u .) P94- entire absolution of the penitent. SERMON II. JUDGE THYSELF, THAT THOU BE NOT JUDGED OF THE LORD. A SERMON PREACHED BEFORE THE UNIVERSITY, CATHEDRAL CHURCH OF CHRIST, IN OXFORD, ON THE FIRST SUNDAY TN ADVENT, 1846. BY THE REV. E. B. PUSEY, D.D. REQIUS PROFESSOR OP HEBREW, CANON OP OHRIST CHURCH, AND LATE FELLOW OF ORIEL COLLEGE. OXFORD, JOHN HENRY PARKER; F. AND J. RIVINGTON, LONDON. 1846. Baxter, pointer, oxporb. 1 Cor. xi. 31. If we would judge ourselves, we should not be judged. In my last Sermon, I dwelt upon that authoritative act, whereby God, through the ministry of man, conveys His own sentence of pardon to the soul of the penitent, sets him free from the guilt of his past sins, opens to the blessed influx of His grace the channels which sin had stopped, and often pours at once large grace and love into the soul. But, since the efficacy of Absolution depends upon the penitence of him who receives it, the deeper that penitence, the fuller will be the grace. And so, since special confession, gathering into one before the soul all its greater sins, until it shrinks and recoils and sickens at the miserable sight, mostly brings with it a lowlier self- abhorrence, deepens its cry for mercy, and issues in greater love for Him Who loved it amid such loathsome ness and misery, special confession will mostly obtain more grace and have more assurance of pardon. And this I say, not (God forbid !) to lessen the comfort of such as have not been led by Him to desire any other than the general Absolution of all true penitents in the whole con gregation, when confession has been made to God only, but as a source of increased comfort to laden or anxious souls who feel that they need what is more special to themselves. The Church (I am compelled to repeat) allows us both ways. In particular cases, she recommends special Confession, and Absolution jn form more authori tative. For iu the Visitation of the Sick, she directs her A 2 Priests to " move the sick person to make a special con fession of his sins, if he feel his conscience troubled wit any weighty matter;" and, as Bp. Sparrow" adds, should be considered, whether every deadly sin be no a weighty matter." She would, at least, secure, that they who have, during health, neglected her warnings at the Holy Communion, and shrunk from the shame, should not pass", clogged with grievous sins, into the Presence of their Judge. We, His Priests, are not to wait for the sick man's wish ; we are (if we would obey her, and it has been done of old also) ourselves to "move" the sick man, and suggest to him, that if his conscience be troubled with any weighty matter, he ought to confess it. Absolution is to be given, only on such signs of lowly contrition as betoken " true repentance," — " if he humbly and heartily desire it," (for the Church could never command the Priest to absolve indiscriminately,) but we are directed, in all cases, to appeal to the sick man's conscience ; if he, having need, despise or put it from him, he has to give account of his deed at the Judgment-seat of Christ. And can it be thought that the Church denies that in health, which she recommends in sickness ? She who bids us " often to put men in remembrance to settle their temporal estates in health," lest worldly matters should distract the sacred, precious, hours of sickness, would she have us put off to their sick or death-bed, if they ever see it, those who come to us in health, and tell us that they have a burthened conscience ? They who would bid men delay il to such an hour, know little of sickness or of wounded consciences, or how difficult it is, while the body is enfeebled, and the head confused by weakness, or by racking or wearing pain, or strong fever, or sleepless nights, for the soul to gather itself up for any duty, much less such a weighty task as this. They who have known such hours, when the * Rationale, ad loc. mind, far from being able to use collected thought or disentangle its maze of sins, sinks down exhausted with any effort, and can only cry in the fewest words wherein prayer can be formed, " Lord, have mercy," know well that they would not, for the whole world, have to dis burden their conscience then. It is, (as they well know, who have either undergone, or, by witnessing, have shared the healthful suffering,) it is enough often, even in health, to turn the head dizzy, when the soul brings before itself the dismal heap of all the heavier sins of a whole life, which by God's grace it can recall. Even then, it must cry out, " I should have fainted, but that I believed to see the goodness of the Lord in the land of the living." And is this a task to be reserved to the death-bed ? Better then, than to neglect it altogether ! But who that would have it performed at all, (as the Church wisheth,) would have it reserved to a time, when every power by which it is to be discharged aright, is giving way or crushed in the strong grasp of death ? Or is it to be supposed, that penitents will have one " matter," one sin only, on their conscience ? Does ,not our Gracious Lord recover His lost sheep, when wearied out by wanderings ; find the piece of silver, when well-nigh buried, and His Image almost encrusted over in the mire of sin? Does He not recover penitents from the very depths of Hell ? The bosom, once unlocked, pours not out one sin only. The penitent can find no rest, until he have emptied his whole conscience of all the foul matter which has gangrened there, to the very last drop. There may be some out standing sins more prominent ; but take any, the most common case of one who, through a series of years, has fallen by habitual sin, can such a conscience, think you, easily on a sick bed make " the special confession of the sins" which " trouble" it during a whole life ? Are not consciences sorely troubled by a dim, confused, memory of countless sins which it strove to hide from itself, strove often to persuade itself not to be sins, and too well succeeded, or which, by the very force of sinning, it came scarcely or not at all to regard as sins, but which, when its sense is anew quickened by God's Holy Spirit, seem to stand so thick, that the whole life seems one intricate, manifold web of sin, one only in sinfulness. Is it then so easy to recal the sins of ten, twenty, perhaps sixty, or seventy years, of an unexamined, unsifted, con science ? Ye know, if ye have ever tried it, how when earnestly bent on the task, at one time one sin flashes upon the conscience, then another ; these spots of dark ness unfold themselves to the eye, one by one, as it gazes stedfastly on them. " Often," says S. Gregory b, " what escaped the unawakened, becomes known to the mourner. Who, reckless, knew not their guilt, detect it, when, within themselves, aroused against themselves." " The" growing bitterness of penitence, not only heaps up against our heart our greater sins, but even recals the very least. And all these we pursue the more resolutely, the more watchfully we strive to uproot from our heart every germ of evil." Scarce one, probably, even in fullest possession of his mind, with all the helps he can, has found that he has reached at once the depth of this dark abyss. What a task this, when perhaps the hours are numbered and the soul bewildered with the thought of approaching judg- b in Ps. 3. Pcenit. ». 19. §. 21. c Id. in Ps. 4. Pcenit. v. 3. §. 3. on " Wash me more and more." " May my fall profit me ; with this stain, may the spots of offences he washed out, which I have hitherto neglected. For often while we bewail some things done amiss, aroused by the very force of the bitterness to sift ourselves, we find in us other things to be bewailed. 'Which, when done, we the more easily give over to forgetfulness, as we think them either slighter or nothings. The growing bitterness of penitence, not only heaps up against our heart our greater sins, but even recals the very least. And all these we pursue the more resolutely, the more watchfully we strive to uproot from our heart every germ of evil." ment, and Satan, as he often is, assailing him with all his force and subtlety, to plunge him into doubt or despair. Is there not enough to do in that last conflict with the Evil one, that last moment of penitence, and imploring of pardon, and faith, and hope, and love, not to burthen it with aught which can be performed before ? It is a very axiom, that what is good to be done, before we die, it is good to do now, lest death surprise us. It were wantonly to presume on the mercies of God, wilfully to delay to the last hour any thing which ought to be done ere we part out of life. What if there be no last hour for it ? What if death come suddenly ? " Hed Who promiseth pardon to the penitent, promiseth no morrow to the procrastinator." In that the Church then bids us " move" the sick in body and soul to special confession of sins, if their consciences are " troubled with any weighty matter," she bids us receive them now, if they come to us. In that she would . have us, if we need it, " moved" thereto by God's ministers in death, she must wish that God would, if we need it, move us thereto in life. What, again, if after the oil and .wine have been poured into the sick man's wounds, he recover his bodily health also ? It is well known that one who has once tasted " the benefits of absolution" for heavier sins, and found good for his soul in the, special counsels of God's ministers, longs mostly to continue to " open his griefs" for slighter sins into which he after wards falls, that he finds it a healthful discipline for his soul, a safeguard often, by God's grace, against sin ; that God gives him thereby lightness and gladness of heart, to " go on his way," through the wilderness, " rejoicing." Is such an one to be repelled ? Is he to be told that the remedy he seeks for is only for those more deeply wounded, or bid go into other folds, if he still would have it f Or, again, in those most sorrowful and difficult cases of relapse a See S. Aug. Serm. 82. §. 14. p. 264. Oxf. Tr, into very grievous sin, are we to imitate the severity or the Primitive Church, without her watchful care and tender love for penitents, and put them off to their sick or death bed, ere they can be admitted again to bear that sentence of pardon, in which they once tasted the grace of God - No ! the Church, our Mother, would not bring all her children, with their varied tempers, -needs, languish- ings, sicknesses, under one rigid, unbending, rule. She shews, in the Exhortation to the Holy Communion, that she would deal, not with laden consciences only, but with timorous, scrupulous, doubting, tender, souls, the lambs of the flock of Christ, otherwise than she would with those who seem to themselves,, or are, the strong or the whole. One thing only she excludes, when she excludes any thing, compulsory confession; " that8 any man should be bound to the numbering of his sins;" ** as if," adds Ho6feerr, " remission of sins otherwise were impossible." But, short of this, in that Exhortation, she strives, with an austere, anxious love, to rouse tbe conscience, not only as to overt, but as to secret, mental, sins, " if any of you be in malice, envy, or any other grievous crime;" and then, after words, which may well shake the soul through and through, w lest after taking of that Holy Sacrament, the devil enter into you, as he entered into Judas, aud fill you full of all iniquities, and bring you to destruction both of body and soul," she straightway insists on the necessity of " a quiet conscience," and invites such as cannot otherwise quiet theirs, to open their griefs, that by the ministry of God's Holy Word, they may receive the benefit of abso lution. " By the ministry," she says, " of God's Word," • Homily on Repentance. P. II. ' E. P. vi. 4. 15. quoted in " Entire Absolution of the Penitent," Serm. i. p. 12. u. 6. " They" [the Fathers] " doe no* only leave it free for men to confesseor not confesse their sinnes unto other 'which is the most that we would have:) Abp. Ussher's Answer to a Jesuit. And so others. " for," (as I said more at large before*,) " all forgiveness of sin, by whomsoever, or howsoever it comes to us, is from Him." " God Alone forgiveth sin." The Word of God is the authority by virtue of which the Priest acts ; " men," S. Ambrose says ¦', " supply their ministry" only ; or as he says again', " Sins are i'emitted through the word of God, of which the Levite is the interpreter and a sort of executor : they are remitted also through the office of the Priest, and the sacred miuistry." Nor can any argument as to the judgment of the Church on this or any other subject be drawn from the mere omission ofthe more direct injunctions of an earlier form of our English Liturgyj. It had indeed argued a rashness or fickleness in the Compilers, such as we may well shrink from thinking possible, had they altered, as a matter of principle, what a year before k, they had declared lo have been done " by1 aid of the Holy Ghost." But * Ibid p. 4. sqq. h de Sp. S. iii. 10. see S. Ambrose more fully, Serm. i. p. 6 — 8. ' de Cain et Abel ii. 4. §. 15. (see, further, Note A. at the end.) Bp. Morton accordingly substitutes " the office ofthe Minister" as equivalent; (Appeal, p. 270. quoted by Bp. Montagu, Appeal to Csesar, c. 35.) " And indeed the power of absolution, whether it be general or particular, whether in public or in private, it is possessed in our Church, where both in our Public Service is proclaimed pardon and absolution upon all penitents ; and a private applying of particular absolution unto penitents by the office ofthe Minister. And greater power than this, no man hath received from God." So then Bp; Overall in substituting " by the Minister," (see below p 15, n. a.) did no more, in fact, than Bp. Morton. The object of all is to express that the authority is ministerial only. s Book of Common Prayer A.I>. 1549. In the rubric on " special con fession" in " the Visitation of the Sick," there then stood, " and the same form shall be used in all private confessions." This was omitted in 1552. k " The commissioners appear to have completed their revision of the Book of Common Prayer before the end ofthe year 1551." The changes began to be agitated a year after the publication of the first, Ib. p. xvi. from Heylyn, Hist. Ref. p. 106. ' Act for the Uniformity of Service &c. A. 2 et 3 Edv. VI "the Arch bishop of Canterbury and certain of the most learned and discreet Bishops and other learned men of this realm having as well eye and respect to the most sincere and pure Christian religion taught by the Scriptures, as to the 10 now, on the contrary, they again affirmed it to be a very godly order," " agreeable to the Word of God and the Primitive Church;" and so they bore witness to what they were compelled to withdraw, even while they suppressed its expression. Nor if we turn to the practice of her most faithful sons, shall we think that a new thing, or foreign to the meaning of the Church, or limited to certain cases of gross sin, which the pious Hooker and Saravia habitually used; and of Hooker and good Bp. Saunderson, we hear, that at the eve'of death, after receiving Absolution, " the mind of the one " seemed more cheerful," on the other's" face there seemed " a reverend gaiety and joy." usages of the primitive Church, should draw and make one convenient and meet order, rite, and fashion of common and open prayer and administration ofthe Sacraments, to be had and used in his Majesty's kingdom of England and Wales, the which at this time, by the aid of the Holy Ghost with one uniform agreement, is of them concluded." m Act for the Uniformity of Common Prayer &c. A. 5 et 6 Edv. VI. " When there hath been a very godly Order set forth by authority of Par liament, for common prayer and administration ofthe Sacraments, to be used in the mother tongue, within this Church of England, agreeable to the Word of God and the primitive Church, very comfortable to all good people desiring to live in Christian conversation &c. And because thefe hath -risen, in the use and exercise of the aforesaid common service in the Church, heretofore set forth, divers doubts for the fashion and manner of the ministration of the same, rather by the curiosity of the minister and mistakers, than of any other worthy cause, therefore as well for the more plain and manifest explanation hereof, as for the more perfection of the said order of common service, in some places where it is necessary to make the same prayer and fashion of service more earnest and fit- to stir Christian people to the true honouring of Almighty God &c.'' Whatever these last words may be meant to apply to, it is clear, 1) that the book in its earlier form is approved and the objections treated as cavils; 2) that the concessions were made to a party, whose suc cessors went out of the Church and trampled it under foot, 3) the most material of these changes, (a very painful one) was subsequently rescinded. n Walton's Life of Bp. Saunderson, Lives, ii. p. 258. Oxf. 1805. 0 Ib. i. p. 345, 6. He received it as a preparation for his last Communion, after which this effect was seen. It was the day before his blessed death. Bp. Andrewes also says of himself in his " private prayers," " Who hast opened a door of hope to me, confessing and entreating, through the power ofthe mysteries and ofthe keys. (John xx. 22. Matt. xvi. 19.)" p. 258 ed. Hall. Bp. Taylor, again, even where he complains of the rareness of Confession 11 Nor, again, can it be said, that, in her meaning, the solemn words " by His Authority committed unto me, I absolve thee from all thy sins in the Name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Ghost," relate to the removal of censures of the Church only. On the contrary, the portion of the older form", which rather relates to those censures, is omitted, and that part only is retained which directly relates to the remission of sins. Again, the sins which we are bid to urge men to confess, are sins by which the penitent's conscience is troubled, sins known to himself and to God only, and these are no objects of the censure of the Church. They are sins, which the Priest knows not of, whereas a Priest could amongst us in his times, implies that it was practised, not in sickness only, but in health. He is speaking of the easiness of absolution, in the modern Church, whether iu England or the Roman Communion. " To confess and to absolve is all the method of our modern repentance, even when it is most severe. Indeed, in the Church of England, I cannot so easily blame that proceeding ; because there are so few that use the proper and secret ministry of a spiritual guide, that it is to be supposed he that does so, hath long repented and done some violence to himself and more to his sins, before he can master himself so much as to bring himself to submit to that ministry." Doctrine and'raotice of Repentance, e. ix. «. 6. §. 68. And again, the " advice concerning Confession'' in the Guide for the Penitent, which is either Bp. Taylor's or that of a like-minded contemporary, implies that it was a, recognised practice. " You are advised by the Church, under whose discipline you live, that before you are to receive the holy Sacrament, or when you are visited with any dangerous sickness, if you find any one particular sin, or more, that lies heavy upon you, to disburden yourself of it into the bosom of your confessor, who not only stands between God and you to pray for you, but hath the power of the keys committed to him, upon your true repentance, to absolve you in Christ's Name from those sins which you have confessed to him." The fact that this has been a received book among us, which since Bishop Taylor's time has accompanied the Golden Grove, implies surely that the advice has been followed. A book would not continue to be popular, if a main rule in it went against people's practice. They would take what was more kindred with their practice. It is said also by those who have read the notices of private habits before the Revolution of 1688, that Confession and spiritual guidance were received practices. ° '« Et sacramentis ecclesise te restituo." See Sarum Manual in Mr. Palmer's Antiq. of Eng. Rit. ii. 226. 12 hardly be ignorant, whether one, committed to his charge, had fallen under the public censures of the Church or no. Nor, again, has the Church any where given to the Priest the power of removing her censures, in cases of ordinary sickness". But, in truth, the doctrine of the Church herein is very clear and explicit. She distinctly says in her Homily, "Absolution hath the promise of forgiveness of sins." At our Ordination as Priests, she repeated to each of us our Lord's words ", " Whose sins thou dost forgive, they are forgiven." Upon the special confession of the sick, she bids us absolve him; and the words of Absolution contain a rehearsal of the authority through which we do it. " By His Authority committed unto me, I absolve thee from all thy sins" in the Name of the All-Holy Trinity, in Whose Name we received our commission. She speaks of "the benefit of Absolution," as distinct q from " ghostly advice and counsel," both being needed for the penitent ; she retains in her Ordinations, and Absolution of the sick, the ancient words. What had this been but hypocrisy and double dealing, had she not meant it in the#same sense as of old ? What unreality and mockery were it of the penitent's hopes, what ashes for bread, nay, rather a scorpion, what waste of precious moments on which eternity may hang, to move the sick to confess his sins, then, in solemn words, which sinful men may well tremble to use, to " absolve him," if truly penitent, " from all his sins" if this solemn act is not of value to his soul, or relates only to Church censures, under which these secret » The instances mentioned in Bingham, 19. 3. are all cases of necessity. i' " He" [the Jesuit] " hath done us open wrong in charging us to deny that ' Priests have power to forgive sins,' whereas the very formal words which our Ordination requireth to be used in the Ordination of a Minister are these, ' Whose sins thou dost forgive, &c.' " Abp. Ussher Answer to Challenge, p. 313