SOUTHWELL THE CATHEDRAL AND SEE Yale Center for British Art and British Studies BELL'S CATHEDRAL SERIES: EDITED BY GLEESON WHITE AND EDWARD F. STRANGE SOUTHWELL .y. a. Solas &• Co., Photo.] SOUTHWELL CATHEDRAL, FROM THE WEST. THE CATHEDRAL CHURCH OF SOUTHWELL A DESCRIPTION OF ITS FABRIC AND A BRIEF HISTORY OF THE EPISCOPAL SEE BY THE REV. ARTHUR DIMOCK, M.A. with thirty-eight ILLtJSTRATIONS. LONDON GEORGE BELL & SONS 1898 W. H. WHITE AND CO. LTD. RIVERSIDE PRESS, EDINBURGH. GENERAL PREFACE This series of monographs has been planned to supply visitors to the great English Cathedrals with accurate and well illus trated guide-books at a popular price. The aim of each writer has been to produce a work compiled with sufficient knowledge and scholarship to be of value to the student of Archaeology and History, and yet not too technical in language for the use of an ordinary visitor or tourist. To specify all the authorities which have been made use of in each case would be difficult and tedious in this place. But amongst the general sources of information which have been almost invariably found useful are: — (i) the great county histories, the value of which, especially in questions of gene alogy and local records, is generally recognised ; (2) the numerous papers by experts which appear from time to- time in the Transactions of the Antiquarian and Archaeological Societies ; (3) the important documents made accessible in the series issued by the Master of the Rolls ; (4) the well- known works of Britton and Willis on the English Cathedrals ;. and (5) the very excellent series of Handbooks to the Cathedrals originated by the late Mr John Murray ; to which the reader may in most cases be referred for fuller detail, especially in reference to the histories of the respective sees. Gleeson White, E. F. Strange, Editors of the Series. AUTHOR'S PREFACE The MSS. at Southwell include the following : — The "White Book," of which the earlier part is in a four teenth-century handwriting. It contains bulls, charters, etc., the earliest of the date of 1 106. The " Register of Thurgarten Priory " is almost a duplicate of this. The "Chapter Register" contains the Acts of the Chapter from 1467-1542, and includes the Visitations by the Chapter,. and probate matters, entered without regard to order. The " Register of Leases " is chiefly concerned with a date still later. vi AUTHOR'S PREFACE Extracts from one or other of these appeared in Dugdale's " Monasticon " and other works. A century ago William Dickin son (afterwards Rastall) of Muskham Grange used the MSS. in compiling his " Antiquities." He was a laborious but inaccurate scholar, resembling Jonathan Oldbuck, and his Ad Pontem theory, together with similar inferences, has met the fate of the Praetorium of the Laird of Monkbarns. His book contains a certain amount of useful information ; and I am indebted to Mr G. T. Knowles of Southwell for the loan of his copy of this scarce work. A late edition of Le Neve's "Fasti" (1854) contains a list, necessarily incomplete, of the canons by the Rev. J. F. Dimock, a former minor canon ; and in various papers read before learned societies my father quoted from the records. The report of the Historical MSS. Commission for 1891 has a short notice. In 1 89 1 Mr Arthur Francis Leach, Assistant Charity Com missioner, and formerly fellow of All Souls, Oxford, published for the Camden Society his "Visitations and Memorials." The documents are chiefly from the Chapter Register : " the book was intended to exhibit the church in its inner relations." This volume is the most valuable that has been published ; and the introduction and the lists enhance its importance. Mr Leach has kindly written to me about the mysterious criminal court alluded to in the corrections by the chapter. Outside sources of information are scanty. An occasional reference in an old chronicle or in the York records includes almost everything of value. A folio on the architecture was published by Mr Dimock in 1853. He was familiar with the records in the library, and, in the conclusions he drew, had the assistance of many of the leading architects and antiquaries. So far as I know his inferences have not been superseded in any important partic ulars ; and the only drawback to this folio (of which a popular edition appeared in 1875) is, that it is rather an explanation of the plates than a complete treatise. I am indebted to Mr A. H. Lyell, the honorary secretary •of the Royal Archaeological Institute, for a copy of the Rev. J. L. Petit's paper, and to Messrs S. B. Bolas & Co., and Mr A. J. Loughton of the Market Place, Southwell, for the use of the photographs — duly attributed to each. A. D. CONTENTS PAGE Chapter I. — History of the Building- — Part I., The Town and Church 3 Part II., Constitution of the Chapter 18 Chapter II. — The Exterior — Nave and Transept — Part I., Norman . . 24. Part II., Early English 46 Part III., Early Decorated or Geometrical 52 Chapter III. — The Interior — Part I., Norman . 57 Part II., Early English 73 Part III., Decorated 87 Chapter IV. — The Palace and Wolsey . no Chapter V. — The Dissolution of the Chapter 124 Appendices 128 LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS .Southwell Cathedral from the West Arms of the See .... .Southwell, and Palace Ruins, from the Parks Detail of Transept . Pinnacle — Central Tower North Porch ... North Porch, Chimney of North Porch, Interior West Door ... West Front (in 1850) .... Doorway facing the Palace Flying Buttress and Pinnacle of Choir ¦Clerestory Window Bay of Nave . . . ' . Nave — looking East Nave, Pillar in Nave, North side of Arcade Nave, South Aisle . Norman Arch of Central Tower Sculpture on Norman Capitals -Choir, looking East Choir, Sectional drawing of one Bay Choir from South Aisle . •Choir, looking East The Sedilia .... Arcading of the Vestibule Doorway to Chapter-House Canopies of Stalls . Details of Doorway Capital — Chapter-House . ¦Capital — Chapter-House . Capital — Chapter-House . Carving of Stall Canopy .... Rood Screen from the Nave .... Rood Screen — Under the Screen, looking South Choir, looking West .... Southwell, West Tower before Restoration Plan Frojitispiece Title 3 2627 3132333639 4348 56- 58 59 61 63 6569 7175777981 838993 969799 100101 102103 106107 125131 .S. B. Bolas &= Co., Photo.] SOUTHWELL FROM THE PARKS— THE PALACE RUIN'S IN FRONT. SOUTHWELL CATHEDRAL CHAPTER I HISTORY OF THE BUILDING PART I.— THE TOWN AND CHURCH The compilers of Domesday found Southwell with " clerks " holding prebends : before the close of the thirteenth century these canons or prebendaries had been gradually raised by successive endowments to their final complement of sixteen. The chapter thus constituted successfully survived the storm and stress of the Tudor Reformation, only to experience dissolution from the zeal for change following in the train of the first Reform Bill. Limitations of space permit only of a bird's-eye sketch of the rise and progress of this remarkable college, the history of which is identical with the history of the town, and to a certain extent of the county ; and which has left as its enduring monument that stately minster, since 1884 the cathedral church of the new diocese for Notts and Derbyshire. Existing remains demonstrate that in the time of the Roman occupation, the four wells with their abundant supply of fresh spring water attracted a few Britons. Of these wells, one is at the south-east of the town, and, from its situation on the property of the Lord of the Manor, was subsequently called the Lord's Well ; two more are within the minster precincts — the Holy Well in the open court, and the Lady's Well in the churchyard ; and a fourth, St. Catherine's, to the west, where the chapel of that name was built. Six or seven miles to the north-east, a neighbouring village received the name of Norwell ; and for a parallel reason came the name of the place by the south wells, and thence Southwell, the first syllable 3 4 SOUTHWELL CATHEDRAL pronounced as in Southwark. The researches of Gibbon led him to conclude that the Britons had some thirty to forty bishops and a widespread organisation ; but of Southwell and the surrounding district there is really nothing known for certain during this time beyond that it was christianised. After the withdrawal of the Romans there is a blank of more than two hundred years until, under date a.d. 627, Baeda records that Paulinus of York, one of the missionaries of Augustine, who had the active support of his convert. King Eadwine of Northumbria, baptised in the river Trent ; and to these two — Paulinus and Eadwine — the invading Angles of the Trent Valley owed their conversion.* During the troubled times that followed, the northern part of the Trent Valley — parts of Lindsey and Southumbria — was now in one kingdom, now in another; now in one diocese, now in another. It will come as a surprise to most people to learn that what was afterwards called Notts, or, at least, that part which included Southwell, was for a short time not only in the diocese of Leicester, but in the province of Lichfield. The diocese of Leicester came to an end — the chroniclers tell us they know not how — and after the disappearance of the short-lived archbishopric of Lichfield, at the beginning of the eighth century, Southwell went back to the province and diocese of York. It was after this that Southwell became an important religious centre. At Ripon and Beverley the early missionary priests * The repeated attempts to connect Southwell with the Tiovulfingacestre of Baeda must be dismissed as unsupported. To make matters more puzzling still, Henry of Huntingdon, who says he relied upon Baeda, writing in the twelfth century, calls the place of the baptising the town "now called Fingecestre." There was no such town ; there was the little riverside hamlet of Fiscartune, now called Fiskerton, the nearest spot on the Trent to South well ; and Henry was perhaps thinking of this when he wrote. Baeda says that a convert told a monk named Daeda, and Daeda told him, that • he, the convert, had been baptised in the Trent near the " civitas " called in the language of the Angles Tiovulfingacestre. This name has been hopelessly lost. In itself, no place so well satisfies this second-hand account, as where the river, after passing under Clifton Grove, sweeps by Wilford Church. Here the bed is so formed that the priest could stand in comfort, and have plenty of water for immersion ; while Nottingham, close at hand, might then have been a settlement sufficiently large to be called a "civitas." Southwell was not large enough. Or, perhaps, Torksey or Littleborough is meant. HISTORY OF THE BUILDING 5 had given way to a more settled ministry ; and at Southwell secular canons, who were also parish priests, were by degrees appointed. Whether at Beverley or Ripon they were ever regulars had better be left an open question ; at Southwell, when we first come across them, they had been already , for some time in existence as seculars. They were in effect before they were supported by separate prebendal endowments Colidei or Culdees, as at York — that is to say, bound by no especial vows, and belonging to no particular order.* A mapping- out of the country into parishes had begun in the days of Theodore of Tarsus : it took centuries to complete. Many villages around Southwell were quite out of the reach of any parish priest, and the resident clergy, besides serving their own church, supplied the deficiencies of the district. Why was it that so small and obscure a place was chosen in preference to Nottingham? The answer must be that its very quietness and remoteness was in its favour, since at the same time it was both central and accessible. Nottingham was the scene of constant strife, and became one of those "five burghs," such a source of contention between English and Dane : Southwell was comparatively exempt. It was not liable to siege and capture first by one and then by another; if any place was peaceful, that place was Southwell. The archbishops wished for a capital for the southern part of their diocese with a cathedral church and staff of clergy, to be what Beverley was for the east and Ripon for the west, and Southwell, with its long traditions, was ready at hand. And afterwards, while the Danes were ravaging Northumbria, it was impossible for the archbishop to obtain anything from his property there ; and in order that he might have a livelihood, the see of Worcester went with York. During this time (972-1016) Southwell became a convenient half-way house between the two dioceses. The earliest recorded endowment, though not of necessity the first granted, is a royal donation to Oskytel the Danish Archbishop of York {circa a.d. 956) of a demesne of twenty mansas at Southwell ; and power was especially retained to the archbishop to dispose of it at his death as he deemed best. Archbishop Alfred Putta (1023-51) was a great supporter of secular foundations. Beverley and Southwell * Appendix A. The Culdees. 6 SOUTHWELL CATHEDRAL both benefited from his liberality. Most likely during his reign that rude Anglo-Saxon church was built, which sup planted some other of which we have no information. Putta lived a great deal at Southwell, and died there, so that a manor house or palace was then in existence. He was buried at Peterborough Abbey. Kinsius, his successor, gave to the old minster two bells. We have now come to a time when we may speak of the county of Notts, and of canons and their prebends, and we can well understand why any archbishop, monk though he might be, as Kinsius was, would encourage establishments like Southwell. Of what practical use to a diocese was a body of Benedictines ? Their interests were confined to the boundaries of their own monasteries ; but secular clergy appointed by the archbishop himself were of great assistance. As the parishes increased in number, and the outside duties were by degrees confined to their own particular churches, they could still help in many ways in general diocesan matters ; and in this way York, Beverley, and Ripon grew up, not to mention smaller colleges like Howden. The system was abused afterwards ; but originally it was of great practical utility. In the eleventh century, if not in the tenth, certain of the clergy had separate endowments or prebends, and their outside duties were confined to one particular church, situated in the township or parish of the endowment, while one residence in Southwell and a second in the prebendal village were allotted to them, and afterwards their stalls and benefices came to be called by the names of these particular prebends. In this way the Culdee system developed into the prebendal ; and what with the archbishop's occasional residence, and the staff of clergy, we can understand the statement of Leland : " Ther was a Se at Southwel of the Merches which now longeth to the Archbishop of York." Before the Conquest Southwell was the southern capital of the diocese. Aldred, to whom befell the strange fortune of consecrating both Harold and William, enlarged York and Beverley; and Hugh the Chanter of York tells us that he made prebends at Southwell.* By the time of his death (1070 or 1075) the following at least were in existence, although it might be later on they were * Prebendas apud Suthwell fecit. HISTORY OF THE BUILDING 7 called by their local names ; — Normanton, Norwell Overhall, Norwell Palace Hall (or Palishall), Oxton and Cropwell, Woodborough, North Muskham. Aldred attempted, without success, to enforce celibacy amongst the clergy. The First Norman Archbishops. — With Aldred, that judicious benefactor of Southwell, passed away for a long period the archbishops who spoke and taught in the common tongue of the people. His successors looked down on the English as the English had previously looked down on the Britons, and appointed other Normans to the stalls, with whom they could take counsel ; and the strange sight began to be witnessed of prebendaries using a kind of "pigeon" English to make themselves understood. The first Norman, Thomas I. of Bayeux, "a prelate of great genius, and a friend of the Muses," had to part with Lindsey (and for a time with Newark) when the capital of the huge neighbouring diocese was removed from the Oxfordshire Dorchester to Lincoln. Lincoln is now reckoned as of a venerable antiquity, yet her chapter is appreciably the junior of Southwell. Archbishop Gerard (21 May 1108) died at Southwell while asleep in his garden, and with a MS. on astrology under his pillow, and was buried at York. His successor Thomas II. (1108-1114), a son of the first Norman bishop of Worcester, addressed a pastoral letter to the people of Nottinghamshire, begging for their contributions for the building of the church of S. Mary of Southwell {de Suwellae) " and that ye may the more willingly do this, we release you, " so that you need not visit every year the church of York, as . ¦' all our other people (or parishioners) do, but the church of " S. Mary of Southwell instead, and there have the same " pardon as at York." , This letter helps to explain the raison d'etre of Southwell. York was too far away for the Notts people, 70 to 80 miles from Nottingham by road, and Southwell was central for the whole county. The favourite Norman system of choosing the leading town was not adopted because a chapter and a residence were both in existence at Southwell, and because of the situation of the town. Driven like a wedge into the southern province, if Nottinghamshire was to make procession anywhere, South well was easier of access than Nottingham. Already for ad ministrative purposes the archbishop's capital for the county. 8 SOUTHWELL CATHEDRAL the minster now became the mother church in every respect. But if this was to be the case, the small and roughly-built minster then standing was quite inadequate according to the more magnificent Norman ideas. Every one of the old Saxon cathedrals either had or then was undergoing the process of pulling down, only to be rebuilt on a larger scale and in a better manner. Southwell's turn came rather late in the day ; and the proportions and the masonry both benefited in consequence. As at York, the work was done piece meal, the old coming down as the new progressed. Thomas could hardly have lived long enough to see the whole com pleted, with its chancel square at the east and four eastern apses now no more ; but he would at least have the gratification of knowing that everything was advancing towards completion.* The late Mr J. R. Green has made clear one obscure point in this universal system of rebuilding on a more magnificent scale. Where, we ask, did the money come from ? Neither the contributions of the liberal, nor forced labour, would suffice. The Jews found the money required. They had come over with or after the Conqueror, and settled in the towns in their different Jewries under the king's immediate protection. " Castle and cathedral alike owed their existence " to the loans of the Jews." The Jewish money-lenders of York and Lincoln assisted in the building of Southwell. By this time, if not earlier, the number of stalls was ten, Norwell Tertia Pars, Oxton Altera Pars, and St. Muskham having been created, and the office of sacrist or sexton raised to the dignity of a canonry. Henry I. and Stephen both granted rights and immunities, civil, criminal, and forest. Archbishop Thurstan (1119-1135) founded the stalls of Beckingham and Dunham, prebends in the north of the county, with the village tithes and some glebe, and Hallough- ton or Halton, near to Southwell. Pope Honorius {circa 11 25) wrote to the archbishop against the marriage of the cathedral clergy. " In your churches [York, Beverley, Ripon, Southwell] " be earnest to reform discipline, and restore the refectory at " Southwell to the good condition in which it existed in times * So far as the letter of Archbishop Thomas goes, being without date, it might have been written by either Thomas ; but the finely pointed masonry and the later Norman in the architecture suggest the second Thomas. HISTORY OF THE BUILDING 9 " past." The pope objected to the canons being married and living with their families ; he wanted them to be celibate, and take their meals together ; but he was mistaken in supposing that they ever had done so at Southwell. Alexander III. promulgated two bulls, one to the minster clergy (1171), and the other to his "well beloved the arch- " deacon, dean * and the other clergy of the county." After confirming the Whitsuntide procession and directing that the chrism or consecrated oil should be distributed at that synod by the rural deans throughout the county, he exempted the chapter from the control of the archbishop, and almost annihilated the authority of the latter, t Archbishop Roger had obtained the pope's support to dis allow the over-lordship of Canterbury, and this was the pay ment demanded. It was a cruel blow, for the church and its staff owed nearly everything to the archbishop, and the pre bendaries were his advisers and assistant curates. Now they were quite independent. An imperium in imperio was established, and what York lost Rome was expected to gain. The chapter naturally preferred being placed on an equality with York ; for in spite of Whitsuntide processions and synods, York, as in the matter of the confirmation of the Halloughton prebend, had exercised some sort of authority. Now they could do so no longer, and the two chapters became in every sense equal. The canons were also permitted to appoint vicars both to their stalls and to their parishes. After the death of Roger the see was vacant for a number of years, and, in the absence of King Richard, William, Bishop of Ely and papal legate, as chancellor, acted as regent. He con trolled the northern province, and punished those who had violated the king's peculiar by massacring Jews. Richard, however, despatched to England Hugh, Bishop of Durham, with full power as justiciary north of the Humber. At Ely the two prelates met ; and on Hugh presenting his credentials super seding William in the north, William said that he would cheer fully resign his power there. William then inveigled his rival to the quiet and seclusion of Southwell, and here, having Bishop Hugh completely in his power, put him under arrest. He kept him in custody in the palace until Hugh had promised * Decano ; but there was no dean, though one appears afterwards. t Ab omni jure & consuetudine episcopali penitus & immunes. IO SOUTHWELL CATHEDRAL to resign Windsor and all the other places entrusted to_ him ; and even then would not release him until he had his son (so Roger de Hoveden calls him) as his hostage. William was eventually deposed by John and the council. When Richard returned he chose Southwell for the place at which to meet William the Lion of Scotland in order to settle differences. After reducing Nottingham by the help of some engines which threw large stones. Palm Sunday 1194 saw Coeur de Lion at his palace or hunting-box of Clipstone in Sherwood Forest, and William at Worksop. Each rested " on "account of the solemnity of the day," and on the morrow (4th April) met at Southwell. . Roger de Hoveden says that they repaired the next day to Melton, but Florence of Worcester that they continued at Southwell over the Tuesday, and that during their stay, William demanded of Richard "all the " dignities and honours which his predecessors held in " England," and that Richard answered, that "he would give " him satisfaction after he had consulted his barons." The council was held at Northampton on Easter Eve, and Richard declined to concede the demands of the Scotch King. Archbishop Walter de Gray (1216-56). — Beyond that Pavia, daughter of Nigel de Rampton, and widow of Robert de Maluvel, founded the fourteenth prebend, that of Rampton, some twenty miles north of Southwell, there is nothing to record before Gray's episcopate. The diocese was in a constant state of turmoil and disorder from political affairs, and this had its effect upon the architecture of the minster. From the late Norman of Thomas II. there is nothing until we arrive at the maturity of the Lancet Gothic or Early English of the thirteenth century. The transition between the two is entirely wanting. Gray was a great and many-sided prelate ; in spite of his political duties, he both governed his diocese and built extensively. At Southwell he considered the Norman choir too small, and issued (1233) an indulgence for thirty days for the completion of that Early English building, which to this day, although externally shorn of its high roof, is internally almost exactly as he left it, and a fitting commemoration of his reign. He also endeavoured to mitigate some of the harmful results of the Bull of Inde pendence. As the canons were allowed to appoint vicars, it HISTORY OF THE BUILDING ii was equivalent to granting them leave of non-residence. Gray tried to enforce that they really should appoint deputies, both vicars-choral for their stalls, and perpetual vicars for their prebendal parishes. Other ranks of the minster clergy date from his time. At first the vicars-choral said or chanted the masses for the dead; but in 1241 Robert de Lexington, canon of one of the Norwells, and Chief Justiciary, founded two chantries in the church, and made provision for a third to be removed there from a chapel in the town. He gave to the chapter the presentation of Barnburgh in South Yorkshire, and, by some power difficult now to under stand, provided that the rector was to pay 23 merks yearly for the support of two priests, two deacons and two sub- deacons, " who for ever at the altar of the blessed Thomas "the Martyr in the church of Southwell" were to celebrate the divine offices for the repose of his own soul and those of his relatives and others. As a distinct body ranking below the vicars-choral, the chantry priests now became a regular part of the minster staff, and eventually numbered thirteen. As the prebendaries might now be non-resident without his licence. Gray tried to establish a dean as head of the chapter in permanent residence. He was only visitor and patron, and in having no regular president, other than the senior canon in residence, Southwell differed from all other churches. York had its dean, Beverley its provost, Ripon its permanent president in the prebendary of Stanwick ; and during Gray's time a dean named Hugh appears for a short time. But it was not to be ; and we soon hear no more of him.* Gray's reforming zeal urged the chapter to consent to various statutes and regulations. Those who were ordained to serve in the church had to pass an examination before the canons in residence, and to be of a good character. A canon, accompanied by a vicar and the registrar, was to visit yearly the churches within the jurisdiction, and put an end to abuses. The canons-resident were likewise given complete authority over all the other clergy, and these were to be fined for absence from worship. The readers of the lessons {lectiones), whether in the choir or pulpit, were to look the passages over beforehand, and to read * Leach, p. xxxv. Dugdale also states that once there was a dean. 12 SOUTHWELL CATHEDRAL audibly and distinctly. Those who failed in this, and more particularly those who upset the gravity of the others, were to be flogged in the chapter-house. The inferior clergy of the choir were to look over their music before service, were not to use their books during service, but to look at the music or order board {tabulam). Bad and violent language outside the church was punishable by one flogging or a shilling fine, or, as a second alternative, by the wearing of the bulgewarium round the culprit's neck "according " to the ancient use of the church." The same offence com mitted inside was to be punished by two floggings or a two shillings fine, and for the third expulsion ensued. By the Portsmouth charter of Henry IIL, dated July 1253, in confirmation of previous ones, the chapter in civil and criminal matters over its officials and property became, if any thing, more independent than ever of the ordinary law of the land. " The canons of S. Mary of Southwell shall enjoy the " same privileges and immunities as those of S. Peter of York, " particularly they shall receive the amercements of their " tenants, and fines for all such offences as they have been " guilty of . . . exemptions from tolls and duties, from suits " of counties, hundreds, and wapentakes, and from all gelds " such as Danegeld, Horngeld, etc. etc., and that they shall " have their courts of justice with soc and sac." There is also mention made at this period of rights of some kind over parts of Sherwood Forest. Archbishop John Romanus (1286-96). — Romanus had a somewhat troubled reign. He had quarrels with the Pope, who wanted to appoint foreigners, and with the York chapter about his right of visitation. This latter was settled by arbitration, and is of interest as the Southwell statutes were always based on York. The archbishop was to visit once in five years, and was to enter the chapter-house unattended by chaplains or clerks, two canons sworn to secrecy being the only persons allowed to act with him ; and canonical obedience was to be rendered by the dean.* The visitation held at Southwell on the Tuesday after the Epiphany 1294 has been preserved, and from this we gather that the old provisions, which enacted that non-resident canons were to provide vicars, had not been carried out, for it was decreed that they were to provide * Ornsby's "York," p. 161. HISTORY OF THE BUILDING 13 perpetual vicars {vicarii perpetui) to their parish churches before the next visitation. Vicars-choral and clerks were forbidden to laugh and talk in the choir, particularly during service, under pain of expulsion, and no women, other than relatives of good repute, were to live in the houses of the vicars- choral and perpetual vicars. The number of stalls was brought up to sixteen by the addition of Eaton, and by carving N. Leverton out of Beckingham. In this way the archbishop endeavoured to provide for the residence of at least some canons ; and the non-resident were to provide proctors or proxies (generally their vicars-choral) to answer for them in chapter. But his abiding work is architectural. At York he laid with great ceremony the foundation-stone of a new nave, and at the same time a new chapter-house was commenced there, and both have survived the storm and stress of six centuries. At Southwell he determined that the canons should likewise have a fitting house. The masons had now become a highly-organised body with supervisors, surveyors, overseers and a host of other officials. The master masons were first-rate architects, and the men below them — the freemasons — were not merely workmen but sculptors and artists.* Alike in elegance of proportion and elaborate beauty of detail, archi tecture was rapidly approaching the full glory of the Decorated epoch, and during his time was commenced at least, if not finished, that miracle of mediseval inspiration, the chapter house. At York, to help in meeting the cost of the new buildings, offenders of various kinds were punished by the infliction of fines, the amount of which was determined by the penancers. At Southwell, the archbishop resorted to a method which no doubt increased his popularity. At this same visitation of 1294 it was decreed that the houses {i.e. both in Southwell and on the prebends) of the alien canons, which had fallen into a ruinous condition, were to be repaired within a year under penalty of a heavy fine to go to the fabric of the new chapter house. As the revenues of these alienigenae were collected by local officials, the penalties could be easily deducted, and by one and the same decree this prelate showed his objection to these foreigners, mulcted them in part of their benefices, * On this subject see Gwilt's "Architecture," p. 126. 14 SOUTHWELL CATHEDRAL prevented money from crossing the Alps, and aided the addition of the finest member to the minster. "The Sainte Chapelle "at Paris, the Angel Choir at Lincoln, fall into a second rank " compared with this Southwell chapter-house." Nothing is known of the older one. Archbishop Thomas de Corbridge (1300-4). — Cor- bridge endeavoured to check the abuse of illiterate clerks, by decreeing that no candidate was to be ordained by title of the chapter and no vicar was to be appointed until a satisfactory examination had been passed before the chapter. The canons were to pay the stipends of both their vicars punctually, so that the latter need not wander about the country to the scandal of all good people. The services were to be better rendered ; and the precentor was to examine the music books and see that they agreed, to prevent discord in the singing, while the decani and cantoris sides were to be equal. As visitor he insisted that the statutes of Romanus were to be carried out, and that in the prebendal churches perpetual vicars were to be appointed within a year; his predecessor had granted ¦ five years in vain. Whilst he ruled that there must always be in residence three, or at least two, canons ; he saw how, in spite of the recently added stalls, neither he nor his successors could enforce even so much as that, and it was settled that when none were resident " from any cause inevitable " and legitimate, leave having been asked of us," some discreet person under oath was to govern, while only canons who had duly qualified as residents were to share in the common fund. The reign of Corbridge was short ; he left no mark in the diocese, but his efforts to purify the chapter were praise worthy. He died at the palace, and was buried in the choir near the pulpit ; but the exact spot is now lost. The Bull of Independence did its work ; and non-residence became the rule. The popes further made use of their claim to appoint foreigners to vacant stalls ; and amongst others Stephen de Ferentino, cardinal priest, held Norwell Overhall, and Stephen of St. Mary beyond Tiber, also cardinal priest, held Normanton, both during the thirteenth century. The kings, like the popes, wanted the stalls as a cheap way of paying those priests who served them as lawyers and secretaries. In this way John Clavell, the king's clerk, received Norwell Overhall; and in the fourteenth century, HISTORY OF THE BUILDING 15 AVilliam de Melton (who succeeded Dominus Lambertus, a. foreigner appointed by Letters Apostolic) obtained a stall, holding, at the same time, another in Lincoln, the provost- -ship of Beverley, and. the archdeaconry of Barnstaple. He gave these up on his accession to the throne of York in 13 1 7. His active life was mainly spent as secretary to Edward IL, and lord keeper and then treasurer to Edward III. It is unnecessary to multiply instances. Mr Gairdner has pointed -out how monarchs found their shrewdest administrators in the Tanks of the clergy ; and this was a cheap and easy way of paying them. It was not expected that a candidate for the priesthood should have what an age with a higher standard would call vocation. A promising young man applied for -orders as he would now try for the Civil Service or be called to the Bar. Nobody expected him to be a winning preacher, -or to have an ardent zeal for souls. For years it was well that he employed himself usefully somehow, and did not, on the plea of dulness and boredom, live a life of complete idle ness or worse away from Southwell. In the first half of the fourteenth century the beautiful rood screen was carved : the last work worthy of praise, for it was followed by the insertion of the huge west window with the idea of lighting up the gloom of the nave, and the lowering of the roofs throughout. In numerous cases brought before the courts of law, the chapter proved their rights to their property and privileges ; and benefactors multiplied. Amongst others. Canon Richard de Chesterfield (1379) built a new home for the sixteen vicars-choral on the site of the present one. Canon Thomas Haxey (141 5) built another for the chantry priests on the site of the present Grammar School, and Arch bishop Cardinal John Kempe(i439) purchased for three hundred merks, from the Crown, the confiscated alien priory of Ravens- dale in Lindsey, and presented it to the vicars-choral. Later on the triennial visitations (1469 to 1540) by the chapter show that the inferior clergy had deteriorated in religion and morals, more than one-half being frequently accused of offences more or less serious. There is an inventory of the goods of Richard de Normanton, parish vicar in 1369.* This functionary performed the duties of parish priest for the residuary * Leach, p. 197. i6 SOUTHWELL CATHEDRAL parish, and was appointed by the prebendary of Normanton ; and for certain purposes the parishioners had part of the minster allotted to them as their "parish church within the " collegiate church." The parish altar was dedicated to St. Vincent, and had one frontal of silk, and a second of coarser material, decorated with the royal arms ; and there were four towels {tobalia), two ferials and a corporal. For mass were five sets of vestments, each with chasuble, stole, fanon (or maniple), alb, amice, and girdle. Two were reckoned as " principals," one with and the other without the tunic ; the others were for ordinary Sundays and week days. Two cushions covered with red syndon and a lectern belonged to the altar, as did nine napkins, besides a carpet for " double " feasts. At Easter the parishioners made their communion at a long table {mensa domini) covered with two long cloths. The choral robes (for the parish vicar assisted the choir) were cope, almuce {almicium, not the amicium or amice for celebrations), rochet and surplice {super-pellicium). The parish plate included two silver -gilt chalices, of which the more valuable was for Easter, a portable silver-gilt cross, and a plated staff; and there were candlesticks of iron or wood and a gilt copper cup for the host. A breviary or portiforium with music was estimated at five pounds — a chantry priest's stipend ; and Richard was provided with surplice or lantern for visiting the sick, as well as with a set of sermons on the epistles and gospels throughout the year. Undoubtedly the parishioners were accustomed to hear somebody's sermons read ; and the parish priests performed the duty instead of a prebendary. The Brothers Booth. — There is aready explanation of Arch bishop William Booth (1452-65) making Southwell his favourite residence. Like a wise man, he did not care to have anything to do with the Wars of the Roses ; and during the whole of this time Southwell, true to its traditions, was remote from armies and battlefields. He improved the stipends of the chantry priests, and enlarged the chapel of Henry le Vavasour outside the south-west angle of the nave, the home of the Grammar School, and there he elected to be buried.* His successor, George Neville, brother to the king-maker, was unwise enough * In the will of Robert Batemanson there is a reference to " my Lord William Bothe's quer," which implies that William, and not Laurence, restored it. HISTORY OF THE BUILDING 17 to interfere in matters of State, and was rewarded by the seizure of his vast private property and exile and imprisonment at Calais and at Guisnes. At Neville's death William's brother Laurence was translated from Durham, and during his reign (1476-80) showed his brother's preference for Southwell. He added two chantries to the Vavasour or Grammar School chapel, and was buried by his brother's side. This adjunct, needlessly pulled down in the last century, came to be called the Booth chapel. While Laurence was at Southwell, in July 1479, the two resident canons gave themselves leave of absence, pleading the ravages of the plague. Canon Christopher Urswick, LL.D. — Amongst the non-resident dignitaries immersed in affairs of State was Christopher Urswick, instituted to Norwell Palishall by proxy (6th April 1509). He was taken into the service of the Lady Margaret, wife of Richmond and mother of Henry VII., whose third husband was Stanley the first Earl of Derby of the present creation. Engaged in plots and suffering exile for his mistress and her son, after Bosworth he became Henry's chaplain and almoner, and obtained the deanery of York, which he exchanged for a canonry on receiving the more coveted deanery of Windsor. He was also at some time or other rector of Hackney and archdeacon of Richmond, of Wells, and of Surrey. Before he was a prebendary he would accompany Henry on the royal progress through the north, when the king, avoiding Newark on account of the plague, passed through Southwell on his way from Lincoln to Not tingham. He was employed as special plenipotentiary to settle with the Emperor Maximilian I. the terms on which Henry was to be admitted into the Holy League. He died in 1522, and Wolsey appointed to the vacant stall his own illegitimate son, Thomas Wynter. Urswick is chiefly mentioned here, because to him belongs the distinguished honour of figuring in Shakespeare {Richard III. Act iv. scene 5). To him, on the eve of Bosworth, Stanley laments that his own hands are tied, as his son is a hostage in Richard's power — My son George Stanley is franked up in hold. If I revolt, off goes young George's head. It is unnecessary to remind the reader that "Sir" does not B 1 8 SOUTHWELL CATHEDRAL there mean a knight, but is the equivalent for the modern " Reverend." PART II. -CONSTITUTION OF THE CHAPTER The constitution by which the minster was governed was unique, and so remarkable as to require a special summary, excepting in so far as has been already anticipated. Southwell was the cathedral city and mother church of the county from the time that Nottinghamshire first became a county at all — let us say, from a hundred years before the Conquest. The Whitsuntide procession merely emphasised and ratified this fact. At this festival a synod was held, which would seem to have been more for the purpose of festivity than of legislation, and the chrism or holy oil was distributed through the rural deans to the various parishes of the county. Each parish had to pay a specified tax, called the Pentecostal offering, varying from the humble sixpence of Staunton to the merk of Nottingham and Newark. Of this offering ten per cent, went to the sacrist, and forty per cent, each to the prebendary of Normanton and the residents' common fund ; alto gether some fifteen or sixteen pounds. In the palmy days of pilgrimages and processions Southwell must have looked very gay at Whitsuntide. After gradually dying out. Arch bishop Drummond, in the last century, on his own authority, put a stop to the little that was left of this time-honoured pageant. It is strange that no one has ever been able to fix the exact day of the week on which it was held. The Liberty of Southwell and Scrooby was a civil juris diction of the archbishop as a great landowner, and extended over some twenty parishes. Besides his Southwell manor house or palace, he had another at Scrooby, on the famous north road near the Yorkshire border* ; and his property was for the most part contiguous to these two seats. Within his Liberty he appears up to quite recent times to have been very much his own Lord Lieutenant and High Sheriff, with sessions in dependent of the county, and justices of the peace of his own nomination. The Peculiar of Southwell was an ecclesiastical juris diction of the chapter over the ancient manor or lordship of * There was a third at Laneham, on the Trent. HISTORY OF THE BUILDING 19 Southwell and the prebendal villages. With the exception of ordination and confirmation, the canons were their own arch bishop, as they were their own archdeacon and rural dean. They had full authority over their subordinates, including the perpetual vicars of the prebendaries, and over all, clergy and laity alike, for certain matters then seemingly reckoned as ecclesiastical offences, such as slander, perjury, and immorality. They could punish by fine, suspension, penance, and ex communication, but in later years dropped the punishment of flogging. The court of the chapter (or rather Dr William Worseley, the one resident canon) sentenced Cristina Saynton to walk three Sunday mornings before the Cross in the processions, carrying a wax candle, and clad in a loose unfastened " tunic," with bare feet and legs, and towel over her head. Agnes Nothorne was sentenced to walk round Edingley Churchyard on Palm Sunday, barefooted, and with a net over her head ; and on Good Friday to approach the Cross with bended knees, and then crawl with bare feet and head covered as before, and kneeling before two altars in the church, say before each five times the Lord's Prayer, the Ave Maria, and the Creed. This ecclesiastical jurisdiction included the proving of wills of all persons ; and the records contain many instances of probate. To this was added the civil jurisdiction of " assizes of bread and ale," with power to punish fraud, and authority over weights and measures. In respect of their own property, the chapter had their court "views of Frank pledge," etc., and the individual prebendaries likewise had theirs in respect of their endowments in land ; and there were appeals from the prebendal courts to those of the chapter. In short, they had a complete feudal jurisdiction, both over their own lands and over those they held in trust for the service of the minster and for their subordinates. But there were in addition certain marked privileges. The lands of the prebends were free from the authority of the sheriff and all other officers of the king, unless the canon consented. The canons had " in their houses and " lands Soc and Sac, Tol and Theam, and infanganthef (the " right of executing a thief) and intol and utol, and all those " same customs of the honour and liberty which the king has " in his own lands." Their tenants were almost, if not entirely, exempt from military service, and their taxes, when any were 20 SOUTHWELL CATHEDRAL required, were levied by the York Convocation, to which they sent a proctor, and not, it would seem, by king and parliament ; and the fines did not go to the Crown. Although a large part of the manor had been mapped out into daughter parishes, such as Edingley and Upton, a residuary parish of considerable area always remained*; and from the beginning of non-residence the chapter delegated their pastoral duties to the parish vicar. There were five chapels in the town, besides chapels of ease in the more remote parts of the parish. The actual town was divided into the Burgage, between the Greet and the market-place, and the Prebendage ; and the latter was chiefly ecclesiastical property of various kinds. To the church itself appertained the old tradition of sanctuary. A man charged with murder even, or an outlaw, could take sanctuary for thirty days ; and if by that time he had not made his peace, some of the clergy were to escort him for thirty leagues {leugae), " with some sign of the Church's peace," and also relics, wherever the accused wanted to go, and bring him back three times. Interference involved the crime of "breaking the Church's peace." It is difficult to say when sanctuary was abolished or died out. Another peculiar privilege was, that the clergy were not tried by the usual courts for the most serious crimes. There is only one such recorded, a bad case of felonyt ; and this came before "judges (or justiciaries) of our Lord the King, " nominated (? deputatis) to preserve the peace," and was tried at the south door of the church or in one of the canons' houses. Whether these'' judges were the ordinary itinerant justices, or those of the Court of Eyre north of the Trent, or the archbishop's in right of his liberty of Southwell and Scrooby, or a special commission — this is a puzzle. The Clergy and Staff. — The archbishops were at first head of the chapter, and the canons their curates. They must have begun to lose touch when, in the twelfth century, the chapter became independent. Henceforth they were visitors, and at their visitations held what were in reality courts. Subse quently the statute of Premunire, by putting a stop, or at least a check, to papal bulls, and that of Provisors, by forbidding * The present area, including that of the modern daughter parish of Holy Trinity, is put down at over 5000 acres. t In which, however, the accused was acquitted. HISTORY OF THE BUILDING 21 the appointment of foreigners to vacant stalls, increased some what their authority. They were always patrons of the sixteen stalls by right of their having endowed them (with one excep tion) ; and it is clear from what happened in Wolsey's time, that they could by use celebrate when they pleased, and appoint the preachers. Sometimes, but not always, the statutes or decrees of the chapter read de consensu 6^ voluntate of the archbishop. The prebendaries, addressed in chapter as " venerable," were sixteen in number, and their prebends were : — Beckingham, Dunham, Eton, Halloughton, N. Leverton, N. Muskham, S. Muskham, Normanton (with the chancellorship), Norwell Overhall, Norwell Palishall (or Palace Hall), Norwell Tertia Pars, Oxton cum Cropwell, Oxton Secunda Pars, Rampton, Sacristaria, Woodborough. By the valuation of 1547, Norwell Overhall was worth ^^50 a year, and Eton only J^2. These valuations were, however, below the real profits, as the tenants paid part of their rents in a lump sum (technically called a " fine ") at the commencement of the lease. The chapter, in conjunction with the church wardens appointed by them, controlled their common fund for the residents as well as the fabric fund or " ladie land," and they were trustees of the endowments of the inferior clergy, and the several miscellaneous bequests for tapers, lamps, etc. Next we may place the perpetual vicars, of whom there were twelve, Normanton (within the residuary parish) and the Sacrist prebend (the duties of which were limited to the church) not requiring them.* Their stipends from land, the lesser tithes, rent charges on the prebends, and other sources were small. They had no duties in the minster itself, but were subject to the chapter. Each canon appointed the vicar of his prebend. The daughter churches of the parish were also under the chapter. Passing over the parish vicar, there were vicars-choral for all the prebends ; and these performed, as deputies of the canons, the long round of daily services. They were paid J^t, a year by their prebendaries, and shared in their own common fund, and lived in common in their own college. They had a common seal for their property, but were never a separate * There were two for the three prebends of Normanton, and one for Oxton. 2 2 SOUTHWELL CATHEDRAL corporation, being appointed by their canons and under the control of the chapter, who made the bye-laws that governed them. In chapter meetings they often acted as proctors or proxies for their absent chiefs. One of them was appointed " hebdomodary " each week, and took the priest's part. They had a precentor for each side of the choir; and there seems to have been as well a precentor in chief. They were always in priests' orders, and the chapter strictly prohibited their holding any care of souls. Their use was that of York. In ancient times they were not cafled minor canons. Next ranked those peculiar officers against whom Sir Walter Besant waxes so eloquent. The chantry priests or chaplains were an offshoot of the vicars-choral, who previously said or sang the appointed masses for the departed. The earliest donation was that of Prebendary and Justiciary Robert de Lexington, 9th October 1241 ; and the latest that of Laurence Booth (1479), who endowed two in the Vavasour Chapel : altogether thirteen priests, and nine or ten altars. I'hey "followed the choir," or, in addition to their specific duties, assisted in the singing ; and the priest of St. Nicholas also served the parochial chapel of ease of Halam, while others performed similar outside duties, and one was usher of the Grammar School and a second " player at the organs." The chantry priests, besides their endowments, which averaged four or five pounds a year each, shared a small common fund, and, thanks to Canon Thomas Haxey, from the year 1415 lived together in their own house on the site of the present Grammar School, and could lodge outsiders. The chantry of St. John the Evangelist was in the gift of the vicars - choral, and to the rest the chapter appointed. The vicars - choral were generally promoted from this body. Next ranked two deacons, who, besides other duties, marshalled the processions, and two sub-deacons : the pay of the former being ;^3, los. and of the latter J^2, 13s. Clerks were ordained as sub-deacons, and advanced to priests' orders; and all four offices were some times combined with vicar-choralships. The six choristers were laymen, as was the incense-bearer or thuribuler. Then there were the registrar (an important official), the master of Our Lady's works, the vergers, or wand-bearers, and others : altogether some sixty or more, not counting the wardens who were generally vicars-choral. HISTORY OF THE BUILDING 23 But the list of offices is not yet exhausted ; for the prebendary of Normanton, in his capacity of chancellor, was the secretary for education for the county, and appointed to such grammar schools as Nottingham, Newark, and Wollaton, as well as to Southwell. Southwell Grammar School must be one of the very oldest educational establishments in the country, and the present headmaster (appointed by the bishop of the diocese) has a long unbroken line of predecessors going back to Norman times. The master was a vicar-choral or chantry priest, and received J^2 a year out of the Normanton prebend, and his assistant half that sum. Complaints were made latterly that the master shirked his duties, was too fond of giving " remedies " or holidays, so that the boys paid their parents' substance for nothing, and allowed English to be talked in school instead of Latin. The " Song School " was a separate establishment, of which the master was paid ;Q\ a year, and taught other subjects besides singing. Possibly his pupils were choir boys, and the school held in the north transept chapel of the nave. The sacrist, besides his vicar-choral, had " clerks " under him ; and complaints were made that these, as well as other clerks and ministers of the church, did not attend the Grammar School. At Wollaton school, adults (^iri) were likewise taught ; and at Southwell, it would seem that these " clerks " received, or were supposed to receive, some smattering of Latin with a view to ordination, for in spite of their name they do not appear to have been already in orders. The archbishop presented to the Hospital of St. Mary Magdalene ; and there was a nunnery. No trace is left of either of these institutions. In value and importance, Southwell ranked below London and York, but quite on a level with many cathedrals. CHAPTER II EXTERIOR THE NAVE AND TRANSEPT PART I.— NORMAN Very happy in their choice of situation, the first builders selected an extensive tract of meadow land with a gentle slope from west to east ; and consecrated the meadow itself for a burial ground. Later builders never changed this site ; and the church of Edwy and Edgar, and that of the eleventh century, as well as the present one, occupy the ground on which first stood a rude and hastily-constructed edifice of wood. Every one must at once be struck with the ample and unbroken space on all sides, allowing, as it does, full justice to be done to the fair proportions. In mediaeval, as in modern, buildings the site is often too limited or too insignificant to do full justice to the architecture. It is otherwise here, and to this charm is added a second which, again, modern architects are apt to ignore. The building follows the natural slope of the ground it occupies ; it is not constructed upon an artificial dead level. And the advantage of this in adding to the picturesque appear ance becomes evident as we look at the building as a whole from different points of view : it grows upon one. And this effect of the spacious churchyard is still further enhanced by the position of the surrounding houses. There is not an unsuitable building in sight. The beautiful avenue of elms, called the Prebends' Walk, at the northern side, half-conceals, half-reveals a row of detached houses environed by gardens, some of them in the prosperous days of the collegiate chapter prebendaries' residences. The buildings of the Grammar School are at the north-west angle. Along the west side are other houses, and the churchyard surroundings are completed by the gardens and partially restored ruins of the palace of Wolsey and of Sandys, and by the open gateway and railing which leave to ^iew the lawn-covered Vicars' Court with its five houses. 24 EXTERIOR— THE NAVE AND TRANSEPT 25 The old Whitsuntide ceremonials, in times when Whitsuntide fell ten days later than now, were rendered more impressive by the surrounding bloom ; and at no time of the year does the general aspect now present a more charming appear ance than at the County Choral Festival in June, when the foliage of the trees, arrived at its first maturity, has not yet lost its early freshness. The principal gateway is on the west : a simple Norman structure with a niche overhead, in which, before the destruc tive days of Puritan iconoclasts, was placed a statue. The work on either side dates from the beginning of the nineteenth century. A second and plainer gives entrance on the north by the Prebends' Walk ; and a third by the Vicars' Court. There is no eminence from which to get a bird's-eye view. The western front and towers are commanded from the west gateway, the ground sloping gently. Standing by the corner of the palace and vicars' gardens we get the south-east view of choir, south transept, and central tower. Going round to the north-east, and standing by the small entrance from the street by the corner house of the Vicars' Court, the solid Early English choir on the left, the late Norman central tower in the middle, and the elegant Decorated chapter-house with the restored high-pitched roof are grouped together. And the due north view from the north gateway comprises the beautifully broken front from the west tower and north porch to the late Early English of the transept chapel, the whole being flanked on the left by the chapter-house. But the grouping of the three towers can only be properly appreciated from a greater distance ; from the meadows on the south-east, where they combine with the palace ruins, or from the more distant view when approaching by rail from RoUeston. The external dimensions in feet are as follow : — Extreme length, 318, of which the Norman nave and tower comprise 185; extreme length of transepts, 137; breadth of nave, 72; breadth of south transept, about 40; of north, a trifle less ; breadth of choir, same as nave, and including the two chapels, 108. Thus it will be seen that Southwell occupies a place amongst the smaHer cathedrals. Not only is it less than Durham, York, and Lincoln, but also than Norwich and Exeter. It is, in fact, a little larger than Rochester. The original Norman choir was 26 SOUTHWELL CATHEDRAL of course different. The dedication is to the Blessed Mary the Virgin of Southwell. The stone chiefly came from quarries in the neighbourhood of Mansfield, twelve or fourteen miles away through Sherwood Forest. That used by the Norman builders is of a dark yellowish hue, while their Early English and Decorated successors found some of a lighter hue with blue-tinted veins. Fortunate in other matters, Southwell was fortunate in the choice of material. That eminent geologist Sir Roderick Murchison once expressed his regret that, when the Houses of Parliament were rebuilt, these quarries were not used. " If " the Mansfield stone had been selected, not one pinnacle in " that otherwise grand building would have been subjected, as " it now was, to perish." There is no fear of the minster perishing. Nave and transepts have already withstood the storms and rains of seven hundred and fifty years of the climate of the midlands, and choir and chapter-house almost as long. And this stone was chiselled by competent masons, after the fine pointed masonry of the later Norman had taken the place of the ruder work of earlier churches. The Central Tower is a massive building of rather less than 40 feet square, and rises 105 feet from the ground. The decora tion of the upper part is divided into two stages, separated by string courses ; and the four faces of the same stage are alike. The lower consists of an arcade or series of arches ; and, as is so often the case in Norman bufldings of the twelfth century, these arches inter sect. This same intersecting work is repeated in the corresponding stage of the north-west tower, as well as on either side of the in terior of the north porch. The arcade of the upper stage is different in design, inasmuch as the arches are separate and do seven in number. The space on Wall of Transept. not intersect. They are EXTERIOR— THE NAVE AND TRANSEPT 27 either side of the central arch is rather more than the others ; and the three central arches are pierced for windows, and, like the windows in the other towers, were once divided by a shaft into two lights. Above the upper stage the usual Norman corbel table is carried round the four sides. Originally the tower may have ended with a simple parapet ; but if there were any spire, it would probably be of stone, of no great height, and rising from the outer surface of the walls — in fact, little more than a roof of pyramidal shape. The present roof dates from after the fire of 1711. The parapet is an addition, but con tains stones with the Norman zigzag and circular hollow work. As the transept gables are similarly orna mented, it is assumed that these stones were removed from there and placed in their present position when the transept roofs were lowered ; and accordingly the parapet of the tower is of the same date as the debasing of the transept roof This — Mr Dimock's theory — has been generally adopted by experts, and is interest ing as an example of how archae ologists are enabled to mark even the minor changes in detail. The somewhat elaborately carved pin nacles are, like the parapet, out of place on a Norman tower, although of Norman masonry. Originally placed at the ends of the transept gables, they corresponded with others in the north porch. Seen from below, they look too dwarfed and insignificant for their present altitude. The Bells, eight in number, are in this tower. If the first pair, the gift of Archbishop Kinsius before the Conquest, were ever placed here, they have long since been either destroyed or recast. An inscription on the wall of the interior, near the north door of the choir, tells us that "Thomas Wymondesold, of " Lambeth in the county of Surry, Esquire, gave unto this Pinnacle— Centkal Tower. 28 SOUTHWELL CATHEDRAL " church a set of chimes and 20 shillings per annum for "ever toward the keeping of them. 1693." Wymondesold's gift was reduced to a shapeless mass by the above-mentioned fire of 17 1 1, and Ruddall of Gloucester cast a new peal with the following inscriptions : — I St. Abraham Ruddall of Gloucester cast us all 1721. 2nd. Peace and good neighbourhood. 3rd. Prosperity to this Town. 4th. Prosperity to our Benefactors. 5 th. From Lightning and Tempest, Good Lord, deliver us. 6th. Prosperity to the Chapter. 7th. Prosperity to the Church of England. Sth. I to the Church the Living call, and to the Grave do summon all. Since then some have been recast and the inscriptions altered — 2nd. G. Mears, founders, London, 1849. 4th. T. Mears of London, fecit 181 9. 5th. T. Mears of London, fecit 1819. The wish expressed on the sixth bell has unhappily not been fulfilled. The chimes are set to the National Anthem. The Nave and Aisles. — The length, including the west towers, of .the external wall is 135 feet, the breadth 73. The division is into seven bays (broken on the north side by the famous porch) separated by . buttresses. The effect is massive, stern, and bare to a degree. The buttresses are flat : of the same breadth and thickness throughout, and terminate in the parapet wall, which overhangs sufficiently to receive them. They would seem to have been constructed as much for ornament as for support. The only other relief of the Norman builders was those slightly projecting horizontal bands, the string courses. Two of these go round the whole of the Norman building, including the buttresses, excepting where by later alterations or other causes the continuity is broken. The lower of these, with heavy zigzag or chevron moulding — a peculiarity of late Norman — passes underneath such of the original windows as are left. But, as is so commonly the case, after-ages found that these windows did not give sufficient light, and enlarged several of them. The string course had to be removed to its corresponding position underneath the new windows. EXTERIOR— THE NAVE AND TRANSEPT 29 and was connected with the old by upright and vertical bands, the material being found in the somewhat similar zigzag mouldings of the sides of the destroyed Norman windows. This ready and economical use of the displaced stonework gives a peculiar appearance to the exterior of the early Perpendicular windows, which architecturally are quite out of place. The higher continuous string course above the aisle windows was not broken from this cause, and remained unaltered until the great west window was inserted. Ex ceedingly interesting are the small and plain square windows in the aisles above the second string course, intended to give light to the triforium. In the nave and both aisles the projecting eaves have given place to parapets, supported by the old simple yet bold nebule corbel table beneath. As has been just stated incidentally, the windows of the two nave aisles represent various ages and different styles. Fortun ately, from some unexplained reason, one of the original lights has been left intact, that in the north aisle nearest to the north west tower, and is similar in detail to the lower tier of the transepts. In this we again meet with the zigzag ornament round both the sides and the arch, with outer side shafts supporting a semi-circular edge roll above ; while the hood- moulding or dripstone is of the double billet, like the zigzag, a favourite Norman moulding. In the south aisle the three windows nearest to the tower at the west are imitations of the one just mentioned. They werepiit in about 1847, when the last remains of Booth's (or Le Vavasour's) Chapel were removed, and the old foundation near the north-west tower disturbed. The four windows in either aisle to the east are early Perpen dicular of the end of the fourteenth century. They are of three lights, and the arches are four-centred. They have transoms, while the tracery of the upper part is in flowing lines. The outer hood-moulding or dripstone arch terminates with the head-dress of the latter part of the fourteenth century. These windows are poor and meagre, and unworthy of their position ; but are historically interesting as specimens of the work of a time when the land had been stricken down and every thing upset by the great pestilence. The remaining window — that immediately to the west of the north porch — is modern. A pleasing detail is the central broken string course of either 30 SOUTHWELL CATHEDRAL aisle. This is simply a continuation of the plain square abacus or top ornament of the side shafts of the first Norman windows. Broken by both buttresses and windows, it supplements the continuous upper and lower string courses, and assists them in relieving the bareness of the walls. The Clerestory of the Nave. — Rising above the aisles the clerestories constitute one of those features which makes Southwell quite unique amongst English churches. The cir cular windows lighting up the interior of the nave are so peculiar, as to make the architect, when he first sees them, imagine himself for the moment in Normandy or the German Palatinate ; and, in common with other details presently to be noticed, mark off the Norman exterior as belonging to that particular late style and period sometimes called Romanesque. "More singular perhaps than beautiful" is an authoritative criticism passed upon them. In these windows the only ornament is the plain round-patterned mouldings, suggestive of gigantic wedding rings, which encircle them. The parapet and corbel are of the same style as those of the aisle beneath ; and there are no buttresses, the round windows alone separating the different bays. Generally when the high-pitched Norman roof has been (as at Southwell) replaced by one of lower elevation, we find that the clerestory windows are inserted at the same time ; but here these plain circular windows, lighting up the interior, form part of the original building, and no other church in England possesses the same characteristic. The North Porch. — The north side of the nave differs from the south in its possession of this charming feature which occupies the third bay from the west. It is universally cited, with such examples as Sherborne and Malmesbury, as one of the finest specimens left. Perhaps it excels both of these, and certainly adds materially to the general beauty and interest of the north view, while the details are full of interest. Externally it is some 19 ft. broad, the massive walls leaving an internal breadth of about 14 ft., and it projects from the nave about 22 ft. In the outer portal two semi-cylindrical shafts worked into and engaged with the front terminate in capitals with cushion and scalloped mouldings. From these capitals (or, more accurately, from the string course above) spring the arches of two orders, with square, round, and hollow mouldings. That lower continuous zigzag string course, already described. EXTERIOR— THE NAVE AND TRANSEPT 31 is here utilised in an ingenious manner. Continued from beneath the aisle windows, it passes along the outside walls .y. B. Bolas &• Co., Photo.] NORTH PORCH. of the porch. Next it forms the abacus (or top of the capitals) of the pillars of the outer portals, and then doubles round along 32 SOUTHWELL CATHEDRAL the interior walls above the arcading, finally losing itself in the outermost capital of the inner portal. Above the outer portal is the gable formed by an angle of about thirty degrees. Three windows, the centre by a frequent arrangement larger than the others, give light to the quaint paradise or upper room. These windows, glazed with diamond panes, have, as elsewhere, their inner arches unbroken by capitals or abaci, and ornamented with the zigzag; but the outer arch has the shafts and capitals, and is less ornamented ; and above these the dripstone with the triple nebule and finished off with grotesquely carved heads. The two gable ends are crowned with round turrets pointed at the summit ; and . the western serves the purpose of a chimney flue to the upper room, being pierced with air holes. When this arrange ment was first made it is impossible to say. The interior walls to the height of the continued string course are richly adorned with arcades. These are formed of the beautiful intersecting arches, and rest upon plain stone benches. The inner portal .is formed by six receding arches. In the innermost the un broken and rich zigzag is repeated; in the rest the arches stand upon shafts and capitals, and exhibit great variety of moulding, that next to the innermost having the unusual beak- head. This inner doorway almost comes up to the west door of Rochester in showing what the Norman crafts men were capable of; and it is a pity that the waggon- vaulted roof of unfinished stone is too plain to harmonise. The oaken doors of the fourteenth century have flowing tracery carved on the wood. Access to the upper room or paradise is obtained from the triforium. The fireplace, chimney, and cupboards, made out of the thickness of the walls, show the dwelling-place of the sacrist, whose duty it was to sleep in the church that he might be at hand to ring the bejls and perform other offices. This paradise over a Norman Chimne\ — North Poklk. EXTERIOR— THE NAVE AND TRANSEPT 33 porch has set archaeologists to work in order to find others ; and they have succeeded in discovering one only, that of S. B. Bolas &' Co., Photo.] NORTH PORCH, INTERIOR. Bredon, in Worcestershire. But the peculiarities of this member of the north front of the cathedral are its least charm. c 34 SOUTH^VELL CATHEDRAL The outer archway and gable, the intersecting arcades of the inside walls, and the glorious inner portal, are matched by the way in which the whole combines with the varied architecture of the north front. In the floor is the slab of the grave of some unknown person who died in 1536. The inscription is illegible, but the "tau" X cross and heart have been deciphered. Is it by any chance that the last sacristan's clerk of the old order of things elected that his lifeless remains should sleep their long last sleep underneath the time-honoured chamber where he had been wont to take his nightly rest ? Booth's Chapel. — The curious, by scanning closely the south wall of the nave near the south-west tower and the adjoining ground, may discern some recent alterations. It is the site of a chantry chapel dedicated to St. John the Baptist, and erected about 1280 by one of the prebendaries Henry le Vavasour. This means that Le Vavasour gave or bequeathed some small endowment to support a priest whose duty it was to celebrate a specified number of masses for the repose of the soul of some particular person, probably of Le Vavasour himself. At first it was always called after the patron saint. Archbishop William Booth (1452-65), who enlarged it, was buried here; and his brother. Archbishop Laurence Booth (1476-80) endowed two more chantries to Our Lady and St. Cuthbert. He had previously (1457-76) been Bishop of Durham, and hence St. Cuthbert's name. At the time of his death he was busy in improving the chapel, and directed in his will that his body was to be interred in the south side. It is now impossible to trace the exact spot where the remains of these two prelates, who were so attached to Southwell, and who died there, were laid, nor of those others whom we know by the wills proved before the chapter to have been buried inside. The second chantry and altar thus founded in 1480 are the only dedication to the Blessed Virgin within the minster, although the church itself was named in her honour ; for there never has been any Lady Chapel properly so called. Yet this name is given to the chapel by William Enkersol, chantry priest of St. John the Baptist. In his will he directed "my bodie to be buryed in "the churche yerde of our ladie of Suthwell beforesaide of "the est side of our ladie is chapel." From the death of Archbishop Laurence the building was called Booth's Chapel ; and the only chantries we are able to localise are the three here. EXTERIOR— THE NAVE AND TRANSEPT 35 Dickinson tells us that the windows formerly contained the coats of arms of the Booth family and their connections. While stfll a chantry, it was also the Grammar School under the direction of the prebendary of Normanton, ex officio chancellor. As the Grammar School it continued until in the year 1784 it was demolished on the ground that it marred the symmetry of the buildings ; and on the site of the old chantry house the present school was built, after the chapel had been its home for nearly four hundred years. During some altera tions in 1847 the wall of the aisle fell in, and was then restored to its present state. In its later days the chapel was also used as the library ; and when pulled down, the books and manu scripts were deposited in the north transept chapel of the nave. The West Front. — The western door has a striking resemblance to the still more beautiful inner one of the north porch, and likewise illustrates the care bestowed by Norman artificers upon this part of their edifices. It is of five arches ; and here again the innermost arch is unbroken and profusely adorned with the familiar zigzag. The outer four rest upon shafts with scalloped capitals, and are alternately ornamented with the edge roll and zigzag, two with each kind of moulding; and the hood-moulding above is of the double billet. The oaken doors, of the same date as those of the north porch, are covered with elaborate iron scroll work. Very beautiful is the effect of doorway and door; and we wish the same could be said of the window, but we have unhappily come to the great eyesore and disfigurement of the building. For this great west window takes up almost the whole space between the towers from doorway to summit. The style is late Perpendicular — probably not earlier than 1450. It is of seven lights, with many mullions and transoms and much tracery. In itself this does not harmonise or blend with Norman architecture, and the straight perpendicular lines of the tracery are inelegant ; but the chief fault is the enormous size, occupying the entire centre of the front and, without exaggeration, suggestive rather of a railway station or the Crystal Palace than of a Norman nave. The string courses of the two towers tell us the probable size and position of the original windows, even though not connected from tower to tower ; so do the transepts, and suggest three lights one 36 SOUTHWELL CATHEDRAL above the other, either arched as in the nave aisles, or circular as in the clerestory, with perhaps at the top a small square S. B. Bolas &= Co., Photo.] WEST DOOR. window like those beneath the clerestory. What windows the Normans put in they put in after some such fashion as this. Then came the Early English architects, and they may EXTERIOR— THE NAVE AND TRANSEPT 37 have inserted larger lancet-headed lights, which would match well enough with the rest, and display no such incongruity as we now see. Rochester Cathedral and the little-known priory church of Cartmel are two other typical examples of this fifteenth-century want of taste. Can we then assign any reason for this? I think we can, as has been already fore shadowed in the description of the four eastern windows of the nave aisles. Norman windows were small for two reasons : light was not valued, and glass was scarce, if used at all, for we cannot trace glass prior to the closing years of the twelfth century. Early English builders made their windows larger than the Norman, and the Decorated still further increased the size. But both performed their work in such due pro portion as to take away the idea of gloom and add to the beauty. So things went on until in the middle of the four teenth century came that terrible pestilence which, among other and more important things, in some buildings seems to have broken the orderly and systematic evolution of our architecture. The old school appears to have died out, and the new were not always mere copyists or followers who made gradual alterations of merely minor importance, but alas ! sometimes parodists. Certainly we owe much to men like William of Wykeham ; but let us in our ecclesiastical architecture fix upon the exact year of 1350. Let us compare in the same building what was finished before this with what was finished after, and we arrive at this result — evolutionary development of beauty before, evolutionary development of ugliness after. Undoubtedly this theory works out at Southwell. The north porch and west doorway are more beautiful than any earlier Norman ; the Early English choir is more beautiful than these ; but the great glory of Southwell is neither nave nor choir, but the chapter-house of 1290, while the least beautiful parts are the eastern windows of the nave aisles of a century later, and worst of all this great west window of the fifteenth century. Let those whose recol lections go back twenty years add the flattened and debased roofs that everywhere obtained, and the minster surely points the rnoral and adorns the tale. The improvements of men are often more destructive than the hand of time.* , * Mais si belle qu'elle se soit conservee en vieillissant, il est difficile de ne pas soupirer, de ne pas s'indigner devant les degradations, les mutila- 38 SOUTHWELL CATHEDRAL The height of the western towers is 99 feet, and with the modern spires 149 feet; the external base a square of 23 feet. They are divided into seven stages. The buttresses, flat and broad, are placed near the angles, and extend to the height of the parapet — that is to say, to the summit of the fifth stage, while the different stages are separated by plain string courses. In the second stage from the ground the west windows are imitation Norman of quite recent intro duction, copied from the original in the nave aisle and transepts, for the Normans themselves left these lower stages blank. Formerly Decorated windows of three lights of the time of Edward IIL, with double foliated tracery, were inserted, and that of the southern tower, after various vicissitudes, has found a home in one of the gardens of the Vicars' Court. The slits piercing the wall at different heights near the outer angle are staircase windows. The fifth stage has an arcade of three round arches on each face ; the centre, which has zigzag mouldings, pierced for lights. It is when we come to the sixth stage, the first above the base of the roof, that we notice an interesting difference in the work of the two towers. Here the Normans artistically began their more elaborate decoration, so as to finish off their work gracefully. In the northern tower is an arcading of intersecting round-headed arches, similar to those of the central tower, and in the interior of the north porch ; but in the southern tower the design differs, for the workmen caused the arches to stop at the point of intersection, the upper stones being omitted. The result is, that these arches are not round-headed, but lancet-shaped. Intentionally or unin tentionally, the round Norman dies away into the pointed Gothic of Early English. Was the pointed arch invented in this way ? This used to be maintained, and there is something to be said in favour of a theory so ingenious ; but the general consensus of opinion amongst experts is not to extend inferences from this interesting peculiarity too far. tions sans nombre que simultanement le temps et les homines ont- fait subir au venerable monument. . . Si nous avions le loisir d'examiner une a une avec le lecteur les diverses traces de destruction imprimees a I'antique ^glise, la part du temps serait la moindre, la pire celle des homines. . . . et ce que nous disons de I'eglise cathidrale de Paris, il faut le dire de toutes les eglises de la chretiente au nioyen age. ("Notre Dame," livre troisieme, c. I.). I have discussed the effect of the Great Pestilence upon architecture in the Gentleman's Magazine, Aug. 1897. WEST FRONT : (AS IN 1850) THE TOWERS WITHOUT THE SPIRES, THE SOUTH TOWER SHOWING THE EARLIEST POINTED ARCHES IN THE TOP STAGE BUT ONE. 40 SOUTHWELL CATHEDRAL The pointed arch, in its use upon a large scale for doorways, aisles, windows, and the like, it is now held, was of independent origin. The ornamentation is continued in the top stage, where the arcades are similar to those of the fifth, excepting that the central light is larger and double. The Normans, when they crowned their towers with spires at all, generally made them correspond in plan. Thus to the square towers of Southwell they would have added, if they added anything, pyramidal or square spires, and these would be of no great height ; but we do not know how they finished off here, and are equally ignorant of any early alterations. Engravings up to the fire of 1 7 1 1 (which has to be so frequently mentioned) show spires which seem too lofty and tapering for Norman work ; but no one is satisfied as to their date. After the fire, similar ones of wood and sheeted lead took their place. At the beginning of this century the lower part of the northern tower threatened danger, and the spires, being ignorantly thought too heavy for safety, were removed, and parapets and corner pinnacles to match the central tower substituted. The restoration under the auspices of the Ecclesiastical Commissioners included the addition of spires 50 feet high, after the pattern of those removed, and this was accomplished by 1880. There will always be a difference of opinion as to whether there was any gain, for these spires do not match the flat summit of the central tower. It is not only that while all three still possessed the same pattern of summit that they were cited as amongst the finest specimens of their kind ; but so great an authority as Mr E. A. Freeman, whose knowledge of archi tecture extended over Western Europe, was always wont to declare that the grouping of the three, as he saw them before 1880, was as nearly as possible perfect. And it is extremely doubtful whether the new spires resemble the original Norman at all. The straight lines of the string courses, and the flat buttresses of the towers added to the clerestory windows, give the peculiar tone and character to the nave, and assist in marking it off as belonging to that Norman style, more Con tinental than English, called Romanesque.* * Builder, July 2, 1892, p. 12. This term " Romanesque" has become a ready source of confusion. It is used in at least two distinct senses. {a) The architecture prevalent in Western Europe contemporary with our Anglo-Norman. In this sense it appears to be used by the writer in the EXTERIOR— THE NAVE AND TRANSEPT 41 The Transepts, or the transept (for the term is sometimes used in the singular), were intended to carry out the idea of a cross. In such early buildings as the basilican churches of Rome they are represented by a space at the east end, and the head of the cross is only an apse. In course of time arms were extended, especially towards the east, as in the original Norman choir of Southwell, and the Early English choir is almost as long as the nave. Still later, the Decorated nave of York was made of the same length as the choir. At South well the dimensions are 128 feet by about 40, but owing to the chapel on its eastern side, the north front is not quite equal to the south. With exceptions comparatively slight, to be mentioned presently, the Norman work has not been tampered with. Of the three string courses mentioned in the description of the nave, the highest and the lowest are here continued, and above them a third, level with the base of the clerestory ; the three together dividing the different fronts into four stages, which are further relieved by buttresses reaching up to the corhel tables. The windows of the second stage are of the usual pattern of the original aisle windows of the nave. In the third stage they are larger, and the inner arches have the edge roll, while the outer have large, rude cable moulding of a peculiar pattern — " a series of what is called the double cone, arranged " spiraUy after the fashion of the ordinary cable mould- " ing." The hood is of three overhanging rows of a small square - footed nebules. The transoms and mullions are later and questionable additions. The topmost stage has the circular windows like those of the clerestory; but in the north transept there is the cable moulding of the usual pattern, alternating with a special row of beads instead of the plain rounds or "large wedding rings." The gables of the north and south fronts, low pitched and without windows, are exceedingly singular and striking, the whole surface being 'filled in with zigzag and small circles, incised in the Builder ; and I should say that the intersection of the arcading ought to be added to the " Romanesque" peculiarities. [b] As a general term for the architecture prevalent in Western Europe prior to the introduction of the Gothic. In this latter and more accepted use of the term English Saxon and Norman architecture would both be included. The term was intended to imply of Roman or Italian origin. 42 SOUTHWELL CATHEDRAL north front and embossed in the south. Altogether these details display many peculiarities, and one writer describes the general effect as "almost barbaric." The bear on the north gable was formerly in the workshop of one of the builders employed, and from thence found its way to Upton Hall, two miles away, and elsewhere. It was placed in its present place on the supposition that it originally occupied the same ; and a modern lion to match now adorns the south gable. In the south front facing the palace is a doorway of moderate size, which was restored in 1847. It is original Norman of three orders, profusely enriched with zigzags, and of the usual pattern, the inner order continuous, and the two outer arches resting upon detached jamb shafts, with the zigzag string course running over all as a hood- mould. There was no corresponding door in the north transept, for that shown in old engravings, an after addition, has been filled up. A residence stood on the site of the palace from the earliest times, and this south door was intended for the use of the inhabitants. In the east wall of the south transept two short buttresses, which stop in the third stage, and the pattern and arrangement of the stones show that a chapel with an apse has been pulled down ; and the former existence of this explains the absence of windows excepting in the top stage. With the transepts we have come to the end of the existing Norman exterior ; and the present is a suitable place to add a few remarks on the roofs, and on the Norman choir which has been pulled down and superseded. In both late Norman and Early English work the roof was generally high pitched ; and the marks on each face of the central tower proved that the entire roof was elevated to an angle of about forty - five degrees. In course of time the ends of the beams became decayed, and then in a degenerate age ensued an unhappy change. In order that the work might be cheaply done, the rotten ends were sawn off, and the old beams still used ; but, so as to make their now shortened dimensions of sufficient length, the high pitch had to give way to one much lower. A general rule may be laid down that whenever a twelfth-century roof has been lowered the cause and the method were of this nature. EXTERIOR— THE NAVE AND TRANSEPT 43 When this was done at Southwell we do not know, but shall probably be not far out of our reckoning in assuming that -J- B. Bolas &. Co., Photo.] DOORWAY FACING THE PALACE. the low roof and the west window, both out of place, were the work of the same designer and the same time. Thoroton's " History of Notts " and Hollar's engravings in Dugdale's 44 SOUTHWELL CATHEDRAL Monasticon both show the low roof. After the great fire the restoration vyas carried out by the ignorant and indifferent chapter on the same lines ; and the material itself was poor and covered with slate. " The poor church has become," complained Mr Dimock, " in comparison with what it once " was, mutilated, debased, and earth clinging ; a wretched life- " less monument." And in endorsing this his friend Mr E. A. Freeman, in his characteristic Saturday Review style, added — " A poor parody of its former self," " the mutilated wreck of " storm and fire, the victim of a base economy which executed " essential repairs at the smallest possible cost, and brutally "pulled down what it was inconvenient to restore."* But these two and others of a like mind and a like authority were fortunately able to influence that slowly-moving corporation, the Ecclesiastical Commissioners ; and at length that body resolved to devote part of the corporate revenues of the dissolved and extinct chapter to a thorough restoration after the designs of Mr Ewan Christian. In 1879-80 the roofs, excepting the choir, were restored to their original pitch, and the old material was cast aside for massive English oak covered with cast-lead. In this not only was the external roof made after the original pattern, but, in thus going back to archsological correctness the dignity and stateliness of Archbishop Thomas the Second's minster were greatly enhanced. Looked at, then, from either point of view — that of antiquity or that of beauty — it is difficult to see how exception can be taken for leaving out of our estimate the western towers the two combine. Yet, at the time, the Society for the Protection of Ancient Buildings was up in arms, and Mr Christian's noble conceptions vigorously opposed. A wordy war of the roofs followed, and it was gravely contended, although the four faces of the central tower told their own tale of the pitch of the original roofs, that the taking away of the flattened floor of 1711 was an act of vandalism. Had this low covering been constructed on Norman lines, it would have been another matter; Mr Christian would then have been in a dilemma as to whether archaeology or beauty ought to be satisfied. As things really were, both were on his side. For tunately the controversy was useless, and Mr Christian and his skilled workmen had their way. It is amazing that any highly- cultivated body of men, students of art in art's highest phases, * Saturday Review, Nov. 29, 1879, p. 662. EXTERIOR— THE NAVE AND TRANSEPT 45 should ever have raised such a storm in a tea-cup ; but when we come to the interior of the choir they will appear in a light even worse. The foundations show that before the present Early English choir a Norman choir extended eastwards from the base of the central tower to a length of 59 feet — that is to say, to less than half of its beautiful successor. It had north and south aisles of about 40 feet in length, terminating in apses. In all probability it was of the same date as the nave and transepts, and not part of the earlier church existing in the eleventh century, for there are sufficient marks upon the east side of the central tower to suggest that the triforium and clerestory corresponded to the nave, in which case they would naturally be of the same date. The external breadth was the same as now, but the extra thickness of Norman walls made the internal breadth about a foot less.* It becomes, then, comparatively easy to picture to ourselves in rough outline the Norman church of the twelfth century as a whole. Substitute for the present choir one reaching only some 60 ft. eastwards of the central tower, with aisles and clerestory similar to the nave, and terminating with a rectangular eastern wall. Make the aisles terminate with apses, and add to the east face of either transept a short and broad apsidal chapel. Next add windows after the patterns of the transepts and put a high-pitched roof everywhere with overhanging eaves and no parapets ; and we have a general idea. The one difficulty is how to crown the tower summits. Mr J. H. Parker seemed to think that, judging by such stone specimens as are still left, wherever in late Norman there is anything to be called a spire at all, it is of low proportions, "little more than a pyramidal roof, but becoming gradually " elongated as time advanced, and so leading the way to the "gracefully elevated spire proper of the Early English." We may then finish off the three towers with pyramids of four sides and overhanging eaves. * The dimensions of the Norman choir were discussed by Mr Dimock in a paper read before the British Archjeological Association, and published in their /OT.'nza/ of January 1853. Mr C. Hodgson Fowler, who has been long intimately acquainted with his subject, in the Architect of June 23rd, 1877, takes a somewhat different view. The evidence appears to be too slight for the most careful and correct of experts to agree altogether. 46 SOUTHWELL CATHEDRAL The date of the Norman work can be disposed of in a few words. Archbishop Thomas the Second wrote his letter to the people of Notts, asking for contributions for the building of their mother church, during his episcopate, which began in 1 109 and lasted only six years. This evidence is corroborated by the building itself. The general good workmanship, the fine pointed masonry, and the Romanesque details of the exterior synchronise with the archbishop's letter, as do the edge roll flanked by hollows, the more elaborate zigzag and other mouldings, which could only have been made with a skilfully- used chisel. From iiio to 1115 is then the date of com mencement, while it is well not to attempt to decide the duration of the building operations. Amongst others, the naves of Durham, Norwich, and Rochester are contemporary. PART IL— EARLY ENGLISH The Choir. — One of the few good services rendered by King John was the influence he brought to bear upon the York chapter to elect Walter de Gray to the long-vacant see. A wave of enthusiasm for the new style was passing over the land, and Gray encouraged fresh works at York, Ripon, South well, and elsewhere. When the new building was commenced at Southwell, first of all an Early English addition was made to the existing Norman choir, and the high altar was removed nearly 70 feet eastwards. After this had been finished, the Norman choir and choir aisles were pulled down, and on their site the Early English choir completed, and, with the exception of the roof, almost exactly as we now see. The foundations of the eastern part are entirely of local stone, but on the site of the older choir a quantity of Mansfield stone is used, which came from the fabric pulled down. This method of enlargement by degrees was not uncommon. The plan is of eight bays, not counting a small blank bay at the junction with the transepts. The choir aisles extend along six of these, and from the fifth a small transeptal chapel projects on either aisle. The dimen sions in feet are — Length, 128 ; of aisles, 98 ; breadth, including aisles, 73 ; and including the two transept chapels, 108 ; breadth of east end, 40. The material is sandstone. The northern front was after- EXTERIOR— THE NAVE AND TRANSEPT 47 wards in a great measure hidden away by the erection of the chapter-house and vestibule. The walls are less thick than in the Norman work, and generally this part is less massive, and the roof was loftier. There used to be a doorway on the south side, apparently for the convenience of the palace, but this has long since been closed. The South Front. — The base mouldings show the first point of difference from the Norman work. These mouldings and the continuous string course below the second or window stage run all round the eastern part of the building — the early Decorated additions on the north side equally with the Early English, and are distinguished for their bold and effective outline, and more particularly for their deep undercutting. A second point of difference from the Norman, and more striking, is seen in the buttresses. They have a much greater pro jection, and less breadth, although unusually broad for Early English work, and are square in the lower stage, but chamfered — i.e. the edges are shaved off — above. They are finished off with lofty acute-angled heads or pediments, which have their faces sunken. These heads rise up above the parapet waU, and are ornamented with that typical Early English moulding, the so-called dog-tooth. Some idea of it may be gained in the following way : — Take four (or in certain instances only three) leaves of the common beech, placs their stems together so as to overlap a little, and cause this central point to be raised somewhat after the fashion of a dwarfed pyramid. The simpler term of "leaf" moulding would be more suggestive than "dog-tooth." The buttresses at the angles, both of the transept chapel and of the east end of the aisle, are grouped in pairs, one on either front. These are without the lofty pediment, but terminate in a slope beneath the cornice. The windows in the bays formed by the buttresses are single-light lancets and without tracery. Between the two south transepts — those of the nave and choir — are four bays ; the two central have the windows in pairs, the others singly. The circular turret - shaped projection at the south-west angle of the choir transept is a staircase leading to the triforium, which causes the adjacent window to be smaller. On the other hand, the single window to the west is larger. These windows are the typical lancets of their period, the pointed arch appearing as though formed on an acute-angled SOUTHWELL CATHEDRAL triangle. So are those in the transept chapel, and the smaller one in the gable of the east end of the aisle and the pair beneath it. These are all deeply set and with chamfered jambs. The outer arches spring from single shafts, engaged and with the fillet moulding — a small flat band placed between the rounds, which first came into vogue. at this time — and have bold hood-moulds. The cornice moulding of the aisle is original, but the parapet above a later substitute for the eave roof. T'he displacement of the roof of the transept chapel by lowering to the flat level of the second stage has caused this to resemble a mere projection from the adjacent aisle ; but the marks on the clerestory wall show clearly that originally it possessed a high-pitched roof and lofty gable, and formed a transept to the choir proper, as did the other on the north side. In consequence, above the aisle the bay of the clerestory is here blank, while the others have a pair of small lancets placed a little apart. Here, again, the jamb shafts are engaged, while the hood-moulds are beautifully enriched with the dog-tooth. Above the cleres tory the parapet is original and extremely fine. It is carried on a corbel table of grotesque heads, with cornice mouldings enriched with dog tooth, as also above the plain face in a deep hollow below the ridge. The two flying buttresses were added later, the pinnacles adorned show. The There must Flying Buttress and Pinnacle of Choir- with crockets licence of 1337 probably points to their age. have been alairm for the stability of the wall and roof, and these were placed as supports. Formerly the western one had a water drain emerging from the heavy stonework at the base. The Chancel.— By this is meant that part of the choir east of the aisles. In a minster dedicated to St. Mary we EXTERIOR— THE NAVE AND TRANSEPT 49 expect to find a Lady Chapel eastward of the high altar ; but there is none here, neither has there ever been : her altar was elsewhere.* This east end extends two bays beyond the aisles, and is square - fronted hke York. It has been remarked — "The architecture here is in the purest and most " refined Early English style ; very reticent of ornament, but " with an almost Greek refinement and delicacy in the design " of the buttresses, and the general composition of the lines ; " and in general effect, and in the detail of the buttress-heads, " the base course, and other points, is so similar to the work "of the nave and south transept of I^incoln that one cannot "but think some of the same hands were employed on both."t This may well have been the case, as these parts of Lincoln were erected between 1 203-1 253, during the episcopate of William of Blois and his two successors. All the buttresses, both those which separate the two easternmost bays and those which stand in the usual pairs at the angles are of larger dimensions in width and projection than the others farther west. Otherwise they are similar in character, and have four string courses between the base and parapet. The pairs at the corners have massive octagonal pinnacles, shafted at the angles, have each side finished with a sharp gabled head enriched with dog-tooth, and at the summit conical cappings with ribs rising to the apex from the capitals of the angle shafts. The arrangement of the windows is as follows : — The bays adjoining the aisle have them in pairs, and the easternmost bays singly ; the east front has four — both stages everywhere the same. The windows on the north and south sides are similar to those previously described ; but the east front calls for remark. The arrangement of four in each stage is singular; and when in the same stage all four are of equal height, peculiarly so. In those rare instances of a series of four the rule is for the central pair to be higher than the outside ones. In the upper stage are also blank arches adjoining the buttresses; as is the case with the adjacent bays. The abaci of these lancets are continued round the buttresses and walls as string courses, dividing the two stages into upper and lower parts. The windows, deeply set, have the sides * See the remarks on Booth's Chapel and Appendix C. t Builder, July 2nd, 1892. D so SOUTHWELL CATHEDRAL chamfered ; and the finely - moulded triple - clustered shafts are filleted. The arches are enriched with the dog-tooth, and the outer one constitutes a continuous arcade. In the lower stage, almost the entire width of the front is occupied : in the upper the windows are less deeply set and in consequence narrower, but the blank arches completely fill up the whole available space between the buttresses, and here the lights are of a greater height; and this heightening and narrowing, so as to add to the effect, must be pronounced most successful. The windows of the end bays are similar in pattern ; and the chancel, flanked as it is by the aisles and chapels, in spite of being "very reticent of ornament" — for there is no tracery — has been commended and admired by every expert and architect who has seen it. But as with the west front, so here again with the east we have to lament that later men have marred what their pre decessors have bequeathed to them. Early English roofs were almost, if not quite, universally of a steep slope, more so than the Norman ; and at Southwell the marks still left, and particu larly on the east front of the central tower, demonstrate that this was the case. The old lofty roof is gone and the old lofty gable with it ; and above the third stage a dwarfed window in a dwarfed gable, and a late battlement surmounted by a late cross is what we now see. What used to be seen at first was this lofty gable pierced either with yet another tier of lancets or with a circular light after the manner of the circular windows of York, Lincoln, and Beverley, the whole surmounted by a lofty cross rising above the lofty buttress heads, conspicu ous from far and near. We have only to go to Lincoln (or indeed judge by the restored roof of the nave) to see what a difference this makes. When was this, "as complete " a mutilation as the headless trunk of some fine ancient statue," perpetrated ? Some time after the completion of the chapter-house, and by the same people, or at least in the same spirit, as that which lowered the roof and pierced the west wall of the' nave. The North Front. — From the exterior the only parts visible are the end bay of the aisle and the transept chapel ; and this latter is partly overlapped by the chapter-house. The details are similar to the rest ; but the flying buttress has no pinnacles, and the small window in the gable of the aisle has EXTERIOR— THE NAVE AND TRANSEPT 51 a peculiar flattened hood-mould, almost semicircular. There seems to be no reason for this difference from the corresponding window on the other side. When standing against the north front of the chapel, one is almost shut in by the buttresses of the chapter-house. The choir illustrates that the striking difference between the Norman and Early English styles lies not only in the greater massiveness of the former, and in the pointed lancet arches of the latter, but also in the greater window space, the chancel alone possessing twenty ample lights. It has been proved that glass came into use in Early English times, and this circum stance may explain the development. The indulgence of Archbishop Walter Gray fixes the date of the commencement of building at about 1230. The North Transept Chapel.— Before leaving the Early English part of the exterior, and still taking the building in its chronological order, this addition to the Norman transept next demands attention. The only part visible from the exterior is the north front, which projects slightly from the transept, the east front being hidden by the vestibule. A peculiarity is that the buttresses, which project in the first stage as far as those at the east end, have their angles chamfered in the second stage only. In the third stage the projection is diminished ; and the chamfering of the stage below ends in a point against the square face. The buttresses to the west originally ter minated, like those of the choir, with a triangular head, ornamented with the dog-tooth, but when the gable parapet was added a crocketed gable head was placed above this head and behind it. The eastern buttress, adjoining the vestibule, ends in a slope beneath the parapet. The large window in the second stage is a later development, enlarged to give more light to the chapel within. The shafts are not purely circular, hut what Professor Willis called keeled — i.e. with bands or fillets in the front resembling the keel of a boat ; and they support an arch with a hood-mould over all. The general appearance is somewhat heavy and inelegant, as the arch seems too large. Mullions divide the lower part into three lights, and the tracery above is double foliated, and what is styled reticu lated — i.e. diamond-shaped or with squares placed diagonally. This window, with its peculiarities, affords a hastily -made example of indifferent and late Decorated ; but in the stage 52 SOUTHWELL CATHEDRAL above we go back to pure Early English. This is an arcading of five lancets, of which two are pierced for lights, supported by circular shafts detached from the wall. The window in the fourth stage has an arch resembling the segmental pointed ; and the filleted shafts are engaged. The mouldings of the arch are peculiar ; they are not of the same pattern as the adjoining buttress, but more nearly than anything else resemble a transition from the Norman nail-head to the Early English dog-tooth. And the tracery and mullions are very late work, suggesting that alterations were made long after. This chapel is partly built upon the site of a smaller apse- shaped Norman one. A buttress of the north aisle of the choir, partly worked into the south-east angle of the chapel, shows by the cornice moulding that the choir wall once joined on to the transept ; remains of a Norman arch are still visible in the transept wall. The work as a whole, and emphatically the central arcading of lancets, are of the date of the middle of the thirteenth century. There is documentary evidence that in 1249 and 1260 additions were made to the fabric ; and to one of these dates we may safely assign it. PART IIL— EARLY DECORATED OR GEOMETRICAL The chapter-house and its vestibule are the last additions to the fabric, and were added after the chapter had been endowed with the three additional prebends of Eaton, North Leverton, and Beckingham at the end of the thirteenth century, and increased to its final complement of sixteen. The thirteen prebendaries (or such of them as lived in England and were resident) met before in a smaller and earlier chapter house on the same site as the existing one. In view of the increased number and importance of the college, a more spacious assembly room was felt to be necessary; and, like their brethren of York, Lichfield, Wells, and elsewhere, they built the present fine council chamber for the transaction of business. This part of the minster belongs to that beautiful style of architecture which some call Early Decorated and others Geometrical. It is a legitimate development of the Early English, and prevailed, roughly speaking, during the last thirty EXTERIOR— THE NAVE AND TRANSEPT 53 years of the thirteenth and the first fifteen of the succeeding century, gradually verging into the Decorated proper.* The Vestibule. — The only parts of this seen from the exterior are the north front and so much of the western as extends beyond the chapel : this projection is of about twenty feet. It is built outwards from the second bay of the choir aisle. At the north-west corner are a pair of buttresses the height of the wall, set at right angles to each other, with square edges and shallow niches at the top, and terminated with acute gable heads with crockets and finials. They are surmounted at the back by other gables standing out from the roof In the western front is an ogee-shaped window arch, formed of two contrasted curves and sharp-pointed. Owing to the difficulty of construction, this form is not usual for large openings, though common enough over tombs, niches, and small doorways. The solitary window of the north front has the arch more equilateral and sharp-pointed than those of the chapter house. It is much plainer, and is not sufficiently broad to fill up the entire space. The arch is of two orders, and springs from attached keeled jamb shafts : the lights trefoiled at the head, and above two trefoiled circles with one quatrefoiled under the apex. Generally the greater plainness, as well as the comparative narrowness, of the north window, suggest that the vestibule is slightly prior in date to the chapter-house. The Chapter-House. — On the east side of the vestibule, and at its northern end, this unique adornment was added to the fabric. It is in front of the third and fourth bays and the transept chapel of the choir aisle, completing the enclosure of the open court, and is of such large dimensions as to overlap the project ing chapel, one of the great buttresses actually touching. At Wells, where the chapter-house is in a similar position and on a larger scale, this overlapping does not occur, as the choir is on a relatively larger scale ; and it seems a pity that at Southwell the example of Lincoln was not followed, and the chapter house built on to the end of the vestibule as distinct from the side. There is nothing in the lie of the ground to prevent this ; and the beautiful northern front of the choir would not have £,. * The Early Decorated tracery is arranged principally in circles, quatrefoils, and other regular figures, with the featherings for the most part confined to the larger piercings ; this is usually called Geometrical tracery. (Parker's "Glossary.") 54 SOUTHWELL CATHEDRAL been so much shut out from view. The only reason that can be assigned is that there was a wish for an enclosed courtyard ; and undoubtedly, whether or not we accept the tradition that it was anciently used as a baptistery, it was, as we shall see, used for some purpose of importance. The building is an exact' octagon, each side of 17 feet; and five sides are visible from the exterior. The basement mould ings correspond with those of the vestibule ; but the continued string course immediately under the windows is higher, as is the blank stage below. The four corner buttresses which are visible (the fifth is partly hidden) show distinctly a point of difference between the two styles of architecture — the Early English and the Early Decorated. They are divided into stages, as are the Early English, by a string course from the spring of the window arches ; but are at once narrower and of greater projection than the corner ones at the east end. The edges are unchamfered ; and the buttresses continue with un diminished projection until they terminate at a point some feet below the parapet. As with the vestibule, they have shallow niches at the summit, which are trefoiled at the top under acute- headed gablets. Above the buttresses proper and at the back, rising through the parapet, are square pedestals with rounded edges, with faces sunk concavely to make shallow niches. Like the niches below, these terminate in a trefoil ; and the pedestals are crowned with pinnacles, with most elaborate crockets and finials. Some of these really resemble bishop's crooks, from which the name may have been derived, while others show signs of repair not always in the best taste. At the base of the pinnacles are grotesque gargoyle-shaped figures projecting from their feet. As these are not images of saints, they have been spared by iconoclasts ; but we have to lament that destructive and ill-regulated zeal which pulled down the statues from their niches, for if the same hands that worked the carv ing of the interior worked these, the effect must have been glorious to a degree. The buttresses more than any other part suggest York : though it stills remain unsettled which of the two chapter-houses is the older. The original parapet has fortunately been spared. Below is a corbel table of trefoil arches springing from heads with the triangular spaces between also trefoiled : next, the hollow cornice moulding with a late variety of the dog-tooth : next, a broad plain face, and over EXTERIOR— THE NAVE AND TRANSEPT 55 all a series of open quatrefoils. Six of the octagon sides have windows, of which five are visible from the exterior. These occupy the entire breadth from buttress to buttress ; and it is doubtful whether anything is gained by this. The arrangement at the east end, where a small blank space is allowed on either side, certainly produces a better effect ; and this enlargement of the Decorated style does not cause it to compare favourably with its predecessor, so far as this particular point is concerned. The arches are of three orders ; the shafts attached and keeled with mouldings of rounds and hollows. The windows are of three lights, trefoiled in the heads, with two trefofled circles above, and a quatrefoil above these under the apex of the arch, very much the same as with the north window of the vestibule. The cusping is largely pierced and springs from the soffit only, not from the sloping sides of the tracery as in later work of the kind ; and the mullions have a small shaft in front with base and capital, and with chamfered sides. By comparing these windows with those of the choir the difference of style is brought out still more prominently than by the buttresses or parapets. The roof has been restored to its old lofty pitch ; and all whose memories go back to the old flattened one, prior to 1881, will unanimously concur in approval. When the statues were in their places the effect must have been considerably enhanced ; as it is, the exterior scarcely prepares us for the culminating glories within. The document of the date 1294 speaks somewhat vaguely of " the new chapter-house " as either contemplated or building or completed ; and this date agrees with the architecture. The Open Court. — The boundaries are the chapter-house, the small transept chapel of the choir, the third and fourth bays of the choir aisle, and the vestibule. The peculiar way in which one of the buttresses of the chapter-house abuts against the chapel so as to complete the enclosure is again noticeable, while those parts of the choir visible from here and from nowhere else suggest regrets that so fine a specimen of pure Early English was ever hidden away. A doorway, now blocked up, with a low segmental arch of wedge-shaped stones or voussoirs, at first formed part of the choir aisle. The holy well was closed up in 1764, after a member of the Fowler family had S6 SOUTHWELL CATHEDRAL lost his life by falling in. It was this well that probably suggested the tradition of a baptistery standing here. The north front as seen standing by the Prebends' Walk or in the adjoining street affords the most picturesque view of the minster, broken, as it is, by the north porch, the Norman transept, and the chapter-house. We have here every kind of architecture from the stern and comparatively rude late Norman to the elaborate and finished Early Decorated — one hundred and eighty years of steady progress and evolution — and this seeming want of unity constitutes an artistic harmony. But, looking at the south-east front from the more distant point of view of the parks, it becomes evident that the restoration is not yet complete, and that the heightening of the nave roof has rendered the corresponding heightening of the choir roof urgent and indispensable. Clerestory \^'IND0W in Nave Transept CHAPTER III THE INTERIOR PART I.— NORMAN The Nave. — "Internally the nave at Southwell is a grand " specimen of Norman architecture." Such is an authoritative criticism passed upon it ; and the massiveness and solidity of the structure is immediately impressed upon the mind, while the thickness and shortness of the pillars and the width of the arches further convey the idea of lowness. And yet this general sternness, not to say gloom, is not what it was before the windows, and notably the west one, were enlarged. We have to imagine Norman windows throughout, and without glazing, in order to picture to ourselves the nave in the days of our rude forefathers. And as we look round upon the vast quantities of material required in the construction of the interior, we cannot but wonder at the toil and industry required to convey all these great blocks of limestone along the rough paths of Sherwood Forest, and place them in position. The dimensions already given have, of course, been those of the exterior ; but owing to the thickness of the walls, and notably of the west front, a sensible diminution has to be made to arrive at the internal measurements. The length to the inside of the lower arch is 136 feet, and looking through the arch and across the transept to the rood screen 168 feet. The breadth is 63 feet, and, to give an idea of the massiveness of the pillars at the base, the width between two opposite pillars is only some 28 feet, and that of each aisle inside the pillars is but 12 feet. The aisles extend the entire length, and are separated from the body by seven pillars on either side, forming eight bays : the width between two adjacent pillars being about 13 feet 2 inches.* The elevation of the walls presents the usual * These measurements, which have been carefully made from a ground plan, differ slightly from those of Mr Louis Petit in the Memoirs of the Archaological Institute of 1850, p. 208. 57 SOUTHWELL' CATHEDRAL three stages of nave arcade, triforium, and clerestory in large buildings of the periods, differing from the later choir. The whitewash on the walls and the plaster work which formerly filled up the triforium arches were both removed some years before the more recent restoration was taken in hand. With the excep tion of the windows already mentioned and of the roof and flooring the interior is pure Nor man, unchanged since the first completion ; and the Romanesque details noticeable in the exterior are wanting. There is a small quantity of orna ment, particularly in the different mouldings, to relieve the heaviness of the structure; but sim plicity and massive grandeur, as distinct from grace and elegance, are what the Normans aimed at ; and it is so here. Formerly the west window, in some of its seven lights, and other windows of the nave contained coats of arms, of which the church throughout possessed so many specimens. Un fortunately these her- Nave, shoving Three Stages in the Interior. aldic emblems fell under the ban of the Roundheads during the Civil War and the Commonwealth ; a few, however, are still preserved in the chapter-house. The Nave Arcade. — The round pillars are about sixteen feet in circumference, and only nine in height between base -y. B. Bolas A' Co., Photo.] INTERIOR OF NAVE,". LOOKING EAST. THE INTERIOR 6i and capital — i.e. the height of the actual circular part is less than twice the diameter. They have plain square bases ; and the round capitals, of no great projection, have mouldings different in the different pillars, in their way as interesting a piece of detail as any in the minster. The first on the south side, reckoning from the west, and the last on the north have the cable, and others the lozenge, nebule, and hatchet. But most remarkable is the fifth on the south side with a series of four — the beaded cable, lotus leaf, triple nebule, and lozenge. This last seems almost too elaborate for the date, and rather suggests a decoration of later times. The arches are of two orders of voussoir - shaped stones : the moulding of the inferior is a square keel set diamond- wise between two edge-rolls, and of the superior a plain soffit with a smaller edge-roll flanked with a filleted hollow. Above the two orders the hood is of a double round billet. Immediately above the arches the string course separating the two lower stages has the hatch both on the sides and beneath. The Triforium. — The series of arches in the second stage open on to galleries the complete width of the aisles beneath, and resting upon their vaulting. Above the round pillars of the nave arcade, and supported by them, are other pillars, massive and rectangular, and attached to these two semi- cylindrical shafts with scalloped cushion capitals. From these shafts spring the two orders of the arch, of the same span as those of the nave arcade beneath, but of less height and with similar mouldings. The moulding of the hood above is com posed of three overhanging rows of the square-footed nebule. There is here a curious circumstance, the meaning of which everyone asks, and which is deserving of mention. Both from Pillar in Nave. 62 SOUTHWELL CATHEDRAL the crown of the arches, and from the abaci of the capitals of the inferior shafts large stones project. It would seem that the Norman builders thought these arches too large to remain without further ornament, and began to place two smaller arches within each, with an upright continued from the supporting shaft to the crown of the arch above. This is the case in the triforium of Romsey Abbey ; but either a change of builders or a change of mind took place at Southwell to prevent the carrying out of this intention. Mr Christian took the trouble to fill in one of the arches after the Romsey pattern to judge of the effect. The Clerestory. — The walls of the topmost stage are blank and uninteresting. The arches of one order only spring from semi-cylindrical shafts ; and shafts and arches are quite plain. They were considered too remote to be worthy of the ornamentation bestowed on the lower stages. The circular windows, not seen from below, are so small and in such deep recesses, as partially to defeat their object of giving additional light to the body of the building. Between the arches and the windows a passage constructed in the thickness of the wall runs round the whole Norman building, nave and transepts alike. The Nave Aisles. — These, the full length of the nave, are plain and without the arcading often to be found in Norman churches of this size : a bench table runs along the foot. Beneath the windows is a string course chamfered underneath. The solitary window of the whole thirteen left in its original state — that nearest to the north-west tower — has the side shafts extensively splayed ; the nave arch has a continuous edge-roll flanked by a filleted hollow, and the sill is worked in steps ascending to the actual opening. To restore the building to its original state we have to imagine the remaining twelve windows similar to this. The Perpendicular windows are as poor inside as out ; but when, as at the first, the side shafts were ornamented with colouring, they may have presented a more favourable appearance. All the glass is modern. Very different in character to the windows are the roof or ceiling of both aisles underneath the triforium galleries ; for here we have quad- repartite vaulting with groined ribs, as fine as any in England. The ribs spring in the outside from corbels beneath the .y. .S. .So/o-r &° Co., /',^
. religious order founded by St. Columba in the middle of the sixth century ; but this would seem to be a mistake, for, says Canon Ornsby, the name was unknown to Baeda, Eddi, and Andamnan. Deicola { = Godefrihte, or God-fearing) was the appella tion given first to anchorites, and afterwards to certain secular clergy. The clergy of Canterbury were called Cultores [Dei] Clerici in ioo5 ; those of York Colidei or Culdees so late as Henry I. Mr Leach says (p. XX.) that the clergy of Lichfield were likewise of Culdee origin under St. Chad. Perhaps the least unlikely inference is that at Southwell, as elsewhere, the Culdees represent an intermediate stage between the primi tive missionaries and the prebendaries of a later time with their separate churches and endowments. They were allowed to marry, and shared in a common fund. APPENDIX B A STORY OF THE SUPERNATURAL Florence of Worcester says (under date 1137) : "At Southwell, a 'vill' " of the archbishop's, while a grave was being made for a funeral, there " were found some relics of saints, and a glass phial with raised sides to " prevent its being broken, and full of very clear water ; which being given " to the sick, they were on tasting it restored to their former health." Florence says that this story was told him by Henry, Bishop of Winchester. APPENDIX C CHANTRIES, CHAPELS, AND ALTARS The eight chantry foundations of the thirteenth century were St. Thomas the Martyr (three), St. Peter, St. Nicholas (with Halam annexed), St. Stephen, St. John Baptist, and St. John the Evangelist. After a lull of more than a century come St. Mary at the altar of St. Michael (with Wheatley annexed), a second St. John the Baptist, otherwise the Morrow Mass, St. Mary Magdalene, and Our Lady, and St. Cuthbert (two, founded in 1479). The Lady Chapel is a puzzle : it was outside the choir, on the north side, and with the churchyard adjoining the east ; and no site seems to satisfy these three conditions. Perhaps more than one chapel is so named in wills. The chapel of St. John the Baptist had two altars, one to that saint, and 128 APPENDICES 129 another to St. Cuthbert, each with two chantries : it was the Vavasour or Booth Chapel at the south-west of the nave, the place of the Grammar School. The chapel of St. John the Evangelist was in the north aisle (whether of nave or choir not stated). The locality of St. Thomas' Chapel with its three chantries is uncertain ; and there is a mention of the chapels of St. Lawrence and of St. Margaret near one another, but their altars are not mentioned. The altar of St. Peter was within the choir, but the sites of the remaining chantry altars cannot be settled. Besides the parish altar of St. Vincent, that of Our Lady of Grace is twice mentioned in the wills. The high altar is in one place called " the greater altar of St. Mary." There were, besides, the chapels of St. Thomas the Martyr in the Burgage, St. Catherine at the end of Westhorpe near the holy well, two in Easthorpe half-a-mile apart, and one in Normanton. The names of the three last are unknown ; and the five seem to have been chantries. I am chiefly indebted to Mr Leach for the above information. APPENDIX D A STORY OF CHARLES I. Robert Thoroton, who published his "Nottinghamshire" in 1677, says that a Mr Savage told him the foUowing story : — The time of this visit of the king was between Naseby and the subsequent residence at Oxford. The king, with a few faithful followers, took refuge at Southwell. "The day " after his arrival he walked about the town not known, and entered thf " shop of a shoemaker, whose name was Lee, who was a fanatic of the day. " His majesty, after some conversation with this man, bid him take measure " for a pair of shoes. Lee, in taking the king's foot in his hand and looking "at him attentively, refused to jiroceed. The king, astonished at the man's ' ' behaviour, desired him to do what he had requested ; but the shoemaker " actually refused, giving a reason that the king was the customer he had " been warned against in a dream the night before, in which he [the customer] " was doomed to destruction, and those who worked for him would never ' ' thrive. The forlorn monarch, whose misfortunes had opened his mind to " the impressions of superstitions, uttered an ejaculation expressive of his " resignation to the will of providence, and returned to the palace, which " was the place of his abode." Thoroton says that Charles was many times at Southwell, and once with the queen. APPENDIX E PATRONAGE OF THE CHAPTER The chapter were patrons of the daughter parishes of Bleasby-cum-Morton, Edingley, Farnsfield, Halam, Kirklington and Upton, and of Boughton, Kneesal, RoUeston, S. Wheatley and Woodborough in Notts; of Barn burgh in Yorkshire ; and of Barnoldby, Beelsby, Brigsley, Hatcliffe, Howerby, Ravensdale, and Waltham in North Lincolnshire. All the prebendaries but those of Normanton, Woodborough, Palishall, and the sacrist presented to their several vicarages, excepting that the two I I30 APPENDICES prebendaries presented alternately to both Oxton and Cropwell. The prebendary of Normanton presented to the Southwell parish vicarage, and North Muskham to Caunton. At the dissolution, after allowing for vested interests, the whole of this patronage was divided between the two new bishoprics of Ripon and Manchester, but until Mr Shepherd's death, in 1873, th^ surviving prebendaries reserved their patronage. Barnburgh was at one time worth ^55° ^ y^^r nett, and Beelsby a hundred less ; but most of the others were of small value. There were also some half-dozen chapelries. APPENDIX F THE LAST OF THE CLERGY Prebendaries. Beckingham . Dunham Eton Halloughton . North Leverton North Muskham South Muskham Normanton Norwell Overhall Norwell Palishall . Norwell Tertia Pars Oxton and Cropwell Oxton Altera Pars . RamptonSacrist . Woodborough Parish Vicar Thomas Henry Shepherd, the last of the prebendaries, died Feb. 1873, on whose death the patronage of the chapter went to the bishops of Ripon and Manchester. He was rector of Clayton and S. Wheatly. Thomas Cozens Perci val. William Barrow. Robert Lowe. Henry Smith. Charles Boothby. John Thomas Becher. George Wilkins, vicar-general and Archdeacon of Nottingham. After the Act of Dissolution he lived at the Residence House, and died there 1865. Chas. Geo. Venables Vernon. Robert Chaplin. Edward Denison (rB. of Salisbury). James Jarvis Cleaver. Frederick Anson (D. of Chester). Fitzgerald Wintour. Charles Nixon. Edward Garrard Marsh. Morgan Watkins. Minor Canons or Vicars-Choral. Alfred Tatham (1841-76). Robert Frederick Smith, M.A., vicar of Edingley-cum- Halam. Late scholar of Lincoln College, Oxford. Succeeded Mr Dimock (preferred to Barnburgh in 1863), and still remains. The last clergyman associated with the defunct chapter. He was ordained as curate to the Rector of Southwell in 1856. PLAN OF SOUTHWELL CATHEDRAL. DIMENSIONS- EXTERIOR. Length — 318 feet. Length of Nave — 185 feet. Width of Nave — 72 feet. Choir — Length, 128 feet. Choir Aisles — Length, 98 ft. Choir, with Aisles — Breadth, 73 feet. Choir, with both Transept Chapels —Breadth, 108 feet. Height of Central Tower, 105 feet. Height of Western Tower, 99 feet. Do. , including Modern Spires, 149 feet. W. H. WHITE AND CO. LTD., RIVERSIDE PRESS, EDINBURGH Bell's Cathedral Series. EDITED BY GLEESON WHITE and E. F. STRANGE. In specially designed cloth cover, crown %vo, \s. ed. each. Now Ready. CANTERBURY. By Hartley Withers. 2nd Edition, revised. 36 Illustrations. SALISBURY. By Gleeson White. 2nd Edition, revised. 50 Illustrations. CHESTER. By Charles Hiatt. 24 Illustrations. ROCHESTER. By G. H. Palmer, B.A. 38 Illustrations. OXFORD. By Rev. Percy Dearmer, M.A. 34 Illustrations. EXETER. By Percy Addleshaw, B.A. 3? Illustrations. WINCHESTER. By P. W. Sergeant. 50 Illustrations. LICHFIELD. By A. B. Clifton. 42 Illustrations. NORWICH. By C. IL B. Quennell. 38 Illustrations. PETERBOROUGH. By Rev. W. D. Sweeting. 51 Illustrations. HEREFORD. By A. Hugh Fisher, A. R.E. 34 Illustrations. LINCOLN. By A. F. Kendrick, B.A. 46 Illustrations. WELLS. By Rev. Percy Dearmer, M.A. 43 Illustrations. SOUTHWELL. By Rev. Arthur Dimock, M.A. 37 Illustrations. In the Press. DURHAM. By J. E. Bygate. | GLOUCESTER. By H. J. L. J. Mass4. YORK. By A. Clutton Bkock, B.A. Preparing. ST. DAVID'S. By Philip Robson. I CHICHESTER. By H. C. Corlettb, ELY. By T. D. Atkinson, A.R.I.B.A. A.R.I.B.A. WORCESTER. By E. F. Strange. | ST. ALBANS. RIPON. ST. PAUL'S. CARLISLE. BRISTOL. Unifortn -with above Series. ST. MARTIN'S CHURCH, CANTERBURY. By the Rev. Canon Routledge. {Ready. BEVERLEY MINSTER. By Charles Hiatt. Un the Press. Opinions of the Press. " For the purpose at which they aim they are admirably done, and there are few visitants to any of our noble shrines who will not enjoy their visit the better for being furnished with one of these delightful books, which can be slipped into the pocket and carried with ease, and is yet distinct and legible. ... A volume such as that on Canterbury is exactly what we want, and on our next visit we hope to have it with us. It is thoroughly helpful, and the views of the fair city and its noble cathedral are beautiful. Both volumes, moreover, will serve more than a temporary purpose, and are trustworthy as well as delightful. " — Notes and Queries. "We have so frequently in these columns urged the want of cheap, well -illustrated, and well -written handbooks to our cathedrals, to take the place of the out-of-date publications of local booksellers, that we are glad to hear that they have been taken in hand by Messrs George Bell & Sons." — St. James's Gazette. "Visitors to the cathedral cities of England must often have felt the need of some work dealing with the history and antiquities of the city itself, and the architecture and associations of the cathedral, more portable than the elaborate monographs which have been devoted to some of them, more scholarly and satisfying than the average local guide-book, and more copious than the section devoted to them in the general guide-book of the. county or district. Such a legitimate need the 'Cathedral Series' now being issued by Messrs George Bell & Sons, under the editorship of Mr Gleeson White and Mr E. F. Strange, seems well calculated to supply. The volumes are handy in size, moderate in price, well illustrated, and written in a scholarly spirit. The history of cathedral and city is in telligently set forth and accompanied by a descriptive survey of the building in all its detail. The illustrations are copious and well selected, and the series bids fair to become an indispensable companion to the cathedral tourist in England." — Times. "They are nicely produced in good type, on good JDaper, and contain numerous illustrations, are well written, and very cheap. We should imagine architects and students of architecture will be sure to buy the series as they appear, for they contain in brief much valuable information. " — British Architect. "Half the charm of this little book on Canterbury springs from the writer's recognition of the historical association of so majestic a building with the fortunes, destinies, and habits of the English people. . . . One admirable feature of the book is its artistic illustrations. They are both lavish and satisfactory — even when regarded with critical eyes." — Speaker. ' ' There is likely to be a large demand for these attractive handbooks. '' — Globe. "Bell's ' Cathedral Series,' so admirably edited, is more than a descrip tion of the various English cathedrals. It will be a valuable historical record, and a work of much service also to the architect. The illustrations are well selected, and in many cases not mere bald architectural drawings but reproductions of exquisite stone fancies, touched in their treatment by fancy and guided by art." — Star. " Each of them contains exactly that amount of information which the intelligent visitor, who is not a specialist, will wish to have. The dis position of the various parts is judiciously proportioned, and the style is very readable. The illustrations supply a further important feature ; they are both numerous and good. A series which cannot fail to be welcomed by all who are interested in the ecclesiastical buildings of England." — Glasgow Herald. "Those who, either for purposes of professional study or for a cultured recreation, find it expedient to ' do ' the English cathedrals will welcome the beginning of Bell's ' Cathedral Series.' This set of books is an attempt to consult, more closely, and in greater detail than the usual guide-books do, the needs of visitors to the cathedral towns. The series cannot but prove markedly successful. In each book a business-like •description is given of the fabric of the church to which the volume relates, and an interesting history of the relative diocese. The books are plentifully illustrated, and are thus made attractive as well as instructive. They cannot but prove welcome to all classes of readers interested either in English Church history or in ecclesiastical architecture. " — Scotsman. "A set of little books which may be described as very useful, very pretty, and very cheap .... and alike in the letterpress, the illustra tions, and the remarkably choice binding, they are ideal guides." — Liverpool Daily Post. "They have nothing in common with the almost invariably wretched local guides save portability, and their only competitors in the quality and quantity of their contents are very expensive and mostly rare works, each of a size that suggests a packing-case rather than a coat-pocket. The ' Cathedral Series ' are important compilations concerning history, archi tecture, and biography, and quite popular enough for such as take any sincere interest in their subjects." — Sketch. LONDON: GEORGE BELL AND SONS. 3 9002 '