for a ¦return to the former state of affairs in Portugal, to agree to the same principle with respect to Spain. And he argued that the status ante bellum for the Mediterranean, if adopted, would not only require from us the cession of Malta, but from the French the restitution of those con quests which they had made on the borders of the Mediter ranean ; of the county of Nice and of the other territories which had been wrested from the King of Sardinia ; with the restoration of the Grand Duchy of Tuscany and the rest of Italy to their former independence. In a subsequent despatch he refuted by a reference to his former proposals, which were in M. Otto's possession, the utterly false state ment that, since the commencement of the discussions, Britain had raised her demands ; though, as he also showed, she had had a right to raise them carefully reserved to her by a declaration which he himself had made in April, that "in the event of the evacuation of Egypt by the French previously to the signing of the preliminaries, he should not consider himself as bound to adhere to their full extent to the conditions," which he then proposed. He reminded M, Otto that, from his sovereign's "invariable anxiety to provide for the interests of his allies, and from his sincere desire to facilitate the attainment of peace, he had been authorised to offer, in addition to the restitutions which he had already proposed, the island of Trinidad," which would secure a complete re-establishment of " the status ante bellum for Spain, in consideration of the status ante bellum for Portugal." If, as " the French Government had distinctly admitted, his Majesty was entitled to a com pensation out of his conquests for the important acquisi tions which France had obtained upon the Continent," it was impossible for him to propose to retain less than he now demanded. Otto, or rather his master Buonaparte, and his minister, the celebrated Talleyrand, felt that they were getting worsted in the argument. They began to appeal to our 6o LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION ri8oi moderation and " regard for the interests of humanity. A distant island more or less could not be a sufficient reason for prolonging the miseries of the world." And their practical comment on this maxim thus laid down was a demand that had never been made before, that, while France should retain all her conquests except " the ports of the Adriatic and of the Mediterranean belonging to the Pope and the King of Naples,'' Britain should restore all that she had made with the single exception of Ceylon ; the only other advantage which she was to derive being a restoration of Portugal to its former integrity. What was particularly demanded was that Malta should be restored to the Order of its ancient Knights (from whom, it will be remembered, it was not the English but the French who had captured it ; the English had only taken it from the French), though M. Otto was willing to agree that its forti fications should be destroyed. In reply. Lord Hawkesbury declined entering into any " explanations relative to the island of Malta," except on the condition of the French Government agreeing to a reasonable "arrangement re specting the West Indies conformably to the principle which had been already recognised as the just basis of negotiation." And his firmness on this point made the French plenipotentiary alter his tone. Though on the 20th of July M. Otto had required the absolute cession by Great Britain of all her conquests in the West Indies, on the nth of August it was "with sincere satisfaction'' that he found the British Government resolved to retain some of them ; and the hint that the acquiescence of France in her so doing might be met on her part by a reconsidera tion of the question of Malta " removed the only obstacle" to a pacification. Yet so innate was the spirit of insincerity and trickery in the French Government, that in his very next communi cation, made, as M. Otto informed Lord Hawkesbury, in consequence of an express which he had just received from Paris, it was proposed to confine the acquisitions which i8oi] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 6i Great Britain should retain to the single island of Sainte Lucie. The British minister, in reply, threatened to break off the negotiations altogether. And once more his steady adherence to his former declarations were rewarded. On the 1st of October, only two days after he had written that " if the French Government should persist in any further demands there could no longer remain any pro spect of the negotiation being brought to a happy conclu sion," M. Otto was authorised to sign preliminaries, and it was agreed that plenipotentiaries should be sent by both Governments to Amiens to conclude a definitive treaty. The minister whom our Government selected was Lord Cornwallis, a nobleman of high character, who, if he had not been very successful as a soldier in North America, as Governor-General in India had shown considerable energy and capacity, and as Lord-Lieutenant of Ireland at the time of the Union had proved himself possessed of great patience and address. Lord Malmesbury, whom Pitt had designed to employ the year before, had become afflicted with deafness to such a degree that he was no longer de sirous of diplomatic employment of so delicate a character ; and the instructions drawn up by Lord Hawkesbury for Lord Cornwallis were so precise as to render his want of experience as a negotiator of but little importance. Indeed most of the points which had been topics of dispute had been so settled in the preliminary articles that they were adopted without alteration. It had been agreed that we were to retain Ceylon and Trinidad, and to restore the rest of our conquests ; while, as a counterbalance to those great concessions on our part, France was bound to withdraw her troops from the dominions of the Pope and King of Naples, and to guarantee the integrity of Portugal. Malta we con sented to restore to the Knights of St. John, on condition of its being further placed under the guarantee of the Emperor of Russia. But, as this Order was at the time in a state of disorganization, not having even a Grand Master, it was evidently requisite to re-establish it on a proper 62 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1801 footing, that it might be in a condition to resume its authority, before we could consent to withdraw from our occupation of so important an island.^ So completely, however, was the signature of the pre liminary articles regarded as practically the conclusion of the treaty, that, when Parliament met at the beginning of November, both parties agreed in looking on them in that light, and debated their merits and the conduct of the ministry in agreeing to them as unreservedly as if no further negotiation of any kind had been pending. The concessions which we had made in resigning so many of our conquests, and in leaving France in possession of so many of her acquisitions, were most vehemently attacked in the House of Lords by the late Foreign Secretary, Lord Grenville ; and in the House of Commons by his brother, Mr. Thomas Grenville, and Mr Windham. It was no slight proof that the objections made were specious ¦¦¦ There was no point, however, on which the French Government insisted more strongly than that we should withdraw our troops at once. A paper delivered in by M. Otto September 30th, the day before the signature of the preliminaries, contains the following sen tence : " II (le Gouvernement Frangais) ne consentira jamais k une clause ou redaction d'oii il pourrait rdsulter que Malthe ne serait pas dvacu^e par les troupes Anglaises immddiatement aprfes la ratification du traitd ddfinitif. Le tems qui s'dcoulera entre la conclusion des pr^- liminaires et celle du traitd ddfinitif sera suffisant pour que I'ordre et la Puissance garante ayant pris leurs mesures pour assurer I'occupation de Malthe." It was owing solely to the unyielding firmness of Lord Hawkesbury that Malta was not evacuated with the precipitation thus insisted on (in which event we should have found it difficult to reconquer it), but that it remained in our hands at the renewal of the war. It may be added that if we had evacuated it inconsiderately we should only have been laughed at by Buonaparte himself for our simplicity. He never seriously expected that we should relinquish it, and perhaps his pertinacity as to the precise language of the articles relating to it was dictated mainly by his desire to have a plausible pretext for future rupture. De Bourrienne tells us, " Je ne cessais de dire au Premier Consul qu'k la place des Anglais'il n'en ferait pas autrement, et je lui prddis sans balancer que cette lie serait la principale cause de la rup ture de la paix. II pensait comme moi." (Mdmoires de M. de Bourrienne, vol. 4, xix. 303.) i8oi] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 63 rather than solid, that the policy of the ministry in making peace on such conditions was supported both by Pitt and Fox. Pitt argued that, after the dissolution of the con tinental alliance by the Peace of Luneville, it was impossible for us to pursue any other line of conduct but that of making peace ; as to the conditions on which it was con cluded, he was more anxious about the tone and character of the peace than for any particular object ; and he thought it wiser even to accept terms short of what the country might be strictly entitled to than to risk the negotiation by too obstinate adherence to any particular point. And this was not only the language which he thought it becoming to him to hold in his place in Parliament, in consideration of the circumstances under which those who had concluded the treaty had come into power; but his deliberate opinion, as he expressed it in letters to his private friends. "^ And Fox, differing from those of his followers who disparaged Ceylon and Trinidad, affirmed them to be most important acquisitions ; and " could not flatter himself that we could have obtained peace on better terms. If too much import ance," he truly said, " had been attached to trifles, we should have risked another year of war, which in itself would have been a great evil. He believed, indeed, that better terms might have been obtained a year before ; but at present, as to the terms and tone of the treaty, he fully coincided with the ministry." But, from his position as the minister chiefly responsible for it, the speaker whose language was most carefully scanned was Lord Hawkesbury. As on the debate which took place subsequently on the merits of the definitive treaty, he naturally extended and amplified the argument he used on this occasion,' it is sufficient to state ' Lord Stanhope (Life, vol. iii. p. 351) quotes a letter of his to Mr. Long, dated October i, 1801, in which he says, " The terms, though not in every point precisely all that one could wish, are certainly highly creditable, and on the whole very advantageous." ^ His speech, however, on this occasion was one that made a great impression on the House. In Lord Colchester's Diary (i. 376, seq) different correspondents of the speaker are quoted as extolling it in 64 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [i8oi now that the Opposition in the Lower House did not ven ture on a division ; and in the House of Lords, where the obstinacy of Lord Grenville forced one on, he was unable to muster more than ten votes to support the opinions which he advanced on the subject. This failure of its opponents was, of course, no slight encouragement to the Government to proceed in the course it had already marked out for itself The negotiation received a slight additional interest from the circumstance that the discussions on the part of France were conducted by the brother of the First Consul, Joseph Buonaparte, who afterwards became King of Naples, and then of Spain, and as such had a narrow escape of being brought to England as a prisoner after the battle of Vittoria. On the first arrival of Lord Cornwallis, Talleyrand proposed to transfer the seat of negotiation from Amiens, the place which had been originally fixed upon, to Paris itself; or, at all events, to settle some of the most important points in dispute in that city ; and Lord Cornwallis, who was highly satisfied with the manner and language of Buonaparte when he was presented to him, would not have thought such a step objectionable, if it would have led to his discussing the matters in question "in confidential interviews with the First Consul himself" The language of the First Consul himself, as he reported it to Lord Hawkesbury, was studiously complimentary ; and in the exchange of such courtesies the British negotiator was in respect no more remiss. the warmest terms. Mr. Corry says, " Lord Hawkesbury was able and successful in his speech beyond former character.'' And of his speech in a second debate the week after he says, " On the Convention yesterday Lord Hawkesbury was excellent. His character in the House of Commons rises daily and justly. His speech was better than that on the peace;" and Wilberforce's friend. Lord Muncaster, writes, " You do not need from me any character of the debate ; but I cannot help saying to you that Lord Hawkesbury's was the most chaste speech of a man of business I almost ever heard." Lord Sheffield uses somewhat similar expressions. i8oi] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 65 Private.^ Paris, November 10, 1801. My dear Lord, It was with very sincere satisfaction that I received your despatch of the 6th, as it has relieved me from the most delicate and difficult part of my immediate business with the Chief Consul. I have had this morning my first audience, at which Talleyrand of course was present. Buonaparte was gracious in the highest degree. He inquired particularly after his Majesty, and the state of his health ; and spoke of the British nation in terms of great respect, intimating that, as long as we remained friends, there would be no interruption of the peace of Europe. I told him that the horrors which succeeded the Revolution had created a general alarm ; that all the neighbouring nations dreaded the contagion ; that when, for the happiness of mankind, and of France in particular, he was called on to fill his present station, we knew him only as a hero and a conqueror, but the good order and tranquillity which the country now enjoyed, made us respect him as a statesman and a legislator, and had removed our apprehensions of having connexion and intercourse with France. Lauriston informed me that the First Consul would see me with out the presence of a third person before my departure for Amiens ; but this information became less interesting to me since the good news which you have imparted to me respecting Hanover. The concourse of people at the fireworks last night was very great ; no carriages were allowed to pass but those of the foreign ministers ; and as I drove through the streets I was astonished to find such a multitude so perfectly quiet, and heard nothing near my coach but expressions of civility. I have the honour to be, &c. &c. Cornwallis. When, however, he found that Talleyrand only desired to keep the conduct of the negotiation wholly in his own hands, instead of trusting it to Joseph Buonaparte, he changed his mind as to the propriety of consenting to any alteration in the first arrangement. Joseph, as VOL. I. F 66 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1801 he wrote to Lord Hawkesbury, "had the character of being a well-meaning, although not a very able man," and he hoped that "his near connexion with the First Consul might perhaps be in some degree a check on the spirit of chicanery and intrigue which animated the Minister of the Interior." He therefore adhered to the plan previously laid down for him ; and, though he had one or two preliminary discussions on different subjects before he left Paris, they were held with Joseph Buonaparte, and were therefore of much the same character as they would have been if they had taken place in Amiens. Mr. Jackson, who was our minister at Paris while Lord Cornwallis was at Amiens, and who was among those who took an unfavor able view of the treaty, in talking it over with Lord Malmes bury, who shared his views, attributed many of the stipula tions or concessions with which he was dissatisfied to Lord Cornwallis himself, " his drowsiness, and his total want of practice and experience in matters of that kind ;"^ and, per haps, had the plenipotentiary had more experience of the diplomatic, and especially of the French diplomatic character, his suspicions might have been in some degree awakened by the earnestness displayed by M. Buonaparte in extolling his own integrity before any imputations had been cast upon it. He commenced his first interview by a declaration " that it was his intention to deal fairly and openly, that he was a stranger to the arts of negotiation, and should not attempt to carry any point by cunning or chicanery ; " and Lord Cornwallis, who coincided in the wish thus expressed to conduct the conferences between them with frankness and sincerity, implicitly believed him. More penetrating judges would probably have thought differently at the time ; cer tainly those who are acquainted with the absolute dominion which the younger brother exercised over all his family, and the almost invariably bad faith which characterised his own dealings with other nations, will not be surprised to hear that, at the end of a month, Lord Cornwallis found ' Diaries of Lord Malmesbury, iv. 71. i8oi] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 67 that articles in the intended treaty, after they had been formally agreed to, were surreptitiously altered ; that, in some, important sentences had been omitted, in others significant phrases had been inserted, in one a change of the highest importance had been silently introduced ; and that, finally, his secretary discovered that, after Lord Corn wallis had believed the arrangements of the matters con tained in those articles to have been fully concluded, the document relating to them had been carefully revised by the French plenipotentiary, who with his own hand had made' a number of corrections " replete with matter and expressions calculated to ensnare, to throw upon Lord Cornwallis himself the odium of the delay, and upon the whole to create confusion in all the proceedings." One of the alterations thus dishonestly foisted in would have represented us as agreeing to the placing of Malta under the protection and guarantee, not of the Czar, who was a prince sufficiently powerful to render them effectual, but of the King of Naples, whom recent transactions had proved to be completely at the mercy of, and therefore under the influence of, the French. The trickery, however, which was thus detected tended to defeat its own object. As a matter of course, it strengthened the hands of Lord Corn wallis ; and the neutrality of Malta, after we should have evacuated it, was finally settled as we had proposed. In another matter also he succeeded in carrying the views of his own Government in opposition to the aims of the First Consul. Buonaparte so completely ignored his allies, even at the very moment that he was professing to be acting in their interest, that he desired wholly to exclude their representatives from the Conference at Amiens, leav ing any terms which we might make with them, the Go vernments of Spain and Holland, or, as the latter was now styled, the Batavian Republic, to be settled in subordinate and separate treaties. But Lord Hawkesbury, in a very able and argumentative despatch, insisted that the treaty about to be concluded should "be one general treaty of F 2 68 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1802 peace, comprehending the interests of all the Powers engaged in the war, and that there should not be distinct treaties concluded with each state separately." He showed by reference to the Peace of 1763, that this had been the course adopted on similar occasions in times past, and required that, if he had not such already, "the French plenipotentiary should obtain from his Govern ment the necessary full powers enabling him to con clude a general treaty of that description." The result of this resolution on our part was that those who had been the allies of France in the war at once despatched, as they were probably anxious to do, plenipotentiaries to Amiens to act on their behalf, Senhor Azara being the Spanish minister, and M. Schimmelpenninck the envoy of the new Dutch Government. No further difficulty of any importance occurred, and on the 27th of March the defini tive treaty was formally signed. There was a general belief that the pacification it had effected would not be of long duration. The king himself during the progress of the negotiation had more than once intimated to Lord Hawkesbury his conviction that the " con duct of the French could not be built upon ;" and after its conclusion he expressed the same opinion to Lord Malmes bury, calling it " an experimental peace, and nothing else." It had been, however, he added, "unavoidable, because he had been abandoned by everybody, allies and all." And this feeling of the probable instability of the peace, which more than one act of Buonaparte's during the nego tiation had greatly increased,* was one of the greatest ' ''April %th.—Y\tt told Lord Malmesbury that ' he had, when the preliminaries were signed, thought that Buonaparte had satisfied his ambition, and would rest contented with the power and reputation he had acquired ; . . . that, however, all that had passed since had con vinced him that he had been in error, and that the electing himself President of the Italian Republic, the attainment of Louisiana, the two Floridas, and the island of Elba, left no doubt on his mind that he was and ever would remain the same rapacious insatiable plunderer, i8o2] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 69 difficulties with which the Cabinet had to struggle in the debate which ensued. In fact, the treaty contained one article which it was well known it would be almost impossible to execute strictly. It was stipulated that the British forces "should evacuate Malta and its depen dencies within three months from the exchange of the ratifications, or sooner if possible ; " and that " at that epoch it should be given up to the Order in its present state, provided the Grand Master, or commissaries fully authorised according to the statutes of the Order, should be in the island to take possession, and the force which was to be provided by his Sicilian Majesty" (who was to be invited to garrison the different fortresses in the island for one year) " should have arrived." But it was almost certain that neither of these events, the arrival of a Grand Master or of a Neapolitan garrison, could take place within three months. There had been no Grand Master at all for many years. The knights had dwindled in number to a small force; their ancient spirit had fallen in a still more conspicuous degree when they surrendered the island to the French without striking a single blow in its defence; and they had become objects of such universal dislike to the native Maltese, and were so con scious of their unpopularity, that it was not likely that many of them would be induced to return at all. It was, therefore, from the first, nearly certain that we should be unable to evacuate the island by the time appointed in the treaty, while it was almost equally sure, considering the extreme persistency with which the First Consul had tried every expedient to create and maintain for France an influence over the island, that our failure to execute the treaty on this point to its very letter would form the ground of angry complaint. with as little good faith, as he forraerly found him to be ; that still he did not regret having spoken in favour of the peace : it was become a necessary measure ; and rest for England, however short, was desir able,"— Malmesbury's Diary, iv. 64. 70 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1802 This, however, though felt to be a difficulty by the ministers themselves, was not much dwelt upon by the Opposition in their attacks upon the treaty. It was re markable that, while Pitt himself sincerely and energeti cally supported it, those who put themselves in the first rank of its assailants had been his colleagues till his resignation, and were those who had most identified them selves with him by following him in his retirement. Lord Grenville in the House of Lords, and Mr. Windham in the House of Commons, moved addresses to the king censuring the peace as one which exposed the kingdora to great danger, since by it we had made great sacrifices without any compensating concessions having been pro cured from France. In a biography of one who was at that time a member of the House of Commons, we may confine ourselves to the debate in that House, and prin cipally to the part which Lord Hawkesbury himself bore in it. Mr. Windham founded his arguments chiefly on his opinion of the insatiable character of the existing French Government (an opinion in which, as we have seen, Pitt had lately felt compelled to coincide). He maintained that the arrangements which had been made with respect to Malta, however we might flatter ourselves, were a virtual surrender of that island to France. If the King of Naples should send a garrison to the fortresses, the putting them into his hands, circumstanced as he was, was an immediate introduction of the French. In the same way he maintained that the restoration of the Cape of Good Hope, to which also we had bound ourselves, would prove a cession of that stronghold, the half-way house to India, to the same all-grasping Power. He equally disapproved of those articles of the treaty which had allotted to France a portion of the Portuguese Guiana, and the fertile province of Louisiana. He could draw no distinction between the present form of government in France and the Jacobinism which was rampant seven years before ; and our naval victories, to which there had been i8o2] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 71 no interruption, ought to have saved us from a peace which left, or rather made, France so formidable. Lord Hawkesbury' himself undertook to reply to Windham ; and, disdaining a mere avoidance of censure, boldly challenged the approval of the House for what had been done. He moved an amendment to the proposed address, to the effect that "the House was fully sensible that his Majesty had wisely consulted the interests of his people in forming a definitive treaty on the basis of the preliminaries ; that it relied on his Majesty's well-known disposition to adhere with the most scrupulous fidelity to his engagements ; but that it entertained a perfect confi dence that he would be always prepared to defend against every encroachment the great sources of the wealth, com merce, and naval power of the empire. And that it was firmly persuaded that his Majesty's faithful subjects would be always ready to support the honour of his crown, and the rights, laws, and liberties of their country, with the same spirit they had manifested during the war which was now happily brought to a conclusion." And he supported his amendment with arguments which even his antagonists admitted to be profound and able, and which his partisans maintained to be irresistible. He reminded the House that " at the very moment when the present ministry were entering upon office, the country was losing its chief ally upon the Continent, the only one which, from the position of its dominions, and from its power, could be expected to make a formidable resistance to the progress of the French armies, by the Peace of Luneville. Previously, Britain had been the head of a confederacy. That peace placed her, instead, in the position of being the sole and ^ The Annual Register, which at this time was written with great violence of party spirit, and was still under the influence of Dr. Laurence, who had edited it till the close of the preceding century, and who took a warm part against the ministry in this very debate, describes Lord Hawkesbury's speech on this occasion as " by much the ablest defence of the treaty which was made in either House of Parliament." (Ann. 1802, p. 152.) 72 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [i8oz unassisted mark for a hostile league. The enmity of the Baltic Powers she defeated by her promptitude of action ; and, having quelled them, we were able to negotiate with France. But with her we could only negotiate for our selves and Portugal, not for our allies in Germany, who had already settled their own affairs at Luneville. And for Portugal we did obtain good terms, even the restoration of some of the territory of which France had previously despoiled her. For ourselves, we retained two islands of the highest value and importance, Ceylon in the East Indies, Trinidad in the West. And though we did not preserve Malta, the House would remember that we had never intended to do so. We always designed to restore it to the Knights of St. John. And henceforth their pos session of the island was to be guaranteed to them by the joint agreement of all the principal Powers of Europe. Great stress had been laid by those who censured the peace on the acquisitions made by France since the com mencement of the wan It was true she had obtained Louisiana from Spain ; but she had possessed that pro vince before, and had willingly ceded it to Spain as a settlement which had proved of but little value. And in India she had lost ground : neither in the West nor East Indies could her possessions be compared to ours, either in extent or in prosperity. Her navy and com merce, in every part of the world, was still less on a footing of equality with ours. In the course of the war, she had lost more than half her fleet, and all her com merce. He maintained that a treaty that left us and the French in such a relative condition, could not be con sidered anything but honorable to us. He could never agree with the doctrine laid down by some gentlemen that, whenever any of the continental Powers became involved in a quarrel with France, it was our business, without con sidering how the question affected our own external and internal interests, immediately to embark in a war. It was not expedient for us to continue the war for Holland and i8o2] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 73 the Netherlands, much less was it justifiable to continue it for Italy. And, indeed, those Powers which were more nearly connected with that country than ourselves, Austria, Russia, and Prussia, had approved or acquiesced in the new constitution that had lately been established in Italy. As to the faults of omission which had been alleged against the present treaty, the principal stress appeared to be laid on the non-renewal of certain other treaties, but the truth was that the events of the war had so completely unhinged the foundations of all former treaties, that it would be almost impossible, if they were renewed, to bring them to bear at all upon the present political state of Europe. If we had sanctioned the Treaty of Luneville, for instance, we should have made ourselves parties to the dismemberment of the Germanic empire.^ At present we could say that, if we had been unable to recover for continental Europe all its rights, we had at least been no party to its wrongs. It was true that no commercial stipulations had been introduced into the treaty, but commercial treaties involve so many subjects, and raise so many points of discussion, that it would have caused great delay to have mixed up such matters in the present treaty. The French would find it impossible to prohibit our manufactures in a time of peace as they had done in war, and, if it should come to a war of prohibitory duties we had sufficient arms for our defence in our own hands. , Prophecies had been ventured on that the peace now made could not last. He could not pretend to say that this treaty, or any other which might be made at the present time, was secure ; but he could not see that any additional security was to be gained by a continuance of war. Any such security must be looked ^ By the Treaty of Luneville, which was concluded in February 1 801, between France and the Emperor of Germany, Belgium and all the territories on the left or western bank of the Rhine were ceded to France, and the princes who were dispossessed of their dominions by this arrangement were proraised indemnifications in the more central parts of the empire. At the same time the independence of the Batavian, Helvetic, and Cisalpine Repubhcs was guaranteed. 74 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1802 for in the condition and disposition of France herself That country now appeared to be returning to her old maxims of religion and politics, and a renewal of the war must be calculated to plunge her again into the revolution ary system. It was wise to spare the resources and spirit of this country as much as possible ; they had been in some degree strained by the long duration of the war, and required to be cherished by peace." He summed up his speech by affirming that " he had proved that the interests and honour of Britain had been preserved, that her allies had not been neglected, and that no degrading or dis honorable article had been introduced into the treaty,'' and moved his amendment, which expressed, as we have seen, a full approval of the conduct of the ministry in framing and conducting this treaty. Neither of the great leaders, Pitt or Fox, spoke on this occasion, but two of Fox's chief supporters, Mr. Sheridan and Mr. Grey, expressed their approval of the peace, though Sheridan artfully endeavoured to make it a ground of censure of the previous ministry for rejecting the over tures of the First Consul in 1800 ; and Mr. Grey com bined his sanction of the peace with a repetition of his old denunciations of the war. In the end the ministers found their views of the transactions supported by an over whelming and most unusual majority. Only twenty members could be induced to countenance Windham's judgment, while 276 proclaimed by their votes their opinion that the honour and interests of the country had been fully consulted. And there seems no doubt that the decision thus adopted was correct. It is somewhat singular that our treaties of peace have invariably been attacked in Parliament ; that of Paris as severely as that of Utrecht, though by it we recovered Minorca and secured Canada ; that of Versailles with as much acerbity as the one which was just concluded, though in 1783 we made no sacrifices but those of claims which we had proved unable to enforce, and terminated the most disastrous as well as the most i8o2] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 75 impolitic war in which we had ever been engaged. On the whole the decision of Parliament in favour of the treaty seems to have been well founded. Though we were to give up Malta, our former history did not warrant our then looking on it as of the importance which we have since learnt to attribute to it. We had never possessed it before ; we had not found our position injured by the loss of Minorca, though since 1783 that island had been restored to an active enemy; and, though the possession of Malta would have been of great importance to us if we had not had Gibraltar, as matters stood there seemed no reason to suppose that its condition in neutral hands strong enough to hold it would not be as advantageous to us as if we had the charge and burden of defending it. Again, though we restored the Cape, and several valuable conquests in the West Indies, yet it might fairly be argued that we only restored what, if peace continued, we could well dispense with, and, if war were revived, we could without difficulty recover; as in fact we did recover them. If, as the ministers did not attempt or wish to deny, we had made some sacrifices, we had made no concessions inconsistent with our honour ; and, on points of but trifling importance, it was neither unmanly nor unstatesmanlike to admit some abatement of our strict pre tensions for the sake of peace. It was no slight argument in favour of the present treaty that the leaders of the Opposition declined to commit themselves by a condemna tion of it. Pitt, in his defence of the preliminaries, had laid it downi as the sound principle which should guide all such negotiations that, " in selecting those acquisitions which we desired to retain, it was our interest not to aim so much at keeping possession of any fresh conquest which was not of material value, as at retaining those acquisitions which from their situation or other causes were the best calculated for confirming and securing our ancient territories. The first object which must naturally present itself to every minister must be to give additional vigour to our maritime strength, 1 See his Speeches, vol. iii. p. 267. 76 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1802 and security to our colonial possessions.'' And his un rivalled knowledge of every matter connected with trade and finance gives irresistible weight to the opinion he further expressed, that in that point of view the acquisi tions which we retained in the East and West Indies were of infinitely greater value than any stronghold in the Mediterranean. On the value of Trinidad and Ceylon Fox fully agreed with his great rival. And even the witticism of Sheridan, which is better remembered than any of the longer speeches, that it was a peace which every one was glad of, though no one was proud of, is in itself an admission that no one really saw in it anything incompatible with the dearest interests of the nation, its good faith and honour. i8o2] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 77 CHAPTER III. Buonaparte becomes Consul for life — His discontent with England — Lord Hawkesbury's reply to his remonstrances — Mr. Hookham Frere's description of parties in Spain — Buonaparte's encroach ments — His preparations for war — He annexes Piedmont to France — Switzerland implores the aid of Britain — Lord Whitworth is sent to Paris — Negotiations with Austria and Russia — Meeting and character of the new Parliament — Eagerness of the French for the maintenance of peace— Buonaparte's intrigues in Russia — Sebastiani's mission to Egypt — Buonaparte's overtures to Louis XVIII. — Corruption of Buonaparte's family — Lord Whitworth's interview with Talleyrand — He leaves Paris. Those who doubted the permanence of the tranquillity thus restored to the kingdom had not long to wait for events which promised to justify their forebodings. The ratifications had scarcely been exchanged when Buona parte gave an indication of the extent of his personal ambition by procuring first the extension of the Con sulate to himself for ten years beyond the period ori ginally fixed, without any mention of his colleagues, whom every one felt to be mere cyphers, and before the end of the summer the further prolongation of his authority for his life. In all but name, he was now abso lute sovereign of the nation ; and, though there was a large party secretly indignant at these progressive en croachments, very few ventured to give open utterance to their discontent. Another prediction on which Wind ham and his supporters had ventured seemed to be in course of verification when our ministers learnt that a commercial treaty was being negotiated between France 78 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION. [1802 and Spain, of which the chief aim was understood to be to limit and embarrass the trade of this country. It was still less a secret that the First Consul was busy in encouraging the party of faction and insurrection at Naples ; while, before the end of July, Mr. Arthur Paget, our minister at Vienna, forwarded intelligence that a triple alliance had been concluded between France, Prussia, and Russia, which, even before he was able to learn its precise nature, he was convinced was full of danger to Austria. Mr. Paget himself, on making this communication, ven tured on a prophecy, of which it has been reserved for our day to see the fulfilment, when he added, " The threat which has for a considerable time been held out to the Court of Vienna by France, of establishing a rivality of strength between Austria and Prussia, seems to be at length accomplished : and, considering the relative situa tion of the two countries at this present epoch, there is, in rrxy opinion, every reason to apprehend that Prussia will at no very distant period rise to be the first Power in Germany.'' Austria, however, soon became aware of what had been done, and behaved with strange, discreditable, and, as she soon found out, most mischievous vacillation on the sub ject. She first made a treaty herself with France, by which she seemed to sanction the indemnities which were to be given to Prussia for her provinces beyond the Rhine which she had been compelled to cede to France ; and then, a few weeks afterwards, when she found that Bavaria too was to obtain territories which' she did not wish to see in her hands, she put her troops in motion with a precipitation which resembled pettish ill-temper more than statesmanlike resolution. She soon found herself unable to support the advance which she had thus made, and was compelled to recede, and to consent to all that was being done with an acquiescence which was too evidently the result of weakness to earn goodwill or gratitude. We, however, abstained from interfering in a matter i8o2] OF LORD LIVERPOOL, 79 which the contracting parties and the German Diet had a right to settle for themselves, and with which we had no immediate concern ; and the first expression of dis satisfaction came from France. There was no single idea so firmly rooted in Buonaparte's mind as a hatred of the press in all countries ;^ and because some of the English newspapers and a journal conducted in London by a French emigrant, named Peltier, spoke in disrespectful, and sometimes contum_elious, terms of him, he made those publications a ground of formal complaint, and directed M. Otto, who was now residing in England as the envoy of the French Government, to claim the punishment of the publishers of these papers as men who, if they were not infringing any positive law in England, were violating the law of nations by disturbing the harmony which subsisted between the two countries. Some weeks before Talley rand, the Minister of the Interior, had complained to Mr. Merry, our representative in Paris, of our affording an asylum to the French princes, the French bishops, and other emigrants, some of whom offended the eyes of M. Otto by appearing before him " still decorated with the insignia of French orders which no longer existed," while " the political principles and conduct of them all must necessarily occasion great jealousy to the French Government." And now he enjoined M. Otto to combine with his demand for the chastisement of the journalists another for the removal of the emigrants in question from the British shores. In an elaborate note, M. Otto affirmed to Lord Hawkesbury, without producing the slightest proof in confirmation of his assertion, that these emigrants, and especially the former bishops, distributed incendiary papers through the maritime provinces of France ; that others ' " Je lui ai souvent entendu dire, ' Si je lui lache la bride je ne resterai pas trois mois au pouvoir' " (De Bourrienne, iv. 19, p. 305). Presently M. de Bourrienne imputes the attacks on England in the Moniteur to the First Consul himself : — " II se vengea par de violens articles qui furent insdrds dans le Moniteur.''' 8o LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1802 held dangerous meetings in the island of Jersey. And he explained that he had been instructed to demand the removal of all these emigrants, the transportation of another body to Canada, and even the dismissal of the French princes themselves, by a recommendation, which they would have no means of resisting, to retire to Warsaw, where the head of their family, the Count de Provence, was still residing. Lord Hawkesbury was equally "surprised at the circumstances under which M. Otto had thought proper to present such a note, at the style in which it was drawn up, and at the complaints contained in it." He recommended him to withdraw it, which the Frenchman did not conceive himself authorised by his instructions from Paris to do, though he consented to make some alterations in its wording which the British minister suggested. But, even when modified. Lord Hawkesbury did not consider it becoming our dignity to honour it with a formal reply, but preferred, as he wrote to his father, to " instruct Mr. Merry very fully as to the language which he was to hold in consequence of it at Paris, while he himself should adopt those mea sures which might be judged right because they are right, and without any reference to the note." The letter which, in pursuance of this plan, he wrote to Mr. Merry, in order that he might communicate his senti ments to the French Government, he first submitted to the king himself and received his approval of it in the follow ing characteristic note : Weymouth, August 29th, 1802. It is impossible to pen a more weak and improper paper than the one delivered by M. Otto, or a more suitable answer than the one prepared by Lord Hawkesbury. The king never doubted either of the evil disposition or impertinence of the French Government ; but he trusts that firmness and temper will, for some time, preserve peace, which can alone be kept by this country holding a dignified language while treating with that faithless people. George R. i8o2j OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 8i And the despatch well deserved the king's praise for its conciliatory frankness combined with an unmistakeable resolution to violate no English law, and offend no English habit or feeling. Lord Hawkesbury was not ashamed to avow his anxious desire to allay the irritation which he admitted it to be natural for the French Government to feel. He unreservedly admitted that improper paragraphs respecting Buonaparte had appeared in the English journals, and that papers still more indecent and vexatious had been published by foreigners residing in England. To chastise such, the French Government might fairly have appealed to the English laws for redress, which they would actually have obtained. But they had chosen, in stead, to take the law into their own hands. They had retaliated by libels on England, published in the authorised organ of the French Government, the Moniteur} His Majesty felt it beneath his dignity to complain of such attacks, but it was impossible, when M. Otto had presented such a note, to forbear calling Mr. Merry's attention to the conduct of the French in this respect. Mr. Merry must be aware (and he was at liberty to communicate to the French authorities the whole of Lord Hawkesbury's note, and even to put the substance of it in writing, as a memorandum of the conversation he might hold with the French minister) that " the king neither would nor could, in consequence of any representation or menace from a foreign Power, make 1 In a letter on this subject to his son. Lord Liverpool says : " It is positively asserted that Buonaparte is himself a writer of some of the paragraphs that have appeared in the Moniteur, which are certainly as offensive to our Government as any published in our papers can be to him. It is said also that the French Govern ment sent over an agent here to purchase what may be called the goodwill of some of our newspapers." The first of these assertions is almost certainly true. When Buonaparte had reproached Fouchd for not detecting and arresting the author of a pamphlet entitled " Caesar, Cromwell, and Buonaparte," Fouchd told De Bourrienne that the author, who was Buonaparte's own brother Lucien, had shown him the MS. full of corrections by Buonaparte hiraself (De Bourrienne) iv. 13, p. 219.) VOL. I. G LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1802 ¦ concession which could be in the smallest degree Igerous to the liberty of the press, justly dear to every tish subject. The British constitution admits of no vious restraints upon publications of this descrip- 1. But we had courts of law, wholly independent of the ecutive Government, capable of taking cognizance of all jroper publications ; bound to inflict punishment on inquents ; and which, in fact, often have punished ;ls defamatory of foreign governments. Our own vernment has no other protection than that of these tie laws ; and, while it is willing to give foreign govern- nts every possible protection, it can neither consent to v-model our laws or to change our constitution to itify the wishes of any foreign Power. With respect to ; Alien Act, which we were asked to put in force to pel those foreigners who were alleged to be the authors these offensive publications, that law had only been icted to enable the king to prevent the residence here foreigners whose numbers or principles were calculated endanger the internal peace of his dominions. It would an abuse of it to exert it in the case of such individuals those of whom M. Otto complained, and who, if they i done wrong, were amenable to other laws. 'The demand for the removal of the French princes i other emigrants was still more inadmissible. The snch had urged that we had formerly demanded the noval of the Pretender from France. There was a .nifest difference between the cases. When Jam.es II. ;t fled from England, he retired to France ; and we /er made the slightest demand for the dismissal of him any of his family or adherents from St. Germain's, where, fact, he lived and died. But when, after his death, uis XIV., in direct violation of former treaties, formally cnowledged his son as King of England, we could no iger be indifferent to such an insult, and, in the Peace Utrecht, we made it one of the conditions of the treaty it the Pretender himself should not be allowed to reside i8o2] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 83 in France. But we never extended the demand to any members of his family or any of his adherents, though they were notoriously busy in exciting actual rebellion in England. We never required the removal even of the Duke of Berwick, who, from his talents and principles, was the most dangerous man in the world to the interests of the country and the Protestant succession. In the present instance the demand for the removal of the French princes and their partisans rested on no condition of any treaty ; indeed, the 20th article of the recent treaty especially limited the persons whom either Government might claim to have surrendered to them, to criminals accused on fair evidence of murder, forgery, or fraudulent bankruptcy. If the bishops, of whom M. Otto com plained, could be proved to have attempted to induce the French people to disturb their existing Government, or resist the new Church establishment, then his Majesty would think himself justified in removing them from the country (as, in fact, he was preparing to remove Georges and some of his followers). But then proof must first be given that they are making such attempts." Finally, Lord Hawkesbury thought it important to observe that the tone of M. Otto's note was "far from conciliatory ; and that the practice of presenting such notes could not fail to have the effect of indisposing the two nations to each other, instead of consolidating and strengthening the peace which was now happily estab lished. It was the duty of a wise Government to en deavour to allay feelings of irritation, rather than to provoke them. The king was sincerely disposed to adopt every measure for the preservation of peace which was consistent with the honour and independence of the country, and with the security of its laws and constitution. But the French Government must have formed a most erroneous judgment of the disposition of the British nation and of the character of its Government, if it expected that any representative of a foreign Power would ever induce G 2 84 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [[802 them to consent to a violation of those rights on which the liberties of the people of this country are founded." And the Ministry did not limit its conciliatory disposi tion to a courteous despatch ; but when Peltier, the French writer of whom Otto had chiefly complained, proceeded to publish articles which were not only defamatory of the per son and character of the First Consul, but were even capable of being construed as incitements to assassination, our Government successfully instituted a prosecution against him, without however pacifying Buonaparte himself, or in ducing him to check the attacks which the Moniteur con tinued to make on everything connected with England. The First Consul even took upon himself to issue an order to M. Lavalette, the French Postmaster-General, to disregard the regulations which, by mutual agreement, had governed the communications between the two countries since the re-establishment of peace, and to prevent the conveyance of passengers by the mail-packets, solely, as M. Lavalette confessed to Mr. Merry, in order to retaliate on us in another way the vexation which he felt at the comments made on his conduct by the English press; and the entrance of English newspapers and pamphlets into France he absolutely prohibited. The negotiation of the commercial treaty with Spain, for which he was anxious, was interrupted for a time by the refusal of King Charles to proceed with it till the French Government should have discharged the debts owing to some Spaniards whose property in France had been recently sequestrated under circumstances of admitted illegality. But this refusal, which, in the case of a more consistent and independent Government, would have been dictated by a proper sense of what was due to itself and to its subjects, was, in the case of Spain, a mere burst of impotent petulance. The Court and Government of Spain were at this time in a most miserable condition ; and the character of the principal personages, the king, the queen, and Godoy, the Prince of Peace, had so great an influence on i8o2] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 85 the subsequent history of the whole Continent, that no apology seems needed for inserting a letter from a very penetrating observer, Mr. Hookham Frere, who was at this time resident at Madrid as our ambassador, and who thus describes them to the Secretary of State for the guidance of our Government : My Lord, Valentia, December 22d, 1802. I take the advantage of this form of letter to forward to your Lordship such notions respecting the state and character of this Court as could not with propriety be entrusted to a public despatch, and I must entreat your Lordship to bestow the same care upon its security, or to destroy it as soon as it has served the purpose of information for which it was intended. I am the more anxious upon this point from knowing that, wherever scandalous anecdotes are concerned, even though they should involve the most important secrets, they do some how find their way into public notoriety in a manner almost unaccountable, and I am well aware that if any such anecdotes should become current in London the)' will infallibly be referred to me as their source, and will be attended with the worst consequences to his Majesty's service. The character of his Catholic Majesty had been for a long time misunderstood ; it had been imagined that he possessed a great deal of latent energy. The freedom of his carriage, the impetuosity of all his movements, the abruptness of his ges tures and tones of voice, all favoured this idea ; and it was imagined that the passiveness which he had shown in many instances proceeded rather from want of reflection and under standing than from want of vigour and spirit, and that, when ever a case should arise in which his honour and interests should be decidedly and evidently implicated, he would at last exhibit that firmness the want of which had been so long regretted. These occasions have, however, presented them selves too often to afford any hope from their recurrence, and the character of this sovereign must, it is imagined, be classed with that of other princes of his house, and with that of the unfortunate Louis XVI. in particular, in whom the same tone and manner were visible without being attended by those mental energies which they usually indicate. 86 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1802 It is, besides, very generally apprehended that the king has, by the suggestions of his consort, become a convert to a perfect systera of political epicurism, and that they have formed together a short of shocking calculation that the pre sent system, carefully managed, may be raade to last their time, and that the miseries which are to result from it must be the concern of their successor. The conduct of the queen had been for a long time notorious to every individual in the country except the king, and it was imagined that whenever the discovery was made his resent ment would be terrible and fatal. It is, however, now past a doubt that the king is no longer deceived, information having been given him to which he could not shut his eyes. I have it even from good authority, and from more than one quarter, that the Prince of Peace had the audacity, some time ago, to conceive the project of removing the queen into confinement upon this accusation ; that he reproached her, in the presence of the king, with the irregularity of her conduct ; and concluded by saying that not as a punishment for what was to be regarded as a natural infirmity, but for the avoidance of scandal, and for the removal of bad example, she ought to be sent away from the Court. He then appealed to the Archbishop of Toledo and Seville, his brother-in-law, with whom the scene had been concocted ; but, the archbishop's courage failing hira, he concluded in a milder sense, and the Prince of Peace was left in a violent altercation with the queen at the one end of the room, while the king, looking on, told the archbishop to see how they quarrelled. It is supposed to be upon this principle that the present gallant has not been suffered to attend the Court in its journey. The situation of the Prince of Peace with respect to the king is singular. I have been told, and I am disposed to believe, that the king fears him. The Prince of Peace has certainly been known to raake use of expressions which looked that way. Immediately after the campaign in Portugal, the Prince of Peace upon some occasion presented himself under the windows of the palace with a train of one hundred and fifty general officers and others. The queen was overheard to say to the king, " This is too much ! " and yet they both came i8o2] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 87 forward to the balcony and returned his salute, and received him with marked expressions of attention. General Morla (now Governor of Cadiz), who attended the Prince of Peace, did not take off his hat, though the prince told him to do so, and reminded him that he was standing in the presence of the king. Yet this insolence passed unnoticed. The queen has long dreaded him ; but, whether from the remains of old attachment, or from the extreme ascendency he has acquired over her, she certainly overturned the scheme which in Urquizo's Ministry had been prepared for his destruction. It is a singular fact, and perfectly agrees with what I have before mentioned, that, notwithstanding his seeming omni- potency, he has never been able to unite in his person the administration of the War Department and the command of the army. The queen, who was alarmed at this union of powers, prevailed upon the king to resist it ; the prince was baffled, and the office has been held for this year and a half in commendam by the Minister of Justice, who was bred a lawyer, and is no more acquainted with military affairs than other lawyers usually are. He is certainly at this moment indisposed towards France, though he entertains at the sarae time an excessive distrust of the British Government, the effect of the former calumnies of the French. I believe I mentioned to your Lordship once that he was seriously persuaded that the British Government had employed persons to poison or assassinate him. This notion, which appears so absurd in England, is not so here, owing, as I find, to the extreme frequency of the former crime. This distrust is so powerful, that though I have reason to believe that he proposes to send a secret mission to England, I am in doubt whether I should venture to propose such a step for him for fear of exciting some suspicion of collusion between me and the person whom he might propose to employ. Suspicion and distrust are, as I am informed, the characteristic qualities of his nature, which betray themselves in the management of his domestic concerns ; and in other matters of trifling import this quality (as is naturally to be expected from his situation) is daily gaining ground. His vanity, which was one of the chief instruments which the French formerly made use of, by exciting 88 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1802 his jealousy of the reputation of the British minister, has now taken an opposite direction, and has made him equally impa tient of the celebrity of Bonaparte. There is, too, I beHeve, a good deal in the physical antipathy which must exist between two creatures of such opposite natures : the one gross, sensual, and iUiterate, eating, drinking, digesting, and in the full enjoy ment of animal life; the other valetudinary in constitution, romantic and pedantic, and reraoved at an equal distance on the other side of the line of propriety and good taste. It is certain that he hates Bonaparte as much for the means by which he has risen, as the other must despise him for those by which he has done so. I was so persuaded of this that I ventured to touch upon the point in the short conversation which we had together, when he questioned me as to my opinion on the continuance of peace. I answered, " Que voulez-vous ? Qui peut rdpondre des volontes d'un homme, qui ne boit ni ne mange, qui est agite par un malaise physique, et qui ne peut rester en repos pour nous aprfes les sacrifices que nous avons fait pour obtenir la paix? Vous pouvez etre sflr que nous serious bien faches de les avoir fait gratuitement" The way in which he received this convinced me that I was right Supposing this jealousy and antipathy to have their full effect, and the jealousy and distrust on the other side to be got over, the Prince of Peace would still have to combat the intrigues and influence ofthe queen, who would dread the idea of seeing hira invested with such an authority as would be necessary for carrying into execution any measure of vigour or effect, from the well-grounded apprehension that the exercise of this authority would shortly be directed against herself As far as I can venture to judge, this is the obstacle the most likely to prove fatalto any project for the emancipation of Spain. In addition to this must be taken into consideration the levity of the Prince of Peace's character, and the possibility that at any tirae, in a moment of vanity or pique, he might suffer the most important secret to escape hira ; which he would no sooner have done than he would immediately set about to crush and destroy his accomplices, in order to efface the suspicions which his own imprudence had excited. I ought not to omit to mention to your Lordship, that after i8o2] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 89 speaking with some feeling of the manner in which Azara had been treated, he expressed to me his surprise that our ambas sador at Paris should have put up with some slights which he understood had been passed upon him. As the subject was one upon which I had no information, I did not follow it ; but I was struck with the circumstance of his expressing an anxiety for the support of British dignity. 1 shall endeavour to point out to him the propriety of sending a secret and confidential mission to Vienna, where the minister is a mere sensualist and completely null. This step is no less desirable than the mission to England, as it is evident that, if Spain were to attempt to mutiny, even with the utmost assist ance of Great Britain, she would only draw down ruin upon herself, as the Government would not have the courage to bear up against the first reverses which they must naturally expect, nor the foresight to perceive that Spain, with the national spirit which prevails in the country, with the antipathy to France, the military passion of the people, and its various local advantages, is, in fact, a country which can never be conquered, except by the weakness or connivance of its Government. They would probably, at the end of the first campaign, conclude a peace which would leave the country a conquest in the hands of France. In the present moment the suspicion of such an intention would be attended with the most fatal consequences. We must bear in mind that an attempt to rescue Spain from her present situation is, in fact, a conspiracy against the established authority of France, and that its discovery would be attended with the same effects as the discovery of any other conspiracy; namely, the ruin of every individual concerned in it. It must therefore (if ever such a scheme can be set on foot) be treated in the same manner; nothing, or at least as Htde as possible, must be committed to writing, and everything must be con ducted by the verbal communication of confidential persons. I take this opportunity to mention to your Lordship that the suspicion which was excited by a passage of Azara's letter, a copy of which I transmitted from Lisbon near two years ago, is much strengthened by what I have found to be the impression here; namely, that our secrets have been betrayed. An emigrant here, a relation of Portalis's, was constantly in possession of go LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1802 good information, which he was understood, and which, I believe, with the usual vanity of his nation, he professed to derive through his relation with that source. I will now proceed to give your Lordship some account of the reraaining principal personages. The Prince of Asturias is about eighteen years old, lively, affable, unembarrassed, and pleasing in his manners, in countenance and complexion re sembling his raother. His political sentiraents have not been declared sufficiently to be spoken of with certainty, but he is not known to have given any tokens of predilection for the French ; and this alone, considering the circumstances of the times, may be considered as a favourable symptom. He usually speaks slightingly of the Prince of Peace, sometimes calling him the " Garde de Corps" and sometimes the " Senhorito," which is about equivalent to "foli Cceur" in French, or "pretty young gentleman " in English. His innocence and simplicity on cer tain points were so great as to have produced a very ludicrous erabarrassraent on the occasion of his marriage. This however will, in all probability, be soon effectually removed, as some of his attendants are occupied in plying him with all sorts of pestilent books upon this principle, which I give in their own words : " Puisque enfin nous devons etre gouvem^s par les feraraes, il faut d'abord lui gater le cceur." The princess his wife is a little fair figure, seeraingly of a delicate constitution, nearly handsome, much resembling the pictures of her mother, said to be very observant, and sometimes satirical. I will now conclude, entreating your Lordship to believe that I am, with great truth and respect. Your Lordship's most obedient, humble Servant, H. Frere. With such rulers there could be no long interruption of the influence exercised over Spain by a neighbour of so unyielding a will as the First Consul. In his eyes his allies ceased to be friends the moment that they were unwilling to be slaves ; and, though the whole course of the negotiations of the preceding winter had shown him that any new encroachments on his part would excite a feeling of alarm which must endanger the continuance of peace, i8o2] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 9' yet the ratifications were hardly exchanged before he began to show that his appetite for a further extension of his authority and for additional acquisitions of territory was alike unsatiated and unchecked. Every month brought forth fresh instances of his disregard for the spirit, and often for the letter, of the recent treaty. He began by exacting from the Sultan permission for French merchant- ships to navigate the Black Sea on the same footing as ships "of the most favoured nation." He even pressed for such a liberty being allowed to French ships of war, though armed ships of every other country were excluded, and was with difficulty induced to recede from that pre tension. And, at the very same moment that he was demanding these favours from the Porte, there was reason to believe that he was endeavouring to tempt others to co-operate with him in the dismemberment of the Turkish empire,^ that he might obtain a port in the Mediterranean nearer to Egypt than Malta, in case he failed to recover his influence over that island. Mr. Merry next reported that he was equipping a power ful fleet in Toulon. The preparation of a naval force could hardly be meant to menace any other Power but ourselves; and before the end of the summer fresh extensions of his power along the Italian coast supplied additional evidence what the object of that armament really was. In August, as has been already mentioned, he procured the pro longation of his consular authority for his life ; and though, as Mr. Merry reported, the discontent which the measure really produced in France was "smothered by fear," it was ' On the 1 6th of June Mr. Merry wrote to Lord Hawkesbury that he had additional reason to believe the reports of a design having been formed by the French Government for the dismemberment of Turkey, and of such a plan having made a part of the discussions in which the Russian minister had been so closely engaged. But M. de Marcoff had lately received an answer on the subject by which the Emperor of Russia appears to have disapproved the plan, and to have expressed a desire that the integrity of the Turkish empire should be maintained. According to the plan proposed, France was to have had the Morea. 92 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1802 impossible for other countries to fail to see in such a measure increased means of bending France to his absolute will, and so making himself more formidable to his neigh bours. Accordingly the next month witnessed the com mencement of a series of encroachments which were manifestly incompatible with the preservation of peace, being in fact so many steps designed to strengthen him for the renewal of the war on which he was bent. In the beginning of September he issued a decree annexing Pied mont to France, on the shameless plea that no article in the treaties of Luneville or Amiens had forbidden him to do so ; and he instantly began to secure his hold over his new province by cutting new roads across the Alps. A week or two later he seized on Parma and Piacenza, and took possession also of Elba, that little island which after wards became so conspicuous a monument of his fall. The same month he dissolved the existing constitution of the Batavian Republic by open force of arms, not because its Legislature, which was indeed of his own creation, was not sufficiently obsequious to his will, but merely that it might be modelled for the future more exactly on the plan of the French Republic. And in the first days of October he despatched his favourite aide-de-camp. General Rapp, to Lausanne, to announce to the rulers of the Helvetian Republic that their Government also was dissolved, and that the First Consul took upon himself to settle the differences which existed between the different countries by his own "efficacious mediation." The Swiss implored the protection and assistance of Great Britain. But their country was so placed that, had we been ever so much inclined to aid them with troops, it would have been impossible to do so. We could only remonstrate with the French Government for its tyrannical interference with the constitution of a free country, and promise the Swiss them selves pecuniary succour in case they should resolve on making an armed resistance, which they soon found to be impracticable. Buonaparte sent Ney, one of the greatest i8o2] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 93 of his generals, to overrun and subdue the country, and at the beginning of the following year promulgated a new con stitution, which in fact made him master of Switzerland. It was obvious that these manifold encroachments of the First Consul, these extensions of the power of France in every direction, had made so great a change in the state of Europe since the signature of the Treaty of Amiens as entirely nullified our obligation to complete the cessions to which we had engaged ourselves. To give additional force to the representations which we decided on making on the subject, we replaced Mr. Merry by an ambassador of higher rank. Lord Whitworth ; and a despatch which Lord Hawkesbury addressed to him on his appointment sets in the clearest possible light the line of policy on which the Cabinet had resolved, and the grounds by which our resolution to retain those conquests which, under a different state of affairs, we had been willing to restore, was abundantly justified. Most secret and confidential. TO LORD whitworth. My Lord, November 14th. I take the first opportunity of communicating to your Excellency, for the regulation of your conduct, the instructions which his Majesty is pleased to give you on such points as are at present subjects of difference between his Majesty and the French Government, and to desire that you will endeavour to conform yourself to them in all your conversations with the French ministers. You will lose no proper opportunity of expressing his Majesty's earnest solicitude for the preservation of the peace which sub sists between the two countries; his disposition to do every thing in his power for that purpose which is consistent with the honour of his crown and the interests of his dominions ; and his regret at any circumstances which may have arisen to interrupt that harmony and good understanding which is so important to the welfare and happiness of both countries. You will, however, state most distincdy his Majesty's determination 94 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1802 never to forego his right of interfering in the affairs of the Con tinent on every occasion in which the interests of his own dominions, or those of Europe in general, may appear to him to require it. This right his Majesty possesses in common vrith every other independent Power ; it rests upon general prin ciples, and does not require the confirmation of any particular treaty. It is nevertheless iraportant that you should observe that the circumstances which led to the last peace, and the principles upon which the negotiation was conducted, would give his Majesty a special right to interpose in any case which might lead to the extension of the power or influence of France. In the comraunications which took place between the two Governraents previous to the signature of the preHminary articles, his Majesty proposed, as the basis of negotiation, that, if the French Governraent would not relinquish the continental acquisitions which they had obtained from other Powers in the course of war, his Majesty would claim the right of keeping a part of his conquests as a compensation for the important acquisitions of territory made by France upon the Continent. This principle was formally recognised by the French Govern ment in an official note in the following words : " Cependant on reconnoit que les grandes ^v&emens survenus en Europe et les changemens arrives dans les territoires des grands Etats du Continent peuvent autoriser une partie des demandes du Gou vernement Britannique." The terras of the treaty of peace were negotiated in conforraity to this basis ; and it appears therefore clear that the then existing state of possession and of engage ments as respects the Continent were the foundations of the peace itself and that his Majesty has therefore an undoubted right to interpose, in consequence of the treaty, in every case in which the state of possession may appear to him to have undergone any raaterial alteration, or in which the engagements which were then subsisting have been violated to the prejudice of his Majesty or of the other Powers of Europe. You will proceed to observe that the annexation of Piedmont to France since the conclusion of the definitive treaty makes a most material difference in the state of the fixed and permanent pos sessions of France. That the renunciation of the Duchy of Parma in favour of France, a circumstance which was con- i8o2] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 95 cealed at the time of negotiating the peace, and which is become of the greatest importance from its furnishing an additional instance of that system of secret cession which is totally inconsistent with any system of security for Europe, makes a most essential difference likewise in the relative cir cumstances of the two countries. That at the time of concluding the peace the French Government were bound by the most sacred engagements to respect the independence of the Helve tian and Batavian Republics, and to ahow the people of those countries to choose whatever form of government they might think proper. That the violation of this right in the Swiss people, and the invasions of their territory, notwithstanding the representation made in their favour by his Majesty, makes a most material alteration in the state of engagements since the conclusion of the definitive treaty, and adds most considerably to the influence and the power of France, to the prejudice of a state which was then acknowledged as independent. That the conduct of the French Government to the Batavian Republic was not less objectionable ; that the independence of this republic was acknowledged both by the Treaty of Luneville and by the Treaty of the Hague ; the French Government were permitted to keep garrisons in that country only till the time of a general peace. That by a convention signed in August iSoi, the French troops were to remain there till the conclusion of the definitive treaty of peace between Great Britain and France. That the French troops have not to this period evacuated the country, and that the First Consul is represented lately to have declared, " That in the event of any differences among the people of that country on the subject of their internal govern ment, he would march with his whole army to suppress them.'' That this is an obvious violation of the independence of the Batavian Republic, and that his Majesty has a peculiar right to interpose on the present occasion, as he consented to make numerous and most important restitutions to the Batavian Government in the treaty of peace, on the consideration ol that Government being independent and not being subject to any foreign control. It is unnecessary for me to recommend to your Excellency to make these representations with moderation and temper. You 96 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1802 will attend very particularly to any explanations which may be given you respecting thera, and you will engage to report such explanations to his Majesty's Government. You will avoid, with peculiar caution, committing his Majesty's Government as to what may be their ultimate determination upon all or any of these points ; viz. whether under any cir cumstances an unsatisfactory explanation respecting them might lead to war on the part of his Majesty ; whether it might in duce his Majesty to claim some additional acquisition to coun terbalance the acquisitions of France, or whether it might be thought most prudent for the present to acquiesce. His Majesty's conduct in this respect must be determined by a variety of considerations, and particularly by the information which he may receive of the sentiments and intentions of the other European Powers. It is natural to suppose that the French rainisters will take an early opportunity of bringing forward, at least in conversation, any grievance which they may choose to allege against his Majesty's Government ; and I have no doubt the most promi nent will be the complaints which they have so often advanced already respecting the liberty of the press in this country, and the conduct of the French emigrants who are resident here. Upon these subjects it is unnecessary for me to do more than to refer you to my despatch to Mr. Merry (No. 20), and to desire that you would strictly conform yourself to the in structions therein contained. In the event, however, of any conversation upon this subject, it is material that you should remark on the paragraphs which have lately appeared in the Moniteur, calumniating his Majesty's Government, and that you should dwell particularly on the distinction existing be tween paragraphs of this nature appearing in a paper avowedly official and the paragraphs in our English publications, over which the Governraent of this country have no previous con trol, and which have been. repeatedly and expUcitly disavowed by his Majesty's Government. If the French Government should enter into any conversation with you on the subject of the Island of Malta, it is of great importance that you should avoid committing his Majesty as to what may be eventually his intentions with respect to that i8o2] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 97 island. It is evident that the arrangements stipulated in the twentieth article of the definitive treaty cannot as yet be carried into effect. That neither the Governments of St. Petersburg or of Berlin have given any decisive answer to the appHcation that has been made to them to become guarantying Powers of the arrangement. That according to the article the Grand Master must be chosen before there can be any person properly authorised to receive possession of the island. That Prince Ruspoli has declined the situation of Grand Master, and that it will be necessary, therefore, for the Pope to make some other selection. I recommend to you, however, to avoid saying anything which may engage his Majesty to restore the island, even if these arrangements should be completed according to the true intent and spirit of the tenth article of the Treaty of Amiens. His Majesty would certainly be justified in claiming the possession of Malta as some counterpoise to the acquisitions of France since the conclusion of the definitive treaty ; but it is not necessary to decide in the present moment whether his Majesty will be desirous to avail himself of his pretensions in this respect. It would be better, therefore, that you should not bring the subject of Malta forward at present, unless it should be first mentioned by the French ministers. You will then conform yourself to the instructions above stated, and you will be very particular in representing to me everything which may pass upon this important subject. I shall not fail to inform your Excellency from time to time of the substance of the conversations which may take place between General Andrfessi and myself, as it is of the utmost importance that your language to the French Minister for Foreign Affairs should correspond as much as possible with mine to the French Ambassador. Yours truly, Hawkesbury. Lord Hawkesbury, at the same time, entered into full explanations with the Courts of Vienna and St. Petersburg, v/hich were not without influence in the subsequent course of events. But he doubted whether, even if those Govern ments were to give the most open sanction and support VOL. I. H 98 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1802 to our view.s, Buonaparte would be induced to recede in the least from the path of aggressive ambition on which he had entered. There was, as he wrote to his father, perhaps some little encouragement to be derived from the character of the new French ambassador. General Andr^ossi, who succeeded M. Otto when Lord Whitworth superseded Mr. Merry ; and whom Otto represented as a man "of very moderate principles, and very strongly inclined to the preservation of peace." Otto assured Lord Hawkesbury that the General " would pay very littie attention to Talleyrand, and that he had obtained the privilege of corresponding directly with the First Consul,"' while Lord Hawkesbury " had also reason to know that Andr^ossi had expressed his disapprobation as to what had been done in Switzerland, and had even said that Buonaparte was aware that he had gone too far" The Parliament which met on the i6th of November was a new one, and a fortnight afterwards Lord Hawkes bury began to entertain rather more sanguine hopes of being able to preserve peace ; while, at the same time, he thought the House of Commons inclined to judge ' Though of course this was not known to the English Cabinet, the selection of General Andr^ossi had been the act of Buonaparte him self, and was not at all approved by Talleyrand. De Bourrienne relates an amusing scene between the First Consul and the minister in connexion with the appointment. " Le soir meme M. de Talley rand vint travailler avec lui ; nous Ations k la Malmaison. 11 fut question de la nomination d'un ambassadeur en Angleterre : le Premier Consul nomma plusieurs personnes, et dit ensuite, 'J'ai envie de nommer Andr^ossi.' M. de Talleyrand, qui n'^tait pas bien dispose pour ce choix, lui rdpondit d'un air spirituel et malin : ' Vous voulez nommer Andr^ aussi ! Quel est done cet Andrd?' ' Je ne vous parle pas d'un Andrd, je vous parle d'Andr^ossi ; est-ce que vous ne le con- naissez pas? Pardieu, Andrdossi, g^n^ral d'artillerie.' 'Andr^ossil ah, oui, oui, c'est vrai, Andr^ossi. Je n'y pensais pas ; je cherchais dans la diplomatie, et je ne I'y trouvais pas. C'est vrai ; oui, oui, c'est vrai, il est dans I'artillerie.' Le Premier Consul parla alors du G&^ral Andrdossi de manifere k faire voir k M. de Talleyrand qu'il d^signait ce gdndral d'artillerie pour I'ambassade k Londres." (De Bourrienne, iv. 32, p. 343-) i802] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 99 favorably of and to support the Ministry, whatever might happen. He writes to his father : — The House was rather flat, but this I have observed is generally the case with a new Parliament; a great proportion of the members who attend being new members, who are unac quainted with the ways of the House, and who cannot be expected to give much encouragement to any party. There is certainly much room for political intrigue, as there are various parties in the House, and each of them inclined to pursue a system of its own. I understand, however, from Mr. Addington, that his assurances of support from country gen tlemen are as satisfactory as he could possibly expect The conduct of Government with respect to France is certainly approved of in general, both in and out of Parliament. The prevailing sentiment appears to be considerable irritation with respect to the conduct of France, but a strong desire to avoid war if possible. Our next debate will probably take place on the army estimates. It is intended to vote very large estab lishments : 35,000 men will be proposed for Great Britain, 25,000 for Ireland ; 5,000 for Jamaica, 10,000 for the Leeward Islands, 8,000 for Gibraltar and Malta, 7,000 for North America and Canada, and 14,000 for the East Indies. Sanguine hopes are entertained that, from the flourishing state of the revenue, a force to this extent may be kept up without the necessity of imposing any new taxes, or at least without imposing any that can be material. I do not hear when Mr. Pitt is likely to come up The intelligence from St. Domingo in the Moniteur is certainly far short of the tmth. Andr&ssi acknowledged to me that they had lost fourteen generals. Lord Nelson told me yes terday that he had had a private letter from Admiral Duck worth, who is on the Jamaica station, and who says that, with every effort of perseverance on the part of the French Govern ment, it would require fifty years at least to restore the island to anything like its former state of prosperity. And, for this and other reasons, I am inclined to think that the French Government will not be disposed to seek a quarrel with us. But the extraordinary, and in some respects extravagant, cha- H 2 loo LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1803 racter of Buonaparte makes all reasoning on this subject more than usually doubtful. The ministers in foreign courts are all aware of this. Andrdossi said to me the other day, "Dans tout ce qu'on fait il y a beaucoup qui tient au personnel." Lord Hawkesbury and his chief did not miscalculate as to the inclination of the House to support the Ministry. Fox indeed soon withdrew the aid which he had given it in the debate on the peace, and expressed a decided opposition to the increase in the war estimates : but he was followed by so few, even Sheridan resolutely differing from the views which he advanced, that he did not venture to divide against it, and the general feeling seemed evi dently to be that expressed by the old proverb, "Si vis pacem para bellum," that to show a readiness for war was the most likely mode to avoid being dragged into one. And except that the Ministry, and especially Lord Hawkes bury himself, began to feel uneasiness ,about Pitt's con tinuance of support,^ the state of affairs at home looked as promising as they could desire. The year 1803 opened ' As early as January 9th, 1803, Lord Hawkesbury writes to his father, that "though Pitt professed himself friendly to Government, and determined to continue his support of them, he certainly passes a great part of his time with those who are hostile in every way to the present Administration" (he means especially his own particular friend Canning), " and who have succeeded in impressing him with the idea that it is not for his credit to be supposed to be in the confidence of Government and a party to their measures when he has no share of either power or responsibility. I understand, however" (the letter continues), " that he is decidedly adverse to the acceptance of office. What all this will produce it is difficult to say. I confess I think it scarcely possible that under a.n.y probable circumstances he is likely to be induced to oppose Government, but it is possible he may be per suaded to start doubts and take distinctions which would have the effect of embarrassing Government, and of shaking the confidence of the public in them." It is remarkable that in April of this year Mr. Addington told the Speaker " that in January intimation came to him on the part of Mr. Pitt that Mr. Pitt was less disincUned to retum to power, and that Mr. Addington had told Steele, Perceval, and others of Mr. Pitt's friends that he (Mr. Addington) would be no obstacle to so desirable an end." (Diary of Lord Colchester, i. 413.) i8o3] OF LORD LIVERPOOL, loi peacefully, and Lord Whitworth's account of the First Consul's reception of the diplomatic body on New Year's day reads like a narrative of similar assemblies of more recent date. " The subject of his general conversation turned chiefly on philanthropy. He congratulated him self, as if he had in part contributed to it, on the improved state of civilization and social happiness, not only in France, but throughout Europe ; but lamented that every Govern ment should have adopted more or less the pernicious sys tem of maintaining such enormous standing armies, adding that it was a pity they would not all agree to reduce them at least two-thirds. I observed that one good example would have more effect than the best reasoning." Lord Whitworth became daily more and more convinced that the great body of the French people, and especially of the Parisians, were most strongly averse to a renewal of the war. The hotel which had been taken for him he found in need of considerable repairs, which he was now exe cuting; and the citizens watched the works with the greatest interest, judging of his expectation of the pro- babihties of a continued peace by the willingness which he might show to incur expense, which, if his embassy should be brought to an early termination by hostilities, would be wasted. Much, he thought, depended on our coming to a good understanding with Russia, which had a peculiar interest in the question of Malta, from the proposal which had been made to the Czar, both by France and England, to place that island under his especial protection. And a naval officer of high repu tation, Sir J. B. Warren, was sent to St. Petersburg to endeavour to stir the Government of that country to an early declaration of its resolution. But to obtain a positive answer of any kind from the Russian Ministry at that time was impossible. They feared France while they hated it. A letter from M. Sablonkoff, a Russian noble then residing at Paris, to the Count Alexander Woronzow, the Russian Chancellor, whose confidence he ICE LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1803 enjoyed, which fell into the hands of our Government, showed them that this feeling predominated over every other ;^ and Buonaparte spared no pains, by personal caresses of and a show of confidence in the Russian diplomatists and nobles in Paris, to gain them over to his secret views, which were already as hostile to England, and as ambitious and grasping, as when, four years later, he was able to compel Alexander's adhesion to them at Tilsit. With this knowledge Lord Hawkesbury had no difficulty in inducing his colleagues to delay the evacuation of Malta ; and he received the King's approval in a curious letter, which shows that, with all his straightforward honesty and frankness, George III. was not a stranger to the diplo matic arts of evasion and procrastination : January 28th, 1803. The King has read the proposed note to be delivered by Sir John Warren to the Chancellor, Count Woronzow, in answer to the one transmitted by him on the subject of Malta. The great object of the answer should be to protract the evacuation as long as possible, from the manifest views France nourishes ^ The date was February 9, 1803, and M. Sablonkoff 's language seems to have been only a reflection of Woronzow's language to him. He says : " Ce que vous m'avez dit de la France n'est que trop vrai. Ce pays, quoique dans la misfere, est cependant bien k craindre. Un peuple Idger et vicieux, dirigd par une bande de magistrals cupides et liches, qu'un ambitieux fortune maitrise, est une hydro dont toutes les tStes sont ^galement dangereuses. Je le r^p^te, la France est un monstre qu'on ne saurait assez redouter." Further on the letter says, " Le g^n^ral Hitroff a eu une presentation privde au Premier Consul. II lui a remis une lettre de I'Empereur. Avec une lettre comme celle- Ik on est sur d'etre bien regu. Je donnerai des ordres pour que tout vous soit ouvert et montr^. II a tenu Hitroff pendant plus d'une heure. II lui a, entr'autres choses, parld de son indignation contre la conduite infdme des Anglais pendant leur coalition avec les Russes, et a fini le dialogue par dire que la France et la'Russie dtaient trop eloign^es pour se faire la guerre. Et qu'elles sont faites pour etre amies. ' Je r^ponds qu'k nous deux nous donnerons la loi k I'Europe enti^re, au globe entier.' Hitroff m'a paru enchant^ de son esprit, mais dtonnd de son despotisme : toujoursy^, inoi, partout mon" i8o3] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 103 of fresh expeditions to the East. The King trusts this note will open a tedious negotiation, which is certainly the line at present most suitable to the tranquillity of the globe. It is supposed that Lord Hawkesbury will give at a proper time notice to Count Simon Woronzow'^ of the step which has been taken, as his good or bad disposition towards the measure will at the present moment have great weight at his Court ; and, though it may be feared that no great activity can be expected from the Court of Russia, it is desirable to get her as much interested in the question, and as closely connected with this country, as apparent cordiality from henc6 can effect. George R. January did not pass without Buonaparte affording fresh indications of how little sincerity there was in his pro fessions of a desire to maintain peace, and fresh specimens of his discourteous arrogance towards every other nation. In the autumn he had sent M. Sebastiani, a general whose abilities were not confined to his own profession, to Egypt, nominally to re-establish the French commerce with that country on the footing on which it had stood before the war, but really to efface that impression of our superior power which had been produced by the inglorious end of his own expedition to that country, and to tamper with the Pachas and other officers of the Porte. And he now pubHshed in the Moniteur a report which the general had just addressed to him, in the highest degree insulting and injurious to England ; accusing the English Government and diplomatists of intriguing against those Turkish officials who were friendly to France, and the English Commander-in-chief, General Stuart, of instigating his own assassination; giving a most precise account of our force in that country, but disparaging its condition and manage ment in every particular, affirming that " a great mis understanding existed between General Stuart and the ^ The brother of the Chancellor, and at this time the Russian ambassador in London. I04 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1803 Pacha," and concluding with an assertion that "6,000 French would at present be enough to conquer Egypt." Since it was evident that the attempt on Egypt thus suggested, and, as the publication of the report showed, not disapproved of, would be greatly facilitated by our removal from Malta, it of course made us the more resolute not to relinquish our hold on that important island while matters remained in such a state of uncertainty ; and that determination was strengthened by every fresh instance of anxiety displayed on the subject by the First Consul. At the same time Buo'naparte was taking a singular step with a view to consolidate his own power, or rather to force the way to his attainment of the higher rank which he coveted, by seeking to bribe the Count de L'Isle, as the next brother of the last king was now styled, into a resignation of his rights as legitimate heir to the French throne, by the offer of a princely establishment in some other country,^ which * The proposal and the reply made by the French prince are recorded by Alison, xxxv. § 84. But that author, who mistakes the place of Louis's abode at the time, does not seem to have been aware that the King of Prussia pressed its acceptance on Louis, was willing to gua rantee the performance of the conditions, and expected to be able to prevail on the Czar to add his guarantee also. In spite of the desire of Louis to keep the transaction secret, it soon became known to Lord Hawkesbury, who received copies of the correspondence ; and the following letter of Louis to his brother (afterwards Charles X.) on the subject will not be without interest : — " A Varsovie, ce 2 Mars, 1803. " Voici, mon cher frfere, un incident auquel j'imagine que vous ne vous attendiez gu&res. B. P. g4td d'un cotd par la fortune, sentant de I'autre combien peu solide est une usurpation opposde k d'impr^- scriptibles droits, a osd croire qu'il pourrait nous determiner k vendre les notres. Le Roi de Prusse, auquel il s'est ouvert sur ses projets, n'a pu se dispenser de me transmettre cette ouverture. Ici pour m'dpargner des details je laisse parler les pieces'' (a copy of the proposal and of the reply made in writing by Louis to M. le President de Meyer, who had been sent from Berlin with the proposal, and had just opened himself on the subject to the Abbe Edgeworth). '• Je n'essayerai pas de vous peindre les divers sentimens qui se sont eieves en moi. Vous les eprouverez. Vous jugerez, comme moi, qu'il y aurait de I'avantage k publier tout ceci. Mais souvenez-vous que les i8o3] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. loj should be guaranteed by the King of Prussia. Though both parties desired to keep it secret, it could not long be concealed from us; and the knowledge of Buonaparte's disappointment rather increased Lord Hawkesbury's ex pectations of being able to avoid a rupture .without relinquishing Malta, which he had now entirely resolved, at least for the present, not to do. This belief was further strengthened by a step of M. Otto, which it was impossible to suppose had been taken without the privity of the First Consul He was now at Paris ; and availed himself of his previous official acquaintance with the Secretary for Foreign Affairs to write him a private and confidential letter (as if a minister in Lord Hawkesbury's position could possibly receive one of such a character from a diplomatist in the employ of the French Government). Avowing his sole object to be the maintenance of peace, he sought to coax the English minister over to his, or rather to Buonaparte's, views ; assuring him that " Malta could not be retained by England without becoming the justes egards dus au Souverain qui me donne asile m'ont determine k garder le silence ; et imitez ma reserve. J'excepte cependant de cette loi votre fils cadet, et MM. le Due d'Orieans, le Due de Montpensier, le Comte de Beaujolais, le Prince de Conde, et le Due de Bourbon. Ceci n'est pas une simple confiance d'amitie entre fr^res. Si jamais le mot de feu M. le Prince de Conty, ' La couronne nous appartient k tous, notre atne la porte,' fut applicable k un cas, c'est k celui-ci, et vous voyez par ce que votre fils aine a ecrit au bas de ma note que je I'ai le premier instruit de I'affaire. Je n'ecris point en particulier k chacun des autres, cela est inutile, puisque je vous charge de leur faire part de ce qui se passe. Prescrivez leur egalement silence et en mon nom. Quant aux reponses k la proposition, soit qu'elles soient faites en commun, soit que chacun fasse individuellement la sienne, il faudra me les addresser, mais doubles, afin que j'en garde une, et que je fasse passer I'autre en original au Roi de Prusse. " Vous n'avez pas besoin de conseil, mais je ne puis me refuser k une reflexion, c'est que la moderation dans les formes accroit la force du fonds. Le tems, mon ami, devoile tout : ceci sera done connu un jour, et j'ose me flatter que ce chapitre ne defacera pas notre histoire. " Adieu, mon cher fr^re, je vous aime et vous embrasse de tout mon cceur. " Louis Antoine." io6 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1803 immediate cause of war : this was the firm opinion, not only of the First Consul, but of every man in the (French) Administration, and, he might add, of every French citi zen who loved his country, and who felt any regard for the dignity of its government. In fact, the Treaty of Amiens resolved itself into a convention about Malta." , An underhand attempt like this on the part of the First Consul to carry his point by private solicitation naturally led to the suspicion that he was more unwilling to have recourse to hostilities than he wished us to believe. Lord Whitworth's report of the general state of feeling in France was very different from M. Otto's account of it. The ambassador reported "that the general opinion of the most sober and sensible people, particularly in the class of senators, was decidedly against the First Consul. That they were persuaded that England was right ; and that, if we were forced to have recourse to hostilities, we should be driven to that necessity by his restless and mad ambi tion." And in the middle of March, on the very same day on which Buonaparte had collected a Court in his wife's apartments, for the express purpose of publicly attacking the British ambassador on the subject,^ Lord Whitworth received a most singular proof that even those most nearly connected with the First Consul differed from the resolution which he entertained, or at least expressed, on the subject. The occurrence was so extraordinary that he would not venture to send his report by his own messenger except in cypher : Most secret and confidential. Paris, 14th March, 1803. My Lord, A person entirely in the confidence of M. Lucien Buonaparte has commissioned a gentleman ^ who frequently visits me, and in 1 " Au cercle de Madame Buonaparte il a saisi I'occasion d'exprimer sa juste indignation devant une assembiee faite pour donner de I'eclat k ses paroles." — Correspondance de Napoleon I. viii. 250 (Letter to General Hedouville, dated March 16, 1803). ^ M. Huber, a Swiss gentleman. i8o3] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 107 whom I place confidence, to suggest to me the possibility of engaging the First Consul to consent to our keeping possession of Malta ; that is to say, his family might perhaps be induced, for a valuable consideration, to obtain his consent to our retaining that possession. It is not meant that the First Consul would sell us Malta. But his relatives, who have such an interest in preserving the peace, might, by such means, be engaged to exert their influence over him for that purpose. And, in order to satisfy the First Consul, and to palliate the transaction, at the same time that a sacrifice of money is made to their avarice, some offer might be made to the pride of the First Consul, such as the acknowledgment of any Government not yet acknowledged, or assistance in shipping, or any other way in the recovering his authority at St. Domingo. I throw this out to your Lordship as it was thrown out to me. In the present state of the business it cannot be kept too secret ; and I should very much recommend that it be communicated only to Mr. Addington and Lord Liverpool. I am sure that your Lordship would feel the inconvenience of its being submitted to the Cabinet. I have, &c. &c. Whitworth. It must be added that, though he had no doubt of the sincerity of Lucien in the matter, and indeed there could be but little question of the eagerness of every member of the First Consul's family to promote the success of any transaction calculated to enrich themselves,^ Lord Whitworth had no great confidence in the efficacy of the means proposed. Three days afterwards he writes, that though "such an advantage could not be too dearly purchased," and though " in such a matter parsimony would defeat its own end, he was, however, at the same time far from satisfied that the thing was practicable. Those who undertook it would have to contend with every obstacle which pride and revenge could oppose to them." At the ^ The Memoires of De Bourrienne, which indeed are corroborated by more than one passage in the Napoleon Correspondence, are full of stories proving the inordinate rapacity of all Buonaparte's relatives and connexions. io8 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1803 same time he was " persuaded that, after the First Consul had vented his ill-humour, and- when he should come to reflect on the little advantage to be gained by a war with England, and on the slender means he possessed of engaging in it, we should find him more tractable." Cir cumstances, however, varied every day, and our ambas sador's opinion of them was necessarily subject to the same fluctuations. A week after his first letter, he forwarded another despatch, using the same precautions for secrecy, and reporting that " It was now thought that the family of the First Consul would not be strong enough to stand alone the brunt of his violence and obstinacy. It had been judged, therefore, that the gaining over Talleyrand would be more likely to ensure success." He was to be sounded in a day or two, and Lord Whitworth thought that, " when his personal interest was so strongly engaged, we might depend on his zealous support." Lord Hawkes bury, in his reply to the first intimation of this plan, had intimated a willingness to give Lucien 100,000/. This Lord Whitworth thought would be far too small a sum, but added, though as yet the parties had not specified what they expected, that, even though the expense should prove considerable, we were at least sure that that of one campaign, or even a long continuance of the present demonstration, would be infinitely greater ; and he there fore hoped Lord Hawkesbury would be prepared to meet any terms he might have to propose, on the calculation rather of the money saved than of the money expended. The acknowledgments^ at first suggested as likely to influence the First Consul Lord Whitworth had on further consideration abandoned, partly as too inconsistent with our previously avowed principles of policy, and partly lest "by such a step we might indispose Russia irrecon cilably to our views." A day or two later he had more precise intelligence to furnish. The member of Buonaparte's family to be ' Of Governments recently established in Italy. i8o3] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 109 bribed was not Lucien, but Joseph; who "had been sounded, and was well-disposed." Not that Lucien was not equally willing to be "well-disposed," but Joseph, it was thought, "would unite more cordially with M. de Talleyrand than Lucien ;" and Lord Whitworth had become more anxious than ever "to impress upon Lord Hawkes bury that this business should not be marred by any parsimony. It might be necessary to dazzle these people by the fortunes they may make. It must not be con sidered as a common bribe, or as common secret-service money, but rather as a grand operation of state. . . . It must be considered that many persons are to be gained ; all in the very first situations, and all partaking the pillage of this country [France] ; consequently above the temptation of a common bribe." Lord Whitworth's ideas of what might be necessary, if not beyond Lord Hawkesbury's expectations, were at all events too grand for Mr. Addington. "I have no fixed idea," he continues, " of what may be necessary ; but in calculating what we may expend in one month of war, the sacrifice of a million, or even of two millions, would be economy." Lord Whit worth's private letters of this date are strongly indicative of the uncertain character of the whole policy of the French Government at the time, influenced as it was partly by the singular character of the First Consul himself, so strangely made up of impulse and of patience, of arrogance and violence, combined with and often bridled by the most far- sighted calculation. At one moment the British ambassador was driven to the conclusion that " we should never be able to keep possession of Malta without fighting for it, and was equally persuaded that by giving it up we should not avoid a war unless we had made up our minds to see the Corsican take possession of Egypt, and cut and carve as he thought proper; and, even in that case, he feared for Portugal." At another moment he repeated his belief that " the French Government, at the same time that it endeavoured to put a good face on the matter, was seriously occupied no LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1803 in devising expedients by which to give us the security we required as a preliminary to the evacuation of Malta." He added, " In talking this matter over, Talleyrand made use of an expression which had not yet escaped him, ' Quand est-ce done que votre gouvernement prononcera un si ? Nous evacuerons Malthe si.' . . They evidently wish we should propose some modification, and we may be sure that the firmer our tone the better will be the terms, should we be willing to consent to any." At the end of another week Lord Whitworth was able to report that he had made some progress in negotiation with Joseph, which however, in one sense, he admitted to be no progress at all ; but his despatch is sufficiently interesting and curious to deserve to be given without abridgment : Secret and Confidential. Paris, March 31st, 1803. My Lord, Before I proceed to give your Lordship an account of my inter view with Joseph Bonaparte, I should inform your Lordship that, it having been judged absolutely necessary to the success of the transaction to gain M. Talleyrand, I had, the day before, by means of M. Huber, who first suggested to me the possibility of establishing such a party ; who brought me the first inforraation from the friend of Lucien ; and who, from his habits of intimacy with many considerable people here, and particularly with M. Talleyrand, possesses the means of rendering himself highly useful, sounded him on the subject He immediately started all those difficulties which might be expected from one who is daily in the habit of witnessing and suffering from the violence of the First Consul, and repeatedly declared that he would hear of nothing short of the execution of the Treaty of Amiens in all its points. When he had exhausted this topic, and was told that a party was actually formed, the object of which was to combat this determination of the First Consul; that Lucien and Joseph Bonaparte, and in all probability Madame Bonaparte, would act in concert with him; and that very considerable pecuniary advantages raight be derived from it to hiraself; his tone was i8o3] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. iii softened. He expressed great surprise, but no reluctance to afford his assistance ; he desired, however, two days to con sider. M. Huber then told him it was absolutely necessary I should see Joseph Bonaparte, that I felt the advantages which might result from a direct communication of this kind, but that I am scrupulous of taking any indirect road, being, as I was, so perfectiy satisfied with my oflfitial intercourse with him, and had therefore determined to avoid it unless it should meet with his concurrence. This I did in order to give a proof of my wish to conciliate, and because I am as much persuaded of the advantage of gaining his co-operation as I am of the diffi culties he might throw in our way were he to be against us. He expressed himself perfectly satisfied with my intention of seeing Joseph Bonaparte, and on the whole gave us reason to suppose that the time he has desired will confirm him in the disposition we could wish. I yesterday, therefore, saw Joseph Bonaparte; and although this interview produced nothing sufficiently decisive to justify any very sanguine expectation of his successful interference, yet I think he said as much as he could say consistently with his situation and with the delicacy of the transaction. It has so happened that, partly with a view to the assistance I might receive from him in an emergency like the present, and partly on account of his personal good qualities, I have cultivated his acquaintance more than that of any other individual, so that we were both relieved from our natural embarrassment. I began the conversation by telling him (it had been - pre viously agreed that I should not allude to any private transac tion) that, if I importuned him by talking of our affairs, he must impute it to the sincere desire I had to avert the calami ties of war, and to effect a perfect and permanent good under standing between the two Governments ; that I applied to him rather than to any other because I knew him to be the friend of peace, because it was he who negotiated the peace, and who consequently could distinguish better than any other what was the letter and what was the spirit of the Treaty of Amiens. He here took up the conversation to assure me that I judged him rightly, that he was anxiously desirous of peace, and that there was nothing he would not do, consistently with 12 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1803 the good of the country, to preserve it, but that he saw no means of effecting that purpose unless we were disposed to execute fully and unequivocally the treaty we had entered into; that by the treaty we were bound to evacuate Malta; and the First Consul would not, and indeed could not, consent to its being infringed. On this I appealed to him in his capacity of negotiator of that treaty, endeavouring to draw the line between the letter and the spirit, and maintaining that if we hesitated in this instance to fulfil the former, the latter had been infringed by the First Consul from the very moment of its execution to the present time. I then went over the old ground, enumerating the acquisitions which had been made by France since the peace, and I assured him that, although his Majesty's ministers had not thought themselves justified in breaking off the negotiation, as they were very much tempted to do, yet it could not but be naturally expected that the conduct of the French Government had excited such mistrust and jealousy, as must break out on the first occasion. This occa sion had unfortunately soon been given by the manifestation of the First Consul's views on Egypt ; that this was a point on which it was impossible we could be indifferent, since it could be considered in no other light than as a direct attack upon ourselves ; that fortimately those views had been pub lished before we had evacuated the island of Malta, and con sequently it became incumbent on his Majesty's ministers, as a means of defence, to keep possession of it until confidence could be restored. This naturally led to a repetition of the same assurances which I have on different occasions received from M. de Talleyrand, of the total renunciation, on the part of the First Consul, of any project he might have had in contem plation, to which of course I paid but little attention. I did not scruple to tell him that there was not a man at all conversant with politics in any country, and even in this, who did not believe that the First Consul would invade Egypt at every risk the moment we were out of the Mediterranean ; and that, im pressed with such a belief, he must be sensible we could not relinquish the only point from whence such a project might be defeated. That in our hands Malta was but a point of defence. It was far from our intention to distress the trade of i8o3] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 113 this country in the Mediterranean; we were, on the contrary, ready to come to any understanding on that subject. That Malta was necessary to us as a safeguard to Egypt, and in no other point of view. After talking over this matter at some length, he assured me that Malta was not, as we supposed, the real cause of the difficulty on the part of the First Consul ; were there no other, it might perhaps be got over. But that which never could was the sense of shame and loss of reputation which must result from his acquiescence on this occasion, more particularly after the measure which had been resorted to in England. He was very warm on this subject, repeating those phrases which are constantly in the mouth of the First Consul : that he does not live for the present, that he exists for posterity; that his honour is dearer to him than his life ; that, if he forfeits that, he forfeits the only hold he has on the confidence of this country; and many more sentiments of this nature, which cannot but appear, on a very small retrospect, somewhat extraordinary. In opposition to these feelings, I endeavoured to place the danger to which he would expose this country, his own situation, and that of his family and friends, all involved in the same fate. He admitted the whole force of this argument, but still insisted on the determination of the First Consul, to which, however, he was almost disposed to apply the term of obstinacy, not to recede from the full execution of the Treaty of Amiens. I regretted that a mere point of punctilio should be put in competition with the numberless misfortunes to which a renewal of hostilities might, and most probably would, expose this country, and consequently the individual interests of the First Consul and his family. I endeavoured to make him sensible of the great disadvantage under which they would now renew the contest ; that we should, it is trae, have the burthen of a war to support, but that would undoubtedly be home with the same patience, and with the same loyalty, which had animated his Majesty's subjects during the whole of the late conflict. France had the same, and still greater, pecuniary difficulties to contend with, with the addition of an unsettled Government, a disputed title, and a formidable party always ready to avail itself of the first opportunity of giving effect to VOL. I. I 114 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1803 its malevolence. This would naturally be considered by the First Consul and his family, and, when put in the scale against a mere sacrifice of punctilio, would, I tmsted, leave no room for hesitation. In reply to this, he adverted to the means by which the First Consul had attained his present situation ; that he owed it all to his character; that that alone main- • tained him ; and that, if he once gave that up, he exposed himself to greater danger than he could possibly incur by a recourse to war, which would only prove still stronger to the country that it had no resource but in his military talents. Your Lordship will perceive from this sketch of ray first con versation that no great hope is given of a change in the First Consul's determination ; but a direct and confidential inter course is established with Joseph Bonaparte, who has free access to hira when he pleases, who certainly has, if not great influence, at least all the advantages which temper and modera tion raust always have on violence and passion. I cannot, therefore, but think that the business is in a fair way, suppos ing it raay be judged expedient to accomplish it by the means I have pointed out. We must, however, in that case, make up our rainds to be more than liberal, for I repeat again that sraall considerations avail but little in great objects, and when they are to be attained by persons in great situations. I think, therefore, we raay reasonably expect to carry our point, whether we choose to abide by the effect of our demonstration, or to employ the means to which this despatch has a reference. The one raight be attended with some risk, and certainly vrith great loss of tirae and raoney; the other may be equally effectual, with the advantage of expedition and economy. I have the honour to be, with the highest respect, my Lord, Your Lordship's most obedient, humble Servant, Whitworth. On one point the Cabinet at home differed from the views expressed by their ambassador. They would not refuse to gratify Buonaparte by the acknowledgment of the Italian states, which Lord Whitworth had first sug gested, but of which he had subsequently, as we have seen, discarded the idea. On the contrary, at a council i8o3] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 115 held on the 3d of April, and attended by every member of the Cabinet, they addressed a minute to the King, stating that "they were unanimously of opinion: firstly, that if Malta could be retained, and the Levant and the Turkish empire thereby secured, it would be desirable to facilitate such an arrangement, by acknowledging, what we cannot prevent, the new Italian states. And secondly, that if the French Government were determined to oppose the retention of Malta, they should be called upon to propose some equivalent security for those objects which would be endangered by the removal of his Majesty's forces from Malta under the present circumstances. It was their opinion likewise that no time should be lost in bringing the present discussions to an issue ; and that, if the French Government should decline all negotiation. Lord Whit worth should be instructed to leave Paris." There could be no doubt whatever of the wisdom of the decision intimated in the last sentence, for the feverish state of uncertainty in which the kingdom had been kept for some months was worse even than war itself; and instructions in accordance with this minute were sent to Lord Whitworth, to make a formal offer that, on condition of " Malta remaining in perpetuity in the possession of his Majesty, and of the French troops evacuating Holland and Switzerland, we would take on ourselves the indemnifica tion of the knights of St. John, would confirm the acqui sition of Elba by France, and acknowledge the King of Etruria, and the Italian and Ligurian republics.", Lord Whitworth fulfilled his orders, as, indeed, he always did, with great ability ; and, in the conversation which he had with Talleyrand on delivering to him the paper containing these proposals, he did not refuse to forward a counter- memorandum by the French minister, which, however, con tained no definite proposal, but merely expressed a general willingness to agree to " anything which might tend to put an end to the present difficulties, or be agreeable to the English Government, and which should not be contrary I 2 1 1 6 LIFE AND A DM I NIS TRA TION [ 1 803 to thfe Treaty of Amiens ; " explaining to Lord Hawkes bury in his public despatch that his motive for consenting to forward such a paper was an idea that it was just possible that Buonaparte might be led to consent to our retaining temporary possession of Malta for a fixed term of years. But in his private letter he expressed a fear that he could no longer " hold out any sanguine expecta tion of concluding this discussion on our own terms with out having recourse to hostilities. Nevertheless he should still continue his secret dealings with Joseph Buonaparte and Talleyrand, feeling assured that the First Consul's family, ministers, and the public at large all felt the danger of war ; so that he firmly believed that, if it were left to the decision of any individual in France, except the First Consul himself and a few of his rapacious generals, Malta would not be suffered to stand for an instant in the way of peace." Though he had forwarded Talley rand's counter-proposal, he " had not given him the least hope that anything short of the permanent possession of Malta would do." But the First Consul himself he looked on as a most " intractable character.'' The funds were falling from the anticipation of war, and he was vainly endeavouring to bolster them up by sending his brothers to buy stock with ostentatious openness. But the more his subjects showed their disinclination to war, the more willing he seemed to be to renew it. Each day increased Lord Whitworth's conviction of the obstinacy of Buona parte himself, but at the same time each day also confirmed his kiiowledge of the accessibility of all about him, his brothers and all, to bribes. Talleyrand and Joseph Buona parte were those who set the greatest value on their ser vices ; but " the venality of all," he reported, " was beyond all imagination ; he could not but think that, if we had tempted it in the negotiation at Amiens, we should not now be negotiating on the present differences:'' and even now he would not absolutely despair, if money could be forthcoming in sufficiently large sums. Money, however. i8o3] OF LORD LIVERPOOL, 117 Mr. Addington was apparently unwilling to provide to the amount expected : and, indeed, there were difficulties in the way of his doing so which, ob\-ious as they were, escaped Lord Whitworth in his anxiety to terminate the dispute between the two nations peaceably ; the chief one being that it would be impossible for the ministers to disclose how they had expended it, and, in all proba bility, equally impracticable to induce the House of Com mons to sanction such an expenditure in the dark. Even had the money been furnished, it is probable that it would have been useless, since, before the end of April, Talleyrand informed Lord Whitworth from the First Consul that " no consideration on earth should induce him to consent to a concession in perpetuity of Malta in any shape what ever ; he would never suffer Great Britain to acquire a possession in the Mediterranean." And a day or t\vo after the same minister stated that he was equally resolved not to hear of our keeping even " temporary possession " of it. It was to no purpose that Lord Whitworth re minded the Frenchman that in fact we had possession, and that "the recent conduct of the French Government had rendered it so necessary for our security " that, " rather than abandon it, we were prepared to go to war." Talley rand offered us Lampedosa, without, it must be supposed, the slightest expectation that we should accept it, even if it had belonged to France to bestow, which it did not. We refused it; and, after one or two more interviews, in which the French minister made one or two other proposals, manifestly only to gain time. Lord Whitworth demanded his passports, as he had been ordered to demand them, and on the 12th of May quitted Paris to return to England, ii8 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1803 CHAPTER IV. Renewal ofthe secret negotiations — Debate on the renewal ofthe war — Pitt's disapproval of the ministers' policy — Great division in their favour — Col. Crawford's proposal to fortify London — Lord Hawkes bury is removed to the House of Lords — His opinion of the weakness of the German and Russian Governments — Buonaparte's measures towards Spain and Portugal — Portugal applies to us for aid — Plans for the partition of Turkey — Peculiarities of the constitution of Turkey — Buonaparte's colonial losses and plans for the invasion of Great Britain — Death ofthe Due d'Enghien — Louis XVIII. applies to Britain for an asylum — Renewed illness of George III. — General discontent with Addington — Pitt writes to the King — The Volun teer Bill — Pitt writes again to the King — Addington resigns, and Pitt becomes Prime Minister — Lord Hawkesbury becomes Home Secretary. Yet even now so intense was the eagerness of Joseph Buonaparte for his expected bribes, that he once more had recourse to the same agent, who had been originally employed, to convey to Lord Whitworth an intimation that he might perhaps still be able to avert war, and yet leave us in possession of Malta, if we would acquiesce in the First Consul making an arrangement with the King of the Two Sicilies, by which he might become master of Otranto and Taranto. M. Huber found that Talleyrand had entertained the same views, and indeed that he had even sent a messenger to London to propose such a com promise. The simple Swiss gentleman assured the wily minister that he thought the proposal might be accepted; but the British Cabinet rejected it without a moment's hesitation. The King of the Two Sicilies might not be i8o3] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 119 strong enough to resist the cession which Buonaparte was inclined to extort from him, but it could not become us to make ourselves parties to such an act of spoliation, alike devoid of all reasonable pretext and contrary to all national law.i Lord Hawkesbury looked on this proposition, thus made at, or even after, the last moment, as a mere repetition of the attempt to gain time, which, indeed, was of great importance to the First Consul. For Buonaparte had been so accustomed to see everything yield to his will, he had been allowed to dictate with such absolute authority to all the sovereigns on the Continent, that he could not con ceive that we should really prefer war to submission ; and therefore, thinking that hostilities would not recommence till he himself should choose, he had allowed his army to fall into considerable temporary disarrangement. A great many men in every regiment were on furlough ; his cavalry wanted remounts ; and the branch which he had looked on with peculiar favour, the artillery, was in a particularly defective state, the old guns which had been worn out in his recent campaigns not having been replaced, because he had ordered a series of experiments to be gone through before fresh ones were cast.^ The result was that for above ' The Cabinet very becomingly say, " Neither England nor France has a right to dispose of a town or port belonging to an independent sovereign, and that his Majesty will never participate in the smallest degree in any system of spoliation." (Lord Malmesbury, iv. 252.) Lord Malmesbury, however, represents the French proposal as merely one to allow France to occupy Otranto [by itself] for the same period [probably ten years] as we were to retain Malta for. But M. Huber, in his letter to Lord Whitworth, twice says expressly that their demand was for Taranto as well as Otranto, and makes no express mention of these towns ever being restored, though the term he uses is certainly only " occuper.'' " If the views which, according to Las Casas (Memoires, v. 8), Napoleon explained in a conversation at St. Helena, were those which he had really entertained at this time, he had desired to continue at peace with England till he had settled the whole of the affairs of the Continent according to his own inclination, till he had raised an army and fleet which we should have found absolutely irresistible with our smaller population (i 5,000,000 of Enghsh against 40,000,000 of French, I20 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1803 two years he was comparatively inactive, arming indeed against us once -more the hostility of Spain and Holland, but augmenting his own enemies in a still greater degree : increasing his personal rank by the assumption of the imperial title, and crushing his domestic foes by the banishment of some, the public execution of others, and, it can hardly be doubted, the private assassination of at least one ; but at the same time alienating the most honest of his own subjects (to say nothing of the offence given to all Europe) by the lawless seizure and destruction of a prince who had never offended, nor had the means of offending, him. And meanwhile waiting for blows from others instead of inflicting them ; blows which came surely and heavily ; for, before he had gained a single victory on land, his fleet was annihilated, and all hope of prosecuting the conquests of which he had dreamt in the East, or of inflicting the slightest injury on Britain except through the sides of her allies, was for ever dissipated. The Ministry and the Opposition in England must, of course, both have foreseen that the war on our side would be carried on mainly by sea ; and neither party could have doubted what would be the result of battles fought there by Nelson and his pupils. But no consideration of that kind influenced the Parliament for a moment in the decision to which both Houses speedily came on the momentous subject of the renewal of the war. More than one question was raised in the debates which occupied their attention the week after the King had announced to them that he had withdrawn his ambassador from Paris, or, in other words, that he was about to embark in war. One point raised was, whether under existing circumstances the war was justifiable ; a second, which, it could not be denied, as he stated the difference), and by roads and canals had organized such a complete system of internal communication as would enable him to concentrate his whole force, or any portion of it which he might consider sufficient, at any point of the coast without our being aware of his movements. i8o3] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 121 might be considered independently of the former, was whether the conduct of the ministers had been prudent in allowing the negotiations, the failure of which was the immediate cause of war, to assume the complexion which they had ultimately presented ; whether, in short, at an earlier stage of them the necessity, the cruel necessity, of renewing hostilities could not have been prevented. On the first it may be almost said that there was no difference of opinion. From some accidental mismanagement, which enabled the general crowd of ordinary visitors to obtain seats in the galleries of the House of Commons to the exclusion of the reporters, very little is known of the debate on the address, which was moved by Lord Hawkesbury himself in reply to the royal message.^ His speech, how ever, was so conclusive as to the impossibility of avoiding war unless, by the surrender of Malta, we would place our selves absolutely at the First Consul's mercy, that even Mr. Grey, the steady partisan of the Jacobin party in France, could not refuse to support the Crown in the impending war, though he moved an amendment censuring the conduct of the ministers. Nor could Fox, though he adopted Grey's view and several of his arguments, refrain from condemning many of the demands which Buonaparte had put forward. He did, indeed, extenuate the First Consul's desire to obtain Egypt so far as to deny that it afforded a sufficient cause for going to war, arguing that former Cabinets had felt that it did not do so, since sixteen or seventeen years before we had made a commercial treaty Avith France at the very time when M. de Vergennes, then Prime Minister of that country, was known to be pre paring to send forth an expedition against Egypt. Indeed he attacked Pitt, who in the earlier part of the debate had approved the war, and had exhorted the ministers to pre pare to commence hostilities with vigour, even more fiercely ^ Pitt's speech, pronounced by some of his hearers to have been the finest (it must have been among the finest) that he ever delivered is ' unreported for this reason. (See Lord Stanhope's Life of Pitt, iv. 46.) 122 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1803 than he criticised- Addington. But he could convince only a small number of even his own friends. Windham openly denounced his speech as one which sought an unworthy popularity by supporting selfishness against patriotism, and by opposing private considerations to grand views of national policy ; and at last, after a debate of two nights, the Ministry had a triumphant majority of 398 against dj ; that small number being all that their Whig opponents could muster. But the main conflict took place ten days later, when in the House of Peers Lord Fitzwilliam, and in the Commons Colonel Patten, moved a long series of resolutions, con demning the Government for having failed to keep Parliament from time to time informed of the state of affairs, of the conduct of France, and of the steps taken by themselves in consequence of that conduct ; and, again, for not having made " timely and adequate representations " against those acts of France with which they were dis satisfied, representations which, it was contended, would either have arrested the aggressions of that country, or, if France would not desist from them, would have prevented his Majesty from reducing his forces and surrendering his conquests, especially the Cape of Good Hope, and would thus have placed him in a better position for renewing the war. The resolutions were wordy and prolix in a most unusual degree : they were supported by the Grenvilles, who in the former debate had approved of the war ; and Pitt, who on that occasion had strongly advocafSd an unanimous agreement to the address, now no longer sup ported the ministers, though he still abstained, in words, from blaming them ; and moving the previous question,' ^ Pitt had made up his mind to this course some days before. On the 1 8th of May Lord Malmesbuiy records : "Canning early; little to say. Pitt, who, he says, thinks as he does, will attend on the 24th to give his opinion ; means to fire over the heads of the Government, i.e. not to blame or praise them, but to support war measures (iv. 254). This second debate took place June 3d. i8o3] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 123 declared that he did so because, while he could not concur in the extent of the charges involved in the proposed resolutions, he could not, on the other hand, affirm that the explanation afforded by the ministers, upon general points, was so clear as to justify a decided negative of them. He alleged, as apparently his chief reason for abstaining from a formal censure of the ministers, that " he was aware of the inconveniences which would result from such a measure as the present motion, unless the clearest necessity existed for it, unless such interference by Parliament could be justified by some extraordinary exigency of affairs." He intimated, indeed, by implication, that he saw " considerable grounds for dissatisfaction at their conduct," but he con sidered that to pass a vote of censure on them now, which would be tantamount to a vote of removal, must, "by unsettling the whole system of government, diminish our means of sustaining the struggle in which we were engaged, and of calling forth those resources necessary for our defence." Not only would a change of the Administration be a temporary suspension of the functions of the executive Government, but the new ministers who might succeed would feel themselves for some time in a delicate situation, which must disable them in some degree from a satisfactory discharge of their duties. He declined " entering into any detailed discussion of the papers " which had been laid before Parliament. " Things more urgent, more important, demanded our care ;" and he would prefer to see the House " keeping the Parliamentary pledge which it had given by showing its determination to support his Majesty with their lives and fortunes ; and the ministers showing them selves alive to and equal to the situation in which they found themselves by presenting a strong bill of supply, providing resources not merely for every demand of the public service, but adequate to every scale of execution : a measure that would display and call forth the means of sustaining the struggle, not merely for one year, but till we should have brought it to a successful issue ; some 124 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1803 measure by which we should be enabled to complete our army, and to call into action the national strength, and give activity to all the military skill, discipline, and ex perience we possess.'' Addington himself was the only minister who had spoken before Pitt, and he had probably not anticipated the course which his predecessor and patron was about to take ; though in fact it was chiefly at him that Pitt's remarks had been aimed, since what Pitt doubted was not so much the propriety of what had hitherto been done, not even of the restoration of the Cape to the Dutch, as Addington's finan cial competency to provide the necessary means for the energetic warfare which he described as indispensable. As usual the brunt of the battle for the defence of the Ministry fell on the Foreign Secretary, and he at once followed Pitt, refusing to accept his amendment as less of a censure than the original resolutions. He argued with great force, that when a direct vote of censure had been moved, the question was of too great importance to be shirked by passing on, as Pitt had proposed, to the orders of the day ; ministers were entitled to demand a direct decision, negative or affir mative, a direct acquittal or condemnation. He dwelt with great force on Pitt's avoidance of details : " On such a question the Ministry had a right to expect details, to require that he should point out especially what parts of their conduct he disapproved. It was not impossible that in a long and arduous negotiation some points of their manage ment might afford grounds for difference of opinion even among their friends. But in a country like this he always considered it to be the first principle both of support and of opposition to ministers, that those who agreed or disagreed with them should do so on a general view of their whole conduct. It could not be expected that all should approve of every particular point, but members should overiook minor differences for the sake of giving effect to the general scheme of policy which they approved." He appealed with great effect to Pitt's own conduct on the question of i8o3] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 125 the Russian armament, when Pitt himself declined to meet a vote of censure by any evasive motion such as that of the previous question, but the charge was met boldly and directly negatived. Pitt's present motion was " a censure in disguise, under delay ; but ministers could not, would not, acquiesce in the discredit of a suspended censure. They had no such desire to retain their places at all hazards as could lead them to submit to such a compromise with con demnation. Neither he nor his colleagues desired to remain in office longer than they could be useful to their country. For himself, if he felt that he was reduced to that situation in which he could not serve his country with advantage, he would carry the seals to the feet of his gracious sovereign, and entreat him to appoint a successor more worthy. It was because he would not remain in office discredited and useless that he opposed the previous question, for he would not retain it one hour after he had reason to think that he had forfeited the confidence of the House and the good opinion of the country." There can be no doubt that Lord Hawkesbury was cor rect in the view which he thus expressed of Pitt's amend ment. It looked like the motion of one " willing to wound and yet afraid to strike :" and Lord Hawkesbury's course of insisting on treating it as a vote of censure not less dis tinct than the resolutions themselves seemed more manly, and as such commended itself both to the House and to the country.^ In a description of the debate which he transmitted to his father he explained Pitt's conduct, which he characterised as " certainly most extraordinary and most unaccountable," by his belief that " he had been ' The Annual Register, at this time, as has been mentioned before, wholly in the interest of the Opposition, admits : " It is but justice to say that the manly and spirited manner in which the latter (Lord Hawkesbury) rejected the species of compromise recommended by Mr. Pitt, heretofore his great friend and patron, and his calling on the Senate for either direct acquittal or condemnation, gained, as it deserved, considerable respect and approbation." 126 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1803 worked upon by such of his personal friends as were enemies to the present Government, till his mind had become completely unhinged. He looked," he continued, " dreadfully ill, and his physician said that his nerves had been completely shaken by the state of agitation and un certainty in which he had been lately kept.' The line which Mr. Fox took," the letter adds, " was a singular one. He voted with us on the question of the orders of the day. He abstained from voting on the second question; and stated that, with respect to the general tendency of the resolutions, since they must be considered as going to effect a change of administration, he was hostile to them, though he disapproved of the conduct of ministers in some re spects. He did not wish to see them removed, because he did not think they were likely to be succeeded by any set of men who were more pacifically disposed. There were, however, several facts in the resolutions which he was not prepared to negative, and, as he was not ready to move any amendment, he should go away without voting. Sheridan and Erskine voted with us throughout." The result of the division proved more favorable to the ministers than probably any one of either side expected. A majority of nearly 300 supported them on the .amend ment, and, many members having retired before the second division, one equally great in proportion voted with them on the main question of the resolutions.^ Finding themselves thus supported they proceeded to increase the regular army ; to encourage the formation of strong corps of volunteers ; and to equip a fleet overpowering in numbers, and still more irresistible from the tried skill of the great officers who 1 " Mr. Abbot records, as the key to Pitt's conduct, that different circumstances had led him to believe that Addington was secretly indisposing the King towards him, and playing falsely ; and that this irritation, fomented by Canning and the Grenvilles, made him dis posed to enter the Cabinet by force, and treat Mr. Addington as a perfidious friend." — Lord Colchester's Diary, i. 430. 2 The precise numbers were : — On the amendment, 333 v. 56 ; on the resolutions, 275 v. 34. i8o3] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 127 served in it ; and in all their measures, even in one so novel to the constitution and practice of the nation as the raising an army of reserve by compulsory ballot, they received the almost unanimous support of both Houses of Parliament : perhaps the most remarkable feature in the debates which arose on the different details being a suggestion put for ward by an independent member. Colonel Crawford, that steps should be taken to fortify London, our great naval arsenals, and some other places which he looked on as at once peculiarly important and peculiarly accessible, such as the mouth of the Humber and Newcastle ; and also to construct some lines of fortification for the internal defence of the country in the event of an enemy making good his landing on any part of the coast. Pitt, who on all recent occasions had supported the Ministry, warmly advocated this pro posal also, as a sort of supplement to their plans ; adding, with prescient sagacity, a suggestion of his own, that for the defence of portions of our coast it might be well to multiply our smaller vessels, " and mount them with guns of heavy metal and carronades," so as to form a kind of floating battery. The Ministry, as a body, opposed it ; and perhaps a time of actual war may not be the season at which the construction of such extensive fortifications is most prac ticable. But the present generation has seen the idea adopted, and Pitt's proposition of floating batteries re garded, by those most competent to judge, as not the least efficacious portion of the scheme. It has been mentioned that Pitt's objections were really to the Minister's financial measures, some of which he com pelled him in some degree to remodel. And the general opinion of the country was scarcely concealed that Ad dington was unequal to the office which he was filling in a time of war. Yet so unconscious did he seem of his diffi culties that, at the end of the session, he weakened himself in the House of Commons by removing Lord Hawkesbury to the House of Lords. It was a singular and ill-judged step, for the eloquence which at times he had to encounter 128 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1803 in the House of Commons was the most formidable that had ever assailed a Government : leaving Pitt, whose sup port was now but occasional, out of the question. Fox, Canning, Sheridan, and Grey, were adverse to him on almost every question ; and Lord Hawkesbury was the only speaker of any power or weight whom he had to oppose to them, while in the House of Lords Lord Gren ville was the only opponent who could at all be considered formidable, and for him the Chancellor was more than a match. The promotion, for such in some sense it must be considered, was not in accordance with the wishes and judgment of Lord Hawkesbury himself, and still less with those of his father, who already began to look forward to his becoming Prime Minister. Lord Liverpool was con vinced that Mr. Addington could not stand, and that, even if Pitt should return to office for a time, his health must inevitably prevent his long continuance there (a prediction but too fatally verified). In such a position of affairs he pointed out to his son that the ball would be at his feet ; that all " Pitt's old friends would be very happy to serve under him ; that, as he had good reason to believe, many even of the partisans of Fox would not be unwilling to fight under the same banner ; that though the Grenvilles would be in opposition, they were so self-important and troublesome that it was better to have them as enemies than as friends ; but that his chance of carrying on the affairs of the kingdom with due energy and a fair prospect of success would be far better if, in the beginning at least, he were in the House of Commons than elsewhere." Lord Hawkesbury fully coin cided in the justice of his father's views ; but he felt that he could not refuse the wishes of the Prime Minister, part of whose plan was the introduction of Mr. Tierney into the Government as Treasurer of the Navy, a measure which, as Tierney had formerly fought a duel with Pitt, seemed to the world in general a complete barrier to Pitt's resumption of office ; and its being so regarded was not perhaps its slightest recommendation in Addington's eyes. That Lord i8o3] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 129 Liverpool did not overrate the popularity of his son with all parties, and the high esteem in which his abilities as a speaker and a man of business were held, is proved by the circumstances ' under which he was subsequently called to the head of affairs ; but, though Lord Hawkesbury lost neither reputation nor influence by the removal, it is equally certain that it was a false step on the part of Addington himself, who more than once must have greatly regretted the loss of his aid in the debates of the ensuing session. Meantime the French ruler was weakening rather than strengthening himself by his first measures, in spite of the appearance of success which they bore. He overran Han over, and occupied Hamburg and Bremen ; but this last step, and the subsequent closing of the Elbe and Weser against all commerce with Britain, were such violations of the rights of neutral Powers that they awakened deep discontent among the chief nations of Germany. As long, however, as that feeling exhaled in weak remonstrances, Buonaparte could afford to regard it with indifference, and no exertions of our Foreign Secretary could rouse those Powers to any stronger measures. As he wrote to his . father, " The Court of Vienna appeared to be very feeble, that of Petersburg very flat, and that of Berlin very false ;" and it was not till still greater violations of all established usages, and encroachments more immediately menacing to themselves, had warned them that they could no longer temporize with the potentate who was guilty of them, that the two former could be roused to an active resistance, while Prussia, increasing in falsehood, fell to such a depth of base ness as to seek the alliance of the despoiler of her German brethren, in the hope of being allowed to share in their spoils. On the other side of France affairs for a moment seemed likely to lead to operations that would have anticipated the war which for years afterwards filled the whole Penin sula. Buonaparte felt that, in preparing for a war such as he hoped to be able to wage, his first want was money. To provide it he first sold Louisiana, which had been ceded ' Vide infra, c. xi. VOL. L K I30 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1803 to him by the Treaty of Amiens, to the United States, for a sum exceeding 3,000,000/. sterling. And as his next step, though not yet insisting that Spain should openly declare war against us, which he was well aware could only ruin her without injuring us, he began to e.xert a pressure on that country and Portugal to compel them to pay him large monthly sums of money, exacting them from the first as an old ally, from the second as a nation which could only thus be prevented from being an enemy. Spain, Mr. Frere reported, was greatly irritated by the terms demanded of her ; so greatly that he believed it not impossible that, by judicious bribes and compliments to the Prince of Peace and the principal ministers, we might even detach her from the side of France. And in Portugal the Prince Regent formally applied to us for assistance and support in order that he might be enabled to resist the exorbitant demands made upon him and his people. Our Cabinet was not dis inclined to comply with the request, coming as it did from a people with whom we had been so long connected by treaties of alliance. But it was rightly judged necessary in the first place to ascertain what micans Portugal possessed of helping herself And with this view Lord Hawkesbury submitted to the King the advice of the Cabinet, that an officer of skill and reputation should be despatched to Portugal to see whether the native army corresponded to the account which M. Souza, the Prince Regent's minister, gave of it ; and, if it should prove in such a state as to numbers and efficiency that, with moderate aid from us, there might seem a hope of its making effectual resistance (for it was clear that no large French force could be spared to compel Portugal to compliance), then Lord Hawkes bury and his colleagues were prepared to send four or six thousand men, including a strong division of cavalry, to reinforce the Portuguese army, and to enable it to resist the invasion of any French force of moderate strength. It need hardly be said that George IIL fully concurred in the expediency of the plan thus submitted to him ; but at the same time he did not conceal his conviction that the result l8o4] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 131 of an investigation of Portugal's power to protect herself would show it to be useless to try to help her in the manner proposed. "He feared that it was impossible for troops to be in a more helpless state than the Portuguese were at the present moment.'' And, unless our aid were likely to be effectual, he expressed a reasonable unwillingness "to diminish the means of defence both in this island and Ireland ; as in both much must depend on our having cavalry, that being a branch which the enemy could not bring over to any great extent." His fears proved well founded: the Portuguese were so weak at the moment that the 6,000 men whom we might have furnished them would have been the largest half of their army ; and Buonaparte gave them no time to strengthen themselves. Before the close of autumn they were compelled to follow the example of Spain in agreeing to contribute a large yearly sum towards the expenses which France would incur through the war. The proposal of partitioning Turkey which France had made to Russia has been already mentioned. And the Turks themselves were aware of it, but regarded it with their usual indifference. Our ambassador, Mr. Drummond, wrote to Lord Hawkesbury in September: "The Russian drago man has very lately, by order of M. Italinski, made a full avowal to the Porte of the proposition made by France for the partition of this empire. It was strongly recommended to them at the same time to take the measures of precau tion which I had been long recommending [to increase the army in the Morea]. The answer which was made on this occasion by the Turkish Ministry was a little singular. It evinced much confidence, if it did not show consummate wisdom. They observed that it was very extraordinary that Buonaparte should presume to parcel out the Turkish empire without the permission of their magnificent em peror: that they defied Russia and France together to put such a scheme into execution ; but that they could not understand why one of these Powers should not try to take the^ whole for itself without making another a partner in the spoil." Mr. Drummond expressed his conviction that K 2 132 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1804 the Turkish empire was declining fast, and that the enemy which it had really to dread was Russia and not France, though Russia at this moment seemed to be its protector from France. And the whole course of subsequent trans actions in that country has shown the soundness of this opinion. The greater part of his despatch refers to matters of which the interest was but temporary ; the character of the Turkish ministers, and of the different ambassadors and envoys residing at Constantinople. But one paragraph is worth extracting, as giving a different idea of the Turkish constitution from that which is generally entertained. "We are generally taught to believe in England thatthe Ottoman empire is governed by a despot whose will is law, and whose minister, or favourite, disposes of the whole power under the authority of his sovereign. This is by no means the case. If indeed the Sultan desired to cut off the head of any one individual in his realm, there is no law against it, and there would probably be no opposition to it, provided the offender had no army under his command. Personal property and personal security, so well protected and so well defined by the law of England, are undoubtedly left at the mercy of the strongest in Turkey. But in all affairs of state, in all measures which comprehend the general politics of the country, the Sultan is not despotic; nor are his ministers possessed of much authority. The constitution of this Government is in fact oligarchical ; and that may be the reason why it is not judged to be the best in the world. The supreme council consists of about ten or twelve members, and it is in this council that the most important measures are determined. The authority of the Sultan is indeed nominally paramount; but it is felt by all parties that it is not really so. The influence of the Ulemah^ is on the other hand omnipotent. No measure can be safely proposed without the concurrence of this powerful body, and none carried into execution without their express consent. Several of these chiefs have seats in the supreme council, and any disrespect shown to ^ The body of priests. i8o4] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 133 their opinion, when once given, would be productive of the most fatal consequences. Among the Ulemah are found the men most versed in the law, the faith, and the training of the Mussulmans ; consequently the men whose minds have imbibed the greatest number of prejudices, and are the most perverted from common sense." It never occurred to Mr. Drummond as possible that half a century later France should be induced to unite with Great Britain to protect the Sultan from the very Power whom she now invited to join her in oppressing him ; nor that a prince seated on the Ottoman throne would become so enligh tened, and so sure of his authority, as voluntarily to in troduce reforms of the character most distasteful to the Ulemah ; that he would accept an order of Christian knighthood, and visit the chief nations of Christendom with a view not only of cultivating their goodwill towards him self, but of learning to improve the habits and ameliorate the condition of his subjects in general. For many months after the renewal of the war the First Consul had almost ceaseless reason to repent his obstinate rejection of all our proposals. We were able to dispense with his consent to the retention of Malta ; though we had restored the Cape to his ally, we had not given back Pondicherry to himself, and the West Indian islands which we had given up were recovered one after another; two being taken by us of which we had not previously been masters. His army in St. Domingo was reduced to surrender, and he was unable to retaliate on us in any quarter. His only consolation for the ac cumulated defeats which he was sustaining at our hands lay in forming plans, and making preparations on a more extensive scale than before, for the invasion of these islands, which kept our Government in a state of constant watchfulness, if not of apprehension. The ostentatious parade which he made of these preparations was probably intended to incline us to revive the negotiations for peace, which were rather suspended than wholly given up. At the time of the final rupture we had still intimated a 134 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1804 disposition to listen to the mediation of Russia, if that Power should be willing to interpose it. And though the Czar still hung back, it was possible that at any moment he might become desirous of putting an end to a state of things which was injurious to every nation in Europe. He was, hov/ever, personally offended with the First Consul, who, on one occasion, had lately insulted his ambassador at Paris, the Count de Marcoff, with almost as much rude ness as he had displayed to Lord Whitworth, openly accusing him, and the Russian Cabinet in general, of an unfair partiality to England.^ And, as such charges have a tendency to verify themselves, Alexander made a strong and formal remonstrance to Talleyrand against several parts of Buonaparte's conduct in which he saw proofs of a contempt for the rights of all nations but France ; and at the same time, by repeated acts of attention and kindness to our countrymen who chanced to be in his dominions, he gave indications of a rising desire to cultivate friendly relations with our nation. He was especially desirous that our Government should be fully informed of " great military preparations making by the French upon the coasts of the Adriatic Sea, the object of which was, without doubt, the Turkish empire," in order that a conviction of their designs might " make us more ready to take measures by means of our naval forces to oppose the enterprises of the First Consul in that part of the world.'"' He was still, however, apparently watching for some opportunity of mediating with effect, when he might be able to procure the removal of his own causes for dissatis- ^ The First Consul came up to him at the levee, and said, " Je sais que le Comte de Woronzow n'est pas favorable aux Frangais, qu'il aime les Anglais ; et qu'il n'a pas fait tout ce qui depend de lui pour empecher la guerre ;" and presently, " II y a du double dans ceci, et si le Comte de Woronzow I'avait voulu il aurait pu con tenir I'Angleterre ; " and again, " Si I'Empereur comptait observer une conduite si vague vis-k-vis de la France, pourquoi lui a-t-elle jamais demande des services ?" (Malmesbury, iv. 266.) ^ Despatch from Count Woronzow to his brother Count Simon Woronzow, the Russian ambassador in London. i8o4] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 135 faction, as well as ours, when the First Consul's crowning outrage, in his seizure and slaughter of the Due d'Enghien, broke off not only every prospect of peace, but every desire to conclude one with a tyrant who could be guilty of so atrocious and unprovoked a crime.^ The following letter from the Prince de Cond6, the father of the Due d'Enghien, to the King of Sweden, will not be without interest : Wanstead House, le 18 Avril, 1804. Au Roi de Suede, Aprfes avoir payd le premier tribut de larmes que nous devons 'k la mdmoire de I'infortund Due d'Enghien, et dont la source ne tarira jamais, notre premier soin, notre premier sentiment est de mettre aux pieds de V. M. notre vive et respectueuse recon noissance de tous les soins g^ndreux et touchans, qu'elle a bien voulu se donner, pour prdvenir cet horrible assassinat ; votre grandeur d'ame. Sire, et votre sensibility (qualit^s si rares aujourd'hui) viennent de se manifester dans cette cruelle occa sion, d'un manih'e k vous attacher tous ceux qui mdritent le nom d'hommes. Oh, Roi compatissant, et si noblement digne du rang que vous occupez, vous avez voulu sauver les Condds ! . . . le Ciel ne I'a pas permis. . . . Puisse au moins votre illustre exemple dveiller I'Europe, et faire sentir aux souverains k quel point il leur importe d'opposer enfin une resistance insurmontable par son ensemble et par son but, au torrent de crimes, dont un seul homme, si e'en est un, se propose d'inonder I'univers. Votre illustre pfere, Sire, vouloit prdvenir toutes les horreurs de la Revolution en I'attaquant \ force ouverte (helas, que n'a-t-il ^te dcoutd, nous n'aurions pas k le pleurer lui-meme) ! C'est peut-etre k I'dnergique sensi- bihtd de V. M. qu'est reservde la gloire de sauver le monde ^ Dumouriez, who was at this time in London, regarded the trans action at first, when it was only known that the Duke had been seized, in a singular point of view. He writes to a friend (the Baron de Bulen) at Munich : " On dit le Due d'Enghien relache. Je n'en crois rien. Je n'ose pas vous parler d'un fait qui deshonore I'Allemagne, et qui ne peut tourner qu'k la gloire de Buonaparte s'il excite sa clemence, ou k une terreur universelle s'il consulte sa rigueur et sa justice. Je reste pdtrifie, non par la tete de Buonaparte-Meduse, mais par celle des tStes i perruques qui lui sont opposees." (Extract from a copy of the Letter in the Liverpool Papers.) 136 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [i8o4' entier, en d^cidant par ses pressantes sollicitations les puissances de I'Europe k seconder par la force le vceux des trois quarts de la France, qui n'aspire qu'k rentrer sous I'obeissance de son roi legitime, en secouant le joug d'un monstre, qui ne connoit plus de moyens de prolonger son usurpation qu'en faisant couler les flots de sang et de larmes. J'oserais vous le repeter. Sire, une noble resistance clairement annoncee dans son seul but, imposante par la force de ses moyens, pure dans ses principes et dans ses suites, et prete k s'arreter dfes que le Roi de France, present aux armees, pourroit reprendre avec surete les renes de son royaume : voilk les seuls moyens de rendre le calme k I'Europe ; si je m'e'gare en ce raoment, raon excuse est toute prete, et I'univers I'admettra ; comment ne pas se hvrer k de grandes idees quand c'est au digne heritier des Gustave qu'on ecrit. Daignez, Sire, recevoir avec bonte nos plus sincferes et nos plus respectueux remerciments des genereuses demarches que V. M. a bien voulu faire en faveur de I'interessante victime, que le tyran du monde vient d'immoler k sa rage ; la reconnoissance que nous vous devons. Sire, est profond ement gravee dans nos coeurs par I'amour paternel et I'admiration de vos vertus ; I'em- preinte en est ineffagable. Je suis avec un profond respect. Sire, de Votre Majeste, Le trfes-humble et trfes-obeissant Serviteur, Louis Joseph de Bourbon. The folly of this most infamous action was, as Fouche is reported to have said, more than equal to its wickedness. And it was more impolitic than even Fouche was quite aware, for, at the moment when it was committed, the King of Prussia was so dissatisfied with our continued claim to exercise our right of search over all vessels which entered our ports,^ even when belonging to neutral Powers, that he 1 " Le droit de visite que I'Angleterre se propose d'exercer indis- tincteraent sur tous les vaisseaux neutres qui arrivent dans ses ports est une nouvelle mesure arbitraire dont il n'a jamais ete question, et qui outrepasse dans leur plus grande etendue les principales stipulations des derniferes conventions de 1801." (Extract from a despatch from the King of Prussia himself to his minister at St. James's, of which a copy is in the Liverpool Papers.) i8o4] OF LORD LIVERPOOL, 137 was greatly inclined openly -to break with us, and to range himself on the side of France, when even his selfish and sordid timidity was roused to a momentary feeling of indignation by the insult offered to the whole body of German princes in the violation of the Baden territory, and the still more terrible wrong done to royal blood by the murder of one whose relationship to kings was his sole offence. The head of the Bourbons, the prince who afterwards remounted the throne of his ancestors under the title of Louis XVIII., and whom his faithful adherents never ceased to regard as their king,, was at this time at Rome. But, even before the slaughter of his cousin, he had begun to think that city neither a sufficiently secure asylum, nor the Pope a sufficiently powerful protector, so manifest was the intention of the First Consul to reduce every authority in Italy to a state of subjection. He was resolved, indeed, to remain at Rome as long as possible, flattering himself that, little as Buonaparte cared either for considerations of religion or the rights of princes who could not support -them with an army, even he would shrink from infringing the privileges of the Pope, and violating the sacred terri tory of the Church.^ But, in order to be prepared before hand for any emergency, he applied to the Court of Vienna for an asylum in the event of his finding himself compelled to quit Rome. Near as was the relationship which bound them together, the Emperor of Austria felt himself unable to afford the fugitive prince efficient protection, and was com pelled to decline receiving him. And Louis, grieved rather ' " Ce ne sera qu'k I'extremite que Sa Majeste se resoudra k aban- donner ce sejour, dans I'espoir surtout que I'horreur qu'inspirerait k tous les souverains et k tous les peuples la violation d'un asyle sacre, fonde sur le droit des gens, eioignera le Premier Consul de se porter k cet extreme; quoiqu'il soit possible, d'un autre c6te, qu'on doit s'attendre k tout d'un Gouvernement immoral." (Letter of Count Rossi, chamberlain of Louis XVIII., date March 3d, a singular proof of the general belief in the utter lawlessness of Buonaparte's character, if it be remembered that it was written nearly three weeks before the death of the Due d'Enghien. The entire" letter, whicb is in cypher, is like others on the same subject in the Liverpool Papers.) 138 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1804 than surprised, then turned to the one Power which neither feared the as yet invincible French general, nor ever suffered any consideration to interfere with her proud privilege of sheltering all unfortunate princes. The Count de Front, who was his most trusted agent in England, apphed to Lord Hawkesbury, who without hesitation expressed the willingness of his own royal master to extend the hospi tality of any part of his dominions to his brother sove reign ; and, as De Front thought Malta the most convenient place if Louis should be compelled to a sudden retreat, at once despatched orders to the authorities in that island to be on the watch for his arrival, and to receive him with all the honours due to his birth. For some weeks all the partisans of the Bourbons were in great anxiety for his safety ; reports had reached the French Royalists that Buonaparte had some suspicions of what was in agitation, and had caused his uncle, who was a cardinal of the Roman Church, to insist on the Pope exerting his vigi lance to prevent the departure of Louis ; but, as no French ship dared to show itself in the Mediterranean while Nelson was watching Toulon, the Pope had no means of restrain- . ing the King's movements, save by the employment of actual force ; and Louis was thus assured of a safe retreat and efficient protection if ever he might find himself in need of it. - Meanwhile both England and France were in a state of internal agitation. France, first, from the announcement of the discovery of an extensive conspiracy, which in all pro bability had no real existence, against the power, perhaps even the life, of the First Consul ;i then from the murder ^ Bourrienne, than whom few had better opportunities of informa tion, altogether denies the existence of any conspiracy.- According to him, Fouche by his secret agents induced Pichegru, Georges, and the rest to come to Paris, that he might make a merit with the First Consul of revealing the fact of their being there, and so procure, as he did, his own restoration to the office of chief of the police. But " Ces messieurs etaient venus sur le Continent, non pas pour conspirer contre la vie du Premier Consul, mais pour examiner I'etat des choses, et pouvoir dire d'une maniere certaine aux princes de la maison de i8o4] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 139 of the Due d'Enghien, to which few even of Buonaparte's warmest admirers give any other name ; and, last of all, from his movements to the attainment of the summit of his ambition, the imperial crown. England was unsettled, though in an inferior degree, from the conviction that was growing up on all sides that neither as a financier nor as director of the general policy of the kingdom at such a time was the Prime Minister equal to his office. Even his own colleagues were aware of his incapacity ; and in the autumn of 1803 one or two changes were made in different departments, which did not strengthen the Cabinet as a whole, and left the principal evil untouched. But the urgent need of a strong Ministry was increased at the beginning of the next year, when the King had a return of his old mental complaint, and it seemed probable that it might become necessary to appoint a regency. Such a conjuncture increased the zeal of the Whigs to displace the whole Cabinet,^ and at the same time led Pitt, on the King's recovery (for his illness did not last long), to show, for the first time, such a willingness to resume office Bourbon ce qu'ils devoient penser," &c. &c. (Memoires, v. 19, 284.) The Count de Front, writing to Rossi (March 23d), says : " Comme vous verrez dans les gazettes frangaises beaucoup d'inculpations contre Sa Majeste Britannique et ses ministres k regard de la conspiration qui a ete decouverte en France, . . . . je crois devoir vous en dire mon opinion particulifere, et c'est que le ministfere anglais n'a eu aucune part quelconque dans le plan, vrai ou faux, de conspiration qui doit avoir ete forme par une partie de ceux qui sont presentement en France ; mais en meme teras je n'ai aucun doute que si le General Pichegru, ou quelqu'autre des principaux chefs, eiit reussi k former un parti ca pable d'amener un autre ordre de choses en France, il aurait ete puis- samment seconde d'ici. Cela aurait ete d'autant moins extraordinaire qu'on sait qu'il yak Paris un Club de Revolutionnaires Irlandais, pr^ts k faire, avec le secours de la France, en Irlande, ce que ferait un parti soutenu par I'Angleterre en France." ^ Lord Malmesbury says, " During the King's illness Opposition increased both in violence and numbers" (iv. 286) ; and Fox writes, " It makes him, the doctor (f.e. Addington), more and more contemned every day ; indeed the contempt, both with respect to the degree and the universality of it, is beyond what was ever known . . . ;" and in another letter, " Let us first get rid of the doctor is my first principle of action." (Lord Russell's Memorials of Fox, iii. 244, iv. 24, &c.) I40 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1804 that he wrote to the King to explain his views on the state of the nation, and of the measures which ought to be adopted. He even himself brought forward one motion on the state of the navy, which, as he justified it by de claring that, "considering the extent of the danger that now threatened the kingdom, our means of repelling it by our naval efforts were more inadequate than at any former period," was a direct censure on the Administration. A proposal which he made a few weeks afterwards to increase the army of reserve, in direct opposition to the plan brought forward by the Minister, indicated the same conviction of the incompetency of Addington to fulfil the just expectations of those who felt the importance of the existing crisis. And his disapproval of Addington's financial schemes was even more positive. In the fierce debates which took place in the House of Commons in the early part of the session the Prime Minister must have greatly missed the aid of Lord Hawkes bury, but in the House of Lords the Foreign Secretary fully confirmed the reputation he had previously earned, and showed himself competent to lead it by making far the ablest speech that was made in either House on the Volunteer Bill. Apart from the effectiveness of his argu ments and the well-chosen neatness of his language, the facts which he stated were highly creditable to the public spirit of the nation, and calculated to inspire the most desponding with reliance on our resources. Though we had within the four seas the largest regular army of troops of the line and militia which had ever been assembled, more numerous by 40,000 men than had been serving only three years before, the threats of invasion had added to that great host no fewer than 330,000 volunteers ; and, though attempts were made by the Opposition in both Houses to deny their efficiency, it was remarkable that those members who, as professional soldiers, were the most competent to judge of it, were those who spoke most highly of it, and who expressed the greatest confidence in the service which might be expected from such an armament. i8o4] OF LORD LIVERPOOL, 141 The objections to this part of the Government scheme for the defence of the kingdom were certainly ill-founded. The public spirit which could enlist such a band of all ranks to stand forward voluntarily and gratuitously to undergo the fatigues and restraints of a military life, was in itself a feeling to be encouraged rather than repressed ; and we may still look on it with a closer interest than attaches to many bygone measures, since the noble force thus assembled, prodigious as it was, if the population of the kingdom at the time be considered, was the father of the magnificent army which now voluntarily musters in every county, and which, by rendering any attempt to invade Britain as desperate as it was felt to be then, has already at least once had a powerful influence in pre venting the interruption of peace, and has thus earned the gratitude of Europe at large, as well as the admiration and attachment of its countrymen. But though on this subject the plan of the Government was both judicious and successful, for their bill was carried by great majorities in both Houses, Addington saw clearly that he could no longer hold his ground as Prime Minister. The attacks upon his Administration, proceeding sometimes from Pitt and his adherents, sometimes from the Whig side of the House, became more frequent, and the divisions on them grew less and less favorable. In those days, for a Cabinet not to be supported by a large majority was re garded as a defeat, and on more than one occasion in the course of April the supporters of the Administration scarcely outnumbered its opponents by more than twenty. Fox had given notice of a motion on the defence of the country for the 23d of April, and on the 17th, the day after the majority for the Government had dwindled on a question relating to the Irish militia to twenty-one, Addington opened a negotiation with Pitt, sending a message to him to ask whether he was willing to communicate his opinion concerning the existing state of affairs, apd the best mode of carrying on the government. Pitt, as he replied, did not think it consistent with his respect for the King to 142 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1804 express views tending to a change in his Majesty's Govern ment to any one but the King himself, nor to volunteer them to the King ; but he added that, if his Majesty should desire him to do so, he was quite prepared to state his feeHngs on every matter of public policy without delay. And having, we may suppose, received such an intimation from his royal master, a day or two afterwards he addressed a letter to his Majesty, explaining his own past conduct towards the Administration, and the motives which had actuated him ; and this letter was followed by another, nominally addressed to the Lord ChanceUor, but in reality also to the King, since it was to be laid before his Majesty, in which he indicated his notion of the general line of policy to be pursued on the leading questions of interest, and also his views of the principles on which a new Admini stration should be formed. On the first subject (since Pitt fully observed his promise made three years before, to waive all mention of the laws affecting the Roman Catholics) there was probably no difference of opinion between him and his royal master, .but on the second they were not equally well agreed. Pitt had expressed his conviction that it was " more important than perhaps at any former period in the history of the kingdom to give the greatest possible strength and energy to the Government, by uniting in the King's service as large a proportion as possible of the weight of talents and con nexions, drawn, without exception, from parties of aU descriptions, and without reference to former differences and divisions. He saw reason to hope that the circum stances of the time were peculiarly favorable to such an union, and that it might now be possible, with his Majesty's gracious approbation, to bring all persons of leading in fluence, either in Parliament or the country, to concur heartily in a general system formed for the purpose of extricating the country from its present difficulties, and endeavouring, if possible, to rescue Europe from the state to which it was reduced." And he especially named Mr. Fox and Lord Grenville as members of the Opposition, to i8o4] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 143 which he had never considered himself to belong, whom he thought it particularly desirable to include in a new Admi nistration. Both were especially unpalatable to the King. With respect to Lord Grenville, in his reply to Pitt's letter George III. declared that that nobleman had strongly allied himself with the Roman Catholics (subsequent events proved how well founded this statement was), and mentioned also his political obstinacy. But his feelings towards Mr. Fox were even more bitter. He recalled " the whole tenor of Mr. Fox's conduct '" since the days of Lord North, the necessity which had arisen for his expulsion from the Privy Council, and " expressed his astonishment that Mr. Pitt should for one moment have harboured the thought of bringing such a man before his royal notice." He added a hope that, " so far as the public service would permit, he might have the benefit of the further services of the ma jority of Addington's colleagues." Pitt, therefore, was pre cluded from availing himself of the co-operation which Fox was willing to afford him. For once in his life Fox behaved with magnanimity and a freedom from party spirit, and endeavoured to prevail on the ablest of those whom he looked on as his personal adherents to join the new Ministry. Grenville's conduct was different. As to him, the King withdrew his prohibition ; on which, as if to show his own sense of his own importance, Grenville refused to take office in an Administration formed on a principle of exclusion ; of the exclusion, that is to say, of Fox, to whom till within the last few months he had been fiercely op posed during the whole of his public life. It is absolutely impossible to justify this refusal. In one sense every Government must be formed on a principle of exclusion : of the exclusion, that is, of those whose views of policy differ from those of the intended Cabinet ; and, though rejection by the Sovereign on personal grounds is cer tainly a different thing, yet it was impossible to deny that George III. had sufficient reasons to justify his decision both in Fox's general conduct, and especially in the language in which that statesman and his companions 144 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1804 habitually indulged respecting himself It was even more unquestionable that Grenville was one of the last persons in the kingdom in whom a desire for P'ox's co-operation could at that time have been expected, or who was entitled to demand it. Nor indeed, though the willingness to unite with Fox on this occasion was undoubtedly an instance of the sincerity of Pitt's patriotism, can it be looked on as equally a proof of the soundness of his judgment. For the coalition of 1782, though far less indefensible on the part of Lord North than in Fox, had certainly in some degree damaged the elder statesman's reputation also : and a repe tition of such a step now would have compelled Pitt to concessions scarcely inferior to those to which his prede cessor had consented. Such an union could only have worked well by both parties postponing every question of domestic policy, and agreeing to concentrate the whole energies of the Government and the country on the prose cution of the war. And such a postponement might plau sibly have been represented, as in some quarters it certainly would have been represented, as a subordination of political principle to a desire for office. This, as we shall presently see, was the opinion entertained by Lord Hawkesbury.^ But it was not that held by Grenville ; and his refusal to rejoin his old colleagues, because the idea of a coalition with their old antagonist was abandoned, was defensible on no ground of either precedent or principle. The truth would seem to be that he had adopted the idea that neither Pitt nor the King could do without him. Pitt, however, was as proud as himself, and with better reason ; he resolved to show him that he could dispense with his aid ; and when, at the beginning of May, Addington formally resigned office, he carried out the King's wishes by selecting his col leagues mainly from among those who had been members of Addington's and of his own former administration. It was almost a matter of course that Lord Hawkesbury continued a Secretary of State, but he did not remain in his old post. Pitt had hoped to secure the assistance ^ Vide infra, p. 201. l8o4] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 145 of Lord Moira, who, besides that he was himself a man of considerable ability, was of special importance from his intimacy v/ith and influence over the Prince of Wales ; and, as no place seemed so suited to his abilities as the Foreign Office, to strengthen the Ministry Lord Hawkesbury consented to give it up, it being at first settled that he should instead take the management of war and the colonies.' But, as the arrangements went on, he was ulti mately transferred to the Home Office, chiefly, it seems probable, because, according to the usage of that day, when the Prime Minister was a commoner, the Home Secretary, if a peer, was the leader of the Upper House, and partly to comply with the fancy of the King himself, who desired such an arrangement, alleging as his reason that the Home Secretary was the officer with whom, next to the Prime Minister himself, he was brought into the most frequent contact, and that there was no one with whom he found it so pleasant to transact business as Lord Hawkesbury. As far as personal feelings were concerned. Lord Hawkes bury would have preferred remaining where he was ; but he knew that, in the formation of a new Ministry, it is often necessary to make sacrifices. And some of the reasons for which the change was proposed were, as we have seen, of a nature so complimentary and gratifying as greatly to contribute to reconcile him to it, though, as matters were eventually settled, the motive which had originally suggested any change at all, disappeared ; since Lord Moira, after a good deal of vacillation, declined joining the Ministry : and the seals of the Foreign Office were given to Lord Harrowby. ^ It is remarkable that in the very copious narrative of these trans actions contained in Lord Liverpool's letters, which will be given a few pages further on, this appointment is not mentioned ; but among the Liverpool Papers I find the following note : " St. James's Palace, May 13th, 1804. " The King desires Lord Hawkesbury's attendance here at four this day, to take the custody of the seals of the Colonial Department." VOL. I. L 146 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1804 CHAPTER V. Lord Liverpool's account of the formation of Pitt's second Administra tion — Canning's attack on Lord Hawkesbury — They are reconciled — The Additional Force BiU— A new Corn Bill —Lord Hawkesbury's views of Free Trade — Disputes in the royal family — Trades Unions — Rise of Mr. O'Connell — Lord Hawkesbury's advice to the Roman Catholics — Reconciliation of Pitt and Addington — The attack on the Spanish treasure-ships — Napoleon's letter to George III. — Alliance with Austria and Russia. The whole of the details relating to the formation of the new Administration ' have been narrated before by dif ferent writers, and of course from different points of view ; but, as the truth is only to be arrived at by the comparison ' The new Ministry was eventually composed of the following members : — First Lord of the Treasury and Chancellor of Exchequer, Mr. PiTT. Lord Chancellor, Lord Eldon. Lord President, Duke of PORTLAND. Lord Privy Seal, Earl of Westmoreland. Home Secretary, Lord HAWKESBURY. Foreign Secretary, Earl of Harrowby. Colonial Secretary, Earl of Camden. First Lord of Admiralty, Lord MELVILLE. President of Board of Control, Lord CASTLEREAGH. Master of the Ordnance, Earl of Chatham. President of Board of Trade, Duke of MONTROSE. Chancellor of Duchy of Lancaster, Earl MuLGRAVE. Lord Castlereagh being the only member of the House of Commons besides Pitt himself in the Cabinet. But Canning, whose great eloquence was becoming generally acknowledged, was Treasurer of the Navy ; and one of the new secretaries of the Treasury was a man who subsequently obtained the highest reputation for his thorough knowledge of all commercial and financial subjects, Mr. W, Huskisson. i8o4] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 147 of as many accounts as possible, provided they proceed from persons in a position to acquire accurate knowledge, I will add here a relation of the whole circumstances, con tained in three letters from Lord Liverpool to his cousin. Dr. Cornwall, bishop of Hereford, which, as the writer's information was of course derived in great part from his son, may be very nearly taken as the account of Lord Hawkesbury himself Addiscombe Place, July 8th, 1804. My DEAR Lord, I have now been in the country about two months. I have seen here very few people ; I have not even seen Hawkesbury but twice. When I left London, Administration was changing, and it has since been changed. I have learned, however, authenti cally, the principal events that have passed ; and I mean now, in the course of two or three letters, to send you an account of these transactions ; and I do it at the desire, and with the approbation, of Lord Hawkesbury. Mr. Pitt made himself the instrument of producing a change in the Administration ; for this purpose he wrote letters to the King, which I have seen. His only charge against the late Administration was weakness and imbecility. He did not state a single fact in proof of it, nor has a single fact been brought forvs^ard in either House of ParHament, or even in public conversation. The majority in either House was not great, but full as great in the House of Commons as Mr. Pitt had upon his Defence Bill. Mr. Addington and his colleagues thought fit, however, to give way, and some persons of importance think them wise in doing so. The King offered Mr. Addington an earldom and a pension of 4,000/. a year, which he refused, though pressed to accept these favours by the King and others. In the meantime a Court intrigue was going on. The Queen and the Duke of York were in open hostility with the Prince of Wales, and had no intercourse whatever. The dukes of Cumberland and Cambridge attached themselves to the Duke of York, the Duke of Clarence to the Prince of Wales, and the Duke of Kent acted a doubtful part between them. The Queen and Duke of York were apprehensive that the Adminis- L 2 148 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1804 tration which then existed was not sufficient to support them, in case of events, 'against the heir apparent, and wished therefore that it should be strengthened, particularly by Mr. Pitt. They therefore contributed to bring about the change, though the King was always firm in support of Mr. Addington. The state of the King's health was then, and continues to be, precarious ; according to the physicians, his bodily health is such as to promise a long life, and they are of opinion they shall cure him of any raental derangement, if he wih comply with what they shall advise. The notes which he writes (of which I have seen a great number) are not only wise and discreet, but excellent. His conversation, also, and behaviour are perfectly good when he is in the company of those for whora he feels any respect. But when he gets into the com pany of the female part of his family, or among his servants in the stables, his conversation is not certainly such as it ought to be ; and he marked this particularly in the only visit he has paid to Windsor ; so that he is to go there no more, and I believe he will live principally at Kew. He has promised to conform to the rules prescribed by the physicians, and I incline to think he will now do so. On the other hand, the Prince of Wales has never seen his father, mother, sisters, or brothers, that are attached to that part of the royal family. He obtains, however, information of what passes amongst them, as is supposed, through the Duke of Kent, and probably through other quarters. He declares him self in direct hostility to the Government that has been formed, and, by way of making friends, gives great dinners to all that he thinks may be gained. He professes that he will not take a temporary regency, but that he must have it for good, and without limitation, if he has it at all. He propagates unfavor able accounts of his father's health, and calls upon certain persons now in power, even by letter, not to trust to the reports of physicians alone, but to bring the business before Parliament. He is, as I take it, very much in the hands of Lord Moira and Mr. Fox; but I do not think that any ofthe others, though they wish to avail theraselves of his influence for the destruction of those who are now in power, are much connected with him. I now revert to Mr. Pitt. This gentleman proposed to form an i8o4] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 149 Administration of all the parties that assisted in the two Houses of Pariiament, excluding Mr. Addington. He has had some personal quarrel with the person last mentioned. The secret is supposed to be in the hands of Mr. Steele,^ and perhaps of a few others. I am totally unacquainted with it. Mr. Addington told me expressly he never would disclose it. Mr. Pitt proposed with earnestness that Mr. Fox, as well as others, should be taken in the Administration. I doubt whether he was ever sincere, or indeed thought that an Administration could be formed in which Mr. Fox and the others could bear a part. The King firmly rejected Mr. Fox, to which Mr. Pitt at last gave way, insisting, however, on taking in Lord Grenville. The King, though disinclined to his lordship, acquiesced. Mr. Pitt went then to Lord Grenville, and made the proposition to him. Lord Grenville would not consent to become a part of an Administration from which Mr. Fox and his friends were excluded. He confirmed this determination by a letter which you must have seen in the newspapers. Mr. Pitt then took the resolution of forming an Administration of his own friends, and of such of the late Administration as he approved of In my next letter I will send you an account of the share which Lord Hawkesbury has had in this transaction, and I shall afterwards convey to you some curious anecdotes, which it is proper you should know. I have the pleasure to tell you that my health continues full as well, perhaps rather better, than it was when you saw me in London. All the family desire their best compliments to you and your family. I am, with sincere regard, my dear Lord, Your Lordship's faithful Servant, Liverpool. My DEAR Lord, In my last letter I promised to give your Lordship an account of the share which Lord Hawkesbury had in the late change in the Administration. When Mr. Pitt determined to form an Administration out of his own friends and of a certain number of Mr. Addington's coadjutors, he sent Mr. Charies Long to Lord Hawkesbury to propose a meeting with him. At this 1 Secretary to the Treasury. ISO LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1804 conference Mr. Pitt said that Lord Hawkesbury was to con tinue Secretary of State, but asked hira if he would have any objection to change his department if Lord Moira could be gained, and he should prefer to have the Foreign Department. Lord Hawkesbury, who is attached to this department, and the members of which were much attached to him, objected, and stated his objections, but at last gave way if Lord Moha could be gained. When Lord Hawkesbury told me of this, I did not much object to the consent he had given if the change was founded on the acquisition of such a person as Lord Moira, who, from his connexion with the Prince, was of great import ance. The experiment was tried, by letters written to Lord Moira, but it wholly failed. Mr. Pitt then saw Lord Hawkes bury again, and said that he could not bring Lord Harrowby into his Cabinet unless he made him Secretary of State for the Foreign Department, for his health was so infirm that he could not execute any other, and that Lord Hawkesbury must con tinue to have the management of the House of Lords. Mr. Pitt assigned no other reason. Lord Hawkesbury again objected as before, but in the end acquiesced, for the reason stated to him. When Lord Hawkesbury acquainted me with this, I expressed great dissatisfaction, for I did not think that Lord Harrowby was a man either of the importance, the talents, or the knowledge of business, that Lord Hawkesbury was to leave his office merely for his lordship's accommodation. The point, however, had been decided, and nothing further could be said. I had, in truth, some presentiment of what afterwards happened. Lord Hawkesbury went, however, into the Home Department The King was, I am persuaded, informed of the sentiments which I entertained on this subject, and on this account he first conveyed to me, through Sir Joseph Banks, that he pre ferred having Lord Hawkesbury in his new situation ; that he thought it a situation of more iraportance, and that it brought him more frequently into his Majesty's presence, so that he should be more nearly connected with hira. Shortly after this, his Majesty further marked his confidence in me, and his wish to reconcile me to the change, by sending me all the corre spondence which had passed between Mr. Pitt and others, in consequence of this change of Administration; and I had reason i8o4] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 151 to conjecture that the King placed very great personal confi dence in Lord Hawkesbury. Before I proceed, it is necessary I should observe that Lord Hawkesbury insisted with Mr. Pitt on preserving his friend Mr. WaUace in the office he then held, whom Mr. Pitt intended to dismiss, from personal impressions against him made by Mr. Canning and others. This act of friendship on the part of Lord Hawkesbury stirred up against him the enmity of many of the little persons who environ and influence Mr. Pitt. Lord Hawkesbury was the means of preserving Lord West moreland, whom Mr. Pitt wished to dismiss, notwithstanding the long personal friendship which had existed between them. I beHeve that Hawkesbury performed this office in compliance with the wishes of the King. When it was known that Mr. Wallace was to be continued in office, Mr. Canning and his little connexions began to spread unfavorable reports to Lord Hawkesbury; and when the Defence Bill came to be debated, Mr. Canning made use of expressions in the House of Commons of a very hostile nature to Lord Hawkesbury. It was evident that every word of his speech was prepared. It was replied to by several, particularly by Mr. Bragge, who told Mr. Canning that he had first been introduced into business by Lord Hawkesbury, that he now enjoyed one of the most profitable offices ^ under Government in consequence of that introduction, and yet he had thought fit unjustly to censure Lord Hawkesbury. Mr. Canning did not deny this fact or say a word in reply. Even Mr. Pitt was so sensible of the offence which had been given that he endeavoured to bring Mr. Canning to an explanation, but without success, and Mr. Pitt said himself what was not in fact true. He concealed the real motive of the change, as stated by himself to Lord Hawkesbury, and assigned another reason for it. Lord Hawkesbury, very much offended with the whole of this transaction, took four-and-twenty hours to consider what he should do. After full deliberation. Lord Hawkesbury v«ote a letter on the twentieth of last month to Mr. Pitt, resigning his ' Mr. Canning, who had been Under-Secretary of State in Pitt's first Administration, was Treasurer of the Navy in this his second Ministry. 152 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1804 office as Secretary of State, assigning as his reasons for it what I have already stated, and which I need not therefore repeat, but professing in the strongest terms his personal attachment to the King. Mr. Pitt immediately replied to this letter, and tried to diminish the offence which had been given, but begged of Lord Hawkesbury not to proceed, or say a word of this trans action, till he had had a conference with him, expressing in strong terms how sensible he was of the mischief that would be done to the existing Administration if any knowledge should get abroad of what had passed on this occasion. The next day Lord Hawkesbury and Mr. Pitt had a conference, in which, after a long discussion, and much art on the part of Mr. Pitt, Lord Hawkesbury continued firm; and then Mr. Pitt offered to remove the person who had been the occasion of what had passed in the House of Commons relative to himself if he made a point of it. Lord Hawkesbury took a day to consider of this, when he returned for answer that he would not suffer that any one should be dismissed, or even resign his office, on his account. But after having stated to Mr. Pitt, in very clear and explicit but temperate terms, the impropriety of his own language, he required that Mr. Pitt should take sorae opportunity of stating the real trath of what had passed between thera when he consented to change his situation ; viz. that he gave his consent merely for personal accommodation. Mr. Pitt in answer proraised to do what Lord Hawkesbury insisted on if an occasion should offer, and expressed in strong terms his opinion of the talents and abilities of Lord Hawkesbury, and his most sincere and earnest desire that they might act together on the most cordial footing of political confidence and personal friendship. When Lord Hawkesbury sent his letter to me, I advised him to be satisfied, and everything is going on well ever since. There are, how ever, some other little anecdotes, which I shaH make the subject of another letter ; but I shall not be able to write to you for a day or two, as Mr. Lock is going to leave me. I am, with the sincerest regard, my dear Lord, Your Lordship's faithful Servant, Liverpool, i8o4] OF LORD LIVERPOOL, 153 Addiscombe Place, i6th July, 1804. My DEAR Lord, Previous to what passed as related in the latter part of my last letter, Lord Hawkesbury had told me that Mr. Canning's in fluence over Mr. Pitt was greatly diminished; but when this gentleman heard of Lord Hawkesbury's resolution to resign, he appears to have been very much alarmed. He came three times to seek Lord Hawkesbury, who twice refused to see him ; the third time he forced himself upon him. I am informed, from Mr. Canning's ovra account, Lord Hawkesbury treated him very coldly ; he made many apologies, denying his intention to give any offence. At length Mr. Canning offered to resign his office if Lord Hawkesbury required it. Lord Hawkesbury was then more civil to him, but dismissed him without any assurance, but returned his answer in the letter he afterwards wrote to Mr. Pitt, in which, as I said before, he declared that he would not suffer any one to resign on his account. I am assured that Mr. Canning and all his little squad are in very low spirits, and it is certain that Mr. Pitt has never told the whole of what passed to any of these gentlemen. I think it is probable that they will work in every way they can to the prejudice of my son : whether they will succeed it is impossible to foretell ; but I think he acts perfectly right in setting them at defiance. He must destroy their influence, or they must destroy him. I have thus given your Lordship a short history of the late change in the Administration, and of some incidents that have occurred in consequence thereof The late Administration were charged with imbecility, and yet, neither in Mr. Pitt's letters to the King, nor in any speech or proceeding in either House of Parliament, has any one single act of imbeciHty been imputed to them, or any charge brought against them. This is a most extraordinary circumstance. If we compare the individuals of which the late Administration was composed with those of the present, we shall find the present much weaker than the pre ceding one, except in the single case of Mr. Pitt. He certainly is, in oratory at least, superior to Mr. Addington. Lord Melville is certainly not a better First Lord of the Admiralty 154 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1804 in public estimation than Lord St. Vincent ; and no one of the new members of the present Administration can be compared to Mr. Yorke as a man of business. The Duke of Montrose, Lord Camden, and Lord Mulgrave are wretched indeed. Lord Harrowby has some parts, but the weakness of his mind, and the consequent weakness of his health, almost disqualify him for a man of business, and still more for a speaker. Mr. Pitt has not a single member in the House of Commons qualified to give him material support in debate ; while he has to contend with opponents distinguished by talents of every description : Mr. Fox, Mr. Sheridan, Mr. Windham, Mr. Tierney, and others. There are other circumstances which may put an end to his Administration. The King's health is precarious, and even that of Mr. Pitt disqualifies him from taking so vigorous and active a part as he did when he was before in the same situation ; his popularity has also much declined, particularly in the western and northern parts of England. And, though he has some zealous friends among the merchants of the City, the enthusiasm which once prevailed shows itself no longer in his favour. If the King's health was to decline, and the Prince of Wales to become regent, Mr. Fox, in conjunction with Lord Moira, will become the efficient ministers- If Mr. Pitt's health was to decline so as to prevent his continuing in office, Mr. Addington would be his successor, and return to his former situation. He has risen, since he retired, very much in public estimation ; and, in tmth, men of his character will always recover the good opinion of the public when they are out of office, though they are neither praised nor sufficiently respected as long as they retain their power. He is calm, sensible, cautious, and has shown himself of late to be very disinterested, though he has in fact but 2,200/. a year to live on, except the office he gave his son, and he will give no offence by the conduct he wiU hold while he may be said to be in opposition. The Grenville party, though it contains some men of ability, is not very numerous, and the persons of which it consists are universally unpopular. The heads of this party are considered by every one as violent in their principles, and to the last degree selfish. I have thus, my dear Lord, opened to you the whole of my i8o4] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 155 sentiments on the present state of affairs. Hawkesbury is in perfect health and spirits. I am, with sincere regard, Your Lordship's faithful Servant, Liverpool. It will here be seen that in one of these letters is a brief mention of a disagreement with one of the subor dinate, but very important, members of the Ministry. The new Treasurer of the Navy, Canning, was a man of pre eminent ability, of clear judgment, of rapid decision, of large and liberal views, and of an eloquence second only on his side ofthe House to that of Pitt himself. He was also connected by terms of close intimacy with Lord Hawkes bury. Their friendship, as has been already mentioned, had commenced at Oxford, and they had since been connected by parliamentary and official intercourse. Canning having been Under-Secretary of State during the latter years of Pitt's first Ministry. When, on Pitt's resignation. Lord Hawkesbury was raised to Cabinet office, Addington would gladly have secured the assistance of Canning also ; but he entertained a strong opinion on the propriety of removing the restrictions from the Roman Catholics, and followed Pitt into retirement, though Pitt, rating service to the country more highly than a show of personal attachment to himself, strongly advised, and even entreated, him to continue at his post. He, however, persisted in his resig nation : but, though thus far proclaiming his resolution to act on Pitt's example rather than by his advice, he was far from imitating him in his subsequent conduct. During the whole of Addington's government, he was its most un wearied and versatile opponent, attacking both Administra tion and Minister with speeches in and lampoons out of the House ; and descending, on at least one occasion, to some thing too like treachery and intrigue, to induce Pitt to take measures to withdraw his support from the Ministry, and to overthrow it before he had seen any reason to be dissatis fied with its proceedings. The truth was that Canning had 156 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1804 one great fault during the early part of his career, though, seeing how it had marred both his usefulness to his country and his personal advancement, he afterwards had the good sense to cure himself of it. The fault was an extreme rest lessness. Conscious of the possession of great powers, he was inclined to deny the credit of any ability to those who came into competition with him, to disapprove of everything which he had no share in doing. Accordingly, although it would be doing him great injustice to compare him, as to expansion of mind and lofty designs, with Lord Grenville, yet in respect of the first transactions of the Government which he had refused to join, he followed the guidance of his former chief at the Foreign Office rather than the wiser, better-tempered, and more self-denying judgment of Pitt. He denounced the peace publicly and privately, professing to regard it as the arrangement of Addington himself not of " Hawkesbury, who had merely held the pen,"' and as in itself justifying his unwillingness to serve under such a principal. And now, when he had returned to office under Pitt, he could not restrain himself from not only still aiming his sarcasms at his predecessors, but even from assuming that Pitt so fully agreed with, and so completely deferred to the objections which he had formerly made to the Peace of Amiens (though, as has been seen, Pitt publicly supported and privately approved of it), that the change which had been made in the department of the Foreign Office had been adopted in consequence of those objections ; and, in the debate on the Additional Force Bill in the middle of June, he affirmed, by way of vindicating his own consistency on now taking office with so many colleagues who had been members of the previous Ministry, that there was a great and general change of system. Especially had it been changed in those points on which Addington's measures had been unsatisfactory to himself, and in the front he placed the foreign policy. ^ See his letter to Lord Boringdon, October 29th, 1801, in "George Canning and his Times," p. 69. j8o4] of LORD LIVERPOOL, 157 "I objected," said he, "to the administration of foreign affairs : that has been changed ;" giving additional sting to the assertion by his next sentence: "I objected to the naval administration : that has been changed ; " the want of energy and vigilance in the naval department having been, as we have seen, selected by Pitt himself as the most prominent object for censure. Such a statement was well calculated to arouse Lord Hawkesbury's indignation. He looked on it as tantamount to an assertion that the speaker had not consented to take even an office which did not give a seat in the Cabinet without stipulating for such a change in our foreign policy as required the removal of the former Foreign Secretary ; and that that removal had therefore been caused by the Prime Minister's acquiescence in the propriety of that change. Canning afterwards disclaimed in the strongest manner any intention of conveying such a notion, but the comments made on his language, as soon as he sat down, by Sheridan and others, showed that Lord Hawkesbury was not unwarranted in the interpretation which he put on it. Nay, Pitt himself must have regarded it in the same light ; so pointedly, in the course of his own speech, delivered at a later hour of the same evening, did he allude to Canning's expressions, and so carefully did he give a different colour to the recent arrangements. " There was not the slightest ground," he affirmed, " for imagining that a noble friend of his, whom he had always esteemed and loved, was degraded by taking the Home instead of the Foreign Department, though he confessed that there were some parts ofthe foreign system which he did not approve, of which it was not neces sary to say more. Those who knew the circumstances knew how far that change was from any motive that could infer degradation." Nor did he forbear to administer a sharp rebuke to him whose (to say the least) unguarded language had made it necessary for him to allude to the subject at all. " Indeed he could not see in what view such a thing could be mentioned at all, unless it were for the purpose 158 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1804 of sowing jealousies and dissensions among the present ministers ; and as such it deserved his severest animad version." Angry, however, as Lord Hawkesbury was, with his habitual self-command he determined (as he wrote word to Lord Liverpool) "to take no step in the business tih after twenty-four hours' consideration." But at the end of that time he wrote to the Prime Minister himself, reminding him that " the change from the Foreign to the Home De partment had been proposed by Pitt solely on the ground of personal accommodation. That he himself had plainly declared it to be contrary to his own wishes and feelings, which, however, he was willing to sacrifice for the con venience of Pitt himself in making his arrangements ; and that from the first he had been fully aware of the construc tion which would be given to this transaction in the world, and of the advantage which any Opposition might be ex pected to take of it. These consequences he had then been prepared to disregard. But now, after this construc tion had been publicly sanctioned by a member of the Government supposed to possess a considerable share of Pitt's personal confidence, he felt that, consistently with what he owed to his own honour and reputation, he could no longer continue a member of the Government." He added also, as a proof that he was not deciding too hastily, or under the impulse of annoyance at a single expression, which might not mean so much as it seemed to convey, that he knew that " the imputation thus publicly made had been circulated from the same quarter for some time past in private society." At the same time he assured Pitt that his withdrawal from office should make no difference in his resolution to give all possible support to his Government. Pitt's reply would have been amply satisfactory to any one who was not rendered peculiarly sensitive by a feeling of wounded honour He declared that " it was scarcely possible that any circumstance could arise which on every personal account could give him- individually more pain." i8o4] OF LORD LIVERPOOL, 159 And in this he was undoubtedly sincere ; for, as has been already mentioned, in the first arrangement of Addington's Cabinet he had singled Lord Hawkesbury out for especial commendation. He pointed out how promptly and de cidedly he had himself alluded to the subject in order to efface the construction which others showed an inclination to put on Canning's words. And he corroborated most fully Lord Hawkesbury's own statement that the recent changes "had been proposed and acceded to solely on the ground of personal accommodation." He did more. For when Canning, who had neither wished nor expected his words to be taken so seriously, and who, when he learnt what deep offence he had given, expressed to Lord Hawkesbury and to Pitt his desire rather to resign his own place than to embarrass the Government by allowing Lord Hawkesbury to retire, Pitt, without at all concealing how useful Canning's aid was to himself in the House of Commons, declared that, if he were driven to such an alter native, he must accept his resignation rather than that of Lord Hawkesbury. Such a declaration, while it was only just, inasmuch as Canning was certainly the offender in the dispute, and only in accordance with what Lord Hawkesbury was entitled to by his seat in the Cabinet, a rank to which Canning had not yet risen, was also in itself so high and practical a compliment and proof of the value the Prime Minister set upon his services, that, as we have seen in his father's letters to Bishop Cornwall, he consented to withdraw his resignation. In the winter the matter was for a moment re-opened by the mischief-making tattle of officious friends on both sides, but was speedily set at rest by candid per sonal explanations and the judicious mediation of a comme n friend. Lord Morpeth. Of course the outline, though not the details, of what had taken place was generally known, and the anticipations which Lord Hawkesbury expressed to his father when he first communicated to him his resig nation of his office, that "so far as it was a personal i6o LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1804 question, what had happened would not turn to his disad vantage in the eyes of the world," was verified ; for the world in general, and especially the world of politicians, looks with favour on a man who is prompt to vindicate his own honour, so long as his conduct in vindicating it is marked with forbearance and good temper. And in another way the transaction redounds to the credit of both, of Canning as well as of Lord Hawkesbury. For it is only with men of really fine and generous dispositions that a reconciliation, after a dispute of so serious a kind, can be so complete as to leave no soreness behind it. But it was such in this instance. They at once returned to their former habits of cordial intimacy : which was never again inter rupted. Even their difference on the question which, after the termination of the war, was, till its final settlement, the cardinal point of domestic politics, led to no diminution of their personal" regard for each other And on all other points, as no one could better appreciate the brilliancy of Canning's genius or the soundness of his views than his old friend and colleague, so no one could exceed Canning in the frankness and warmth with which he at all times ac knowledged the assistance that he derived in carrying out those views from his confidence in the steady support and straightforward advocacy which he was sure to receive from the Prime Minister. Before his resumption of office Pitt, as we have seen, had shown his dissatisfaction with the measures, both naval and military, which had been adopted for the further prose cution of the war. One of the first bills which, still under the influence of this feeling, he introduced as minister was that known as the " Additional Force Bill ; " by which he hoped to remove the difficulties which had lately been found to impede the recruiting for the regular army, and to aug ment the army of reserve, which hitherto had never reached the number intended. And he calculated on attaining both these objects by a reduction of the militia to its former amount, which of late had been greatly exceeded. The i8o4] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. i6i bill was vehemently attacked not only by Fox, but also by Windham and Addington ; but it passed the House of Commons by a majority of above 40. In the Upper House it encountered equally earnest opposition from Lord Grenville ; from Lord Moira, who, as we have said, was closely connected with the Prince of Wales ; from Lord Hobart, who had been one of Addington's Secretaries of State, and from others ; but it was efficiently advocated by Lord Hawkesbury. His argument rested very mainly on the ground that the original establishment of the army of reserve having not only been a judicious, but also, as was proved by the results, an eminently successful measure, the present bill was in fact but a necessary correction of and supplement to it. In some points the former Act had been found to press both heavily and, what was worse, unequally on those whom it most affected. This bill redressed the inequalities, and removed the pressure. Lord Grenville had objected to it as unconstitutional, since it tended to establish a large standing army in time of peace. So old an argument, if indeed it could be called one at all, admitted of being easily disposed of by the most cursory reference to the length of time during which a standing army had been kept on foot in the kingdom. And it was evident that the principle was not affected by the number of men employed ; but Lord Hawkesbury, moreover, contended and proved that the force to be established by the present bill was wholly free from any unconstitutional element, inasmuch as it would be as en tirely under the control of Parliament as any description of force that could be conceived. Above all, he recom mended the measure as one calculated to save us for the future from those embarrassments which hitherto had always crippled us at the commencement of a war, arising from the want of men. His speech on the whole was so conclusive that the bill passed the House of Lords by a majority of 154 to 69, or more than two to one. And he was equally successful, or yOL. I. M i62 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1804 even more so (since the opponents of the measure did not in this instance venture to divide at all), in persuading the House to agree to a bill for regulating the corn-trade; making the conditions under which grain might be exported or im ported dependent on the average price of corn (for the year) in the maritime districts of the island. The object was stated by him in the House of Lords to be : " First to render the prices of corn steady, and to counteract, as far as legis lation could effect it, the dangers and inconveniences of frequent fluctuation, with which their Lordships could not fail to be impressed when they recollected that within a few years the price of wheat had been on one occasion 43J. a quarter, and at another time had risen to the enor mous price of 156J. ; and the other object aimed at was to encourage agriculture by adopting such measures as might afford the farmer a fair profit for his labour and capital." It is probable that, in advocating the measure. Lord Hawkesbury was in some degree yielding his own judgment to that of his colleagues, and that it may have been owing to this circumstance that his language was unusually guarded. "He would not," he said, "then go into an examination of the view urged by some of the most respectable and most enlightened men in the country, whether it would not be wiser to abstain from all legis lation, and to leave the trade in corn as free as it was in any other commodity." And it is certain that, at a somewhat later period, when, in consequence of an apprehended scarcity of the potato crop in Ireland, the Secretary for Ireland, then Sir A. Wellesley, suggested a fresh, even if only a temporary, alteration of the law, not without some apparent anxiety for the adoption of his proposal. Lord Hawkesbury expressed to him a very decided opinion " of the difficulties which must arise from any interference of the Government or Legis lature on the subject," as calculated "to derange trade, and give an impulse to unhealthy speculation." And in the re-arrangement of our financial and commercial i8o4] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 163 legislation, rendered necessary by the termination of the war, we shall find that he was a general advocate for the greatest abstinence from interference with trade and com merce that the complicated interests and established habits of a country like Great Britain seemed to permit. If not the earhest champion of free-trade, he was certainly the first who, with any of the responsibility of the Government on his shoulders, supported such a principle. And it was no idea taken up by him hastily, or on light grounds, but one to which he consistently adhered throughout his whole career, and the more steadily the more he had the power to give effect to it. Those who, in our own generation, lavish panegyrics not undeserved on the financial abilities dis played, and the financial and commercial reforms achieved, by Sir Robert Peel, should bear in mind that he imbibed the principles on which those reforms were founded from the statesman who introduced him into the Government. The giving the royal assent to the bill was the last act of the session. And the vacation, acceptable to all the ministers, was more welcome to none than to Lord Hawkesbury, who required leisure to make himself acquainted with the duties, and to enable him to grapple with the perplexities, of his new office. And, if not so imposing in appearance as the labours of the Foreign Secretary, on whose management the mainte nance of friendship and alliance with foreign Powers and the peace or war of the world often depended, they were equally multifarious, almost equally important at the moment, often even of more real and solid consequence, as being cal culated to exert a more permanent influence on the internal policy of the kingdom and condition of the people. The very question of peace and war was not wholly unconnected with the Home Office at the time, from the expectation which generally prevailed that the first operation attempted by the enemy would be the invasion of this island ; and much of Lord Hawkesbury's correspondence with the King during the recess of 1804 refers to the measures which M 2 1 64 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1804 he would be required to take, in the event of any landing on our shores being effected, to preserve the tranquillity of the kingdom.' Both his royal master and himself believed that the review which the new Emperor held at Boulogne in the middle of August, in honour of him self and his namesake, the new Saint Napoleon, whom he had just called into existence as a compliment to himself was but a rehearsal of the grand attempt which was to follow immediately. But when, in a skirmish which took place before the end of the month under the eyes of Napoleon himself the new Emperor found that a British frigate and three small sloops were sufficient to repel ninety of his brigs and gunboats, he became convinced that no flotilla of small vessels, however numerous, would be sufficient to protect his transports, and he adjourned the enterprise till the following year, when the plan of naval operations which he had formed would, he hoped, give him, at least for a time, the command of the Channel But, besides the possible chances of the war, questions of the gravest character were surrounding the Home Secretary on every side. In a country such as Britain, even the most private affairs of the royal family are not without an influence on public politics ; and this had never been the case in a greater degree than during the present reign ; nor perhaps ever so much in that as at the time of which we are speaking, when the eyes of the nation were directed to three generations at once, and the arrangements neces sary for the education of the future heiress of the kingdom might affect the course of events for the greater part of the century. The King himself, as was not unnatural, conceived that he had, as sovereign, a right to the principal ' August 14th, two days before the review at Boulogne, Lord Hawkesbury writes to his father : " From intelligence which has lately reached us we are inclined to believe that the attempt of invasion will soon be made. Their preparations are very great ; and they have stopped building, which looks as if they considered them complete. They have about 3,000 vessels of different descriptions, and 180,000 men between Ostend and Cherbourg." i8o4] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 165 voice in the settlement of those arrangements ; his right being certainly, in the general view, strengthened by the unhappy terms on which the parents of the young princess were living. And it was hardly possible for either of them to behave with greater impropriety than. their conduct now displayed. The Prince made the most ostentatious parade of his differences with his father ; abstaining from attend ing the levee on his birthday, driving by the palace at the time as if on purpose to show that no cause but in clination kept him away; afterwards, when he had agreed to wait on his father at Kew, changing his mind, and desiring to intimate his change of purpose by a message couched in terms so disrespectful that the chancellor re fused to convey it. While the Princess of Wales, acting with more than usual flightiness, sent messages to those in charge of her daughter, in the King's name, of which he had no knowledge, and the obedience to which took him wholly by surprise, and threw him into great and dangerous agitation. However, after a discussion of some months the Prince gave way, in appearance at least ; and, though he still spoke most irreverently of his father in private society, and dwelt with the exaggeration of evi dent satisfaction on the infirm state of his mental health, he consented to allow him the sole and exclusive care of his daughter ; and the selection of her abode and of her different attendants and teachers was made by the King himself with great anxiety and most judicious discern ment. Unhappily, the arrangement which was now con cluded did not terminate all the differences in the royal family ; and when Lord Hawkesbury's interference was next called for, the necessity for it arose from disputes between the Prince and Princess which were still more distressing, because still more discreditable. Another matter to which Lord Hawkesbury's attention was called in the autumn of this year was of a nature which at more than one subsequent period has attracted notice ; but never so much as lately, since the atrocities i66 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1804 to which the system of the Trades Unions is calculated to lead had never been fully comprehended till they were disclosed by the recent investigations. In 1804 these unions were of recent growth, the first societies of the kind having been apparently established in imitation of the different political associations to which admiration of the principles of the French Revolution had given birth. But they had already grown to such a head, and the workmen had adopted steps to procure their objects which were so unquestionably illegal, that the masters, who saw every proper principle of trade attacked by them, and their own means of livelihood imperilled, petitioned the Home Secretary to take the matter into his own hands, and to institute a Government prosecution of the chief members of the Union. Lord Hawkesbury very naturally referred the petition to the Attorney-General, Mr. Perceval, celebrated afterwards as the only lawyer of professional eminence who, since the Revolution, has ever become Prime Minister. And the opinion which he received in reply is worth preserving, as probably the earliest pro nounced by any lawyer or minister on a question which is now assuming such great importance. October 5th, 1804. My Lord, I have had the honour of receiving your Lordship's letter of the 2 2d ult., accompanied with several papers relative to the com bination formed by the boot and shoe makers in the metropolis, which your Lordship thereby submitted to the consideration of the Solicitor-General and rayself, who were requested to state an opinion as to the steps raost proper to be taken thereon. These papers contain a statement of a very extensive combina tion existing amongst the boot and shoe makers in the me tropolis, who are in correspondence, by means of delegates, committees, and otherwise, with similar combinations, or rather branches of the same combination, in different parts of the kingdom. The systera seems to be established upon the plan acted upon by the Corresponding Society, and other united Societies, which have been found to act with such mischievous i8o4] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 167 concert in England, Scotland, and Ireland, upon political points which were the objects of the union ; and there appears to be no doubt that the plan of the present combination is capable of being applied in support of any object to which they may be disposed to direct it. The present objects seem to be the increase of wages, some regulation with respect to the nuraber of apprentices, and imposing an obligation upon the masters to employ no journeyman who, as not being a member of the combination, or refusing to comply with its rules and submit to its authority, has made himself obnoxious to its raembers. This latter object, it is plain, is immediately directed to the establishment of the strength of the society, by putting into their hands the means of compelling every journey man in the trade, and, through the journeymen, every master in the trade, to submit to their terms under peril of ruin, by loss of employment to the journeymen, and loss of workmen to the masters. The general evidence of the existence of such a system seems to be very strong and convincing ; but it is not given with that detail and particularity with regard to individuals as to enable me to point out to your Lordship the persons whom (if it should be thought fit for Government to take it up as a subject on which they would direct a prosecu tion) it would be proper to select as objects of that prosecution. But the papers contain the offer of more information, and I think it may be reasonably concluded, from what they contain, that sufficiently particular information against individuals might be procured. Upon the point of lav\', I have no difficulty in stating to your Lordship that the combination is illegal, and that the parties, if particularized by such evidence as I above suppose to be within reach of being procured, are liable to be prosecuted for a misdemeanour. With respect to the policy of Government's instituting such a prosecution, my mind is in too great a degree of doubt to permit me to state any opinion, or to do more than to submit it to your Lordship and his Majesty's Government to determine it, suggesting some of the considerations which create my doubts. If the effect of prosecuting or not prosecuting by Government was to begin and end with this case alone, it perhaps might be i68 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1804 immaterial who carried on the prosecution. The source of evidence is opened to Government, and the pubHc prosecutor would probably be able to procure sufficient evidence to convict. But as it will be viewed as a precedent of what the masters in this trade, and in others, will expect Government to do in future, it seeras to me to deserve very serious considera tion. For it is not only to be collected from these papers, but it is otherwise too notorious, that similar combinations exist in almost every trade in the kingdom. And if Government attends to this application on the part of the boot and shoe makers, similar applications must be expected from every other trade, and it will lead to an opinion that it is not the business of the masters of the trade, who feel the injury, to prosecute, but that it is the business of the Government. And it seems to admit of no doubt, but that either as regards the authority and weight of the raasters, or the facility of securing evidence to prosecute with effect, such prosecutions had better be in the hands of the masters than of Government. It must be ad mitted, indeed, that the offence has grown to such a height, and such an extent, as to raake it very discouraging for any individual to institute a prosecution ; as the persons whom he would prosecute would be supported at their trial, and during their imprisonment, by the contributions of their confederates, and his own shop would possibly be deserted by his work men. But then it is clear that it is owing to the inertness and timidity of the masters that the conspiracy has reached this height, and it may well be feared that this inertness wiU be rather increased than diminished by the interference of Govern ment. The same timidity which disposes each at present to wish to leave it to sorae other parties to prosecute, lest by prosecution they should lose their workraen, wiU dispose them to leave to others the equally, if not more, obnoxious duty of informing ; and when they once think the punishment of such offences to be the business of Government, they wiU think it also the business of Government to procure the evidence, and not theirs to give it ; so that the future detection and prosecution of such offences would probably be rendered more difficult. Besides, in all these cases there are always, whether well founded or not, complaints on both sides, and the i8o4] OF LORD LIVERPOOL, 169 impartiality of Government would be awkwardly tested if, after undertaking a prosecution, at the instance of the masters, against the conspiracy of the journeymen, they were to be applied to on the part of the journeymen to prosecute the same masters for a conspiracy against their men. These are some of the considerations which lead me to doubt whether it would or would not be politic to institute a prose cution by the public in this case ; and I take leave to submit them to your Lordship's better determination. Upon the ille- gaHty of this conspiracy I have had an opportunity of knowing that the Solicitor-General agrees with me, but not having been able to see him since I have read the papers myself, and being pressed by the persons who submitted these papers to your Lordship not to delay my opinion upon them, I have reflected upon the whole of the case without waiting to confer with the Solicitor-General upon the expediency of Government engaging in the prosecution. I have the honour to be, my Lord, Your Lordship's most obedient, humble Servant, Sp. Perceval. Mr. Perceval's opinion was, almost as a matter of course, acted on by his colleague who had invited it. Lord Hawkesbury declined to institute such a prosecution as had been requested. And the matter dropped for a time : the workmen abating some of their pretensions when they learnt (for the Attorney-General's opinion seems to have become known to the parties principally concerned) that their combination, carried out as they intended to carry it out, was such a violation of the law as might expose them to punishment. In Ireland there were difficulties of a more serious nature : some affecting the political tranquillity of the island, and likely, in their complications, to involve that of Great Britain also; others affecting the character of the judi cial bench and the administration of justice, on which hitherto no political agitation had even cast a suspicion. That at so unquiet a moment, when the insurrection that had just been quelled had inevitably left behind it a still I70 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1804 sweUing under-current of discontent, libels should have been published on those concerned in the punishment of the rebels could hardly be unexpected. But, after the printer of one of the most virulent attacks on the Lord Lieutenant, the Lord Chancellor, and other high officers of the Crown had been brought to justice, it was found that the author of the libel was actually one of the judges. Even in Ireland so discreditable a state of things as now ensued had not previously been seen. Two of his col leagues so resented the conduct of which they believed a third to have been guilty that they refused to sit on the bench with him. The fourth took his part : one-half the Queen's Bench broke off all intercourse, both official and private, with the other half and threats of actions at law for libel and slander were freely bandied between those who were appointed to be the dispensers of justice to others. The question, too, which had broken up Pitt's former Ministry was revived, and that under the peculiarly em barrassing circumstance of those who brought it forward being men of deservedly high reputation and influence in Ireland. Lord Fingall, Lord Gormanstown, Sir Edward Bellew, and others, some country gentlemen, some mer chants of affluence, and some barristers, among whom was one, Mr. Daniel O'Connell, who afterwards rose to great celebrity by his ultimately successful advocacy of the question, at the beginning of the year had formed themselves into a committee for the purpose of pressing on the Government the propriety of repealing the laws affecting the Roman Cathohcs, to which body they ah belonged ; and they were now preparing a petition to be presented to both Houses of Parliament ; while at the very same time certain information reached the Government of a very extensive disaffection in the southern and western counties, and of a large party being in negotiation with the French to induce them to invade the island. The French were lavish of, and probably sincere in, their i8o4] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 171 promises to comply with the invitation : but it is remark able that, according to the intelligence which was received by the ministers, they had resolved not again to try the western coast, where the misadventures of General Hum bert and Commodore Bomparfi were still fresh in their recollection ; but they proposed instead to venture up St. George's Channel, and, while a Dutch fleet sailed round towards the Donegal coast to draw off our attention to that quarter, to endeavour to land a force in the neigh bourhood of Dublin and surprise the capital. Lord Hawkesbury failed, as we shall see hereafter, in his endeavours to induce the Roman Catholics to postpone their movement to a more favorable time. His advice may have been suspected, since his having held office in Addington's Ministry raised a presumption that he was opposed to the removal of the restrictions complained of. But when he urged upon them, as he was evidently authorised to do by the Prime Minister, that "whatever might be Pitt's opinion on the merits of the question itself, it would be impossible for him, under the present circum stances, to take any other line than that of resisting it to the utmost of his power, and that it was certain that any expectation of carrying the question at that time would be completely disappointed," it would have been wise of them to listen to him ; for he was acting rather as a friend than as an adversary when he argued that it was impolitic to a degree " little short of insanity for the Catholics to think of pressing their claims at that time, since the consequence would infallibly be that many persons would be committed against them who, under other circumstances, might come to a different conclusion ; but who, having once taken their line upon the question, might be disposed on that account ever after to adhere to it." He added : " The agitation of ' A few weeks after General Humbert's surrender. Commodore Bompart, with a squadron consisting of a ship of the line and eight frigates, having 3,000 men on board as a reinforcement for the general, had all his ships but two taken by a squadron under Sir J. B. Warren. 172 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1804 the question at this time may influence the opinions of many likewise on the merits of the question itself It will impress them with a conviction of the malus animus of those who bring it forward, as the removal of the exist ing disabilities would not practically benefit ten persons in the whole country, and the conduct of the Catholics will appear to arise from a desire on their part either to embarrass Government by the agitation of the question at a most unseasonable time, or to make this measure, when carried, the foundation of further claims and pre tensions of the most alarming nature to all who are attached to the existing constitution in Church and State."! If, in speaking of those who might be led to conceive an unfavorable impression of the objects of the Roman Catholics and their general loyalty to the constitution by their pertinacity in thus pressing their claims at this moment, he included himself; and if he, not having pre viously made up his mind on the principle, but being now compelled to make a sudden and hasty selection, was thus led to embrace that side of the question which was hostile to their emancipation, as it was subsequently called ; it was indeed a most unfortunate mistake for themselves and for the kingdom at large which the Roman Catholics now committed. For in that case it seems probable that, by alienating one who subsequently enjoyed the chief power in the State for such a length of time, they eventually post poned the attainment of their demands, and kept the whole kingdom in a state of agitation for many years. A mistake of policy at this moment it undoubtedly was, because it can never be prudent to endeavour to push forward a claim at a time when circumstances render its success impossible. And Pitt's repudiation of it, coupled with the motive which led to his taking that line, clearly showed that at ! These opinions are expressed in a letter to the Lord Lieutenant, written " to be made use of by him, as he might think proper, in his further communications with any members of the Catholic body." i8o4] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 173 the moment concession was absolutely impracticable. The Roman Catholics indeed may in all candour be excused for disregarding the dictates of strict prudence on the subject, not only from their firm conviction of the reason able and rightful character of their claims, but because it is undeniable that the Ministry which carried the Union had led them to expect an immediate recognition of them. So that they were smarting under the double injury of restric tion and disappointment. But it is not so easy to acquit those politicians who in the next session of Parliament made themselves their organ ; though they were as well aware as Pitt himself of the impossibility of obtaining the King's consent, and of the danger of agitating and un settling his mind by pressing for it ; and though one of them, when, a few months later, he found himself in Pitt's position, abandoned the advocacy of the question from the very same motive which had influenced that minister. One cause of anxiety to both the Ministry and the nation was removed in the course of the winter by the thorough re-establishment of the King's health, to which his recon ciliation with the Prince of Wales no doubt greatly con tributed. In November the Prince visited his father at Windsor ; and for the first time for many years the father and son slept under the same roof : though Lord Hawkesbury feared that it was but an apparent and temporary har mony, an apprehension in which the King himself coincided. Before the end of the year Lord Hawkesbury himself had the good fortune to be able to contribute further to the royal comfort, under circumstances very flattering to him self, and showing beyond all cavil or contradiction how very high his own character and influence stood with both the late and the present minister. In a letter to his father on the subject of the Catholic claims he had mentioned his belief that Lord Fingall and his party were secretly encouraged in the prosecution of them by the Grenvilles ; and after discussing its probable bearing on the different parties in the State, and on the King's feelings towards 174 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1804 each, added, evidently from a wish that was father to the thought, that it might perhaps " bring Pitt and Addington again together." ^ To Lord Hawkesbury's mind it was, of course, no slight reason for desiring such a reconciliation, that it would add considerable strength to the Government, which, in the latter part of the past session, Addington's connexions had opposed with a zeal that seemed to have its foundation in pique and personal animosity ; and, as soon as the idea had occurred to him, he began to attempt to carry it out. He first opened a communication with Ad dington, judging that, since he was deeply annoyed by the circumstances under which he had been compelled to resign the Treasury, it was necessary to ascertain whether he was willing to receive an overture from his successor in good part, before compromising Pitt by inducing him to make one which might not be listened to. The result, as he reported to his father, was encouraging ; and circumstances so far favored the negotiation that just at the time a vacancy was caused in the Cabinet by an accident which happened to Lord Harrowby, of a nature so serious as to compel him to retire from office. Lord Hawkesbury, having thus suc cessfully sounded Addington, opened the matter to Pitt, who, as a matter of etiquette, since such a reconciliation as was proposed of necessity involved some alterations in the Ministry, first applied to the King for his sanction, which was never more willingly granted, and then gave the answer, which had been confidently calculated on, ' In other narratives which mention this reconciliation. Lord Hawkesbury is spoken of as if he had been merely Pitt's agent, em ployed by him to sound Addington " early in December " (Lord Stanhope), "the 12th of December" (Lord Colchester). But the date of the letter from which extracts are quoted as above is Novem ber 6, showing conclusively that the first person to whom the idea occurred was Lord Hawkesbury himself. And an extract from a letter of Addington's, quoted by Dean Pellew (Life of Lord Sidmouth, ii. 325), corroborates this idea, by showing that he had heard from Lord Hawkesbury before the end of October, evidently on the subject of re conciliation, to which at first Addington was not very greatly inclined. 1804] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 175 authorising the friendly mediator to begin his proposed work of political benevolence. The matter may be said to have been decided from the first, though the arrange ment of the details took a little time to complete. The Duke of Portland, who was a great sufferer from ill health, was anxious to retire ; and therefore Lord Hawkesbury's plan was that Addington should be raised to the peerage, and succeed the duke as President of the Council, with the lead of the House of Lords, which he himself was willing to resign to him : but Addington naturally stipulated for the admission of some of those whom he looked upon as his especial friends and adherents into the Government as well as for his own ; indeed, for his own he was less anxious, since he considered his fortune unequal to support the dignity of the peerage. It was obvious, however, that a consideration of the office which he had lately filled, with the reasons of his original promotion to, and of his subse quent resignation of it, would make it inconvenient in the extreme for him to become, as he at first proposed, a Secretary of State, and remain in the House of Commons. Lord Hawkesbury felt that there were other reasons also which would militate against the success of such an arrange ment ; and, considering the experience which he had already acquired in both Houses, and his subsequent position as Prime Minister, the opinion which he expresses of the qualities respectively necessary for a Prime Minister and for a Secretary of State in the same House with the Prime Minister is very curious. As he writes to Lord Liverpool, the day after his first interview with Addington, " He never would be able to keep up his credit as second in the House of Commons, attacked as he would be by Opposition ; he is much more qualified to be first, as he was before ; for good sense, good manners, dignity, and a reasonable speaking will carry a man through the former situation when he has all the advantage of authority ; but no man can be of any consequence in the second situation in such a body as the House of Commons who is not an able debater 176 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1804 in detail, and has not, above all, the talent of quick reply." Before Christmas the two, now willing to be reunited, met at Lord Hawkesbury's, and had a long conference, at which the chief points were amicably settled. As what had been going on was of course widely known, their interview had been expected with great curiosity and interest by many, and by none with greater than by the King. From the first Lord Hawkesbury had kept his Majesty informed of the general character of the communications which he received on both sides ; and now, the day after the King knew they were to meet, as he had not heard from Lord Hawkesbury since, he wrote him the following character istic note of commendation and inquiry : Windsor Castle, December 24, 1804. The King has the greatest satisfaction in expressing to the Lord Hawkesbury his thorough approbation of the judiciousness and fairness of his conduct in the arduous task of bringing Messrs. Pitt and Addington together, who both are certainly attached to his Majesty, and that will be the real bond of their union, and will rekindle in their breasts the friendship which has from a very early age consolidated thera, and which false friends and backbiters had for a time apparently destroyed, but there is good reason to believe had not in reality effected. The King is most desirous to know bow the raeeting ended yes terday, and whether Lord Hawkesbury augurs well from this fhst interview. George R. And the next day, having received the intelligence he hoped for, he showed his approval of their conduct to the two principals in the way which he explained to Lord Hawkesbury in a second letter : Windsor Castle, December 25, 1804. Lord Hawkesbury is too well acquainted with the King's senti ments not to feel the gratification that has arisen in his Majesty's mind on the account of the two meetings' of ' They had a second meeting at Addington's house on the day after the first. i8o4] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. ^yj Messrs. Pitt and Addington having proved perfectly satis factory. This gives the more pleasure as attachment to their king and country are the real ground on which these interviews have been founded. The King will, with great pleasure, see Lord Hawkesbury, who has been the happy instrument of effecting the reconciHation of two men who ought ever to have been friends, and may now easily remain so, either of the days he has proposed. To secure, if anything is wanting, the con tinuation of the cordial intercourse now effected, his Majesty has prepared letters for each of the parties, going no further than his thanks to both for having reunited for the good of his service. And, indeed, that is one of the greatest eases to his mind that, in a political view, could have been effected. These Lord Hawkesbury, after perusing, is to transmit to each of them. George R. The chief difficulties that arose in the course of the nego tiation were raised, not by either of the principals, but by their adherents, who tried, on the one side, to persuade Addington that the consideration shown for his wishes in the proposed arrangements fell short of that which he was entitled to expect ; and, on the other, to suggest to Pitt that he was sacrificing his own dignity by giving any share in the actual Government to Addington before he had atoned for his recent opposition by at least an equal period of support out of office. But besides that the political advantages to each were manifest, both were men of too kindly natures to be easy under the estrangement. And Pitt was certainly expressing his real feelings on the subject to the most intimate of his private friends, Wilberforce, when, in allusion to the attacks that were made upon him on the subject, he said, " I think they are a tittle hard upon us in finding fault with our making it up again, when we have been friends from our childhood, and our fathers were so before us." ' By the arrangements finally made, Addington was raised to the peerage as Viscount Sidmouth, and succeeded the ! Life of Wilberforce, iii. 2ii. VOL. I. N 178 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [18 Duke of Portland as President of the Council. Lord Mulgrave was transferred to Lord Harrowby's office ; and Addington's friend. Lord Buckinghamshire, who, as Lord Hobart, had been Secretary for the Colonies in his Adminis tration, became Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster. Among the subjects of negotiation, it had been stipulated that Addington and his party were to support the war with Spain ; an event which, from the circumstances that had caused it, an attack made by a British squadron on some Spanish galleons on their way from South America while the two countries were still at peace, was sure to be singled out for attack by the Opposition. Pitt, however, had had no difficulty in satisfying his recovered friend that, however strong in appearance were the arguments likely to be brought forward against so irregular an act, the reasons which had influenced the Cabinet in directing the attack were stronger still. They were founded on the absolute subserviency of Spain to France ; on the con sequent certainty that the vast treasures with which the galleons were freighted would be employed for French objects ; and also on the fact, which could not be ques tioned, that the only chance of such an attack being successful lay in perfect secrecy. With such reasons Addington was abundantly satisfied ; and the Ministry, strengthened by his accession in numbers and general popularity, since the circumstances under which he had originally become Minister naturally caused his return to office to be looked on as an additional security to the Protestant Church, prepared with confidence to encounter the conflicts of the coming session of Parliament. That session is surrounded with a certain melancholy interest, as being the last of Pitt's life. His health and strength had been so evidently failing for some years (we have seen the beginning of the decay noticed by Lord Hawkesbury nearly seven years before) that the end can really have taken but few by surprise. Nor, almost till the last, was any deficiency apparent of that i8o4] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 179 energy of character which marked him out as a man pre-eminently fitted to rule ; of that lofty yet winning eloquence which could persuade all but the most stub born or self-seeking antagonists, and win applause even from them ; of that exquisite temper and engaging address, which often made those who differed from him surrender their doubts, and those who were resolved not to do so dread being drawn within the circle of his fascinations ; ' of that fertility of resource, and (its child) that happy sanguineness of disposition, which knew not how to despair, and could often extract comfort and even fresh grounds for hope out of the most disappointing or most adverse circumstances. Yet, though the man himself was still un altered even by the deadly inroads of secret disease of which he can hardly have been unconscious, the features of this his last campaign were sadly changed from those which had marked his former years of Parliamentary conflict. And the chief differences were such as could not fail to weigh him down with great personal vexation. It was a severe disappointment to him to find how hollow was the reconciliation which had just re-united him to Addington. It was a mortification of the most painful character to be compelled to acquiesce in the impeachment of one of his colleagues on charges affecting his personal integrity and honour, and to remove his name from the Privy Council. And, though it was in some degree a triumph that his own reputation for pre-eminent ability and spotless honour -was so firmly established that neither of these events, each of which might have overturned another Administration, failed to shake his, the unusually painful character of the conflicts of this session was probably not without its share in accelerating the decay of his strength. 1 " He begged me not to write, but to state in conversation what I wished to say. I told him that I was afraid of that, for his manner a good deal affected me."— Lord Sidmouth to his Brother (Life, ii. 361). N 2 i8o LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1804 The war, it need hardly be said, continued, and was carried on, as far as our own exertions were concerned, in the same manner as in previous years, solely at sea. But before Parliament met, the ruler of France (a his torian may call him the Emperor Napoleon, though during his lifetime the British Government never recognised his imperial rank) made, or professed to make, an effort to restore peace; As if his genius raised him above the necessity of observing the etiquette usual among sovereigns, he did not trust his ministers with the task of opening a negotiation, but with his own hand wrote to King George, whom he called his " Brother," and, in a rhapsody of sen timental argumentation, " conjured his Majesty not to deny himself the happiness of giving peace to the world, not to leave that sweet satisfaction to his children."' Five years before he had adopted a similar course, and Lord Grenville, then Secretary for Foreign Affairs, had pre vailed on the Cabinet to let him draw up an elaborate answer, raising topics for argument in a manner which Was certainly useless when the general purport was a refusal to treat under existing circumstances. It was now seen that such a style was a mistake, and, after a careful consideration of the matter by the whole Cabinet, a reply was forwarded (addressed, as on the former occasion, by our Foreign Secretary to M. Talleyrand, who still filled the same office in France), expressing in the most generalterms the King's willingness and even eagerness to restore peace, provided it could be " founded on bases not incompatible with the permanent security and essential interests of his dominions,'' but reminding M. Talleyrand that his Majesty had allies on the Continent whom he must consult before he could "¦ answer more particularly to the overture that had been made to him." It is impossible that Napoleon could have expected, it is highly improbable that he desired, any other ' " Je conjure Votre Majesty de ne pas se refuser au bonheur de donner elle-meme la paix au monde. Qu'elle ne laisse pas cette douce satisfaction h. ses enfans."— Nap. Corr. vol. x. p. 100. i8o4] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. i8i answer. He was now far better prepared for war than he had been two years before. He had made gigantic pre parations for the invasion of Britain, and had great confi dence in the success of his naval combinations which were to facilitate it. While, if it should fail, he was, as the result showed, almost equally prepared to turn the forces which he had collected in another direction, in the hope, if he were unable to overcome or even attack ourselves, of at least wounding us through the side of our allies, and counterbalancing our empire of the sea by establishing an equal predominance for himself on the Continent. We, on our part, as the reply to his overture intimated, were not indifferent to the interests of the continental nations, with which indeed our own interest was inseparably connected, since it was obvious that our chances of bringing the war to an honourable termination must be augmented in exact proportion to the number and power of the allies whom we could range on our side. And with this con viction Pitt, amid all interruptions and all other causes of anxiety, was steadily pursuing the great object of his foreign policy, the enlisting the co-operation of Austria and Russia against France. Both countries were equal to France in population and most of those resources which have the greatest weight in warlike operations. If Austria had of late been forced to submit to hard conditions, on the other hand the greatest disaster which had befallen France on land since the first outbreak of war had been inflicted on her by a Russian commander.' And there seemed no reason to doubt that the two countries, united and aided by the treasures of England, of which the Government was willing to be wisely lavish in such a cause, would be able to establish a superiority which must compel the ambitious warrior on the French throne to a peace which was then only likely to be durable when he should have learnt to his cost that war could not always be, as he boasted that hitherto it had been, "consistent with his 1 Suvarof s defeat of Macdonald at Novi. 1 82 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1804 glory." Before the end of the summer the great minister fully succeeded in his negotiations.' By his own address, his liberality, and the evidence which his measures gave of the absolute unselfishness of his and his country's policy, he armed against the enemy a force which required nothing but a judicious use of it to render it irresistible. And he could not foresee that the utter incompetency and imbecility of one general, and the rashness of another, would neu tralize the superiority unquestionably in their hands, and in a few weeks prostrate the two empires in deeper humi liation than ever at the mercy of their conqueror. Parliament met in the middle of January, and as before, though Lord Hawkesbury had proposed to resign the lead in the House of Lords to the new President of the Council, it was considered more expedient that he should himself retain it, and the chief management, therefore, of the debates there was still entrusted to him. As events turned out, it was a most fortunate arrangement, since it would have been very injurious to the Government to have had at first but a half-hearted support from its leader among the peers, and before the end of the session to have been deserted by him. The battle between the two parties was at first carried on with equal vigour in both Houses. On the capture of her galleons Spain had declared war against England, and it was not to be expected that the Oppo sition would allow an act of so questionable a character as an attack on a squadron belonging to a nation with which we were at peace to pass uncriticised. The unhappy circumstances which accompanied the attack (one of the Spanish ships having blown up, with the destruction of nearly all her crew) were owing to the weakness of the ' " During the whole of this year Pitt was negotiating his great alliances with Russia and Austria. . . . Never was any measure (as far as human foresight can go) better combined nor better negotiated. Its failure was solely in the execution, and for this either the precipi tancy of Austria herself, or the treachery and imbecility of her com manders, are solely responsible." — Lord Malmesbury, iv. 339. i8o4] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 183 force which was sent against them, the Spanish captains thinking it inconsistent with their honour to submit to the orders of a squadron only their equal in number and equipment. Had it been, as it should have been, so over powering as to compel an unresisting submission,' though war might not have been averted, we should have been saved the most unfortunate part of the transaction. Lord Grenville, unwearied in his hostility to the Government, and in his displays of fidelity to the principles of his new alliance with the Whigs, undertook the task of denoun cing the act which had been committed, but made the defence of the Government easier by the blind furiousness of his language when he described it as " an atrocious act of barbarity, which stamped indelible infamy on our name," and by the positiveness with which he laid it down as his conviction that any war with Spain " might have been prevented by common prudence on our part." For Lord Hawkesbury had no difficulty in leading the majority of his hearers to agree with him that Spain was so completely subservient to France that the French Government was reckoning on her resources as its own ; in proving that French men-of-war were actually in the fort of Ferrol at the time of the attack, only waiting till a Spanish squadron, which was being equipped in the same port, should be ready to join them ; that some French regiments had also been received at the same place ; and that now, as in 1762, Spain was in fact only waiting for the arrival of her ' It is curious that no one but Nelson saw this. Orders were sent to Admiral Cornwallis to detach two frigates against them, and to Nelson to send some frigates, without specifying the number. He instantly sent Sir R. Strachan with a ship of the line and four frigates, and with further orders to add to that force any other ships he might meet on his way. But Sir R. Strachan did not arrive at Cadiz till too late ; and of the four ships that engaged the Spaniards, two, the Medusa and the Amphion, had joined those from the Brest fleet two days before by mere accident. Had they not, we might have had the disgrace of being defeated. (See the Author's History of the British Navy, c. xxviii.) 1 84 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1804 treasure-ships to throw off the mask. In the presence of these facts, the omission to give warning of our intentions by a formal declaration of war, and that practically still graver error of entrusting the enterprise to a squadron so weak as to provoke, indeed to compel, resistance, were overlooked ; and the feeling in favour of the Government on the whole transaction was so unequivocally demon strated that Lord Grenville did not venture to divide, and the House silently sanctioned conduct which, in some parts at least, no member of it could have entirely approved. After being so successful in a weak case. Lord Hawkes bury was not likely to fail when he had both policy and justice on his side; and, in three debates which arose on motions of the Opposition, which (ostensibly proposing to improve the system of recruiting, to add to the effective ness of the militia and the army of reserve) were in fact so many motions of censure on the Government, and were designed to compel its retirement from office, he not only carried with him overwhelming majorities (a result which must be admitted to be owing to the general feeling of the House in favour of Pitt), but fully established his own superiority as a debater to every peer on either side ; even those who were most opposed to the Government (with the single exception of Lord Grenville, who never saw any merit in those who differed from him) confessing the admirable temper and consummate judgment with which he maintained the principles of the Cabinet, without embittering their defeat to his opponents by a single taunt or sarcasm. These, however, were questions of temporary interest. But immediately after Easter one was brought forward which had never been discussed in Parliament before, but which was henceforth destined to exercise a predominant influence on both parties in the State and on the tranquillity of the whole kingdom for a quarter of a century; embarrassing the formation of more than one Ministry, disuniting others, and at last only settled under the imminent dread of insurrection and civil war. ¦i8o5] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 185 CHAPTER VL Lord Hawkesbury's speech on the CathoHc question — Impeachment of Lord Melville — Resignation of Lord Sidmouth — The King's sight becomes affected — Sir Robert Calder's action — Pitt fails in negotia tions with Prussia, and with the Opposition — Battle of Trafalgar — Indignation of the King of Prussia at the violation of his terri tory— -Battle of Austerlitz— Death of Pitt — The King offers the Treasury to Lord Hawkesbury — Gives him the Wardenship of the Cinque Ports — Resignation of the Ministry — Lord Grenville becomes First Lord of the Treasury — Lord Hawkesbury as leader of the Opposition — Lord Hawkesbury's speech on the admission of Lord EUenborough into the Cabinet — Comparison of the two Ministries — Death of Fox — Lord Hawkesbury's conduct to Lord Grenville's Ministry — Dissolution of Parliament — Conduct of the Ministry on the Catholic question — Duke of Portland's letter to the King — Resignation of the Ministry. The Roman Catholics in Ireland had disregarded Lord Hawkesbury's advice to postpone urging their claims for a removal of their political disabilities to a more propitious season. They drew up petitions to both Houses, and even besought the Prime Minister himself to take charge of that addressed to the Commons, though they were no strangers to the fact of his having pledged himself to the King to abstain from any further advocacy of the subject, at least during the lifetime of his Royal Master. It was no unworthy sacrifice of opinion for the sake of office to do so ; since, whatever may be his opinions on the abstract policy or justice of any measure, no statesman, and least of all one who is responsible for the tranquil government of a kingdom, is bound to urge proposals which he knows can not be carried ; much less those of which even the agita- i86 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1805 tion may produce great mischiefs. And, after the avowed resolution of the King to renounce his crown rather than to consent to any modification of the laws of which Lord Fingall and his friends complained, such was beyond all question the case in the present instance. So notorious indeed was the impossibility of carrying any motion for the rehef of the Roman Catholics, and the likelihood that a renewal of the discussion might throw the King into the same state in which its first proposal had plunged him in 1801, that the next year Fox, when he had on his own shoulders the same responsibility which now weighed on Pitt's mind, imitated his conduct, and declared that he would not agitate his sovereign by bringing the question forward. At present, however, when his object was to em barrass the Administration, he had no such scruples. He and Lord Grenville gladly undertook the patronage of the cause ; presented the petitions, and made them the subject of formal motions in both Houses. The debate in the House of Lords took place on the loth of May. Except when he contended that the causes which had originally led to the enactment of the restrictions complained of had no longer any existence, but had passed away with the death of Charles Edward, Lord Grenville weakened his case by narrowing it to the condition of the Roman Catholics in Ireland. He panegyrized their uniform loyalty, and, from the forbearance of the Scotch since their union with Eng land to endeavour " to substitute their own religion for the Episcopacy of the English Church," he drew an argument that the Irish Roman Catholics, if placed on a footing of political equality with their Protestant fellow-country men, would contentedly acquiesce in the predominance of the Church of England. No argument could have been worse chosen, for in fact the Episcopacy of the Church of England had been suppressed in Scotland ; but Lord Hawkesbury in reply disdained to avail himself of its weakness, preferring to argue the question on broader grounds. A more appropriate opportunity for considering i8os] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 187 the merits of the whole question will arise hereafter. But though some of his arguments were prompted by or based on the circumstances -of the moment, as when he con cluded " that as long as the Catholics refused to take the oath of supremacy they should be deprived of political power; and there was never a moment when adherence to such a principle was more necessary than now, when all Catholic Europe was nearly subjected to France, and the Pope was placed in a state of absolute subjection to that country;" he rested others on general principles, urging that the maintenance of the existing tests was a necessary safeguard to religion. And that " if it was a fundamental principle of the constitution as established by the Bill of Rights and the Act of Settlement, that the King must be in communion with the Church of England, the same limitation ought to apply to the advisers and officers of the Crown. To remove the restrictions (and of course it was plain that they could not be retained on Protestant Dissenters after they had been abrogated in the case of the Roman Catholics) would be to give to those who were the greatest enemies of the Church of England power to interfere with its patronage. At an earlier period in our history the ruin of the Church and the monarchy had ac companied each other, and, as his principle was to uphold the estabhshment of both, he must resist the motion." It is evident that these principles, on which he relied to justify the maintenance of the restrictions complained of, were so general that they seemed to pledge the speaker to a perpetual retention of them, though it afterwards appeared that he did not look on them as debarring him from consenting to any relaxation whatever of the exist ing laws.' Whether his present feelings were in any degree influenced by the considerations which he had urged the previous year to Lord Hardwicke cannot be known ; but it seems probable that the belief which forms his principal argument in that letter, that many of those ' See infra, p. 381. i88 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1805 who advocated a compliance with the prayer of the pre sent petition did so with a view to making it a stepping- stone to further changes, had its weight with him, and contributed to induce him to express his opinion in a manner from which he could not afterwards personally recede, though, as we shall see hereafter, he was unable so to adhere to it as to maintain it as the unanimous opinion of his Cabinet. Some of those peers who followed him in his vote on the present occasion assigned grounds for their votes which were avowedly founded on the existing cir cumstances of the kingdom, and, as such, did not fetter their course on the same question at a subsequent period. But those who looked on the removal of the restrictions at any time as dangerous, and those who thought it at the present moment impolitic or impracticable, were, when united, so numerous, that Lord Grenville could only muster 49 supporters, against 178 who voted with the Government. And thus, at all events, the sagacity of the advice which Lord Hawkesbury had given the year before was fully vindicated, even in the interests of the Roman Catholics themselves, whose cause was certainly injured for the moment by this display of the numerical weakness of their advocates. The King himself, as may well be supposed from the feeling which he had shown on the subject in 1801, was greatly pleased at the greatness of the majority. He wrote the next morning "to Lord Hawkesbury, that " he was most highly gratified : he trusted that the division would show so strongly the sense of the House of Lords, that there would never again be any difficulty in resisting the Catholic question, which, the more it is examined, the more unreasonable it must appear. One could not but lament that the peerage should produce S i members to support such a question." And he wrote again the next day to express equal satis faction at the result of the debate in the House of Com mons, where Mr. Fox had been defeated in an unusually full House by 336 to 124. " It showed," he said, "the true i8o5] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 189 sense of the nation on the Catholic question, and, one must hope, would make it lie dormant. At all events, it was highly advantageous that it had had a full discussion in both Houses of Parliament, and that the question of toleration would now stand on its true legs, and not be pretended to mean more than any wise Government could possibly admit." Before this debate took place. Lord Hawkesbury had been nearly relinquishing the leadership of the House by exchanging his Secretaryship of State for the office of First Lord of the Admiralty. The proposal that he should do so originated in the only transaction which, in his long career, inflicted on Pitt personal mortification and distress. A commission of inquiry into the condition and administration of the navy, which had been appointed some time before, had brought to light the fact that, some years before, when Lord Melville, the First Lord of the Admiralty, had been Treasurer of the Navy, his deputy treasurer, a gentleman named Trotter, had been in the habit of making use of the funds in his hands, which, of course, belonged to the nation, for his personal benefit. There was reason to think that Mr. Dundas (for at that time he had not been raised to the peerage) was cognizant of Mr. Trotter's conduct. And it was even imputed to him that there had been occasions on which large sums of the public money had been placed to his account at his bankers', and that he had derived a profit from the use of them. It was not alleged that a single farthing had been lost to the nation, but it was argued that by such practices the nation had been exposed to the risk of loss, and that such transactions were clearly in violation of the law. No charge involving an offence of that character had been brought against a minister of the Crown since the time of the South Sea Bubble. Nor is there any one thing of which England has at all times been more jealous or more justly proud than of the unsullied integrity of her public men, above su-spicion as above corruption. 19° LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1805 It was not strange, therefore, that the mere whisper of such a charge having been made, on at least plausible grounds, against one who had since become a Cabinet Minister, should have universally produced a most painful impression, or that the Opposition should have eagerly seized upon it as a means of at least embarrassing and distressing the Ministry, if not of overthrowing the minister. Lord Melville declined to give any very satisfactory explanation of the matter, alleging that, as many years had elapsed since he had ceased to fill the post of treasurer, he was no longer in possession of the vouchers which would enable him to render any accurate account; and insinuating also that the sums which had, as was proved, been at times placed to his own credit had in fact been so placed that they might be employed in the secret service of the country, without leaving it possible to trace their appli cation. It is very likely that this was the real truth ; and Mr. Whitbread subsequently admitted that he had never suspected Lord Melville of having personally enriched himself by these transactions ; but his language at the moment was hardly so candid. He was intimately con nected with some of the leaders of the Opposition, and, to promote the political views of his party, at the beginning of April he, as a member of the House of Commons, brought forward an elaborate motion, founded on the report of the commission of enquiry, which he assumed to be of itself a sufficient proof of Lord Melville's guilt, and censuring him in the plainest and strongest terms. The Ministry had held more than one meeting to decide upon the way in which this motion should be met. Pitt himself would have encountered it with a direct negative ; but, though Canning agreed with him, no member of the Cabinet was prepared to recommend so bold a course. One or two were probably influenced, perhaps unconsciously, by personal motives. Lord Sidmouth hated Lord Melville, from the belief that he had had a great share in bringing Pitt to act with vigour against him while minister in the preceding spring, and he now openly urged Pitt to abandon his cause as i8o5] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 191 untenable, with the threat, if he did not do so, of him self withdrawing from the Administration. Lord Hawkes bury, though far from agreeing with Lord Sidmouth, thought a simple negative to the vote of censure too hazardous, as one which went too directly in the teeth of the report of the commissioners, and which might conse quently wreck the Ministry without saving their colleague. He therefore suggested the attempt to stave off the vote of censure by a proposal to refer the matter to a select com mittee of inquiry. He was supported by the President of the Board of Control, Lord Castlereagh, who, as Irish Secre tary, had had a share, second only to that of Pitt himself, in carrying the Irish Union ; who had since that time been steadily and rapidly rising in the estimation of Parliament as a first-rate man of business ; and who, being the most intrepid of men, was certainly most unlikely to recommend any measure which savoured of compromise if he did not judge that there was in fact no alternative. In a motion for such a committee Lord Sidmouth was willing to acquiesce; and it was finally decided that the course to be adopted by the Ministry should be a proposal to substitute such a committee for Whitbread's proposal of censure without further inquiry. Pitt himself moved for the committee as an amendment to Whitbread's motion, but was defeated. When the House came to a division, the numbers were found to be equal, 216 on each side ; and the Speaker gave his casting vote for Whitbread's motion, in so doing following the usual etiquette, though he chose also to assign for his decision a statement that " the charges of violation of the Act of Parliament, and of Lord Melville's connivance at Mr. Trotter's conduct, were confessed and established, and fit for the immediate judgment of the House." It is unnecessary here to go minutely into the subse quent steps of this unfortunate affair; Lord Melville of course resigned his office in the Government, and with his own consent was removed from the list of Privy Council lors. Whitbread wished to procure an address from the 193 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1805 House to remove him from the King's councils and pre sence for ever ; but such a course (before any formal con viction, or even trial) bore too clearly the marks of personal animosity and violence to be tolerated by the feeling of the House, and he was forced to withdraw his motion. It was right that a man so far under suspicion as to have been the subject of such a report as that which the com missioners had presented should no longer be a minister or privy councillor of the Crown ; but the report, however un hesitating might be its language, could not be said actually to establish his guilt ; he had as yet had ho opportunity of making his defence again.st it, and, till the accuracy of the report was legally proved, it was obviously unjust to put him under a perpetual ban of exclusion. In fact, that this was the case was practically admitted by Whitbread himself when, on a subsequent day, he moved for his impeachment. Another member, of the name of Bond, one of Lord Sid- mouth's party, and who as such was bound to support the Government, proposed instead a criminal prosecution ; and the House of Commons vacillated in a strange and discredit able manner. One day they adopted Mr. Bond's plan, the next day they rescinded that vote and decided on an im peachment,' which was instituted in the following session. It was conducted with great energy and ability by Whit bread himself, who acted as prosecutor, and also tendered himself as a witness, and by Sir Samuel Romilly, who in the new Administration which in the interval had succeeded to office had been appointed Solicitor-General. But Lord Melville was acquitted of every article of the impeachment by decisive, and of many by overwhelming, majorities ; and, ^ There was a doubt of the propriety of their former vote. Lord Hawkesbury writes to Lord Liverpool, " The proceedings in the Court of King's Bench against a peer upon so important a charge can cer tainly not be defended on any sound constitutional principles. Serious doubts are entertained whether it is not a breach of our privileges. Cowper" [the chief clerk of the House of Lords] '' strongly inclines to this opinion. The House of Commons might have addressed the King to direct the Attorney-General to prosecute ; but in this case they have done it not by address, but by their own order!' i8o5] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 193 as far as absolving him from any personal corruption, the \'erdict has been generally approved. That he had been guilty of the grossest carelessness, which in such a matter is but little short of criminality, is beyond all question ; but that he had himself made the verj- slightest profit by Mr. Trotter's irregularities there seems no reason to believe. The most immediate consequence of the transaction was the retirement of Lord Sidmouth from the Administration in a way which does little credit to that statesman's disin terestedness. It became of course necessary at once to fill up Lord Melville's place, and ]\Ir. Pitt's first idea was to place Lord Hawkesbury at the head of the Admiralty. " He was not," as he wrote to his father, " at all desirous of the change. It would bring with it considerable anxieties, and cost him some sacrifices ; but, at the same time, he was of opinion that, if it were urged upon him, he could not, under all the present circumstances, creditably decline it. It was certainly the office, next to that of Prime IVIinister, of the most importance, and of the greatest pow er and responsi bility, and it was of the utmost consequence that it should be filled by some person who enjoyed a due portion of public esteem and confidence, and who would be able to keep down that party spirit which had of late been spreading itself very widely in the profession of the Navy." But Lord Liver pool was far from approving of his willingness to accept it. He admitted, indeed, the paramount importance of the office at a time \\hen we were engaged in a war ^\hich was carried on by us almost ^\-holly on the seas. But for that very reason he thought the First Lord like!}- to be made the scapegoat for every kind of shortcoming. He pointed out to his son (with great truth) that it \\2S " an office in which no man yet had gained credit." He was also \'ery^ averse to his giving up the lead in the House of Lords, which he would have done if his suc cessor at the Home Office had been a peer. And this last objection seems to have been the one which finally weighed with Pitt, and induced him to abandon his first VOL. I. O 194 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1805 plan, and to appoint Sir Charles Middleton, an old admiral who had been greatly in Lord Melville's confidence, and had been his chief adviser in the professional part of his duties. Sir Charles became a peer under the title of Lord Barham ; and, during the short period for which he retained the office, amply justified the selection which had been made. But Lord Sidmouth most absurdly took his ap pointment as a personal offence. Though himself by no means of a grasping or arrogant disposition, his relations and chief partisans were most insatiable jobbers ; and he had pressed the transfer of Lord Buckinghamshire to the Admiralty in order that his own brother, or brother-in- law, might succeed to the Chancellorship of the Duchy, for which either of them was so far qualified that it made no call on the ability of the occupier. He actually resigned his own office, and induced Lord Buckinghamshire to follow his example. Once more Lord Hawkesbury inter posed as a peacemaker, and persuaded him to recall his resignation : but the breach was only healed for a time ; Lord Sidmouth was still sore, and his more self-seeking kinsmen were incurably discontented. In the debates which ensued on different questions relating to Lord Melville, his brother, Mr. Hiley Addington, and one of his chief con nexions, Mr. Bond, took every opportunity of showing the most marked hostility to that nobleman, Mr. Bond, as has been already mentioned, even putting himself forward to move the House to proceed against him by a criminal prosecution ; and the conduct of the whole party gave such offence to the chief body of Pitt's original supporters, that Lord Hawkesbury saw that it would be impossible for him any longer to prevent a rupture ; he thought indeed that their pretended support and real opposition to the Govern ment was more embarrassing than their open hostility. The King made no secret of his displeasure at their con duct,' and Pitt at last remonstrated openly with Lord 1 Lord Sidmouth's biographer believes that Lord Sidmouth was offended by Pitt's volunteering to him the statement that he could no i8o5] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 195 Sidmouth on their behaviour, and declared that it had ren dered it impossible for him to give places under Govern ment such as they coveted. It was not to Lord Sidmouth's credit that he sanctioned their factious conduct by repeating his resignation and adhering to it ; Lord Buckinghamshire again following his example. Nor, indeed, did Pitt now endeavour to retain them. In fact it is a sufficient proof how incompatible their continuance in office had become with the preserva tion to the Administration of the character of an united Government, that Mr. Fox had already ventured to open a communication with Lord Sidmouth, the object of which was evidently to induce him to desert Pitt by holding him out the lure of a coalition with himself in the event of his longer provide for his friends ; when he might instead " have silently deferred the fulfilrnent of his engagement for a time." But a letter of Lord Hawkesbury's to Lord Liverpool seems to show that Lord Sidmouth, in spite of Bond's violent conduct, demanded an immediate provision for him. Lord Hawkesbury writes (July 5th) : " There is reason to believe Lord Sidmouth will not remain unless Bond is imme diately provided for, and Mr. Pitt feels the strongest objections, after the part which Bond has taken, and above all the hostile manner in which he took it, to open an office for him till some proofs have been given of returning cordiality. Between ourselves the King has said that, if Mr. Pitt should propose Mr- Bond to him, he should at the present moment object to it. How it will all end it is difficult to say. I have not heard a word frora Lord Sidmouth on any confidential subject for two months ; and in truth he is wholly in the hands of .other persons." On the 7th, Lord Sidmouth resigned, and wrote to his brother in the evening with great complacency - " I had an audience of two hours, and everything passed as I wished." He might have been less self-satisfied if he had known the impression he left on the mind of the King. He almost forced the key of the council box in his care into the King's hand, in spite of his Majesty teHing him it should be delivered to Lord Hawkesb^ury. Though the King wished to end the audience, he alrnost forced his Majesty to listen to him for an hour, and so fatigued and displeased him that when the King returned to his family he said, " That has been plaguing me to death." (Lord Malmesbury's Diary, iv. 339.) And he afterwards told one of his attendants that "never since the days of George Grenville had he been tormented by so fatiguing an interview." (Jesse's Life of George III. iii. 437.)- O 2 196 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1805 hereafter having the authority to form a Ministry.' It was necessary for Pitt at once to fill up the vacancies caused by these resignations; and, apparently, he enter tained a behef or at least a hope, that the late decisive divisions on the Catholic question had laid it finally to sleep, and had thus removed some of the difficulties which had previously hindered his efforts to form an Administra tion on a more extended basis. With this feehng he now made arrangements which were of a manifestly temporary character, combining for the moment two Cabinet offices, removing Lord Camden from the War Department to the Presidency of the Council, and uniting his office to that which Lord Castlereagh already held at the Board of Control. But, whatever arrangements he may have contemplated, he was not spared to effect them. A few days afterwards, on the 12th of July, the Parliament was prorogued. He never met it again. When it re-assembled he was on his death-bed ; and the efforts which he had made in the defence of his accused friend were the last occasions on which his voice was heard in the House of Commons. The prorogation itself was remarkable for another circumstance, eminently calculated to enlist the whole people in sympathy for their sovereign, and to strengthen the general wish to spare him all anxieties but such as were inseparable from his position. For almost the first time in his reign, George III. did not attend in person to thank the Houses for their labours, for he could not have read the speech which was prepared for that purpose : his sight was affected. A cataract had recently formed in both his eyes ; increasing with unusual rapidity, though not at first supposed likely to produce permanent blindness. Indeed his oculist for some time confidently 1 Lord Sidmouth informed his usual confidant, Mr. Abbot, that " Mr. Fox sent him a message by Tierney to the effect that it was a great misrepresentation of his sentiments to say that he had expressed any idea of excluding Lord Sidmouth from any Administration on a broad basis." (Life of Lord Sidmouth, ii. 370.) i8o5] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 197 asserted that he should be able to cure him, though the operation for that purpose could not be performed till the blindness had become total. The King was not at first informed of the nature of the disease ; and in a letter to Lord Hawkesbury, written towards the end of July, he intimates a belief that it was a mere temporary malady. The hope he implies of an early recovery is very touching, when it is remembered how incurable the affliction hang ing over him really proved, and how many years he was destined to pass under what is probably the greatest of all deprivations. The writing is scarcely legible ; the signature and part of the postscript absolutely undecipher able from the way in which the one is written over the other, while the confusion of the first sentence shows how unable the writer was to read what he had said : The King cannot refrain from the pleasure of acquainting Lord Hawkesbury that an accidental inflammation in the worst eye, with the remedies ably used by Mr. Phipps, has proved of great advantage to the use of that eye. Mr. Phipps says that he had a similar instance the last year with the eyes of Lord Melbourne, where a cataract had been expected, but had since completely disappeared P.S. — We have just received .... Lord Nelson has destroyed .... enemy. Heaven has granted us this success. George R. The royal signature had indeed become so undistinguish able at all times that the ministers were thinking of having a stamp made for him to affix to State papers, and con sulted the lawyers on the proceedings which would be necessary to give such a mode of signature validity. But presently the disease seemed for a time to be arrested, and some years elapsed before the poor old man became absolutely incapable of distinguishing objects. The attention of the whole kingdom was at this time absorbed, above all matters, on the movements of Nelson, to which the King's postscript alludes. The intelligence 198 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1805 which had reached Weymouth, whatever it may have been, proved delusive, though four days before Sir Robert Calder had fallen in with Villeneuve, who was flying from Nelson, and had inflicted on him a defeat sufficient to compel him to a total change of his plans, though not so decisive as to satisfy the expectations that had been raised in England of the success to be achieved by any English fleet which should encounter a French one, however superior in number. The circumstances under which Sir Robert had fallen in with the enemy at all were eminently creditable to the energy of the new First Lord of the Admiralty ; who, when on the 9th of July the brig Curieux reached England with intelligence from Nelson that Villeneuve had returned from the West Indies to Europe, and with the further news that she herself had seen him on her homeward voyage too far to the northward to render it probable that a return to the Mediterranean was his object, despatched her back the very same day with orders to the squadrons before Rochefort and Ferrol, to unite and intercept him. The comparison drawn by the nation between what Calder had actually done and what it was presumed Nelson might have done led, as is well known, to Sir Robert being tried by a court-martial, and repri manded for an error in judgment and want of sufficient vigour. It may well be doubted whether the defence which he made, founded on the necessity of guarding against the Rochefort squadron coming out to reinforce Villeneuve, to whom he was already far inferior in numbers, was not a sufficient justification of his apparent slackness. But a letter of Lord Hawkesbury to his father on the subject shows that he was not, as other commanders had been, sacrificed to a popular clamour, but that, on the first blush of the case, his fellow-seamen formed an opinion on his conduct unfavorable to him. For the very week that his despatch arrived. Lord Hawkesbury's comment on it to his father is that " The intelligence from the fleet is not satisfactory, and Lord Barham has, I believe, by this i8o5] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 199 time written to Sir Robert Calder to demand an explana tion of his proceedings. The City, in particular, is very much out of humour at what has passed, and the officers of the navy seem in general to think that it will not be possible for him to justify himself" Whatever may be thought of his conduct, the action which he had fought, indecisive as it was, had the effect of terminating all the apprehensions that had been entertained of a French invasion of this country. Napoleon himself, from the moment that he learnt that Villeneuve, instead of proceeding onwards to the Channel, had been driven down to Ferrol, abandoned the idea.' And Pitt, relieved from ' The invasion of England had been no favourite with the French army. Among Lord Hawkesbury's papers is the following song. Marmont was the commander of one large division of the army of invasion. CHANSON DE L'ARMEE FRAN(;AISE EN HOLLANDE, AoUT 1805. Sur I'air, Marlbrook s'en va-t-en guerre. Marmont s'en va-t-en guerre, Miroton, ton, ton, Mirontaine. Marmont s'en va-t-en guerre ; Dieu sait s'il reviendra De ce pays Ik-bas Qu'on norame I'Angleterre, Qu'on veut subjuguer Et qu'on veut subjuguer Pour Monsieur Buonaparte. Ce n'est pas notre affaire. Miroton, &c. Ce n'est pas notre affaire Que d'aUer naviguer Pour un gueux d'^tranger Qui n'est Roi de la France. Miroton, &c. Qui n'est Roi de la France Que pour la ddsoler. Pour nous faire enterrer. Que le diable I'emporte En Corse ou il est tx6 [D'un 200 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1805 any further necessity of watching over the safety of our own coasts, bent his mind with greater earnestness than ever to confirming the inclinations of Austria to join the alliance which had been concluded with Russia some months before. He succeeded, and Sweden also was won on terms similar to those for which Austria had stipulated ; each country being entitled to receive a large subsidy from Britain in proportion to the number of men she was to bring into the field. The only quarter in which Pitt's address failed was Prussia, which, faithful to the maxims of Frederic II. to make acquisitions of territory, by whatever means they might be obtained, her chief object, preferred the chance of despoiling King George of Hanover, and with this view courted the friendship of the Ruler of France. He was less successful in the negotiations by which he endeavoured to strengthen his Ministry. It had been his hope, that as different topics of disagreement were gradually eliminated, those who had refused to join him before might become more willing to unite with him ; and, wholly governed by one absorbing idea, to serve his country most effectually, he was willing to make many sacrifices to secure to it the benefit of the services of those of whose solid talents he had a high opinion. Relationship still kept him partial to Lord Grenville. The memory of their many conflicts, of the exhaustless fertility, the logical subtlety, D'un greffier ruind. Ce n'dtait pas la peine De I'avoir couronnd Contre notre bon gr^. Morbleu, mes camarades Revenons au pass^ Ou, Louis Bienaim^ Nous menait k la gloire Sans nous faire noyer. It is clear Buonaparte was not more popular than his project of invasion with this division of his army. But it is curious to find them going back to contrast him with the infamous Louis XV. even when Saxe was his general. i8o5] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 201 the indomitable energy with which Fox had often defied his sarcasm or retorted his arguments, made him still more eager to have the benefit of his aid against the common enemy. Unhappily, the slightest expectation of an over ture from him made both advance pretensions to which it was irnpossible for him even to listen.' Even if he had brought himself to yield the slightest portion of the de mands which they were inclined to make he would have gained nothing, for he would have lost the co-operation of those of his existing colleagues, whom he most valued. Lord Hawkesbury writes to his father at the end of Sep tember, at the very time that Pitt was at Weymouth, whither he had gone expressly to consult the King : " I am convinced from all I see and all I hear from a variety of quarters, that any project of coalition on a broad basis would be most injurious to the country, and most fatal to the reputa tion of Government. If such a project should be enter tained, I am determined to have nothing to do with it." And the King himself had the same feeling. He had indeed no idea of the arrogance of the claims which the Opposition leaders were prepared to put forward, as neither had Pitt ; but he declared to more than one person a resolute determination to admit none of them into the Administration, observing, with a peremptoriness that ad mitted of no discussion, that "he could not trust them, and they could have no confidence in him." ^ One of those to whom he made this declaration, Mr. Rose, attributed the fixedness of the resolution which his Majesty thus expressed mainly to the influence of Lord Hawkesbury himself, who, a favourite from the first, had been steadily rising in the ' " Canning told me that all attempts to gain the Grenvilles had failed through the influence of Tom Grenville, who would not hear of a separation from Fox." (Malmesbury's Diary, iv. 343.) " As we learn from Fox's familiar correspondence at this time, he intended to insist on the condition that Pitt should resign the Treasury, and that some friend of Fox, as Grey, or Lord Fitzwilliam, or Lord Moira, should be placed there in his stead." (Stanhope's Pitt, iv. 335.) 2 Diaries of the Right Hon. G. Rose, ii. 200, seq. 202 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1805 King's opinion. Whatever may have been the cause, it was evident that Pitt had no alternative but to obey, to drop all idea of gaining strength from the accession of other parties, and to continue to conduct the government with his original adherents, and such additional supporters as the perception of his superiority, both in patriotism and ability, to his opponents, might from time to time win over to him. Meanwhile the whole kingdom, and, above all, the Ministry, were agitated and perplexed with anxieties about the issue of the continental campaign, and by the con tinual arrival of reports uncertain, and often contradictory. Lord Hawkesbury's letters to his father at this time are full of scraps of intelligence, which he receives and reports without any great reliance on their accuracy, and which, even when proceeding from sources apparently trustworthy, subsequently proved to have no foundation whatever. To give a single instance : on the 3d of November, a vessel arrived at Harwich from Holland, relating that the greatest joy prevailed at Amsterdam on account of a defeat of the French by the combined Russian, Austrian, and Prussian armies, in a battle which had lasted four days, and which had cost Napoleon 28,000 men. Lord Hawkesbury, in for warding a copy of the captain's statement, for which he declines to vouch, expresses himself nevertheless the more inclined to believe that soniething important must have happened, because, for the first time since the commence ment of hostilities, many days had elapsed without any intelligence through the regular channels, or any foreign newspapers having reached Downing Street. Important events had indeed occurred, though not of the nature the sea-captain's intelligence implied. The very next day all Britain was alternately lamenting and rejoicing at the greatest exploit that even a British fleet had ever performed ; exulting in the contemplation of a most brilliant and decisive victory, and, to its honour, amid all its joy at the prostration of the enemy, doubting i8o5] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 203 whether the glory had not been too dearly purchased ;' for the hero, whom all loved as much as they admired and trusted him, had achieved it at the expense of his own life. Nelson was dead. The statesmen of the Cabinet, however, had other drawbacks to their feeling of triumph at the success of our own arms. We had done our work completely, and for the rest of the war, last as long as it might, we were to remain undisputed masters of the sea. But the same day which brought the news of Trafalgar counterbalanced it in some degree by certain information of the disgrace ful surrender of the Austrian army under Mack at Ulm. Lord Hawkesbury's reflections on the two events, with the account of the honours already fixed as to be paid to Nelson's memory, are contained in the following letter to his father : T-, T^ Whitehall, November 6th, 1805. Dear Father, ' ' -" I enclose the Gazette of Lord Nelson's victory. There is perhaps no example of so glorious and decisive a victory. The French fought uncommonly well, and Villeneuve is, I understand, in astonishment at the result. Poor Nelson's death is worthy of his life. He lived long enough to know the event of the action. It is a singular circumstance that this victory took place on the very day^ of the capitulation of Ulm, and almost at the very time that Buonaparte was declaring that ships, colonies, and commerce were all that he wanted. I have vsritten to the King to propose a general thanksgiving. Nothing is yet finally determined about the honours and provision for Nelson's family; but I believe it will be decided to make his heir an I Lord Malmesbury's statement has been often quoted ; but it is so honorable to the whole nation that it may be repeated here : " The first impression was not joy .... I never saw so little public joy. The illumination seemed dim, and, as it were, half clouded by the desire of expressing the mixture of contending feelings. Every com mon person in the streets speaking first of their sorrow for him, and then of the victory." (Diaries, iv. 342.) ''^ This seems to be a sHght mistake. Trafalgar was fought October 2 ist, and, according to Alison, Mack laid down his arms on the 20th. 204 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1805 earl, to double . the present pension, and to settle it upon the title for ever. Collingwood will be created a peer. I trust this event will have its effect upon the Powers of the Continent, and will prove to them how much their honour and safety depends on their own exertions. We have nothing new from thence, and have now been in utter darkness (except what we hear from France and Holland) for a fortnight. Your affectionate Son, Hawkesbury. The concluding sentence of this letter seems to show that the capitulation of Ulm was not at first thought an occurrence of decisive importance ; and indeed, that it was such is rather because it was an indication of the divisions and utter want of energy which characterised the councils of Vienna at that time, than from its intrinsic mag nitude. It certainly was not a misfortune which might not have been retrieved ; and it was not unreasonable to expect that the very means by which it had been wrought, the vio lation of the Prussian territory by the French army, might prove also the means of its retrieval, by determining the King of Prussia to form the confederacy against a potentate who had shown, at his expense, so profound a contempt for all the recognised rights of nations. Our minister at Berlin, Mr. Jackson, wrote word that the intelligence of Bernadotte's march through Anspach, "which was received at Potsdam while Baron Hardenberg [his prime minister] was with the King, violently affected his Majesty, who directed Baron Hardenberg to assemble a council composed of the Duke of Brunswick, Marshal Mollendorf, and Count Schulenberg. Their report, which was unanimous, and recommended by the most speedy and decisive measures, was sent to the King on the afternoon of the 17th. . . . Baron Hardenberg informed him [Mr. Jackson], and the Austrian and Russian ministers, that a day or two must elapse before he could communicate to them the King of Prussia's determination; but that they might be assured that he would fully vindicate the honour i8o5] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 205 and dignity of his crown and sovereignty." An express was sent off to the Emperor of Russia to accept the proposal which he had made, of an interview with the King at Berlin, and Mr. Jackson reported further that "the prospect of Prussia joining the allies against France had excited the most universal joy among the military and every description of persons not avowedly devoted to France." And these anticipations would have been verified, had it not been for the prodigious celerity and success of Napoleon's operations. At the interview at Berlin, the King of Prussia definitively consented to join the allies, only postponing his formal declaration of his intention till he could receive from the French Government an answer to a proposal of a Prussian media tion, which, as Lord Hawkesbury explained to Lord Liverpool, "was, in fact, little more than a pretence for delay, till Prussia could bring up her different armies to the frontier ; since the terms were such as it was impos sible for France to accept." As all expected, France rejected them ; but before the day on which Prussia was to declare war against her arrived, the battle of Austerlitz had crushed the spirit of both Austria and Russia ; and Prussia, thus bereft of her expected supporters before she had committed any act of open hostilit}^, was glad to withdraw from the treaty which she had just made, and to fall back on her former plan of enriching herself at the expense of her third ally, and obtaining Hanover ; though, as her intention to join the enemies of France was no secret, she was now forced to purchase it by exchanging for it some of her southern provinces. Lord Hawkesbury was with Pitt at Bath when the news of the battle of Austerlitz reached England, repre sented, as he reports to Lord Liverpool, "in the worst colours" by our minister at Vienna, Sir A. Paget, whose despatch " was evidently the letter of a man discontented with the Government to which he is accredited." It has been said by more than one person professing to be well 2o6 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1806 informed, that the intelligence, involving the failure of the confederacy which he had formed with such labour and address, killed the great English minister. But, though it was no doubt a heavy disappointment, the first account given of him after the news reached him is more favorable than some of those of an earlier date. He had been "laid up with a fit of the gout, but it was now going off, and he hoped to be able to drink the waters for a week before he returned to London." It had been originally intended that Parliament should re-assemble on the 7th of January, 1806, but before that day arrived Pitt had become so seriously ill, that it was deemed more expedient to postpone the meeting till the Tuesday, the 2^st. It yyas not at first apprehended that his illness would have a fatal termination, and he fluc tuated so much that, even as late as the afternoon of the day on which Parliament was to meet. Lord Chatham brought word to Lord Hawkesbury that he was "much better than yesterday morning." It had, however, by that time become almost evident, as Lord Hawkesbury wrote to Lord Liverpool, that " even in the event of his complaint taking a favorable turn, there could be very little chance of his resuming public business during the active part of the session." But Lord Hawkesbury did not as yet despair that he and his colleagues might be able to continue to conduct the business of government. Their plan was " to endeavour to gain time as to any essential business, and try to make as strong a muster of their friends as possible." Pitt's name, however dis abled he might be for a time, while he lived was still a tower of strength to his party. No man was so honoured ; so trusted. But Lord Hawkesbury did not conceal from himself that " the situation of the King and of the country might become most critical, and it made the rest of the ministers anxiously resolve in their minds what might be best to be done." He himself in Pitt's absence, had been the chief framer i8o6] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 207 of the King's speech, which, as he was not ashamed to state to the House of Lords, the members of which by this time well knew the circumstances to which he alluded, had been intentionally couched in such language as to create no difference of opinion as to the terms of the address which would be presented in reply to it. That end was answered, as the leaders of the Opposition abstained from proposing any amendment, and both parties rested on their arms, waiting to see what turn the Minister's illness might take. They were not long kept in suspense. Before daybreak on the 23d Pitt died. Lord Hawkesbury conveyed the melan choly news down to the King ; and reported his interview with his Majesty to Lord Liverpool in the following letter : Secret. St. James's Square, Thursday. Djsar Father, I am just come from home for dinner, not having been five minutes alone the whole of the day, and being under the necessity of attending a Cabinet this evening. I have had a very long and distressing conversation with the King. He was much better, however, at the end of it than he was at the beginning. He has returned to Windsor to-night, and pro mised to remain there quiet till he hears from us, which will probably be on Saturday morning. He has desired that we would, each of us (after the subject has been thoroughly discussed), send him our opinion in writing of what is best to be done. I do not believe there will be any material dif ference of opinion, as far as I can judge at present .... Your affectionate Son, Hawkesbury. On Saturday morning the King returned to London, and Lord Hawkesbury had a second and still longer conference with him. The result of the deliberations of the Cabinet on the two previous days had been that, under the exist ing circumstances, they should be unable to carry on the government successfully. In truth the suddenness of the loss which they had sus tained (for till very recently no suspicion had been enter- 2o8 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION . [1806 tained that Pitt's life was in danger) and its real magnitude both contributed to make the Ministry, thus deprived of its leader, seem weaker than it really was. For Pitt had been pre-eminently suited to his office. Equally sound and brilliant, he was the most consummate financier that the world had, or yet has, seen ; the most fertile and original in resource ; and the most eloquent expounder of his plans and principles of action ; dauntless amid dangers, clear headed in perplexities, and ever consistent in his views and maxims, but at the same time too practically wise to refuse to adapt his policy to the circumstances of the time. And the achievements of his Administration had been worthy of his talents. He had commenced the liberation of trade and commerce from their old shackles ; he had brought forward a plan of parliamentary reform admirable alike in its extent and its moderation ; thus, though the war into which he was drawn with France compelled him afterwards to suspend his plans for the reform of abuses and the amelioration of the State, setting an example to future statesmen, which has since borne abundant and salutary fruit. The greatest of all measures of domestic reform, the Union with Ireland, he carried in the face of unpa ralleled difficulties ; nor, as we have seen, was it his fault that it was not made a complete measure. As an arranger of alliances he was not less successful, nor has greater political skill been often evinced than that by which, in the last year of his life, he united Austria and Russia in the league against France, a league which nothing but the incredible mismanagement of the allies thus united could have rendered barren. The loss of such a chief might, for a moment, well dismay his followers ; the King, indeed, did not share their opinions, and earnestly pressed Lord Hawkesbury to keep the Ministry together, and to take the chief post himself But Lord Hawkesbury had not formed his opinion without the most careful consideration of every circumstance ; he knew that his colleagues had been equally cautious before they decided on their inability to i8o6] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 239 maintain themselves ; he therefore felt he had no alterna tive but to adhere to what had been their unanimous decision ; and, unpalatable as he was aware that such advice must be, he urged on his Majesty the necessity of now readmitting Mr. Fox to his' councils.' From one act of kindness to himself George III. would not be dissuaded. He had formerly insisted on Pitt's accepting the Warden- ship of the Cinque Ports as an act of obedience to himself, and he now, in like manner, conferred it on Lord Hawkes bury ; overruling all his objections, and evidently determined to regard that post as his one private piece of patronage. The adherence of his existing ministers to their resolu tion of retiring naturally compelled him to have recourse to the Opposition. He determined, to quote Lord Hawkes bury's language, "to swallow a bitter pill," but "to do it in the most dignified manner, and to put the whole on grounds which, if they should fail, would secure the good opinion and support of the whole country." He felt indeed that, after what had passed two years before, he could not, without loss of dignity, make a personal application to Mr. Fox ; but he at once sent for Lord Grenville, and authorised him to form a new Administration, volunteering an express consent to his consulting Fox on the subject. Indeed, Pitt's death and the withdrawal of his colleagues rendered it impossible now to exclude one whom all agreed in con sidering the man of the greatest ability in the nation. If indeed there was any who might have been expected not to wish for his presence, it was Lord Grenville himself, who not three weeks before had affirmed the existence of cardinal and unextinguishable differences between himself and that statesman on the most important subjects.^ However, they speedily agreed to take office together; ' See vol. iii. p. 148. ^ He wrote to his brother, Lord Buckingham, January 7th, 1806 : *' What is all this to lead to ? ... A joint Government of Fox's friends and ours, who, the very first day that we meet in Cabinet, shall pro bably differ on the leading question of our whole policy, that of resis tance or submission." (Court and Cabinets of George III. iv. 9.) VOL. L P 2IO. LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1806 and, as if the disagreement between themselves on the topics Lord Grenville had alluded to were not sufficient, they took into their deliberations a third statesman. Lord Sidmouth, who was certainly not supposed to agree with either of them, and who, while himself a minister, had been at least as much the object of Lord Grenville's hostility as Lord North had formerly been of Fox's. But the King accepted all their arrangements without demur ; though not without first having a long conference and dis cussion with those inembers of his retiring Ministry in whom he still placed his chief confidence. Lord Hawkesbury and the Chancellor. They, however, gave him none but the most loyal advice ; and on the 5th of February the greater part of the new appointments appeared in the Gazette. Lord Grenville was First Lord of the Treasury ; but, as had happened at the end of the last reign, when the late minister's father, the first William Pitt, held the seals of the Foreign Office, Fox, who now took the same post, was universally considered as the Prime Minister. He had just added to the disfavour with which the King regarded him by a singular piece of bad taste, as well as of opposition to what he could hardly doubt to be the King's wishes : opposing the address which, four days after Pitt's death, the House voted by an overwhelming majority, for a pubhc funeral and a monument to the deceased minister. But, after he was installed in office, his conduct changed, and he rendered himself more acceptable to the King than most of his colleagues by the attentive and respectful demeanour which he carefully and uniformly observed towards his royal master. Lord Hawkesbury was now called upon to fill a new post, that of leader of the Opposition, which brings into action different qualides from those who are required of a minister. The latter is the commander of the garrison, generally standing on his defence ; at all events, never provoking hostile demonstration by wanton sallies. The former is the chief of the besieging army, which expects him to let slip i8o6] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 211 no opportunity of attacking their adversaries when it can be done with advantage ; but to unite with that constant vigilance a prudence which shall abstain from all fruitless assaults, from any attempt to deliver blows on unimpor tant points ; above all, from every enterprise the failure of which may be turned to their discredit or disadvantage. These duties Lord Hawkesbury is admitted to have dis charged with singular judgment and success. And the first occasion on which he was called upon thus to exert him self was one of especial difficulty and delicacy, since he had to combine a decided objection to an appointment with a sincere feeling of respect for, and, on many subjects, of agreement with him on whom the appointment had been conferred. The present was manifestly a Coalition Ministry : one division of it being made up of those who had served with Pitt, and had therefore some inclinations towards Toryism ; another of those who had throughout been in opposition to him, and were therefore to be classed as pure Whigs : this latter section doubling the former in number ; while in the original list of Cabinet Ministers Lord Sid mouth was entirely unsupported.' From a natural unwill ingness to be so completely isolated he first pressed the claim of Lord Buckinghamshire (who shared the office of Postmaster-General with Lord Carysfort) to a Cabinet office. And, when that could not be conceded, he insisted on, and at last carried, the admission to the Cabinet of the Chief Justice, Lord EUenborough. There was a prece dent for such an appointment in the case of Lord Mans field ; but it was soon found to be so inconvenient that, when that great judge had once quitted the Cabinet, on a change of Ministry, he could never be prevailed on to resume his place in it ; and the repetition of such a step, after it had been thus practically discredited, excited such great and general disapprobation that it was made the 1 Mr. Abbott arranges the Cabinet thus (ii. 37) : Lord Grenville, Lord Spencer, Mr. Windham; Lord Sidmouth; Mr. Fox, Mr. Grey, Lord FitzwiUiam, Lord H. Petty, Lord Moira, Lord Erskine, C. P 2 212 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1806 subject of a distinct motion in each House of Parliament : in both the attack coming not from members avowedly in Opposition, but from the independent party ; Lord Bristol, who mooted the question in the House of Peers, being even a personal friend of Lord Sidmouth himself It is probable that Lord Hawkesbury, in his position as a former Cabinet Minister, would not have thought fit to originate the objec tion ; but when, at the beginning of March, Lord Bristol moved a resolution on the general principle, affirming the impropriety of "summoning any of the judges of the courts of common law " to councils of State, he could not hesitate to support it, affirming that " the question was one which vitally touched the very essence of the constitution. He had no personal objection to Lord EUenborough him self ; on many great points he knew that their opinions concurred : but he disapproved of the conversion of the Chief Justice into a political minister, not only on the prin ciples of the British constitution, but on general principles of liberty, He would cite Baron Montesquieu's opinion on the division of political power in a State ; and that great writer had laid it down as an axiom, that it was more adviseable that the judicial power should be separated from the executive than that the legislative power should be kept distinct from the executive. Blackstone had said the same. For himself he was not such an extravagant theorist as to wish to push principles beyond practical utility ; but the course which a wise legislator would adopt would be to make the exceptions to his general principles not as numerous, but as few as possible. In his conception there could be no union more dangerous than that of a judge and a minister of State ; and such, to all intents and pur poses, the Chief Justice was now made. He was thus of necessity identified with those who constituted what was called the Government, in danger of becoming a party to all their passions and prejudices ; and giving him, as he himself did, full credit for the utmost purity, it was im possible that, in questions which might arise between the i8o6] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 213 Government and individuals, he should generally be regarded as an unbiassed judge. Suppose, for instance, a man were indicted for a libel on the Administration : the Chief Justice might be called upon to sit in judgment on an offence committed against himself Cases of riot again might arise which the Government would find it necessary to repress by the vigorous exercise of its executive authority. Could it be adviseable that afterwards a member of the Cabinet should be found presiding at the trial of those accused of such disturbances .' Lord Bristol had stated truly that, since the Revolution, there was but one instance of a common law judge acting as a Cabinet Minister. Why did he begin his researches at the Revolution, but for this reason, that it was only from that period that the inde pendence of the judges commenced .' The case of the Lord Chancellor having a seat in the Cabinet bore no analogy whatever to that of a Chief Justice, because his jurisdiction had no connexion with criminal law. The Chancellor was removable at pleasure, because he was a Cabinet Minister ; neither the judges nor the Master of the Rolls were, because it was not intended that they should ever become responsible advisers of the Crown. It had been asserted, in the course of the debate, that the appointment could not be stated with truth to be either illegal or unconstitutional ; yet the very speaker who made this admission [Lord Eldon] had argued that, though it might be neither, yet nevertheless it was in the highest degree inexpedient and unadvisable. On the question of the legality of the appointment the authority of his noble friend was indisputable ; and he him self was well aware how difficult it was, when once a step was admitted not to be illegal, to prove it to be unconsti tutional. But he had no hesitation in affirming that the present appointment of a common law judge to a seat in the Cabinet was not congenial with the pure principles and practice of the constitution. He should regret to see that respect which was due to the sacred character of a judge diminished by his becoming mixed up, as a party to them. 214 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1806 with the struggles of politics ; and, whatever might be the decision of the House, he affirmed it to be beyond all question that such was the general feeling of the country." Lord Bristol, meaning his motion rather as a protest against the appointment than as an attack to embarrass the Government, forbore to press it to a division. But it was generally felt that Lord Hawkesbury's speech was unan swerable ; and the reason which makes it desirable to quote portions of it is, that it is a speech eminently character istic of his union of extensive constitutional knowledge with moderation in its application. It shows his acquaint ance with and appreciation of general principles and the theory of government, combined with an indisposition to push them too far; and founds his objections not on any visionary subtleties, but on cases of probable, ordinary, and even recent occurrence. There had been a vehement outcry against the late Prime Minister for his prosecution of Hardy and his fellow-prisoners ; but that outcry would have been increased tenfold, would have been irresistible, if a member of the same Cabinet which instituted the prose cutions had also sat to try those who were accused. At a later day Lord EUenborough himself admitted the justice of the arguments that had been brought forward against his appointment,' and greatly regretted that he had been induced to lend himself to such a measure. The new Ministry was not very popular from the com mencement. The English people as a rule dislike coali tions, and the union of Lord Grenville with Fox, to whom till recently he had been always most vehemently opposed, and of both with Lord Sidmouth, whom while in office Lord Grenville from the first, and latterly Fox also, had attacked with unceasing bitterness, seemed little less unnatural than that which above twenty years before had incurably damaged Fox's reputation. Lord Sidmouth was more excusable than either, because he, like Lord North before, might fairly consider these solicitations now ' Lord Campbell, Lives of the Chief Justices, iii. 188. i8o6] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 215 for his co-Operation a practical recantation of the reproaches and contempt they had formerly heaped upon him. And Fox more pardonable than Lord Grenville, because, as more than half the Cabinet was composed of his own adherents, the others were in fact surrendering their judg ment to his in every matter on which he might think fit to insist. Still the Coalition was unpopular as being a coalition ; and there was no quality in its composition which could tend to reconcile men to what from principle and habit they disapproved. Some of the underlings of the Government, knowing the value of a plausible name, in allusion to the statement that had been advanced and admitted a couple of years before, that it was a time that required all the abilities of the kingdom to be united in its service, boasted that what had been wanted was now accomplished, and christened the new Administration " All the Talents." But, in fact, in practical administrative ability it was not only inferior to the last Ministry while Pitt lived ; but, with the single exception of Fox, it was generally inferior to it even after its great chief was taken away. If we look at the principal offices, no prejudice could compare Lord Spencer, the new Home Secretary, to Lord Hawkesbury, any more than Lord Erskine as Chan cellor could be placed on a level with Lord Eldon. Mr. Grey was no doubt superior to Lord Barham as a speaker, and, being a younger man, had a higher reputation for general ability and vigour ; but of the particular depart ment in which he was now placed he had no knowledge whatever ; while Lord Barham, old as he was, had shown an energy which even his younger successor could not surpass, combined with a judgment founded on profes sional experience to which, of course, he could make no pretension. Again, though as a speaker Mr. Windham had a higher reputation than Lord Castlereagh, he was unquestionably inferior to him as a man of business,' One ' " July 1 5//2.— Rode two hours with Lord Grenville. A dissolution of Parliament is not in contemplation. . . . Our other subjects of conver- 21 6 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1806 member of each Government, though not in the Cabinet, was too brilliant to be passed over without mention. Sheridan succeeded Canning as Treasurer of the Navy. Here, perhaps, there was but little inequality of oratory; even if it be said that Canning never made the impression which is attributed to more than one of Sheridan's early speeches, it still cannot be denied that the latter was no longer what he had been, and his setting rays at the time of which we are speaking could not outshine the meridian brilliancy of the rising ornament of the Tories ; while in every other point, in official ability, in large and provident states manship, and above all in character, Sheridan unhappily could not be for a moment put in competition with his rival. What character, therefore, the Administration enjoyed for pre-eminent ability rested solely on the deservedly high reputation of Fox. But it was soon seen that it had little of him but his name. He was ten years older than Pitt, and his constitution was even more completely broken up. Before he had been two months in office it became occa sionally necessary to postpone portions of the ministerial business because of his inability to take a part in it ; and for the last five weeks of the session he was forced to discontinue his attendance altogether. Early in September he died ; but before that time he had become so conscious that his political life was over, that he expressed a desire to resign his office : and Lord Grenville showed such a consciousness that " all the talents " of the kingdom were not yet combined in its service, that he invited Canning to succeed him almost on his own terms. Canning was ambitious and desirous of office, as every man confident of his power to fill it with advantage to his country and to his reputation must be ; but he had not that " inconsiderate precipitancy of ambition"' which could lead him for the sation were Mr. Fox's state of health, Windham's utter unacquaintance with militia, and county affairs." — Lord Colchester's Diary, ii. 77. ' His own words. See his letter to Lord Barrington, " Life and i8o6] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 217 sake of office to coalesce with a party v/ith which he had hardly an opinion in common, or of which he doubted the stability. And he had sound reason for his doubts. The King, indeed, reluctant as he had been to entrust the Government to the present ministers, acted with the most scrupulous fairness to them, abstaining from touching in the least degree on politics in his occasional conversations with members of the Opposition.' But the Duke of York, who was supposed to be no stranger to the King's secret feelings, was earnest in encouraging the Tory Opposition to an united plan of action. He would gladly have seen an attempt made to dispossess the Ministry before the prorogation ; but Lord Hawkesbury and the other leaders of the party thought such a step would be premature. Lord Hawkesbury had already given a cordial and generous support to the Government in the measures which it had adopted towards Prussia on its seizure of Hanover. He was prepared to give an equally impartial sanction to the breaking off, as he foresaw must happen, of the negotiations into which they had entered with France. He reciprocated too the feeling which during the last weeks of Pitt's life had led Fox to withdraw or postpone the objections which he had been prepared to make to some recent measures, " Mentem mortalia tangunt;"^ and, knowing Fox's condition to be almost equally hopeless, he would not harass the last weeks of his life by any needless show of opposition. But Fox had hardly been laid in the grave when he learnt that the tactics of the Ministry were altered ; and he consequently saw the expediency of changing his own. Times of G. Canning," p. 97. It is remarkable that in " The Court and Cabinets of George III.," by the Duke of Buckingham, this overture to Canning is passed over in silence. ' See a mention of a visit of George III. to Bulstrode (Malmes bury, iv. 3S). 2 Fox's quotation when, just before the meeting of Parliament in January, he announced Pitt's state to his adherents as a reason for moderation. ^ 2i8 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1806 Fox's death had led to a slight change in the relative pro portions of the Ministry. Of course his own loss had weakened his party in it beyond retrieval, though the office which he had filled was given to the ablest of his personal followers. Mr. Grey's father had been made an earl in the spring, so that he, his eldest son, was now known as Lord Howick. He became Foreign Secretary, with the lead in the House of Commons ; and his place at the Admiralty was bestowed on Lord Grenville's brother, Mr. Thomas Grenville. Judging by what occurred immediately after wards, there can be little doubt that Lord Grenville now resolved to re-open the Catholic question, which Fox, while he lived, would not permit to be agitated. And, as the existing Parliament was known to be unfavorable to any change in the national policy on that question, he deter mined on a dissolution of Parliament. The intention was viewed with great displeasure by the Opposition, and Lord Hawkesbury seems to have gone beyond his party in con sidering it not only objectionable, but so indefensible that it might be possible to induce the King to refuse his con sent to it. Accordingly he addressed the following letter to his Majesty : Sire, The confidence with which your Majesty has been so graciously pleased to honour me makes rae feel it an indispensable duty to obtrude on your Majesty's time for a very few moments for the purpose of bringing under your Majesty's consideration several circumstances which may eventually become of great public importance, and with which I am confident your Majesty would desire to be acquainted. Since the change which took place in your Majesty's councils in the beginning of February last, an alteration has been produced in the relative state of parties much more rapid and extensive than could have been expected in so short a space of time. Your Majesty's present ministers have disappointed the expec tations of many persons who were, in the first instance, dis posed to place confidence in them : their strength in Parliament has evidently dirainished; has proved rauch less than could have i8o6] OF LORD LIVERPOOL, ii^i been imagined ; and they have been progressively losing ground in the opinion of the country. On the other hand, the party which constituted your Majesty's last Administration have be come more united amongst themselves, and have confessedly acquired a great increase of strength and influence in Parliament and in the country, and more particularly in the House of Commons, where they were supposed, both by themselves and by their opponents, to be most weak some months ago. The result appears to be, upon the most accurate investigation, that independent of that strength which belongs to Government as such, and which may be considered as transferable from one Administration to another, the number of persons attached to your Majesty's present servants in the House of Commons very little exceed the number of those who are attached to their opponents. The state of the county representation in Great Britain will furnish a reasonably fair test of the truth of this observation. The number of county members of Great Britain favorably disposed to the present Administration are forty-nine; those favorably disposed to their opponents are forty-five; there are eight undecided, but more inclined to the latter than to the former ; and seventeen altogether doubtful. Under these circumstances I cannot avoid most anxiously re questing your Majesty's attention to the effect of a dissolution of Parhament at the present time. Such a measure would have the inevitable effect of throwing the whole influence of Govern ment in the borough elections into the hands of the present Administration. It would secure to them the strengffi they would thereby acquire for the whole of a new Parliament. It would determine in their favour the opinions of many persons who are undecided at present, and, in the event of your Majesty's feeHng it expedient to change your Administration, it would deprive their successors of the advantage of that measure which would be essential to the establishment of their power. This measure, if it should be proposed, cannot fairly be pressed upon your Majesty on any public grounds. The present Parlia ment was chosen in the month of June 1802. Three years of its legal existence, then, are unexpired, and no pretence for a dissolution can be advanced either on the ground of any 220 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1806 obstruction having been given in the House of Commons to the necessary business of Government, or on account of any material difference of opinion between the two Houses of Parliament. I feel the less difficulty in submitting these obser vations for your Majesty's consideration in consequence of knowing that, whatever shades of difference of opinion may exist on other points, there is an unusual agreement upon this sub ject amongst all those who are not connected with the present Administration whose opinion it has been judged practicable or prudent to ascertain. There are several points connected with the subject of this letter which I could explain more fully to your Majesty in conversa tion ; but, until I receive your Majesty's commands to attend you, I feel the impropriety there would be in my obtruding myself into your presence at this tirae. I have the honour, &c. &c., Hawkesbury. In thus urging the King to refuse his consent to measures on which his ministers had resolved. Lord Hawkesbury was but following the precedent afforded by Lord Temple and Lord Thurlow in 1783.' But George III. did not repeat the conduct by which he then had given occasion to un favorable but hardly unjust animadversion. He probably liked his present Ministry as little as he liked that of 1783. He had contrasted the respectful demeanour of Fox with the arrogance of another member of his Cabinet, whom he did not name, but whom it was not difficult to identify, as walking up to him " in the way he should have expected from Buonaparte after the battle of Austerlitz." ^ And he was even more offended at the sneers with which, as it was well known. Lord Grenville at times permitted himself to speak of Pitt, though he owed to him his introduction to official life,^ first as Speaker and then as a Secretary of ' Stanhope's Life of Pitt, i. 147 — 149. ''¦ Twiss's Life of Eldon, i. 510. ^ " Lord GrenvUle, in a note which I saw to-day, said 'that he was determined to make the Treasury as remarkable for its punctuality in i8o6] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 221 State. But George III. knew also that he himself had been thought to have acted in a way contrary to the spirit of the constitution in encouraging any opposition to his ministers' policy while they continued in his service. And he judged, more correctly than Lord Hawkesbury, that he could not now refuse his consent to the dissolution without, at the same time, requiring their resignation ; and that the proposal to dissolve a Parliament that had already sat for four years, though it might be uncalled for, would not be looked on by the kingdom as a sufficient reason for dis missing them. The event proved that he decided wisely, and his forbearance was rewarded by their giving him an opportunity of treating with them, in which he had the sympathy of the great majority of his people. When the new Parliament met. Lord Hawkesbury re stated his objections to the late dissolution, now bringing them forward as a formal accusation of the Ministry, for having advised an unusual exertion of the royal prero gative " with levity and without due necessity." He admitted, indeed, what could not be denied, that to dis solve the Parliament at his pleasure "was a prerogative which was inherent in the King in its strongest sense. If it were possible that Parliament could acquire legal perma nence, for ever so short a time, independent of the Crown, there would be no security for the monarchy." But no prerogative could be exercised in an unusual manner with out "the ministers who advised such an act incurring the weightiest responsibility.'' And that this was the character of the late dissolution he considered that he proved by the fact that, "since the passing of the Septennial Act, there had been but one example, that of 1784, of a Parliament being dissolved under six sessions. The dissolution in 1784 had been unavoidable, because at that time a mis understanding existed between the Crown and the House of Commons with respect to the Government. But no business as it had been heretofore for the contrary' (a sneer as unfounded as ungrateful)."— Lord Colchester's Diary, ii. 63. 222 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1806 circumstance had occurred, no plea had been assigned by the ministers for the late dissolution." This statement of the length of Parliaments during the preceding century will seem strange to a generation accustomed to the proceedings of recent Administrations, which have been in the habit of using dissolution as one of their most ordinary weapons. It may perhaps be doubted whether they have done wisely, or whether they have not rather laid themselves open to the charge of " making the medicine of the constitution its daily bread." And Lord Hawkesbury's argument, founded, as it was, on almost invariable practice, was well calculated to make an impression on those to whom it was addressed. But it was so impossible seriously to question the right of dissolution that he did not venture to found any motion on his objections : if he had, beyond all question the House would have felt that, however ill-judged or causeless the late dissolution might have been, the power of the King to dissolve at discretion was one of such vital necessity to the safety of the constitution, that it was better to let an occasional misuse of it pass unchallenged than to commit itself to any step which might have the least tendency to fetter or embarrass the free exercise of the royal pre rogative. And, as matters turned out, before many months had passed Lord Hawkesbury himself had reason to rejoice that he had not elicited such a vote from any considerable number of his brother peers. Lord Hawkesbury had not in his letter endeavoured to alarm the King on the subject of any concessions to the Catholics. Indeed the intentions of the ministers on that subject were probably hardly suspected when he wrote. But very soon after the meeting of the new Parliament, which took place in the middle of December, a report gained ground that they were preparing a bill intended, if not as an actual removal of all the restrictions affecting Roman Catholics, at least as such a relaxation of some of them as must prove an inevitable stepping-stone to the abolition of the rest. And though Lord Sidmouth had in i8o7] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 223 no degree withdrawn his objections to such a step, yet he had greatly contributed to encourage his colleagues in a belief of its practicability by a statement that the King was so absorbed in meditation on the increase of his blind ness and other infirmities, as to have become indifferent to political questions. Under this impression the leaders in the Ministry thought that they might safely afford a modified indulgence to the Roman Catholics. They were certainly influenced solely by the sincerity of their conviction of the justice of the claims preferred by that body to a perfect equality of civil rights with their Protestant fellow-subjects, and not by any mere personal motive. On the contrary, they thought the conduct of the Irish Roman Catholics at the time, and especially of their leaders, not only factious and intemperate, but most embarrassing to the Adminis tration ; ' but they would neither allow this feeling of personal annoyance to weigh with them, nor those more important considerations which had njade such men as Pitt and Fox, though equally impressed with the wisdom of the concession, renounce all further agitation of the question. And they prepared a bill which, though not going all the lengths which Pitt had originally proposed, should yet grant an effective raeasure of indulgence which would be parti cularly acceptable to the higher classes among the Roman Catholics, and would supply hereafter an argument for granting more. A bill passed in 1793 had enabled Roman Catholics in Ireland to hold any commissions in the army, short of the very highest ; but, by a singular oversight, it made no mention of their serving in England or Scot land, though the regiments to which they belonged were, of course, as liable to be quartered in either of those countries as in Ireland. The first proposal of the Ministry went solely ' See " Life and Opinions of Earl Grey," p. 143, where the writer (the present Earl) quotes a letter from Lord Grenville to his father, characterising a speech made by Mr. Keogh at a meeting of the Irish Roman Catholics, as one which "for its intemperance and inflam matory tendency had hardly ever been equalled." 224 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1807 to the rectification of this omission by the addition of one ¦or two clauses to the Mutiny Bill. But having procured the King's consent, though far from cheerfully or willingly given, to those clauses, they were, by that success, en couraged to attempt more ; they withdrew those clauses, and substituted for them a separate bill, giving to Roman Catholics, in every part of the King's dominions, a right to liold any rank in either army or navy. Such a concession was certainly a different thing from a grant of civil privileges, or rather from a removal of civil restrictions. But it was obvious that it must immediately lead to it ; since it would have been an intolerable incon sistency to refuse an equality of rights to those whom the State invited to an equality of dangers. It is singular that the ministers should have expected to obtain the King's sanction to it, because, even when assenting to the previous measure, he had expressly declared that " he would not go one step further."' But so strangely were they led away by their wishes, that they not only expected to obtain it, but believed that they had obtained it, and in that belief they introduced the bill. Its introduction led to a warm dispute in the Cabinet. Lord Sidmouth, the Lord President, who was averse to any relaxation of the existing restrictions, and who declared not only that he could be no party to such a measure, but that he had not been aware that any such had been contemplated by his colleagues, ' Lord Sidmouth, a few weeks later, stated the written consent which the King had given to the additional clauses in the Mutiny Bill to have been concluded in these words : that " however painful his Majesty had found it to reconcile to his feelings the removal of objec tions which may have the most distant reference to a question which has already been the subject of such frequent and distressing reflection, be would not, under the circumstances in which it was so earnestly pressed, and adverting particularly to what took place in 1793, pre vent his ministers from submitting, for the considerations of his Par liament, the propriety of inserting the proposed clauses in the Mutiny Bill. Whilst, however, the King so far reluctantly conceded, he thought it necessary to declare that he could not go one step further." (Cobbett's Parliamentary Debates, vol. ix. p. 393.) i807] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 225 at the same time asserted his conviction that his royal master was equally ignorant. Lord Grenville and Lord Howick affirmed that the object of their bill had been fully explained to the King by the latter nobleman, that he had deliberately assented to its introduction, and, more over, that it had been most distinctly expressed in a despatch which had been written to the Lord Lieutenant of Ireland, and which, before being sent, had been sub mitted to his Majesty, and had been returned by him without comment or the slightest intimation of disapproval. But Lord Sidmouth proved to be right. When the real scope of the bill was explained to the King, he was thunder struck and indignant. He affirmed that he had not only not assented to any such measure, but that his ministers knew that he never would. The King and Lord Howick were thus at direct issue on a matter of fact. And, as Lord Howick's scrupulous veracity and honour are above suspicion, the fairest way of solving the contradiction would appear to be to suppose that, in his conference with his minister, the King had abstained from repeating his dis approval, as thinking it sufficiently indicated by the terms in which he had given his sanction to the clauses in the Mutiny Act, and that the unfortunate state of his eyesight had caused him to overlook or mistake the sen tences relating to the bill in the Irish despatch. However this may be, it is certain that, from the moment that he knew the real character of the bill now before ParHament, he announced in the most positive manner his determina tion never to sanction it. And, though what had thus taken place between him and his ministers could not yet have been known to any but the members of the Cabinet, it happened, by a singular coincidence, that the next day' the Duke of Portland wrote to his Majesty, expressing his belief that his Majesty's wishes and intentions on the 1 According to Lord Sidmouth's speech, already alluded to, this hap pened March 11. The Duke of Portland's letter is dated March 12th, and is given at length in Lord Malmesbury's Diary (iv. 360). VOL. L Q 226 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1807 subject were misunderstood, his conviction on this point being so strong that he ventured to add that, even if " any peculiarity of circumstances should have induced his Majesty to acquiesce in that bill, he himself should think that, by following the dictates of his own conscience, and voting against it, he should not offend." He had no doubt that the bill might be, and would be, defeated in the House of Lords ; and if the King should in consequence " be driven to take the conduct of his affairs out of the hands of those who were now administering them, he placed his own zealous and faithful services at his Majesty's command." The consequence of such a step as that taken by the Duke, who had for many years enjoyed a very special degree of private intimacy with the King, could hardly have been a matter of doubt for a moment. George III. again announced to his ministers, in the most unmistake able terms, his repugnance to their policy on the subject in question ; and he sent a similar communication to the Duke. He went further ; he resolved to protect himself from a renewal of such agitating vexation. And when the ministers, in consequence of his declaration, withdrew the bill, he required of them a promise that they would never again, under any circumstances, re-open the question. To give such a pledge they thought incompatible with their duty, whether as privy councillors of the Crown or as ordinary members of Parliament ; and such a refusal was practically equivalent to a resignation of their offices. i8o7] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. CHAPTER VII. The King sends for Lord Hawkesbury— The Duke of Portland becomes Prime Minister — Lord Hawkesbury the most prominent member of the new Administration — Debate on the change — Lord Hawkesbury's speech — Maiden speech of Lord Aberdeen — Dissolution of Parlia ment — Treaty of Tilsit — The expedition to Denmark — The Orders in Council, and dissatisfaction of the United States — Quarrels between the Prince and Princess of Wales — Arrival of Louis XVIII. as Comte de L'Isle in England — His letters to the King and Lord Hawkesbury — Plans of the Portuguese royal family — Debate and speech of Lord Hawkesbury on the Danish expedition — Seditious conspiracies in Ireland — Lord Hawkesbury's policy in Ireland — Proposal for a com mutation of tithes in Ireland — Lord Grenville moves for a Committee on the Catholic question — Arrangements in Scotland, and Lord Hawkesbury's rules for the distribution of his patronage. The first step the King took towards the formation of a new Administration was to seek the advice of Lord Hawkesbury and Lord Eldon. They found him, as is mentioned in a letter from Lord Hawkesbury to Lord Liverpool, " never better in health or more composed in manner. He communicated to them all that had passed between himself and his Government on the Catholic bill. The important facts of the transaction were for tunately in writing, and formed a complete justification of the King's conduct. He had resolved," Lord Hawkes bury added, "on changing his Government," and Lord Hawkesbury anticipated "that the new arrangements would be made without any considerable difficulty." During the next few days, with the exception of those Q 2 228 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1807 persons who were not yet formally divested of their minis terial character, George III. saw no one but Lord Hawkes bury. And it was through him that all the arrangements for the new Administration were completed. The King had intended to place him at the head of the Treasury, but the whole party had already come to an understanding to recommend that the nominal lead in the new Admi nistration should be conferred on the Duke of Portland. When, twenty years before, he had been placed in the same situation as the chief of the Coalition Ministry, the Duke had displayed no kind of abihty ; and his natural mediocrity of intellect was now enfeebled by an agonizing disease, which would prevent his taking an active part in Parliament. But he had great borough influence and a most extensive political connexion ; both of which would be of service in the outset. For it required no shrewdness of foresight to predict that the new Ministry would be exposed to " a most formidable attack" from their predecessors, though Lord Hawkesbury, when he prophesied this, did not doubt that "if they had good nerves they should get through it.'' He himself was, as before, to lead the House of Lords, an arrangement that hardly required specifying, for the Duke himself, during the two years and a half that he remained at the Treasury, never addressed a single speech to his brother peers, if indeed he ever appeared among them at all. Lord Hawkesbury returned to the Home Office, the other Secretaries of State being Canning at the Foreign Office, and Lord Castlereagh in the Colonial and War Department; Mr. Perceval, who had previously held no appointments but those connected with his profession of the law, became Chancellor ofthe Exchequer, with the lead in the House of Commons ; Lord Eldon resumed the seals ; the Admiralty was entrusted to Lord Mulgrave. The other places, inferior in importance, though higher in dignity, the Presidency of the Council and the custody of the Privy Seal, were conferred on Lord Camden and Lord West- i8o7] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 229 moreland. Lord Chatham became Master-General of the Ordnance ; Mr. Huskisson resumed his old post as one of the Secretaries of the Treasury. And, among those not in the Cabinet, two subsequently rose to an eminence which forbids the passing over their names in silence : Sir Arthur Wellesley was appointed Secretary for Ireland, and Lord Palmerston became one of the Lords of the Admiralty. And thus was inaugurated the great Tory Ministry, which, with scarcely any changes but those occasioned by death or the growing infirmities of one or two members, governed England for above twenty years with unbroken success and unequalled glory. From the very first it bore in a high degree the stamp of Lord Hawkesbury's own character ; reflecting it, of course, to a greater extent when, at the end of five years, he became its acknow ledged chief His task of upholding the new Ministry in his character of leader of the House of Lords began before his other and more official duties as Secretary of State had made any great call on his time or abilities. He had not deceived himself when he foretold that they should have a formi dable attack to encounter. For, the very day that he received the seals. Lord Grenville gave notice of his intention to explain on the morrow the circumstances which had led to his finding himself in his present situa tion ; and shortly afterwards one of his chief partisans, the Marquis of Stafford, gave notice of a resolution which, though couched in a single paragraph, was, in fact, rather two resolutions than one, since there was no necessary connexion between its different clauses. The first was particular ; it lamented the recent change in his Majesty's councils : the second was general ; it asserted it to be "contrary to the first duties of the responsible ministers of the King to restrain themselves by any pledge, ex pressed or implied, from submitting to his Majesty faith fully and truly any advice which in their judgment the course of circumstances may render necessary for the 23° LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1807 honour of his Majesty's crown, and the welfare of his dominions." For the purpose of this narrative it will be more con venient to look on the two debates as one general dis cussion of the recent transactions, and to combine the two speeches made by Lord Grenville and the two replies which they received from Lord Hawkesbury. The speech in which Lord Grenville professed to explain the circum stances which had caused the faU of the late Ministry was rather an attempt to lead the House away from the real question, than a judicious or even skilful exposition of the merits of the case. He gave an elaborate exposition of the arguments in favour of the removal of the restric tions which pressed on the Roman Catholics, and affirmed with great emphasis, what every one knew, that both Pitt and Fox had adopted them as irresistible. In touching on the merits of the bill which had been prepared, he, as was not unusual with him, injured his cause by over stating it, representing the refusal to remove the existing restrictions " as a renewal of persecution for the sake of dif ferences in religion,'' and asked, with a vehemence which many of even his own supporters felt to be misplaced, " If persecutions for the sake of differences in religious opinions were again to be revived in Ireland, could there be any question that it would produce the most dreadful dis sensions.''" But he slurred over the equally well-known fact that both the great statesmen whom he mentioned had in the last two years of their lives deliberately resolved not to bring the question forward, because, however maintainable it might be in principle, circumstances were such that to press it while those circumstances existed must be useless, and might be in the highest degree mischievous. And he gave no adequate explanation whatever of the reasons which had induced himself and his colleagues to disregard their example, and to press the consideration of proposals to which, as they well knew, the mind of their royal master was unalterably averse. He .said indeed that Lord Howick i8o7] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 231 had been under the impression that he had obtained the sanction of the King to the introduction of the bill ; but he took no notice of the great improbability that, on a matter on which his Majesty had hitherto felt so strongly, he should suddenly have entirely changed his mind, with out a single argument having been employed to lead to that revolution in his opinions : an improbability so strong that, the moment the full force of the intended measure was seen, both the Duke of Portland, who was out of the Ministry, and Lord Sidmouth, who was a mem ber of the Cabinet, came to the same conclusion, that his Majesty must have given his consent to the measure under a total misconception. He was more successful when he proceeded to justify his refusal to pledge himself never to re-open the question, on the ground that, even if he had in his own mind resolved to abandon it till he saw a prospect of carrying it, it was clearly quite a different thing to debar himself from doing so, under any pressure of political necessity, by a formal renunciation. And he argued with considerable force that such a pledge was absolutely inconsistent with the duties of ministers. It was, as he truly said, " their duty to advise the King, and to give, without favour or affection, that counsel which they thought best for the country." And he asked, "What would be the situation of any set of men who should bind themselves by oath to discharge this important office, and at the same time bind themselves by a written promise not to discharge it 1 Could the British constitution exist if ministers should give pledges of such a character.'" He argued fairly and convincingly that such a pledge once given would have a tendency to become a precedent. And he endeavoured ftom that argument to throw a heavy responsibility on the new Administration, contending that, "as such a pledge was required of the ministers who retired, upon every fair construction it must have been given by those who had succeeded them. And if this doctrine and practice were to prevail, the corner-stone of 232 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1807 our constitution, namely, the maxim that the King can do no wrong, and that his ministers are completely responsible, is gone. We should return to those principles which must sap the foundation -of the monarchy; to those, he had almost said, diabolical principles by which the King of this country was once brought to answer to his Parliament, and was made responsible for all the transactions of the Government." Lord Hawkesbury, in reply, declined, on this occasion, to enter at length into the merits of the Catholic question itself, as one which had already received " the most ample discussion in both Houses of Parliament, and had been decided on by the largest majorities ever known two years before ; " though he did not abstain from briefly reiterating his own opinion, that the removal of the restrictions on the Roman Catholics would be a change of " the fundamental principle of the constitution, which had established a Pro testant Government and Church Establishment ; he believed that such a change would overthrow the constitution ; and, though this doctrine might be termed bigotry, he preferred to any new lights the bigotry of 1688, which had effected the Revolution, and established the liberties of this country on the most solid foundation. But he conceived that, even if he had been favorable to a removal of all restrictions, he might still, with perfect consistency, have objected to the 'measure brought in by the late Government as one which would only have unsettled the question ; for was it possible to think that this measure would have satisfied the Catho lics, that it would not rather have stimulated their desire for further concessions } This measure was to give them the sword, but to refuse them everything beside; and yet he had never conversed with any person on the subject who would not rather grant to the Catholics what the late ministers by this measure refused them, and refuse what by this measure they had granted." He then entered into the, for the moment, more important question of what the original proposal of the ministers had been to which the l8o7] 01 LORD LIVERPOOL. 233 King had assented, and of how far they were justified in inferring his approval of the larger measure which they had subsequently introduced. By a minute but, as no one denied, a most accurate dissection of the papers which were before the House, he completely established his assertion that the original proposal laid before his Majesty "did not go further than to make the provisions of the Irish Act, the Act of 1793, general. His Majesty was assured that it was only the same measure to which he had assented in 1793, and was only intended to carry into effect that Act according to the principle upon which it had been enacted. That principle had been to give to the Catholics the privi lege of holding certain commissions in the army, reserving others ; and the reservation of some formed as much a part of the principle as the concession of others. When it was subsequently found out that a clause in the Mutiny Act would not have the power, which it had been intended to give it, of making the Act of 1793 general, a separate bill was introduced. That step was so far unobjectionable ; but not so if the object aimed at in the new and separate bill was different from that which was meant to be accom plished by the addition of clauses to the Mutiny Act. How any misapprehension as to the King's opinion sub sequently arose it was not for him to decide ; but he had authority to state that, on the 3d of March, a commu nication was made to his Majesty on the subject, and on the 4th Lord Howick had an audience of him, when his Majesty stated his objections to the measure. Yet, in spite of what had thus fallen from his Majesty, that same evening Lord Howick gave notice of his intention to bring in the bill, and the next evening he actually introduced it into the House of Commons. He fully acquitted that noble lord of intending to assume a permission which had not been granted to him. He was ready to admit that that noble lord had felt convinced in his own mind that nothing had fallen from his sovereign during his audience that precluded him from opening the measure as he had done in his place 234 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1807 in Pariiament. But it was admitted that the ministers soon found that the King had not been made aware of the intended effect of the new bill ; that, as soon as he became acquainted with it, he declared his entire and absolute dis approval of it ;_and that the ministers, finding that it could not be modified so as to answer the purpose for which it had been intended, withdrew it altogether." He proceeded to defend and justify the pledge which the King had required from his late ministers. " In with drawing the bill it appeared that they had made two reserves : first, that they should be at liberty to declare their opinions on the general policy of the measure, as well on the withdrawal of the bill as in the event of the Catholic petition being presented ; secondly, that as a Government they should be at liberty to bring the subject from time to time under his Majesty's consideration, by recommending such measures as they might think proper to be adopted. When any individual," he proceeded to argue, " consents to give up any measure, he has, no doubt, a right to propose conditions : but in this case there were two parties ; and, though the late ministers had a right to propose conditions, the situation of his Majesty was not to be forgotten. He asked their lordships to consider what would have been the situation of the King if he had assented to that proposi tion .' what would have been the effect of such an assent but to divide the unity of the Executive } Would it not be to destroy the constitution, one of the wise maxims of which was that the King could do no wrong, thereby casting a veil over his sacred character 1 Would it not have the effect of casting the whole odium upon his Majesty of resisting the measure, and of giving the whole popularity to his ministers } Was his Majesty to be kept in a con stant state of expectation, waiting till his ministers might think they had a greater power of extorting his consent to it .'' He was not aware of any other alternative his Majesty had when they had refused to withhold the statemeilt of their opinions, or -to make any promise respecting the future, i8o7] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 235 than that which he had adopted. He had authority to state, on the part of his Majestj'-, that the measure which had been brought forward was widely different from that which had been first proposed to him and sanctioned by him. For himself, he could aver that till he had been called upon, in conjunction with Lord Eldon, by his Majesty, he was wholly ignorant of the transaction. But, when he had been so called on, it would have been a base shrinking from his duty if he had not yielded obedience to his sovereign's commands. And he shrank from no responsibility which that obedience had imposed upon him. On the contrary, he maintained that those who shrank from responsibility were Lord Grenville and his late colleagues, who, in order to cloak their own misconduct and absurdities, had so strangely ventured to arraign the personal conduct of his Majesty at their lordships' bar." In these last-quoted sentences Lord Hawkesbury most adroitly took up his strongest ground. If we look at the whole transaction by the light of constitutional principle, and, it might even be said, of common sense, it is difficult to deny that for a privy councillor or minister to pledge himself never under any circumstances to recommend a particular class of measures or line of policy to his sove reign would be plainly inconsistent with that earlier duty to which, on becoming a privy councillor, he had most solemnly bound himself: at all times to tender such advice as he should think for the benefit of both king and kingdom. But exactly in proportion to the strength of this argument does blame attach to Lord Grenville and his colleagues for voluntarily and gratuitously placing them selves in a position in which such a pledge was likely to be demanded of them. The King's demand could not have taken Lord Grenville by surprise, for no one knew better than he that six years before George III. had required a very similar pledge of Pitt, and had parted with even him when he declined to give it. It may be admitted that the King, in doing so, had taken up a false position ; but it was sure 236 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1807 that, under similar circumstances, he would return to it ; and the deeper Lord Grenville's feeling of the unconstitu tional character of such a demand was, the plainer was his duty to avoid provoking his royal master to make it. He had certainly laid himself open to Lord Hawkesbury's charge, that, in his defence of himself for declining to give the promise asked of him, he was in fact arraigning his king ; his conduct in so doing being aggravated by the consideration that it was his own wanton wrongheaded- ness thaf had brought the King and himself into such a situation. The result of the debates showed the feeling of both Houses of Parliament on the general features of the transaction. In the Lords a majority of 81, in the Com mons one of 46, rejected the motions of the Opposition, showing by their votes a resolution to give the new Ministry fair play; the majority being in each instance probably augmented by a feeling of sympathy with the King, and in some degree by a jealousy and distrust of the Roman Catholics, of whom the late ministers and their adherents were from this time forth looked on as the especial champions. Two circumstances were remarkable in the debate and division in the House of Lords ; the first appearance as a speaker of a future Prime Minister, and the extreme fulness of the House. Lord Hawkesbury's report to his father, now sinking under extreme old age, alludes to both : Nothing could go off better than our debate in the House of Lords ; and the division exceeded ray expectations. The House of Lords was never on any forraer occasion so full : the largest number that ever divided before, including proxies, was 229, and the nuraber last night was 261 ; as I hear, within 15 of the whole nuraber that had taken their seats. The debate was, in fact, very good. Lord Aberdeen spoke for the first tirae, and did well. Lord Harrowby made the best speech I ever heard from him. It produced a considerable effect on the House, and evidently galled Lord Grenville particularly. I never heard frora Fox, in the tiraes of his greatest-violence, i8o7] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 237 so factious and mischievous a speech as Grenville's. I do not, however, dread any bad effects from it even in Ireland, as I know, from experience, that sort of speech defeats its own object. There will be another debate in the House of Commons to-morrow, but after the great majority in our House, and the decision of the City, it is not to be apprehended that the minority will increase in numbers. The opinion of the city of London had at that time greater influence than it carries at the present day ; and that body, looking on the struggle between the two parties as turning solely on the concession or rejection of the claims of the Roman Catholics, proclaimed its opinions by an address to the King, thanking him for the support which he had " recently given to the Protestant reformed religion." The feeling was so general throughout the country that the ministers were prompted to avail themselves of it to the utmost ; and, forgetting how they had condemned the dis solution of the previous year, resolved to repeat it, though the existing Parliament had only sat for a single session. As a matter of constitutional practice it cannot be thought justifiable thus to have thrown the whole kingdom into the turmoil of a general election, merely in order to increase their majority by taking advantage of the excitement existing on a particular subject " before the country had time to cool." ' But as a measure of party tactics it suc ceeded perfectly. The new Parliament met in June, and in the debate on the address, though Lord Howick himself moved an amendment, and supported it by one of his most elaborate speeches, in which he travelled over the whole ground of difference between the present and the late Governments, his own conduct, the principles of religious toleration, and the loyalty of the Roman Catholics, he found his adherents fewer by fifty than they had been in the last Parliament, and was defeated by a majority of ' Lord Hawkesbury's expression to his father on announcing to him the intention to dissolve, in the same letter of which an abstract has already been given. 238 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1807 nearly 200 votes. In another division, a few days later, when Mr. Whitbread moved for a committee on the state of the nation, the result was the same : and during the latter part of the session, which did not last quite two months, the Opposition in the House of Commons almost ceased from dividing the House, and in the Upper House Lord Grenville altogether gave up his attendance. And it was well that the Ministry found itself strong. For the address had scarcely been voted when intelligence arrived from the Continent of events which had not only for a time put an end to every prospect of resistance to France by our allies in the east of Europe, but which also threatened to augment our enemies to a very important extent. In the middle of June Napoleon had defeated the Russians in the great battle of Friedland. In itself the victory was not one which ought to have decided a war, for the Russian army engaged was less than 50,000 men ; and had not yielded without inflicting prodigious loss upon their enemies, who were infinitely superior in numbers ; only four months before, when the forces were more nearly equal,' they had fought a drawn battle with the French emperor at Eylau, which, indeed, if their general had not retired the next day, they might have claimed as a victory ; and, if the whole camipaign were taken into con sideration, the French had probably been the greater sufferers. But Alexander, though possessed, as he after wards showed, of both bravery and fortitude, was a vain, impulsive man ; easily offended, easily flattered. He had conceived a great admiration for Napoleon, which was fostered by some of the French conqueror's adroit partisans in the Imperial Court ; he had taken offence at England, ' Alison gives the numbers at Friedland, fought June 14, as on the side of the French 70,000 infantry and ,10,000 cavalry, against 40,000 Russian infantry and 8,000 cavalry ; and at Eylau, fought February 8, as 85,000 (of which nearly 16,000 were cavalry) against 75,000. He does not specify the number of the Russian horse, which, however, were far fewer than the French. But the Russians at Eylau had 460 guns to 350 French. i8o7] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 239 as if it undervalued his alliance because it hesitated to furnish the enormous subsidies which he had not been ashamed to solicit ; and, under the influence of these combined feelings, he now opened a negotiation with Napo leon. Ten days afterwards the two sovereigns had an interview at Tilsit, when they personally arranged a treaty, providing not only for the cessation of the war with one another, but for the co-operation of Russia with France against England ; while by secret articles it was also ar ranged that they should compel Denmark, Sweden, and Portugal to join their confederacy. Throughout the whole war our Foreign Office was admirably served by its agents : when Lord Hawkesbury filled that department the des patches sent or received by the foreign ambassadors in London were lying on his desk copied and deciphered on the very same day that they quitted or arrived in London ; and the duty of procuring the earliest intelligence was not likely to be neglected by so provident and energetic a secretary as Canning. The substance of the Tilsit treaty, secret articles and all, was instantly transmitted to London ; and the Ministry, thus warned in time, lost not a moment in taking steps to protect the country from the new attack which was aimed at it. They were wanting neither in resolution, nor in prompti tude, without which indeed resolution would have been use less. The most important part ofthe secret articles was that by which the new friends agreed to compel Denmark to join them against us ; since Denmark had a powerful fleet which, if added to the naval force of France and Russia, would strengthen them in the arm in which they were weakest, and might prove of no trifling service to the French Emperor in the event of his resuming his project of obtaining the mastery of the Channel with a view to the invasion of our shores. We resolved to prevent that fleet from being so tumed against us. To suppose that Denmark would be able to resist the compulsion intended to be brought to bear on her was impossible. The only safety for ourselves 240 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1807 lay, therefore, in anticipating it; and with this feeling Canning, as Foreign Secretary, proposed to his colleagues to demand of the Danes a temporary surrender of their fleet, a deposit of it in our hands while the war should last, and to support that demand by the despatch of such a force to the Baltic as should both render it impossible for the Danes to refuse it, and excuse them even to Napoleon himself for a submission which would so cruelly derange his plans. His advice was adopted, and carried out with a celerity as admirable as the boldness of the advice. The conference at Tilsit had taken place on the 25th of June ; the treaty founded on it was not actually signed till the 7th of July. On the 27th of the same month a combined force of twenty-seven ships of the line and 20,000 men sailed for the Sound, and in less than a week reached Copenhagen. Unhappily the Danish rulers, though they at once perceived the armament by which our demand was supported to be overpowering, nevertheless thought their honour con cerned in resisting it, and we were compelled to bombard their capital Then when, to satisfy this false point of honour, many houses and much property had been destroyed, and many lives, more valuable than either, had been sacrificed, the Crown Prince yielded. A few of his ships, as not being seaworthy, were destroyed, and the rest, amounting, including gunboats, to above sixty sail, were brought to England. This achievement could not be said to add to our enemies ; in fact the chief reason why it exasperated those who already were such was that it prevented the addition on which they had calculated being made to their number But on the opposite side of the world an occurrence took place which seemed Hkely for a moment to involve us in war with a nation that had only an indirect concern in the war which was raging in Europe. The decrees which the French Emperor had issued, and had compelled his allies to issue, respecting commerce, and the Orders in Council with which Lord Grenville's Government had retaliated, had proved i8o7] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 241 a great obstacle to the carrying trade of the United States. If the question had been looked at fairly, it must have been seen by the most prejudiced observer that France, not England, was the original cause of the vexations which the Americans experienced, since it was Napoleon who had set the example of interference with such matters by the establishment of regulations which there was no pre cedent to justify. But it was England which was chiefly regarded with ill will by the Americans, because, while France was unable to enforce its orders, we both could and did compel the observance of ours ; while another source of disagreement between us was found in the number of British seamen who were serving in ships belonging to the United States, and whom our captains claimed a right to search for and carry off. On one occasion in the early part of this year the advance of this pretension had led to a collision between men-of-war of the two nations, the Leopard, a British 50-gun ship, having fired into the American frigate Chesapeake ; on which the President of the United States, Mr. Jefferson, who was generally under stood to be unfriendly to this kingdom, issued a pro clamation commanding all British ships at once to quit the American harbours, and to abstain from entering them in future. The feeling of our Government on first hearing of this transaction cannot be better shown than in the following extract of a letter from Lord Hawkesbury : The American Government, in consequence of the action be tween the Leopard and the Chesapeake, have issued a procla mation prohibiting the armed vessels of this country from entering their ports or harbours. We have as yet received no official communication on the subject, except a note from Mr. Munro, the American minister here, written, as he avows, without any authority from his Government, but only in con sequence of the notoriety of the transaction. The civilians are of opinion that Admiral Berkeley was not justified in his orders, which authorised the searching a man-of-war for deserters; but that, on the other hand, if there really were VOL. I. R 242 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1807 deserters from our ships in the American service, the Araerican Government were bound, on representation, to discharge them. We are not sufficiently acquainted with all the circumstances of the case to be able to decide on the exact application of these principles to the case itself: but it will be thought right to send a respectable naval force to Araerica, with a minister authorised to enter into explanations on the subject, provided the American Government revoke their prohibitions ; but, in the event of their refusal, with full power to commence hostilities. There appears to exist no doubt that the exclusion of the ships of war of one belligerent frora these ports whilst those of the other are admitted is a violation of neutrality to which the country cannot submit. How this business wiU end it is irapossible to say. An American war, in addition to all our other difficulties, would certainly be an evil at the present moraent ; but experience has proved that we shall not avoid it by unbecoming concessions, and the losses, if it shall occur, will fall more heavily upon the Americans than upon the people of this country. We were certainly very near a war when the minister whom we sent out to negotiate had authority, under cer tain circumstances, to declare it. It was averted for a moment, partly by the exertions of the diplomatists on each side, and partly in consequence of the expiration of Mr. Jefferson's term of office, and of his successor, Mr. Madison, being a man of more pacific temper But the cause of discontent remained. Since we refused to withdraw our Orders in Council, Mr. Madison was com pelled by the public feeling in the United States to maintain the order of his predecessor, known on his side of the Atlantic as the Non-Intercourse Act ; and, as the consequence was the cessation of all traffic between the countries, a mutual animosity was engendered and kept up, till, when Lord Hawkesbury himself was the British Prime Minister, it broke out, as will be mentioned hereafter, in formal war. Matters such as these were not in Lord Hawkesbury's i807] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 243 department, and are mentioned here chiefly because, when Parliament reassembled, it was on him that the task of defending the measures of the entire Government devolved. But the affairs which, during his first months of office, principally caused him trouble and embarrassment, were also such as a Home Secretary is not usually called on to interfere with, and which, if they made no call on his states manlike ability, eminently required those other qualities with which he was endowed, firmness, temper, and courtesy, to enable him to steer through them without discredit or offence. In the preceding summer, under the last Admi nistration, the quarrels between the Prince of Wales and his Princess had acquired a more public notoriety than before, from the Prince bringing against his wife a formal charge of infidelity. In this instance no blame attaches to him, because the reports of her misconduct, and of her having even given the Princess Charlotte a brother, were so rife that to examine into their truth had become a constitutional necessity. The investigation had been entrusted by Lord Grenville to a Commission of four noblemen,' with which no fault could be found but that they all belonged to one party, and that the one with which the Prince himself was politically connected. Their labours were not protracted ; at the end of a few weeks they presented their report, which acquitted the Princess of everything but extreme indiscretion. But when she demanded that her formal acquittal should be ratified by the King admitting her to his Court, from which, while her conduct was the subject of enquiry, she had been excluded, compliance with her demand was eluded under a variety of pretences, which showed how little the Cabi net, which furnished the whole body of Commissioners, exercised the impartiality which it had been, at all events, the first duty of that section of it to observe. It was not till the Princess threatened to publish to the world her ' The Commissioners were Lord Erskine, Lord EUenborough, Lord Grenville, and Lord Spencer, all members of the Whig Cabinet. R 2 244 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1807 own version not only of the recent investigation, but of the recriminatory charges which she conceived herself justified in bringing, and able to establish, against her husband, that Lord Grenville's Cabinet promised that the King should receive her ; and, when they had made the promise, they took care to hinder its fulfilment ; so that, on the accession of the Tories to office, they found the whole affair in the most unsatisfactory state possible. The Princess having been pronounced innocent, but being still treated as if she were guilty, they at once applied them selves to do away with an inconsistency which seemed cal culated to throw a doubt on the equity of the King himself They reported to his Majesty, as their unanimous opinion, that the Princess was, as a necessary result of the report of the Commissioners, entitled to be " admitted, with as little delay as possible into his Majesty's royal presence, and to be received in a manner due to her rank and station in his Majesty's Court." And it was on Lord Hawkesbury that the task devolved of announcing, not only the opinion of the Ministry to the King, but the decision to which the King had in consequence come to both the Prince and Princess. As the resolutions thus adopted were agreeable to no one (not to the King, for the reception of the Princess, under the circumstances, could hardly fail to embarrass and agitate him ; nor to the Prince, who was compelled to acquiesce in the establishment of his wife's innocence, and in her consequent reception at Court ; nor to the Prin cess herself, who must have felt herself, though formally acquitted of criminality, but insufficiently cleared of sus picion, and received at Court rather on sufferance than cor dially or honorably), it was not a very pleasant nor easy task to communicate them to the different parties. But Lord Hawkesbury contrived to execute this difficult and delicate task in such a manner as not to lose the esteem or good will of either. It added to the difficulty of his task that the Prince would not accept the acquittal of the Princess with a good grace., nor abstain from insisting, to the fullest i8o7] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 245 extent, on his right as a father to regulate her intercourse with their daughter ; and that the Princess, with inexpli cable wrongheadedness, gave him some excuse for a part of the restrictions which he placed upon that intercourse by persisting in detaining about her person a boy whom she had adopted, and whose establishment in her house had probably been the origin of the chief accusation which had been brought against her; and, what was almost worse, considering the effect which any agitating circum stances were likely to have on the King's health, both still persisted in addressing themselves to him. The Prince insisted that he, as the sovereign and head of the family, should make himself the channel of communication to announce to the Princess his resolution that she should not visit their daughter at Warwick House, which had been recently fitted up for her, because he looked on it as a part of his own residence, Carlton House, with which, indeed, it had a communication. While the Princess, who had hitherto been living at Blackheath, wrote also to His Majesty, requesting that apartments might be assigned her at St. James's, in order that she might receive more frequent visits from her child ; and the King, though deeply pained and shocked by the whole affair, yet wishing, as a father, to do his best to heal, or at least to veil, the scandal, as far as the case admitted, and being now under the guidance of advisers of real impartiality, complied, in a cer tain degree, with both their requests. He took on himself to write to the Princess to communicate to her the Prince's prohibition of her visits to Warwick House, not conceal ing from either that he " was not to be understood to give his sanction to such a rule, or to admit the reasons which appeared to have influenced the Prince in resolving to establish it." Indeed the deep regret which his letter also expressed, "that the result of the late enquiry had not had the happy effect of restoring personal harmony between the Prince and Princess," was manifestly a reproof to him rather than to the lady. And though he was 246 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1807 unable to comply with her request for apartments at St. James's Palace, which had no rooms suited for the purpose, he promised " to take immediate steps for her accommoda tion in one of the royal palaces," Kensington being in dicated as the most suitable; adding that "a compliance with this request on his part had become the more urgently necessary from the determination taken by the Prince of Wales." In this state the affair rested for some years. And if the settlement thus made had been final, we would gladly have passed over the whole affair in silence ; but at a subsequent period the dispute between the royal pair was revived with the addition of so many fresh circum stances of pain and shame, and such universal notoriety, that suppression is impossible. Even the reputation of the Ministry became concerned in the truth being known ; and nothing is left but to lament the melancholy series of misconduct and perversity by which a family scandal became inseparably connected with the national history. As if no kind of extra official trouble was to be spared Lord Hawkesbury, before the end of the year the French prince, afterwards King Louis XVIII., unexpectedly ar rived in England, travelling under the name of the Count de L'Isle. The circumstances which led to his doing so are best explained by the Count de L' Isle's letter to the King, and by a more detailed statement which he inclosed in a courteous note to Lord Hawkesbury : Letter from Louis XVIII. to the King. , ^ A Yarmouth, ce 2 Novembre, 1867. Monsieur mon Frere et Cousin, Je ne puis laisser passer le premier moment oh je mets pied k terre dans les Etats de Votre Majesty, sans la remercier de I'accueil qu'y revolt le Comte de L'Isle. Je prononce exprfes ce nom, parce que je n'en veux, ni n'en pretends un autre dans ces circonstance.s, ainsi que Votre Majestd en a pu juger par les ddraarches faites en ra8me tems que ma lettre du 16 Octobre i8o7] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 247 lui a €t€ remise. Un jour viendra, j'en ai le ferme espoir, ou, avec I'appui de Votre Majesty et de sa gendreuse nation, je pourrai prendre publiquement le titre qui m'appartient ; mais ce jour n'est pas venu, et en I'attendant il m'est k la fois doux et d'un bien favorable augure d'avoir un sentiment de reconnois sance k exprimer k Votre Majesty. Je prends la libertd de recommander k sa bontd le Comte d'Avaray que je charge de cette lettre, mieux que personne il peut dire k Votre Majestd combien je lui suis sincferement attache. Je prie Votre Majestd d'etre bien convaincue de tous les senti mens avec lesquels je suis, Monsieur mon Frfere et Cousin, &c. &c. Louis. Statement enclosed in a Letter from Louis XVIII. to Lord Hawkesbury. Gosfield, le 18 Novembre, 1807. Je suis parti de Mittau pour rdpondre k une invitation du Roi de Sufede antdrieure au sidge de Stralsund, mais que cette circon- stance ne rendoit pour moi que plus pressante. Le vent m'ayant empechd d'aborder k I'lsle de Riigen, et continuant k me repousser, j'ai pris le parti d'aller relacher k Carlscrone, ou le Roi, k la suite d'une maladie mortelle, m'avoit prdcddd. Dans mes conferences avec ce Prince, il m'a fortement con- seilld de passer en Angleterre. 1°. Pour travailler k dtablir, plus solidement que jamais, avec le ministfere, un accord ferme et permanent, qui seul peut mettre un terme aux malheurs de I'Europe. 2°. Pour andantir les calomnies si favorables k I'usurpation, solddes par elle, et non moins injurieuses k moi-meme qu'k mon fibre, que nous pouvons marcher par des routes divergentes. 3°. Pour examiner par moi-meme les projets et les moyens des chefs ou agents royalistes, et combiner leur travail avec celui d'une classe qui ne mdrite pas moins de fixer I'attention et qui, dans Paris m^me, m'offre ses services. 4°. Pour attacher le de'vouement et Taction de tous les bons Frangois et la mienne propre aux efforts gdne'reux de I'Angleterre. 248 f.IFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1807 S°. Pour jouir de la satisfaction, dtant rduni k mon frfere, a mes neveux et k mes cousins, au milieu de mes serviteurs ras- semblds en Angleterre, d'exprimer k George III et k sa nation ma gratitude de leur noble hospitalitd envers les Frangois fidMes. A ces motifs s'en joignit un autre bien puissant, celui de con fondre les malignes insinuations que je nourris des preven tions contre le Gouvernement Britannique qui m'empechent de m'entendre franchement avec lui. Je ddfdrai done k Tavis de Gustave IV, si conforme k mes propres sentimens. Ce premier point arretd, nous pensames que si je demandois Tagrdment de me rendre en Angleterre, j'occasionnerois plus d'embarras au gouvernement que par une arrivde subite et inattendue. Le Roi de Sufede rae conseilla done ce dernier parti, et me fit conduire par une de ses frdgates, convaincu qu'avec de pareils motifs Tdtroite union qui existe entre Sa Majestd Britannique et lui sauveroit tout ce qu'U pouvoit y avoir d'irrdgulier dans cette marche. Les vents qui ra'avoient tant contrarid sur la Baltique rae retinrent trois seraaines k Gottembourg. Ayant dans cet intervalle acquis la certitude que ma prochaine arrivde dtait connue en Angleterre, et que ddsormais le secret convenu entre Gustave IV et moi dtoit vain, je crus devoir par ddlicatesse meme pour Sa Majeste Britannique ne pas garder plus longtems le silence, et en donnant avis de cette resolution au Roi de Sufede, je confiai k un packet-boat que je supposois devoir arriver plus tot que moi, la lettre du 16 Octobre que je m'etois proposd d'abord de n'dcrire qu'en touchant les cotes de la Grande Bretagne. Dans cette lettre j'ai exposd franchement au Roi les motifs de mon voyage, en parlant k ce Prince le meme langage que j 'ai tenu k tous les souverains et particuUferement k I'Empereur de Russie. Sans m'arreter k rdfuter ici les interpretations donndes dans cer tains papiers k mes projets et k raa conduite, j'ajouterai que j'ai trop de confiance dans Sa Majestd Britannique et dans ses - ¦ Ministres pour ne pas etre certain qu'ils ne m'ont jamais suppose I'intention de vouloir chercher k les entrainer au-delk des mesures dictees par leur sagesse. i8o7] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 249 J'ai regu avec autant de sensibilite que de reconnoissance Toffre que le Roi m'a faite du Palais d'Holyrood pour ma residence et celle de ma farnille. Si j'dtois venu dans I'intention de chercher un asile, je m'en serois ouvert au coeur genereux de George III. Mais ayant laisse ma femme et la Duchesse d' Angouleme en Courlande, des motifs de deiicatesse, et je puis dire de politique generale, que Sa Majeste Britannique et son cabinet peuvent apprecier, expliqueront en ce moment ma conduite. D'aprfes cet expose sincere, et bien convaincu que dans les pre sentes circonstances une grande circonspection est requise, j'attendrai en silence et dans une parfaite securite le moment oh les Ministres croiront utile de se mettre en communication directe avec moi. C'est dans cette resolution, et n'ayant jamais compte resider k Londres, mais ne voulant pas cependant abuser de Tobligeance du Marquis de Buckingham, que je compte sous peu de jours quitter Gosfield et prendre une maison pour Thiver, sans aucun edat, k portde de mes parens, de mes serviteurs et de ceux enfin qu'il m'est important d'ecouter. Je ne puis terminer cette not#sans detruire par des faits la sup position accreditee, que j'avois pretendu redamer le titre et les honneurs de la royaute. Mes instructions k mon frbre et au Comte de la Chatre ; la lettre du Comte d'Avaray k M. d'Adler- berg, en date du 16 Octobre; la mienne au Roi, en date de Yarmouth, retardee par une circonstance particulibre k laquelle je suis etranger, enfin mon refus du salut de la frdgate suedoise en quittant son bord, prouvent suffisamment que, dans ma volonte meme, c'est le Comte de L'Isle, et non le Roi Trfes- Chretien qui est venu descendre en Angleterre. Louis. As his arrival in this country implied an expectation that we should support the expense of his establishment, a duty of hospitality' from which, to the credit of all ' By an account found in Lord Hawkesbury's papers of the next year, 1808, it appears that, from the year 1794 to that time, the sums which had been voted by Parliament for the use of the French emigrants araounted to above two millions and three-quarters of 'money. 250 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1807 be it said, neither party was inclined to shrink, our liber ality gave the Government a right in some degree to dictate the conditions under which it should be exercised ; especially the locality where the Prince's residence should be fixed. The inconveniences which might arise from his taking up his residence in or near London were obvious ; and George IIL himself suggested his with drawal to Scotland, proposing to have Holyrood Palace fitted up for his reception there. Lord Hawkesbury at once made the offer in the king's name. But though, at a later period, and after a second revolution, his younger brother thankfully chose Holyrood for his abode, Louis objected to it now. The Marquis of Buckingham placed one of his country seats at his disposal ; and, after some discussion, the resolution to which the Cabinet finally came was that, though the King had no other palace to offer, the prince might establish himself with his retinue, which was very numerous, in any part of the kingdom, provided it was not within fifty miles of the metropolis. He acquiesced with apparent thankfulness and compla cency, and took up his residence at Gosfield ; but after a time some of his English visitors, apparently to annoy the Ministry, began to represent to him that any re striction on his place of abode or movements was an insulting interference, and to encourage him to disregard it ; and Lord Hawkesbury was compelled to announce that his nearer approach to the capital must be followed by a cessation of all communication between him and the Government. He had other difficulties also. The younger prince. Monsieur, afterwards Charles X. had been for some time in England : and, as soon as Louis arrived, the old jealousies between the two brothers, which had shown themselves so discreditably at Coblentz fifteen years before, were revived. A letter of Lord Liverpool's to his father, written the very week after Louis had landed at Yarmouth, shows how a community in mis fortune had failed to reconcile the brothers ; while the i8o7] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 251 latter part of it throws some curious light oil the affairs of Portugal, which in the ensuing year began to exercise a powerful influence on the affairs of all Europe : We shall still have, I fear, a great deal of trouble with the French king and his attendants. They are at present at Gosfield. The Comte d'Avaray, who is the reputed minister, applied yesterday to be allowed to come to town ; but leave was refused to him. I conclude Monsieur will return in a few days, and we shall then know with more certainty on what we have to rely. I have no doubt of his anxiety to get his brother out ot the country, as far as he can manifest it without indecency. The brothers have always had two distinct parties ; besides, Monsieur would not like to be eclipsed by the presence of his elder brother. The fate of Portugal appears to be still uncertain. The Prince Regent professed his determination, by our last accounts, at all events to send his eldest son to the Brazils. You will be sur prised, perhaps, to hear that the Pope's nuncio at Lisbon has done everything in his power to persuade the Prince Regent himself and the whole royal family to go to the Brazils. He has represented to them in very strong terms the great advan tages that would arise to the Catholic religion from the estab lishment of a powerful Catholic empire in that quarter of the world. The information we have received respecting his advice is undoubted ; but it should be kept secret, for fear of com promising the Pope and his nuncio with Buonaparte. But with his firm refusal to sanction any departure from the conditions laid down by the Cabinet for the French prince's residence among us. Lord Hawkesbury combined such evident sympathy with his position, and such an unmistakeable desire to consult his wishes in every way that did not threaten to open political discussions, which at that time could be neither useful nor seasonable, that Louis gradually learnt to acquiesce with entire cheer fulness in the path marked out for him. The condition as to the distance of his abode from London was slightly relaxed ; and at last he settled quietly at Hartwell, a seat =52 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1807 belonging to the Marquis of Buckingham, near Ayles bury, and reniained there till the train of events, of which the commencement is alluded to in the extract just given from Lord Hawkesbury's letter, replaced him on the throne of his ancestors. Lord Hawkesbury's anticipations that the expedition against Denmark would be made the subject of a formi dable attack by the Opposition were realized as soon as Parliament reassembled. Indeed, it may be said that the Ministry, who were, as they were entitled to be, proud of their conduct in every part of the transaction ; of their vigilance and address in obtaining the earliest intelligence of the Treaty of Tilsit, with the existence and purport of the secret articles ; of the decision and energy which they had displayed in counteracting the aims of their old and new enemies; and of the complete success which had crowned their efforts, challenged the criticism of their opponents by putting a congratulatory and exulting men tion of the enterprise in the very front of the King's speech, and in the address which their adherents in both Houses proposed as a reply to it. It was a bold challenge, because, though they had in their possession a most convincing and irresistible argument in the secret articles, it was one which they were resolved that no consideration of self-justifica tion should tempt them to use ; which indeed they could not use without ensuring the ruin of the agent to whose timely information they were indebted for their knowledge of them ; and with his ruin the destruction to the country of all means of acquiring similar information hereafter. If they withheld that absolute proof of the propriety of their conduct, they must rely for their justification on general policy ; on the knowledge that all who were not wilfully blind possessed of the strength of France, of the weakness of Denmark, and of the way in which the ruler of France was sure, sooner or later, to avail himself of the inability of Denmark, and of all countries situated as Denmark was situated, to resist his commands ; and, above all, on their i8o7] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 253 own characters not only as able statesmen, but as honest men, who would neither assert their knowledge of what they did not know, nor wantonly oppress a nation whose prudence or whose weakness might suggest to it the observance of an honest neutrality, much less one whom there were many reasons to regard as a secret well- wisher. Their conduct was discussed not fewer than three times. First on the address ; again on a motion made by the Duke of Norfolk for papers "to throw more light on the motives which induced the ministers to propose and under take the expedition ;" and lastly on a proposal of Lord Darnley's to address the King with a formal condemnation of the conduct of the Ministry, which was met by Lord Eliot by a motion for an address signifying the highest approval of their " prompt and vigorous measures." But, as on a former occasion, it will be more convenient to look on the different discussions as parts of one prolonged debate. It was somewhat singular that the peer who, on the first occasion, put himself forward as the leader of the Opposition was Lord Sidmouth. But the chief argument on which he rested his condemnation of the Ministry was, in fact, the highest compliment that could be paid to them. He reminded his brother peers of the date of the Treaty of Tilsit, the 7th of July, of the date of the entrance of our irresistible armament into the Baltic, the 3d of August, and he contended that these dates were "alone sufficient to prove that the ministers were not acting upon any in formation which they had obtained of the secret engage ments entered into between France and Russia ; and in which they would have it understood that Denmark con curred." The ministers had never alleged or supposed that Denmark had concurred, or had been invited to concur, in the secret articles ; they merely affirmed, what was patent to the meanest comprehension, that Denmark was not strong enough to refuse an invitation which was likely to be pressed on her by neighbours of a strength so dispropor- 254 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATIOiV [1807 tioned to her own. But Lord Sidmouth's denial that their act of the 3d of August, or rather of a week earlier (since, as has been mentioned before, it was on the 27th of July that our expedition sailed), could possibly have been the consequence of their knowledge of a transaction which was only completed at a great distance from our shores on the 7th of the same month, did in fact only prove that. Prime Minister though he had been, he was still utteriy ignorant of the resources which, at such a crisis, energetic rulers could put forth to obtain information ; and that he was still more unable to appreciate or even believe in the vigour and promptitude with which men desenring the name of statesmen, deserving to have the destinies of a nation committed to their care, can act on intelligence, however unexpected. Lord Grenville in one respect even went beyond Lord Sidmouth, for in the debate on the address he ventured to allege that, when "the ministers had asserted that there were secret articles in the Treaty of Tilsit, affecting the interests of this country, and the French had asserted that there were none, that denial of the French Government was a challenge, and it was incum bent upon ministers to prove their assertion; and that, as they had not attempted to prove it, they had given it up." It was easy to demolish an antagonist who could make it a charge against the ministers that they had not chosen to give formal satisfaction and proof to an enemy of the truth of their assertions, when the very act of which he was complaining was founded on the circumstance that he required no proof from us, but had it in his own possession ; when in fact the very ability to give the proof demanded of itself made the proof unnecessary. And in the very same breath Lord Grenville admitted that "it was laid down by the most approved writers on the law of nations that, where you had certain evidence of the intention of an enemy to seize upon a neutral territory, neutral vessels, or property (such neutral being incapable of resisting), and thereby to place you in imminent danger, you have a right i8o7] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 255 to seize such neutral territory, vessels, or property, in order to ensure your own safety." Lord Hutchinson, a general officer who had been employed on a mission to the court of the Czar at the time, joined in the attack on the Ministry, though the chief reason he alleged for his opinion was a singular one, being founded on the great indignation which Alexander had expressed at our conduct. Lord Moira also condemned it, arguing that Denmark would have persisted in maintaining its neutrality, and that neither France nor Russia could " have followed them to the island of Zea land," to compel them to abandon it ; and Lord Grey, after adopting this opinion from Lord Moira, followed Lord Gren ville in another argument, and asserted that dates proved "that it was morally and physically impossible that the declaration put into the mouth of the King could be true," or that the order for the expedition against Denmark could have been the consequence of the Treaty of Tilsit. He, too, dwelt on the displeasure with which the Emperor of Russia had viewed our conduct ; and pronounced that the ministers only refused to give "precise information because they felt that they had immolated the honour of their country ; " and Lord Erskine, it may be almost said, went further than he in the positiveness with which he took on himself to deny that any information about the secret articles had ever been received at all. One more speaker on the same side deserves to be noticed, because he was the nephew of Fox, and would have been his successor at the Foreign Office if it had been thought judicious by his party to be guided by the partiality of the dying statesman in a matter of such importance. He not only endorsed all the allegations of former speakers that " the ministers were incapable of supporting the assertions which they had put into the King's speech by the least shadow of evidence;" but also ventured on the declaration that, even if France had succeeded in overbearing Denmark's resolution to preserve a neutrality, the acquisition of the Danish fleet could have been of no service to her ; could neither have 256 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1807 materially injured this country, nor increased our danger of invasion. Against this combined attack of many parties the ministers had the aid of the great statesman who, by his own foresight and energy, had greatly extended and strengthened our dominion in India ; and was therefore pre-eminently qualified to appreciate such qualities in the Home Government, the Marquis Wellesley. He reviewed the whole scheme of Napoleon's policy, his hatred of Eng land ; laying it down as an undeniable proposition that the battle of Friedland, and its result, the alliance between France and Russia, would, beyond " all question, lead to his immediately turning his whole power against ourselves ;" and contended that no proof could be wanted of " his in tention to destroy and annihilate our independence, nay, our very existence as a nation." But, besides that the present narrative is concerned chiefly with the language of Lord Hawkesbury, we may the more fitly confine ourselves to his speech on this occasion, because it was the one which entered most closely into what may be called the personal defence of the ministers. He disdained to notice with any particular refutation the arguments by which his opponents had attempted to show that the expedition to the Baltic had not been really decided on in consequence of the transactions at Tilsit. He took, as became the organ of the Government, the high ground that "what his Majesty's speech stated as a fact they were bound to believe. It was not unusual for Pariia ment to act upon a fact distinctly stated to them by the ministers of the Crown ; and they had a right to have their statements as to a matter of fact accepted with confidence. But in this instance the truth of those statements had been corroborated by others than the ministers themselves. It had been corroborated by the Portuguese Government, which, before the result of the expedition to Copenhagen was known, the allies of Tilsit had required to make common cause with them against England, and to unite its i8o7] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 257 fleet to theirs, in order that the confederacy might thus be enabled to make a general attack on these islands. It was confirmed by the testimony of different persons in Ireland, where, strange to say, all the designs and projects of the enemy were most speedily known, and where it was promised that the combined fleets of Spain, Portugal, and Denmark would make a descent on both the British islands." He skilfully availed himself of Lord Grenville's admission that there might be circumstances in which our own personal safety would justify a disregard of the strict rights of a neutral nation which wanted the power requisite to enable it to preserve its neutrality, and affirmed that the whole case rested on the answers to be given to these questions : " i. Whether the House believed that there was a design on the part of the enemy to form a great maritime confederacy against this country, and to seize the fleet of Denmark to effect this purpose .' 2. Whether it was practicable for him to carry this design into execution either by absolute force or intimidation .' 3. Whether the object was of sufficient magnitude and importance to justify a deviation from the ordinary rules of proceeding .-' As to the first question, even without the Treaty of Tilsit and its secret articles, no one could possibly doubt the intention of the present ruler of France. He never concealed it. It was expressly stated in the official journals of that country. As to the second, the present unexampled condition of the Continent was an equally undeniable proof of his power to form such a confederacy. The events of the last two years, which had prostrated at his feet all Austria, Russia, and Prussia, had left no power on the Continent to which Denmark could look for the slightest support, and had produced a state of affairs which no one, whether states man or political writer, had ever witnessed or imagined before. It was idle to speak of Denmark as able to resist the compulsion which France might desire to put upon her, because there might be difficulties in the way of pouring a French army into Zealand from Holstein. The Crown VOL. I. S 258 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1807 Prince himself had confessed that in 1801 Denmark had no means of resisting the demands of Russia. How then could it be seriously pretended that she could now resist Russia and France united .? When both these questions were thus answered, when it was admitted or proved that France had the desire to form a confederacy against us, and the power to compel Denmark to join it, the answer to the third question, turning on the importance of the object attained by our expedition, could be no matter of doubt. The expedition had at once disabled an entire fleet in so advanced a state of preparation that in six weeks it was got ready for service. It was therefore necessary for safety. It had been adopted and carried out with a celerity the Opposition might not be able to appreciate ; but that celerity was indispensable to its success. To have given an hour Xo preliminary negotiation before despatching our fleet would have shown the enemy that their intentions were discovered, and would have thus enabled them at least to increase our difficulties, if not altogether to baffle out exertions. Lord Hutchinson had alleged that our pro ceedings had excited a general feeling of disgust through out Europe. Lord Hawkesbury denied it. Had it dis gusted Sweden, where the King still preferred our alliance .' or Portugal, whose Court still looked on us as its only pro tectors .' He would even venture to ask. Had it even offended the nation of Russia ? For there also, as he was informed by credible witnesses, the mass of the people considered our act as a necessary measure of self-defence. No doubt those nations which were under the domina tion of France were obliged to express whatever sentiments the ruler of France thought fit to prescribe for them. Finally, he affirmed that the safety not only of this nation, but of the whole world, had required the measure which we had adopted. Nothing prevented France from acquiring universal dominion but the naval power of Great Britain. That alone formed the security of the whole globe. It was indeed no ordinary step that had been taken ; but was it i8o7] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 259 an ordinary situation of affairs when, except France, we ourselves were the only independent nation in Europe 1 Two sources of the power of the enemy had been intended to be the navy of Denmark and the navy of Portugal. They were both happily removed out of his grasp. Those who formed a correct estimate of the power of France, and considered at the same time that personal preservation was the first law of nature, must agree that the ministers had averted a great danger from the country, and, in doing so, had acted with all the mildness that the case permitted." Apart from the cogency of the speaker's arguments, their manly tone, and the distinctness with which he rested his cause, in the first place, on the ministers' right to expect complete reliance on their assurance that they had received such and such information from a trustworthy source, was well calculated to win the favour of his hearers. And to such a degree did he carry the House with him that his opponents could barely muster fifty votes to support them in their attack upon the Ministry, which they now therefore found they had strengthened rather than injured. Among the statements which Lord Hawkesbury had advanced in confirmation of the accuracy of their intel ligence one was, that the junction of the Danish with the French fleet for the invasion of this kingdom had been expected in Ireland ; and a great portion of his attention throughout the year was occupied by the condition of that part of the kingdom, where the agitation which had hitherto shown itself in occasional feverish outbreaks was now acquiring a settled organization and a permanent character, which even the concession of its original demand for emancipation has not yet extinguished. Its first osten sible object was one in which religion and politics were mingled ; Catholic emancipation, to use the brief and comprehensive term by which it was usually described. But with this another soon became combined, and the lower classes, who were nearly all Roman Catholics, had learnt to be almost equally eager for the transfer of their S 2 26o LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1807 allegiance to France. As early as the middle of the pre ceding summer some of the resident officers of the Govern ment in Dublin had reported to Lord Hawkesbury that " the whole middle and lower class in Ireland was de cidedly hostile to the Government and to the English connexion ; that the people, even the labouring poor, talked and thought of nothing but Buonaparte's successes on the Continent, and relied with certainty on his invading their country and separating it from England ; the poor saying that they could not lose, and that they believed they should gain, by the change." And a fresh association was formed to promote both objects, the attainment of civil equality and the French invasion, by a system of outrage and terror. The members took the name of " the Liberty Rangers," announcing their resolution to be " to effect all that the Croppies had failed to achieve in the year 1798." The higher classes among the Roman Catho lics were not, except perhaps in very rare instances, ac quainted with the treasonable part of these designs, but they were so intemperate in their prosecution of emancipation that one gentleman, a Mr. Keogh of Mountjerome, openly denounced the warmest and ablest of their advocates in Parliament, Curran, the Irish Master of the Rolls, and Grattan, whose name requires no further description, for treachery to their cause, because they had expressed dis approval of the violence of the language which they intro duced into an intended petition. In such a posture of affairs it was necessary to strengthen the hands of the Executive in Ireland by measures of military precaution, since any steps in the direction of indulgence or liberty would be liable to be misinterpreted and ascribed to fear, if the Government did not first show itself able to put down disaffection with the strong hand. It happened that the two colleagues whose departments most closely connected them with the Home Secretary on these subjects were both Irishmen ; Lord Castlereagh was Secretary at War, Sir Arthur Wellesley was Secretary for i8o7] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 261 Ireland. The latter had also been a member of the Irish House of Commons. And the intimate acquaintance which both necessarily had with the country peculiarly qualified them to judge of Lord Hawkesbury's plans. One part of these was calculated at once to meet the danger of an out break at home, and of invasion from abroad. He suggested the propriety of fortifying some of the most important and most assailable points, especially Cork and Dublin ; and Cork he proposed to make a large military depot, a step which, as he pointed out to Wellesley, the situation of the town would hereafter make " very convenient for the des patch of speedy and secret reinforcements to any armies that might be employed anywhere to the westward or the southward." It is a singular coincidence that Sir Arthur himself subsequently proved to be the general whose army derived the greatest advantage from this piece of foresight. As a member of Addington's Adminstration Lord Hawkes bury had devoted a great deal of attention to increasing the efficiency of the London police. He had resumed the task when he returned to office ; and he now wrote to Wellesley to recommend him without delay to take measures for assimilating the police in Dublin, and if possible in the other great towns of Ireland, to that of Westminster, entering into the minutest details with a precision which no one was better able to appreciate than his correspondent, and to which indeed he could find a close resemblance in his own habits. And besides, and as a sort of counterbalance to these measures of repression. Lord Hawkesbury had in contem plation others which could not fail to be regarded as favours and indulgences by the Roman Catholics, if they would compare what was offered, not with any imaginary con cessions which might be required to place them on a footing of equaHty with the Church of England, but with what they had hitherto enjoyed, and with what was necessary for the full efficiency of their Church in Ireland. He proposed to augment the grant which had hitherto been calculated 262 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1807 to support 200 students at Maynooth, by a sum sufficient to increase that number by a fourth ; while, at the same time, since nothing was further from his intention than to favour or promote the vigour of one Church at the expense of the other, he desired Sir Arthur to procure him, re specting the " existing establishment of Protestant charter schools," which was said to be very defective, " such infor mation as might enable the Government to take judicious steps for improving their organization and extending their usefulness ; steps which it was especially incumbent on them to take at " a time when they were contemplating so large an increase of an institution for the education of Catholics." It was to a certain extent as a measure accep table to the professors of both the Church of England and the Roman Catholic forms that he finally desired Sir Arthur to consult the Primate, the Lord Chancellor, and any other persons of sufficient judgment and authority, on the possi bility of devising some satisfactory measure for the com mutation of tithes : always " bearing this in mind, that no system of commutation ought for a moment to be enter tained that did not give to the clergy the same security which they enjoyed at the present moment ; that is, the security of the land." The measure last mentioned was unavoidably postponed for many years ; but it is no slight proof of Lord Hawkes bury's sagacity, that when tithes were at last commuted, both in England and Ireland, the principle on which the commutation was effected was that indicated in the letter of instructions from which this extract has been quoted. The majority of the other measures were at once carried out ; but it cannot be said that they were followed by the consequences which they deserved of allaying disaffection. On the contrary, the willingness shown by the Ministry to make some concessions rather encouraged the Roman Catholic priesthood to insist on more. And in one instance, that of allowing the King a veto on the appointment of Roman Catholic bishops, which the chief authorities of i8o7] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 263 their Church had previously consented to sanction, they played fast and loose with their own supporters, repudiating conditions to which they had formally agreed, in a manner which drew down a warm denunciation of their bad faith from so steady a partisan of their cause, on the general principles of toleration, as Lord Grey. Yet, in spite of the notorious disloyalty of the bulk of the Irish Roman Catholics at that time, of the equally undeniable bad faith of their prelates and leaders, and in spite too of his own knowledge of the unalterable resolution of the King to consent to no relaxation of the existing laws on the subject. Lord Grenville thought every conside ration so secondary to that of embarrassing the Govern ment that he again presented a petition from the Roman Catholics, and moved for referring it to a committee ; supporting his motion by the same arguments that he had used before ; and unfortunately provoking Lord Hawkes bury to rest his opposition to it still more positively and emphatically than before on a principle from which he could hardly depart or swerve. He now affirmed his " conviction that a Protestant Government alone was consistent with the laws and constitution of the British empire," and maintained that the oath which barred the Houses of Par liament and the great offices of State against the Roman Catholics was "a test with which, consistently with the security of the Protestant Government and Protestant Establishment, it was impossible to dispense." In one important particular, that of union, the Roman Catholics were stronger than they had been before, as those in England, who had hitherto held aloof from their Irish brethren, had now come to the resolution of combining with them, and despatched an agent to Ireland to arrange a system of co-operation.' But it did not assist them in ' Sir A. Wellesley, who communicated this fact to Lord Hawkesbury, makes a curious comment on it : " The Irish appear to hope to derive some advantage from this union of interests, of which it can only be said that, if it should be made, it will inoculate them with more 264 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1807 the Parliamentary divisions. Lord Grenville was defeated by eighty-seven ; and in the House of Commons, where a motion similar to his was brought forward by Grattan, and enforced in one of his finest speeches, even Canning, who was as favorable to the principle of emancipation as Pitt had been, spoke and voted against it, though his reasons were founded solely on the unreasonableness of pressing a request, however reasonable, at a time when those who urged it knew a compliance with it to be impracticable. If, as with the history of the next twenty years before us it seems impossible to doubt, the long postponement of the settlement of so agitating a question was a great misfortune, those who opposed it, like Lord Hawkesbury, are scarcely more responsible or blameable for the protraction of the agitation than those professed champions of the Roman Catholics who, by their untimely and factious advocacy, drove their opponents to rest their opposition to their claims on grounds from which it was hardly possible for them to recede with plausibility, or even decency. Scotland had long ceased to cause anxiety to its governors from the same causes as Ireland ; but, perhaps from the necessity under which the Government had at one time found itself of lavishing the public money among the chieftains of the clans, there was no quarter of the King's dominions in which jobbery was more rife. And an attempt to induce Lord Hawkesbury to countenance what was delicately called an arrangement, though unimportant in itself after the transaction was over, seems worth pre serving from the broad principles which it led him to announce as his rule in the dispensation of patronage, in which, as will be seen hereafter, when he became the head of the Government, few ministers have ever been equally scrupulous. Some changes in the organization of the chief courts of judicature were contemplated, and in con- religion, and may have the effect of moderating their party violence ; at all events it will give us an additional channel for knowing their secrets." i8o7] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 265 nexion with them one of the chief judges wished to retire, endeavouring to make a stipulation not only that he should receive a pension, to which from his length of service he was amply entitled, but that the vacancy on the judicial bench should be filled by his own son ; and great interest, of the kind which is apt to be most influential with ministers, was exerted to induce their compliance with this condition. In reply to this proposal Lord Hawkesbury writes : " There will be every disposition to consider the claims of Mr. at a proper opportunity, but we are convinced that it is of the utmost importance, with a view to the new system of judicature which is about to be intro duced in Scotland, that any arrangement which grows out of it should be free from even the appearance of any personal object, and should rest exclusively on public grounds. I have no difficulty, therefore, in saying that if Mr. 's claims to the bench were equal, in all respects, to those of any other person at the bar in Scotland, it would be more advisable, even in that case, that his pretensions should be postponed till another vacancy. I am confident that, if the bench of judges in England enjoys a degree of respect and confidence which it possesses in no other country, it owes it in a great measure to the scrupulous delicacy which prevails in all the arrangements respecting it ; and I can say from my own knowledge that ever since the union with Ireland the same principles have been adopted with respect to the courts of justice in that country as have been found by experience so beneficial in England." A few months later he had to withstand some peculiarly pressing solicitations of the same kind in England from a supporter whom it was especially difficult to refuse, and his language was that, in all cases of a vacancy on the judicial bench, " the person best qualified, whoever he might be, would be appointed, without any regard to favour or political arrangement." And in a similar spirit, when two prelates of noble birth and great family influence were entreating their translation to more lucrative sees, he wrote 266 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1807 to the Lord Lieutenant to disregard both their claims. " He was only anxious," he said, ^' for the most proper person, and the most creditable appointment." He sug gested the name of another bishop, wholly unknown to himself, solely on the ground of his reputation " as a hard working prelate and a considerable scholar," adding what, if it had been known, might have led to gome diminution of the solicitations on these subjects, that " the fact of his not having applied for promotion, if it were right to call it such, was, in his judgment, no objection whatever ; on the contrary, if he was the proper person, rather a recom mendation," i8o8] OF LORD LIVERPOOL, 267 CHAPTER VIII. Napoleon's invasion of the Peninsula— Sir A. Wellesley is sent to Portugal — Commencement of the Peninsular War — Lord Grenville's attack on our policy in engaging in that war — Death of the first Lord Liverpool— Lord Liverpool's defence of the Ministry — Conduct of the French princes — Lord LiverpooTs memorandum on the Wal cheren expedition — Quarrel between Lord Castlereagh and Canning — Resignation of the Duke of Portland — Letter from Mr. Perceval — He becomes Prime Minister — Lord Liverpool becomes Secretary of State for War and the Colonies — He recommends the evacuation of Walcheren — Contest for the Chancellorship of Oxford — Lord Liverpool's views as to the maintenance of the Peninsular War, and his letter to Lord Wellington. The autumn of 1808 had seen the commencement of a new stage of the war. After the battle of Friedland all Europe to the east of the Rhine was prostrate at the feet of Napoleon, and he was thus left at leisure to direct his attention to the countries on the other side of France, beyond the Pyrenees. Neither of the Peninsular kingdoms was in a condition to make a long resistance to his first attack. The royal family of Portugal fled frora Lisbon to take refuge in their Araerican dominions, and even before the close of 1807 the French marshal Junot led an army across the frontier, and, meeting with no resistance, in a few days made himself master of the whole country. At the beginning of 1808 a second French army invaded Spain ; Charles IV. abdicated the throne in favour of his son, who was first proclaimed King as Ferdinand VII. ; was next persuaded by Murat, Napoleon's brother-in-law, to enter 268 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1808 France for the purpose of a conference with the French Emperor ; and was then seized, and compelled to resign all pretensions to the throne ; while the crown, which he could scarcely be said to have worn, was transferred to Napoleon's brother Joseph. That prince had not long before been invested with the kingdom of Naples by the same autho rity; and, in order that Murat too might wear a diadem, was now transferred, not altogether with his own consent, to Madrid. But the Spaniards did not acquiesce in the new dynasty as easily as the Neapolitans. Fallen as they were from their ancient heroism and renown, they had yet honour enough left to resent the shameless trickery of which their sovereigns, however unworthy they had shown themselves, had been the victims, and courage sufficient to rouse them to defy the invader of their own rights, the usurper of their king's prerogatives. Their first steps in the way of resistance were singularly successful. It was hardly a month after Joseph had been recognised by the Notables as their king, when, on the 21st July, a French army was surrounded at Baylen, and compelled to an inglorious capitulation ; while in Portugal events were equally un favourable to the common enemy. The overthrow of the two Peninsular kingdoms without a shadow of pretext for hostilities had kindled a flame of universal indignation throughout Britain. The very pusillanimity and imbecility of the sovereigns had augmented our sympathy for the people. The moment that intelligence reached our shores of the rising of the Spaniards against their new rulers, we determined on aiding them, and a small force was placed under the command of Sir A. Wellesley, who, by his skilful management of the attack on Copenhagen, had shown that his military genius was not confined to the requirements of Indian warfare. A fortnight after Dupont had surrendered at Baylen, Wellesley landed in Mondego Bay, between Oporto and Lisbon. Before the end of August he had defeated Junot . in one skirmish and one i8o8] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 269 pitched battle, and had the means at his command for driving him in ignominious retreat out of Portugal, when fresh commanders arrived from England, to prevent his reaping the full harvest of fame which he had deserved. They preferred negotiations to the vigorous pursuit which he recommended : but even their diplomacy, feeble as it was, compelled the French to evacuate Portugal, and to leave the Russian fleet, which had sailed to the Tagus to co-operate with them, to become our prize. The generals were all recalled, and the army was placed under the com mand of Sir John Moore, who in the course of the auturan received reinforcements which emboldened him to under take measures of active offence. Leaving one division for the protection of Portugal, he advanced into Spain with the reraainder, in the hope of being able to aid the citizens of Madrid, who were making enthusiastic preparations for the defence of their capital. But the check which his arms had received was sufficient to bring Napoleon him self across the Pyrenees ; and the forces which he as sembled were so overpowering in number that he had no difficulty in compelling the British general to retreat. Nor was it without sorae difficulty and hardship that, with sadly diminished numbers, Moore reached the harbour of Corunna. There he turned to bay, repulsed Soult, to whom Napoleon had entrusted the last stages of the pur suit, in a hard-fought battle, in which he purchased the victory at the cost of his own life, while the discomfiture of the enemy enabled the array to re-embark in safety. It returned to England ; but the success of Wellesley in the autumn, and even the importance which Napoleon had been seen to attach to Moore's operations, premature as they were, plainly showed to the rainisters that they had at length found a field on which the British arraies could act with advantage to the comraon cause. And they resolved to send Wellesley back to Portugal, which he himself pronounced to be the fittest country for the base of his operations. He reached the Tagus at the latter end 270 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1809 of April, 1 809, and from that time the history of the war, as far as England was concerned, is identified with his career of steady progress and unbroken triumph. But if Lord Grenville had been listened to, those campaigns, the most glorious in the records of the British army, would never have been commenced. The instant that Parliament met, he took the opportunity of denouncing the conduct of the Ministry, both in its past acts and its present pro jects. In the autumn Napoleon and Alexander had trans mitted to this country a joint proposal for the restoration of peace, in language which showed the resolution of the French ruler to retain his hold upon Spain, and of the Russian Emperor to assist him to the utmost in so doing ; the Spaniards, who were in arms for the rights of their native sovereign, being characterised as insurgents. We refused to enter into a negotiation which should involve the abandonment of their cause ; and though Lord Gren ville admitted the insincerity of Napoleon's proposals, he nevertheless pronounced our implied demand, that he should withdraw his brother from the Spanish throne, as " unreasonable." The further maintenance of a British force in the Peninsula he pronounced to be a " committal of the country to a hopeless contest, in which success could not be the reward of valour." Nor were the consequences to be limited to the disasters of our army. " He had no hesitation in declaring that, if the system hitherto acted on were to be further pursued, the destruction of this monarchy was inevitable, and that we should soon be reduced to the same condition with Prussia and the con quered states of the Continent." The history of Parliamentary faction has preserved but few instances of any one who made any pretence to states manship committing himself to a prophecy which the event so signally falsified ; and the Secretary of State, who by the recent death of his father had now become Earl of Liverpool, had no difficulty in convincing the House that his own view of the state of affairs was the more 1 809J OF L ORD LI VERPO OL. 271 sound when he affirmed, in express contradiction of the preceding speaker's opinion, that "it was difficult to con ceive any situation which would better warrant hopes of ultimate success than that of Spain at the present day. The people were unanimous in their resistance to the invader, and it was the only instance since the first outbreak of the French Revolution in which a whole people had taken up arms in their own defence, while the Country itself pos sessed many local advantages in favour of the natives and their allies against any invader." He was at least equally supported by the general feeling both of his brother peers and of the nation at large, when he contended that the ground on which we had rested our recent rejection of the French and Russian proposals, namely, a refusal to admit that the Spaniards, who were in arms for their hereditary sovereigns, were insurgents, and that Joseph Buonaparte was thfe legitimate King of the country, was the only ground consistent with the honour and reputation of the country. In fact, on neither of the occasions when Lord Grenville pronounced his condemnation of the conduct of the Govern ment did he venture to invite the judgment of the House by a division. And the ftext attack on the policy of the Government came from Lord Grey. He was hardly as comprehensive in his condemnation of it as his colleague, who had "declared sincerely that not one measure had been adopted by the ministers which, had he been in thdr situation, he would have thought it right to resort to." But he was bolder even than he ; for he ventured to deliver his opinion on matters of military science and on the generalship of Wellesley, condemning him even for the victory of Vimiero, on the ground that to fight a battle at all was " to incur a hazard which he ought not to have done." And he summed up his view of all the transactions in the Peninsula in an address, in which he proposed to represent to the King that " disgrace had been brought on his Majesty's councils, and injury sustained by the British fempire : that nO just view had been taken 272 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1809 of the political situation of either Spain or Portugal : . . . . nor had any due attention been paid to the supply of those means which alone could have enabled the British armies to act with a reasonable hope of success." Lord Liverpool, as he had ventured to do even when Pitt was the assailant, met the attack on the Government boldly, in the directest manner, admitting their entire responsibility ; and invited the judgment of the House and of the country on every part of their conduct. Lord Grey " had declared it to be his opinion that ministers ought to have waited to ascertain the probability of the success of the cause of patriotism in Spain, before they offered the Spaniards assistance. What .' when the feeling of resistance was so strong and so general in Spain, would it have been honorable to the British character to say to the gallant Spaniards : ' We will not give you aid while you are in want of it, while your efforts at emancipation are in infancy. We will defer our assistance till you are in full strength, and have no need of it Y Had such been the language of the ministers, they would indeed have deserved the reprobation of every man in the country. It was remarkable that each individual who censured their con duct had a plan of his own ; but none of these plans had a single principle of agreement with each other, a fact which showed the greatness of the difficulties under which the ministers themselves must have laboured in forming their own plans. But, with respect to the plan which they had adopted, he undertook to establish two points : firstly, that it was the most wise and expedient that could have been adopted in the view in which cir cumstances at first presented themselves ; and also that it had been pursued with the utmost steadiness and firm ness, and with eminent success : and, secondly that, even after fuller information was obtained of the state of the Peninsula, no other place could have been sub stituted which promised greater advantages." He entered into a detailed explanation of the object for which Sir i8o9] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 273 A. Wellesley had been sent to Portugal ; and showed that the very circumstance of their so employing him before they had received the minute details of the posture of affairs in that country, for which Lord Grey would have had them wait, of itself justified their conduct in the other point of which he had complained of it, namely, in leaving large discretionary powers to the general. Indeed any general entrusted with the safety of an army in a distant country was entitled to have confidence re posed in him, and a large discretion left to him. And he reminded the House that the Gallician Junta had declared that the general's first object, even in the interest of Spain, should be the expulsion of the French from Portugal Lord Grey had taken on himself to condemn Wellesley for fighting and defeating the French at Vimiero. " He could say with truth of that gallant officer, that he had been influenced by his public duty alone. And it would be superfluous now to repeat any eulogy on his campaign, which in thirteen days had compelled the enemy to evacuate Portugal. Lord Grey had also denounced the Ministry for having provided their general with an insufficient force of cavalry. He forgot not only the difficulty of procuring at a moment's notice any great quantity of transports for the conveyance of horses ; but, what was still more material, he forgot also the nature of the country in which the army was to serve. In the centre of Spain cavalry could act, but not in the maritime provinces of either country. And so rauch was this the case that, when Sir John Moore was retreating, he was forced to separate the cavalry from the infantry because the best route for the infantry was one by which supplies for the cavalry could not be conveyed ; and the march of the infantry was delayed owing to the necessity of bringing forward the cavalry in small detachments. Un doubtedly the Spaniards had met with reverses and mis fortunes. Ministers had not been so weak, so destitute of foresight, as to expect that their first efforts would be VOL. L T 274 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1809 crowned with unqualified success. That would have been to calculate on impossibilities. But these reverses had not been owing to their indifference to the cause, or to their want of courage. They were rather to be imputed to their want of discipline and military experi ence, and to an ill-judged contempt of the enemy." He was equally decided in his defence of Sir John Moore's operations ; venturing even on the assertion that that officer's advance, " regarded as a diversion, had completely succeeded ; and that he in his conscience beHeved that forward movement had saved Spain.'' He was probably alone in this opinion at the time, but, since he spoke, it has been corroborated by the soundest military critics, who have looked on the march into Castile as a proof of great strategical ability. Finally the speaker challenged the verdict of Parliament on the past campaign as a whole. "By it we had gained possession of the Russian fleet, while our own had been relieved from the tediousness and difficulties of a blockade. We had materially assisted the cause which we undertook to support. And, though Buonaparte had 200,000 men in that country ; though his troops were of the bravest, his generals among the most skilful in the world, he had not yet succeeded in subduing Spain. It had been said a year before that Buonaparte was so placed that partial success would be almost as prejudicial to him as failure. But partial success was all that he had met with ; for he had not yet got possession of more than half of Spain, and in the other districts the hostility of the people was as fierce as ever. Upon the whole, I have the satisfaction,'' concluded the speaker, " in common with my colleagues, to reflect that, whatever may be the results of the struggle we are embarked in, we have not lost the confidence of the Spanish people. We know that every Spanish heart beats high for their country ; we know that, whatever shall happen, they will not accuse us. Submission may be the lot they are fated to endure in the end ; but they do not impute to us the i8o9] OF LORD LIVERPOOL, 275 cause of their misfortunes. They are sensible that neither the thirst after commerce, nor territory, nor security, has been the motive of the assistance we have offered them on this important occasion. Whatever may be the results, we have done our duty. We have not despaired ; we have persevered, and will do so to the last, while there is anything left to contend for with the slightest prospect of eventual success." It was an argumentative and manly defence, and it had its deserved recognition in a decisive majority. Lord Grey was aided by Lord Grenville, by Lord Sidmouth, and his steady adherent Lord Buckinghamshire, by all, in fact, who hoped to rise to office if the proposed address should be carried ; but in an unusually full House he was beaten by above fifty votes, and the ministers were thus left at liberty to follow out their own designs for the deliverance of the Peninsula from the eneray's grasp. In April, as has been already stated, Wellesley sailed once more for that country, which he only quitted to cross the Pyrenees as the invader of France, after Victor, Massena, Ney, Marmont, Jourdain, and Soult had all proved alike unable to check his career of victory ; and so corapletely had Lord Liverpool estab lished his raastery over his Opponents that when, later in the session, he brought down a message from the King to Parliament, desiring the Houses to enable hira to furnish a loan to the Prince Regent of Portugal, the Whigs would not venture to do more than put up the Duke of Norfolk and Lord Buckinghamshire to utter a feeble murmur of discon tent, and the raoney was granted with apparent unanirait)^. A Cabinet has seldom had its firraness rewarded with such speedy and decisive success as attended the resolution of the present Ministry to prosecute its own plans of war without being turned aside by the clamours of faction. Even now a generation accustomed to look on the pre eminence of WeUington as an indisputable fact can hardly avoid marvelling at the rapidity and completeness of his first triumphs. It was the 22d of April when, after a T 2 276 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1809 stormy and dangerous voyage, he cast anchor in the Tagus. On the 1st of May he moved towards the northern pro vinces, on his way defeating one or two French generals in trifling actions. On the 13th he surprised Soult in Oporto, and drove him and his army from the city in ignominious retreat, which was also so sudden and unex pected that he himself ate the dinner which had been pre pared for the French marshal. By the iSth he had chased him out of Portugal as he would gladly have chased Junot the year before ; then, without a moment's delay returning to the south, he pushed on up the Tagus into Spain, with the view of relieving the northern provinces by alarming Soult for the safety of Madrid ; and before July had closed gained a decisive victory over King Joseph himself at Talavera. With the conduct or progress of the war Lord Liverpool, however, had not yet any official connexion. It was for tunate for him that during the early part of the year he was still Home Secretary, as thus he escaped being mixed up in ever so trifling a degree with the annoyances which the charges brought against the Duke of York as Com mander-in-Chief must have caused the Secretary at War. And his chief troubles during that period arose from the conduct of the French princes and' their retinues. The latter were continually quarrelling with one another, and sought to make him the umpire between them ; an office which he declined, not without administering a dignified rebuke to those who made so bad an use of the hospitality afforded them by this country, pursuing a line of conduct which was in the highest degree discreditable to the prince himself whom they acknowledged as their king ; while Louis himself was even more difficult to manage, since, discrowned as he was, he nevertheless looked on himself as King of all his fellow-emigrants in England, and put forth pretensions to exert an authority over them which was wholly incompatible with our laws and the rights of our own monarch. i8o9] OF LORD LIVERPOOL, 277 As those who quarrelled took no care to conceal their differences, but rather seemed proud of publishing them to the world,' Lord Liverpool was compelled to expostulate with the princes themselves ; and the following letter to the Comte d'Artois at last had the effect, if not of putting an end to the conduct of which he complained, of at least deterring the inferior parties from making their quarrels a public scandal, and of repressing the pretensions put forth by their head, which were inconsistent not only with our laws, but with the title of Count, which, as we have seen, was all that he clairaed in this country. Private and most confidential. Charles Street, March 2, 1809. Sir, Since I had the honour of seeing your Royal Highness the day before yesterday, I am sorry to be under the necessity of stating that some circumstances have come to my knowledge respecting the intentions ofthe Comte de L'Isle, and of those who advise him, which have given me the most serious concern. Your Royal Highness is fully acquainted with my sentiments vrith regard to the unjustifiable publications of Monsieur de Puisaye, and how sincerely I lamented the steps taken by the ' The following is a copy of a handbill which the Comte de Puisaye, not undistinguished in the wars of La Vendde, thought it decent to print and circulate about the noblemen at that time most in Louis's confidence : " Londres, Janvier 26, 1809. Mon respect pour le Roi de France, et pour les princes de son sang, ne me permettant pas de rdpliquer publiquement au libelle recemment rdpandu par M. Beyrade d'Avaray, avant d'avoir soumis k Sa Majeste Trfes-Chretienne les preuves qui constatent les mefaits et Tignominie de I'homme qui a si longtems et si indignement abuse de sa confiance, j'espfere que les honnetes gens qui d^plorent autant la forme audacieuse de ce libelle, qu'ils sont indignes de son contenu, me sauront gre d'un deiai qu'ils jugeront sans doute etre suffisamment justifie par son motif. Le Comte Joseph de Puisaye, Lieutenant- General." And the same Comte de Puisaye did more than this. For in some " Memoires " which he published about this time he printed secret correspondence of some of our ministers, without any permission from our Govern ment, and even, as Canning wrote to Lord Liverpool that he believed, " in defiance of Lord Castlereagh's prohibition." Our Government was forced at last to threaten to stop his pension. 278 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1809 Comte de L'Isle, and the Comte d'Avaray in consequence of them, not only as they were calculated to increase the very evils which they were intended to prevent, and to produce effects most prejudicial under the present circumstances to the cause of royalty itself, but as they had the appearance of an assertion, on the part of the Comte de L'Isle, of a species of jurisdiction over the French resident^ within his Majesty's dominions, which is wholly inconsistent with the laws, and constitution of this country. I will not conceal from your Royal Highness that the conduct of the Comte d'Avaray has appeared to his Majesty's Government to have been on several occasions so very objectionable, and his views with respect to this country so discordant from those which ought to be entertained by any person standing in the relation which he does to the Comte de L'Isle, that it has been a subject of deliberation how far it might not be proper to direct that he should leave this countiy. Painful and distressing as such a proceeding would be to his Majesty and his Government, the interests of the Comte de L'Isle himself might render it necessary to resort to it, unless the Comte d'Avaray can be induced to appreciate more correctly his real situation in this country. I beg your Royal Highness will consider this letter as con fidential ; at the same time I am sure I may rely on your prudence and good sense to prevent an explosion which, from your knowledge of this country, you must be sensible would be at any time most inconvenient, and at the present moment dangerous to the interests of those who occasioned it. I have the honour, &c., Liverpool. The prodigious exertions which Napoleon was now making in Spain and Austria were in one point of view a relief to Lord Liverpool's department, since they prevented the pos sibility of any enterprise being undertaken by France against Ireland. And consequently, as he wrote to the Lord Lieutenant, the Duke of Richmond, at the beginning of the summer, he was now able to consent to a portion of the force which had previously been required in that i8o9] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 279 country being transferred to Wellesley's command in Portugal. " He knew, however, that a considerable force raust be wanted to secure internal tranquillity," and there fore Governraent " would never reduce the British infantry in Ireland below 120,000 men." He naturally attached great iraportance to the victory gained over Napoleon at Essling in May, hoping " for the raost iraportant conse quences from it, if the Austrians could but follow up their successes, before he received reinforcements." But no British statesman could anticipate the miserable vacilla tions and jealousies which, combined with his own slowness of moveraents, hindered the Austrian prince's victory from being of any permanent advantage to his country. And scarcely the. most experienced soldier could have calcu lated on the tenacity of purpose, the fertility of resource, the accuracy of corabination, and energetic rapidity of execution by which, in the short space of six weeks. Napo leon was able to fight another battle on a still larger scale, and to terrify Austria into an ignorainious peace which proved Wagrara^ to have been a decisive victory. Our exertions, as it is hardly necessary to remind the reader, were not this year ¦confined to the south of Europe. A still larger force than that entrusted to Wellesley was sent against Antwerp. It raiscarried to a great extent, ' In spite of the pompous bulletin of Napoleon, no testimony can be plainer than that of Savary, who was in the battle, that Wagram was not a victory till the Archduke Charles made it one by his unac countable retreat. He says, " L'armee autrichienne nous tint tete pres- que partout." And, after pointing out one or two errors in the Arch duke's conduct, he adds, " l'armee autrichienne n'avait aucune raison pour se retirer, elle etait plus forte que nous;'' and concludes, "Les grands evfenemens de guerre sont toujours suivis d'un etat moral qui forme I'opinion pour ou contre un des deux partis. La bataille d'Ess- ling nous avait rendu I'opinion ddfavorable. Celle de Wagram detruisit ce que la premiere avait produit de facheux, et nous rendit un peu de notre premiere popularitd. Ce qui acheva de nous ramener I'opinion, qui s'entetait k douter de notre succfes, c'est que nous suivimes l'armee autrichienne dans sa retraite. (Mem. du Due de Rovigo, iv. 13.) 28o LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1809 chiefly through an undue deference to the judgment of George III. himself, who probably, from an attachment to Pitt's memory, pressed the appointment of that statesman's brother. Lord Chatham, to the command of the army employed. Yet the enterprise was not ill-judged, nor did it wholly fail, since the destruction of Flushing, which was fully accomplished, was an achievement of great import ance in the eyes of our ablest soldiers, and of Napoleon also, whose works at Antwerp were deprived of their chief value by the demolition of the docks and arsenal at the mouth of the Scheldt. We need not enter into the details of the expedition ; but, as the consideration which led to its being generally regarded as neither fortunate nor creditable to the country proceeded mainly from the pestilence which the unwholesome air of the Walcheren marshes engendered among our troops, a very conclusive defence of the endea vour to retain possession of that island, which was sub mitted to his colleagues by Lord Liverpool who, before we had evacuated it, had become Secretary of the War Department, will be read with interest, and can hardly be denied to have been well founded. In the following observations I confine myself to that part of the question respecting the expedition to the Scheldt which relates to the retention of the island of Walcheren, after the object of Antwerp had been entirely abandoned, and the army withdrawn from South Reveland. The possession of the island of Walcheren, and the town and port of Flushing, have been at all times favourite objects of policy with the Government of this country. The latter, together with Ramrilikens and the Bril, have been actually in our possession, and been garrisoned by British troops from the year 1585 to the year 1616, and the restoration of these places to the States of Holland was one of the most unpopular acts of King James I. The conquest of Walcheren has been a subject repeatedly under the consideration of different Administrations during the last war and the present. It was a subject of consideration in iSog] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 281 Lord Sidmouth's Administration. It was an object about which Mr. Pitt was particularly anxious in the year 1805. It is likewise reported to have been an object of the last Administration in the year 1806-7, a^s the best diversion that could then be made in favour of Russia. On these several occasions, I speak con fidently of the two first, the object was abandoned, not from undervaluing its importance, nor from the supposed unhealthi ness of the climate, but because the military means at the time were thought inadequate to the attainment of it. I can appeal likewise to Lord St. Vincent, to Commander Owen, and to every naval officer who has seriously reflected on the subject of invasion, whether the Scheldt is not the only quarter from whence an invasion of England can be seriously appre hended, as long as we maintain our superiority at sea ; and whether the possession of the island of Walcheren would not render any such project impracticable, by making it impossible for any fleet or flotilla of the enemy to move out of the Scheldt without the certainty of our being able to bring them to action. These particulars having been premised, it is further to be observed that one of the objects of the expedition to the Scheldt was a diversion in favour of Austria. It is not denied that Austria would have preferred a more early diversion to the north of Germany, but, after the expedition to the Scheldt had been undertaken, the Austrian Government were so persuaded of the importance of it as a diversion in their favour that they were particularly solicitous that the operation should be con tinued in that quarter, and should not then be diverted else where. During a considerable part of the month of August, during the whole of the month of September, and until the middle of the month of October, there was every reason to believe that hostilities were to be renewed. As late as the I oth of October a letter was received from Mr. Bathurst, dated the 2 ist of September, informing the Government that the armistice was to be renounced the next day. The accounts of the state of the Austrian army were most favorable, and the change which had taken place in the command was represented as likely to lead to more vigorous operations. It was not till about the middle of October that reports were first brought to this country which proved afterwards to be unfounded, Articles -S3 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1809 of Peace having been actually signed between Austria and .France.' It was not till the 30th of October that the fact of peace having been signed was known with certainty in this country, and measures had been taken to prevent any delay which might occur in the evacuation of Walcheren on the 24th and 27 th of that month. The expedition to the Scheldt had produced the effect of divert ing troops from the interior of Germany, and which were on their march towards the Danube to Antwerp and Holland. The occupation of Walcheren by British troops, and the spirit of discontent which had manifested itself in sorae parts of Holland and the Low Countries, and was likely to be kept alive by the retention of the island by the British Government, rendered it impossible for Buonaparte, in such a state of things, not to keep a considerable force in those countries. Eut whether that force was more or less, the question is whether the Government of this country would ever have been pardoned if, upon the renewal of hostilities, any proportion of French force could have been directed towards the Danube, which must have otherwise been employed in keeping in check the British force, and those who might be supposed likely to support them, and thereby decide the fate of the campaign, which, from the experience of what had occurred previous to the armistice and the unsubdued spirit of the Austrian armies, might not otherwise unreasonably be considered as doubtful. But, even if hostilities did not recommence, was not the posses sion of so favourite an object as Walcheren and Flushing by the British force likely to have an effect favorable to Austria in the negotiation for peace ? It was certainly believed in Paris that the conquest and retention of the island by the British forces had materially influenced the negotiation. Upon this view of the question alone, there would be little difficulty in contending that, even if the expedition should not be judged by some the most expedient direction of the British force, yet having been undertaken, and the island of Walcheren being in our possession at a tirae when it was uncertain whether hosti- ^ The battle of Wagram was fought July 6th, 1809. On the 18th Austria signed an armistice, and the Peace of Vienna was formally signed October 14th. i8o9] 01 LORD LIVERPOOL. 283 lities would or would not be renewed between Austria and France, it could not be judged politic to abandon it till the issue of those negotiations was known, particularly as the winter season was approaching, and the inconvenience of retaining Walcheren was likely to diminish every day. It must be observed, in the next place, that, independent of the general value attached to Walcheren as a naval station. Sir Richard Strachan wrote to Lord Mulgrave on the 13th of September, to request that the island might not be given up till he had had an opportunity of seeing Lord Mulgrave upon the subject, and until Government had heard all the opinions for and against it. He states his own opinion to be strongly, under the then existing circumstances, for retaining the island. Sir Richard Strachan did not arrive in the Downs until the 3d of October. In all the communications which his Majesty's ministers had at the time with the different officers who came from Walcheren, or who had had an opportunity of forming an opinion upon the practicability of retaining it, the distinction which was taken was whether the state of the Continent admitted of the French Government directing a considerable portion of their force against that island. They were all of opinion that, if the war between Austria and France should recommence, there could be no doubt but that it was possible to retain it with a com paratively small force, both naval and military ; but that if peace should be re-established between Austria and France, and a large proportion of the disposable force of France could be brought into Flanders and Holland, the defence of Walcheren would evidently be attended with very great difficulty, and at all events could only be accomplished by a very large force, both naval and military, and at a very considerable expense. Under such circumstances the policy of retaining it must have depended in a considerable degree on the question of peace or war between Austria and France. But even if it had been determined to evacuate the island as early as the 9th or loth of September, the evacuation could not have been accomplished, together with the destruction of the basin, in less than six weeks, or I might even say two months. For the sick must all have been embarked before the effective 284 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1809 part of the garrison could be removed, and before it would have been safe to have given the alarm in the island, which the commencement of the operations for destroying the basins would necessarily create. The nuraber of sick were nearly 8,000 on the 13th of September, and above 9,000 (the largest nuraber at any period) on the 23d of September. The evacua tion could not therefore, in this view, have been effected before the end of the month of October, the period at which the healthy season is represented as usually beginning. It must likewise be observed that the effect of destroying the basin, and the practicability of stopping up the navigation ofthe river, could only be ascertained by local observations on the spot, after we had obtained possession of the island, and, until the sentiments of the naval officers and engineers were ascertained upon these points, it would not have been adviseable to have determined on the evacuation. It was found impracticable to stop up the navigation, but the destruction of the basin for a time was effectually accoraplished ; and it appears by the last accounts that the French Government are not determined even to attempt to restore it : until they can restore it, or establish some port equally convenient in the same quarter, they lose the advantage of being able to keep twenty sail of the line in a state ready equipped for sea at the mouth of the Scheldt. The autumn of the year 1809 once more brought the office of Prime Minister within Lord LiverpooTs reach, if the gratification of personal ambition had ever been a prime object of his policy. The circumstances that led to the change which took place, though from their coincidence in point of time with the expedition to Flanders they were often identified in the view of the public with that enter prise, were in point of fact wholly independent of it. They must be attributed, in the first instance, to that restlessness of disposition which has already been remarked as the chief fault of Canning's character, leading him to be always dissatisfied with the way in which every department but his own was managed. A natural consciousness,of splendid ability had also engendered in him something of a dicta- i8o9] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 285 torial temper, which had been greatly fostered by occur rences in his personal history since Pitt's death, which showed hira the high value which all persons attached to his co-operation. Even while Fox still held the seals Lord Grenville had made a second attempt to gain him to his Administration almost on his own terras. He was nearly connected by marriage with the Duke of Portland ; ' and, on the formation of the present Cabinet, he had had influence sufficient to close it against Lord Sidmouth ; and this circumstance probably contributed to create a belief in his mind that his dictation on other points would not be resisted. Under the influence of this unfortunate dispo sition, in the course of the spring he began to suggest alterations in the composition of the Cabinet to the Prime Minister There had been differences of opinion between Canning and Lord Castlereagh in the preceding winter, principally on the obligation of the Government to carry out the terms agreed to by the generals concerned in the Convention of Cintra ; and in the discussion of the point raised by Canning, who insisted that they had exceeded their powers, the Cabinet in general had coincided with Lord Castlereagh. Canning had subsequently expressed great discontent at the comparative failure of Sir John Moore's expedition, and began to feel still more annoyance than, as the arrangement was inevitable, he could well express, at a clashing of the War Department, over which Lord Castlereagh presided, with his own Foreign Office in portions of their political correspondence.^ A coolness had in consequence grown up between the two rainisters ; and Canning, availing himself of his connexion with the Prime Minister, at the beginning of April urged the re moval of Lord Castlereagh, and his replacement by Lord Wellesley, with whom, ever since that nobleman's return from India, he had closely connected hiraself. The Duke ' The Duke of Portland and Canning had marrried two sisters. 5 See " George Canning and his Times " (by G. A. Stapleton, Mr. Canning's private Secretary), p. 174. 286 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1809 received and acted on the demand thus made upon him with an imbecile unfairness which nothing but his bodily sufferings can excuse : he apparently did not at all coincide in the sufficiency of Canning's reasons for removing a col league with whom he generally agreed ; but he saw still less how to dispense with Canning's assistance, if he should per sist in offering his own resignation as the only alternative ; and he therefore agreed to require Lord Castlereagh's retirement in favour of Lord Wellesley after a time, though in the meanwhile he kept the contemplated arrangement a profound secret from all but one or two of his colleagues, one of whom. Lord Camden, the President of the Council was looked upon as the especial friend of Lord Castlereagh. The general outline of the events which ensued cannot be better explained than in a letter from Lord Liverpool to Mr. Wallace, written while the new arrangements were in progress which they had necessitated : Private and confidential. Coombe Wood, September 23, I0C9. My dear Wallace, As you must be desirous of knowing generally the circumstances which have led to the present extraordinary state of the King's Government, I have thought the following account of them would not be unacceptable to you. The particulars must be deferred till you come to town. The story respecting Lord Castiereagh is too long to render it possible for me to trouble you with it at length at the present moment His removal from the situation of the Secretary of State had been determined some time before either Perceval, myself, or the majority of the King's servants knew of the occurrences which had led to it. The expedition to the Scheldt had been decided before we even heard of it ; and the question at that time was, whether the communication should be made to Lord Castlereagh immediately after the sailing of the expedition, or whether it should be deferred till its conclusion, and till the result of it was known in this country. A variety of considerations induced us to think (perhaps erroneously) that this was the most improper time for making any new 1809] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 287 an-angements of the departments of Government ; and we were led to hope that some events might occur in the course of the expedition which might obviate, in some degree, the difficulties which at that time presented themselves to our minds. In this state matters remained till Sunday, the loth inst, when the expedition being considered by Canning to be at an end, he called upon the Duke of Portland for the fulfilment of the promise which the duke had' most unfairly extracted from the King (without the knowledge of the greater part of his colleagues, and particularly of those whom he was most bound to consult), at the time Lord Granville Leveson was admitted into the cabinet. The promise was, however, absolute, and, having been made ia the King's name, must necessarily be fulfilled. The state of the Duke of Portland's health had become more critical every day ; and it occurred to me that the best means of obviating the various difficulties with which we were sur rounded, was by persuading the Duke of Portland to retire, and by making, in consequence, an entire new arrangement of the Administration. It was obvious that no satisfactory arrangement could be made of the Government in the House of Commons if Perceval and Canning did not both form a part of it. Though there might be advantages in the first minister being in the House of Commons, Perceval was fully aware that Canning might make difficulties in acting under him in that capacity, and in a com munication which passed between them he proposed that they should both keep their relative situations, and that some peer, whom the King would approve, should be agreed upon as First Lord of the Treasury. This communication led to an explanation from Canning that, in his opinion, the first minister must be in the House of Commons ; that the choice in that House rested between Perceval and himself ; that he could not expect that Perceval would agree to his holding the situation, and that he, on the other hand, could not agree to act under Perceval as first minister. To this Perceval replied that their situations were very different. That since the commencement of the present Government he had been entrusted witii the general direction of business in the House of Commons ; that he could not consent to Canning being minister without giving 288 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1809 up both the situation and office which he had hitherto held in the House of Commons ; that in the other alternative Canning would remain in the same office, and that though his (PercevaTs) power and authority in the House would be somewhat increased. Canning's would not, therefore, be diminished ; that he was aware, however, of the difficulties which might be considered as fairly standing in the way of such an arrangement, and that it was his wish, therefore, that they should endeavour to agree upon a third person to whom these objections did not apply. This proposal was, however, rejected. Canning de clared that, if the Duke of Portland resigned, he should resign likewise ; that he was ready to undertake to be minister himself, but that he could not agree to any arrangements of the nature suggested. Such is the state of this most extraordinary transaction. I have stated little more than facts, and leave them to your own judgment. I should only add that the remaining members of the Cabinet, with the exception of Lord Granville Leveson, are determined to stand together, and by the King. Huskisson and Sturges Bourne follow Canning ; Rose, Long, Wellesley Pole, and I believe I may say all the other members of the Govern ment, appear disposed to take their part with the majority of the Cabinet. It would be vain, however, to think of forming a Government on our own exclusive strength without sorae attempt at union with the most respectable of those who have hitherto been opposed to us. In consequence of this opinion Perceval and myself received the King's commands, on Saturday, to communicate with Lord Grey and Lord Grenville for the purpose of forming an extended and corabined Administration. Messengers have been sent with this communication, and I conclude Lord Grey and Lord Grenville will be in town by the end of the week. What will be the result of the negotiation it is impossible to say ; but under all the present circumstances it is certainly deserving of a fair trial. I shall be obliged to you if you will consider this letter as con fidential. You shall hear from me again as soon as the result is known. Believe me to be. Most sincerely yours, Liverpool. i8o9] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 289 In the course of the suraraer, as is mentioned in this letter. Canning had been strengthened in the Cabinet by the introduction of his friend Lord Granville Leve son, who in June succeeded Sir Jaraes Pulteney as Secre tary at War, an office which did not usually confer a seat in that body ; but this did not render him less anxious for the other alteration. And, as soon as the failure of the Walcheren expedition was known, though this was in no degree attributable to Lord Castlereagh, whose measures of provision for its success had been complete and admirable, he demanded the instant fulfilment of the arrangement which had been promised to him. His renewal of his appli cation had two consequences which he did not anticipate. The duke, terrified at the degree of trouble and arrogance which he foresaw, instantly resigned ; and Lord Castlereagh then for the first time becoming aware of what had been going on behind his back so long, naturally conceived that he had been treated with the most extreme unfairness. He certainly had ; but the persons to blame were the duke him self and Lord Camden, not Canning, who had not been aware of the secrecy which had been practised, and who, as soon as he became acquainted with it, foresaw that the blame of it would fall on himself, and remonstrated warmly against it' Lord Castlereagh took the view which Canning ' I subjoin an extract from a letter from Canning to the Duke, a copy of which is in the Liverpool Papers. The date is July 18. " But in justice to myself I cannot forbear to request of your Grace that it may be remembered, whenever hereafter this concealment shall be alleged (as I doubt not it will) against me, as an act of injustice towards Lord Castlereagh, that it did not originate in my suggestion ; that, so far from desiring it, I conceived, however erroneously. Lord Camden to be the sure channel of communication to Lord Castlereagh ; and that, to a very late period, I beheved such communication to have been actually made." And the Duke replied : " As to the reserve which you observe has been practised, and is to be continued, towards Lord Castlereagh, I have not the least hesitation in assuring you that I shall always be ready to avow its having originated with me ; and, whatever blame may have been or to be incurred, to take the whole of it, and to acknowledge the remonstrances you have repeatedly made against it. VOL. L U [Sut 290 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1809 foresaw that he would take, and claimed satisfaction in the way in which in those days it was ordinarily given. The two ministers fought a duel and, almost as a matter of course, subsequently resigned their offices. The first steps in the reconstruction of the Ministry have been indicated in the letter to Mr. Wallace. It was not without the greatest unwillingness that the King was induced to consent that Lord Grenville and Lord Grey should be consulted ; and his surrender of his own inclinations and judgment met but a sorry reward.' Lord Grey refused to go to London to discuss any future arrangements, and Lord Grenville went to town with a fixed resolution to reject whatever proposal might be made to him ; conse quently the Ministry went on as before, with a slight re arrangement of offices, and undoubtedly with some diminu tion of strength : not indeed in the House of Lords, where they gained weight by the acquisition of Lord Wellesley as a colleague, but in the Commons, where the loss of both Canning and Lord Castlereagh was of incalculable importance; certainly not to be counterbalanced by the acquisition of Mr. Ryder, who became a Secretary of State. Before his duel Canning had avowedly been a candidate for the Treasury, saying openly that it was desirable, as But I must own to you that I neither knew, nor did I imagine, that till a late period, or, indeed, at any time since the measure of Lord C 's removal has been in agitation, you have believed that the communication of it had been actually made to him." ' I subjoin a curious and interesting letter from Mr. Perceval to Lord Liverpool, giving an account of his conversation with the King on this subject: " My pear Lord, "As you desired me to give you a line upon my return from Windsor, I sit down for that purpose. But, in the first place, I must state that I did not arrive here till past four o'clock, and found the summons to the Cabinet at half-past three, which, as I could not possibly attend till past five, I am obliged to neglect. As the King kept me for a full hour and a. half, and as his conversation was very precise, abstruse, and continued, it is impossible to attempt giving you any full idea of it. Many points, indeed, I shall hardly notice. What he said of Lord Chatham, who he says is hurt, and adds, ' With reason' 1 809] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 291 indeed it has often been felt and acknowledged to be since, that the Prime Minister should be a member of the Lower and what I observed upon that, will keep : but he began with it. Upon quitting that subject he said, ' But now to our business.' And then he told me he must give me an account of Canning's conversation, which he called the most extraordinary he ever heard. He went through it with wonderful accuracy. I will endeavour, at another time, to give you the particulars ; all that is now important is that, in the King's opinion, and in mine also from his relation of it, it was very little dif ferent from his letter, except that it was more explicit and more strong, and except that he distinctly stated to the King, as his opinion, that the D of P 's health was such that it was not possible he should retain his situation. The points in which he was more precise were, that the minister who must in these times be necessarily in the House of Commons must also necessarily have complete authority over all other departments. That at the present time he and I were the only persons that could be this minister, not only in the present Adminis tration, but in any part ofthe House. That he should not be surprised or displeased in the least if the King preferred me ; that it would be the most natural thing of the two, it would hardly require a new patent, only the insertion of a new name in the old one. But that if his Majesty honoured him with his commands, he would readily undertake it. ' Not,' said the King, 'that he would consider of it, that he would advise with others, as you or any other person would have said, but he was fully pre pared to undertake it. Now,' continued his Majesty, ' I do not believe, if he was to be the minister, that there is any one of you who would con tinue with him ; and he does not seem at all to think of that.' I told him I had no authority to say, or means of knowing, that none of his present servants would continue : I thought some certainly would not, but I could not pretend to speak for any one but myself I told him that when I had penned the passage in the minute, in which it was said that his Majesty might collect from Mr. C 's letter that he would undertake it, I had been almost afraid I might have drawn an inference beyond what might have been intended. ' Oh, no,' he said, ' he stated it to me most distinctly, and said that the ministers who retired when Mr. Pitt died had done in his opinion very unwisely ; that he was not then in the Cabinet, but that he should have advised other wise.' I said I had never heard before that he had thought so, but I could not pretend to say what his opinion was at that time ; but if he had not said that he would have advised their continuance, I should rather have suspected the contrary to be his opinion. These are, I think, the most material points, in the King's narrative of Canning's conversation, the comment and observations upon vvhich I have no time for now, nor for many other particulars which I could state but U 2 [for 292 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1809 House ; and avowing also that, though he could not expect Perceval to serve under him, he on his part would not serve Jfor want of time. The account of this narrative and the observations upon it being over, he then proceeded to the subject of the minute of the Cabinet. He said he would consider of it very maturely, could not deliver an opinion then. I assured him I had not expected one ; I only thought he might wish to see me, and converse upon various points of it. He was very glad I had come, he said, and glad to talk to me about it ; that he should talk to the Lord Chancellor and Lord Liverpool and others to-morrow. He knew, indeed, that they could not represent it in any other view than had been done in the paper ; but it was a decision for life, everything was at stake, and he must not come to that decision without the maturest consideration, that he did not know how to make up his mind to it. He seemed disappointed at the opinion leading to a communication both with Lord Grey and Lord Grenville; the latter evidently formed, as we anticipated, the great objection. He could do nothing towards it, he said, till he was satisfied upon the point (the Catholic question). When he was advised last to send for Mr. Pitt by the Lord Chancellor, he had required to know expressly from Mr. Pitt that he would not bring forward that question ; that he had the most direct assurance from Mr. Pitt in writing ; he knew he had his letter, he had been looking for it (he then digressed into an account of his papers ; that he was arranging them all regularly ; that up to 1800 they were quite perfect; and from the commencement of the late Administration up to August last ; and that for that period he could turn to any paper in a minute) ; but he said he should find Mr. Pitt's paper ; it was an express assurance. And further, he said, when he saw Mr. Pitt, he not only confirmed the assur ance, but added, that he would not only not bring it forward, but that for private views of his own he would oppose it whoever brought it forward. This, he said, he voluntarily said to him : it was more than he expected ; it surprised him ; it appeared like an expression of his own opinion ; that he might have paid him (the King) the compliment of supposing that the determination was taken out of compliment to him ; but he stated it to be for private reasons of his own. He must, he said, have a similar assurance now ; that this was a point he could not give up in honour : no more, he said, could I ; that I as well as he had both given our opinions upon that point solemnly to the country ; that we could not give them up. " I agreed that we could not give them up ; that his servants were unanimous in their opinion that he must be protected against that question ; that it was with that view, and upon that principle, that they had humbly given his Majesty the opinion which that paper con tained ; that they thought under the circumstances of the times that it i8o9] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 293 under Perceval. It was an avowal which could not be justified, so manifestly did it involve an arrogant boast of was the most effectual, if not the only effectual, means of so protect ing him. That if Lord Grey and Lord Grenville consented to form a Government with us, who were known to have such decided opinions upon that subject, they must come into that Government with a perfect knowledge that that measure could never be a measure of that Govern ment ; that this would necessarily be implied from the very formation of the Government. ' It must be expressed,' he said, 'or he could not be satisfied.' I stated that it did not appear to me probable to expect that Lords Grey and Grenville could as men of honour consent, after all that had been said upon this subject, to have even the question put to them, to require an express declaration upon this. ' Then,' said he, ' I am driven to the wall, and would be deserted.' I assured his Majesty again that the object of his present servants was to protect him ; they would not desert him ; that the opinion we had furnished to his Majesty was, as we thought, the best mode of protecting him ; that if we madean ineffectual attempt to form an Administration alone, we should be overpowered, and would not be able to stand between him and the wall. " ' Then,' said he, rather hastily, but very collectedly and firmly, ' they should take the Government to themselves ; he would have nothing to do with it ; they should not have his name.' ' Oh, sir,' said I, • what an extremity your Majesty is contemplating ! What would become of your Majesty's country }' ' No country had a right to expect a man should give up his own honour. His honour was in his own keeping. If the country deserted him, he could not help it.' I again assured his Majesty that deserting him was the last thing we thought of But we conceived that the combined Government which we had an idea of forming was to be formed by his Majesty's present servants, and with such a proportiofcof them that, having a full share in the different offices, we should, by refusing at any time (as we should refuse) to concur in any measure of that description, be enabled to put a stop to it by bringing the Government to an end ; that they would feel this, and they therefore would naturally not think of attempting it. He then asked what reason we had for thinking they would form such a Government. I said that we could not, without almost making an overture to them, have found their real sentiments ; but that we had reason, from various conversations of their friends, to think it probable they would not generally object, though undoubtedly we could not tell in what manner they would expect it to be made. He asked .what these conversations were. I told him Lord Henry Petty's to Lord Euston, Lord Grey's to Colonel Gordon, Lord G. Cavendish's to Lord W. Bentinck. ' But then,' he said, ' what is to be done if they refuse ?' I r-=aid 294 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1809 a superiority of talent. For Perceval was the older man and the older minister; he had filled the office which said we had not omitted to think of that ; but that the manner of their refusing, and the grounds on which they refused, might be so various, and it would depend so much upon them, that there was no possibility beforehand of distinctly saying what would in that event be best to be done till the event occurred. Then he asked how it was to be done. I suggested the letter to both at once, stating his Majesty's commands that they should communicate with us, and that we should consider on the formation of a Government, and that we had his com mands also to acquaint them that if they wished to see his Majesty first that his Majesty would see them. That would be very hard upon him, he said ; he had no means of letting the world know what might pass : they might each tell their own story. The last time he had the good fortune to have it in writing. That would not do ; he could not see them ; but he knew from us what they were prepared to do. That he was the worst person in the whole world to settle any point with them ; he was sure he should quarrel with them at the first setting out. I said that certainly would not answer any purpose ; that it was certainly an important consideration that his Majesty might think of, but that we had considered that it would be better to offer them the alternative. Then he asked whether I thought I alone should communicate with them, or I and any one else. I said that as there were to be two of them, I thought it preferable that there should be some one joined with me. He agreed in this, and suggested the Chancellor as the person. I explained the Chancellor's objection, from the various instances of personal conflict in which he had been engaged with them. ' What,' says he, impatiently, ' do you think I could be advised to form a Government without the Chancellor ?' 'By no means,' I said ; I thought that the present ChanceUor might be one of the Government ; but that your Lordship must be another : that I considered this as indispensable. He then seemed to be satisfied as to the reason for not joining the Chancellor with me, and canvassed the question whether it should be you, or Lord Bathurst, or who else ; and this, as well as other questions, were left open for con sideration. Much more passed, which I may possibly in part recollect, though I am not certain that I shall ; but I think I have given you enough to show the temper of mind in which I found him, and that at last his mind was led to consider the proposition with more reference to the detail of it than he would have done if he had insurmountable objections to the whole. He concluded however with saying he could not yet form any opinion ; that he must take time to think of it He thanked me for coining down to him, and for giving him, as he expressed it, that opportunity of thinking aloud upon it. [" Upon i8o9] OF LORD LIVERPOOL 295 latterly the Prime Minister when a commoner had usually united with the Treasury, and he had been the leader of the Ministry in the House of Commons. And it is a striking proof of the extent to which the ascendancy of Canning's genius was acknowledged, that his thus claiming promotion over Perceval's head, as a condition of his continuing to serve his Majesty as a member of the Government, does not appear to have struck those who were aware of such a pretension as unreasonable. The duel, however, as he felt himself, put an end for the time to such a possibility. The King himself was justly offended with both the combatants. In acknowledging the letter in which Lord Liverpool conveyed to him the intelli gence of what had taken place, he declared it "had occa sioned hira not more serious concern than surprise, that two persons holding the situations of Secretaries of State, and still in possession of the seals of office, should have been guilty of so total a dereliction of duty as to violate the laws which they were bound to maintain by the authority vested in them." If, therefore, the Prime Minister was to be a com moner, Perceval had now no competitor. Lord Liverpool coincided in the opinion that that arrangement was the most desirable. The King willingly adopted this view, and once more united the Treasury and the Exchequer. But the events which were taking place at the same time in Germany were again leaving us to maintain the whole burden of the war against France. On the 14th of October " Upon the whole I never knew him in any conversation which I have had the honourof having- with him so coherent, so distinct, or anything like so methodical in the view which he took of the different points of the subjects on which he conversed. I much doubt whether you wiU think my account gives you a fair representation of it in these particu lars ; but I have been writing as fast as my pen could run, and I fear you wiU have some trouble in deciphering it. You may read it to any of your colleagues you please, and I wiU thank you to send it to the Chancellor for his information before he sees the King to-morrow. " Yours very truly, " Sp. Perceval." 296 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1809 Austria signed a final treaty of peace at Vienna, so that we had no longer a single ally but Portugal, whose exertions could be of no service unless they were both supported by English liberality and directed by English skill. In such a posture of affairs the department which was charged with the conduct of hostilities became, next to the Exchequer, the most important office in the State ; and therefore Perceval's first step in the organization of the Cabinet was to propose to Lord Liverpool to quit the Home Office and become Secretary of State for War and the Colonies. Though he had originally been unwilling to take the Home Office in exchange for that of Foreign Affairs, Lord Liverpool had now become so familiar with its duties that he would have preferred continuing where he was ; but he saw, as he explained in a letter to the King on the subject, that his agreeing to the arrangement proposed "would afford greater facilities than any other plan for completing the Government in a way which Would be acceptable to his Majesty ; and he never allowed his personal inclinations or convenience to interfere with the requirements of the public service. His general feeling on the duty of all the ministers to sacrifice every other consideration to that of serving the King with a due consideration for his feeHngs and unalter able opinions, is shown in the following extract of a letter from him to Lord Wellington on his first acceptance of his new office : — I know you have heard from Pole,' and probably from others, all the distressing circurastances which have led to Castlereagh's and Canning's resignation, and to the present state of the Administration. It is painful to reflect that a Government, which had nothing serious to apprehend from its enemies, should be brought to the point of dissolution by the divisions of its friends. Whatever may be the state of personal feelings on some parts of these transactions, or the public difficulties in which they may have involved us, the line of duty I consider ' The Hon. W. Wellesley Pole, Lord Wellington's brother, afterwards Lord Maryborough. i8o9] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 297 as plain. We accepted the Government two years ago to protect the King against an unwarranted attempt to surprise his conscience on a subject on which he was known to have the strongest scruples. Having done so, I feel that we are bound not to desert him. We may be defeated in the struggle when Parliament meets ; but, even in that event, we shaU at least have the satisfaction of keeping a respectable party together, which may be able to afford some protection to the King, and, I trust, some security to the country. One raore change also requires notice. As on Canning's resignation his friend Lord Granville Leveson had also retired. Lord Palmerston was now transferred to the post of Secretary at War, which he held frora that tirae without interruption for nearly twenty years, still discharging its duties when, on Lord Liverpool's illness in 1827, Canning, then . becoraing Prime Minister, rewarded his long service by attaching to it a seat in the Cabinet. Though, as we have seen. Lord Liverpool had a strong impression of the value of the island of Walcheren, if it were possible to retain it, the practicability of doing so appeared both to him and his colleagues so greatly affected by the conclusion of the Treaty of Vienna, which raust enable Napoleon to bring down an overpowering force on the Scheldt, that he now recoraraended the withdrawal of our troops, founding this advice, in a minute which he subraitted on the subject to the King, entirely on the withdrawal of Austria frora the war, and in no respect on any change of his own opinion as to the iraportance of the island. The King approved of the intention, adding an expression of great anxiety for the destruction of all the naval works along the banks of the Scheldt, which had formed a part of Lord Liverpool's proposal. Accordingly orders were at once sent out ; the whole of the fortifications, the docks and arsenal, all which had recently been greatly enlarged and strengthened, were demolished, and before Christmas the last regiment had returned home ; many of the men unhappily bringing back with thera the seeds of disease, which the pestilential 298 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1809 vapours of the Walcheren marshes seemed to have im planted permanently in their constitutions. At the same time Lord Liverpool was taking a deep personal interest in another matter which was of a mixed character, private as well as in some degree political. The arrangements for the reconstruction of the Ministry had not been fully completed when the Duke of Portland died. He had been Chancellor of the University of Oxford, and, even before his death. Lord Grenville had been diligently canvassing the members of the University in the hope of succeeding him. He had so decidedly deserted the Tories for the Whigs that it was not to be expected that he would be allowed to obtain his object without opposition ; but the Tories were long irresolute whom to select as their candidate. Those most solicitous for the honour of the University naturally desired to put forth some one whose general reputation for ability and statesmanship should be at least as high as that of Lord Grenville, even with the additional weight that his name derived from the fact of his having been Prime Minister. And with this feeling some of the heads of colleges applied to Lord Liverpool to allow himself to be put in nomina tion. It was known, however, that the Duke of Beaufort, who had extensive connexions with the University, was anxious for the honour, and, as Lord Liverpool's friends admitted their belief that he also would certainly become a candidate. Lord Liverpool declined the proposal, feeling a great solicitude that Lord Grenville should be defeated, and being equally convinced that a division of the Tory interest must render his success probable. The Tories then turned their eyes to the Lord Chancellor; and, as by that time a report had got abroad that the Duke of Beaufort had abandoned all idea of offering himself Lord Eldon consented to stand in the breach. He had hardly committed himself to the competition when it became known that the duke would certainly be nominated also. And thus the evil which Lord Liverpool had sacrificed his iSogJ OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 299 own pretensions to avert was incurred. He laboured, however, as strenuously in the interest of his colleague as he could have done in his own cause ; canvassing all whom he could have any hope of influencing for his brother minister ; and putting Lord Eldon's claims still more on the ground of his opposition to the emancipation of the Roman Catholics than on the pre-eminent reputation which he was rapidly creating as a judge. But his efforts were in vain. The division of the Tory interest was fatal to both candidates. The Duke of Beaufort had no chance himself, but he drew frora the Chancellor votes enough to turn the scale against him, and at the close of the poll, though the two Tories had between them above 700 votes. Lord Grenville defeated Lord Eldon by 13, having 406 in his favour against 393. As may be supposed, the moment that the question of Walcheren was disposed of the attention of the new War Secretary was engrossed by the war in the Penin sula. Wellesley, for his capture of Oporto and victory at Talavera, had been raised to the peerage as Viscount Wellington, and Lord Liverpool now bent the whole of his energies to furnishing him with means to win still higher honours. It . was probably a consideration of the advantages which might be expected to arise frora having in the Government a brother of the general employed in the Peninsula, that had led him and his colleagues so willingly to accede to Canning's proposal to substitute Lord Wellesley for Lord Castlereagh. And now, the moment that he himself had changed his office, he wrote to the marquis, who was at this time at Lisbon as our ambassador, to " convey to him in the strongest terms his personal anxiety that he should accept the offer which would be made him," of returning home to take the Foreign Office, "and joining the greater part of his old friends in supporting the King's authority against the endeavours which would infallibly be made to reduce him to a state of unconditional submission." For it was less 300 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1809 a secret than ever that the Opposition, headed by Lord Grenville, designed to make a vigorous effort at the meet ing of Parliament to force themselves into office ; mis calculating so greatly the disinterestedness and high- mindedness of Canning , as to believe that they might gain him as a coadjutor. Lord Liverpool himself did not think it absolutely impossible that he might be won over by a repetition of the offers which Lord Grenville had formerly made to him ; but, though he knew how intimately Lord Wellesley had connected himself with him, he had no scruple in expressing his confidence that, even if Can ning, from a feeling of disappointment at recent events, should so commit himself Lord Wellesley would not suffer his friend "to involve him also in that connexion. He was," he concluded, " most solicitous to add that, if a consideration of all the circumstances of the case should induce Lord Wellesley to accept the offer, he would find in himself a colleague who would be desirous most cor dially to co-operate with him in every branch of business, whether in office or in Parliament. It was a satisfaction to reflect that, amidst all the difficulties of the Ministry, they were at this time an united party, and that they had a cause to support which the country had not hitherto, when a fair appeal had been made to it, shown any dis position to abandon." On the question thus alluded to, the removal of the restrictions on the Roman Catholics, Lord Wellesley did not wholly agree with his correspondent. He was not, indeed, inclined to press for emancipation in the teeth of insurmountable obstacles ; but he judged, with states manlike foresight, that it must eventually be conceded, and that therefore it was only a question of time. But, though thus differing from Mr Perceval and Lord Liver pool on the cardinal point of their domestic policy, he had no hesitation in joining them as a colleague, because at the time the foreign policy of the country was the more important, or at least the more immediately pressing i8o9] OF LORD LIVERPOOL, 301 consideration. That, in his eyes, was identified with the support to be given to his brother in his campaign ; and he had no doubt that he could aid WeUington more efficiently by consultations with the Government at horae than with the Portuguese rainisters. He therefore returned to Eng land to becorae Secretary of State, when he found Lord Liverpool had lost no time in taking the best raeans of acting up to his and Wellington's wishes, by obtaining in forraation of the opinions and expectations of the general himself Lord Liverpool had scarcely been sworn in to the perforraance of his new duties, when he addressed to Wellington a series of questions, with the view of laying the answers before his colleagues, and taking thera as a guide for their future arrangements. He indicated to him his own view, which on subsequent occasions he ex pressed even more strongly, as being the only conduct com patible with honour, that " it must be our policy to reraain in Portugal as long as we could remain there without risking his army." But at the same time he pointed out to him that "as there was every reason to believe that peace had been concluded between France and Austria " (he was writing before any certain intelligence of the treaty had, or could have, arrived in England), it "was probable that the whole railitary efforts of France would, in a short time, be directed against Spain." And therefore he asked Wellington's opinion of the chance of these efforts " for the complete subjugation of that country " proving successful. And what, with reference to present operations, was raore iramediately important, whether "they would be likely to make a serious attack upon Portugal before they had acquired a tolerably quiet possession of every part of Spain north of the Sierra Morena : whether they were likely to be able to spare an army sufficient for this purpose before the north and centre of Spain were subdued .' If they did make such an attack, what was the prospect of a successful resistance .' " And finally, what, to one responsible for not unduly risking a British array in 302 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1809 a hopeless contest, was the most important question of ah, " If resistance were not likely to prove ultimately success ful, how far the British army would be endangered, and its embarkation be likely to be prevented, by delaying to withdraw it till the French had penetrated in force into Portugal ? " They were sagacious questions, indicating the possession of that happy talent which fixes its attention on points of far more importance, to the disregard of others of inferior though perhaps of more obvious moment. Yet, while the novelty of his appointment necessarily made him feel the want of precise information which had dictated them, he did not conceal his expectation of receiving such an answer as would justify a vigorous prosecution of the contest ; but, in putting his enquiries, reminded Wellington that, " not withstanding all the efforts which the French had already made, they had never at any one period since the rising of the people been in military possession of more than one half of the country." And, while asking his opinion about the probability of their invading Portugal, he ex pressed a strong doubt whether they could have any prospect of success without employing an army which should at least double the amount of our own, and whether, while Spain was unsubdued, they could possibly spare so great a force for that purpose. And he added an emphatic opinion as an individual that, " though we should not be justified, from want of timely precaution, in sacrificing that army, which formed the greater part of our disposable force, yet it would neither be just nor politic to abandon Portugal before such a measure was absolutely necessary." Wellington, who probably as yet stood alone among military men in his confidence of the eventual result of the war, had no hesitation in giving expression to that confidence in his answer. He believed that, "if the Spaniards were commonly prudent," it would require "a very large reinforcement indeed to give the enemy military pos session of the country ; a much larger to effect its complete i8o9] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 303 subjugation." But he likewise thought, in a railitary point of view, that, even before they had made theraselves raasters of Spain they ought to renew their invasion of Portugal ; indeed, " that they ought to make the possession of Portugal their first object. But they would not succeed with an army of even 70,000 or 80,000 men unless they made their attack at once, which he had reason to suppose impossible." As to Central Spain, or Old Castile, that province, he pointed out, " was already subdued ; and indeed had in all wars been in the possession of the army that was strongest, especially in cavalry." That if, con trary to his expectation, the French should attack Portugal at once, " they would be successfully resisted " he had little doubt, and no doubt at all that, under any circura stances, even " after defeat," he could re-erabark his array. It is reraarkable how closely the opinions here expressed coincided with the views of Napoleon himself, as we learn from his correspondence. They are the more striking now that we can reflect on thera by the light of their complete fulfilment. But Lord Liverpool's appetite for information was not yet completely satisfied ; and before he had received Wellington's answers to his first questions, he addressed him a second letter of enquiry, which shows not only a remarkable acquaintance with the character of the different provinces of Spain, and of the nature of each, but proves, too, how fully the writer was prepared to agree in Wellington's anticipations of the ultimate result of the struggle. For he points out, from the past history of the country, how great will be the difficulties experienced by the enemy before he can subdue those districts which, as being nearer France and further from us, superficial observers raight have fancied the most completely at the mercy of an army crossing the Pyrenees, or a fleet, sailing: from Toulon. The whole letter is well worth preserving, as a proof how felicitous was the choice which, Perceval had made when he persuaded the writer to undertake the War Department. 304 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1809 Private. Downing Street, 21st November, 1809. Dear Lord Wellington, I think it may be very material that we should endeavour to procure, if possible, some accurate information respecting the present state of the provinces of Catalonia, Aragon, and Valencia. I have always thought it an unfortunate circumstance unavoidably attendant on the Spanish contest, that the provinces best cal culated, from the character and disposition of their inhabitants, to make a formidable resistance to the French, should be the most remote from all intercourse with the British Government. The Aragonese are, as we are informed, universally admitted to be the most warlike people in Spain, and the Catalonians and Valencians the most industrious and active. The resistance which these provinces have made (though we are imperfectly informed of the particulars) appears to have been raore spirited, determined, and systematic than that of any other part of Spain. And though their neighbourhood to the frontiers of France must have given their enemy great advan tages over them, yet it does not appear that they ever have been completely subdued ; and, as long as the spirit of resist ance continues there, it will be very difficult for Buonaparte to make an adequate effort for the purpose of reducing under his authority the more southern provinces. It must be obvious that you have it not in your power, even if it were otherwise desirable, to afford any direct military assistance to this part of Spain by means of the array under your command ; and I ara not prepared to say that, even under the circum stances of such a change in the Spanish Governraent as raight " afford the prospect of a more favourable issue to the contest, it would be advisable to employ a limited moveable corps on the coasts of Catalonia and Valencia. But I think it raay be useful to have at least the means of con sidering this question fairly and fully, and that at all events this advantage would arise from opening an intercourse with that part of Spain, that we should know how far we might really depend upon them, what they wanted, and whether we had i8o9] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 305 the means of affording them any assistance which could be considered as important. If you agree with me in this opinion, I think it may be very advisable that you should send some steady officer on whose judgment you can rely, to provide you with information respect ing this part of Spain, and it may be more convenient, on many accounts, that this officer should go from the British army, and communicate with you as commander of his Majesty's forces in the Peninsula, than that he should be sent direct from this country. The names of two officers have been suggested to me as properly quahfied for such service. Colonel Rourke and Major Sturgeon of the Staff Corps. I know nothing of them personally. You are the best judge how far they are competent to the service, and, if so, whether they can be properly spared at this time from the army. Having opened my mind to you upon this subject, I leave it to you to take such measures upon it as you may judge most advisable. I am confident that you will see the importance, in the event of the war continuing in the Peninsula, of giving your most serious attention to the state of these provinces. I ought to add, that any steps which you may think it expedient to adopt for this purpose should be communicated to Lord Wellesley, or whoever may be his Majesty's minister in Spain ; and he should be informed that the object of sending an officer to those provinces is to obtain military information, and not to interfere in any concerns whatever of a political nature. I am, &c. &c. Liverpool. The answer therefore to his first questions which, shortly after the despatch of this second letter. Lord Liverpool received, coincided closely with his own hopes and judg ment. He laid it before his colleagues, accorapanied as it had been with an explanation of the need that the array had of reinforceraents to supply the vacancies which the last campaign had caused in its ranks, and before the end of the year he was enabled to promise Wellington the re inforcements which he required, and which as yet were not VOL. I. X 3o6 UFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1809 more than would suffice to keep his army at the strength of 30,000 effective men. And he added a request to know privately the names of the general officers whom Wellington would wish to have under him, that he might send those, and no others. In fact, as he wrote to him in the course of the following summer, " when he accepted the seals of the War Department, he laid it down as a principle that, if the war was to be continued, we ought not to suffer any part of our efforts to be directed to other objects." With the promise of the troops came also the assurance that "his Majesty felt the strongest inducement, from at tachment to his ancient ally, and from every motive of sound policy, to persevere in the contest in the Peninsula as long as it could be maintained with a reasonable ex pectation of success." He assured the general that " the King fully coincided with the ministers in leaving him a large discretion for his operations ;" only bidding him re member " how essential the return of his army must be to the security of his own dominions in the event of Spain and Portugal falling entirely under the dominion of France." And, while thus leaving him to the almost unfettered exercise of his discretion with respect to his own operations. Lord Liverpool likewise showed the confidence which he himself placed in that discretion in other matters (for the measures to be taken for the maintenance of war were adopted principally in deference to Wellington's judgment, and on his responsibility). And he announced to him also that the King had consented to give the Portuguese the pecuniary aid which he had recommended to enable them to keep on foot such an army as their population could supply, and to officer it with British officers. The adoption of these measures is manifestly owing in no trifling degree to the confidence which Lord Liverpool himself felt in the eventual issue of the contest. And when it is considered how few people in England, whether soldiers or civilians, shared it at this time, that confidence is by itself a proof of i8o9] OF LORD LIVERPOOL, 307 a very statesmanlike and comprehensive judgment. At the same time it in no wise led him to overlook the possi bility of failure ; but the conclusion of the same despatch enters as carefully into the possibility of a hurried evacua tion of the country becoming necessary, and into the measures which, in such an event, would be requisite, as if the army had already met with some disaster, or, like that of Moore, were only seeking to escape one by a rapid retreat to the coast. And Wellington himself must have derived additional assurance and encouragement from knowing that, besides his own brother, he had a friend in the Cabinet who, while he thus displayed entire reliance on his skill and prudence, and a sanguine conviction of his eventual triumph, yet took into consideration the possibiHty of disappointment, and raight therefore be depended on to stand by him as firmly in moments of disaster as of victory. So consistent was Lord Liverpool in his resolution to concentrate, so long as he should be in office, the whole exertions of the country on the Peninsula, that when Sir John Stuart inforraed hira that, in compliance with Lord Collingwood's suggestions, he had detached a force to expel the French frora the Ionian Islands, he instantly warned hira that although, " if the occupation by us of those islands would tend raaterially to the security of Sicily without the . necessity of increasing our railitary force at that tirae in the Mediterranean, it raight on that ground, be deemed expedient," it would not be so if it required the slightest addition to the number of the troops under Sir John's com mand, which indeed it would probably " be necessary to reduce rather than to augment, to provide for the exi gencies of the service in other quarters." He concluded by repeating a hint which the general had already received from Lord Castlereagh, that he might be required to detach any troops which he could spare to the eastern coast of Spain, where a diversion raight facilitate Wellington's operations by compelling the French to divide their forces. X 2 3o8 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1809 And he was the more anxious to employ the needlessly large force at present in Sicily for that object, because, as he more than once expressed to Wellington, he felt it a great inconvenience that "the provinces best calculated, from the character and disposition of their inhabitants, to make a formidable resistance to the French, should be the most remote from " our own shores. i8io] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 309 CHAPTER IX. Lord Liverpool's labours as Secretary for the Colonies — State of Canada — Lord Liverpool's estimate of the difficulties of the Ministry, and of Lord Wellington in Spain — Lord Grenville's censure of the conduct of the war — Lord Liverpool's defence — His panegyric on the spirit of the Portuguese and Spaniards — Lord Grey's motion on Parliamentary Reform — Lord Liverpool's speech — The recent Re form Bill — Opinion of Castanos on the war — Difficulties of providing specie — The loss of Ciudad Rodrigo — Irritability of Wellington — Letter of Lord Liverpool to Wellington. Lord Liverpool filled the office of Secretary of State for War and the Colonies for about two years and a half, and during that period the attention of the whole Govern ment as well as his own was principally fixed on our Peninsular army. As the iraportance of its operations and the grandeur of its commander's genius gradually developed, the anxiety of the whole nation became concentrated on it. But as yet he himself, and the energetic statesman whom he had replaced, were, with Wellington's own relations, whose views were naturally coloured by their confidence and pride in him, almost the only men in England who estimated at its true value the field opened to our glory by the French invasion of the Peninsular kingdoms, and by the spirit of unanimous resistance which that most unprovoked of all Napoleon's outrages had awakened in the people of both nations. Yet the very minister- who felt most deeply the necessity of devoting his whole attention to this part of his work, was the very one who by his office was the most called upon to devote no trifling portion of his labours 3IO LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1810 to Other subjects ; for, by an absurdity that was never re medied till its practical inconveniences were brought out StiU more fully by the difficulties of a subsequent war, the care of the colonies, with all their varied interests, was committed to the same department as the war. And the minister whose whole energies, however untiring they might have been, would have been strained to the very uttermost by the task of giving judicious and timely counsel and in struction to the general of an army, and of providing him with means of all kinds for carrying out those instructions, often had his time occupied and his mind distracted by the affairs of the extreme east or west, by clerical establish ments in one settlement, and by proposals for establishing new forms of government in another. In deaHng with all these various and dissimilar subjects Lord Liverpool displayed the same extensive and accurate information, and, where the occasion admitted it, at least an equally shrewd and penetrating foresight, as has been already remarked on topics with which he had had more opportunity of making himself previously acquainted. While explaining to one of the chief dignitaries of the Church at home his extreme anxiety to be able to procure the acceptance of chaplaincies in Ceylon by clergymen " of talents and character likely as such to be respected by the inhabitants of the colony ; " and having with this view asked him to recommend him persons properly qualified (for on no subject was Lord Liverpool more scrupulous throughout his long official career than in his distribution of ecclesiastical patronage, never making it a means of pro viding for his own relations or dependants), he took occa sion to explain to him all the different circumstances which rendered the appointments which he had to offer both eligible and important. Eligible, because the island was particularly healthy ; important, because " Christianity has less difficulties to encounter in its progress in Ceylon than in any other part of the East. The distinction of castes must, while it continues, form a considerable impediment i8io] OF LORD LIVERPOOL 3" to its progress in India. But this distinction does not exist amongst the Ceylonese, who are Buddhists ;' and it has been consequently found that great facilities have existed in per suading large numbers of the natives to be baptized, though it has been difficult to eradicate afterwards the reraains of their superstition." In Canada his attention was at the same time deraanded by a question of greater political iraportance ; one which has on more than one occasion within our tirae caused our statesmen the greatest anxiety, and which has only within a very short time been settled on what may be hoped to ' On this passage I have been favoured with the following comment by my kind friend the late Bishop of Ceylon :— " The extract you sub mit for my opinion from Lord Liverpool's papers is in the main correct, though not quite so. The distinction of castes does exist among the Ceylonese Buddhists ; but it partakes more of a social than of a reli gious character, and is therefore neither so bigoted nor so obtrusive as in India ; but in the north and on the north-east coast of the island, occupied by the Tanish race from India, to the entire exclusion ofthe Singhalese, both Brahminism and caste are in full force. Education and missionary work has made some impression on them ; and is pro gressing favorably but slowly. In the south and centre the Singha lese race and language and religion (that of Buddhism) prevail and to this portion of the island Lord Liverpool's remark is more appli cable, great numbers under the Dutch rule (which preceded our own) having been induced rather than persuaded to be baptized in the hope of Government employment. Their system of parochial subdivisions and registration was very complete, and none were admitted on their lists (called thombos) without compulsory baptism. These registers I found to be still cherished by thousands of hollow professors of Chris tianity, who could see no inconsistency in calling themselves ' Budd hist Christians.' This is a real hindrance to missionary progress, but Christian education in the last fifteen or twenty years has done its work more thoroughly, and we may well be hopeful of better fruit." When it is recollected that Ceylon was among our very latest acqui sitions, the accuracy of Lord Liverpool's information concerning its people, in which one who has had such pre-eminent opportunities of becoming acquainted with the island as Bishop Chapman finds so little to correct, is a remarkable evidence of the honest and judi cious diligence with which he applied himself to every part of his duties ; and may well incline us to rely on his statements respecting other raatters on which a knowledge of the precise truth was more easily attainable. 312 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1810 prove both a permanent and a safe footing. The bill of 1 79 1, by which the province had been parted into two divi sions, had not been found to answer the main object which had been hoped from it, that of quenching the animosities which existed between the old French inhabitants and the more modern settlers of English blood. And the present commander-in-chief in the colony. Sir James Craig, wrote to Lord Liverpool in the summer of 18 10, to suggest some modifications of the Act which he had reason to think would be acceptable to the French party, who, as was not unnatural, were the aggressors in the disputes which had arisen, and were now looking with eagerness which was not dissembled, and with wishes which could hardly be mis taken, on our contest with France. He looked at the question solely with regard to his position of responsibility for the tranquillity of the province. Lord Liverpool was compelled to take a wider view, which he explained in the following letter : Dear Sir, I do not know whether my public despatches by this mail will prove satisfactory to you. I can assure you that the subject of your very able letter has been most anxiously considered, not only by those who are imme diately the King's confidential servants, but by the Attorney- General and by the Master of the Rolls, who has much local knowledge of Canada from having passed the early part of his life in that country. It would be wasting your time to repeat to you in a private letter those considerations which you will find fully brought before you in my public despatch. But there is one circumstance to which I would wish particu larly to draw your attention, a circumstance to which I have obliquely alluded in my public letter, but which for reasons sufficiently obvious it was impossible for me to explain in such a letter so explicitly as I can in a private communication. You may rely upon it, that if the subject of the constitution of Canada was brought under the discussion of the British Par liament, the cause of the Canadians would be warmly supported by all the democrats and friends of reform in this country. It i8io] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 313 would most probably receive the support likewise, under pre sent circumstances, of Lord Grenville, the original framer of the Act of 1 7 91, and of his friends. The support of so powerful a combination, even if it was for the moment successfully resisted, could not fail to have the effect of encouraging the factious and disaffected in Canada. They would look to the chance of their friends coming into Government for a revision and alteration of the system which might at this time be adopted. In short, we should have the game of the American war played over again. The object of Opposition would be, in the first instance, to embarrass fhe Government, but by the measures they would adopt for that purpose they might separate the North American colonies fi-om the mother country. Another consideration impresses itself very strongly on our minds, that every en deavour would be made in Parliament to connect the questions of Government in Canada with the Catholic question in Ire land. It may be admitted that some connexion might not unfairly be considered as existing between them. The intro duction, however, of such a topic might be productive of the most unfortunate results, both in Ireland and Canada, especially at the present time. We are therefore clearly of opinion that the great object ought to be to keep the subject of Canada out of Parliament as long as possible, unless a connexion could be proved between the popular party in Canada and the Government of France. In that case I am convinced there would be no difficulty in carry ing the most effectual measures, even the abolition of the Constitution of 1791. But, in any other alternative except this, I dread no proceeding so strongly as an appeal to Parliament. In communicating to you these sentiments, I can assure you that we are all fully convinced of the evils which have arisen from the Act of 1791, and of the absurdity of attempting to give what is falsely called the British constitution to a people whose education, habits, and prejudices render them incapable of receiving it. But the evil is done ; our steps cannot be easily retraced. We must endeavour, in the first instance, to make the best use we can of the instrument which has been put into our hands, but above all we must avoid tampering with it. If Parliament is to be called upon for its interposition, it must be 314 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1810 by the most decisive and effectual measures, such as will pre vent altogether the recurrence of the evils again ; and it appears to us that it would be in vain to expect the adoption of such measures frorn Parliament without a case far stronger, and very different in its nature, than that which we could bring at present under their consideration. With respect to any military attempt of Buonaparte upon Canada, I can assure you that at present his hands are too full for any such operation. It is evident that he has not the military means of raaking as large an effort in Spain and Portugal as his interest and reputation require. As long as the contest can be maintained in that quarter upon its present scale we need be under little apprehension for more distant objects. I ara happy in being able to acquaint you with what I have no doubt you will have heard frora many other quarters, and . particularly from some of j our professional friends, that the events of this campaign hive exceeded our most sanguine expectations, and certainly af.brd no very unreasonable ex pectation that the contest in the Peninsula may finally prove successful At all events, if the Fr ench are not expelled from the country, many years must elapse before they can obtain sufficiently quiet possession of it to enable them to avail themselves of its resources, and to direct them against the King's dominions. I am, &c. Liverpool. The mention of the contest in the Peninsula, contained in the above letter, shows how real was the confidence which he felt in its ultimate result. And he acted with as much resolution as he wrote, losing no time in sending out reinforcements sufficient to keep up Wellington's force always " at the amount which he considered as necessary, 30,000 men fit for duty," and with them every kind of supply which the general thought requisite, and which the resources of the kingdom could furnish. But he had in his way as great difficulties to contend with as Wellington himself Some of them are explained in his private letters to Wel lington, from which it is but fair to his memory here to give copious quotations, because, without a candid examination of them, it would be impossible to form an adequate idea i8io] OF LORD LIVERPOOL, 315 of his merit in surmounting them. It was a great thing during these eventful years that the minister on whose department the efficiency of the army depended, even raore than on the general himself, should encourage the general by candid support, by the most implicit and judicious confidence, and, above all, by the fellow-feeling as to the eventual issue of the struggle, and as to the duty iraposed on us, by our national honour, to persevere in it to the last. In sorae instances the letters also show a great capacity for organization, corabined with a great insight into character, and even into the professional ability of different officers. It is the more necessary to point this out, because it is well known that the Opposition in Parhament made complaints which frora time to time escaped Wellington, on occasional deficiencies ofdifferent kinds which impeded his movements, the text for furious denunciations ofthe Ministry at the time ; and that since that day writers have sought to enhance his glory by dwelling on these deficiencies, and inveighing against the Government for suffering them to exist; keeping out of sight the fact that he himself, when not under the influence of moraentary irritation, admitted that the minis ters had done all that raen in their position possibly could do, and that the real cause of the disappointments which he at tiraes experienced was to be found partly in their own political difficulties, and partly in the state of Europe, which, as in the case of his frequent want of raoney, rendered it actually difficult to procure the precious raetals in sufficient quantities, and had reduced us, for our own internal trade, to resort to a paper currency. This latter difficulty is certainly not exaggerated in the following extract frora a private letter from Lord Liver pool to Lord Wellington, written in December of this same year, 1 809, the first year of the war as far as his array was concerned : The expenditure of this country has become enormous ; and, if the war continues, we must lopk to economy. I do not believe so great a continued effort has ever been made by this country. 3i6 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1809 combining the military and pecuniary aid together, as his Majesty is making for Portugal and Spain. The respective Governments of these countries should be made sensible of the truth of this position, and should feel the necessity of making extraordinary exertions for their own support I think it material to draw your attention to the mode of defraying the expense which it has been agreed to incur for the Portu guese army. We are naturally anxious to know, with some certainty, that we have our money's worth for our money. It is very desirable, therefore, that the sums advanced by Great Britain for the Portuguese force should be applied directly to defraying the expenses of that force, and should not pass circuitously through the hands of the Portuguese Governraent; in which case we might not be certain that it was not diverted to other purposes. It was not easy to guard against such a misappropria tion of our treasures in Portugal, and still harder in Spain, where the corruption of all classes, even of the highest, was as general as their presumption and obstinacy. An extract from another letter, written on the same day, while it makes light of some circumstances which looked formidable on paper, alludes, though without dwelling too much on them, to the difficulties which beset the Ministry itself As to the campaign, it informs Wel lington that : It is understood here from a messenger of Stahremberg's, who has passed through France, that 80,000 raen have been ordered to raarch to Bayonne. If Buonaparte cannot send a larger force, I should not feel rauch alarraed at the prospect. I think we may, however, rely that he will make every possible exertion to subdue Spain, and that his first great efforts will be directed against the British army. All our measures should be calcu lated on this view of the subject. It is a great satisfaction to us to find that you entertain a just notion of the eventual difficulties to which you may be exposed, and that you have not undervalued them on the one hand, or exaggerated them on the other. Lord Wellesley is installed, and we are going on very smoothly. i8io] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 317 It is impossible to form any calculation yet of our strength in Parliament. We have some awkward questions to manage at the outset (particularly that of Walcheren), which must put us under considerable difficulties. I trust, however, that by pru dence and temper we shall get through them. He was estimating the difficulties of himself and his col leagues in the very same frame of mind which he praised in the general, neither undervaluing nor exaggerating them ; and, as to the progress of the campaign, showing a keen and correct appreciation of the course likely to be taken by Napoleon, and of the force which he would find necessary for the attainment of his object. But probably, with all his experience of Lord Grenville's inability, through sheer ill-temper, to see two sides of a question, he was hardly prepared for the degree to which party rancour blinded him and the rest of the Opposition, when Parliament re-asserabled. In the debate on the address Lord Grenville denounced with almost equal vehemence the general and the ministers. " His heart was full, and he must give vent to his feelings." And his feelings led him to pour forth such a torrent of unreasoning invective as has rarely been heard. He attacked every one concerned in the expedition to the Scheldt. And this part of his harangue was in truth plausible, for it could not be denied that in some quarter or other there had been great mis management. But he marred the effect of it by being equally if not more vehement on the subject of the cam paign on the Tagus, for which, in a subsequent speech, a few days later, he even urged the House to refuse its thanks to Lord Wellington : declaring that it was impossible to justify him for fighting a battle at Talavera, and denying that the result of that battle had been a victory to our arms. Lord Grey, a constant critic of all military opera tions, even went beyond his friend in his condemnation of both ministers and general, declaring himself unable to give utterance to the indignation with which he had heard of honours having been conferred on Wellington resembling those which had formerly been bestowed upon 3i8 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1810 Marlborough, and forgetting all the ordinary restraints of Parliamentary courtesy in his description of the imbe cility and misconduct of the ministers, and of the miseries which they had inflicted on their country. It must be stated, to Lord Grey's honour, that he subsequently recanted his denunciations of the conduct of the war ; which Lord Grenville never did. But at the opening of this session he fully rivalled his coadjutor in vehemence; and the two made motion after motion designed in the first place to eject the Ministry, but all having the una voidable effect, whether they succeeded or failed, of embarrassing the defenders of the nation, and with it of the common cause of freedom in Europe. On another occasion Lord Grenville ventured on the most dangerous of all acts of temerity, prophecy. He asked, " Was there any man who heard him, who in his con science believed that even the sacrifice of the whole of the brave British army would secure the kingdom of Portugal .¦' And if he received from any person an answer in affirmation of that opinion, he should be able to judge, by that answer, of the capacity of such a person for the government of this country, or even for the transaction of public busi ness in a deliberative assembly. He had always thought the enterprise impossible, but now it was known to all the people of the country that it had become certainly impossible." He denounced the ministers for persisting in such an enterprise. He denounced the general as an officer possessed of no military quality but courage. He denounced our envoy in Portugal for erroneous views of the capabilities of the country, and for an unwise method of carrying out even his own ill-conceived plans, and he insisted on the instant withdrawal of the British army from Portugal. " The campaigns in Spain and Portugal had already cost this nation the lives of 12,000 of its brave soldiers. It was now to be considered whether any further sacrifice was to be incurred in this hopeless contest. He would conjure their Lordships not to go on in the fruitless profusion of life and treasure ; but, while i8io] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 319 there was yet time, arrest the fatal progress of national calamity and disgrace. Portugal, so far from the most defensible, was the least defensible country in Europe." The relation of these efforts of disappointed ambition and impotent malice is not a purposeless waste of tirae. They are recapitulated here for the lesson they afford of the degree to which the spirit of faction can drive men of even high ability, and for the sake of the at least equally instructive warning that in political debate every speech and argument should be judged of by its own validity, and not by the presumed purity of intention or intellectual capacity of the speaker. Lord Liverpool, as was his wont, met these different motions with a straightforward opposition, which began by brushing away all the flirasy subterfuges and artful screens with which a show of an attempt had been made to disguise the real object of his assailants. In whatever forra, whether of substantive motion or specious araendraent, they brought the question forward, he treated their different steps as " virtual raotions for the reraoval of the Ministry, and for the abandonment of our allies beyond the Pyrenees." His defence of the Governraent was complete on every point but one, where it must be admitted to have been partially defective. He affirmed truly that the enterprise undertaken against the fortresses on the Scheldt was " the greatest expedition ever sent from this country upon any occasion," and that " the object, the destruction of the enemy's naval preparations at Antwerp, was one for which it was worth while to encounter a considerable risk." But when he added, " That it failed in its ulterior object was not to be attributed to any fault or failure in the plan, or in the execution of it ; to any neglect of the Executive Government, or to any miscon duct of the army or navy ; but to circumstances which it was impossible to control, to the elements, and to the unusual state of the weather at that season," he advanced an excuse which his hearers can hardly have accepted as well founded, and which posterity has not endorsed. For it was notorious that the want of success was solely owing 320 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1810 to the dilatory incapacity of Lord Chatham;' and it was almost equally well known that he had owed his appoint ment to the pertinacious partiality of the King himself, and not to the judgment of his colleagues in the Cabinet. Probably this latter fact contributed to make all parties desire to avoid that part of the question. And on no other topic had Lord Liverpool any difficulty in carrying conviction to the minds of his hearers. He had unques tionably reason on his side when he reproached Lord Gren ville and the other assailants of the Government for "the dangerous and impolitic appeal which they had made to the passions of the people, by displaying to them in aggra vated colours the losses of the army and the pecuniary burdens they were called on to support." And, in reply to their description of the country which was the scene of war as one destitute of points of defence, he was not content with merely disproving the accuracy of that description on the testimony of militaty officers better acquainted with the country than those who thus con demned it, but he reminded the House of a fact which, except by Wellington and himself, had not hitherto been much attended to, that we had on our side what was of greater consequence in such a contest than any advantages to be derived frora the character of the country, the cha racter of the people. In the kingdoms beyond the Rhine " the moment their armies were defeated the countries ' Alison, in a note on chap. Ix. § 1 3 of his history, has accumulated a number of authorities beyond all suspicion on this point, testifying that the plan of the Government was well conceived, and could hardly have failed to succeed in other hands. Pelet, the author or authors of the " Victoires et Conquetes," Jomini, and, above aU, Napoleon him self, according to both O'Meara and Montholon, agree that, when the expedition first reached the Scheldt, Antwerp was so scantily gar risoned as to be wholly at our mercy. The loss of a few days sufficed to put that important town out of danger. But even after Antwerp was safe, the naval officers (as the present writer has shown in his " History of the British Navy," xxxiii.) strongly pressed the adoption of other operations of which they could have ensured the success, and which would have been of great importance ; but Lord Chatham would not listen to them- i8lo] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 321 were conquered. The people were everywhere neutral, and uniforraly remained tame spectators of the contest which was to decide their fate. But in Spain our armies had the support of the whole armed population, which throughout two campaigns had fought under every circurastance of adversity and disadvantage, and were still as resolute not to yield to the foreign invader as at the beginning of the struggle. Undoubtedly the Spanish armies when by them selves had suffered some severe defeats. But the noble baron had spoken as if war had not its chances and reverses, as if the risks in railitary operations were not always proportioned to the raagnitude of the contest, and had triuraphantly asked. What had we gained in the Penin sula .'' What had we gained .'' We had gained the hearts of the whole population of Spain and Portugal We had gained that of which no triuraphs, no successes of the eneray could deprive us. In Portugal such was the affec tion of the inhabitants that there was not a want of the British soldier that was not instantly and cheerfully sup plied. In Spain the universal feeling, even in that awful moraent of national convulsion and existing revolution, was that of the most complete deference to the British envoy and Government ; and so perfect was their confi dence in both that they placed their fleet under the orders of the British admiral Whatever might be the issue of the contest, to this country would always remain the proud satisfaction of having done its duty. He trusted we should never abandon Spain so long as any hope remained of the possibility of ultimate success. Their lordships were bound by every sentiment of honour and good faith to support a people who had themselves given proofs of honour, good faith, and bravery that had not been exceeded by any nation that ever existed." The day was not far distant, it came even before he quitted the office which he was then holding, when the murmurs of even his most rancorous opponents were silenced by the glorious and undeniable success which attended the perseverance of the Govern ment in the course which he had thus laid down for it. VOL. I. Y 322 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1810 But when even those who did not, like Lord Grenville and Lord Grey, proclaim the incompetence of the British general, and deny that Talavera had been a victory, might yet reasonably doubt whether the complete rout of the principal Spanish army at Ogana' did not more than counterbalance it with regard to the probability of Spain making a permanently successful resistance to the invader, at such a time to speak nothing but words of hope and encouragement required not only a clear foresight, a capacity for taking a comprehensive view of the whole question in all its chances of fortune whether for good or evil but the equally statesmanlike attribute of resolute courage, of firmness to withstand not only the assaults of his antagonists, but the doubts of his friends, the commend able anxieties and uneasiness of the whole people. One of the motions by which the Government was assailed in this session was brought forward by Lord Grey, and referred to the general state of the nation ; and one topic on which he dilated has not yet lost its interest. Undeterred by the convulsions into which the atrocities of the French Revo lutionists were throwing the whole world, he had in 1792 allowed himself to be made the organ of the revolutionary- societies which had established themselves on their model in England, and in that character had then brought forward a motion on the subject of Parliamentary Reform, which Pitt, though in less dangerous times he' had shown himself a friend of the principle, with a wiser patriotism now refused to countenance it on the express ground of the " anarchy and confusion" which at such a moment such a measure must produce. It could hardly be said that the present time, while we were engaged in a most arduous war, was more favorable for its consideration ; but Lord Grey now brought ' At Ogana, on the 3d of November, the Spanish General Areizaga, with 50,000 men, was utterly defeated by Soult with 30,000. He lost 20,000 prisoners and nearly all his artillery and ammunition. And his overthrow led to a smaller army, under the Duke del Parque, receiving an almost equally decisive defeat frora Kellerraann before the end of the same month. i8io] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 323 it forward as a subject the neglect of which was a grave fault in the Cabinet. He admitted, indeed, that there was " some difference between his present sentiments and his former impressions " on the question. And he showed how great that difference was by a denunciation of " those vague and general speculations in which some men would wish to engage ;" and by a declaration that he should wish to take for his guide and rule in the framing of any raeasure of reform "the fixed principles ofthe constitution ;" and that "the remedy which he sought was one which should be liraited by the existing defects, should be raarked out by the constitution itself and should not launch out into any extravagance of theory." But, though Lord Grey had been thus guarded in the enunciation of his present sentiraents. Lord Liverpool wisely thought it was a matter on which in so critical a season no doubt should be allowed to exist as to the feelings of the Governraent. And in his reply he delivered his opinion, in which all his colleagues coincided, that while "they had no objection to an economical re form," they would never countenance any measure which went beyond " a practical remedy for practical grievances." Among these he did not class the inequalities in the Parlia mentary representation of the people on which Lord Grey had dwelt, but which he affirmed to be only apparent, and to have no reality. On the contrary, "he would say that he believed there never was a period in our history when the representation of the people in Parliament was less unequal. That it was unequal in theory he would admit, but that theoretic inequality he regarded as one of the greatest advantages of our constitution. This was the opinion of that enlightened statesman Mr. Burke, who said that it was this peculiarity in its constitution which made it, instead of an assembly of deputies, an entire and perfect deliberative meeting. For hiraself, he had carefully examined all the plans of reform that had been subraitted to ParHaraent at various tiraes, and he would fairly state that there was not one of thera to which he did not see insuperable objections. One of these plans, brought forward by the noble mover, Y 2 324 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [i8ia certainly not the most objectionable, aimed at making population and not property the basis of representation. Such a change he thought could not but be exceedingly injurious in its effects.'' These few sentences, weighty in themselves, derive a particular importance from the office to which the speaker soon rose, and which, as he never changed his opinion on the subject, marked out the line to which the King's Government, as long as it was taken from the Tory party, steadily adhered ; those who were looked on as its most liberal section, such as Canning and his school, being to the full as much opposed to any tampering with the existing composition of Parliament as the most tenacious adherents of old customs, and adopting the very arguments on which Lord Liverpool now relied. It was not till he had passed away that the champion of Reform, to whom he now opposed himself, carried a measure on the subject which popular clamour induced him to make far more sweeping than he seems at this time to have contemplated ; though after its enactment it was acquiesced in with cheerfulness, even by those who had most strenuously resisted it, and, in the perilous excitement of the third French Revolution, even with satisfaction, as being supposed to have taken away from all but the most profligate demagogues all pretence for exciting the people to discontent, and to have contri buted greatly to the feeling which made the lower classes rally round their sovereign at a moment when scarcely another throne in Europe could be looked on as secure. But that Reform Bill of 1832 is now in its turn superseded and swept away. The craving for change, not in order to remove acknowledged grievances, but merely for the sake of change, and to gratify those vague theories of equality which Lord Liverpool now denounced, and even Lord Grey repudiated, has been stimulated till it threatens to become insatiable ; and, if the assertion of the advocates of the bill of 1867 be correct, that it is but the necessary consequence and complement of the previous measure, it may well be doubted whether Lord Liverpool and his Tory colleagues i8io] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 325 were not counselling the nation more for its permanent advantage when they resisted the first approaches to reform, than those more popular statesmen who excited the populace to demand and then granted a measure which is thus proved to have been merely an incitement to re quire more, and an instrument to compel the concession of one which must prove at no distant day absolutely incom patible with the preservation of a single fragment of the ancient constitution. On every division in these debates the Government was supported by decisive majorities in both Houses ; and this naturally gave them confidence to proceed more firmly in prosecuting their own views as to the war. Lord Liverpool was a little embarrassed and perplexed by the Spanish General Castanos. At the beginning of 18 10 that officer was appointed to the comraand of the chief Spanish array ; an occurrence at which in one point of view Lord Liver pool was greatly pleased, because " he knew frora expe rience that he was the raost right-rainded Spaniard who had appeared since the Revolution ; and he believed hira to be sincerely and zealously attached to the British con nexion. He had also been so principally concerned in all those events which had led to the present state of things in Spain that it was scarcely possible for him under any circurastances to look forward to any prospect of terras with the eneray." But though his steady fidelity to the cause in which he was embarked could thus be depended on, " it appeared by his letters that he thought unfavor ably of the issue of the contest in Spain upon the prin ciples on which it was then conducted," even while he believed that " it would not be possible for the French to subdue the country" completely. And the knowledge that such was his language caused Lord Liverpool deep anxiety, since he naturally attributed great weight to the sentiments of one who had such means of forraing a cor rect judgraent, and such strong reasons to desire to corae to the opposite opinion ; and he consequently began to " fear from his account that the enemy might prove successful in 325 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1810 passing the Sierra Morena, and in getting possession of Seville. In that case," he supposed, " the Spanish armies must retreat to the island of Leon, and every effort must be made for the defence and safety of Cadiz." In such an event he anticipated that the Spaniards might solicit Wellington himself to furnish troops from his army to re inforce the garrison, and he proceeded therefore to consult the general whether, if such a request were made, he would be able to comply with it " consistently with the security of Portugal ; and, if it should become necessary to make an option between the two objects, which ought to be pre ferred ;" adhering to his usual practice of setting the case to be decided on in every point of view before Wellington, supplying him with all the information in his power, and then leaving him to regulate his conduct by his own judg ment. Nothing can show more plainly the resolution of some of the Opposition at the time, and of some of the critics of the Ministry since that day, to find fault, right or wrong, with all that they did and all that they did not do, than the circumstance that Lord Liverpool's conduct in thus leaving Wellington unfettered to use his own discretion has been attacked as if it were a mean evasion of the re sponsibility which belonged to himself and his coHeagues as ministers. He expressed his reasons for so doing to the general in a letter written towards the end of this year : " We wish you to be governed on this point " [that of bringing the French to action] " entirely by your own dis cretion ; and that you should neither abstain from attack nor engage in it in consequence of any opinion which may be supposed to be entertained in this country. If it were even possible (which it is not) to form a just opinion here ¦on such a subject, the change of circumstances and succes sion of events would be very likely to render that opinion, which might have been good when it was formed, bad when it came to be acted upon. In short you know our objects to be the defence of Portugal and the support of the cause of the Peninsula, as long as they are practicable ; and I trust you feel that you possess the entire confidence of the i8io] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 327 Governraent with respect to the measures which it raay be desirable to adopt for these purposes, whether they may be of a cautious or of a raore enterprising character." Candid judges, with rainds unpervert.ed by the tera porary struggles of party, will be of opinion that this is the only spirit in which instructions ought to be fraraed by a Cabinet coraposed of civilians for a railitary commander ; that, if he deserves to be trusted with the safety of an army at all, he certainly deserves to be trusted to know how to direct its operations better than they. And they will be supported in so deciding by no less an authority than that of Nelson, who stated his own rule of conduct to be to con sider that it was impossible for the ministers " to tell exactly at a distance " what ought to be done, but to reraeraber their general object, the destruction of the French, and to carry out that object in the most effective way, whether that way were in accordance with, or even in open contradiction to, the letter of their instructions. At the same time it is ira possible to avoid reraarking that, if ever a Ministry could with wisdom fetter the discretion of a distant general, the comprehensive views of the whole question, and the capacity for judging, not merely of the general features of the operations on both sides, but even of professional details, during these years displayed by Lord Liverpool, would have justified the existing Cabinet in being more precise and minute in their instructions. To aid Wellington's judgment on the question now sub mitted to him. Lord Liverpool added that "there could be no doubt but that in this country a higher value was set upon Cadiz (connected with the Spanish fleet, arsenal, &c.), than upon Lisbon ; but," he proceeded, " even if the value of the two objects were equal, is it not true that Cadiz and some part of the south of Spain raight be defended, if Portugal were, for the tirae, lost ; but that Portugal could not long be defended if Andalusia were in possession of the French .? It is material Hkewise to consider how far under such circumstances the Portuguese army could be induced to retreat to the southern provinces of Portugal, and to 32S LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1810 keep up thereby a line of communication with the British and Spanish armies." So sound did Wellington himself think the views ex pressed in this letter of the mutual importance of Cadiz and Portugal to one another, that, while it was on its way to him, he sent a division under General Graham to rein force the garrison, and in a short time that all-important city was placed out of danger. So far Lord Liverpool's mind was at ease ; but on other points he was full of anxiety and perplexity. The history of that period of the war has been often, it might perhaps be said generally, re presented as if the general alone had felt assured of ulti mate success, and as if one of the hardest of his tasks had been to inspire with a portion of his own confidence and courage a weak and desponding Ministry. Lord Liverpool's letters, as we have seen, disprove this notion to a very great extent. He himself and certainly most if not all of his colleagues, apart from their reliance on Wellington's abilities, which they fully appreciated even before his return to Por tugal in the preceding spring, felt a strong conviction that they had found a field where they could successfully stem the further advance of Napoleon's ambition. And in the reasons which had dictated this opinion it would be more correct to say that they coincided with Wellington than that they borrowed them from him. The despondency existed, not in the Ministry, but in the nation at large. The factious cavils of the Opposition concurred with what seems the natural propensity of every people to blame those who for the time are their rulers. The refutation of these cavils by the ministers was refused the weight which pro perly belonged to it, because it seemed like an eulogy of their own prudence, a pleading of their own cause ; and thus the murmurs of those who lamented the death of Moore, who sneered at Wellington's imprudence and wanton rash ness in fighting unnecessary battles, and even denied that a victory had been won at Talavera, gained more credit with the unreflecting and impatient many than those who pointed out that he had already twice expelled the French from i8io] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 329 Portugal ; that on every occasion on which the EngHsh and French soldiers had raet in conflict the French had been worsted in spite of a considerable superiority in nurabers ; and that it was plain that throughout Wellington was able to regulate his operations by his own preconceived ideas, and that the enemy were unable to compel him to take a single step unsanctioned by his own deliberate judgraent. From believing the description given by Lord Grenville, Lord Grey, and their followers and copyists in the House of Commons, of the character of the last campaign, the people in general, and even military men who ought to have known better, were easily led to augur still worse of that which was to corae. In March 18 10, Lord Liverpool, while expressing to Wellington the unabated sanguineness of the Ministry itself, is forced to add, " I should apprise you, however, that a very considerable degree of alarm exists in this country respecting the safety of the British array in Portugal The chances of successful defence are considered here by all persons, military as well as civil, so improbable," that there would be but little sympathy for the general, and no approval, if, in consequence of his persevering in what those critics would call "a desperate resistance," the array were to raeet with any disaster, how ever trivial. Lord Liverpool evidently foresaw that, in the event of any such mishap befalling it, the popular clamour would becorae so ardent as to render it irapossible for the Governraent to persist in keeping an array in the field, though even in that case he was resolved not to withdraw frora the struggle, but to throw the bulk of our force into Cadiz: arguing that "15,000 or 20,000 British troops might make it secure for the reraainder of the war ; and such a garrison would either oblige the French to evacuate the south of Spain, or would corapel them to keep in that part of the country an array of at least three tiraes the amount of the British force." Therefore, even if defeated both by the enemy in the field and by his antagonists in ParHament, he would not 330 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1810 abandon hope while one foot of ground remained on which a British regiment could make a stand. But the disparagement of our own chances of success, and the panegyrics of our enemy's genius and power, both equally ceaseless, inevitably embarrassed and hindered the Ministry in their attempts to supply the general with all the resources which he required, and which they were eager to furnish. And, even if this had not been the case, such a scarcity of specie at this time prevailed throughout Europe that there was a great difficulty in providing money. It cannot be better shown than in the following extracts from a letter of Lord Liverpool to Wellington, written at the end of June in this year, the last portion of which ex hibits also the earnestness with which the whole Cabinet, and especially the writer, encountered, and from the first had resolved to withstand and to overcome, all difficulties. Thus he writes : I can assure you that we are making every effort to supply you with specie. The Bank has had, from the beginning, the most positive directions to purchase all that can be procured in the markets ; but, notwithstanding the prosperous state of the trade of the country, they are in such distress with respect to specie, that they were positively in want, about a fortnight ago, of a hundred thousand dollars for the purpose of internal circulation. I should think that there must be large quantities of specie in Portugal ; for the balance of trade between Por tugal and Great Britain is at all times in favour of the former, and I ara not aware of any circurastance which can lead to an export of specie from Portugal to other countries, except for the purpose of purchasing corn. It would be a great relief if the Portuguese Government would take a considerable part of the subsidy in kind. The Americans, who will bring flour both to Lisbon and Cadiz, would be too glad to receive bills upon England for it. . . . We should feel mortified to the greatest degree if the contest in the Peninsula should fail for want of pecuniary means. No Government could attach more importance to the continuance of it than the present, or be more disposed to direct the whole disposable efforts of the country to this one object. When I accepted the seals of the iSio] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 331 War Department, I laid it down as a principle that, if the war was to be continued in Portugal and Spain, we ought not to suffer any part of our efforts to be directed to other objects. Upon this principle we have acted, and are still acting. Every regiment which is serviceable, and every general officer of reputation and experience whose station in the army admitted of his being employed in Portugal and Spain, has been selected for this service. ... If any means can be found for providing for our wants in the one matter of specie, we shall, I trust, get through the campaign creditably, and perhaps brilliantly; and I cannot avoid entertaining hopes of ultimate success. In one way even the general excellence of our credit added to our difficulties ; as in a letter written a week or two afterwards Lord Liverpool (though far from wishing the case different) writes : I hope we shall not be disappointed in our expectation of supplies from Vera Cruz ; and, if they should arrive in the course of the next six weeks, we shall do tolerably well We cannot expect to carry on war on a large scale without some difficulties : those of a pecuniary nature are perhaps more trying than any others, but they are, at the same time, most common. We are in general such good paymasters when compared to our enemies, that it is very difficult for us to resort to those shifts and expedients to which they are in the constant habit of re curring whenever a pressure of difficulties comes upon them, or the circumstances of the service require them. His letters to General Graham in Cadiz are in the same strain. And it may be that he had in his raind the jealousies which had already begun to divide the French marshals when he forwarded to Grahara copies of the des patches which he had written to Wellington, and " recom mended Graham to have the raost unreserved comrau nications with hira;" not only because "the whole army in the Peninsula was under Wellington's general comraand, but because it was also of the utmost importance that the arrangements which were raade with respect to any part of it should be made, as far as possible, on one system, and that the military operations having in view 333 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1810 the security of Lisbon and Cadiz should be connected on the same principle.'' Many of the injunctions and counsels contained in these letters may appear to refer either to petty details, unworthy the notice of history, or to matters of course. But it is on apparently trivial points that the success or failure of great operations often turns, nor are any things more apt to be overlooked than those which seem matters of course. It is the peculiar characteristic of men fit for posts of the highest trust not to think such beneath their attention. And the interest which Lord Liverpool's correspondence shows him to have taken in such matters of minute detail is also a proof how especially well- suited he was for the post which at this crisis was the most arduous and important in the whole Government. The summer of 18 10 did not pass without one great mis fortune, not indeed to our own armies, but to our allies, in the fall of Ciudad Rodrigo, which, greatly to his personal chagrin, Wellington was forced to leave to its fate. Pro bably no single incident in the whole war shows in a stronger light how singularly fit he was for such a com mand as was entrusted to him at such a time. For it was by no means certain that he was not strong enough at least to deliver the garrison. The Portuguese were almost as eager as the Spaniards that he should make an attempt to save the place ; because, while it remained untaken, the French could hardly renew their invasion of Portugal. The gallantry of the garrison itself and of its veteran com mander, Andreas Herrastl was a powerful incentive to try to succour them ; and if Wellington had looked not only to the chances of success in the enterprise, but even to the credit of the whole campaign, instead of to the general issue of the entire war, he would certainly have attempted to save them. But he felt bound to take, as he warned Herrasti himself " a larger view of the interests of the allies," as concerned the whole war ; and, in comparison with them, to disregard the preservation of any "single town, however important ; " and feeling that the " irrevo- i8io] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 333 cable loss of the whole cause would be the consequence of any failure in the atterapt to relieve Ciudad Rodrigo," he decided that frora such an atterapt it was his duty to refrain. Still it could not be denied that its surrender to the French bore the appearance of discorafiture and disaster. And it is therefore creditable to Lord Liverpool also that he was in no degree discouraged by it ; on the contrary, he wrote to Wellington in terras of decided commendation for forbearing to risk a battle for its defence, reminding him that " the attitude which he had been able to assume on the frontier had certainly had the effect of protracting the siege, and obliging the enemy to collect together the great means which they had been compelled to eraploy." Allusion has been raade to the mistaken view which some writers have taken of the confidence entertained by the rainisters in the result of the war. And it cannot be denied that they find grounds for their theory in certain isolated portions of Wellington's despatches. But the truth is that this greatest of generals, though patient beyond all men in action, was rarely, at any time of his life, patient or measured in his language. He was at this tirae not only engaged in one of the raost arduous labours that ever rested on one raan's shoulders, but he was erabarrassed in the perforraance of it by all kinds of irritating difficulties ; not only by the obstinacy of the Spaniards and the disin clination of the Portuguese for military service,^ but by the misconduct of his own troops. Long before the war was over he had brought thera to a perfection of discipline and consideration for the people araong whora they were serving of which no other array in the world has shown an equal example. But, in his earlier campaigns, the raoraent that I It was often necessai-y to send the Portuguese recruits in chains to head-quarters to prevent them deserting before they joined their regi ments. And in 1809, when he had just expelled the French from Oporto, the municipal authorities of that very city made grievous complaints of his pressing them to lend him 10,000/. for the use of the army, though they were assured that it should be repaid almost instantly. 334 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1810 the excitement of actual warfare ceased, they broke through all rules, and committed gross outrages on the natives, which created a great bitterness of feeling on their part, and provoked the general into declaring that "he had long been of opinion that a British army could bear neither success nor failure, and that their present conduct proved the truth of this judgment." The officers, too, were becoming weary of the war, and were disgusting him with constant requests for leave. And when, in addition to these and other numberless annoyances, any momentary want of supplies of any kind pressed on him, he was apt to give vent to his mortification in terms which he himself in his cooler moments admitted to be unfounded. One of his letters, in which he addressed his complaints to Lord Liverpool, produced an answer which is worth preserving, not only for the excellent temper with which it soothes the general's vexation while refuting his complaints, but also for the picture it affords of the difficulties with which the Cabinet had to contend at home, and of the vigorous and resolute efforts which they were nevertheless making to place the means of success within his reach ; efforts so great that, with all their anxiety to maintain the contest to the very last, indeed partly because of that very anxiety, they felt it doubtful whether the country would or could long bear so violent a strain : Private. London, September 10th, 1810. My .dear Lord Wellington, I have received your letter, marked "private," of the 19th ult. I am at a loss to conceive upon what grounds you can have supposed that the King's ministers had no confidence in the measures adopted for the defence of Portugal. I should have thought that their language in Parliaraent must have had the effect of satisfying the world as to their pubHc sentiments upon this subject. It certainly exposed them not only to the censure of Opposirion, but even to the animadversion of some of their friends, for what was represented to be their extreme sanguine ness in the cause of the Peninsula. With respect to their i8io] OF LORD LIVERPOOL, 335 private sentiments, I never knew a question on which there was less difference of opinion in Cabinet than upon the subject of Portugal ; either as to the expediency of persevering in the defence of it, as long as could be consistent with the safety of the British army, or as to the belief that there existed a fair chance of success, provided the attack was deferred till after the British army was reinforced, and had recovered the effects of the sick ness of the last campaign, and that time could be gained for the equipment and discipline of the Portuguese force. It is certainly true that, in the House of Commons, the Portuguese subsidy was carried by a small and unwilling majority ; and I believe that, if the House had been left to act upon their own feelings, they would in the month of February, when the subsidy was voted, have decided upon withdrawing the army from Portugal ; but this is principally to be ascribed to the circum stance that all the officers in the army who were in England, whether they had served in Portugal or not, entertained and avowed the most desponding views as to the result of the war in that country. Not one officer, as far as I recollect, ex pressed, on the occasion, any confidence as to probable success ; and not a mail arrived from Lisbon which did not bring letters at the time from officers of rank and situation in the army (many of which were communicated to me) avowing their opinions as to the probability, and even necessity, of a speedy evacuation of the country. It is true that some of the officers to whom I allude have since entirely changed their opinions, as I know from letters which I have recently received from them ; and they may now, therefore, be very ready to shift their former opinions upon the members of the Government ; but the truth is, the contest never could have been maintained in Portugal through the winter and spring, if it had not been for the determination of Government to persevere in it, at all risks to themselves, against not only the declared opinions of their opponents, but the public remonstrances of many of their friends. Upon another part of your letter I am anxious to make an obser vation. I can assure you that you are very much mistaken if you suppose that the defensive system of warfare, which you have felt it necessary and expedient to adopt during the 336 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1810 present campaign, has lowered your reputation in this country. Upon this subject I can safely refer you to any friends or correspondents you may have in England, in whatever situation of life they may be, and I am sure you will find thera all concur in stating that your military reputation never stood so high as it does at the present moment, and that even those whom you might suppose were least favorably inclined towards you are disposed now to do you the fullest justice. You will find in the enclosed paper the answers to all your pro positions in the order in which you brought them forward ; I trust that most of them will prove satisfactory to you. When the reinforcements now destined for you shall have reached you, and the four regiments shall have arrived from Sicily, the British army in Portugal will have received an augmentation of nearly 14,000 rank and file; and, allowing for a waste during the campaign of 4,000 men, the augmentation at the end of it would still amount to 10,000 men beyond the force originally destined for the defence of Portugal. I should deceive you if I held out to you the expectation that either the military or financial resources of this country would enable the Governraent to keep up' an army to this amount in Portugal for any considerable length of time, in addition to all the other necessary drains upon the service. The recruiting does not, at this moment, cover in proportion the ordinary waste of an array at home, and, unless we receive larger supplies of money from South Araerica than we have any reason to expect, Mr. Perceval is at a loss to know how we shall be able to find specie to meet such a great increase of expenditure. The augmentation, therefore, of your force must be considered as raade with reference to the present exigency ; and if the contest is to be raaintained in Portugal and in the Peninsula upon the principle originally adopted, of its being a long contest, the British army must be reduced as soon as the present exigericy will admit of it. We are very anxious, therefore, not with a view of abandoning, but for the purpose of maintaining the contest in the Peninsula for an indefinite time, that, as soon as the present crisis shall appear to be over, you would send home the excess of your i8io] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 337 force, after keeping 30,000 effective rank and file in Portugal and a sufficient garrison at Cadiz ; selecting, of course, these regiments to be returned home which are the least efficient, and consequently the least fitted for active service. The question, in short, must c(jme to this. We must make an option between a steady and continued exertion upon a mode rate scale, and a great and extraordinary effort for a Hmited time, which neither our means, military or financial, will enable us to maintain permanently. If it could be hoped that the latter would bring the contest to a speedy and successful conclusion, it would certainly be the wisest course ; but, unfortunately, the experience of the last fifteen years is not encouraging in this respect. Ever most sincerely yours, (Signed) Liverpool. To such an extent, indeed, did Lord Liverpool carry his resolution to place every conceivable resource at Wel lington's disposal that in October he even wrote him word that he had procured the sanction of the Admiralty to his borrowing " the lower-deck guns of the men-of-war in the Tagus, and availing himself of the assistance of a propor tion of the seamen and marines of the fleet for the purpose of manning thera," if he should think such a step desirable for the purpose of strengthening his lines of defence at Torres Vedras, of the construction and object of which the Governraent had been inforraed, though Massena, whose projects and boasts they were intended to confound, had as yet no suspicion of their existence. VOL. I. 338 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1810 CHAPTER X. Illness of the King — Violence of the Opposition — Discussions on the Regency — Characteristics of Lord Liverpool's eloquence — Lord Holland's opposition — The Prince of Wales becomes Regent. The next letter which the general received from the minister is not without a melancholy interest. It was written to congratulate him on the result of the battle of Busaco, in which he had given Massena an unmistakeable lesson that his retreat before the French legions was not forced upon him by the superior strategy of the marshal, renowned, intrepid, and skilful though he was, but was a part of his own long-premeditated plan of the campaign. For the victory of the British army was decisive ; and the triple line of fortification which subsequently received our troops had occupied the whole summer in its construction. Richly merited, therefore, was the panegyric which Lord Liverpool was, as it were, the mouthpiece of the whole nation in pronouncing on the commander-in-chief And, as the Portuguese divisions had highly distinguished them selves in the battle, he added that the King proposed to confer the Order of the Bath on General Beresford, the officer who had been entrusted with the duty of bringing them under the restraints and giving them the strength of discipline, and who had performed his task with the most conspicuous zeal and ability. Lord Liverpool added, "I can assure you that I never saw the King more entirely satisfied than he has been with the late operations of the army." i8io] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 339 It was the last letter in which such language could ever be applied to George III. His favorite daughter. Prin cess Amelia, was lying on her deathbed, and he had more than once expressed his apprehension that his mind would not be equal to the shock that her death, which he knew to be inevitable, must cause hira. When it took place he was hardly conscious of it. The date of the letter of which the sentence quoted above is an extract is the 17th of October. That day week the first signs of a relapse into his old disorder were perceptible. He grew rapidly worse ; every hour confirmed the worst apprehensions that had been entertained ; and before the 2d of November, the day on which his daughter breathed her last, he had sunk into a state of derangement which eventually proved permanent and incurable. It was not at first supposed to be of such a character. The completeness of his recovery frora forraer attacks of the sarae kind naturally engendered a hope that this seizure would prove equally teraporary. And the language which Lord Liverpool held to Wellington on the subject was, that "the reports of all the physicians who attend hira are so far favorable, that they agree in giving the most confident expectations of his recovery. I trust this event will happen speedily, and before it can be necessary to take any steps for filling up the defect in the royal authority, for I am thoroughly convinced that, if a regency is once established, the King never will recover." For his alienation of mind as yet was only partial, and not without intervals of consciousness. A Regency could not have been appointed without his being aware of it, and the feeling which he had displayed on that subject in 1788 could not fail to be present to the recollection of his ministers. He had then looked on all who had been desirous to hasten the appointment of a Regency almost in the light of his personal eneraies, and had declared that if the bill had once passed, whatever raight have been the state of his health afterwards, he would never have resumed z 2 340 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1810 his authority. It was therefore a clear and positive duty of the ministers to postpone till the last moment a step which might have so prejudicial an effect. And at the beginning of December they still saw reason to hope that it might be unnecessary to have recourse to it, so decided, as Lord Liverpool wrote on the 4th, were " the reports of the physicians that the King had been getting gradually better for the last five days." But the Opposition refused to take the chances of his recovery into their calculation. A subsequent paragraph of the same letter proceeds thus : " We had a most dis agreeable scene in the two Houses of Parliament on Thurs day last [November 29]. The feeHng and temper of the country are, however, as good as possible, and our majori ties were respectable. But the conduct of Lord Grenville on this occasion was beyond anything we could have conceived." While of the leaders of parties and sections of parties he says : " Canning was not in the House, and his friends did not vote ; Lord Sidmouth and his friends zealous with us. Castlereagh likewise with us." On the 1st of November the existing prorogation of Parliament h*ad expired. As a matter of course it had been intended that it should be renewed ; but since, from the King's illness, that had become impossible, the ministers, on its meeting, had instead moved an adjournment of both Houses ; and on the 29th, feeling the importance of allow ing no step to be precipitated which might damp the prospect of the King's restoration to health. Lord Liverpool proposed to repeat the adjournment for a fortnight longer. So harmless and ordinary a motion might have been expected to pass without comment. But the Opposition entertained no doubt that the appointment of 'a regent, who could be no one but the Prince of Wales, would be followed by their instant installation in office, and were not inclined to wait for so desired a consummation a single day. Lord Spencer was put forward with an amendment, which proposed "to examine his Majesty's physicians, and i8io] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 341 to report the examination to the House without delay," and Lord Grenville supported hira in an harangue of which scarcely any exercise of charity can account for its veheraenee and exasperation. He exhausted the whole vocabulary of Parliaraentary reproach in his denunciations of the idea of waiting a fortnight to see what turn his Majesty's disorder raight take. If their Lordships should agree to such a raotion, "they would be turning their backs upon the constitution and upon the country." It was "a proposition most derogatory to the dignity of ParHament, most hostile to the best interests of the monarchy, and most repugnant to every principle of the constitution." If, when the ministers proposed the pre vious adjournment, they had intended thus to repeat it, he would say that " they had not alone been guilty of disingenuousness, but had been iraplicated in a very criminal and treacherous proceeding." If he himself were to con sent to the adjournment, it " would be a base and criminal dereliction of his duty." Lord Liverpool had founded his motion on a report raade by the King's physicians to the Privy Council at an examination of those gentleraen. That this body should have been convened for the purpose of instituting an exaraination, " without the consent, the know ledge, and the sumraons of the King," was now denounced as an act " most hostile to the principles upon which the monarchy stands, and one which, though not republican, would lead to the establishment of the raost odious and detestable forra of aristocracy." Lord Liverpool had said " that there existed two grave reasons for the House con curring in his proposition : first, that there had taken place, since the comraenceraent of the King's illness, a material araendraent in his disorder ; and secondly, that it had not been of long duration, as it had been when the Estates of the realm before proceeded to supply the deficiency of the kingly functions. Of these two facts, so confidently de pended upon, he (Lord Grenville) denied that the House possessed any legal or constitutional knowledge." 342 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1810 It is evident that this argument rested on a strange misconception of the case, and of the ministers' proposal. If the Cabinet had been bringing in a bill proposing to enact a law, it would have been indispensable that every form should be strictly observed, and that ParHament itself should have examined the witnesses on whose evidence it was about to found its exercise of legislative power. But, as matters stood, where it was manifestly most desir able to postpone action which might prove to be pre mature ; and, till the permanent nature of the King's malady should be clearly established, to avoid giving the case a publicity which might tend to increase the chance of its becoming permanent. Parliament might well be content to acquire its information, so long as it was certain, in an informal manner. That, as yet, the King's disease had not been of long duration was a matter of universal notoriety. It was not above five weeks since he had been mixing with his Court in perfect health. That it was now abating, if alleged by the physicians to the Privy Council, would certainly not be denied by them before the Parliamentary Committee. The factiousness and unreasonableness of the attack on the conduct of the ministers was accordingly condemned by a large majority of the House : the most remarkable circumstance in the division being that the princes of the royal family no longer acted as an united party ; but, while the Dukes of York and Cambridge (the first-mentioned of whom was, of all the brothers, the most attached to the Prince of Wales) voted with the ministers, the Dukes of Clarence and Sussex joined the Whigs, with whom they now began to identify themselves. The hopes, however, which the physicians had expressed of the King's speedy restoration to health grew fainter as December advanced. When, at the expiration of the fortnight. Parliament reassembled. Lord Liverpool him self moved the appointment of a Committee of the House to examine the physicians in attendance on his Majesty ; i8io] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 343 and the Prime Minister made a similar motion in the House of Coraraons. The raotions were agreed to as a matter of course ; and on the report of the Comraittees it appeared that the physicians, five in nuraber. Dr. Rey nolds, Dr. Heberden, Dr. Baillie, Sir H. Halford, and Dr. Robert Willis, were unanimous in giving it as their opinion that, though a speedy recovery was less probable than it had seemed a few weeks before, the chances of the King's ultimate restoration to coraplete health were in no degree diminished. When pressed on the subject of his time of life, they were equally agreed that years had made an unusually slight impression on his constitu tion ; that he was, as one expressed hiraself, younger and stronger at seventy-two, than raany persons at sixty- two, and therefore that his age was not likely to present any great impediment to his cure. When similarly ques tioned as to his blindness, there was a similar harraony in their opinion that in the first stages of the coraplaint that deprivation was even an advantage, as reraoving the patient out of the reach of raany circurastances which might cause agitation ; though, as he progressed towards recovery it might be in some degree injurious, as rendering it raore difficult to amuse his mind. Dr. Willis explained to the Committee that the malady was rather derange ment (a term which of itself seems to indicate a temporary attack) than insanity ; and Sir H. Halford stated as one reason why he relied on the disease being eventually removed, "that his Majesty's faculties did not seera in any respect impaired by the continuance of his disease : so far from it, that his perception was clear and keen ; his raeraory, which is the first faculty usually observed to be influenced and injured by this disease, and which is the first to feel the effects of age, was sound and strong. It was his judgraent that was eclipsed." Still as, though thus unanimous in believing in the -probability of the King's ultimate recovery, the physicians equally agreed in apprehending that it could not be speedy, 344 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1810 the ministers decided that it was necessary to appoint a regency ; and in doing so they wisely and naturally took for the guide as to their own conduct the precedent afforded by the transactions of 1788. In some respects they were more fortunate than Pitt and his colleagues, in that the ground was partly cleared for them by the discussions which had taken place on that occasion. But the old question whether they should proceed by a legislative bill to confer the kingly authority on the Prince of Wales, or by an address to his Royal Highness, entreating him to take that authority upon himself, was as fiercely debated as ever. The objection which was urged with the greatest plausibility against proceeding by bill was the same which had been proposed by Fox before, that the royal assent, which by the constitution was indis pensable to make any bill the law of the land, could not be given ; and that to affix the Great Seal to any such document without the express order of the sovereign was an act of treason. There was also the same personal motive existing now which had operated on the former occasion, and which, it is impossible to avoid suspecting, coloured to a certain extent the arguments and con duct of both parties ; that both took it for granted that the first act of the Prince of Wales as regent would be to change the Administration. Those, therefore, who expected that the first consequence of the establishment of the Regency would be an invitation to them to become the advisers of the Regent, were solicitous to ingratiate them selves with him by conferring the power on him in a manner which he was known to prefer. Those who considered him as incurably alienated from them, and who, from past experience, had reasonable doubts of both the political prudence and the filial duty which he was likely to exhibit, were desirous to fetter, for a time at least, his exercise of authority by some not very rigorous restrictions. And this motive had an inevitable weight in making the one party prefer the address, and the i8io] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 345 other the bill. For if the Prince were of right and by his own act to assume the sovereign authority, he must of course assume it as free and unfettered as it had been exercised by his father. But, if his exercise of it de pended on an enactment of Parliament, it was plain that they who conferred it must have a right to affix condi tions and limitations to their gift. The truth was that neither method of procedure was free from objections, or reconcileable to the strict theory of the constitution. A regulation was certainly incomplete which was enacted by only two Estates of the realm, instead of three. To declare a measure so passed as valid a law as if the three had consented to it ; to suppose the consent of the third when it was notorious that it neither had been nor could be given, was an ignoring of that third, or an usurping of its power, which was in direct antagonism to the most fundamental principles of the constitution. On the other hand, for the two Houses of Parliament to address the Prince of Wales to take on himself the supreme authority by his own act was not only a similar ignoring or usurp ing of the power of the third Estate, the sovereign, but it was also an invitation to an usurpation, which was a still greater violation of constitutional law : an invitation to the Prince to seat himself on the throne which his father had not yet vacated. With such alternatives alone before thera, the ministers were clearly justified in choosing that which had the greater argument in its favour to counterbalance the objections which they theraselves could not deny. And therefore Lord Liverpool, in bringing forward the pro posals on which the Government had decided, applied hiraself mainly to prove that, though the precedents on the subject were neither numerous nor very explicit, they all went to establish the right and power of Parliament to raeet the difficulty by its own enactment, and certainly gave no countenance whatever to the suggestion that any one, even the acknowledged heir to the throne, had any 346 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1810 right to seize upon it till Parliament should have placed him there. On the 27th of December he brought forward three resolutions. Firstly, that, by the King's indisposition, the personal exercise of the royal authority was suspended. Secondly, that it was the right and duty of the Lords and Commons to provide the means of supplying this defect. Thirdly, that for that purpose it was necessary that Lords and Commons should also determine on the means whereby the royal assent might be given in Parliament to such bill as might be passed by the two Houses of Parliament. The first it was impossible that faction itself could deny. To establish the two last he apphed all his fertility of argument, whether derived from facts or analogy ; all his knowledge of constitutional law, and of historical prece dent. " Till he heard that it was intended to object to the resolutions which he had laid upon the table, he had thought that all would be agreed on the propriety of looking back to the precedent of 1788 as that which might be denominated a rule of conduct in respect of the form of their proceedings. The principle of that great and salu tary precedent he considered analogous to, and clearly founded on, the genuine principles of the constitution. It was that the throne must be considered as always fuH, and that the political capacity of the sovereign is always in existence, whatever may be the immediate temporary inca pacity or personal situation of the monarch. This was a practical distinction, of a nature not only expedient, but necessary to ensure the governed the continued existence of all the advantages to be derived from the principle and operations of an hereditary monarchy. The second prin ciple, on which the proceedings of 1788 were founded, and which rendered them a proper precedent on the present occasion, was that the law knows no such office as that of regent. It is an office created under special circumstances, to meet a special exigency, which must always be grounded upon the necessity of the case itself and ought not to be i8io] OF LORD LIVERPOOL, 347 extended beyond what the existing exigency may require. If this had not been the feeling of our ancestors, they would have made some general provision on the subject of regency ; and had such an office as that of regent been recognised by laws we should have found something respecting it in the statute-book, and should long since have had it defined by the law of the land. But our ancestors evidently held that it was dangerous to meddle or interfere with so important a question by prospective provisions ; and, whatever inconvenience might arise frora any interval occurring in the personal exercise of the royal functions, they chose to rest upon the broad basis of the presumed general capacity of the king. In such a defi ciency as the present they trusted entirely to the Parlia ment of the day to provide for the emergency, not by the adoption of any general measure, but by particular regula tions founded on the special circurastances of the case ; which raight thereby furnish the strongest barrier when opposed to individuals aspiring to that office, and the strongest security to the Crown itself He knew that some entertained an opinion that it might be wise to extend the principles and rules of the succession to the throne to the order and right of succession to the regency; that, how ever, had not been the principle of our ancestors, nor had it been an acknowledged principle in raonarchical govern raents in other countries to which regulations sirailar to those of our own raight have been applied. There was, indeed, hardly any country where that point had been so settled ; nay, so far frora it, the heir apparent or heir pre sumptive in raost other countries is positively considered as the last person that should be appointed regent : as we knew that in countries where even the Salique law pre vailed, the next successor to the throne had not been generally considered as entitled of right to take and exer cise the powers of the regency. The third principle, on which the proceedings of 1788 were forraed, and which forraed the basis of the third resolution, was that it be- 348 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1810 longed to Parliament alone to appoint the regency. There had been no instance whatever in our history in which to make the appointment had not been recognised as the right and duty of the Parliament. And the very nature of the case limited the use of the term Parliament here to the Lords and Commons. Claims of right undoubtedly in some instances had been made by individuals aspiring to' the office of regent, but those claims on full consideration had been uniformly rejected. In the reign of Henry VI, the monarch being a minor, a claim was made by the next of kin to exercise the royal authority during the minority : the claim was considered by Parliament, that is, by the Lords and Commons of Parliament, precedents were searched for, the authority of all the greatest men of the time was taken upon the subject, and the answer to that claim was that the Duke of Gloucester, the person asserting it, could have no such claim either by will or by kindred, but that the power of appointing a regent for the kingdom belonged solely to the estates of the realm. In short, he would venture to assert, without fear of contradiction, that no example whatever was to be found of any other mode of appointing a regent, except by the Estates of the realm in Parliament assembled. At the same time he might remind their Lordships that, on the present occasion, while claiming for the Estates of the realm the sole exclusive right to appoint the regent, he did not in any way mean to contend that the Prince of Wales ought not to be the person appointed. He had only said thus much on the question of the right of Parliament, because the claim of right on the part of the Prince had been explicitly preferred in 1788, though it had been subsequently abandoned. "There was a fourth great constitutional principle on which the great precedent of 1788 was founded, worthy of particular attention : that, on a review of our whole his tory, there did not appear to be a single instance, with i8io] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 349 the exception of the cases of the Duke of Gloucester, after wards Richard IIL, and of the Duke of Soraerset in the reign of Edward VI. , in which the authority of the regent, even though appointed by Parliament, had not been in some way or other also Hmited or restrained by Parlia raent. He was aware that it raight be said that the examples referred to were mostly drawn frora tiraes of turbulence and violence. That could not be denied ; but he must at the same time reraind the House that to these times we are to look back for the establishment of the great and fundamental principles of the constitution ; for the assertion of the rights and liberties of the people ; for the foundation of those salutary laws which provide for the security of the lives and properties of the subject ; and that we were consequently bound to regulate our conduct even by the precedents and authority of these reraote tiraes, if no later or better authority could be procured. The period between the establishraent of the Great Charter and the accession of Henry VII. was that at which we were to look for the great foundation of our con stitution. And there were many instances in the history of the Stuarts, who derived their right to the crown from the Tudors, where the greatest lawyers deduced those principles of Hberty, on which the Revolution was after wards founded, from the precedents established during that period. The great principles then laid down by Lord Coke, Selden, and other most eminent constitu tional lawyers, rested practically on the precedents of that epoch ; which, although a period of violence and civil commotions, was yet one to which Englishmen raust look for the principles of their civil and political liberty. " Moreover, these precedents had been confirmed in later times. In the twenty-fifth year of the last reign provision was made for a regency in the event of a prince who was a minor succeeding to the throne. At that time, in default of the issue of Frederick, the late Prince of Wales, the Duke of Cumberland was presumptive heir to the throne. 35° LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1810 a person at that time extremely popular in the country, and a favourite son of the reigning monarch ; yet under all those circumstances Parliament gave the regency not to him, but to the Princess Dowager of Wales, subject to such limitations and restrictions as they in their wisdom thought proper to impose. It was clear therefore that those pre cedents, taken altogether, fully established the principle that the whole arrangement was, and had at all times been considered to be, wholly within the province of Parliament. The question now to be considered was in what way Parliament should proceed. The ministers recommended a bill, which, by virtue of the authority of the two Houses of Parliament, should receive the sanction royal by com mission under the Great Seal, and thereby become an act of the whole Legislature. Others, it was equally well known, intended to propose proceeding by an address to the Prince of Wales, requesting him to take upon himself the government of the country, still under such restric tions and Hmitations as should seem meet to the Houses. I wish therefore," continued Lord Liverpool, "to call your Lordships' attention to the difference between the two modes of proceeding. It has been asserted that the two Houses cannot by any act of theirs appoint a regent, because they are incompetent, by themselves, to pass any law. But if this be so, if the two Houses cannot by any act of theirs legally appoint a regent, how can they appoint him by address any more than by bill .' And again, whether they appoint him by address or by bill, will he not be equally appointed by Parliament ; which, so long as it consists only of the two Houses of Lords and Commons, those who resist the mode of proceeding by bill deny to have any legal right to appoint him .' The only difference would be that he would not be so formally appointed in one case as in the other. For my own part I have no hesitation in saying that I consider the mode of proceeding by bill not only the better mode, but the only mode that, upon any sound view of the principles of i8io] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 351 the constitution, can be adopted. I conceive likewise that the mode of proceeding by address would not estab lish the authority of the Regent so firmly as that the courts of law would be controlled by it, because, if there were any flaw in its legislative sanction, they might think themselves not bound to take cognizance of his autho rity. An address, I admit, may call into activity legal powers already in existence, but cannot therefore be con sidered efficient to call forth or enact any powers not already existing ; so that our proceedings in Parliament, if we should adopt the raode of proceeding by address, might be followed by a refusal on the part of the courts of law to act upon thera. This, therefore, is a capital objection to the raode of proceeding by address ; but it does not hold good with respect to the raode of proceed ing by a bill to which the Great Seal shall have been affixed, for any bill to which the Great Seal has been once affixed has all the authority and power of law so long as it reraains unrepealed. And this is equally the case if it has been affixed illegally ; for that is a question into which the courts of law cannot inquire, but which can only be investigated by the Parliament." Lord Stanhope interrupted the speaker to declare that this was a false view of the law ; but he only led Lord Liverpool to prove his position on the spot, by a citation of the language held by Lord Camden in 1788, who then affirmed with respect to the Great Seal, that " Such was its efficacy and unquestionable authority that, even if the Lord Chancellor should put the Great Seal by caprice to any comraission, it could not be afterwards questioned, not even by the judges themselves. If an Act of Parliament passed by authority of a commission issued under the Great Seal, and was endorsed with the words ' Le Roi leveut', it raust be received as a part of the statute law of the land, and could not be disputed." And he further established his assertion by a reference to indisputable precedents drawn from the annals of Henry VI. and Edward VI., when unqualified 352 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1810 obedience had been rendered to different enactments after the royal assent had been formally signified to them, even though it was far from certain that that assent had been duly and legitimately obtained. Lord Liverpool therefore concluded that, in case of the " personal incapacity of the King to signify his assent, there remained no other mode to provide for the deficiency but that of legislation. It lay only in the two remaining branches of Parliament to provide for the deficiency. For this there were numerous precedents. The principle of the present proceeding went throughout on the consideration that the throne was full; that the courts of justice were open ; that the State was alive in all its parts. In 1688, much vaunted as a precedent for proceeding by address, the case was wholly different. The throne was vacant ; the courts of justice were shut ; the Great Seal was destroyed. Under these circumstances there was no alternative. Parlia ment then could have no authority to legislate, and of necessity adopted that mode under the circumstances which appeared to them most beneficial to the State. They adopted it because of the exigency of the case. He was ready to admit that, if the King were capable, the two Houses had no power to legislate without his authority; but, if he were incapable, they had no other means of legis lating but by putting the Great Seal into activity. The common rule and constitutional principle was not to legislate partially if we could legislate generally. If there was a natural defect in one branch of the Legislature, then recourse must be had to that which is nearest the power of the whole in order to complete an act of authority by that which remains. We must either pursue that mode of legis lating or do nothing at all. We must exert our legislative authority by the best means and forms which we have, and we shall then have the satisfaction of knowing that our act of authority cannot be disputed except by Parliament itself on reasonable grounds.'' He concluded : " I wish that the question respecting these i8io] OF LORD LIVERPOOL, 353 resolutions now before you should rest on its own merits. They involve one of the greatest and most important questions ever discussed in Parliaraent ; they involve the most essential rights of the Legislature ; they involve the most essential interests of the throne : and in these considera tions they involve everything raost dear to the liberties of the subject, raost iraportant to the preservation of the con stitution. Their adoption will afford the best security for the welfare and prosperity of the country, and hold out the most effectual protection for the rights and interests of all classes of the coraraunity. For it cannot but be incon sistent with the genuine principles of the constitution and monarchy of the country, that any individual, however exalted in rank or station, should be invested with the powers of sovereignty without the constitutional sanction and control of Parliament." Unusually copious extracts have been given from Lord Liverpool's speech on this occasion, partly on account of the great constitutional iraportance of the subject, and because the mode of procedure then adopted will probably be taken at any future time as affording an irresistible pre cedent ; partly, perhaps still raore, because they afford as good a speciraen as can be desired of Lord Liverpool's style of oratory. It may not soar to the highest flights of eloquence; it does not seek to illustrate the topics with which it deals by any rich or varied imagery (they hardly admitted of impassioned appeals to the feelings) ; and from sarcasm he at all times carefully abstained. But never theless the speech, in its unabridged completeness, is not without high merit. It exhausts the question ; it displays a thorough and minute knowledge of the whole history of the subject, an entire mastery of the fundamental , prin ciples and of the practical working of the constitution. It marshals facts and precedents with admirable clearness both of arrangement and explanation. It shirks no point which could be raised by the opposite party ; it avoids the fatal but comraon error of weakening a single argument or VOL. L A A 354 LIFE AND ADMINISTRATION [1810 statement by exaggeration. Such a style of oratory, if, as has been admitted, not of the highest possible class, is nevertheless well suited to the character of the speaker as a minister entrusted with the conduct of weighty and delicate State affairs, well adapted to its object of convincing the reason of Parliament, and of justifying the proceedings of the Government to the nation at large. The speech was completely successful. Lord Grenville, who had held an inferior office in Pitt's Ministry in 1788, felt himself precluded by his position then from now opposing a measure which marched exactly in the steps of that proposed by his chief on that occasion, though he indemnified himself for the forbearance of his vote by a virulence of invective (if indeed his language deserves so respectable a name) against the ministers personally sur passing all former explosions of his ill-temper. The sole cause of his indignation, as he himself avowed, was that they had allowed two months to elapse before they had taken any steps to fill up the void left in the Government by the King's illness. He declared that their conduct in so doing " was putting to hazard the best interests of the coun try, and might entail calamity, not alone upon this nation, but upon the whole human race. Supporting, as he meant to do, their proposition, he must still reprobate and condemn the accumulated criminality of ministers : he must exclaim with all his might against the usurpation of those arrogant raen, who first, since the days of Cromwell, had the au dacity to assume and to exercise the functions of the regal authority. Their conduct could only be considered as an outrageous insult upon the nation, and a barefaced usur pation of the sovereign's power, by forging his royal mandate and issuing orders in the King's name, when it was admitted that his Majesty's pleasure could not possibly have been taken upon any public measure." Such frantic vehemence defeated itself Considering that twice within the recollection of most of his hearers the King had been attacked by a malady of the same kind, and had i8io] OF LORD LIVERPOOL. 355 corapletely recovered, it was not likely that they could be induced to think eight weeks too long a period to wait in the hope of indications of a sirailar recovery ; while it was obvious that, unless the whole Governraent were brought to a standstill during the incapacity of the King, the rainisters must take upon themselves to carry it on as if they were able to consult him. The task of formally opposing the resolutions therefore was left to Lord Holland. He could not deny the sound ness of Lord Liverpool's principal positions, acknowledging even what in 1788 his uncle had so strenuously denied, that Parliament had the undoubted right, in appointing a re gency, of " passing by even the heir apparent or presumptive of the throne." But he denied that " any agreeraent of the two Houses could make an Act of Parliaraent," and charac terised any atterapt to impose teraporary limitations on the prerogative proposed to be entrusted to the Regent as "a direct and studied insult to hira." He went further, and formally denied the power of the two Houses so to limit the royal authority even when vested in the hands of a deputy, on the ground that "as it had been conferred on the King for the security of the people, as, unless it were necessary to their interests and conducive to their safety, it ought not to exist at all, no power but that of a_/z