\i< - Deposited by the Linonian and Brothers Library 1908 SCOTLAND AS IT WAS AND AS IT IS. SCOTLAND AS IT WAS AND AS IT IS BY THE DUKE OF ARGYLL VOLUME SECOND CAWDOR CAHTLE EDINBUEGH: DAVID DOUGLAS MDCCCLXXXVII CONTENTS OF VOL. IL CHAPTER I. PAGE THE RESPONSE OF OWNERSHIP, . . 1 CHAPTER II. BEFORE THE DAWN, . 61 CHAPTER HI THE BURST OF INDUSTRY, . 144 CHAPTER IV. THE FRUITS OF MIND, 229 APPENDIX, . 323 ILLUSTRATIONS. Cawdok Castle (after a sketch by George Reid, E™S,A.). VigneUe "QuEENAiG" (Range OF Mountains, Sutherland), . 112 "SOULVEIS" (Suthekland), 132 Ben More, Mull (Volcanic Mountain), , ^64 Loch Maree (Ross-shire), ^6 VOL. II. A 2 CHAPTER I. THE RESPONSE OF OWNERSHIP. There is a theory very prevalent in the popular literature of Scotland that the last Jacobite Rebel lion, which arose in July 1745 and was quelled on the Moor of Culloden in April 1746, marks the date of a great change in the landed tenures of the Highlands. The notion is, that before that date the old native population of the country lived in some condition of Arcadian bliss, founded on the relation between Celtic Clansmen and their Chiefs, whilst subsequent to that date their position became soon changed, and lowered into the modern relation between Tenant and Landlord, or between Owners and Occupiers of the soil. The facts and documents which have been already dealt with in these pages, prove that this theory is a dream built up out of two separate delusions. One of these delusions is in respect to the true nature of the change which was involved in the passage from Celtic dues and services to rents fixed by contract or agreement. The other delu sion is in respect to the causes of that change, — 2 SCOTLAND AS IT WAS AND AS IT IS. to the areas of country over which it passed, — and to the dates at which it became established. As regards the nature of that change, the theory not only mistakes but reverses the facts, whilst as regards the districts it affected, and the times of its arising, the popular idea is not less erroneous. Systematic hardship and oppression was insepar able from the condition of the native population under the unlimited exactions of Celtic Feudalism. The change from those exactions to definite and stipu lated rents, lasting for definite and stipulated times, was not a change for the worse, but a change immea surably for the better. On the other hand, the last Jacobite Rebellion — " The Forty-Five," as it is still called in Scotland — marks no epoch in the history and progress of that change, which is to be compared in importance with other epochs of much older date. The Jacobite Rebellion of 1745 catches the super ficial eye merely because it happens to have been the last occasion on which the Clans were mar shalled in open war against the Government. But wars and rebellions of this kind were quite separate from those standing and permanent evils of the Clan system which afiected most powerfully the condition of the people. Open wars against the Government — occurring almost always at distant intervals, and never of long duration, — had no other effect than some local devastations, and the loss of a few hundred fives. It was the perennial feuds between Clan and Clan, or rather between Chief THE RESPONSE OF OWNERSHIP. 3 and Chief, — it was the numerous, nameless, and desolating usages of daily life under the full-blown system of Celtic Feudalism, that kept down the people, and prevented the possibility of any advance in industry or in wealth. The change from this system to the system of definite agricultural rents dates, in. the Eastern and in the Middle Lowlands of Scotland, from the foundation of the Monarchy, — ^from the first introduction of Law, and from the first settlement of the races out of whose amalgama tion Scotland grew. The history of its progress is the history of our civilisation. In the Border High lands the great epoch of its accomplishment is that of the Union of the Crowns. In the Western Highlands and the Hebrides the most memorable date is 1609, only a few years later, when the Celtic usages were condemned as the root of the misery and barbarism which confessedly prevailed, and when the fundamental demands of peace and of law were recorded in the " Statutes of lona." From that date all over the Western Highlands it made somewhat slow, but, on the whole, steady and con tinuous progress, in proportion as the rebellious Clans were broken up, and those Chiefs became firmly established who were loyal to the Government. Their interest and inclination alike induced them to merge their lawless character as Chiefs, in their lawful character as the protectors and promoters of peaceful industry, in. virtue of being great Owners and improvers of the soil. The distances of History are foreshortened to us 4 SCOTLAND AS IT WAS AND AS IT IS. like the distances of Space. We forget the long intervals of time that really separate events which, in perspective, seem now close together. Thus to us looking back it seems as if almost the whole time between the Union of the Crowns and the second Jacobite Rebellion in 1745 was a time full of wars. And so it was — but with long intervals be tween those wars, during which the silent processes of change and of advance had time to lay dowoi and to consolidate the growing structures of Society. Thirty-six years elapsed between the accession of James i. and the first shedding of blood in the great Civil Wars of his son's reign, in 1639. During the whole of that interval progress was being made in the civiKsation of the Highlands. The worst period of those wars for that portion of the country, was the period occupied by the brilliant but savage and unscrupulous campaign of Montrose, and this only lasted about eighteen months, from April 1644, when he erected his standard at Dumfries, to Sep tember 1645, when he was finally defeated by General Leslie at Philiphaugh. It is a memorable fact, too, that in this campaign the original nucleus of the army of Montrose was not composed of Scoto- Celts, but of the Irish Celts, whom he recruited through the Macdonalds of Antrim, — whom he joined only after a journey in disguise in the heart of the Highlands, — and without whose help he does not appear to have had, or to have hoped for, any pro spect of success. They were employed to ravage the western portions of Argyllshire upon their way. THE RESPONSE OF OWNERSHIP. 5 The courage, resource, and agUity of Montrose, with the enjoyments of violence and plunder which were held out to all his followers, did at last rouse the passions and attract the cupidity of some Northern Clans, so that before his defeat his army is said to have accumulated to the number of 6000 men. But their dispersion, as usual, was complete ; and when, after an interval of six years, Montrose made his last and fatal attempt in 1650, he again made it trusting to a body of German mercenaries whom he landed in the North. But the Highlanders did not flock to his standard, and it was a Chief of the purest Celtic blood — Macleod of Assynt, — who surrendered him, or in Jacobite language, "betrayed" him to the Government. Again, after this rebellion there was a long inter val of repose in the Highlands, and during part of it, under the rule of the great Protector, for seven or eight years, from 1650 to 1658, an important stride was made towards the final settlement and civilisa tion of the country. The master eye and the master hand of Cromwell saw and touched the root-evil of the Clans ; and he made his dealings with it so conspicuous that they have caught the eye even of compilers who, with no special knowledge of this subject, write School Primers upon the History of the time. Thus we are told in one of these, with some looseness of expression, but with substantial truth, that " in order to improve the state of the people, all feudal dues were taken away. A fixed rent in money was substituted for aU the services and 6 SCOTLAND AS IT WAS AND AS IT IS. restrictions to which the land had been hitherto liable."^ The Restoration in 1660 restored everything that was corrupt and bad wherever its power reached, and we have seen the wicked purpose with which its appeal to Celtic Feudalism was made in 1677. But the work of the "Highland Host" lasted only for a few months, and no raiding expe dition of this kind could affect the permanent causes which were steadily at work aU over the Highlands ever since the Clans had ceased to fight among them selves. The Rebellion which was raised in 1685 by my own unfortunate ancestor, the ninth Earl of Argyll, attempting, in concert with the Duke of Monmouth in England, to anticipate by a few years the Great Revolution which was at hand, was a Rebellion suppressed in a few weeks. He brought no bands of Irish Celts to ravage his native coimtry. He brought no Dutch or German mercenaries to fight the battles of Scottish freedom. He achieved no immediate success to attract plundering Caterans always ready to flock to those who promised booty. He represented a Cause and not a Person. The Cause was one which Highlanders had never valued. His own lands had already become largely occupied by peaceful Farmers, whilst only a remainder of the Subtenants belonged to the old idle and fighting classes. Celtic Feudalism therefore completely failed him. He did not appeal either to the rude, 1 I quote from the History of Scotland, by Margaret Macarthur — an excellent Book of its class, belonging to the series edited by Edward A. Freeman, D.C.L. THE RESPONSE OF OWNERSHIP. 7 or to the sentimental, incitements which alone had ever moved it. He was joined by a mere handful — about 1800 men— and nothing came of his attempt except the sacrifice of his own life, and the ravage of his own estates. Yet he spoke in the light of prophecy when in his last hours he said, " I have a strong impression on my spirit that deliverance will come very suddenly."^ Three years later, the great Revolution of 1688, which was peaceably accomplished elsewhere, in volved once more that appeal to the Clans — with as tisual an Irish contingent — which was raised by John Graham of Claverhouse, Viscount Dundee. In 1689, at KiUiecrankie, the Highlanders showed what they could do in fighting. But the death of their leader was, as usual, fatal to them, for mere fighting is only one part of the art of war. This rising again was speedily suppressed, but for several years a great part of the Highlands con tinued in a troubled state — tdl in 1692, the Govern ment insisted on the formal submission of every suspected Chief. In that year the massacre of the Macdonalds of Glencoe cast indelible disgrace on the Government of King William. But the execration with which this deed was denounced when its real nature came to be understood, is a satisfactory indi cation of the change which had been long in progress. Such a revival, imitation, and even exaggeration by a civilised Government, of the worst features of Celtic intertribal treachery and murder, revolted the public 1 Macaulay's History of Enr/land, vol. i. p. 563-4. VOL. II. B 8 SCOTLAND AS IT WAS AND AS IT IS. conscience, and the feeling it excited brings out as nothing else could do, how fast and far Society had advanced from the typical Epoch of the Clans. It is remarkable, however, that this atrocious murder was perpetrated and defended, not as a mere act of vengeance against men who were rebels, but as a sentence of execution against men who were irre claimable marauders. And this, beyond all doubt, they actually were. Macaulay has expended all the resources of his eloquence in explaining how impos sible it was that they could be anything else, living as they did in Glencoe. " All the science and industry of a peaceful age," he says, " can extract nothing valuable from that wilderness : but in' an age of violence and rapiae the wilderness itself was valued on account of the shelter which it afforded to the plunderer and the plunder. Nothing could be more natural than that the Clan to which this rugged desert belonged should have been noted for predatory habits. For, among the Highlanders, generally, to rob was thought at least as honourable an employment as to cultivate the soil ; and of all the Highlanders the Macdonalds of Glencoe had the least productive soil, and the most convenient and seciire den of robbers."-^ This great crime, which has justly entailed upon its perpetrators the severest judgment of posterity, was due to the combination of two of the strongest incitements which existed at the time, first, the indignation of a civilised Government against men who, in the midst of a 1 Macaulay's History of England, vol. iv. p. 192. THE RESPONSE OF OWNERSHIP. 9 peaceful society, lived avowedly and notoriously a life of plunder ; and secondly, the fierce and vin dictive passions of a neighbouring Clan, to whose hands the punishment was committed, and whose lands and houses had been ravaged and destroyed by the unhappy victims. The massacre of Glencoe is therefore to be regarded as one of the last, and one of the most signal examples of the old evils which we have traced from the days of the Wolf of Badenoch, in the power of Celtic Feudalism to rouse ferocious passions — ^in the cruel and treacherous deeds which men comparatively civilised and enlight ened could persuade themselves to defend and even to adopt when they came into contact with it. Another interval of twenty -three years separates the massacre of Glencoe from the first Jacobite rising of the Eighteenth Century, in 1715. This rising was so short, and so easily suppressed, that its effects were altogether evanescent, and can hardly have interrupted in the smallest degree the gradual and steady processes of change which were happily bringing to an end the terrible abuses and miseries of the Clans. The Rebellion was suppressed within Five Months. There were the usual incidents — the treachery of Chiefs — the gallantry of their Highland followers. The Earl of Mar attended a Levee of George i. on the day before he left London to raise the standard of the Pretender in the valley of the Dee. In their invasion of England, where, as is well known, they penetrated as far as Preston, they were miserably led. On the other hand, at the 10 SCOTLAND AS IT WAS AND AS IT IS. Battle of SheriflPmuir, the Clans fought with their accustomed courage, and won quite half of the honours of the day. But for more than a single battle the military power of Celtic Feudalism was nearly gone. Their surrender in England at Preston, and their dispersion in Scotland, after SheriflPmuir, mark the low point to which it had already fallen. Again, we have another long interval, from the Rebellion of 1715 to that of " The Forty-Five," an interval of no less than thirty years — or, as it is usually reckoned, a whole generation. This is one of those many intervals between conspicuous events, over which the eye of the historian often passes with a careless and unobservant glance, seeing nothing that catches his attention, or at least nothing of a large class of facts which, nevertheless, are of far higher interest and importance than the cycle of rebellions. Now it is in respect to this interval of time — an interval during which a whole generation was born and rose to manhood, before the last of our civil wars — before " The Forty-Five " — that I am in possession of documents which singularly illustrate the continuity of Scottish history, and the identity of the processes of change through which our civilisation had been steadily advancing over the whole Kingdom from the days of Malcolm Canmore. Having now indicated the period to which these documents refer, and its importance in an historical point of view, I must add a few words in explana- THE RESPONSE OF OWNERSHIP. 1 1 tion of the men whose evidence they contain. The management of great Baronial Estates in those days was an object of ambition among men of the highest position in society. It was an employment which had all the dignity, and variety of interest, and extent of power, which belonged to the govern ment of a Province. Smaller Proprietors of land of the oldest families, Clansmen nearly related to their Chief, and men of high public positions, even on the Bench and at the Bar, were among the number of those who imdertook such duties, and who devoted to them all the knowledge and culture of their day. Such was the character and position of the two men whose narratives and reports I am about to cite. Nor is it less important to observe the position of the districts respecting which their evidence is sup plied. We have seen how long and how late the worst evils of Celtic Feudalism lingered in those Western Isles of Scotland, which had always been most inaccessible to the central government, and amongst which savage intertribal wars had for many generations kept the people in poverty, and the Kingdom in frequent uneasiness and alarm. We have seen, nevertheless, from the Conferences of lona, held in 1609, that all these habits and customs were confessed and acknowledged by the Chiefs themselves to be barbarous and illegal, and that reversion to the system of regular rents and of tenures known to the law, was the admitted remedy, and the promised reform. We have seen that in Kintyre the system of agricultural Leases and 1 2 SCOTLAND AS IT WAS AND AS IT IS. generally all the relations of Landlord and Tenant came naturally into full operation the moment that district was freed from the Clan Donnel, the last representatives of the old Lords of the Isles, and of a family which for centuries had upheld and handed down the picturesque but savage customs and traditions of the Clans. We have seen, too, that the tenure by Lease which had been enjoyed for centuries, even in the Hebrides, by the blood-relations of the Chiefs, was now in that district extended to those poorer men who constituted the great bulk of the population, but who formerly were only Subtenants, without any tenure except that which arose out of the neces sity of having men who could render "services." These services never were exclusively military. The spade-plough^ was more constantly needed than the sword or the pike. They included every kind of labour, and every kind of exaction by which the prodvice of labour could be made to support the power, or minister to the rude but lavish and waste ful expenditure of the Chiefs. This great process of the emergence of law and order from under the over lying burden of Celtic violence and confusion, is a process which we have thus seen in its earliest results, but which hitherto we have not seen in the details and methods of its operation. Yet it is these details which are the most interesting facts of all in the history of civilisation — the steps by which so great 1 The "casoroim," the ancient implement of Celtic agriculture— a heavy spade driven by the foot. The word means " crooked foot." THE RESPONSE OF OWNERSHIP. 13 a reform was made— the action of those who were agents in it — the exact condition of things with which they had to deal — and the nature of the powers which were the instruments of their work. All this is precisely the information supplied to us by papers connected with the management of certain estates w^hich fell into the possession of the Clan Campbell, along with or soon after the acquisi tion of Kintyre. These estates were purely Hebri- dean — lying in the Islands of Mull and of lona, and in the adjoining peninsula of Morven, with one of the outer Islands, Tyree, which had from the most ancient times been closely connected with lona. All these lands had for centuries been dominated by the Clan Maclean, whose brave but fierce and law less Chiefs now sleep in numbers beneath the sheltering stones, and the rude knightly effigies of the Reilig Oran.' In 1732, about half-way between the two Jacobite risings of 1715 and 1745, Camp bell of Stonefield, Sheriff" of the County, was sent to examine and report on their condition. From that Report we learn that these lands were universally held in Lease by gentlemen who were themselves either members of the Clan Campbell, or in some cases were Macleans, or by others who, according to the common habit of the Celts, had submitted to the new Chief who was also the new Proprietor. Under these gentlemen came the families of the ' This is the Celtic name of probably the oldest place of burial still used in the British Islands — that surrounding the walls of St. Gran's Chapel, near the Cathedral of lona. It dates from the Columbau age, the 7th century. " Oran " was one of C'olumba's followers. 14 SCOTLAND AS IT WAS AND AS IT IS. native population, who were called Tenants, but who were only Subtenants, holding at the will of the Leaseholders or Tacksmen, and complaining bitterly of the oppressions under which they laboured. It was the first business of the Sheriff" to inquire into the truth of these complaints ; and though he indi cates that they were exaggerated, yet, in the most practical of all ways, he supports them by suggest ing the only remedy. The old Celtic exactions levied by the Chiefs and Chieftains upon their Sub tenants, rested and could only rest upon the ultimate power of removal. The Subtenants were not protected in respect to rent or services by any definite covenant or bargain, nor were they pro tected in respect to tenure by holding for any definite time. Very often the Tacksmen had brought them in upon the lands when these Tacksmen them selves obtained their Lease, just as we have seen that this was the actual case when the De Hays took a farm from the Abbot of Scone in 1312. Moreover, as in that case so in many others, there was an express stipulation in the Lease that the Tacksman should remove these men when he himself removed. In all cases of " Tacks " during aU the intervening centuries the Leaseholding Clansman and Tenant held the complete power of the Owner over all his Subtenants, unless this power was re strained by the terms of his own Lease on behalf of the Proprietor. But any such restriction does not appear to have been common, and in the Western Isles, where the powers of Celtic Feudalism had been widest and THE RESPONSE OF OWNERSHIP. 15 most unchecked, it was probably unknown. There the dependence of the Subtenant upon the Tacks man, who alone represented the power and position of the Proprietary Chief and the authority of the Clan, was complete and absolute. The proper remedy then was clear, — now that men were giving up the life and the habits of the Clans, and were be ginning to look steadily to the improvement of the country, and to the increase of its value, founded upon the increased produce of settled industry. The remedy was to give to the Subtenants the same kind and degree of security which had long been given to the relatives of the Chief — that is, the security of a Covenant or Lease. This accordingly was the policy recommended by SheriflP Campbell. The Leases of certain Tacksmen were about to expire. He advised that they should not be renewed except upon new conditions. Their Subtenants should have the same kind of protection which they them selves enjoyed. The rents and services of these men should be fixed and definite, and their tenure should, in like manner, be of a specified duration. Nay more, the larger Tenants should be bound in their Leases to cause better houses to be built for the smaller class of holders, where these men con tinued to be Subtenants at all. Many of them, however, were to be lifted out of this category alto gether. They were to have Leases directly from the Proprietor, and to become themselves " Tacksmen," with the full status and security of that class. It is important to observe that this proposed re- 16 SCOTLAND AS IT WAS AND AS IT IS. form rested entirely on the possession and on the exer cise of the fullest powers of Ownership on the part of the Proprietor. Moreover, it rested on these powers as exercised over the very pick of those who repre sented and indeed constituted the Clan. It was the old class of Tacksmen, who held whatever rights belonged by Celtic usages to the blood and personal following of the Chief. Yet, we see here that when these Leases came to an end, the Proprietor of the lands they held could tell them that unless they agreed to entirely new conditions, they must make way for other men. This was the only power of enforcement which the Proprietor could hold or could exert in modifying, reforming, or extirpating the oppressive usages which had become estabhshed among the Celts. Nor was this power of removing Clansmen from Farms at the end of their Leases a power which was used as a threat only, without being actually exerted. It was iised, as we see, from the Report of SheriflP Campbell, in a great number of cases where the lands were re-let directly to the old Subtenants, or to new men who were more likely than their predecessors to work the new system with intelligence and fidelity. Although this Report was written thirteen years before "The Forty-Five," which is popularly supposed to repre sent an epoch of change in tenures, and although it goes back to a previous condition of things which implies an unbroken history of many centuries, there is not even a hint or an expression which implies that any doubt existed in the minds of any THE RESPONSE OF OWNERSHIP. 17 of the various classes concerned, that the Proprietor was exercising any other powers than those which were not only known to the law but were also familiar to the people. And as this power was the only engine which could be used to redeem the poorer classes from the oppression of others, so also was it the only engine which could be used to redeem them from the con sequences of their own ignorant and barbarous customs. Just as the prohibition and abandonment of some usages, traditional among them, w^as im posed upon the Tacksmen under the penalty of removal, so the prohibition and abandonment of other usages, as old and as firmly established, was imposed upon the class of Subtenants — under the same penalty of having to leave the estate if they were unwilling to accept the new conditions. In both cases, equally, the first steps towards a civilised condition, and towards agricultural improvement, were taken, and could only be taken, on the strength of the fullest powers and rights of Ownership. No thing short of those powers could have overcome the desperate tenacity of the people in resisting every change and clinging to habits which, originally bad, had gone from bad to worse through that great law which determines the development of corruption. It is proved by the whole tenor of SheriflP Camp bell's Report that the domestic economy of the people in this part of Scotland had remained worse than stationary for more than a thousand years. Although they lived in a country where rock and 18 SCOTLAND AS IT WAS AND AS IT IS. stone was abundant, and in general easily accessible — although a whole Island ^ of the finest limestone lay oflP both Mull and Morven, and was separated from them only by a narrow strait — although the people had before their eyes for more than six hundred years the rough but massive and splendid masonry of the Cathedral of lona and of St. Oran's Chapel, — yet they continued to live in hovels com posed of nothing more solid than turf lined, and perhaps propped on the inside, by wattled branches of birch, oak, and hazel. These were the lineal descendants of the houses, dating from prehistoric times, which sheltered Columba and his brethren in the Sixth Century, and on which it seems that no step of advance had been made near the middle of the Eighteenth, or during an interval of about eleven hundred years. The rapid decay of such structures, the constant necessity of removal, was leading to the destruction of the scanty and shaggy brushwoods which alone represented the ancient Caledonian forests. This, however, was by no means the worst feature of the case. Huts of turf and wattled twigs may be quite as warm and com fortable as many of the hovels which in Ireland and in some of the Hebrides are now always built of loose stones without cement. But in a much more important and vital matter, namely, the husbandry of the people, there is clear evidence of a ruinous decline. It is impossible to read the details given in Adamnan's Life of ' The Island of Lismore. THE RESPONSE OF OWNERSHIP. 19 Columba of the agricultural operations of his Monks in lona, and to compare them with the facts given in SheriflP Campbell's Report, without seeing that there had been a terrible and a truly barbarous decline. It had become the universal custom of the people to cut their corn crops of oats, or an inferior barley, high above the ground. The considerable portion of straw which remained attached to the ear was then destroyed by fire, the ear itself being much wasted in the process. This was the only process by which they knew how to get at the grain free from husks, the half-roasted grain falling out during the combustion, and being afterwards roughly ground by the hand between two stones, a primitive form of Mill, called Querns, which has survived to our own day in some of the remoter Hebrides. The remaining straw which had been left upon the ground, instead of being used for the food of cattle, or for manure, was used for thatch — the whole of this valuable product being thus practically lost — because fern and heath, which was in " great plenty" all over the country, would have made better thatch, and was useless for other pur poses. All these barbarous and wasteful usages had been the natural and inevitable result of the inse cure life which all classes had led in these countries under the system of the Clans. Men will not even think of building substantial houses, nor barns with threshing-floors, nor mills, when such erections, together wdth their owners, were constantly exposed to destruction by fire and sword. It was a positive 20 SCOTLAND AS IT WAS AND AS IT IS. advantage, under such conditions, to have no build ings except such as could be raised in a couple of days out of materials delved with the spade and cut by the hatchet. As usual, men being such creatures of habit, very soon lost all sense of the want of better things. In 1 723 the gradual settlement of the country had so far proceeded that one or two of the Tacksmen had built Corn Mills. But the people persisted in using the old Querns. So it was with everything. No improvement could gain even a momentary footing, except when imposed upon the people by the authority of those from whom alone their tenure came. Accordingly throughout SheriflP Campbell's Report every proposal he makes is founded on the unquestioned right of the Owner of an estate to let it to whomsoever he liked, and on whatever terms he could get Tenants to accept pos session. Moreover, we see that this power was used not only sometimes and in a few cases, but system atically over large areas of land. It involved very often no less than the old immemorial work of " planting" the country with selected men. In making this selection political ends were in separably blended with economic considerations. The Clans of the mainland had been longer in contact with the advancing civihsation of the Low Country. They were both the most loyal men and the men best acquainted with such im proved methods of agriculture as were knowm in that day. Accordingly when a Clansman secured a Lease of some large tract of land in the Western THE RESPONSE OF OWNERSHIP. 21 Islands, it was often his first care to plant it with Campbells, or others of his own dependants brought from the mainland of Argyllshire. Thus the SheriflP reports of three well-known such tracts in the Island of Mull, that having been formerly let on Lease to gentlemen of the name of Campbell, these Tacksmen " had gone a good length to plant there several districts with people of the same name, or their friends, and that it must be acknowledged the Tenants were beginning to manage those lands better than the rest of the country." In marked contrast with this result, he reported in respect to another district, that it had been let to one of the old Clan of M'Lean, and that he, in true Celtic fashion, " kept a swarm of poor people of his own name around him who had neither the skill nor the substance (capital) to manage the land to any pur pose." The "keeping" of those people on the farm is not ascribed by the SheriflP to any difficulty in removing them arising out of Tenure, but expressly to the " lenity " of the Tacksman. The truth pro bably was that he followed the traditions of his class, which encouraged a crowd of dependants, who performed for the Tacksmen all the services they required, and were content themselves with a bare subsistence. This, with occasional plenty, could generally be obtained in former times by plunder, and in 1728 it was only beginning to be felt by these poor people that even a bare subsistence could not be secured when plunder had been stopped, and before industry had begun. 22 SCOTLAND AS IT WAS AND AS IT IS. There is no indication, however, in the Sheriflp's Report that he saw or even thought of any excess of population over the resources of the country. On the contrary, one of the stipulations he recommends for the new Leases was that the Tenant should be bound to bring into the country, and plant a certain number of men as Subtenants, who should cultivate what was then practically waste. These men, thus introduced and planted by the power and care of the Proprietors, together with those other Subtenants to whom he gave Leases, and redeemed from the exactions of the larger Tacksmen, are the progeni tors of the men now known as " Crofters." They have been mythically represented as a native popu lation inheriting for centuries a certain fixity of tenure, independent of the Owoier, whereas the his torical fact is that the process by which they were " planted" is in many cases, as we shall see further on, later even than 1737 by more than half a century. There is, moreover, another part of the Sheriff's Report which shows the unquestioned power then exercised by the Landlord in the disposal of his pro perty. This part relates to the question of rents. It was no easy question under the circumstances of the case. The money rents previously paid by the Subtenants to the Tacksmen were ascertained by an examination on oath. The services exacted, too, as well as any fines or feudal dues, were found out as nearly as possible by the same method. But as it was one great object to put an end to Services, and THE RESPONSE OF OWNERSHIP. 23 to all dues or exactions merely arbitrary, the diflfi- culty remained as to the additional rent which the commutation of these Services would be fairly worth. All these points resolved themselves at last into the value of the produce of land under the existing con ditions of agriculture, btit taking into account such of the new conditions as would tell at once on the profit of the Tenant. But here again the SheriflP w^as met with the diflSculty that he was accustomed to consider land values only on the mainland, and did not know enough of the local circumstances to estimate such values in the Islands. This pro blem could only be solved by taking the values set upon the land by the people themselves. In other words, it could only be solved by putting the lands up to local competition. As soon as the people were assiired that they would be protected by Leases and by the authority of the Proprietor, from the resentment and vengeance of their old masters, the Tacksmen, it was found that they came forward and offered freely for their small possessions. Here we have an example — not of conduct being governed by abstract theories, but — of an abstract principle emerging out of the practical necessities of conduct, and seeking expression in a " rugged maxim hewn from life." The worthy SheriflP was not thinking of any science of Political Economy when he said that until the Subtenants could be persuaded to oflPer frankly " he could have no tolerable informa tion of the value of the country, since it is by the competition of tenants that the value of land can be VOL. II. c 24 SCOTLAND AS IT WAS AND AS IT IS. known." Political Economy, as a science, had not risen above the horizon in Scotland in 1732, Adam Smith was then a weakly, but a studious and absent little boy, nine years of age, doing his les sons in the grammar-school of Kirkcaldy, and forty- four years were yet to elapse before the epoch of his immortal Inquiry into the Wealth of Nations. The Sheriff's aphorism on the only method of ascertaining values was nothing more than the half- conscious expression of a general rule drawn directly from observation and experience. None the less is this sentence an emphatic, because an unconscious, testimony to the doctrine and the practice of the time : and none the less was the conduct of the people in those Insular Estates a testimony equally emphatic to their own recognition of the practice, not as an oppression but as a privilege. It impMed of course that the Owner of the Estate had the right of freely disposing of his lands, as an in separable part of the right of Ownership. It impHed also that they themselves had no other right of tenure than that of agreement, and that faihng such agreement they were liable to removal. But no doubt or question as to either of these facts had ever entered their heads. Nothing in their own past history or traditions could have raised it. Some of them probably knew that tiieir fathers had moved from the lands of one Chief who could not protect them, to the lands of another who could. Others of them perhaps knew that their progenitors had at no very distant date THE RESPONSE OF OWNERSHIP. 25 enlisted under the Chief of the Macleans as soldiers enlist under a famous Captain, and had been allowed to settle on his lands as his " men and retainers. Others again, doubtless, had them selves been removed at the end of a Lease from the farm of one Tacksman Tenant to the farm of another. All of them knew by daily experience that upon these Tenants they themselves were absolutely dependent, and could and would be removed if they failed in dues or services. Lastly, they aU knew that those who were above them — the Tacksmen, their masters, and often their oppressors —who were the very aristocracy of the Clan, — them selves held their lands by no independent right, but by Leases terminating at certain dates, and freely granted by the Proprietor. It was not a loss, but an immense gain to them to be raised from tenancy- at-will to tenancy under Lease. For the first time in their history they were free to bargain for their farms. For the first time they could be sure that nothing would be exacted from them beyond the terms of that bargain, and that their removal could not take place except for breach of covenant, or until the expiry of a certain time. Accordingly the SheriflP reported that when they were fully assured of protection they came in and oflPered for these new and great advantages a considerable augmen tation of rent. We have here the clearest evidence of the per fect continuity of law and of practice in respect to the Ownership and Occupation of land which has 26 SCOTLAND AS IT WAS AND AS IT IS. marked the progress of Scotland over the whole of its area and from the earliest centuries. We see the fullest powers of Ownership assumed and recog nised as undoubted and unquestioned, and we see its functions in promoting the civilisation of the country as clearly as we have already seen it at earlier periods when Parliament appealed to it for the suppression of intolerable evils. Lest, however, this evidence of SheriflP Campbell should be in any way subject to detraction from his relations with his Chief, by a fortunate accident we have, a few years later, the same evidence confirmed and amplified on the authority of an independent and a very celebrated man. Among the names of illustrious Scotchmen at this critical period of our history, there is no name, perhaps, which shines with a purer lustre than that of Duncan Forbes of Culloden. Him self a Highlander of Highlanders, with an inti mate knowledge of their character and habits, he was able to sympathise, so far as mere feeling was concerned, with the personal attachments which made them Jacobite. But his rehgion, and his culture, and the noble profession of the Law — of which he was a distinguished ornament, and of which he rose to be the head in his native country — kept him true to the historical develop ments of the Scottish people. He used all his influence, and strained every nerve to prevent the RebeUion; and when it w^as suppressed, by the bloody battle fought upon his own Estate, he THE RESPONSE OF OWNERSHIP. 27 exerted himself with equal energy to mitigate the vengeance of the Government against the van quished. As a Statesman, as a Lawyer, and as a Highlander belonging to another and a distant Clan, he had pre-eminent qualifications for giving wise advice on the difficult questions — partly politi cal and partly economic — which were involved in the management of such Estates as those which had come into the hands of the Argyll family in the Islands. The possessor of them at that time was John, the Second Duke (1678-1743), who as a Soldier played an illustrious part in the wars of Marlborough, and at home as a Statesman took a share not less illustrious in the Councils w^hich, at the death of Queen Anne in 1714, secured the Protestant Succession.'^ These two men were intimate friends. Their sympathies were the same in the great Constitutional questions of their day, and they were not less aUke in those dispositions of character on which so much depends in the management of aflPairs. Difificulties had evidently arisen in carrying into effect all the recommenda tions of SheriflP Campbell. He had said in his Report that the people seemed "bewitched" ' Lecky's History of England, vol. i. p. 164. It is a curious illustra tion of the power of genius in Sir Walter Seott's immortal works, that this Duke — the companion in arms of Marlborough and Eugene — the friend of Pope and Thomson, and sung by both — is nevertheless now commonly identified as " Jeanie Deans' Duke" from the beautiful and touching story in the Heart of Midlothian. The additional Dukedom of Greenwich was granted to him by Queen Anne for his public services; As this Duke had no sons, the Title of Greenwich lapsed with his life. The present Duke of Buccleuoh is his only direct descendant, through a daughter. 28 SCOTLAND AS IT WAS AND AS IT IS. in the tenacity of their adherence to their waste ful customs. The Tacksmen had opposed a pas sive but combined resistance to changes which aflPected so much their own power ; and they had easily succeeded in persuading the simple and ignorant people under them that old customs were better than new conditions. Under these circum stances, and in view of the expiry of a number of existing Leases, Forbes of CuUoden, in the same year in which he attained the dignity of Lord President of the Supreme Court of Law in Scot land, 1737, undertook for his friend a mission to his Island Estates in Mull, Morven, and Tyree. The account of his journey, and the Report of what he saw and encountered, is one of the most interesting and authentic documents we possess in respect to the condition of the people of the Western Coast and Islands at that time.-^ It confirms the previous account of SheriflP Campbell in every par ticular. The Lord President is emphatic in his testimony, and severe in his language as to the use made by the Tacksmen of the absolute power they held over the subordinate tenants. He speaks of their "tyranny" and "oppression." He speaks of their " unmerciful exactions." He speaks of the land even lying waste by reason of these exactions, and declares that " if the system had continued but a few years longer, the Islands would have been 1 It has been now published in Appendix A to the " Crofter Report," 1884, vol. i. p. 387. It was recovered among the papers of Lady Mary Coke, daughter of John Duke of Argyll and Greenwich, by the present Earl of Home, who most kindly presented it to me. THE RESPONSE OF OWNERSHIP. 29 entirely unpeopled." He reports that within the previous seven years " above one hundred families had been reduced to beggary and driven out of the Island." Yet these Tacksmen were the genuine representatives of the Clan system. They con stituted, in fact, what was called the Clan — for those below them had long ceased to be treated or regarded as more than " the men " under them ; it is plain, that both by law and by continuous usage, the Leaseholding Clansmen ruled with absolute power — ^that is to say, so far as the possession of the land was concerned. Historically speaking, the existence of this power — more than the use made of it — is the important point. The use . made of it must have varied in difiPerent districts, and stiU more in the hands of difiPerent men. But the fact is aU-important that this absolute power is referred to as universally existing in the hands of the Tacksmen over all who held land under them. No doubt on this fact is even thought of. Throughout the narrative there is not one single indication of any limita tions or obstacles in the way of this power, arising out of any independent or customary rights of subordinate tenure. The Tacksman held over the whole of his Farm, and, during the term of his Tack, the whole powers of Ownership, in so far as they were delegated by the Lease. Amongst these powers there was of necessity the power of remov ing those who would not, or could not, pay the rents or perform the services which the Tacksman 30 SCOTLAND AS IT WAS AND AS IT IS. might demand as the condition of possession. But since that demand was indefinite, and variable from year to year, the condition of the Subtenants was necessarily precarious. For such evils there could be only one remedy. They arose from the powers of Ownership being separated from its special interests, and therefore from its natural motives. They were delegated to men whose own possession was not permanent, and whose interests were therefore not identified with the growdng wealth and permanent prosperity of the people. The remedy clearly was to go back to a connection foiinded on the nature of things — to keep in the hands of the Proprietor, and in his alone, the power of removal — to deal directly with the Subtenants — to give to them the same measure of security which the Tacksmen had themselves enjoyed. It was, as Culloden -^ expressed it, " to deliver them from the tyranny of Tacksmen, to free them from the oppres sion of Services and Herezelds, and to encourage them to improve their farms by giving them a sort of property in their grounds for nineteen years by Leases, if they showed themselves worthy of the intended favour by offering frankly for their farms such rent as fairly and honestly they could bear." If farms with Subtenants on them were to be let at all to the old class of Tacksmen, these Sub tenants were to get a separate tenure, subsisting for the same period as the Lease. 1 I adopt here the Highland custom of calling Forbes by the name of his estate. THE RESPONSE OF OWNERSHIP. 31 Such, accordingly, was the policy adopted by Culloden, as it had been already recommended by the Sheriff. Culloden, however, came not only to recommend, but also armed with authority to act upon his opinion. Accordingly, he announced to the Subtenants that he was prepared to let their lands to them upon Leases, and he invited them to oflPer. To the Tacksmen he made the like proposal, under the stipulated restrictions and conditions. To his surprise he found himself met by an organised combination not to offer at all, or to offer only very inadequate rents. The Tacksmen had persuaded the Subtenants to regard wdth fear and with suspicion the proposals made to them. The first thing to be done was to break up a combination which rested on the cunning and selfishness of a few, and on the ignorance and prejudice of the many. And this Culloden was prepared to do at any cost. During some days of explanation and persuasion, he found the most effectual argument to be a warning that he would leave them in their former subjection to the Tacksmen. At last the truth dawned on the minds of some of them, and he induced a certain number of the small Tenants to make tolerably fair offers for their holdings. These oflPers he immediately accepted, and concluded a bargain with those who made them. Dealing with the Tacksmen, he was more peremptory and severe. He had in his own suite some gentlemen of the same Highland class, but who, from living on the mainland, were better 32 SCOTLAND AS IT WAS AND AS IT IS. acquainted with the essential conditions of agricul tural progress. Some of these were induced to make fair oflPers for the larger farms, whose former Tenants were manoeuvring so unscrupulously to thwart the most necessary reforms. Suddenly several of these men found that their farms were re-let to others, and that they themselves were dispossessed. Such examples speedily had the desired eflPect. The Subtenants, when they found that any reasonable oflPer of their own was at once accepted, and that they ran no risk of being relegated to the dominion of the Tacksmen because of a higher oflPer, came in readily, and became themselves regular Tacksmen — relieved from all but a few stipulated services, and possessed for the fu-st time of a definite tenure of their small possessions. The remaining Tacksmen also became more reasonable, and in the final result Culloden had the satisfaction of reporting that those large Insular Estates had been re-let, with some little immediate increase of rent, and under such new conditions as would lay the foundations of indefinite improvement for the future. The Leases which were given at this time carried fuUy into effect the great reform which it was their object to attain. Many of them were given directly to men who had been Subtenants. Amidst the almost universal neglect and destruction which have overtaken old Leases, a fortunate accident has preserved some few specimens of those which were drawn up by CuUoden, and signed by him as Com- THE RESPONSE OF OWNERSHIP. 33 missioner over the Duke's Estate, at a time when he himself had become Lord President of the Court of Session. They are of considerable interest on more points than one. The application to Sub tenants, who had always been Tenants-at-wUl, of the old law and practice of Scotland in respect to Leases of Farms, was not without some difificulties. Not only in the Highlands, but all over Scotland, this class of Occupier lived in clusters, groups, villages, or " Clachans." Some parts of the Farm they generally held in common. Other parts they held in various shares, generally divided on the " runrig " system by yearly lots. Partly, no doubt, for facUities of defence, partly as a traditional survival of mere habit from the far distant day of Village Communities, this method of occupa tion was nearly universal. But never in historic times had these Townships any corporate existence either in law or in usage. For centuries the Proprietors had been moving some, and planting others, whilst individuals were brought in from time to time by the same authority, vdth the grant of " rooms," or of shares or portions of the Farm. To whom then, were the new Leases to be given 1 To the group, or to the individual Tenants of whom the group actually consisted at the time ? Culloden was not a man to be foiled by speculative difficulties, nor was he a man to make any changes not really needed for his purpose. He solved the diflficulty by taking things as they actually stood, by changing as little as possible, and by applying 34 SCOTLAND AS IT WAS AND AS IT IS. the principle of the Lease to the actual Occupiers, and according to their actual methods of occupation. Thus in the case of one Farm occupied by six Tenants, but unequally divided, a Lease of 1789 was granted by name to each of them, but with a specification of the share belonging to each man or woman. The whole Farm as known by its name, with all its pertinents as known by use and wont, is let to the six Tenants, for the term of nineteen years, in the proportions specified — one- half to Hugh M'Lean, one-sixth to Rachel Mac- Arthur, one-twelfth to Donald Macdonald, and so on. Thus far, the Tenants were dealt with sepa rately, and the Lease was given to each in his individual capacity. That which the Lease assured to each of them was the "peaceable possession" of the Farm, in the specified shares, " during the space (of time) aforesaid." Subletting, or assigning, was excluded, but each Tenant could leave his share to his natural heirs. On the other hand, there was a clause which recognised all the Tenants as in some sense, and for some purposes, a Community, because in some practices they were so of necessity, from living so close together, and from possessing more or less grazing land in common. This clause was a special provision, that in case of the failure of any one of the Tenants, the others were bound either to take up his share themselves, or else to find another fit Tenant who could do so on the same conditions. The rent was a fixed sum for the Farm as a whole, for which all the Tenants were THE RESPONSE OF OWNERSHIP. 35 bound as a Community, jointly and severally. Failure in the payment of rent voided the Lease, and the Proprietor was then free to re-let the Farm to others. The share payable by each was left apparently to their own arrangement, but the ar rangement woidd naturally follow the proportions specified in the Lease. Then, after the clause fix ing the rent, comes the new clause which constituted the great reform in favour of this class of Tenant — the clause in respect to Services. The words are these (following the sum of rent) : — "and that (sum) in full satisfaction of all Herezelds and other prestations (obligations) and services whatsoever, which are hereby discharged, — except the services of Tenants for repairing harbours, mending high ways, or making or repairing Mill Leads (conduits) for the general benefit of the Island." ^ In these words we see the symbol and consum mation of a change which amounted to a revolution. In the abolition of all Services, except a few strictly limited and defined, which were for purposes directly connected with the benefit of a whole district and of a large community, we see the last step, or almost the last, from the mediaeval to modern con ditions of society. In the admission of a class to the benefit of Leases who had hitherto been always merely Tenants-at-will, and had in practice been often compelled to move from the necessity either of seeking protection or of rendering service, we see the elevation of a large portion of the people from a I This Lease, with explanatory notes, is given in Appendix I. p. 323. 36 SCOTLAND AS IT WAS AND AS IT IS. state of complete uncertainty and dependence, to a state in which they could themselves rely, and could make others rely, upon definite engagements. Nor is the significance of these Leases given to Subtenants some years before " The Forty-Five " exhausted, when we have noted the clauses which they do contain. Hardly less remarkable than the insertion of some of these clauses, is the omission of other clauses which in such Instruments had been almost universal. Services of a military kind had for many hundred years been among the fundamental obligations of those to whom the occupation of land had been lent or given. Even in the Kintyre Leases, which we have seen were granted about one hundred years before the Leases framed by Culloden, there were at least some surviving echoes of the Military Ages. In the full stream of those Ages, when we put our ear to the language of such Instruments, we hear, as it were, always the sound of fighting — the atmosphere of war. If it was not always being actually waged, it was at least always in habitual contemplation. In the Leases of about 1639 there are only a few customary phrases, coming from the old days — phrases, which were even then little more than survivals of a time drawing to its close. Under the influence of the alarm which was occasioned by the first Jacobite Rebellion of 1715, Parliament had in that year^ prohibited, as contrary to public policy, aU clauses in Charters or Leases which imposed the ancient ' First of Geo. i. cap. 54. THE RESPONSE OF OWNERSHIP. 37 obligations of " Personal Attendance, Hunting, Hosting, Watching, and Warding." These had been the last survivals, but they had long been practically obsolete. They now became illegal. Accordingly in the Leases of Culloden in 1739, there is not even a whisper of the kind. We have entered finally on the times of peaceful industry. But there is another featu.re of these Leases which is remarkable. Just as some old customary clauses were dropped, both as obsolete and as no longer lawdul, so also some other clauses which were soon to become universal, had not yet come to be introduced. I refer to what are called the " cropping clauses " — stipulations to secure good husbandry, and to prevent the deterioration of the land by gross violations of its rules. In those Leases of 1739, there is not a word upon the sub ject. Doubtless this was due to the fact that the attention of Culloden was concentrated on the one great fundamental reform of establishing in the class of Subtenants the principle of tenure by Lease and at a fixed rent, instead of tenure at Will, and subject to services vague, indefinite, and un limited. One step at a time — seems to have been his motto and his method of proceeding. But curious and instructive as these facts are, in respect to the first steps then taken for improving the condition of the Western Highlands, they would be incomplete without giving some account of the evidence we derive from the same distinguished man as to the depths of ignorance and of barbarism 38 SCOTLAND AS IT WAS AND AS IT IS. into which the people had actually fallen, and on the necessity for further steps of remedy and reform. Culloden was not content wdth visiting Mull and Morven^districts which were near to the mainland and comparatively accessible. He determined to in spect personally the Island of Tyree, which lies from twenty to thirty miles farther out into the Western Ocean. Unlike the nearer Hebrides, this Island is not mountainous but low and flat, with large areas of very fine land, capable of raising excellent crops of corn. Its very name is said to be derived from its agricultural richness — the lona Monks having called it " Terra Ethica," the land of corn ;^ and its Celtic name stiU retaining the letters of this deriva tion in the form of Thirithe. The climate is better than on the mainland, because the heavy rain clouds which shed their torrents on Ben More and the other hills of Mull, pass over without notice the unobtrusive levels of Tyree. An old Gaelic poem calls the Island " the Low-lying Land of Barley." Even without any culture the natural grasses and pastures of the Island are exceptionally green and rich, so that cattle can live and thrive upon it with less help than is generally required in the Highlands from food prepared and stored by human foresight. Yet on this Island, so favoured by nature, Culloden found the people far poorer than in the Isle of Mull, where soil and climate were all greatly inferior. The conditions of agricultural knowledge and prac- 1 The word " ech" or " ich" signifies corn or barley, and the name of the Island passed through several stages of decay during the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Centuries. See Reeves's Adamnan, p. 48. THE RESPONSE OF OWNERSHIP. 39 tice which he found prevailing may well seem incredible in a country where, undoubtedly, a far higher civilisation had given lessons to the people more than a thousand years before. Barley was the staple produce of Tyree, but the land, from never being allowed to rest and from being never manured, was so overrun with rank strong weeds that it was an absolute impossibility to drive a sickle through it. Culloden never saw fields covered with a greater load of herbage than the corn-fields in Tyree, but when this herbage was examined not one-tenth part was corn, the rest being aU wild carrot, mustard, and other weeds. The poor creatures who depended on these crops did not know how to clear the land of this vegetation, into which all the natural fertility of the soil was allowed to pass. As they could not cut their corn they knew no other mode of gathering it than by pulling it up by the roots. Then they sacrificed the straw by burning, whilst the grain, from being half roasted, became unsaleable. Even this operation could not be performed untU the noxious seeds had ripened before the corn, and had time to be shed upon the land to the still more complete suflPocation of each succeeding crop. These were but samples of innumerable other practices, equally barbarous, which Culloden had not time to specify or describe, but which he dismisses with the signifi cant general description, " all the other ridiculous processes of husbandry which almost utterly destroy the Island." He traces all these evils to the VOL, II. D 40 SCOTLAND AS IT WAS AND AS IT IS. ignorance and poverty of the people, consequent on the exactions of the Tacksmen. He found himself encountered by the same kind of combination as ia Mull. The remedy he recommended was also the same, and the measures he took to break down an interested and ignorant oppostion, were identical in both cases. With equal diflficulty he at last per suaded some of the small Tenants to accept the security of Leases, and several of the larger Farms he re-let to gentlemen from the mainland, who came under the new reformed conditions. The graphic and authentic picture thus drawn of the condition of a Hebridean Estate in the second quarter of the Eighteenth Century, is a picture of the whole of the Highland area, with such local modifications as were due to the comparative nearness of each district to the old centres of civilisation and of law. It is the picture of Celtic Feudalism dying hard. But it was dying — ^and it had been dying for a long time from causes with which the Jacobite rebeUions had nothing whatever to do. In principle it was abeady dead when Culloden wrote, eight years before " The Forty-Five." Every- thuag he says implies that nothing of it was left except a few traditions. Some of its worst evils had already been put an end to, even in the Hebrides, where it had attained' its most rank development. The ferocious feuds and fightings of the Clans had ceased for more than a hundred years. Reiving and thieving had not been ended, for this was carried on systematically to. a somewhat later THE RESPONSE OF OWNERSHIP. 41 period, and was still indeed the habitual resource of the Clans wherever they were in proximity to richer lands which could be plundered. But the same re source was not open to the poor people of the distant Hebrides. Nothing of the Clan system remained to them except the old power of unlimited exactions, in the hands of Tacksmen who had come to represent the Chiefs and Chieftains of other days. In the ages of intertribal war and plunder this power had its compensations, of a kind, to those who lived under it. But in the dawning age of peace and industry, it was a practice of the Clan system which presented an insuperable obstacle to progress. The transformation of this power for evil into a power for good, had been the great work of reformation all over Scotland. For this purpose nothing was required except to carry back the power to the only legal foundation on which it had ever rested, namely, the power of Ownership, and so to evoke the higher motives which must in evitably give to it a wise direction. Accordingly, no thing is more remarkable in the Report of Culloden, as it had been in the Report of the SheriflP, than the undoubting certainty with which he assumed, and everybody else assumed, that, even in those distant centres of Celtic Feudalism, the Proprietors of the land had the fullest right to let it to aU comers. Without this right, Culloden could have done nothing and advised nothing. If the Occupiers could have insisted on remaining, they could have insisted on continuing all the barbarous customs to which they were ignorantly but passionately attached. To this 42 SCOTLAND AS IT WAS AND AS IT IS. day they might have been living on crops of which one-tenth was corn and nine-tenths were weeds. They might have been pulling them up by the roots, consuming all the valuable straw, and damaging by fire the little residue of grain. The improvement of the country would certainly have been postponed for generations. Those only who know the desperate and almost superstitious tenacity with which they clung, and in some places do even now cling, to customs and usages of the most injurious kind, can estimate what the West Highlands would have been if, in the last century, they had been separated in law, as they had long been separated in lawless ness, from the redeeming agencies at work in the hands of Ownership for the improvement and civili sation of the Scottish Kingdom. On one point I have repeated the language of Culloden almost with a feeling of compunction. His Report is expressed with great severity as respects the conduct and the habits of a class which was then, and had long been, one of the most essen tial elements of society in the Highlands — the class of gentlemen Tenants who held farms under Leases or Tacks from the Proprietor. The remnants of this class survived down to our own times. I have a personal recollection of some of them, aU of whom were excellent, and some of them even distinguished, men. Not a few were old soldiers, and many were descendants from collateral branches of the family of their Chief None of them were Farmers in the modern sense of the word, although some of them THE RESPONSE OF OWNERSHIP. 43 acquired a taste for, and knowledge of, the breeding of cattle, by which they made an adequate profit and lived mainly on the produce of the farm. Beyond this, and perhaps the making of some fences, very few of them were agricultural im provers, and I know of no case in which any great step was taken by men of this class in introducing into the Highlands those reforms in the cultivation of land of which the country stood so much in need. On the other hand, all those whom I have known or heard of as belonging to this class, were gentle men in the best meaning of the term — men incap able of a dishonourable action, and disposed to deal as justly and humanely with their inferiors as was consistent with the standard of obligation univer sally recognised in their day and generation. It is possible that Culloden, though himself a Highlander, may not have kept fully in mind what that stan dard of obligation was in the remoter parts of the country where the progress of law and of legally defined rights had not yet broken down the vague customs and usages which had come down to them through many generations. It is well, however, that the glamour which fiction and romance have cast around these usages should be dispelled by the broad daylight of Culloden's evidence, and that the incompatibility of those customs with the first elements of our modem civihsation should be seen now as it was seen, not after, but before the " Forty- Five," by a great Lawyer and a great Statesman, brought into personal contact with the whole 44 SCOTLA.ND AS IT WAS AND AS IT IS. conditions of society which had been moulded by them. Culloden does not explain the nature of the " services " or " exactions " which were imposed on the Subtenants by the Tacksmen or Leaseholders. But this omission can be supplied from other sources. They were doubtless the same as those usually paid to Proprietors where there were no Tacksmen, or where such Proprietors were of the smaller class, hv- ing on the spot as the Tacksmen did. They are to be found given in detail in a very instructive paper, drawm up in 1795 by Sir John Sinclair, for the Board of Agriculture. That paper refers especially to the northern counties of Cromarty, Ross, Suther land, and Caithness, with the Islands of Orkney and Shetland. But the same customs prevailed everywhere in the Highlands, and, indeed, at a still older date, over the whole British Islands. Specie or money being very rare, the rents of the small Tenants were principally paid in grain — that is, in Bear or Oats. " In addition to the rent," says Sir John, " the Tenants of that description were bound to pay the following services, namely, tilling, dunging, sowing, and harrowing a part of an exten sive farm in the Proprietor's (or Tacksman's) posses sion, providing a certain quantity of peats for his fuel, thatching a part of his houses, furnishing straw-ropes, or ropes of heath for that purpose, and for securing his corn in the barnyard, weeding the land, leading a certain quantity of turf from the common for manuring, mowing, making, and in- THE RESPONSE OF OWNERSHIP. 45 gathering the hay, the spontaneous produce of the meadow and marshy ground, cutting down, harvest ing, threshing out, manufacturing, and carrying to market or seaport a part of the produce of the farm." Besides these services, the Tenants paid in kind the following articles under the name of cus toms, namely, straw bags, ropes made of hair for drawing the plough, reeds used for similar purposes, tethers, which, being fixed in the ground by a peg or small stake, and the cattle tied to them, pre vented them from wandering over the open country, straw for thatching, etc. The Tenants also, accord ing to the extent of their possessions, kept a certain number of cattle during the winter season — paid vicarage on the smaller tythes ; as of lamb, wool, etc., a certain number of fowls and eggs, veal, kid, butter, and cheese ; and on the sea-coast the tythe of their fish and oil, besides assisting in carrying sea-ware for manure. Sometimes, also, a certain quantity of lint was spun for the lady of the house, and a certain quantity of woollen yarn annually exacted. Sir J. Sinclair tells us that such were the " services " " which almost universally prevailed " in the county of Caithness, so late as thirty or forty years before he wrote — ^that is, so late as (say) 1760, or twenty-four years later than the Report of Culloden.^ It is needless to say that payments and services so numerous, so various, and so indefinite in amount, might be so worked, and, indeed, could not fail to 1 Agricultural Reports, Scotland, vol. iv., part iv., County Caithness. 46 SCOTLAND AS IT WAS AND AS IT IS. be SO worked as to leave the small Tenant no certain time for the cultivation of his own land on any improved system. Now, it is important to observe, that most of these services and exactions, even when due, never could have been actually imposed by the great Landowners, because they had no farms in their own hands scattered all over the country upon which alone such labour could be of any value. But the smaller Proprietors could, and did, exact them, at least near their own residences ; and when Tacksmen were allowed to sub-let without restric tions, these services must have become widely oppressive and destructive to industry. The reform, therefore, which consisted in the double operation of letting farms directly to those who had been Subtenants, and of limiting or abol ishing the power of imposing services in the hands of individual Tacksmen, was a reform of the first order of importance. As I am in possession of some of the Leases which were granted nineteen and twenty years later by Archibald, third Duke of Argyll, I am able to explain the general nature of the further steps then taken in pursuance of the same principles. This is an interval which overleaps the famous " Forty- Five," and at the end of it we find nothing but the quiet, continuous progress of a change which had been commenced before. As the Lord President Forbes was quite as intimate a friend of this Duke as he had been of his more illustrious brother, it THE RESPONSE OF OWNERSHIP. 47 is probable that Duke Archibald's Leases embodied the latest recommendations of Culloden. In the first place, the " Tacks" or Leases given in, and sub sequent to, 1755, to the larger class of Tenants, that is, to the old class of Tacksmen, prohibited all sub letting upon "precarious tenures," that is, tenures at Will, wdth dues as uncertain as the tenure. In the second place, the smaller Leaseholder himself, although stdl bound to perform for the Proprietor certain services as part of his rent, had these services not only strictly defined and limited, but also made redeemable at a fixed and specified rate of commu tation. So many days' service each year — ^twelve or twenty-four days — was the usual stipulation, and it is a curious illustration of the enormous change in the value of labour, as well as in the value of money, that one day's labour was commutable at the rate of one penny, so that twelve days' service in the year was redeemable by the addition of one shilling sterhng to the rent. It was, moreover, a special part of the stipulation that the labour or service could not be exacted either at seed-time or at harvest. In this modified form, the rendering of a certain fixed amount of service or of day's labour each year has been a stipulation surviving in some cases down to the present day. Between the Report of Culloden and the potato failure and consequent famine of 1846-7, I am in possession of a continuous series of documents showing the progress of aflPairs in the Island of Tyree. They prove in the greatest detail that 48 SCOTLAND AS IT WAS AND AS IT IS. every single step towards improvement, which has been taken during the last 150 years has been taken by the Proprietor, and not by the people. Not only so, but every one of these steps, with out exception, has been taken against the pre vailing opinions and feelings of the people at the time. " All in this farm very poor, and against any change " — such is the description repeated over and over again in a detailed Report on each Farm sent to my grandfather, John, siKth Duke, in 1803, when he was contemplating certain changes to which I shall afterwards refer. Great poverty and great ignorance are always " against any change." They are invariably associated with a languor of mind which is incompatible with the possibility of improvement. The very desire of better things is absent, and even if the desire existed the means would still be wanting. Under such conditions every reform must begin outside the people, and absolutely requires to be pressed upon them. I am not speaking merely of the outlays of money, which come from capital. I am speaking of those exer cises ofmind— of foresight, and of authority— which come from Ownership, and cannot be enforced without the possession of its fuUest rights. The aboHtion of the Run-rig system was always most unpopular in the Highlands. In Tyree, as else where, it w^as abolished, and could only be abolished by the authority of Ownership. Again— illicit dis tillation, with the worse than waste of an immense quantity of grain,— was another inveterate habit. THE RESPONSE OF OWNERSHIP. 49 suppressed with the greatest difficulty by the same power. Every subsequent measure of improve ment — the regular division of individual holdings — the fencing of them — the selection of the best can didates for the occupation of them — ^the prohibition of cultivation on land liable to destructive sand-blow ing — the building of a better class of houses — ^the introduction of ploughs in substitution for the primi tive " crooked spade " — the introduction of carts — of grain of a better kind — of superior stock — of dairy farming ; in short, every single item of progress in agriculture has been the work, and often the arduous and expensive work, of the Proprietor. Moreover, even all these would have been useless without the arrest laid upon reckless sub- division, and the steady progress made towards the establishment of more adequate and comfortable possessions. The legislative measures which followed the sup pression of the Rebellion of 1745 — the disarming of the people, and the prohibition of the native dress,^ except as a uniform in the Forces of the Crown — were blows struck at Celtic Feudalism with a special view to extinguish its pohtical danger, along with its spirit and its miHtary power. These measures were needless, and if they had stood alone, would probably have had nothing but a bad eflPect. Causes, however, far deeper seated than any legis lative measures of this kind, had long been operating in the right direction, and these had already almost completed what no mere statute could eflPect. There 1 20 Geo. II. cap. 51. 50 SCOTLAND AS IT WAS AND AS IT IS. was, however, one Act of Parliament passed at this time which marks the consummation of a great change, and which raised a hot discussion closely connected with the subject of the present work. This was the abolition of the Heritable Jurisdictions. Accidental events had given this question an impor tance which it did not really possess. The Rebellion of 1745 had made a deep impression on the pubhc mind both in England and in the Lowlands of Scot land. Enghshmen had seen a Highland army invading their country, and marching in triumph through Preston and Manchester as far south as Derby. London for a time had been in a state of panic. Scotchmen had seen their Capital taken, and a Popish Pretender holding his court at Holy- rood. Both England and Scotland could not but take serious note of the fact that the Jacobite forces had twice defeated the Royal army in pitched battles in the open field — first, on the 20th September 1745 at Prestonpans, near Edinburgh, where Sir John Cope was badly beaten, with the loss of his artillery and stores; a second time at Falkirk on the 17th January 1746, where General Hawley was routed not less completely. And this was the second of these Jacobite Rebellions within 30 years. The victory at Culloden, therefore, although it seemed to be for the time complete, did not, and could not set men's minds at rest. They were disposed to look with anger and alarm into the causes and the system which enabled a few great Nobles to raise armies of ten and twelve thousand men, and at such frequent THE RESPONSE OF OWNERSHIP. 51 intervals, to contend on almost equal terms with the armies of the Kingdom. In this state ofmind they confounded together, as men are very apt to do under such conditions, two, or more than two, very differ ent things. They confounded, amongst others, the power of Clanship or of Chiefship with the power of Heritable Jurisdictions. In this they were not only completely mistaken, but altogether wide of the truth. The power of the Chiefs of Clans was wholly independent of Charters or of Law. The Heritable Jurisdictions, on the contrary, were entirely founded on Charters and on Law. They were grants by the Crown of Judicial power given to individual men, not because thev were Chiefs of Clans, but because they were the chartered Owners of great territorial Estates. These powers were given to Ownership, and not to " Chiefery." Many of the most powerful Rebels were men who had no Heritable Jurisdiction ; many of the great Land owners who did possess extensive legal Jurisdictions, were the most loyal and the most energetic sup porters of the Government. On the other hand, not a few Rebel Lords who had chartered Jurisdic tions found in them no help at all. The Parliament of Scotland had for centuries been attacking and denouncing the power of Chiefs; whilst, on the contrary, in the Treaty of Union with England in 1707, the Scottish Parliament had inserted two special articles ^ saving the Heritable Juris dictions of the Barons, and the analogous privi- 1 Articles xx. and xxi., Act. Pari. Scot., vol. xi. Append, p. 204. 52 SCOTLAND AS IT WAS AND AS IT IS. leges of Royal Burghs, as Chartered rights of Property. When, therefore, the British Parliament in 1746 and 1747 came to consider what they were to do against Celtic Feudalism, they soon found that the Heritable Jurisdictions formed no part of it, and had nothing to do with the political dangers which had so alarmed the Kingdom. Yet feeling that these Juris dictions were for other reasons open to objection, and had long been abolished in England, they fol lowed the judicious course of taking the opinion of a learned, wdse, and patriotic man — applying to his knowledge for the facts, and to his wisdom and patriotism for advice. In January and August 1746, the House of Lords, in two Orders, applied to the Court of Session in Scotland for a Report on the different kinds of Heritable Jurisdiction, and for the draft of such a Bill as they would recommend to the adoption of Parliament.^ The Lord President of that Court was then the same Duncan Forbes of Culloden of whom we have seen so much acting in another character. His Report is dated January 9, 1747. Like everything he wrote it was clear, concise, and enainently judicial in its tone. He explained and defended the Heritable Jurisdictions in the light of the times in which they had been introduced. He recommended the abolition of them (with a few important reservations) in the light of the new con ditions of society which had now arisen. " One of ' A most admirable precedent, which might perhaps still be followed with advantage on some occasions. THE RESPONSE OF OWNERSHIP. 53 the principal causes," he says, " of lodging High Jurisdictions in powerful Families heretofore was the great diflficidty the Government was under, of bring ing oflPenders to justice, and executing the laws, when the country was yet uncivilised, and the necessity of committing that charge to such as were able to execute the same ; and as that part of the United Kingdom commonly called the Highlands of Scotland has at all times been, and is at this day, in a state so unsettled, that offenders are not from thence easily amenable to justice, nor can Process of Law have free course through it, due care must be taken to bring that part of the country under subjection to the law, and to secure the Execution of Process of all kinds within it, before any hopes can be entertained of seeing a regular administration of Justice by the King's Courts and Judges there." Assuming, however, that the essential preliminary would be otherwise secured, he sent up to the Lords the draft of a BiU for the desired purpose, and on this draft the Act which abolished the Heritable Jurisdictions was drawn and passed in the same year.-' To a very large extent it was a mere statu tory acknowledgment of changes which had already been practically established. In the preamble to the 1 7th clause the Act narrated as a matter of fact that Heritable Jurisdiction affecting the higher criminal offences, and the penalty of death, had " long been discontinued, or had fallen into disuse as to the exercise thereof" In general and sweep- 1 20 Geo. n. cap. 43. 54 SCOTLAND AS IT WAS AND AS IT IS. ing terms all Heritable Jurisdictions, both civil and criminal, were now "abrogated, taken away, totally dissolved, and extinguished." They were resumed and re-annexed to their original source— the Crown. And yet some valuable and significant reserva tions were made by subsequent clauses in accord ance with the recommendation of the Lord Pre sident — in accordance, not less, with important usages at that time still in ftdl activity, and with the traditional policy of the native Parliaments of Scotland. These reservations aflPected only the lower jurisdiction of the Baronial Courts, or, as they were called, the "Baron BaiUie Courts," for the framing and enforcement of Estate regulations, and for the recovery of rents due by contract. The view taken by the Lord President of the Heritable Jurisdictions as a whole evidently was, that so far from having been one of the strengths of Celtic Feudalism, they had been, on the contrary, the only means by which that dangerous powder could be restrained and resisted. They had been a strength in the hand of Ownership, for the defence and en forcement of legal obligation. But now the govern ment of the Crown was in a condition to undertake this great duty over the whole Kingdom. The Lord President, however, had seen how much still remained to be done in the cause of civilisation which could be done by no other power whatever than the power of Ownership in the management of landed property. For centuries this power had been exercised to a THE RESPONSE OF OWNERSHIP. 55 large extent through the lower jurisdiction of the Baronial Courts, presided over by " Bailies," as representatives of the Proprietor or Lord. It was most desirable to retain an Institution which was still in full working order, which had in it some strong popular elements of unbroken usage and tradition; and without which the progress of agricultural improvement might be seriously impeded. In accordance, therefore, with the advice of the highest Court in Scotland, and of its distinguished President, the old Baronial Courts were allowed to retain a petty jurisdiction in civil cases aflPecting values up to Forty shillings, and in all cases what ever for the recovery of " rents, mails, and duties," arising out of Charters, Leases, or other Instruments under which land was occupied.^ This Act, therefore, made no change in the general practice which had been long established of inserting a clause in all Leases of agricultural land, binding the Tenant to attend and to serve on the Courts of the Barony in which his Farm lay. This was not an onerous but an honourable service, analogous to that of serving as Jurymen in the King's Courts. It associated all the Tenants in the administration both of law and of equitable jurisdiction arising out of the most important relations of the society in which they lived. It was only very gradually that these Courts fell into desuetude. The clause providing for attendance upon them survived in Leases down to oui own days. I have myself signed many Leases 1 Clause 17. VOL. II. E -56 SCOTLAND AS IT WAS AND AS IT IS. out of which this old clause had not yet dropped. The changes which gradually extinguished these Courts were many. The class of men who took Farms gradually changed. Farms, themselves, he- came more and more individual possessions — less and less associated with that uniformity of customs and of habits which always dies under an active spirit of improvement. Then, the King's Courts, the Sheriffs, and the Sheriff-Substitutes, penetrated everywhere, and the inevitable tendency of reforms of every kind was to concentrate all Jurisdiction in the highest and most responsible administrators of justice and of law. But none the less were the Baronial Courts a valuable institution during an important time, and their value lay especially in the facilities they lent to Ownership in rendering its full response to the appeal which had been made to it by Parliament and the Crown. Belonging strictly to the same category of Legislation another Act of the same Session deserves our notice. Amid the fear and hatred roused by the Jacobite RebeUions against all that was sup posed to be connected with Celtic Feudalism, another loud clamour arose against certain incidents of Feudal Tenure which had been developed in Scotland. These were the incidents aflPecting all Vassals or Feuars connected with Fines, Wardships, and other occasional dues to their "Superiors," which in Scotland were called " Casualties." Some of these were open to great objection— not as con nected in the slightest degree with the power of THE RESPONSE OF OWNERSHIP. 57 Celtic Chiefs, but on the contrary as hampering and embarrassing the great antagonist power of landed Ownership. It was in the hands of the Vassals, and not of the Superiors, that the real powers and virtues of Ownership lay. It was the Vassals, not the Superiors, who possessed the " Dominium utile " — the dominion which incited men to the im proved and more profitable use of land. It was a matter therefore of public interest that they should be able to exercise that power upon conditions which were known and calculable. Upon the narrative, accordingly, that certain specified kinds of Casualties " had been much more burdensome, grievous, and prejudicial to the Vassals, Proprietors of the Lands held by these Tenures, than they had been beneficial to the Superiors," an Act^ was passed abohshing them for the future, and for the past requiring them to be commuted into a fixed feu-duty, either by agreement between the parties, or by valuation through the Court of Session. We cannot be mistaken in seeing here the handiwork of the same enlightened Judge and Statesman who drafted the Act abolishing the Heritable Jurisdictions, when we ascribe to him an important clause in this further Statute which extended to Agricultural Tenants under Lease the same principle of certainty in obligations which the other clauses secured for the Proprietors under whom they held. This clause^ was in strict accord ance with the principle he had embodied in the ^ 20 Geo. II. cap. 50. - Clause 21. '58 SCOTLAND AS IT WAS AND AS IT IS. new Leases which he had drawn up for the Tenants in the Argyll Estates. It did not abolish Services as a part, or as a concomitant, of rent. He knew that some of them were reasonable and even necessary. Neither did it assume to Parlia ment the task of specifying the particular services it might be expedient to retain. He knew that local circumstances and mutual interests must determine this. But it did abolish, and render illegal for the future, all Services which were in definite and unrestricted in nature and amount. The Tenant and the Proprietor might bargain for such Services as they pleased ; but these Services must be named, and specified. Uncertainty- vagueness — the want of definition had been the ruin and oppression of the cultivating classes under Celtic Feudalism. The Lord President struck at this feature of the system, and extended by law to those classes that same remedial principle to which a wider range had been just given on behalf of chartered Ownership. And so the new clause declared that no Tenant or Tacksman should in future be obliged or liable to perform any Services whatsoever other than such as shall be expressly and particularly reserved and specified, with the number and kinds thereof enumerated in some written Instrument, signed by both the parties thereto — " any former Law or usage notwith standing." This was indeed wise and sound Legislation, and it was only another item in the Response of Owner- THE RESPONSE OF OWNERSHIP. 59 ship to the long-standing appeals of the old Parlia ments of Scotland. For it is to be observed that these new Statutes were passed in the united or British Parliament, forty years after the Union, in special consultation with the highest Court of Law in Scotland, and with the full assent of the Scottish Peerage and of the Scottish Proprietors. It is indeed curious to observe that although the privilege of recording Protests by minorities in the House of Lords was exercised on the passing of the BiU for the abolition of the Heritable Juris dictions, that Protest w^as not signed by a single Scotch Peer. It was signed by only six Peers — all of them Englishmen. It is true that the Chartered Proprietors of the Heritable Jurisdiction were to receive a compensation. But the amount of this compensation was left absolutely to the decision in each case of the Court of Session — and this was made a point of objection by the Protesting English men. And now, disembarrassed on the one hand of powers which had outlived their time, and emanci pated on the other hand, from liabilities which discouraged the use of capital, the Ownership of Land in Scotland was ready to go forward faster, and wdth redoubled energy, on a career which indeed was by no means new, but which was now to be pursued under more favourable conditions and with an immense development of industrial results. Before, however, we can enter upon a review of these results, we must go back for a little upon the 60 SCOTLAND AS IT WAS AND AS IT IS. Past, and estimate from authentic sources of in formation what the condition of -Scotland was in the beginning of the second half of the Eighteenth Century, as well as attend to some events which arose during that period, and which exerted an influence upon the people more powerful than either new laws or ancient usages. CHAPTER IL BEFORE THE DAWN. Very nearly a century and a half — 144 years — had now elapsed since the Union of the Crowns, and the condition of Scotland, as compared with its condition at that time, presented at least one curious parallel, and one not less striking contrast. In 1603 the Cateran of the Highland Glens was the fellow and the counterpart of the Moss Trooper of the Border Dales. Both were the children of the Clan system — the product of its degeneration and decay. The men who swarmed from the Hills fall ing into the sources of the Leven, the Earn, the Tay, the Dee, the Spey, and the Beauly Firth, led substantially the same life as those who mustered in the wider valleys or on the gentler slopes which shed their waters into the Solway and the Tweed. The Scoto-Saxon and the Celtic Clans were then in the same stage of progress. The habits of both races had been equally uncivilised and destructive. But now the armed horseman of the Border had not only disappeared, but had been long almost forgotten. When one only of these facts absorbed attention, and when the other had fallen out of mind — when the Cateran was still a terror, and the Moss Trooper 62 SCOTLAND AS IT WAS AND AS IT IS. had become a mere tradition — it was only natural that the causes which had been common to both should be popularly confounded and confused. Only the calmer spirits, trained in the knowledge of History and of Law, appreciated those causes, and perceived the remedies which could alone prevail over them, in the one case, as they had already pre vailed over them, in the other. But in the midst of the anger which swelled around the last Jacobite Rebellion, there were some writers of the time who saw clearly that as regarded the dangers of Clanship the new Statutes of 1747 could only have an in direct eflPect. One of these writers pointed out that in all the Border Counties Clanship had once been as powerful and as destructive to industry as it still appeared to be in any part of the Celtic High lands. He urged that after the Union of the Crowns, without any meddhng with the Heritable Jurisdictions of the great Landowners of the Low lands, and without any modification of the Feudal " casualties," those evils of Clanship had been eradicated in the Southern Highlands so completely " that civility, good order, and industry super vened among them, and Clanship wore off by degrees, and at last totally ceased, so that no such thing has been known in those parts within the memory of man." ' Although this phrase, "the memory of man," has not a meaning which is precise, yet it has a 1 An Misay upon Feudal Holdings, etc., in Scotland (anonymous). London, 1747. One of a collection of pamphlets of this date. BEFORE THE DAWN. C3 meaning which is of measurable scope. It must indicate a period of more than a century, seeing that every generation has inherited the memory of its fathers for at least that period of time. This, then, would take us back to 1647, since which it was asserted as a matter of notoriety that no memory remained of the Border Clans — a date only forty-four years after the Union of the Crowns. Within that short period, then, representing little more than a single generation, the whole system must have been broken up, extinguished, and almost forgotten. How had this great change been so speedily effected ? Of the universal prevalence of Clanship in the Southern Counties of Scotland up to the Union, and of all the worst habits of life inseparable from it, there can be no doubt whatever. We have the detailed evidence of the Parliament of Scotland in 1587, only sixteen years before, and of many a Tale and Ballad which illustrates that evidence in forms more picturesque and equally authentic. Sir Walter Scott, the latest and most illustrious Minstrel of the Borders, who himself belonged to one of the most powerful of the Southern Clans, has said of his native districts that "for a long series of centuries the hands of rapine were never folded in inactivity, nor the sword of violence returned to its scabbard."^ The truth is, that his account represents a condition of society more per manently bad than had prevailed in any portion of the Highlands. All down the Eastern Coasts of 1 Border Minstrelsy. Preface by Sir W. Scott (ed. 1802), p. 48. 64 SCOTLAND AS IT WAS AND AS IT IS. Scotland, indeed, there had always been a broad belt of low country which was the seat of industry and of peace. But the whole area embraced by the Middle and the Western Marches had been nothing but the strongholds of fighting and marauding Clans. Scott tells us that until after the Union, land in those regions had hardly ever been suflS- ciently cultivated to aflPord any rent at all. In one respect only had an advance been made beyond the northern portions of the Kingdom. The great Landowners of the Southern Counties had long ago discovered that sheep could graze upon their moun tains as well as cattle upon the lower grounds; and it is recorded of James v. that he had a flock of 10,000 of these animals in the Forest of Ettrick alone. But the bulk of the people raised no crops sufficient to feed themselves, far less to afford a surplus for the purposes of exchange. Yet, as there was a large population, it lived, and could only live on the plunder of its neighbours. This is the only explanation — and even this is hardly sufficient — of the formidable levies which the Border Chiefs seem always to have been able to conunand in frays, forays, and sometimes in auda cious enterprises against the Crown. Not seldom these levies were made so suddenly and so secretly, that the power of collecting them indicates an abundance of population far greater than the pro duce of their own country could habitually sustain. James vi. himself, with all his ParHament, had sud denly found himself, wdien a boy, in the hands of BEFORE THE DAWN. 65 the "Bold Buccleuch," who in the year 1571 made a dash at Stirling with 300 infantry and 200 horsemen.-' But this was a mere squadron of the great force which could be called forth when occasion required a real " Summoning of the Array." We are told that " at the blaze of their beacon-fires the Borderers could assemble 10,000 horsemen in the course of a single day."^ How came such long ancestral habits to be so suddenly exchanged for others 1 How came this great military population to be disposed of in favour of the ploughman and the farmer ? It had to be done, — for the old life could be led no longer. He whom the Borderers had called in contempt the King of Fife and of the Lothians, had become King of Great Britain and Ireland. The " Marches " and the " Borders " had disap peared, and now there was only one United King dom, with a strong Government surrounding on all sides the Southern Clans. There were but two ways of meeting such a com plete revolution in the facts of life. One remedy was sudden and temporary, but was a necessary preliminary to another remedy which would be gradual and permanent. That portion of the popu lation which could not adapt itself to the new life — and this was a large portion — must go else where. The other remedy — that which must be more slow and more gradual — would spring up of itself, out of the new motives which were inseparable from the new conditions. All other " measures " 1 Border Minstrelsy, Preface, p. 37. ^ Ibid. p. 69. 66 SCOTLAND AS IT WAS AND AS IT IS. must be weak or futile. Such measures, however, were tried ; for men are slow to recognise or under stand what the real influences are which the human Will steadily obeys. Legislative measures similar to those which were tried against the Highlanders in 1747; prohibiting their dress, and the carrying of their arms, had been tried against the Borderers — with this difference only, that as their accoutrements and equipments were different, the things aimed at were not the same. For the most part, the Border Clans were horsemen, and not foot soldiers. With wonderful ingenuity they had trained their horses to go upon morasses by throwing themselves down on their bellies and their houghs, and thus gaining an artificial breadth of support, to cross, by short floundering leaps, ground in which ordinary horses were instantly bogged. Accordingly, one of the measures aimed against the Borderers was a prohi bition against the possession of horses above the size of ponies. But the real remedies were begun when the native Chiefs and Landowners recruited a Legion of men who, having known no other life than fighting, were incapable of industry, and were glad to oflPer the service of their lances to countries which were as glad to have them. This Legion repaired to Holland, and were absorbed in the wars of the Low Country.^ One whole Clan of Greemes, specially intractable, were deported to Ireland, where they did, and where their descendants are now doubtless doing, well.^ '¦ Border Minstrelsy, Preface, p. 49. 2 /jj,;^ BEFORE THE DAWN. 67 But the great remedy — the permanent remedy — was the immediate opening up of the ordinary channels of peaceful industry. This was the final and irresistible response to the old appeal from the power of Chiefs to the power of Ownership. The eflPect was immediate, — such as might be produced by the sudden rising of a new atmosphere, and of a new climate upon the vegetation of the world. The proper seeds were all there — for these are every where stored in the nature of Man, and in the nature of his more civilised desires. From the moment peace and security were established. Land owners began to value their estates as they had never valued them before. They now valued them not for the precipitous ravines, — the impenetrable thickets, — the treacherous morasses, — on the edges of which they could build castles, or in which they could hide cattle, or behind which they could retreat from a pursuing enemy. They valued them for the corn they could produce, and for the share of it which was due to those to whom the cultivator owed his tenure, — this being his only right of exclu sive occupation. So immediate was this eflPect that within three or four years of the Union proprietors began to look closely over their own private " marches," and to claim from each other portions of territory which, before, it had been rather a burden to defend.^ This was all that was required. No special legislation was needed. Old motives had been killed. New motives had taken possession of ' Border Minstrelsy, Preface, p. 44. 68 SCOTLAND AS IT WAS AND AS IT IS. Society. There must have been a great exodus from the Dales of the old fighting classes. And more im portant still, after this exodus had been accom plished, there was a free current of migration to and from the surrounding districts of the oldest Scottish civilisation. There was no barrier of race. There was no barrier of language. The popidation came and went as agriculture gradually developed, and as the mutual interests of men led them to bargain with each other for what each could give towards the profitable occupation and cultivation of the soil. Withm less than half a century, as we have seen, the Moss Trooper cavahy had been forgotten, and the grazier and the farmer reigned in their stead.^ And now let us turn from the parallel to the contrast. The Union of the Crowns was a great epoch in the Celtic Highlands, as well as in the Marches of the Border. It closed almost completely the ages of internal war. One of the last ferocious battles of the Clans, the famous and bloody fight between the Macgregors and Colquhouns in Glen Fruin, was fought in 1603. Thenceforward blood shed had nearly ceased. But there was no exodus from the Highlands of the fighting classes as there was from the Borders, neither was there any con tinuous outflow and inflow between the Celtic and the Scottish populations, to and from their respec- ^ statutes against Moss Troopers on the Border continued to be passed down to a much later date. But the old name had come to be attached to mere robbers and banditti. BEFORE THE DAWN. 69 tive districts, like to that which had arisen on the Borders. More impassable than the mountain barriers, there still remained between the High landers and the Lowlanders the antipathies of race, and the diflPerences of language. From all this the fact arose that the Highland Caterans lived on and multiplied in their glens, leading to a very large extent, as they could only lead, a life of plunder. Instead of becoming a thing of the past within little more than a single generation, as the Clans of the Border had become, they continued, on the contrary, to be a living and a very terrible reality for more than a century and a half Although, during this time, there was little or no advance in agriculture, there was a cessation of deaths in battle, and it is certain that population within the Highland line was pressing more and more closely upon the limits of subsistence. It could not be otherwise. Many parts of Scotland which are now among the richest, were then miserably poor. Thirty years after the Union, in Charles the First's Parliament of 1633, a BiU was brought in providing " that all impositions for restraining the inbringing of victual may be dis charged," and this was desired upon the ground that the "whole Sheriffdoms of Dumbarton, Ren frew, Argyll, Ayr, Wigtown, Nithsdale, Stewartry of Kirkcudbright, and Annandale are not able to entertain themselves in the most plentiful years that ever fell out without supply from foreign parts." ^ 1 Act. Pari Scot. vol. v. p. 49. My attention -was called to this re markable fact by the late Mr. Cosmo Innes. 70 SCOTLAND AS IT WAS AND AS IT IS. If this was true at that time of comparatively fertile districts of the Lowland country, it must have been still more true of all the wilder portions of the Highlands. The land was a land capable of yielding adequate means of support, even to a limited number, only as a return to capital, industry, and skiU. The life was a life in which industry was impossible, and in which both capital and agricultural skill were unattainable and un known. Accordingly one eminent authority has said of the old inhabitants of the Highlands that " they were always on the verge of famine, and every few years suffering the horrors of actual starva tion." ^ It is curious how completely this fact is now forgotten or ignored. In part this forgetfulness arises out of one of the most blessed laws of nature — that the memory of pain is transient, whilst the memories of pleasure are enduring. Especially would this be true of a highly imaginative people, feeding on Legend, and having no literature of its own except the literature of Song. There is no poetic or inspiring element in the fight with Famine. Yet the moment we examine in detail the historical documents of greatest value, which are Family Papers and the records of Parliament, we find abundant evidence of the extreme poverty of Scotland and of her people. From century to century the same complaint is repeated, and gener ally in tones which imply not so much any sudden Sketches of Early Scotch History, p. 434. By Cosmo Innes. BEFORE THE DAWN. 71 scarcity from adverse seasons, as a standing defi ciency of food for the adequate support of the popu lation. In the reign of James in., in 1476, this complaint is so worded as to declare expressly that Scotland was then dependent on the Foreigner for its living. " Because," says this Statute, "Victuals are right scant within the country, and the most supportation that the Realm has is by strangers of diverse nations that bring victuals,"^ Five years later, in 1483, the continued pressure of this condition of things opened the eyes of the Legislature to a truth as affecting the Foreign Importer, to which they continued curiously blind as aflPecting equally the Home Producer, — the truth, namely, that any attempt to regulate the price of imported victuals by law could only do harm, by driving away the Foreigner on whom so much depended. An Act of that year therefore provided that in order to induce Foreigners to come for the benefit of the King's lieges, they should enjoy the benefit of free bargains, and that " no price be set upon their goods, except by buying and seUing with their own consent."^ The span of a single human life had not yet elapsed, when Parliament returned to the subject in a yet more serious mood. It had in the meantime been doing its best to dis courage production by arbitrary limitations on price. But now it did more in the same direction by putting arbitrary limits on consumption. Industry 1 18 James in. c. 5; Act. Pari. Scot, vol. iL p. 118. 2 22 James in. c. 10; Act. Pari. Scot,, vol. ii. p. 144. VOL, II, F 72 SCOTLAND AS IT WAS AND AS IT IS. is sometimes recouped for a small price, by exten sive custom. But this, too, was to be checked. The nation had recourse to a Sumptuary Law. It treated itself as if it were a ship at sea, with only a limited store of food which could not be increased, but which might be made to serve longer by everybody on board being put on rations. The idea was embodied in a law with grotesque inconsistencies. It denounced excess in eating as " voluptuosity." But it did not put all men on equal fare. It established a scale corre sponding to men's rank in life. The consequence was, the highest Ministers of the Christian Church were put highest on the scale of eating, and there fore lowest on the scale of self-denial. Archbishops, Bishops, and the highest ranks of the Peerage were allowed a maximum of eight dishes, whilst the scale descended, through the various degrees of station and wealth, to a maximum of three. To avoid eva sion it was specified that each " dish" must contain "one kind of meat" only.^ Illogical and childish as this Statute must appear to us now, I am not sure that it is more childish than many theories pre valent in our own time upon the subject of "luxury." There is no rational, or indeed intelligible definition of this word which does not include within its meaning all that exceeds the bare necessities of life, The food of a convict — the apparel of a convict— the lodging of a convict — is the standard with which 1 Act. Pari. Scot., 1551, vol. ii. p. 488. Of course, "meat" meant all kinds of food, and not animal food exclusively. BEFORE THE DAWN. 73 we must begin. All the comforts and conveniences of life — aU that refines and elevates the course and the enjoyment of it — ^belongs to the class of luxuries, and the Industries which are employed in the pro duction of them are the profitable employments of the people. These Industries cannot be separated from the consumption of their products. " Volup tuosity " must be marked oflP by a higher and more spiritual touch than the coarse one of ParUamentary enactments, or even of intellectual definitions. The characteristics of it can only be recognised by those moral faculties which establish contact between the Individual, with all his specialities of circumstance, and the duty he owes to the Giver of every good and every perfect gift. We enter here, however, upon other fields of discussion, from which we must retire again. The interest of this Statute for our present purpose lies in its remarkable preamble : " Hav ing respect to the great and exorbitant dearth risen in this Reahn of victuals and other stuff for the sustentation of mankind, and daily in creasing." It is a common but erroneous notion that the Highlanders, like the inhabitants of other wild countries, had at least always an abundant supply of game. But neither was this source extensively available. The country swarmed with Foxes, Eagles, Hawks, and, at an earlier period, as we have seen, with Wolves. These animals eflPec- tuaUy prevented any abundance of game. Even the Deer being often wholly unprotected, killed out 74 SCOTLAND AS IT WAS AND AS IT IS. of season, driven about and allowed no rest, were reduced extremely in number, and in the Seven teenth Century were found only in the highest and least accessible mountains of the country.^ When we remember that this language was used by men living in the richest portions of the country, in or near which there was free access to the Foreign Merchant, we can form some idea of the much greater dearth which must have prevaUed elsewhere. These repeated Statutes during several centuries indicate beyond all doubt the great poverty of the nation, and the deep distress which must have been frequent, if not habitual, among the poorer classes, in districts where no imports could ever penetrate. This state of things is not astonishing. The only matter of astonishment is how any considerable population could have lived at all. Let us remem ber, in the first place, that the food which now for several generations has been the principal food of all poor agricultural populations, was not then available. There were no potatoes. Let us re member, in the second place, that the climate is a wet one, and that artificial drainage was absolutely unknowm. Let us remember, in the third place, that although potatoes will grow on damp and even wet soils, barley and oats will not grow except on land which is comparatively dry. Let us remember, in the fourth place, that in a mountain ous country, with a wet climate and no artificial drainage, the best land in the bottoms of the 1 Sketches of Early Scotch History, p. 424, by C. Innes. BEFORE THE DAWN. 75 valleys must have been very wet, and that even the sides of the hills were often covered with a boggy and spongy soU. It follows from aU these considerations that corn could only be raised on those spots and portions of land which were dry by natural drainage. Sometimes these may have been in the bottoms of the vaU'eys where the soil happened to be light and shingly, but more often they were on the steepest sides of the hUls, on the banks of streams, and among the naturally dry and even stony knolls. Accordingly nothing is more com mon in the Highlands than to see old marks of cultivation upon land so high and so steep, that no farmer in his senses would now consider it as arable at all. When these marks catch the eye of the stranger, full of sentiment, but deficient in knowledge, he looks upon them, and quotes them as the melancholy proofs of ancient and abandoned industry, of the decay of agricul ture, in short of a stagnant or declining state. Whereas, in truth, these are the most sure and certain indications of the low and rude condition of agriculture in former times. They prove that the better lands which are now drained and cleared and ploughed, must have been then under swamp and tangled wood. When again we remember that such dry spots and patches of land as were then capable of bearing corn, were used for that purpose year after year ; when we remember that there was no such a thing known as a rotation of crops, since aU the green varieties were wanting ; when we con- 76 SCOTLAND AS IT WAS AND AS IT IS. sider further, that even the rudiments of a system of manuring land were also unknown, it is impos sible to be surprised that the population of the Highlands was exposed to frequent and severe famines, and we may well even wonder how any considerable population was maintained at all. Sir Walter Scott, in one of the most powerful of his immortal Tales, the novel of Roh Roy, has put into the mouth of Bailie Jarvie an accurate descrip tion of the over-population of the Highlands, as compared with the actual resources of the country in the time of that noted Cateran, who is the hero of the story : " The military array of this Hieland country, were a' the men-folk between aughteen and fifty-six brought out that could bear arms, couldna come weel short of fifty-seven thousand and five hundred men. Now, sir, it 's a sad and awfu' truth, that there is neither wark, nor the very fashion nor appearance of wark, for the tae half of thae puir creatures; that is to say, that the agriculture, the pasturage, the fisheries, and every species of honest industry about the country, can not employ the one moiety of the population, let them work as lazily as they Kke, and they do work as if a plough or a spade burned their fingers; Aweel, sir, this moiety of unemployed bodies amounting to one hundred and fifteen thousand souls, whereof there may be twenty-eight thousand seven hundred able-bodied giUies fit to bear arms, and that do bear arms, and wUl touch or look at nae honest means of livelihood even if they could get it BEFORE THE DAWN. 77 — which, lack-a-day ! they cannot. . . . And mair especiaUy mony hundreds o' them come down to the borders of the low country, where there 's gear to grip, and live by stealing, reiving, lifting cows, and the like depredations — a thing deplorable in ony Christian country, the mair especially that they take a pride in it," ^ etc. In this passage Scott did not speak at random. In an article contributed to the Quarterly Review in January 1816,^ we have his picture of the historical facts embodied in Roh Roy. In that paper he pointed out that the most remarkable fact connected with the Highlands about a hundred years before he wrote, was the rapid increase of the popula tion, which, pent up wdthin narrow and unfertile valleys, could neither extend itself towards the mountains, on account of hostile Clans, nor to wards the Lowlands, because the civilised country, though unable to prevent occasional depredations, was always too powerful to admit of any permanent settlement being gained upon the plains by the mountaineers. But limited to its own valley, each Clan increased in numbers in a degree far beyond proportion to the means of supporting them. Each little farm was, by the tenant who cultivated it, divided and sub-divided among his children and grandchildren, until the number of human beings to be maintained far exceeded that for whom, by any mode of culture, the space of ground could supply even the poorest nourishment. In illustra- 1 Roh Roy, p. 291 : 1870. 2 Vol. xiv. pp. 283-3.33. 78 SCOTLAND AS IT WAS AND AS IT IS. tion of this general description, Sir Walter parti cularises the rugged district, now so well knovm to tourists, between Loch Katrine and Loch Lomond, in the neighbourhood of Inversnaid, where 150 families were living upon ground which did not pay £90 a year of rent, or in other words, where each famUy on an average rented land at twelve shiUings a year as their sole source of livelihood.^ It is well to have this prosaic testimony to a memorable economic fact, not from any cold-blooded Statistician, but from the greatest Poet of History that has ever adorned the literature of any country. The only error that can be detected in this picture drawn by Sir Walter Scott is, that in some ways it is probably an under-statement rather than any over-statement of the case. The terrible and then increasing disproportion between the old Celtic population and their legitimate means of subsist ence, is as powerfully as it is accurately expressed. But the contrast between these two quantities be comes all the more indicative of the extreme un productiveness of the country, arising out of the ignorant agriculture and idleness of the people, when we discover that the actual amount of the population which was so poor, and which was driven to such expedients for support, was in all probabifity a much smaller amount than the figures indicated by Sir Walter. The fighting power exhibited in the short but dashing Rebellions of 1715 and of 1745 has led very generally to an estimate of the ' Quarterly Review, vol. xiv. p. 296-7. BEFORE THE DAWN. 79 number of fighting men turned out by the High landers, which is almost certainly exaggerated. It will surprise many to be told that the greatest number of men in arms against the Government in the RebeUion of 1745, from the beginning to the end of it, did not exceed 11,000 men.^ In 1715 the Earl of Mar had entered Stirling wdtb only 5000, and the doubling of his force at the Battle of SheriflPmuir was due to Irish reinforcements. Of course it is to be remembered that some of the most powerful Clans were loyal to the Government, so that the Rebel forces never represented the full power of the Highland population. Some of them remained neutral. Robert Macgregor, the famous " Rob Roy," hung upon the outskirts of this battle at SheriSinuir with a contingent, which took no part in the engagement — its astute leader being a waiter on Providence and a watcher of the tide. This broad fact, however, remains undoubted, that although many great Nobles and Proprietors in the Lowlands joined in the RebeUion of 1745, the whole military force which supported the Pretender was entirely raised by the Highland Proprietors, although at least one- half the value of the whole Estates afterwards forfeited belonged to the Lowland Rebels.^ The explanation of this is obvious. It was in the Highlands alone that a large surplus ' I take this from an interesting MS. in the Brit. Mus., No. ] 04, in the " King's Collection," written by a gentleman who travelled over all the Highland Counties soon after the Rebellion of 1745, and seems to have been employed by the Government to report upon them. ^ Observations o» the Highlands, by the Earl of Selkirk, 1805, App. A. 80 SCOTLAND AS IT WAS AND AS IT IS. population survived over and above those whose time was occupied with any industrial pursuits, and over and above the number which could be supported by them. In the Lowlands the old military population had disappeared, — having been dispersed from their original seats, and absorbed into the ranks of peaceful industry, — some of them in the country, some of them in connection with the rising commerce of the Towns. At last one outlet was opened for the High landers which had been opened for the Border Clans more than a hundred years before — the outlet, namely, of lawful military service. It is constantly repeated that the idea of enlisting Highland Regi ments was due to the genius of the elder Pitt, the Earl of Chatham, when he came into power in December 1756, and undertook the conduct of the war with France in America and in Europe. This, however, is a mistake. That great man has enough of glory without ascribing to him the merit of a suggestion which unquestionably came from two native Scotchmen, who were also native Highlanders. There is conclusive evidence that the policy of enlisting Highlanders, as such, in the regular mUitary service of the Crown, was due to the common counsels of these two intimate and hereditary friends, Archibald, third Duke of Argyll, better known as Earl of Islay,^ and Duncan Forbes ' He succeeded his brother John, Duke of Argj-U and Greenwich, in 1743, and died in 1761. During the whole of the Ministry of Walpole, and some succeeding Ministries, he was intrusted with the chief conduct of affairs in Scotland. BEFORE THE DAWN. 81 of CuUoden. Indeed, a beginning had been made at a stiU earlier date. No less than twenty-seven years before the famous ministry of Pitt, this policy had been inaugurated, so far as regarded the pur poses of a local MUitia for keeping the peace of the Highlands, by the formation in 1730 of the six Independent Companies which, from the con trast of their dark clothing with the red uniform of the Army, came to be known as the Black Watch.-' These six separate Companies, numbering in all 510 men, were constituted as closely as possible on the same system as that which had long been the system of the Clans. The officers were taken from the loyal Clans, the CampbeUs, Grants, Munros, etc., but the men were recruited from all Highlanders who would enlist. The "Broken Men " of the Highlands were as willing to join these Com panies as they had always been to join any powerful Chief. These bodies of men were in the strictest sense of the . word new Clans, formed precisely as any other Clan might have been begun, in the palmy days of Celtic Feudalism.^ We know the actual constitution of at least one of the Jacobite Clans engaged in the RebeUion of 1745, and we see that essentiaUy it was a mere military body with only the flavour of family or blood connection arising out of relationship between the officers. It was the contingent which represented the Stewarts 1 Stewart's Sketches of the Highlanders, vol. i. part iii., pp. 240-248. ^ Col. Stewart says, " their service seemed merely that of a Clan sanctioned by legal authority " (Sketches, vol. ii. p. 254). 82 SCOTLAND AS IT WAS AND AS IT IS. of Appin. In this gallant corps, numbering up wards of 300 men, there were only six famiUes who were genuine inheritors of the name and blood of Stewart. Of the killed and wounded in aU the battles of the campaign, only 47, belonged to them, whilst 109 belonged to "Macs" of almost every sort and kind existing in the Highlands. Yet nothing could exceed the courage and fidelity of the men to their leaders. They contributed much to the defeat of Sir John Cope at Prestonpans, and to the rout of General Hawley at Falkirk. At Culloden they broke the Royal regiment opposed to them, untU it was rallied behind supports.^ The Statesmen who in 1730 first enrolled the original Companies of the Black Watch upon exactly the same principle, must have been native Scotch men, knowing intimately the habits of the people whom these Companies were formed at once to watch, to employ, and to keep in order. Between 1730 and 1738 they seem to have exercised an excellent efPect upon the Highlands, and it was perhaps due to them that the Rebellion of 1745 was not far more formidable even than it actually proved to be. In the last of these years — 1738 — the same year in which Culloden gave such wise advice for the agricultural settlement of the population on his friend's Hebridean estates, — he drew up a paper recommending an extension of the policy 1 These interesting details are given by Mr. Gregory, editor of De Rebtu Albanicis, and author of the History of the Highlands. They were derived from Charles Stewart (Fasnacloioh), who was private secretary to Prince Charles Edward. BEFORE THE DAWN. 83 of enlisting Highlanders in the regular Army.^ Through Lord Islay it was laid before Sir Robert Walpole, who approved and sanctioned the idea. Although this scheme was not immediately carried into eflPect on any great scale, yet a beginning was at once made, for it must have been in consequence of the advice of Islay and Culloden that in the following year, 1739, the Independent Companies of the Black Watch were formed into a Regiment — the famous " Forty-Second." ^ The Letters of Service for the formation of this Regiment, dated October 25, 1739, directed that the corps should be " raised in the Highlands," the men to be natives of that country, and none other to be taken. ^ The steps by which this famous body of men passed from mere Companies, representing the Clan organisation, into regular Regiments of the British Army are curious, and some of them are painful. The original Companies were raised strictly for local service among the mountains. They were scattered over the Highlands, but principally stationed along the line of the Great Glen from which, on either side, they could keep their watch and maintain the law. When they were "regi mented " the men did not clearly understand the change from local to general service, although the "Letters of Service" distinctly stated that the Regiment was to take its place in the Royal Army, "according to the establishment thereof " * When 1 Culloden Papers, Introd. p. 31. 2 Originally, and for a few years, numbered the "Forty-Third." 3 Stewart's Sketches, vol. i. p. 244. * Ibid. 84 SCOTLAND AS IT WAS AND AS IT IS. it was marched to London in 1743, and Jacobite agents told them they might be sent to America, there was — -not a mutiny — but a wholesale deser tion. Following the frequent example of their ancestors, they retreated in a body from London, about May 16 in that year, and tried to regain the Highlands by marching through the centre of England. Surroiinded and obliged to sur render their arms, when they had got as far as Oundle in Northamptonshire, they were soon re stored to order, and transferred to Flanders to serve in the never-ending wars waged upon that great battlefield of Europe. There, during the two years 1743 and 1744, they won golden opinions by their civility, trustworthiness, and conduct ; and there, in 1745, at the bloody and disastrous fight of Fon- tenoy, the Highlanders established their renown, first by their dash during the battle, and then by their disciphne and courage at the most diflficdt and dangerous post of honour, that of covering the rear of an army in retreat.^ Not indeed even then for the first time had the soldiers of Scotland and of the Highlands become known to the Continental States. For many hun dred years they had been honoured in France, and during the Seventeenth Century they had borne a distinguished part in the wars of the Low Country. In the great CivU War at home between Charles I. and the Parliamentary Forces, the Highlanders had been called on for a contingent, and the M'Leods of • Stewart's Sketches, vol. ii. pp. 269-70 ; Culloden Papers, pp. 200-3. BEFORE THE DAWN. 85 Skye, whose Chiefs were zealous Royalists, had lost in the war, and especially at Worcester, so many men that, by the general consent of the Northern Clans, it was agreed that they should have a respite from military service till their numbers should increase.-' Nevertheless the conduct of the Black Watch, as one of the regular Regiments of the British Army at Fontenoy, attracted the universal notice of the world. And this was stiU twelve years before the measure commonly ascribed to Pitt. So far, indeed, was he from having any merit in this matter, that so late as 1744 he was denouncing on principle any additions to a standing army, and declaring that " the man who solely depends upon arms for bread can never be a good subject, especiaUy in a free country." ^ It is clear, therefore, that the honour of this measure is an honour to be ascribed to the Statesmen who were then at the head of aflPairs in Scotland. Moreover, in the legislation of 1747, the Act which forbade the use of the Highland dress, speciaUy excepted that use as a regimental uniform. This clearly indicated not a temporary or accidental expedient, but a per manent poHcy. Accordingly the Forty-Second was employed on aU kinds of service, both at home, in Ireland, and abroad, during the eleven years between the battle of Fontenoy and its embark ation for Canada in 1756. Not even the first idea of using Highlanders for the reinforcement of the Army in America can be justly ascribed to 1 MSS. Brit. Mus. 2 Thackeray's Life of Pitt, vol. i. p. 127. 86 SCOTLAND AS IT WAS AND AS IT IS. the initiative of Pitt. The Forty-Second had been under orders for Canada, and had actually em barked in 1748, when they were accidentally driven back by storms. But the Forty-Second formed part of the Force sent out under General Abercromby in 1756, and which landed at New York in June of that year.-' The Ministry of Pitt was not formed till the foUo-wing month of December, so that the policy of employing Highland Regiments in the struggle with France for supremacy in the Ne^w World, cannot possibly be ascribed to him. The scheme of adding largely to the Highland element in the regular army by the addition of two new Regiments of 1200 men each, and of sending them out to America, seems to have been renewed by Archibald, Duke of Argyll, on the same prin ciple of Clan enlistment which had been found so successful in the case of the Black Watch. ^ The only merit due to Pitt in this matter, was that when he came into power in December 1756, at a time marked by great national depression and disaster, having himself previously denounced the use of Hanoverian troops, he rose above all his former prejudices about "Standing Armies," and directed the immediate execution of the scheme, The truth is, that the defeat of Fontenoy and the Jacobite Rebellion happening in the same year, had put an end to the nonsense of political tra- 1 Stewart's Sketches, vol. i. p. 294. 2 Beatson's Military and Naval Memoirs, vol. ii. (ed. 1804), under date 1757. BEFORE THE DAWN. 87 dition on this subject. Pitt had now entered upon a great war, and he was almost driven , by necessity, in January 1757, to resort stiU more largely to that recruiting ground of a fighting race in the Highlands, the value of which had been tested on the most famous fields of Europe, and had then already come to be universally recognised.^ During the rest of the century, and during the next century dowm to the Battle of Waterloo in 1815, this recruiting ground was more and more largely drawn upon — so that be tween 1740 and 1815 no less than fifty Battalions had been raised mainly from the Highlands, irre spective of smaller corps, and many " Fencible " or MiUtia Regiments ^ besides. The eflPects of this great opening of military service upon the population of the Highlands was very great, both directly and indirectly. The in direct eflPects cannot be measured by the mere diminution of numbers from the casualties of war. These were never excessive ; indeed they may be said to have been trifling compared with those accompanying the murderous conflicts of our own day, in which arms of precision, and of enormous range, mow down men as the ears of corn fall before the reaping-knives. Fontenoy was reckoned a bloody battle at the time, and the severest fight- 1 Mr. Leoky, one of the most careful and philosophical of our living historians, has recognised the " exaggeration " of the merit commonly ascribed to Pitt ; but he still leaves to that Statesman more than is his due (History of England, vol. ii. p. 458). ^ Stewart's Sketches, vol. ii p. 293. VOL. II. G 88 SCOTLAND AS IT WAS AND AS IT IS. ing fell to the lot of the Black Watch ; yet they lost in killed only 30 men, with 86 wounded. Fontenoy was described by an officer concerned in both actions as " nothing " to the disastrous fight against the French and Indians at Ticonderoga in 1758, when the Highlanders encountered the brave Montcalm,' and when their killed numbered 297, and the wounded 306. This was more than one-half the whole Regiment. During the remaining service of this splendid corps, from its embodiment in 1740 to the Peace of 1815 — a period of seventy-five years — in all the wars in which it was engaged, in Flanders, Canada, America, the Peninsula, and Waterloo — its total losses in kUled only came to 778 men (rank and file), and 2291 wounded. The proportion of officers kiUed and wounded was immensely greater.^ At this rate of loss, takiog even the whole of the Regiments which came to be recruited, chiefly but no longer exclusively, from the Highlands, the drain upon the population was not very heavy, and probably much less than would have arisen from such intertribal wars and devas tations as those which marked the Fifteenth and Sixteenth Centuries. But the indirect eflPect of the Highland Regi ments was enormous. Men from every part of the Highlands became acquainted with other regions of the world — with higher standards and modes of living,— with other pursuits than breeding a few 1 Mante's History of the War in North America, 1754-1764, p. 148. ' The figures are given in detail in Stewart's Sketches, vol. ii., App. No. I. BEFORE THE DAWN. 89 half-starved cattle, and raising a few bolls of poor Oats and Bear. They resumed that foremost rank in the military annals of their coun-^ry which they had not held since the days of Bannockburn and Byland. In particular, they became familiar, during the war in Canada and in the American Colonies, with those "Plantations" which sounded so dreadful in the ears of the Forty-Second when they first heard of them, that the men rushed oflP in a panic to regain their hUls. They had now the opportunity of seeing the glorious lands which are drained by the St. Lawrence and the Hudson. AUotments in the Province of New York to the amount of 2000 acres each were given by the Government to such oflficers as had occasion to leave the Service.^ Thus so early as 1765 the American Plantations had become a home both to Highland gentlemen and to Highland soldiers. Not a few of them retired from the Army and settled there, and those who came home recounted round the peat fires of Mull, Skye, the Lewis, and of all the glens of the main land, the adventures they had met with in the Forests of the Mohawk, of Lakes George and Cham- plain, and beside the broad waters of Ontario. The love of adventure and the love of fighting all over the world, were incitements thus brought into com petition with the rival love of idleness at home. And as the possibUity of fighting had come to an end there, whUst the necessity of industry grew more imperative, even old habits, so powerful with ' Memoir and Correspondence of Mrs. Grant of Laggan, vol. i. p. 8. 90 SCOTLAND AS IT WAS AND AS IT IS. all primitive races, became less and less competent to counteract the attractions of the New World. Powerful as the external influences were which thus came into operation, their action was rendered still more powerful by some new internal causes which about the same time began to crowd the people inconveniently at home. These new causes did not arise from political events of any kind. They arose especially from the concurrence of some dis coveries, very different in kind, but aU belonging to that class of agencies which often teU on the progress of the world and on the destiny of nations, far more deeply than the valour of soldiers, or the policy of statesmen. The fields of Nature are very wide fields, and of boundless fertiUty to those who walk on them with an eye to see, and a mind to question. Every now and then, from one or more of her vast domains, there is a rush of new Products, or of new Inventions. Then, suddenly, within per haps the space of a few years, the Human Family finds itself " endowed with new mercies," and the whole conditions of life are changed over large areas of the world. Such a time, undoubtedly, was the latter half of the Eighteenth Century. Among many others there were in particular Three dis coveries, during those fifty years, two of which told upon the whole of Europe, and one of which told especiaUy upon the poorest population of the High lands. Let us stop for a moment to look at these discoveries, for a whole volume of phUosophy belongs to each. BEFORE THE DAWN. 91, In the dim and far-distant East, — in centuries as remote from ours as the country or the race, — more than a thousand years before the Christian era, — one of those terrible diseases had arisen which belong to the class of Plagues. So sweeping, so fatal, and at the same time so loathsome was it that we might almost suppose King David must have alluded to it when he sang of deliverance from the "noisome pestilence."^ Yet there is reason to beUeve that the mysterious isolation of that curious people the Chinese, amongst whom it originated, kept the great nations of Western Asia uncontaminated for hundreds of years later than the latest days of the Jewish Monarchy. The Jews did indeed profit from the commerce of the East. The imagery of their Hterature is full of aUusion to its products, and to the love they had for the employment of them. But neither the "Ivory Palaces" which "made them glad,"^ nor the "Apes and Peacocks"^ which ministered to their amusement, or to their sense of gorgeous colour, indicate any access to countries farther east than Hindostan. It was not, apparently, untU the last quarter of the Sixth Century of the Chris tian era that Persian merchants brought the Small pox from the far East into Arabian ports.* But this was in 572 — the very year of the birth of Mahomet. And so it happened that this great scourge was planted in the Arabian Peninsula at the very time 1 Ps. xcL 3. 2 Pa. xiv. 8. ^ i Kings x. 22. * See Art. on "Smallpox," Quarterly Review, vol. xix. p. 361. 92 SCOTLAND AS IT WAS AND AS IT IS. when, in the course of a few years, it could not fail to spread into all the regions which were soon to be penetrated by the great Conqueror who had just been born. The basin of the Mediterranean Sea, girdled as it was by all that remained of the oldest civilisations of the world, could not be a barrier, but became rather a channel and a road. The Moors took this new Pest with them when they crossed into Europe, and established their short but brUliant culture in the Palaces of Seville, Cordova, and Granada. Again, when they passed the Pyrenees, and, invading France, were defeated by Charles Martel, Christian Europe was indeed deUvered from an Infidel conquest; but even victorious battles could only spread the contagion of disease. And so, from that date onwards, the Eastern PestUence was established in the Western World, and at frequent intervals it mowed down its thousands among all the races which had settled there. It penetrated every where, and was indiscriminate in its attacks upon Celt and Saxon. No place was too secluded, no shore was too remote. From time to time it deci mated even the lonely Hebrides. It is strange how entirely this is forgotten now. 'But we have the abundant evidence of a generation which remem bered it only too weU. Of the parish of KUmuir in Skye the Minister writes in 1792 that up to a time beyond the middle of the century Smallpox prevaUed to a very great extent, and almost de populated the country.' Of the parish of Snizort 1 Old Slat. Ace, vol. ii. p. 551. BEFORE THE DAWN. 93 the Minister records tbat when this disease did visit the Island it sometimes swept whole families away, or left only one, or two, or three survivors.^ The same tale is repeated from such secluded parishes as Durness in Sutherland,^ and Glassary in Argyll, where it is mentioned as having been specially fatal among the children.^ The effect of such a disease in checking population must have been very great. Such was the state of things when, in 1716, an Englishwoman of high education and Uvely wit, going as the -wife of the British Ambassador to Con stantinople, and spending her holiday among the vUlages around that city, heard of the strange idea which had long been established among Turkish mothers, that by "grafting" this terrible disease upon their own healthy children they could be made to take the infection in a mild form, and could be practicaUy ensured against its more dan gerous attacks in after Ufe. Singularly free from prejudice herself, and having that best gift of genius, the wUlingness to accept a new idea. Lady Mary Wortley Montagu did not content herself with curiosity and wonder, but carefully examined the evidence, and became convinced of the result.* Yielding to this conviction she gave proof of her courage and of her intelligence by " grafting " this terrible disease upon her own child in April 1718. ' Old St